32
University of Wollongong Research Online Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre - AROC Centre for Health Service Development - CHSD 2008 Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation services to explore injury rehabilitation in Australia C. Poulos University of Wollongong, [email protected] F. Simmonds University of Wollongong, [email protected] Kathy Eagar University of Wollongong, [email protected] R. Poulos University of New South Wales Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Publication Details C. Poulos, F. Simmonds, K. Eagar & R. Poulos "Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation services to explore injury rehabilitation in Australia", 9th World Conference on Injury Prevention and Safety Promotion, Merida, Mexico, 15-18 Mar, (2008)

Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

University of WollongongResearch Online

Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre -AROC Centre for Health Service Development - CHSD

2008

Utilizing a national benchmarking database forrehabilitation services to explore injuryrehabilitation in AustraliaC. PoulosUniversity of Wollongong, [email protected]

F. SimmondsUniversity of Wollongong, [email protected]

Kathy EagarUniversity of Wollongong, [email protected]

R. PoulosUniversity of New South Wales

Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library:[email protected]

Publication DetailsC. Poulos, F. Simmonds, K. Eagar & R. Poulos "Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation services to explore injuryrehabilitation in Australia", 9th World Conference on Injury Prevention and Safety Promotion, Merida, Mexico, 15-18 Mar, (2008)

Page 2: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation services to explore injury rehabilitation in Australia

Christopher Poulos1

Frances Simmonds1

Kathy Eagar1

Roslyn Poulos*2

1. University of Wollongong, Australia2. University of NSW, Australia

Page 3: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

Outline

1. Australian Health Care system2. Rehabilitation following injury3. Rehabilitation outcomes

Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre4. Rehabilitation funding

Sub-acute and Non-acute Patient Classification system

5. Injury Rehabilitation data

Page 4: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

1. Australian Health Care System

Page 5: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

The Australian Health Care System- in a nutshell

Universal coverage (Medicare)Medical provisionHospital provisionSome allied healthSubsidized pharmaceuticals

Universal coverage includes rehabilitation

Separate State based schemes for support following catastrophic motor vehicle injury

Mix of public and private provision (and private health insurance)

Page 6: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

2. Rehabilitation following injury

Page 7: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

What is rehabilitation following injury?

Rehabilitation is about providing people with loss of function or ability due to injury with the highest level of independence possible. Dimensions include:

PhysicalPsychologicalSocialEconomic

It is achieved through a combined and coordinated use of medical, nursing and allied health services, and assistive devices when needed.

It involves individual assessment, treatment, regular review, discharge planning, community reintegration and follow-up.

Page 8: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

Principles of rehabilitation following injury

Rehabilitation should start early.Often while the person is in acute care

Prevent secondary complicationsPressure areasContracturesVenous thromboembolic eventsDisuse and atrophyDeconditioningDepressionDependence

Multidisciplinary

Sufficient intensity

Goal orientated

Page 9: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

3. Rehabilitation outcomes

Page 10: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre - AROC

Established 2002

Objective is to collect standardized data for every rehabilitation episode of care in Australia (and New Zealand)

Purpose is for National Benchmarking of outcomes

Multiple stakeholdersPublic and private providersGovernmentInsurersProfessional bodies

Over 90% of inpatient facilities currently submit data

Biannual reports to member facilities

Page 11: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

AROC Annual Reports

The AROC Annual Report: the state of rehabilitation in Australia 2005. Frances Simmonds; Tara Stevermuer. Australian Health Review; Apr 2007; 31 Suppl 1:S31-S53

The AROC Annual Report: the state of rehabilitation in Australia 2006. Frances Simmonds; Tara Stevermuer. Australian Health Review; To be published soon!!

Page 12: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

AROC dataset includes:

DemographicsImpairmentFunctional Independence Measure (FIM)

AdmissionDischargeChange Efficiency (change/Length of stay)

Length of stayDate of acute onsetCo-morbidities, complications, interruptionsDischarge destinationImpairments due to trauma (from 2007)Now 50,000 episodes per year

Page 13: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

Functional Independence Measure (FIM)

18 items (7 point ordinal scale)13 motor5 cognitive

Individual’s ability to carry out an activity independently, versus the need for assistance from another person or device.

Score reflects actual, observed, performance.

Must be collected within 72 hours of rehabilitation admission and within 72 hours before discharge.

Page 14: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

MOTOR COGNITIVE SCORING

Functional Independence Measure (FIM)items

Page 15: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

AROC link

AROC isbased at University

of Wollongong

CHSDhttp://chsd.uow.edu.au

Page 16: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

•Dataset•Impairmentcodes•Guidelines•FIM•AN-SNAP

Page 17: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

Injury-specific impairments in the2002 – 2006 AROC dataset

Traumatic brain injuryOpen, closed, other

Traumatic spinal cord dysfunctionParaplegia (incomplete, complete)Quadriplegia C1-4 (incomplete, complete)Quadriplegia C5-8 (incomplete, complete)

FractureHip (unilateral, bilateral)FemurPelvis

BurnsMajor multiple trauma

Brain + Spinal cord injuryBrain + Multiple Fracture/AmputationSpinal cord + Multiple Fracture/Amputation

Page 18: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

AROC dataset from July 2007

More information on trauma / injurySpecific question about trauma as the cause of impairmentEnhanced detail in fracture impairments

Page 19: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

Trauma to be included in the AROCdataset from July 2007

Page 20: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

ORTHOPAEDIC CONDITIONSFracture (includes dislocation, excludes neurological involvement)

8.111 Fracture of hip, unilateral (includes #NOF)8.112 Fracture of hip, bilateral (includes #NOF)8.12 Fracture of shaft of femur (excludes femur involving knee joint)8.13 Fracture of pelvis8.141 Fracture of knee (includes patella, femur involving knee joint, tibia or fibula involving knee joint)8.142 Fracture of lower leg, ankle, foot8.15 Fracture of upper limb (includes hand, fingers, wrist, forearm, arm, shoulder)8.16 Fracture of spine (excludes where the major disorder is pain)8.17 Fracture of multiple sites (multiple bones of same lower limb, both lower limbs, lower with upper limb, lower limb with rib or sternum. Excludes with brain injury or with spinal cord injury)8.19 Other orthopaedic fracture (includes jaw, face, rib, orbit or sites not elsewhere classified

AROC 2007 Enhanced detail in ‘Fracture’ impairment codes

Page 21: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

4. Rehabilitation funding

Page 22: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

AN-SNAP classification system

Australian Sub-acute and Non-acute Patient casemix classification system.

Version 1 developed in 1996Diagnosis is not the major determinant of cost in rehabilitationDiagnosis Related Groups in the acute setting

Five case typesRehabilitationPalliative CarePsychogeriatricGeriatric evaluation and managementMaintenance

Rehabilitation classes are based on impairment, function and +/- ageNot based on aetiology of impairment such as injury

Page 23: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

AN-SNAP funding model

Blended payment modelEpisode paymentPer diem amountRules around short stay and long stay outliers

Also based on cost weights

Version 1 had 32 inpatient Rehabilitation Classes

Version 2 released in 2007

Page 24: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

Examples of AN-SNAP classes and cost weights

AN-SNAP CLASSCOST

WEIGHT

Page 25: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

How is the data collected?One database to collect AROC and SNAP dataMany data elements identicalCollected at each facility and uploaded (in NSW)

Identical dataelements

AROCdatabase

SNAPdatabase

Page 26: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

5. Injury rehabilitation data

Page 27: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

AROC 2006 data

Total episodes reported 48836Injury represented a minimum of 6695 episodes (13.7%)Limitations of the data system precluded the identification of injury as the cause of the impairment for:

AmputationPain syndromesOrthopaedic - joint replacementsOrthopaedic - otherDebility

New item will remedy this problem from 2007Injury probably represents 15 – 20% plus of inpatient Australian rehabilitation episodesDatabase of domiciliary rehabilitation remains in its infancy

Page 28: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

0.30.7FIM Efficiency

2131FIM improvement

6547Length of stay

7680Adm FIM (mean)

3648Age (mean)

86%70%Male

14%30%Female

Complete lesionIncomplete lesion

Traumatic paraplegia

Page 29: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

Traumatic Quadriplegia C1-4

0.10.2FIM Efficiency

813FIM improvement

5952Length of stay

5677Adm FIM (mean)

3939Age (mean)

100%92%Male

0%8%Female

Complete lesionIncomplete lesion

Page 30: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

Hip, femur and pelvic fractures

0.8FIM Efficiency

18.5FIM improvement

23Length of stay

83Adm FIM (mean)

79.5Age (mean)

28%Male

72%Female

Hip, femur, pelvic fractures

Page 31: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

Why?

Uniform rehabilitation data across the countryDetailed clinical outcomes and complicationsUnits can benchmark performancePlatform for researchData linkage possible

Units own their own dataClinical data and costing data

Time precludes exploring the actual data – see me if interested or consult the publications in Australian Health Review

Page 32: Utilizing a national benchmarking database for rehabilitation

Muchasgracias

Thankyou