16
Today’s lecture Understanding phylogenetic trees (part II)

Understanding phylogenetic trees (part II)

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Understanding phylogenetic trees (part II)

Today’s lecture

Understanding phylogenetic trees (part II)

Page 2: Understanding phylogenetic trees (part II)

Phylogenetic inference = the process by which the branching pattern of evolutionary relationship (phylogeny) is estimated. A phylogenetic tree is a hypothesis; it is subject to re-evaluation upon the discovery of new evidence.

How do we infer phylogeny?

Reconstructing phylogeny

Page 3: Understanding phylogenetic trees (part II)

“The characters which naturalists consider as showing true affinity between any two or more species, are those which have been inherited from a common parent, all true classification being genealogical.” Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species (1859)

From comparable similarities (characters); shared traits between species.

Character/trait = a variable characteristic of an organism, or group of organisms.

Character states = the different forms a character can take.

Reconstructing phylogeny

Charles Darwin photo by Leonard Darwin, 1874. From Woodall, 1884: Transactions of the Shropshire Archaeological Society E.g. Body covering; flower color

scal

es

feat

hers

whi

te

yello

w

Page 4: Understanding phylogenetic trees (part II)

Homology = homologous characters are those inherited from a common ancestor.

Reconstructing phylogeny: characters

The states of homologous characters are comparable with one another, and may provide insight into evolutionary relationship.

Analogy = analogous characters have multiple, independent evolutionary origins.

Analogous characters do not provide useful indicators of evolutionary relationship.

Dial, 1992

Page 5: Understanding phylogenetic trees (part II)

Synapomorphy = shared, derived character. (from Greek: syn—together (shared) + apo—away + morph—form) A derived state shared by two or more lineages, which was present in their common ancestor, and is not found in other organisms.

Synapomorphies diagnose monophyletic groups.

Reconstructing phylogeny: characters

E.g., angiosperms (flowering plants)

Page 6: Understanding phylogenetic trees (part II)

Reconstructing phylogeny: characters

Ovules enclosed in carpels: synapomorphy

defining angiosperms

Ovu

les

encl

osed

in c

arpe

ls

Soltis et al., 2011

Page 7: Understanding phylogenetic trees (part II)

Symplesiomorphy = shared, ancestral character. (from Greek: syn—together (shared) + plesio—near + morph—form) An ancestral state shared by two or more lineages, which was present in their common ancestor, but is not found in all of its descendants. Symplesiomorphies diagnose paraphyletic groups.

Reconstructing phylogeny: characters

E.g., “dicots” vs. monocots

Page 8: Understanding phylogenetic trees (part II)

Reconstructing phylogeny: characters

Two seed leaves: symplesiomorphy

defining “dicots”

One

see

d le

af

Page 9: Understanding phylogenetic trees (part II)

Convergence or parallelism = analogy. (from Greek: homo—same + plassein—to mold) A state shared by two or more lineages which is not due to common ancestry. Convergent evolution, or parallelism. Convergent characters diagnose polyphyletic groups.

Reconstructing phylogeny: characters

E.g., “Amentiferae”

Page 10: Understanding phylogenetic trees (part II)

Reconstructing phylogeny: characters

convergent characters associated with wind pollination,

defining “Amentiferae”

Wind pollination: multiple origins

Page 11: Understanding phylogenetic trees (part II)

Reconstructing phylogeny: characters

Polarity = direction of evolutionary change.

How  do  we  know  what  is    ancestral  and  what  is    derived?  

Page 12: Understanding phylogenetic trees (part II)

Reconstructing phylogeny: characters

Polarity = direction of evolutionary change.

Polarity assessment

1) Fossil record – oldest is primitive

2) Simple to complex – evolutionary trends tend to reoccur in different groups

3) Correlation – primitive states tend to occur together in organisms

4) Common is primitive – “ingroup analysis”

5) Ontogeny – developmentally early stages are primitive

6) Outgroup comparison – inference from distribution of character states in sister group

Page 13: Understanding phylogenetic trees (part II)

Reconstructing phylogeny: characters

Polarity = direction of evolutionary change.

Outgroup comparison Character states in the outgroup = ancestral condition in the ingroup.

The preferred outgroup for determining polarity is the closest lineage to the ingroup: the sister group.

petals unfused = ancestral

Page 14: Understanding phylogenetic trees (part II)

out 1 2 3

4 steps

acb

b

out 1 23

5 steps

aa cc

b

out 1 32

6 steps

aa ccb

b

Parsimony = the principle that the best explanation is the simplest one.

Trait a Trait b Trait c Taxon 1 Absent (0) Present (1) Absent (0) Taxon 2 Present (1) Absent (0) Present (1) Taxon 3 Present (1) Present (1) Present (1) Outgroup Absent (0) Absent (0) Absent (0)

Most parsimonious tree a, c = synapomorphies for 2+3 b = homoplasy (convergence)

Reconstructing phylogeny: in practice

Page 15: Understanding phylogenetic trees (part II)

Real example with DNA sequence data (nucleotide characters).

Reconstructing phylogeny: in practice

Page 16: Understanding phylogenetic trees (part II)

In practice: many taxa, many characters; computationally intensive

Felsenstein,  1978  

Reconstructing phylogeny: in practice