33
Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Models

Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Unit I Introduction to the

40 Fuel Models

Page 2: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

NIFTT http://www.frames.gov/portal/server.pt/comm

unity/niftt/382/training/1659

Page 3: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

What is a model?

• A device used to emulate the real world

Page 4: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

What is a fuel model?

• Set of fuelbed characteristic inputs needed by a fire model

Page 5: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

What is a fuel model?

• Set of fuelbed characteristic inputs needed by a fire model

Fuelbed inputs: • Fuel load by size class • Bulk density • Fuel particle size • Heat content • Extinction moisture content

Page 6: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Characteristics

Page 7: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

What is a fuel model?

• Set of fuelbed characteristic inputs needed by a fire model

– Fire behavior fuel models – NFDRS fuel models – Fuel loading models – FCCS fuelbed

Page 8: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

What is a fuel model?

• Set of fuelbed characteristic inputs needed by a fire model

– Fire behavior fuel models – NFDRS fuel models – Fuel loading models – FCCS fuelbed

Page 9: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Why the 40 Fuel Models?

• More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting post treatment fire behavior • Cover a wider range of seasons • Better drives crown fire initiation models • Reduced need for custom fuel models

Page 10: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Systems

• BehavePlus • FARSITE • FlamMap • FSPro • FFE-FVS • NEXUS • BEHAVE by

Remsoft • FMAplus

Page 11: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

History

Page 12: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

History

Page 13: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

History

Page 14: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

History

• Many fuel inputs have always been constant for all fuel models – 10-h and 100-h dead fuel SAV ratio – Total and effective mineral fraction – Ovendry fuel particle density

Page 15: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Characteristics

• Designed to stand alone

Page 16: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Characteristics

• Designed to stand alone • Original 13 still available

Page 17: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Characteristics

• Designed to stand alone • Original 13 still available • Specifies fuelbeds not vegetation

Page 18: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Naming

• Three-part naming convention

Page 19: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Naming

• Three-part naming convention – Fuel model code

Page 20: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Naming

• Three-part naming convention – Fuel model code – Fuel model number

Page 21: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Naming

Page 22: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Naming

Page 23: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Naming

Page 24: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Naming

Page 25: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Naming

Three Part Naming Convention 1) Fire Model Code 2) Fuel Model Number 3) Fuel Model Name

Page 26: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Dynamic fuel models

• Allocation of herbaceous load to live and dead

Dynamic

Page 27: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Dynamic fuel models

Page 28: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Dynamic fuel models

75

0.5

Page 29: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Dynamic fuel models

0.67

Page 30: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Dynamic fuel models

• Allocation of herbaceous load to live and dead

Page 31: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Dynamic fuel models

• Allocation of herbaceous load to live and dead

• Dead herbaceous load takes on dead 1-hr MC

Page 32: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Dynamic fuel models

• Allocation of herbaceous load to live and dead

• Dead herbaceous load takes on dead 1-hr MC

• Dead herbaceous load is given the live herbaceous SAV ratio

Page 33: Unit I Introduction to the 40 Fuel Modelsswfireconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Mindar_part_I.pdf · • More Fuel Model Choices • Less Gaps • Better Suited for predicting

Dynamic fuel models

• Allocation of herbaceous load to live and dead

• Dead herbaceous load takes on dead 1-hr MC

• Dead herbaceous load is given the live herbaceous SAV ratio

• Increases ability (and difficulty)