Upload
truonghanh
View
216
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IAEA Support for Building Nuclear Power Infrastructure
24 September 2014 – IAEA Vienna
Understanding the National Requirements
for a Build-Own-Operate
Nuclear Power Project
Necati YAMAÇ
Head of NEPIO
Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources
TURKEY
Content
Nuclear in Turkey After 50 Years Delay
BOO Model in Akkuyu NPP Project
Advantages and Challenges
National Requirements
Conclusion
2
Electricity Generation
46% Natural Gas
25 % Hydro
24 % Coal (Hard
Coal+Lignite)
3 % Fuel-Oil 2 % Other Renewables (Wind+Jeothermal)
4
Energy Import for Electricity
Generation
98 % 92 %
20 %
0
20
40
60
80
100
Natural Gas Fuel-Oil Coal
Total dependency: 73%
5
Electricity Demand
239 TWh/yr
500 TWh/yr
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2012 2023
Forecast Electricity Demand in 2023
6
GDP Projection
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
900000
1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014
GD
P (
10
00
x$)
GDP&Electricity Demand
-7
-2
3
8
13
18
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Pe
rce
nta
ge
(%
)
Economic Growth Electricity Demand Growth
* General Directory of Energy Affairs, MENR
Population Projection
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
1986198819901992199419961998200020022004200620082010201220142016201820202022
Po
pu
lati
on
(m
illi
on
s)
Year
84 million @ 2023 (estimated) Ref: TÜİK
Renewable Energy Capacity
246 TWh
500 TWh
230 TWh
2013 Electricity demand 2023 Electricity demand target Electricity supply potential fromrenewable energy sources
Tender Attempts
Date Events
1956 Atomic Energy Authority established
1976 Site licence for Akkuyu granted by TAEK
1977-1980 The tender cancelled
1982-1985 The tender cancelled
1986 TEK Nuclear Energy Department closed
1996-2000 The tender canceled after 8 postponements
2007 Nuclear Energy Law (5710)
2010 The tender cancelled
11
CAPEX : 20 billion US $
Reactor Type : VVER-1200 (AES-2006)
Power Capacity : 4800 MWe (4 units)
Operation Time : 60 years
PPA : 15 years / %50 of electricity
Model : Build-Own-Operate (BOO)
Akkuyu NPP Project
13
IGA articles defining BOO
Russian Party:
Financing and insurance
Engineering-Procurement-
Construction
Operation & Maintenance
Fuel supply
SF and RW Management
Decommissioning
Turkish Party:
Allocation of Akkuyu site
Interconnection with
national transmission grid
PPA agreement for 50% of
electricity – remaining
electricity to be sold by the
Project Company in free
market
14
Parties are:
Rosatom on the part of the Russian party,
MENR on the part of the Turkish party.
The Parties shall cooperate for the cooperation areas (25 items).
Turkish Party shall take all necessary measures to facilitate the
grant of all licences and approvals
IGA articles defining BOO
15
BOO model – Turkish party Ministry of Energy &
Natural Resources
(MENR)
Turkish Electricity Transmission
Company
Turkish Electricity Trading and
Contracting Company
Energy Market Regulatory Authority
Turkish Atomic Energy Authority (TAEK)
Ministry of Environment &
Urbanism
Project Company
Owner & Operator
Owner of Electricity
Monthly coordinating meetings of TAEK, MENR and APC
Turkish Electricity Generation Company
PPA
Grid Connection
Allocation of NPP site
EIA decision
Site, construction and operation licenses
Electricity Generation License
AFAD Disaster&Emergency
Managment Presidency
Emergency Preparedness and Response
16
PPA Agreement
17
Power Purchase Agreement (15 year for each unit) 45 year
%50 Electricity
OPEN MARKET
%50 Electricity
TETAŞ (Turkish state
wholesale unit)
12,35 US cent/kWh
Spent Fuel and
Waste
Management
Fund Decommissionning
Fund
0,15
US cent/kWh
0,15
US cent/kWh
APC (Akkuyu Project
Company)
APC (Akkuyu Project
Company)
%100
Electricity
OPEN
MARKET
Turkish Tresuary
Every Year
%20 of APC Profit
19
Advantages
No financial risk on host country
(investment by vendor country – no sovereign guarantee)
Transfer of foreign capital to host country
(Project company 100% owned by vendor country)
Vendor country’s experience in EPC contracts
20
Advantages
Development of capacity in:
- Human resources,
- Localization,
- Regulatory framework.
22
Summary Issues Advantages Disadvantages
Financing + Allocating all risks - Fixed price of electricity?
(change in law) + No treasury guarantee
Technical issues
+ Sustainable operation
(availability of fuel, parts
and services) - Less opportunity in HR
and localization + Spent fuel management
(take back option)
+ Decommissioning
Legislative framework + Cooperation for
licencing
Educational capacity + NPP training, education
- Less opportunity to
utilize local educational
capacity
24
What we have
Strong government support:
IGA (higher position in legislative hierarcy+protection)
Prime Minister’s Decree,
Development Plans.
Rapidly established effective coordination mechanisms with
relevant organizations through a large number of meetings and
other communication channels (NEPIO):
at forefront in Turkish public authorities
first door for the Project Company (1000 meetings in 4
years)
Project Company: Turkish Company but Russian Capital
25
What is required
Nuclear energy policy document
Nuclear safety, security and safeguards,
Environmental protection and RW management,
Emergency preparedness and response,
HR management
Stakeholder involvement and transparency,
Nuclear fuel cycle,
Industrial involvement,
Nuclear energy law
Ratification of international conventions
Development of regulatory framework
26
Conclusion
3. The aim of the BOO Model is not to generate electricity in
Turkish territory
Increasing capacity of;
Local industry,
Human resources,
Regulatory framework.
BOO Model’s advantages for newcomer countries come from
three aspects:
1. Financing (construction)
2. Experience (construction, operation, decommissioning)