Urdpfi Guidelines vol2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

this is URDPFI guideline volume 2, which covers planning laws,Acts,Comparison among state.

Citation preview

  • January, 2015

    Town and Country Planning Organisation

    URBAN AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS FORMULATION AND IMPLEMENTATION

    (URDPFI) GUIDELINES

    Government of IndiaMinistry of Urban Development

    http://moud.gov.in

    Volume II A and II BAppendices to URDPFI Guidelines, 2014

  • URBAN AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS FORMULATION AND IMPLEMENTATION

    (URDPFI) GUIDELINESVolume II A

    Appendices to URDPFI Guidelines, 2014

  • i

    TableofContents

    1 Implicationsof73rd&74thConstitutionAmendmentAct,1993_______________11.1. Provisionsof74thConstitutionAmendmentAct ________________________________________________11.2. NewRolesandFunctionsofStateTownandCountryPlanningDepartment_________________41.3. StatusoftheProvisionsof74thConstitutionAmendmentActonUrbanLocalBodies_______51.4. Recommendations_________________________________________________________________________________9

    2 TheRighttoFairCompensationandTransparencyinLandAcquisitionRehabilitation&ResettlementAct,2013______________________________________11

    2.1. BasisofthenewAct ______________________________________________________________________________112.2. KeyFeatures ______________________________________________________________________________________11

    3 ModelRegionalandTownPlanningandDevelopmentLaw,1985__________153.1 Keyfeatures_______________________________________________________________________________________153.2 Suggestedmodificationsinthelaw______________________________________________________________16

    4 ModelMunicipalLaw,2003____________________________________________________214.1. Keyfeatures_______________________________________________________________________________________214.2. SuggestedchangesintheLaw___________________________________________________________________22

    4.2.1. Clause(s)forinclusioninthepresentMML____________________________________________234.2.2. AdditionalProvisions____________________________________________________________________25

    5 StateLevelLegalFrameworkComparativeAnalysisOverview___________275.1. Maharashtra_______________________________________________________________________________________445.2. HimachalPradesh_________________________________________________________________________________455.3. TamilNadu________________________________________________________________________________________465.4. Gujarat ________________________________________________________________________________________465.5. Karnataka ________________________________________________________________________________________485.6. Bihar ________________________________________________________________________________________485.7. Mizoram ________________________________________________________________________________________50

    6 LegalRequirementsforIndustrialDevelopment_____________________________536.1. Industries(DevelopmentandRegulation)Act,1951__________________________________________536.2. IndustrialPolicy,1991 ___________________________________________________________________________536.3. PolicyforForeignDirectInvestment(FDI)_____________________________________________________546.4. ManufacturingPolicyforClusterDevelopments_______________________________________________56

    6.4.1. NationalManufacturingPolicy,2011___________________________________________________566.4.2. NationalInvestmentandManufacturingZones(NIMZs)Guidelines ________________576.4.3. SpecialEconomicZone(SEZ)Act,2005________________________________________________606.4.4. SchemesforclusterdevelopmentunderMinistries___________________________________626.4.5. ProvisionsforMicroSmallandMediumEnterprises(MSME) _______________________63

    7 OtherNationalLevelLegalRequirements___________________________________677.1. NationalHeritageConservation_________________________________________________________________67

  • ii

    7.1.1. TheAncientMonumentsandArchaeologicalSitesandRemains(AmendmentandValidation)Act,2010____________________________________________________________________69

    7.2. NationalEnvironmentalLegalRequirements__________________________________________________707.2.1. EnvironmentImpactAssessmentNotification2006__________________________________707.2.2. EnvironmentProtectionAct,1986_____________________________________________________717.2.3. ForestConservationAct,1980__________________________________________________________727.2.4. CoastalRegulationZone,2011__________________________________________________________737.2.5. EcoSensitiveZones _____________________________________________________________________74

    7.3. CantonmentAct,2006____________________________________________________________________________76

  • iii

    ListofTablesTable1.1:ItemslistedinEleventhandTwelfthSchedule__________________________________________________2Table1.2:FinancesofPanchayats&Municipalities________________________________________________________3Table1.3:StatewiseCompliancewith74thCAAasonOctober2004_____________________________________7Table1.4:StatusofMPCsinvariousStates_________________________________________________________________8Table5.1:ComparisonofTownandCountryPlanningActs&implementationacrossNation________29Table5.2:ComparisonofTownandCountryPlanningActsofsevenStates_____________________________35Table6.1:LiberalisedSectorforForeignDirectInvestment(RelatedtoUrbanandRegionalPlanning)56Table6.2:SchemesproposedforpromotionofCluster/ParkDevelopment____________________________64Table6.3:Micro,SmallandMediumEnterprisesClassification__________________________________________65Table7.1:StatutoryObligationsofEnvironmentClearances_____________________________________________72Table7.2:ActivitiesProhibited,RegulatedorPermittedinEcosensitiveZone_________________________75

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 1

    Implicationsof73rd&74thCAA,1993

    1 Implications of 73rd & 74th ConstitutionAmendmentAct,1993

    1.1. Provisionsof74thConstitutionAmendmentAct

    The 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act (73rd CAA) came in effect from 24th April,1993and74thConstitutionAmendmentAct(74thCAA), ineffect from1st June1993,ushered a new era in the history of urban local government in the country. TheConstitutionofIndiahasdetailedprovisionsforensuringprotectionofdemocracyinParliamentandStateLegislatures;however,itdidnotmakelocalselfgovernmentinurbanareasaclearcutconstitutionalobligation.EventhoughtherewasprovisionfororganisationofvillagePanchayatsintheDirectivePrinciplesofStatePolicy,therewasno reference tomunicipalitiesexcept implicitly inEntry5of theStateList,whichplaces the subject of local selfgovernment as a responsibility of the State.The74thCAA (referred to as part IXA of Constitution)made provisions for decentralisation,thereby, ensuring democracy in the establishment and operation of local selfgovernment.Itbestowspowertothepeopletoplanforthemselvesandparticipateinthedecisionmakingprocess.ThemainprovisionsintroducedbytheActareasunder:

    1) ConstitutionofPanchayatsandMunicipalities:

    Article243Bof73rdCAA,providesfortheconstitutionofPanchayatsatthreelevelsinastate:

    a) Village,b) Intermediate (may not be constituted in a State having a population not

    exceedingtwentylakhs)andc) District.

    Article243Qof74thCAA,providesforconstitutionofMunicipalitiesineveryStateasgivenunder:

    a) NagarPanchayatfortransitionalarea,thatistosay,anareaintransitionfromruraltourbanincharacter.

    b) MunicipalCouncilforasmallerurbanarea,andc) MunicipalCorporationforalargerurbanarea.

    2) ConstitutionofWardCommittees: Article 243 S provides for constitution ofwardcommittees,consistingofoneormorewards,withintheterritorialareaofaMunicipalityhavingapopulationof3,00,000ormore.

    3) DurationofMunicipalities:Article243Eof73rdCAAand243Uof74thCAA,provides a fixed termof 5 yearsof apanchayat andmunicipality respectively,fromthedateappointed.Electionstoconstituteapanchayatormunicipalityarerequired to be completed before the expiration of the duration of themunicipality.

  • 2 URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    Implicationsof73rd&74thCAA,1993

    4) Powers, authority and responsibilities of Panchayats andMunicipalities:Article 243G of 73rd and 243W of 74th CAA provides powers, authority andresponsibilities of Municipalities subject that legislature of the State by lawendow:

    a) ThePanchayatsandMunicipalitywithsuchpowersandauthority thosearenecessary to enable them to function as institutions of selfgovernment. The law prepared by the state government may containprovisions for the devolution of powers and responsibilities uponMunicipalities,withorwithoutconditionswithrespecttoi. the preparation of plans for economic development and social

    justice;ii. the performance of functions and implementation of schemes asmay

    beentrustedtothemincludingthoseinrelationtothematterslistedintheEleventhandTwelfthSchedule;

    b) The Committees with such powers and authority as may be necessary toenable themtocarryout theresponsibilitiesconferreduponMunicipalitiesthemincludingthoseinrelationtothematterslistedintheTwelfthSchedule.

    Table1.1: ItemslistedinEleventhandTwelfthSchedule

    S.No. 29Itemsofthe11thSchedule S.No. 18Itemsofthe12thSchedule

    1 Agriculture,includingagriculturalextension

    1 Urbanplanningincludingtownplanning

    2 Landimprovement,implementationoflandreforms,landconsolidationandsoilconservation

    2 Regulationoflanduseandconstructionofbuildings

    3 Minorirrigation,watermanagementandwatersheddevelopment

    3 Planningforeconomicandsocialdevelopment

    4 Animalhusbandry,dairyingandpoultry 4 Roadsandbridges

    5 Fisheries. 5 Watersupplyfordomestic,industrialandcommercialpurposes

    6 Socialforestryandfarmforestry 6 Publichealth,sanitationconservancyandsolidwastemanagement

    7 Minorforestproduce 7 Fireservices

    8 Smallscaleindustries,includingfoodprocessingindustries

    8 Urbanforestry,protectionoftheenvironmentandpromotionofecologicalaspects

    9 Khadi,villageandcottageindustries 9 Safeguardingtheinterestsofweakersectionsofsociety,includingthehandicappedandmentallyretarded

    10 Ruralhousing 10 Slumimprovementandupgradation

    11 Drinkingwater 11 Urbanpovertyalleviation

    12 Fuelandfodder 12 Provisionofurbanamenitiesandfacilitiessuchasparks,gardens,playgrounds

    13 Roads,culverts,bridges,ferries,waterwaysandothermeansof

    13 Promotionofcultural,educationalandaestheticaspects

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 3

    Implicationsof73rd&74thCAA,1993

    S.No. 29Itemsofthe11thSchedule S.No. 18Itemsofthe12thSchedulecommunication

    14 Ruralelectrification,includingdistributionofelectricity

    14 Burialsandburialgrounds;cremations,cremationgroundsandelectriccrematoriums

    15 Nonconventionalenergysources 15 Cattlepounds;preventionofcrueltytoanimals

    16 Povertyalleviationprogramme 16 Vitalstatisticsincludingregistrationofbirthsanddeaths

    17 Education,includingprimaryandsecondaryschools

    17 Publicamenitiesincludingstreetlighting,parkinglots,busstopsandpublicconveniences

    18 Technicaltrainingandvocationaleducation

    18 Regulationofslaughterhousesandtanneries

    19 Adultandnonformaleducation

    20 Libraries.

    21 Culturalactivities

    22 Marketsandfairs

    23 Healthandsanitation,includinghospitals,primaryhealthcentresanddispensaries

    24 Familywelfare

    25 Womenandchilddevelopment

    26 Socialwelfare,includingwelfareofthehandicappedandmentallyretarded

    27 Welfareoftheweakersections,andinparticular,oftheScheduledCastesandtheScheduledTribes

    28 Publicdistributionsystem

    29 Maintenanceofcommunityassets Source:73rd&74thConstitutionalAmendmentAct

    5) FinancesofPanchayatsandMunicipalities:AsperArticle243Hof73rd&243Xof74thCAAithasbeenlefttothelegislatureoftheStatetospecifytheimpositionoftaxes.

    Table1.2: FinancesofPanchayats&Municipalities

    RevenueSources Responsibilityof

    Taxes,Duties,feesetcetera LeviedandcollectedbyPanchayats&Municipalities

    Taxes,Duties,feesetcetera LeviedandcollectedbyStateGovernment

    Grantinaid GiventomunicipalitiesfromtheStateGovernment

    Funds For crediting and withdrawal of money by Panchayats &Municipality

    Source:73rd&74thConstitutionalAmendmentAct

    6) StateFinanceCommission:Article 243 I of 73rd CAA give provision of StateFinanceCommission(SFC).Article243Yof74thCAAextendsduty/powerofSFC

  • 4 URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    Implicationsof73rd&74thCAA,1993

    to review the financial positions of municipalities apart from PanchayatiRajInstitutionsandmakerecommendationstotheGovernor.

    7) Committee forDistrictPlanning: Article 243 ZDprovides for constitution ofDistrict Planning Committee at district level in every state, to consolidate theplanspreparedby thePanchayats and theMunicipalities in thedistrict and toprepareadraftdevelopmentplanforthedistrictasawhole.

    a) A close study of this article provides a reasonable inference that eachmunicipalityisexpectedtoprepareaplanforitsareaandundertakethetaskof urban planning including town planning, regulation of land uses,construction of buildings and phasing of the programme for economic andsocialdevelopmentasenvisagedintheTwelfthSchedule.

    b) The DPC would provide interaction with the municipal bodies andpanchayatiRajinstitutions,inadditiontoplanningandconflictresolutions.

    8) Committee for Metropolitan Planning: Article 243 ZE provides forconstitution of a Metropolitan Planning Committee (MPC) for planning ametropolitan area having a population of 10 lakh ormore, comprising one ormoredistrictsandconsistingofoneormoremunicipalitiesorpanchayats.

    9) ScheduledAreas: In terms of Article 243M of 73rd&243ZC of 74th CAA, theseprovisionsshallnotapplytoScheduledareasandTribalareasasreferredtoinArticle244oftheConstitution(i.eScheduledareasandscheduledtribesintheStatesofAssam,Meghalaya,TripuraandMizoram.)However,Parliamentmaybylaw,extendtheprovisionsofPartIXAtotheseareassubjecttosuchexceptionsandmodificationsasmaybespecifiedinthatlaw.

    In order to provide time to StateGovernments to allow changes to bemade in thethenexistingStateMunicipallawswhichwereinconsistentwiththeprovisionsofthe74thCAA,atransitionperiodofoneyearwasprovided,uptill31stMay1994.

    1.2. New Roles and Functions of State Town and CountryPlanningDepartment

    The new role of Town and Country Planning Departments that emerges out of theprovisionsofthe73rd&74thCAAshall,amongothers,include1:

    a) AdviceandtechnicalassistancetotheStateGovernmentonmatterspertainingto spatial planning and development as well as implementation of stateprogrammes;

    b) InitiationofactionpertainingtoprovisionoflegalsupportinrelevantActsforsocioeconomic, spatial planning and development processes; and on thesuggestedRegionalandUrbanDevelopmentPlanningsystem;

    1UDPFI Guidelines, 1996 & MM

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 5

    Implicationsof73rd&74thCAA,1993

    c) Assistance to theStateUrbanandRegionalPlanningBoard in formulationoftheStatePerspectivePlanandstrategyofspatioeconomicdevelopmentoftheState,havingregard toproposals contained indistrictandmetropolitanareadevelopmentplans;

    d) Division of the State into various planning regions taking into account thephysical,sociocultural,economicandclimaticconsiderationsandformulationofplansoftheirspatioeconomicdevelopmenttoserveasaguideforresolvinginterdistrict developmental issues and provide basis for interdistrict cooperationandcoordinationwithaviewtopreparedistrictdevelopmentplansmoreharmonious;

    e) Scrutinyofthedistrictandmetropolitanareadevelopmentplansforapprovalof State Government, taking into account the State perspective plan, spatioeconomic development strategy and proposals of relevant planning regioncoveringthedistrictofthemetropolitanarea;

    f) Ensuring that respective settlement Development Plans prepared by localauthoritiesarewithintheframeworkoftheapprovedperspectiveplanoftheState/settlement;

    g) Technical assistance to local authorities if so requested at the cost of theconcernedbody;

    h) Preparationofthedevelopmentplanincaseofdefaultbythe localauthority,district planning committee or the metropolitan planning committee, if sodirectedbytheStateGovernment,atthecostoftheconcernedplanningbody;

    i) Provision of necessary research input directly or through the help ofconsultants in formulation of policies, strategies, norms, standards, laws,regulations and rules pertaining to urban and regional planning anddevelopmentmatters;

    j) Provisionofmanpowertrainingfacilities;

    k) Establishment of an Urban and Regional Information System anddisseminationofinformation.

    1.3. Status of the Provisions of 74th Constitution AmendmentActonUrbanLocalBodies

    The 74th CAA envisages that the District and Metropolitan Planning CommitteesconsolidateplanspreparedbythePanchayatsandtheMunicipalities inthedistrict/metropolitan region. It shall prepare a draft development plan for the district/metropolitanregionasawholeandsendthedraftDistrictandMetropolitanPlanstotheStateGovernment.TheimplicationisthattheseplansaretobeintegratedwiththeState Plans. As per the Constitutional mandate, the District and MetropolitanDevelopment Plans have to ensure coordinated spatial planning, sharing of natural

  • 6 URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    Implicationsof73rd&74thCAA,1993

    and other resources, integrated provision of infrastructure and environmentalconservation.TheapproachhasbeenmaintainedforregionalplanninginChapter4ofVolume1.

    TheconstitutionofDPCandMPCin74thCAAisanapproachfortheStatestoaddressregional planning issues. However, these provisions have not been adopted at allIndialevel.ThestudycarriedoutbyNationalInstituteofUrbanAffairs(NIUA)ImpactoftheConstitution(74th)AmendmentActontheUrbanLocalBodies:AReview,April2007 andMOUD Strategic Plan ofMinistry of UrbanDevelopment for 20112016reveals that only few States have undertaken constitution of MPC, DPC andWardCommittees(WCs),whereastherearelargenumberofstateswhoareyettointegratetheseprovisionintheirlegislativeframework.Thetablebelowshowsthestatewisecomplianceof74thCAAprovisionsasonOctober2004.

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 7

    Implicationsof73rd&74thCAA,1993

    Table1.3: StatewiseCompliancewith74thCAAasonOctober2004

    Sr.No. State/UT

    Constitutionof Reservation

    ofSeats

    RegularConductofElections

    Constitutionof

    ULBs WCs DPCs MPCs SFCs

    1. AndhraPradesh 9 9 9 9 9

    2. ArunachalPradesh# 9 9

    3. Assam 9 9 9 9 94. Bihar 9 9 9 9 95. Chhattisgarh 9 9 9 9 96. Delhi 9 9 9 9 97. Goa 9 9 9 98. Gujarat 9 9 9 99. Haryana 9 9 9 9 910. Himachal

    Pradesh 9 9 9 911. Jharkhand 9 9 912. Karnataka 9 9 9 9 9 913. Kerala 9 9 9 9 9 914. Madhya

    Pradesh 9 9 9 9 9 915. Maharashtra 9 9 9 9 916. Manipur 9 9 9 917. Meghalaya*

    18. Mizoram*#

    19. Nagaland*

    20. Orissa 9 9 9 9 921. Punjab 9 9 9 922. Rajasthan 9 9 9 9 923. Sikkim# 924. TamilNadu 9 9 9 9 9 925. Tripura 9 9 9 926. Uttaranchal 9 9 9 927. UttarPradesh 9 9 9 928. WestBengal 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

    Source: NIUAupdatetable#TherearenomunicipalitiesinState *Theprovisionsof74thCAAarenotappliedtocertainscheduleareasandtribesofIndia

    Itcanbeobservedthatonly10stateshaveprovisionforconstitutingDPCsandonly1statehasprovisionforconstitutingMPC.However,otherStateslikeMaharashtraandAndhraPradeshnowhaveprovisionforconstitutingMPCs.

  • 8 URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    Implicationsof73rd&74thCAA,1993

    AccordingtoIndianInstitutesofPublicAdministration(IIPA)report UrbanSectorFeedbackforMetropolitanPlanningCommittees,IIPA,thestatusoftheMetropolitanPlanning Committees constituted so far or thosewhich are in the process of beingconstitutedasin2011aregivenintablebelow:

    Table1.4: StatusofMPCsinvariousStates

    S.No. NameofState MetropolitanCity StatusofMPC

    1. WestBengal Kolkata Constituted

    2. Maharashtra Mumbai Constituted

    3. Maharashtra Nagpur Constituted

    4. Maharashtra Pune Constituted

    5. AndhraPradesh Hyderabad Atinitialstageofconstitution.

    6. Karnataka Bengaluru Atinitialstageofconstitution.

    7. MadhyaPradesh Bhopal Necessarylegislationisyettobepassed

    8 UttarPradesh Kanpur StateGovernmentisconsideringtoissueanotificationunderSection57AofUPMunicipalCorporationsAct,1959forconstitutionofMPC

    9. Gujarat Ahmedabad Tobeconstituted

    10. Rajasthan Jaipur Tobeconstituted

    11. Haryana Faridabad ConstitutedSource:IIPA

    AspertheIIPAReport,theStatesarereluctanttoexpeditefollowupwithregardtoimplementationoftheconstitutionalprovisionsandmostofthemarelaggingbehindin the preparation ofMetropolitan Development Plan. Some of the reasons for notoperationalizingtheprovisionsoftheConstitutionalAmendmentActmaybe: ThepreparationofMetropolitanDevelopmentPlanisaprofessionally ledspatial

    exercise and is not mere consolidation of the sectoral plans. The MPCs lackadequate/requisiteprofessionalcapacitiestoprepareit.

    Lackof technicalexpertise in theMetropolitan Planning Committee or lack ofdirections/guidanceforconstitutingthesame.

    Prior to preparing a Metropolitan Development Plan (MDP), it is imperative todelineate the metropolitan region based on certain criteria. Barring a fewmegacitieslikeKolkata,Mumbai,Chennai,HyderabadandBengaluru,noneoftheothermetropolitancitieshavedelineatedtheirrespectivemetropolitanregions.

    For preparing Metropolitan Development Plan, a multi disciplinary teamcomprising of Town & Country Planners as an urban planner and/or regionalplanner,environmentalplanner,transportplannersandinfrastructureplannerasthecoreteamandateamofexpertsasperrequirementofthestudyisessentiallyamultidisciplinaryexercise.

    Lack ofwill among the State Governments to take action for delineating themetropolitanareaaswellaspreparingtheplanforthesame.

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 9

    Implicationsof73rd&74thCAA,1993

    Lackof incentives/initiatives for taking appropriate action for preparation ofMetropolitan Development Plan whichmay not be the priority for some of theStateGovernments.

    AsperNIUAstudy,inKarnataka,KeralaandTamilNadu,DPCshavebeenconstitutedandtechnicallytheyarefunctioning.However,itislearntthatinKarnatakatheyhavenotbeenfunctioningasexpected.IncaseofMadhyaPradesh,itislearntthatDPChasno executive powers. In Chhattisgarh, the DPCs are not functioning at all and nomeetingsofDPCsarebeingheld.Infact,KeralaistheonlystateinthesouthwhereDPCsareactiveandfunctional.

    It isapparentthatmanystatesareyettointegrate74thCAAintermsofconstitutingDPC and MPC as a part of decentralized planning process in order to address theissues at all levels. Report of the Working Group on Urban Strategic Planningprepared by MoUD, has also emphasized a major thrust to Regional and UrbanPlanningandpreparationofDistrict,MetropolitanandCitySpatialandDevelopmentPlansthroughstrategicguidelinesandfinancialsupport.

    1.4. Recommendations

    Forpromotionofstrongerpublicprivatepartnership,itisessentialtoimplement73rdand 74th CAA. Quality of development largely depends upon how direct and freeparticipationisincorporatedfordevelopmentprojectsinlocalareas,thisrequirementis almostessential. Further,Guidelines recommendreviewand revisionofRegionalPlans and Development Plans every 5 years. This review is critical mechanism forguidingdevelopmentmeaningfullyandcanonlybedonethroughdirectinvolvementoflocalcommunities(theirrepresentatives),concernedlocalauthoritiesandexperts.ThereforeURDPFIGuidelinesrecommendsthatStatesshouldimplementthe73rdand74thCAAattheearliest.Alllegalandadministrativehurdlesinimplementationshouldbeaddressedandactionsshouldbetaken.SomeStateshavealreadyshownexamplesin this regard. For implementation of the provisions of 73rd and 74th CAA, therecommendationsontheexistingsetupofDevelopmentAuthoritiesareasunder:

    a) TheexistingStateRegional andTownPlanningBoard, constitutedunderStateTownPlanningActmaycontinue.

    b) The currentplanning role and functionofMetropolitanRegionalPlanningandDevelopmentAuthoritiesandBoardsconstitutedforplanninganddevelopmentof metropolitan regions may be in conflict with the role and functions ofMetropolitan Planning Committee (MPC) when constituted as mandatoryrequirementoftheprovisionsofthe74thCAA.Consideringthisandalsothatanestablishedinstitutionneednotbedemolished,itissuggestedthatthesebodiesbereorganisedtoserveasMPCitselforalternativelyserveastechnicalarmofMPC.TheKolkataMPCmodelisgiveninSection4.5.1ofvolume1.

  • 10 URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    Implicationsof73rd&74thCAA,1993

    c) The Area Planning and Development Authorities constituted to prepare andenforcedevelopmentplansofurbancentresundertheStateTownandCountryPlanning Act or other Actsmay have a conflict of role and functionswith theUrbanLocalAuthoritiesconstitutedundermodifiedStateMunicipalitiesAct.

    d) Itissuggestedthat,takingintoconsiderationthespiritof74thCAA,thesebodiesshouldbemergedorworkastechnicalwingsoftheMPCandDPCwhereverthecasemaybe.Administrativeamalgamationprocessshouldbeeffectivelydecidedbythestategovernments.

    e) Theexistingsinglefunctionboards/undertakingslikeHousingBoard,ElectricityBoard, Refuse Collection and Disposal Board, Transport Corporation/Undertaking, which were constituted under various Acts for the purpose ofdischarging the specifically assigned function,may continue, if so required bythecouncilofthelocalauthority.

    f) Training programmes for awareness building about development process andrelatedissuesamongtheelectedrepresentativesisimportant.Suchprogrammesshould be conducted by the state governments with the help of T&CPDepartmentandoutsideexperts.

    g) Extra attention shall be paid on the development and administration of periurban areas through local selfgovernments so that ground developments ofouter fringes of large settlements are consistent with proposals of planningactivities.

    TheConstitution(73rd&74thAmendment)Act,1992isappendedwithitswebURLinAppendixO'ofVolumeIIB.

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 11

    TheRighttoFairCompensationandTransparencyinLandAcquisitionRehabilitation&ResettlementAct,2013

    2 The Right to Fair Compensation andTransparency in Land AcquisitionRehabilitation&ResettlementAct,2013

    2.1. BasisofthenewAct

    The Land Acquisition Act of 1894 was created with the purpose of facilitatingacquisition of privately held land by the government for public purposes. LandAcquisition plainly means the acquisition of land for some public purpose by agovernment agency from individual landowners, as authorised by the law, afterpaying a governmentfixed compensation to cover losses incurred by landownersfromsurrenderingtheirlandtotheconcernedgovernmentagency.

    Over a period of time numerous issueswere highlighted in the 1894 Act, such as;cumbersome and costly procedure delaying the land acquisition, determination ofpublic purpose contestable at law, property valuation techniques were flawedresulting in a heavy strain on public finances and restrictions on the scale ofdevelopmentandredevelopmentproject. Itwasalsoargued that landwasacquiredfornumberofprojectswithnopublicpurposeattached,asinthecaseofSEZs,atwellbelowthemarketvalueof theproperties.Additionally,relocationandrehabilitationoflandownersdisplacedbytheactionsoftheAct,wasnotcoveredcomprehensivelyandadequately.

    It is for these andother reasons that government proposed to replace the saidActwith a New Act The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in LandAcquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (effective from 1stJanuary2014).

    ThisLawwasproposedduetothefollowingbasicreasons: PublicconcernonlandacquisitionissuesandabsenceofNationallawtoprovide

    for the Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R) and compensation forloss oflivelihoods.

    MultipleamendmentsweremadetotheoriginalAct,butprincipallawcontinuedtobethesamei.e.theLandAcquisitionAct,1894whichwasanoutdatedLaw.

    Need for balance was felt for addressing concerns of farmers and those whoselivelihoodsweredependentonthelandbeingacquiredaswellasfacilitatinglandacquisitionforindustrialization,infrastructureandurbanization.

    2.2. KeyFeatures

    Salient features of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in LandAcquisition,RehabilitationandResettlementAct,2013,areasfollowing:

  • 12 URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    TheRFCLARRAct,2013TheRighttoFairCompensationandTransparencyinLandAcquisitionRehabilitation&ResettlementAct,2013

    Asthetitleof thesaidActsuggests, it favoursfaircompensationratherthanfastacquisitionofland.Minimumcompensationforlandacquisition isdetailedoutintheActandIndianstatesareevenempoweredtoprovidebenefitsandsafeguardsthatgooverandabovetheprovisionsofthislawtotheaffectedfamily.

    Affectedfamilieshavebeendefinedaslandownersandlivelihoodlosers. Safeguardforfoodsecurityhasbeenincludedbystatingthatmulticropirrigated

    landwillbeacquiredonlyas lastresortunderexceptionalcircumstances.Still, ifsuch areas are acquired, equivalent area of culturable wasteland is to bedeveloped foragriculturalpurposesoranamountequivalent to thevalueof thelandacquiredshallbedepositedwiththeappropriategovernmentforinvestmentinagricultureforenhancingfoodsecurity.

    Minimum rehabilitation and resettlement (R&R) entitlements package has beenintroduced.AffectedfamilieswillhavechoiceofavailingoptionsgivenintheAct.

    Specialprovisions,inadditiontotheR&Rpackage,havebeengivenforSCs/STs. Role ofPanchayatiRajInstitutions especiallyGramSabhas has been enhanced in

    theAct.ConsentofGramSabhaismandatoryforacquisitioninScheduledArea. Special Provisions have been provided to the farmers like, farm land will be

    acquiredonlywhennounutilisedlandisavailable,enhancescompensation,priorconsent of land losers, increased share in sale of acquired land and exemptionfrom income tax and from stamp duty, damage to crops will be included incompensation price, 20% of the developed land (if land was acquired forurbanizationpurpose)willbeofferedtothefarmers.

    UnderthenewAct,landcanbereturnedtooriginalownersiftheStatesodecides,with the condition that land is not used within 5 years in accordance with thepurposeforwhichitwasacquired.

    RoleoftheDistrictCollectorhasbeenreducedinthenewActascomparedtotheold one, where collector had complete authority to decide what activityconstituted public purpose. Under thenew law, these roles of the collector arenot prescribed. Under the old Act, collector could decide what quantum ofcompensationcouldbepaid to thosedisplacedwhile thenew lawhasa formulafordecidingthequantumofcompensation.

    InthenewAct,benefitsfortenantsandsharecroppershavebeenintroduced.Thelaw covers all tenants and sharecroppers, artisans; who will not just bear therehabilitation and resettlement benefits but will also have a share in thecompensation.

    In the Resettlement area, 25 infrastructural amenities have to be provided tominimise the impact of relocation. Few of such amenities are roads, properdrainage and sanitation, safe drinkingwater, grazing land, fair price shops, postoffices,storagefacility,transportfacility,burialorcremationgroundetcetera.

    TheprovisionoftheNewLawhasbeenmadecompliantwithotherlawssuchas;The Panchayats Act, 1996, The Schedule Tribes and Other Traditional ForestDwellersAct,2006andlandtransferregulationsinScheduleVarea.Thisacthas

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 13

    TheRighttoFairCompensationandTransparencyinLandAcquisitionRehabilitation&ResettlementAct,2013

    gone one step further by providing consent of GramSabhas rather than justconsultationasintheabovementionedActs.

    Diversesafeguardshavebeenprovidedagainstindiscriminateacquisitionofland.Suchas,socialimpactassessmenthasbeenmademandatoryexceptforirrigationprojectsandithastobecompletedwithin6months.Useofacquiredlandcannotbechangedfromthepurposespecified inthe landuseplansubmittedat timeoflandacquisition.

    TransparencyprovisionshavebeenprovidedinAct,fewofwhichare,GramSabhahastobeconsultedinSocialImpactAssessment(SIA)process,SIAdocumenttobemadeavailableforpublicscrutiny,alldocumentsmandatorytobemadeavailableinthepublicdomainandonthewebsiteetcetera.

    TimelineshavebeenspecifiedinActtomaketheprocessoflandacquisitiontimebound. Likecompensationhastobegivenwithinaperiodofthreemonthsfromthe date of the award.Monetary R&R entitlements are to be providedwithin aperiodofsixmonthsfromthedateoftheaward.

    ProvisionsoftheNewLawdonotapplytotheactivitiescoveredunderother13Government of India Lawswhich permits land acquisition for specific purposes(like, legislations relating to National Defence, National Highway, and Railway).Though the provisions of the New Law relating to compensation, rehabilitationandresettlementwillapplybyanotificationoftheCentreGovernment.

    TheRighttoFairCompensationandTransparencyinLandAcquisition,Rehabilitationand Resettlement Act, 2013 is a legislation that regulates land acquisition andprovideslaiddownrulesforgrantingcompensation,rehabilitationandresettlementtotheaffectedpersons.TheActhasprovisionstoprovidefaircompensationtothosewhose land is acquired permanently or temporarily, brings transparency to theprocessofacquisitionoflandtosetupfactoriesorbuildings,infrastructuralprojectsandassuresrehabilitationof thoseaffected.TheActestablishesregulations for landacquisition as a part of India's massive industrialization driven by publicprivatepartnership.

    TheRighttoFairCompensationandTransparencyinLandAcquisition,RehabilitationandResettlementAct,2013isappendedwithwebURLinAppendixOofVolumeIIB.

  • 14 URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    TheRFCLARRAct,2013TheRighttoFairCompensationandTransparencyinLandAcquisitionRehabilitation&ResettlementAct,2013

    Thispageisintentionallyleftblank.

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 15

    ModelRegionalandTownPlanningandDevelopmentLaw,1985

    3 Model Regional and Town Planning andDevelopmentLaw,1985

    3.1. Keyfeatures

    TownandCountryPlanningOrganisation(TCPO) formulated theModelTownandCountryPlanningLawintheyear1960.ThismodelActwasrevisedbyTCPOinyear1985 as Model Regional and Town Planning and Development Law to enact acomprehensiveurbanandregionalplanninglegislationinalltheStatesandUTs.Itis in the form of guidelines which ensures better overseeing and coordination ofplanning with implementation, so that a single agency can undertake both thesefunctions. In themodel, theplanninganddevelopmentauthority tobeconstitutedhasbeenequippedwithfullplanninganddevelopmentpowerstodischargethetaskofplanningandimplementation.

    TheModelRegional andTownPlanningandDevelopmentLaw,1985 provides forthefollowing:

    1) Constitution of State Regional and Town Planning Board by the StateGovernmentforthepurposeofadvisingonthedelineationoftheregionfortheplanneddevelopment,

    2) Directing the preparation of metropolitan, regional and area plans by themetropolitan,regionalandareaplanninganddevelopmentauthorities,

    3) Setting up of metropolitan, regional and area planning and developmentauthoritiesfordifferenturbanandruralareaswithintheStatetoundertakepreparationofdevelopmentplansandtoenforceandimplementthem,

    4) Coordinating the planning and implementation of physical developmentprogrammes,

    5) TheModelLawprovides3stepsfortheadministrationofthislaw,thestepsarefollowing:a) Preparationofexistinglandusemap,b) Preparation of an outline development plan and comprehensive

    developmentplanandtheirenforcement,andc) Preparation of detailed schemes of development or redevelopment as

    envisagedintheplansandtheirimplementation.

    The Model Regional and Town Planning and Development Law was prepared in1985,almost30yearsago,sincethenmanylegislativeandideologicalchangeshavetakenplaceinthedevelopmentalapproachofGoI.Alsotoincorporatetheprovisionsof74thCAA,theModelRegionalandTownPlanningandDevelopmentLawrequiresa complete revision and restructuring. Accordingly, the suggested changes in theModellawaredescribedinthefollowingsections:

  • 16 URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    ModelRegionalandTownPlanningandDevelopmentLaw,1985

    3.2. Suggestedmodificationsinthelaw Replacing old Land Acquisition Act with the LARR Act (2013): Land

    Acquisition Act of 1894 is suggested to be replaced by The Right to FairCompensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation andResettlementAct,2013.

    MandatoryImplementationof73rdand74thCAAs:ItshouldbemandatorybyallUrbanLocalBodies(ULBs),tofollow74thCAA,formakingULBsastrongandeffective body through devolution of power and functions. On the same line,KeralaTownandCountryPlanningDepartmentimplementedKeralaTownandCountryPlanningOrdinance2013,whichcameintoeffectfollowingthe73rdand74th amendments to the Constitution. The ordinance constitutes the DistrictPlanningCommittee(DPC)atdistrictlevelandMetropolitanPlanningCommittee(MPC)atMetropolitanlevel.In MPC/DPC, full time dedicated urban and regional professionals for betterassessment,preparationandexecutionorimplementationofplanatbothlevelsare required. In the DPC, an average of 1 Planner for 1 million populationissuggestedbytheTCPO,whileinMPC1TownPlannerisrequiredforpopulationof5lakh.

    Interstate Planning provisions, organization structure, roles andresponsibilities

    The main objective for setting up InterState Planning concept is to promoteeconomic growth and balanced development of the Region (two or more thantwostates)forprovidingsuitableinfrastructuraldevelopmentthroughinterrailandroadbasedtransportationnetworks,minimizingtheadverseenvironmentalimpact, developing selected urban settlements with urban infrastructurefacilities. In India a number of InterState planning organizations have beenestablishedtoachievetheabovesaidobjectives.

    In 1985, Enactment of the National Capital Region Planning Board Act by theUnionParliament,with the concurrence of the participating States ofHaryana,RajasthanandUttarPradesh,NCRPlanningBoardwasconstituted.

    Under section 8 of the NCRPB Act, the powers of the Board shall include thepowersto:

    Call forreportsandinformation fromtheparticipatingStatesandtheUnionterritory with regard to preparation, enforcement and implementation ofFunctionalPlansandSubregionalPlans;

    Ensure that thepreparation,enforcementand implementationof FunctionalPlan or SubRegional Plan, as the case may be, is in conformity with theRegionalPlan;

    IndicatethestagesfortheimplementationoftheRegionalPlan;

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 17

    ModelRegionalandTownPlanningandDevelopmentLaw,1985

    Review the implementation of the Regional Plan, Functional Plan, SubRegionalPlanandProjectPlan;

    Selectandapprovecomprehensiveprojects,callforprioritydevelopmentandprovidesuchassistancefortheimplementationofthoseprojectsastheBoardmaydeemfit;

    Select,inconsultationwiththeStateGovernmentconcerned,anyurbanareas,outsidetheNationalCapitalRegionhavingregardto its location,populationand potential for growth, whichmay be developed in order to achieve theobjectivesoftheRegionalPlan;and

    EntrusttotheCommitteesuchotherfunctionsasitmayconsidernecessarytocarryouttheprovisionsofthisAct.

    SimilarinterstatedevelopmentregionsmaybenecessarytobeplannedinotherpartsofIndiaespeciallyinvolvingfastchangingurbanregionswhichfallinmorethanoneState.TheLawissuggestedtobemodifiedtoincludeprovisionsfornotonlyDPCandMPCbutalsoforinterstateauthoritiesasstatedabove.

    Joint Area Committee: Kerala Town and Country Planning Ordinance,2013providesconstitutionofJointAreaCommitteeforanareaofmorethanoneMunicipalCorporation,MunicipalCouncil,TownPanchayatorVillagePanchayateitherinfullorinpart.Forthepurposeofplanningoftheareainwhichtheyarejointlyinterestedorforwhichtheyareresponsible.

    Innovative Systems of Land Assembly: There are various techniques todevelop small or fragmented land parcels into usable land through transfer ofownership.SomeofthesetechniquesaresuggestedtobeincludedintheLaw. Town Planning Scheme: Town Planning Scheme has emerged as a

    successfulmodeloflanddevelopment;itissuggestedtoincludetheprovisionintheLaw.TheMaharashtraRegionalandTownPlanning(MRTP)Act,1966,TheGujaratTownPlanningandUrbanDevelopmentAct(GTPUDA),1976andnow Kerala Town and Country Planning Ordinance, 2013, have includedprovisionsforTownPlanningScheme.

    LandPoolingandDevelopmentSchemes2:Land Pooling scheme aims toprevent, selling of land without the owners consent. Under Delhi LandPoolingPolicy,landownerscansurrendertheirlandholdingintothecentralpoolandbestakeholdertothedevelopmentproposedintheirland.Oncethelandispooled,thelandownerwouldgetbackcertainamountof landoftheirtotallandsurrenderedlandasdevelopableland.

    Transferable Development Rights (TDR), TDR is a technique of landdevelopment which separates the development potential of a particular

    2Source: Master Plan of Delhi, 2021.

  • 18 URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    ModelRegionalandTownPlanningandDevelopmentLaw,1985

    parceloflandfromandallowsitsuseelsewherewithinthedefinedzonesofthe city.TDR is takenaway from the zoneand it is tradable. TheLaw shalldefine itsuseasa technique forredevelopmentandreconstructionof innercityzones.

    AccommodationReservation:TheconceptofAccommodationReservationallows the land owners to develop the sites reserved for an amenity in thedevelopment plan using full permissible FSI/FAR on the plot subject byagreeing to entrust andhandover the built up area of such amenity to thelocal authority free of all encumbrances and accept the full FSI/FAR ascompensation in lieu thereof.ThismechanismhasconsiderablyrelievedthelocalauthoritiesfromincurringhugeexpensesforthepurposeofacquisitionofsuchlandsandcanbeconsideredintheLawwithcertainconditions.

    EncouragingPrivateand JointSectorParticipation: The current policies ofeconomic liberalization in the country and the emphasis on private sectorparticipationinplanninganddevelopmentprocessshouldbeprovidedwiththeappropriate legal support. It is suggested that private sector participation incertain sectors shall be allowed and encouraged by the law in light of the FDIpolicy. Local Self Government has to consult nongovernmental institutions,organizationsandprofessionalbodiesinthepreparationofPerspectivePlanfortheDistrictandMetropolitanArea.

    TimeLine:RegionalPlansandDevelopmentPlansshouldbe for20yearswiththe provisions for review / revision every 5 years to be coterminuswith theStateFiveYearplan.Differentplanssuggested: RegionalPlan(Interstate/Interdistrict/district) DevelopmentPlan(planningareaincludingtheMunicipalarea)

    Currentlydifferenttimelineisfollowedforreviewofregionalandcityormetropolitandevelopmentplansbydifferentstateswhichshouldbestandardisedasfaraspossible.

    TamilNadu,MizoramandGujarathaveprovisionofrevisingDevelopmentalPlanonce in5yearsofplanpreparation.Karnatakaprovides for revisiononly afterten years and Maharashtra in twenty years. Himachal Pradesh provides forrevision but gives no minimum time frame. Bihar has no provision of plansrevision.

    State Regulatory Body The UrbanRegional Planning& DevelopmentRegulatory Authority (Town Planning Board/ Town Planning Committee(Kerala))suggested by the URDPFI Guidelines, 2014 to be established by StateGovernmentsthroughstatutorysupport.TheroleofthisStateBodywouldbetoregulate and monitor the functioning of Development bodies. The regulatory

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 19

    ModelRegionalandTownPlanningandDevelopmentLaw,1985

    authorityatthestatelevelmayfunctionasanappellantauthoritytoaddressthegrievancesredressal.Itshallalsolistofauthoritiesandrolesandresponsibilitiestoavoidmultiplicity.Regulatorybodyshould review thesmooth functioningoftheagenciestoovercomethemultiplicity,duplicationorgaps.TheestablishmentofthisauthoritywouldrequireamendmentofStateTownandCountryPlanningActs.

    This State level apex regulatory body for appropriate functioning should bechaired, preferably, by the Chief Minister of the state with other membersdecidedbytheStategovernment.TheroleofStateauthoritytobereferredfromVolumeI(section3.6).

    DisasterRiskManagement:Disaster riskmanagementwith specific referencetoclimatechangeimpactandappropriateresponseforitshouldbeincorporatedasanimportantcomponentofplanformulationwithfocusonbetterenergyuse,watermanagement,greenbalanceandreductionofvulnerabilitytodisaster.

    CityInfrastructureFund:ACity Infrastructure Fund should be established aturban centers by the Executive order of State Government. It should be otherthan the Budget fund and dedicated only for the Urban and RegionalInfrastructure development. The possible sources of funding for theinfrastructure fundmustbedefinedandstreamlined inconsultationwithStateFinanceCommissionbytheStateGovernment.

    Planning for Green Cities: In view of the need for accelerated urbandevelopment and to guide cities to ecofriendly, Green city developmentapproach should be given priority especially in green field development.PlanningforsuchcitiesshouldbeencouragedandprovisionsforthesametobeincludedintheAct.

    ThechangesintheModelLawshouldbeconsideredbasedontheabovementionedpoints,provisionfromvariousStateTownandCountryPlanningActsanddetailedstudybyTownandCountryPlanningOrganisation.TheModelRegionalandTownPlanningandDevelopmentLaw,1985isappendedwithitswebURLinAppendixOofVolumeIIB.

  • 20 URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    ModelRegionalandTownPlanningandDevelopmentLaw,1985

    Thispageisintentionallyleftblank.

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 21

    ModelMunicipalLaw,2003

    4 ModelMunicipalLaw,20034.1. Keyfeatures

    TheModelMunicipal Law, 2003preparedbyMinistry ofUrbanDevelopment andPovertyAlleviation(theerstwhileundividedMinistry)isaninitiativetoimplementtheprovisionsofthe74thCAAforempowermentofurbanlocalbodiesandprovidelegislativeframeworkforimplementationoftheUrbanReformAgenda.TheLawisexpectedtoenhancethecapacitiesofULBstoleveragepublicfundsfordevelopmentofurbansectorandprovideanenvironmentsothaturbanlocalbodiescanplaytheirrolemoreeffectivelyandensurebetterservicedelivery.

    ThesalientfeaturesoftheModelMunicipalLaware:

    1) Constitution of theMunicipal Area based on population, classification of thethreelevelsofMunicipalitiesanditsconstitution.

    2) AlltheexecutiveactionsoftheEmpoweredStandingCommitteeshallbetakeninthenameofMunicipality.

    3) IndirectelectionofMayororChairpersonforafiveyearterm.

    4) ConstitutionofWardsandWardCommittees.

    5) State Level Municipal Establishment Audit Commission to review the staffstatus.

    6) ClassificationofMunicipalfunctionsinto:

    a) Coremunicipal functions includingwatersupply,drainageand sewerage,solidwastemanagement,roads,etcetera;

    b) FunctionsassignedbyGovernment3;and

    c) Otherfunctions.

    7) State government can dissolve an elected body if it shows default inperformance or abuse of powers, after giving due notice and review by acommittee.

    8) ProvisiontoimplementrecommendationsoftheStateFinanceCommission.

    9) Municipalfundwithseparateaccountsforvariousservices.

    10) PreparationofbudgetestimationofMunicipality.

    11) Preparation of State Municipal Accounting Manual and appointment of theMunicipalAccountsCommittee.

    12) StateGovernmentcanappointaprofessionalcharteredaccountantasauditor.ULBstopreparebalancesheetoftheassetsandliabilitiesannually.

    13) Municipalitiestoprepareaninventoryofpropertieseachyear.3The functions assigned by Central/ State Government may be undertaken subject to the underwriting of the costs by the

    concerned levels of government.

  • 22 URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkModelMunicipalLaw,2003

    14) State Government to frame a Comprehensive Debt Limitation Policy layingdown the general principles of borrowings of loans with regard toMunicipalitiesfinancialcapacity.

    15) Powerofmunicipalitiestoraiseloans.

    16) Internal revenuesofMunicipality andpower to levy taxes, user charges, feesandfines,developmentcharge,advertisement,othertaxesandtolls.

    17) EnableparticipationofprivatesectorandNGOsinconstruction,financinganddeliveryofservicesincludingbillingandcollection.

    18) Enable setting up of State Municipal Regulatory Commission that willdetermine user charges and standard of services suggest avenues of privatesectorparticipationandensurefairdealtocitizens.

    19) Agendaforurbanenvironmentmanagement.Municipalitiestoprepareannualenvironmentalandsubsidyreports

    20) Provides for the representationofMunicipalities inDistrictandMetropolitanPlanningCommittees.

    21) Provision for improvement in existing area such as removal of congestedbuildings

    22) Constitution of Municipal Streets Technical Committee and other aspectsrelatedtostreets

    23) UniquePremisesNumberingSystem

    24) Provisionsforbuildings

    25) MunicipalLicenses

    26) MaintenanceofStatistics

    27) ManagementofDisasters

    4.2. SuggestedchangesintheLaw

    TheModelMunicipalLaw(MML)wasintroducedmorethanadecadeback;itis pertinent that the provisions of MML need to be updated to bring it inharmonywith therecentdevelopments in theMunicipalLaw. MoUDstudyundertaken by NUIA to review the MML, suggested various points forrevision of the provisions given in MML, based on their status ofimplementation.

    TherearevariousprovisionsinthecurrentscenariothatarevitalforMMLtobring it in line with the new developments in municipal governance.Provisions like reservations of seats forWomen/SC/ST/BC inMunicipality,Local Bodies/Municipal Ombudsman, functions and duties of Area SabhaRepresentative,disclosureofvariousdocumentsrelatingtomunicipalaffairs,accrual based double entry system of accounts, defining functions and

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 23

    ModelMunicipalLaw,2003

    responsibilitiesofDPCsandMPCsaresuggestedtobedetailedoutundertheMML.

    The above mentioned NUIA study has also highlighted lack of criticalprovisions in MML, such as, municipal ombudsman, accrual based doubleentry system; public disclosure of budget, financial and accounts ofmunicipality; public private partnership (PPP) in the delivery of basicservicesofthemunicipality,andinperformanceofinfrastructureprojects.

    4.2.1. Clause(s)forinclusioninthepresentMML

    Definitions of area sabha and area sabha representatives shall bedefinedintheMML.

    MML to be theModel Law for States to follow. It should clearly have aclause defining Annual Rateable Value / Capital Value / Unit AreaValue/AnnualLettingValue.

    DefinitionofLocalBodiesorMunicipalOmbudsman/underjurisdictionof LokAyukta should be defined. According to 13th Central FinanceCommission, the state government must put in place a system ofindependent localbodyOmbudsman. However, it is left to theStates todecidewhichsystemtofollow.

    Provision on reservation: Article 243 T of the Constitution of Indiaprovides for reservation of women, SC, ST, and BC. Since MMLsupplementtheaimsof74thCAA,itshouldbeincorporatedinMML.

    Provisions relating to Local Bodies/Municipal Ombudsman: The SecondAdministrative Reforms Commission and the 13th Finance Commission haverecommendedthataseparateOmbudsmanforlocalbodiesbeconstitutedtolookinto the complaints of corruption and maladministration against thefunctionariesoflocalbodies.ThismayalsoincludeStaffsreviewontheNonEthicpractisesandprovisionforthe protection of whistle blowers. In case, the municipality opts to create apositionoflocalbodiesombudsman,itisnecessarytoaddprovisionsrelatingtoappointment, functions,powers, termofoffice,conditionsofservice,procedureofdisposalofcomplaintfiledtohisofficeetcetera.

    Formulationofcitizenscharterprovision for Citizens Charter formulationunder Action Plan for Effective and Responsive Government (1997) to besuggested in theMML. Citizen's Charter and Grievance Redressal Bill, 2011 isalso under consideration in Parliament, whichwill support the amendment inMML.The role of the charter tobewell defined includingGrievanceRedressalother thanthosehandledbyLocalBodies/MunicipalOmbudsmanand focusondevelopmentofegovernancemechanismsforPublicaccountability,Dutiesofthestaff,TransparencyandPeoplesparticipation.

  • 24 URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkModelMunicipalLaw,2003

    Accrual Based Double Entry Accounting System: Currently double entryaccounting system is followed by most of the Municipalities in the country.However, asper themandateof the JnNURM,accrualbasedaccounting systemshould be followed as it estimates the future generation of revenue andexpenditureoftheMunicipality.MMLdoesnotmentionthisprovision.Sinceitis one of the important reforms undertaken through JnNURM scheme, it isimportantthatacorrespondingprovisionisincorporatedintheMML.

    Action taken report: The Municipal Authorities must send an action takenreport to the State Government on the defects detected by the governmentauditor.ItisimperativethatthisprovisionshouldbeincludedinMMLforotherstatestofollow.

    Establishment of Escrow Account for any particular project: An escrowaccountforparticularprojectshelpsthemunicipalitytomaintaintheiraccountsclear in terms of borrowing and in terms of future borrowings needs of themunicipality. It will increase transparency for the lenders/stakeholders.Considering few states have already established an escrow account, suchprovisionmaybeaddedtoMMLasanoptionforthemunicipalitiesthatwishtooptforit.

    PropertyTaxassessment:MMLshouldhaveaprovision regardingmannerofassessment of property tax. Municipal Actsmust specifywhether an assesseewould file a Selfassessment or a bill would be presented to him by themunicipality.

    FunctionsandResponsibilitiesofDPC&MPC: MML only speaks ofconstitutionofthesecommittees,whichdoesnotsufficethepurpose.Therefore,it is suggested to define the provisions relating to composition, role andresponsibilitiesofMPC/DPCaswellastheirjurisdictionsasenvisagedundertheconstitutional provisions including specifying the organization which willfunctionasthetechnicalandadministrativesecretariatoftheMPC/DPC.

    Fire hazard and disaster risk response: One of the conditions of the 13thCentralFinanceCommissionwasthatallthemunicipalcorporationsmustputinplaceafirehazardresponseandmitigationplanformillionpluscities.Therefore,MMLshouldcontainaprovisionwithrespecttofirehazardresponseplan,ifnotforalltheDisastermanagements.URDPFIrecommendsfirehazarddisasterriskresponsetobeincorporatedfocusingonreductionofvulnerability.

    State Regulatory Body The Urban and Regional Development RegulatoryAuthority suggested by to be established by State Governments throughstatutory support should play a crucial role to regulate and monitor thefunctioning of Development bodies. Grievances redressal system, roles andresponsibilities of authorities to be integratedwith the State Regulatory Body.Therefore, functions of StateRegulatoryBody to be incorporated in theModel Municipal Law.

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 25

    ModelMunicipalLaw,2003

    4.2.2. AdditionalProvisions

    4.2.2.1. StatePropertyTaxBoard/Act

    The13thCentralFinanceCommissionrecommendedforaStatePropertyTaxBoardtoput inplacean independentandtransparentprocedure forassessingpropertytax.

    MMLprovides for a provisionmentioning the State Property Tax Board,however, it does not clearly state the provisions relating to itsestablishment, composition, functions, powers, accounts, budget, etc. Itcouldbeausefulprovisionsincepropertytaxationisanimportantsourceofrevenueandthiswouldhelpimprovethevaluationofthepropertyinasystematicandtransparentway.

    4.2.2.2. StateFinanceCommission

    The 13th Central Finance Commission suggests that the StatesGovernments must prescribe through an Act qualification of personseligible for appointment of the State Finance Commission (SFC).Therefore,MMLissuggestedtoprescribeaprovisionforestablishmentofpermanentSFCcell.

    4.2.2.3. NotificationwithRespecttoServiceLevels

    The 13th Central Finance Commission suggests that State Governmentmustnotifyorcauseallmunicipalitiestonotifyattheendofthefiscalyear the service standards for four service sectors (Water Supply, StormWaterDrainage,SewerageandSWM).Forasteptowardsthecomplianceofsuchreforms,MMLmustcontainthisprovision.

    4.2.2.4. HumanResourcesPolicyReform

    Servicesprovidedby localbodies forSWM,Sewage,WaterChannelsandElectricityplaysacrucialrole inmaintainingenvironmentalstandardsofcityandaswellqualityoflifeofresidents.Municipallawlooksatonlytheperformance of this function. However, themost neglected part of thisfunctionisthehealthhazardsoftheemployees,whoaredirectlyrelatedtoperform this function.Formitigatinghealthhazards to the employeesofthe Municipality dealing in the works relating to sewerage, garbagecollection,etc.Municipalityshouldprovidepropergeartoitsemployeeslike uniforms, gloves, gum boots, masks, firstaid kit etc. Even thoughhuman contact cannotbe avoided in theperformanceof these tasks, theonly minimal requirement of proper equipment and gear should be

  • 26 URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkModelMunicipalLaw,2003

    providedtoemployees.Inclusionofthisprovisionisimportanttorealizethevisionofsmart,sustainableandresponsiblecities.

    4.2.2.5. Exemptionsasincentive

    It is essential to provide for the extent of Exemption in the propertytaxation on defined conditions. Property tax exemption can be providedfor following or implementing certain desirable projects like, Greendevelopment, Rainwater harvesting, solar power installation in buildingandGreenbuildingetc.asanincentive.AspertheNUIAstudy,MunicipalActsofBiharhasnoprovisionmentioningtheexemptionsfrompropertytaxation,butmanyotherstateshavealreadyprovidedforexemptions.ItissuggestedthatMMLprovideforanysuchprovision.

    4.2.2.6. RainWaterHarvestingMandatory

    It is one of the optional reforms under JnNURM. Looking at the urbangrowth, rainwaterharvesting shouldbeamandatoryprovision inall theActstorechargegroundwaterandaugmentoverallwateravailability.Suchprovisions in the Municipal Act may ensure its application in the LocalAreaPlansandSpecialPurposePlan.ItissuggestedtoincludethisintheMMLandplaceswhereitcanbemademandatorywithinthebuildingbyelawsdependinguponenforcementcapabilitiesandlocalconditions.

    TheModelMunicipalLaw,2003 is appendedwithURL inAppendixOofVolumeIIB.

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 27

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkComparativeAnalysisOverview

    5 State Level Legal Framework ComparativeAnalysisOverview

    Urban and regional planning legislation controls the planning and developmentactivity in a State. Some states have comprehensive Town and Country Planninglegislation which provides for urban planning and development from a regionalperspective beyond the city limits and coordinated with the overall framework ofeconomicdevelopment,prioritiesandresourceavailability.SomeofthesestatesareGoa, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Nagaland, Orissa, Punjab,Rajasthan,TripuraandUttarPradesh.

    Town and Country Planning Organisation (TCPO) with the direction from MoUDconducted brainstorming session throughout the country during 2008 to 2010.Further, during the formulation of URDPFI Guidelines, various workshops wereconducted in both the studies to share knowledge on urban development practicesand development policies / strategies of respective States and recommendations /advicewereprovidedtoalltheStates.TCPOhasanalysedthestatusofT&CplanningActs of the States. An overview of the States in terms of implementation of T&CPlanning Acts in their jurisdiction is given in Table no. 5.1. This table has beenupdatedasperthelatestinformationavailableason31stJuly2013fromTCPOwithrespecttothecitieswhohavepreparedStatutoryMasterPlans.

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 28

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkComparativeAnalysisOverview

    Thispageisintentionallyleftblank.

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 29

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkComparativeAnalysisOverview

    Table5.1: ComparisonofTownandCountryPlanningActs&implementationacrossNation

    Sr.No NameofState

    WhetherTownandCountryPlanningDept.

    Exists

    WhetherT&CPActenacted

    NoofTownsasperCensus2011

    No.ofCensusTowns

    No.ofStatutoryTowns(ULBs)

    StatutoryTowns(%)

    No.ofMasterPlanApproved

    No.ofMasterPlansUnderPreparation

    TownshavingMasterPlan(%)

    1 AndhraPradesh DirectorateofTown&CountryPlanning

    AndhraPradeshTownandCountryPlanningAct,1920

    353 228 125 35 89 60 25

    2 ArunachalPradesh

    DepartmentofTown&CountryPlanning

    ArunachalPradeshUrbanandCountryPlanningAct,2007

    27 1 26 96 1 3 4

    3 Assam DirectorateofTown&CountryPlanning

    AssamTownandCountryPlanningAct,1959

    214 126 88 41 36 42 17

    4 Bihar DepartmentofTown&CountryPlanning

    BiharUrbanandRegionalPlanningandDevelopmentAct,2011

    199 60 139 70 9 20 1

    5 Chhattisgarh DepartmentofTown&CountryPlanning

    ChhattisgarhTownandCountryPlanningAct,1973

    182 14 168 92 28 64 15

    6 Goa DepartmentofTown&CountryPlanning

    GoaTownandCountryPlanningAct,1974

    70 56 14 20 13 19

    7 Gujarat DepartmentofTown&CountryPlanning

    GujaratTownPlanning&UrbanDevelopmentAct,1976

    348 153 195 56 125 14 33

  • 30 URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkComparativeAnalysisOverview

    Table5.1: ComparisonofTownandCountryPlanningActs&implementationacrossNation

    Sr.No NameofState

    WhetherTownandCountryPlanningDept.

    Exists

    WhetherT&CPActenacted

    NoofTownsasperCensus2011

    No.ofCensusTowns

    No.ofStatutoryTowns(ULBs)

    StatutoryTowns(%)

    No.ofMasterPlanApproved

    No.ofMasterPlansUnderPreparation

    TownshavingMasterPlan(%)

    8 Haryana DepartmentofTown&CountryPlanning

    HaryanaDevelopment&RegulationofUrbanAreasAct,1975.

    154 74 80 52 66 20

    9 HimachalPradesh

    DepartmentofTown&CountryPlanning

    HimachalPradeshTownandCountryPlanningAct,1970

    59 3 56 95 19 0 31

    10 Jammu&Kashmir

    DepartmentofTown&CountryPlanning

    Jammu&KashmirDevelopmentAct,1970

    122 36 86 70 2 2

    11 Jharkhand DepartmentofTown&CountryPlanning

    JharkhandTownPlanningandImprovementTrustAct,1954(adoptedfromBihar)

    228 188 40 18 5 2

    12 Karnataka DepartmentofTown&CountryPlanning

    KarnatakaTownandCountryPlanningAct,1961

    347 127 220 63 159 7 46

    13 Kerala DepartmentofTown&CountryPlanning

    KeralaTownPlanningAct,1939

    520 461 59 11 49 15 9

    14 MadhyaPradesh

    DepartmentofTown&CountryPlanning

    MadhyaPradeshNagarThathaGramNiveshNiyam,1975

    476 112 364 76 93 63 18

    15 Maharashtra DirectorateofTownPlanning&

    MaharashtraRegionalandTown

    534 278 256 48 275 51

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 31

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkComparativeAnalysisOverview

    Table5.1: ComparisonofTownandCountryPlanningActs&implementationacrossNation

    Sr.No NameofState

    WhetherTownandCountryPlanningDept.

    Exists

    WhetherT&CPActenacted

    NoofTownsasperCensus2011

    No.ofCensusTowns

    No.ofStatutoryTowns(ULBs)

    StatutoryTowns(%)

    No.ofMasterPlanApproved

    No.ofMasterPlansUnderPreparation

    TownshavingMasterPlan(%)

    Valuation PlanningAct,1966

    16 Manipur DepartmentofTownandCountryPlanning

    ManipurTownandCountryPlanningAct,1975

    51 23 28 55 19 0 37

    17 Meghalaya DirectorateofUrbanAffairs

    MeghalayaTownandCountryPlanningAct,1973

    22 12 10 45 15 4 68

    18 Mizoram DepartmentofTownandCountryPlanning

    MizoramUrban&RegionalDevelopmentAct,1990

    23 0 23 100 15 65

    19 Nagaland DepartmentofTownandCountryPlanning

    NagalandTownandCountryPlanningAct,1980

    26 7 19 73 10 1 38

    20 Orissa DepartmentofTownandCountryPlanning

    OrissatownPlanningandImprovementTrustAct,1956

    223 116 107 48 72 22 32

    21 Punjab DepartmentofTownandCountryPlanning

    PunjabRegionalTownPlanningandDevelopmentAct,1995

    217 74 143 66 32 27 6

    22 Rajasthan DepartmentofTownandCountryPlanning

    RajasthanUrbanImprovementAct,1959

    297 112 185 62 183 46 62

    23 Sikkim NoindependentTownandCountryPlanning

    TheSikkimUrbanandRegionalPlanningand

    9 1 8 89 4 17 44

  • 32 URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkComparativeAnalysisOverview

    Table5.1: ComparisonofTownandCountryPlanningActs&implementationacrossNation

    Sr.No NameofState

    WhetherTownandCountryPlanningDept.

    Exists

    WhetherT&CPActenacted

    NoofTownsasperCensus2011

    No.ofCensusTowns

    No.ofStatutoryTowns(ULBs)

    StatutoryTowns(%)

    No.ofMasterPlanApproved

    No.ofMasterPlansUnderPreparation

    TownshavingMasterPlan(%)

    Department,howeverTownPlanningcellexistsunderUrbanDevelopmentandHousing

    DevelopmentAct,1998

    24 TamilNadu DepartmentofTownandCountryPlanning

    TamilNaduTownandCountryPlanningAct,1971

    1097 376 721 66 123 50 11

    25 Tripura DepartmentofTownandCountryPlanning

    TripuraTownandCountryPlanningAct,1975

    42 26 16 38 13 2

    26 UttarPradesh DepartmentofTownandCountryPlanning

    UttarPradeshUrbanPlanningandDevelopmentAct,1973

    915 267 648 71 207 25 23

    27 Uttarakhand DepartmentofTownandCountryPlanning

    UttarakhandUrbanPlanningandDevelopmentAct,1973

    115 41 74 64 42 0 37

    28 WestBengal TownandCountryPlanningCellfunctioningunderUrbanDevelopmentDepartment

    WestBengalTownandCountry(PlanningandDevelopment)Act,1979

    909 780 129 14 126 85 5

    29 A&NIslands. NoindependentTownandCountry

    Andaman&NicobarTownand

    5 4 1 20 1 Notreported 20

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 33

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkComparativeAnalysisOverview

    Table5.1: ComparisonofTownandCountryPlanningActs&implementationacrossNation

    Sr.No NameofState

    WhetherTownandCountryPlanningDept.

    Exists

    WhetherT&CPActenacted

    NoofTownsasperCensus2011

    No.ofCensusTowns

    No.ofStatutoryTowns(ULBs)

    StatutoryTowns(%)

    No.ofMasterPlanApproved

    No.ofMasterPlansUnderPreparation

    TownshavingMasterPlan(%)

    PlanningDepartmentexistsasondate.AsmallTownandCountryPlanningunitisworkingundertheCommcumSecy(PWD/UD)&ChiefEngraspartofAPWD.

    CountryPlanningRegulations,1994

    30 Chandigarh DepartmentofUrbanPlanning

    TheCapitalofPunjab(DevelopmentandRegulation)Act,1952

    6 5 1 17 2 0

    31 Delhi TownPlanningDepartment,MCD

    DelhiDevelopmentAct,1957

    113 110 3 3 1 0 1

    32 Dadra&NagarHaveli

    DepartmentofTownandCountryPlanning

    Dadra&NagarHaveliTownandCountryPlanningAct,1974

    6 5 1 17 6 0 100

    33 Daman&Diu DepartmentofTownandCountryPlanning

    Daman&DiuTownandCountryPlanningAct,1974

    8 6 2 25 1 0 13

  • 34 URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkComparativeAnalysisOverview

    Table5.1: ComparisonofTownandCountryPlanningActs&implementationacrossNation

    Sr.No NameofState

    WhetherTownandCountryPlanningDept.

    Exists

    WhetherT&CPActenacted

    NoofTownsasperCensus2011

    No.ofCensusTowns

    No.ofStatutoryTowns(ULBs)

    StatutoryTowns(%)

    No.ofMasterPlanApproved

    No.ofMasterPlansUnderPreparation

    TownshavingMasterPlan(%)

    34 Lakshadweep NoTownandCountryPlanningDepartment,HowevertheworksarehandedbyPWD

    Yettobeenacted 6 6 0 0 0

    35 Puducherry DepartmentofTownandCountryPlanning

    PuducherryTownandCountryPlanningAct,1969

    10 4 6 60 4 0 40

    GrandTotal 7933 3892 4041 51 1843 567 23

    Source:TCPO,MoUD2011

    As reflected in table above, barring UT of Lakshadweep, all States and UTs of India have Town and Country Planning Acts andDepartments. Ithasbeennoticed thatall thenewStates includingChhattisgarh, JharkhandandUttarakhandhave theirownTownandCountryPlanningActs.However,theseActsaresameasenactedbytheiroriginalStatefromwheretheywerebifurcated.

    Thereare fewStateswhichhaveenactedorare inprocess toenactnew lawswithrespect toUrbanDevelopmentandTownPlanning.BiharhasenactedBiharUrbanPlanningandDevelopmentAct,2012.

    BasedontheunderstandingfromexistingUDPFIguidelines,itisessentialtoidentifygapsandbestpracticeswhichareadoptedbyStateswithrespecttoUrbanandRegionalDevelopment.ComparisonofsomeoftheStatesascasestudieshasbeenundertakenforthereviewT&CPActsofcountry.TheStateshavebeenchoseninsuchamannersothatitcoversalmostalltheregion,i.e.North,West,SouthandEast,ofthecountry.Moreover,forreviewpurpose,variousparameterssuchasRegionalDevelopment,LandAcquisitionMechanism,affirmationwith74thCAA,institutionalsetupsareconsidered.TheseStatesare:

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 35

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkComparativeAnalysisOverview

    North:HimachalPradesh South:TamilNaduandKarnataka East:BiharandMizoram West:MaharashtraandGujarat

    Table5.2: ComparisonofTownandCountryPlanningActsofsevenStates

    S.No. Criteria TamilNadu KarnatakaHimachalPradesh Mizoram Bihar Maharashtra Gujarat

    1 StatePlanningCommittee/Board/Authority

    ProvisionofStatePlanningboard

    ProvisionofStatePlanningBoard

    DirectorateofTownandCountryPlanning,headedbytheDirector,appointedbyState

    MizoramUrbanPlanningandDevelopmentBoard/committee

    BiharUrbanPlanningandDevelopmentBoardTheGovernmentmayalsoconstituteUrbanArtsandHeritageCommission

    NoprovisionforStateLevelPlanningCommitteeorBoardorAuthority.

    NoprovisionforStateLevelPlanningCommitteeorBoardorAuthority.

    2 FunctionsOfStatePlanningBoard

    Toguide,directandassisttheplanningauthorities AdvisetheStateGovernmentonplanningmatters DirectthepreparationofDevelopmentPlansbyPlanningAuthorities PrepareandfurnishreportsrelatingtotheworkingT&CAct

    NotApplicable NotIllustrated ToprepareandenforceIntegratedInterimDevelopmentPlan,DistrictorRegionalDevelopmentPlan,RuralorSectoralPlan,UrbanDevelopmentPlanandAction ToprepareDevelopmentScheme ToprepareRegionaland

    Toguide,directandassistthePlanningAuthority AdviseonthedelineationofthePlanningArea(s)anddirectthepreparationofDevelopmentPlan Undertake,assistandadviseonthecoordinationofplanningandimplementationofphysicaldevelopmentprogrammes Directthe

    NotApplicable NotApplicable

  • 36 URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkComparativeAnalysisOverview

    Table5.2: ComparisonofTownandCountryPlanningActsofsevenStates

    S.No. Criteria TamilNadu KarnatakaHimachalPradesh Mizoram Bihar Maharashtra Gujarat

    RuralCentreDevelopmentPlanandintegratingUrbanandRuralDevelopmentschemesandDevelopmentPlanspreparedbytheMunicipalitiesorVillageCouncilsoranyLocalauthorityandassisttheStateGovernmenttocoordinatedevelopmentactivitiesatalllevelswithinthePlanningAreaorRegion

    preparationsofoneormoreRegionalDevelopmentPlan,RegionalTransportationPlans,TownDevelopmentPlans DirectthepreparationsofoneormoreregionalnaturalresourcesandenvironmentalConservationPlans

    3 MetropolitanDevelopment/PlanningAuthority/Committee

    EstablishmentofChennaiMetropolitanDevelopmentAuthority

    FunctionsandPowers:

    ToprepareaMasterPlanoradetailed

    SeparateProvisioninBangaloreMetropolitanRegionDevelopmentAuthorityAct,1985

    Noprovisiontoconstitute

    NoprovisiontoconstituteMPC

    TheactdoesnthaveprovisionforconstitutingtheMetropolitanPlanningAuthorityorCommittee,howeveritdefinesthefunctionofMPCtoprepareDevelopmentPlanforMetropolitanArea

    Noprovision,howeveraseparateactmakesmandatorytoconstituteMumbaiMetropolitanRegionalDevelopmentAuthorityunder

    Noprovisiontoconstitute

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 37

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkComparativeAnalysisOverview

    Table5.2: ComparisonofTownandCountryPlanningActsofsevenStates

    S.No. Criteria TamilNadu KarnatakaHimachalPradesh Mizoram Bihar Maharashtra Gujarat

    DevelopmentPlanoranewTownDevelopmentPlan ToprepareanewTownDevelopmentPlanfortheareaconcernedtosecurethelayingoutanddevelopmentofthenewtowninaccordancewiththenewTownDevelopmentPlan

    BombayMetropolitanRegionDevelopmentAuthorityAct,1974

    4 PlanningArea RegionalPlanningareabasedonPopulationandtypeofdevelopment LocalPlanningAreabasedonPopulationandtypeofdevelopmentandprovisioninRegionalPlan NewTownAreabasedonPopulationand

    StatehasgotpowertodeclareanyareaintheStatetobeaLocalPlanningArea.

    StatetodeclarePlanningarea

    StategovernmentinconsultationwithBoardorCommitteemaydeclarethelimitofTownorUrbanareaintheState

    StateonadviceofBoardmaydeclareorwithdrawtheregionsorareas,includingaMetropolitanAreaorareafordevelopmentofnewtownsintheStatetobeaPlanningArea

    Criteriafordelineationofplanningareaisnotdescribed

    DevelopmentareaandUrbanDevelopmentareatobedeclaredbyStateGovernment

  • 38 URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkComparativeAnalysisOverview

    Table5.2: ComparisonofTownandCountryPlanningActsofsevenStates

    S.No. Criteria TamilNadu KarnatakaHimachalPradesh Mizoram Bihar Maharashtra Gujarat

    typeofdevelopmentandprovisionasnewtowninRegionalPlan

    5 PlanningAuthorities

    PlanningAuthoritiestobeconstitutedatdifferentlevelas: TheRegionalPlanningAuthority TheLocalPlanningAuthority TheNewTownDevelopmentAuthority

    TheStateGovernmentinconsultationwiththeBoardmayconstitutePlanningAuthorityafterdeclarationofplanningarea

    TownandCountryPlanningAuthoritytoconstitutebytheState SpecialAreaDevelopmentAuthoritytobeestablishedforspecialareasasidentifiedbyStateorinRegionalPlan

    DistrictPlanningandDevelopmentCommittee CityorTownPlanningandDevelopmentCommittee

    StatetoconstitutethePlanningAuthorityanditshallbeknownbysuchnameastheGovernmentmaydetermine

    RegionalPlanningBoard SpecialPlanningAuthority NewTownDevelopmentAuthority

    AreaDevelopmentAuthority UrbanDevelopmentAuthority

    6 FunctionandpowersofPlanningAuthority

    TheRegionalPlanningAuthorityto: carryoutasurveyandpreparereportsonthesurveys prepareanexistinglandusemap

    PlanningAuthority(asmentionedinsectionabove)PreparationofamapshowingpresentlanduseTheplanningauthorityto: Prepare

    SpecialAreaDevelopmentAuthority ToprepareDevelopmentPlanforthespecialarea; toimplementtheDevelopmentPlan

    FunctionandpowersofPlanningAuthorityorboardaredescribed(sameasinrow2)

    PlanningAuthorityshallcarryoutsuchfunctionsandexercisesuchpowersasmaybeprescribedbytheRules PlanningAuthoritymaycarryoutorcausetobecarriedoutsurveysofitsPlanningAreaandto

    RegionalPlanningBoardto: carryoutasurveyoftheregion,andpreparereportsonthesurveyssocarriedout preparean

    AreaDevelopmentAuthoritytoundertake: PreparationofDevelopmentPlans preparationofTownPlanning

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 39

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkComparativeAnalysisOverview

    Table5.2: ComparisonofTownandCountryPlanningActsofsevenStates

    S.No. Criteria TamilNadu KarnatakaHimachalPradesh Mizoram Bihar Maharashtra Gujarat

    LocalPlanningAuthorityto:

    carryoutasurveyoftheLocalPlanningArea preparereportsonthesurveys prepareaMasterPlanandaDetailedDevelopmentPlan

    NewTownDevelopmentAuthorityto:

    prepareanewTownDevelopmentPlan carryoutbuildingandotheroperations

    OutlineDevelopmentPlanpriortothepreparationofMasterPlan CarryoutthesurveyassoonastheplanningareadeclaresPreparationofMasterPlan. PrepareTownPlanningSchemeImplementationofplan,OncetheMasterPlanisapprovedbytheState,

    toprovideforthemunicipalmanagementofthespecial tootherwiseperformallsuchfunctionswithregardtothespecialareaasspecifiedbyStateGovernmentfromtimetotime.

    preparereportorreportsofsuchsurveys EveryplanningauthoritywillprepareapresentLandUseMapandaLandUseRegister PlanningAuthoritytoprepareaDevelopmentPlanafterdeclarationofPlanningArea

    existinglandusemapforthepurposeofpreparingaRegionalPlan; prepareaRegionalplan

    SpecialPlanningAuthorityto:

    carryoutasurveyandprepareanexistinglandusemapofthearea,andprepareandpublishthedraftproposalsforthelands

    SchemestocarryoutsurveysinordertoprepareDevelopmentPlans controlthedevelopmentactivities

    UrbanDevelopmentAuthoritytoundertake:

    PreparationofDevelopmentPlans preparationofTownPlanningSchemes carryoutsurveysinordertoprepareDevelopmentPlans controlthedevelopmentactivities guide,direct

  • 40 URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkComparativeAnalysisOverview

    Table5.2: ComparisonofTownandCountryPlanningActsofsevenStates

    S.No. Criteria TamilNadu KarnatakaHimachalPradesh Mizoram Bihar Maharashtra Gujarat

    andassistthelocalauthorities

    7 PreparationofPlans

    Regional MasterPlan NewTownDevelopmentPlan DetailedDevelopmentplan

    MasterPlan RegionalPlan DevelopmentPlanandSectoralPlan

    DistrictorRegionalDevelopmentPlan, UrbanDevelopmentPlan, RuralorSectoralPlan, ActionPlan

    DevelopmentPlan MetropolitanareaDevelopmentplan

    RegionalPlans DevelopmentPlan PreparationofDevelopmentPlanforadditionalarea

    DevelopmentPlan

    8 Scope/Objectives/ContentsofPlans

    Objectivesofeachtypeofplanisdefined

    ContentsofMasterPlanareelaborated

    ContentsofDevelopmentPlanandSectoralPlanareelaborated

    Contentsofeachtypeofplanasmentionedinactareelaborated

    ScopeandContentsofDevelopmentPlanareillustrated

    ContentsofRegionalPlanandDevelopmentPlanareelaborated

    ContentsforDraftDevelopmentPlanareelaborated

    9 Affirmationwith74thAmendmentAct

    DPCandMPCarenotincorporated

    DPCandMPCarenotincorporated

    DPCandMPCarenotincorporated,

    StatetoconstituteDistrictPlanningandDevelopmentCommitteeandCityorTownPlanningandDevelopmentCommittee.ChairmanofthecommitteetobeappointedbyStatewhereasothermemberstobe

    NoprovisionforconstitutingDPCandMPC.HoweveritelaboratessomefunctionsofMPC

    NoprovisionforDPCandMPC.

    NoprovisionforMPCandDPC

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 41

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkComparativeAnalysisOverview

    Table5.2: ComparisonofTownandCountryPlanningActsofsevenStates

    S.No. Criteria TamilNadu KarnatakaHimachalPradesh Mizoram Bihar Maharashtra Gujarat

    selectedatdistrictlevelandcitylevelincompliancewiththeAct.

    10 ProvisionforRegionalPlanning

    ProvisionofRegionalPlanningtobedonebyRegionalPlanningAuthority

    NoprovisionforRegionalPlanning

    ProvisionforpreparationofRegionalPlan

    ProvisionforpreparationofDistrictorRegionalPlan

    TheActdoesnthavespecificprovisionforRegionalDevelopmentPlans,howeveritdefinesbasicscopeofDevelopmentPlanswhichalsoincludeRegionalPlans

    TheActhasprovisionforRegionalPlanningBoardandelaboratesitsfunctionwithrespecttoregionaldevelopment

    NoprovisionforRegionalPlanning.ThoughtheActprovidesforDevelopmentAreahoweveritdoesnotelaborateonthespatialextentandcriteriafordeclarationofsucharea.

    11 TownPlanning/DevelopmentScheme

    DetailedTownPlanningSchemespreparedundertheTamilNaduTownPlanningAct,1920,

    PlanningAuthority,forthepurposeofimplementingtheproposals,maymakeoneormoretownplanningschemesfortheareawithinitsjurisdiction

    TheTownandCountryDevelopmentAuthoritymay,atanytime,declareitsintentiontoprepareatownDevelopmentSchemeandprovisionsaredefinetoincorporateinTownPlanning

    ForthepurposeofimplementingtheproposalscontainedintheDevelopmentPlan,prepareoneormoreDevelopmentSchemeforfiveyearsorforoneyear.DevelopmentSchemetobe

    TheplanningauthoritymayinviteareaDevelopmentSchemesfromdevelopers.AnAreaDevelopmentSchememaybemadeinrespectofanylandwhichis:(a)intheprocessofdevelopment,(b)likelytobeusedforanydevelopmentincludingbuilding

    APlanningAuthoritymayforthepurposeofimplementingtheproposalsinthefinalDevelopmentPlan,prepareoneormoreTownPlanningSchemesfortheareawithinitsjurisdiction.Contentsofdraft

    AppropriateauthoritymaymakeoneormoreTownPlanningSchemefortherespectivedevelopmentarea.TownPlanningSchememaybemadeinrespectofany

  • 42 URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkComparativeAnalysisOverview

    Table5.2: ComparisonofTownandCountryPlanningActsofsevenStates

    S.No. Criteria TamilNadu KarnatakaHimachalPradesh Mizoram Bihar Maharashtra Gujaratscheme.Statehaspowertogivedirectionstoframe/modifyorrevokethescheme

    developedinrespectof:(a)inthecourseofdevelopment,(b)likelytobeusedforbuildingpurposesor(c)alreadybuiltup.

    purposes,or(c)alreadybuiltupon.

    schemeiselaborated

    landinthecourseofdevelopment,likelytobeusedforbuildingpurposesandalreadybuiltupon.Contentofdraftschemearedefinedintheact.

    12 PeriodicRevisionofPlans

    ProvisionofreviewingtheRegionalPlanoncein10yearsandtheMasterPlanmaybereviewedonceinin5years.

    AtleastonceineverytenyearsfromthedateonwhichtheMasterPlanhascomeintoforce

    ProvisionforreviewthePlansatanytime;howeverminimumtimeframehasnotprovided.

    DistrictorRegionalDevelopmentPlanshallbereviewedatleastonceinevery10yearswhereas,InterimDevelopmentPlan,UrbanDevelopmentPlanandRuralorSectorPlanshallbereviewedatleastonceinevery5years

    Noprovision TheStateGovernmentcanreviseatanytimeafteraRegionalplanhascomeintooperation,butnotearlierthantenyears TherevisionshallbeatleastonceintwentyyearsfromthedateonwhichaDevelopmentPlanhascomeintooperation,

    Atleastonceintenyears. AreaDevelopmentAuthorityshallreviseDevelopmentPlan

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 43

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkComparativeAnalysisOverview

    Table5.2: ComparisonofTownandCountryPlanningActsofsevenStates

    S.No. Criteria TamilNadu KarnatakaHimachalPradesh Mizoram Bihar Maharashtra Gujarat

    13 LandAssembly/Mechanism/Acquisition

    PowertoacquirelandundertheLandAcquisitionAct Acquisitionoflandbyagreement,howeverifthevalueofsuchlandexceedsfiftythousandrupees,appropriatePlanningAuthorityshallnotenterintosuchagreementwithoutpreviousapprovaloftheGovernment

    PowertoacquirelandundertheLandAcquisitionActor Acquisitionoflandbyagreement,

    PowertoacquirelandundertheLandAcquisitionActor Acquisitionoflandbyagreement,

    Landcanbeacquiredbyfollowingways:

    compulsorily; byagreement;or bytakinganapplicationtothecollectorforacquiringsuchlandundertheLandAcquisitionAct,1894

    AcquisitionofLandbyWayof

    TransferableDevelopmentRight AccommodationReservation PurchaseofLandbywayofNegotiatedSettlement PowertoAcquirelandundertheLandAcquisitionAct,1894oranyotherLandAcquisitionAct

    AcquisitionofLandbyWayof

    TransferableDevelopmentRight AccommodationReservation PurchaseofLandbywayofNegotiatedSettlementPowertoAcquirelandundertheLandAcquisitionAct,1894oranyotherLandAcquisitionAct

    AcquisitionofLandeitherbyagreementorUnderLandAcquisitionAct1894byAreaDevelopmentAuthority

    Source:RespectiveActs

  • 44 URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkComparativeAnalysisOverview

    Thispageisintentionallyleftblank.

  • URDPFIGuidelines,2014.VolumeIIA.MinistryofUrbanDevelopment 45

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkComparativeAnalysisOverview

    VariouscriteriaareidentifiedformakingthecomparisonsofT&CPActoftheStates.IthasbeenobservedinthetableabovethatthereisnoprovisionofconstitutingStatelevelPlanningBoardorCommittee in theStatesofGujaratandMaharashtra.But inBihar, the recently enacted Urban Planning and Development Act in 2012 givesprovision to constituteUrban Planning andDevelopment Board at State level. ThisActalsorecommendsconstitutingtheUrbanArtsandHeritageCommissioninorderto (a) preserve and conserve archaeological and historical sites, (b) restore andconserve urban design in planning area. Karnataka and Himachal Pradesh haveprovisionofconstitutingtheStateLevelPlanningBoards;howeverfunctionsoftheseboardsarenotspecifiedintheirrespectiveT&CPActs.

    TheStatemaynotifyPlanningAreainconsultationwithPlanningBoards.However,inmanyStatessuchasKarnataka,HimachalPradesh,MaharashtraandGujarat,theStateGovernmentwithoutanyconsultationwith thePlanningBoardscannotifyPlanningorDevelopmentAreafortheregion.TamilNaduistheonlyStatewhichelaboratesthecriteria for delineating the Planning Boundary whereas other States have notconsideredanysuchcriteriaintheirrespectiveActs.

    TheroleofPlanningBoardissignificantforconstitutingthePlanningAuthoritiesforNotifiedPlanningArea. Ithasbeenobserved thateveryStatehas itsownhierarchyfor constituting Planning authorities / Committees for the planning area. States ofTamil Nadu andMaharashtra have a provision to constitute the Regional PlanningAuthority,whereasinGujarat,AreaDevelopmentAuthorityandUrbanDevelopmentAuthorityaretobeconstitutedfordevelopmentofsettlements.Though,theextentofDevelopment Area is not defined in the Gujarat TP&UD Act which may createconfusion in deciding the regions boundary. The constitution of District PlanningCommittee(DPC) isalmost leftbyeveryStateexceptMizoram.TheMizoramUrbanandRegionalDevelopmentAct,makesmandatorytoconstituteDPCandCityorTownPlanning Committee in accordance with 74th CAA, however function and power ofDPCarenotspecified.MizoramUrbanandRegionalDevelopmentAct,haveprovisionfor constituting Local Authorities such as Village Councils and Municipalities toparticipateinplanningprocess.

    Onthesameline,TamilNadu,KarnatakaandMaharashtrahavealsomadeaprovisionwith respect to constitution of Metropolitan Development Authority. However thisprovisionislimitedtoChennai,BangaloreandMumbai.AllotherMetropolitancitiesin theseStatessuchasPune,NagpurandMangaloreetceterahavebeen ignored. IthasbeennoticedthatStatessuchasMaharashtraandHimachalPradeshhavespecialprovision to constitute Special Area Development/Planning Authority in order todevelopNotifiedArea.

    In order to prepare Plans at different levels,most of the States have provision forDevelopmentPlanorMasterPlanwhichistobedevelopedforNotifiedPlanningArea,

  • 46 URDPFIGuidelines,2014. Volume IIA. MinistryofUrbanDevelopment

    StateLevelLegalFrameworkComparativeAnalysis

    whereasTamilNaduandMaharashtrahavespecificprovisiontoformulateRegionalPlansinidentifiedregion.

    TownPlanningorDevelopmentscheme isan important tool todevelop land;everyStatehasmadeprovisiontodevelopPlanning/DevelopmentScheme.Landacquisitionis an important aspect for implementation of plans. States empowers PlanningAuthorities through T&CP Acts to acquire land, however mechanism for landacquisitionvaryamongst States. In everyState, landacquisition ismentioned tobeeither as per Land Acquisition Act, 1894 or through agreement with the owner.MaharashtraandBiharhaveadditionalmechanismi.e.TownPlanningSchemesandTransferofDevelopmentRighttoacquirelandfordevelopmentpurposes.

    5.1. Maharashtra

    InMaharashtra,TownPlanningisastatutoryfunctionofalltheMunicipalAuthoritieseven before the Constitution (74th) Amendment Act. In view of this, no separateprovisionwasconsiderednecessarybytheStateGovernmenttoamendthe1966Act.ThisAct,amendedupto5thAugust1992wasconsideredacomprehensiveAct.TheAct provided that the Development Plan prepared by Planning Authority shallindicatethemanneroflanduse,allocationoflandforvariouspurposes,andprescribethe time period for steps in the plan preparation process with extended time ifrequired.

    TheMaharashtra Regional and Town Planning (MRTP) Act has given emphasis onRegional Planning.