21
University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education 3211 Providence Drive Anchorage, Alaska 99508-8269 EDET A637, The Design of e-Learning 3 Credits, Spring 2010 Web-based course CRN: 38218 Mondays 6pm to 8pm Elluminate Instructor: G. Andy Page, Ph.D. "Learning occurs in the mind, independent of time and place." (Plato, 428-348 BC, The Greek Anthology (1906), 111, 197) Physical Office Hours: Wednesdays, 11am to noon. Virtual Office Hours: Anytime you see a green available Skype icon. I am available to work with you synchronously and privately. I have set up an Elluminate session in Blackboard (e- Live!) in the COURSE MATERIALS section entitled “Perpetual Elluminate Session” as a means to communicate. Also, there are numerous ways to contact me for individual consultation and undivided attention. IMPORTANT: Because of the rapidly changing pace of technology there will be, in all likelihood, there will be changes to the syllabus. This will help me meet your learning needs and I will publish these changes in the course Blackboard Announcements. **UAA Technology Outage Protocol** The UAA Provost recommends and encourages faculty to create a “Technology Outage Protocol”. http://www.uaa.alaska.edu/academicaffairs/ Due to the unreliable nature of Elluminate, and in the event you are unable to connect to Elluminate or lose your Elluminate connection, please follow the following steps: Scenario A: Unable in connect to E-Live Scenario B: Lose connectivity while in E-Live Send me an instant message through SKYPE. Check your Internet connection by opening a new browser. If the browser opens to a new webpage. If this doesn’t work call my cell phone 907.223.0924 If you are not able to reconnect in Elive, instant message me in Skype or call me on my emergency cell 907.223.0924. If Elive is not operational then class is cancelled. I will send out an email about how to proceed within 24 hours. If Elive is not operational in 15 minutes then class is cancelled. I will send out an email about how to proceed within 24 hours. Office Location: PSB 229G

University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education

3211 Providence Drive Anchorage Alaska 99508-8269

EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning

3 Credits Spring 2010 Web-based course

CRN 38218 Mondays 6pm to 8pm Elluminate

Instructor G Andy Page PhD

Learning occurs in the mind independent of time and place (Plato 428-348 BC The Greek Anthology (1906) 111 197)

Physical Office Hours Wednesdays 11am to noon Virtual Office Hours Anytime you see a green available Skype icon I am available to work with you synchronously and privately I have set up an Elluminate session in Blackboard (e-Live) in the COURSE MATERIALS section entitled ldquoPerpetual Elluminate Sessionrdquo as a means to communicate Also there are numerous ways to contact me for individual consultation and undivided attention IMPORTANT Because of the rapidly changing pace of technology there will be in all likelihood there will be changes to the syllabus This will help me meet your learning needs and I will publish these changes in the course Blackboard Announcements

UAA Technology Outage Protocol

The UAA Provost recommends and encourages faculty to create a ldquoTechnology Outage Protocolrdquo httpwwwuaaalaskaeduacademicaffairs

Due to the unreliable nature of Elluminate and in the event you are unable to connect to Elluminate or lose your Elluminate connection please follow the following steps

Scenario A Unable in connect to E-Live Scenario B Lose connectivity while in E-Live Send me an instant message through SKYPE

Check your Internet connection by opening a new browser If the browser opens to a new webpage

If this doesnrsquot work call my cell phone 9072230924

If you are not able to reconnect in Elive instant message me in Skype or call me on my emergency cell 9072230924

If Elive is not operational then class is cancelled I will send out an email about how to proceed within 24 hours

If Elive is not operational in 15 minutes then class is cancelled I will send out an email about how to proceed within 24 hours

Office Location PSB 229G

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

2

College of Education University of Alaska Anchorage 3211 Providence Drive Anchorage AK 99508 SKYPE gapman1 SecondLife handle Eclectic Kohime (CELL) 907 223-0924 VOICE MAIL 9077864331 Fax 9077864313 Email address Andrewuaaalaskaedu Course Meeting Information Location Online httpbb6uaaalaskaeduwebappslogin CONTENT WEBSITE httpgandrewpagecomelearning Day(s) and Time(s) Web-based distance learning (asynchronous amp synchronous mediums) The Elluminate LIVE sessions will be on Mondays from 6pm to 8pm I will arrive early for each session at approx 530pm and will be available after class if needed We will also have a perpetual Elluminate session available 24 hours a day 7 days a week for your respective WORKGROUP meetings The link to this session is located in Blackboard Click on ldquoElluminaterdquo and then select the ldquoPerpetual Elluminate Session for SPRING 2010rdquo Catalog Course Description Development of effective instructional methods for P-20 educators in web-based learning environments Special Note This course uses the Blackboard course management system Experience with Blackboard required Course PrerequisiteCo-requisites Students in the course must have a bachelorrsquos degree from an accredited university It is assumed that the student has writing and thinking skills which allows for production of masterrsquos level work Course Design The course design for EDET A637 is VERY UNIQUE This course will be a social constructivist project-based community of learners environment Students will work together collaboratively to construct the educationallearning components of an online lesson specifically related to their practice Social constructivism is a variety of cognitive constructivism that emphasizes the collaborative nature of much learning Social constructivism was developed by post-revolutionary Soviet psychologist Lev Vygotsky Vygotsky was a cognitivist but rejected the assumption made by cognitivists such as Piaget and Perry that it was possible to separate learning from its social context He argued that all cognitive functions originate in and must therefore be explained as products of social interactions and that learning was not simply the assimilation and accommodation of new knowledge by learners it was the process by which learners were integrated into a knowledge community1 1[Source httpgsiberkeleyeduresourceslearningsocialhtml] Overall this 15-week course is designed to provide an overview of instructional technology and specifically e-learning It allows every learner the freedom to explore and research areas of their own interest within the field As previously

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

3

noted this course will include the development and design of online web-based educational supplement (s) NOTE See the ldquoCommunity of Learnersrdquo webpage for past examples of who learners have created Participation is not only an important part of the course it is required for the successful implementation of your ideas We all need and want to hear your thoughts Come prepared to engage in stimulating conversation and participate in interesting activities in a hands-on minds-on environment

1 Outside reading course work and assignments are estimated to take 6-8 hours per week This time includes collaborative work in small groups video lecturediscussion via Elluminate live individual conferences and online supplements

2 There are no additional matriculation fees other than those already charged by the University of Alaska at Anchorage

Instructional Goals and Student Outcomes (Next page)

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

4

Instructional Goal 10 Facilitation Social constructivism in a virtual environment Student Outcomes Assessment Measures Assignment Standards

11 Understand the importance of online engagement and community building 12 Identify key issues opportunities and problems 13 Facilitate a discussion online

14 Apply principles and best practices of effective online facilitation techniques

Participation in workgroups presentation using online technologies (Elluminate dimdim Skype WizIQ etc)

Students design and development digital learning objects for in their own webspace

NETS for Teachers 2008

Facilitate and Inspire Student Learning and Creativity

Design and Develop Digital-Age Learning Experiences and Assessment

Model Digital-Age Work and Learning

Instructional Goal 20 Design and Development Student Outcomes Assessment Measures Assignment Standards

21 Design and develop an online e-lesson 22 Apply specific criteria to the selection of appropriate media or technology 23 Work collaboratively following the instructional design and development process 24 Apply relevant e-Learning theories to design an online education module 25 Use technology to increase each students ability to plan locate evaluate select and use information to solve problems and draw conclusions

Iterative design of e-lesson Guide the development and instructional process for a student designed online learning module Introduce students to current e-Learning theory and seminal professional journals related to e-Learning

Design an elesson Collaborate D amp D on a course in Moodle

Promote and Model Digital Citizenship and Responsibility

Engage in Professional Growth and Leadership

httpwwwisteorgAMTemplatecfmSection=NETS

Instructional Goal 30 Emerging Educational Technologiesrdquo Evaluating the technology Student Outcomes Assessment Measures Assignment Standards

31 Understand current emerging technologies 32 Incorporate these technologies in an online environment 33 Explain the functionality of an emerging technology

Create a presentation reviewing an emerging web technology

Review an emerging technology

Facilitate and Inspire Student Learning and Creativity

Instructional Goal 40 Critical review of research

Student Outcomes Assessment Measures Assignment Standards

41 Critical review of research

Presentation of research Upload review to website

Facilitate and Inspire Student Learning and Creativity

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

5

IV Guidelines for Evaluation Students will be evaluated on

1 Class participationfacilitation of discussiongroup workinteractivity 2 e-Lesson (Teach a concept through technology) 3 Review and presentation of an emerging web-based technology 4 Instructional Design workgroup collaborative presentation 5 Moodle course constructione-book construction

V Course Level Justification This is a course in a graduate-level professional preparation program Students are required to apply knowledge and skills gained from previous graduate course work or professional work experience in the development of course projects Commitment to Technology College of Education students are expected to (a) demonstrate sound understanding of technology operations and concepts (b) plan and design effective learning environments and experiences supported by technology (c) implement curriculum plans that include technology applications in methods and strategies to maximize student learning (d) use technology to facilitate a variety of effective assessment and evaluation strategies (e) use technology to enhance productivity and professional practice and (f) understand the social ethical and human issues surrounding use of technology in PreK-12 schools and apply those principles in practice

Course Policies

Technology Integration University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education students are expected to (a) demonstrate sound understanding of technology operations and concepts (b) plan and design effective learning environments and experiences supported by technology (c) implement curriculum plans that include technology applications in methods and strategies to maximize student learning (d) facilitate a variety of effective assessment and evaluation strategies (e) use technology to enhance productivity and professional practice and (f) understand the social ethical and human issues surrounding use of technology in adult education training and education and apply those principles in practice Attendance and Make-up Work Your participation in discussions and the quality of the interactions will be noted in great detail FYI Blackboard has the ability to provide the instructor with detailed statistics on the quantity of your participation In other words I can

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

6

see when you login what pages you open and how long you are logged into the course I also be using artificial intelligence technology to rate the quality of each studentrsquos participatory contribution Is this too Orwellian Attendance is crucial even in the virtual world Quality participation and not just taking up digital space is critical Unless there is documented evidence late assignments will not be accepted This is not fair to your colleagues or me

(1) Deadlines for assignments are nonnegotiable All Assignments are due by 12 midnight (AKST) on the prescribed date

Grading 90-100= A 80-89 = B 70-79 = C 60-69 = D Below 60 = fail

Course Text amp Readings Required Texts (ALL ARE OPEN- SOURCE AND DIGITAL)

(1) Anderson T amp Elloumi F (2004) Theory and practice of online learning (2nd Edition) Retrieved January 26 2007 from httpcdeathabascaucaonline_book

(2) The Tower and the Cloud An EDUCAUSE eBook httpwwweducauseeduthetowerandthecloud Course Calendar Schedule Mini Calendar Session 1 January 11th Introductions and Overview of course Session 2 January 18th HOLIDAY Session 3 January 25th Admin issues Session 4 February 1st Emerging Online Tech Session 5 February 8th Design Theory Group 123 Presentations Session 6 February 15th Design Theory Group 456 Presentations Session 7 February 22th Working with the Virtual Student Session 8 March 1rd Research Presentations members from groups 4 5 6 March 8th SPRING BREAK Session 9 March 15th Lessons Learned in the Cyberspace Classroom even More Educational Uses of Technology in e-learning Session 10 March 22 Discussion of Emerging Technologies and their Educational Utility Part II Session 11 March 29st ET Presentations members of Groups 4 5 6 Session 12 April 5th Transforming Courses for the Online Classroom (See session 5 for links) Session 13 April 12 OpenCourse ware presentation (see Session 6 for links) Session14 April 17 Student Mini Showcase Emerging Tech Presentations members of Groups 4 5 6 Session 15 April 24 Student Mini Showcase Emerging Tech Presentations members of Groups 1 2 3 All Full group Elluminate Live Sessions will be recorded Mondays 6-800pm Elluminate

January

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 Session 1

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 Holiday

NO CLASS

19 Work on Session 2

assignments

20 21 22 23

24 25 Session 3

Admn issues

26 27 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

28 29 30

31

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

8

February

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1

Session 4 2 3

Add to the ldquoWeb Tools amp Strategiesrdquo

wiki

4 5 6

7 8 Session 5

Groups 1 2 3 present and facilitate

design theories

9 We will review the Session 5 content in

Session 12

10 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

11 Groups 123 Facilitate BB

discussion this entire week

12 13

14 15 Session 6

Groups 4 5 6 present and facilitate

design theories

16 We will review the Session 6 content in

Session 13

17 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

18 Groups 4 5 6 Facilitate BB

discussion this entire week

19 20

21 22 Session 7

Virtual Student

23 Post URL to final versions of e-Lesson by midnight AK time

24 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

25 26 27

28

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

9

March

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1

Session 8 e-Lessons Due Post in Black

2 3 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

4 5 6

7 8 Spring Break

No Class

9 10

11 12 13

14 15 Session 9

16 17 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

18 Moodle Design

19 20

21 22 Session 10

23 24 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

25 Moodle Design

26 27

28 29 Session 11

30 31 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

10

2010

1

2 3 Session 12

Transforming Courses for the

Online Classroom

4 5 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

6 Moodle Design

7 8

9 10 Session 13

Open Courseware

11 12 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

13 Moodle Design

14 15

16 17 Session 14

ET Presentations Groups 4 5 6

18 19 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

20 Moodle Design

Completed

21 22

23 24 Session 15

ET Presentations Groups 1 2 3

25 26 FINAL DAY to Add to the ldquoWeb Tools amp

Strategiesrdquo wiki

27 28 29

30 31

April APRIL

The readings for this course will be more intensive during the first 8 weeks of the course The remainder of the course is more of a hands-on approach that involves applying that knowledge The textbooks are SUPPLEMENTAL learning objects that when combined with the online content should enrich your overall experience I reserve the right to addsubtract content to better meet your learning needs I believe in a democratic classroom and am open to suggestions and creative ideas We are ALL learners and that includes me we are ALL teachers and that includes you Wisdom about ONLINE LEARNING Assignments Grading Due dates

Assignment

Value

Due date

E-lesson Teach a concept digitally

20

Monday March 1 Remember to post the link of your e-lesson in the e-Lesson in the DISCUSSION FORUM Also post your embedded or linked presentation in Moodle after uploading

Emerging Web 20 Technology presentation 20

To be shared in Elluminate Sessions 14 amp 15 Mini-Showcase Embed your presentation in Moodle

ParticipationContribution to Community of Learners and WORKGROUPS

20

All semester Communal Constructivism

Moodle Course Construction

20 All Semester

Instructional Design Workgroup Presentation 20 Monday February

8th and Feb 15th

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

12

Rubric for Participation = We participate therefore we arerdquo 20 Excellent participation Significant contribution to the collaborative nature of this course through high quality and critical discussions detailed presentations submitted on time superior involvement with your group substantial amount of input high level input in chatdiscussions Substantive Elluminate Live presence Contributes to synchronous discussions Excellent facilitationparticipant of weekly Blackboard Discussion Forums as well as postings in the Blog numerous quality contributions to the Moodle course and contributions to the Web Tools amp Strategies wiki

10

Good Moderate contribution in Blackboard average postings frequent participation decent quality in postings in chatdiscussion boards and group work frequent Elluminate presence and good Moodle contributions

8-9

Some Student sporadically checks in to Blackboard low quality contribution insubstantial postings little critical reflection group input is marginal little input in Elluminate the blog the discussion forums and Moodle

5-7

Little Student checks in less than once a week online little or no contribution to discussions very little or no input

1-4

E-Lesson 20

You are to use whatever medium you want to create an electronic lesson That is the lesson should

be in a format that it can be viewed via the Internet See the webpage for more information

examples and specifics Basically your goal here is to teach us a concept of your choice using

technology It can be a webpage video or whatever tool(s) you want to use Examples will be

provided Your e-Lesson will potentially become a part of the e-book on e-Learning Check out

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

13

httpgobongobookscom as this will be the online interface for our collaboration

Emerging Web-based Technology Presentation (TOPIC DUE by FEB 1st) 20 You have the opportunity to select an emerging ONLINE technology of your choice and evaluatereview it You will construct a presentation in to share your findings for all learners There are numerous examples from past courses on the websitehelliphave FUN and be creative When you have narrowed your search of the appropriate Web 20 technology please POST your selection amp rationale in the course Blackboard discussion board forum entitled MY EMERGING ONLINE TECHNOLOGY Presentations must cover the following

(1) description of the technology (2) developers of the technology (3) current or projected uses of the technology (4) costs (5) specialized equipment or standards for usage (6) availability (7) access (8) adaptability (9) level of interactivity (10) type of control (11) vendor or producer information (12) educational applications of the technology and a (13) bibliography covering salient sources (14) Also please include screen captures embedded as figures

While optional you can choose to have your presentation peer reviewed (quid pro quo) before submission

Feedback Assessment for Emerging ONLINE Technology Presentation 4 Excellent coverage of item 3 Good coverage of item 2 Some coverage of item 1 Little coverage of item 0 Item was not included in paper Comments are provided when possible or necessary for clarification

Item Assessment Comment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

14

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the technology being addressed Includes graphics creative amp knowledgeable overview

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the application of the technology to education

Presentation is interesting and appealing and is critically reviewed

Presentation is free from technical glitches and runs smoothly

Presentation includes an overview and summation

Total 20

The ldquoONLINE Emerging Technologiesrdquo presentation should provide the reader with OverviewSummation

Screen captures of the technology This review could be hardware or software technologies

Your critical reflection and review For this assignment Do NOT copy quote or cite ANY review from

another source I want your candid point of view regarding the utility of this technology How might this technology be used in an educational format

Post your presentation in the Moodle Course

Students must ensure that ALL assignment files are free of viruses before submitting them Keep your virus detection software up to date Should an assignment file fail scrutiny by our institutionrsquos standard virus detection software the student submitting it will be so advised by email A virus-free version of the file must be resubmitted within 24 hours of the posting date of this email Any subsequent failure to adhere to this requirement will cause an assignment to be unacceptable and a 0 grade will be recorded for this assignment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

15

Moodle Course Construction 20 All

Semester You will be given TEACHER access to a Moodle course shell for designing

an online course Teachers can do anything within a course including changing the activities and grading students

University of Alaska Anchorage Policies

Incomplete Grade Policy Incomplete Grades Unless there is a veritable reason I do not recommend students pursue this route Communicate with me as I know that sometimes life happens An ldquoIrdquo (Incomplete) is a temporary grade It is used to indicate that a student has made satisfactory progress in the majority of the work in a course but for unavoidable absences or other conditions beyond the control of the student has not been able to complete the course The Incomplete Grade Contract a signed contract form between the student and the faculty member that stipulates the assignment(s) required to finish the course is required and must be completed and filed with the department or deanrsquos office before an ldquoIrdquo grade is assigned Course work must be completed by a date specified in the contract not to exceed one year Upon completion of the required course work the faculty member must submit a change of grade form accompanied by a copy of the incomplete grade contract to the department or deanrsquos office If course work is not completed within one year or if the terms specified on the Incomplete Grade Contract are not met the student may be assigned a failing grade (F or NP depending on the grading basis of the course) If course work is not completed within one year and the faculty member does not submit a change of grade at that time the ldquoIrdquo will become a permanent grade and it will be necessary for the student to re-register to obtain credit for the course ADA Policy The provision of equal opportunities for students who experience disabilities is a campus-wide responsibility and commitment Disabilities Support Services (DSS) is the designated UAA department responsible for coordinating academic support services for students who experience disabilities To access support services students must contact DSS (786-4530 or 786-4536 TTY) and provide current disability documentation that supports the requested services Disability support services are mandated by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 Additional information may be accessed at the DSS Office in Business Education Building (BEB105)or on-line at wwwuaaalaskaedudss Academic Dishonesty Policy Academic integrity is a basic principle that requires all students to take credit only for the ideas and efforts that are their own Cheating plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty are defined as the submission of materials in

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

16

assignments exams or other academic work that is based on sources prohibited by the faculty member In addition to any adverse academic action which may result from the academically dishonest behavior the University specifically reserves the right to address and sanction the conduct involved through student judicial review procedures and the Academic Dispute Resolution Procedure specified in the University catalog If you have ANY questions about citations or academic honesty you should contact me I will be using special software when reviewing papers to certify the integrity of the author not authors I take this matter extremely serious and because this course is a graduate course I assume ALL students have had ample opportunity to educate themselves of appropriate academic conduct Professional and Ethical Behavior University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education students are expected to abide by the State of Alaska Code of Ethics of the Education Profession and professional teaching standards as they concern students the public and the profession The standards adopted by the Professional Teaching Practices Commission govern all members of the teaching profession A violation of the code of ethics and professional teaching standards are grounds for revocation or suspension of teaching certification Religious Holiday or Cultural Observance If a class meeting occurs on a religious holiday or cultural observance day and you are obligated to miss class for this event you must notify the instructor in writing by the end of the second week of the semester Email Policy

The subject line for each email submission should include the following

ldquoEDET 637 (topic)rdquo The may seem pedantic but it helps with organization I generally receive over 75+ emails in a 24-hour period and I file away all correspondence from students Also during Spring 2010 I will be teaching 3 courses doing research serving on numerous committees and boards traveling to conferences etc There are many 18 hour+ days ahead and I like to be busy and productivehellipI loathe busy work and repeating myself Excessive emails make unreasonable time demands on both sender and recipient The following are my guidelines for proper email communication Please ensure you have legitimate need before you write Thanks I will answer email about

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

17

Questions arising from difficulty in understanding course content If you need clarity on ANYTHING let me know

Requests for feedback about graded assignments Private issues appropriate for discussion within the teacher-student

relationship IMPORTANT I will do my best to respond to your email within a 24-hour period unless otherwise noted Please check into BLACKBOARD (ie the Announcements Blog and Discussion Forums) EVERYDAY to assure that you receive course information disseminated in a timely fashion

Andyrsquos Strongly Suggested Student Code of Conduct

In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions

Be self-motivated and self-directed Approach the course with a desire to learn Be a good time managerhellipstart your iterative design NOW Submit constructive criticism for course improvements Participate in a respectful manner in discussions Comply with the honor code

If there is anything else that you feel I should know please do not hesitate to confidentially communicate that concern with me I am committed to making this a positive educational experience for each and every student

G Andrew Page January 2009

e-Lesson Rubric

Teacher Name Dr Page Student Name ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

18

Content Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Subject knowledge is excellent

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Attractiveness Makes excellent use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance the presentation

Makes good use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance to presentation

Makes use of font color graphics effects etc but occasionally these detract from the presentation content

Use of font color graphics effects etc but these often distract from the presentaion content

Mechanics No misspellings or grammatical errors

Three or fewer misspellings andor mechanical errors

Four misspellings andor grammatical errors

More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar

Sources Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes All documented in desired format

Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes Most documented in desired format

Source information collected for graphics facts and quotes but not documented in desired format

Very little or no source information was collected

Oral Presentation Interesting well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention

Relatively interesting rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention

Delivery not smooth but able to hold audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

19

Instructional Design Group Presentation

Teacher Name Dr Page Group ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

Presentation Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention Engages and involves class

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost

Content Group defines and tell HOW design approach can be used Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Excellent resources

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good Good resources

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors Some resources

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Resources Product shows a large amount of original thought Ideas are creative and inventive

Product shows some original thought Work shows new ideas and insights

Uses other peoples ideas (giving them credit) but there is little evidence of original thinking

Uses other peoples ideas but does not give them credit

DESIGN Groups TBA Group 1 Gagnersquos ID Model Heather amp Kitty Group 2 ADDIE Donna Morgan Kimberly Group 3 Rapid-Prototyping Model Sarah amp Lara Group 4 Algo-heuristic Model MB and John Group 5 Dual-coding theory Sasha Bethany George Group 6 Dick amp Carey Model Tracy Andy(Sam) Tim

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

20

Spring 2010 Community of Learners Name email 1 Sarah Frick ansck2uaaalaskaedu 2 Heather Corriere dfhbckodiakalaskaedu 3 Donna Kreiensieck asdkk6uaaalaskaedu 4 Kitty Deal kdealkodiakalaskaedu 5 John D Seltenright anjds2uaaalaskaedu 6 Tracy Scott inalaskausyahoocom 7 Timothy Perry astrp4uaaalaskaedu 8 Lara Madden anlnm1uaaalaskaedu 9 George Flores asgef1uaaalaskaedu 10 Morgan Grey anmg2uaaalaskaedu 11 Maj-Britt Kimm asmk20uaaalaskaedu 12 Sasha Lamoureux asstl5uaaalaskaedu 13 Andy Holleman andyhollemangmailcom 14 Bethany Zimpelman asbz2uaaalaskaedu 15 Kimberly Handy Handy_Kimberlyasdk12org

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21

Jose Feitorsquos ldquoFacets of Intellectual Community1rdquo

1 Student ownership Students recognize their ownership of the learning process Students are dissatisfied with overly directive instructors

2 Shared inquiry There is an appreciation for the generative potential of multiple perspectives Students are surprised at the insights of ldquoquiet peoplerdquo Students are dissatisfied when other students do not engage

3 Allowing ldquonot knowingrdquo Students have the ability to acknowledge their initial lack of understanding Students have a willingness to be wrong and let their opinions evolve Students ask genuine questions There is space for students to struggle with a difficult text

4 Socio-emotional climate The atmosphere is emotionally safemdashstudents know they will not be attacked There is an expectation of help from fellow students There is mutual encouragement and support There is a perception of shared fate and commonalitymdashldquoWere all in the same boatrdquo Tension is relieved through humor

5 Intellectual intimacy Students have deeper access into the inner workings of one anotherrsquos minds They know classmates on a more profound level than they know their friends There is permeability to the opinions of others

1 Feito J Exploring Intellectual Community Group Learning Processes in Traditional ldquoGreat Booksrsquo Seminarsrdquo Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Final Report CASTL Electronic Workspace Menlo Park CA The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching June 13 2002 in Huber M T amp Hutchings P (2005) p47 The Advancement of Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching San Francisco Jossey-Bass

  • NETS for Teachers 2008
  • Technology Integration
  • Academic Dishonesty Policy
  • Professional and Ethical Behavior
  • In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions
Page 2: University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

2

College of Education University of Alaska Anchorage 3211 Providence Drive Anchorage AK 99508 SKYPE gapman1 SecondLife handle Eclectic Kohime (CELL) 907 223-0924 VOICE MAIL 9077864331 Fax 9077864313 Email address Andrewuaaalaskaedu Course Meeting Information Location Online httpbb6uaaalaskaeduwebappslogin CONTENT WEBSITE httpgandrewpagecomelearning Day(s) and Time(s) Web-based distance learning (asynchronous amp synchronous mediums) The Elluminate LIVE sessions will be on Mondays from 6pm to 8pm I will arrive early for each session at approx 530pm and will be available after class if needed We will also have a perpetual Elluminate session available 24 hours a day 7 days a week for your respective WORKGROUP meetings The link to this session is located in Blackboard Click on ldquoElluminaterdquo and then select the ldquoPerpetual Elluminate Session for SPRING 2010rdquo Catalog Course Description Development of effective instructional methods for P-20 educators in web-based learning environments Special Note This course uses the Blackboard course management system Experience with Blackboard required Course PrerequisiteCo-requisites Students in the course must have a bachelorrsquos degree from an accredited university It is assumed that the student has writing and thinking skills which allows for production of masterrsquos level work Course Design The course design for EDET A637 is VERY UNIQUE This course will be a social constructivist project-based community of learners environment Students will work together collaboratively to construct the educationallearning components of an online lesson specifically related to their practice Social constructivism is a variety of cognitive constructivism that emphasizes the collaborative nature of much learning Social constructivism was developed by post-revolutionary Soviet psychologist Lev Vygotsky Vygotsky was a cognitivist but rejected the assumption made by cognitivists such as Piaget and Perry that it was possible to separate learning from its social context He argued that all cognitive functions originate in and must therefore be explained as products of social interactions and that learning was not simply the assimilation and accommodation of new knowledge by learners it was the process by which learners were integrated into a knowledge community1 1[Source httpgsiberkeleyeduresourceslearningsocialhtml] Overall this 15-week course is designed to provide an overview of instructional technology and specifically e-learning It allows every learner the freedom to explore and research areas of their own interest within the field As previously

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

3

noted this course will include the development and design of online web-based educational supplement (s) NOTE See the ldquoCommunity of Learnersrdquo webpage for past examples of who learners have created Participation is not only an important part of the course it is required for the successful implementation of your ideas We all need and want to hear your thoughts Come prepared to engage in stimulating conversation and participate in interesting activities in a hands-on minds-on environment

1 Outside reading course work and assignments are estimated to take 6-8 hours per week This time includes collaborative work in small groups video lecturediscussion via Elluminate live individual conferences and online supplements

2 There are no additional matriculation fees other than those already charged by the University of Alaska at Anchorage

Instructional Goals and Student Outcomes (Next page)

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

4

Instructional Goal 10 Facilitation Social constructivism in a virtual environment Student Outcomes Assessment Measures Assignment Standards

11 Understand the importance of online engagement and community building 12 Identify key issues opportunities and problems 13 Facilitate a discussion online

14 Apply principles and best practices of effective online facilitation techniques

Participation in workgroups presentation using online technologies (Elluminate dimdim Skype WizIQ etc)

Students design and development digital learning objects for in their own webspace

NETS for Teachers 2008

Facilitate and Inspire Student Learning and Creativity

Design and Develop Digital-Age Learning Experiences and Assessment

Model Digital-Age Work and Learning

Instructional Goal 20 Design and Development Student Outcomes Assessment Measures Assignment Standards

21 Design and develop an online e-lesson 22 Apply specific criteria to the selection of appropriate media or technology 23 Work collaboratively following the instructional design and development process 24 Apply relevant e-Learning theories to design an online education module 25 Use technology to increase each students ability to plan locate evaluate select and use information to solve problems and draw conclusions

Iterative design of e-lesson Guide the development and instructional process for a student designed online learning module Introduce students to current e-Learning theory and seminal professional journals related to e-Learning

Design an elesson Collaborate D amp D on a course in Moodle

Promote and Model Digital Citizenship and Responsibility

Engage in Professional Growth and Leadership

httpwwwisteorgAMTemplatecfmSection=NETS

Instructional Goal 30 Emerging Educational Technologiesrdquo Evaluating the technology Student Outcomes Assessment Measures Assignment Standards

31 Understand current emerging technologies 32 Incorporate these technologies in an online environment 33 Explain the functionality of an emerging technology

Create a presentation reviewing an emerging web technology

Review an emerging technology

Facilitate and Inspire Student Learning and Creativity

Instructional Goal 40 Critical review of research

Student Outcomes Assessment Measures Assignment Standards

41 Critical review of research

Presentation of research Upload review to website

Facilitate and Inspire Student Learning and Creativity

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

5

IV Guidelines for Evaluation Students will be evaluated on

1 Class participationfacilitation of discussiongroup workinteractivity 2 e-Lesson (Teach a concept through technology) 3 Review and presentation of an emerging web-based technology 4 Instructional Design workgroup collaborative presentation 5 Moodle course constructione-book construction

V Course Level Justification This is a course in a graduate-level professional preparation program Students are required to apply knowledge and skills gained from previous graduate course work or professional work experience in the development of course projects Commitment to Technology College of Education students are expected to (a) demonstrate sound understanding of technology operations and concepts (b) plan and design effective learning environments and experiences supported by technology (c) implement curriculum plans that include technology applications in methods and strategies to maximize student learning (d) use technology to facilitate a variety of effective assessment and evaluation strategies (e) use technology to enhance productivity and professional practice and (f) understand the social ethical and human issues surrounding use of technology in PreK-12 schools and apply those principles in practice

Course Policies

Technology Integration University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education students are expected to (a) demonstrate sound understanding of technology operations and concepts (b) plan and design effective learning environments and experiences supported by technology (c) implement curriculum plans that include technology applications in methods and strategies to maximize student learning (d) facilitate a variety of effective assessment and evaluation strategies (e) use technology to enhance productivity and professional practice and (f) understand the social ethical and human issues surrounding use of technology in adult education training and education and apply those principles in practice Attendance and Make-up Work Your participation in discussions and the quality of the interactions will be noted in great detail FYI Blackboard has the ability to provide the instructor with detailed statistics on the quantity of your participation In other words I can

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

6

see when you login what pages you open and how long you are logged into the course I also be using artificial intelligence technology to rate the quality of each studentrsquos participatory contribution Is this too Orwellian Attendance is crucial even in the virtual world Quality participation and not just taking up digital space is critical Unless there is documented evidence late assignments will not be accepted This is not fair to your colleagues or me

(1) Deadlines for assignments are nonnegotiable All Assignments are due by 12 midnight (AKST) on the prescribed date

Grading 90-100= A 80-89 = B 70-79 = C 60-69 = D Below 60 = fail

Course Text amp Readings Required Texts (ALL ARE OPEN- SOURCE AND DIGITAL)

(1) Anderson T amp Elloumi F (2004) Theory and practice of online learning (2nd Edition) Retrieved January 26 2007 from httpcdeathabascaucaonline_book

(2) The Tower and the Cloud An EDUCAUSE eBook httpwwweducauseeduthetowerandthecloud Course Calendar Schedule Mini Calendar Session 1 January 11th Introductions and Overview of course Session 2 January 18th HOLIDAY Session 3 January 25th Admin issues Session 4 February 1st Emerging Online Tech Session 5 February 8th Design Theory Group 123 Presentations Session 6 February 15th Design Theory Group 456 Presentations Session 7 February 22th Working with the Virtual Student Session 8 March 1rd Research Presentations members from groups 4 5 6 March 8th SPRING BREAK Session 9 March 15th Lessons Learned in the Cyberspace Classroom even More Educational Uses of Technology in e-learning Session 10 March 22 Discussion of Emerging Technologies and their Educational Utility Part II Session 11 March 29st ET Presentations members of Groups 4 5 6 Session 12 April 5th Transforming Courses for the Online Classroom (See session 5 for links) Session 13 April 12 OpenCourse ware presentation (see Session 6 for links) Session14 April 17 Student Mini Showcase Emerging Tech Presentations members of Groups 4 5 6 Session 15 April 24 Student Mini Showcase Emerging Tech Presentations members of Groups 1 2 3 All Full group Elluminate Live Sessions will be recorded Mondays 6-800pm Elluminate

January

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 Session 1

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 Holiday

NO CLASS

19 Work on Session 2

assignments

20 21 22 23

24 25 Session 3

Admn issues

26 27 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

28 29 30

31

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

8

February

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1

Session 4 2 3

Add to the ldquoWeb Tools amp Strategiesrdquo

wiki

4 5 6

7 8 Session 5

Groups 1 2 3 present and facilitate

design theories

9 We will review the Session 5 content in

Session 12

10 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

11 Groups 123 Facilitate BB

discussion this entire week

12 13

14 15 Session 6

Groups 4 5 6 present and facilitate

design theories

16 We will review the Session 6 content in

Session 13

17 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

18 Groups 4 5 6 Facilitate BB

discussion this entire week

19 20

21 22 Session 7

Virtual Student

23 Post URL to final versions of e-Lesson by midnight AK time

24 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

25 26 27

28

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

9

March

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1

Session 8 e-Lessons Due Post in Black

2 3 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

4 5 6

7 8 Spring Break

No Class

9 10

11 12 13

14 15 Session 9

16 17 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

18 Moodle Design

19 20

21 22 Session 10

23 24 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

25 Moodle Design

26 27

28 29 Session 11

30 31 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

10

2010

1

2 3 Session 12

Transforming Courses for the

Online Classroom

4 5 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

6 Moodle Design

7 8

9 10 Session 13

Open Courseware

11 12 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

13 Moodle Design

14 15

16 17 Session 14

ET Presentations Groups 4 5 6

18 19 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

20 Moodle Design

Completed

21 22

23 24 Session 15

ET Presentations Groups 1 2 3

25 26 FINAL DAY to Add to the ldquoWeb Tools amp

Strategiesrdquo wiki

27 28 29

30 31

April APRIL

The readings for this course will be more intensive during the first 8 weeks of the course The remainder of the course is more of a hands-on approach that involves applying that knowledge The textbooks are SUPPLEMENTAL learning objects that when combined with the online content should enrich your overall experience I reserve the right to addsubtract content to better meet your learning needs I believe in a democratic classroom and am open to suggestions and creative ideas We are ALL learners and that includes me we are ALL teachers and that includes you Wisdom about ONLINE LEARNING Assignments Grading Due dates

Assignment

Value

Due date

E-lesson Teach a concept digitally

20

Monday March 1 Remember to post the link of your e-lesson in the e-Lesson in the DISCUSSION FORUM Also post your embedded or linked presentation in Moodle after uploading

Emerging Web 20 Technology presentation 20

To be shared in Elluminate Sessions 14 amp 15 Mini-Showcase Embed your presentation in Moodle

ParticipationContribution to Community of Learners and WORKGROUPS

20

All semester Communal Constructivism

Moodle Course Construction

20 All Semester

Instructional Design Workgroup Presentation 20 Monday February

8th and Feb 15th

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

12

Rubric for Participation = We participate therefore we arerdquo 20 Excellent participation Significant contribution to the collaborative nature of this course through high quality and critical discussions detailed presentations submitted on time superior involvement with your group substantial amount of input high level input in chatdiscussions Substantive Elluminate Live presence Contributes to synchronous discussions Excellent facilitationparticipant of weekly Blackboard Discussion Forums as well as postings in the Blog numerous quality contributions to the Moodle course and contributions to the Web Tools amp Strategies wiki

10

Good Moderate contribution in Blackboard average postings frequent participation decent quality in postings in chatdiscussion boards and group work frequent Elluminate presence and good Moodle contributions

8-9

Some Student sporadically checks in to Blackboard low quality contribution insubstantial postings little critical reflection group input is marginal little input in Elluminate the blog the discussion forums and Moodle

5-7

Little Student checks in less than once a week online little or no contribution to discussions very little or no input

1-4

E-Lesson 20

You are to use whatever medium you want to create an electronic lesson That is the lesson should

be in a format that it can be viewed via the Internet See the webpage for more information

examples and specifics Basically your goal here is to teach us a concept of your choice using

technology It can be a webpage video or whatever tool(s) you want to use Examples will be

provided Your e-Lesson will potentially become a part of the e-book on e-Learning Check out

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

13

httpgobongobookscom as this will be the online interface for our collaboration

Emerging Web-based Technology Presentation (TOPIC DUE by FEB 1st) 20 You have the opportunity to select an emerging ONLINE technology of your choice and evaluatereview it You will construct a presentation in to share your findings for all learners There are numerous examples from past courses on the websitehelliphave FUN and be creative When you have narrowed your search of the appropriate Web 20 technology please POST your selection amp rationale in the course Blackboard discussion board forum entitled MY EMERGING ONLINE TECHNOLOGY Presentations must cover the following

(1) description of the technology (2) developers of the technology (3) current or projected uses of the technology (4) costs (5) specialized equipment or standards for usage (6) availability (7) access (8) adaptability (9) level of interactivity (10) type of control (11) vendor or producer information (12) educational applications of the technology and a (13) bibliography covering salient sources (14) Also please include screen captures embedded as figures

While optional you can choose to have your presentation peer reviewed (quid pro quo) before submission

Feedback Assessment for Emerging ONLINE Technology Presentation 4 Excellent coverage of item 3 Good coverage of item 2 Some coverage of item 1 Little coverage of item 0 Item was not included in paper Comments are provided when possible or necessary for clarification

Item Assessment Comment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

14

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the technology being addressed Includes graphics creative amp knowledgeable overview

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the application of the technology to education

Presentation is interesting and appealing and is critically reviewed

Presentation is free from technical glitches and runs smoothly

Presentation includes an overview and summation

Total 20

The ldquoONLINE Emerging Technologiesrdquo presentation should provide the reader with OverviewSummation

Screen captures of the technology This review could be hardware or software technologies

Your critical reflection and review For this assignment Do NOT copy quote or cite ANY review from

another source I want your candid point of view regarding the utility of this technology How might this technology be used in an educational format

Post your presentation in the Moodle Course

Students must ensure that ALL assignment files are free of viruses before submitting them Keep your virus detection software up to date Should an assignment file fail scrutiny by our institutionrsquos standard virus detection software the student submitting it will be so advised by email A virus-free version of the file must be resubmitted within 24 hours of the posting date of this email Any subsequent failure to adhere to this requirement will cause an assignment to be unacceptable and a 0 grade will be recorded for this assignment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

15

Moodle Course Construction 20 All

Semester You will be given TEACHER access to a Moodle course shell for designing

an online course Teachers can do anything within a course including changing the activities and grading students

University of Alaska Anchorage Policies

Incomplete Grade Policy Incomplete Grades Unless there is a veritable reason I do not recommend students pursue this route Communicate with me as I know that sometimes life happens An ldquoIrdquo (Incomplete) is a temporary grade It is used to indicate that a student has made satisfactory progress in the majority of the work in a course but for unavoidable absences or other conditions beyond the control of the student has not been able to complete the course The Incomplete Grade Contract a signed contract form between the student and the faculty member that stipulates the assignment(s) required to finish the course is required and must be completed and filed with the department or deanrsquos office before an ldquoIrdquo grade is assigned Course work must be completed by a date specified in the contract not to exceed one year Upon completion of the required course work the faculty member must submit a change of grade form accompanied by a copy of the incomplete grade contract to the department or deanrsquos office If course work is not completed within one year or if the terms specified on the Incomplete Grade Contract are not met the student may be assigned a failing grade (F or NP depending on the grading basis of the course) If course work is not completed within one year and the faculty member does not submit a change of grade at that time the ldquoIrdquo will become a permanent grade and it will be necessary for the student to re-register to obtain credit for the course ADA Policy The provision of equal opportunities for students who experience disabilities is a campus-wide responsibility and commitment Disabilities Support Services (DSS) is the designated UAA department responsible for coordinating academic support services for students who experience disabilities To access support services students must contact DSS (786-4530 or 786-4536 TTY) and provide current disability documentation that supports the requested services Disability support services are mandated by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 Additional information may be accessed at the DSS Office in Business Education Building (BEB105)or on-line at wwwuaaalaskaedudss Academic Dishonesty Policy Academic integrity is a basic principle that requires all students to take credit only for the ideas and efforts that are their own Cheating plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty are defined as the submission of materials in

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

16

assignments exams or other academic work that is based on sources prohibited by the faculty member In addition to any adverse academic action which may result from the academically dishonest behavior the University specifically reserves the right to address and sanction the conduct involved through student judicial review procedures and the Academic Dispute Resolution Procedure specified in the University catalog If you have ANY questions about citations or academic honesty you should contact me I will be using special software when reviewing papers to certify the integrity of the author not authors I take this matter extremely serious and because this course is a graduate course I assume ALL students have had ample opportunity to educate themselves of appropriate academic conduct Professional and Ethical Behavior University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education students are expected to abide by the State of Alaska Code of Ethics of the Education Profession and professional teaching standards as they concern students the public and the profession The standards adopted by the Professional Teaching Practices Commission govern all members of the teaching profession A violation of the code of ethics and professional teaching standards are grounds for revocation or suspension of teaching certification Religious Holiday or Cultural Observance If a class meeting occurs on a religious holiday or cultural observance day and you are obligated to miss class for this event you must notify the instructor in writing by the end of the second week of the semester Email Policy

The subject line for each email submission should include the following

ldquoEDET 637 (topic)rdquo The may seem pedantic but it helps with organization I generally receive over 75+ emails in a 24-hour period and I file away all correspondence from students Also during Spring 2010 I will be teaching 3 courses doing research serving on numerous committees and boards traveling to conferences etc There are many 18 hour+ days ahead and I like to be busy and productivehellipI loathe busy work and repeating myself Excessive emails make unreasonable time demands on both sender and recipient The following are my guidelines for proper email communication Please ensure you have legitimate need before you write Thanks I will answer email about

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

17

Questions arising from difficulty in understanding course content If you need clarity on ANYTHING let me know

Requests for feedback about graded assignments Private issues appropriate for discussion within the teacher-student

relationship IMPORTANT I will do my best to respond to your email within a 24-hour period unless otherwise noted Please check into BLACKBOARD (ie the Announcements Blog and Discussion Forums) EVERYDAY to assure that you receive course information disseminated in a timely fashion

Andyrsquos Strongly Suggested Student Code of Conduct

In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions

Be self-motivated and self-directed Approach the course with a desire to learn Be a good time managerhellipstart your iterative design NOW Submit constructive criticism for course improvements Participate in a respectful manner in discussions Comply with the honor code

If there is anything else that you feel I should know please do not hesitate to confidentially communicate that concern with me I am committed to making this a positive educational experience for each and every student

G Andrew Page January 2009

e-Lesson Rubric

Teacher Name Dr Page Student Name ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

18

Content Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Subject knowledge is excellent

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Attractiveness Makes excellent use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance the presentation

Makes good use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance to presentation

Makes use of font color graphics effects etc but occasionally these detract from the presentation content

Use of font color graphics effects etc but these often distract from the presentaion content

Mechanics No misspellings or grammatical errors

Three or fewer misspellings andor mechanical errors

Four misspellings andor grammatical errors

More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar

Sources Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes All documented in desired format

Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes Most documented in desired format

Source information collected for graphics facts and quotes but not documented in desired format

Very little or no source information was collected

Oral Presentation Interesting well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention

Relatively interesting rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention

Delivery not smooth but able to hold audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

19

Instructional Design Group Presentation

Teacher Name Dr Page Group ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

Presentation Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention Engages and involves class

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost

Content Group defines and tell HOW design approach can be used Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Excellent resources

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good Good resources

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors Some resources

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Resources Product shows a large amount of original thought Ideas are creative and inventive

Product shows some original thought Work shows new ideas and insights

Uses other peoples ideas (giving them credit) but there is little evidence of original thinking

Uses other peoples ideas but does not give them credit

DESIGN Groups TBA Group 1 Gagnersquos ID Model Heather amp Kitty Group 2 ADDIE Donna Morgan Kimberly Group 3 Rapid-Prototyping Model Sarah amp Lara Group 4 Algo-heuristic Model MB and John Group 5 Dual-coding theory Sasha Bethany George Group 6 Dick amp Carey Model Tracy Andy(Sam) Tim

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

20

Spring 2010 Community of Learners Name email 1 Sarah Frick ansck2uaaalaskaedu 2 Heather Corriere dfhbckodiakalaskaedu 3 Donna Kreiensieck asdkk6uaaalaskaedu 4 Kitty Deal kdealkodiakalaskaedu 5 John D Seltenright anjds2uaaalaskaedu 6 Tracy Scott inalaskausyahoocom 7 Timothy Perry astrp4uaaalaskaedu 8 Lara Madden anlnm1uaaalaskaedu 9 George Flores asgef1uaaalaskaedu 10 Morgan Grey anmg2uaaalaskaedu 11 Maj-Britt Kimm asmk20uaaalaskaedu 12 Sasha Lamoureux asstl5uaaalaskaedu 13 Andy Holleman andyhollemangmailcom 14 Bethany Zimpelman asbz2uaaalaskaedu 15 Kimberly Handy Handy_Kimberlyasdk12org

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21

Jose Feitorsquos ldquoFacets of Intellectual Community1rdquo

1 Student ownership Students recognize their ownership of the learning process Students are dissatisfied with overly directive instructors

2 Shared inquiry There is an appreciation for the generative potential of multiple perspectives Students are surprised at the insights of ldquoquiet peoplerdquo Students are dissatisfied when other students do not engage

3 Allowing ldquonot knowingrdquo Students have the ability to acknowledge their initial lack of understanding Students have a willingness to be wrong and let their opinions evolve Students ask genuine questions There is space for students to struggle with a difficult text

4 Socio-emotional climate The atmosphere is emotionally safemdashstudents know they will not be attacked There is an expectation of help from fellow students There is mutual encouragement and support There is a perception of shared fate and commonalitymdashldquoWere all in the same boatrdquo Tension is relieved through humor

5 Intellectual intimacy Students have deeper access into the inner workings of one anotherrsquos minds They know classmates on a more profound level than they know their friends There is permeability to the opinions of others

1 Feito J Exploring Intellectual Community Group Learning Processes in Traditional ldquoGreat Booksrsquo Seminarsrdquo Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Final Report CASTL Electronic Workspace Menlo Park CA The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching June 13 2002 in Huber M T amp Hutchings P (2005) p47 The Advancement of Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching San Francisco Jossey-Bass

  • NETS for Teachers 2008
  • Technology Integration
  • Academic Dishonesty Policy
  • Professional and Ethical Behavior
  • In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions
Page 3: University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

3

noted this course will include the development and design of online web-based educational supplement (s) NOTE See the ldquoCommunity of Learnersrdquo webpage for past examples of who learners have created Participation is not only an important part of the course it is required for the successful implementation of your ideas We all need and want to hear your thoughts Come prepared to engage in stimulating conversation and participate in interesting activities in a hands-on minds-on environment

1 Outside reading course work and assignments are estimated to take 6-8 hours per week This time includes collaborative work in small groups video lecturediscussion via Elluminate live individual conferences and online supplements

2 There are no additional matriculation fees other than those already charged by the University of Alaska at Anchorage

Instructional Goals and Student Outcomes (Next page)

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

4

Instructional Goal 10 Facilitation Social constructivism in a virtual environment Student Outcomes Assessment Measures Assignment Standards

11 Understand the importance of online engagement and community building 12 Identify key issues opportunities and problems 13 Facilitate a discussion online

14 Apply principles and best practices of effective online facilitation techniques

Participation in workgroups presentation using online technologies (Elluminate dimdim Skype WizIQ etc)

Students design and development digital learning objects for in their own webspace

NETS for Teachers 2008

Facilitate and Inspire Student Learning and Creativity

Design and Develop Digital-Age Learning Experiences and Assessment

Model Digital-Age Work and Learning

Instructional Goal 20 Design and Development Student Outcomes Assessment Measures Assignment Standards

21 Design and develop an online e-lesson 22 Apply specific criteria to the selection of appropriate media or technology 23 Work collaboratively following the instructional design and development process 24 Apply relevant e-Learning theories to design an online education module 25 Use technology to increase each students ability to plan locate evaluate select and use information to solve problems and draw conclusions

Iterative design of e-lesson Guide the development and instructional process for a student designed online learning module Introduce students to current e-Learning theory and seminal professional journals related to e-Learning

Design an elesson Collaborate D amp D on a course in Moodle

Promote and Model Digital Citizenship and Responsibility

Engage in Professional Growth and Leadership

httpwwwisteorgAMTemplatecfmSection=NETS

Instructional Goal 30 Emerging Educational Technologiesrdquo Evaluating the technology Student Outcomes Assessment Measures Assignment Standards

31 Understand current emerging technologies 32 Incorporate these technologies in an online environment 33 Explain the functionality of an emerging technology

Create a presentation reviewing an emerging web technology

Review an emerging technology

Facilitate and Inspire Student Learning and Creativity

Instructional Goal 40 Critical review of research

Student Outcomes Assessment Measures Assignment Standards

41 Critical review of research

Presentation of research Upload review to website

Facilitate and Inspire Student Learning and Creativity

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

5

IV Guidelines for Evaluation Students will be evaluated on

1 Class participationfacilitation of discussiongroup workinteractivity 2 e-Lesson (Teach a concept through technology) 3 Review and presentation of an emerging web-based technology 4 Instructional Design workgroup collaborative presentation 5 Moodle course constructione-book construction

V Course Level Justification This is a course in a graduate-level professional preparation program Students are required to apply knowledge and skills gained from previous graduate course work or professional work experience in the development of course projects Commitment to Technology College of Education students are expected to (a) demonstrate sound understanding of technology operations and concepts (b) plan and design effective learning environments and experiences supported by technology (c) implement curriculum plans that include technology applications in methods and strategies to maximize student learning (d) use technology to facilitate a variety of effective assessment and evaluation strategies (e) use technology to enhance productivity and professional practice and (f) understand the social ethical and human issues surrounding use of technology in PreK-12 schools and apply those principles in practice

Course Policies

Technology Integration University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education students are expected to (a) demonstrate sound understanding of technology operations and concepts (b) plan and design effective learning environments and experiences supported by technology (c) implement curriculum plans that include technology applications in methods and strategies to maximize student learning (d) facilitate a variety of effective assessment and evaluation strategies (e) use technology to enhance productivity and professional practice and (f) understand the social ethical and human issues surrounding use of technology in adult education training and education and apply those principles in practice Attendance and Make-up Work Your participation in discussions and the quality of the interactions will be noted in great detail FYI Blackboard has the ability to provide the instructor with detailed statistics on the quantity of your participation In other words I can

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

6

see when you login what pages you open and how long you are logged into the course I also be using artificial intelligence technology to rate the quality of each studentrsquos participatory contribution Is this too Orwellian Attendance is crucial even in the virtual world Quality participation and not just taking up digital space is critical Unless there is documented evidence late assignments will not be accepted This is not fair to your colleagues or me

(1) Deadlines for assignments are nonnegotiable All Assignments are due by 12 midnight (AKST) on the prescribed date

Grading 90-100= A 80-89 = B 70-79 = C 60-69 = D Below 60 = fail

Course Text amp Readings Required Texts (ALL ARE OPEN- SOURCE AND DIGITAL)

(1) Anderson T amp Elloumi F (2004) Theory and practice of online learning (2nd Edition) Retrieved January 26 2007 from httpcdeathabascaucaonline_book

(2) The Tower and the Cloud An EDUCAUSE eBook httpwwweducauseeduthetowerandthecloud Course Calendar Schedule Mini Calendar Session 1 January 11th Introductions and Overview of course Session 2 January 18th HOLIDAY Session 3 January 25th Admin issues Session 4 February 1st Emerging Online Tech Session 5 February 8th Design Theory Group 123 Presentations Session 6 February 15th Design Theory Group 456 Presentations Session 7 February 22th Working with the Virtual Student Session 8 March 1rd Research Presentations members from groups 4 5 6 March 8th SPRING BREAK Session 9 March 15th Lessons Learned in the Cyberspace Classroom even More Educational Uses of Technology in e-learning Session 10 March 22 Discussion of Emerging Technologies and their Educational Utility Part II Session 11 March 29st ET Presentations members of Groups 4 5 6 Session 12 April 5th Transforming Courses for the Online Classroom (See session 5 for links) Session 13 April 12 OpenCourse ware presentation (see Session 6 for links) Session14 April 17 Student Mini Showcase Emerging Tech Presentations members of Groups 4 5 6 Session 15 April 24 Student Mini Showcase Emerging Tech Presentations members of Groups 1 2 3 All Full group Elluminate Live Sessions will be recorded Mondays 6-800pm Elluminate

January

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 Session 1

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 Holiday

NO CLASS

19 Work on Session 2

assignments

20 21 22 23

24 25 Session 3

Admn issues

26 27 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

28 29 30

31

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

8

February

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1

Session 4 2 3

Add to the ldquoWeb Tools amp Strategiesrdquo

wiki

4 5 6

7 8 Session 5

Groups 1 2 3 present and facilitate

design theories

9 We will review the Session 5 content in

Session 12

10 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

11 Groups 123 Facilitate BB

discussion this entire week

12 13

14 15 Session 6

Groups 4 5 6 present and facilitate

design theories

16 We will review the Session 6 content in

Session 13

17 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

18 Groups 4 5 6 Facilitate BB

discussion this entire week

19 20

21 22 Session 7

Virtual Student

23 Post URL to final versions of e-Lesson by midnight AK time

24 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

25 26 27

28

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

9

March

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1

Session 8 e-Lessons Due Post in Black

2 3 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

4 5 6

7 8 Spring Break

No Class

9 10

11 12 13

14 15 Session 9

16 17 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

18 Moodle Design

19 20

21 22 Session 10

23 24 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

25 Moodle Design

26 27

28 29 Session 11

30 31 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

10

2010

1

2 3 Session 12

Transforming Courses for the

Online Classroom

4 5 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

6 Moodle Design

7 8

9 10 Session 13

Open Courseware

11 12 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

13 Moodle Design

14 15

16 17 Session 14

ET Presentations Groups 4 5 6

18 19 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

20 Moodle Design

Completed

21 22

23 24 Session 15

ET Presentations Groups 1 2 3

25 26 FINAL DAY to Add to the ldquoWeb Tools amp

Strategiesrdquo wiki

27 28 29

30 31

April APRIL

The readings for this course will be more intensive during the first 8 weeks of the course The remainder of the course is more of a hands-on approach that involves applying that knowledge The textbooks are SUPPLEMENTAL learning objects that when combined with the online content should enrich your overall experience I reserve the right to addsubtract content to better meet your learning needs I believe in a democratic classroom and am open to suggestions and creative ideas We are ALL learners and that includes me we are ALL teachers and that includes you Wisdom about ONLINE LEARNING Assignments Grading Due dates

Assignment

Value

Due date

E-lesson Teach a concept digitally

20

Monday March 1 Remember to post the link of your e-lesson in the e-Lesson in the DISCUSSION FORUM Also post your embedded or linked presentation in Moodle after uploading

Emerging Web 20 Technology presentation 20

To be shared in Elluminate Sessions 14 amp 15 Mini-Showcase Embed your presentation in Moodle

ParticipationContribution to Community of Learners and WORKGROUPS

20

All semester Communal Constructivism

Moodle Course Construction

20 All Semester

Instructional Design Workgroup Presentation 20 Monday February

8th and Feb 15th

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

12

Rubric for Participation = We participate therefore we arerdquo 20 Excellent participation Significant contribution to the collaborative nature of this course through high quality and critical discussions detailed presentations submitted on time superior involvement with your group substantial amount of input high level input in chatdiscussions Substantive Elluminate Live presence Contributes to synchronous discussions Excellent facilitationparticipant of weekly Blackboard Discussion Forums as well as postings in the Blog numerous quality contributions to the Moodle course and contributions to the Web Tools amp Strategies wiki

10

Good Moderate contribution in Blackboard average postings frequent participation decent quality in postings in chatdiscussion boards and group work frequent Elluminate presence and good Moodle contributions

8-9

Some Student sporadically checks in to Blackboard low quality contribution insubstantial postings little critical reflection group input is marginal little input in Elluminate the blog the discussion forums and Moodle

5-7

Little Student checks in less than once a week online little or no contribution to discussions very little or no input

1-4

E-Lesson 20

You are to use whatever medium you want to create an electronic lesson That is the lesson should

be in a format that it can be viewed via the Internet See the webpage for more information

examples and specifics Basically your goal here is to teach us a concept of your choice using

technology It can be a webpage video or whatever tool(s) you want to use Examples will be

provided Your e-Lesson will potentially become a part of the e-book on e-Learning Check out

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

13

httpgobongobookscom as this will be the online interface for our collaboration

Emerging Web-based Technology Presentation (TOPIC DUE by FEB 1st) 20 You have the opportunity to select an emerging ONLINE technology of your choice and evaluatereview it You will construct a presentation in to share your findings for all learners There are numerous examples from past courses on the websitehelliphave FUN and be creative When you have narrowed your search of the appropriate Web 20 technology please POST your selection amp rationale in the course Blackboard discussion board forum entitled MY EMERGING ONLINE TECHNOLOGY Presentations must cover the following

(1) description of the technology (2) developers of the technology (3) current or projected uses of the technology (4) costs (5) specialized equipment or standards for usage (6) availability (7) access (8) adaptability (9) level of interactivity (10) type of control (11) vendor or producer information (12) educational applications of the technology and a (13) bibliography covering salient sources (14) Also please include screen captures embedded as figures

While optional you can choose to have your presentation peer reviewed (quid pro quo) before submission

Feedback Assessment for Emerging ONLINE Technology Presentation 4 Excellent coverage of item 3 Good coverage of item 2 Some coverage of item 1 Little coverage of item 0 Item was not included in paper Comments are provided when possible or necessary for clarification

Item Assessment Comment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

14

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the technology being addressed Includes graphics creative amp knowledgeable overview

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the application of the technology to education

Presentation is interesting and appealing and is critically reviewed

Presentation is free from technical glitches and runs smoothly

Presentation includes an overview and summation

Total 20

The ldquoONLINE Emerging Technologiesrdquo presentation should provide the reader with OverviewSummation

Screen captures of the technology This review could be hardware or software technologies

Your critical reflection and review For this assignment Do NOT copy quote or cite ANY review from

another source I want your candid point of view regarding the utility of this technology How might this technology be used in an educational format

Post your presentation in the Moodle Course

Students must ensure that ALL assignment files are free of viruses before submitting them Keep your virus detection software up to date Should an assignment file fail scrutiny by our institutionrsquos standard virus detection software the student submitting it will be so advised by email A virus-free version of the file must be resubmitted within 24 hours of the posting date of this email Any subsequent failure to adhere to this requirement will cause an assignment to be unacceptable and a 0 grade will be recorded for this assignment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

15

Moodle Course Construction 20 All

Semester You will be given TEACHER access to a Moodle course shell for designing

an online course Teachers can do anything within a course including changing the activities and grading students

University of Alaska Anchorage Policies

Incomplete Grade Policy Incomplete Grades Unless there is a veritable reason I do not recommend students pursue this route Communicate with me as I know that sometimes life happens An ldquoIrdquo (Incomplete) is a temporary grade It is used to indicate that a student has made satisfactory progress in the majority of the work in a course but for unavoidable absences or other conditions beyond the control of the student has not been able to complete the course The Incomplete Grade Contract a signed contract form between the student and the faculty member that stipulates the assignment(s) required to finish the course is required and must be completed and filed with the department or deanrsquos office before an ldquoIrdquo grade is assigned Course work must be completed by a date specified in the contract not to exceed one year Upon completion of the required course work the faculty member must submit a change of grade form accompanied by a copy of the incomplete grade contract to the department or deanrsquos office If course work is not completed within one year or if the terms specified on the Incomplete Grade Contract are not met the student may be assigned a failing grade (F or NP depending on the grading basis of the course) If course work is not completed within one year and the faculty member does not submit a change of grade at that time the ldquoIrdquo will become a permanent grade and it will be necessary for the student to re-register to obtain credit for the course ADA Policy The provision of equal opportunities for students who experience disabilities is a campus-wide responsibility and commitment Disabilities Support Services (DSS) is the designated UAA department responsible for coordinating academic support services for students who experience disabilities To access support services students must contact DSS (786-4530 or 786-4536 TTY) and provide current disability documentation that supports the requested services Disability support services are mandated by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 Additional information may be accessed at the DSS Office in Business Education Building (BEB105)or on-line at wwwuaaalaskaedudss Academic Dishonesty Policy Academic integrity is a basic principle that requires all students to take credit only for the ideas and efforts that are their own Cheating plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty are defined as the submission of materials in

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

16

assignments exams or other academic work that is based on sources prohibited by the faculty member In addition to any adverse academic action which may result from the academically dishonest behavior the University specifically reserves the right to address and sanction the conduct involved through student judicial review procedures and the Academic Dispute Resolution Procedure specified in the University catalog If you have ANY questions about citations or academic honesty you should contact me I will be using special software when reviewing papers to certify the integrity of the author not authors I take this matter extremely serious and because this course is a graduate course I assume ALL students have had ample opportunity to educate themselves of appropriate academic conduct Professional and Ethical Behavior University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education students are expected to abide by the State of Alaska Code of Ethics of the Education Profession and professional teaching standards as they concern students the public and the profession The standards adopted by the Professional Teaching Practices Commission govern all members of the teaching profession A violation of the code of ethics and professional teaching standards are grounds for revocation or suspension of teaching certification Religious Holiday or Cultural Observance If a class meeting occurs on a religious holiday or cultural observance day and you are obligated to miss class for this event you must notify the instructor in writing by the end of the second week of the semester Email Policy

The subject line for each email submission should include the following

ldquoEDET 637 (topic)rdquo The may seem pedantic but it helps with organization I generally receive over 75+ emails in a 24-hour period and I file away all correspondence from students Also during Spring 2010 I will be teaching 3 courses doing research serving on numerous committees and boards traveling to conferences etc There are many 18 hour+ days ahead and I like to be busy and productivehellipI loathe busy work and repeating myself Excessive emails make unreasonable time demands on both sender and recipient The following are my guidelines for proper email communication Please ensure you have legitimate need before you write Thanks I will answer email about

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

17

Questions arising from difficulty in understanding course content If you need clarity on ANYTHING let me know

Requests for feedback about graded assignments Private issues appropriate for discussion within the teacher-student

relationship IMPORTANT I will do my best to respond to your email within a 24-hour period unless otherwise noted Please check into BLACKBOARD (ie the Announcements Blog and Discussion Forums) EVERYDAY to assure that you receive course information disseminated in a timely fashion

Andyrsquos Strongly Suggested Student Code of Conduct

In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions

Be self-motivated and self-directed Approach the course with a desire to learn Be a good time managerhellipstart your iterative design NOW Submit constructive criticism for course improvements Participate in a respectful manner in discussions Comply with the honor code

If there is anything else that you feel I should know please do not hesitate to confidentially communicate that concern with me I am committed to making this a positive educational experience for each and every student

G Andrew Page January 2009

e-Lesson Rubric

Teacher Name Dr Page Student Name ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

18

Content Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Subject knowledge is excellent

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Attractiveness Makes excellent use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance the presentation

Makes good use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance to presentation

Makes use of font color graphics effects etc but occasionally these detract from the presentation content

Use of font color graphics effects etc but these often distract from the presentaion content

Mechanics No misspellings or grammatical errors

Three or fewer misspellings andor mechanical errors

Four misspellings andor grammatical errors

More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar

Sources Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes All documented in desired format

Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes Most documented in desired format

Source information collected for graphics facts and quotes but not documented in desired format

Very little or no source information was collected

Oral Presentation Interesting well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention

Relatively interesting rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention

Delivery not smooth but able to hold audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

19

Instructional Design Group Presentation

Teacher Name Dr Page Group ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

Presentation Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention Engages and involves class

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost

Content Group defines and tell HOW design approach can be used Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Excellent resources

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good Good resources

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors Some resources

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Resources Product shows a large amount of original thought Ideas are creative and inventive

Product shows some original thought Work shows new ideas and insights

Uses other peoples ideas (giving them credit) but there is little evidence of original thinking

Uses other peoples ideas but does not give them credit

DESIGN Groups TBA Group 1 Gagnersquos ID Model Heather amp Kitty Group 2 ADDIE Donna Morgan Kimberly Group 3 Rapid-Prototyping Model Sarah amp Lara Group 4 Algo-heuristic Model MB and John Group 5 Dual-coding theory Sasha Bethany George Group 6 Dick amp Carey Model Tracy Andy(Sam) Tim

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

20

Spring 2010 Community of Learners Name email 1 Sarah Frick ansck2uaaalaskaedu 2 Heather Corriere dfhbckodiakalaskaedu 3 Donna Kreiensieck asdkk6uaaalaskaedu 4 Kitty Deal kdealkodiakalaskaedu 5 John D Seltenright anjds2uaaalaskaedu 6 Tracy Scott inalaskausyahoocom 7 Timothy Perry astrp4uaaalaskaedu 8 Lara Madden anlnm1uaaalaskaedu 9 George Flores asgef1uaaalaskaedu 10 Morgan Grey anmg2uaaalaskaedu 11 Maj-Britt Kimm asmk20uaaalaskaedu 12 Sasha Lamoureux asstl5uaaalaskaedu 13 Andy Holleman andyhollemangmailcom 14 Bethany Zimpelman asbz2uaaalaskaedu 15 Kimberly Handy Handy_Kimberlyasdk12org

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21

Jose Feitorsquos ldquoFacets of Intellectual Community1rdquo

1 Student ownership Students recognize their ownership of the learning process Students are dissatisfied with overly directive instructors

2 Shared inquiry There is an appreciation for the generative potential of multiple perspectives Students are surprised at the insights of ldquoquiet peoplerdquo Students are dissatisfied when other students do not engage

3 Allowing ldquonot knowingrdquo Students have the ability to acknowledge their initial lack of understanding Students have a willingness to be wrong and let their opinions evolve Students ask genuine questions There is space for students to struggle with a difficult text

4 Socio-emotional climate The atmosphere is emotionally safemdashstudents know they will not be attacked There is an expectation of help from fellow students There is mutual encouragement and support There is a perception of shared fate and commonalitymdashldquoWere all in the same boatrdquo Tension is relieved through humor

5 Intellectual intimacy Students have deeper access into the inner workings of one anotherrsquos minds They know classmates on a more profound level than they know their friends There is permeability to the opinions of others

1 Feito J Exploring Intellectual Community Group Learning Processes in Traditional ldquoGreat Booksrsquo Seminarsrdquo Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Final Report CASTL Electronic Workspace Menlo Park CA The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching June 13 2002 in Huber M T amp Hutchings P (2005) p47 The Advancement of Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching San Francisco Jossey-Bass

  • NETS for Teachers 2008
  • Technology Integration
  • Academic Dishonesty Policy
  • Professional and Ethical Behavior
  • In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions
Page 4: University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

4

Instructional Goal 10 Facilitation Social constructivism in a virtual environment Student Outcomes Assessment Measures Assignment Standards

11 Understand the importance of online engagement and community building 12 Identify key issues opportunities and problems 13 Facilitate a discussion online

14 Apply principles and best practices of effective online facilitation techniques

Participation in workgroups presentation using online technologies (Elluminate dimdim Skype WizIQ etc)

Students design and development digital learning objects for in their own webspace

NETS for Teachers 2008

Facilitate and Inspire Student Learning and Creativity

Design and Develop Digital-Age Learning Experiences and Assessment

Model Digital-Age Work and Learning

Instructional Goal 20 Design and Development Student Outcomes Assessment Measures Assignment Standards

21 Design and develop an online e-lesson 22 Apply specific criteria to the selection of appropriate media or technology 23 Work collaboratively following the instructional design and development process 24 Apply relevant e-Learning theories to design an online education module 25 Use technology to increase each students ability to plan locate evaluate select and use information to solve problems and draw conclusions

Iterative design of e-lesson Guide the development and instructional process for a student designed online learning module Introduce students to current e-Learning theory and seminal professional journals related to e-Learning

Design an elesson Collaborate D amp D on a course in Moodle

Promote and Model Digital Citizenship and Responsibility

Engage in Professional Growth and Leadership

httpwwwisteorgAMTemplatecfmSection=NETS

Instructional Goal 30 Emerging Educational Technologiesrdquo Evaluating the technology Student Outcomes Assessment Measures Assignment Standards

31 Understand current emerging technologies 32 Incorporate these technologies in an online environment 33 Explain the functionality of an emerging technology

Create a presentation reviewing an emerging web technology

Review an emerging technology

Facilitate and Inspire Student Learning and Creativity

Instructional Goal 40 Critical review of research

Student Outcomes Assessment Measures Assignment Standards

41 Critical review of research

Presentation of research Upload review to website

Facilitate and Inspire Student Learning and Creativity

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

5

IV Guidelines for Evaluation Students will be evaluated on

1 Class participationfacilitation of discussiongroup workinteractivity 2 e-Lesson (Teach a concept through technology) 3 Review and presentation of an emerging web-based technology 4 Instructional Design workgroup collaborative presentation 5 Moodle course constructione-book construction

V Course Level Justification This is a course in a graduate-level professional preparation program Students are required to apply knowledge and skills gained from previous graduate course work or professional work experience in the development of course projects Commitment to Technology College of Education students are expected to (a) demonstrate sound understanding of technology operations and concepts (b) plan and design effective learning environments and experiences supported by technology (c) implement curriculum plans that include technology applications in methods and strategies to maximize student learning (d) use technology to facilitate a variety of effective assessment and evaluation strategies (e) use technology to enhance productivity and professional practice and (f) understand the social ethical and human issues surrounding use of technology in PreK-12 schools and apply those principles in practice

Course Policies

Technology Integration University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education students are expected to (a) demonstrate sound understanding of technology operations and concepts (b) plan and design effective learning environments and experiences supported by technology (c) implement curriculum plans that include technology applications in methods and strategies to maximize student learning (d) facilitate a variety of effective assessment and evaluation strategies (e) use technology to enhance productivity and professional practice and (f) understand the social ethical and human issues surrounding use of technology in adult education training and education and apply those principles in practice Attendance and Make-up Work Your participation in discussions and the quality of the interactions will be noted in great detail FYI Blackboard has the ability to provide the instructor with detailed statistics on the quantity of your participation In other words I can

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

6

see when you login what pages you open and how long you are logged into the course I also be using artificial intelligence technology to rate the quality of each studentrsquos participatory contribution Is this too Orwellian Attendance is crucial even in the virtual world Quality participation and not just taking up digital space is critical Unless there is documented evidence late assignments will not be accepted This is not fair to your colleagues or me

(1) Deadlines for assignments are nonnegotiable All Assignments are due by 12 midnight (AKST) on the prescribed date

Grading 90-100= A 80-89 = B 70-79 = C 60-69 = D Below 60 = fail

Course Text amp Readings Required Texts (ALL ARE OPEN- SOURCE AND DIGITAL)

(1) Anderson T amp Elloumi F (2004) Theory and practice of online learning (2nd Edition) Retrieved January 26 2007 from httpcdeathabascaucaonline_book

(2) The Tower and the Cloud An EDUCAUSE eBook httpwwweducauseeduthetowerandthecloud Course Calendar Schedule Mini Calendar Session 1 January 11th Introductions and Overview of course Session 2 January 18th HOLIDAY Session 3 January 25th Admin issues Session 4 February 1st Emerging Online Tech Session 5 February 8th Design Theory Group 123 Presentations Session 6 February 15th Design Theory Group 456 Presentations Session 7 February 22th Working with the Virtual Student Session 8 March 1rd Research Presentations members from groups 4 5 6 March 8th SPRING BREAK Session 9 March 15th Lessons Learned in the Cyberspace Classroom even More Educational Uses of Technology in e-learning Session 10 March 22 Discussion of Emerging Technologies and their Educational Utility Part II Session 11 March 29st ET Presentations members of Groups 4 5 6 Session 12 April 5th Transforming Courses for the Online Classroom (See session 5 for links) Session 13 April 12 OpenCourse ware presentation (see Session 6 for links) Session14 April 17 Student Mini Showcase Emerging Tech Presentations members of Groups 4 5 6 Session 15 April 24 Student Mini Showcase Emerging Tech Presentations members of Groups 1 2 3 All Full group Elluminate Live Sessions will be recorded Mondays 6-800pm Elluminate

January

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 Session 1

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 Holiday

NO CLASS

19 Work on Session 2

assignments

20 21 22 23

24 25 Session 3

Admn issues

26 27 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

28 29 30

31

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

8

February

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1

Session 4 2 3

Add to the ldquoWeb Tools amp Strategiesrdquo

wiki

4 5 6

7 8 Session 5

Groups 1 2 3 present and facilitate

design theories

9 We will review the Session 5 content in

Session 12

10 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

11 Groups 123 Facilitate BB

discussion this entire week

12 13

14 15 Session 6

Groups 4 5 6 present and facilitate

design theories

16 We will review the Session 6 content in

Session 13

17 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

18 Groups 4 5 6 Facilitate BB

discussion this entire week

19 20

21 22 Session 7

Virtual Student

23 Post URL to final versions of e-Lesson by midnight AK time

24 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

25 26 27

28

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

9

March

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1

Session 8 e-Lessons Due Post in Black

2 3 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

4 5 6

7 8 Spring Break

No Class

9 10

11 12 13

14 15 Session 9

16 17 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

18 Moodle Design

19 20

21 22 Session 10

23 24 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

25 Moodle Design

26 27

28 29 Session 11

30 31 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

10

2010

1

2 3 Session 12

Transforming Courses for the

Online Classroom

4 5 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

6 Moodle Design

7 8

9 10 Session 13

Open Courseware

11 12 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

13 Moodle Design

14 15

16 17 Session 14

ET Presentations Groups 4 5 6

18 19 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

20 Moodle Design

Completed

21 22

23 24 Session 15

ET Presentations Groups 1 2 3

25 26 FINAL DAY to Add to the ldquoWeb Tools amp

Strategiesrdquo wiki

27 28 29

30 31

April APRIL

The readings for this course will be more intensive during the first 8 weeks of the course The remainder of the course is more of a hands-on approach that involves applying that knowledge The textbooks are SUPPLEMENTAL learning objects that when combined with the online content should enrich your overall experience I reserve the right to addsubtract content to better meet your learning needs I believe in a democratic classroom and am open to suggestions and creative ideas We are ALL learners and that includes me we are ALL teachers and that includes you Wisdom about ONLINE LEARNING Assignments Grading Due dates

Assignment

Value

Due date

E-lesson Teach a concept digitally

20

Monday March 1 Remember to post the link of your e-lesson in the e-Lesson in the DISCUSSION FORUM Also post your embedded or linked presentation in Moodle after uploading

Emerging Web 20 Technology presentation 20

To be shared in Elluminate Sessions 14 amp 15 Mini-Showcase Embed your presentation in Moodle

ParticipationContribution to Community of Learners and WORKGROUPS

20

All semester Communal Constructivism

Moodle Course Construction

20 All Semester

Instructional Design Workgroup Presentation 20 Monday February

8th and Feb 15th

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

12

Rubric for Participation = We participate therefore we arerdquo 20 Excellent participation Significant contribution to the collaborative nature of this course through high quality and critical discussions detailed presentations submitted on time superior involvement with your group substantial amount of input high level input in chatdiscussions Substantive Elluminate Live presence Contributes to synchronous discussions Excellent facilitationparticipant of weekly Blackboard Discussion Forums as well as postings in the Blog numerous quality contributions to the Moodle course and contributions to the Web Tools amp Strategies wiki

10

Good Moderate contribution in Blackboard average postings frequent participation decent quality in postings in chatdiscussion boards and group work frequent Elluminate presence and good Moodle contributions

8-9

Some Student sporadically checks in to Blackboard low quality contribution insubstantial postings little critical reflection group input is marginal little input in Elluminate the blog the discussion forums and Moodle

5-7

Little Student checks in less than once a week online little or no contribution to discussions very little or no input

1-4

E-Lesson 20

You are to use whatever medium you want to create an electronic lesson That is the lesson should

be in a format that it can be viewed via the Internet See the webpage for more information

examples and specifics Basically your goal here is to teach us a concept of your choice using

technology It can be a webpage video or whatever tool(s) you want to use Examples will be

provided Your e-Lesson will potentially become a part of the e-book on e-Learning Check out

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

13

httpgobongobookscom as this will be the online interface for our collaboration

Emerging Web-based Technology Presentation (TOPIC DUE by FEB 1st) 20 You have the opportunity to select an emerging ONLINE technology of your choice and evaluatereview it You will construct a presentation in to share your findings for all learners There are numerous examples from past courses on the websitehelliphave FUN and be creative When you have narrowed your search of the appropriate Web 20 technology please POST your selection amp rationale in the course Blackboard discussion board forum entitled MY EMERGING ONLINE TECHNOLOGY Presentations must cover the following

(1) description of the technology (2) developers of the technology (3) current or projected uses of the technology (4) costs (5) specialized equipment or standards for usage (6) availability (7) access (8) adaptability (9) level of interactivity (10) type of control (11) vendor or producer information (12) educational applications of the technology and a (13) bibliography covering salient sources (14) Also please include screen captures embedded as figures

While optional you can choose to have your presentation peer reviewed (quid pro quo) before submission

Feedback Assessment for Emerging ONLINE Technology Presentation 4 Excellent coverage of item 3 Good coverage of item 2 Some coverage of item 1 Little coverage of item 0 Item was not included in paper Comments are provided when possible or necessary for clarification

Item Assessment Comment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

14

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the technology being addressed Includes graphics creative amp knowledgeable overview

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the application of the technology to education

Presentation is interesting and appealing and is critically reviewed

Presentation is free from technical glitches and runs smoothly

Presentation includes an overview and summation

Total 20

The ldquoONLINE Emerging Technologiesrdquo presentation should provide the reader with OverviewSummation

Screen captures of the technology This review could be hardware or software technologies

Your critical reflection and review For this assignment Do NOT copy quote or cite ANY review from

another source I want your candid point of view regarding the utility of this technology How might this technology be used in an educational format

Post your presentation in the Moodle Course

Students must ensure that ALL assignment files are free of viruses before submitting them Keep your virus detection software up to date Should an assignment file fail scrutiny by our institutionrsquos standard virus detection software the student submitting it will be so advised by email A virus-free version of the file must be resubmitted within 24 hours of the posting date of this email Any subsequent failure to adhere to this requirement will cause an assignment to be unacceptable and a 0 grade will be recorded for this assignment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

15

Moodle Course Construction 20 All

Semester You will be given TEACHER access to a Moodle course shell for designing

an online course Teachers can do anything within a course including changing the activities and grading students

University of Alaska Anchorage Policies

Incomplete Grade Policy Incomplete Grades Unless there is a veritable reason I do not recommend students pursue this route Communicate with me as I know that sometimes life happens An ldquoIrdquo (Incomplete) is a temporary grade It is used to indicate that a student has made satisfactory progress in the majority of the work in a course but for unavoidable absences or other conditions beyond the control of the student has not been able to complete the course The Incomplete Grade Contract a signed contract form between the student and the faculty member that stipulates the assignment(s) required to finish the course is required and must be completed and filed with the department or deanrsquos office before an ldquoIrdquo grade is assigned Course work must be completed by a date specified in the contract not to exceed one year Upon completion of the required course work the faculty member must submit a change of grade form accompanied by a copy of the incomplete grade contract to the department or deanrsquos office If course work is not completed within one year or if the terms specified on the Incomplete Grade Contract are not met the student may be assigned a failing grade (F or NP depending on the grading basis of the course) If course work is not completed within one year and the faculty member does not submit a change of grade at that time the ldquoIrdquo will become a permanent grade and it will be necessary for the student to re-register to obtain credit for the course ADA Policy The provision of equal opportunities for students who experience disabilities is a campus-wide responsibility and commitment Disabilities Support Services (DSS) is the designated UAA department responsible for coordinating academic support services for students who experience disabilities To access support services students must contact DSS (786-4530 or 786-4536 TTY) and provide current disability documentation that supports the requested services Disability support services are mandated by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 Additional information may be accessed at the DSS Office in Business Education Building (BEB105)or on-line at wwwuaaalaskaedudss Academic Dishonesty Policy Academic integrity is a basic principle that requires all students to take credit only for the ideas and efforts that are their own Cheating plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty are defined as the submission of materials in

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

16

assignments exams or other academic work that is based on sources prohibited by the faculty member In addition to any adverse academic action which may result from the academically dishonest behavior the University specifically reserves the right to address and sanction the conduct involved through student judicial review procedures and the Academic Dispute Resolution Procedure specified in the University catalog If you have ANY questions about citations or academic honesty you should contact me I will be using special software when reviewing papers to certify the integrity of the author not authors I take this matter extremely serious and because this course is a graduate course I assume ALL students have had ample opportunity to educate themselves of appropriate academic conduct Professional and Ethical Behavior University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education students are expected to abide by the State of Alaska Code of Ethics of the Education Profession and professional teaching standards as they concern students the public and the profession The standards adopted by the Professional Teaching Practices Commission govern all members of the teaching profession A violation of the code of ethics and professional teaching standards are grounds for revocation or suspension of teaching certification Religious Holiday or Cultural Observance If a class meeting occurs on a religious holiday or cultural observance day and you are obligated to miss class for this event you must notify the instructor in writing by the end of the second week of the semester Email Policy

The subject line for each email submission should include the following

ldquoEDET 637 (topic)rdquo The may seem pedantic but it helps with organization I generally receive over 75+ emails in a 24-hour period and I file away all correspondence from students Also during Spring 2010 I will be teaching 3 courses doing research serving on numerous committees and boards traveling to conferences etc There are many 18 hour+ days ahead and I like to be busy and productivehellipI loathe busy work and repeating myself Excessive emails make unreasonable time demands on both sender and recipient The following are my guidelines for proper email communication Please ensure you have legitimate need before you write Thanks I will answer email about

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

17

Questions arising from difficulty in understanding course content If you need clarity on ANYTHING let me know

Requests for feedback about graded assignments Private issues appropriate for discussion within the teacher-student

relationship IMPORTANT I will do my best to respond to your email within a 24-hour period unless otherwise noted Please check into BLACKBOARD (ie the Announcements Blog and Discussion Forums) EVERYDAY to assure that you receive course information disseminated in a timely fashion

Andyrsquos Strongly Suggested Student Code of Conduct

In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions

Be self-motivated and self-directed Approach the course with a desire to learn Be a good time managerhellipstart your iterative design NOW Submit constructive criticism for course improvements Participate in a respectful manner in discussions Comply with the honor code

If there is anything else that you feel I should know please do not hesitate to confidentially communicate that concern with me I am committed to making this a positive educational experience for each and every student

G Andrew Page January 2009

e-Lesson Rubric

Teacher Name Dr Page Student Name ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

18

Content Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Subject knowledge is excellent

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Attractiveness Makes excellent use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance the presentation

Makes good use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance to presentation

Makes use of font color graphics effects etc but occasionally these detract from the presentation content

Use of font color graphics effects etc but these often distract from the presentaion content

Mechanics No misspellings or grammatical errors

Three or fewer misspellings andor mechanical errors

Four misspellings andor grammatical errors

More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar

Sources Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes All documented in desired format

Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes Most documented in desired format

Source information collected for graphics facts and quotes but not documented in desired format

Very little or no source information was collected

Oral Presentation Interesting well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention

Relatively interesting rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention

Delivery not smooth but able to hold audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

19

Instructional Design Group Presentation

Teacher Name Dr Page Group ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

Presentation Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention Engages and involves class

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost

Content Group defines and tell HOW design approach can be used Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Excellent resources

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good Good resources

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors Some resources

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Resources Product shows a large amount of original thought Ideas are creative and inventive

Product shows some original thought Work shows new ideas and insights

Uses other peoples ideas (giving them credit) but there is little evidence of original thinking

Uses other peoples ideas but does not give them credit

DESIGN Groups TBA Group 1 Gagnersquos ID Model Heather amp Kitty Group 2 ADDIE Donna Morgan Kimberly Group 3 Rapid-Prototyping Model Sarah amp Lara Group 4 Algo-heuristic Model MB and John Group 5 Dual-coding theory Sasha Bethany George Group 6 Dick amp Carey Model Tracy Andy(Sam) Tim

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

20

Spring 2010 Community of Learners Name email 1 Sarah Frick ansck2uaaalaskaedu 2 Heather Corriere dfhbckodiakalaskaedu 3 Donna Kreiensieck asdkk6uaaalaskaedu 4 Kitty Deal kdealkodiakalaskaedu 5 John D Seltenright anjds2uaaalaskaedu 6 Tracy Scott inalaskausyahoocom 7 Timothy Perry astrp4uaaalaskaedu 8 Lara Madden anlnm1uaaalaskaedu 9 George Flores asgef1uaaalaskaedu 10 Morgan Grey anmg2uaaalaskaedu 11 Maj-Britt Kimm asmk20uaaalaskaedu 12 Sasha Lamoureux asstl5uaaalaskaedu 13 Andy Holleman andyhollemangmailcom 14 Bethany Zimpelman asbz2uaaalaskaedu 15 Kimberly Handy Handy_Kimberlyasdk12org

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21

Jose Feitorsquos ldquoFacets of Intellectual Community1rdquo

1 Student ownership Students recognize their ownership of the learning process Students are dissatisfied with overly directive instructors

2 Shared inquiry There is an appreciation for the generative potential of multiple perspectives Students are surprised at the insights of ldquoquiet peoplerdquo Students are dissatisfied when other students do not engage

3 Allowing ldquonot knowingrdquo Students have the ability to acknowledge their initial lack of understanding Students have a willingness to be wrong and let their opinions evolve Students ask genuine questions There is space for students to struggle with a difficult text

4 Socio-emotional climate The atmosphere is emotionally safemdashstudents know they will not be attacked There is an expectation of help from fellow students There is mutual encouragement and support There is a perception of shared fate and commonalitymdashldquoWere all in the same boatrdquo Tension is relieved through humor

5 Intellectual intimacy Students have deeper access into the inner workings of one anotherrsquos minds They know classmates on a more profound level than they know their friends There is permeability to the opinions of others

1 Feito J Exploring Intellectual Community Group Learning Processes in Traditional ldquoGreat Booksrsquo Seminarsrdquo Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Final Report CASTL Electronic Workspace Menlo Park CA The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching June 13 2002 in Huber M T amp Hutchings P (2005) p47 The Advancement of Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching San Francisco Jossey-Bass

  • NETS for Teachers 2008
  • Technology Integration
  • Academic Dishonesty Policy
  • Professional and Ethical Behavior
  • In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions
Page 5: University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

5

IV Guidelines for Evaluation Students will be evaluated on

1 Class participationfacilitation of discussiongroup workinteractivity 2 e-Lesson (Teach a concept through technology) 3 Review and presentation of an emerging web-based technology 4 Instructional Design workgroup collaborative presentation 5 Moodle course constructione-book construction

V Course Level Justification This is a course in a graduate-level professional preparation program Students are required to apply knowledge and skills gained from previous graduate course work or professional work experience in the development of course projects Commitment to Technology College of Education students are expected to (a) demonstrate sound understanding of technology operations and concepts (b) plan and design effective learning environments and experiences supported by technology (c) implement curriculum plans that include technology applications in methods and strategies to maximize student learning (d) use technology to facilitate a variety of effective assessment and evaluation strategies (e) use technology to enhance productivity and professional practice and (f) understand the social ethical and human issues surrounding use of technology in PreK-12 schools and apply those principles in practice

Course Policies

Technology Integration University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education students are expected to (a) demonstrate sound understanding of technology operations and concepts (b) plan and design effective learning environments and experiences supported by technology (c) implement curriculum plans that include technology applications in methods and strategies to maximize student learning (d) facilitate a variety of effective assessment and evaluation strategies (e) use technology to enhance productivity and professional practice and (f) understand the social ethical and human issues surrounding use of technology in adult education training and education and apply those principles in practice Attendance and Make-up Work Your participation in discussions and the quality of the interactions will be noted in great detail FYI Blackboard has the ability to provide the instructor with detailed statistics on the quantity of your participation In other words I can

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

6

see when you login what pages you open and how long you are logged into the course I also be using artificial intelligence technology to rate the quality of each studentrsquos participatory contribution Is this too Orwellian Attendance is crucial even in the virtual world Quality participation and not just taking up digital space is critical Unless there is documented evidence late assignments will not be accepted This is not fair to your colleagues or me

(1) Deadlines for assignments are nonnegotiable All Assignments are due by 12 midnight (AKST) on the prescribed date

Grading 90-100= A 80-89 = B 70-79 = C 60-69 = D Below 60 = fail

Course Text amp Readings Required Texts (ALL ARE OPEN- SOURCE AND DIGITAL)

(1) Anderson T amp Elloumi F (2004) Theory and practice of online learning (2nd Edition) Retrieved January 26 2007 from httpcdeathabascaucaonline_book

(2) The Tower and the Cloud An EDUCAUSE eBook httpwwweducauseeduthetowerandthecloud Course Calendar Schedule Mini Calendar Session 1 January 11th Introductions and Overview of course Session 2 January 18th HOLIDAY Session 3 January 25th Admin issues Session 4 February 1st Emerging Online Tech Session 5 February 8th Design Theory Group 123 Presentations Session 6 February 15th Design Theory Group 456 Presentations Session 7 February 22th Working with the Virtual Student Session 8 March 1rd Research Presentations members from groups 4 5 6 March 8th SPRING BREAK Session 9 March 15th Lessons Learned in the Cyberspace Classroom even More Educational Uses of Technology in e-learning Session 10 March 22 Discussion of Emerging Technologies and their Educational Utility Part II Session 11 March 29st ET Presentations members of Groups 4 5 6 Session 12 April 5th Transforming Courses for the Online Classroom (See session 5 for links) Session 13 April 12 OpenCourse ware presentation (see Session 6 for links) Session14 April 17 Student Mini Showcase Emerging Tech Presentations members of Groups 4 5 6 Session 15 April 24 Student Mini Showcase Emerging Tech Presentations members of Groups 1 2 3 All Full group Elluminate Live Sessions will be recorded Mondays 6-800pm Elluminate

January

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 Session 1

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 Holiday

NO CLASS

19 Work on Session 2

assignments

20 21 22 23

24 25 Session 3

Admn issues

26 27 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

28 29 30

31

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

8

February

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1

Session 4 2 3

Add to the ldquoWeb Tools amp Strategiesrdquo

wiki

4 5 6

7 8 Session 5

Groups 1 2 3 present and facilitate

design theories

9 We will review the Session 5 content in

Session 12

10 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

11 Groups 123 Facilitate BB

discussion this entire week

12 13

14 15 Session 6

Groups 4 5 6 present and facilitate

design theories

16 We will review the Session 6 content in

Session 13

17 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

18 Groups 4 5 6 Facilitate BB

discussion this entire week

19 20

21 22 Session 7

Virtual Student

23 Post URL to final versions of e-Lesson by midnight AK time

24 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

25 26 27

28

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

9

March

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1

Session 8 e-Lessons Due Post in Black

2 3 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

4 5 6

7 8 Spring Break

No Class

9 10

11 12 13

14 15 Session 9

16 17 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

18 Moodle Design

19 20

21 22 Session 10

23 24 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

25 Moodle Design

26 27

28 29 Session 11

30 31 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

10

2010

1

2 3 Session 12

Transforming Courses for the

Online Classroom

4 5 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

6 Moodle Design

7 8

9 10 Session 13

Open Courseware

11 12 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

13 Moodle Design

14 15

16 17 Session 14

ET Presentations Groups 4 5 6

18 19 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

20 Moodle Design

Completed

21 22

23 24 Session 15

ET Presentations Groups 1 2 3

25 26 FINAL DAY to Add to the ldquoWeb Tools amp

Strategiesrdquo wiki

27 28 29

30 31

April APRIL

The readings for this course will be more intensive during the first 8 weeks of the course The remainder of the course is more of a hands-on approach that involves applying that knowledge The textbooks are SUPPLEMENTAL learning objects that when combined with the online content should enrich your overall experience I reserve the right to addsubtract content to better meet your learning needs I believe in a democratic classroom and am open to suggestions and creative ideas We are ALL learners and that includes me we are ALL teachers and that includes you Wisdom about ONLINE LEARNING Assignments Grading Due dates

Assignment

Value

Due date

E-lesson Teach a concept digitally

20

Monday March 1 Remember to post the link of your e-lesson in the e-Lesson in the DISCUSSION FORUM Also post your embedded or linked presentation in Moodle after uploading

Emerging Web 20 Technology presentation 20

To be shared in Elluminate Sessions 14 amp 15 Mini-Showcase Embed your presentation in Moodle

ParticipationContribution to Community of Learners and WORKGROUPS

20

All semester Communal Constructivism

Moodle Course Construction

20 All Semester

Instructional Design Workgroup Presentation 20 Monday February

8th and Feb 15th

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

12

Rubric for Participation = We participate therefore we arerdquo 20 Excellent participation Significant contribution to the collaborative nature of this course through high quality and critical discussions detailed presentations submitted on time superior involvement with your group substantial amount of input high level input in chatdiscussions Substantive Elluminate Live presence Contributes to synchronous discussions Excellent facilitationparticipant of weekly Blackboard Discussion Forums as well as postings in the Blog numerous quality contributions to the Moodle course and contributions to the Web Tools amp Strategies wiki

10

Good Moderate contribution in Blackboard average postings frequent participation decent quality in postings in chatdiscussion boards and group work frequent Elluminate presence and good Moodle contributions

8-9

Some Student sporadically checks in to Blackboard low quality contribution insubstantial postings little critical reflection group input is marginal little input in Elluminate the blog the discussion forums and Moodle

5-7

Little Student checks in less than once a week online little or no contribution to discussions very little or no input

1-4

E-Lesson 20

You are to use whatever medium you want to create an electronic lesson That is the lesson should

be in a format that it can be viewed via the Internet See the webpage for more information

examples and specifics Basically your goal here is to teach us a concept of your choice using

technology It can be a webpage video or whatever tool(s) you want to use Examples will be

provided Your e-Lesson will potentially become a part of the e-book on e-Learning Check out

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

13

httpgobongobookscom as this will be the online interface for our collaboration

Emerging Web-based Technology Presentation (TOPIC DUE by FEB 1st) 20 You have the opportunity to select an emerging ONLINE technology of your choice and evaluatereview it You will construct a presentation in to share your findings for all learners There are numerous examples from past courses on the websitehelliphave FUN and be creative When you have narrowed your search of the appropriate Web 20 technology please POST your selection amp rationale in the course Blackboard discussion board forum entitled MY EMERGING ONLINE TECHNOLOGY Presentations must cover the following

(1) description of the technology (2) developers of the technology (3) current or projected uses of the technology (4) costs (5) specialized equipment or standards for usage (6) availability (7) access (8) adaptability (9) level of interactivity (10) type of control (11) vendor or producer information (12) educational applications of the technology and a (13) bibliography covering salient sources (14) Also please include screen captures embedded as figures

While optional you can choose to have your presentation peer reviewed (quid pro quo) before submission

Feedback Assessment for Emerging ONLINE Technology Presentation 4 Excellent coverage of item 3 Good coverage of item 2 Some coverage of item 1 Little coverage of item 0 Item was not included in paper Comments are provided when possible or necessary for clarification

Item Assessment Comment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

14

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the technology being addressed Includes graphics creative amp knowledgeable overview

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the application of the technology to education

Presentation is interesting and appealing and is critically reviewed

Presentation is free from technical glitches and runs smoothly

Presentation includes an overview and summation

Total 20

The ldquoONLINE Emerging Technologiesrdquo presentation should provide the reader with OverviewSummation

Screen captures of the technology This review could be hardware or software technologies

Your critical reflection and review For this assignment Do NOT copy quote or cite ANY review from

another source I want your candid point of view regarding the utility of this technology How might this technology be used in an educational format

Post your presentation in the Moodle Course

Students must ensure that ALL assignment files are free of viruses before submitting them Keep your virus detection software up to date Should an assignment file fail scrutiny by our institutionrsquos standard virus detection software the student submitting it will be so advised by email A virus-free version of the file must be resubmitted within 24 hours of the posting date of this email Any subsequent failure to adhere to this requirement will cause an assignment to be unacceptable and a 0 grade will be recorded for this assignment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

15

Moodle Course Construction 20 All

Semester You will be given TEACHER access to a Moodle course shell for designing

an online course Teachers can do anything within a course including changing the activities and grading students

University of Alaska Anchorage Policies

Incomplete Grade Policy Incomplete Grades Unless there is a veritable reason I do not recommend students pursue this route Communicate with me as I know that sometimes life happens An ldquoIrdquo (Incomplete) is a temporary grade It is used to indicate that a student has made satisfactory progress in the majority of the work in a course but for unavoidable absences or other conditions beyond the control of the student has not been able to complete the course The Incomplete Grade Contract a signed contract form between the student and the faculty member that stipulates the assignment(s) required to finish the course is required and must be completed and filed with the department or deanrsquos office before an ldquoIrdquo grade is assigned Course work must be completed by a date specified in the contract not to exceed one year Upon completion of the required course work the faculty member must submit a change of grade form accompanied by a copy of the incomplete grade contract to the department or deanrsquos office If course work is not completed within one year or if the terms specified on the Incomplete Grade Contract are not met the student may be assigned a failing grade (F or NP depending on the grading basis of the course) If course work is not completed within one year and the faculty member does not submit a change of grade at that time the ldquoIrdquo will become a permanent grade and it will be necessary for the student to re-register to obtain credit for the course ADA Policy The provision of equal opportunities for students who experience disabilities is a campus-wide responsibility and commitment Disabilities Support Services (DSS) is the designated UAA department responsible for coordinating academic support services for students who experience disabilities To access support services students must contact DSS (786-4530 or 786-4536 TTY) and provide current disability documentation that supports the requested services Disability support services are mandated by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 Additional information may be accessed at the DSS Office in Business Education Building (BEB105)or on-line at wwwuaaalaskaedudss Academic Dishonesty Policy Academic integrity is a basic principle that requires all students to take credit only for the ideas and efforts that are their own Cheating plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty are defined as the submission of materials in

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

16

assignments exams or other academic work that is based on sources prohibited by the faculty member In addition to any adverse academic action which may result from the academically dishonest behavior the University specifically reserves the right to address and sanction the conduct involved through student judicial review procedures and the Academic Dispute Resolution Procedure specified in the University catalog If you have ANY questions about citations or academic honesty you should contact me I will be using special software when reviewing papers to certify the integrity of the author not authors I take this matter extremely serious and because this course is a graduate course I assume ALL students have had ample opportunity to educate themselves of appropriate academic conduct Professional and Ethical Behavior University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education students are expected to abide by the State of Alaska Code of Ethics of the Education Profession and professional teaching standards as they concern students the public and the profession The standards adopted by the Professional Teaching Practices Commission govern all members of the teaching profession A violation of the code of ethics and professional teaching standards are grounds for revocation or suspension of teaching certification Religious Holiday or Cultural Observance If a class meeting occurs on a religious holiday or cultural observance day and you are obligated to miss class for this event you must notify the instructor in writing by the end of the second week of the semester Email Policy

The subject line for each email submission should include the following

ldquoEDET 637 (topic)rdquo The may seem pedantic but it helps with organization I generally receive over 75+ emails in a 24-hour period and I file away all correspondence from students Also during Spring 2010 I will be teaching 3 courses doing research serving on numerous committees and boards traveling to conferences etc There are many 18 hour+ days ahead and I like to be busy and productivehellipI loathe busy work and repeating myself Excessive emails make unreasonable time demands on both sender and recipient The following are my guidelines for proper email communication Please ensure you have legitimate need before you write Thanks I will answer email about

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

17

Questions arising from difficulty in understanding course content If you need clarity on ANYTHING let me know

Requests for feedback about graded assignments Private issues appropriate for discussion within the teacher-student

relationship IMPORTANT I will do my best to respond to your email within a 24-hour period unless otherwise noted Please check into BLACKBOARD (ie the Announcements Blog and Discussion Forums) EVERYDAY to assure that you receive course information disseminated in a timely fashion

Andyrsquos Strongly Suggested Student Code of Conduct

In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions

Be self-motivated and self-directed Approach the course with a desire to learn Be a good time managerhellipstart your iterative design NOW Submit constructive criticism for course improvements Participate in a respectful manner in discussions Comply with the honor code

If there is anything else that you feel I should know please do not hesitate to confidentially communicate that concern with me I am committed to making this a positive educational experience for each and every student

G Andrew Page January 2009

e-Lesson Rubric

Teacher Name Dr Page Student Name ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

18

Content Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Subject knowledge is excellent

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Attractiveness Makes excellent use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance the presentation

Makes good use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance to presentation

Makes use of font color graphics effects etc but occasionally these detract from the presentation content

Use of font color graphics effects etc but these often distract from the presentaion content

Mechanics No misspellings or grammatical errors

Three or fewer misspellings andor mechanical errors

Four misspellings andor grammatical errors

More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar

Sources Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes All documented in desired format

Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes Most documented in desired format

Source information collected for graphics facts and quotes but not documented in desired format

Very little or no source information was collected

Oral Presentation Interesting well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention

Relatively interesting rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention

Delivery not smooth but able to hold audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

19

Instructional Design Group Presentation

Teacher Name Dr Page Group ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

Presentation Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention Engages and involves class

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost

Content Group defines and tell HOW design approach can be used Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Excellent resources

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good Good resources

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors Some resources

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Resources Product shows a large amount of original thought Ideas are creative and inventive

Product shows some original thought Work shows new ideas and insights

Uses other peoples ideas (giving them credit) but there is little evidence of original thinking

Uses other peoples ideas but does not give them credit

DESIGN Groups TBA Group 1 Gagnersquos ID Model Heather amp Kitty Group 2 ADDIE Donna Morgan Kimberly Group 3 Rapid-Prototyping Model Sarah amp Lara Group 4 Algo-heuristic Model MB and John Group 5 Dual-coding theory Sasha Bethany George Group 6 Dick amp Carey Model Tracy Andy(Sam) Tim

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

20

Spring 2010 Community of Learners Name email 1 Sarah Frick ansck2uaaalaskaedu 2 Heather Corriere dfhbckodiakalaskaedu 3 Donna Kreiensieck asdkk6uaaalaskaedu 4 Kitty Deal kdealkodiakalaskaedu 5 John D Seltenright anjds2uaaalaskaedu 6 Tracy Scott inalaskausyahoocom 7 Timothy Perry astrp4uaaalaskaedu 8 Lara Madden anlnm1uaaalaskaedu 9 George Flores asgef1uaaalaskaedu 10 Morgan Grey anmg2uaaalaskaedu 11 Maj-Britt Kimm asmk20uaaalaskaedu 12 Sasha Lamoureux asstl5uaaalaskaedu 13 Andy Holleman andyhollemangmailcom 14 Bethany Zimpelman asbz2uaaalaskaedu 15 Kimberly Handy Handy_Kimberlyasdk12org

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21

Jose Feitorsquos ldquoFacets of Intellectual Community1rdquo

1 Student ownership Students recognize their ownership of the learning process Students are dissatisfied with overly directive instructors

2 Shared inquiry There is an appreciation for the generative potential of multiple perspectives Students are surprised at the insights of ldquoquiet peoplerdquo Students are dissatisfied when other students do not engage

3 Allowing ldquonot knowingrdquo Students have the ability to acknowledge their initial lack of understanding Students have a willingness to be wrong and let their opinions evolve Students ask genuine questions There is space for students to struggle with a difficult text

4 Socio-emotional climate The atmosphere is emotionally safemdashstudents know they will not be attacked There is an expectation of help from fellow students There is mutual encouragement and support There is a perception of shared fate and commonalitymdashldquoWere all in the same boatrdquo Tension is relieved through humor

5 Intellectual intimacy Students have deeper access into the inner workings of one anotherrsquos minds They know classmates on a more profound level than they know their friends There is permeability to the opinions of others

1 Feito J Exploring Intellectual Community Group Learning Processes in Traditional ldquoGreat Booksrsquo Seminarsrdquo Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Final Report CASTL Electronic Workspace Menlo Park CA The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching June 13 2002 in Huber M T amp Hutchings P (2005) p47 The Advancement of Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching San Francisco Jossey-Bass

  • NETS for Teachers 2008
  • Technology Integration
  • Academic Dishonesty Policy
  • Professional and Ethical Behavior
  • In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions
Page 6: University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

6

see when you login what pages you open and how long you are logged into the course I also be using artificial intelligence technology to rate the quality of each studentrsquos participatory contribution Is this too Orwellian Attendance is crucial even in the virtual world Quality participation and not just taking up digital space is critical Unless there is documented evidence late assignments will not be accepted This is not fair to your colleagues or me

(1) Deadlines for assignments are nonnegotiable All Assignments are due by 12 midnight (AKST) on the prescribed date

Grading 90-100= A 80-89 = B 70-79 = C 60-69 = D Below 60 = fail

Course Text amp Readings Required Texts (ALL ARE OPEN- SOURCE AND DIGITAL)

(1) Anderson T amp Elloumi F (2004) Theory and practice of online learning (2nd Edition) Retrieved January 26 2007 from httpcdeathabascaucaonline_book

(2) The Tower and the Cloud An EDUCAUSE eBook httpwwweducauseeduthetowerandthecloud Course Calendar Schedule Mini Calendar Session 1 January 11th Introductions and Overview of course Session 2 January 18th HOLIDAY Session 3 January 25th Admin issues Session 4 February 1st Emerging Online Tech Session 5 February 8th Design Theory Group 123 Presentations Session 6 February 15th Design Theory Group 456 Presentations Session 7 February 22th Working with the Virtual Student Session 8 March 1rd Research Presentations members from groups 4 5 6 March 8th SPRING BREAK Session 9 March 15th Lessons Learned in the Cyberspace Classroom even More Educational Uses of Technology in e-learning Session 10 March 22 Discussion of Emerging Technologies and their Educational Utility Part II Session 11 March 29st ET Presentations members of Groups 4 5 6 Session 12 April 5th Transforming Courses for the Online Classroom (See session 5 for links) Session 13 April 12 OpenCourse ware presentation (see Session 6 for links) Session14 April 17 Student Mini Showcase Emerging Tech Presentations members of Groups 4 5 6 Session 15 April 24 Student Mini Showcase Emerging Tech Presentations members of Groups 1 2 3 All Full group Elluminate Live Sessions will be recorded Mondays 6-800pm Elluminate

January

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 Session 1

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 Holiday

NO CLASS

19 Work on Session 2

assignments

20 21 22 23

24 25 Session 3

Admn issues

26 27 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

28 29 30

31

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

8

February

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1

Session 4 2 3

Add to the ldquoWeb Tools amp Strategiesrdquo

wiki

4 5 6

7 8 Session 5

Groups 1 2 3 present and facilitate

design theories

9 We will review the Session 5 content in

Session 12

10 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

11 Groups 123 Facilitate BB

discussion this entire week

12 13

14 15 Session 6

Groups 4 5 6 present and facilitate

design theories

16 We will review the Session 6 content in

Session 13

17 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

18 Groups 4 5 6 Facilitate BB

discussion this entire week

19 20

21 22 Session 7

Virtual Student

23 Post URL to final versions of e-Lesson by midnight AK time

24 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

25 26 27

28

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

9

March

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1

Session 8 e-Lessons Due Post in Black

2 3 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

4 5 6

7 8 Spring Break

No Class

9 10

11 12 13

14 15 Session 9

16 17 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

18 Moodle Design

19 20

21 22 Session 10

23 24 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

25 Moodle Design

26 27

28 29 Session 11

30 31 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

10

2010

1

2 3 Session 12

Transforming Courses for the

Online Classroom

4 5 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

6 Moodle Design

7 8

9 10 Session 13

Open Courseware

11 12 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

13 Moodle Design

14 15

16 17 Session 14

ET Presentations Groups 4 5 6

18 19 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

20 Moodle Design

Completed

21 22

23 24 Session 15

ET Presentations Groups 1 2 3

25 26 FINAL DAY to Add to the ldquoWeb Tools amp

Strategiesrdquo wiki

27 28 29

30 31

April APRIL

The readings for this course will be more intensive during the first 8 weeks of the course The remainder of the course is more of a hands-on approach that involves applying that knowledge The textbooks are SUPPLEMENTAL learning objects that when combined with the online content should enrich your overall experience I reserve the right to addsubtract content to better meet your learning needs I believe in a democratic classroom and am open to suggestions and creative ideas We are ALL learners and that includes me we are ALL teachers and that includes you Wisdom about ONLINE LEARNING Assignments Grading Due dates

Assignment

Value

Due date

E-lesson Teach a concept digitally

20

Monday March 1 Remember to post the link of your e-lesson in the e-Lesson in the DISCUSSION FORUM Also post your embedded or linked presentation in Moodle after uploading

Emerging Web 20 Technology presentation 20

To be shared in Elluminate Sessions 14 amp 15 Mini-Showcase Embed your presentation in Moodle

ParticipationContribution to Community of Learners and WORKGROUPS

20

All semester Communal Constructivism

Moodle Course Construction

20 All Semester

Instructional Design Workgroup Presentation 20 Monday February

8th and Feb 15th

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

12

Rubric for Participation = We participate therefore we arerdquo 20 Excellent participation Significant contribution to the collaborative nature of this course through high quality and critical discussions detailed presentations submitted on time superior involvement with your group substantial amount of input high level input in chatdiscussions Substantive Elluminate Live presence Contributes to synchronous discussions Excellent facilitationparticipant of weekly Blackboard Discussion Forums as well as postings in the Blog numerous quality contributions to the Moodle course and contributions to the Web Tools amp Strategies wiki

10

Good Moderate contribution in Blackboard average postings frequent participation decent quality in postings in chatdiscussion boards and group work frequent Elluminate presence and good Moodle contributions

8-9

Some Student sporadically checks in to Blackboard low quality contribution insubstantial postings little critical reflection group input is marginal little input in Elluminate the blog the discussion forums and Moodle

5-7

Little Student checks in less than once a week online little or no contribution to discussions very little or no input

1-4

E-Lesson 20

You are to use whatever medium you want to create an electronic lesson That is the lesson should

be in a format that it can be viewed via the Internet See the webpage for more information

examples and specifics Basically your goal here is to teach us a concept of your choice using

technology It can be a webpage video or whatever tool(s) you want to use Examples will be

provided Your e-Lesson will potentially become a part of the e-book on e-Learning Check out

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

13

httpgobongobookscom as this will be the online interface for our collaboration

Emerging Web-based Technology Presentation (TOPIC DUE by FEB 1st) 20 You have the opportunity to select an emerging ONLINE technology of your choice and evaluatereview it You will construct a presentation in to share your findings for all learners There are numerous examples from past courses on the websitehelliphave FUN and be creative When you have narrowed your search of the appropriate Web 20 technology please POST your selection amp rationale in the course Blackboard discussion board forum entitled MY EMERGING ONLINE TECHNOLOGY Presentations must cover the following

(1) description of the technology (2) developers of the technology (3) current or projected uses of the technology (4) costs (5) specialized equipment or standards for usage (6) availability (7) access (8) adaptability (9) level of interactivity (10) type of control (11) vendor or producer information (12) educational applications of the technology and a (13) bibliography covering salient sources (14) Also please include screen captures embedded as figures

While optional you can choose to have your presentation peer reviewed (quid pro quo) before submission

Feedback Assessment for Emerging ONLINE Technology Presentation 4 Excellent coverage of item 3 Good coverage of item 2 Some coverage of item 1 Little coverage of item 0 Item was not included in paper Comments are provided when possible or necessary for clarification

Item Assessment Comment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

14

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the technology being addressed Includes graphics creative amp knowledgeable overview

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the application of the technology to education

Presentation is interesting and appealing and is critically reviewed

Presentation is free from technical glitches and runs smoothly

Presentation includes an overview and summation

Total 20

The ldquoONLINE Emerging Technologiesrdquo presentation should provide the reader with OverviewSummation

Screen captures of the technology This review could be hardware or software technologies

Your critical reflection and review For this assignment Do NOT copy quote or cite ANY review from

another source I want your candid point of view regarding the utility of this technology How might this technology be used in an educational format

Post your presentation in the Moodle Course

Students must ensure that ALL assignment files are free of viruses before submitting them Keep your virus detection software up to date Should an assignment file fail scrutiny by our institutionrsquos standard virus detection software the student submitting it will be so advised by email A virus-free version of the file must be resubmitted within 24 hours of the posting date of this email Any subsequent failure to adhere to this requirement will cause an assignment to be unacceptable and a 0 grade will be recorded for this assignment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

15

Moodle Course Construction 20 All

Semester You will be given TEACHER access to a Moodle course shell for designing

an online course Teachers can do anything within a course including changing the activities and grading students

University of Alaska Anchorage Policies

Incomplete Grade Policy Incomplete Grades Unless there is a veritable reason I do not recommend students pursue this route Communicate with me as I know that sometimes life happens An ldquoIrdquo (Incomplete) is a temporary grade It is used to indicate that a student has made satisfactory progress in the majority of the work in a course but for unavoidable absences or other conditions beyond the control of the student has not been able to complete the course The Incomplete Grade Contract a signed contract form between the student and the faculty member that stipulates the assignment(s) required to finish the course is required and must be completed and filed with the department or deanrsquos office before an ldquoIrdquo grade is assigned Course work must be completed by a date specified in the contract not to exceed one year Upon completion of the required course work the faculty member must submit a change of grade form accompanied by a copy of the incomplete grade contract to the department or deanrsquos office If course work is not completed within one year or if the terms specified on the Incomplete Grade Contract are not met the student may be assigned a failing grade (F or NP depending on the grading basis of the course) If course work is not completed within one year and the faculty member does not submit a change of grade at that time the ldquoIrdquo will become a permanent grade and it will be necessary for the student to re-register to obtain credit for the course ADA Policy The provision of equal opportunities for students who experience disabilities is a campus-wide responsibility and commitment Disabilities Support Services (DSS) is the designated UAA department responsible for coordinating academic support services for students who experience disabilities To access support services students must contact DSS (786-4530 or 786-4536 TTY) and provide current disability documentation that supports the requested services Disability support services are mandated by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 Additional information may be accessed at the DSS Office in Business Education Building (BEB105)or on-line at wwwuaaalaskaedudss Academic Dishonesty Policy Academic integrity is a basic principle that requires all students to take credit only for the ideas and efforts that are their own Cheating plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty are defined as the submission of materials in

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

16

assignments exams or other academic work that is based on sources prohibited by the faculty member In addition to any adverse academic action which may result from the academically dishonest behavior the University specifically reserves the right to address and sanction the conduct involved through student judicial review procedures and the Academic Dispute Resolution Procedure specified in the University catalog If you have ANY questions about citations or academic honesty you should contact me I will be using special software when reviewing papers to certify the integrity of the author not authors I take this matter extremely serious and because this course is a graduate course I assume ALL students have had ample opportunity to educate themselves of appropriate academic conduct Professional and Ethical Behavior University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education students are expected to abide by the State of Alaska Code of Ethics of the Education Profession and professional teaching standards as they concern students the public and the profession The standards adopted by the Professional Teaching Practices Commission govern all members of the teaching profession A violation of the code of ethics and professional teaching standards are grounds for revocation or suspension of teaching certification Religious Holiday or Cultural Observance If a class meeting occurs on a religious holiday or cultural observance day and you are obligated to miss class for this event you must notify the instructor in writing by the end of the second week of the semester Email Policy

The subject line for each email submission should include the following

ldquoEDET 637 (topic)rdquo The may seem pedantic but it helps with organization I generally receive over 75+ emails in a 24-hour period and I file away all correspondence from students Also during Spring 2010 I will be teaching 3 courses doing research serving on numerous committees and boards traveling to conferences etc There are many 18 hour+ days ahead and I like to be busy and productivehellipI loathe busy work and repeating myself Excessive emails make unreasonable time demands on both sender and recipient The following are my guidelines for proper email communication Please ensure you have legitimate need before you write Thanks I will answer email about

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

17

Questions arising from difficulty in understanding course content If you need clarity on ANYTHING let me know

Requests for feedback about graded assignments Private issues appropriate for discussion within the teacher-student

relationship IMPORTANT I will do my best to respond to your email within a 24-hour period unless otherwise noted Please check into BLACKBOARD (ie the Announcements Blog and Discussion Forums) EVERYDAY to assure that you receive course information disseminated in a timely fashion

Andyrsquos Strongly Suggested Student Code of Conduct

In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions

Be self-motivated and self-directed Approach the course with a desire to learn Be a good time managerhellipstart your iterative design NOW Submit constructive criticism for course improvements Participate in a respectful manner in discussions Comply with the honor code

If there is anything else that you feel I should know please do not hesitate to confidentially communicate that concern with me I am committed to making this a positive educational experience for each and every student

G Andrew Page January 2009

e-Lesson Rubric

Teacher Name Dr Page Student Name ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

18

Content Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Subject knowledge is excellent

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Attractiveness Makes excellent use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance the presentation

Makes good use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance to presentation

Makes use of font color graphics effects etc but occasionally these detract from the presentation content

Use of font color graphics effects etc but these often distract from the presentaion content

Mechanics No misspellings or grammatical errors

Three or fewer misspellings andor mechanical errors

Four misspellings andor grammatical errors

More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar

Sources Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes All documented in desired format

Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes Most documented in desired format

Source information collected for graphics facts and quotes but not documented in desired format

Very little or no source information was collected

Oral Presentation Interesting well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention

Relatively interesting rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention

Delivery not smooth but able to hold audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

19

Instructional Design Group Presentation

Teacher Name Dr Page Group ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

Presentation Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention Engages and involves class

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost

Content Group defines and tell HOW design approach can be used Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Excellent resources

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good Good resources

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors Some resources

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Resources Product shows a large amount of original thought Ideas are creative and inventive

Product shows some original thought Work shows new ideas and insights

Uses other peoples ideas (giving them credit) but there is little evidence of original thinking

Uses other peoples ideas but does not give them credit

DESIGN Groups TBA Group 1 Gagnersquos ID Model Heather amp Kitty Group 2 ADDIE Donna Morgan Kimberly Group 3 Rapid-Prototyping Model Sarah amp Lara Group 4 Algo-heuristic Model MB and John Group 5 Dual-coding theory Sasha Bethany George Group 6 Dick amp Carey Model Tracy Andy(Sam) Tim

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

20

Spring 2010 Community of Learners Name email 1 Sarah Frick ansck2uaaalaskaedu 2 Heather Corriere dfhbckodiakalaskaedu 3 Donna Kreiensieck asdkk6uaaalaskaedu 4 Kitty Deal kdealkodiakalaskaedu 5 John D Seltenright anjds2uaaalaskaedu 6 Tracy Scott inalaskausyahoocom 7 Timothy Perry astrp4uaaalaskaedu 8 Lara Madden anlnm1uaaalaskaedu 9 George Flores asgef1uaaalaskaedu 10 Morgan Grey anmg2uaaalaskaedu 11 Maj-Britt Kimm asmk20uaaalaskaedu 12 Sasha Lamoureux asstl5uaaalaskaedu 13 Andy Holleman andyhollemangmailcom 14 Bethany Zimpelman asbz2uaaalaskaedu 15 Kimberly Handy Handy_Kimberlyasdk12org

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21

Jose Feitorsquos ldquoFacets of Intellectual Community1rdquo

1 Student ownership Students recognize their ownership of the learning process Students are dissatisfied with overly directive instructors

2 Shared inquiry There is an appreciation for the generative potential of multiple perspectives Students are surprised at the insights of ldquoquiet peoplerdquo Students are dissatisfied when other students do not engage

3 Allowing ldquonot knowingrdquo Students have the ability to acknowledge their initial lack of understanding Students have a willingness to be wrong and let their opinions evolve Students ask genuine questions There is space for students to struggle with a difficult text

4 Socio-emotional climate The atmosphere is emotionally safemdashstudents know they will not be attacked There is an expectation of help from fellow students There is mutual encouragement and support There is a perception of shared fate and commonalitymdashldquoWere all in the same boatrdquo Tension is relieved through humor

5 Intellectual intimacy Students have deeper access into the inner workings of one anotherrsquos minds They know classmates on a more profound level than they know their friends There is permeability to the opinions of others

1 Feito J Exploring Intellectual Community Group Learning Processes in Traditional ldquoGreat Booksrsquo Seminarsrdquo Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Final Report CASTL Electronic Workspace Menlo Park CA The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching June 13 2002 in Huber M T amp Hutchings P (2005) p47 The Advancement of Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching San Francisco Jossey-Bass

  • NETS for Teachers 2008
  • Technology Integration
  • Academic Dishonesty Policy
  • Professional and Ethical Behavior
  • In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions
Page 7: University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

January

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 Session 1

12 13 14 15 16

17 18 Holiday

NO CLASS

19 Work on Session 2

assignments

20 21 22 23

24 25 Session 3

Admn issues

26 27 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

28 29 30

31

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

8

February

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1

Session 4 2 3

Add to the ldquoWeb Tools amp Strategiesrdquo

wiki

4 5 6

7 8 Session 5

Groups 1 2 3 present and facilitate

design theories

9 We will review the Session 5 content in

Session 12

10 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

11 Groups 123 Facilitate BB

discussion this entire week

12 13

14 15 Session 6

Groups 4 5 6 present and facilitate

design theories

16 We will review the Session 6 content in

Session 13

17 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

18 Groups 4 5 6 Facilitate BB

discussion this entire week

19 20

21 22 Session 7

Virtual Student

23 Post URL to final versions of e-Lesson by midnight AK time

24 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

25 26 27

28

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

9

March

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1

Session 8 e-Lessons Due Post in Black

2 3 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

4 5 6

7 8 Spring Break

No Class

9 10

11 12 13

14 15 Session 9

16 17 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

18 Moodle Design

19 20

21 22 Session 10

23 24 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

25 Moodle Design

26 27

28 29 Session 11

30 31 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

10

2010

1

2 3 Session 12

Transforming Courses for the

Online Classroom

4 5 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

6 Moodle Design

7 8

9 10 Session 13

Open Courseware

11 12 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

13 Moodle Design

14 15

16 17 Session 14

ET Presentations Groups 4 5 6

18 19 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

20 Moodle Design

Completed

21 22

23 24 Session 15

ET Presentations Groups 1 2 3

25 26 FINAL DAY to Add to the ldquoWeb Tools amp

Strategiesrdquo wiki

27 28 29

30 31

April APRIL

The readings for this course will be more intensive during the first 8 weeks of the course The remainder of the course is more of a hands-on approach that involves applying that knowledge The textbooks are SUPPLEMENTAL learning objects that when combined with the online content should enrich your overall experience I reserve the right to addsubtract content to better meet your learning needs I believe in a democratic classroom and am open to suggestions and creative ideas We are ALL learners and that includes me we are ALL teachers and that includes you Wisdom about ONLINE LEARNING Assignments Grading Due dates

Assignment

Value

Due date

E-lesson Teach a concept digitally

20

Monday March 1 Remember to post the link of your e-lesson in the e-Lesson in the DISCUSSION FORUM Also post your embedded or linked presentation in Moodle after uploading

Emerging Web 20 Technology presentation 20

To be shared in Elluminate Sessions 14 amp 15 Mini-Showcase Embed your presentation in Moodle

ParticipationContribution to Community of Learners and WORKGROUPS

20

All semester Communal Constructivism

Moodle Course Construction

20 All Semester

Instructional Design Workgroup Presentation 20 Monday February

8th and Feb 15th

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

12

Rubric for Participation = We participate therefore we arerdquo 20 Excellent participation Significant contribution to the collaborative nature of this course through high quality and critical discussions detailed presentations submitted on time superior involvement with your group substantial amount of input high level input in chatdiscussions Substantive Elluminate Live presence Contributes to synchronous discussions Excellent facilitationparticipant of weekly Blackboard Discussion Forums as well as postings in the Blog numerous quality contributions to the Moodle course and contributions to the Web Tools amp Strategies wiki

10

Good Moderate contribution in Blackboard average postings frequent participation decent quality in postings in chatdiscussion boards and group work frequent Elluminate presence and good Moodle contributions

8-9

Some Student sporadically checks in to Blackboard low quality contribution insubstantial postings little critical reflection group input is marginal little input in Elluminate the blog the discussion forums and Moodle

5-7

Little Student checks in less than once a week online little or no contribution to discussions very little or no input

1-4

E-Lesson 20

You are to use whatever medium you want to create an electronic lesson That is the lesson should

be in a format that it can be viewed via the Internet See the webpage for more information

examples and specifics Basically your goal here is to teach us a concept of your choice using

technology It can be a webpage video or whatever tool(s) you want to use Examples will be

provided Your e-Lesson will potentially become a part of the e-book on e-Learning Check out

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

13

httpgobongobookscom as this will be the online interface for our collaboration

Emerging Web-based Technology Presentation (TOPIC DUE by FEB 1st) 20 You have the opportunity to select an emerging ONLINE technology of your choice and evaluatereview it You will construct a presentation in to share your findings for all learners There are numerous examples from past courses on the websitehelliphave FUN and be creative When you have narrowed your search of the appropriate Web 20 technology please POST your selection amp rationale in the course Blackboard discussion board forum entitled MY EMERGING ONLINE TECHNOLOGY Presentations must cover the following

(1) description of the technology (2) developers of the technology (3) current or projected uses of the technology (4) costs (5) specialized equipment or standards for usage (6) availability (7) access (8) adaptability (9) level of interactivity (10) type of control (11) vendor or producer information (12) educational applications of the technology and a (13) bibliography covering salient sources (14) Also please include screen captures embedded as figures

While optional you can choose to have your presentation peer reviewed (quid pro quo) before submission

Feedback Assessment for Emerging ONLINE Technology Presentation 4 Excellent coverage of item 3 Good coverage of item 2 Some coverage of item 1 Little coverage of item 0 Item was not included in paper Comments are provided when possible or necessary for clarification

Item Assessment Comment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

14

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the technology being addressed Includes graphics creative amp knowledgeable overview

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the application of the technology to education

Presentation is interesting and appealing and is critically reviewed

Presentation is free from technical glitches and runs smoothly

Presentation includes an overview and summation

Total 20

The ldquoONLINE Emerging Technologiesrdquo presentation should provide the reader with OverviewSummation

Screen captures of the technology This review could be hardware or software technologies

Your critical reflection and review For this assignment Do NOT copy quote or cite ANY review from

another source I want your candid point of view regarding the utility of this technology How might this technology be used in an educational format

Post your presentation in the Moodle Course

Students must ensure that ALL assignment files are free of viruses before submitting them Keep your virus detection software up to date Should an assignment file fail scrutiny by our institutionrsquos standard virus detection software the student submitting it will be so advised by email A virus-free version of the file must be resubmitted within 24 hours of the posting date of this email Any subsequent failure to adhere to this requirement will cause an assignment to be unacceptable and a 0 grade will be recorded for this assignment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

15

Moodle Course Construction 20 All

Semester You will be given TEACHER access to a Moodle course shell for designing

an online course Teachers can do anything within a course including changing the activities and grading students

University of Alaska Anchorage Policies

Incomplete Grade Policy Incomplete Grades Unless there is a veritable reason I do not recommend students pursue this route Communicate with me as I know that sometimes life happens An ldquoIrdquo (Incomplete) is a temporary grade It is used to indicate that a student has made satisfactory progress in the majority of the work in a course but for unavoidable absences or other conditions beyond the control of the student has not been able to complete the course The Incomplete Grade Contract a signed contract form between the student and the faculty member that stipulates the assignment(s) required to finish the course is required and must be completed and filed with the department or deanrsquos office before an ldquoIrdquo grade is assigned Course work must be completed by a date specified in the contract not to exceed one year Upon completion of the required course work the faculty member must submit a change of grade form accompanied by a copy of the incomplete grade contract to the department or deanrsquos office If course work is not completed within one year or if the terms specified on the Incomplete Grade Contract are not met the student may be assigned a failing grade (F or NP depending on the grading basis of the course) If course work is not completed within one year and the faculty member does not submit a change of grade at that time the ldquoIrdquo will become a permanent grade and it will be necessary for the student to re-register to obtain credit for the course ADA Policy The provision of equal opportunities for students who experience disabilities is a campus-wide responsibility and commitment Disabilities Support Services (DSS) is the designated UAA department responsible for coordinating academic support services for students who experience disabilities To access support services students must contact DSS (786-4530 or 786-4536 TTY) and provide current disability documentation that supports the requested services Disability support services are mandated by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 Additional information may be accessed at the DSS Office in Business Education Building (BEB105)or on-line at wwwuaaalaskaedudss Academic Dishonesty Policy Academic integrity is a basic principle that requires all students to take credit only for the ideas and efforts that are their own Cheating plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty are defined as the submission of materials in

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

16

assignments exams or other academic work that is based on sources prohibited by the faculty member In addition to any adverse academic action which may result from the academically dishonest behavior the University specifically reserves the right to address and sanction the conduct involved through student judicial review procedures and the Academic Dispute Resolution Procedure specified in the University catalog If you have ANY questions about citations or academic honesty you should contact me I will be using special software when reviewing papers to certify the integrity of the author not authors I take this matter extremely serious and because this course is a graduate course I assume ALL students have had ample opportunity to educate themselves of appropriate academic conduct Professional and Ethical Behavior University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education students are expected to abide by the State of Alaska Code of Ethics of the Education Profession and professional teaching standards as they concern students the public and the profession The standards adopted by the Professional Teaching Practices Commission govern all members of the teaching profession A violation of the code of ethics and professional teaching standards are grounds for revocation or suspension of teaching certification Religious Holiday or Cultural Observance If a class meeting occurs on a religious holiday or cultural observance day and you are obligated to miss class for this event you must notify the instructor in writing by the end of the second week of the semester Email Policy

The subject line for each email submission should include the following

ldquoEDET 637 (topic)rdquo The may seem pedantic but it helps with organization I generally receive over 75+ emails in a 24-hour period and I file away all correspondence from students Also during Spring 2010 I will be teaching 3 courses doing research serving on numerous committees and boards traveling to conferences etc There are many 18 hour+ days ahead and I like to be busy and productivehellipI loathe busy work and repeating myself Excessive emails make unreasonable time demands on both sender and recipient The following are my guidelines for proper email communication Please ensure you have legitimate need before you write Thanks I will answer email about

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

17

Questions arising from difficulty in understanding course content If you need clarity on ANYTHING let me know

Requests for feedback about graded assignments Private issues appropriate for discussion within the teacher-student

relationship IMPORTANT I will do my best to respond to your email within a 24-hour period unless otherwise noted Please check into BLACKBOARD (ie the Announcements Blog and Discussion Forums) EVERYDAY to assure that you receive course information disseminated in a timely fashion

Andyrsquos Strongly Suggested Student Code of Conduct

In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions

Be self-motivated and self-directed Approach the course with a desire to learn Be a good time managerhellipstart your iterative design NOW Submit constructive criticism for course improvements Participate in a respectful manner in discussions Comply with the honor code

If there is anything else that you feel I should know please do not hesitate to confidentially communicate that concern with me I am committed to making this a positive educational experience for each and every student

G Andrew Page January 2009

e-Lesson Rubric

Teacher Name Dr Page Student Name ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

18

Content Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Subject knowledge is excellent

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Attractiveness Makes excellent use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance the presentation

Makes good use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance to presentation

Makes use of font color graphics effects etc but occasionally these detract from the presentation content

Use of font color graphics effects etc but these often distract from the presentaion content

Mechanics No misspellings or grammatical errors

Three or fewer misspellings andor mechanical errors

Four misspellings andor grammatical errors

More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar

Sources Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes All documented in desired format

Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes Most documented in desired format

Source information collected for graphics facts and quotes but not documented in desired format

Very little or no source information was collected

Oral Presentation Interesting well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention

Relatively interesting rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention

Delivery not smooth but able to hold audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

19

Instructional Design Group Presentation

Teacher Name Dr Page Group ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

Presentation Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention Engages and involves class

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost

Content Group defines and tell HOW design approach can be used Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Excellent resources

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good Good resources

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors Some resources

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Resources Product shows a large amount of original thought Ideas are creative and inventive

Product shows some original thought Work shows new ideas and insights

Uses other peoples ideas (giving them credit) but there is little evidence of original thinking

Uses other peoples ideas but does not give them credit

DESIGN Groups TBA Group 1 Gagnersquos ID Model Heather amp Kitty Group 2 ADDIE Donna Morgan Kimberly Group 3 Rapid-Prototyping Model Sarah amp Lara Group 4 Algo-heuristic Model MB and John Group 5 Dual-coding theory Sasha Bethany George Group 6 Dick amp Carey Model Tracy Andy(Sam) Tim

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

20

Spring 2010 Community of Learners Name email 1 Sarah Frick ansck2uaaalaskaedu 2 Heather Corriere dfhbckodiakalaskaedu 3 Donna Kreiensieck asdkk6uaaalaskaedu 4 Kitty Deal kdealkodiakalaskaedu 5 John D Seltenright anjds2uaaalaskaedu 6 Tracy Scott inalaskausyahoocom 7 Timothy Perry astrp4uaaalaskaedu 8 Lara Madden anlnm1uaaalaskaedu 9 George Flores asgef1uaaalaskaedu 10 Morgan Grey anmg2uaaalaskaedu 11 Maj-Britt Kimm asmk20uaaalaskaedu 12 Sasha Lamoureux asstl5uaaalaskaedu 13 Andy Holleman andyhollemangmailcom 14 Bethany Zimpelman asbz2uaaalaskaedu 15 Kimberly Handy Handy_Kimberlyasdk12org

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21

Jose Feitorsquos ldquoFacets of Intellectual Community1rdquo

1 Student ownership Students recognize their ownership of the learning process Students are dissatisfied with overly directive instructors

2 Shared inquiry There is an appreciation for the generative potential of multiple perspectives Students are surprised at the insights of ldquoquiet peoplerdquo Students are dissatisfied when other students do not engage

3 Allowing ldquonot knowingrdquo Students have the ability to acknowledge their initial lack of understanding Students have a willingness to be wrong and let their opinions evolve Students ask genuine questions There is space for students to struggle with a difficult text

4 Socio-emotional climate The atmosphere is emotionally safemdashstudents know they will not be attacked There is an expectation of help from fellow students There is mutual encouragement and support There is a perception of shared fate and commonalitymdashldquoWere all in the same boatrdquo Tension is relieved through humor

5 Intellectual intimacy Students have deeper access into the inner workings of one anotherrsquos minds They know classmates on a more profound level than they know their friends There is permeability to the opinions of others

1 Feito J Exploring Intellectual Community Group Learning Processes in Traditional ldquoGreat Booksrsquo Seminarsrdquo Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Final Report CASTL Electronic Workspace Menlo Park CA The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching June 13 2002 in Huber M T amp Hutchings P (2005) p47 The Advancement of Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching San Francisco Jossey-Bass

  • NETS for Teachers 2008
  • Technology Integration
  • Academic Dishonesty Policy
  • Professional and Ethical Behavior
  • In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions
Page 8: University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

8

February

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1

Session 4 2 3

Add to the ldquoWeb Tools amp Strategiesrdquo

wiki

4 5 6

7 8 Session 5

Groups 1 2 3 present and facilitate

design theories

9 We will review the Session 5 content in

Session 12

10 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

11 Groups 123 Facilitate BB

discussion this entire week

12 13

14 15 Session 6

Groups 4 5 6 present and facilitate

design theories

16 We will review the Session 6 content in

Session 13

17 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

18 Groups 4 5 6 Facilitate BB

discussion this entire week

19 20

21 22 Session 7

Virtual Student

23 Post URL to final versions of e-Lesson by midnight AK time

24 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

25 26 27

28

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

9

March

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1

Session 8 e-Lessons Due Post in Black

2 3 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

4 5 6

7 8 Spring Break

No Class

9 10

11 12 13

14 15 Session 9

16 17 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

18 Moodle Design

19 20

21 22 Session 10

23 24 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

25 Moodle Design

26 27

28 29 Session 11

30 31 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

10

2010

1

2 3 Session 12

Transforming Courses for the

Online Classroom

4 5 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

6 Moodle Design

7 8

9 10 Session 13

Open Courseware

11 12 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

13 Moodle Design

14 15

16 17 Session 14

ET Presentations Groups 4 5 6

18 19 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

20 Moodle Design

Completed

21 22

23 24 Session 15

ET Presentations Groups 1 2 3

25 26 FINAL DAY to Add to the ldquoWeb Tools amp

Strategiesrdquo wiki

27 28 29

30 31

April APRIL

The readings for this course will be more intensive during the first 8 weeks of the course The remainder of the course is more of a hands-on approach that involves applying that knowledge The textbooks are SUPPLEMENTAL learning objects that when combined with the online content should enrich your overall experience I reserve the right to addsubtract content to better meet your learning needs I believe in a democratic classroom and am open to suggestions and creative ideas We are ALL learners and that includes me we are ALL teachers and that includes you Wisdom about ONLINE LEARNING Assignments Grading Due dates

Assignment

Value

Due date

E-lesson Teach a concept digitally

20

Monday March 1 Remember to post the link of your e-lesson in the e-Lesson in the DISCUSSION FORUM Also post your embedded or linked presentation in Moodle after uploading

Emerging Web 20 Technology presentation 20

To be shared in Elluminate Sessions 14 amp 15 Mini-Showcase Embed your presentation in Moodle

ParticipationContribution to Community of Learners and WORKGROUPS

20

All semester Communal Constructivism

Moodle Course Construction

20 All Semester

Instructional Design Workgroup Presentation 20 Monday February

8th and Feb 15th

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

12

Rubric for Participation = We participate therefore we arerdquo 20 Excellent participation Significant contribution to the collaborative nature of this course through high quality and critical discussions detailed presentations submitted on time superior involvement with your group substantial amount of input high level input in chatdiscussions Substantive Elluminate Live presence Contributes to synchronous discussions Excellent facilitationparticipant of weekly Blackboard Discussion Forums as well as postings in the Blog numerous quality contributions to the Moodle course and contributions to the Web Tools amp Strategies wiki

10

Good Moderate contribution in Blackboard average postings frequent participation decent quality in postings in chatdiscussion boards and group work frequent Elluminate presence and good Moodle contributions

8-9

Some Student sporadically checks in to Blackboard low quality contribution insubstantial postings little critical reflection group input is marginal little input in Elluminate the blog the discussion forums and Moodle

5-7

Little Student checks in less than once a week online little or no contribution to discussions very little or no input

1-4

E-Lesson 20

You are to use whatever medium you want to create an electronic lesson That is the lesson should

be in a format that it can be viewed via the Internet See the webpage for more information

examples and specifics Basically your goal here is to teach us a concept of your choice using

technology It can be a webpage video or whatever tool(s) you want to use Examples will be

provided Your e-Lesson will potentially become a part of the e-book on e-Learning Check out

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

13

httpgobongobookscom as this will be the online interface for our collaboration

Emerging Web-based Technology Presentation (TOPIC DUE by FEB 1st) 20 You have the opportunity to select an emerging ONLINE technology of your choice and evaluatereview it You will construct a presentation in to share your findings for all learners There are numerous examples from past courses on the websitehelliphave FUN and be creative When you have narrowed your search of the appropriate Web 20 technology please POST your selection amp rationale in the course Blackboard discussion board forum entitled MY EMERGING ONLINE TECHNOLOGY Presentations must cover the following

(1) description of the technology (2) developers of the technology (3) current or projected uses of the technology (4) costs (5) specialized equipment or standards for usage (6) availability (7) access (8) adaptability (9) level of interactivity (10) type of control (11) vendor or producer information (12) educational applications of the technology and a (13) bibliography covering salient sources (14) Also please include screen captures embedded as figures

While optional you can choose to have your presentation peer reviewed (quid pro quo) before submission

Feedback Assessment for Emerging ONLINE Technology Presentation 4 Excellent coverage of item 3 Good coverage of item 2 Some coverage of item 1 Little coverage of item 0 Item was not included in paper Comments are provided when possible or necessary for clarification

Item Assessment Comment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

14

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the technology being addressed Includes graphics creative amp knowledgeable overview

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the application of the technology to education

Presentation is interesting and appealing and is critically reviewed

Presentation is free from technical glitches and runs smoothly

Presentation includes an overview and summation

Total 20

The ldquoONLINE Emerging Technologiesrdquo presentation should provide the reader with OverviewSummation

Screen captures of the technology This review could be hardware or software technologies

Your critical reflection and review For this assignment Do NOT copy quote or cite ANY review from

another source I want your candid point of view regarding the utility of this technology How might this technology be used in an educational format

Post your presentation in the Moodle Course

Students must ensure that ALL assignment files are free of viruses before submitting them Keep your virus detection software up to date Should an assignment file fail scrutiny by our institutionrsquos standard virus detection software the student submitting it will be so advised by email A virus-free version of the file must be resubmitted within 24 hours of the posting date of this email Any subsequent failure to adhere to this requirement will cause an assignment to be unacceptable and a 0 grade will be recorded for this assignment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

15

Moodle Course Construction 20 All

Semester You will be given TEACHER access to a Moodle course shell for designing

an online course Teachers can do anything within a course including changing the activities and grading students

University of Alaska Anchorage Policies

Incomplete Grade Policy Incomplete Grades Unless there is a veritable reason I do not recommend students pursue this route Communicate with me as I know that sometimes life happens An ldquoIrdquo (Incomplete) is a temporary grade It is used to indicate that a student has made satisfactory progress in the majority of the work in a course but for unavoidable absences or other conditions beyond the control of the student has not been able to complete the course The Incomplete Grade Contract a signed contract form between the student and the faculty member that stipulates the assignment(s) required to finish the course is required and must be completed and filed with the department or deanrsquos office before an ldquoIrdquo grade is assigned Course work must be completed by a date specified in the contract not to exceed one year Upon completion of the required course work the faculty member must submit a change of grade form accompanied by a copy of the incomplete grade contract to the department or deanrsquos office If course work is not completed within one year or if the terms specified on the Incomplete Grade Contract are not met the student may be assigned a failing grade (F or NP depending on the grading basis of the course) If course work is not completed within one year and the faculty member does not submit a change of grade at that time the ldquoIrdquo will become a permanent grade and it will be necessary for the student to re-register to obtain credit for the course ADA Policy The provision of equal opportunities for students who experience disabilities is a campus-wide responsibility and commitment Disabilities Support Services (DSS) is the designated UAA department responsible for coordinating academic support services for students who experience disabilities To access support services students must contact DSS (786-4530 or 786-4536 TTY) and provide current disability documentation that supports the requested services Disability support services are mandated by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 Additional information may be accessed at the DSS Office in Business Education Building (BEB105)or on-line at wwwuaaalaskaedudss Academic Dishonesty Policy Academic integrity is a basic principle that requires all students to take credit only for the ideas and efforts that are their own Cheating plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty are defined as the submission of materials in

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

16

assignments exams or other academic work that is based on sources prohibited by the faculty member In addition to any adverse academic action which may result from the academically dishonest behavior the University specifically reserves the right to address and sanction the conduct involved through student judicial review procedures and the Academic Dispute Resolution Procedure specified in the University catalog If you have ANY questions about citations or academic honesty you should contact me I will be using special software when reviewing papers to certify the integrity of the author not authors I take this matter extremely serious and because this course is a graduate course I assume ALL students have had ample opportunity to educate themselves of appropriate academic conduct Professional and Ethical Behavior University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education students are expected to abide by the State of Alaska Code of Ethics of the Education Profession and professional teaching standards as they concern students the public and the profession The standards adopted by the Professional Teaching Practices Commission govern all members of the teaching profession A violation of the code of ethics and professional teaching standards are grounds for revocation or suspension of teaching certification Religious Holiday or Cultural Observance If a class meeting occurs on a religious holiday or cultural observance day and you are obligated to miss class for this event you must notify the instructor in writing by the end of the second week of the semester Email Policy

The subject line for each email submission should include the following

ldquoEDET 637 (topic)rdquo The may seem pedantic but it helps with organization I generally receive over 75+ emails in a 24-hour period and I file away all correspondence from students Also during Spring 2010 I will be teaching 3 courses doing research serving on numerous committees and boards traveling to conferences etc There are many 18 hour+ days ahead and I like to be busy and productivehellipI loathe busy work and repeating myself Excessive emails make unreasonable time demands on both sender and recipient The following are my guidelines for proper email communication Please ensure you have legitimate need before you write Thanks I will answer email about

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

17

Questions arising from difficulty in understanding course content If you need clarity on ANYTHING let me know

Requests for feedback about graded assignments Private issues appropriate for discussion within the teacher-student

relationship IMPORTANT I will do my best to respond to your email within a 24-hour period unless otherwise noted Please check into BLACKBOARD (ie the Announcements Blog and Discussion Forums) EVERYDAY to assure that you receive course information disseminated in a timely fashion

Andyrsquos Strongly Suggested Student Code of Conduct

In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions

Be self-motivated and self-directed Approach the course with a desire to learn Be a good time managerhellipstart your iterative design NOW Submit constructive criticism for course improvements Participate in a respectful manner in discussions Comply with the honor code

If there is anything else that you feel I should know please do not hesitate to confidentially communicate that concern with me I am committed to making this a positive educational experience for each and every student

G Andrew Page January 2009

e-Lesson Rubric

Teacher Name Dr Page Student Name ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

18

Content Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Subject knowledge is excellent

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Attractiveness Makes excellent use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance the presentation

Makes good use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance to presentation

Makes use of font color graphics effects etc but occasionally these detract from the presentation content

Use of font color graphics effects etc but these often distract from the presentaion content

Mechanics No misspellings or grammatical errors

Three or fewer misspellings andor mechanical errors

Four misspellings andor grammatical errors

More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar

Sources Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes All documented in desired format

Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes Most documented in desired format

Source information collected for graphics facts and quotes but not documented in desired format

Very little or no source information was collected

Oral Presentation Interesting well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention

Relatively interesting rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention

Delivery not smooth but able to hold audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

19

Instructional Design Group Presentation

Teacher Name Dr Page Group ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

Presentation Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention Engages and involves class

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost

Content Group defines and tell HOW design approach can be used Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Excellent resources

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good Good resources

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors Some resources

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Resources Product shows a large amount of original thought Ideas are creative and inventive

Product shows some original thought Work shows new ideas and insights

Uses other peoples ideas (giving them credit) but there is little evidence of original thinking

Uses other peoples ideas but does not give them credit

DESIGN Groups TBA Group 1 Gagnersquos ID Model Heather amp Kitty Group 2 ADDIE Donna Morgan Kimberly Group 3 Rapid-Prototyping Model Sarah amp Lara Group 4 Algo-heuristic Model MB and John Group 5 Dual-coding theory Sasha Bethany George Group 6 Dick amp Carey Model Tracy Andy(Sam) Tim

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

20

Spring 2010 Community of Learners Name email 1 Sarah Frick ansck2uaaalaskaedu 2 Heather Corriere dfhbckodiakalaskaedu 3 Donna Kreiensieck asdkk6uaaalaskaedu 4 Kitty Deal kdealkodiakalaskaedu 5 John D Seltenright anjds2uaaalaskaedu 6 Tracy Scott inalaskausyahoocom 7 Timothy Perry astrp4uaaalaskaedu 8 Lara Madden anlnm1uaaalaskaedu 9 George Flores asgef1uaaalaskaedu 10 Morgan Grey anmg2uaaalaskaedu 11 Maj-Britt Kimm asmk20uaaalaskaedu 12 Sasha Lamoureux asstl5uaaalaskaedu 13 Andy Holleman andyhollemangmailcom 14 Bethany Zimpelman asbz2uaaalaskaedu 15 Kimberly Handy Handy_Kimberlyasdk12org

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21

Jose Feitorsquos ldquoFacets of Intellectual Community1rdquo

1 Student ownership Students recognize their ownership of the learning process Students are dissatisfied with overly directive instructors

2 Shared inquiry There is an appreciation for the generative potential of multiple perspectives Students are surprised at the insights of ldquoquiet peoplerdquo Students are dissatisfied when other students do not engage

3 Allowing ldquonot knowingrdquo Students have the ability to acknowledge their initial lack of understanding Students have a willingness to be wrong and let their opinions evolve Students ask genuine questions There is space for students to struggle with a difficult text

4 Socio-emotional climate The atmosphere is emotionally safemdashstudents know they will not be attacked There is an expectation of help from fellow students There is mutual encouragement and support There is a perception of shared fate and commonalitymdashldquoWere all in the same boatrdquo Tension is relieved through humor

5 Intellectual intimacy Students have deeper access into the inner workings of one anotherrsquos minds They know classmates on a more profound level than they know their friends There is permeability to the opinions of others

1 Feito J Exploring Intellectual Community Group Learning Processes in Traditional ldquoGreat Booksrsquo Seminarsrdquo Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Final Report CASTL Electronic Workspace Menlo Park CA The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching June 13 2002 in Huber M T amp Hutchings P (2005) p47 The Advancement of Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching San Francisco Jossey-Bass

  • NETS for Teachers 2008
  • Technology Integration
  • Academic Dishonesty Policy
  • Professional and Ethical Behavior
  • In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions
Page 9: University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

9

March

2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1

Session 8 e-Lessons Due Post in Black

2 3 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

4 5 6

7 8 Spring Break

No Class

9 10

11 12 13

14 15 Session 9

16 17 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

18 Moodle Design

19 20

21 22 Session 10

23 24 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

25 Moodle Design

26 27

28 29 Session 11

30 31 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

10

2010

1

2 3 Session 12

Transforming Courses for the

Online Classroom

4 5 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

6 Moodle Design

7 8

9 10 Session 13

Open Courseware

11 12 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

13 Moodle Design

14 15

16 17 Session 14

ET Presentations Groups 4 5 6

18 19 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

20 Moodle Design

Completed

21 22

23 24 Session 15

ET Presentations Groups 1 2 3

25 26 FINAL DAY to Add to the ldquoWeb Tools amp

Strategiesrdquo wiki

27 28 29

30 31

April APRIL

The readings for this course will be more intensive during the first 8 weeks of the course The remainder of the course is more of a hands-on approach that involves applying that knowledge The textbooks are SUPPLEMENTAL learning objects that when combined with the online content should enrich your overall experience I reserve the right to addsubtract content to better meet your learning needs I believe in a democratic classroom and am open to suggestions and creative ideas We are ALL learners and that includes me we are ALL teachers and that includes you Wisdom about ONLINE LEARNING Assignments Grading Due dates

Assignment

Value

Due date

E-lesson Teach a concept digitally

20

Monday March 1 Remember to post the link of your e-lesson in the e-Lesson in the DISCUSSION FORUM Also post your embedded or linked presentation in Moodle after uploading

Emerging Web 20 Technology presentation 20

To be shared in Elluminate Sessions 14 amp 15 Mini-Showcase Embed your presentation in Moodle

ParticipationContribution to Community of Learners and WORKGROUPS

20

All semester Communal Constructivism

Moodle Course Construction

20 All Semester

Instructional Design Workgroup Presentation 20 Monday February

8th and Feb 15th

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

12

Rubric for Participation = We participate therefore we arerdquo 20 Excellent participation Significant contribution to the collaborative nature of this course through high quality and critical discussions detailed presentations submitted on time superior involvement with your group substantial amount of input high level input in chatdiscussions Substantive Elluminate Live presence Contributes to synchronous discussions Excellent facilitationparticipant of weekly Blackboard Discussion Forums as well as postings in the Blog numerous quality contributions to the Moodle course and contributions to the Web Tools amp Strategies wiki

10

Good Moderate contribution in Blackboard average postings frequent participation decent quality in postings in chatdiscussion boards and group work frequent Elluminate presence and good Moodle contributions

8-9

Some Student sporadically checks in to Blackboard low quality contribution insubstantial postings little critical reflection group input is marginal little input in Elluminate the blog the discussion forums and Moodle

5-7

Little Student checks in less than once a week online little or no contribution to discussions very little or no input

1-4

E-Lesson 20

You are to use whatever medium you want to create an electronic lesson That is the lesson should

be in a format that it can be viewed via the Internet See the webpage for more information

examples and specifics Basically your goal here is to teach us a concept of your choice using

technology It can be a webpage video or whatever tool(s) you want to use Examples will be

provided Your e-Lesson will potentially become a part of the e-book on e-Learning Check out

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

13

httpgobongobookscom as this will be the online interface for our collaboration

Emerging Web-based Technology Presentation (TOPIC DUE by FEB 1st) 20 You have the opportunity to select an emerging ONLINE technology of your choice and evaluatereview it You will construct a presentation in to share your findings for all learners There are numerous examples from past courses on the websitehelliphave FUN and be creative When you have narrowed your search of the appropriate Web 20 technology please POST your selection amp rationale in the course Blackboard discussion board forum entitled MY EMERGING ONLINE TECHNOLOGY Presentations must cover the following

(1) description of the technology (2) developers of the technology (3) current or projected uses of the technology (4) costs (5) specialized equipment or standards for usage (6) availability (7) access (8) adaptability (9) level of interactivity (10) type of control (11) vendor or producer information (12) educational applications of the technology and a (13) bibliography covering salient sources (14) Also please include screen captures embedded as figures

While optional you can choose to have your presentation peer reviewed (quid pro quo) before submission

Feedback Assessment for Emerging ONLINE Technology Presentation 4 Excellent coverage of item 3 Good coverage of item 2 Some coverage of item 1 Little coverage of item 0 Item was not included in paper Comments are provided when possible or necessary for clarification

Item Assessment Comment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

14

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the technology being addressed Includes graphics creative amp knowledgeable overview

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the application of the technology to education

Presentation is interesting and appealing and is critically reviewed

Presentation is free from technical glitches and runs smoothly

Presentation includes an overview and summation

Total 20

The ldquoONLINE Emerging Technologiesrdquo presentation should provide the reader with OverviewSummation

Screen captures of the technology This review could be hardware or software technologies

Your critical reflection and review For this assignment Do NOT copy quote or cite ANY review from

another source I want your candid point of view regarding the utility of this technology How might this technology be used in an educational format

Post your presentation in the Moodle Course

Students must ensure that ALL assignment files are free of viruses before submitting them Keep your virus detection software up to date Should an assignment file fail scrutiny by our institutionrsquos standard virus detection software the student submitting it will be so advised by email A virus-free version of the file must be resubmitted within 24 hours of the posting date of this email Any subsequent failure to adhere to this requirement will cause an assignment to be unacceptable and a 0 grade will be recorded for this assignment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

15

Moodle Course Construction 20 All

Semester You will be given TEACHER access to a Moodle course shell for designing

an online course Teachers can do anything within a course including changing the activities and grading students

University of Alaska Anchorage Policies

Incomplete Grade Policy Incomplete Grades Unless there is a veritable reason I do not recommend students pursue this route Communicate with me as I know that sometimes life happens An ldquoIrdquo (Incomplete) is a temporary grade It is used to indicate that a student has made satisfactory progress in the majority of the work in a course but for unavoidable absences or other conditions beyond the control of the student has not been able to complete the course The Incomplete Grade Contract a signed contract form between the student and the faculty member that stipulates the assignment(s) required to finish the course is required and must be completed and filed with the department or deanrsquos office before an ldquoIrdquo grade is assigned Course work must be completed by a date specified in the contract not to exceed one year Upon completion of the required course work the faculty member must submit a change of grade form accompanied by a copy of the incomplete grade contract to the department or deanrsquos office If course work is not completed within one year or if the terms specified on the Incomplete Grade Contract are not met the student may be assigned a failing grade (F or NP depending on the grading basis of the course) If course work is not completed within one year and the faculty member does not submit a change of grade at that time the ldquoIrdquo will become a permanent grade and it will be necessary for the student to re-register to obtain credit for the course ADA Policy The provision of equal opportunities for students who experience disabilities is a campus-wide responsibility and commitment Disabilities Support Services (DSS) is the designated UAA department responsible for coordinating academic support services for students who experience disabilities To access support services students must contact DSS (786-4530 or 786-4536 TTY) and provide current disability documentation that supports the requested services Disability support services are mandated by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 Additional information may be accessed at the DSS Office in Business Education Building (BEB105)or on-line at wwwuaaalaskaedudss Academic Dishonesty Policy Academic integrity is a basic principle that requires all students to take credit only for the ideas and efforts that are their own Cheating plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty are defined as the submission of materials in

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

16

assignments exams or other academic work that is based on sources prohibited by the faculty member In addition to any adverse academic action which may result from the academically dishonest behavior the University specifically reserves the right to address and sanction the conduct involved through student judicial review procedures and the Academic Dispute Resolution Procedure specified in the University catalog If you have ANY questions about citations or academic honesty you should contact me I will be using special software when reviewing papers to certify the integrity of the author not authors I take this matter extremely serious and because this course is a graduate course I assume ALL students have had ample opportunity to educate themselves of appropriate academic conduct Professional and Ethical Behavior University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education students are expected to abide by the State of Alaska Code of Ethics of the Education Profession and professional teaching standards as they concern students the public and the profession The standards adopted by the Professional Teaching Practices Commission govern all members of the teaching profession A violation of the code of ethics and professional teaching standards are grounds for revocation or suspension of teaching certification Religious Holiday or Cultural Observance If a class meeting occurs on a religious holiday or cultural observance day and you are obligated to miss class for this event you must notify the instructor in writing by the end of the second week of the semester Email Policy

The subject line for each email submission should include the following

ldquoEDET 637 (topic)rdquo The may seem pedantic but it helps with organization I generally receive over 75+ emails in a 24-hour period and I file away all correspondence from students Also during Spring 2010 I will be teaching 3 courses doing research serving on numerous committees and boards traveling to conferences etc There are many 18 hour+ days ahead and I like to be busy and productivehellipI loathe busy work and repeating myself Excessive emails make unreasonable time demands on both sender and recipient The following are my guidelines for proper email communication Please ensure you have legitimate need before you write Thanks I will answer email about

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

17

Questions arising from difficulty in understanding course content If you need clarity on ANYTHING let me know

Requests for feedback about graded assignments Private issues appropriate for discussion within the teacher-student

relationship IMPORTANT I will do my best to respond to your email within a 24-hour period unless otherwise noted Please check into BLACKBOARD (ie the Announcements Blog and Discussion Forums) EVERYDAY to assure that you receive course information disseminated in a timely fashion

Andyrsquos Strongly Suggested Student Code of Conduct

In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions

Be self-motivated and self-directed Approach the course with a desire to learn Be a good time managerhellipstart your iterative design NOW Submit constructive criticism for course improvements Participate in a respectful manner in discussions Comply with the honor code

If there is anything else that you feel I should know please do not hesitate to confidentially communicate that concern with me I am committed to making this a positive educational experience for each and every student

G Andrew Page January 2009

e-Lesson Rubric

Teacher Name Dr Page Student Name ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

18

Content Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Subject knowledge is excellent

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Attractiveness Makes excellent use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance the presentation

Makes good use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance to presentation

Makes use of font color graphics effects etc but occasionally these detract from the presentation content

Use of font color graphics effects etc but these often distract from the presentaion content

Mechanics No misspellings or grammatical errors

Three or fewer misspellings andor mechanical errors

Four misspellings andor grammatical errors

More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar

Sources Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes All documented in desired format

Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes Most documented in desired format

Source information collected for graphics facts and quotes but not documented in desired format

Very little or no source information was collected

Oral Presentation Interesting well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention

Relatively interesting rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention

Delivery not smooth but able to hold audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

19

Instructional Design Group Presentation

Teacher Name Dr Page Group ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

Presentation Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention Engages and involves class

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost

Content Group defines and tell HOW design approach can be used Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Excellent resources

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good Good resources

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors Some resources

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Resources Product shows a large amount of original thought Ideas are creative and inventive

Product shows some original thought Work shows new ideas and insights

Uses other peoples ideas (giving them credit) but there is little evidence of original thinking

Uses other peoples ideas but does not give them credit

DESIGN Groups TBA Group 1 Gagnersquos ID Model Heather amp Kitty Group 2 ADDIE Donna Morgan Kimberly Group 3 Rapid-Prototyping Model Sarah amp Lara Group 4 Algo-heuristic Model MB and John Group 5 Dual-coding theory Sasha Bethany George Group 6 Dick amp Carey Model Tracy Andy(Sam) Tim

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

20

Spring 2010 Community of Learners Name email 1 Sarah Frick ansck2uaaalaskaedu 2 Heather Corriere dfhbckodiakalaskaedu 3 Donna Kreiensieck asdkk6uaaalaskaedu 4 Kitty Deal kdealkodiakalaskaedu 5 John D Seltenright anjds2uaaalaskaedu 6 Tracy Scott inalaskausyahoocom 7 Timothy Perry astrp4uaaalaskaedu 8 Lara Madden anlnm1uaaalaskaedu 9 George Flores asgef1uaaalaskaedu 10 Morgan Grey anmg2uaaalaskaedu 11 Maj-Britt Kimm asmk20uaaalaskaedu 12 Sasha Lamoureux asstl5uaaalaskaedu 13 Andy Holleman andyhollemangmailcom 14 Bethany Zimpelman asbz2uaaalaskaedu 15 Kimberly Handy Handy_Kimberlyasdk12org

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21

Jose Feitorsquos ldquoFacets of Intellectual Community1rdquo

1 Student ownership Students recognize their ownership of the learning process Students are dissatisfied with overly directive instructors

2 Shared inquiry There is an appreciation for the generative potential of multiple perspectives Students are surprised at the insights of ldquoquiet peoplerdquo Students are dissatisfied when other students do not engage

3 Allowing ldquonot knowingrdquo Students have the ability to acknowledge their initial lack of understanding Students have a willingness to be wrong and let their opinions evolve Students ask genuine questions There is space for students to struggle with a difficult text

4 Socio-emotional climate The atmosphere is emotionally safemdashstudents know they will not be attacked There is an expectation of help from fellow students There is mutual encouragement and support There is a perception of shared fate and commonalitymdashldquoWere all in the same boatrdquo Tension is relieved through humor

5 Intellectual intimacy Students have deeper access into the inner workings of one anotherrsquos minds They know classmates on a more profound level than they know their friends There is permeability to the opinions of others

1 Feito J Exploring Intellectual Community Group Learning Processes in Traditional ldquoGreat Booksrsquo Seminarsrdquo Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Final Report CASTL Electronic Workspace Menlo Park CA The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching June 13 2002 in Huber M T amp Hutchings P (2005) p47 The Advancement of Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching San Francisco Jossey-Bass

  • NETS for Teachers 2008
  • Technology Integration
  • Academic Dishonesty Policy
  • Professional and Ethical Behavior
  • In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions
Page 10: University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

10

2010

1

2 3 Session 12

Transforming Courses for the

Online Classroom

4 5 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

6 Moodle Design

7 8

9 10 Session 13

Open Courseware

11 12 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

13 Moodle Design

14 15

16 17 Session 14

ET Presentations Groups 4 5 6

18 19 Add to the ldquoWeb

Tools amp Strategiesrdquo wiki

20 Moodle Design

Completed

21 22

23 24 Session 15

ET Presentations Groups 1 2 3

25 26 FINAL DAY to Add to the ldquoWeb Tools amp

Strategiesrdquo wiki

27 28 29

30 31

April APRIL

The readings for this course will be more intensive during the first 8 weeks of the course The remainder of the course is more of a hands-on approach that involves applying that knowledge The textbooks are SUPPLEMENTAL learning objects that when combined with the online content should enrich your overall experience I reserve the right to addsubtract content to better meet your learning needs I believe in a democratic classroom and am open to suggestions and creative ideas We are ALL learners and that includes me we are ALL teachers and that includes you Wisdom about ONLINE LEARNING Assignments Grading Due dates

Assignment

Value

Due date

E-lesson Teach a concept digitally

20

Monday March 1 Remember to post the link of your e-lesson in the e-Lesson in the DISCUSSION FORUM Also post your embedded or linked presentation in Moodle after uploading

Emerging Web 20 Technology presentation 20

To be shared in Elluminate Sessions 14 amp 15 Mini-Showcase Embed your presentation in Moodle

ParticipationContribution to Community of Learners and WORKGROUPS

20

All semester Communal Constructivism

Moodle Course Construction

20 All Semester

Instructional Design Workgroup Presentation 20 Monday February

8th and Feb 15th

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

12

Rubric for Participation = We participate therefore we arerdquo 20 Excellent participation Significant contribution to the collaborative nature of this course through high quality and critical discussions detailed presentations submitted on time superior involvement with your group substantial amount of input high level input in chatdiscussions Substantive Elluminate Live presence Contributes to synchronous discussions Excellent facilitationparticipant of weekly Blackboard Discussion Forums as well as postings in the Blog numerous quality contributions to the Moodle course and contributions to the Web Tools amp Strategies wiki

10

Good Moderate contribution in Blackboard average postings frequent participation decent quality in postings in chatdiscussion boards and group work frequent Elluminate presence and good Moodle contributions

8-9

Some Student sporadically checks in to Blackboard low quality contribution insubstantial postings little critical reflection group input is marginal little input in Elluminate the blog the discussion forums and Moodle

5-7

Little Student checks in less than once a week online little or no contribution to discussions very little or no input

1-4

E-Lesson 20

You are to use whatever medium you want to create an electronic lesson That is the lesson should

be in a format that it can be viewed via the Internet See the webpage for more information

examples and specifics Basically your goal here is to teach us a concept of your choice using

technology It can be a webpage video or whatever tool(s) you want to use Examples will be

provided Your e-Lesson will potentially become a part of the e-book on e-Learning Check out

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

13

httpgobongobookscom as this will be the online interface for our collaboration

Emerging Web-based Technology Presentation (TOPIC DUE by FEB 1st) 20 You have the opportunity to select an emerging ONLINE technology of your choice and evaluatereview it You will construct a presentation in to share your findings for all learners There are numerous examples from past courses on the websitehelliphave FUN and be creative When you have narrowed your search of the appropriate Web 20 technology please POST your selection amp rationale in the course Blackboard discussion board forum entitled MY EMERGING ONLINE TECHNOLOGY Presentations must cover the following

(1) description of the technology (2) developers of the technology (3) current or projected uses of the technology (4) costs (5) specialized equipment or standards for usage (6) availability (7) access (8) adaptability (9) level of interactivity (10) type of control (11) vendor or producer information (12) educational applications of the technology and a (13) bibliography covering salient sources (14) Also please include screen captures embedded as figures

While optional you can choose to have your presentation peer reviewed (quid pro quo) before submission

Feedback Assessment for Emerging ONLINE Technology Presentation 4 Excellent coverage of item 3 Good coverage of item 2 Some coverage of item 1 Little coverage of item 0 Item was not included in paper Comments are provided when possible or necessary for clarification

Item Assessment Comment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

14

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the technology being addressed Includes graphics creative amp knowledgeable overview

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the application of the technology to education

Presentation is interesting and appealing and is critically reviewed

Presentation is free from technical glitches and runs smoothly

Presentation includes an overview and summation

Total 20

The ldquoONLINE Emerging Technologiesrdquo presentation should provide the reader with OverviewSummation

Screen captures of the technology This review could be hardware or software technologies

Your critical reflection and review For this assignment Do NOT copy quote or cite ANY review from

another source I want your candid point of view regarding the utility of this technology How might this technology be used in an educational format

Post your presentation in the Moodle Course

Students must ensure that ALL assignment files are free of viruses before submitting them Keep your virus detection software up to date Should an assignment file fail scrutiny by our institutionrsquos standard virus detection software the student submitting it will be so advised by email A virus-free version of the file must be resubmitted within 24 hours of the posting date of this email Any subsequent failure to adhere to this requirement will cause an assignment to be unacceptable and a 0 grade will be recorded for this assignment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

15

Moodle Course Construction 20 All

Semester You will be given TEACHER access to a Moodle course shell for designing

an online course Teachers can do anything within a course including changing the activities and grading students

University of Alaska Anchorage Policies

Incomplete Grade Policy Incomplete Grades Unless there is a veritable reason I do not recommend students pursue this route Communicate with me as I know that sometimes life happens An ldquoIrdquo (Incomplete) is a temporary grade It is used to indicate that a student has made satisfactory progress in the majority of the work in a course but for unavoidable absences or other conditions beyond the control of the student has not been able to complete the course The Incomplete Grade Contract a signed contract form between the student and the faculty member that stipulates the assignment(s) required to finish the course is required and must be completed and filed with the department or deanrsquos office before an ldquoIrdquo grade is assigned Course work must be completed by a date specified in the contract not to exceed one year Upon completion of the required course work the faculty member must submit a change of grade form accompanied by a copy of the incomplete grade contract to the department or deanrsquos office If course work is not completed within one year or if the terms specified on the Incomplete Grade Contract are not met the student may be assigned a failing grade (F or NP depending on the grading basis of the course) If course work is not completed within one year and the faculty member does not submit a change of grade at that time the ldquoIrdquo will become a permanent grade and it will be necessary for the student to re-register to obtain credit for the course ADA Policy The provision of equal opportunities for students who experience disabilities is a campus-wide responsibility and commitment Disabilities Support Services (DSS) is the designated UAA department responsible for coordinating academic support services for students who experience disabilities To access support services students must contact DSS (786-4530 or 786-4536 TTY) and provide current disability documentation that supports the requested services Disability support services are mandated by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 Additional information may be accessed at the DSS Office in Business Education Building (BEB105)or on-line at wwwuaaalaskaedudss Academic Dishonesty Policy Academic integrity is a basic principle that requires all students to take credit only for the ideas and efforts that are their own Cheating plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty are defined as the submission of materials in

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

16

assignments exams or other academic work that is based on sources prohibited by the faculty member In addition to any adverse academic action which may result from the academically dishonest behavior the University specifically reserves the right to address and sanction the conduct involved through student judicial review procedures and the Academic Dispute Resolution Procedure specified in the University catalog If you have ANY questions about citations or academic honesty you should contact me I will be using special software when reviewing papers to certify the integrity of the author not authors I take this matter extremely serious and because this course is a graduate course I assume ALL students have had ample opportunity to educate themselves of appropriate academic conduct Professional and Ethical Behavior University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education students are expected to abide by the State of Alaska Code of Ethics of the Education Profession and professional teaching standards as they concern students the public and the profession The standards adopted by the Professional Teaching Practices Commission govern all members of the teaching profession A violation of the code of ethics and professional teaching standards are grounds for revocation or suspension of teaching certification Religious Holiday or Cultural Observance If a class meeting occurs on a religious holiday or cultural observance day and you are obligated to miss class for this event you must notify the instructor in writing by the end of the second week of the semester Email Policy

The subject line for each email submission should include the following

ldquoEDET 637 (topic)rdquo The may seem pedantic but it helps with organization I generally receive over 75+ emails in a 24-hour period and I file away all correspondence from students Also during Spring 2010 I will be teaching 3 courses doing research serving on numerous committees and boards traveling to conferences etc There are many 18 hour+ days ahead and I like to be busy and productivehellipI loathe busy work and repeating myself Excessive emails make unreasonable time demands on both sender and recipient The following are my guidelines for proper email communication Please ensure you have legitimate need before you write Thanks I will answer email about

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

17

Questions arising from difficulty in understanding course content If you need clarity on ANYTHING let me know

Requests for feedback about graded assignments Private issues appropriate for discussion within the teacher-student

relationship IMPORTANT I will do my best to respond to your email within a 24-hour period unless otherwise noted Please check into BLACKBOARD (ie the Announcements Blog and Discussion Forums) EVERYDAY to assure that you receive course information disseminated in a timely fashion

Andyrsquos Strongly Suggested Student Code of Conduct

In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions

Be self-motivated and self-directed Approach the course with a desire to learn Be a good time managerhellipstart your iterative design NOW Submit constructive criticism for course improvements Participate in a respectful manner in discussions Comply with the honor code

If there is anything else that you feel I should know please do not hesitate to confidentially communicate that concern with me I am committed to making this a positive educational experience for each and every student

G Andrew Page January 2009

e-Lesson Rubric

Teacher Name Dr Page Student Name ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

18

Content Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Subject knowledge is excellent

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Attractiveness Makes excellent use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance the presentation

Makes good use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance to presentation

Makes use of font color graphics effects etc but occasionally these detract from the presentation content

Use of font color graphics effects etc but these often distract from the presentaion content

Mechanics No misspellings or grammatical errors

Three or fewer misspellings andor mechanical errors

Four misspellings andor grammatical errors

More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar

Sources Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes All documented in desired format

Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes Most documented in desired format

Source information collected for graphics facts and quotes but not documented in desired format

Very little or no source information was collected

Oral Presentation Interesting well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention

Relatively interesting rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention

Delivery not smooth but able to hold audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

19

Instructional Design Group Presentation

Teacher Name Dr Page Group ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

Presentation Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention Engages and involves class

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost

Content Group defines and tell HOW design approach can be used Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Excellent resources

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good Good resources

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors Some resources

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Resources Product shows a large amount of original thought Ideas are creative and inventive

Product shows some original thought Work shows new ideas and insights

Uses other peoples ideas (giving them credit) but there is little evidence of original thinking

Uses other peoples ideas but does not give them credit

DESIGN Groups TBA Group 1 Gagnersquos ID Model Heather amp Kitty Group 2 ADDIE Donna Morgan Kimberly Group 3 Rapid-Prototyping Model Sarah amp Lara Group 4 Algo-heuristic Model MB and John Group 5 Dual-coding theory Sasha Bethany George Group 6 Dick amp Carey Model Tracy Andy(Sam) Tim

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

20

Spring 2010 Community of Learners Name email 1 Sarah Frick ansck2uaaalaskaedu 2 Heather Corriere dfhbckodiakalaskaedu 3 Donna Kreiensieck asdkk6uaaalaskaedu 4 Kitty Deal kdealkodiakalaskaedu 5 John D Seltenright anjds2uaaalaskaedu 6 Tracy Scott inalaskausyahoocom 7 Timothy Perry astrp4uaaalaskaedu 8 Lara Madden anlnm1uaaalaskaedu 9 George Flores asgef1uaaalaskaedu 10 Morgan Grey anmg2uaaalaskaedu 11 Maj-Britt Kimm asmk20uaaalaskaedu 12 Sasha Lamoureux asstl5uaaalaskaedu 13 Andy Holleman andyhollemangmailcom 14 Bethany Zimpelman asbz2uaaalaskaedu 15 Kimberly Handy Handy_Kimberlyasdk12org

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21

Jose Feitorsquos ldquoFacets of Intellectual Community1rdquo

1 Student ownership Students recognize their ownership of the learning process Students are dissatisfied with overly directive instructors

2 Shared inquiry There is an appreciation for the generative potential of multiple perspectives Students are surprised at the insights of ldquoquiet peoplerdquo Students are dissatisfied when other students do not engage

3 Allowing ldquonot knowingrdquo Students have the ability to acknowledge their initial lack of understanding Students have a willingness to be wrong and let their opinions evolve Students ask genuine questions There is space for students to struggle with a difficult text

4 Socio-emotional climate The atmosphere is emotionally safemdashstudents know they will not be attacked There is an expectation of help from fellow students There is mutual encouragement and support There is a perception of shared fate and commonalitymdashldquoWere all in the same boatrdquo Tension is relieved through humor

5 Intellectual intimacy Students have deeper access into the inner workings of one anotherrsquos minds They know classmates on a more profound level than they know their friends There is permeability to the opinions of others

1 Feito J Exploring Intellectual Community Group Learning Processes in Traditional ldquoGreat Booksrsquo Seminarsrdquo Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Final Report CASTL Electronic Workspace Menlo Park CA The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching June 13 2002 in Huber M T amp Hutchings P (2005) p47 The Advancement of Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching San Francisco Jossey-Bass

  • NETS for Teachers 2008
  • Technology Integration
  • Academic Dishonesty Policy
  • Professional and Ethical Behavior
  • In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions
Page 11: University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

The readings for this course will be more intensive during the first 8 weeks of the course The remainder of the course is more of a hands-on approach that involves applying that knowledge The textbooks are SUPPLEMENTAL learning objects that when combined with the online content should enrich your overall experience I reserve the right to addsubtract content to better meet your learning needs I believe in a democratic classroom and am open to suggestions and creative ideas We are ALL learners and that includes me we are ALL teachers and that includes you Wisdom about ONLINE LEARNING Assignments Grading Due dates

Assignment

Value

Due date

E-lesson Teach a concept digitally

20

Monday March 1 Remember to post the link of your e-lesson in the e-Lesson in the DISCUSSION FORUM Also post your embedded or linked presentation in Moodle after uploading

Emerging Web 20 Technology presentation 20

To be shared in Elluminate Sessions 14 amp 15 Mini-Showcase Embed your presentation in Moodle

ParticipationContribution to Community of Learners and WORKGROUPS

20

All semester Communal Constructivism

Moodle Course Construction

20 All Semester

Instructional Design Workgroup Presentation 20 Monday February

8th and Feb 15th

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

12

Rubric for Participation = We participate therefore we arerdquo 20 Excellent participation Significant contribution to the collaborative nature of this course through high quality and critical discussions detailed presentations submitted on time superior involvement with your group substantial amount of input high level input in chatdiscussions Substantive Elluminate Live presence Contributes to synchronous discussions Excellent facilitationparticipant of weekly Blackboard Discussion Forums as well as postings in the Blog numerous quality contributions to the Moodle course and contributions to the Web Tools amp Strategies wiki

10

Good Moderate contribution in Blackboard average postings frequent participation decent quality in postings in chatdiscussion boards and group work frequent Elluminate presence and good Moodle contributions

8-9

Some Student sporadically checks in to Blackboard low quality contribution insubstantial postings little critical reflection group input is marginal little input in Elluminate the blog the discussion forums and Moodle

5-7

Little Student checks in less than once a week online little or no contribution to discussions very little or no input

1-4

E-Lesson 20

You are to use whatever medium you want to create an electronic lesson That is the lesson should

be in a format that it can be viewed via the Internet See the webpage for more information

examples and specifics Basically your goal here is to teach us a concept of your choice using

technology It can be a webpage video or whatever tool(s) you want to use Examples will be

provided Your e-Lesson will potentially become a part of the e-book on e-Learning Check out

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

13

httpgobongobookscom as this will be the online interface for our collaboration

Emerging Web-based Technology Presentation (TOPIC DUE by FEB 1st) 20 You have the opportunity to select an emerging ONLINE technology of your choice and evaluatereview it You will construct a presentation in to share your findings for all learners There are numerous examples from past courses on the websitehelliphave FUN and be creative When you have narrowed your search of the appropriate Web 20 technology please POST your selection amp rationale in the course Blackboard discussion board forum entitled MY EMERGING ONLINE TECHNOLOGY Presentations must cover the following

(1) description of the technology (2) developers of the technology (3) current or projected uses of the technology (4) costs (5) specialized equipment or standards for usage (6) availability (7) access (8) adaptability (9) level of interactivity (10) type of control (11) vendor or producer information (12) educational applications of the technology and a (13) bibliography covering salient sources (14) Also please include screen captures embedded as figures

While optional you can choose to have your presentation peer reviewed (quid pro quo) before submission

Feedback Assessment for Emerging ONLINE Technology Presentation 4 Excellent coverage of item 3 Good coverage of item 2 Some coverage of item 1 Little coverage of item 0 Item was not included in paper Comments are provided when possible or necessary for clarification

Item Assessment Comment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

14

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the technology being addressed Includes graphics creative amp knowledgeable overview

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the application of the technology to education

Presentation is interesting and appealing and is critically reviewed

Presentation is free from technical glitches and runs smoothly

Presentation includes an overview and summation

Total 20

The ldquoONLINE Emerging Technologiesrdquo presentation should provide the reader with OverviewSummation

Screen captures of the technology This review could be hardware or software technologies

Your critical reflection and review For this assignment Do NOT copy quote or cite ANY review from

another source I want your candid point of view regarding the utility of this technology How might this technology be used in an educational format

Post your presentation in the Moodle Course

Students must ensure that ALL assignment files are free of viruses before submitting them Keep your virus detection software up to date Should an assignment file fail scrutiny by our institutionrsquos standard virus detection software the student submitting it will be so advised by email A virus-free version of the file must be resubmitted within 24 hours of the posting date of this email Any subsequent failure to adhere to this requirement will cause an assignment to be unacceptable and a 0 grade will be recorded for this assignment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

15

Moodle Course Construction 20 All

Semester You will be given TEACHER access to a Moodle course shell for designing

an online course Teachers can do anything within a course including changing the activities and grading students

University of Alaska Anchorage Policies

Incomplete Grade Policy Incomplete Grades Unless there is a veritable reason I do not recommend students pursue this route Communicate with me as I know that sometimes life happens An ldquoIrdquo (Incomplete) is a temporary grade It is used to indicate that a student has made satisfactory progress in the majority of the work in a course but for unavoidable absences or other conditions beyond the control of the student has not been able to complete the course The Incomplete Grade Contract a signed contract form between the student and the faculty member that stipulates the assignment(s) required to finish the course is required and must be completed and filed with the department or deanrsquos office before an ldquoIrdquo grade is assigned Course work must be completed by a date specified in the contract not to exceed one year Upon completion of the required course work the faculty member must submit a change of grade form accompanied by a copy of the incomplete grade contract to the department or deanrsquos office If course work is not completed within one year or if the terms specified on the Incomplete Grade Contract are not met the student may be assigned a failing grade (F or NP depending on the grading basis of the course) If course work is not completed within one year and the faculty member does not submit a change of grade at that time the ldquoIrdquo will become a permanent grade and it will be necessary for the student to re-register to obtain credit for the course ADA Policy The provision of equal opportunities for students who experience disabilities is a campus-wide responsibility and commitment Disabilities Support Services (DSS) is the designated UAA department responsible for coordinating academic support services for students who experience disabilities To access support services students must contact DSS (786-4530 or 786-4536 TTY) and provide current disability documentation that supports the requested services Disability support services are mandated by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 Additional information may be accessed at the DSS Office in Business Education Building (BEB105)or on-line at wwwuaaalaskaedudss Academic Dishonesty Policy Academic integrity is a basic principle that requires all students to take credit only for the ideas and efforts that are their own Cheating plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty are defined as the submission of materials in

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

16

assignments exams or other academic work that is based on sources prohibited by the faculty member In addition to any adverse academic action which may result from the academically dishonest behavior the University specifically reserves the right to address and sanction the conduct involved through student judicial review procedures and the Academic Dispute Resolution Procedure specified in the University catalog If you have ANY questions about citations or academic honesty you should contact me I will be using special software when reviewing papers to certify the integrity of the author not authors I take this matter extremely serious and because this course is a graduate course I assume ALL students have had ample opportunity to educate themselves of appropriate academic conduct Professional and Ethical Behavior University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education students are expected to abide by the State of Alaska Code of Ethics of the Education Profession and professional teaching standards as they concern students the public and the profession The standards adopted by the Professional Teaching Practices Commission govern all members of the teaching profession A violation of the code of ethics and professional teaching standards are grounds for revocation or suspension of teaching certification Religious Holiday or Cultural Observance If a class meeting occurs on a religious holiday or cultural observance day and you are obligated to miss class for this event you must notify the instructor in writing by the end of the second week of the semester Email Policy

The subject line for each email submission should include the following

ldquoEDET 637 (topic)rdquo The may seem pedantic but it helps with organization I generally receive over 75+ emails in a 24-hour period and I file away all correspondence from students Also during Spring 2010 I will be teaching 3 courses doing research serving on numerous committees and boards traveling to conferences etc There are many 18 hour+ days ahead and I like to be busy and productivehellipI loathe busy work and repeating myself Excessive emails make unreasonable time demands on both sender and recipient The following are my guidelines for proper email communication Please ensure you have legitimate need before you write Thanks I will answer email about

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

17

Questions arising from difficulty in understanding course content If you need clarity on ANYTHING let me know

Requests for feedback about graded assignments Private issues appropriate for discussion within the teacher-student

relationship IMPORTANT I will do my best to respond to your email within a 24-hour period unless otherwise noted Please check into BLACKBOARD (ie the Announcements Blog and Discussion Forums) EVERYDAY to assure that you receive course information disseminated in a timely fashion

Andyrsquos Strongly Suggested Student Code of Conduct

In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions

Be self-motivated and self-directed Approach the course with a desire to learn Be a good time managerhellipstart your iterative design NOW Submit constructive criticism for course improvements Participate in a respectful manner in discussions Comply with the honor code

If there is anything else that you feel I should know please do not hesitate to confidentially communicate that concern with me I am committed to making this a positive educational experience for each and every student

G Andrew Page January 2009

e-Lesson Rubric

Teacher Name Dr Page Student Name ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

18

Content Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Subject knowledge is excellent

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Attractiveness Makes excellent use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance the presentation

Makes good use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance to presentation

Makes use of font color graphics effects etc but occasionally these detract from the presentation content

Use of font color graphics effects etc but these often distract from the presentaion content

Mechanics No misspellings or grammatical errors

Three or fewer misspellings andor mechanical errors

Four misspellings andor grammatical errors

More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar

Sources Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes All documented in desired format

Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes Most documented in desired format

Source information collected for graphics facts and quotes but not documented in desired format

Very little or no source information was collected

Oral Presentation Interesting well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention

Relatively interesting rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention

Delivery not smooth but able to hold audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

19

Instructional Design Group Presentation

Teacher Name Dr Page Group ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

Presentation Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention Engages and involves class

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost

Content Group defines and tell HOW design approach can be used Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Excellent resources

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good Good resources

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors Some resources

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Resources Product shows a large amount of original thought Ideas are creative and inventive

Product shows some original thought Work shows new ideas and insights

Uses other peoples ideas (giving them credit) but there is little evidence of original thinking

Uses other peoples ideas but does not give them credit

DESIGN Groups TBA Group 1 Gagnersquos ID Model Heather amp Kitty Group 2 ADDIE Donna Morgan Kimberly Group 3 Rapid-Prototyping Model Sarah amp Lara Group 4 Algo-heuristic Model MB and John Group 5 Dual-coding theory Sasha Bethany George Group 6 Dick amp Carey Model Tracy Andy(Sam) Tim

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

20

Spring 2010 Community of Learners Name email 1 Sarah Frick ansck2uaaalaskaedu 2 Heather Corriere dfhbckodiakalaskaedu 3 Donna Kreiensieck asdkk6uaaalaskaedu 4 Kitty Deal kdealkodiakalaskaedu 5 John D Seltenright anjds2uaaalaskaedu 6 Tracy Scott inalaskausyahoocom 7 Timothy Perry astrp4uaaalaskaedu 8 Lara Madden anlnm1uaaalaskaedu 9 George Flores asgef1uaaalaskaedu 10 Morgan Grey anmg2uaaalaskaedu 11 Maj-Britt Kimm asmk20uaaalaskaedu 12 Sasha Lamoureux asstl5uaaalaskaedu 13 Andy Holleman andyhollemangmailcom 14 Bethany Zimpelman asbz2uaaalaskaedu 15 Kimberly Handy Handy_Kimberlyasdk12org

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21

Jose Feitorsquos ldquoFacets of Intellectual Community1rdquo

1 Student ownership Students recognize their ownership of the learning process Students are dissatisfied with overly directive instructors

2 Shared inquiry There is an appreciation for the generative potential of multiple perspectives Students are surprised at the insights of ldquoquiet peoplerdquo Students are dissatisfied when other students do not engage

3 Allowing ldquonot knowingrdquo Students have the ability to acknowledge their initial lack of understanding Students have a willingness to be wrong and let their opinions evolve Students ask genuine questions There is space for students to struggle with a difficult text

4 Socio-emotional climate The atmosphere is emotionally safemdashstudents know they will not be attacked There is an expectation of help from fellow students There is mutual encouragement and support There is a perception of shared fate and commonalitymdashldquoWere all in the same boatrdquo Tension is relieved through humor

5 Intellectual intimacy Students have deeper access into the inner workings of one anotherrsquos minds They know classmates on a more profound level than they know their friends There is permeability to the opinions of others

1 Feito J Exploring Intellectual Community Group Learning Processes in Traditional ldquoGreat Booksrsquo Seminarsrdquo Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Final Report CASTL Electronic Workspace Menlo Park CA The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching June 13 2002 in Huber M T amp Hutchings P (2005) p47 The Advancement of Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching San Francisco Jossey-Bass

  • NETS for Teachers 2008
  • Technology Integration
  • Academic Dishonesty Policy
  • Professional and Ethical Behavior
  • In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions
Page 12: University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

12

Rubric for Participation = We participate therefore we arerdquo 20 Excellent participation Significant contribution to the collaborative nature of this course through high quality and critical discussions detailed presentations submitted on time superior involvement with your group substantial amount of input high level input in chatdiscussions Substantive Elluminate Live presence Contributes to synchronous discussions Excellent facilitationparticipant of weekly Blackboard Discussion Forums as well as postings in the Blog numerous quality contributions to the Moodle course and contributions to the Web Tools amp Strategies wiki

10

Good Moderate contribution in Blackboard average postings frequent participation decent quality in postings in chatdiscussion boards and group work frequent Elluminate presence and good Moodle contributions

8-9

Some Student sporadically checks in to Blackboard low quality contribution insubstantial postings little critical reflection group input is marginal little input in Elluminate the blog the discussion forums and Moodle

5-7

Little Student checks in less than once a week online little or no contribution to discussions very little or no input

1-4

E-Lesson 20

You are to use whatever medium you want to create an electronic lesson That is the lesson should

be in a format that it can be viewed via the Internet See the webpage for more information

examples and specifics Basically your goal here is to teach us a concept of your choice using

technology It can be a webpage video or whatever tool(s) you want to use Examples will be

provided Your e-Lesson will potentially become a part of the e-book on e-Learning Check out

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

13

httpgobongobookscom as this will be the online interface for our collaboration

Emerging Web-based Technology Presentation (TOPIC DUE by FEB 1st) 20 You have the opportunity to select an emerging ONLINE technology of your choice and evaluatereview it You will construct a presentation in to share your findings for all learners There are numerous examples from past courses on the websitehelliphave FUN and be creative When you have narrowed your search of the appropriate Web 20 technology please POST your selection amp rationale in the course Blackboard discussion board forum entitled MY EMERGING ONLINE TECHNOLOGY Presentations must cover the following

(1) description of the technology (2) developers of the technology (3) current or projected uses of the technology (4) costs (5) specialized equipment or standards for usage (6) availability (7) access (8) adaptability (9) level of interactivity (10) type of control (11) vendor or producer information (12) educational applications of the technology and a (13) bibliography covering salient sources (14) Also please include screen captures embedded as figures

While optional you can choose to have your presentation peer reviewed (quid pro quo) before submission

Feedback Assessment for Emerging ONLINE Technology Presentation 4 Excellent coverage of item 3 Good coverage of item 2 Some coverage of item 1 Little coverage of item 0 Item was not included in paper Comments are provided when possible or necessary for clarification

Item Assessment Comment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

14

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the technology being addressed Includes graphics creative amp knowledgeable overview

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the application of the technology to education

Presentation is interesting and appealing and is critically reviewed

Presentation is free from technical glitches and runs smoothly

Presentation includes an overview and summation

Total 20

The ldquoONLINE Emerging Technologiesrdquo presentation should provide the reader with OverviewSummation

Screen captures of the technology This review could be hardware or software technologies

Your critical reflection and review For this assignment Do NOT copy quote or cite ANY review from

another source I want your candid point of view regarding the utility of this technology How might this technology be used in an educational format

Post your presentation in the Moodle Course

Students must ensure that ALL assignment files are free of viruses before submitting them Keep your virus detection software up to date Should an assignment file fail scrutiny by our institutionrsquos standard virus detection software the student submitting it will be so advised by email A virus-free version of the file must be resubmitted within 24 hours of the posting date of this email Any subsequent failure to adhere to this requirement will cause an assignment to be unacceptable and a 0 grade will be recorded for this assignment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

15

Moodle Course Construction 20 All

Semester You will be given TEACHER access to a Moodle course shell for designing

an online course Teachers can do anything within a course including changing the activities and grading students

University of Alaska Anchorage Policies

Incomplete Grade Policy Incomplete Grades Unless there is a veritable reason I do not recommend students pursue this route Communicate with me as I know that sometimes life happens An ldquoIrdquo (Incomplete) is a temporary grade It is used to indicate that a student has made satisfactory progress in the majority of the work in a course but for unavoidable absences or other conditions beyond the control of the student has not been able to complete the course The Incomplete Grade Contract a signed contract form between the student and the faculty member that stipulates the assignment(s) required to finish the course is required and must be completed and filed with the department or deanrsquos office before an ldquoIrdquo grade is assigned Course work must be completed by a date specified in the contract not to exceed one year Upon completion of the required course work the faculty member must submit a change of grade form accompanied by a copy of the incomplete grade contract to the department or deanrsquos office If course work is not completed within one year or if the terms specified on the Incomplete Grade Contract are not met the student may be assigned a failing grade (F or NP depending on the grading basis of the course) If course work is not completed within one year and the faculty member does not submit a change of grade at that time the ldquoIrdquo will become a permanent grade and it will be necessary for the student to re-register to obtain credit for the course ADA Policy The provision of equal opportunities for students who experience disabilities is a campus-wide responsibility and commitment Disabilities Support Services (DSS) is the designated UAA department responsible for coordinating academic support services for students who experience disabilities To access support services students must contact DSS (786-4530 or 786-4536 TTY) and provide current disability documentation that supports the requested services Disability support services are mandated by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 Additional information may be accessed at the DSS Office in Business Education Building (BEB105)or on-line at wwwuaaalaskaedudss Academic Dishonesty Policy Academic integrity is a basic principle that requires all students to take credit only for the ideas and efforts that are their own Cheating plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty are defined as the submission of materials in

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

16

assignments exams or other academic work that is based on sources prohibited by the faculty member In addition to any adverse academic action which may result from the academically dishonest behavior the University specifically reserves the right to address and sanction the conduct involved through student judicial review procedures and the Academic Dispute Resolution Procedure specified in the University catalog If you have ANY questions about citations or academic honesty you should contact me I will be using special software when reviewing papers to certify the integrity of the author not authors I take this matter extremely serious and because this course is a graduate course I assume ALL students have had ample opportunity to educate themselves of appropriate academic conduct Professional and Ethical Behavior University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education students are expected to abide by the State of Alaska Code of Ethics of the Education Profession and professional teaching standards as they concern students the public and the profession The standards adopted by the Professional Teaching Practices Commission govern all members of the teaching profession A violation of the code of ethics and professional teaching standards are grounds for revocation or suspension of teaching certification Religious Holiday or Cultural Observance If a class meeting occurs on a religious holiday or cultural observance day and you are obligated to miss class for this event you must notify the instructor in writing by the end of the second week of the semester Email Policy

The subject line for each email submission should include the following

ldquoEDET 637 (topic)rdquo The may seem pedantic but it helps with organization I generally receive over 75+ emails in a 24-hour period and I file away all correspondence from students Also during Spring 2010 I will be teaching 3 courses doing research serving on numerous committees and boards traveling to conferences etc There are many 18 hour+ days ahead and I like to be busy and productivehellipI loathe busy work and repeating myself Excessive emails make unreasonable time demands on both sender and recipient The following are my guidelines for proper email communication Please ensure you have legitimate need before you write Thanks I will answer email about

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

17

Questions arising from difficulty in understanding course content If you need clarity on ANYTHING let me know

Requests for feedback about graded assignments Private issues appropriate for discussion within the teacher-student

relationship IMPORTANT I will do my best to respond to your email within a 24-hour period unless otherwise noted Please check into BLACKBOARD (ie the Announcements Blog and Discussion Forums) EVERYDAY to assure that you receive course information disseminated in a timely fashion

Andyrsquos Strongly Suggested Student Code of Conduct

In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions

Be self-motivated and self-directed Approach the course with a desire to learn Be a good time managerhellipstart your iterative design NOW Submit constructive criticism for course improvements Participate in a respectful manner in discussions Comply with the honor code

If there is anything else that you feel I should know please do not hesitate to confidentially communicate that concern with me I am committed to making this a positive educational experience for each and every student

G Andrew Page January 2009

e-Lesson Rubric

Teacher Name Dr Page Student Name ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

18

Content Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Subject knowledge is excellent

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Attractiveness Makes excellent use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance the presentation

Makes good use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance to presentation

Makes use of font color graphics effects etc but occasionally these detract from the presentation content

Use of font color graphics effects etc but these often distract from the presentaion content

Mechanics No misspellings or grammatical errors

Three or fewer misspellings andor mechanical errors

Four misspellings andor grammatical errors

More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar

Sources Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes All documented in desired format

Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes Most documented in desired format

Source information collected for graphics facts and quotes but not documented in desired format

Very little or no source information was collected

Oral Presentation Interesting well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention

Relatively interesting rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention

Delivery not smooth but able to hold audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

19

Instructional Design Group Presentation

Teacher Name Dr Page Group ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

Presentation Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention Engages and involves class

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost

Content Group defines and tell HOW design approach can be used Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Excellent resources

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good Good resources

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors Some resources

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Resources Product shows a large amount of original thought Ideas are creative and inventive

Product shows some original thought Work shows new ideas and insights

Uses other peoples ideas (giving them credit) but there is little evidence of original thinking

Uses other peoples ideas but does not give them credit

DESIGN Groups TBA Group 1 Gagnersquos ID Model Heather amp Kitty Group 2 ADDIE Donna Morgan Kimberly Group 3 Rapid-Prototyping Model Sarah amp Lara Group 4 Algo-heuristic Model MB and John Group 5 Dual-coding theory Sasha Bethany George Group 6 Dick amp Carey Model Tracy Andy(Sam) Tim

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

20

Spring 2010 Community of Learners Name email 1 Sarah Frick ansck2uaaalaskaedu 2 Heather Corriere dfhbckodiakalaskaedu 3 Donna Kreiensieck asdkk6uaaalaskaedu 4 Kitty Deal kdealkodiakalaskaedu 5 John D Seltenright anjds2uaaalaskaedu 6 Tracy Scott inalaskausyahoocom 7 Timothy Perry astrp4uaaalaskaedu 8 Lara Madden anlnm1uaaalaskaedu 9 George Flores asgef1uaaalaskaedu 10 Morgan Grey anmg2uaaalaskaedu 11 Maj-Britt Kimm asmk20uaaalaskaedu 12 Sasha Lamoureux asstl5uaaalaskaedu 13 Andy Holleman andyhollemangmailcom 14 Bethany Zimpelman asbz2uaaalaskaedu 15 Kimberly Handy Handy_Kimberlyasdk12org

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21

Jose Feitorsquos ldquoFacets of Intellectual Community1rdquo

1 Student ownership Students recognize their ownership of the learning process Students are dissatisfied with overly directive instructors

2 Shared inquiry There is an appreciation for the generative potential of multiple perspectives Students are surprised at the insights of ldquoquiet peoplerdquo Students are dissatisfied when other students do not engage

3 Allowing ldquonot knowingrdquo Students have the ability to acknowledge their initial lack of understanding Students have a willingness to be wrong and let their opinions evolve Students ask genuine questions There is space for students to struggle with a difficult text

4 Socio-emotional climate The atmosphere is emotionally safemdashstudents know they will not be attacked There is an expectation of help from fellow students There is mutual encouragement and support There is a perception of shared fate and commonalitymdashldquoWere all in the same boatrdquo Tension is relieved through humor

5 Intellectual intimacy Students have deeper access into the inner workings of one anotherrsquos minds They know classmates on a more profound level than they know their friends There is permeability to the opinions of others

1 Feito J Exploring Intellectual Community Group Learning Processes in Traditional ldquoGreat Booksrsquo Seminarsrdquo Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Final Report CASTL Electronic Workspace Menlo Park CA The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching June 13 2002 in Huber M T amp Hutchings P (2005) p47 The Advancement of Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching San Francisco Jossey-Bass

  • NETS for Teachers 2008
  • Technology Integration
  • Academic Dishonesty Policy
  • Professional and Ethical Behavior
  • In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions
Page 13: University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

13

httpgobongobookscom as this will be the online interface for our collaboration

Emerging Web-based Technology Presentation (TOPIC DUE by FEB 1st) 20 You have the opportunity to select an emerging ONLINE technology of your choice and evaluatereview it You will construct a presentation in to share your findings for all learners There are numerous examples from past courses on the websitehelliphave FUN and be creative When you have narrowed your search of the appropriate Web 20 technology please POST your selection amp rationale in the course Blackboard discussion board forum entitled MY EMERGING ONLINE TECHNOLOGY Presentations must cover the following

(1) description of the technology (2) developers of the technology (3) current or projected uses of the technology (4) costs (5) specialized equipment or standards for usage (6) availability (7) access (8) adaptability (9) level of interactivity (10) type of control (11) vendor or producer information (12) educational applications of the technology and a (13) bibliography covering salient sources (14) Also please include screen captures embedded as figures

While optional you can choose to have your presentation peer reviewed (quid pro quo) before submission

Feedback Assessment for Emerging ONLINE Technology Presentation 4 Excellent coverage of item 3 Good coverage of item 2 Some coverage of item 1 Little coverage of item 0 Item was not included in paper Comments are provided when possible or necessary for clarification

Item Assessment Comment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

14

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the technology being addressed Includes graphics creative amp knowledgeable overview

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the application of the technology to education

Presentation is interesting and appealing and is critically reviewed

Presentation is free from technical glitches and runs smoothly

Presentation includes an overview and summation

Total 20

The ldquoONLINE Emerging Technologiesrdquo presentation should provide the reader with OverviewSummation

Screen captures of the technology This review could be hardware or software technologies

Your critical reflection and review For this assignment Do NOT copy quote or cite ANY review from

another source I want your candid point of view regarding the utility of this technology How might this technology be used in an educational format

Post your presentation in the Moodle Course

Students must ensure that ALL assignment files are free of viruses before submitting them Keep your virus detection software up to date Should an assignment file fail scrutiny by our institutionrsquos standard virus detection software the student submitting it will be so advised by email A virus-free version of the file must be resubmitted within 24 hours of the posting date of this email Any subsequent failure to adhere to this requirement will cause an assignment to be unacceptable and a 0 grade will be recorded for this assignment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

15

Moodle Course Construction 20 All

Semester You will be given TEACHER access to a Moodle course shell for designing

an online course Teachers can do anything within a course including changing the activities and grading students

University of Alaska Anchorage Policies

Incomplete Grade Policy Incomplete Grades Unless there is a veritable reason I do not recommend students pursue this route Communicate with me as I know that sometimes life happens An ldquoIrdquo (Incomplete) is a temporary grade It is used to indicate that a student has made satisfactory progress in the majority of the work in a course but for unavoidable absences or other conditions beyond the control of the student has not been able to complete the course The Incomplete Grade Contract a signed contract form between the student and the faculty member that stipulates the assignment(s) required to finish the course is required and must be completed and filed with the department or deanrsquos office before an ldquoIrdquo grade is assigned Course work must be completed by a date specified in the contract not to exceed one year Upon completion of the required course work the faculty member must submit a change of grade form accompanied by a copy of the incomplete grade contract to the department or deanrsquos office If course work is not completed within one year or if the terms specified on the Incomplete Grade Contract are not met the student may be assigned a failing grade (F or NP depending on the grading basis of the course) If course work is not completed within one year and the faculty member does not submit a change of grade at that time the ldquoIrdquo will become a permanent grade and it will be necessary for the student to re-register to obtain credit for the course ADA Policy The provision of equal opportunities for students who experience disabilities is a campus-wide responsibility and commitment Disabilities Support Services (DSS) is the designated UAA department responsible for coordinating academic support services for students who experience disabilities To access support services students must contact DSS (786-4530 or 786-4536 TTY) and provide current disability documentation that supports the requested services Disability support services are mandated by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 Additional information may be accessed at the DSS Office in Business Education Building (BEB105)or on-line at wwwuaaalaskaedudss Academic Dishonesty Policy Academic integrity is a basic principle that requires all students to take credit only for the ideas and efforts that are their own Cheating plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty are defined as the submission of materials in

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

16

assignments exams or other academic work that is based on sources prohibited by the faculty member In addition to any adverse academic action which may result from the academically dishonest behavior the University specifically reserves the right to address and sanction the conduct involved through student judicial review procedures and the Academic Dispute Resolution Procedure specified in the University catalog If you have ANY questions about citations or academic honesty you should contact me I will be using special software when reviewing papers to certify the integrity of the author not authors I take this matter extremely serious and because this course is a graduate course I assume ALL students have had ample opportunity to educate themselves of appropriate academic conduct Professional and Ethical Behavior University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education students are expected to abide by the State of Alaska Code of Ethics of the Education Profession and professional teaching standards as they concern students the public and the profession The standards adopted by the Professional Teaching Practices Commission govern all members of the teaching profession A violation of the code of ethics and professional teaching standards are grounds for revocation or suspension of teaching certification Religious Holiday or Cultural Observance If a class meeting occurs on a religious holiday or cultural observance day and you are obligated to miss class for this event you must notify the instructor in writing by the end of the second week of the semester Email Policy

The subject line for each email submission should include the following

ldquoEDET 637 (topic)rdquo The may seem pedantic but it helps with organization I generally receive over 75+ emails in a 24-hour period and I file away all correspondence from students Also during Spring 2010 I will be teaching 3 courses doing research serving on numerous committees and boards traveling to conferences etc There are many 18 hour+ days ahead and I like to be busy and productivehellipI loathe busy work and repeating myself Excessive emails make unreasonable time demands on both sender and recipient The following are my guidelines for proper email communication Please ensure you have legitimate need before you write Thanks I will answer email about

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

17

Questions arising from difficulty in understanding course content If you need clarity on ANYTHING let me know

Requests for feedback about graded assignments Private issues appropriate for discussion within the teacher-student

relationship IMPORTANT I will do my best to respond to your email within a 24-hour period unless otherwise noted Please check into BLACKBOARD (ie the Announcements Blog and Discussion Forums) EVERYDAY to assure that you receive course information disseminated in a timely fashion

Andyrsquos Strongly Suggested Student Code of Conduct

In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions

Be self-motivated and self-directed Approach the course with a desire to learn Be a good time managerhellipstart your iterative design NOW Submit constructive criticism for course improvements Participate in a respectful manner in discussions Comply with the honor code

If there is anything else that you feel I should know please do not hesitate to confidentially communicate that concern with me I am committed to making this a positive educational experience for each and every student

G Andrew Page January 2009

e-Lesson Rubric

Teacher Name Dr Page Student Name ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

18

Content Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Subject knowledge is excellent

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Attractiveness Makes excellent use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance the presentation

Makes good use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance to presentation

Makes use of font color graphics effects etc but occasionally these detract from the presentation content

Use of font color graphics effects etc but these often distract from the presentaion content

Mechanics No misspellings or grammatical errors

Three or fewer misspellings andor mechanical errors

Four misspellings andor grammatical errors

More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar

Sources Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes All documented in desired format

Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes Most documented in desired format

Source information collected for graphics facts and quotes but not documented in desired format

Very little or no source information was collected

Oral Presentation Interesting well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention

Relatively interesting rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention

Delivery not smooth but able to hold audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

19

Instructional Design Group Presentation

Teacher Name Dr Page Group ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

Presentation Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention Engages and involves class

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost

Content Group defines and tell HOW design approach can be used Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Excellent resources

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good Good resources

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors Some resources

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Resources Product shows a large amount of original thought Ideas are creative and inventive

Product shows some original thought Work shows new ideas and insights

Uses other peoples ideas (giving them credit) but there is little evidence of original thinking

Uses other peoples ideas but does not give them credit

DESIGN Groups TBA Group 1 Gagnersquos ID Model Heather amp Kitty Group 2 ADDIE Donna Morgan Kimberly Group 3 Rapid-Prototyping Model Sarah amp Lara Group 4 Algo-heuristic Model MB and John Group 5 Dual-coding theory Sasha Bethany George Group 6 Dick amp Carey Model Tracy Andy(Sam) Tim

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

20

Spring 2010 Community of Learners Name email 1 Sarah Frick ansck2uaaalaskaedu 2 Heather Corriere dfhbckodiakalaskaedu 3 Donna Kreiensieck asdkk6uaaalaskaedu 4 Kitty Deal kdealkodiakalaskaedu 5 John D Seltenright anjds2uaaalaskaedu 6 Tracy Scott inalaskausyahoocom 7 Timothy Perry astrp4uaaalaskaedu 8 Lara Madden anlnm1uaaalaskaedu 9 George Flores asgef1uaaalaskaedu 10 Morgan Grey anmg2uaaalaskaedu 11 Maj-Britt Kimm asmk20uaaalaskaedu 12 Sasha Lamoureux asstl5uaaalaskaedu 13 Andy Holleman andyhollemangmailcom 14 Bethany Zimpelman asbz2uaaalaskaedu 15 Kimberly Handy Handy_Kimberlyasdk12org

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21

Jose Feitorsquos ldquoFacets of Intellectual Community1rdquo

1 Student ownership Students recognize their ownership of the learning process Students are dissatisfied with overly directive instructors

2 Shared inquiry There is an appreciation for the generative potential of multiple perspectives Students are surprised at the insights of ldquoquiet peoplerdquo Students are dissatisfied when other students do not engage

3 Allowing ldquonot knowingrdquo Students have the ability to acknowledge their initial lack of understanding Students have a willingness to be wrong and let their opinions evolve Students ask genuine questions There is space for students to struggle with a difficult text

4 Socio-emotional climate The atmosphere is emotionally safemdashstudents know they will not be attacked There is an expectation of help from fellow students There is mutual encouragement and support There is a perception of shared fate and commonalitymdashldquoWere all in the same boatrdquo Tension is relieved through humor

5 Intellectual intimacy Students have deeper access into the inner workings of one anotherrsquos minds They know classmates on a more profound level than they know their friends There is permeability to the opinions of others

1 Feito J Exploring Intellectual Community Group Learning Processes in Traditional ldquoGreat Booksrsquo Seminarsrdquo Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Final Report CASTL Electronic Workspace Menlo Park CA The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching June 13 2002 in Huber M T amp Hutchings P (2005) p47 The Advancement of Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching San Francisco Jossey-Bass

  • NETS for Teachers 2008
  • Technology Integration
  • Academic Dishonesty Policy
  • Professional and Ethical Behavior
  • In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions
Page 14: University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

14

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the technology being addressed Includes graphics creative amp knowledgeable overview

Presentation communicates a substantial amount of information about the application of the technology to education

Presentation is interesting and appealing and is critically reviewed

Presentation is free from technical glitches and runs smoothly

Presentation includes an overview and summation

Total 20

The ldquoONLINE Emerging Technologiesrdquo presentation should provide the reader with OverviewSummation

Screen captures of the technology This review could be hardware or software technologies

Your critical reflection and review For this assignment Do NOT copy quote or cite ANY review from

another source I want your candid point of view regarding the utility of this technology How might this technology be used in an educational format

Post your presentation in the Moodle Course

Students must ensure that ALL assignment files are free of viruses before submitting them Keep your virus detection software up to date Should an assignment file fail scrutiny by our institutionrsquos standard virus detection software the student submitting it will be so advised by email A virus-free version of the file must be resubmitted within 24 hours of the posting date of this email Any subsequent failure to adhere to this requirement will cause an assignment to be unacceptable and a 0 grade will be recorded for this assignment

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

15

Moodle Course Construction 20 All

Semester You will be given TEACHER access to a Moodle course shell for designing

an online course Teachers can do anything within a course including changing the activities and grading students

University of Alaska Anchorage Policies

Incomplete Grade Policy Incomplete Grades Unless there is a veritable reason I do not recommend students pursue this route Communicate with me as I know that sometimes life happens An ldquoIrdquo (Incomplete) is a temporary grade It is used to indicate that a student has made satisfactory progress in the majority of the work in a course but for unavoidable absences or other conditions beyond the control of the student has not been able to complete the course The Incomplete Grade Contract a signed contract form between the student and the faculty member that stipulates the assignment(s) required to finish the course is required and must be completed and filed with the department or deanrsquos office before an ldquoIrdquo grade is assigned Course work must be completed by a date specified in the contract not to exceed one year Upon completion of the required course work the faculty member must submit a change of grade form accompanied by a copy of the incomplete grade contract to the department or deanrsquos office If course work is not completed within one year or if the terms specified on the Incomplete Grade Contract are not met the student may be assigned a failing grade (F or NP depending on the grading basis of the course) If course work is not completed within one year and the faculty member does not submit a change of grade at that time the ldquoIrdquo will become a permanent grade and it will be necessary for the student to re-register to obtain credit for the course ADA Policy The provision of equal opportunities for students who experience disabilities is a campus-wide responsibility and commitment Disabilities Support Services (DSS) is the designated UAA department responsible for coordinating academic support services for students who experience disabilities To access support services students must contact DSS (786-4530 or 786-4536 TTY) and provide current disability documentation that supports the requested services Disability support services are mandated by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 Additional information may be accessed at the DSS Office in Business Education Building (BEB105)or on-line at wwwuaaalaskaedudss Academic Dishonesty Policy Academic integrity is a basic principle that requires all students to take credit only for the ideas and efforts that are their own Cheating plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty are defined as the submission of materials in

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

16

assignments exams or other academic work that is based on sources prohibited by the faculty member In addition to any adverse academic action which may result from the academically dishonest behavior the University specifically reserves the right to address and sanction the conduct involved through student judicial review procedures and the Academic Dispute Resolution Procedure specified in the University catalog If you have ANY questions about citations or academic honesty you should contact me I will be using special software when reviewing papers to certify the integrity of the author not authors I take this matter extremely serious and because this course is a graduate course I assume ALL students have had ample opportunity to educate themselves of appropriate academic conduct Professional and Ethical Behavior University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education students are expected to abide by the State of Alaska Code of Ethics of the Education Profession and professional teaching standards as they concern students the public and the profession The standards adopted by the Professional Teaching Practices Commission govern all members of the teaching profession A violation of the code of ethics and professional teaching standards are grounds for revocation or suspension of teaching certification Religious Holiday or Cultural Observance If a class meeting occurs on a religious holiday or cultural observance day and you are obligated to miss class for this event you must notify the instructor in writing by the end of the second week of the semester Email Policy

The subject line for each email submission should include the following

ldquoEDET 637 (topic)rdquo The may seem pedantic but it helps with organization I generally receive over 75+ emails in a 24-hour period and I file away all correspondence from students Also during Spring 2010 I will be teaching 3 courses doing research serving on numerous committees and boards traveling to conferences etc There are many 18 hour+ days ahead and I like to be busy and productivehellipI loathe busy work and repeating myself Excessive emails make unreasonable time demands on both sender and recipient The following are my guidelines for proper email communication Please ensure you have legitimate need before you write Thanks I will answer email about

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

17

Questions arising from difficulty in understanding course content If you need clarity on ANYTHING let me know

Requests for feedback about graded assignments Private issues appropriate for discussion within the teacher-student

relationship IMPORTANT I will do my best to respond to your email within a 24-hour period unless otherwise noted Please check into BLACKBOARD (ie the Announcements Blog and Discussion Forums) EVERYDAY to assure that you receive course information disseminated in a timely fashion

Andyrsquos Strongly Suggested Student Code of Conduct

In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions

Be self-motivated and self-directed Approach the course with a desire to learn Be a good time managerhellipstart your iterative design NOW Submit constructive criticism for course improvements Participate in a respectful manner in discussions Comply with the honor code

If there is anything else that you feel I should know please do not hesitate to confidentially communicate that concern with me I am committed to making this a positive educational experience for each and every student

G Andrew Page January 2009

e-Lesson Rubric

Teacher Name Dr Page Student Name ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

18

Content Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Subject knowledge is excellent

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Attractiveness Makes excellent use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance the presentation

Makes good use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance to presentation

Makes use of font color graphics effects etc but occasionally these detract from the presentation content

Use of font color graphics effects etc but these often distract from the presentaion content

Mechanics No misspellings or grammatical errors

Three or fewer misspellings andor mechanical errors

Four misspellings andor grammatical errors

More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar

Sources Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes All documented in desired format

Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes Most documented in desired format

Source information collected for graphics facts and quotes but not documented in desired format

Very little or no source information was collected

Oral Presentation Interesting well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention

Relatively interesting rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention

Delivery not smooth but able to hold audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

19

Instructional Design Group Presentation

Teacher Name Dr Page Group ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

Presentation Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention Engages and involves class

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost

Content Group defines and tell HOW design approach can be used Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Excellent resources

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good Good resources

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors Some resources

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Resources Product shows a large amount of original thought Ideas are creative and inventive

Product shows some original thought Work shows new ideas and insights

Uses other peoples ideas (giving them credit) but there is little evidence of original thinking

Uses other peoples ideas but does not give them credit

DESIGN Groups TBA Group 1 Gagnersquos ID Model Heather amp Kitty Group 2 ADDIE Donna Morgan Kimberly Group 3 Rapid-Prototyping Model Sarah amp Lara Group 4 Algo-heuristic Model MB and John Group 5 Dual-coding theory Sasha Bethany George Group 6 Dick amp Carey Model Tracy Andy(Sam) Tim

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

20

Spring 2010 Community of Learners Name email 1 Sarah Frick ansck2uaaalaskaedu 2 Heather Corriere dfhbckodiakalaskaedu 3 Donna Kreiensieck asdkk6uaaalaskaedu 4 Kitty Deal kdealkodiakalaskaedu 5 John D Seltenright anjds2uaaalaskaedu 6 Tracy Scott inalaskausyahoocom 7 Timothy Perry astrp4uaaalaskaedu 8 Lara Madden anlnm1uaaalaskaedu 9 George Flores asgef1uaaalaskaedu 10 Morgan Grey anmg2uaaalaskaedu 11 Maj-Britt Kimm asmk20uaaalaskaedu 12 Sasha Lamoureux asstl5uaaalaskaedu 13 Andy Holleman andyhollemangmailcom 14 Bethany Zimpelman asbz2uaaalaskaedu 15 Kimberly Handy Handy_Kimberlyasdk12org

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21

Jose Feitorsquos ldquoFacets of Intellectual Community1rdquo

1 Student ownership Students recognize their ownership of the learning process Students are dissatisfied with overly directive instructors

2 Shared inquiry There is an appreciation for the generative potential of multiple perspectives Students are surprised at the insights of ldquoquiet peoplerdquo Students are dissatisfied when other students do not engage

3 Allowing ldquonot knowingrdquo Students have the ability to acknowledge their initial lack of understanding Students have a willingness to be wrong and let their opinions evolve Students ask genuine questions There is space for students to struggle with a difficult text

4 Socio-emotional climate The atmosphere is emotionally safemdashstudents know they will not be attacked There is an expectation of help from fellow students There is mutual encouragement and support There is a perception of shared fate and commonalitymdashldquoWere all in the same boatrdquo Tension is relieved through humor

5 Intellectual intimacy Students have deeper access into the inner workings of one anotherrsquos minds They know classmates on a more profound level than they know their friends There is permeability to the opinions of others

1 Feito J Exploring Intellectual Community Group Learning Processes in Traditional ldquoGreat Booksrsquo Seminarsrdquo Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Final Report CASTL Electronic Workspace Menlo Park CA The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching June 13 2002 in Huber M T amp Hutchings P (2005) p47 The Advancement of Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching San Francisco Jossey-Bass

  • NETS for Teachers 2008
  • Technology Integration
  • Academic Dishonesty Policy
  • Professional and Ethical Behavior
  • In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions
Page 15: University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

15

Moodle Course Construction 20 All

Semester You will be given TEACHER access to a Moodle course shell for designing

an online course Teachers can do anything within a course including changing the activities and grading students

University of Alaska Anchorage Policies

Incomplete Grade Policy Incomplete Grades Unless there is a veritable reason I do not recommend students pursue this route Communicate with me as I know that sometimes life happens An ldquoIrdquo (Incomplete) is a temporary grade It is used to indicate that a student has made satisfactory progress in the majority of the work in a course but for unavoidable absences or other conditions beyond the control of the student has not been able to complete the course The Incomplete Grade Contract a signed contract form between the student and the faculty member that stipulates the assignment(s) required to finish the course is required and must be completed and filed with the department or deanrsquos office before an ldquoIrdquo grade is assigned Course work must be completed by a date specified in the contract not to exceed one year Upon completion of the required course work the faculty member must submit a change of grade form accompanied by a copy of the incomplete grade contract to the department or deanrsquos office If course work is not completed within one year or if the terms specified on the Incomplete Grade Contract are not met the student may be assigned a failing grade (F or NP depending on the grading basis of the course) If course work is not completed within one year and the faculty member does not submit a change of grade at that time the ldquoIrdquo will become a permanent grade and it will be necessary for the student to re-register to obtain credit for the course ADA Policy The provision of equal opportunities for students who experience disabilities is a campus-wide responsibility and commitment Disabilities Support Services (DSS) is the designated UAA department responsible for coordinating academic support services for students who experience disabilities To access support services students must contact DSS (786-4530 or 786-4536 TTY) and provide current disability documentation that supports the requested services Disability support services are mandated by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 Additional information may be accessed at the DSS Office in Business Education Building (BEB105)or on-line at wwwuaaalaskaedudss Academic Dishonesty Policy Academic integrity is a basic principle that requires all students to take credit only for the ideas and efforts that are their own Cheating plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty are defined as the submission of materials in

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

16

assignments exams or other academic work that is based on sources prohibited by the faculty member In addition to any adverse academic action which may result from the academically dishonest behavior the University specifically reserves the right to address and sanction the conduct involved through student judicial review procedures and the Academic Dispute Resolution Procedure specified in the University catalog If you have ANY questions about citations or academic honesty you should contact me I will be using special software when reviewing papers to certify the integrity of the author not authors I take this matter extremely serious and because this course is a graduate course I assume ALL students have had ample opportunity to educate themselves of appropriate academic conduct Professional and Ethical Behavior University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education students are expected to abide by the State of Alaska Code of Ethics of the Education Profession and professional teaching standards as they concern students the public and the profession The standards adopted by the Professional Teaching Practices Commission govern all members of the teaching profession A violation of the code of ethics and professional teaching standards are grounds for revocation or suspension of teaching certification Religious Holiday or Cultural Observance If a class meeting occurs on a religious holiday or cultural observance day and you are obligated to miss class for this event you must notify the instructor in writing by the end of the second week of the semester Email Policy

The subject line for each email submission should include the following

ldquoEDET 637 (topic)rdquo The may seem pedantic but it helps with organization I generally receive over 75+ emails in a 24-hour period and I file away all correspondence from students Also during Spring 2010 I will be teaching 3 courses doing research serving on numerous committees and boards traveling to conferences etc There are many 18 hour+ days ahead and I like to be busy and productivehellipI loathe busy work and repeating myself Excessive emails make unreasonable time demands on both sender and recipient The following are my guidelines for proper email communication Please ensure you have legitimate need before you write Thanks I will answer email about

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

17

Questions arising from difficulty in understanding course content If you need clarity on ANYTHING let me know

Requests for feedback about graded assignments Private issues appropriate for discussion within the teacher-student

relationship IMPORTANT I will do my best to respond to your email within a 24-hour period unless otherwise noted Please check into BLACKBOARD (ie the Announcements Blog and Discussion Forums) EVERYDAY to assure that you receive course information disseminated in a timely fashion

Andyrsquos Strongly Suggested Student Code of Conduct

In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions

Be self-motivated and self-directed Approach the course with a desire to learn Be a good time managerhellipstart your iterative design NOW Submit constructive criticism for course improvements Participate in a respectful manner in discussions Comply with the honor code

If there is anything else that you feel I should know please do not hesitate to confidentially communicate that concern with me I am committed to making this a positive educational experience for each and every student

G Andrew Page January 2009

e-Lesson Rubric

Teacher Name Dr Page Student Name ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

18

Content Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Subject knowledge is excellent

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Attractiveness Makes excellent use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance the presentation

Makes good use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance to presentation

Makes use of font color graphics effects etc but occasionally these detract from the presentation content

Use of font color graphics effects etc but these often distract from the presentaion content

Mechanics No misspellings or grammatical errors

Three or fewer misspellings andor mechanical errors

Four misspellings andor grammatical errors

More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar

Sources Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes All documented in desired format

Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes Most documented in desired format

Source information collected for graphics facts and quotes but not documented in desired format

Very little or no source information was collected

Oral Presentation Interesting well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention

Relatively interesting rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention

Delivery not smooth but able to hold audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

19

Instructional Design Group Presentation

Teacher Name Dr Page Group ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

Presentation Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention Engages and involves class

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost

Content Group defines and tell HOW design approach can be used Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Excellent resources

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good Good resources

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors Some resources

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Resources Product shows a large amount of original thought Ideas are creative and inventive

Product shows some original thought Work shows new ideas and insights

Uses other peoples ideas (giving them credit) but there is little evidence of original thinking

Uses other peoples ideas but does not give them credit

DESIGN Groups TBA Group 1 Gagnersquos ID Model Heather amp Kitty Group 2 ADDIE Donna Morgan Kimberly Group 3 Rapid-Prototyping Model Sarah amp Lara Group 4 Algo-heuristic Model MB and John Group 5 Dual-coding theory Sasha Bethany George Group 6 Dick amp Carey Model Tracy Andy(Sam) Tim

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

20

Spring 2010 Community of Learners Name email 1 Sarah Frick ansck2uaaalaskaedu 2 Heather Corriere dfhbckodiakalaskaedu 3 Donna Kreiensieck asdkk6uaaalaskaedu 4 Kitty Deal kdealkodiakalaskaedu 5 John D Seltenright anjds2uaaalaskaedu 6 Tracy Scott inalaskausyahoocom 7 Timothy Perry astrp4uaaalaskaedu 8 Lara Madden anlnm1uaaalaskaedu 9 George Flores asgef1uaaalaskaedu 10 Morgan Grey anmg2uaaalaskaedu 11 Maj-Britt Kimm asmk20uaaalaskaedu 12 Sasha Lamoureux asstl5uaaalaskaedu 13 Andy Holleman andyhollemangmailcom 14 Bethany Zimpelman asbz2uaaalaskaedu 15 Kimberly Handy Handy_Kimberlyasdk12org

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21

Jose Feitorsquos ldquoFacets of Intellectual Community1rdquo

1 Student ownership Students recognize their ownership of the learning process Students are dissatisfied with overly directive instructors

2 Shared inquiry There is an appreciation for the generative potential of multiple perspectives Students are surprised at the insights of ldquoquiet peoplerdquo Students are dissatisfied when other students do not engage

3 Allowing ldquonot knowingrdquo Students have the ability to acknowledge their initial lack of understanding Students have a willingness to be wrong and let their opinions evolve Students ask genuine questions There is space for students to struggle with a difficult text

4 Socio-emotional climate The atmosphere is emotionally safemdashstudents know they will not be attacked There is an expectation of help from fellow students There is mutual encouragement and support There is a perception of shared fate and commonalitymdashldquoWere all in the same boatrdquo Tension is relieved through humor

5 Intellectual intimacy Students have deeper access into the inner workings of one anotherrsquos minds They know classmates on a more profound level than they know their friends There is permeability to the opinions of others

1 Feito J Exploring Intellectual Community Group Learning Processes in Traditional ldquoGreat Booksrsquo Seminarsrdquo Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Final Report CASTL Electronic Workspace Menlo Park CA The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching June 13 2002 in Huber M T amp Hutchings P (2005) p47 The Advancement of Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching San Francisco Jossey-Bass

  • NETS for Teachers 2008
  • Technology Integration
  • Academic Dishonesty Policy
  • Professional and Ethical Behavior
  • In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions
Page 16: University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

16

assignments exams or other academic work that is based on sources prohibited by the faculty member In addition to any adverse academic action which may result from the academically dishonest behavior the University specifically reserves the right to address and sanction the conduct involved through student judicial review procedures and the Academic Dispute Resolution Procedure specified in the University catalog If you have ANY questions about citations or academic honesty you should contact me I will be using special software when reviewing papers to certify the integrity of the author not authors I take this matter extremely serious and because this course is a graduate course I assume ALL students have had ample opportunity to educate themselves of appropriate academic conduct Professional and Ethical Behavior University of Alaska Anchorage College of Education students are expected to abide by the State of Alaska Code of Ethics of the Education Profession and professional teaching standards as they concern students the public and the profession The standards adopted by the Professional Teaching Practices Commission govern all members of the teaching profession A violation of the code of ethics and professional teaching standards are grounds for revocation or suspension of teaching certification Religious Holiday or Cultural Observance If a class meeting occurs on a religious holiday or cultural observance day and you are obligated to miss class for this event you must notify the instructor in writing by the end of the second week of the semester Email Policy

The subject line for each email submission should include the following

ldquoEDET 637 (topic)rdquo The may seem pedantic but it helps with organization I generally receive over 75+ emails in a 24-hour period and I file away all correspondence from students Also during Spring 2010 I will be teaching 3 courses doing research serving on numerous committees and boards traveling to conferences etc There are many 18 hour+ days ahead and I like to be busy and productivehellipI loathe busy work and repeating myself Excessive emails make unreasonable time demands on both sender and recipient The following are my guidelines for proper email communication Please ensure you have legitimate need before you write Thanks I will answer email about

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

17

Questions arising from difficulty in understanding course content If you need clarity on ANYTHING let me know

Requests for feedback about graded assignments Private issues appropriate for discussion within the teacher-student

relationship IMPORTANT I will do my best to respond to your email within a 24-hour period unless otherwise noted Please check into BLACKBOARD (ie the Announcements Blog and Discussion Forums) EVERYDAY to assure that you receive course information disseminated in a timely fashion

Andyrsquos Strongly Suggested Student Code of Conduct

In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions

Be self-motivated and self-directed Approach the course with a desire to learn Be a good time managerhellipstart your iterative design NOW Submit constructive criticism for course improvements Participate in a respectful manner in discussions Comply with the honor code

If there is anything else that you feel I should know please do not hesitate to confidentially communicate that concern with me I am committed to making this a positive educational experience for each and every student

G Andrew Page January 2009

e-Lesson Rubric

Teacher Name Dr Page Student Name ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

18

Content Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Subject knowledge is excellent

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Attractiveness Makes excellent use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance the presentation

Makes good use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance to presentation

Makes use of font color graphics effects etc but occasionally these detract from the presentation content

Use of font color graphics effects etc but these often distract from the presentaion content

Mechanics No misspellings or grammatical errors

Three or fewer misspellings andor mechanical errors

Four misspellings andor grammatical errors

More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar

Sources Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes All documented in desired format

Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes Most documented in desired format

Source information collected for graphics facts and quotes but not documented in desired format

Very little or no source information was collected

Oral Presentation Interesting well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention

Relatively interesting rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention

Delivery not smooth but able to hold audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

19

Instructional Design Group Presentation

Teacher Name Dr Page Group ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

Presentation Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention Engages and involves class

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost

Content Group defines and tell HOW design approach can be used Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Excellent resources

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good Good resources

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors Some resources

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Resources Product shows a large amount of original thought Ideas are creative and inventive

Product shows some original thought Work shows new ideas and insights

Uses other peoples ideas (giving them credit) but there is little evidence of original thinking

Uses other peoples ideas but does not give them credit

DESIGN Groups TBA Group 1 Gagnersquos ID Model Heather amp Kitty Group 2 ADDIE Donna Morgan Kimberly Group 3 Rapid-Prototyping Model Sarah amp Lara Group 4 Algo-heuristic Model MB and John Group 5 Dual-coding theory Sasha Bethany George Group 6 Dick amp Carey Model Tracy Andy(Sam) Tim

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

20

Spring 2010 Community of Learners Name email 1 Sarah Frick ansck2uaaalaskaedu 2 Heather Corriere dfhbckodiakalaskaedu 3 Donna Kreiensieck asdkk6uaaalaskaedu 4 Kitty Deal kdealkodiakalaskaedu 5 John D Seltenright anjds2uaaalaskaedu 6 Tracy Scott inalaskausyahoocom 7 Timothy Perry astrp4uaaalaskaedu 8 Lara Madden anlnm1uaaalaskaedu 9 George Flores asgef1uaaalaskaedu 10 Morgan Grey anmg2uaaalaskaedu 11 Maj-Britt Kimm asmk20uaaalaskaedu 12 Sasha Lamoureux asstl5uaaalaskaedu 13 Andy Holleman andyhollemangmailcom 14 Bethany Zimpelman asbz2uaaalaskaedu 15 Kimberly Handy Handy_Kimberlyasdk12org

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21

Jose Feitorsquos ldquoFacets of Intellectual Community1rdquo

1 Student ownership Students recognize their ownership of the learning process Students are dissatisfied with overly directive instructors

2 Shared inquiry There is an appreciation for the generative potential of multiple perspectives Students are surprised at the insights of ldquoquiet peoplerdquo Students are dissatisfied when other students do not engage

3 Allowing ldquonot knowingrdquo Students have the ability to acknowledge their initial lack of understanding Students have a willingness to be wrong and let their opinions evolve Students ask genuine questions There is space for students to struggle with a difficult text

4 Socio-emotional climate The atmosphere is emotionally safemdashstudents know they will not be attacked There is an expectation of help from fellow students There is mutual encouragement and support There is a perception of shared fate and commonalitymdashldquoWere all in the same boatrdquo Tension is relieved through humor

5 Intellectual intimacy Students have deeper access into the inner workings of one anotherrsquos minds They know classmates on a more profound level than they know their friends There is permeability to the opinions of others

1 Feito J Exploring Intellectual Community Group Learning Processes in Traditional ldquoGreat Booksrsquo Seminarsrdquo Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Final Report CASTL Electronic Workspace Menlo Park CA The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching June 13 2002 in Huber M T amp Hutchings P (2005) p47 The Advancement of Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching San Francisco Jossey-Bass

  • NETS for Teachers 2008
  • Technology Integration
  • Academic Dishonesty Policy
  • Professional and Ethical Behavior
  • In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions
Page 17: University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

17

Questions arising from difficulty in understanding course content If you need clarity on ANYTHING let me know

Requests for feedback about graded assignments Private issues appropriate for discussion within the teacher-student

relationship IMPORTANT I will do my best to respond to your email within a 24-hour period unless otherwise noted Please check into BLACKBOARD (ie the Announcements Blog and Discussion Forums) EVERYDAY to assure that you receive course information disseminated in a timely fashion

Andyrsquos Strongly Suggested Student Code of Conduct

In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions

Be self-motivated and self-directed Approach the course with a desire to learn Be a good time managerhellipstart your iterative design NOW Submit constructive criticism for course improvements Participate in a respectful manner in discussions Comply with the honor code

If there is anything else that you feel I should know please do not hesitate to confidentially communicate that concern with me I am committed to making this a positive educational experience for each and every student

G Andrew Page January 2009

e-Lesson Rubric

Teacher Name Dr Page Student Name ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

18

Content Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Subject knowledge is excellent

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Attractiveness Makes excellent use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance the presentation

Makes good use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance to presentation

Makes use of font color graphics effects etc but occasionally these detract from the presentation content

Use of font color graphics effects etc but these often distract from the presentaion content

Mechanics No misspellings or grammatical errors

Three or fewer misspellings andor mechanical errors

Four misspellings andor grammatical errors

More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar

Sources Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes All documented in desired format

Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes Most documented in desired format

Source information collected for graphics facts and quotes but not documented in desired format

Very little or no source information was collected

Oral Presentation Interesting well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention

Relatively interesting rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention

Delivery not smooth but able to hold audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

19

Instructional Design Group Presentation

Teacher Name Dr Page Group ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

Presentation Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention Engages and involves class

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost

Content Group defines and tell HOW design approach can be used Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Excellent resources

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good Good resources

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors Some resources

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Resources Product shows a large amount of original thought Ideas are creative and inventive

Product shows some original thought Work shows new ideas and insights

Uses other peoples ideas (giving them credit) but there is little evidence of original thinking

Uses other peoples ideas but does not give them credit

DESIGN Groups TBA Group 1 Gagnersquos ID Model Heather amp Kitty Group 2 ADDIE Donna Morgan Kimberly Group 3 Rapid-Prototyping Model Sarah amp Lara Group 4 Algo-heuristic Model MB and John Group 5 Dual-coding theory Sasha Bethany George Group 6 Dick amp Carey Model Tracy Andy(Sam) Tim

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

20

Spring 2010 Community of Learners Name email 1 Sarah Frick ansck2uaaalaskaedu 2 Heather Corriere dfhbckodiakalaskaedu 3 Donna Kreiensieck asdkk6uaaalaskaedu 4 Kitty Deal kdealkodiakalaskaedu 5 John D Seltenright anjds2uaaalaskaedu 6 Tracy Scott inalaskausyahoocom 7 Timothy Perry astrp4uaaalaskaedu 8 Lara Madden anlnm1uaaalaskaedu 9 George Flores asgef1uaaalaskaedu 10 Morgan Grey anmg2uaaalaskaedu 11 Maj-Britt Kimm asmk20uaaalaskaedu 12 Sasha Lamoureux asstl5uaaalaskaedu 13 Andy Holleman andyhollemangmailcom 14 Bethany Zimpelman asbz2uaaalaskaedu 15 Kimberly Handy Handy_Kimberlyasdk12org

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21

Jose Feitorsquos ldquoFacets of Intellectual Community1rdquo

1 Student ownership Students recognize their ownership of the learning process Students are dissatisfied with overly directive instructors

2 Shared inquiry There is an appreciation for the generative potential of multiple perspectives Students are surprised at the insights of ldquoquiet peoplerdquo Students are dissatisfied when other students do not engage

3 Allowing ldquonot knowingrdquo Students have the ability to acknowledge their initial lack of understanding Students have a willingness to be wrong and let their opinions evolve Students ask genuine questions There is space for students to struggle with a difficult text

4 Socio-emotional climate The atmosphere is emotionally safemdashstudents know they will not be attacked There is an expectation of help from fellow students There is mutual encouragement and support There is a perception of shared fate and commonalitymdashldquoWere all in the same boatrdquo Tension is relieved through humor

5 Intellectual intimacy Students have deeper access into the inner workings of one anotherrsquos minds They know classmates on a more profound level than they know their friends There is permeability to the opinions of others

1 Feito J Exploring Intellectual Community Group Learning Processes in Traditional ldquoGreat Booksrsquo Seminarsrdquo Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Final Report CASTL Electronic Workspace Menlo Park CA The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching June 13 2002 in Huber M T amp Hutchings P (2005) p47 The Advancement of Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching San Francisco Jossey-Bass

  • NETS for Teachers 2008
  • Technology Integration
  • Academic Dishonesty Policy
  • Professional and Ethical Behavior
  • In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions
Page 18: University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

18

Content Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Subject knowledge is excellent

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Attractiveness Makes excellent use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance the presentation

Makes good use of font color graphics effects etc to enhance to presentation

Makes use of font color graphics effects etc but occasionally these detract from the presentation content

Use of font color graphics effects etc but these often distract from the presentaion content

Mechanics No misspellings or grammatical errors

Three or fewer misspellings andor mechanical errors

Four misspellings andor grammatical errors

More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar

Sources Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes All documented in desired format

Source information collected for all graphics facts and quotes Most documented in desired format

Source information collected for graphics facts and quotes but not documented in desired format

Very little or no source information was collected

Oral Presentation Interesting well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention

Relatively interesting rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention

Delivery not smooth but able to hold audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

19

Instructional Design Group Presentation

Teacher Name Dr Page Group ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

Presentation Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention Engages and involves class

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost

Content Group defines and tell HOW design approach can be used Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Excellent resources

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good Good resources

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors Some resources

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Resources Product shows a large amount of original thought Ideas are creative and inventive

Product shows some original thought Work shows new ideas and insights

Uses other peoples ideas (giving them credit) but there is little evidence of original thinking

Uses other peoples ideas but does not give them credit

DESIGN Groups TBA Group 1 Gagnersquos ID Model Heather amp Kitty Group 2 ADDIE Donna Morgan Kimberly Group 3 Rapid-Prototyping Model Sarah amp Lara Group 4 Algo-heuristic Model MB and John Group 5 Dual-coding theory Sasha Bethany George Group 6 Dick amp Carey Model Tracy Andy(Sam) Tim

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

20

Spring 2010 Community of Learners Name email 1 Sarah Frick ansck2uaaalaskaedu 2 Heather Corriere dfhbckodiakalaskaedu 3 Donna Kreiensieck asdkk6uaaalaskaedu 4 Kitty Deal kdealkodiakalaskaedu 5 John D Seltenright anjds2uaaalaskaedu 6 Tracy Scott inalaskausyahoocom 7 Timothy Perry astrp4uaaalaskaedu 8 Lara Madden anlnm1uaaalaskaedu 9 George Flores asgef1uaaalaskaedu 10 Morgan Grey anmg2uaaalaskaedu 11 Maj-Britt Kimm asmk20uaaalaskaedu 12 Sasha Lamoureux asstl5uaaalaskaedu 13 Andy Holleman andyhollemangmailcom 14 Bethany Zimpelman asbz2uaaalaskaedu 15 Kimberly Handy Handy_Kimberlyasdk12org

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21

Jose Feitorsquos ldquoFacets of Intellectual Community1rdquo

1 Student ownership Students recognize their ownership of the learning process Students are dissatisfied with overly directive instructors

2 Shared inquiry There is an appreciation for the generative potential of multiple perspectives Students are surprised at the insights of ldquoquiet peoplerdquo Students are dissatisfied when other students do not engage

3 Allowing ldquonot knowingrdquo Students have the ability to acknowledge their initial lack of understanding Students have a willingness to be wrong and let their opinions evolve Students ask genuine questions There is space for students to struggle with a difficult text

4 Socio-emotional climate The atmosphere is emotionally safemdashstudents know they will not be attacked There is an expectation of help from fellow students There is mutual encouragement and support There is a perception of shared fate and commonalitymdashldquoWere all in the same boatrdquo Tension is relieved through humor

5 Intellectual intimacy Students have deeper access into the inner workings of one anotherrsquos minds They know classmates on a more profound level than they know their friends There is permeability to the opinions of others

1 Feito J Exploring Intellectual Community Group Learning Processes in Traditional ldquoGreat Booksrsquo Seminarsrdquo Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Final Report CASTL Electronic Workspace Menlo Park CA The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching June 13 2002 in Huber M T amp Hutchings P (2005) p47 The Advancement of Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching San Francisco Jossey-Bass

  • NETS for Teachers 2008
  • Technology Integration
  • Academic Dishonesty Policy
  • Professional and Ethical Behavior
  • In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions
Page 19: University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

19

Instructional Design Group Presentation

Teacher Name Dr Page Group ________________________________________

CATEGORY 5 4 3 2

Presentation Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention Engages and involves class

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time

Delivery not smooth but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost

Content Group defines and tell HOW design approach can be used Covers topic in-depth with details and examples Excellent resources

Includes essential knowledge about the topic Subject knowledge appears to be good Good resources

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors Some resources

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors

Resources Product shows a large amount of original thought Ideas are creative and inventive

Product shows some original thought Work shows new ideas and insights

Uses other peoples ideas (giving them credit) but there is little evidence of original thinking

Uses other peoples ideas but does not give them credit

DESIGN Groups TBA Group 1 Gagnersquos ID Model Heather amp Kitty Group 2 ADDIE Donna Morgan Kimberly Group 3 Rapid-Prototyping Model Sarah amp Lara Group 4 Algo-heuristic Model MB and John Group 5 Dual-coding theory Sasha Bethany George Group 6 Dick amp Carey Model Tracy Andy(Sam) Tim

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

20

Spring 2010 Community of Learners Name email 1 Sarah Frick ansck2uaaalaskaedu 2 Heather Corriere dfhbckodiakalaskaedu 3 Donna Kreiensieck asdkk6uaaalaskaedu 4 Kitty Deal kdealkodiakalaskaedu 5 John D Seltenright anjds2uaaalaskaedu 6 Tracy Scott inalaskausyahoocom 7 Timothy Perry astrp4uaaalaskaedu 8 Lara Madden anlnm1uaaalaskaedu 9 George Flores asgef1uaaalaskaedu 10 Morgan Grey anmg2uaaalaskaedu 11 Maj-Britt Kimm asmk20uaaalaskaedu 12 Sasha Lamoureux asstl5uaaalaskaedu 13 Andy Holleman andyhollemangmailcom 14 Bethany Zimpelman asbz2uaaalaskaedu 15 Kimberly Handy Handy_Kimberlyasdk12org

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21

Jose Feitorsquos ldquoFacets of Intellectual Community1rdquo

1 Student ownership Students recognize their ownership of the learning process Students are dissatisfied with overly directive instructors

2 Shared inquiry There is an appreciation for the generative potential of multiple perspectives Students are surprised at the insights of ldquoquiet peoplerdquo Students are dissatisfied when other students do not engage

3 Allowing ldquonot knowingrdquo Students have the ability to acknowledge their initial lack of understanding Students have a willingness to be wrong and let their opinions evolve Students ask genuine questions There is space for students to struggle with a difficult text

4 Socio-emotional climate The atmosphere is emotionally safemdashstudents know they will not be attacked There is an expectation of help from fellow students There is mutual encouragement and support There is a perception of shared fate and commonalitymdashldquoWere all in the same boatrdquo Tension is relieved through humor

5 Intellectual intimacy Students have deeper access into the inner workings of one anotherrsquos minds They know classmates on a more profound level than they know their friends There is permeability to the opinions of others

1 Feito J Exploring Intellectual Community Group Learning Processes in Traditional ldquoGreat Booksrsquo Seminarsrdquo Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Final Report CASTL Electronic Workspace Menlo Park CA The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching June 13 2002 in Huber M T amp Hutchings P (2005) p47 The Advancement of Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching San Francisco Jossey-Bass

  • NETS for Teachers 2008
  • Technology Integration
  • Academic Dishonesty Policy
  • Professional and Ethical Behavior
  • In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions
Page 20: University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

20

Spring 2010 Community of Learners Name email 1 Sarah Frick ansck2uaaalaskaedu 2 Heather Corriere dfhbckodiakalaskaedu 3 Donna Kreiensieck asdkk6uaaalaskaedu 4 Kitty Deal kdealkodiakalaskaedu 5 John D Seltenright anjds2uaaalaskaedu 6 Tracy Scott inalaskausyahoocom 7 Timothy Perry astrp4uaaalaskaedu 8 Lara Madden anlnm1uaaalaskaedu 9 George Flores asgef1uaaalaskaedu 10 Morgan Grey anmg2uaaalaskaedu 11 Maj-Britt Kimm asmk20uaaalaskaedu 12 Sasha Lamoureux asstl5uaaalaskaedu 13 Andy Holleman andyhollemangmailcom 14 Bethany Zimpelman asbz2uaaalaskaedu 15 Kimberly Handy Handy_Kimberlyasdk12org

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21

Jose Feitorsquos ldquoFacets of Intellectual Community1rdquo

1 Student ownership Students recognize their ownership of the learning process Students are dissatisfied with overly directive instructors

2 Shared inquiry There is an appreciation for the generative potential of multiple perspectives Students are surprised at the insights of ldquoquiet peoplerdquo Students are dissatisfied when other students do not engage

3 Allowing ldquonot knowingrdquo Students have the ability to acknowledge their initial lack of understanding Students have a willingness to be wrong and let their opinions evolve Students ask genuine questions There is space for students to struggle with a difficult text

4 Socio-emotional climate The atmosphere is emotionally safemdashstudents know they will not be attacked There is an expectation of help from fellow students There is mutual encouragement and support There is a perception of shared fate and commonalitymdashldquoWere all in the same boatrdquo Tension is relieved through humor

5 Intellectual intimacy Students have deeper access into the inner workings of one anotherrsquos minds They know classmates on a more profound level than they know their friends There is permeability to the opinions of others

1 Feito J Exploring Intellectual Community Group Learning Processes in Traditional ldquoGreat Booksrsquo Seminarsrdquo Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Final Report CASTL Electronic Workspace Menlo Park CA The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching June 13 2002 in Huber M T amp Hutchings P (2005) p47 The Advancement of Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching San Francisco Jossey-Bass

  • NETS for Teachers 2008
  • Technology Integration
  • Academic Dishonesty Policy
  • Professional and Ethical Behavior
  • In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions
Page 21: University of Alaska Anchoragealaska-andy.weebly.com/uploads/5/5/4/0/5540606/edet_a637_elearn... · University of Alaska Anchorage . College of Education . 3211 Providence Drive

EDET A637 SP 2010

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

G Andy Page PhD | Andrewuaaalaskaedu | EDET A637 The Design of e-Learning University of Alaska Anchorage | PSB 229 | SP 2010 | (cell) 9072230924 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21

Jose Feitorsquos ldquoFacets of Intellectual Community1rdquo

1 Student ownership Students recognize their ownership of the learning process Students are dissatisfied with overly directive instructors

2 Shared inquiry There is an appreciation for the generative potential of multiple perspectives Students are surprised at the insights of ldquoquiet peoplerdquo Students are dissatisfied when other students do not engage

3 Allowing ldquonot knowingrdquo Students have the ability to acknowledge their initial lack of understanding Students have a willingness to be wrong and let their opinions evolve Students ask genuine questions There is space for students to struggle with a difficult text

4 Socio-emotional climate The atmosphere is emotionally safemdashstudents know they will not be attacked There is an expectation of help from fellow students There is mutual encouragement and support There is a perception of shared fate and commonalitymdashldquoWere all in the same boatrdquo Tension is relieved through humor

5 Intellectual intimacy Students have deeper access into the inner workings of one anotherrsquos minds They know classmates on a more profound level than they know their friends There is permeability to the opinions of others

1 Feito J Exploring Intellectual Community Group Learning Processes in Traditional ldquoGreat Booksrsquo Seminarsrdquo Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Final Report CASTL Electronic Workspace Menlo Park CA The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching June 13 2002 in Huber M T amp Hutchings P (2005) p47 The Advancement of Learning The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching San Francisco Jossey-Bass

  • NETS for Teachers 2008
  • Technology Integration
  • Academic Dishonesty Policy
  • Professional and Ethical Behavior
  • In order for each of us to maximize our time and this learning experience I humbly ask that each person adhere to these admonitions