Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Unmanned AircraftRoadmap
Cleared for Open Publication11-S-1201
Overview
• Current UAS Status
• Acquisition Challenges
• Vision and Roadmap– Interoperability – Airspace Integration– Unmanned Systems Roadmap
• Summary
2
DoD UAS Flight Hours (By Department, By Fiscal Year)
As of September 30, 2011
050000
100000150000200000250000300000350000400000450000500000550000600000650000700000
AIR FORCE ARMY NAVY & USMC
Flight Hours
Does not include Group 1 UAS
3
6225 916 63 312 12245
384 199 16 8 24 710
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Rave
n -R
Q-1
1
WA
SP
Pum
a
gMA
V -R
Q-1
6
Scan
Eag
le
Hun
ter -
MQ
-5
Shad
ow -R
Q-7
Pred
ator
/Sky
War
rior
Fire
Sco
ut -
MQ
-8
A16
0T H
umm
ingb
ird
Glo
bal H
awk
-RQ
-4
Reap
er -
MQ
-9
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5
Tota
l DoD
Unm
anne
d A
ircr
aft
DoD Unmanned Aircraft InventoryR
aven
–R
Q-1
1
WAS
P
Pum
a
gMAV
–R
Q-1
6*
Scan
Eag
le
Hun
ter –
MQ
-5*
Shad
ow –
RQ
-7*
Pred
ator
*/ G
ray
Eagl
e
Fire
Sco
ut –
MQ
-8
A160
Hum
min
gbird
Glo
bal H
awk
–R
Q-4
Rea
per –
MQ
-9
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5
Unmanned Aircraft by Grouping
* Not
in P
rodu
ctio
n
~7500 ~120 ~430 ~225 ~100
4
DoD Acquisition Challenges
• Acquisition Efficiencies & Affordability
• Interoperability
• Airspace Access
• Frequency Spectrum
• Cost Control
• Acquisition Performance
• Technology Transition
• Sustainment Planning
• Open Business Model
Our program managers should be scrutinizing every element of program costs, assessing whether each element can be reduced relative to the year before, challenging learning curves, dissecting overheads and indirect costs, and targeting cost reduction with profit incentives - in short, executing to what the program should cost.
Under Secretary of Defense (AT&L) Memo to Acquisition Professionals, Better Buying Power, Sept 2010
Reuse verses Start New
5
A
InteroperabilityAutonomy
Communications
Airspace Integration
Training
Propulsion & Power
Manned –Unmanned
Teaming
FarMedium
Near
Meeting the ChallengesUnmanned System Roadmap
Policy& TrustWeaponization Service
Oriented Architecture
AutonomyInterop.
Security & SpectrumDeconfliction
BandwidthEfficiencies
StandardsTTPs &CONOPs
HumanSystemInterface
SimulationFidelity
COA &Policy
Sense &Avoid
Dynamic Ops
ExtremeEndurance
OpticalComms
CrossDomain
Sense &Adapt
FuelCell
High Efficiency
ScalableTransparentControl
6
Introduction/Vision
Vision: Seamless integration of diverse unmanned capabilities that provide flexible options for Joint Warfighters while exploiting the inherent advantages of unmanned technologies, including persistence, size, speed, maneuverability, and reduced risk to human life. DoD envisions unmanned systems seamlessly operating with manned systems while gradually reducing the degree of human control and decision making required for the unmanned portion of the force structure.
Roadmap &Catalog: https://extranet.acq.osd.mil/uwir/ (CAC Protected)Roadmap: http://www.acq.osd.mil/sts/organization/uw.shtml
7
OSD is Improving Interoperability and Affordabilityof UAS GCSs Through Open Business Processes
Feb. 2009, OUSD (AT&L) Mandates Common GCS Architecture
Sept. 2010, OUSD (AT&L), Mandates More Competition
Mar. 2011, UCS Publishes Common GCS Architecture Vol. 1
Mar. 2011, GCS Architecture Vol. 2 Released
Jun. 2011, Open Bus
Model Released
1
2
3
4
5
OSD has developed a common architecture and designed an open business model to meet its objectives
8
OA Acquisition Objectives
To remove the traditional barriers to Effective Competition in the UASControl Segment and provide market access to a broad, heterogeneousindustrial base of software providers in an agile acquisition and integrationenvironment.
9
OSD (AT&L)
Interfaces, Data Models, and Documentation
Navy
Air Force
Industry
Chartered by Joint UAS Task Force Interoperability IPT Technical SocietySAE Operating Rules per Public Law 104-113 (NTTAA) and MB Circular A-119
Program of Work and Operating Rules in DoDAF AV-1UCS WG includes all PoR Use Cases for development of UAS Standard
Functional Service Decomposition
UCS Vision
10
Army
Governance Process
Best-of-Breed GCSwith competed services
and maintainability
Clo
sed
or U
ncom
mon
Clo
sed
or U
ncom
mon
Clo
sed
or U
ncom
mon
Ope
n M
essa
ge S
et
Ope
n M
essa
ge S
et
Standards-based Interconnection..
Acquisition Opportunities
(Silos of excellence)
11
Target Specific Module
Ope
n M
essa
ge S
et
Target Specific Module
Target Specific Module
(Open, Competitive Business Approach)
Summary
• Unmanned Warfare has had continuous scrutiny for portfolio efficiencies• Congress/GAO• USD(AT&L)• UAS Task Force
• Significant efforts is underway within OSD, AT&L focusing on affordability • “Should Cost” “Will Cost” of UAS systems• Open Business Model (OBM) vision for UAS GCSs• Open Architecture – Reuse• Remove Redundancy across Service
Certification • Reuse verse Start New
12
Backups
13
Backups
DoD Unmanned Systems Roadmap
14
Coordinated 2011-2036 Vision for Services and Industry
2011-2036 Edition planned for 3rd Qtr FY11
Airspace Integration
• Methodology: incremental approach to providing critical access to a given operations profile prior to implementing a full dynamic operations solution.
• Immediate focus: Near-term mission-critical access while simultaneously working toward far-term routine NAS access
Dynamic Operations
Terminal Area Operations
Vertical Transit Operations
Line-of-Sight Operations
Operating Areas
Lateral Transit Operations
Vision: Ensure unmanned aircraft have routine access to the appropriate airspace necessary to meet mission requirements 15
UCS Reference Architecture A
rchitecture Governance
Information (cross cutting concerns)
Quality of S
ervice (QoS
)
Integration
Software Components
UAS Business Processes
Domain User Interfaces (GUI/ HCIs)
Vehicle Control System SupportMission ControlMission Planning Mission Assessment
UCSDomain Services
System Status
Sensor Status
Sensor Control
Vehicle Control
Vehicle Mgmt
Current Weather
Collection Planning
Route Planning
WeaponPlanning
Mission & Task Planning
Weapon Status
Blue Force Tracker Fusion
ExploitProduct
Product QC
Product Output
Coordination
Mission Assessment
Audio CommLink 16
Comms Mgmt
Dept/ApprControl
Chat
ProductProcessing
NetworkMgmt
Dynamic Targeting
BattlespaceAwareness
CommLink Mgmt
AirfieldPlanning
JMPS
Training
LMSThreat
Planning
Mission Briefing
Mission Debriefing
CommsPlanning
Dynamic Re -planning
ACG Monitoring
Dynamic WeaponsPlanning
DynamicThreatMgmt
LMS
System Health,Main
Mission Control Training
SOA Infrastructure & Operational Systems
Airfield PlanningPublish /
SubscribeRequest / Response
LinuxMessaging-Oriented Middleware
(MOM)
Operating Systems
NCES
Collaboration People Discovery
ServiceDiscovery
ContentDiscovery
MetaDataDiscovery
ESB Mgmt Mediation/ESB
Messaging ContentDelivery
ServiceSecurity
Information Management
16
17
UCS-WG ACTIVITIESUNCLASSIFIED
OUSD/AT&L ADM Published
UCS Architecturev0.5
Released
UCS ArchV1.0
Released
UCS ArchV2.0 to BeReleased
UCSIndustry
Days
UCS ArchV2.1 to BeReleased
IWPDemo
UCS ArchV2.0
Kickoff
Feb 2009 May 2009 Dec 2009 Jun 2010 Aug 2010 Nov 2010
pkg Blue Force SA Serv ice
«servicePoint» Blue Force SA«requestPoint» Responses«service»
Blue Force SA Sv c
«servicePoint» Blue Force SA«requestPoint» Responses
BlueForceSARequests
BlueForceSAResponses BlueForceSARequests
BlueForceSAResponsespkg Blue Force
«servicePoint»Blue Force SA «requestPoint» Translate
«Domain»Blue Force
«servicePoint»Blue Force SA «requestPoint» Translate
BlueForceSARequestsBlueForceSAResponses
BlueForceSARequests
BlueForceSAResponses
AdditionalOSD Funding
HMI Study Plan kickoff
AdditionalExperimentswith 3rd party
ImplementationStructuring
Interfaces & Models for all PoR
Migration Plan for
PoRUCS Industry
Brief
Structuring Industry
2009Concept
Exploration
Dec 2009Version 0.5Incl. AV-1
June 2011Version 2.0
Jan 2012Version 2.1
Architecture Modeling (Funded)
June 2010Version 1.0
Nov 2010IWP DemoMar 2011JSIL Demo
Architecture Definition & Demonstration
Jan 2011 May 2011 July 2011 Sept 2011 Nov 2011 Jan 2012
Enduring Organization