26
UNBONDED PRE- STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED

CONNECTIONSProf. John F. Stanton

University of Washington,Seattle, Washington, USA

The ROSE School, Pavia.June 2009

Page 2: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

REFERENCE DOCUMENT

Design Guidelines for Precast Concrete Seismic Structural

Systems

John F. Stanton & Suzanne D. NakakiPRESSS Report No. 01/03-09

Available from PCI (and on Rose School website)

Page 3: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

UNBONDED PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRAME:

GOALS• Zero residual drift (ZRD)

– Frame returns to vertical after earthquake

• Damped response

– Damping restricts peak drift

• Little damage even in a large earthquake

– Building can be re-occupied quickly

Page 4: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

POSSIBLE CONFIGURATIONS:(Continuous beams)

Page 5: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

POSSIBLE CONFIGURATIONS:(Continuous columns)

Page 6: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

CONFIGURATIONS

• Continuous Columns– Often used by precasters

• Continuous Beams– Long Heavy Beams– Columns must be accurately placed for bars to fit

Page 7: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

REINFORCEMENT CONFIGURATIONS

• Unbonded prestressing only– Simple to construct, but no hysteretic damping.– Damping could be supplied by external devices or

RC frames in parallel with UBPT frame.

• UB prestressing + rebar = “Hybrid Frame”– Internal hysteresis (damping) supplied by rebar– All-in-one package.

Page 8: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

UBPT Prestressed-only Frame

Shown with post-tensioned beams, multi-storey columns.Requires post-tensioning on site. Easy fit-up.

Post‐tensioning tendon 

(unbonded) Post‐tensioning  anchorage

Page 9: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

UBPT Prestressed-only Frame

Pre‐stressing tendon

Bonded region

Unbonded region

Shown with pretensioned beams, one-storey columns.Can prestress in plant. Columns must be accurately placed.

Page 10: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

UBPT Prestressed-only Frame Components

Unbonded PT tendon

Grout

Page 11: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

Hybrid Frame Components

Unbonded PT tendon

Bonded Rebar

Rebar locally debonded

Grout

Page 12: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

Deformed Shape

Page 13: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

Deformed Shape

Page 14: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

Deformed Shape

Page 15: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

Deformed Shape

Page 16: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

Hybrid Frame Components(Courtesy Nakaki Bashaw Group)

Pre-tensioned strands

Beam rebar (not continuous)

Sleeves for column bars (grouted)

Grout bed at interface

Column bar splices

Only the pre-tensioned strands cross the interface

Page 17: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

Hybrid Frame Components(Courtesy Nakaki Bashaw Group)

Mild steel (A706) (grouted)

Unbonded region

Post Tensioned Tendon (ungrouted)

Fiber Reinforced Grout

Page 18: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

UBPT FRAME CONCEPT

• PT tendon provides strength

• PT provides elastic restoring force

• Damping is minimal (use 5% critical)

Page 19: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

NON-LINEAR ELASTIC BEHAVIORLINEAR NONLINEAR

ELASTIC

INELASTIC

σ σ

σ

ε

εε

Elastic: Load and unload along the same pathInelastic: Load and unload along different pathsLinear: Load/unload path is a straight lineNonlinear: Load/unload paths are not straight.

Page 20: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

Hybrid Frame combines both features

Force - Deflection

•Returns to vertical•Nonlinear elastic•Low damping

•Residual drift•Nonlinear inelastic•High damping

PT only

Rebar only

Page 21: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

Hysteresis Loops - Combinations

100/0

25/75 0/100

50/5075/25

Page 22: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

DESIGN PROCEDURE

• Rational design procedure

• Design forces same as cast-in-place concrete SMRF

• Explicit evaluation of drift capacity

• Design of other parts of frame: per code

Page 23: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

ASSUMPTIONS

• All deformation occurs at the interface, not in the beam.

• PT is unbonded the entire length of the frame, except for bonded region at each end.

• cgp is at mid beam-height.

Page 24: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

LIMIT STATESWe need to define limit states at which the moment

strength will be computed.

• Nominal moment strength:• Corresponds to the design moment. • Used to size the reinforcement at the interface

• Maximum probable strength• Corresponds to the Maximum Credible

earthquake• Forms the basis for Capacity Design forces for

adjacent elements.

Page 25: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

NOMINAL STRENGTH LIMIT STATE

Smaller of • Onset of strain hardening in mild steel (if any).• Yield of PT steel.

Comparable to nominal strength of reinforced concrete frame

Page 26: Unbonded PreStress Connections · UNBONDED PRE-STRESSED CONNECTIONS Prof. John F. Stanton University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA The ROSE School, Pavia. June 2009

MAXIMUM PROBABLE STRENGTH LIMIT STATE

• Smaller of : • Strain at peak strength of mild steel.• Yield of PT steel.

System must have at least 3.5% drift capacity at MPS limit state.