US Army Corps of Engineers

BUILDING STRONG®

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) presentation to

2012 NC Federal Construction and

Infrastructure Summit

MG Todd T. Semonite

Deputy Commanding General

US Army Corps of Engineers

11 October 2012

BUILDING STRONG®

2

USACE FY12 Accomplishments =

Exceptional Results Contracting – 85,203 actions totaling over $22 B in obligations

Civil Works – $12.3 B in obligations: regular, supplemental, ARRA, FCCE, FEMA

Military Programs – Awarded 307 projects totaling over $7.76 B in facilities

investment for our stakeholders.

Environmental – Executed over $1.58 B in support of DOD and non-DOD

reimbursable environmental programs, including:

• $347M Environmental Quality

• $327M Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP)

• $135M BRAC

• $328M for the Formerly Used Defense Sites Program (FUDS)

Small Business - Awarded $7.4B (45.3% of CONUS obligations) to SMALL

BUSINESSES

BUILDING STRONG®

3

1. Ensure a highly capable force within evolving budgetary

constraints

2. Transform the Institutional Army

3. Build the Army of 2020 ( POM 14-18 )

4. Enhance Army Activities in the Asia-Pacific region

5. Fund reset and modernization

6. Champion Soldiers, Civilians, and Families

7. Strengthen information assurance and cyber security

8. Ensure accountability

9. Develop energy solutions

10.Finalize Arlington National Cemetery reforms

SECARMY’s Top Priorities

BUILDING STRONG®

4

Army Strategic Issues

• Current Operations

• Health of the Force

• Drawdown

• Sequestration

BUILDING STRONG®

5

565

555

543

527

513

502

490 490502

490 490 490

440

460

480

500

520

540

560

580

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

Ramp: 490K by End of FY17

OCO BASE

≈$3.7B

≈$2.8B

≈$1.7B≈$0.7B

• Gradual slope

• Base funding only to 502K in

FY13, 490K FY14 & beyond

Note: Data points are as of the end of each Fiscal year, 30 September

Army Drawdown

BUILDING STRONG®

6

Army Budget Trends

BUILDING STRONG®

7

USACE provides value for the Nation in many ways to diverse

stakeholders:

Delivers professional results and positive impacts in construction,

natural resource management, energy, sustainability, capacity building.

World-class Civilians and Soldiers, structured to deliver across the globe.

Rapidly responds to disasters and challenges of all kinds.

U.S. Army “ambassadors” to political leaders, America’s small

businesses, and to citizens wherever we serve them.

USACE’s Value to the Nation

BUILDING STRONG®

8

USACE Mission Areas

• Acquire, Manage and Dispose

• DoD Recruiting Facilities

• Contingency Operations

• Intelligence

• Federal

• State

• Local

• International

Homeland

Security

• Critical Infrastructure

• Anti Terrorism Plans

• Facility Security

USACE Has a Diverse Mission Set Driven by Diverse Customers

Re

al

Esta

te

• Military Construction

• COCOM Support ,Overseas

Contingency Operations (OCO)

• Installation Support,

Environmental, Energy and

Sustainability

C

ivil

Wo

rks

• Navigation, Hydropower

• Flood Control, Shore Protection

• Water Supply, Regulatory

• Recreation, Disaster Response

• Environmental Restoration

Research & Development • Warfighter

• Installations & Energy

• Environment

• Water Resources

BUILDING STRONG – USACE Supports the Army and the Nation

Geospatial Support

Partnership

• Common Operating Picture/Environment

• Support to Emergency & Contingency Ops • Support to Civil Works Programs

• Support to Military Programs

BUILDING STRONG®

9

BRAC 2015 Completed Early, ACSIM

credits capabilities-based planning”

Army Comptroller to

Slash Petroleum

Budget Request,

Cites efficiencies

achieved

Army/USACE Headlines 2020

at Walkable

Installations

BUILDING STRONG®

10

USACE

2020

The Maturity of our VISION

Realization

Organization

Reorganization

The Final Frontier

AGING

INFRASTRUCTURE

UNRELIABLE RESOURCE

ENGINES

CONSTRUCTION COSTS

WORKFORCE TRENDS

UNRELIABLE RESOURCE

ENGINES

CONSTRUCTION COSTS

DEBT/DEFICIT IMPACTS

AGING

INFRASTRUCTURE

Afghanistan Drawdown

In 2014

ARMY REDUCTION OF

80,000 SOLDIERS

OCO FUNDING

MIGRATION TO BASE

MIDDLE EAST

UNREST

“CHALLENGED” STATE

BUDGETS

FY 13 CRA

FY13 OMA

REDUCTION

SEQUESTRATION

IMPACTS???

FY13 CIVIL WORKS

REDUCTION

BUILDING STRONG®

11

USACE Mission

Deliver vital engineering solutions, in collaboration with our partners,

to secure our Nation, energize our economy, and reduce our risk from disaster USACE Vision

Engineering solutions for the Nation

US Army Corps

of Engineers ®

Commanding General’s Priorities

Transform Civil Works

Defend and Protect our Nation

Prepare USACE for the Future

USACE Campaign Plan DRAFT Pre-Decisional

As of : 10 October 2012

Deliver enduring and essential water resource

solutions using effective transformation strategies.

Deliver innovative, resilient, and sustainable

solutions to DoD and the Nation.

Build Great People and Strong Teams to sustain a diverse

culture of collaboration, innovation, and participation

to shape and deliver strategic 2020 solutions.

Deliver support to the Nation that prevents conflict,

shapes the strategic environment, wins campaigns

through engagement, and is responsive to disasters.

Goal 1: Karen Durham-Aguilera Goal 2: Steve Stockton Goal 3: Lloyd Caldwell Goal 4: Sue Engelhardt / James Dalton

CG Objective 1a: Jim Balocki

Action 1a1: Develop and Establish Framework for USACE support to

COCOMs / SCCs.

Enhance our Life-Cycle Interagency

Support to Natural or Man-made Disasters.

CG Objective 1b: Karen Durham-Aguilera

Action 1b2: Improve the Corps of Engineers Remedial Action Program (

CERAP ).

Optimize our support to strengthen and improve

the Engineer Regiment and the Joint Engineer Force.

CG Objective 1c: BG DeLuca / COL Spellman

Action 1c2: Capture USACE Project Management Lesson’s Learned.

Improve Interagency and International Support.

CG Objective 1d: Jim Balocki

Transform our Civil Works program

to optimize its value to the Nation.

CG Objective 2a: Steve Stockton

Implement collaborative and integrated approaches

to achieve sustainable water resource solutions.

Objective 2b: Steve Stockton

Implement streamlined and transparent regulatory

processes to sustain aquatic resources.

Objective 2c: Jim Hannon

Action 2c1: Develop / Implement tools / web-based technology to improve

transparency.

Deliver reliable, resilient, and sustainable infrastructure systems.

Objective 2d: Jim Hannon

Deliver services and infrastructure to

enable global operations and installations.

Objective 3a: Lloyd Caldwell

Action 3a2: Develop certified Regional Master Planning Support Centers.

Action 3a3: Transform Real Estate practices.

Deliver energy efficient and sustainable solutions

for military communities and USACE facilities.

CG Objective 3b: Christine Altendorf

Deliver energy efficient and sustainable solutions

for contingency bases and operations.

CG Objective 3c: Jim Balocki

CG Objective 3d: Jeff Holland

Action 3d1: Improve Enterprise-wide Innovation.

Action 3d2: Improve Knowledge Creation and Knowledge Sharing.

Strengthen workforce technical and leadership

competencies to operate and win in a global environment.

Objective 4a: James Dalton

Protect and build trust with all customers and

teammates through strategic engagement and communication.

CG Objective 4b: Bob Kazimer / Curry Graham

Action 4b2: Improve alignment of internal USACE communications.

Action 4b3: Improve delivery of communication services.

Action 4b4: Institutionalize Knowledge Management.

Action 4b5: Implement Cyber Security into all USACE Technology.

Action 4b6: Improve Information Portfolio Management.

Streamline USACE business,

acquisition, and governance processes.

CG Objective 4c: Wes Miller

CG Objective 4d: Sue Engelhardt

Action 4d1: Prevent talent loss.

Action 4d3: Win the war for talent.

Action 1a4: Provide Trained and Ready personnel for COCOMs / SSCs

requirements.

Action 1b4: Maintain AFCS / TCMS for Joint contingency facility design.

Action 3a4: Develop MMSC Critical Success Factors into MM Core

Competencies.

Action 4a2: Develop / Implement clear Career Development Plans.

Action 4d4: Promote and engrain an FR culture in USACE.

Action 2b1: Implement collaboration approaches, systems, tools and skill building.

Action 2d2: Enable a strong Gulf Coast Recovery.

Action 1a2: Strategic Engagement: Achieve CCMDs / SSCs effects.

Action 1b3: Improve the readiness and responsiveness of USACE civilian

cadre.

CG Action 1c1: Expand Career Broadening Opportunities for

Officers and NCOs.

Action 1d2: Provide tailored solutions that support whole of government

efforts.

Action 4c1: Improve Quality and Performance Improvement ( QPI )

Framework.

CG Action 4d2: Shape the workforce of the future.

Action 3b2: Support Army Energy and sustainable Programs.

CG Action 3d3: Improve Critical Technology Transfer.

CG Action 2a1: Implement a watershed-based budget

development process.

Action 2a3: Improve CW portfolio performance in changing climatic

conditions.

CG Action 2a2: Implement planning modernization process.

Action 2b2: Implement a customer / stakeholder engagement strategy.

Action 2c2: Reduce infrastructure project permit decision times. Action 3c2: Leverage Certified RMPSCs to support DOD/Army infrastructure

initiatives.

Action 3c3: Develop strategic capabilities enabling engineering solutions. Action 1c3: Increase strategic outreach to Universities to expand knowledge

of USACE. Action 1c4: Develop and Implement strategic partnerships with RC and

Districts. Action 1c5: Improve professional credentialing of Officers / NCOs via

USACE courses.

CG Action 1a3: Integrate USACE capabilities into COCOMs / SSCs

plans.

CG Action 1b1: Maintain Regional Readiness with contingency

capabilities.

Deliver solutions to our COCOMs to win the current

fight and achieve long-term global security objectives.

CG Action 1d1: Engage / Integrate USACE for Interagency

strategic objectives. CG Action 2d1: Implement the USACE Infrastructure strategy.

Action 3a1: Establish Life Cycle Metric ( LCM ) Management Framework.

CG Action 3c1: Continue integration of Energy and Basing

Initiatives w/in the CoP.

Build Strong people and teams through leader development, talent management, and STEM Outreach .

Identify and implement measures to foster innovation, knowledge sharing, and critical technology transfer initiatives.

CG Action 4c2: Improve USACE Governance processes and systems.

Action 4a1: Improve USACE Technical Competencies and Capacity.

CG Action 4b1: Improve consistent, integrated Strategic

Communication.

CG Action 3b1: Achieve Federal sustainability and energy

goals and targets.

BUILDING STRONG®

12

Chief of Engineers’ Priorities – Mapped to ACP and UCP

DRAFT

PRE-DECESIONAL

AS OF 07AUG12

Support the Army and Nation in Achieving

Energy Security and Sustainability Goals

Support the COCOM and CENTCOM

Commander in Winning the Current Fight DoD

Develop USACE 2020 2020

Build Strong … People and Teams Through

leader development and talent management

Streamline USACE Business

and Governance Processes

Transform Civil Works to Deliver the Best

Possible Products and Services to the Nation CW

Ensure critical enabling technologies

Enhance Our Interagency Disaster

Response and Recovery Capability FEMA

Build Strategic Engagements with

all Customers and Teammates

Strengthen and Further Teamwork in the Joint Engineer Force in Support of Joint Force 2020

Joint

Support the Engineer Regiment Army

Partner w/ IMCOM to Deliver and Maintain

Enduring Installations and Contingency Basing

BUILDING STRONG®

13

18.7 18.9

23.0

25.9

30.7

42.9

32.1

47.7 46.2

38.2

31.6

37.3

25.4 24.8 22.9

20.8

( $ billions )

Fiscal Year

10.4 10.7

14.9 17.8

21.5 23.8 22.4

27.0 29.0 29.9

23.8 27.7

18.4 18.2 16.3

14.2

8.3 8.2

8.1

8.1

9.2

19.1

9.7

20.7 17.2

8.3

7.8

9.6

7 6.6 6.6

6.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

'01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Military Civil Works

The USACE Program

BUILDING STRONG®

14

UNCLASSIFIED

India

BUILDING STRONG®

Legend Progra

m

Active

Project

s

Active Totals

CERP 894 $399,005,794

DFI 158 $488,121,702

DOA 3 $9,325,715

DOJ 3 $5,076,136

DoS 13 $309,612,060

ESF 493 $720,885,507

FMS 19 $290,664,885

I-CERP 42 $28,554,348

INL 31 $116,524,734

IRRF 2829 $5,788,092,400

ISFF 712 $1,320,682,140

MCA 164 $1,216,680,973

MCAF 20 $243,209,033

MCCA 35 $366,942,381

MCCAF 12 $201,867,655

OMA 427 $354,227,540

OMAF 1 $11,863,699

OMN 24 $17,837,869

Totals 6044 $11,889,174,57

1

Note: 6130 total projects, 6044 contained grid coordinates.

Approx 3.5% did not, therefore, cannot be displayed.

N

Iraq

Saudi Arabia

Jordan

Syria

Iran

Kuwait

Baghdad

Mosul

Basrah

NOTE: Approx 25 IRRF project

locations plotted in the Persian

Gulf

UNCLASSIFIED 14

BUILDING STRONG®

15

UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO

UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO

Afghanistan

Pakistan

Iran

Tajikistan

Turkmenistan

India

Uzbekistan

China

Kabul Jalalabad

Kandah

ar

Herat

Mazar-i-sharif

BUILDING STRONG®

Legend Program Active

Projects Active Totals

ANA 102 $2,378,234,400

ANP 259 $1,352,628,148

CD 19 $12,923,635

FMS 48 $15,967,182

I&P 27 $97,706,009

MILCON 164 $2,720,087,680

O&M 82 $449,597,955

W&I 40 $545,962,072

Totals 742 $7,572,807,081

Note: 440 of 742 active projects have associated grid

coordinates and are represented on this map.

Source: P2v3 as of February 2011

15

BUILDING STRONG®

16

Expeditionary Engineering Lines of Effort End State

USACE maintains an

ability to provide

responsive technical

engineering and

contract construction

support capabilities to

COCOMs/ASCCs during

contingencies,

exercises, and

peacetime engagement

through forward

deployed and CONUS-

based engineering

assets.

Outputs

FFE CIP

FEST

FDU

TAD CIP

LOE 3: Enduring Expeditionary Capability

TAD

DCO/G3

COCOM-IA LNOs/

Mil Planners

Reachback

FFE Teams

LOE 2: Reachback Capability

LOE 1: Integration Capability

Minimum Capability

Mission Command / C2

Node

LNOs/Mil Planners

(Geographic COCOMs)

UROC RFI Processing,

FEST Equipment

Preparation, DB

Maintenance

FEST(7/2), CREST,

EnvST

TAD with FLAG Officer

~80%

reduction in

manpower

BUILDING STRONG®

17

($1.883 B) Navigation (38%)

($1.425 B) Flood Risk (28%)

Management

($621 M) Ecosystem (12%)

Restoration & Infrastructure

($193 M) Hydropower (4%)

($243 M) Recreation & Natural (5%)

Resource Management

($193 M) Regulatory Program: (4%)

Wetlands & Waterways

($6 M) Water Supply (<1%)

($185 M) Expenses (4%) (Includes ASA(CW))

(FY 2012 Workplan)

U.S. Army Civil Works Program Preserving the Strength of the Nation

Lock and Dam 15 ( Mississippi River )

Flood Wall ( Williamson, KY )

Everglades

Dredge ESSAYONS ( Coos Bay, OR )

Bonneville II Powerhouse ( Washington )

Lake Seminole ( Mobile District )

Deliver enduring, comprehensive,

sustainable, and integrated solutions to

the Nation’s water resources & related

challenges through collaboration with

our stakeholders

( Regions, States, localities, Tribes, other Federal

agencies )

BUILDING STRONG®

18

Civil Works Value to the Nation

• U.S. Ports and Waterways convey >2B Tons of Commerce

• Foreign Trade creates >$160 B in Tax Revenues

Over $6 in flood damages prevented for every $1 spent on

Flood Risk Management

• Stewardship of 11.7 million acres of public lands

• 12,700 miles of Levees and 400 miles of shoreline protection

• 694 Dams and 926 Harbors

• 13,000 miles of Commercial Inland Waterways

• Environmental Restoration and Emergency Responses

• Generate $18 B + 500 K jobs

•3% of Nation’s Electricity: $1.5 B plus in sales

•50% cost of Rail and 10% cost of Trucks

BUILDING STRONG®

19

Alaska

Pacific

Ocean

Division

North

Atlantic

Division (New York) Northwestern

Division (Portland)

Southwestern

Division (Dallas)

South Pacific

Division (San Francisco)

South Atlantic

Division (Atlanta)

Seattle

Sacramento

Los

Angeles Honolulu

Omaha

Kansas City

Chicago

Tulsa Little

Rock

Mobile

Savannah

Norfolk

Ft. Worth

Louisville

Baltimore New York

Albuquerque

Great Lakes

& Ohio River

Division (Cincinnati)

LEGEND: Engineer Commands

Divisions

District HQ location

Division boundary

Vicksburg

Trans

Atlantic

Division (Winchester)

USACE Military Programs Boundaries

Districts Outside the US:

Europe (Germany)

Far East (Korea)

Japan

3 Districts in TAD

BUILDING STRONG®

20

Military Missions Program Trends -

FY01-16 Program ($Millions)

Fiscal Year Note: FY11 consist of actual executed program

FY12 consist of current program on books plus carryover

FY13 – 16 consist of BES POM as of 14 Oct 11

OCO (FY12) only includes OMA OCO for the Overseas Mission and Reconstruction – Reimbursable for

Afghanistan Security Forces

BUILDING STRONG®

21

21

A New Vision for an

All New USACE

(3) Develop USACE 2020

(4) Streamline USACE Business and

Governance Processes

(5) Transform Civil Works to Deliver

the Best Possible Products & Services

to the Nation

(6) Build Strong … People and Teams

Through leader development and

talent management

(7) Enhance Our Interagency Disaster

Response and Recovery Capability

(8) Ensure critical enabling

technologies

(9) Strengthen and Further Teamwork

in the Joint Engineer Force in Support

of Joint Force 2020

(10) Partner with IMCOM at all

Echelons to Deliver and Maintain

Enduring Installations and

Contingency Basing

(11) Build Strategic Engagements with

all Customers and Teammates

(12) Support the Engineer Regiment

USACE Reinvents Itself!!

Sets New Vision for 2028

The US Army Corps of Engineers has

rework its Vision. The old vision of A

GREAT engineering force of highly

disciplined people working with our

partners through disciplined thought

and action to deliver innovative and

sustainable solutions to the Nation’s

engineering challenges. The new

vision is simply Engineering the

Future.

With the new Vision comes a new

mission statement for the organization:

Provide vital public engineering

services (solutions) in peace and war

to strengthen our Nation’s security,

energize the economy and reduce

risks from disasters.

The US Army Corps of Engineers has also set a

new list of priorities for the organization. These 12

priorities will shape the future of the organization

and guide the operational function of the divisions

and districts. The twelve priorities are:

(1) Support the COCOM and CENTCOM

Commander in Winning the Current Fight

(2) Support the Army and Nation in Achieving

Energy Security and Sustainability Goals

2020