1
Nature © Macmillan Publishers Ltd 1998 8 news NATURE | VOL 394 | 9 JULY 1998 107 [WASHINGTON] Public interest in science and technology is at an all-time high in the United States, even though popular understanding of basic scientific concepts remains weak, according to an extensive study for the National Science Foundation (NSF). But the study, published last week, reports that this understanding is still greater than that in many other countries, and that US faith in the ability of science to do good is markedly greater than that elsewhere. The study was conducted by Jon Miller of the Chicago Academy of Sciences, and is incorporated into Science and Engineering Indicators 1998, the NSF’s biennial report on national trends in science. It found that 70 per cent of Americans say they are inter- ested in science and technology; this is the highest number ever recorded. The number saying they were interested in science was up from 61 per cent in 1992 and 67 per cent in 1995, and now exceeds those professing interest in foreign policy (47 per cent) and economic policy (68 per cent). The number who considered themselves ‘well informed’ about scientific discoveries and new technologies had also risen sharply over the past five years, the survey found. Miller, who has been conducting the survey for NSF since 1979, says the last find- ing reflects growing public familiarity with scientific ideas, partly as a result of strong science coverage in newspapers and on tele- vision. “It is a measure of how comfortable people feel with science,” he says. The survey also finds that Americans are vastly more positive about the overall impact of science and technology than those in Europe or Japan. Using a list of questions to generate an ‘index of scientific promise’ as a measure of positive attitudes, and an ‘index of scientific reservation’ to measure negative ones, the study indicates that Americans’ positive impressions of science and technol- ogy have grown from an already high base. The latest study gives the United States a ‘scientific promise’ index of 70 and a ‘scien- tific reservation’ index of 37, resulting in a ‘confidence ratio’ between the two indices of 1.89, up from 1.76 in 1992. Numerous studies in European countries (and in Canada) have identified a similar belief in science’s promise but far greater reservations, with resulting ratios of between 1.1 and 1.3 (see graph). A 1991 study in Japan indicated that people there share Europe’s reservations but have much less faith in the promise of science and technology, with a resulting confidence ratio of less than one. Miller attributes Americans’ high confi- concepts. Only 11 per cent could explain what a molecule was, while 44 per cent knew that electrons were smaller than atoms. An index based such questions gave the United States a score of 55, similar to scores recorded in previous studies in the United Kingdom, Denmark and France, but higher than those of other European countries and Japan. Although recent international compar- isons have suggested that US schoolchildren are poor at science and mathematics, Miller believes that the reason US adults do quite well in his scientific literacy test is that 40 per cent of Americans go to college, and that nearly all of them are exposed to “at least a year” of science there. In Europe, as he points out, college students pursuing degrees other than science often get no exposure to it at all. Miller adds that most of the public are unable to distinguish between science and technology, but says this is unsurprising. “If you asked a scientist whether the human genome project was ‘science’ or ‘technology’ you would get a good dinner-table discus- sion going, so you can’t blame the public for being confused,” he says. Despite the strong support for science identified by the study, Miller worries that a sizeable proportion of the population still has little understanding of science. The survey reveals that 45 per cent of respondents knew that the Earth goes round the Sun once a year. But any science educator who might lie awake at night fearing that most Americans retain the pre-Copernican view that the Sun goes round the Earth can sleep soundly: fewer than a quarter think this; the rest think the Earth goes round the Sun once a day. Colin Macilwain dence in science to its successful record in assuring national security and better health- care, and in developing computer and telecommunications equipment. “This country has had a string of successes in sci- ence. For the average person, a lot of things have improved,” he says. “And once you have a society that comes to celebrate its scientific achievements, that tends to perpetuate itself.” But the study found little improvement in the public’s ability to grasp basic scientific University says sorry for its racist past [MUNICH] The University of Rostock has become the first east German university formally to apologize for removing academic titles on racial or political grounds during the Nazi era from 1933 to 1945. The university has said that the derecognition of academic qualifications was an “arbitrary measure” that was illegal and invalid. The university has found in its archives 15 cases of derecognition, all involving Jewish male academics. Only one of them, Georg Cohn, still had a university post at the time. The others had fled Germany earlier, and so were automatically branded as political traitors by the Nazi regime. The university’s investigations also showed that derecognition of doctorates was first proposed by German students, not by the Nazi government. In a letter sent to the Bavarian ministry of education in September 1933, the “German student body — Bavaria district” requested that the ministry strip of their doctorates “traitors who left the country”. The proposal was eagerly pursued by ministries and universities all over Germany. Angela Hartwig, head of the University of Rostock’s archives, says that, when enquiries from Nature drew attention to the fact that the derecognitions had never been annulled, the university felt the need to compensate for the political injustice that had occurred during the Nazi era (see Nature 391, 112; 1998). Quirin Schiermeier 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Japan Spain Germany Netherlands France GB Italy US Source: Science & Engineering Indicators 1998 Happy days: the ratio of those seeing high ‘promise’ to serious ‘reservations’ in science is higher in the United States than elsewhere. US public puts faith in science, but still lacks understanding

US public puts faith in science, but still lacks understanding

  • Upload
    colin

  • View
    214

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Nature © Macmillan Publishers Ltd 1998

8

news

NATURE | VOL 394 | 9 JULY 1998 107

[WASHINGTON] Public interest in science andtechnology is at an all-time high in the UnitedStates, even though popular understandingof basic scientific concepts remains weak,according to an extensive study for theNational Science Foundation (NSF).

But the study, published last week,reports that this understanding is still greaterthan that in many other countries, and thatUS faith in the ability of science to do good ismarkedly greater than that elsewhere.

The study was conducted by Jon Miller ofthe Chicago Academy of Sciences, and isincorporated into Science and EngineeringIndicators 1998, the NSF’s biennial report on national trends in science. It found that 70 per cent of Americans say they are inter-ested in science and technology; this is thehighest number ever recorded.

The number saying they were interestedin science was up from 61 per cent in 1992and 67 per cent in 1995, and now exceedsthose professing interest in foreign policy (47per cent) and economic policy (68 per cent).The number who considered themselves‘well informed’ about scientific discoveriesand new technologies had also risen sharplyover the past five years, the survey found.

Miller, who has been conducting the survey for NSF since 1979, says the last find-ing reflects growing public familiarity withscientific ideas, partly as a result of strong science coverage in newspapers and on tele-vision. “It is a measure of how comfortablepeople feel with science,” he says.

The survey also finds that Americans arevastly more positive about the overall impactof science and technology than those inEurope or Japan. Using a list of questions togenerate an ‘index of scientific promise’ as ameasure of positive attitudes, and an ‘indexof scientific reservation’ to measure negativeones, the study indicates that Americans’positive impressions of science and technol-ogy have grown from an already high base.

The latest study gives the United States a‘scientific promise’ index of 70 and a ‘scien-tific reservation’ index of 37, resulting in a‘confidence ratio’ between the two indices of1.89, up from 1.76 in 1992.

Numerous studies in European countries(and in Canada) have identified a similarbelief in science’s promise but far greaterreservations, with resulting ratios of between1.1 and 1.3 (see graph). A 1991 study in Japanindicated that people there share Europe’sreservations but have much less faith in thepromise of science and technology, with aresulting confidence ratio of less than one.

Miller attributes Americans’ high confi-

concepts. Only 11 per cent could explainwhat a molecule was, while 44 per cent knewthat electrons were smaller than atoms. Anindex based such questions gave the UnitedStates a score of 55, similar to scores recordedin previous studies in the United Kingdom,Denmark and France, but higher than thoseof other European countries and Japan.

Although recent international compar-isons have suggested that US schoolchildrenare poor at science and mathematics, Millerbelieves that the reason US adults do quitewell in his scientific literacy test is that 40 percent of Americans go to college, and thatnearly all of them are exposed to “at least ayear” of science there. In Europe, as he pointsout, college students pursuing degrees otherthan science often get no exposure to it at all.

Miller adds that most of the public areunable to distinguish between science andtechnology, but says this is unsurprising. “Ifyou asked a scientist whether the humangenome project was ‘science’ or ‘technology’you would get a good dinner-table discus-sion going, so you can’t blame the public forbeing confused,” he says.

Despite the strong support for scienceidentified by the study, Miller worries that asizeable proportion of the population stillhas little understanding of science.

The survey reveals that 45 per cent ofrespondents knew that the Earth goes roundthe Sun once a year. But any science educatorwho might lie awake at night fearing thatmost Americans retain the pre-Copernicanview that the Sun goes round the Earth cansleep soundly: fewer than a quarter thinkthis; the rest think the Earth goes round theSun once a day. Colin Macilwain

dence in science to its successful record inassuring national security and better health-care, and in developing computer andtelecommunications equipment. “Thiscountry has had a string of successes in sci-ence. For the average person, a lot of thingshave improved,” he says. “And once you havea society that comes to celebrate its scientificachievements, that tends to perpetuate itself.”

But the study found little improvement inthe public’s ability to grasp basic scientific

University says sorry for its racist past[MUNICH] The University of Rostock hasbecome the first east German universityformally to apologize for removingacademic titles on racial or political groundsduring the Nazi era from 1933 to 1945. Theuniversity has said that the derecognition ofacademic qualifications was an “arbitrarymeasure” that was illegal and invalid.

The university has found in its archives15 cases of derecognition, all involvingJewish male academics. Only one of them,Georg Cohn, still had a university post at thetime. The others had fled Germany earlier,and so were automatically branded aspolitical traitors by the Nazi regime.

The university’s investigations alsoshowed that derecognition of doctorates was

first proposed by German students, not bythe Nazi government. In a letter sent to theBavarian ministry of education inSeptember 1933, the “German student body— Bavaria district” requested that theministry strip of their doctorates “traitorswho left the country”. The proposal waseagerly pursued by ministries anduniversities all over Germany.

Angela Hartwig, head of the Universityof Rostock’s archives, says that, whenenquiries from Nature drew attention to thefact that the derecognitions had never beenannulled, the university felt the need tocompensate for the political injustice thathad occurred during the Nazi era (seeNature 391, 112; 1998). Quirin Schiermeier

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Japan

Spain

Germany

Netherlands

France

GB

Italy

US

Source: Science & Engineering Indicators 1998

Happy days: the ratio of those seeing high‘promise’ to serious ‘reservations’ in science ishigher in the United States than elsewhere.

US public puts faith in science,but still lacks understanding