278
IAEA-TECDOC-462 ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 TRAINING MANUAL FOR NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING TECHNIQUES A TECHNICAL DOCUMENT ISSUED BY THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, VIENNA, 1988

ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

IAEA-TECDOC-462

ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALSAT LEVEL 2TRAINING MANUAL

FOR NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING TECHNIQUES

A TECHNICAL DOCUMENT ISSUED BY THEINTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, VIENNA, 1988

Page 2: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2IAEA, VIENNA, 1988IAEA-TECDOC-462

Printed by the IAEA in AustriaJune 1988

Page 3: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

FOREWORD

The International Atomic Energy Agency is executingregional projects in the Latin American and Caribbean Regionand the Asia and Pacific Region using the syllabi contained inIAEA-TECDOC-407 'Training Guidelines in Non-destructive TestingTechniques . * which has been referenced as being suitable fortraining NOT personnel by the International StandardsOrganisation in the draft standard DP9712, 'The Qualification andCertification of NDT Personnel'.

These ultrasonic notes have therefore been preparedessentially in accordance with the syllabus for Level 2ultrasonic personnel and have been used as the basis for the 80hour model Level 2 ultrasonic regional training coursesconducted by the Asia and and Pacific Project.The notes are theresult of contributions from a number of National NDTcoordinators in the Asia and Pacific Region who have beenorganising National NDT Training Courses.

For guidance it is suggested that the minimum 80hours training recommended by ISO DP9712 be divided as follows;

1. General knowledge 8 hours2. Terminology»physical principles

and fundamentals of ultrasonics 8 "3. Testing techniques and their

limitations 8 "4. Equipment and accessories 6 "5. Calibration of the testing

system 12 "6. Specific applications 12 "7. Codes, standards,specifications

and procedures 10 "8. Recording and evaluation of

results 109. Special techniques 6 "

Page 4: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

EDITORIAL NOTE

In preparing this material for the press, staff of the International Atomic Energy Agencyhave mounted and paginated the original manuscripts and given some attention to presentation.

The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the governments of the Member Statesor organizations under whose auspices the manuscripts were produced.

The use in this book of particular designations of countries or territories does not imply anyjudgement by the publisher, the IAEA, as to the legal status of such countries or territories, oftheir authorities and institutions or of the delimitation of their boundaries.

The mention of specific companies or of their products or brand names does not imply anyendorsement or recommendation on the part of the IAEA.

Page 5: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 11

1.1. Quality and reliability ........................................................................... 111.2. Non-destructive testing (NDT) methods of quality control ............................... 12

1.2.1. Liquid penetrant testing ............................................................... 121.2.2. Magnetic particle testing .............................................................. 131.2.3. Eddy current testing ................................................................... 141.2.4. Radiographie testing method ......................................................... 141.2.5. Ultrasonic testing ....................................................................... 14

1.3. Comparison of different NDT methods ...................................................... 171.4. Destructive versus non-destructive testing ................................................... 19

2. TERMINOLOGY, PHYSICAL PRINCIPLES AND FUNDAMENTALSOF ULTRASONICS ................................................................................... 23

2.1. The nature of ultrasonic waves ................................................................ 232.2. Characteristics of wave propagation .......................................................... 25

2.2.1. Frequency ................................................................................ 252.2.2. Wave length ............................................................................. 252.2.3. Velocity .................................................................................. 252.2.4. Fundamental wave equations ......................................................... 252.2.5. Ultrasonic waves ........................................................................ 272.2.6. Acoustic impedance .................................................................... 272.2.7. Acoustic pressure and intensity ...................................................... 27

2.3. Types of ultrasonic waves ...................................................................... 292.3.1. Longitudinal waves ..................................................................... 292.3.2. Transverse or shear waves ........................................................... 302.3.3. Surface or Rayleigh waves ........................................................... 312.3.4. Lamb or plate waves .................................................................. 322.3.5. Velocity of ultrasonic waves ......................................................... 34

2.4. Behaviour of ultrasonic waves ................................................................. 352.4.1. Reflection and transmission at normal incidence ................................ 35

2.4.1.1. Reflected and transmitted intensities ................................... 352.4.1..2. Reflected and transmitted pressures .................................... 36

2.4.2. Reflection and transmission at oblique incidence ................................ 382.4.2.1. Refraction and mode conversion ........................................ 382.4.2.2. Snell's Law ................................................................. 382.4.2.3. First and second critical angles ......................................... 402.4.2.4. Reflected acoustic pressure at angular incidence .................... 40

2.5. Piezoelectric and ferroelectric transducers .................................................. 412.5.1. Piezoelectric effect ..................................................................... 412.5.2. Types of piezoelectric transducers .................................................. 42

2.5.2.1. Piezoelectric crystal transducers ........................................ 422.5.2.2. Polarized ceramic transducers ........................................... 452.5.2.3. Comparison of piezoelectric transducers ............................... 46

Page 6: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

2.6. The characteristics of the ultrasonic beam .................................................. 482.6.1. The ultrasonic beam ................................................................... 48

2.6.1.1. Near field .................................................................... 492.6.1.2. Calculation of near field length ......................................... 502.6.1.3. Far field ..................................................................... 52

2.6.2. Beam spread ............................................................................. 522.7. Attenuation of ultrasonic beams ............................................................... 55

2.7.1. Scattering of ultrasonic waves ....................................................... 552.7.2. Absorption of ultrasonic waves ...................................................... 562.7.3. Loss due to coupling and surface roughness ...................................... 56

2.8. Diffraction ......................................................................................... 61

3. ULTRASONIC TEST METHODS, SENSORS AND TECHNIQUES ...................... 63

3.1. Basic ultrasonic test methods .................................................................. 633.1.1. Through transmission method ........................................................ 633.1.2. Pulse echo method ..................................................................... 643.1.3. Resonance method ...................................................................... 65

3.2. Sensors ............................................................................................. 663.2.1. Ultrasonic probe construction ........................................................ 663.2.2. Types of ultrasonic probes ............................................................ 68

3.2.2.1. Contact type probes ....................................................... 683.2.2.2. Immersion type probe ..................................................... 72

3.3. Pulse echo testing techniques .................................................................. 733.3.1. Contact type techniques ............................................................... 73

3.3.1.1. Normal beam techniques ................................................. 733.3.1.2. Applications of contact type normal beam probes ................... 743.3.1.3. Angle beam techniques ................................................... 793.3.1.4. Calculation of various distances for angle beam probes ........... 803.3.1.5. Surface wave techniques .................................................. 83

3.3.2. Immersion testing techniques ......................................................... 83

4. PULSE ECHO TYPE ULTRASONIC FLAW DETECTOR .................................. 87

4.1. Construction and mode of operation of a pulse echo type flaw detector .............. 874.1.1. Functions of the electronic elements ................................................ 874.1.2. Operation of a pulse echo type flaw detector ..................................... 90

4.2. Scan presentation ................................................................................. 914.2.1. A-scan presentation .................................................................... 924.2.2. B-scan presentation ..................................................................... 924.2.3. C-scan presentation ..................................................................... 944.2.4. Echo amplitude and its control ...................................................... 95

4.2.4.1. Decibel (dB) unit .......................................................... 95

5. CALIBRATION OF THE TEST SYSTEM ....................................................... 995.1. Calibration and reference test blocks ......................................................... 995.2. Commonly used test blocks .................................................................... 99

5.2.1. I.I.W. (VI) calibration block ........................................................ 995.2.3. Institute of Welding (I.O.W.) beam profile block ............................... 109

5.2.3.1. Plotting of beam profile .................................................. 110

Page 7: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

5.2.4. ASME reference block ................................................................ Ill5.2.5. Area-amplitude blocks ................................................................. Ill5.2.6. Distance-amplitude blocks ............................................................ 1135.2.7. Blocks ..................................................................................... 113

5.3. Checking equipment characteristics ........................................................... 1145.4. Methods of setting sensitivity .................................................................. 120

5.4.1. Distance amplitude correction curves ............................................... 1215.4.2. DOS (distance-gain-size) diagram method ......................................... 122

5.4.2.1. Setting sensitivity for a normal beam probe .......................... 1245.4.2.2. Setting of sensitivity for angle beam probe ........................... 127

5.4.3. Grain response on time base at maximum testing range ........................ 1295.5. Measurement of attenuation .................................................................... 130

5.5.1. Longitudinal wave attenuation ....................................................... 1305.5.2. Transverse wave attenuation ......................................................... 131

5.6. Determination of transfer loss for angle beam probes .................................... 1325.7. Couplants .......................................................................................... 1335.8. Influence of the test specimen on the ultrasonic beam .................................... 134

5.8.1. Surface roughness ...................................................................... 1345.8.2. Specimen with curved surface ....................................................... 1355.8.3. Coated surfaces ......................................................................... 1375.8.4. Mode conversion within the test specimen ........................................ 1375.8.5. Orientation and depth of flaw ........................................................ 137

5.9. Selection of ultrasonic probe ................................................................... 1385.9.1. Choice of ultrasonic beam direction ................................................ 1385.9.2. Choice of probe frequency ........................................................... 1395.9.3. Choice of probe size ................................................................... 140

6. SPECIFIC APPLICATIONS ......................................................................... 141

6.1. Ultrasonic inspection of welds ................................................................. 1416.1.1. Types of weld joints ................................................................... 1416.1.2. Weld defects ............................................................................. 144

6.1.2.1. Lack of root penetration .................................................. 1446.1.2.2. Lack of fusion .............................................................. 1446.1.2.3. Slag inclusion ............................................................... 1456.1.2.4. Tungsten inclusion ......................................................... 1456.1.2.5. Porosity ...................................................................... 1456.1.2.6. Cracks ........................................................................ 1456.1.2.7. Undercut ..................................................................... 1466.1.2.8. Excessive penetration ..................................................... 1466.1.2.9. Concavity at the root of the weld ...................................... 1466.1.2.10. Lamellar tearing ............................................................ 147

6.1.3. General procedure for ultrasonic testing of welds ............................... 1476.1.4. Examination of root in single Vee Butt welds without backing strip

in plates and pipes ..................................................................... 1526.1.4.1. Scanning procedure ........................................................ 1526.1.4.2. Selection of probe angle .................................................. 155

6.1.5. Examination of weld body in a single Vee Butt weld withoutbacking strip ............................................................................. 1566.1.5.1. Selection of probe angle .................................................. 157

Page 8: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

6.1.6. Inspection of single Vee Butt welds with backing strips or inserts ........... 1576.1.6.1. Welds with EB inserts .................................................... 1576.1.6.2. Welds with backing strips ................................................ 159

6.1.7. Inspection of double Vee welds ..................................................... 1596.1.7.1. Critical root scan for double Vee welds .............................. 1596.1.7.2. Weld body examination of double Vee welds ........................ 160

6.1.8. Examination of T-welds ............................................................... 1616.1.9. Examination of nozzle welds ......................................................... 161

6.1.9.1. Fully penetrated set on weld ............................................. 1626.1.9.2. Partially penetrated set in weld ......................................... 1636.1.9.3. Examination of set through nozzle welds ............................. 163

6.2. Ultrasonic inspection of forgings .............................................................. 1646.2.1. Forging defects ......................................................................... 1646.2.2. Testing of semi-finished products: rods and billets .............................. 165

6.2.2.1. Billets ........................................................................ 1656.2.2.2. Rod materials ............................................................... 1696.2.2.3. Use of immersion technique for billet or rod materials ............ 170

6.2.3. Tube testing ............................................................................. 1726.2.4. Testing of forgings ..................................................................... 174

6.3. Ultrasonic inspection of castings .............................................................. 1756.3.1. Defects in castings ..................................................................... 176

6.3.1.1. Shrinkage defects .......................................................... 1766.3.1.2. Defects associated with hindered contraction during cooling ..... 1796.3.1.3. Defects associated with entrapped gas airlocks ...................... 181

7. ULTRASONIC STANDARDS ....................................................................... 183

7.1. Commonly used ultrasonic standards ......................................................... 1837.2. ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code .................................................... 1837.3. BS 3923: Part 1: Manual examination of fusion welds in ferritic steels .............. 186

8. RECORDING AND EVALUATION OF RESULTS ............................................ 195

8.1. Determination of the location, size and nature of a defect ............................... 1958.1.1. Defect location .......................................................................... 1958.1.2. Methods of defect sizing .............................................................. 196

8.1.2.1. 6 dB drop method ......................................................... 1968.1.2.2. 20 dB drop method ........................................................ 1978.1.2.3. Flaw location slide ......................................................... 199

8.1.2.3.1. Plotting the beam spread (vertical plane) on theflaw location slide ........................................... 200

8.1.2.3.2. Using the flaw location slide for flaw locationin welds ....................................................... 201

8.1.2.3.3. Defect sizing using the flaw location slide ............. 2038.1.2.4. Maximum amplitude technique .......................................... 2048.1.2.5. DOS diagram method ..................................................... 205

8.1.3. Determination of the nature of a defect ............................................ 2078.2. Ultrasonic test report ............................................................................ 210

Page 9: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

APPENDIX A. WELDING PROCESSES AND DEFECTS ......................................... 217

APPENDIX B. CASTINGS AND FORCINGS AND THEIR RELATEDDISCONTINUITIES ..................................................................... 243

APPENDIX C. ULTRASONIC PRACTICALS ........................................................ 255

I. Use of ultrasonic flaw detector (functions of various controls on theflaw detector) ....................................................................... 255

II. Calibration and use of ultrasonic flaw detector with normal probes ..... 257El. Comparison of various couplants ............................................... 259IV. Calibration with angle beam probe ............................................. 260V. Thickness measurement using the ultrasonic flaw detector ................ 266

VI. Experiment with mode conversion .............................................. 267VII. Understanding decibel (dB) system ............................................. 268

Vin. Velocity measurement in materials by ultrasonics ........................... 269DC. Beam profile in vertical and horizontal plane ................................ 270X. Checking equipment characteristics ............................................. 272

XI. Sensitivity setting using an angle probe and the ASME block ............ 277XII. Determination of the attenuation and surface transfer loss correction

between the reference calibration block and the test plate ................. 278Xu!. Flaw sizing practice ............................................................... 279XIV. Procedure for the examination of a single-Vee Butt weld

according to ASME V ............................................................ 281

Page 10: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Please be aware that all the Missing Pages

in this document were originally blank pages

Page 11: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Quality and Reliability

An industrial product is designed to perform a certainfunction. The user buys it with every expectation that itwill perform the assigned function well and give atrouble-free service for a reasonable period of time. Thelevel of guarantee or certainty with which a trouble-freeservice can be provided by any product may be termed itsdegree of reliability. The reliability of a machine or anassembly having a number of components depends upon thereliability factors of all the individual components.Most of the machines and systems in the modern day world,for example, railways, automobiles, aircrafts, ships,power plants, chemical and other industrial plants etc,are quite complex having thousands of components on whichtheir operation and smooth running depends. To ensure thereliability of such machines it is important that eachindividual component is reliable and performs its functionsatisfactorily.

Reliability comes through improving the quality or qualitylevel of the components or products. A good qualityproduct can therefore be termed one which performs itsassigned function for a reasonable length of time. On theother hand products which fail to meet this criterion andtheir failure or breakdown occurs unpredictably andearlier than a specified time may be termed as bad or poorquality products. Both these types of products differ inreliability factors or quality levels.

The quality of products, components or parts depends uponmany factors important among which are the design,material characteristics and materials manufacturing andfabrication "techniques. Quality may be defined in termsof defects and imperfections present in the materials usedfor making the product or the presence of such defects andimperfections in the finished product itself. Manydefects can also be formed in products during service.The nature of these defects differs according to theprocess of its design and fabrication as well as theservice conditions under which it has to work. Aknowledge of these defects with a view to determining themand then minimizing them in a product is essential toachieve a better or an acceptible level of quality.

An improvement in the product quality to bring it to areasonable quality level is important in many ways. Itincreases, as already mentioned, the reliability of theproducts and the safety of the machines and equipment andbrings economic returns to the manufacturer by increasinghis production, reducing his scrap levels, enhancing his

11

Page 12: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

reputation as a producer of quality goods and henceboosting his sales. There is therefore a need to havemethods by which the defects in the products can bedetermined without affecting their serviceability.

1.2. Non-Destructive Testing (NOT) Methods Of Quality Control

The term "Non-destructive testing" is used to describe thematerial testing methods which, without damaging orinfluencing the usefulness of a material or component,give information about its properties. NDT is concernedwith revealing the flaws in an item under inspection. NDTcan not however predict where flaws will develop due tothe design itself.Non-destructive testing (NDT) plays an important role inthe quality control not only of the finished product, butalso of half finished products as well as the initial rawmaterials. NDT can be used at all stages of theproduction process. It can also be used during theprocess of establishing a new technology by monitoringproduct quality or when developing a new product.Outside the manufacturing field, NDT is also widely usedfor routine or periodic control of various items duringoperation to ascertain that their quality has notdeteriorated with use.The methods of NDT range from the simple to thecomplicated. Visual inspection is the simplest of all.Surface imperfections invisible to the eye may be revealedby penetrant or magnetic methods. If really serioussurface defects are found, there is often little point inproceeding to the more complicated examinations of theinterior by ultrasonics or radiography. The principle NDTmethods are Visual or Optical Inspection, Dye PenetrantTesting, Magnetic Particle Testing, Eddy Current Testing,Radiographie Testing and ultrasonic Testing.The basic principles typical applications, advantages andlimitations of these methods with now be brieflydescribed.A number of other NDT methods exist. These are used onlyfor specialized applications and consequently are limitedin use. Some of these methods are Neutron Radiography,Acoustic Emission, Thermal and Infra Red Testing, StrainSensing, Microwave Techniques, Leak Testing, Holographyetc.

1.2.1. Liquid Penetrant Testing

This is a method which can be employed for the detectionof open-to-surface discontinuities in any industrialproduct which is made from a non porous material. In thismethod a liquid penetrant is applied to the surface of the

12

Page 13: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

product for a certain predetermined time, after which theexcess penetrant is removed from the surface. The surfaceis then dried and a developer is applied to it. Thepenetrant which remains in the discontinuity is absorbedby the developer to indicate the presence as well as thelocation, sise and nature of the discontinuity. Theprocess is illustrated in Fig .1.1.

'•' '. ,'•-. ''•'•'• ''.•"'-~-• '.'-• Ur """•»"-"--'I

'•"•••-^Zs-(a) (b)

MMULÜÜL il!/11 ii i !!,'{'f hjirn• • . • - . . 7-\ |Vf ;:-.-."-: .-

(fini II

(c) (d)

Figure 1.1 Four stages of liquid penetrant process:-(a) Penetrant application and seepage into

the discontinuity.(b) Removal of excess penetrant.(c) Application of developer, and(d) Inspection for the presence of

discontinuities.

1.2.2. Magnetic Particle Testing

Magnetic particle testing is used for the testing ofmaterials which can be easily magnetized. This method iscapable of detecting open-to-surface and just-below-the-surface flaws. In this method the test specimen is firstmagnetised either by using a permanent magnet, or anelectromagnet or by passing electric current through oraround the specimen. The magnetic field thus introducedinto the specimen is composed of magnetic lines of force.Whenever there is a flaw which interupts the flow ofmagnetic lines of force, some of these lines must exit and

13

Page 14: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

re-enter the specimen. These points of exit and re-entryform opposite magnetic poles. Whenever minute magneticparticles are sprinkled onto the surface of the specimen,these particles are attracted by these magnetic poles tocreate a visual indication approximating the size andshape of the flaw. Fig. 1.2. illustrates the basicprinciples of this method.

1.2.3 Eddy Current Testing

This method is widely used to detect surface flaws, tosort materials, to measure thin walls from one surfaceonly, to measure thin coatings and in some applications tomeasure case depth. This method is applicable toelectrically conductive materials only. In the methodeddy currents are produced in the product by bringing itclose to an alternating current-carrying coil. Thealternating magnetic field of the coil is modified by themagnetic fields of the eddy currents. This modification,which depends on the condition of the part near to thecoil, is then shown as a meter reading or cathoderay tubepresentation. Fig. 1.3. gives the basic principles ofeddy current testing.

1.2.4 Radiographie Testing Method

The radiographie testing method is used for the detectionof internal flaws on many different materials andconfigurations. An appropriate radiographie film isplaced behind the test specimen (Fig. 1.4) and is exposedby passing either X-Rays or gamma rays through it. Theintensity of the X-rays or gamma rays while passingthrough the product is modified according to the internalstructure of the specimen and thus the exposed film afterprocessing, reveals the shadow picture of the internalstructure of the product. This shadow picture, known as aradiograph, is then interpreted to obtain data about theflaws present in the specimen. This method is used on awide variety of products such as forgings, castings andweldments.

1.2.5. Ultrasonic Testing

Ultrasonic inspection is a nondestructive method in whichhigh frequency sound waves are introduced into thematerial being inspected. Most ultrasonic inspection isdone at frequencies between 0.5 and 25 MHz - well abovethe range of human hearing, which is about 20 Ha to 20 KHz.The sound waves travel through the material with someattendant loss of energy (attenuation) due to materialcharacteristics or are measured after reflection at

14

Page 15: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Test object

MagnetCylindrical tesl object

Flux llow-lines

f

l|i

fît * -

K =

r ^

Crack\

-.-ca^^Kvss

'

!,l!S

..'nil. J

;i

5 N /Mild steel blockto complete path

"\1

-

X ' '

j2 - —— Currenl —— .

Bar under lest -

p

Flaws.

Flux lines

Threading bar

Melal prods

Figure 1.2

Conductivegauze pads

Current source

MAGNETIC FIELDMAGNETISING COIL

X EDDY ,<j> >^ CURRENT '."" ^X

a) SURFACE PROBE

EDDYCURRENT

b) ENCIRCLING COIL

ARTICLE

.x Nt

1 »—-J—

INSTRUMENT

COIL -*1

fa)c) INTERNAL COIL

Figure 1.3 Eddy current testing.

15

Page 16: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

RADIATION SOURCE

TEST SPECIMEN

RADIATIONDETECTOR

Figure 1.4 Arrangement for radiographie testing method.

Transmitter IJ"driver 11

Transmitter _probe

Amplifier

Boundary

/ Cathode raytube

Receiver probe

_r

0 __ 2 6 B

Figure 1.5 Basic components of an ultrasonic flawdetector.

16

Page 17: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

1.3

interfaces(pulse echo) or flaws, or are measured at theopposite surface (pulse transmission). The reflected beamis detected and analyzed to define the presence andlocation of flaws. The degree of reflection dependslargely on the physical state of matter on the oppositeside of the interface, and to a lesser extent on specificphysical properties of that matter, for instance, soundwaves are almost completerly reflected at metal-gasinterfaces. Partial reflection accors at metal-liquid ormetal-solid interfaces. Ultrasonic testing has a superiorpenetrating power to radiography and can detect flaws deepin the test specimen (say upto about 6 to 7 meters ofsteel). It is quite sensitive to small flaws and allowsthe precise determination of the location and size of theflaws. The basic principle of ultrasonic testing isillustrated in Fig. 1.5.

Comparison of different NDT methods

Frequently it may be necessary to use one method of NDT toconfirm the findings of another. Therefore, the variousmethods must be considered complementary and notcompetitive, or as optional alternatives. Each method hasits particular merits and limitations and these must betaken into account when any testing program is planned.Table 1 gives a summary of the most frequently used NDTmethods.

Table 1. Guide to NDT techniques

Technique

Opticalmethods

Radio-graphy

ultra-sonics

Access requirements

Can be used to viewthe interior ofcomplex equipment.One point of accessmay be enough.Must be able to reachboth sides.

One or both sides{or ends}

Equip-mentcapitalcostB/D

A

B

Ins-spec-tioncostD

B/C

B/C

!

Remarks

Very versatilelittle skillrequired, repaysconsideration atdesign stage.Despite highcost, large areascan be inspectedat one time;considerableskill requiredin interpre-tation.Requires point-by-point searchhence expensiveon largestructures,skilledpersonnelrequired.

17

Page 18: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Table 1. Guide to NDT techniques

Technique

Magneticparticle

Penetrantflawdetection

Eddycurrent

Access requirements

Requires a clean andreasonably smoothsurface

Requires flaw to beaccessible to thepenetrant { that is »clean and at thesurface)

Surface must (usually)be reasonably smoothand clean.

Equip-mentcapitalcost

D

D

B/C

Ins-spec-tioncostC/D

C/D

C/D

Remarks

Only useful onmagneticmaterials suchas steel; littleskill required;only detectssurface breakingon near surfacecracks .For all materialssome skillrequired; onlydetects surface-breaking defects;rather messy.For surface-breaking or near--surface flaws,variations inthickness ofcoatings, orcomparison ofmaterials; forother than simplecomparisonconsiderable skillis usuallynecessary (theexception isAmlec forsurface-breakingcracks in steels)______________

Where A =D =

highest cost,lowest cost.

18

Page 19: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

1.4 DESTRUCTIVE VS. NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING

The corresponding advantages and disadvantages of destructive andnon-destructive tests are compared in table 2.

Table 2. Comparison of destructive and non-destructive test.

DESTRUCTIVE TESTSAdvantages :

NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTSLimitations :

Tests usually simulateone or more serviceconditions. Consequently,they tend to measureserviceability directlyand reliably

Tests usually involveindirect measurements ofproperties of no directsignificance in service.The correlation betweenthese measurements andserviceablity must beproved by other means.

Tests are usually quan-titative measurements ofload for failure, sig-nificant distortion ordamage, or life to fail-ure under given loadingand environmental con-ditions. Consequentlythey may yield numericaldata useful for designpurposes or for estab-lishing standards orspec i f i cat i ons.

Test are usually quali-tative and rarely quan-titative. They do notusually measure load forfailure or life to failureeven indirectly. They may,however, reveal damage orexpose the mechanisms offailure.

The correlation betweenmost destructive testmeasurements and thematerial propertiesbeing measured (particu-larly under simulatedservice loading) isusually direct. Hencemost observers may agreeupon the results of thetest and their signifi-cance with respect to theserviceability of thematerial or part.

Skilled judgment and testor service experienceare usually required tointerpret test indications.Where the essential corre-lation has not been proven,or where experience islimited, observers maydisagree in evaluatingthe significance of testindications.

19

Page 20: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Table 2. Comparison of destructive and non-destructive test.

Limitations Advantages1. Tests are not made onthe objects actually

used in service. Conse-quently the correlationor similarity betweenthe objects tested andthose used in servicemust be proven by othermeans.

Tests are made directlyupon the objects to beuse in service. Conse-quently there is no doubltthat the tests were madeon representative testobjects.

2. Tests can be made on onlya fraction of the produc-tion lot to be used inservice. They may havelittle value when the

properties vary unpredict-ably from unit to unit.

Tests can be made on everyunit to be used in serviceif economically justifield.Consequently they may beused even when greatdifferences from unit tounit occur in productionlots.

Tests often cannot bemade on complete pro-duction parts. The testsare often limited to testbars cut from productionparts or from specialmaterial specimens pro-cessed to simulate theproperties of the partsto be used in service.

Test may be made on theentire production partor in all critical regionsof it. Consequently theevaluation applies to thepart as a whole. Manycritical sections of thepart may be examinedsimultaneously or se-quentially as convenientand expedient.

A single destructive testmay measure only one ora few of the propertiesthat may be criticalunder service conditions.

Many non-destructive tests,each sensitive to differentproperties or regions ofthe material or part, maybe applied simultaneouslyor in sequence. In thisway it is feasible tomeasure as many differentproperties correlated withservice performance asdesired.

20

Page 21: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Table 2. Comparison of destructive and non-destructive test.

Limitations AdvantagesDestructive tests are notusually convenient toapply to parts in service.Generally, service must beinterrupted and the partpermanently removed fromservice.

5. Non-destructive tests mayoften be applied to partsin service assemblieswithout interruption ofservice beyond normalmaintenance or idleperiods. They involve noloss of serviceable parts.

6. Cumulative change over aperiod of time cannotreadily be measured on asingle unit. If severalunits from the same lotor service are tested insuccession over a periodof time, it must be proventhat the units wereinitially similar. If theunits are used in serviceand removed after variousprriods of time, it mustbe proven that each wassubject to similarconditions of service,before valid data can beobtained.

6. Non-destructive testspermit repeated checks ofa given unit over a periodof time. In this way, therate of service damage, ifdetectable,and itscorrelation with servicefailure may be establishedclearly.

With parts of very highmaterial or fabricationcost, the cost ofreplacing the partsdestroyed may be pro-hibitive. It may not befeasible to make anadequate number andvariety of destructivetests.

Acceptable parts of veryhigh material orfabrication costs are notlost in non-destructivetesting. Repeated testingduring production orservice is feasible wheneconomically andpractically justified.

21

Page 22: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Table 2. Comparison of destructive and non-destructive test.

Limitations : Advantages :8. Many destructive tests

require extensivemachining or otherpreparation of the testspecimens. Often, massiveprecision-testingmachines are required.In consequence the costof destructive testingmay be very high, andthe number of samplesthat can be prepared andtested may be severelylimited. In addition suchpreparation and tests maymake severe demands uponthe time of highly skilledworkers.

8. Little or no specimenpreparation is required formany forms of non-destruc-tive tests. Several formsof non-destructive testingequipment are portable.Many are capable of rapidtesting or sorting and insome cases may be madefully automatic. The costof non-destructive testsin less, in most cases,both per object testedand for overall testing,than the cost of adequatedestructive tests.

The time and man-hourrequirements of manydestructive tests arevery high. Excessiveproduction costs may beincurred if adequate andextensive destructivetests are used as the pri-mary method of productionquality control.

9. Most non-destructive testmethods are rapid andrequire far fewer man--hours or actual hoursthan do typical destructivetests. Consequently thetesting of all theproduction units at a costnormally less than, orcomparable, to, the coastof inspecting destructivelyonly a minor percentage ofthe units in productionlots is feasible.

22

Page 23: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

2. TERMINOLOGY, PHYSICAL PRINCIPLES AND FUNDAMENTALSOF ULTRASONICS

2.1 The nature of ultrasonic waves

To understand how ultrasonic wave motion occurs in a medium,it is necessary to understand the mechanism which transferathe energy between two points in a medium. This can beunderstood by studying the vibration of a weight attached toa spring. Fig 2.la

8o"o§ ----r —=sJone cycle

G\l

----A

----8

(a)Down

(b)

Figure 2. 1 a) Weight attached to a springb) Plot of displacement of W with time w.r.t

position A.

The two forces acting on w, while it is at rest, are forceof gravity G and tension T in the spring. Now if W is movedfrom its equilibrium position A to position B, tension Tincreases. If it is now released at position B, W wouldaccelerate toward position A under the influence of thisincrease in tension.

At A the gravity G and tension T will again be equal,but asnow W is moving with a certain velocity, it will overshootA. As it moves toward position C, tension T decreases andthe relative increase in gravity G tends to decelerate Wuntil it has used up all its kinetic energy and stops at C.At C, G is greater than T and so W falls toward A again. AtA it possesses kinetic energy and once more overshoots. AsW travels between A and B, T gradually increases and slowsdown W until it comes to rest at B. At B, T is greaterthan G, and the whole thing starts again.

23

Page 24: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

The sequence of displacements of W from position A to B, Bto A, A to C and C to A, is termed a cycle. The numberof such cycles per second is defined as the IreausuCY o£vib.Ea.tion. The time taken to complete one cycle is known asthe time period T of the vibration, where T = 1

fThe maximum displacement of W from A to B or A to C iscalled the amp_litu,de Q£ Yib_r.atio.n. All these conceptsare illustrated in Fig.2.1 (b).

All materials are made of atoms (or molecules) which areconnected to each other by interatomic forces. These atomicforces are elastic i.e the atoms can be considered to boconnected to each other as if by means of springs. Asimplified model of such a material is shown in figure 2.2.

ELASTICNTERATOMIC FORCES

ATOMS

Figure 2.2. Model of an elastic body.

Now if an atom of the material is displaced from itsoriginal position by any applied stress, it would start tovibrate like the weight W of figure 2.1 (a). Because ofthe interatomic coupling, vibration of this atom will alsocause the adjacent atoms to vibrate. When the adjacentatoms have started to vibrate, the vibratory movement istransmitted to their neighbouring atoms and so forth. Ifall the atoms were interconnected rigidly, they would allstart their movement simultaneously and remain constantly inthe same state of motion i.e. in the same Eb.a,se. Butsince the atoms of a material are connected to each other byelastic forces instead, the vibration requires a certaintime to be transmitted and the atoms reached later lag inphase behind those first excited.

24

Page 25: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

2.2 Characteristics of wave propagation

2.2.1 Frequency :

The frequency of a wave is the same as that of thevibration or oscillation of the atoms of the medium inwhich the wave is travelling. It is usually denoted by theletter f and until recently was expressed as the number ofcycles per second. The International term for a cycle persecond is named after the physicist H . Hertz and isabbreviated as Hz

3 H z =1 cycle per second

1 KHz = 1000 Hz = 1000 cycles per second

1 MHz = 1000000 Hz = 1000000 cycles per second

2.2.2 Wave Length

During the time period of vibration T, a wave travels acertain distance in the medium. This distance is definedas the wavelength of the wave and is denoted by the Greekletter . Atoms in a medium, separated by distance willbe in the same state of motion (i.e. in the same phase)when a wave passes through the medium.

2.2.3 Velocity

The speed with which energy is transported between twopoints in a medium by the motion of waves is known as thevelocity of the waves. It is usually denoted by the letterV.

2.2.4 Fundamental Nave Equations

When a mechanical wave traverses a medium,the displacementof a particle of the medium from its equilibrium positionat any time t is given by :

a = a sin 2TTf t ———————————————(2.1)oWhere a = Displacement of the particle at time t.

a = Amplitude of vibration of the particle,of = Frequency of vibration of the particle.

25

Page 26: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

A graphical representation of equation 2.1figure 2.3

is given in

Figure 2.3

Equation 2.2 is the equation of motion of a mechanical wavethrough a medium. It gives the state of the particles (i.e.the phase) at various distances from the particle firstexcited at a certain time t.

= a sin 2 7T f (t - X )•o V

(2.2)

Where a =

a =o

Vf

Displacement (at a time t and distance Xfrom the first excited particle ) of a particleof the medium in which mechanical wave istravelling.Amplitude of the wave which is the same as thatof the amplitude of vibration of theparticles of the medium .Velocity of propagation of the wave.Frequency of the wave.

Figure 2.4 gives the graphical representation of equation2.2.

g f *g amplitude

•sI

wavelength A

distance

Figure 2.4 Graphical representation of equation 2 . 2 ,

26

Page 27: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Since in the time period T, a mechanical wave of velocity Vtravels a distance in a medium, therefore we have :-

X - V Tor (2.3)

But the time period T is related to the frequency f by

f — -(2.4)

Combining equations 2,3 and 2.4 we have the fundamentalequation of all wave motion i.e.

v = (2.5)

2.2.5 ultrasonic Waves

Sound waves are vibrations of particles of gases, solidsor liquids. The audible sound range of frequencies isusually taken from 20 Hz to 20 KHz . Sound waves withfrequencies higher than 20 KHz are known as ultrasonicwaves. In general ultrasonic waves of frequency range0.5 MHz to 20 MHz are used for the testing of materials.The most common range for testing metals is from 2 MHz to5 MHz

2.2.6 Acoustic Impedance

The resistenoe offered to the propagation of an ultrasonicwave by a material is known as the acoustic impedance. Itis denoted by the letter Z and is determined bymultiplying the density (^ of the material by the velocityV of the ultrasonic wave in the material i.e.

Z = (2.6)

Table 2.1 gives acoustic impedances of some commonmaterials.

2.2.7 Acoustic Pressure And Intensity

Acoustic pressure is the term most often used to denotethe amplitude of alternating stresses on a material by apropagating ultrasonic wave. Acoustic pressure P is

27

Page 28: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Table 2.l : Densities, sound velocities and acoustic impedances ofsome common materials.

Material

aluminiumaluminium oxidebismuthbrasscadmiumcast ironconcretecopperglassglycerinegoldgrey castinghard metalleadmagnesiummotor oilnickelperspexplatinumpolyamide (nylon)polyethylenePolystyrolPolyvinylchloride(PVC hard)

porcel lainequartaquartz glasssilversteel (low alloy)steel(calibration block)tintitaniumtungstenuranium owater (20 C )zinc

Density3

kg/m

27003600980081008600690020008900360013001930072001100011400170087088001180214001100940

10601400240026502600105007850785073004540

191001870010007100

ctransm/s

313055001100212015002200-22602560—1200265040007003050_2960143016701080925

115010603500—3515159032503250167031802620--2410

ctransm/s

63209000218044302780530046004700426019203240460068002160577017405630273039602620234023802395560057605570360059405920332062305460320014804170

Z 310 Pa s/m

17 06432 40021 36435 88323 90824 1509 20041 83015 3362 49662 53233 12074 80024 6249 8091 51449 5443 22184 7442 8822 2002 5233 35313 44015 26414 48237 80046 62946 47224 23628 284104 28659 8401 480

29 607

28

Page 29: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

related to the acoustic impedence Z abd the amplitude ofparticle vibration a as :

P = Z a ————————————(2.7)Where P = acoustic pressure.

Z = acoustic impedence.a = amplitude of particle vibration.

The transmission of mechanical energy by ultrasonic wavesthrough a unit cross-section area, which is perpendicular tothe direction of propagation of the waves, is called theintensity of the ultrasonic waves. Intensity of theultrasonic waves is commonly denoted by the letter I.Intensity I of ultrasonic waves is related to the acousticpressure P, acoustic impedence Z and the amplitude ofvibration of the particle as:

2I = P —————————————————(2.8)

2 Zand

I = P a ————————————————(2.9)2

WhereI = intensity.P = acoustic pressure.Z = acoustic impedence.a = amplitude of vibration of the particle.

2.3 Types of ultrasonic Waves

Ultrasonic waves are classified on the basis of the mode ofvibration of the particles of the medium with respect to thedirection of propagation of the waves, namely longitudinal,transverse, surface and Lamb waves.The major differences of these four types of waves arediscussed below.

2.3.1 Longitudinal Waves

These are also called compression waves. In this type ofultrasonic wave alternate compression and rarefaction

29

Page 30: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

zones are produced by the vibration of the particlesparallel to the direction of propagation of the wave.Figure 2.5 represents schematically a longitudinalultrasonic wave.

r—COi

i '•£{

* •* i

/_.

^PRESSIONi ——————

j.1; .".;'.

'•';•'.

' • .'t

'••

1

RAREFACTION

Û'**

1•>•;

•'• ':.

':: '•''.

•.'/,

••. .

• •*.*•

''•"'. '.'

. * i* **

."*%*,

DIRECTION 0FPROPAGATION

Figure 2.5 Longitudinal wave consisting of alternaterarefactions and compressions along thedirection of propagation.

For a longitudinal ultrasonic wave, the plot of particledisplacement versus distance of wave travel along with theresultant compression crest and rarefaction trough is shownin figure 2.6.

Direction

Figure 2.6 Plot of particle displacement versus distance ofwave travel.

Because of its easy generation and detection, this type ofultrasonic wave is most widely used in ultrasonic testing.Almost all of the ultrasonic energy used for the testing ofmaterials originates in this mode and then is converted toother modes for special test applications. This type of wavecan propagate in solids, liquids and gases.

2.3.2 Transverse or Shear Waves

This type of ultrasonic wave is called a transverse orshear wave because the direction of particle displacement

30

Page 31: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

is at right angles or transverse to the direction ofpropagation. It is schematically represented in figure2.7.

\\

Figure 2.7 Schematic representation of a transverse wave.

For such a wave to travel through a material it is necessarythat each particle of material is strongly bound to itsneighbours so that as one particle moves it pulls itsneighbour with it, thus causing the ultrasound energy topropagate through the material with a velocity which isabout 50 per cent that of the longitudinal velocity.For all practical purposes, transverse waves can onlypropagate in solids. This is because the distance betweenmolecules or atoms, the mean free path, is so great inliquids and gases that the attraction between them is notsufficient to allow one of them to move the other more thana fraction of its own movement and so the waves are rapidlyattenuated.The transmission of this wave type through a material ismost easily illustrated by the motion of a rope as it isshaken. Each particle of the rope moves only up and down,yet the wave moves along the rope from the excitation point.

2.3.3 Surface or Rayleigh Waves

Surface waves were first described by Lord Rayleigh andthat is why they are also called Rayleigh waves. Thesetype of waves can only travel along a surface bounded onone side by the strong elastic forces of the solid and onthe other side by the nearly nonexistent elastic forcesbetween gas molecules. Surface waves, therefore, areessentially nonexistent in a solid immersed in a liquid,unless the liquid covers the solid surface only as a verythin layer. The waves have a velocity of approximately 90per cent that of an equivalent shear wave in the samematerial and they can only propagate in a region nothicker than about one wave length beneath the surface ofthe material. At this depth, the wave energy is about 4per cent of the energy at the surface and the amplitude ofvibration decreases sharply to a negligible value atgreater depths.In surface waves, particle vibrations generally follow anelliptical orbit, as shown schematically in figure 2.8.

31

Page 32: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Direction of wavetravel

AIR

METAL •Par fidevibration At rest surface

Small arrows indicate directions of particle displacement.Figure 2.8. Diagram of surface wave propagating at the

surface of a metal along a metal - airinterface.

The major axis of the ellipse is perpendicular to thesurface along which the waves are travelling. The minoraxis is parallel to the direction of propagation.

Surface waves are useful for testing purposes because theattenuation they suffer for a given material is lower th«nfor an equivalent shear or longitudinal wave and becausethey can flow around corners and thus be used for testingquite complicated shapes. Only surface or near surfacecracks or defects can be detected, of course.

2.3.4 Lamb or Plate Waves

If a surface wave is introduced into a material that hasa thickness equal to three wavelengths, or less, of thewave then a different kind of wave, known as a plate wave,results. The material begins to vibrate as a plate i.e.the wave encompasses the entire thickness of the material.These waves are also called Lamb waves because the theorydescribing them was developed by Horace Lamb in 1916.Unlike longitudinal, shear or surface waves, thevelocities of these waves through a material are dependentnot only on the type of material but also on the materialthickness, the frequency and the type of wave.

Plate or Lamb waves exist in many complex modes ofparticle movement. The two basic forms of Lamb waves are: (a) symmeterical or dilatational : and (b) asymmetericalor bending. The form of the wave is determined by whetherthe particle motion is symmetrical or asymmeterical withrespect to the neutral axis of the test piece. Insymmetrical Lamb (dilatational) waves, there is alongitudinal particle displacement along neutral axis ofthe plate and an elliptical particle displacement on eachsurface (Figure 2.9 (a) ).

32

Page 33: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

PARTICLE VIBRATION

DIRECTION OF WAVE TRAVEL

AT RESTSURFACE

NEUTRAL AXIS

PART/CLE VIBRATION

Diagrams of the basic patterns of (a) symmeterical(dilatational) and (b) asymmeterical (bending)Lamb waves.

This mode consists of the successive "thickenings" and"thining" in the plate itself as would be noted in a softrubber hose if steel balls, larger than its diameter, wereforced through it. In asymmeterical(bending) Lamb waves,there is a shear particle displacement along the neutralaxis of the plate and an elliptical particle displacementon each surface (Figure 2.9 (b) ). The ratio of the majorto minor axes of the ellipse is a function of the materialin which the wave is being propagated. The asymmetericalmode of Lamb waves can be visualized by relating theaction to a rug being whipped up and down so that a rippleprogresses across it.

33

Page 34: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

2.3.5 Velocity of Ultrasonic Waves

The velocity of propagation of longitudinal, transverse,and surface waves depends on the density of the material,and in the same material it is independent of thefrequency of the waves and the material dimensions.

Velocities of longitudinal, transverse and surface wavesare given by the following equations.

-{2.10)

(2.11)

0.9XV -(2.12)

Where V Velocity of longitudinal waves.

Velocity of transverse waves.

sEG

Velocity of surface waves.

Young's modulus of elasticity.Modulus of rigidity.Density of the material.

For steel

0.55 •(2.13)

The velocity of propagation of Lamb waves, as mentionedearlier, depends not only on the material density but alsoon the type of wave itself and on the frequency of thewave.

Equation 2.10 also explains why the velocity is lesser inwater than in steel, because although the density for steelis higher than that of water, the elasticity of steel ismuch higher than that of water and this outclasses thedensity factor.

Table 2.1 givens the velocities of longitudinal andtransverse waves in some common materials.

34

Page 35: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

2.4 Behaviour of Ultrasonic waves

2.4.1 Reflection and Transmission at Normal Inoidenoe

2.4.1.1 Reflected And Transmitted Intensities

When ultrasonic waves are incidence at right angles tothe boundary {i.e normal incidence) of two media ofdifferent acoustic impedences, then some of the wavesare reflected and some are transmitted across theboundary. The amount of ultrasonic energy that isreflected or transmitted depends on the differencebetween the acoustic impedences of the two media. Ifthis difference is large then most of the energy isreflected and only a small portion is transmitted acrossthe boundary. While for a small difference in theacoustic impedences most of the ultrasonic energy istransmitted and only a small portion is reflected back.Quantitatively the amount of ultrasonic energy which isreflected when ultrasonic waves are incident at theboundary of two media of different acoustic impedences{Figure 2.10), is given by :-

R =

Where RZ

( 2.14)

Reflection Co-efficientAcoustic impedence of medium 1.

Acoustic impedence of medium 2.

Reflected ultrasonic intensity.

Incident ultrasonic intensity.

Reflected wave -*

Transmitted wave

Incident waveMEDIUM 1

Interface

MEDIUM 2Z,

Figure 2.10 Reflection and Transmission at NormalIncidence.

35

Page 36: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

The amount of energy that is transmitted across the boundaryis given by the relation :

I 4 Z ZT = t = 12 —————————— (2.15)

Ii

Where

/Z + Z }11 2 J

T = Transmission co-efficient.Z - Acounstic impedence of medium I1Z = Acounstic impedence of medium 22I = Transmitted ultrasonic intensity,tI = Incident ultrasonic intensity.i

The transmission co-efficient T can also be determined fromthe relation :-

T = 1 - B ———————————————— (2.16)Where

T = Transmission co-efficientR = Reflection co-efficient

2.4.1.2 Reflected and Transmitted Pressures

The relationships which determine the amount ofreflected and transmitted acoustic pressures at aboundary for normal incidence are :

Z ZP = 2 - 1r ——————— ——————————————— (2.17)

Z + Z2 l

2Zand P = 2-t ——————— ——————————————— (2.18)

Z + Zl 2

WherePr = amount of reflected acoustic pressure.Pt = amount of transmitted acoustic pressure.Z = acoustic impedence of material from which1 the waves are incident.

Z = acoustic impedence of material in which2 the waves are transmitted.

36

Page 37: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

As is clear from equations 2.17 and 2.18, Pr may be positiveor negative and Pt may be greater than or less than unity,depending on whether Z is greater or less than Z .When Z \ Z

2 1 2 1e.g water-steel boundary then Pr is positive and Pt . 1.This means that the reflected pressure has the same phase asthat of the incident pressure and the transmitted pressureis greater than that of the incident pressure (Figure 2. 11b). The fact that the transmitted pressure is greater thanthe incident pressure is not a contradiction to the energylaw because it is the intensity and not the pressure that ispartitioned at the interface and as shown by equations 2.17and 2.18 the incident intensity is always equal to the sumof the reflected and transmitted intensities irrespective ofwhether Z \ Z or Z \ Z

1 / 2 2 / 1

The reason for a higher transmitted acoustic pressure insteel is that the acoustic pressure is proportional to theproduct of intensity and acoustic impedance (equation 2.8 )although the transmitted intersity in steel is low, thetransmitted acoustic pressure is high because of the highacoustic impedence of steel.When Z \ Z e.g. steel-water interface, then P is

1 ' 2 rnegative which means that the reflected pressure is reversedas shown in figure 2.11 a.

Sound Pressure

Water

Sound Pressure

Transmittedwave

Water

Reflectedwave

Steel

Transmitted wave

(a) (b)

Fig. 2.11 Acoustic pressure values in the case of reflectionon the interface steel/water, incident wave insteel (a) or in water (b).

37

Page 38: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

2.4.2 Reflection and Transmission At Oblique Incidence

2.4.2.1 Refraction And Mode Conversion

If ultrasonic waves strike a boundary at an obliqueangle, than the reflection and transmission of the wavesbecome more complicated than that with normal indidence. Atoblique incidence the phenomena of mode conversion (i.e achange in the nature of the wave motion) and refraction ( achange in the direction of wave propagation) occur. Figure2.12 shows what happens when a longitudinal wave strikes aboundary obliquely between two media. Of course, there isno reflected transverse component or refracted transversecomponent if either medium 1 or medium 2 is not solid.

Figure 2.13 gives all the reflected and transmittedwaves when a transverse ultrasonic wave strikes aboundary between two media. The refracted transversecomponent in medium 2 will disappear if medium 2 isnot a solid.

2.4.2.2 Snell's Law

The general law that, for a certain incident ultrasonicwave on a boundary, determines the directions of thereflected and refracted waves is known as Snell's Law.According to this law the ratio of the sine of theangle of incidence to the sine of the angle ofreflection or refraction equals the ratio of thecorresponding velocities of the incident, and reflectedor refracted waves. Mathematically Snell's Law isexpressed as

Sin. ———— = i ———————————— (2.19)Sin /-^ ———

' V2

Whereo£ = the angle of incidence.•* - the angle of reflection or refraction.

V = Velocity of incident wave.1

V = Velocity of reflected or refracted waves.2

Both <^ and p are measured from a line normal to the boundary.V38

Page 39: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Normal to the

ß'

oft MED/UM

Interface

MEDIUM,

= Angle of incidence of longitudinal wave.- Angle of reflection of transverse wave.- Angle of refraction of transverse wave.- Angle of refraction of longitudinal wave.

Figure 2.12 Refraction And Mode Conversion For AnIncident Longitudinal Wave.

Figure 2.13

-Normal to theinterface

MEDIUM 1

Interface

MEDIUM 2

= angle of incidence of transverse wave.= angle of reflection of transverse wave.= angle of refraction of transverse wave.= angle of refraction of longitudinal wave.

Refraction And Mode Conversion For An IncidentTransverse Wave.

39

Page 40: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

2.4.2.3 First And Second Critical Angles

If the angle of incidence o(. (figure 2. 13) is small,1

ultrasonic waves travelling in a medium undergo thephenomena of mode conversion and refraction uponencountering a boundary with another medium. Thisresults in the simultaneous propagation of longitudinaland transverse waves at different angles of refractionin the second medium. As the angle of incidence isincreased, the angle of refraction also increases. Whenthe refraction angle of a longitudinal wave reaches 90°the wave emerges from the second medium and travelsparallel to the boundary (figure 2.14 a). The angle ofincidence at which the refracted longitudinal waveemerges, is called the £ir.s_£ SEitieol aQgie . If theangle of incidence c^. is further increased the angle of

1 orefraction for the transverse wave also approaches 90 .The value ofo<. (figure 2.14 b) for which the angle of

1 orefraction of the transverse wave is exactly 90 , iscalled the sgGQQd. cjzitisâl äugle. At the secondcritical angle the refracted transverse wave emergesfrom the medium and travels parallel to the boundary.The transverse wave, has become a surface or Rayleighwave.

a)-Firsf Critical Angle b).Second Critical Angle

Figure 2 . 1 4 .

2.4.2.4 Reflected Acoustic Pressure At Angular Incidence

Figure 2.15 gives the acoustic pressure reflectionfactors for reflected transverse and longitudinal wavesat a steel-air boundary.

40

Page 41: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

20' 3031' 32' 33'33'2'

on

Of)

70

60

SO

kO

30

20

to

^\\\

\

\

\

\

\

y

\

^

s\

1

\\

/A

/Siir

**

et

/

?/

///

,1;0 W 20 30 W SO 60 70 SO 90

Figure 2.15 Acoustic pressure of reflected waves Vs angleof incidence.

The angle of incidence of longitudinal waves is shown by thelower horizontal scale and the angle of incidence of shearwaves by the upper horizontal scale. The vertical scaleshows the reflection factor in percentages.It should be noted from figure 2.15 that :a) The reflected acoustic pressure of longitudinal waves

is at a minimum of 13 % at a 68° angle of incidence.This means the other portion of the waves is modeconverted to transverse waves.

b) For an angle of incidence of about 30° for incidenttransverse waves, only 13 % of the reflected acousticpressure is in the transverse mode. The remainder ismode-converted into longitudinal waves.

c) For incident shear waves if the angle of incidencelarger than 33.2° , the shear wavesreflected and no mode conversion occurs.

isare totally

2.5 PIEZOELECTRIC AND FERROELECTRIC TRANSDUCERS

2.5.1 Piezoelectric Effect

A transducer is a device which converts one form of energyinto another. Ultrasonic tranducers convert electricalenergy into ultrasonic energy and vice versa by utilizing aphenomenon known as the eiezoel.ectric effect. Thematerials which exhibit this property are known aspiezoelectric materials.

41

Page 42: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

In the direct piezoelectric effect, first discovered by theCurie brothers in 1880, a piezoelectric material whensubjected to mechanical pressure,will develop an electricalpotential across it (Figure 2.16). In the inversepiesoelectric effect, first predicted by Lippman in 1881and later confirmed experimentally by the Curie brothers inthe same year, mechanical deformation and thus vibration inpiezoelectric materials is produced whenever an electricalpotential is applied to them (Figure 2.17). The directpiezoelectric effect is used in detecting and the inversepiezoelectric effect in the generation of ultrasonic waves.

•f + + + + *

Figure 2.16 Direct piezoelectric effect.

0

(c) Expansion

0)

o

© (d) Contraction

Q)

eFigure 2.17 Inverse piezoelectric effect.

2.5.2 Types of Piezoelectric Transducers

Piezoelectric transducers can be classified into twogroups. The classification is made based on the type ofpiezoelectric materai which is used in the manufacture ofthe transducer. If the transducers are made from singlecrystal materials in which the piezoelectric effect occursnaturally, they are classified as eiÊSSÊlectrie crystaltEaQsdU.ee.rg.. On the other hand the transducers which aremade from polycrystalline materials in which thepiezoelectric effect has to be induced by polarization, aretermed polarized ceramic transducers.

2.5.2.1 Piezoelectric Crystal Transducers

Some of the single crystal materials in which thepiezoelectric effect occurs naturally are quartz,tourmaline, lithium sulphate, cadmium sulphide and zincoxide. Among these quartz and lithium sulphate are themost commonly used in the manufacture of ultrasonictransducers,

42

Page 43: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

(a) Quartz

Naturally or artificially grown quartz crystals have acertain definite shape which is described bycrystallographic axes, consisting of an X-, Y- and Z-axis.

axes of naturallygrown quartz

_ X-cut quartz forX longitudinal waves

Y-cut quartz fortransverse waves

Figure 2.18 System coordinates in a quartz crystal(simplified) and positions at X and Y-cutcrystals.

The piezoelectric effect in quarts can only be achievedwhen small plates perpendicular either to the X-axis or Y--axis are cut out of the quartz crystal. These are calledX-cut or Y-cut quartz crystals or transducers. X-cutcrystals are used for the production and detection oflongitudinal ultrasonic waves (Figure 2.19) while Y-cutcrystals are used for the generation and reception oftransverse ultrasonic waves (Figure 2.20). Transverse andsurface waves can be produced from an X-cut crystal bytaking advantage of the phenomenon of mode conversion whichoccurs at an interface of two media of different acousticimpedences when a longitudinal ultrasonic wave strikes theinterface at an angle.Some of the advantages and limitations of quartz whenas an ultrasonic transducer, are given below.

used

Advantages

i) It is highly resistant to wear,ii) It is insoluble in water.

iii) It has high mechanical and electrical stability,iv) It can be operated at high temperatures.

43

Page 44: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

directpiezo-electric

effect

inverseDie zo— electric

effect

CAUSEcrystalbeing

compressedcrystalbeingexpanded

positivevoltageon faces

negativevoltageon faces

SCHEDULE

«tpnnnH &\[mini! V\/

•t.

i-

r- o1J-

mun

mKnii

EFFECTpositivevoltageon faces

negativevoftageon faces

expansionof

crystalcontraction

ofcrystal

Figure 2.19.The piezoelectric effect of quartz (X-cut,schematic).

directpiezo- electric

effect

inverseplC£<J ClCL.ll 11*

effect

CAUSEshearing straindeforms crystalto the left

shearing straindeforms crystalto the rightpositivevoltageon facesnegativevoltageon faces

SCHEDULE

«^«p

%£=7

&^-i-

EFFECTpositivevoltageon faces

negativevoltageon faces

shearing motionof crystalto the right

shearing motionof crystalto the left

Figure 2.20. The piezoelectric effect ofschmatic).

quartz {Y-cut

Limitations

i) It is comparatively expensive.ii) It is the least efficient generator of ultrasonicenergy.

iii) It suffers from mode conversion ——— when an X-cut quartz is used besides generatinglongitudinal waves it also generates transverse

44

Page 45: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

waves. Transverse waves are generated because anX-cut crystal when compressed, elongates in theY-direction also. Production of transverse wavesgives rise to spurious signals after the mainpulse.

iv) It requires a high voltage for its operation,

b) Lithium Sulphate

Lithium sulphate is another piezoelectric crystal whichis commonly used for the manufacture of ultrasonictransducers. Some of the advantages and limitations of alithium sulphate transducer are as follows.

Advantages

i) It is the most efficient receiver of ultrasonicenergy.

ii) It can be easily damped because of its lowacoustic impedence.

iii) It does not age.iv) It is affected very little from mode conversion.

Limitations

i) It is very fragile.ii) It is soluble in water. o

iii) It is limited in use to temperatures below 75 C.

2.5.2.2 Polarized Ceramic Transducers

Polarized ceramic transducers have nearly completelyreplaced quartz and are on their way to replacingartificially grown crystals as transducer elements.Polarized ceramic transducer materials are ferroelectric innature. Ferroelectric materials consist of many "domains"each of which includes large number of molecules, and eachof which has a net electric charge. When no voltagegradient exists in the material these domains are randomlyoriented (Figure 2.21). If a voltage is applied, thedomains tend to line up in the direction of the field.Since a domain's shape is longer in its direction ofpolarization than in its thickness the material as a wholeexpands. If the voltage is reversed in direction thedomains also reverse direction and the material againexpands. This is in contrast to the piezoelectric crystalmaterials which contract for a voltage in one direction andexpand for a voltage in the opposite direction.

45

Page 46: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

The ferroelectric mode (i.e. expansion for both positiveand negative voltage) can be easily changed topiezoelectric mode by heating the ferroelectric material toits Curie point (the temperature above which aferroelectric material loses its ferroelectric properties)and then cooling it under the influence of a bias voltageof approximately 1000 V per mm thickness.

In this way the ferroelectric domains are effectivelyfrozen in in their bias field orientations and thepolarized material may then be treated as piezoelectric.

Polarized ceramic transducers, as the name implies, areproduced like ceramic dishes etc. They are made frompowders mixed together and then fired or heated to asolid. The characteristic properties required of atransducer for certain applications are controlled byadding various chemical compounds in different proportions.Some of the advantages and limitations of ceramictransducers are :

Advantages

i) They are efficient generators of ultrasonicenergy.

ii) They operate at low voltages.iii) Some can be used for high temperature

applications eg. lead rnetaniobate Curie pointo

550 C.

Limitations

i) Piezoelectric property may decrease with age.ii) They have low resistance to wear,iii) They suffer from mode conversion.

2.5.2.3 Comparison of Piezoelectric Transducers

Piezoelectric transducers can be compared from data similarto that shown in Table 2.2. The Eiesg.elE2tr.ic. njQdulya ld.1is a measure of the quality of a piezoelectric transduceras an ultrasonic transmitter. Greater values of 'd'reflect a transducer's greater efficiency as atransmitter. Table 2.2 shows that lead-zirconate-titanatehas the best transmitter characteristics. TheeieaQeleetEie âsferffiatiQQ eöüstant IB. is a measure of theability of a transducer to act as an ultrasonic receiver.

46

Page 47: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

®Zf!^i3&&§:

No potential applied

Potential applied

Figure 2.21 Domains in Ferroelectric material,

High H values show the greater ability of the transduceras a receiver. From table 2.2 it is evident that lithiumsulphate is the best receiver of ultrasonic energy. Theelectroffigchauisal c.oyp.ling. fâStor. 1K1 shows the efficiencyof a transducer for the conversion of electric voltage intomechanical displacement and vice versa. This value isimportant for pulse echo operation as the transducer actsas a transmitter and receiver. Higher values of K meanthat the overall efficiency of the transducer as atransmitter and receiver is better. The values for lead-meta niobate, lead-zirconate-titanate and barium-titanatelie in a comparable order. A satisfactory resolution powerrequires that the soup. ling, factor for radial öSQÜlaÜQQKP. is as low as possible. Kp is a measure for theappearance of disturbing radial oscillations which widenthe signals. These radial oscillations are because of themode conversion disturbances of the transducers. From thispoint of view lithium sulphate and lead-metaniobate are thebest transducer materials. Since in the case of contact aswell as immersion testing a liquid couplant with a lowacoustic impedance Z is required, the transducer materialshould have an acoustic impedance of the same order to givea better transmission of ultrasonic energy into the testobject. In this respect the best choices are lithiumsulphate or lead-meta-niobate or quartz as all of them havelow acoustic impedances.

47

Page 48: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

TABLE 2.2 Bo»e Characteristics Of Cosson Piezoelectric Transducers.

Soundvelocity

C 1/5

Acousticiipedance

4 2z 10 kg/i B

Electro-•echanic

k

Piezoeletric•odulus

d

Piezoeletricdefoliationconstant

H

Couplingfactor forradialoscillations

KP

Lead lirconatetitanate

4000

30

0.4 - 0.7

150 - 591

1.8 - 4.4

0.5 - 0.4

,!1

Bariui titinate ! Lead »taniobate!

1

5100 ! 3300!1

1

!27 ! 20.5

11

!

1

1

0.45 ! 0.4!!

1

!125 - 190 ! 85

1t

I

1I

!!

1.1 - 1.4 ! 1.91

!

11

1I

l1

i0.8 ! 0.07

l1

i!!

! Lithitu sulphate ! Buartz11

!5440 ! 5740

11

!t

11.2 ! 15.2

1

i

!!

0.38 ! 0.111

!

I1

!15 ! 2.3

t

1

!II

8.2 ! 4.9i!

1t

!11

0 ! 0.11I

1!

I I1

1 Lithiui ni oba te i! t

i ;i 7320 !t :i i.... — . ——— {i :

i34 :

ii

i!

0.2

4

4.7

-

i!!

2.6 THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ULTRASONIC BEAM

2.6.1 The ultrasonic Beam

The region in which ultrasonic waves are propagated from anultrasonic transducer is known as the ultrasonic beam. Forthe purpose of ultrasonic testing of materials, the greatlysimplified shape of an ultrasonic beam for a circulartransducer is as shown in Figure 2.22 . Two distinctregions of the beam exist and are classified as the nearfield region and far field region.

48

Page 49: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

o/ (-6dB)—

(-20 dB-

Figure 2.22

2.6.1.l Near Field

A piezoelectric transducer can be considered to be acollection of point sources, each of which is emittingspherical ultrasonic waves to the surrounding medium (Figure2.23). These spherical waves interfere with each other andresult in a system of maxima and minima in intensity in theregion close to the transducer. This region is known as thenear field region. The shape of the wave front in the nearfield, is as shown in figure 2.23 and is planer.

Figure 2.23

The intensity variation along and across the axial distancefor a typical transducer are shown in figures 2.24 & 2.25respectively.

I I0 NI N2 N3 N4

Distance from the transducer in near field lengths——»-

Figure 2.24 Distribution of intensity along the axialdistance.

49

Page 50: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Figure 2.25

(A) 5MHz Beam Plot in water

Beam plot in water of a 5 MHz, 5/8 inchdiameter round transducer.

Flaws appearing in the near field must be carefullyinterpreted because a flaw occuring in this region canproduce multiple indications and the amplitude of thereflected signal from the flaw can vary considerably if theeffective distance from the probe varies.

2.6.1.2 Calculation Of Near Field Length

The length N of the near field depends upon the diameter ofthe transducer and the wave-length of the ultrasonic wavesin the particular medium. The near field length for a probeincreases with increase in its diameter and frequencyand can be calculated approximately from

Where

N = D2

= D f4 V

(2.20)

N = Near field length.D = Diameter of transducer.V = Velocity of sound in material,f = Frequency.

(i) Longitudinal Wave Probe With Circular Transducer

Since because of glueing the effective transmitting area ofa transducer is 97 % V, he near field length for acircular transducer of a longitudinal wave probe is moreaccurately given by :

D 2Near field length = N = eff = 0.94 D = 0.94. D.f

4 V(2.21)

50

Page 51: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Where D = 0.97 Deff

D = diameter of the transducer.^ = wave-length of ultrasound in the

material.f = frequency of ultrasound in the

material.V = velocity of ultrasound in the

material.

(ii) Angle Probe With Circular Transducer

2 velocity in perspex (longitudinal)N = D - Perpex depth x ———————————————————————————

___ velocity in steel (transverse)4?) (2.22)

(iii) Angle Probe With Square Or Rectangular Transducer

length of the width of the frequency of the1.3 x x x 0.97 x

N = transducer transducer transducerTransverse wave

4 x velocity in the (2.23)material

velocity in perspex (longitudinal)- Perspex depth x ———————————————————————

velocity in steel (transverse)where the factor 1.3 in equation (2.23) is the factor ofconversion from circular shape to rectangular shape and thefactor 0.97 is because of the fact that only about 97 % area ofthe transducer is active due to glueing. A simplified formulafor probes with almost square transducers, where the differencein lengths of the edges is a maximum of 12 % , is

2 2a a

Near field length = N = 1.3 eff = 1.3 eff . f—— ——— —— (2.24)^ V

where a is half the effective length of the larger sideeff

which is given in the manufacturer's data sheet of the probe.

51

Page 52: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

2.6.1.3 Far Field

The region beyond the near field is known as the far field.The wave front of ultrasonic waves in the far field beyond adistance of three near field lengths from the transducer isspherical as compared to the wave front in the near fieldwhich is planer. The region in the far field between onenear field length and three near field lengths is known asthe transition region because transition in shape of thewave front from planer to spherical occurs in this region.

The intensity in the far field along the axial distance fromthe transducer beyond three near field lengths, falls offwith distance in accordance with the inverse square law i.e.the intensity decreases inversely with the square of thedistance (Figure 2.24). The intensity in the transitionregion of the far field, varies exponentially with distancewith an exponent of distance between 1 and 2.

The reflected intensity of ultrasonic waves from flawsoccuring in the far field, depends upon the sise of the flawwith respect to the beam dimensions. If the flaw is largerthan the beam then the reflected intensity follows theinverse proportional law i.e.

Intensity of reflection OC __________distance

On the other hand if the siae of the flaw is smaller thanthe beam dimensions then the reflected intensity variesinversely as the square of the distance i.e.

, 1Intensity OC ——————— 2(distance)

2.6.2 Beam Spread

There is always some spreading of the ultrasonic beam in thefar field as the waves travel from the transducer. Theintensity of the beam is a maximum on the central axis anddecreases in proportion to the distance from the transducer.The angle of beam spread or divergence angle % (Figure 2.22)can be calculated from the following equation :

-l K )\X n = Sin nu ——— ———— (2.25)

D

Where A is the wave length of the ultrasonic waves, D isthe diameter in case of a circular transducer and K is aconstant which depends :

52

Page 53: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

i) on the edge of the beam which is considered.Usually the value of K is determined with respectto the reduction of the beam intensity to 50 % (6dB), 10 % (20dB) and 0 % (extreme edge) of themaximum amplitude. The subscript "n" in Y and Kdenotes the respective edge e.g.divergence angle for 6 dB edge anddivergence angle for 20 dB edge.

Y0n Vv

thethe

ii) the method which is used to determine beam spread.In one method the through transmission technique isused. In this case a very small diameter probe ismoved over the back wall surface of several plane -parallel specimens of different thicknesses and arecord is made of the amplitudes of the CRT screenindications. The beam spread is then plotted byjoining together those points which have the sameindication amplitude. The sound beam thus obtainedis also referred to as the " free field " .

In the second method the beam spread is measured bymaking use of the pulse echo technique. In thismethod small reflectors of constant size atdifferent depths are used to plot the beam. Theplot of the beam made by this method is known as the"echo field".

iii) the shape of the transduceror rectangular.

i.e. whether circular

Values of K for a circular transducer determinedby the first method are given in Table 2.3 whileTable 2.4 gives different values of K determined bythe second method for both circular and rectangulartransducers.

Table 2.3. Values of K for circular and rectangulartransducers as determined by throughtransmission technique.

EdgeX (dB)

0 % (0 - 00)

10 X {20 - dB)

50 % (6 - dB)

K circular

1.22

1.08

0.54

K

1.00

0.60

0.91

53

Page 54: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Table.2.4 Values for K for circular and rectangulartransducers as determined by pulse echotechnique.

Edge% (dB)

0 % (0 - 00)

10 % (20 - dB)

50 % (6 dB)

K circular

1.22

0.87

0.51_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ ————————————

K rectangular

1.00

0.74— — —

0.44

In the case of angle beam probes with rectangulartransducers, the width of the beam in the horizontal planeis not equal to the width of the beam in the vertical plane.The half beam widths at one near field distance in thehorizontal and vertical planes, in this case, are called thefocal length and focal width and are denoted by FL and FBrespectively (Figure 2.26).

FOCUS

ACOUSTICALAXIS

(MAIN BEAM)

Figure 2.26. Definition Of Sound Field Data.In Figure 2.26 the other notation used are :

angle of refraction of the beam in steel.angle of beam divergence in the verticalplane.Because of refraction this angle might bedifferent for the upper and lower parts ofthe beam, this is, therefore, usuallygiven by .Cp = + or a> =in the data sheet of a probe, if there isappreciable difference in the two angles.Accordingly the focal width (FB }for the two parts are given as FB^ = +and FB., = - ........ in the data sheets.tvangle of beam divergence in the horizontalplane.

54

Page 55: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

In the data sheets of the pulse echo type probes, data isusually given for the 6 dB or 50 % intensity edge. Todetermine the data for the 20 dB edge from the data sheetsthe following equations are used :

FB = 1.74 FB ............ (2.26)20 6

FL = 1.74 FL ............ (2.27)20 6

1.7420 6

(2.28)

where FB and FB are half the widths of the beam at one20 6

near field distance from the transducer (They are known asfocal widths) and v an<* V are the angles of beam0 20 ô 6divergence for the 20 dB and 6 dB edges respectively.

In the case of pulse echo type angle beam probes with theprobes having rectangular transducers, the width of the beamin the horizontal direction is not equal.

The beam width \ &t & distance X from the transduceris given by :

Y = 2X tan 6 (2.29)Where

ü = the angle of beam divergence, whichmay be either equal to ^ or CJ>

n ndepending on which plane the beamwidth is required to be determined.

2.7 ATTENUATION OF ULTRASONIC BEAMS

The intensity of an ultrasonic beam that is sensed by areceiving transducer is considerably less than the intensityof the initial transmission. The factors that are primarilyresponsible for the loss in beam intensity are discussedbelow :-

2.7.1 Scattering of Ultrasonic Waves :

The scattering of ultrasonic waves is due to the fact thatthe material in which the ultrasonic wave is travelling isnot absolutely homogeneous. The inhomogeneities can beanything that will present a boundary between two materials

55

Page 56: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

of different acoustic impedance such as an inclusion orpores and possibly grain boundaries containingcontaminants. Certain materials are inherentlyinhomogeneous, such as cast iron which is composed of amatrix of grains and graphite particles which differ greatlyin density and elasticity. Each grain in the agglomerationhas radically different acoustic impedance and consequentlyproduces severe scattering. It is possible to encounterscattering in a material of just one crystal type if thecrystals exhibit velocities of different values whenmeasured along axes in different directions. A material ofthis type is said to be Anisotropie. If individual grainsare randomly oriented throughout a material, scattering willoccur as if the material is composed of different types ofcrystals or phases. Materials exhibiting these qualitiesnot only decrease the returned ultrasonic signal because ofscattering, but also often produce numerous small echoeswhich may mask or "camouflage" real indications.

2.7.2 Absorption Of ultrasonic Waves

Absorption of ultrasonic waves is the result of theconversion of a portion of the sound energy into heat. Inany material not at absolute zero temperature the particlesare in random motion as a result of the heat content of thematerial. As the temperature increases, there will be anincrease in particle activity. As an ultrasound wavepropagates through the material it excites the particles.As these particles collide with unexcited particles, energyis transmitted causing them to oscillate faster and throughlarger distances. This motion persists after the sound wavehas passed on, so energy of the passing wave has beenconverted to heat in the material.

2.7.3. Loss due to coupling and surface roughness

A third cause of attenuation is transmission loss due tothe coupling medium and the surface roughness. When atransducer is placed on a very smooth surface of a specimenusing a couplant, the amplitude of signal from the backsurface varies with the thickness of the couplant. Atypical example is shown in Fig. 2.27 .

Figure 2.27

2.25Q 29N PL-3USF-513

^A .1-0.1 0-2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7

Thickness of Couplant (Oil)

Variations of signal amplitude andthickness. couplant

56

Page 57: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

The variation of signal amplitude with the type ofcouplant for various surface roughnesses is shown in Figure2.28, which indicates that the surface roughness shouldpreferably be less than 25 urn.

Surface Rougfanuas ()x m)

50 100 (SO

—- ca

•rt

-10

(l p.at =59-4 M in.)200

1,6 (6.3 u iß.)JIS U maxx2.89*HH3

Clycarino (lOO

Glycerina (50Water Solution

Clycorins (25Vater Solution

Vat orMotor Oil

Figure 2 .28 Variations of signal amplitude with typescouplants for various surface roughness.

of

The transmission loss due to surface roughness is bestobserved when a reference calibration block is used. Areference block is generally made of a material acousticallyequivalent to the test specimen. However, the test specimencannot always have the same surface roughness as thecalibration block. This difference leads to a transfer lossat the contact surface.In addition to the amount of sound lost due to the abovecauses, there are other factors to consider, such as lossesin scattering due to surface roughness of a reflector andspreading of the sound beam. In this instance, attenuationis considered as the sum of all these factors sincethey all affect the amount of sound transmitted to andreturned from an area of interest in the test material.The attenuation losses during propagation in a material areshown in Figure 2.29.

Transfer Loss

Attenuation byScattering

Reflection Loss

Attenuation byBeam spread

Reflection

Figure 2.29 Attenuation losses during transmission.

57

Page 58: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

The variation of acoustic pressure with distance due todivergence and attenuation and beam spread is shown inFigure 2.30.

1.3

1. 1.0t o

.1°- 0.5ot»a 0

X%^^~~--C*-^_

0 200 400 600 800 1000Distance mm

Figure 2.30 Variation of signal amplitude withdistance due to divergence andattenuation losses (Linear representation)

The sound pressure which decreases as a result ofattenuation by scattering and absorption can be written inthe form of an exponential function :

Po (2.30)

Where PoPdcwl

initial pressure at d = ofinal pressure at distance, d.total beam path in the material,attenuation coefficient.

The natural logarithm of this equation givesPo

ot d = In ( ——— ) NPP

This is the attenuation proper, which is expressed innepers. However, following the practice in electricalmeasurement, the decibel measure is given preference. Thisis obtained when the common logarithm with base 10 is usedand multiplied by 20 .

Hence,ot d

Po20 log ( ——— ) dB

PPo

OC = 20 log ( ——— ) dB/mP

d(2.31)

58

Page 59: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Since the sound pressure is proportional to the oscilloscopeecho height, H ,

Ho20 log ( ——— )

Hd

dB/m ....(2.32)

The attenuation coefficient depends on the nature of themedium (i.e. material for transmission) and the frequency ofthe waves. Generally, the attenuation coefficient or thesound attenuation increases with an increase in frequency.If it is a matter of pure absorption, this occurs as thesquare of the frequency and with attenuation due to scatterthe sound reduction occurs at an even higher rate. Figure2.31 shows a typical relationship between attenuation andfrequency for a solid. At low frequencies there is a linearvariation between these factors, attenuation being due toabsorption. At frequencies for which the wavelengthapproaches the grain size, the phenomenon of scatteringoccurs.

UJ(J

8o

Figure 2.31

FREQUENCY (f)

Variations of attenuation coefficient of thetransmitting material with frequency ofwaves.

The effects of attenuation loss due to interaction betweenthe sound wave and the material can be observedexperimentally. When a plate material is examined, theamplitude difference, AH, between the first backreflection,H ,and the second back reflection,H , is due to

Bl B2attenuation by beam spread and scattering, assuming nocontact surface losses, as shown in Figure 2.32 ,

59

Page 60: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

ÎBea-n Soread

•a•ri

K

'S

IBeam Spread

Beam Path Distance

Figure 2.32 Attenuation by beam spread and scattering.

Thus A H = H - HBl B2

= AH + A HBS S

The amplitude difference, A H, between the multiple backreflections can be read out on the equipment gain (orattenuator). The attenuation difference, A. H , by the

BSbeam spread is possible to obtain from the DGS diagram.Hence, the attenuation difference, ^ H , by scattering

Sand absorption is expressed as follows :

A H A H AHBS

If A H is divided by the total distance travelled, theS

result is called the attenuation coefficient,Thus,

o<: = AH AH -s BS2T 2T

Where T is the specimen thickness.

(dB/m)....(2.33)

When the distance, T, is at least 3N, the beam spread lawfor large reflectors can be utilised. The amplitude isinversely proportional to the distance, so that if thedistance is doubled, the amplitude is halved, i.e. a 6 dBreduction. This law provides a simple method of measuringthe attenuation coefficient since AH = 6 dB and the

BSattenuation coefficient O(. is calculated, as follows :

60

Page 61: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

o< = AH - 62 T

(T ^ 3N )A typical example is as follows

dB/m ...........(2.34)

Plate thicknessProbe frequencyProbe diameterNear field length

30 mm4 MHa10 mm17 mm

The second back echo at 60 mm distance is greater than 3N(51 ram); therefore the second and fourth echoes are on the 6dB slope.Suppose the difference in echo amplitude measured betweensecond and fourth echo - 10 dB. Total beam distance betweensecond and fourth echo = 120 mm. Therefore, the attenuationof the plate material at 4 MHz: is

10-6120

130

dB / mm or 33 dB/m

2.8 Diffraction

An important property of ultrasonic waves is there ability,or tendency, to "bend around" and pass obstacles which arecomparable in size to their wave length. This waveinterference or diffraction occurs if the wave impinges upona small inclusion or pore in the metal. A portion of theenergy bends around the defect and reflection is muchreduced (Figure 2.33a) . A second example of thisphenomenon is the bending of ultrasonic waves near the edgeof a specimen (Figure 2.33b). This bending may divert theultrasonic wave from where it would normally be received, tosome other point.

ULTRASONICBEAM -—— —

Hfl 'i

riJl'l

Figure 2.33

'M/ • ' (

HD•UNN\N

^

ULTRASONIC'BEAM

ï(a) (b)Diffraction of ultrasound in solids.(a) Around the defect.(b) Near the irregular edge.

61

Page 62: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

3. ULTRASONIC TEST METHODS, SENSORS AND TECHNIQUES

3.1 Basic ultrasonic Test Methods

ultrasonic waves arriving at an interface between two mediaare partially reflected in to the medium from which they areincident and partially transmitted in to the other medium.The method of ultrasonic testing which utilizes thetransmitted part of the ultrasonic waves is the throughtransmission method while that which make use of thereflected portion of the waves is classified as the pulseecho test method. An other method which is used for theultrasonic testing of materials is the resonance method.

3.1.1. Through Transmission Method

In this method two ultrasonic probes are used. One is thetransmitter probe and the other is the receiver probe. Theseprobes are situated on opposite side of the specimen asshown in Figure 3.1.

Transmitterprobe Sound beam

Receiver probe

Figure 3.1.Position of transmitter and receiver probes inthe through transmission method of ultrasonictesting.

In this method the presence of an internal defect isindicated by a reduction in signal amplitude, or in the caseof gross defects, complete loss of the transmitted signal.The appearance of the CRT screen is as illustrated inFigure 3.2 (a) , (b) and (c) .

63

Page 63: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

(a)

R

(b)

_———o R

(O

R

Figure 3.2 (a) , (b), (c).CRT screen appearance fordefects of varying sizes inthe through transmissionmethod.(a) Defect free specimen.<b) Specimen with a small

defect.(c) Specimen with a large

defect.

This method is used for the inspection of large ingotsand castings particularly when the attenuation is high andgross defects are present. The method does not give the sizeand location of the defect. In addition good mechanicalcoupling and alignment of the two probes is essential.

3.1.2 Pulse Eoho Method

This is the method most commonly utilized in the ultrasonictesting of materials. The transmitter and receiver probesare on the same side of the specimen and the presence of adefect is indicated by the reception of an echo before thatof the back wall echo. The CRT screen is calibrated toshow the separation in distance between the time of arrivalof a defect echo as against that of the back wall echo ofthe specimen, therefore, the location of a defect can beassessed accurately. The principle of the pulse echo methodis illustrated in Figure 3.3 (a) , (b) and (c) .

64

Page 64: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

TR

(a)

Transmissionpulse

(b)

(c)

Back wallechoA

Defectecho

No Backwull echo

Figure 3.3 Principle of pulse echo method of ultrasonictesting.(a) Defect free specimen.(b) Specimen with small defect and(c) Specimen with large defect.

3.1.3 Resonance Method

A condition of resonance exists whenever the thickness of amaterial equals half the wavelength of sound or any multiplethereof in that material. Control of wavelength inultrasonics is achieved by control of frequency. If we havea transmitter with variable frequency control, it can betuned to create a condition of resonance for the thicknessof plate under test. This condition of resonance is easilyrecognized by the increase of received pulse amplitude.Knowing the resonance or fundamental frequency f andvelocity V of ultrasound in the specimen the thickness lt'of the specimen under test can be calculated from theequation : -

t = V2f

Since it is difficult to recognize the fundamental mode ofvibration, the fundamental frequency is usually calculatedfrom the difference of two adjacent harmonics which aredepicted by two adjacent rises in the pulse amplitude.Therefore : -

t =2 (f -

n f )n-1

(3.2)

65

Page 65: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Where= frequency at nth harmonic.

nf = frequency at (n-1) th harmonic.n-1

The resonance method of ultrasonics was at one timespecially suited to the measurement of thickness of thinspecimens such as the cladding tubes for reactor fuelelements.The method has now be largely superceded by thepulse echo method because of improved transducer design.

3.2 SENSORS3.2.1 Ultrasonic Probe Construction

An ultrasonic probe (Figure 3.4) consists of

(i) A piezoelectric transducer,(ii) A backing material.

(iii) A matching transformer which matchesthe piezoelectric transducer electricalimpedance to that of the cable to theflaw detector, to transfer maximum energyfrom the cable to the transducer and viceversa.

(iv) A case which is simply a holder of suitabledimensions and construction.

CoQxial cable

Figure 3.4 An Ultrasonic Probe.

„Matching transformer

-Backing medium

„Transducer

66

Page 66: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

(a) Piezoelectric Transducers

Piezoelectric transducers are already discussed in detail insection 2.5 . An ultrasonic probe is generally excited bya voltage pulse of less than 10 micro second duration. Ashort voltage pulse consists of a band of frequencies.Among these frequencies, the transducer vibrates withmaximum amplitude at the frequency known as the resonancefrequency of the transducer, which is related to itsthickness as follows :

V2t

(3.3)

Where= resonance frequency of the transducer.

t = thickness of the transducer.V = longitudinal wave velocity of ultrasound

in the transducer .

Equation 3.3 is used to determine the thickness of thetransducer required to construct an ultrasonic probe of aparticular frequency.

(b) Backing Material

The backing material in a probe is used to control the twobasic performance characteristics of the probe - resolutionand sensitivity.

Resolution of a probe is its ability to separate the echoesfrom two flaws which are close together in depth.

Sensitivity of a probe is defined as theprobe to detect echoes from small flaws.

ability of the

To have a high resolution probe, the vibration of thetransducer of the probe should be damped as quickly aspossible. But to have a high sensitivity probe, the dampingof the transducer vibration should be as low as possible.The two requirements are contradicatory to each other andtherefore a compromise has to be made.

The maximum damping of the transducer's vibrations isachieved when the backing material has the same acousticimpedance as that of the transducer. This matching of theacoustic impedances of transducer and backing materialallows the ultrasound to pass easily from the transducer

67

Page 67: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

into the backing material. The backing material should alsoprovide a high degree of attenuation and absorption todissipate the transmitted ultrasound so that it will notreflect from the back of the backing material to createspurious signals. To have sufficient sensitivity with highresolution the mismatch of acoustic impedances of thetransducer and backing material is usually approximately 5to 1 for quarts transducers and 1.1 to 1 for lithiumsulphate transducers. Backing materials for pulse echoprobes are often made of fibrous plastics or metal powderscombined with various plastic materials. Attenuation can becontrolled by the grain size of the powder and the impedanceby the proportions of metal powder and plastic.

3.2.2 Types of ultrasonic Probes

3.2.2.1 Contact Type Probes

Contact type probes are scanned in direct contact with thesurface of the test specimen. In normal probes of this typea wear plate is often used to protect the transducer fromwear. When using protected probes a thin layer of anappropriate couplant usually light oil is always requiredbetween the transducer and the wear plate to obtaintransmission of ultrasound energy across the interface.Different contact type probes are discussed below.

(a) Normal Beam Contact Type ProbesAs the name indicates these probes transmit ultrasonicwaves, usually longitudinal , in to the test specimen in adirection perpendicular to the surface of the test specimen.Various direct contact type normal beam probes, which arecommonly used in ultrasonic testing of materials, can beclassified according to their mode of operation as follows :

(i) Single Transducer (Single Crystal) Normal Beam Probe

These probes use a single transducer (Figure 3.5) as atransmitter and receiver of ultrasound. This transducer hasa common connection to the transmitter and amplifier unitsof the flaw detector (Figure 3.6). Because of this commonconnection to the transmitter and receiver unit, the singletransducer probes have a large transmission pulse whichresults in a large dead zone for the probe generally makingthe probe useless for near surface flaw detection and thinwall thickness measurements.Short pulse length probes arenow available which have shorter dead zones thus making themmore useful for testing thin material.

(ii) Double Transducers (Twin Crystal) Probes (or SE probes)

To avoid the limitations encountered in the use of singletransducer normal beam probes for thin wall thickness

68

Page 68: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Socket

-Hard PaperTube

DampingBlock

•Crystal

Protective'Layer

Figure 3.5 Normal beam single crystal contact type probe.

Transmitter unit

•»-

1

— o Jf

^-^ Single crystalprobe

T/"/ rr._____77777T7/// /Figure 3.6 Mode of operation of single crystal probes,

Cable

AcousticBarrier

CrystalRoof Angle Delay

Clock

Figure 3.7 Twin crystal contact type probe and itsultrasonic propagation.

69

Page 69: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Transmitterunit

-Amplifier

Twin Crystalprobe

Figure 3.8 Mode of operation of twin crystal probe.

Max.Sensi-tivity Max.

Sensi-tivity

Great roof angle Small roof angle

Figure 3.9 Ultrasound propagation at great and small roofangles of a double crystal probe.

Sensi-tivity

Smallroof angle

Distancefrom

surface

Figure 3.10 Influence of roof angles over sensitivity oftwin crystal probe.

70

Page 70: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

measurements and near surface flaw detection, doubletransducer normal beam probes are used. These are probeswhich incorporate two transducers in a single case. Thesetransducers are separated acoustically from each other by anacoustic barrier (Figure 3.7). One of the transducers isconnected to the transmitter unit and the other to thereceiver unit of the flaw detector, as shown in figure 3.8,thus eliminating the transmission pulse.

The special features to note in the construction of a doubletransducer probe are the inclination of the transducers andthe long delay blocks. The inclination of the transducersgives a focusing effect and maximum sensitivity can beobtained at a certain point in the specimen for a particularangle of inclination i.e. "roof angle" (Figure 3.9 & 3.10).

The long delay blocks which are made of perspex, or for hotsurfaces, of a heat resistive ceramic material, allow theultrasonic beam to enter the test specimen at its divergentpart (i.e. in the far zone). This eliminates thedifficulties of evaluating a flaw occuring in the near fieldand also helps in producing a shorter dead zone for theprobe for a smaller roof angle.

(iii) Angle Beam Contact Type Probes

In angle probes, refraction and conversion of wave modes areused to transmit ultrasound in to the test specimen atvarious angles to the surface. A typical construction of anangle beam contact type probe is shown in figure 3.11 .

An angle probe transmits longitudinal waves through aperspex delay block at a definite angle of incidence to thesurface of the specimen. The angle of incidence chosen isgreater than the first critical angle so that onlytransverse waves enter the specimen. The longitudinalportion is reflected back in to the probe and is attenuatedby the damping block and thus spurious indications that mayarise due to the presence of the longitudinal waves are

HousingCoiK I Crystal

Damping Block ^Wedge

Figure 3.11 Angle beam contact type probe.

71

Page 71: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

avoided. The refracted angle for steel specimens and thebeam exit point, generally known as the probe index, aremarked on the metal case of the probe.

A surface wave probe is an angle beam probe insofar as ituses a wedge to position the transducer at an angle to thesurface of the specimen. The wedge angle is chosen so thatthe shear - wave - refraction angle is 90° and the waveresulting from mode conversion travels along the surface.

When an angle beam probe designed for steel is used foranother material, the change in angle of refraction shouldbe taken in to acount.

In the case of a 35 angle probe used on copper and graycast iron, a longitudinal wave is also present at 57° and55° respectively. With these materials it is thereforepreferable to use large angles .

3,2,2.2 Immers ion Type Probe

The construction of an immersion type probe is essentiallythe same as that of the contact type normal beam probe.Since however immersion type probes are always in contactwith water they need to be water-proofed and also do notneed to have a wear protective plate in front. Figure 3.12shows the construction of an immersion type probe.

Coaxial connector

Epoxy potting

Housing

Backingmaterial

Piezoelectriccrystal

Figure 3.12 Construction of an immersion type probe.

72

Page 72: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

3.3 PULSE ECHO TESTING TECHNIQUES

Techniques of ultrasonic testing are either of the contacttype or the immersion type. In the contact type, the probeis placed in direct contact with the test specimenwith a thin liquid film used as a couplant for bettertransmission of ultrasonic waves in to the test specimen. Inthe immersion type, a waterproof probe is used at somedistance from the test specimen and the ultrasonic beam istransmitted in to the material through a water path or watercolumn.

3.3.1 Contact Type Techniques

Contact techniques are divided in to three types. These arenormal beam technique, angle beam technique and surface wavetechnique.

3.3.1.1 Normal Beam Techniques

In the normal beam technique the ultrasonic beam isprojected perpendicularly in to the test specimen. Thistechnique may use either single, double or SE normal beamprobes. With the single probe, the transducer of the probeacts as both transmitter and receiver. In this technique anultrasonic beam pulse is projected at in to the specimen andechoes from the flaws within the specimen and from the backwall of the specimen are received (Figure 3.13). Theoccurance of a large transmission pulse when using singletransducer probes renders the single probe technique ineffective for the detection of near surface flaws and forthin wall thickness measurements.

TRANSDUCER

nn

SOUND REFLECTED BACKTO TRANSDUCER FROMDISCONTINUITY AND BACKSURFACE

Figure 3.13 Single Transducer Pulse-Echo Technique.

Double normal beam probe techniques are useful when thespecimen shape is irregular and the back surface is notparallel with the front surface. One probe transmits theultrasonic beam in to the specimen and the other receivesthe echoes from the flaws and back wall (Figure 3.14 ).

73

Page 73: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

TRANSMITTING UNIT RECEIVING UNIT

_ SOUND REFLECTED TORECEIVING UNIT

Figure 3.14 . Double Transducer Pulse-Echo Technique

In S.E. normal beam probe techniques the two transducer arein the same case with one of the transducers acting as atransmitter and the other as a receiver. With thesetechniques thin wall thickness measurements and near surfaceflaw detection are possible because of the elimination ofthe transmission pulse.

3.3.1.2 Applications of Contact Type Normal Beam Probes

(a) Thickness Measurement

(i) Using Single Crystal Probes

One of the most important uses is that of thicknessmeasurement. When a normal beam probe is placed on a platelike test specimen, the CRT screen displays a transmissionpulse and one or more back wall echoes. The distancebetween two consecutive back wall echoes corresponds to thethickness of the test object. Consequently by calibratingthe CRT screen in millimetres using a calibration block, itis possible to have a direct reading of the thickness of theunknown test specimen.

The thickness of the test specimen can be read by usingeither a single back wall echo or for better accuracy usingmultiple echoes. In the case of the single echo techniquethe thickness of the specimen is determined from the pointwhere the left hand edge of the first back wall echo risesfrom the base line, while in the case of the multiple echotechnique the thickness of the last multiple echo is readand then the thickness of the specimen determined bydividing this thickness by the total number of back wallechoes. The multiple echoe technique is used for thinnerspecimens. The limit to the multiple echo technique is themerging of the first back wall echo in to the transmissionpulse and the consequent difficulty in determining the totalnumber of back wall echoes. With good resolution probesthe smallest wall thickness that can be measured with themultiple echo method is about 3 mm. To be able to measuresmaller thicknesses, S.E. probes are used.

74

Page 74: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

(ii) using S.E. Probes

With S.E probes it is possible to measure wall thicknessesdown to 1 mm. Although the design of S.E probes results ina very good near surface resolution, it also calls for aspecial calibration procedure to obtain accurate thicknessmeasurements. The special calibration block for SE probesis a stepped reference block VW (Figure 3.15) having 8 or10 steps from either 1 mm to 8 mm or from 1 mm to 10 mm.

Figure 3.15

_\Z_ 4mm

„,U,J,,..,..,L ,.,l.,n ,.,„J..U„ ..„, . v L ,0 2 4 6 8 10mm

AZ: 8mm

Figure 3.16 Figure 3.17

To calibrate the CRT screen for an SE probe, two suitablesteps of the VW block which are in the desired range arechosen. The probe is first coupled to the thinner step andusing the delay control the back wall echo is brought to thecorresponding scale position. The probe is then coupled tothe thicker step and using the testing range control, theback wall echo is brought to the corresponding scaleposition. These two adjusting steps are repeated until bothechoes stand on the right scale positions.

Figure 3.16 and 3.17 illustrate the two calibration stepsfor the 4 mm and 8 mm steps of the VW calibration block.The two additional echoes between the first and second backwall echoes in the case of the 4 mm step are because of themode conversion effect at the back wall.

75

Page 75: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

The error in the measurement of thickness due to the Vshaped path of the ultrasonic beam (Figure 3.18), becomesnegligibly small if the thickness of the test specimens liesbetween the two step thickness used for the calibration ofthe CRT screen and if the difference in thickness betweenthe two steps is not too large.

Figure 3.18

(iii) Velocity Correction

If the calibration block used for the time base calibrationis a different material than that of the material of thespecimen, then the measured thickness of the specimen has tobe corrected for the difference in velocities in thecalibration block and the test specimen.The correction is made as follow :

Thickness of thespecimen

Indicatedthickness

Longitudinal velocityin specimenLongitudinal velocityin calibration block

(b) Testing For Laminations

1. Standard Procedure

The standard procedure which is used to test for laminationsin plates and pipes, which are to be welded or machined, isgiven below :

(i) Calibrate the time base to allow at least two backwall echoes to be displayed.

(ii) Place probe on the test specimen and adjust thegain control so that the second back wall echo isat full screen height.

(iii) Scan the test specimen looking for laminationindications which will show up at half specimenthickness together with a reduction in back wall

76

Page 76: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

echo amplitude. In some cases a reduction in theamplitude of the second back wall echo may benoticed without a lamination echo being present.Care must be taken to ensure that this reduction inamplitude is not due to poor coupling or surfacecondition.

2. Multiple Echo Technique

Lamination testing of plate or pipe less than 10 mm in wallthickness may be difficult using the standard procedurebecause multiple echoes are so close together that itbecomes impossible to pick out lamination echoes betweenback wall echoes. In such cases a technique, called themultiple echo technique, using a single crystal probe can beused.

The procedure is as follows:{i)

(ii)

Place the probe on a lamination free portion of thetest specimen or on the calibration block.Adjust the time base and gain controls to obtain aconsiderable number of multiple echoes in a decaypattern over the first half of the time base(Figure 3. 19).

Figure 3.19_ 1

/S :

ITI

-X Multiple echo decay pattern

-••

—4 —— | —— | —— | —— | —— » —— | —— | —— | ——

llll!!!jiJ>]! .L. ,...!....,...!_„,...1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0

Figure 3.20

Steeper decay pattern

1 » 1 1 » \ I 1 t-

"M.MK'>J -••'r">lir^"" M'.'lf f*'^"!' '•'.'^--v

8 9 10

77

Page 77: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

(iii) Scan the test specimen. The presence of a laminationwill be indicated by a collapse of the decay patternsuch as the one shown in Figure 3,20 . The collapseoccurs because each of the many multiple echoes iscloser to its neighbour in the presence of alamination.

(c) Examination of Brazed and Bonded Joints

(i) Brazed Joints

If the wall thickness permits clear separation between backwall echoes, brazed joints can be examined using thestandard procedure for lamination testing. However, sincethe brazed metal separating the two brazed walls will have aslighty different acoustic impedence to that of the brazedwalls, a small interference echo will be present for a goodbraze. The technique is, therefore, to look for an increasein this interface echo amplitude (Figure 3.21 a,b,c).

C -H-(a) Technique

JL(b)Good Braze (c) Bad Braze

Figure 3 .21 ( a , b , c )

If the two brazed wall thickness are too thin to permitclear back wall echoes, a multiple echo, as described forlamination testing, can be used.

{i i) Bonded Joints

These may include metal to metal glued joints and metal tonon metal glued joints (e.g. rubber blocks bonded to steelplates ). The technique used is a multiple echo technique.Each time the pulse reaches a bonded interface, a portion ofthe energy will be transmitted in to the bonded layer andabsorbed. Each time a pulse reaches an unbonded layer, allthe energy will be reflected. The decay of the multipleecho pattern for a good bond would, therefore, be shortbecause of the energy loss at each multiple echo in to the

78

Page 78: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Metal

i ' some energyabsorbed

Rubber0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0

Bond

Figure 3.22

\ bond failure

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0

No Bond

Figure 3.23

bond {Figure 3.22 ). However, for an unbonded layer eachmultiple echo will be slightly bigger because there is nointerface loss, and the decay pattern will be significantlylonger (Figure 3.23 ).

3.3.1.3 Angle Beam Techniques

The angle beam technique is used to transmit ultrasonicwaves in to a test specimen at a predetermined angle to thetest surface. According to the angle selected, the wavemodes produced in the test specimen may be mixedlongitudinal and transverse, transverse only, or surfacewave modes. Usually, transverse wave probes are used inangle beam testing. Transverse waves at various angles ofrefraction between 35° and 80Ö are used to locate defectswhose orientation is not suitable for detection by normalbeam techniques.

79

Page 79: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

3.3.1.4 Calculation of Various Distances for Angle BeamProbes

(a) Half Skip and Full Skip Distances and Beam Path Lengths

Figure 3.24 defines the half-skip-distance (BSD), full-skip-distance(FSD), half-skip-beam-path-length (HSBPL) andfull-skip-beam-path-length (FSBPL) for an angle beam probeof refraction angle.

Be

DDistance AB = Half - Skip - Distance (HSD)Distance AC = Full - Skip - Distance (FSD)Distance AD = Half - Skip - Beam - Path - Length (HSBPL)Distance AD + DC = Full-Skip-Bearn - Path - Length (FSBPL)

Figure 3.24

The relations used to calculate HSD, FSD, HSBPL and FSBPLfor a specimen of thickness t, are given below:

HSD = t x tan ?............ ( 3.3 )FSD = 2 x t x tan $........ ( 3.4 )

HSBPL = t/cos Ö ............. ( 3.5 )FSBPL = 2t/cos 9............. ( 3.6 )

If the actual probe angle is exactly equal to the nominalprobe angle then these distances can be calculated by thefollowing formula :

Distance required Fxt ( 3.7 )

Where F is the appropriate factor from Table. 3.1.

80

Page 80: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Table 3. l .

F Probe angleFactor

BSD factor

FSD factor~*

HSBPL factor

FSBPL factor

o35

0.7—

1.4

1.22

2.44

o45

1.0

2.0

1.41

2.83

o60

1.73

3.46

2.0

4.0

070

2.75

5.49_

2.92

5.85

o80

5.67

11.34

5.76

11.52

<b) Calculation of Maximum Penetration Thickness for Thick WallPipes

The normal range of transverse wave angle beam probes (45 ,60 & 70 }, when used on thick wall pipe may not penetrateto the bore of the pipe, but cut across to the outsidesurface again, as shown in Figure 3.25 and miss thedefect.

Figure 3.25

Thickest wall we cantest from the outsidediameter of this pipe

For a given probe angle, the maximum wall thickness of apipe that allows the centre of the beam to reach the bore ofthe pipe can be calculated from the following formula :

Where

t =

t =d =8 =

d (1 - Sin2

——— { 3.8 )

maximum wall thicknessouter diameter (OD) of the pipeprobe angle

81

Page 81: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Equation 3.8 can be rewritten to determine the best anglefor a given wall thickness as:

0 = Sin ( 1 - (2t/d) ) ————— { 3.9 )For convenience equation 3.8 can be simplified for standardangle probes as

t = d x f ————————— ( 3.10 )Where f is the probe factor given in Table. 3.2 .

Table 3.2 .

Probe angle (

Probes factor

e > ! oj 35

( -f- ) ! 0.213

o45

0. 146

o60

0.067

o70

0.030

o80

0.0076

Table 3.3 gives values of maximum wall thickness for variouspipe sizes and probe angles.

Table 3.3

Probe angle

Pipe O.D

4" (100 mm)_

6" (150 mm)

8" (200 mm)~"

10" (250 mm)

12" (300 rnm)

14" (350 rnm)

16" (400 mm)

18" (450 mrn)

20" (500 mm)

o35

21. 3 mm

31. 95 mm

42 . 6 mrn

53.25 rnrn

63. 9 mm

74. 55 mm

85.2 mrn

95.85 mrn

106. 5 mm

o45

14.6 mm

21.9 mm

29. 2 mm

36. 5 mm

43 . 8 mm

51.1 mm

58. 4 mm

65. 7 mm

73. 0 mm

o60

Maximum Wall Thickness

6 . 7 mm

10.05

13. 4 mm

16.75

20. 1 mm

23. 45 mro

26. 8 mm

30. 15 mm_

33. 5 mrn

82

Page 82: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

3.3.1.5 Surface Wave Techniques

Surface wave techniques have been used very successfully fora great number of applications, particularly in the AircraftIndustry. However, it is not so common in the steelindustry because surface finishes are often less smooth, andmagnetic flaw detection will find most defects detectable bysurface waves. The main advantage of surface waves is thatthey follow gentle contours and are reflected sharply onlyby sudden changes in contour, thus making it a very usefultool for the examination of complex shaped components. Themain limitation of these waves is that they are almostimmediately attenuated if the surface finish is rough, iscovered in scale or a liquid (such as the couplant), or ifany pressure is applied by another object (such as the handof the operator ).

3.3.2 Immersion Testing Techniques

Immersion testing techniques are mainly used in thelaboratory and for large installations doing automaticultrasonic testing. It has the advantage that uniformcouplant conditions are obtained and longitudinal andtransverse waves can be generated with the same probe simplyby changing the incident beam angle.

The three basic techniques used in immersion testing are theimmersion technique, the bubbler technique and the wheeltransducer technique.

In the immersion technique both the probe and the testspecimen are immersed in water. The ultrasonic beam isdirected through the water in to the test specimen, usingeither a normal beam technique (Figure 3.26 a ) forgenerating longitudinal waves or an angle beam technique(Figure 3.26 b ) for generating transverse waves.

When the normal beam technique is being used the water pathdistance must always be longer than the distance S inequation ( 3.11 ).

Thickness specimen x sound velocity in waterS = ——————————————————————————————————— ———(3.11)

sound velocity in specimen

When the specimen is steel the water path distance must belonger than 1/4 steel thickness otherwise the 1st back wallecho overlaps the 2nd surface echo and defects near theback wall may not be seen.

In the bubbler or squirter technique, the ultrasonic beam isdirected through a water column in to the test specimen(Figure 3.27 ). This technique is usually used with an

83

Page 83: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

manipulatorprobe

'_—__—_ ~_ T-l~~_

-1 plate

:û: A— — ?( a )

TEST SPECIMEN WATER-FILLED TIREAXLE STATIONARY

•OVERFLOW

•TRANSDUCER

TEST SPECIMEN________\

TRANSDUCER

WATER COUPLANTBUBBLER TECHNIQUE SUPPLY WHEEL TRANSDUCER TECHNIQUE

Figure 3.27 Bubbler and Wheel Transducer Techniques.

automated system for high speed scanning of plate, sheet,strip, cylindrical forms and other regularly shaped forms.The ultrasonic beam is either directed in a perpendiculardirection (i.e. normal direction ) to the test specimen toproduce longitudinal waves or is adjusted at an angle to thesurface of the test specimen for the production oftransverse waves.

In the wheel transducer technique the ultrasonic beam isprojected through a water-filled tire in to the testspecimen. The probe, mounted on the wheel axle, is held ina fixed position while the wheel and tire rotate freely.The wheel may be mounted on a mobile apparatus that runsacross the specimen, or it may be mounted on a stationary

84

Page 84: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

WATER.FILLEOT1RE

TRANSDUCER

WHEEL MOVESOVER MATERIAL Vf=

WATER-FILLED TIR6

TRANSDUCER

WHEELSTATIONARY

MATERIAL MOVES

(a) (b)

Figure 3.28 Stationary and Moving Wheel Transducers

SOUND BEAM DIRECTED IN FORWARDDIRECTION

Of")1

SOUND PROPAGATED INTO MATERIALAT 45° ANGLE

SOUND BEAM DIRECTED TO THE SIDE 90

SOUND BEAM ANGLED TO THE SIDEAND FORWARD

ANGLE OF PROPAGATION MAY BE VARIED BYADJUSTING POSITION CF WHEEL MOUNTING YOKE

Figure 3.29 Wheel Transducer Angular Capabilities.

fixture, where the specimen is moved past it (Figure 3.28 aand b ). The position and angle of the probe mounted onthe wheel axle may be constructed to project normal beams,as shown in Figure 3.28 a and b or to project angledbeams as shown in Figure 3.29

85

Page 85: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

4. PULSE ECHO TYPE ULTRASONIC FLAW DETECTOR

4.1 Construction And Mode Of Operation Of A Pulse Echo Type FlawDetector.

4.1.1 Functions Of The Electronic Elements

Figure 4.1 Shows the block diagram of a pulse echoultrasonic flaw detector.

The cathode ray. tybe. QE SEX (Figure 4.2) contains aheater coil H which heats the cathode C to make it emitelectrons. These electrons are accelerated by a voltageapplied between the cathode C and anode A . Theresultant electron beam is focused by the focusing cylinderF to make it appear on the fluorescent screen S as aspot. As the electrons travel towards the CRT screen Sthey pass two pairs of deflecting plates X and Y .

A voltage applied to the X plates deflects theelectron beam horizontally while a voltage applied to the Y- plates deflects the beam vertically. The list ofthe CRT controls together with some of the names used bydifferent manufacturers is given below

i) Brightness control Brightness, Brilliance,intensity.

ii) Focus control Focus.iii) Astigmatism Astigmatism, Auxiliary

focus.

This control corrects the unsharpness induced in the CRTtrace by the changing transit time of the electron beam spotwhen it is deflected by a voltage applied to the verticalplates.

iv) Horizontal shift Horizontal shift,set zero, x-shift.

v) Vertical shift Vertical shift,Y - shift.

The time-base generator provides a sawtooth voltage to theX-plates of CRT to move the electron beam spot from leftto right across the CRT screen with a uniform speed. Thespeed of the spot depends on the operating time {i.e thetime in which the saw tooth voltage rises from zero to itsmaximum value ) of the sawtooth voltage ( Figure 4.3 }

87

Page 86: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Figure 4.l

Vertical

nH

Horizontal

Figure 4.2

The shorter the operating time the greater is the speed ofthe spot. The control provided for the adjustment of thesaw tooth voltage operating time and hence the speed of thespot is termed the depth range, or test range control. Toprevent the return of the electron beam spot to produce atrace on the screen, the time base generator simultaneouslycontrols the brightness of the spot by means of a squarewave voltage so that the spot remains bright only during theoperating time of the sawtooth voltage (Figure 4.4).Sometimes it is necessary to delay the pulse which triggersthe time base (see clock or timer below) compared to the

88

Page 87: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

ff5

f«——Operating time——*| (4——Operating time ——>\(a)

J

Figure 4.3 (a)(B)

time(b)

SAW TOOTH VOLTAGE FOR TIME BASE.SAW TOOTH VOLTAGE WITH DIFFERENT OPERATINGTIMES.

0 time<u0«o+-I

n

Figure 4.4 Sawtooth voltage for time base withcorresponding square wave voltage for thecontrol of brightness.

89

Page 88: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

pulse which triggers the transmitter. For this purpose acontrol is provided. The control provided for this purposeis usually termed the de_iay_ control.

The transmitter supplies a short electrical voltage pulse of300 - 1000 V to the piezoelectric transducer in the probe.The piezoelectric transducer, in turn, converts thiselectrical voltage pulse in to an ultrasonic wave. In someinstruments controls are provided to adjust the frequencyand amplitude of the electrical voltage pulse, while inothers this adjustment is done automatically. The frequencyand width of the ultrasonic wave pulse are controlledrespectively by the thickness and degree of damping of thepiezoelectric transducer in the probe.

The receiver unit consists of an amplifier, a rectifier andan attenuator. The amplifier amplifies any voltage pulsesupplied to it from the probe. The amplification is of theorder of about 10 . In most instruments the amplifier isof a wide band type with a frequency range of about 1 to 15MHZ and a control to tune the amplifier to the frequency ofthe probe is not needed. In some it is a narrow band typeand a control is provided to tune it to the frequency of theprobe. The rectifier in the receiver unit rectifies thevoltage signal for ease of observation. In some instrumentsa control is provided to observe the received signal eitherin the rectified or unrectified state. The attenuator inthe receiver unit is used to vary the signal amplitude asneeded. The control provided to do this is known as the

c_Q_n.tr_Q_l " and is calibrated in decibels or dB.

The clock or tim.gr çir_çuit generates electrical pulseswhich trigger the time base generator and transmitter at thesame time. These pulses are generated repeatedly to makethe trace on the CRT screen steady and bright. Thefrequency with which these pulses is generated is known asthe p_uise repetition frequency (PRF) . In some instrumentsa control is provided for the adjustment of PRF while inothers it is adjusted automatically with alteration insetting of the test range control.

A control known as ' reject ' or " sup_p.ress_ion " control isprovided in the receiver unit to remove the indications ofrandom noise, known as grass, from the CRT display. Thiscontrol should not be used unless its effect on the verticallinearity is known and allowed for in any subsequentevaluation of a flaw based on reflectivity.

4.1.2 Operation Of A Pulse Echo Type Flaw Detector

The simultaneous triggering of the time-base generator andtransmitter by the clock, initiates an ultrasonic pulse fromthe probe at the same time as the electron beam spot startsto move across the cathode ray tube. When a single crystal

90

Page 89: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

probe is used, the electrical voltage pulse supplied by thetransmitter to the probe is also fed to the receiver unitand is thus amplified and displayed as indication ' a '(Figure 4.1) on the CRT screen. The indication, ' a ' isknown as the " transmission echo " , " transmission pulse," initial pulse "or "main bang ".

The electron beam spot continues to move across the CRTscreen as the ultrasound from the probe moves through thespecimen. When the ultrasound reaches the reflectingsurface b, a part of it is reflected via the probe andreceiver unit to register an indication l b ' on the CRTscreen. The other part which is carried to the far surface'C' of the test specimen is reflected by it to be displayedas indication 1C' on the CRT screen. The indication fromthe reflecting surface 'b' and the far surface or backwall1C' of the specimen are known as the 'defect echo' andback-wall echo " or " bottom echo " respectively.

If the specimen in figure 4.1 is a 25 mm thick steel plate,the above operation would have taken about 8 rnillionths of asecond (8 us) to complete. The pulse repetition frequency(PRF) should, therefore, be high enough to make the patternbright enough to be visible to the human eye. On the otherhand for a 500 mm thick specimen, the time required for thewhole operation to complete is about loo micro second (us).If a high repetition frequency is used in this case,confusion would arise because the probe will send a secondultrasonic pulse before the first one is received.Depending upon the thickness of the test specimen, in mostinstruments, the PRF can be varied between 50 pulse persecond (PPS) to 1250 PPS. This is done automatically inmodern instruments with the setting of the testing rangecontrol.

In twin crystal and transverse wave probes there is aperspex delay block fitted between the piezoelectrictransducer and the surface of the specimen. The ultrasonicwaves travel for some time before entering the testspecimen. To stop the electron beam spot travelling adistance proportional to this travelling time in the perspexdelay block, the delay control is used. The delay controlmakes the time - base generator wait for a period equal tothe perspex travelling time before making the spot startfrom the sero position.

4.2 Scan Presentation

The ultrasonic echoes are electronically translated in tovisual presentations on the CRT yoreen or other recordingdevices. The three basic presentation arc known a.s A-scan,B-scan and C-scan.

91

Page 90: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

4.2.1 A-scan Presentation

The most commonly used presentation is the A-scanpresentation. In this presentation, the horizontal lineon the screen indicates the elapsed time and the verticaldeflection shows the echo amplitude. From the location andamplitude of the echo on the screen the depth of the flaw inthe material and an estimate of the sise of the flaw can bemade . A typical A-scan system is shown in Figure 4,5 .

Amplifier

Ç •) Attenuator

Single^

DoubleSwitch

Pulse Generator

J>

V.

1 ___ fcFigure 4. 5

4.2.2 B-scan Presentation

This presentation gives a cross sectional view of thematerial being tested and will show the length and depth ofa flaw in the test material. The B-scan presentation showsthe reflection of the front and back surfaces of the testmaterial and the flaw. A typical B-scan system is shown inFigure 4.6 . The system differs from the A-scan system inthe following respects :-

i) The display is generated on a CRT screen that isa compound of a long persistance phosphor. Thisproperty of the CRT screen allows the imaginarycross section to be viewed as a whole withouthaving to resort to permanent imaging.

ii) The CRT input for one axis of the display isprovided by an electromechanical device thatgenerates an electrical voltage proportional tothe position of the transducer relative to areference point on the surface of the testspecimen. Most B-scans are generated by scanningthe probe in a straight line across the surfaceof the test piece at a uniform rate. One axis ofthe display, usually the horizontal axis,represents the distance travelled along thisline.

92

Page 91: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Ose il lose op«Screen

'"X

1 _,Y-AXISSWEEP •« ——————— TIMER

Mechanical LinkageTransducer

Test Specimen

Figure 4.6 B-scan presentation.

iii) Echoes are indicated by bright spots on thescreen rather than by deflections of the timetrace. The position of a bright spot along theaxis orthogonal to the probe position axis,usually measured top to bottom on the screen,indicates the depth of the echo within the testspecimen.

iv) To ensure that echoes are recorded as brightspots, the echo-intensity signal from theamplifier is connected to the trace brightnesscontrol of the cathode ray tube. In somesystems, the brightnesses corresponding todifferent values of echo intensity may exhibitenough contrast to enable semiquantitativeappraisal of echo intensity, with can be relatedto flaw size and shape.

The chief advantage of B-scan presentation is it displays across sectional view of the test specimen and the flawswithin it. This retention of the image for a time longenough to evaluate the entire specimen, can avoid the needto photograph the CRT screen display for a permanent record.

The limitations of the B-scan systems are that :-

i) The areas behind a reflecting surface are inshadow, and no indication behind this surface canbe obtained.

ii) The flaw width in a direction mutuallyperpendicular to the ultrasonic beam and thedirection of probe travel is not recorded exceptif the width affects the echo intensity and,thus, echo image brightness.

93

Page 92: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

iii) Because the sound beam is slightly conical ratherthan cylinder!cal, flaws near the back surface ofthe specimen appear longer than those near thefront surface.

Although B-scan systems are more widely used in medicalapplications, they can be used in industry for the rapidscreening of specimens and for the selection of certainspecimens or portions of certain specimens for more thoroughinspection with A-scan techniques.

4.2.3 C-scan Presentation

C-scan equipment is designed to provide a permanent recordof the test when high speed automatic scanning is used,A C- scan presentation displays the flaws in a plan view,but provides no depth or orientation information. A C-scansystem is shown in Figure 4.7. Although a persistentphosphor oscilloscope could, in principle, be used for theC-scan presentation, in practice, other means of recordingthe presentation are superior. Usually some form ofelectromechanical recorder producing a permanent paperrecord, is used.

Y-Axisposition

•cjrç^--]

Y-S*

«-*•Q-&--

ï J (" & *--£* '

BEAMINTENSITY

-€>5— »

VAV — , '

DEPTHGATE

(\MPLIFIER U— ^

RATEGENERATOR

1

s —— PULSER

Test specimen Figure 4.7 C-scan presentation.Testing depth

For C-scan operation, the ultrasonic test unit must beequipped with an electronic gate which samples the receivedechoes for a selected elapsed time after the initialtransmitted pulse. The elapsed time selected isproportional to the distance from the top to the bottom ofthe inspected slice of the test specimen, and the length oftime the gate is open is proportional to the thickness ofthe inspected slice. usually, the depth gate is set so thatfront reflections and back reflections are just barely

94

Page 93: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

excluded from the display. Thus, only echoes from withinthe test specimen are recorded, except for echoes from thinlayers adjacent to both surfaces of the test specimen. Asmentioned earlier, the outstanding disadvantage of C-scanpresentation is that it does not provide information aboutthe depth and orientation of flaws.

4.2.4 Echo amplitude and its control

Most pulse echo flaw detectors have an attenuator controlfitted sometimes called a calibrated gain control. Byturning this control one way the echo height increases andby turning the other way the height decreases. The controlis calibrated in decibel (dB) steps, usually 2dB althoughsome flaw detectors have steps of 0.5 dB or IdB. Becausethe echo height on the cathode ray tube is directlyproportional to the setting on the attenuator control it ispossible to compare the echo heights from two reflectors inthe specimen.

4.2.4.1 Decibel (dB) Unit

The decibel unit is 1/10 of a bel which is a unit based onlogariths to the base 10. If there are two ultrasonicsignals which have to be compared and they have intensitiesI0 and I-L then these signals will vibrate thetransaucer and produce elctrical signals whose power will beP and P respectively .The ratio of these signals I willo 1 o

will equal the electrical power ratio. ——-I

i.e. I - P lo oI P1 1

2Since P o( V

2I = P - Vo o oI P V1 1 1

Since these are likely to be rather large ratios thelogarithm to the base 10 of both sides of the equationgives.

2log I = log V -2 log V Bels

10 o 10 o 10 oI V V1 1 1

95

Page 94: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Since a decibel is 1 Bel10

2 log V Bels = 20 log V decibels10 o 10 o

V V1 1

Since the height, of the deflection on the CRT is directlyproportional to the voltage applied to the Y plates whichalso depends on the voltage developed by the transducer:

20 log V = 20 log H decibelso o

V H1 1

The advantages of the decibel unit are that :-

(a) Large echo height ratios can be given in smallfigures eg.

1000 : 1 = 60 dB1000000 : 1 = 1 2 0 dB

(b) A reversal of the echo height ratio only requires achange of sign e.g.

10000 : 1 = 80 dB1 : 10000 = -80 dB

(c) Multiplication of the echo height ratios correspondsto the simple addition of a dB value, e.g.

gain factor 2 = + 6 dBgain factor 10 = +20 dBgain factor 100 = + 40 dB

Table 4.1 lists the dB values of some echo height ratios.

96

Page 95: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Table 4.l dB values of some echo height ratios.

dB value

1

2

3

4

5

6_ ___ _7

8

9

10

11

12

Echo Height Ratio

1.12

1.26

1.41

1.59

1.78

2

2.24

2.51__ _2.82_ _ _3. 16

3.55

3.98

dB value

13

14

15

16

17

18_

19

20

21

22—

23

24

25

Echo Height Ratio

4.47

5

5.62

6.31

7.8

7.94

8.91

10

11.2

12.59

14.85

15.85

17.78

To find echo height ratios corresponding to a dB value notincluded in Table 4.1 , dB values from Table 4.1 are chosenwhose sum is equal to the dB values for which the echoheight is to be determined. The multiplication of the echoheight ratios corresponding to these chosen dB values willgive the required echo height ratio. For example, to findthe echo height ratio corresponding to 30 dB, let the dBvalues whose sum is equal to 30 dB, be 16 dB and 14 dB. Theecho height ratio for 16 dB is 6.31 and echo height ratiofor 14 dB is 5 and hence 6.31 x 5 = 31.55 is echo heightratio corresponding to 30 dB.

Alternately, the dB value of an echo height ratio, which isnot given in Table 4.1 , can be calculated by reducing this

97

Page 96: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

ratio to echo height ratios included in Table 4.1 , andthen adding their corresponding dB values.

For example, the dB value of an echo height ratio of 625 candetermined as follow :

Reducing 625 to factors included in Table 4.1.625 = 1.25 x 5 x 10 x 10

Since the dB values correspond to 1.25,5 and 10 are 2dB,14 dB and 20 dB respectively , the dB value correspondingto echo height ratio of

625 = 2 + 1 4 + 2 0 + 2 0 = 56 dB.

98

Page 97: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

5. CALIBRATION OF THE TEST SYSTEM

5.1 Calibration And Reference Test Blocks

In ultrasonic pulse echo testing test blocks containingnotches, slots or drilled holes are used to :

(i) determine the operating chacteristics of the flawdetector and probes.

(ii) establish reproducible test conditions.(iii) compare the height or location of the echo from a

flaw in the test specimen to that from anartificial flaw in the test block.

The blocks used for the first two purposes are termedcalibration blocks, while test blocks used for the thirdpurpose, are known as reference blocks. The same test blockmay be used as a calibration or reference block. Testblocks whose dimensions have been established and sanctionedby any of the various groups concerned with material testingstandards are called standard test blocks.

5.2 Commonly Used Test Blocks

Some of the commonly used test blocks along with their usesare as follows :

5.2.1 I.I.W (VI) Calibration Block

The most versatile calibration block is the block describedby the International Institute of Welding (I.I.W.) andproposed by the International Standard Organization(I.S.O.). This block, called the I.I.W. VI block, is asshown in Figure 5.1.

This block is generally used for :(i) the calibration of the time base.

(ii) the determination of probe index.(iii) the determination of probe angle.(vi) the checking of performance characteristics (time

base linearity, resolution, dead zone etc) of theultrasonic flaw detector.

99

Page 98: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

t* 35-»

\ 30 / i \

at.2M l 161 l 10

65 ^-p

..!-- 1-11

IIIIII«

26 »JLLJJI

Figure 5.1

(i) Calibration Of Time Base

(a) With normal beam probes

For calibration of the time base with a normal beam probefor a range of up to 250 mm, the probe is placed at positionC (Figure 5.2) and multiple back wall echoes are obtainedand adjusted to the appropriate scale division of the CRTscreen using the delay and fine material, testing rangecontrols. Figure 5.3 show the CRT screen display for an 100mm calibrated CRT screen. The points where the rising backwall echoes leave the base line have beam adjusted to theappropriate scale divisions to give the time basecalibrations.

For time base calibration of more than 250 mrn with normalbeam probe, the probe is placed at position A or B (Figure5.2 ) and multiple back wall echoes are obtained andadjusted to the appropriate scale divisions. Figure 5.4shows the CRT screen display for a one meter range.

Multiple back wall echoes are used for time base calibrationbecause the distance between the transmission pulse and thefirst back wall echo is some what larger than the distancebetween two consecutive multiple echoes. This zero error is

100

Page 99: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

• 200 mm

91 mm 100mm

r25 mm

I cl~1I il

TFigure 5.2

O 2 4 6 8 10 >/

0 25 50 75 100 mm

Figure 5.3

\ 0 2 4 6 8 1 0 y

Figure 5.4

101

Page 100: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

caused by the ultrasound travelling in the transducer, probeprotective layer (if any) and the layer of the couplantbefore entering the specimen.

(b) With angle beam probes

For a range of 200 ram or more the most direct method is toget multiple back wall echoes from the 100 mm quadrant byplacing the probe at position E (Figure 5.5 a). A CRTscreen display for a range of 200 mm is shown in Figure 5.5b.

Figure 5.5 a.

LUi 1IU "* 110 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0

Figure 5.5.b.

Another method of calibrating the time base for angle beamprobes is to position a normal wave probe at "D" in Figure5.6(a) at which the distance of 91 mm for a longitudinalwave corresponds to 50 mm for shear waves.Figure 5.6(b)shows the CRT display for a range of 250 mm for an angleprobe which has been calibrated with a normal probe and the91 mm length of the calibration block.

After calibrating with the normal probe replace the normalprobe with an angle beam probe, position the probe at "E" sothat a maximum response is obtained from the 100 mm radiusand adjust the transmission point so that the echo from the100 mm radius face coincides with the 100 mm reflectionpreviously obtained with the normal probe therebycorrecting for the delay which occurs in the probe shoe.

102

Page 101: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

• 200 mm

100mm

A

D

25mm

I

IFigure 5.6(a)

f— Longitudinal waves

— Shear waves

Figure 5.6 (b) Linear Scale Of 250 mm.

To calibrate the time base for a 100 mm range with an anglebeam probe, the procedure" used is explained in Figure 5.7a, b & c.

JL_

Figure 5.7 (a) B is set provisionally at or near 10 usingthe sweep length control

103

Page 102: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Screen

0 "£"'lOFigure 5.7 (b) Set B at 0 and B' at 10 using the delay

and sweep length controls respectively.

,B B1

i r Screenj L _ _é l l I I IK)

Figure 5.7 (c) Set B to 10 using the delay control,The zero is automatically correct.

(ii) Determination of the probe index

The probe is placed at position L on the calibration block(Figure 5,8) and a back wall echo from the 100 mm quadrantis obtained. The maximum amplitude of this back wall echois determined by moving the probe to and fro about theposition L. When the maximum amplitude is found then thepoint on the probe which corresponds to the point 0 on theblock is the probe index.

Figure 5.8

(iii) Determination and Checking the Probe Angle

To determine the probe angle, the probe is moved tooand froaccording its angle either at position la' (35°to 60°),lb' ( 60 to 75° ) or 'c' (75° to 80°) as shown in Figure 5.9until the amplitude of the echo from the perspex insert or1.5 mm diameter hole is maximum. The angle of the probe isthe one at which the index of the probe meets the anglescale on the block when the echo amplitude is maximum.

104

Page 103: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

"b"-*:ir^r

Figure 5.9 Determination of probe angle.

(iv) Determining the pulse length

Ero.be. On flaw detectors with a rectified displayposition the probe at position L (Figure 5.8) andcalibrate the test range using the 6 mm step (equivalentto a l s transit time in steel) to a short time range.Place the probe on a suitable surface of the block toproduce a back echo and adjust the delay and amplificationto display the back echo at 100 % FSH. Estimate the pulselength as the distance between the points on the rising andfalling flanks of the displayed pulse which are at 10 % ofthe peak amplitude. The pulse length is expressed in mm oras a time interval.

Angle Erobe Position the angle probe at position Land obtain a back echo from the 100 mrn radius aftercalibrating the time base to a short range (10 - 25 fullscreen). The delay is adjusted to bring the 100 mm back

SHORT PULSE LENGTH LONG PULSE LENGTH

TYPICAL RECTIFIED DISPLAY

Figure 5.10 Typical pulse length display.

105

Page 104: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

echo into the calibrated range. Set the back wall echo to100 % FSH. The pulse length can be estimated as thedistance between the points on the rising and falling flanksof the displayed pulse which are at 10 % of the peakamplitude. (Figure 5.10 ).

5.2.2 DIN 54122 <V2) Block

The latest version of this block is shown in Figure 5.11. Itis particularly suitable for the time base calibration ofsmall diameter normal and angle probes.It can also be used to check the probe index and angle,uses of the block are as follows :

The

Figure 5.11 Test block V2 according to DIN 54122

(i) Time base calibration for range up to 100 mm using""• ——•— —— —— v^^^__ —— « __ __^__ __ „. __ __ __« __ „^__ __ „^ „ ,^__.__ „. ..»,„. __ ____ ^^__ __ __ __ __ __ _ __ __.

normal beam probe.

The probe is placed on the block as shown in Figure 5.12 aand multiple back wall echoes are obtained. These echoesare adjusted using the test range and delay controls.Figure 5.12 b shows the screen display for a 100 mm rangecalibration.

111

,. IllII

i! ,Illl

r

Figure 5.12 a0 2 4 6 8 10

Figure 5. 12 b .

106

Page 105: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

(ii) Time base calibration for ranges up to 250 mm withangle beam probe.

The time base calibration for an angle beam probe forranges up to 250 mm can be done by one of the following twomethods. In both these methods, the probe is moved to andfro until a maximum echo is obtained.

In the first method the probe faces the 25 mm quadrant(Figure 5.13 a). By this method the screen can becalibrated for 100 mm, 175 mm, 200 mm and 250 mm ranges.The echo pattern for a 200 mm range is as shown in Figure5.13 b. The echoes appear at 25 mm, 100 mm and 175 mm. For a250 mm range the echoes appear at 25 mm, 100 mm, 175 mm and250 mm.

ill l U i i H mi illiill mi un uiliuu0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 00 200mm

Figure 5.13 a. Figure 5.13 b.

Figure 5.14 a .

Lili nil nil lui Illl

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 00 200 r

Figure 5.14 b.

In the second method the probe faces the 50 mm quadrant(Figure 5.14 a ). The CRT screen in this case can becalibrated for ranges of 125 mm and 200 mm. The CRT screenpattern for a 200 rnrn range is as illustrated in Figure5.14 b. The echoes appear at 50 mm, 125 mm and 200 mm.

Calibrationangle probe

of time base up to 200 mm using V2facing the 50 mm quadrant.

block and

107

Page 106: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

(iii) Time base calibration for 50 mmIn this method the echo from the 50 mm quadrant is

set at 10 using the sweep control or range control . Theprobe is then reversed so that the echo from the 25 mmquadrant is obtained .This echo is set at 25 using the delaycontrol. The procedure is repeated until calibration iscompleted.

(iv) Determination of probe index

The probe is placed either facing the 25 rnrn quadrant or the50 mm quadrant to obtain echoes at 25 mm or 50 rnrn on the CRTscreen. The probe is moved to and fro to maximize theecho. When the echo amplitude is a maximum, the probe indexis obtained by extending the centre mark of the millimeterscale on the block on to the probe.

(v) Determination of the probe angle

To determine the actual probe angle use is made of the 5mm diameter hole in the block. The probe index is placedagainst the appropriate probe angle inscribed on the blockwith the beam directed towards the 5 mrn diameter hole(Figure 5.15). The probe is moved to and fro until the echois a maximum. An estimate of the probe angle is then madeby noting the probe index position with respect to theangles inscribed on the block.

Figure 5. 15 Checking probe angle using V2 block.

108

Page 107: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

5.2.3 Institute of Welding (I.O.W.) Beam Profile Block

This block (Figure 5.16) is designed primarily for beamprofile measurement and offers eight different direct scanapproaches to the target holes for 45° , 60° and 70° probes,as shown in Figure 5.17 . There are eight more approachesby indirect (one bounce) scan for 45° probes and six for60° probes but none for 70° probes. The total number ofuseable probe positions in any case is determined by thesise of the probe and the probe angle.

Figure 5.16 .

83

"A h

f-SurfacB A |——50—-\

o Adcliiional holes\5 1.5 mm holes 22 mm

jCwdeepon 10° slope;-EL-la ol 2.S mm and

f-gjp 2 al 4 mm cenlres ^-Surface B H35-

75

50

Figure 5.17(

Sites for probes : (a) 45o o

(b) 60 and (c) 70

109

Page 108: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

5.2.3.1 Plotting of Beam Profile

(a) Vertical Plane

The 1.5 rurn target holes are sighted in succession fromsurfaces A and B of the 10 W block. For each case, theposition of the probe index corresponding to the maximumecho amplitude is marked on the block. The probe is thenmoved to and fro so that the target is swept by the beam,the extremes of displacement being reached when the positionof the probe index corresponds to a decrease of 20 dB, or10 % of the original height of the echo, from the maximumecho amplitude. These positions are marked as b and c inFigure 5.18 with mark a representing the position of theprobe for maximum amplitude.

Figure 5.18 a. Figure 5.18 b.

With the probe in its forward position at position b thebottom edge of the beam strikes the target hole while in thebackward position C the top edge of the beam strikes thetarget hole. The beam profile is then plotted as follows :Draw the probe angle with the probe index as its startingpoint. At the appropriate hole depth plot the reading ab(forward position) behind the beam axis while the reading ac(backward position) is plotted in front of the beam axis.Repeat the procedure for holes at other depths and join thepoints.

(b) Horizontal Plane

The probe is placed on surface A or B and the maximumamplitude is obtained from the selected target (Figure5.19a), The range is noted and a reference line is drawnacross the block marking the position of the rear edge ofthe probe. The probe is then moved away from the edge ofthe block and at right angles to it until the echo drops by20 dB. The half beam spread at this particular range(X -22 in Figure 5.19 a) is found by subtracting the 22 mmdrilled depth of the hole from the distance between the edgeof the block and the beam axis (X in Figure 5.19 b). The

110

Page 109: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Probe guide strio

Figure 5.19 a.

,mark probe

lFigure 5.19 b Figure 5.19 c .

Surfacedistances

y -* — . —— i — , — , — H--l—— H ——— 1 —— t— H —— -^ —— 1-

indexFigure 5.20

probe is "then placed on the opposite side of the hole and thesequence is repeated to determine the other half beam spreadwhich is equal to < X - 22) mm in Figure 5.19 c . Theprocedure is repeated for other holes and the beam spreadagainst the range is plotted as shown in Figure 5.20 .

5.2.4 ASME Reference Block

This block is made from the same material as that of thespecimen and contains a side drilled hole whose diameterdepends on the thickness of the specimen. A typical ASMEreference block used for the inspection of welds is shown inFigure 5.21.The block is used to construct a distance - amplitudecorrection (DAC) curve on the CRT screen by noting thechanges in echo amplitude from the hole with change inscanning distance (multiple skip).

5.2.5 Area - Amplitude Blocks

Area - amplitude blocks providedifferent sises at the same depth,the same 2" diameter round stock,

artificial flaws ofEight blocks made fromeach 3 3/4 " in height

111

Page 110: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

constitute a set of area-amplitude blocks. The blockmaterial must have the same acoustic properties as the testpiece material. Each block has a 3/4 " deep flat bottomhole drilled in the center of the bottom surface (Figure5.22 a). The hole diameters vary from 1/64" to 8/64". Theblocks are numbered to correspond with the diameter of theholes, that is block Mo. 1 has a 1/64" diameter hole, and soon up to No. 8, which has an 8/64" diameter hole. Similararea-amplitude blocks made from 1 i§_ " square stock are

16sometimes known as Alcoa series-A blocks.

The amplitude of the echo from a flat bottom hole in the farfield of a normal beam probe is proportional to the area ofthe bottom of the hole. Therefore these blocks can be usedto check linearity of a pulse echo inspection system and torelate echo amplitude to the area { or, in other words, thesize of a flaw ). Because a flat bottom hole is an idealreflector and most natural flaws are less than ideal inreflective properties, an area-amplitude block defines alower limit for the size of a flaw that yields a givenheight of indication on the CRT screen. For instance ifthe height of indication from a flaw in a test piece is sixscale units high and this is also the height of theindication from a 5/64" diameter flat bottom hole at thesame depth as the flaw, it is not possible to determineaccurately how much larger than the reference hole the flawactually is.

r— 1-1/3 In. (SaaNoia 2)

~^r-r! f! 1

„ ——————————————— L ———————————————— -

4 In

126

Location of Holt FromContact Sur foc» DtiaiminadFrom lha Tabla Balow

Bailc Calibration HolaOf DUmaiar "d" S'd«i Par allai

Wllhln +. 0 016 In./M

125Figure 5.21

112

Page 111: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

5.2.6 Distanoe-amplitude Blocks

Distance-amplitude blocks provide artificial flaws of agiven size at various depths. From ultrasonic wave theoryit is known that the decrease in echo amplitude from a flatbottom hole using a circular probe is inversely proportionalto the square of the distance to the hole bottom. Distance-amplitude blocks (also known as Alcoa series-B or Hittblocks) can be used to check actual variations of amplitudewith distance for normal beam inspection in a givenmaterial. They also serve as a reference for setting orstandardizing the sensitivity of the inspection system sothat readable indications will be displayed on the CRTscreen for flaws of a given size and larger, but the screenwill not be flooded with indications of smallerdiscontinuities that are of no interest. On instruments soequipped, these blocks are used for distance amplitudecorrection so that a flaw of a given size will produce anindication on the CRT screen that is of a predeterminedheight regardless of distance from the entry surface.

There are 19 blocks in an Alcoa series-B set. All are 2"diameter blocks of the same material as that beinginspected, and all have a 3/4 " deep flat bottom holedrilled in the centre of the bottom surface (Figure 5.22).The hole diameter is the same in all the blocks of a set.Sets can be made with hole diameters of 3/64" , 5/64"and 8/64" . The blocks vary in length to provide metaldistances of 1/16" , 1/8" through 1" in 1/8"increments and 1 1/4 " through 5 3/4" in 1/2"increments.

Each Alcoa series-B block is identified by a code numberconsisting of a digit, a dash and four more digits. Thefirst digit is the diameter of the hole in one sixty-fourthsof an inch. The four other digits are the metal distancefrom the top surface to the hole bottom in one hundredsof an inch. For instance, a Block marked 3-0075 has a3/64 " diameter hole and a 3/4" metal distance.

5.2.7 Blocks

ASTM blocks can be combined in to various sets of areaamplitude and distance-amplitude blocks. The ASTM basicset consists of ten 2" diameter blocks, each with a 3/4"deep flat bottom hole drilled in the center of the bottomsurface. One block has a 3/64" diameter hole at a 3"metal distance.

Seven blocks have 5/64" diameter holes at metal distancesof 1/8" , 1/4" , 1/2" , 3/4" , 1 1/2" , 3" and6". The remaining blocks have 8/64" diameter holes at 3"and 6" metal distances. The three blocks with a 3" metaldistance and hole diameter of 3/64" , 5/64" and 8/64"form an area-amplitude set, and the set with the 5/64"

113

Page 112: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

3/4

2 diameter -2 diametersur luce

Flat-bottom hole1/64 to 8/64 diameter(see text)

(a)

Metuldistance(see text)

Flat-bottom hole3/64,5/64 ore/64diameter

(b)Figure 5.22Standard reference blocks for use in normal beam ultrasonicinspection :(a) area-amplitude block, and(b) distance-amplitude block.

diameter holes provides a distance-amplitude set. Inadd it.ton to the basic sat, ASTM lists five more area-amplitude standard reference blocks and 80 more distance-amplitude blocks.Each ASTM block is identified by a code number, using thesame system as that used for the Alcoa series-B set.

5.3 Checking Equipment Characteristics

(i) Linearity of time base

The I.I.W. , DIN 54122 or any block of similar materialand finish may be used to measure time base linearity .The choice of thickness is determined by the requirementsthat a longitudinal wave probe placed on the block producesseveral back wall echoes (usually four or five) within thechosen range. For checking the linearity two of the backwall echoes (say, the first and fourth in a five echodisplay) should be set to coincide with appropriate scaledivisions. The position of each of the remaining echoes isthen carefully noted and plotted in the way shown in Figure5.23 . The maximum tolerance is 1 % for the range chosen.Non linearity of the time base is seldom a real problem withmodern flaw detectors and the most common cause of apparent

114

Page 113: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

non linearity is the poor calibration of time base zerothe operator.

by

An important precaution to take during the assessment oftime base linearity is that time base readings are taken aseach signal is brought to a common amplitude. This isusually about 1/2 screen height.

co=5 '0oQ_

•0 8

2

Actual Ideal

Figure > . 2 3

predicted Echo position-«—i—i—i—i—t-

8 10

(ii) Linearity Of Amplifier

To know whether the amplifier of the flaw detector amplifiesa small signal in the same ratio as it amplifies a largesignal i.e. whether the amplifier is linear or not, theprocedure used is as follow : the time base of the flawdetector is calibrated for a range of 250 mm and ten backwall echoes from 25 mm thick side of the block are obtained.The amplitude of the nth echo (usually the one which is justoutside the near field length) is set to a particularamplitude (normally 4/5 screen height). The amplitudes ofthe subsequent echoes ( n -t- l , n +2, n+3 echoes etc.)are noted. The amplitude of the nth echo is then reduced tohalf its original value and the reduction in amplitudes ofthe subsequent echoes are noted. If they are reduced tohalf their original values, then the amplifier is linear,otherwise it is not.

Deviation from linearity for any particular echo can beexpressed as a percentage relative deviation from thefollowing equation :

(Original - (twice theamplitude reducedof echo amplitude)

Deviation = ——————————————————————X 100(Original amplitude ofthe echo )

(5.1)

The deviation from linearity as a function of amplitude canalso be plotted graphically as shown in Figure 5.24 . Sucha curve is only valid for particular settings of frequency,pulse energy, timebase range, and for the gain settinginvolved in the check.

115

Page 114: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Timebase Position

Figure 5.24Example

An alternative simpler method for the checking of amplifierlinearity is to calibrate the time base for the desiredrange and an echo about midway along the time base isobtained. The echo amplitude is set to a desired height andthe attenuator reading is noted.

The attenuator setting is then reduced by 6 dB four orfive time in succession and the decrease in echo amplitudeis noted every time. If it decreases to half the value ofthe previous setting then the amplifier is linear.

(iii) Resolution of the Flaw Detector

The I.I.W. VI block is used to determine the resolution of aflaw detector using a normal beam probe. This block hasthree target reflectors at ranges of 85 mm, 91 mm and 100mm. The probe is placed on the block as shown in Figure5.25 a and echoes from the three reflectors are obtained.The separation of the echoes from each other indicates thedegree of resolution of the flaw detector for thatparticular probe. Figure 5.25 b shows the degree ofresolution for flaw detectors using two different normalbeam probes.

(a)

(b)

Figure 5.25probes

Estimating the resolving power of normal

116

Page 115: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Another block (described in B.S. 3923 : Part 3 : 1972 )usedfor the determination of resolution of flaw detectors usingeither normal beam or angle beam probes is shown in Figure5.26 . With this block the resolution is determined by theminimum distance apart that flaws can be indicated clearlyand separately. In use the probe is placed on the centreline of the block over the change in radius from one step tothe next. Its position is adjusted so that echoes from thetwo radii are of the same height and approximately 1/2 fullscreen height. The steps are said to be resolved when tb^irechoes are clearly separated at half maximum echo height orless.

Figure 5.26 Test block for measuring probe resolution.

(iv) Assessment of Dead Zone

One method of determining the dead zone is to use a specialblock of the kind shown in Figure 5.27. The depth of thedead zone is taken as that „at which the echo from the holecan be clearly distinguished from the transmission pulse ofthe probe at the working sensitivity.

For normal probes another method is to determine the pulselength, calibrate the time base for a known thickness of thematerial under test (eg. 50 mm steel), adjust the gaincontrol to the proposed working sensitivity and place theprobe on a sheet of material of thickness between 0.5 and 1pulse length to produce a series of multiple echoes. If thedead zone is longer than the displayed transmission pulse adisplay similar to that shown in Figure 5.28 will resultand the dead zone length can be measured on the screen.

117

Page 116: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Figure 5.27

1.5 mm ho esdril led 20 mmdeep

MEASUREMENT OF DEAD ZONE LENGTH USINGNORMAL PROBES

Figure 5.28.

0«»a zon«

DISPLAYS FOR SHEAR WAVE ANGLE PROBE SHOWINGTRANSMISSION POINT AND DEAD ZONE

Figure 5.29 .

118

Page 117: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

For angle probes calibrate the time base for a convenientrange and correct the transmission point. Adjust the gaincontrol to the working sensitivity and note the presence ofany noise on the display arising from the probe crystalbacking and/or probe shoe. Measure the dead zone, if any.The dead zone is that portion of the display past thetransmission point where noise interfers withinterpretation. Figure 5.29 .

(V) Maximum Penetrative Power

This is the term used in British Standard BS 4331 todescribe a check which is used to compare the energy out-putfor a particular set and probe with its past performance orwith similar equipments. The check is carried out asfollows : A longitudinal wave probe is placed on thePlastic insert of the I.I.W. block (Figure 5.30) and tht3gain of the instrument is set to its maximum. The number ofmultiple echoes and the amplitude of the last echo are notedand are used to express the maximum penetrative power of theset and the probe.

Probe position

-7-7—T1

10

Figure 5.30 .

119

Page 118: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

5.4 METHODS OF SETTING SENSITIVITY

An ultrasonic flaw detector must be set at a minimum levelof sensitivity since this is the only means whereby echoesof otherwise uncertain significance can be translated intomeaningful information. In principal the choice of asensitivity level is based on the reflectivity of thesmallest flaw that is to be found at the maximum test range.

Two sensitivities are used during an inspection theevaluation sensitivity and the scanning sensitivity.

Evaluation sensitivity (or reference sensitivity)

These are the instrument settings which produce areproducible signal amplitude from a reference artificialreflector with which the instrument settings relating to adiscontinuity echo can be compared.

The evaluation sensitivity can also be called the PrimaryReference Echo (PRE) level .

Scanning Sensitivity

This sensitivity is used during the preliminary scanning ofa test piece to locate all discontinuity echoes which haveto be assessed at the evaluation sensitivity. It is set byincreasing the amplification of the instrument from theevaluation sensitivity instrument settings by a specifiedamount eg. 6dB.The commonly used methods of setting- evaluation sensitivityare :

i. The Distance Amplitude Correction (DAC) method whichis used for instance in the ASME code in which echoheights from similar size artificial reflectors in areference block are plotted on the CRT screen tocompensate for attenuation of the signals withincreasing distance from the probe.

ii. The echo height from a flaw is compared to a disctype reflector in the form of a flat bottomed hole.This method was developed by Krautkrarner and iscalled the DGS method (D - distance, G - gain, S -size )

iii. The grain response on the time base at the maximumtesting range.

iv. The echo height from a 1.5 mm drilled hole in areference block (such as the I.O.W beam profileblock).

120

Page 119: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

5.4.1 Distance Amplitude Correction Curves

I)AC curves are produced using a reference block with a sidedrilled hole as a reference in the case of angle beam probesand flat bottomed holes in a series of blocks as referencesfor normal probes. The ASME code uses this method to setPRE level sensitivity.

The primary reference is set for an angle probe by adjustingthe signal from the drilled reference target, scanned from abeam path length just into the far field or as the ASMEstandard specifies it not less than 3/8 V - path (i.e. 3/8skip distance) or 2 in. which ever is less, to anamplitude of 75 % of full screen height and marking theposition of the echo peak on the CRT screen. The probeposition is shown as position 1 in Figure 5.31 and thescreen presentation is shown as Figure 5.32 The probeis then moved to other locations (positions 2, 3 and 4 inFigure 5.31 ) and the signal amplitude marked on the CRT( Figure 5.32 ) for each position. A curve is drawn joiningthese points. This is the Distance' Amplitude CorrectionCurve. This line represents the reference level at variousdepths in the specimen. Lines may also be drawn at 50 % or20 % of this reference level.

Transfer loss is then calculated between the reference blockand the work piece and is added to the DAC gain. Forinitial scanning the sensitivity is then set at twice (i.e +6dB) the reference level plus transfer loss. Theevaluation of flaws for acceptance or rejection is howevercarried out with the gain control set at the PRE level plusthe transfer loss.

1*t

N

Figure 5.31

, .,-..• 50*\\-\-\--\?«"-'Figure 5.32

121

Page 120: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

The transfer loss is determined by noting the differencebetween the response received from the reference reflectorin the basic calibration block and the same reflectordrilled in the test specimen.

For normal beam probes the distance amplitude correctioncurve need not be constructed when the thickness ofmaterial is less than 2 inches (50 mm). This correction isonly needed for thicknesses greater than 2 inches. Toconstruct the DAC curve, the maximized echo height from thedrilled hole at 1/4 T distance is set to 50 % uf fullscreen height and is taken as the PRE level. Without

the gain uut for tho PRE, tho i>robu is» positionedfrom the drilled hole at 3/4 T

distance { Figure 5.33 a ). The heights of the PRE andthe maximized echo at 3/4 distance are marked on the CRTscreen. The required DAC is obtained by joining these twopoints with a straight line and extending the line to coverthe required testing range. ( Figure 5.33 b).

Primary reference responseset at 50*/« of full screen

In. Min.

Figure 5. 33 a . Figure 5.33 b

The scanning sensitivity level for normal beam probes, ifpossible, is then set at twice the PRE level i.e. the gaincontrol of the flaw detector is set at PRE level gain valueplus 6 dB. The evaluation of flaws is, however, carriedout at the PRE level gain setting.

5.4.2 DGS {Distance-Gain-Size) Diagram Method

This method makes use of the so called DGS diagram,developed by Krautkrarner in 1958 by comparing the echoesfrom small reflectors, namely different diameter flatbottomed holes located at various distances from the probe,with the echo of a large reflector, a back wall reflector,also at different distances from the probe. The differencein the amplitude of echoes of the flat bottomed holes andthe back wall reflector is determined in decibels i.e. dB.The universal DGS diagram for normal beam probes, which canbe used for any normal beam probe irrespective of the sizeand frequency of the probe, is shown in Figure 5.34

122

Page 121: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

V ' # 03 'eft oso£ti7oß03\o i ' à ' 4 S è 1 öS a ig so

Figure 5.34 Universal DGS diagram.

(dB)

(mm)

b _!_n-cJL_ u 7J »? ra—4———ii * w « w » n » n o t « w o

Figure 5.35. DGS diagram for an angle bearn probe

123

Page 122: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

This diagram relates the distance D from the probe (i.ealong the beam) in near field units ,thus compensating forprobes of different size and frequency ,to the gain G in dBfor a flat bottomed hole ( f.b.h.) compared to a particularback wall reflector and the size S of the flat bottom holeas a proportion of the probe crystal diameter.

Since in the case of angle beam probes some of the nearfield length is contained within the perspex path length andthis varies for different designs and sizes of probe,individual DGS diagrams are drawn for each design size andfrequency of angle beam probe. For this reason the scaleused in the angle beam probe DGS diagrams is simplified :the D-scale is calibrated in beam path lengths,the G-scalein decibels as before; and the S-scale representing flatbottom hole or disc shaped reflector diameters in mm.Figure 5.35 shows a typical DGS diagram for a particularangle beam probe.

5.4.2.1 Setting Sensitivity For A Normal Beam Probe

The method of setting sensitivity using the DGS diagramgives the sensitivity in terms of the smallest detectabledisc shape reflector which has to be detected at the maximumtesting range. The procedure is as follow :

i. Determine the near field length N of the probe.ii. Determine the maximum testing range in terms of near

field length units.iii. Specify the diameter of the smallest disc shaped

reflector to be detected at the maximum testingrange.

iv. Divide the diameter of disc shaped reflectorspecified in (iii) by the probe crystal diameter.This will determine the S line in the DGS diagramto be used.

v. Determine the point of intersection between the Sline determined in (iv) and a line drawnperpendicular to the D-scale at the maximum testingrange.

vi. Determine the dB value from the G scale at thepoint of intersection determined in (v).

vu,

Vlll.

Determine the lowest point on themaximum testing range.

S-line up to the

If such a point is different from the point ofintersection determined in (v), then determine thedB value corresponding to this point. Draw a line atthis dB value parallel to the D-scale and extend itup to the maximum testing range. The line is called,the record level.

124

Page 123: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

ix. Extend the line drawn perpendicular to the D scale atthe maximum testing range in (v) to intersect theback wall echo line and note the value of G at thepoint of intersection.

x. Subtract the value of G obtained in (ix) from thatobtained in (vi).

xi. Obtain a back wall echo from the test specimen andset it at an appropriate amplitude, say 2/5 fullscreen height.

xii. Increase the gain by the difference in dB obtained in(x).

The test sensitivity is now set so that any flaw with anequivalent flat bottomed hole the same as that used to setthe sensitivity will give an echo of amplitude at least 2/5full screen height. Echoes lower than 2/5 FSH are notreportable. However echoes larger than 2/5 FSH may or maynot be reportable based on the depth of the flaw and theattenuation of the material.

Attenuation Curve

Since when the sensitivity was set the back wall is used asa reference, the ultrasonic pulse has been attenuated by theplate thickness (t)x2x { where <X. is the attenuationfactor in dB/mm. ) in travelling out and back through thematerial. However at the surface of the specimen there isno attenuation so that the test sensitivity is too high by2to( dB and at raid thickness it is too high by 2tp<. dB.

2An attenuation curve can be drawn on the DGS diagram.If then a flaw echo is obtained at a particular depth whichis above 2/5 FSH , the amplitude can be corrected byreducing the signal height by the difference in dB betweenthe appropriate S line and the attenuation curve at thedefect depth. If the defect is still above 2/5 FSH it isreportable.

Example

Plate thickness steelProbe frequencyProbe diameterNear field distanceAttenuationSmallest equivalent discRecording level

50 mm5 MHZ10 mm normal21 mm0.04 dB/mrn3 mm diam.2/5 full screen height

(FSH)

i. Near field length N = D 2 610 x 5 x 10 = 21mm—————————— 64 x 5.96 x 10

125

Page 124: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

ii. Maximum testing range - 50 = 2.5 approx21

iii. Smallest equivalent disc = 3 mmiv. S line =3 = 0 . 3

10v. Point of intersection 0.3 line and 2.5 Near field

distance is 19 dB.vi. Lowest point on 0.3 line up to 2.5 near field

distance is 22 dB.

vu,

vin.

3X.

XI.

Perpendicular line at 2.5 near fieldintersects back wall line at 4dB.

distance

The difference in dB between the values determined in(vi) and (vii) is 18 dB.The reporting level on the CRT screen is 2/5 offull screen height.

the

Place the probe on the specimen to be inspected andadjust the height of the first back wall echo to 2/5full screen height by using the gain control of theflaw detector.Add the difference in dB determined in (viii) to thesetting of the gain control determined in (x), thussetting the sensitivity of the -flaw detector to givethe height of the echo from an equivalent 3rnmdiameter disc flaw at maximum testing range at 2/5 thof full screen height.

The above procedure has not yet taken into account thelosses due to attenuation of the beam in the specimen.Since 0. 04 dB/mm is the attenuation of the ultrasonic beamin the specimen, then the sensitivity determined by theabove procedure is not the same at the top surface and theback wall of the specimen.

The sensitivity at the top surface is high by an amount B =0.04 x 50 x 2dB = 4 dB as compared to the sensitivity atthe back wall of the specimen. Similarly the sensitivity athalf way through the specimen is high by an amount C - 0.04x 25 x 2 dB =2 dB.

Since the record level is set according to the sensitivityat the back wall of the specimen, a flaw, occuring at adistance shorter than the maximum testing range (i.e. theback wall ) and having an echo height greater than therecord level (i.e. 2/5 th screen height), need not bereportable because of the greater sensitivity at shorterdistances due to less attenuation.

126

Page 125: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

The attenuation curve is drawn as follows :xii. Calculate 50 mm and 25 mm in near field lengths,

2.5 and 1.25 respectively.xiii. The three points are marked on the DGS diagram of

Figure 5.34.xiv. The attenuation curve is drawn on the DGS diagram of

Figure 5.34 as shown.xv. If a flaw is detected at 42 mm whose echo exceeds 2/5

FSH (42 = 2 NFD). The difference in dB between theatténuation curve and the S = 0.3 line curve at 2near field distance = (22.5 - 16.5) - 6dB.

xvi. The echo height is reduced by 6 dB, if it stillexceeds the 2/5 full screen height then it is report-able, otherwise not.

5.4.2.2 Setting Of Sensitivity For Angle Beam Probe

With an angle probe, because there is no back wall echo tobe used as a standard reference, a separate reference echohas to be used. This reference echo can be obtained from areference block such as the reference echo from the 100 mmradius quadrant of IIW (VI) block. This use of a referenceblock calls for the following allowances to be made whilesetting the sensitivity for an angle probe :(a) Allowance for the transfer loss which is due to the

different surface conditions of the test specimen andreference block.

(b) Allowance for the different attenuation of theultrasonic beam in the test specimen and the referenceblock.

(c) Allowance for the difference, if any, between thedistance of the reference reflector and the maximumtesting range.

The procedure to arrive at the correct sensitivity or gainsetting is as follows :

i. Measure the attenuation of the material of the testspecimen and the reference block.ii. Measure the transfer loss between the reference block

and the test specimen.iii. Specify the smallest disc shape reflector to be

detected at the maximum testing range.iv. Read the difference in dB between the reference echo

from the reference block and the minimum flaw size atthe worst position on the DGS diagram of the probeto be used.

127

Page 126: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

v. Calculate the attenuation difference between the testrange up to the reference reflector in the referenceblock and up to the maximum testing range in the testspecimen.

vi. Set the height of the reference echo to 2/5th fullscreen height by adjusting the gain control of theflaw detector. Note the reading of the gain control.Let it be A dB.

vii. Now the required sensitivity is obtained when thegain determined in (iv) + transfer loss asdetermined in (ii) + Attenuation difference asdetermined in (v).

The sensitivity is thus set to give the echo height of thesmallest disc shape reflector at maximum testing range at2/5 th full screen height.

Example :Probe frequency = 4 MHsCrystal dimensions = 8x9 mm rectangular crystal.Sensitivity required - to detect 3 mm diameter disc

reflector at maximum testingrange -200 mm.

Reference reflector = 100 mm quadrant of IIW VI block.

i. Attenuation of IIW block and the test specimen isassumed to be 0.04 dB/mm and 0.08 dB/mmrespectively.

ii. The transfer loss between the IIW reference blockand test specimen is assumed to be equal to 6 dB.

iii. The dB difference read from the DGS diagram of Figure5.35 between the back wall S-curve/100mm D-scaleintersection and the 3mm S-curve/200mm intersectionis 28 dB.

iv. The difference in attenuation between the 100 mmrange of reference IIW block (0.04 x 100 = 4 dB) andthe 200 mm testing range in the test specimen {0.08 x200 = 16 dB) is 16-4 = 12 dB.

v. Set the height of the reference echo to 2/5th screenheight and note the reading of the gain control ofthe flaw detector. Let it be AdB.

vi. Now the required sensitivity or gain is set byadjusting the gain control of the flaw detector to A+ 2 8 + 6 (transfer loss) + 12 (Attenuationdifference) = A + 46 dB. At this sensitivity a 3mrn diameter disc reflector will give at least an echoheight of 2/5 th full screen.

128

Page 127: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

To determine whether a particular flaw, occuring within thetesting range and having an echo height which exceeds the2/5 th screen height at the sensitivity determind in (vi)above , is reportable or not, the attenuation curve has tobe drawn on the DGS diagram. The attenuation curve is drawnusing the same procedure as outlined in section 5.3.2.1.In this example the sensitivity is high by 16 dB at the topsurface and decreasing to sero at 200 mm at the rate of 0.08dB/mm.

5.4.3 Grain Response On Time Base At Maximum Testing Range

In this method the gain controls of the flaw detector are soadjusted that "grass" (i.e. echoes caused by themetallurgical structure of the test specimen) is producedover the full testing range. For weld joints, for example,the target for setting the sensitivity using this method maybe the under surface of the parent material (Figure 5.36 a).A reduction or increase in the sensitivity may now berequired during the scanning to facilitate the explorationof defects. In any case, the change in gain is to be notedin decibels.

With the calibrated gain control finally set and its readingrecorded (reading A), the probe is then transfered to anagreed reference block and positioned for maximum responsefrom the target hole or a reference surface as shown inFigure 5.36 b and c. This reference or calibration blockecho constitutes the primary reference echo (PRE). Itsheight will almost certainly not coincide with anyconvenient graticule division. Therefore, the gain controlis adjusted to bring it to ,say, 75 % of the full screenheight or to some other mark and a record is made of thedifference in gain control readings. Let the new readingafter adjusting the reference echo height to 75 % fullscreen height be B dB.

For normal beam probes, the PRE may similarly be obtainedfrom the parallel section of the reference or calibrationblock.

If the examination is interupted or new equipment broughtin, the sensitivity level can be reinstated by proceeding inthe reverse sequence :(a) Position the probe for maximum response from the

reference target in the reference block.(b) Set the reference echo to the predetermined graticule

height, say, 75 % full screen height.(c) Add or subtract the recorded difference between the

readings A and B so as to restore the reference echoto its original height.

129

Page 128: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

PARENTMETAL

GAIN CONTROLAT READING AdB

Figure 5.36 a

ALREFERENCE BLOCK, SELECTED TARGET

Figure 5.36 b

11W CALIBRATION BLOCK

Figure 5.36 c

5.5 MEASUREMENT OF ATTENUATION

5.5.1 Longitudinal Wave Attenuation

The procedure for measurement of attenuation forlongitudinal waves is based on the fact that the amplitudeof reflection from an infinite reflector (i.e. back wall ofthe specimen ) is inversely proportional to distance if theback wall is situated at a distance equal to or greater than3 near field lengths from the probe. The procedure formeasuring the attenuation of longitudinal waves in aspecimen is as follows :

i. Determine the near field length N of the probe2

(N = D ;4A

D = diameter of probe crystal and is the wavelength of the longitudinal waves).

ii. Find a distance of three near fields.

130

Page 129: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

iii. Place the probe on the specimen and obtain a numberof back wall echoes on a calibrated CRT screen.

iv. Choose two consecutive back wall echoes which liebeyond the 3 near field lengths.

v. Adjust the gain control of the flaw detector to bringthe height of the first back wall echo, selected in<iv), to a predetermined mark on the CRT screen, say,2/5 th full screen height and note the reading ofgain control. Let it be A dB.

vi. Now bring the height of the second selected back wallecho to 2/5 th screen height and note thu reading ofthe gain control. Let it be B dB.

vii. Find the difference C = { B - A ) dB,viii. Subtract 6 dB from the difference found in (vii)

i.e. ( C - 6 ) dB.ix. Divide ( C - 6 ) dB by twice the thickness of the

specimen i.e. ( C - 6 ) dB / 2T mm (where T is thethickness of the specimen ). This gives the requiredattenuation per rnm of path travelled in the specimenby the longitudinal waves.

5.5.2 Transverse Wave Attenuation

It is usual to express transverse wave attenuation in termsof beam path length indicated on the time base, ignoringthe fact that the sound travels out and back. The procedurefor the measurment of tranverse wave attenuation in aspecimen is as follows :

i. Select two identical angle beam probes - one to beused as a transmitter and the other as a receiver ofultrasonic waves.

ii. Calculate the skip - distance and half-skip-beam-path-length.

iii. Calibrate the time base for sufficient range for atleast one full-skip-beam-path-length.

iv. Use a guide to align the transmitter and the receiverprobes.

v. Position the probes at one-skip-distance apart(Positions T and Rl in Figure 5.37.

vi. Adjust the gain-control to bring the received echo tohalf screen height. Note the gain-control reading.Let it be AI dB.

vii. Move the receiver to two skip distances (Position»R2).

131

Page 130: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

\T

hin iijn F2 Ii nil, i

Figure 5.37

viii. Bring the height of the received echo to half screenheight and note the gain-control reading. Let it beA2 dB.

ix. Calculate the difference (A2 - AI) dB.x, Calculate the attenuation in dB/mrn from

Attenuation (A2 - AI) dB/mmHalf-skip-beam-path-1ength

5.6 DETERMINATION OF TRANSFER LOSS FOR ANGLE BEAM PROBES

The procedure for the determination of transfer loss betweenthe reference block and the test specimen for angle beamprobes is as follows :

i. Select two identical probes having the samefrequency, dimensions and refraction angle as theprobe to be used in the testing of the specimen.

ii. Calculate the full-skip-distance and 1/2 skip-beam-path-length for the reference block and test specimenfor the probe chosen.

iii. Using a guide to align the transmitter and receiverprobe, set the probes one skip-distance apart onthe reference block as shown in Figure 5.38 a.

iv. Adjust the received echo to half full screen heightby using the gain-control. Note the gain-controlreading. Let it be AI dB.

v. Using the guide to align the probes, set the probesat one skip distance apart on the specimen as shownin Figure 5.38 b.

vi. Adjust the height of the received echo by using thegain-control to half full screen height. Note thereading of the gain-control. Let it be A2 dB.

viii. Calculate the gain difference A3 = (Al - A2) dB.

132

Page 131: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

ix. On the DGS diagram of the probe note the gaindifference between the intersections of the referenceblock half-skip distance and the back wall S-curveand the intersection of the specimen half-skip-distance and the back wall S-curve. Let it be A4 dB.

x. Calculate the difference in attenuation between thehalf-skip-distance in the refrence block, and thehalf-skip-distance in the specimen. Let thisdifference be A 5 dB.

xi. Calculate the transfer loss in dB from :

Transfer loss = A3 - (A4 + A5) dB.

uü __rar25mm

VT BLOCK

Figure 5.38 a

SPECIMEN

Figure 5.38 b.

5.7 COUPLANTS

In ultrasonic testing a couplant in the form of a liquid orpaste is use to eliminate air between the probe and thespecimen surface. If there is air between the probe and thespecimen no transmission of ultrasonic waves in to thespecimen will take place because of the very low acousticimpedance of air as compared to the acoustic impedances ofthe specimen and the probe.

Commonly used couplants in ultrasonic testing are glycerin,water, oils, petroleum greases, silicone grease, wall paperpaste and various commercial paste like substances.For the selection of a suitable couplant for a particularultrasonic inspection task the following points should betaken into consideration :

133

Page 132: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

i. Surface finish of the test specimen,ii. Temperature of the test specimen.iii.Possiblity of chemical reactions between the test

specimen and the couplant.iv. Cleaning requirement - some couplants are difficult to

remove.

5.8 INFLUENCE OF THE TEST SPECIMEN ON THE ULTRASONIC BEAM

5.8.1 Surface Roughness

The surface roughness of the test specimen can affect theultrasonic inspection in the following ways :i. Loss of sensitivity because of scattering (Figure 5.39)

due to refraction at the top surface and due toreflection at the rear surface (i.e. back wall). Thisis a maximum when the roughness of the surface is equalto or greater than the wavelength of the ultrasonic wavesused for inspection.

ii. Loss of near surface resolution of the inspectionsystem by a lengthening in the transmission pulse.

This lengthening is caused by the reflection of the sidelobe energy back in to the probe by the roughness of thesurface. The side lobe energy is not normally reflectedback in to the probe.

Remedial measures to avoid or minimise this loss ofsensitivity and resolution are any of the following :i. By smoothing the surface.ii. By increasing the gain of the amplifier.iii.By using a probe with a lower frequency.iv. By using a probe with high ultrasonic output.v. By improving the coupling of the probe to the test

specimen. This can be achieved by attaching aprotective plastic membrane to the front surface of theprobe with some drops of couplant between the probe andthe membrane. The membrane fills out the uneveness ofthe surface and thus facilitates the transmission ofultrasonic waves in to the test specimen. In additionthe membrane also protects the probe face frommechanical damage. A part of the ultrasonic energy isobviously absorbed by the material of the membrane, butthe gain caused by the improved coupling in most casesis higher than the losses in the material.

134

Page 133: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Scatter byrefraction

Scatter byreflection

Scatter byreflection

Couplant.try surface

Inside(steel)

BackwallAir

Occurrence of acousticscatter (schematic)Figure 5.39

5.8.2 Specimen With Curved Surface

Two factors contribute to the reduction in sensitivity whena test specimen with a curved surface is ultrasonicallytested. One is the widening or divergence of thetransmitted beam because of refraction and the other is thereduction in the contact area between the probe and the testspecimen. Both of these effects are shown in Figure 5.40.

Workpiece

Probe

t

Coulant

cjw

Figure 5.40 Additional sound beam divergence caused byrefraction between couplant and workpiecesurface.

135

Page 134: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

The contact, area can be increased, and thus the contributionof this factor in reducing sensitivity can be minimised, bythe use of an adapter block or shoe. These blocks are madeto fit the surface curvature of the test specimen.

The skip-distances and beam-path-lengths, are increased byfactors fp and fs respectively for curved surfacespecimens. The factors fp and fs , which depend on theprobe angle 9 and the ratio of wall thickness t tothe out-side diameter D (i.e. t/D), can be obtained fromFigures 5.41 a & b respectively.

COQ0*Ü00

Ioif1.00001 0.0020003 0.0050-01 0.02 0.03 0-05 0-1

Figure 5.41a

0.3

0.001 0.002 0.003 0.005 0.01 0-02 0-03 0.05 0.1 0.2 0-3

Figure 5.41b Beam-path-multiplying factor for pipes andcurved surfaces.

136

Page 135: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

5.8.3 Coated Surfaces

Firmly attached coatings (e.g. coats of paint, firmlyattached mill scale or rust layers) will cause little or nodisturbing effects. But for loose coatings, cleaning with awire brush, file, scraper or grinder is required.

Moist or greasy surfaces are generally advantageousof their improved coupling.

because

5.8.4 Mode Conversion Within The Test Specimen

When the shape or contour of the test specimen is such thatthe ultrasonic beam or a portion of it as in the case ofbeam spread, is not reflected directly back to the probe,mode conversion occurs at the boundary points contacted bythe beam. If a direct reflection also occurs mode convertedindications will appear after the direct reflectedindication because of the longer path travelled by the modeconverted longitudinal wave and slower velocity of the modeconverted transverse wave. Figure 5.42 shows ultrasonicreflections within a long solid test specimen.

TRANS-DUCER

TESTSPECIMEN

Figure 5.42 Mode Conversion Caused by Beam Spread.

5.8.5 Orientation and depth of flaw

The orientation and depth of the flaw may cause confusingindications or may result in the loss of the flaw echo. Inthe case of an unfavourable orientation,e.g. the flaw maylie with its long axis parallel to the ultrasonic beam, amuch smaller indication is obtained than one would expectin proportion to the size of the flaw. If the flaw isangled with respect to the ultrasonic beam, the reflectedbeam is directed away from the probe. A sudden loss of backwall echo, while scanning, indicates the presence of such aflaw. If the decrease in amplitude of back wall echo isproportional to the flaw echo, the flaw is flat and parallelto the test surface. If the flaw echo is small, compared tothe loss in back wall echo, the flaw is probably turned atan angle to the test surface.

137

Page 136: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

LEADING EDGE OF PULSE (EXTENT OF DEAD ZONE)

TRANS-DUCER

TRAILING EDGE OF PULSE

TESTSPECIMEN

FAR ZONE

Figure 5.43 Dead Zone, Near Zone and Far Zone.

Indications are also affected by the depth of the flaw.Figure 5.43 shows the three principal zones of theultrasonic beam : the dead zone, the near zone and the farzone. In contact testing the depth of the dead zone isdetermined by the length of the transmission pulse forsingle crystal probes. No indication from a flaw occuringin the dead zone can be obtained. The indications fromflaws that occur in the near field vary considerably inamplitude as a function of the depth and positon of the flawbecause of the near field affects. In the near field, theultrasonic beam intensity is irregular and thus varyingindications may be obtained from the same flaw as the probeis moved across it. Beyond the near field is the far fieldin which the intensity of the beam decreases exponentiallyas the distance increases.

5.9 Selection of Ultrasonic Probe

For pulse echo contact type ultrasonic testing the selectionof a probe is made on the basis of the following factors. Inorder of preference the factors are :i. Choice of ultrasonic beam direction,ii. Choice of probe frequency,iii. Choice of probe size.

5.9.1 Choice of Ultrasonic Beam Direction

The first thing to decide in the selection of a probe iswhether a normal beam probe or an angle beam probe shouldbe used and if an angle beam probe is to be used which angleshould be selected. The choice should be such that theexpected flaw offers maximum reflectivity i.e. the directionof the beam should be such that the beam strikes the flawsurface in a perpendicular direction. Other considerationsthat should also be taken in to account are to select suchan angle : i) that will avoid indications caused by theshape and geometry of the test specimen and ii) that willgive, if possible, a back wall or other reference echo whichcan be used for indirect flaw detection (e.g. the

138

Page 137: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Edge and fillet indicationswrong

wrongedge indication

rightwrong

geometrical echoes

thread indicationswrm

Figure 5.44 Examples of right and wrong probe arrangements.

disappearence of the back wall echo at spongy or porousstructures in cast iron without any intermediate echoes) andalso as an indication of correct coupling. Some examples ofright and wrong probe arrangements are shown in Figure 5.44.

5.9.2 Choice Of Probe Frequency

The selection of frequency depends on three things :the size of the smallest flaw that is to be detected ; thecrystalline structure of the specimen ; and the degree ofabsorption the specimen offers to the ultrasonic beam. Thefirst consideration calls for the use of as high a frequencyas possible because, generally, the diameter of the smallestdetectable flaw is equal to or greater than a third of thewavelength of the ultrasonic waves used. Thus the greaterthe frequency of the ultrasonic waves, the shorter is thewavelength and hence the smaller is the diameter of thesmallest detectable flaw. In other words the sensitivity offlaw detection is better.

Another additional advantage -in the use of higherfrequencies is that high frequency probes emit shorterultrasonic pulses and thus exhibit better resolution.

Two considerations require the use of low frequency probesnamely if the grain size or the absorption of the specimenis large. Larger grains in the specimen cause scattering ofthe ultrasonic waves which results in a lower depth ofpenetration of the ultrasonic waves, lower flaw detectionsensitivity, and also the display of considerable "grass"or "structural noise" indications on the CRT screen.

139

Page 138: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

This display of grass on the CRT screen makes thedifferentiation of small flaw echoes from the grass,difficult if not impossible.

The absorption of ultrasonic wave's in a specimen increaseswith increase in frequency. Using a high frequency probeto test a high absorption specimen results in a lowerpenetration range and lower flaw, detection sensitivity.

As a result of the above discussion the following generalrule for the choice of test frequency may be adopted : Thefrequency should be as high as possible for high flawdetection sensitivity and resolution ; but the upper limitis set by the grain sise and absorption of the testspecimen.

Usually forged materials are examined with frequenciesbetween 2 and 6 MHz while cast specimens with coarserstructure need frequencies between 0.5 to 2 MHzCeramics (e.g. for electric insulators etc) also presentgood ultrasonic conductivity and can be tested in most caseswith frequencies between 2 to 4 MHz . Syntheticmaterials can be tested with frequencies from 1 to 4MHz according to their absorption and thickness, . Thetest frequencies for concrete and similar materials aremostly between 50 to 200 KHz and thus need special flawdetectors.

5.9.3 Choice Of Probe Size

The third thing to decide while selecting a probe, is theprobe size. For a given frequency the near field lengthdepends only on the diameter of the probe. And as thesizing of flaws, in most cases, is done on the basis ofcomparison with some reference reflectors, the near fieldshould be as short as possible. This is because theintensity variations along and across the ultrasonic beamaxis are irregular and sizing of flaws occuring in the nearfield can not be done by comparison of its reflectivity tothe reflectivity of a reference reflector. Thus for a givenfrequency the probe diameter should be as small as possibleto have a short near field.

140

Page 139: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

6. SPECIFIC APPLICATIONS6.1 Ultrasonic Inspection of Welds

6.1.1 Types of Weld Joints

In the welding process, two pieces of metal are joinedtogether. Molten "filler" metal from a welding rod blendswith molten parent metal at the prepared fusion faces andfuses the two pieces together as the weld cools andsolidifies. Most welds fall in to one of the followingcategories :

i. Butt weld,ii. T-weld .

iii. Noasle weld.A butt weld is achieved when two plates or pipes of usuallyequal thicknesses are joined together using any of the weldpreparations given in figure 6.1.

Figure 6.2a illustrates the weld preparation for a typicalsingle Vee weld and the terms used to describe various partsof the prepared weld area. The same weld after welding isshown in figure 6.2b, showing the original preparation andthe number of passes made to complete the weld,

5 .\O Square edge preparation

'U' preparation

Double 'V preparation

LBacking ring or strip

'EB'insert

Figure 6.1.Various weld configurations

141

Page 140: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

weld

wallthickness

root

weldvewgrep angle

roc t gap

parent I metaf

Figure 6.2a.

I Sweld cap reinforcement

Dashed l ine shows yj>...-l. *'V-i—weld bodya weld pass "f\ I '-/••'

weld root bead

Figure 6.2b.

A T-weld is achieved when two plates are joined at rightangles to each other, A T-weld may be fully penetrated(figure 6.3a) or only partially penetrated (figure 6.3b) bydesign.

(q) FULL PENETRATION WELD

Unfused portion7

(b) PARTIAL PENETRATION WELD

Figure 6.3.

142

Page 141: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

/ j r'S'ss,

* rs*srs s f s-p^

— _,

/ s s X XXXI1

(a) Branch P\pe (b) Bracing Strut

Figure 6.4.

Nozzle welds are those in which one pipe is joined toanother as a branch, either at right angles or some otherangle. As with T-joints, the weld may be fully or onlypartially penetrated. The branch may let in to the mainpipe to let liquids and gases in or out,for instance,or thebranch may simply be mounted on to an unperforated pipe, asin the case of a bracing strut in a tubular structure. Thetwo types are shown in figure 6.4a and b in which the shadedportion shows the pipe wall.

Some typical weld preparations for nozsle welds are shown infigure 6.5. In the diagrams the wall of the main pipe orvessel (called "shell"), and the wall of the branch, stub,or nozzle (called "branch") have been identified.

1Shell /

l

I

i

^"V^^ Fully penetrated "set on" weld

^r / Branch wall

1 /"

Figure 6.5a. Fully penetrated "set on " weld.

Shell

Branch

Figure 6.5b. Partial penetration weld "set in'

Bore

Figure 6.5c. Fully penetrated weld "set through1

143

Page 142: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Branch

Bore

Figure 6.5d. Partial penetration weld "set through'

Shell

Branch

Figure 6.5e. Structural joint, fully penetrated weld.

6.1.2 Weld Defects

The defects which are commonly encountered in welds are:

6.1.2.1. Lack Of Root Penetration

In butt welding, a root gap is usually left at thebottom of the weld (single V weld) or at the centre ofthe weld (Double V weld). If the opening betweenthe two pieces is narrow, it is difficult to achievecomplete penetration and fusion at the root of theweld. A void remains in the root of the weld. Thistype of defect is called lack of root penetration orincomplete root penetration.

6.1.2.2. Lack Of Fusion

This defect is due to lack o.f union in a weld betweenthe weld metal and parent metal, between parent metaland parent metal or between weld metal and weld metal.Lack of fusion can be of the following three types :(a). Lack of side wall fusionThis is caused by a lack of fusion betweenmetal and the parent rnetal at the side ofoutside the root.

thethe

weldweld

144

Page 143: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

(b). Lack of root fusionThis is caused by a lack of fusion between the weldinetal and the parent metal or between adjacent facesof the parent metal at the root.

(c). Lack of inter-run fusion

This is caused by a lack of fusion between adjacentruns of weld inetal in a multi-run weld.

6.1.2.3. Slag InclusionSome slag may be trapped in the deposited metal duringits solidification, particulary if the metal fails toremain molten for a sufficient period to permit theslag to rise to the surface. In multi-pass welding,insufficient cleaning between weld passes can leave aportion of the slag attached to the weld metal whichis then covered by subsequent passes.

6.1.2.4. Tungsten InclusionTungsten inclusions are characteristic of the inertatmosphere welding methods. If the tungsten electrodewhich supports the electric arc comes in to contactwith the weld metal, some tungsten particles aretrapped in the deposited metal.

6.1.2.5. Porosity

Porosity is a collection of gas pores which resultsfrom the entrapment of gas in the solidifying rnetal.The pores are generally spherical in shape. When thepores are uniformly distributed throughout a singlepass weld or throughout several passes of a multiplepass weld, the resulting porosity is called uniformscattered porosity.A group of pores localised in an area is calledcluster porosity. Pores aligned along a jointboundary, the root of the weld or an interbeadboundary, result in porosity termed linear porosity.When the pores are elongated in shape, the resultantporosity is known as piping porosity.

6.1.2.6. Cracks

Cracks occur in weld and base metal when localizedstresses exceed the ultimate strength of the material.Cracks can be classified as either hot cracks or coldcracks. Hot cracks develop at elevated temperatures.They commonly form on solidification of the metal at

145

Page 144: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

temperatures near the melting point. Cold cracks,sometimes called delayed cracks, develop aftersolidification is complete.Cracks may be termed longitudinal or transversedepending on their orientation. When a crack isparallel to the axis of the weld it is called alongitudinal crack regardless of whether it is acenterline crack in weld metal or a toe crack in theheat-affected zone of the parent metal. Transversecracks are perpendicular to the axis of the weld.These may be limited in size and contained completelywithin the weld metal or they may propagate from theweld metal in to the adjacent heat-affected zone andin to the parent metal.Cracks can be described as toe cracks,root cracks orheat affected cracks.(a) Toe cracks generally start from the surface of theweld between the weld and parent metal.They can beginin the weld metal or heat affected zone and are oftenassociated with restraint and the shrinkage of thelast weld pass .(b) Root cracks are associated with the first weldpass and are caused by restraint. They can occur inthe weld bead or heat affected zone.(c) Heat affected zone cracks occur in the heataffected zone and are caused by high heat affectedzone hardness ,high hydrogen content in the weld metaland high restraint.

6.1.2.7. undercut

Undercut is generally located at the junction of theweld and parent metal at the toe or root. undercutcreates a mechanical notch because of the running downof the edges of the beveled weld preparation in to thedeposited metal in the weld groove. Undercut may beeither continuous or intermittent with more or lesssharp edges.

6.1.2.8. Excessive Penetration

In welds, sometimes, molten metal runs through th<?root of the weld groove producing an excessivereinforcement at the back side of the weld. Ingeneral this is not continuous but has an irregularshape with characteristic hanging drops of the excessmetal.

6.1.2.9. Concavity at the Root of the Weld

A concave surface at the root of the weld can occurespecially in pipe welding(without a cover pass on theroot side).

146

Page 145: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

In overhead welding this conditions is a consequenceof gravity which causes the molten rnetal to sag awayfrom the inaccessible upper surface of the weld. Itcan also occur in downhand welding with a backingstrip at the root of the weld if slag is trappedbetween the molten metal and the backing strip.6.1.2.10. Lamellar tearing

Lamellar tearing is ductile tearing which occurs whena rolled plate is stressed through its thicknessby theshrinkage stresses associated with the deposition of alarge volume of weld metal. Typically it occurs infull penetration T butt welds in thick plate greaterthan 20 rnro. It often occurs outside the visible heataffected zone 5 - 1 0 mm below the weld. IT ischaracterised by first decohesion of the non-metallicinclusions in the plate and then a shearing or tearingof the plate from non-metallic inclusion to non-metallic inclusion at about 45 to form a step-likecrack.

6.1.3 General Procedure for ultrasonic Testing of Welds

The procedure for the ultrasonic testing of welds outlinedbelow, if adhered to, will result in a speedy and efficientultrasonic inspection of welds.

(a) Collection of information prior to the testing of weldThe information which has to be collected prior to thetesting a weld includes the following :

i. Parent metal specificationii. Welding process,

iii. Weld joint preparation,iv. Parent metal thickness adjacent to the weld.v. Any special difficulty experienced by the welder

during welding.vi. Location of any repair welds,vii. Acceptance standards.

(b) Establishment of exact location and size of theweld

To establish the exact location of the centre line of theweld, ideally, the parent rnetal should be marked on eitherside of the weld before the commencement of welding. Insome cases where the weld reinforcement has been ground

147

Page 146: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Loctftfng the fool

Normal proa«Figure 6.6a.

v'Maximum peak Centre=llaximum peak

Angle ' probe

Figure 6.6b.

flush with the parent material, it may be necessary to etchthe weld region to establish the weld width.

The centre line of the weld should be marked accuratelythe scanning surface of the weld.

on

For a single vee weld whose reinf.orcernent has been groundflush with the parent metal, the centre line of the weld canbe determined by marking the centre point of a normal probeat two or three locations on the weld (figure 6.6a) at whicha maximum echo is obtained from the weld bead. The linejoining these points is then the centre line of the weld.For single vee welds whose weld reinforcement is not removedan angle beam probe can be used for this purpose, by placingthe probe first on one side of the weld (figure 6.6 b) andmarking the probe index on the specimen where the echo fromthe weld bead is a maximum. On the same side of the weldtwo or three such points are obtained. Then the probe isplaced on the other side of the weld and the probe index isagain marked at different locations when a maximum echo fromthe weld bead is obtained.The centre points of lines joining these marks are thendetermined. When these points are joined the centre line ofthe weld is obtained.

(c). Visual Inspection

A visual check should be carried out prior to thecommencement of testing to make sure that the surface isfree from weld spatter and smooth enough for scanning. Somedefects, e.g. undercut etc., may show at the surface and be

148

Page 147: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Misalignment.

Figure 6.7.noticed during the visual examination. If these defects arein excess of the acceptence standard, then they should beremedied before carrying out the ultrasonic inspection.This is not always possible.Other faults, which should be looked for during visualinspection, are misalignment and mismatch {figure 6.7).These faults may not always adversely affect weldacceptability, but they might interfere with subsequentultrasonic inspection.A clue to misalignment is often the widening of the weld capbecause the welder tries to disguise this fault by blendingthe cap in with the parent metal on either side.

1.Weld bead signal

half skip beampath distance

JWeld cap signal

Lack ofpenetration

half skip beampath distance

Defect signal

Lack ofpenetration

Figure 6 .8,

149

Page 148: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

(d) Parent Metal Examination

The parent metal should be examined with a normal beam probeto detect any defects such as laminations etc., which mightinterfere with the subsequent angle beam probe examinationof the weld, and also to assess the thickness of the parentmetal.The examination should be over a band which is greater thanthe full skip distance for the shallowest angle beamprobe (usually 70 probe) to be used. Figure 6.8 illustrateswhat would happen if a large lamination were present in theparent metal. The presence of a lamination causes the beamto reflect up to the cap giving a signal which might bemistaken for a normal root bead, and at the same time,mi* ses the lack of penetration defect.The setting of sensitivity for this examinâtin should be inaccordance with the relevant specification or code ofpractice. Some of the specification requirements forsensitivity are given below. Refer to the specification formore detai1.

i. ASME SpecificationThe method for settingsensitivity for normal beam probe examination isdescribed in section

ii. British Standard BS 3923 : Part 1 : 1978In this specification, the sensitivity or gain is, wheneverpossible, set at a level at which the second back wall echocan be displayed at full screen height.For parent rnetal examination either a single crystal or atwin crystal probe with a frequency that lies between 2 to6 MHz can be use. The highest frequency in this range ispreferred.

(e) Critical Root Examination

The next step is to make a careful inspection of the weldroot area. This is because it is the root area in whichdefects are most likely to occur and where there presence ismost detrimental. It is also the region in whichreflections occur from the weld bead in a good weld and rootdefect signals will appear very close to the standard beadsignal i.e. it is the region in which the inspector is mostlikely to be confused. Technical details about the rootexamination are given in sections 6.4 and 6.6 for singlevee and double vee welds respectively.

(f) Weld Body Examination

After an examination of the weld root, the body of the weldis then examined for defects using suitable angle beam

150

Page 149: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

probes. Technical details about the weld body examinationare described for each type of weld joint.

(g) Examination for Transverse Cracks

After having examined both the weld root and the weld body,the next step is to detect transverse cracks breakingeither top or bottom surfaces. Magnetic particle inspectionis obviously a quick and effective method for detecting topsurface cracks and therefore often ultrasonic inspection isdone only to detect cracks breaking the bottom surface.If the weld cap has not been dressed, as in figure 6.9, thisscan is done parallel to the weld centre line alongside theweld cap with the probe inclined toward the centre as shown.Since a crack tends to have a ragged edge, it is likely thatsome energy will reflected back to the transmitter. A safertechnique is to use a pair of probes, one transmitting andone receiving. This is also shown in figure 6.9.

weld G/L

Figure 6.9.

If the weld is dressed, a scan along the weld centre lineand several scans parallel to and on either side of the weldcentre line, from each direction, are done to give a fullcoverage of the weld.

(h) Determination of the Location, Size and Nature of theDefect.

If any defect is found as a result of these examinationsthe next step is to explore the defect as thoroughly aspossible to determine :

i. Its exact location in the weld.

151

Page 150: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

ii. Its size parallel with the weld axis (i.e. lengthof the defect). For this usually either the 6 dB or20 dB drop method is used.

iii. Its size through the weld thickness,iv. Its nature (slag, porosity, crack etc).

(i) Test Report

In order that results of ultrasonic examination may be fullyassessed, it is necessary for the inspector's findings to besystematically recorded. The report should contain detailsof the work under inspection, the equipment used and thecalibration and scanning procedures. Besides the probeangle, the probe positions and flaw ranges should berecorded in case the results of the report need to berepeated.

6.1.4 Examination of Root in Single Vee Butt Welds WithoutBacking Strip in Plates and Pipes

6.1.4.1. Scanning Procedure

The scanning procedure for the examination of the rootconsists of the following steps :(a) Selection of probe angle.(b) Calibration of time base on IIW VI or V2 block

for a suitable range. For parent metalthicknesses up to about 30 mm, a time base rangeof 100 mm is suitable.

(c) Determination of the correct probe angle usingIIW VI or V2 block.

(d) Marking the probe index on the probe using IIWVI or V2 block.

(e) Calculation of 1/2 skip distance and 1/2 skipbeam path length (1/2 skip BPL) for the selectedprobe.

(f) Marking of the scan lines at 1/2 skip distance +1/2 root gap from the weld centre line on bothsides of weld (figure 6.11).

(g) Setting the gain sensitivity for scanning andevaluation.

(h) A scan is made by moving the probe slowly fromone end of the specimen to the other, so that theprobe index always coincides with the scanline.To this end a guide is placed behind the

152

Page 151: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

guide guide

weld C ua) Plan View

Figure 6.10

b) Sectional View.

Figure 6.11.

probe in such a way that when the heel of theprobe is butted to the quide, the probe index ison the scanning line (figure 6.11). Flexiblemagnetic strips are very useful for this purpose.Areas with echoes from defects are marked on thespecimen for subsequent examination to establishthe nature and size of the defects.

(i) With the probe index on the scanning line, a lackof penetration echo will occur at the half skipbeam path range.If the weld is a good one, a rootbead echo will occur at a small distance(depending on how big the weld bead is) away fromthe anticipated spot for a lack of penetrationecho (figure 6.12 a). If there is some rootshrinkage or undercut, the echo from thesedefects will occur at a slightly shorter rangethan the critical range (figure 6.12 b).

(j) In addition, to determine whether an echooccuring during the root scan is due to lack ofpenetration, root undercut, root shrinkage, orroot bead, the following points should also betaken in to consideration :i. Since lack of penetration is a good corner

reflector , the echo from it is quite bigcompared to an echo from root undercut or rootshrinkage.

ii. With a lack of penetration echo there will beno weld bead echo, whereas with root undercutand root shrinkage there almost always is.

iii. The echoes from root undercut and rootshrinkage, maximise when the probe is movedbackwards from the scanning line.

iv. If the weld bead echo varies a lot inamplitude and position, then there is a greatprobability of defects in the root area.

153

Page 152: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Figure 6.12 a.

increased rangeusually about 2-3 mm

Figure 6.12 b.

r* % decreased distance\ »

(k) After having carefully examined the root, probingfrom one side of the weld centre line, a secondscan is similarly done from the other side of theweld centre line to confirm the findings of thefirst scan. In addition, the second scan willalso help in interpreting two other types ofdefect in the root area. The first one of theseis shown in figure 6.13. It is a small slaginclusion or gas pore just above the root.

This defect might appear just short of the half skipbeam path length when doing scan 1, leading to theguess that it might be root undercut or rootshrinkage. If this were so scan 2 should put it justfurther than the critical range. But in fact theinclusion will show about the same place i.e. justshort again. Furthermore .from undercut the echo isexpected to maximize when the probe is movedbackwards in scan 1, but in the same scan the echofrom the inclusion will maximize when the probe ismoved forward. The echo from the inclusion will alsomaximize when the probe is moved forward in scan 2.

154

Page 153: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Figure 6.14.

The second defect mentioned above is shown in figure6.14 . This shows a. crack starting from the edge ofthe root bead.

From side 1 a large echo will appear just where theecho from undercut is expected. From side 1, therewill be no accompanying bead echo. From side 2,however, it is possible to get a bead echo as well asthe defect echo.

6.1.4.2 Selection of Probe Angleo o oThe probe angle is normally chosen from 45 ,60 or 70

and sometimes 80 probes,whichever has the shortestbeam path length to the root. The choice of probeangle is limited only by the condition of the weldcap. On thin parent metals it may not be possible toposition a 45° or 60 probe so that the half skipbeam points at the root gap, without the toe of theprobe riding up on to the weld cap.If the weld cap has been dressed flush with the parentmaterial, then probably a 45° probe can be usedprovided the material is not so thin that the criticalbeam path length comes in to the transmission pulse.For welds with the cap in place the followingrecommendations for the root scan are made for variousplate thicknesses :

Parent metal thickness

6 - 1 5 mm

Probe angleo o

60 or 70

15 - 35 mm o o60 or 45

Over 35 mm 45

If a 60 probe is selected for the root scan, thestrong mode converted longitudinal waves which occurwith this probe angle if the waves strike a cornerreflector such as lack of penetration can result inechoes for instance from the weld cap appearing tocome from within the weld .

155

Page 154: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

6.1.5 Examination of Weld Body in a Single Vee Butt WeldWithout Backing Strip

After the root examination is complete, the weld bodyexamination is then done using the following procedure :(a) Selection of an appropriate probe angle.(b) Calculation of the 1/2 - skip and full-skip distances

and 1/2 skip-BPL and full-skip-BPL for the selectedprobe angle.

<c) Marking the parent metal on both sides of the weld withlines parallel to the weld centre line and at distancesof 1/2 skip and full-skip + 1/2 cap width.

Figure 6.15.

(d) Calibration of the time base for an appropriate range.(e) Setting the sensitivity of the probe/flaw detector

system for the maximum testing range which in this caseis the full-skip-BPL.

(f) Scanning the specimen in a zig-zag pattern between themarked scan limits (figure 6.15). Each forward scanshould be at right angles to the weld centre line, andthe pitch of the zig-zag should be a half probe widthto ensure full coverage.

(g) Mark the areas, in which defect echoes occur, forsubsequent location, establishment of nature and sizingof the defect.

156

Page 155: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

6.1.5.1. Selection of Probe Angle

The initial selection of probe angle for the weld bodyexamination depends upon the weld preparation angle.When the cap is dressed and the scan is made directlyover the dressed weld, some of the defects might bevery close to the top surface. If the transmissionnoise of a single crystal probe lasts longer than thereturn time in the perspex shoe, the noise willobscure part of the tirnebase and mask defect echoesclose to the top surface. In such cases twin crystalangle probes may be used. Measurement of beam indexand angle, and timebase calibration for twin crystalprobes is carried out in the same way as for singlecrystal angle probes. Again, if the weld is dressed,confirmation of volumetric defects can be made byscanning a compression wave probe over the weld body.

6.1.6 Inspection of Single Vee Butt Welds With BackingStrips or Inserts

The inspection procedure of such welds only differs fromthat for single vee welds without backing strips in thedetail of the critical root examination. In the rootexamination of this type of weld, the prime object is toconfirm that fusion has taken place between the parent metalroot preparation and the backing strip or insert.

6.1.6.1. Welds with EB Inserts

When properly fused, this weld configuration is like aperfect single - vee weld with a constant root beadprofile. Setting up for a root examination is exactlythe same as for a single - vee butt weld without abacking strip . Scanning along the probe guide willgive a root bead echo which occurs at a particularplace on the timebase and which remains constant inamplitude (provided, of course, couplant and surfaceroughness are also uniform). A drop in the amplitudeof this echo is a clue that fusion may not becomplete. The presence of an echo at exactly half-skip beam path length is positive evidence of nonfusion. Since the insert gives a very strong echo asa rule and that echo is only 2-3 mm beyond the half-skip beam path length position, a short length of nonfusion is only shown as a half skip beam echo slidingup the front of the insert echo (i.e. poorlyresolved), as shown in figure 6.17 (see figure 6.2a).The angle of the probe should be chosen to meet anylack of side wall fusion at right angles for maximumresponse. The exact angle to meet the fusion face atright angle can be calculated from the followingequation :

157

Page 156: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Probe angle = 90 - 0/2 ........ (6.1).Where 9 = weld preparation angle.

The range at which the testing is clone, particularlyusing a 70° probe to suit the weld preparation angle,can be quite long and the sensitivity to defects otherthan lack of side wall fusion may be rather low.Insuch cases it is reasonable to use 45° or 60° probesto carry out supplementary scans. If the weld cap hasbeen dressed, this problem can be overcome by scanningacross the weld centre line from half skip to the faredge of the original cap instead of changing theprobe. Care should be taken to ensure that anyresidual undulation left when the cap is dressed, isnot severe enough to lift the probe index clear of thesurface (figure 6.16).

Lack offusion

.Root bead (insert)signal

0 2 4 6 8

Figure 6.17.10

Lack of fusion at the top of the insert (figure 6.18) canbest be detected by a longitudinal wave probe. For thisreason it is desirable for the weld cap to be dressed toallow the normal beam probe scan. If this can not, or hasnot been done, this defect can often be found as an echooriginating from just above thé root, when using an anglebeam probe because of distortion or entrapped slag.

Figure 6.18,

158

Page 157: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

6.1.6.2. Welds with Backing Strips

When properly fused the weld cross-section looks likethe one shown in figure 6.19.

Figure 6.19.

An angle beam probe scan allows energy to pass throughthe root in to the backing strip. Reflection fromwithin the strip will be shown as a pattern of echoesbeyond the half skip beam path length (figure 6.20a).A decrease in amplitude or total loss of this patternindicates non fusion of the backing strip. Again, itis desirable to have the weld cap dressed so that anormal beam probe can be used to check the rootfusion. With a normal beam probe over the weldcentre, an echo will be received from the back wall,and from the backing strip. Loss of the backing stripecho indicates lack of fusion (figure 6.20b).

half skip beam path length

\J

I Echo pattern/ from backing strip

I I VJuu.

1st back echo

Fused backing stripecho

2nd back echoI/

3rd back echo

L8 10

Figure 6.20a,

2 4 6 8Compression Wave Scan

Figure 6.20b.

10

6.1.7 Inspection of Double - Vee welds

The routine for double-Vee welds is basically the same asthat for single - Vee welds. There are some differences indetail in the critical root examination and the weld bodyscan, because of the difference in weld configuration.These differences are discussed in the following paragraphs.

6.1.7.1. Critical Root Scan for Double - Vee Welds

The typical weld preparation for a double Vee weld isshown in figure 6.1. Figure 6.21 shows the

159

Page 158: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

theoretical lack of penetration defect in this type ofweld.It can be seen that, in theory at least, this defectwhich is planer, vertical and in the middle of theweld volume, ought not to reflect sound back to theprobe. In practice, however, there is often enoughslag or distortion at the top or bottom of the defectto give a reflection.

oIt is usual, therefore, to use a 70 probe, positionedat 1/4 skip distance from the weld centre line, tocarry out the critical root scan. The anticipatedtimebase range for an echo from lack of penetrationcan not be predicated as precisely as for single Veewelds, but, of course, echoes from root bead orundercut do not occur in this type of weldconfiguration.Another method that can be used for the examination ofthe root in double Vee welds, and for that matter forthe detection of any vertical reflecting surfacewithin the volume of a material, is the tandemtechnique shown in figure 6.21.

Figure 6.21.

In figure 6.21, = probe angle, S = separationbetween probe indices, d - depth of aiming point, andt - specimen thickness. For double Vee welds, thebeam is aimed at the centre of the weld (i.e. d = 1/2t), and the probe separation, s, is equal to half skipdistance for that probe angle. For other applicationsthe probe separation for any depth can be calculatedfrom the following formula

= 2 (t-d) tanO ....... (6.2)

6.1.7.2. Weld Body Examination for Double Vee Welds

The weld body examination is much the same as forsingle Vee welds, but this time the scan starts at1/4-skip-distance from the weld centre and goes backto full-skip plus half weld cap width (figure 6.22).

160

Page 159: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Figure 6.22,

In this type of weld configuration .there are fourfusion faces to be examined, and the reflections fromthe bottom weld cap, which occur between half skipbeam path length and 3 to 4 mm beyond half skip beampath length, will prevent confirmation of thecondition of the lower fusion face on the oppositehalf of the weld.

6.1.8 Examination of T-Welds

In the case of a T-weld configuration, for completeinspection of the weld, access to several surfaces isrequired. In practice, access to more than one surface maynot be available and thus only limited inspection of theweld can be carried out.The inspection proceduce for both partially penetrated andfully penetrated (for types of T-weld configuration seefigure 6.3 a&b) T-welds is much the same, but for partiallypenetrated welds monitoring of the non-fused portion of theweld is needed to ensure that it is not longer than thedesign permits. For an ideal case where all surfaces arereadily accessible, the scans to be made for the completeinspection of a T-weld are illustrated in figure 6.23. Scan1 is done with a normal beam probe to detect laminations,lack of fusion and lamellar tearing. Scan 2 is done with anangle beam probe to detect weld body defects and toe cracksand scan 3 is an angle beam probe scan to detect welddefects and lack of side wall fusion.As with the previously discussed weld configurations probeangles and frequencies are be chosen to suit the particularjob. For scan 3 it is useful to choose a probe angle whichwill produce a beam centre line parallel to the weld cap(figure 6.24) to reduce the tendency for confusing capechoes.

6.1.9 Examination of Nozzle Welds

As with T-welds, for the complete inspection of noaale weldsaccess to all the scanning surfaces may not be possible.The following scans are given for fully-penetrated-set-onnoszle welds, partially-penetrated-set-in nozale welds, andeither partially or fully penetrated set through noszlewelds.

161

Page 160: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Scans for T welds

Figure 6.23. Figure 6.24.

The choice of probe angle and frequency, as discussedearlier, depends upon the particular job to be carried out.

6.1.9.1. Fully Penetrated Set on Weld

The scans to be carried out for this type of weld areshown in figure 6.25.

Shell

\ 2

"/rx— «s* 3 ^4

Itlll I

Branch

i

Figure 6.25.

Scans 1 and 2 are normal beam probe scans of shelland branch respectively to determine;(a) Thickness of the shell and branch.(b) Lamination in shell and branch.(c) Lack of fusion of shell wall.(d) Weld body defects.

Scan 3 is a critical root scan. For the preparationshown, 65 is the optimum probe angle.

162

Page 161: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Scan 4 is the scan made by moving the probe betweenhalf skip and full skip limits. This scan is done todetermine lack of side wall fusion and weld bodydefects.

6.1.9.2. Partially Penetrated Set In Weld

The scans are similar to those shown in figure 6.25.However, in this case it is necessary to check theactual penetration achieved and to make sure that thehorizontal fusion face is fused (figure 6.26 a & b).

shellshell

branch

penetration ' depth

Figure 6.26 a. Intended Condition,

branch

unfused face

Figure 6.26 b. Fault.

This can be achieved, with practice, by very carefullyplotting the root echoes. It is usual to plot boththe maximum reflecting point, and, as confirmation,the point at which the echo just disappears (i.e beamcentre and beam edge). From an accurate scale drawingthe intended point of maximum penetration can bedetermined, and the range of this point, using thebeam centre and beam edge, can be measured. Probepositions corresponding to these reflecting points canalso be measured and compared to those achieved duringthe scan.If, in practice, both points occur at probe positionscloser to the shell than the predetermined positions,then the penetration is somewhat deeper than intended,If they occur further from the shell than expected, acondition such as the one shown in figure 6.26 bwould be suspected.

6.1.9.3. Examination of Set Through Nozzle Welds

These nozzle welds are rather like full or partialpenetration T-welds and can be scanned in the sameways as shown in figure 6.23 (scans for T-welds).The main complication arises from the fact that the

163

Page 162: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

BranchSaddle like contour/ of weld

Figure 6.27.

fusion faces, when one pipe fits in to another in thisway, lie along a line which looks rather like a"saddle" (figure 6.27).

The equivalent scan to scan 1 in figure 6.23 is madefrom the bore of the branch (compare figure 6.23 with6.5 c&d), and to determine the weld limits, it isusual to scan the normal beam probe up and down thebore (i.e parallel to the branch axis) noting thechange of echo from wall thickness to weld region andcarefully marking the probe position. A series ofpoints plotted in this way can be joined with chalk orchinagraph crayon to give the weld limits.

6.2 ULTRASONIC INSPECTION OF FORGINGS

6.2.1 Forging defects

Defects can originate during the forging operation. Forgingbursts can occur as a result of insufficiently hightemperature prior to forging. This means that the axis ofthe ingot or semifinished product is deformed when it haslow ductility (or plasticity) and is unable to withstand thestresses set up by deformation and hence it bursts. Lapscan also occur during the forging operation. These arecaused by the squeezing of the surface metal over the top ofanother surface material which, because the surface isoxidised, will never completely fuse to produce a new,sound surface.Defects can originate at the heat treatment stage. Thesecan be hairline cracks (or flakes) and internal transversestress cracks (or clinks). The former are due to thepresence of hydrogen while the latter are due totransformation and cooling stresses which may be high enoughto rupture the steel.When mechanical work is done on a material, surface defectsmay appear as a result of using high machining speeds, largefeed rates or local over-heating. When the material is inservice, cracks may arise as a result of loading the

164

Page 163: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

structure. These can be due to brittleness or fatigue.Cracks due to brittleness may appear suddenly and spreadvery rapidly whereas fatigue cracks which are more commonspread quite slowly and can often be detected even in theirvery early stages of propagation.

6.2.2 Testing of Semi-Finished Products: Rods and Billets

Manufacturing defects occurring in such semi-finishedproducts can either be internal defects or surface defects.Some internal defects originate from ingot defects in thecore such as shrinkage cavities and inclusions which areelongated during rolling or drawing.Others are rolling and drawing defects such as cracks in thecore, radial incipient cracks on the rod surface or spillswhich penetrate to the surface at a small angle. Since mostflaws in rods or billets extend in the longitudinaldirection, this requires that the axis of the sound beam bein a cross sectional plane (figure 6,28 ), either normal oroblique to the surface. Also used are surface waves in thecircumferential direction.

Figure 6.28 Types of defects in round stock andmain directions of testing.

6.2.2.1 Billets

These often have longitudinally directed flaws in thecore zone (pipings, cracks and inclusions) or on thesurface (cracks).The core flaws are detected by using two normal probesconnected in parallel, as shown in figure 6.29 forsctuare billets In this test, a great part of thebillet is not tested (figure 6.30) owing to the beamposition as well as the dead zones of the probes.Therefore, when testing square billets with sidesshorter than 100 mm, SE probes are used. It goes without saying that SE probes with heavily inclined

165

Page 164: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Figure 6.29 Testing billets with two probes connectedin parallel.

Figure 6.30 Incomplete coverage by normal probes usedfor testing square billets.

Figure 6.31, Difficulty in testing round billetswith probes due to reduced contact area.

166

Page 165: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Figure 6.32 Increase in contact area by usingshoes.

perspex

oscillators cannot be used since their maximumsensitivity is just below the surface. Normally theso called 0 SE probes are used. Longitudinal surfaceflaws on square billets are practically impossible todetect with normal, SE or even angle probes.The testing procedure with normal probes for coreflaws mentioned earlier is also applicable for roundbillets but with more difficulty, especially whentesting by hand, because of the curved surface whichreduces contact area and probe sensitivity (figure6.31 ).The contact area can be increased by using a perspexshoe whose front curvature fits closely to the roundbillet (figure 6.32 ).Because divergence of the sonic beam, even from aprobe with a shoe gives rise to disturbing echoesbetween the first and second back-wall echoes, coreflaws in round billets are usually checked with SKprobes.Longitudinal surface flaws in round billets can bedetected with angle probes provided the surface is not

Figure 6.33. Depth of penetration of oblique transversewaves in round billets.

167

Page 166: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

too rough. If a 45°or 60°angle probe with issuitably ground as shown in figure 6.33 , the broadbeam, after a few reflections, fills a zone under thesurface up to a depth of about one-fifth of thediameter. If a longitudinally orientated surface flawis present (figure 6.34 ), an echo will be visible onthe CRT screen; otherwise no echo is visible. It ispossible to miss a flaw that is at an acute angle tothe surface (figure 6.35 ). Therefore, in order tobe able to detect all surface flaws, the angle probemust be turned round by 180 and also moved around thebillet or the billet itself must be turned.

Figure 6.340 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0

Detection of longitudinal surface flaws inround billets using angle probes.

Kigure 6.35 Possibility of missing longitudinal surfaceflaws in round billets using angle probes.

The flaw echo then will move across the screen withalternating heights, having a peak height just beforethe transmission pulse. With the billet rotating andthe angle probe advancing longitudinally, a spiralscan can be performed, enabling all of the billet tobe tested

168

Page 167: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

6.2.2.2. Rod Materials

There is hardly any difference between testing roundbillets and bars for cracks, shrinkage orinclusions. To find defects in the core, it issufficient to scan along at least two longitudinaltracks using a normal or an SE probe depending on themd diameter. As in round billets, surface defectsare detected with oblique transverse waves or withsurface waves when the surface is sufficientlysmooth.The use of a twin-angle probe in a housing,allowing a flowing water coupling, enables bars to thetested with increased speed. A bar without a surfaceflaw will give a large echo on the CRT screen (figure6.36) This echo is caused by the sound beam, emittedby one oscillator, being received by the other andvice versa.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0

Figure 6.36 Testing of round bar with twin-angleprobe.

Both soniccorresponding to a circular measure of about 360'

pulses have to cover the same distance/>

Since the flaw detector is adjusted to half-soundpaths, the common echo will appear on the screen at adistance corresponding to 180* . As the length ofthe sound path between the oscillators does not alterwhen shifting the twin-angle probe or rotating thebar, provided the bar diameter is constant, the so-called control echo position on the CRT screen remainsconstant.Hence, any longitudinal surface flaw can easily bedistinguished from this echo, since the flaw echoposition on the screen in not constant. When theprobe is moved in the direction of a surface flaw, theflaw echo arriving at the nearest oscillator andappearing between the transmission pulse and thecontrol echo will move towards the transmission pulse

169

Page 168: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

90e

A0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0

Figure 6.37 Location of sui-face flaw on rod usingtwin-angle probe.

(figure 6.36 ). The echo arriving at the fartheroscillator is visible at the right of the control echoand. moves in the opposite direction. This echo israther small and therefore is not usually employed forflaw detection. If the probe or rod is moved untilthe high flaw echo is exactly in the middle betweentransmission pulse and control echo, the flaw must belocated exactly one-fourth of the bar circumferencefrom the probe {figure 6.37 ).

6.2.2.3 Use of immersion technique for billet or rodmaterials

Test speed can be maximised by the use of theimmersion technique, especially for small roddiameters. In this technique, the test specimen isimmersed in water and immersion probes are used.

Figure 6.38, Testing of round stock by immersiontechnique.

170

Page 169: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

When a normal probe is used, it is possible to generateall types of waves (Figure 6.38} by moving the probeposition or direction. If the beam in broad, severalwaves can sometimes be obtained simultaneously.

If the surface is not sufficiently smooth, this maygive rise to troublesome interferring echoes in a zonebehind the interface echo.These interferring echoes are produced by surfacewaves which, although they quickly decay on thesurface, still produce strong echoes from minute roughspots, foreign particles and air bubbles on thesurface. Therefore, narrow or focussed sound beamsshould be used.Rod materials are best tested with an SE probe forcore defects and with two normal probes, arranged inan immersion tank as shown in figure 6.39, forlongitudinal defects close to the surface.

Figure 6.39 aRod material withnosurface flaws.

Figure 6.39 bRod material withsurface flaws.

0 1 2 3 4 5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0

0 1 2 3 4 5

\

8 9 10

Figures 6.39a & 6.39b Testing method for detectinglongitudinal surface defects on rod material by theimmersion technique, with separate transmitting andreceiving probes.

171

Page 170: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

One of the normal probes acts as a transmitter and theother as a receiver. The longitudinal beam from thetransmitter passes through the water and strikes thesurface of the rod at an angle. The refractedtransverse wave propagates around a polygon and willnot give rise to any appreciable echo if the bar isfree from surface flaws. With the presence of alongitudinal surface flaw (Figure 6.39b), thetransverse wave is reversed and reflected back in thedirection of propagation. The receiver probe thenpicks up the refracted longitudinal wave. If therod is rotated, a longitudinal surface defect isindicated by a travelling echo on the CRT screen.From figure 6.39 a and figure 6.39 b,it can be seenthat there is no possibility that part of theincident longitudinal wave refracted in water canreach the receiver probe. Therefore, it is impossiblefor any part of the ultrasonic wave to reach thereceiver probe when the bar has no surface flaw.In order to detect all longitudinal surface flawsindependent of their orientation, two pairs of normalimmersion probes are used to give opposing directionsof sound waves (figure 6.40). In actual practice,the bar is spirally advanced through a water tank, theholder with its 5 probes ( 1 SE andprobes ) sliding on the bar.

normal

Figure 6.40. Testing method for longitudinal surfacedefects on rod material by theimmersion technique with two pairs ofTR probes.

6.2.3. Tube Testing

The same testing techniques used for round bar testing areapplicable to tube testing. The only difference, ofcourse, is that there are no core defects. However, surfaceflaws can occur on the inner as well as outer surfaces oftubes. In seamless and rolled pipes, the defects (figure6.41) which are of interest are similar to those occurring

172

Page 171: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

in rod materials, Viz. incipient cracks and spills in theinternal and external surfaces. Laminations can also appearin the wall as a result of the manufacturing process.When an angle probe is used on a tube, the transverse waveis propagated along a sig-zag path in the. tube cross-section. Flaws from both surfaces are indicated on theCRT screen by using as small an angle of incidence aspossible, provided the wall thickness is not too great(figure 6.42 ).

BANDS OFINCLUSIONS

LAMINATION

SPILL IN LONGITUDIONALDIRECTION (FLAKE)

SPILLS

Figure 6.41 Types of defects and main direction oftesting in pipes.

INNER SURFACE

\OUTERSURFACE

Figure 6.42 Testing of tubes using angle probes.

Since the smallest possible angle is 35 , the ratio of wallthickness to tube diameter (d/D), at which a test forinternal flaws is still possible, must not exceed 0.2.Should there be & need for testing tubes with thicker wall(i.e. d/D > 0.2 } for cracks on their internal surface, theangle of incidence must be less than 35° . This can beachieved by attaching an obliquely ground perspex shoe to anormal probe (figure 6.43). Since both longitudinal andtransverse waves are produced simultaneously, manyinterfering echoes which are not echo indications appear onthe screen. Fortunately, these can be distinguished from

173

Page 172: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

J l-Ä^X^J———A—-

SCHEMATIC SCREEN TRACE FE

Figure 6.43 Testing method for detectinglongitudinal surface defects oninternal surfaces of thick-walled tubesusing normal probes.

flaw echoes when the probe or the tube is rotated, sinceflaw echoes move across the CRT screen whereas theinterfering echoes remain stationary.

6.2.4. Testing of Forgings

The testing of forgings is in many ways more straight-forward than the testing of castings. For one thing, thegrain is far more refined, giving much lower attenuation andless noise, and allowing a higher frequency to be used.Secondly defects such as cavities and inclusions in theoriginal billet are flattened and elongated during theforging ,rolling or extrusion process to becomebetter reflectors by becoming parallel to the outersurface. The one exception to this might be cracks whichmay not be parallel to the scanning surface.Much of the testing of forgings can be accomplished withcompression waves using single or twin crystal probes atfrequencies between 4-6 MHa and occasionally up to 10 MHz.Angled shear wave probes are used to explore defectsdetected by the compression waves and to search for defectswhich might not be suitably oriented for compression waves.In the testing of forgings, particularly those which havebeen in service for a period of time, it is very often

to predict where defects will be, if they exist,this reason many specifications only call for ascan looking for one particular defect in one

possibleand forlimitedlocation.The flaws of interest in large forgings are fatigue orstrain cracks and those originating from the productionprocesses. Production flaws are searched for as soon aspossible before the forgings undergo expensive finishing.

174

Page 173: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

6,3 ULTRASONIC INSPECTION OF CASTINGS

The defects in materials which occur during casting arepiping (shrinkage), cavities or porosities, segregation,coarse grain structure, non-rnetallic inclusions and cracks.Piping takes place during the solidification of an ingot.The outer layers are the first to solidify. During thistime the liquid metal collects at the top of the ingotwhere after solidification is complete, a funnel-shapedcavity may appear due to the shrinkage. The shrinkagecavity will be either open or closed and, under certaincircumstances, secondary cavities may be found.The material of an ingot may not be homogeneous. Anyvariation in composition which arises during solidificationis called segregation.One type of segregation is gravitational, being caused bythe separation in the upper part of the ingot of impuritieshaving a lower temperature of solidification and a differentdensity from the surrounding metal. This type ofsegregation consists primarily of sulphur or phosphorus.A coarse grained structure may result when the pouringtemperature is high and cooling takes place slowly. Thissometimes makes it impossible to use ultrasonics because ofthe high attenuation in the material.Gases dissolved in steel separate out when solidificationoccurs since their solubility in liquid metal decreasesrapidly at this stage.If the gas content is high, gas cavities are often trappedunder the surface or in the interior of the ingot.Non-metallic inclusions, such as slag or refractories fromthe steel making process, find their way into the metalduring melting or casting and are quite frequently theultimate cause of fatigue cracks. Longitudinal ortransverse cracks may appear during solidification,depending on the method of construction of the mould, itstemperature, the composition of the steel and thetemperature of the melt.In castings flaw detection almost exclusively concernsmanufacturing defects such as shrinkage cavities, blowholes, inclusions (usually sand or slag) and cracks (causedby internal stresses during cooling while alreadysolidified).Pure segregations are very rarely detected and then only byindirect means. Castings are seldom checked for fatiguecracks but, if required, the testing technique is similar tothat used for forgings.Basically, the demand made for the absence of flaws in thetesting of castings cannot be as high as for workedcomponents because the small shrinkage cavities and poreswhich are always present, produce some "grass" and smallindividual echoes even at 2MHz.

175

Page 174: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Both shear and compression wave techniques are widely usefor the examination of castings. Because the grain structurehas an appreciable effect on the attenuation of ultrasonicwaves, the test frequencies used in the examination ofcastings tend to be lower as compared to the frequenciesused for the testing of other products. Frequencies of 11/4 MHz to 2 1/2 MHz are common and occasionally it isnecessary to drop to 1/2 MHz in order to penetrate to thefar boundary. The most commonly used probes arecompression owave o(single and twin crystal) and shear waveprobes of 45°, 60° and 70° . The ultrasonic flaw detectorused for the inspection of castings should therefore coverthe frequency range 1/2 MHz to 6 MHz and when used withthe probes selected for the job should have good resolutionand penetration characteristics.Penetration characteristics are assessed by placing acompression wave probe on the perspex insert of the VIblock, setting gain controls to maximum and counting thenumber of back wall echoes.A result having two to four back wall echoes indicates a lowpenetrating power for testing work, and six to ten back wallechoes indicates a high penetrating power.

6.3.1. Defects in Casting

In the following, some common defects in castings along withthe techniques commonly used for their detection are discussed.

6.3.1.1. Shrinkage Defects

Shrinkage defects are cavities formed duringsolidification and are formed through liquid to solidcontraction. These defects are not normallyassociated with gas, but a high gas content willmagnify their extent.Shrinkage defects may occur in steel castings wherethere is a localised variation in section thickness.However they may also occur in parallel sectionswhere penetration of the liquid feed metal isdifficult.Typical locations at which shrinkage cavities are mostlikely to occur are shown in figure 6.44 . Wherethere ,is a localized change of section thickness, ahot spot will occur which can not be adequately fed.This will lead to shrinkage cavitation and should,therefore, be avoided if at all possible. Acute anglejunctions ( V,X or Y ) are least satisfactory and T orL junctions are less of a problern.

176

Page 175: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Formation of shrinkage defects.

v /

Below the feeder head Near the gate or runner

Figure 6.44 a.

I

L Section

T Section

X Section

V Section Y Section Centre Line

Figure 6.44 b.

Shrinkage defects in steel castings can be consideredas falling in to there types, namely: Macro-shrinkage,Filamentary-shrinkage, and Micro-shrinkage.

(a) Macro-shrinkage

Macro-shrinkage is a large cavity formed duringsolidification. The most common type of this defectis piping which occurs due to an inadequate supply offeed metal. In good design, piping is restricted tothe feeder head. The technique used to detect thisdefect depends on the casting section thickness.For sections greater than 75 mm thick, a singlecrystal compression wave probe can be use, whilst forthickness below 75 mm it is advisable to use a twincrystal probe.The presence of a defect is shown by a complete lossof back wall echo together with the appearance of a

177

Page 176: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

scan to explore defect limits

defect echo

10

Figure 6.45. Macro-shrinkage

use angle probeto confirm

new defect echo. An angle probe should be used toconfirm the information gained from the compressionwave probe (figure 6.45).

(b) Filamentary Shrinkage

This is a coarse form of shrinkage, but of smallerphysical dimension than a macro-shrinkage cavity.The cavities may often be extensive, branching andinterconnected.Theoretically filamentary shrinkage should occur alongthe centre line of the section, but this is not alwaysthe case and on some occasions it extends to thecasting surface. This extension to the castingsurface may be assisted by the presence of pinholes orworm holes. Filamentary shrinkage can best bedetected with a combined double probe if the sectionis less than 75 mm thick. Defect echoes tend to bemore ragged in outline than for macro-shrinkage. Theinitial scan should be carried out with a largediameter (23mm) probe and the final assessment with asmaller (10-15 mm) diameter probe (figure 6.46).

HTd)

Filamentary shrinkage.

r,(2)

Figure 6.46,

178

Page 177: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

(c) Micro -shrinkage

This is a very fine form of filamentary shrinkage dueto shrinkage or gas evolution during solidification.The cavities occur either at the grain boundaries(inter-crystalline shrinkage), or between the dendritearms {interdendritic shrinkage).

transmissionpulse back

echo!

0 1 2 3 4 5

Figure 6.47 Micro -shrinkage

....I..J....I....I.... I.... I,,..!.. ..I. ...I,

6 7 8 9 10

Using a compression wave probe technique, theindications on the CRT screen from micro shrinkagetend to be grass-like, that is a group of relativelysmall poorly resolved echoes extending over someportion of the tiraebase (figure 6.47) . The existenceof a backwall echo in the presence of a defect echowill be to some extent dependent on the frequencychosen. B'or instance there may be no back wall echowhen using a 4-5 MHz probe due to scattering of thebeam. This might suggest a large angular type ofdefect. However, a change to a 1-2 MHz probe maywell encourage transmission through the defectiveregion to add a back wall echo to the defect echoesand disproving the large cavity impression.

6.3.1.2 Defects Associated With Hindered ContractionDuring Cooling

(a) Hot Tears

These are cracks which are discontinuous and generallyot a ragged -form. They are caused by stresses whichdevelop near the solidification temperature when themetal is at its weakest. The stresses arise when thecontraction of the coaling metal is restrained by amould or core, or by an already solid thinner section.In figure 6.48 some of the causes and locations ofthis type of cracking are shown.

179

Page 178: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

t !

I I

I tA

I 1

Hot tear due to mould resistance along directions A and B

——— C

Hot tear due to casting resistance along length C Hot tear due to change in Section D

Figure 6.48 Hot Tears

(b) Stress Cracks

These are well defined, approximately straight crackswhich are formed when the metal is completely solid.The location of hot tears can rarely be determinedaccurately using a compression wave probe because ofthe orientation of the defects. The most satisfactorytechnique is to use angled probes. In steel castings,the best way to find cracks or hot tears is bymagnetic flaw detection, using ultrasonics to plot thedepth of the defect.

(L

Trace probe position 1

1st backecho

Trace probe position 2îfect echo

0 5

Figure 6 .49 Air Locks

2nd backi echo

10

180

Page 179: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

6.3.1.3. Defects Associated With Entrapped Gas Airlocks

When molten metal is poured in to a mould, air may betrapped in the metal stream and may appear in thesubsequent casting as a cavity or several cavitiesjust below and parallel to the casting surface. Theyare normally best detected by twin crystal compressionwave probes (figure 6.49).

Gas Holes

These defects are discrete cavities, usually greaterthan 1.5 mm in diameter which are caused by theevolution of dissolved gases from the metal duringsolidification. A "Worm hole" is the name given to atubular gas hole which is usually perpendicular to thecasting surface. Since gas holes may be close to thesurface, twin crystal compression wave probes are themost suitable probes to detect them (figure 6.50).

II LL1

! Y2

Trace probe position 2

1st backecho 2nd back

I echo

Trace probe position 1

defects

10 0

Figure 6.50 Gas Holes

4——I—I——. I .——L> -g

181

Page 180: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

7. ULTRASONIC STANDARDS

7.1 Commonly Used Ultrasonic Standards

An ultrasonic standard is a document issued by astandardising organization to ensure reproducible resultsfrom an ultrasonic examination, no matter when, where or whoconducts the examination, Some of the organisations, whosestandards are commonly used in ultrasonic testinginternationally, along with their addresses are listed below:1. ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)

345 East 47th Street, New York, NY 10017, USA.2. ASTM (American Society for Testing Materials)

1916 Race Street,Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA.

3. British Standard Institution,2 Park Street, London W l A 2BS.

4. German Standard Organisation (Deutscher Norrnenqusschuss)1 Berlin 30, Burggrafenstrasse 47.

The ultrasonic standards issued by the above organizationsare listed along with their titles in Table 7.1. Salientfeatures of two standards, ASME Boiler and Pressure VesselCode and British Standard BS 3923, are given in the followingsections.

7.2 ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code

(a) Established Process and Features

Initial enactment of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Codewas in 1914. It was established by a committee set up in1911 with members from utilities, states, insurancecompanies, and manufacturers. Whether or not it is adoptedin the USA is left to the discretion of each state andmunicipality. In any event its effectiveness in reducinghuman casualities due to boiler accidents since adoption iswidely recognised.Rules for nuclear reactor pressure vessels were included inthe Code in 1953, and now the Code is adopted by almost allstates of the United States and the provinces of Canada.After the initial establishment, revisions are issued onceevery three years, so that currently effective is the 1986edition. One of the features of the ASME Code is that partialrevisions are issued twice a year, the summer addenda (July1st), and the winter addenda (January 1st). These addendaused to be made effective six months after the date of issue,but now they are effective immediately upon issuance.. Any

183

Page 181: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

question about interpretation of rules may be submitted tothe committee in a letter of inquiry, and answers from thecommittee are published as Code Cases from time to time.

(b) Constitution of ASME Code

The following contents constitute the ASME Code, 1986edition. Rules for nondestructive examination arecollectively prescribed in Section V. Other Sections foreach component (Section I, III or VIII) reference Section Vor other applicable rules for examination methods, and SNT-TC-1A ( ASNT Recommended Practice) for qualification ofnon-destructive examination personnel. Acceptance criteriaare specified in each Section, or in some cases are quotedfrom ASTM.

1986 ASMEBOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL CODEAn American National Standard

Section *I. Power Boilers

II. Material SpecificationsPart A-Ferrous MaterialsPart B-Nonferrous MaterialsPart C-Welding Rods, Electrodes and Filler Metals

III. Subsection NCA-General Requirements for Division1 and Division 2

III. Division 1Subsection NB-Class 1 ComponentsSubsection NC-Class 2 ComponentsSubsection ND-Class 3 ComponentsSubsection NE-Class MC ComponentsSubsection NF-Component SupportsSubsection NG-Core Support StructuresAppendices

III. Division 2-Code for Concrete Reactor Vessels andContainments

IV. Heating BoilersV. Nondestructive ExaminationVI. Recommended Rules for Care and Operation of Heating

BoilersVII. Recommended Rules for Care of Power Boilers

Available in bound and loose-leaf versions. Eitherversion may be used for ASME Certification.

184

Page 182: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

VIII. Pressure VesselsDivision l

IX, Division 2-Alternative RulesIX. Welding and Erasing QualificationsX. Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic VesselsXI. Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant

Components-Division 1

(c) Rules Concerning Ultrasonic Examination

In ASME Code Section V, ultrasonic examination is addressedin Articles 4,5 and 23,

Article 4 Ultrasonic Examination Methods ForInservice InspectionThis Article describes or references requirementswhich are to be used in selecting and developingultrasonic examination procedures and in thedimensioning of indications for comparison withacceptance standards.

Article 5 Ultrasonic Examination Methods For MaterialsAnd Fabrication

This Article describes or references requirementswhich are to be used in selecting and developingultrasonic examination procedures for welds,parts,components,materials,and thickness determinations. Inall cases accept welds the Article refers to Article23 which contains the appropiate ASTM Standards.The examination of welds is specified in considerabledetails since there is no appropriate ASTM Standard,

Article 23 Ultrasonic StandardsThis Article includes various ultrasonicexamination standards for materials such aslarge forgings, steel plates, castings andpipes (including spiral welding), and foreach ultrasonic general technique;resonance method, straight beam method, andimmers i on method.These standards are ASTM standards adoptedinto ASME as they are or with somemodification. They are assigned the samenumber as ASTM with a prefix S added (ASTMA-388 — ASME SA-388, SA-435, SA-577, SA-578, SA-609, SA-543, SE-114, SE-213, SE-214, and SE-273.

185

Page 183: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

(d) Acceptance criteria

As already stated, acceptance criteria are notspecified in Section V but each Code Section has tobe consulted to find what Article of Section V isquoted there.The examination is conducted in accordancewith the appropriate Article, and acceptance orrejection determined in accordance with the referencingCode Section.As an example, acceptance criteria for welds arespecified in the same way in all of,

Section I , PW-52Section III, Subsection NB, HB-5330, andSection VIII, Division 1, Appendix 12 (Mandatory),which are as follows;

Discontinuities are unacceptable if the amplitudeexceeds the reference level, and discontinuities havelengths which exceed:

(!) 1/4 in. (6mm) for t up to 3/4 in. (19 mm),inclusive;

(2) 1/3 t for t from 3/4 in. (19 mm) to 2-1/4 in.(57 mm), inclus ive;

(3) 3/4 in. (19 mm) for t over 2-1/4 in. (57 mm).Where discontinuities are interpreted to be cracks, lack offusion, or incomplete penetration, they are unacceptableregardless of discontinuity or signal amplitude.

7.3 BS 3923 : PART 1 : MANUAL EXAMINATION OF FUSION WELDS INFEKRITIC STEELS

Section 1. General1. ScopeThis part of BS 3923 deals with manual ultrasonicexamination of fusion welded joints in ferritic steels notless than 6 mrn thick.Noszle welds are covered in Part 3.4. Items for agreementThe following items to be agreed between contractingparties:

186

Page 184: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

(a) Size and type of the smallest flaw to be detected.(b) Method of setting sensitivity(c) Extent of examination{d) Stages at which examination is to be conducted(e) Surface condition

5. OperatorsOperators shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of thecontracting parties their ability in using the actualequipment to be employed for the examination.6. Equipment6.1 Presentation

___«_.^_____

A-scope, with permanent graticule scale markings.6.2 Frequency within the range 1 MHz to 6 MHz.6.3 Time base linearity to within 13» over the whole range.6.4 Amplifier linearity to full graticule height.6.5 Attenuator shall have steps not greater than 2dB and an

accuracy of not less than l dB over a 20dB range.Internal 'noise' from probe shall not interfere withinterpretation of results at the working sensitivity.

6.7 Resolution to block A7 in BS 2704, and the steps areresolved when their echoes are clearly separated at 6 dBbelow maximum echo height.

7. InformationThe operator shall be given the following information beforecommencement of weld examination:a. Type of ferritic steel and form (cast, forged, rolled),b. Joint preparation.c. Weld process; type and probable location of defects

likely to occur.d. Details of any repairs,e. Postweld heat treatment.f. Acceptance standard, including test sensitivity and

acceptable flaw sises.

187

Page 185: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

8. Surface8.1 ConditionSurface contact with probe must be satisfactory and maintaingood coupling. Spatter and loose scale to be removed.Surface roughness not to exceed 6.3 urn Ra or 250 C.L.A.

8.2 ProfileWeld ripples to be removed to avoid confusing surfaceechoes.For critical examination, weld reinforcement shall beremoved by grinding or machining to produce a smoothblending with the parent material on each side of the weld.Variations across weld not to exceed 1.5 mm in any 50 mmlength.

Section 2 . Parent metal examination

9. GeneralParent plate will be tested after welding.a. To locate flaws, such as laminations or tears.b. To establish material thickness.c. To note any attenuation variations.

13. Test sensitivity (normal probe)Second book wall echo to be maintained at full screen heightduring examination.

14. ReportingA report on parent material examination shall be madedescribing and indicating local areas of laminations,surface flaws, areas of high attenuation.

Section 3. Weld examination procedures

15. GeneralWeld examination to consist of :a. Parent material.b. Weld root.c. Fusion faces.

188

Page 186: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

d. Weld body.e. Defects lying transverse to weld,

16. Location of rootBefore testing the exact location of root shall be made bya normal or transverse wave probe and accurately marked.

17.6. Test sensitivityThe sise and type of the smallest flaw to be detected shallbe agreed between contracting parties before testing iscommenced.The sensitivity of the flaw detector/probe combination shallbe such that a clear signal will be obtained from thesmallest defect to be detected throughout the scanningrange.

18. Root scan with angle probes18.1. GeneralA fixed root scan should be carried out from both sidesusing a guide strip.

18.2. CalibrationCalibration of equipment in accordance with BS 2704 and BS4331 Part 3.These checks must include :a. Position of probe index,b. Time base,c. Angle of refraction,d. Vertical beam spread,e. Horizontal beam spread.

23. Evaluation of imperfectionsAny significant echo signal noted shall be furtherinvestigated by the appropriate technique to :a. Confirm the existence of flaws.b. Determine flaw location with reference to datum points.c. Estimate the flaw size.d. Establish nature of flaw.

189

Page 187: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

24. Presentation of resultsScale drawing are recommended indicating length of defect,depth, minimum depth below a given surface, i.e. the innersurface of a pressure vessel.

Appendix AGuidance to probe selection,

Appendix BGuidance on the determination of probe characteristics

Appendix CNote for guidance on the D.G.S. diagram.

Appendix DMethod for setting sensitivity where maximum sensitivity isrequired.

Appendix EMethod for determining the location, size and nature offlaws.

190

Page 188: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Table 7.1 List of Standards

Organization

ASTM

t

StandardNumberNIL

NIL

NIL

«A21

A376

A388

A418

A435

A450

A503

A531

A556

A557

A577

A578

A609

A745

B548

Title

Proposed Practice for Evaluating theCharacteristics Units.Proposed Practice for Evaluating theElectronic Characteristics of Sectionsof Pulse-Echo Ultrasonic InspectionInstruments.Proposed Recommended Practice for theDetection and Evaluation of Discontinuitiesby the Immersed Pulse-Echo UltrasonicMethod Using Longitudinal Waves.Carbon Steel Axles, Non-Heat-Treated andHeat-Treated, for Railway Use.Specifications for Seamless AusteniticSteel for High Temperature Control StationService.Ultrasonic examination of Heavy SteelForgings.Ultrasonic Inspection of Turbine andGenerator Steel Rotor Forgings.Straigh-Beam Ultrasonic Examination ofSteel Plates for Pressure Vessels.General Requirements for Carbon, FerriteAlloy, and Austenitic Alloy Steel Tubes.Ultrasonic Examination of Large ForgedCrankshafts .Ultrasonic Inspection of Turbine-GeneratorSteel Retaining Rings.Standard Specification for Seamless Cold-Drawn Carbon Steel Feedwater Heater Tubes.

—Standard Specification for Electric-Resistance Welded Carbon Steel FeedwaterHeater Tubes.Ultrasonic, Angle-Beam Examination of SteelPlates.Straight-Beam Wave Ultrasonic Examinationof Plain and Clad Steel Plates for SpecialApplications.Longitudinal Beam Ultrasonic Inspection ofCarbon and Low-Alloy Steel Castings.Ultrasonic Examination of Austenitic SteelForgings.Specification for Standard Method forUltrasonic Inspection of Aluminum AlloyPlate for Pressure Vessels.

191

Page 189: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Table 7.1 List of Standards

Organization

ASTM

StandardNumberB594

C597

D2845

D2966

E114

E127

E164E213

E214

E273

E317

E428

E453

E49E500

E587

E588

E664

E797

Title

Ultrasonic Inspection of Aluminum-AlloyProducts for Aerospace Applications.Test Method for Pulse Velocity ThroughConcrete.Test Method for Pulse Velocities andUltrasonic Elastic Constants of Rock,Laboratory Determination of.Test Method for Cavitation Erosion-Corrosion Characteristics of Aluminum inEngine Coolants Using Ultrasonic Energy.Recommended Practice for Ultrasonic Pulse-Echo Straight-Beam Testing by the ContactMethod.Fabricating and Checking Aluminum AlloyUltrasonic Standard Reference Blocks.Ultrasonic Contact Inspection of Weldrnents.Ultrasonic Inspection of Metal Pipe andTubing for Longitudinal Discontinuities.Immersed Ultrasonic Testing by theReflection Method Using Pulsed LongitudinalWaves . — — _— _Ultrasonic Inspection of Longitudinal andSpiral Welds of Welded Pipe and Tubing.Evaluating Performance Characteristics ofUltrasonic Pulse-Echo Testing SystemsWithout the Use of Electronic MeasurementInstruments.Fabrication and Control of Steel ReferenceBlocks Used in Ultrasonic Inspection.Recommended Practice for Examination ofFuel Element Cladding Including theDetermination of the Mechanical Properties.Measuring Ultrasonic Velocity in Materials.Standard Definitions of Terms Relating toUltrasonic Testing.Ultrasonic Angle Beam Examination by theContact Method.Detection of Large Inclusions in BearingQuality Steel by the Ultrasonic Method.Measurement of the Apparent Attenuation ofLongitudinal Ultrasonic Waves by ImmercionMethod.Measuring Thickness by Manual UltrasonicPulse-Echo Contact Method.

192

Page 190: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Table 7.1 List of Standards

Organization

ASTM

SME

BritishStandardOrganization

StandardNumber804

F600

G46

Section V

B.S. 4331

B.S. 2704

B.S. 3923

B.S. 3683

DD28

M36

B.S. 4408

B.S. 4336

B.S. 3889

DTD 936

Title

Calibration of an Ultrasonic Test Systemby Extrapolation Between Flat-Bottom HoleSizes.Nondestructive ultrasonic Evaluation ofSocket and Butt Joints of ThermoplasticPiping.Recommended Practice for Examination andEvaluation of Pitting Corrosion.

Boiler and Pressur VellelCode: Nondestructive Examination.Method for assessing the performancecharacteristics of Ultrasonic flawdetection equipment. Part 1 : overallperformance Part 2 : Electrical performancePart 3 : Guidance on the inservicemonitoring of probes (excluding immersionprobes ) .

Calibration block and recommendations fortheir use in ultrasonic flaw detection.Methods for ultrasonic examination of weldsPart 1 : Manual examination of fusionwelded butt joints in ferritic steels.Part 2 : Automatic examination of fusionwelded butt joints in ferritic steels.Part 3 : Manual examination of nozzle weldsGlossary of terror, used in non destructivetesting. Part 4: Ultrasonic flaw detection.Method of ultrasonic inspection of turbinesand compressor discs using the AVG diagramtechnique.

—Ultrasonic testing of special forgings byan immersion technique using flat -bottomedholes as a reference standard.Recommendations for non-destructive methodsof test for concrete. Part 5 : 1974Measurement of the velocity of ultrasonicpulses in concrete.Methods for non-destructive testing ofplate material.Part 1Â Ultrasonic detection of laminarimperfections in ferrous wrought plate.Methods for non-destructive testing ofpipes and tubes. Part 1A Ultrasonictesting of ferrous pipes (excluding cast).Ultrasonic inspection of aluminium alloyinspection and hand forgings.

193

Page 191: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Table 7.1 List of Standards

Organization

BritishStandardOrganization

GermanStandardOrganisation

StandardNumber

DTD 937

DIN 54119DIN 54120

DIN 54122

Title~

ultrasonic inspection of aluminium alloyplate.

Ultrasonic testing definitions.Ultrasonic calibration block Ho. 1 and itsuse for adjusting and checking ultrasonicpulse-echo equipment._ _ _ _. — _Ultrasonic calibration block No. 2 and itsuse for the adjustment and control ofultrasonic pulse-echo equipment.

194

Page 192: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

8. RECORDING AND EVALUATION OF RESULTS

8.1 Determination Of The Location, Size And Nature Of A Defect

After the initial examination, any significant echo signal isinvestigated to : -(a) determine the flaw location with reference to a datum.(b) estimate the flaw sise.(c) estimate the nature of the flaw.

8.1.1. Defect Location

The location of a defect which has been detected can be readdirectly from the screen of a flaw detector which has beenproperly calibrated. In the case of normal probes thelocation of a defect below the surface is given directly asmay be seen from Figure 8.1 . But in the case of angleprobes the location below the surface has to be calculatedfrom a knowledge of the beam path length and the probeangle.

Probe

defect

Defect echo

JL.8 9 10

Figure 8.1

For example in Figure 8.2 d/B = Cos 0 where ld' is thedepth of the defect below the surface, 8 is the probe angleand 'R' is the length of the sound beam path to the defect.R is also called 'range' and is read directly from thecalibrated screen by noting the position of the defect echo.The location of the defect below the surface can then bedetermined by calculating d. Defect location in theultrasonic inspection of welds is often done using a FlawLocation Slide. Defect location can also be determined byproducing an accurate sketch or by calculation.

195

Page 193: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

defect

Figure 8.2

8.1.2 Methods Of Defect Sizing

The commonly used methods for flaw s is ing in ultrasonictesting are :i. 6 dB drop method,

ii. 20 dB drop method,iii. Maximum amplitude method,iv. DGS diagram method.

These methods are discussed below.

8.1.2.1 6 dB Drop Method

The basic assumption in this method is that the echo heightdisplayed when the probe is positioned for maximum responsefrom the flaw will fall by one half (i.e. by 6 dB andhence the name) when the axis of the beam is brought in toline with the edge of the flaw as illustrated in Figure8.3. The method only v/orks when used as described if theultrasonic response from the flaw is essentially uniformover the whole reflecting surface.

Figure 8.3

196

Page 194: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

The procedure to determine the dimension of a flaw parallelto the probe movement ie. the flaw length is as follows :

i. Position the probe to get maximum echo from theflaw.

ii. Adjust the height of the echo to some convenientscale on the CRT screen by using the gain controlof the flaw detector.

iii. Move the probe across the flaw in one directionuntil the echo height falls to one half of theheight adjusted in (ii).

iv. Mark the centre of the probe on the surface of thetest specimen for this probe position.

v. Now move the probe in the opposite directionthrough the maximised echo position to the positionwhen the echo height again falls to one half of theheight adjusted in (ii).

vi. Mark the probe centre at this position as well.vii. The distance between the two marks gives the

dimension of the defect parallel to the probemovement.

If the reflectivity of the flaw varies considerably ,theprobe is moved until the last significant echo peak isobserved just before the echo drops off rapidly. This peakis brought to full screen height and then the probe is movedas in iii. A similar procedure is followed for the other endof the flaw.The 6 dB drop method is suitable for the sizing of flawswhich have sises of the same order or greater than that ofthe ultrasonic beam width but will give inaccurate resultswith flaws of smaller sizes than the ultrasonic beam. It istherefore generally used to determine flaw length but notflaw height.

8.1.2.2. 20 dB Drop MethodThis method utilises for the determination of flaw size, theedge of the ultrasonic beam where the intensity falls to 10%(i.e. 20 dB) of the intensity at the central axis of thebeam.The procedure to determine the size of the flaw with the 20db drop method is as follows:

j. Position the probe to get a maximum echo amplitudefrom the flaw.

ii. Adjust the echo amplitude to some convenienton the CRT screen using the gain control of theflaw detector.

197

Page 195: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

iii. Move the probe first across the flaw in onedirection until the echo amplitude falls to l/10thof its original height (i.e. by 20 dB).

iv. Mark the position of the probe index on the surfaceof the test specimen at this position.

v. Now move the probe in the opposite directionthrough the maximised echo position until the echoamplitude again falls to l/10th of its originalheight.

vi. Mark the position of the probe index on the surfaceat this position.

vii. Measure the distance between the two markings.viii. Determine the beam width </> at the depth, d, of

the flaw from the beam profile diagram or from theequation.

- D -f 2 ( d - Xo ) tan ——— (8.1)Where <f> = beam width.

d = defect depth.Xo = near field length.D = probe diameter.

ix. <vii) minus (viii), as illustrated in Figure 8.4will thus give the dimension of the flaw parallelto the movement of the ultrasonic beam.

As for the 6dB drop method if the echo amplitude varies asthe probe is traversed across the flaw the 20dB drop shouldbe carried ,out from the last significant echo peak.The 20 dB drop method gives more accurate results than the6 dB drop method because of the greater control one has onthe manipulation of the ultrasonic beam. However sizeestimation using either the 6 dB or 2o dB drop methods haveinherent difficulties which must be considered. The mainproblem is that the amplitude may drop for reasons otherthan the beam scanning past the end of the defect :

1. The defect may taper in section giving a reductionin cross sectional area within the beam. If thisis enough to drop the signal 20 dB or 6 dB thedefect may be reported as finished while it in factcontinues for an additional distance.

2. The orientation of the defect may change so thatthe probe angle is so longer giving maximumresponse - another probe may have to be used.

3. The defect may change its direction.4. The probe may be twisted inadvertantly.5. The surface roughness may change.

198

Page 196: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Figure 8.4

8.1.2.3. Flaw Location Slid©

The School of Applied Non Destructive Testing (SANDT) atCambridge, U.K., has developed a Flaw Location Slide for thelocation and sizing of defects in welds using the 20 dB dropmethod. The Flaw Location Slide consists of a beam plottingchart and a transparant cursor.' Both parts of a FlawLocation Slide are shown in Figure 8.5 a and b.

14 13 12 11 1O 9 3 7 5 4 3 2 101 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14

Figure 8.5 a .

Transparent Cursor side view

• 1• 2• 3• 4• 5• 6. 7. 8• 9• 10

0

Figure 8.5 b .

199

Page 197: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

8.1.2.3.1 Plotting the Beam Spread (Vertical Plane) on theFlaw Location Slide.

The procedure for plotting the be^i« nprp-nd ( verti r-M pi «ne)on the flaw location slide using the IOW Beam Profile Blockis as follows :

i. Calibrate the time base.ii. Determine the probe angle and probe index of the

probe to be used.iii. Mark the probe index on the probe.iv. Draw the probe angle on the beam plotting chart as

shown in figure 8.6 .v. Draw horizontal lines across the beam centre at

depths of 13, 19, 25, 32, 43, 50, 56, and 62 mm(figure 8.6)13 12 11 10 9 3 7 6 5 4 32 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

\ f\ \' N 1" """ i*0 " yyT-j s v-'I&h iV^\ x-_ ' J ~\ * < /'.- '^^/- JÏL

Figure 8.6 ,

vi. Using the procedure outlined in section 5determine the distances ab and ac and thecorresponding beam path lengths (BPL) for eachhole.

vii. Plot points b and c on the beam plotting chartwith respect to the point a (point of croyy-section of the beam angle and the horizontal linesdrawn on the chart for each hole) on the beamplotting chart and draw lines through these pointsas illustrated in figure 8.7 .

viii. Using the procedure outlined above, draw the beamprofiles of 45° and 70° probe on one side of thechart and the beam profileother side of the chart. of 60 probe on the

200

Page 198: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

7•*- ? M M M-4.

8.1.2.3.2. Using the Flaw Location Slide for Flaw Locationin Welds

For the location of flaws in welds the flaw location slideis used as follows :

i. Draw the beam profile (vertical plane) of the probeto be used.

ii. Draw the scale diagram of the weld preparation andits mirror image, on the transparent cursor asshown in figure 8.8 .In figure 8.8 the weld preparation of a singlevee weld in 20 mm plate, and its mirror image, isdrawn on the cursor.

iii. Let a defect be found in a single vee weld in 20 mmthick plate using a 60° probe. Let the echo of the

Figure 8.8

201

Page 199: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Figure 8.9 .

14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 8 S 4 32 1 0 1 ,2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1C 14

Figure 8.10 .

defect maximize when the probe index is at adistance of 17 mra from the weld centre line. Thisdistance, known as the stand off distance, is notedalong with the beam path length or range from theCRT screen. Let the range for this particulardefect be 20 mm. This is illustrated in figure8.9 .

iv. Now set 17 mm on the horizontal scale on the beamplotting chart against the centre line of thecursor, as shown in figure 8.10.

v. Against 20 rnrn down the beam centre line place afine mark. This is the position of the defect inthe weld. In this example it is at the weld centreline and at about half the specimen thickness(Figure 8.10).

vi. For the location of a flaw, the echo of whichmaximizes when the probe location is between the1/2 skip and full skip, use is made of the mirrorimage of the weld preparation. Let the flaw bedetected in the weld by a 60 probe as shown infigure 8.11.

202

Page 200: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

1 4 1 3 1 C 1 1 1 0 9 8 7 ' 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 '10 11 12 13 14

» HU lü î- </•l Beam plotting chart „ '/,-, x

Figure 8.11 .

Let the stand-off distance be 60 mm and the beampath length be 61 mm.vii. Align the 60 mm mark on the horisontal scale with

the central line of the cursor (figure 8.11).viii. Mark the point 61 mm clown the beam centre as shown

in figure 8.11. This point gives the location ofthe flaw in the weld.

8.1.2.3.3. Defect Sizing using the Flaw Location Slide

The procedure for determining the size and orientation of aflaw in the vertical plane is as follows

i. Find the maximum echo from the defect and plot itsposition on the transparent cursor using theprocedure described in section 8.1.2.3.2.

ii. How move the probe toward the weld centre line fromits position of maximum echo until the echo heightis reduced by 20 dB.

iii. Note the stand-off distance and range at thisposition of the probe.

iv. Plot this information on the slide as in (i) butthis time using the bottom edge of the beam insteadof its centre.

v. Now move the probe away from the weld central line,through the position of maximum echo, until theecho height drops again by 20 dB.

vi. Mote the stand-off and range for this position ofthe probe.

203

Page 201: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

vii. Plot this information on the slide using the topedge of the beam this time.

viii. If the above procedure is used for the sising ofthe flaw shown in figure 8.12 a, the three pointson the cursor would have shown the size andorientation of the flaw as illustrated in figure8.12 b.

Figure 8.12a

Figure 8.12 b.8.1.2.4. Maximum Amplitude Technique

.This method takes in to account that fact that most defectswhich occur do not present a single, polished reflectingsurface, but in fact take a rather ragged path through thematerial with some facets of the defect surface suitablyoriented to the beam and some unfavourably oriented. Figure8.13 illustrates this, showing a crack propagating in aweld.Each of the reflecting facets will be at a slightlydifferent range, and although they may be too closetogether to resolve as separate echoes, the echo envelopecan nevertheless be regarded as a series of overlappingseparate echoes. In fact the envelope may look likefigure 8.1 a, b, or c depending on the degree of rangevariation from the different facets and on the resolutionof the equipment.

204

Page 202: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Figure 8.13.

( a )Facets poorly resolved

( b )Better resolution

Figure 8.14.

( c )Clearly resolved

As the beam is scanned across the surface of the defect, thebeam centre will sweep each facet in turn. As it does, theecho from that facet will reach a maximum and then begin tofall, even though the main envelope may at any instant, berising or falling in echo amplitude. The stand-off andrange of the maximum echo of each facet is noted andplotted on the flaw location slide. This results in aseries of points which trace out the extent of the defect.The gain is increased to follow the series of maximum echoesuntil the beam sweeps the last facet.

8.1.2.5. DGS Diagram Method

If after setting the sensitivity, drawing the record lineand the attenuation curve on the DGS diagram of the probeused (as described in section 5.5), a flaw is detectedduring scanning whose echo exceeds the reporting level {i.e.2/5th full screen height) the equivalent sise of the disctype reflector for this defect is estimated as follows forboth a normal beam probe and an angle beam probe :

i. Determine the flaw echo amplitude in decibels abovethe reporting level (i.e. above the 2/5th fullscreen height). Let the dB value be AdB.

ii. Locate the defect depth on the DGS diagram in nearfield length units for normal beam probes, and mmfor angle beam probes. Let the location be marked asX.

205

Page 203: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

iii. At X determine the clB difference between the recordlevel and attenuation curve already drawn on theDGS diagram. Let this difference be B dB.

iv. Determine the difference ( A-B ) dB.v. Determine the point of intersection of a line drawn

perpendicular to the D-scale at X and the linedrawn perpendicular to the G-scale at (A-B) dB.

vi. Determine the S-value of the curve in the DGSdiagram which lies nearest to the point ofintersection determined in (v).

vii. Determine the diameter of the equivalent disc shapereflector in mm as follows :(a) for a normal beam probe multiply the S-value

by the diameter of the probe crystal.(b) for an angle beam probe the S-value itself

gives the diameter of the equivalent disc shapereflector.

Example 1 (Normal beam probe)Probe frequency - 5MHaProbe crystal dia - 10 mmSensitivity setting = as described in section 5.5.Near field length = 21 mm

i. Echo height above the reporting = 9 dBlevel of 2/5th full screen height

42ii. Flaw depth = 42 mm ,{ ——— = 2 near field length)

21iii. Difference between the record level and the

attenuation curve at 4 near field units on DGSdiagram of Figure 5.34 is l dB.

iv. Difference between (i) and (iii) = 8 dB,v. Point of intersection of a line draw at 2 near

field lengths and line drawn at 8 dB lies close to0.4 S-value line (DGS diagram of figure 5.34).

vi. Equivalent disc diameter = 0.4 x 10 = 4mrn.

Example 2 (Angle beam probe)Sensitivity setting = as in section 5.i. Flaw echo amplitude above the reporting level = 40dB

ii. Flaw depth = 50 mm

206

Page 204: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

iii. Difference between record level and attenuationcurve at 50 mm = 12dB from DGS diagram of figure 5.35

iv. Difference 40-12 - 28 dB.v. Point of intersection of line drawn perpendicular to

the D-scale at 50 mm and the line drawnperpendicular to G-scale at 28 dB above the recordlevel lies close to the 5mm S-curve.

vi. Hence the diameter of equivalent disc = 5mm.

i.1.3. Déterminât ion of the Nature of a Defect

After obtaining information about the location and sise ofa defect, and having a knowledge of the manufacturingprocess, an estimation of the nature of the defect can bemade. The nature of a flaw is ascertained by a series ofcontrolled movements of the probe. Different type of probemovements are as shown in figure 8.15.

( C (\\1\\\\\\\

'( C (

-*x

.

C ( C<f ^\\\\\\_J-^

\\\r \U

i C i C C

mi i_ LJ

C

rL.1

1J

Rotational Orbital Lateral Traversing

Figure 8.15 Probe movement

In general, for welds,of the following types.

a flaw can be differentiated as one

(a) Isolated Pore

A pore, normally being round, is a very poorreflector. Theoretically, only those rays of thebeam which hit the pore perpendicularly arereflected to the probe. All rays impacting at anangle are dispersed. Thus, the reflected soundpixtyuure ia small as is the eoho on thescreen(Figure 8.16).The height and of this echodoes not change when the probe is orbited aroundthe pore at a constant distance even from theother side of the weld seam.

207

Page 205: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

AFigure 8.16

During rotational, lateral and transverse scansthe echo rises and falls quickly and smoothly asthe beam scans through the discontinuity.

(b) Porosity

This gives rise to a lot of tiny echoes, dependingon the number and distribution of the pores(figure 8.17).

Figure 8.17In most cases, echoes from pore pockets can bedistinguished from slag inclusions because theformer ones give much smaller echoes whereas thelatter ones give high» pine-shaped echoes.

(c) Slag inclusion

The echo from this flaw can be as high as a crackor lack of fusion but the shape of the echo isquite different. As a result of its raggedsurface, which offers many small targets atdifferent distances, the echo rises like a pinetree from the sero line of the screen (Figure8. 18)When the probe is orbited around the flaw on bothsides of the weld seam the echo height usuallywill not change; only the branches of the pinetree will change shape and position. If the flawis elongated parallel to the seam, a lateral scanwill show a steady echo signal height over asignificant length of scan while a depth scan willshow a sharp peak over a short distance. Like

208

Page 206: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Figure 8.18.pores, slag inclusions have no preferred locationin the weld searn.

(d) Planar defects

Examples of such defects are cracks and incompletepenetration.They reflect the sound energy totallyin a particular direction. The echo height fallsoff drastically when the probe is orbited aroundthe defect or rotated about its own axis from itsposition of maximum echo signal (Figure 8.19).Therefore, it should be easy to distinguish a slaginclusion from a planar flaw.

A1) 2)Figure 8.19.

Since cracks, lack of penetration and lack of sidewall fusion are all planar flaws, they cannot bedifferentiated from each other simply by the echoheight and shape when being radiated from one sideof the seam. To determine the nature of each flawwi'th certainty, the location of the flaw inweld has to be established,penetration and lack of side

theSince incomplete

wa11 fu s ion h avepreferred locations in the weld searn, if a planarflaw is located at the centre of the weld in a

209

Page 207: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

single-vee butt joint, this flaw will hardly be alack of side-wall fusion.If a planar target is located at the edge of thebead it is probably a lack of side-wall fusion.This can be confirmed by irradiating the weld fromthe other side.If the flaw is orientated vertically, the echoheight will be nearly equal when checking fromeither side. If it is inclined, the echo heightwill differ distinctly.

(e) Although it is easy to recognise a 'line' flaw, itis often difficult to decide whether such a flawis continuous or intermittent. If intermittent,it is even more difficult to determine the extentof the gaps between the flaws, chiefly because ofbeam spread and the consequent overlapping ofsuccessive flaws. The echo height usuallyfluctuates, the extent of the rise and fall beinga function of the length of the gap. A continuousbut ragged flaw has a similar effect due to randomreflection of the beam. But this can be detectedby slight oscillation and swivelling of the probeopposite the point of echo fall. There will thenbe several points where the incidence of the beamis most favourable, and echo height will increasesharply. If, however, the the flaw isintermittent, the same movements will result inrapid decline of echo height.With practice, the study of echo response leads toa process of mental integration which enables theUT operator to classify each characteristicsequence with little conscious effort. Ifnecessary, such classification can be confirmed byusing the flaw location slide.

8.2 ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT

In order that the results of the ultrasonic examination maybe fully assessed, it is necessary for the inspectors'sfindings to be systematically recorded. The form of thereport may be different, but, generally, it must contain,clearly and concisely, the following information :(a) Indent!floation

i. Date of the Inspection,ii. Time of the Inspection,

iii. Place of the Inspection,iv. Customer for whom the work is done.v. Inspector carrying out the work.

210

Page 208: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

vi. Component examined. Serial Number, Description,Material.

vii. Code, Specification or standards used.

(b) Equipmenti. Flaw Detector.

ii. Probes, Size, Frequency, Angle,iii. Calibration and reference blocks used,iv. Couplant.

(c) Calibrationi. Sensitivity for all probes used,

ii. Timebase for all probes used {a base range for)iii. Attenuation and transfer corrections, where

appropriate.

(d) Techniquei. Scans made (limits and coverage with each probe)

ii. Sis ing method used,iii. Recording and reporting level used.iv. Limitations on inspection quality imposed byshape or situation of object, time or other factors.

(e) Résultei. Indications found.

ii. Scale drawing showing location and size ofdefects.

iii. Relationship between defects found and acceptancestandard.

The report should be made in plain language. Technicalterms should be used in their correct sense and initials orabbreviations should only be used after they have been usedonce with association with the full term, for example, "3rnrndiameter { 3mm ) , flat bottomed hole (f.b.h.)"Results, that are shown in tabular form, or in sclaedrawings, are easier to follow than long writtendescriptions. . .Examples of two typical report forms and sketches,indicating the location of flaws, are shown in figure 8.20and 8.21.

211

Page 209: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

SINGAPORE INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCHULTRASONIC TEST REPORT

This is A Test Report and Not A Quality CertificateThis Report Must Hot Be Used For Advertisement.

Our Ref Date

Butt-Welded PlateClient : M/s ABC Company Site : Z - workshop

Job Identification

Joint No. 1

Helder

Flaw Detector: Krautkramer ÜSM2M

MaterialThickness

Type 1 steel25mm nominaloEdge Psreparation : 60 double-vee

Plate SurfacePreparation : As rolledWelding Process : Manual metal arcStress Relieved : Yes/NoProbes used :Size Frequency Angle Type

o(a) 8 x 9mm(b) 8 x 9mm(c) 20 'mm 0

4mHz4mHz4mHz

60c45MWB60MWB45SEB4H

Sensitivity Setting : Gain settings for evaluatingdiscontinuitienTest block25 mm 50 dB

45 ! 6055 dB ! 60 dB

Technique : Parent, met.nl

Butt weld

The parent metal was scanned with the SEprobe on both sides of the seam at 1 skipdistance from it.The weld was scanned on both sides of theseam and on both plate surfaces, wherenecessary, using both angle probes.All defect lengths were estimated usingthe 20-dB drop method.

Results :(a) Parent metal

(b) Weld

No lamination was detected in the parent metalscanned.Echoes detected were below 20X of corrected PREor each discontinuity length was less than themaximum allowed in ASME Section 8, except thosedetected in the areas as detailed in thefollowing sheets.

Figure 8.20

212

Page 210: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Our Ref : Date :

Job Description : Butt-welded Plate

Held No

Datum

Flaw No

Probe angleSignal rangeon screenGain setting{PRE + T. L)

Signal PREPRE Signal20% of PREDistance fromdatumDefect distancefrom surface

Defect depthSignal 20%of PRE

Defect type

Complianceto ASMESection 8'

deg.~~*~

mm

db

ram

mTq

~cm

mm

mm

Pass

Fail

1 - AEast end ofbefttn

1

60

50

62

X

150

5_ — _ — ....-....._ — _..

4

Slaginclusion

-

X———————————

»

2

60

50

62

"""

20

350

5

O

Blaginclusion

X

»••g

60

65

62

-

4

450

10

3

1 - B

60

-

-

-

-

!_ * _1

Lack of iPenetration!ii! Xi

X Îi

Operator :

Figure 8.20 (cont.)

213

Page 211: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT

Defect Location In Caititetres Fro« Datu»

Job Identification :

Datu. (EAST Qffl ) 1 - A{OF SCAN )

1 3 50 75 100 125

::

PlanVie«

Plan !Vim ! (!)

Plan ! (2)Vie» ! —

Pian ; {31Vie« ! —

PlanVie«

: : i : :i i ! i i i i! Plan ! 5! Vie* ! !

1 I I > l t I ) I ) I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I> l t t l t t t l l l l t t ) t l 1 I 1 1 I )

Figure 8.20 (cont . )

214

Page 212: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

THE UNIT INSPECTION«

USI^UMFANVUMll'tL) ' i.^^lj

•t^-^^fCf^K Report No.

_ UNIT INSPECTIONEUR

luuing OIliC*

Cuttomer . ,

C I'VVcx '-n ( bgc.Uiso**'TVW« ot woric Piece ,

J><?j.t>

QI^::..: ^ v*^^^

"" ULTRASONIC INSPECTION REPORT °Jle°' T***

Local «on ^ ^ Customer ùrocr »\o. Unit JoO -No.

|toentittcaiion ot WorK piece j\/

Service and Description of Work Piece

toU»

Weictmq Proccu

/MA7/q

Sue „. Material * * .

Inspecuon So*cil>CMK>n

Flaw Detector

UC/%

We.dmg Potmon Weider Streu Hedeved — — . .- — .

^6^rVtA^VXÄ, Yri 1 —— 1 No 1 —— 1

Acceptance Sueciftc*tion Reoornng Levei CouD'*nt

Pro» Tyoe. Sue. Ancie. Freouenev Time Saw Ck.aralion SIOCKI ana Time Base Calibration/• 1 / T 1 - t / j^

r/VCnir»! TMi* MfrP*fO JMfrPiiC^ Lf^}H? Vo£ |o" 5Î?'^7/T7 [Anole« fCO /V7/TJSensitivity Relercnce Stanoards and Gain Adiuitmenl

Tecnnipu« Summary Seaming 3° 45" 60° 70° ° Or" Sensitivity

• Xf'/V^i t • dB dB dB dB ÜB d8

GENERAL REPORT

Tett Restnctiof«OrCommw»

^l J f^^\ \*-cd r* ' T^-S jf &AAA. t»>*_ **_ />*J t>*'

ç\^ y £/<Âj&

'hi , ,/V^ .^, / LM^^. ~ /, A^f '-LJfsJ^A +-t'.^<~'iSA ^o

,», 7^~~^ /.^ ^ ^°.L< &L*~~ ttJut.J.-f:.*sà

, / t f . . ^ •&* */~S Akosl-Continuées on Snevt No.

t /*)

Irnoectinç Authority

S-wwd

Customer Un,| InioeCtion Techn»C'*ft ^^/.'/j^^/ «^^

S'0"«d u I Suoervi.or

Fiqure 8 .21

Page 213: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Ni

SKETCH SmitiR««.

THE UNIT INSPECTION COMPANY

INSPECTION REPORT CONTINUATION

Mctnoo o* imoveiion

Cwltomcr fjrgcr (wo.

R«DO'I No. «no Communion Sntr: So.

Commuta irom Sntci No.

Onil joo No.

Oeicnplion or lotniificatton o( Wor« - «et

' I

I... ._!_.:._.__:_i_l_! • _ _ . L

, ! . : . • • !..! . _ ; a• . }' i i ! • " 1 '!":"! • |"" •• i

Figure 8 .21 (cont.)

Page 214: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Appendix AWELDING PROCESSES AND DEFECTS

Al.O. Welding Processes

The welding processes which are commonly used -for the weldingof metals can be classified as

Al.l Electric Arc Welding Processes.Al.2 Gas Welding Processes.A1.3 Resistance Welding Processes.A1.4 Brazing Processes.A1.5 Miscellaneous Processes.

Al.l. Electric Arc Welding

Electric arc welding cavers the group of welding processeswherein an electric arc furnishes the heat source for thepurpose of welding. The arc is formed when a current is forcedby voltage across the gap between two electrodes or between anelectrode and the work (base metal) and thereby completes anelectrical circuit. The arc supplies concentrated heat to meltthe edges of the base metal and filler metal (when used) whichintermix in a common molten pool and, upon cooling, coalesce toform a continuous weld. In electric arc welding, the higherintensity of heat source (the electric arc), as compared with agas flame, permits a more rapid rate of heat input and higherefficiency of weld deposits. Immediately after the arc isstruck, a molten pool is formed and the welding of the joint isperformed by advancing the arc and adding filler metal if used.There are two types of arc used in the application of thisprocess. One is the direct arc, where the arc is maintainedbetween the work piece and the electrode. The other is theindirect arc, where the arc is maintained between two non-consumable carbon or tungsten electrodes. The weld in bothcases may be completed with or without the addition of fillermetal.The most widely used arc welding methods in metal working aredescribed and their features are discussed, in the followingsection.

Al.1.1. Shielded Metal - Arc Welding ( SMAW )

Shielded metal-arc welding, commonly called stickwelding, is one of the oldest of the modern arc-weldingprocesses. It is also the most widely used. Basically,it is a manual welding process in which the heat for

217

Page 215: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

welding is generated by an arc established between a-fluxcovered consumable electrode and the work. Theelectrode tip, weld puddle ,arc, and adjacent areas o-fthe work piece are protected from atmosphericcontamination by a gaseous shield obtained -from thecombustion and decomposition o-f the -flux covering.Additional shielding is provided for the molten metal inthe weld puddle by a covering of slag -formed by thereaction o-f ingredients in the flux with undesirablecontaminants, such as oxides and salts. Filler materialis supplied by the core of the consumable electrodetypically a wire rod about 14 in. long and withcertain electrodes, by metal powder included in theelectrode covering.Figure Al illustrates the basics of the SMAWprocess.

Piolecliva pas from eloclroclecoating

Molten weld metal

Solidifiedweld metal

Electrode coaling

Electrode wire

AteMetal droplets

Electrode Electrodeholder

Power supply

/Figure Al Typical SMAW Process

The wide use of shielded metal-arc welding stems fromits versatility and the fact that the equipment neededis relatively simple, quite portable, and less expensivethan other arc welding equipment. All one needs is anadequate power supply, a relatively simple electrodeholder, and a set of cables. With these welding can bedone indoors or out-doors on joints virtually in anyposition that can be reached by the electrode. Thatincludes vertical joints and those directly over-head.With a bent electode, even joints in blind areas, whichwould be impossible to reach with more cumbersomewelding guns associated with other equipment, can bewelded.

The versatility of the process is further enhancedbecause power-supply leads can be extended overrelatively long distances and there are no hoses forshielding gas or cooling water, as with other systems.This makes it an ideal repair process for equipment

218

Page 216: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

located in remote areas. Because it is well adapted toout-of-position welding and difficult locations,shielded metal-arc welding is very useful for joiningthe components of complex structural assemblies.But there are limitations to this manual weldingprocess. The deposition rates and deposition efficiency(ratio of the weight of deposited metal to the netweight of filler metal consumed exclusive of stubs) arelower than for gas metal arc and submerged arc weldingand welding has to stop when the electrode has beenconsumed leaving a wasted stub. Another limitation ofSMAW is that deslagging is necessary after each weldingpass to remove the slag covering that forms on the weldsurface.Many metals can be joined by shielded metal-arc welding,but the process is most applicable to carbon and lowalloy steels, stainless steels and heat resistingalloys. Cast irons and the high-strength and hardenabletypes of steel can also be joined by this process, butpreheating, postheating or both may be necessary.Electrode selection and care are also more critical forwelding hardenable steel. Copper and nickel alloys canalso be welded with the SMAW process although otherprocesses are more widely used for joining these metals.Softer metals, such as zinc, lead, and tin , which havelow melting and boiling temperatures, do not lendthemselves to shielded metal-arc welding.

A.1.1.2. Flux-Cored Arc Welding-FCAM

Flux—cored arc welding is a relatively new developmentdating back to the late 50's. It was introduced toovercome the major limitation of covered electrodes,namely, that the weld must be interrupted for electrodechanging, resulting in lost time and wasted materialwith every welding stub. The idea was to feed electrodematerial, including flux, to the arc from a continuouscoil. But the covering of stick electrodes cracks whenwound into a coil, and , also, there is no practical wayto feed electrical current to covered electrode wire.The solution to these problems was self shieldedelectrodes with fluxing and shielding material insidehollow tubular filler metal that can be coiled intocontinuous electrode wire and fed mechanically into thearc. The availability of such flux-cored wireelectrodes led to the development of semiautomaticwelding with manually actuated welding "guns" and offully automated welding with specially designed machinesto manipulate a mechanised welding head and/or thematerial to be joined.There are two major versions of the FCAW process; Selfshielding and with auxiliary-gas shielding. The selfshielding method is similar to shielded metal-arcwelding in that it depends.solely on the flux-core

219

Page 217: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

compounds for the generation of shielding gas.Auxiliary-gas shielding (usually carbon dioxide) can becombined with shielding gas from the core material byspecial equipment that delivers the gas to the electrodeholder. Figure A.2 illustrates the two versions ofthe FCAW .

— Gas optional..i:—- Flux coiod nlnrlio<ln,|i,. Molten metal

, ' 'Ï•' ! '• ' X

Wire facdcontrol

Controlsyslcni

Elßcliodnwircicül

Woih Conl actor Weldinr;control 110V supply niachinn

Figure A2 Typical FCAW Process.

Applications for the two flux-cored arc weldingprocesses overlap considerably, but the self-shieldingmethod is popular because it does not require any of theequipment associated with delivering the auxiliaryshielding gas. Also, the electrode holder is simplerthan that required for the auxiliary-gas shielding. Theself shielding method is used mainly for welding carbonsteels but also has been used successfully for weldingsome low alloy steels. It can be used for out-of-position welding if small diameter electrodes ofsuitable composition are selected. The self-shieldingprocess does not penetrate as deeply as the auxiliary-gasshielded method and, therefore, can be used effectivelywhere there is poor joint fitup.

Flux-cored arc welding with auxiliary-gas is used mainlyfor welding carbon and low-alloy steels and also hasbeen used successfully for welding stainless steels. Itis applicable to a wide range of work-metal thicknessesbeginning with metal as thin as 1/16 in.

220

Page 218: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Al.1.3 Bas Metal-Arc Welding - GMAW

Gas metal-arc welding, generally still referred to asMIS ( Metal Inertrgas ) welding, uses a bare continuousconsumable electrode wire, with arc shielding providedentirely by an externally supplied gas mixture (FigureA3) . The shielding gas protects the molten metal -fromreacting with constituents of the atmosphere, anddeoxidizers may be added as alloys in the electrode.

Nnrzle

Molten wold metal

Solidifiedwnkl metal

E 1er 11 ode

Shielding cas

Feed controlConliol system-».Gas out

Work Gun control

ShieldingCassourco

Contactor •control machine

Figure A3 Typical GMAW Process.

Shielding gases may be helium, argon, carbon dioxide, ortheir mixtures. The equipment required is similar tothat used with fluxcovered arc welding (with auxiliarygas shielding) except that the -filler wire is withoutflux core.

The outstanding features of gas metal-arc welding are:i. It will make top quality welds in almost all

major commercial metals, including carbon, alloyand stainless steels, as well as aluminium,copper, magnesium, iron, titanium and zirconium.It is the preferred process for the welding ofaluminium, magnesium, copper, and many of thealloys of these reactive metals.

ii. The absence of slag means that there is minimumpostweld and interpass clean up and that no slagcan be trapped in the weld.

221

Page 219: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

iii. Welding can be done in all positions.iv. It is a relatively high-speed welding process

because small diameter wire can be used with highwelding currents thereby providing highdeposition rates.

Al.1.4 Gas Tungsten-Arc Welding - GTAW

In gas tungsten-arc welding, commonly called TIG(tungsten-inert gas) welding, the heating arc is struckbetween a nonconsumable tungsten electrode and the work.As with GMAW, shielding is provided entirely by anexternally supplied gas mixture delivered to the weld-puddle area by the electrode holder (Figure A4). Fillermetal may or may not be used, depending on therequirements of the job.

Molten weld melal

Solidified wet

Welding lorrh

Shielding; p.asTungsten olccliodo

- A t e

Filler wire

Coolingwater supply

Inert nc or dc welderp.assupply

Fool pedal(optional)

Figure A4 Typical GTAW Process.

Gas tungsten-arc welding is quite similar to gas metal-arc welding, except that the electrode is used like atorch to produce the heat necessary for coalescence ofthe metals to be joined. In this way, metals can bejoined without the use of any filler wire. Pressure mayby used to assist coalescence as the edges of the jointapproach the molten state. If the work is too heavy formere fusing of the abutting edges, and if groove jointsor reinforcements are required filler metal is addedseparately. This is done with a filler rod fedmanually or mechanically directly in to the weld puddle.

222

Page 220: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Both the tip of the electrode and the tip o-f the fillermetal are kept under the protective gas shield at alltimes during the welding procedure.

The main features of gas tungsten-arc welding are :i. It will make top-quality welds in almost all

metals and alloys used in industry, includingmost grades of carbon, alloy and stainlesssteels, aluminium and most of its alloys,magnesium and most of its alloys, copper andvarious brasses and bronzes; high temperaturealloys of various types; many hard face alloys ;and such metals as titanium, zirconium, gold andsi 1 ver.

ii. Practically no post-weld cleaning is required asthere is no fluxing agent.

iii. There is no weld spatter because no filler metalhas to be transported across the arc stream.

iv. No slag is trapped in the weld material.v. Welding is possible in all positions.

vi. A wide range of metal thickness can be welded.The technique is particularly well suited forwelding thin materials where the requirements forquality and finish are exacting. For example ithas been successful in welding various alloys infoil thicknesses, or in welding such tiny andthin-walled objects as transistor cases,instrument diaphragms etc.

Al.1.5. Plasma-Arc Welding-PAW

Plasma-arc welding is similar to tungsten-arc welding,except that the arc from a tungsten electrode is forcedto pass' through a restriction before reaching the workpiece. This is accomplished by surrounding theelectrode with a nozzle having a small orifice, andforcing an inert gas through this nozzle. The result isa jet of intensely hot and fast-moving plasma caused bythe concentrated ionization of the arc. Plasma-arctorches regularly develop temperatures as high as 60,000F.

In practice, two separate streams of gases are suppliedto the welding torch. One stream surrounds theelectrode within the orifice body and passes through theorifice to form the hot plasma jet. This gas must beinert and is usually argon. The other stream of gaspasses between the orifice body and an outer shell ofthe torch to act as a shielding gas for the weld puddleand surrounding area. An inert gas such as argon canalso be used for shielding, but nonoxidizing gas

223

Page 221: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

mixtures, such as argon with 5 7. hydrogen, have oftenproved advantageous. As with gas tungsten-arc welding,filler metal may or may not be used, depending on therequirements of the particular joint.

G)

Transferred arc

Figure AS

Nonlransferredaic

Arc types for PAW

Two basic arc systems (Figure AS) are used togenerate the plasma : a transferred arc and a nantransferred arc. In the transferred arc system, thework piece is a part of the electrical circuit, as inother arc-welding processes, and the arc "transfers"from the electrode through the orifice to the work. Inthe non transferred arc system, the constricting nozzlesurrounding the electrode acts as an electricalterminal, and the arc is struck between it and theelectrode tip. In such a system heat is delivered tothe work by the hot plasma jet only. For welding, thetransferred arc is used almost exclusively, because thearc delivers more heat to the work.

The main featureswelding are :

and disadvantages of plasma-arc

i. Plasma-arc welding can be used to join carbonand alloy steels, stainless steels, heatresistant alloys, refractory metals, copperalloys and titanium alloys. Aluminium alloyshave also been successfully welded with plasmaarcs, but this is not a significant practice.

ii. Plasma-arc welding works extremely well for thinsections. Because of the stability anddimensional control provided by the restrictedarc, foils as thin as O.U25 mm have been weldedin production. Of course, welding such thinsections requires very precise fixtures and closecontrol over the process. The practical minimumwork thickness seems to be O.O75 mm. , although0.05 mm thick stainless steel has beensuccessfully welded for some years now. Themaximum work thickness is generally a function of

224

Page 222: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

cost. Above about 6mm other welding processesare usually faster and more economical.Sometimes, when quality requirement is high,economical joints can be made by a combination ofPAW and other less-expensive processes. Plasma-arc welding is used for the root pass; a cheaperprocess such as GMAW , for succeeding passes.

iii. The advantages of using the constricted arc ofplasma-arc welding over the gas tungsten-arcprocess include greater energy concentration,improved arc stability, higher welding speed, andlower width-to-depth ratio of the weld bead for agiven penetration.

iv. Some of the disadvantages of plasma-arc weldingcompared with conventional gas metal-arc weldinginclude higher cost of the equipment, short lifeof the orifice body, the need for greater welderknowledge, and a high rate of inert-gasconsumption. PAW equipment usually costs two tofive times as much as that required for gasmetal-arc welding. The cost of orifice-bodyreplacement can be kept down by using a torch inwhich the critical area is designed as an insertthat can be readily changed. Although moreknowledge by the welder is required, much plasma-arc welding is performed with automaticequipment, thus requiring relatively low operatorskills.

Al.1.6 Submerged-Arc Welding - SAW

In submerged-arc welding (Figure A6) a barecontinuous, consumable electrode wire generates thewelding arc under a protective blanket of granularfusible flux. This submerged arc is not visible to theoperator and welding progresses without any of thesparks, spatter, and flash of regular open-arc welding.The process is either semiautomatic or fully automatic,although its main application today is with fullyautomatic systems, primarily for plate and structuralfabrication work.

Regardless of the equipment, the bare consumableelectrode wire, generally a low carbon steel of closelycontrolled chemical composition, is mechanically fedthrough an electrical contact, tube and through the fluxblanket to the joint being welded. Granular flux isdeposited ahead of the arc.

In semi-automatic welding, the welding gun itself may beequipped with a flux feeding device, a small hopper atopthe gun, with gravity flow through a nozzle concentricwith the electrode, or a concentric nozzle connected toan air-pressurized flux tank. Flux may also be appliedin advance of the welding operation or ahead of theweld, from a separate hopper run along the joint. Infully automatic systems, the flux is fed continuously to

225

Page 223: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

tofl Mollen Granular

1

1 -;;s.- • XVV'\^V/ •''.'*>•••', \

Solidified Mollrnweld mêlai wctd ni

rjecliode j"3" ~J From (luxIfoppnr

»•—f-^r>

Tiller wireManually I luxheld Rtin or hpppr.r

Üheclion —of travel

Figure A6 Typical SAW Process.

the joint ahead of or with the arc, and suchinstallations are usually equipped withto pick up unused -flux -for reclamation.

vacuum systems

One of the main advantages of submerged-arc welding isthat it permits the use of very high currents, even onsmall diameter electrode wire, which results inextremely high welding heat. This is because thecurrent can be applied to the electrode very close toits tip, reducing the problems associated with excessiveresistance heating of electrode and surface flux.

Other features of SAW are :i. Joints can be prepared with a relatively shallow

V-groove, resulting in low filler metalconsumption.

11

111

IV.

v.

Although eye protection for the welder isrecommended, helmet-type shielding is notnormally required.High welding speeds and deposition rates, up toten times those of stick-electrode welding, canbe developed.Inexpensive electrode wires can bewelding unalloyed low carbon steels.

used for

The insulating blanket of flux above the arcprevents rapid escape of heat and concentrates it

226

Page 224: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

in the welding zone. Not only are the electrodesand base metal melted rapidly, but the fusion isdeep in to the base metal.

vi. The high welding speed possible with submerged-arc welding minimizes the total heat input of theprocess, and, therefore, helps to preventproblems due to heat distortion. Even relativelythick joints can be made with one pass bysubmerged -arc welding.

The limitations of submerged-arc welding, most, of whichare also common to other flux-type welding process,include the following :

i. Flux, flux handling equipment, and workholdingfixtures are required. Many joints also requirethe use of backing plates, strips or rings.

ii. Flux is subjected to contamination that may causeweld metal porosity.

iii. To obtain a weld of good quality, the base metalmust be homogeneous and essentially free ofscale, rust, oil and other contaminants.

iv. The solidified residue from the fused flux mustbe removed from the weld bead, which i.s often adifficult, time consuming operation. In multipass welding, the slag must be removed after eachpass.

v. The process usually is not suitable with metalless than about 4 mm thick, because burnthrough is likely.

vi. Except for special applications, welding islargely restricted to the flat position forgroove welds, and to flat and horizontalpositions for fillet welds.

Submerged arc welding is most suitable for productionwelding of unalloyed low-carbon steels containing notmore than 0.30 7. carbon, nor more than 0.05 "/.phosphorous and 0.05 "/. sulfur. Medium-carbon steelsand low-alloy structural steels are equally well suitedto submerged arc welding, but they more often requirepreheating, post heating and special electrode wire andfluxes. SAW is also applicable to some high alloy, heattreated and stainless steels, and it is a favoriteprocess for rebuilding and hard surfacing.

Al.1.7 Electro Slag Welding - ESW

Electro slag welding is a specialized adaptation ofsubmerged-arc welding and it is used for joining thickmaterials in the vertical position (Figure A7).Strictly speaking it is not an arc welding process at

227

Page 225: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

K)N>oo

l • .

v

-—^

«

-X

^—- Consum.ible rjuidc tube

>

/

^

1 t

•^_JJ-

4

r^^ — '•!

— Molten flux

—Plate

— Molten weldmetal

— Solidifiedweld metal

l\\__-„]l

f l Waler ji

'——l. f Water cooled

moldingshoes

Wnler out

Control p.innl

W.iler in

Water out

Figure A7 Typical ESW Process.

Page 226: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

all, because it actually depends on the electricalresistivity of a molten flux bath to produce the heatnecessary to melt the filler and base metal.

The process is, however, initiated by an arc, whichheats a layer of granular welding flux contained withinwater-cooled molding shoes or dams and the edges of thejoint, thus turning it to a bath of molten slag. Thearc is then extinguished, and the conductive slag ismaintained in a molten condition by its resistance tothe electric current passing through from a consumableelectrode to the work.

In regular submerged-arc welding, the arc, submergedunder powdered granular flux, creates the heat necessaryfor welding. The depth of the flux is not sufficient toblock arc action. In electroslag welding, however, theflux pool is 38 to 50 mm deep and, because it isformulated to offer a conductive path for the flow ofelectric current, the molten flux can extinguish the arcwithout breaking the flow of current. Infact, ESWfluxes are compounded specially to provide the properelectrical resistivity, desired melting temperatures,and appropriate viscosity.

Electroslag welding progresses vertically along a joint,but the deposition actually takes place with theelectrode being fed through a guide tube into a cavityformed by the pieces being welded and one or more dams.As the electrode is consumed, the welding head andcooling dams move up along a vertical axis. Multiplehead arrangements can be used for welding extremelyheavy sections.

In a variation of the basic ESW process, the consumableelectrode wire is fed through a guide tube that is alsoconsumable. This obviates the need for vertical travelof the welding head, thus simplifying the mechanicalarrangement of the system. Only electrode wire need befed, from a fixed head that hovers above the upperextreme of the weld.

The principal application of electroslag welding iswelding of thick steel plates. heavy forgings and largesteel castings in the fabrication of machine bases andin the structural-steel industry. Its main features are:

i. Extremely high metal-deposition rates.ii. Ability to weld very thick materials in one pass.iii. Minimal joint preparation and fit up

.requi rements.iv. Little or no distortion,v. Low flux consumption.

229

Page 227: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Al.1.8. Stud arc welding

In stud welding, basically an arc welding process, thewelding arc is generated between a metal stud or similarpart and the part to which it is ultimately fused by thewelding heat so generated (Figure A8). In a way itis a variation of the shielded metal-arc process, thestud representing the electrode. But only the end ofthe electrode is melted and it becomes a permanent partof the final assembly.In operation the stud is retained in a hand held orbench-mounted "gun" (Figure A9) and is positionedover the spot where it is to be attached. Uponinitiation, current flows through the stud, which, atthe same time, is lifted slightly, creating an arc.After a very short arcing period, the stud is plunged into the molten pool created on the base plate, and thegun is withdrawn.Typical applications of stud welding include securingspecial lining in tanks ; studing bailer tubes ;assembling electrical panels ; securing water,hydraulic, and electrical lines to buildings, vehiclesand large appliances ; and securing feet and handles tolarge appliances.

A1.2. Oxyfuel Gas Welding - OFW

Oxyfuel gas welding (Figure A10) is defined as a group ofwelding processes that produces coalescence by heatingmaterials with an oxyfuel gas flame or flames with orwithout pressure. The main industrial processes in thisgroup are oxyacetylene, airacetylene, oxyhydrogen andpressure gas welding of the various gas welding processes.Oxyacetylene welding is the most prevelant and the mostimportant in industry. It burns with a very hot flame(about 6100-6300 F), has high heat transfer intensity andprovides a protective atmosphere for the welding zone.Bas welding requires relatively simple equipment ; a fuelgas cylinder, and oxygen cylinder, regulating valves, anda torch that mixes and burns the gases. The equipment iseasily portable, versatile and low cost.Gas welding is best suited to the welding of relativelythin sections e.g. sheet metal, thin-wall tube, smallpipe, and assemblies with poor fitup. Heavy sections canbe gas welded, but arc welding is usually more economical.Most ferrous and nonferrous metals can be gas welded,provided the oxyfuel-gas mixture has appropriate flamecharacteristics such as temperature, heat-transferintensity, and composition of flame atmosphere.

A1.3 Resistance Welding Process

Resistance welding comprises a group of welding processesin which the heat for coalescence of the two metals to be

230

Page 228: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

(A)

Ferrule

Plunge

II

Lilt

(C) (D)

Figure AS Typical stud welding sequence

Solenoid housing

Stud holder

Control •—-cable

Weldingcable

Figure A9 Typical SW gun

231

Page 229: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

INNER CONE

WELDING TORCH TIP

ACETYLENE FEATHER

MOLTEN WELD METAL

SOLIDIFIEDWELD METAL

OFW Process

Blue Yellow whltn Ornn(;p yellow

jTTf«« J--T———/... . J-"—Raw acclylcno flamo

(with shj-ht blue llriße)Blue (will» whiln tiiif!«) Cci.tr SP wliisl.ci «I

/ ——— i'^7'"'^ ! • Ç* / ' A - - - - • - • - - - • - • •»

Extremely lißht p.rcmi \ \Feathery c<lee Oulcr Maine enw.-kipo

Carbutlzinß flatno

White (with slight blue tiiiR

pnii»!(v/ith white

Neu) ml llnrmiConrsov.hisknipdcontour

Drilliant while

llaino

f""C (with whiln tin/jo)

Finn wliishoroil ontoiir

Figure Aio Acetylene flame iypes

joined is generated by the resistance of the joint to thepassage of an electric current and the joining takes placeunder externally applied pressure. It differs from most

welding processes in that no extraneousas filler metal or fluxes, is introducedTherefore, resistance welding does not

metallurgical composition of the joint.is used generally for sheet and light gaugeIn this welding process the quality of fusion

othersuchweld.basicweldingmetals.

material,in to thealter theResistance

taking place depends upon the conditions of temperature,time and pressure. Both alternating and direct currentcan be used to produce resistance welds.

232

Page 230: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Two of the more common types ai resistance weldingprocesses are "spot welding" and "seam welding". In thespot welding process, the work parts are held togetherunder pressure by cylinderical electrodes (Figure All).The size and shape of the individually -formed welds dependupon the size and contour o-f the electrodes. In the seamwelding process, the -flow of electric current is throughthe work parts held together under pressure by circularelectrodes (Figure All) By rotating the electrodesacross the work, the result is a series of overlappingspot welds made progressively along the joint.

ForceWeldingtransformer

force

Projection weld

Spol weld

-r; --:-

Flash welding Scam wold

Figure All Basic resistance-welding methods

A 1.4 Brazing Process

Brazing is a metal joining process where the base metal isheated to a temperature of about 425 C. Non ferrousfiller metals, such as brass or silver alloys, are meltedby the heat of the base metal and flow by capillaryattraction between the closely fitted surfaces of thejoint. Heat for brazing is usually applied by flametorches, furnaces, electric induction, electric resistanceor dropping the work into a hot salt bath. Filler andflux are either applied manually or are preplaced in theform of powder, metallic rings or strips.

A1.5 Miscellaneous Processes

There are number of other welding processes sometimesencountered. Some of the important ones of theseprocesses are briefly discussed below.(a) Friction Welding - FW

In friction welding the heat for coalescence isproduced by direct conversion of mechanical energy tothermal energy at the joint interface. The

233

Page 231: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

mechanical energy is generated by the sliding actionbetween rotating or rubbing surfaces. The basicprocess involves holding a non rotating workpiece incontact with a rotating workpiece under constant orgradually increasing pressure until the interfacereaches welding temperature. The rotation is thenstopped. It is a solid-state process in whichcoalescence occurs at a temperature below the meltingpoint of the metals being joined.Many ferrous and nonferrous alloys can be frictionwelded, and the method can be used to join metals ofwidely differing thermal and mechanical properties.Often, in fact, combinations that can not be joinedby any other method because of the formation ofbrittle phases that would render the jointunsatisfactory, can be effectively joined withfriction welding. The automatic loading and unloadingof friction-welding machines make it ideal for highproduction work.

Some of the other advantages of friction welding are :i) Total energy requirements are only a fraction of

those needed for other welding processes.ii) The operation is relatively clean, there is little

spatter, and no arc fumes or scale.iii) The heat-affected zone is very narrow and has a grain

sise that is often smaller than that in the base metalOf course, friction welding is limited to partsspecifically designed for its unique requirements. Theymust be substantially round and must be able to withstandthe high torques developed during welding.

<b> Ultrasonic Welding - USW

Ultrasonic welding is a form of friction welding thathas long been used to join plastics. Recently, suchhigh frequency vibration has been successfullyapplied to the welding of metals, mostly nonferrousmetals.It is known as a "cold" bonding process, becauseatomic combination and diffusion occurs whilematerials are in a semisolid or solid state.Although some heating occurs, welding depends more onthe cleaning action of the process than on materialheating.In practice, the parts to be welded are clamped underpressure between an anvil and a tip connected to ahorn that vibrates at a high frequency (Figure A12).The welding tip and anvil may be contoured to theshape of the parts. The part in direct contact withthe tip is rubbed at a high frequency against thestationary part. This vibratory action first erodes

234

Page 232: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Direction of vibration

'.i ••.v.-.wvv;---- -•' ;.-...-.M.« .,'.'.•' '•' r.- V ' • ! .', ' '• i

* • . - . . • • • •f. : ..:• ' ">• • ' •, .•i • . ' • t • • • - • . • • • •Horn Weld

Figure A12 Ullrasonic-welding principle Anvil

oxides and other contaminants on the interfacesurfaces. Once they are clean the surfaces come in tointimate contact, and solid-state bonding takesplace.Ultrasonic welding is best-suited -for joining smallparts, sheet and foil. The process is fast, requiresno consumables, and, because of its low heat,theresult of the processing eliminates the need forfurther cleaning. In some instances, even coated,painted and badly rusted surfaces can be effectivelyjoined without surface preparation.

(c) Electron Beam Welding

In electron-beam welding, the heat required forcoalescence of the material is generated by aconcentrated stream of high-velocity electrons aimedat the surface to be joined. When these electronshit the joint, their kinetic energy is turned in tointensive heat.The electron beam is produced by an electron gunsimilar in operation to that of a television tube. Aheated tungsten filament provides the electrons whichare than gathered and accelerated to high velocityand shaped in to a beam by electrical fields. Thebeam is further collimated and focused by passingthrough an electromagnetic focusing coil, or magneticlens.Electron-beammaterials or

welding can be used to weld morecombinations of material than any other

fusion process, and thein equal or superiortungsten-arc welds. Ais that it is extremelyinput to the workpiece.and shrinkageexcessive heat

weld quality in most metalsto that of the best gasmain advantage of EB weldingfast with a minimum of heatThis minimizes distortion

in welding, reduces the effects ofon the physical characteristics of the

material being joined, makes it possible to weld in

235

Page 233: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

close proximity to components that are sensitive toheat and makes possible the joining of dissimilarmetals.On the negative side, most EB welding equipment isrelatively expensive, although small systems are nowcommercially available at a-ffordable prices. Also,fitup for EB welding must be more exact than forother welding processes, because of the narrow natureof the beam.

(d) Laser-Beam Welding - LEW

Because of the higher energy levels that can beattained in the focused out-put of a laser beam, itcan be used as an effective source of heat for avariety of metal work processing, including welding.A laser beam is a highly collimated, monochromatic,coherent beam of light generated by a phenomenon inphysics called "Light Amplification by StimulatedEmission of Radiation - hence "laser".When such a beam is focused on a material surface,much of the energy of this concentrated stream ofphotons is absorbed as heat.The advantages of LBW include :-

i) The absence of physical contact with anelectrode.

li) The absence of flux.111) Localized heating and rapid cooling, due to high

heat intensity and small spot sise. Thisresults in a small heat affected zone.

iv) The ability to weld many dissimilar geometries.v) The ability to weld components in a controlled

atmosphere or sealed in optically transparentmaterial.

vi) The fact that the laser beam can bereadily manipulated and shaped using opticaltooling or scanning techniques, and the weldarea can be located relatively far from thelaser source.

On the debit side, laser systems, like EB systems, arestill relativley expensive, and good part fitup isessential because of the small concentrated spot of heat.

A2.0 Weld Defects and Discontinuitii

A variety of defects occur in welds. Some of thesedefects are discussed below :-

236

Page 234: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

A2.l Gas Inclusion

Bas may be formed in molten weld metal -for various reasonsand may be trapped if there is insufficient time for it toescape before solidification. The trapped gas is usuallyin the form of round holes, termed porosity or blow holes,or of an elongated shape called piping or wormholes.Gas formation may be caused by chemical reaction duringwelding, high sulphur content in plate and/or electrode,excessive moisture in the electrode or on base plateedges, too short an arc, incorrect welding current, wrongpolarity.The type of porosity within a weld is usually designatedby the amount and distribution of the pores. Some of thetypes are classified as fallows:(a) Uniformly scattered

by pores scattered(figure A13 a).

porosity, which is characteriseduniformly throughout the weld

(b)Figure A13

(b) Cluster porosity,pores that are(figure A13 b).

which is characterized by cluster ofseparated by porosity-free areas

(c) Linear porosity, which is characterized by pores thatare linearly distributed (figure A13 c), and whichgenerally occur in the root pass and is associatedwith lack of penetration.

A2.2 Slag Inclusions

Most weld inclusions contain slag that has beentrapped in the deposited metal during solidification.The slag may come from the electrode coating or fluxemployed. The purpose of the flux is to removeimpurities from the metal. If the metal fails toremain molten for a period sufficient to allow theslag to rise to the surface some slag may be trappedwithin the metal. In multipass welding insufficientcleaning and brushing of the bead between passes maynot remove all the slag coating. This may then betrapped in the metal by a subsequent pass. Dirty andirregular surfaces, ripple and under-cut willcontribute to slag entrapment. Slag inclusions arefrequently associated with lack of penetration, poorfusion, oversize root faces, too narrow a groove andfaulty electrode manipulation.

237

Page 235: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

A2.3 Lack of Penetration

Frequently the root of a weld will not be adequatelyfilled with weld metal and a void is left. Thisinadequate penetration may be caused by too small aroot opening, too large an electrode, insufficientweld current, excessive welding speed, improper groovepreparation etc. In joints requiring completepenetration this type of defect is generally notacceptable and requires complete removal andrewelding.

A2.4 Lack of Fusion

Lack of fusion occurs at weld interfaces whereadjacent layers of metal, or the base metal and weldmetal, fail to fuse properly due to a very thin layerof oxide that forms on the metal surfaces. It isusually caused by failure to raise the temperature ofthe base metal or previously deposited weld metal highenough to allow any oxide layers, slag, impurities etcto rise to the surface.

A2.5 Cracks

Cracks are linear ruptures of metal under stress.Although sometimes wide, they are often very narrowseparations in the weld or adjacent base metal.Usually little deformation is apparent.Cracks can occur in a wide varietyand can be located in numerousaround a welded joint (figure A14) ,

of shapes and typespositions in and

Transverse Crack(No. 2

Underbead andHAZ Crack

Toe Crack (No.5)

Fusion-llneCrack

Longitudinal Crack(No. 1)

Figure A14

Root Crack ( No. 8 )

238

Page 236: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Cracks associated with welding may be categorizedaccording to whether they originate in the weld itselfor in the base metal. Four types commonly occur inthe weld metal : transverse, longitudinal, crater andhat cracks. Base-metal cracks can be divided intoseven categories transverse cracks, underbead cracks,toe cracks, root cracks, lamellar tearing,delaminations and fusion-line cracks.

Transverse CracksIn weld metal (No.2 in figure A14) are formed when thepredominant contraction stresses are in the directionof the weld axis. They can be hot cracks, whichseparate intergranularly as a result of hot shortnessor localized planar shrinkage, or they can betransgranular separations produced by stressesexceeding the strength of the material. Transversecracks lie in a plane normal to the axis of the weldand are usually open to the surface. They usuallyextend across the entire face of the weld andsometimes propagate into the base metal.Transverse cracks in base metal (No. 3 in figure A14)occur on the surface in or near the heat-affectedzone. They are the result of the high residualstresses induced by thermal cycling during welding.High hardness, excessive restraint, and the presenceof hydrogen promote their formation. Such crackpropagate into the weld metal or beyond the heataffected zone into the base metal as far as in neededto relieve the residual stresses.

Underbead Cracks(No.6 in figure A14) are similar to transverse cracksin that they form in the heat-affected zone because ofhigh hardness, excessive restraint, and the presenceof hydrogen. Their orientation follows the contour ofthe heat-affected zone.

Longitudinal Cracks(No.4 in figure A14) may exist in three forms,depending on their position in the weld. Checkcracks are open to the surface and extend only partwaythrough the weld. Root cracks extend from the root tosome point within the weld. Full centreline cracks mayextend from the root to the face of the weld metal.Check cracks are caused either by high contractionstresses in the final passes applied to a weld jointor by a hot-cracking mechanism.Root cracks are the most common form of longitudinalweld-metal cracks because of the relatively small sizeof the root pass. If such cracks are not removed,they can propagate through the weld as subsequentpasses are applied. This is the usual mechanism bywhich full centreline cracks are formed.

239

Page 237: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Centreline cracks may occur at either high or lowtemperatures. At low temperatures, cracking generallyis the results of poor fit-up, overly rigid fit-up, ora small ratio of weld metal to base metal.All three types of longitudinal cracks usually areoriented perpendicular to the weld face and run alongthe plane that bisects the welded joint. Seldom arethey open at the edge of the joint face, because thisrequires a fillet weld with an extremely convex bead.Crater Cracks(No. 1 in figure A14). As the name implies, cratercracks occur in the weld crater farmed at the end of awelding pass. Generally, this type of crack is causedby failure to fill the crater before breaking the arc.When this happens, the outer edges of the crater coolrapidly, producing stresses sufficient to crack theinterior of the crater. This type of crack may beoriented longitudinally or transversely, or may occuras a number of intersecting cracks forming the shapeof a star. Longitudinal crater cracks can propagatealong the axis of the weld to form a centreline crack.In addition, such cracks may propagate upward throughthe weld if they are not removed before subsequentpasses are applied.Hat Cracks(No.9 in figure A14) derive their name from the shapeof the weld cross section with which they are usuallyassociated. This type of weld flares out near theweld face, resembling an inverted top hat. Hat cracksare the result of using excessive voltage or too low awelding speed. The cracks are located about halfwayup through the weld and extend into the weld metalfrom the fusion line of the joint.

Toe and Root Cracks(No. 5 and 8 in figure A14) can occur at the notchespresent at locations in the weld when high residualstresses are present. Both toe and root crackspropagate through the brittle heat affected zonebefore they are arrested in more ductile regions ofthe base metal. Characteristically, they are orientedalmost perpendicular to the base-metal surface and runparallel to the weld axis.Lamellar Tearing (Figure A15 )This is a phenomenon that occurs in T-joints where theweb plate is welded on both sides with usually fullpenetration welds. The stresses developed by thisconfiguration result in a separation that takes placein the base metal between the roots of the two weldsextending in a plane parallel to the surface of thebase metal. Such a discontinuity is often associatedwith laminations or other planes of weakness in themetal. It is characterised by a step-like tear and is

240

Page 238: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Figure A15Xs^ LAMELLAR

TEARING

caused by the shrinkage of the weld bead stressing thebase metal through its thicl-ness. This resultsinitially in decohesion of non-metallic inclusions andthen ductile tearing at about 45 between adjacent non-metallic inclusions to produce the step-like tears.Lamellar tearing can occur outside the heat affectedzone 5-10 mm below the fusion face.

Fusion-line Cracks(No. 7 in figure A14) can be classified as eitherweld-metal cracks or base-metal cracts, because theyoccur along the fusion line between the two. Thereare no limitations as to where along the fusion linethese cracls can occur or how far around the weld theycan extend.

A2.6 Root ConcavityRoot concavity is commonly produced by the FC AWprocess. This is a groove created in the root of a.butt weld welded from one side only. In overheadwelding the molten metal sinks in to the weldpreparation due to the force of gravity while in theflat weld position the molten metal may be pulled upby surface tension in to the weld preparation tocreate such a cavity.

A2.7 Under CutDuring welding of the final or cover pass, the exposedupper edges of the bevelled weld preparation tend tomelt and to run down in to the deposited metal in theweld groove. Undercutting occurs when insufficientfiller metal is deposited to fill the resultantgrooves at the edge of the weld bead. The result is agroove that may be intermittent or continuous andparallel to the weld bead. Undercutting may be causedby excessive welding current, incorrect arc length,high speed, incorrect electrode manipulation etc.

241

Page 239: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

A2.8 Burn ThroughA burn through area is that portion of the weld beadwhere excessive penetration has caused the weld poolto be blown in to the pipe or vessel. It is caused bythe factors, such as high current, slow rod speed,incorrect rod manipulation etc, that produceexcessive heat in one area. It is often accompaniedby excessive drop through of the metal on the insideof the pipe.A2.9 Root Pass OxidationOxidation is the result of insufficient protection ofthe weld and heat affected zone from the atmosphere.Severe oxidation will occur on stainless steels, forexample, reducing corrosion resistance, if the jointis not purged with an inert gas.

242

Page 240: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Appendix BCASTINGS AND FORCINGS

AND THEIR RELATED DISCONTINUITIES

Bl.0 Casting

The casting of metals involves the pouring or injection ofmolten metal into a cavity of a particular shape where itis allowed to solidify. The cavity or mold may be of anintricate shape so that when the solidified metal isremoved a part is produced which,with or without furtherpreparation,may be used for its designed purpose. Thebasic steps { Figure B l ) involved in the casting processare;a) The preparation of a pattern or die to form the final

shape and size of part required.b) The preparation of the mold cavity by use of the pattern

and suitable mold material.c) The heating and melting of the metal.d) The insertion of the molten metal into the mold cavity.e) The removal and when necessary the further cleaning or

shaping of the part.

PATTERN PATTERN IN SAND MOLD

COLPLETE CASTING WITHATTACHED GATING SYSTEM

MOLD CAVITY WITH GATING SYSTEM

Figure B l Casting steps

243

Page 241: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Bl.l Methods of castingThere are many casting processes and. they may be groupedinto those using a non-perrnanent mold which is used onlyonce, and those using permanent molds from which a numberof castings may be made. Examples of non-permanent moldsinclude:

Sand castingShell mold castingInvestment or precision casting

Permanent mold castings include:Centrifugal castings-Die or pressure castings

A short summary of the principles involved in the abovecasting processes follows. It should be kept in mind thatthere are many modifications and variations of theseprocesses which are designed for specific applications.

Bl.1.1 Sand casting

The mold used for sand casting may be of the "greensand" or "dry sand " type. Silica sand is generallyused as a mold material because of its refractoryproperties,low cost and availability.In the green sandmold the sand is given plasticity by means of a claybinder that may be present in the sand or added to it.Sufficient water is added to hold the mixturetogether. In a dry sand mold the sand is givenplasticity in a similar fashion but the mold is driedbefore the metal is poured into it thus eliminatingthe formation of water vapour and reducing the type ofcasting defects that are due to gas formation. Inmaking a mold a pattern usually of wood is placed ina flask and molding sand is rammed around it.Ordinarily the mold is made in two halves, the upperportion being called the "cope" and the lower portionthe "drag".The pattern is designed so that it can be removedwithout disturbing the sand ,leaving a pattern shapedcavity in the sand. Cores of baked oil bonded sandare placed in the mold cavity to form internalcavities in the casting.Cores are subject to breakagedue to handling and erosion from the molten metal andare dried and baked to provide the necessary strength.The cope and drag are prepared separately. Before theyare placed together to complete the mold cavity, asshown in Figure B2a,a system of runners,gates andsprue are formed to allow the metal to enter the mold.In most cases cavities for reservoirs ofmetal ( risers ) are formed in the mold (Figure B 2b>.The metal rises into these reservoirs and helps to"feed" the casting as it solidifies. When the mold isclosed the molten metal is poured into the pouringbasin or directly into the sprue. It enters thesystem of runners and gates and finally fills the moldcavity and risers. After the metal has solidified and

244

Page 242: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Pouring Basin

Flask

Core

Joint (for parting)\

Cope

Figure B 2 a

Liquid metal supply to compensate forliquid and solidification shrinkage

Figure B 2 b

sufficiently cooled the sand is removed and the roughcasting revealed. The excess metal of gates,risersetc. are removed and the casting cleaned and finishedas required.

Bl.1.2 Shell molding

In this process the mold material is made of a specialtype of sand in which a powdered thermosetting plasticis mixed. The metal pattern used to produce the partis heated to about 200 C and it is then covered by themixture of sand and thermosetting plastic. Theheat of the pattern causes the plastic to harden andform a shell which is then heated for a short time athigher temperature. The shell is then removed fromthe pattern. The impressions in the shell mold willform one half of the mold cavity. A similar procedureis used to produce the other half of the mold. Themold is usually backed up with other materials , such

245

Page 243: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

as loose sand ,to provide added strength beforecasting.Shell molding provides a part with high dimensionalaccuracy and good surface finish which may eliminatesubsequent machining or finishing. The productionrate is relatively high and the process is suited tothe production of small parts that require closetolerances.

B 1.1.3 Investment castingThis method is also called precision casting becauseit can produce castings with close tolerances andsmooth surfaces which require little or no furthermachining or grinding. There are several investmentcasting processes developed from the "lost wax" processwhich is still widely used. They involve the use of awax or plastic pattern to form the mold cavity. Thewax or plastic patterns are made in quantity frommetal or plaster of paris dies. THe patterns aredipped in slurry of fine refractory material and arethen encased in the investment material { plaster ofparis or mixtures of ceramic materials with highrefractory properties ). The wax is then removed fromthe mold by heating to liquify the v/ax and cause it torun out to be reclaimed. Figure B.3 illustrates the

IIWAX PATTERN COAT WITH REFRACTORY

SLURRYREINFORCE WITH

PLASTER BACKING(INVESTMENT)

ÏÏOVEN DRY TO LIQUIFYOR VAPORIZE PATTERN

ALSO DRY MOLD

POUR (ANY METAL) REMOVE INVESTMENTMATERIAL

Figure B 3 Steps for investment casting

246

Page 244: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

various steps involved in the investment castingprocess. The fine dimensional accuracy that can beobtained with the investment method makes this processideal for complicated parts that are difficult orimpossible to forge or machine. It is used generallyto produce parts that weigh less than IKg althoughlarger castings have been fabricated by this method.

B 1.1.4 Die casting

Low melting point rnetals and alloys may be cast underpressure in a die casting machine that uses metalmolds or dies to form the metal. Liquid metal undergravity or other pressure is forced into the pair ofdies which come together automatically. The metalsolidifies rapidly and the resulting casting isdropped or pushed from the die when they separate.The dies may be water cooled and the process madeautomatic. They are made with great care and produceparts with close dimensional tolerances and of strong,fine grained structure.Die casting is a production operation used when alarge number of similar parts are to be produced.

B 1.1.5 Centrifugal casting

Cylindrical shapes may be made by pouring liquidmetal into a permanent cylindrical mold while it isrotating rapidly.The liquid metal is forced againstthe sides of the mold by centrifugal action where itsolidifies to produce a tube or cylinderical shapedobject such as pipe. The wall thickness of the objectwill depend on the amount of metal poured . When themetal has solidified ,rotation is stopped and thespecimen or "inner lining " removed.The centrifugal action on the metal while it issolidifying increases the density and strength of thepart. The process is suitable for the manufacture ofpipes, tubes, bushings,linings etc,although it canalso be used for more complicated shapes where anentire mold complete with cores, risers,gates etc isspun about its axis.

B1.2 Casting discontinuities

There are certain defects and discontinuities common tocast materials and to the different casting methods. Someof the common casting discontinuities can be classified as:

i) Shrinkage discontinuitiesii) Discontinuities associated with entrapped gas

iii) Discontinuities associated with hindered contractionduring coolingiv) Inclusionsv) Segregations

247

Page 245: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

vi)vii)vu i)

Cold shutCore shiftMisrun

B 1.2.1 Shrinkage discontinuities

Shrinkage discontinuities are cavities formed duringsolidification because of liquid to solid contraction.These defects are not usually associated with gas, buta high gas content will magnify their extent.Shrinkage cavities occur usually at hot spots in the

(Figure B 4 ). They may be ascastingfeeding heads such as risers etc andinstances, are often referred to as "pipes",

ociatedin

withsuch

JYlBelow the feeder head Near the gate or runner

Figure B 4 Formationof shrinkage defects

FILAMENTARY SHRINKAGE

A type of shrinkage discontinuity which is known asfilamentary or centre line shrinkage consists of longstring -like voids which run roughly parallel to eachother or intertwine in a branch-like network. Thenetwork often occurs in bands within the metal near-its centre (Figure B 4 ). It is often hard todifferentiate between severe branch-like shrinkage andhot tears. Microshrinkage or Microporosity is a finedefect in castings which is due to shrinkage or gas orboth in which numbers of cavities occur either roundthe grain boundaries ( intez'crystalline ) or betweenthe dendrite arms ( interdendritic ). A system ofcoarse and usually localised forin of intercrystallineand interdendritic cavities is known as sponginess.

B 1.2.2 Discontinuities associated with entrappedgas.

When gas that is developed during the pouring of ametal casting can not escape through the mold itselfor through the riser or other outlets ,it may be

248

Page 246: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

trapped in the molten metal. The gas may be formed byrelease from the molten metal itself,from the greensand mold,from water vapor, or merely by turbulencecaused when pouring metal.Gas holes ( or blow holes ) are caused by air, mold,or core gases and water vapor being trapped in thecasting, usually on the cope side ,duringsolidification. THey occur single or in clusters andare of smooth ,round,elongated,or oval shape ofvarying sises. Sometimes an extremely long gas holeappears like a shrinkage cavity,although it differsfrom a shrink in that the ends of the gas hole arerounded and smooth.Gas porosity is a discontinuity that is caused bydissolved gases in the molten metal which have becometrapped in the solid casting. The size and amountdepends on the gas content of the metal and the rateof solidification of the casting. Porosity may eitheroccur through-cut or in some localised area of thecasting.Air lock is a discontinuity arising from theentrapment of gas in the metal stream during pouring.This discontinuity may appear in the casting as acavity or several cavities first below and parallel tothe casting surface ( Figure B 5 ).

Figure B 5 Airlock

B 1.2.3. Crack

This is a discontinuity which is due to the fractureof the metal during or after solidification. Hot tearsare cracks which are discontinuous and generally ofragged form . They are caused by stresses whichdevelop near the solidification temperature when thesteel is at its weakest. The stresses arise when thecontraction of the cooling metal is restrained by amold or core,or by an already solid thinner section.Figure B 6 shows some of the causes and locationsof this type of cracking.Stress crack is a well defined and approximatelystraight rupture formed when the metal has becomecompletely solid . Quite large stresses are requiredto cause such a type of crack .Distinctions are sometimes drawn between types of this defect dependingupon the time at which fracture occured e.g.stress crack due to contraction ,residual stress,shockor service.

249

Page 247: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

MOLD

LIGHT (SMALL) SECTIONSSOLIDIFY AND SHRINKFASTER THAN THE HEAVYSECTIONS

HOT TEARS

Figure B 6 Hot tears

B 1.2.4 Inclusions

Inclusions is a general term applied to sand ,slag,oxide etc. trapped in the casting.In most cases thesedefects occur near the surface as a "skin" effect. Insome instances,however, the inclusion may occur at thecentre of the casting, depending on the flow of metal.

B 1.2.5. .Segregation

Segregation is a complex phenomenon that results whenone or more alloying elements is not properly diffusedand concentrates in certain areas. Segregation may beclassified into three types ; general, localised andbanded. General segregation extends over aconsiderable part of the casting and may take avariety of forms e.g. intercrystalline segregation.Local segregation occurs when shrinkage voids or hottears are wholly or partially filled with aconstituent of low melting point. The terms shrinkageand Viot tear segregation can be applied respectivelyto these two conditions. Banded segregation isassociated mainly with centrifugal castings butoccasionally occurs in static castings. It takes theform of alternate layers of the alloy enriched in ordepleted by the separating constituents.

B 1.2.6 Cold shuts

This is a discontinuity caused by the failure of thestream of molten metal to unite with a confluentstream or with solid metal such as a pouring splash,intenal chill or a chaplet. They can frequently be

250

Page 248: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

detected by visual inspection and look like a crackwith a smooth and curved contour. If it is only asurface condition , it is called a "cold lap".

B 1.2.7 Core shiftCastings that have internal cavities designed intothem use a core usually of sand to produce the cavity.If the core is not held firmly in position it may movewhen thé molten metal is poured around it.

B 1.2.8 MisrunA misrun occurs when the molten metal fails to fillthe mold cavity completely.

B2.0 Forgings

Forging is the working of metals into a useful shape byhammering or pressing and is the oldest of the metalforming processes. Most forging operations are carried outhot although some metals are cold forged.The hot working of metals in the foging process results inan improvement in the mechanical properties.This method ofshaping is therefore used in the manufacture of partsrequiring good mechanical properties. Improvement in theproperties results from;a) A general consolidation of the metal and closing of gas

and contraction cavities by means of mechanicalpressure.

b) A refinement of the crystal structure.c) A destruction of the continuity of intergranular

concentrations of impurities and inclusions.Forging is done with either a hammer or a press. Ahorizontal press (forging machine ) is used in certaininstances for forging small parts.Otherwise forgingmachines are of the vertical type,the lower die of which isfixed while the upper die is movable being carried on avertical ram. In the case of hammers the die is raisedmechanically and the blow is struck by the die fallingfreely.With presses , force is used to raise and lowerthe die and the metal is worked by slow steady pressure.Forging is not only used to produce parts of a shape thatcan not be rolller but also for parts of simple uniformshape,round or rectangular when these are large or whenthe quantity required is too small to warrant a roll set-up. Tool steels are often forged with a view to improvingtheir properties.Forgings may be considered under two categories:a) Where the working surface of the die io flat or of

uniform curved contour and shaping is done bymanipulation using tools of simple shape. This iscalled " open die " forging.

251

Page 249: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

b) Where impression dies are used and the metal is shapedby being forced into the die impression. This is called" closed die " forging.

In the first category are forgings of simple round orrectangular cross-section and forgings of more complexshape which are 00 large that the "sinking" of closed dieswould be impractical or too costly. Small forgings ofcomplicated final shape may be rough forged on simpledies and machined to final forms if the number required istoo small to justify the cost of an impression die.Also inthis category are hollow forged parts. For these thecentral hole is either machined out cold (trepanned ) or it-is punched out hot using suitable dies on a press.The partis then forged on a mandrel which passes through the holeand is supported at both ends so that the mandrel acts asthe bottom die.In close die forging on a hammer or press the lower die hasthe impression corresponding to one half of the part to bemade while the upper die has the impression correspondingto the other half. For relatively simple shapes the diesmay have only one impression but more commonly theyincorporate a series of impressions in which the part issuccessively shaped to the final form. Closed die forgingis commonly known as " drop forging ".Around theimpressions the dies are shaped to provide space for theexcess stock as it is not practical to have exactly theright amount of metal to fill the impression .The excessmetal that is forced in to this space is referred to as"flashing " or "flash ". After forging this is trimmed offin a suitable die. The closed die business is socompetative that the losses in trimmed scrap provide one ofthe most important- areas of economy. The hot forgingprocess whereby bolts , for example , are headed is referredto as " hot upset forging "or "hot heading ". In thisprocess a bar of uniform cross section is gripped betweengrooved dies and pressure is applied on the end in thedirection of the axis of the bar by means of a headingtool. The metal flows under the applied pressure and fillsthe cavity between the dies. Figure B 7 shows some examplesof the forging operation.

B.2.1 Rolling and -forging discontinuities

Discontinuities in forgings may originate in the slab orbillet modified by the rolling and forging of the materialor may result from the forging process itself. The morecommon discontinuities are:i) Laminations

ii) Stringersi i i) Seamsiv) Forging lapsv) Forging bursts or cracks

B 2.1.1 LaminationsLarge porosity , pipes and noninetallic inclusions inslabs or billets are flattened and spread out during

252

Page 250: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Laminations

Non-metallic inclusions

ling lap

Internal burst(sub surface)

External burst or crack(open to the surface)

Figure B 7 Rolling and forging and their defects

the rolling and forging processes. These flatteneddiscontinuities are known as laminations.B 2.1.2 StringerNonirietallic inclusions in slabs or billets that arethinned and lengthened in the direction of rolling bythe rolling process are called stringers.B 2. 1.3 SeamsSurface irregularities such as cracks on the slab orbillet are stretched out and lengthened during rolling

253

Page 251: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

and are then called seams. Seams may also be caused byfolding .of the metal due to improper rolling. Seamsare surface discontinuities and on finished bars willappear as either continuous or broken straight lines.On round bar stock they will appear as straight orslightly spiral lines either continuous or broken

B 2.1.4 Forging lapsForging laps are the discontinuities caused by thefolding of metal in a thin plate on the surface of theforging. They are irregular in contour.

B 2.1.5. Forging bursts or cracksForging bursts or cracks are ruptures caused byforging at too low a temperature. They may beinternal or they may occur at the surface.

254

Page 252: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Appendix CULTRASONIC PRACTICALS

PRACTICAL - 1 : USE OF ULTRASONIC FLAW DETECTOR (FUNCTIONS OFVARIOUS CONTROLS ON THE FLAW DETECTOR)

1. Have the instruction manual of the flaw detector andproceed according to the procedure laid down.

2. Make a detailed sketch of the front view of theinstrument showing the names and location of variouscontrol knobs.

3. Before switching on see that the instrument is adjustedfor operation on battery/line voltage etc.

4. Adjust the frequency selection switch such that thereading on it matches with the frequency of the probe tobe used (if control is available).

5. Adjust the transmission/reception switch. After thisconnect a normal probe to the flaw detector.

6. Switch on the mains switch and also switch on theinstrument. Base line with transmission pulse shouldappear on the screen.

7. Move the base line vertically and horizontally with thehelp of controls on the instrument (if controls for suchfunctions are available).

8. Adjust the 'focus' to get a sharp line and transmissionpulse.

9. Apply a thin uniform layer of couplant to the test piece(V-l test block in this case). The couplant in this caseis lubricating oil or grease.

10. Apply the probe to the test block. A number of peaksshould appear on the screen.

11. Adjust the 'depth range' or 'material selection switch'and see how it increases or decreases the distancebetween successive peaks. Select its position to get,for example, 10, 5, 3, 2, etc. peaks on the screen.

12. Operate the 'delay switch' on the instrument and see itsfunction. It should move the spectrum of peaks as awhole without disturbing their relative separation.

13. Operate the 'gain' , 'attenuation' or 'sensitivity'switch and see its function. It should increase ordecrease the amplitude of the peaks. See if there is a'reject' switch on the flaw detector.

255

Page 253: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

If so, operate it and see its function. It should clearall the grass on the base line. Switch off the rejectswitch. It must NOT be used unless instructed to do so.

14. There may be a 'gate' switch on the instrument. This isusually used in automatic testing and is therefore of nointerest to us for the present.

15. Repeat by changing to probes of different frequencies.16. Repeat by placing the probe on different portions and

sides of the test block.17. Record your observations in the form of a detailed

report.18. Practice with other types of flaw detectors if possible.

256

Page 254: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

PRACTICAL - II : CALIBRATION AND USE OF ULTRASONIC FLAW DETECTORWITH NORMAL PROBES

A. Calibration of time base

1. Switch on the instrument as described in Practical - 1,2. Apply the normal probe to the 25 mm thickness of test

block V-l as shows in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Probe

Adjust the sero control and depth range such that fourreflection peaks appear on the screen. Adjust the abovedelay or sero control to accurately located the leadingedge of the first reflection peak with the 2,5 reading ifthe total screen has 10 divisions.Adjust the 4 th echo to the 10.0 reading using the rangecontrol. Readjust the position of the 1st echo using thedelay control and then the 4th echo using the rangecontrol. Repeat until the 1st and 4th echo are locatedaccurately. The 2nd and 3rd echo should now be at the 5and 7.5 reading. The screen appearance would be as shownin Fig. 2 .

Fig. 25.0 7.5

This means that the time is now linear which means thatequal distances on the time base correspond to equalthickness on the test block. It is calibrated to measurethicknesses and ranges of the beam upto 100 mm.Place the probe now facing the 100 mm thickness of theblock as shown in Fig. 3 position (a). Only one peakshould appear on the screen and it should be located at 10.Similarly place the probe at position (b) over the 91 mm

thickness. The single peak should now appear at 9.1

257

Page 255: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

a)Probe

Probe

Fig. 3

reading on the screen. The corresponding screenappearance for position (a) and (b) of Fig. 3 is shown inFig. 4 .

(a)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0Fig. 4

5. Set the flaw detector to give a test range of 400 and800 mm.Caution : Always calibrate with at least two peaks on————— the screen to ensure proper linearity of the

time base.

258

Page 256: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

PRACTICAL - III : COMPARISON OF VARIOUS COUPLANTS

1. Select two normal beam probes of 2 or 4 MHs with andwithout a protective face plate.

2. Calibrate the time base for a 50 mm thickness range using11W Block VI ,

3. Consider the IIW Block and a plate with a rough surfaceas two test specimens.

4. Place the two specimen side by side and apply eachcouplant in turn to both the surfaces and adjust thefirst back-wall echo from both the specimens to 60% offull screen height.

5. Note the gain setting for each couplant and record theresults.

SPECIMEN— — _ _

STANDARDBLOCK

PLATE

PROTECTIVEFACE PLATE

NOYES

— — ——— — —

NOYES

MACHINE OIL GLYCERIN

,

WATER~

~

6. Select the best couplant.

259

Page 257: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

PRACTIVAL - IV : CALIBRATION WITH ANGLE BEAM PROBE

A. Determination of Probe Index using VI Block.1. Select an angle probe.2. Place the probe on the VI block as shown in Fig. 1 and

maximise the echo from the 100 mm quadrant using to andfro movements. Set the instrument sensitivity so thatthe maximised echo height is 50-80% of full screenheight. Care is necessary to ensure that the maximisedecho is not from one of the corners of the quadrant.

3. When the maximised echo has been obtained,probe index on the probe as shown in Fig. 2. mark the

Fig. 1

Probe Index

Fig. 2 .

B. Determination of Probe Angle using VI Blpok

1. Place the probe on the 25 mm wide surface of the VIblock to beam towards the 50 mm diameter perspex insert(Fig. 3 ) .

2. Move the probe to and fro on the test surface andmaximise the signal from the insert.

260

Page 258: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Fig. 3

When the maximum echo has been obtained read the anglewhich is marked on the side of the block and whichcoincides with the probe index. This is the actualrefraction angle of the probe. The angle can be read towithin 0.5 by interpolation. Because of therelatively large reflecting surface it is difficult toobtain a maximum echo and it is therefore recommnededthat the operation be repeated two or three times toensure that the same angle is obtained.

C. lOOwm Range Calibration for Angle Beam Probe using VI Block

Procedure - 1

1. Place a normal probe on the step in the VI (IIWBlock) to give a beam path distance of 91mm as shown inFig. 4.

S T B - A I

Fig. 4

2. Set the first back echo, Bl at the 4th scale division ofthe time base and the second back echo, B2 , at the 8thscale division as shown in Fig. 5 .

3. Change the normal probe to the angle probe.

261

Page 259: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

4. Place the angle probe at the centre of the 100 mm radiusquadrant as shown in Fig. 1 so that the probe indexpoint coincides with central mark on the block.

K

:..

l!'! m-

1

u • t,

II fi ',,

"

1

b n»

ii\

*tu-L' B, B2 J

91 mm 122 mm

The echo should be at exactly 10 scale division if thecalibration is correct.

Procedure - 2

1. Obtain the maximum echo from the 100 mm quadrant andincrease the instrument sensitivity (by about 20dB) tobring the second back echo to about half full screenheight as shown in Fig. 6 .

f the first echo

.the 2nd echo

Fig. 6

2. Adjust the time base control to locate the first echo tothe sero point of the time base and the second echo tothe 10th scale division as shown in Fig. 7 .

100 R the first echo

•200the 2nd echo

Fig. 7

262

Page 260: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

100 R

Fig. 8

first echo

3. Shift the first echo to. the 10th division position usingthe sweep delay control as shown in Fig. 8 .

The time base is now adjusted to a 100 mm test range.

D. Calibration for Test Range 200 mm & 400 mm

1. Place the probe on VI block as shown in Fig. 1 andobtain two back wall echoes from the 100 mm quadrant.

2. Using 'delay' and 'test range' controls set the firstecho to 5th scale division and the 2nd to 10th scaledivision. The time base is now calibrated for 200 mm.

3. For 400 mm test range calibration, obtain four echoesfrom the 100 mm quadrant and set them to 2.5th, 5th,7.5th and 10th scale divisions of the CRT screen.

E. Calibration of Test Range of 100 mm and 125 mm Using V2 Block

1. Determine the probe index as described in A.2. Place the probe on the V2 block so that its crystal

faces the 25mm quadrant and its probe index coincideswith the central mark on the probe (Fig. 9).

3. Obtain two back wall echoes on the screen.

Fig.

263

Page 261: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

4. Using the 'delay' and 'test range' controls adjust thefirst echo to 2.5th scale division and 2nd to 10th scaledivision.

5. The CRT screen is now calibrated for 100 mm test range.

Fig. 10

6. For test calibration of 125 mm, place the probe on V2block so that the probe index coincides with the centralmark on the block and the probe's crystal faces the 50 mmquadrant {Fig. 10 ).

7. Obtain two back wall echoes on the screen and adjustthem to 4th and 10th scale divisions of the screen. Thescreen is thus calibrated for 125 mm test range.

Determination of Probe Index Using V2 Block

1. Place the probe either facing the 25 mm or the 50 rnrnquadrant and obtain a back wall echo.

2. Maximise the echo by the to and fro motion of the probe.3. Mark the point on the probe which coincides with the

central mark of the block. This is the probe index.

G. Determination of the Probe Angle Using V2 Block

1. Place the probe so that its beam is directed toward the5mm diameter hole (Fig. 11)

Fig. 11

264

Page 262: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

2. Maximise the echo obtained from the beam reflected fromthe hole.3. Estimate the probe angle by noting the probe index

position with respect to the angles inscribed on theblock.

H, Measurement of the Location of a Reflector with an angleprobe

1. Place the probe as shown in Fig. 12 and obtain a maximumecho from the 1.5 mm side drilled hole in the VI block.

2. When the maximum echo is obtained, read the beam pathdistance, W and the distance, Y , between the probeindex and the corner of the block.

Ya _

STB-AITifV

s. = r - y-d. - vV- cosd

Fig. 12

3. Calculate the probe index - reflector distance.Y = W. sin 0

4. The hole location along the test surface is given by= Y - y .

5. The depth of the hole from the test surface is given byd = W cos 0

265

Page 263: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

PRACTICAL V : THICKNESS MEASUREMENT USING THE ULTRASONIC FLAWDETECTOR

A. Thickness Measurement With Normal Beam Probes

1. Calibrate the time base for thickness range of 50 mmusing a normal beam probe (MB4S-N).

2. Measure the thicknesses of steps of a stepped block andrecord the results.

3. Compare the result with the measurement obtained with acaliper and determine the difference.

B. Thickness Measurement with TR or Twin Crystal Probe

1. Select a TR probe (e.g. MSEB 4 H).2. Calibrate the time base for a range of 10 mm by

adjusting the sweep control and range control afterplacing the probe on steps with 5 mm and 10 mm thicknessrespectively. In case 'of 5 mm thick step, the peakshould coincide with 5th graticule while for 10mm thickstep the peak should coincide with 10th graticule.The time base is calibrated for 10 mm thickness range.

3. Measure the thickness of another step or plate.4. What is the accuracy of such a measurement?5. Place the probe on each step of stepped block and

measure the thickness.6. State the minimum thickness that can be measured with

your equipment.7. Compare the results with the measurements obtained with

a vernier and calculate the error.

266

Page 264: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

PRACTICAL VI EXPERIMENT WITH MODE CONVERSION

Calibration the time base for a range of 200 mm by placinga normal beam probe on the narrow side of IIW block (Fig.1). Adjust the gain control to set the second back wallecho to full screen height. Regularly spaced spikes willbe seen in between the two back-wall echoes. Measuretheir location and explain their origin, Are these spikesseen between the transmission pulse and first back-wallecho ?

10Fig. IIW BLOCK

2. With the probe still on IIW, adjust the delay, range andgain controls so that four back-wall echoes are seen onthe screen. Do you see the spikes between theconsecutive back-wall echoes. If so what are these ?

3. Now place the same probe on a round steel bar and repeatstep (1) and (2). How many echoes do you see (a)between the transmission pulse and the first back wallecho, (b) between each consecutive pair of back-wallechoes.

o4. Use a 60 angle probe and calibrate the time base for a

range of 100 mm. Place the probe on the narrow side ofIIW Block VI and direct the beam towards the 1.5 mmdiameter hole. Maximise the echo height and adjust thegain control so that the echo is 80% of full screenheight. Record this setting. Now place the probe onflat side of the same block. Direct the beam againtowards 1.5 mm hole and record setting for the sameecho height. Explain the difference between the twogain settings.

267

Page 265: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

PRACTICAL IX : BEAM PROFILE IN VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL PLANE

A. Beam Profile in Vertical Plane

1. Calibrate the time base of your flaw detector for arange of lOOrnrn (or 200rnrn).

2. Determine the angle and exit point of your angle beamprobe.

3. Put the probe on the IOW Block and direct the beamtowards any convenient drilled hole.

4. You will most likely see a number of echoes on the CRTscreen but identify the particular one coming from yourselected hole. This identification can be easilyachieved by comparing the position of the echo with theactual beam path (i.e the distance between the exitpoint and the selected drilled hole) measured by using aruler.

5. Maximise the echo height from this drilled hole bysliding the probe forwards and backwards. Mark theposition of the exit point on the block and identify itas "A" .

6. Adjust the sensitivity (gain/attenuator) control and setthe echo height to, say, 80% of the full CRT screenheight.

7. Move the probe forwards until the echo height drops by20dB. Mark the new position of the exit point on theblock and identify it as "B" .

8. Mow move the probe backwards until the echo height againdrops by 20 dB. Mark the 3rd position of the exit pointon the block and identify it as "C" .

9. Measure the distances AB and AC in mm using a ruler.10. Draw a horizontal line 0' X ' on the beam profile graph

paper below the X-axis at a distance equal to the depthof the selected drilled hole from the contact surface.

11. Draw a line, OZ, from the origin of the axis at an angle(as measured anticlockwise from the Y-axis ) equal tothe probe angle determined earlier in 2. use theangular scale at the graph bottom for this purpose.This line will now represent the beam axis.

12. Mote that AB corresponds to the distance between thebeam axis and the trailing beam edge, and AC, thatbetween the beam axis and the leading beam edge.

13. Hence, on the basis of (12), mark out two points B' & C'on O'X' at distances of AB and AC .from theintersection of the beam axis, OZ , and the horizontalline, ' X ' .

270

Page 266: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

B'C3 is now "the beam width in the vertical plane OXZY atthe depth 00' .

14. Repeat steps 3 to 13 for at least six pairs of points atdifferent depths.

15. Draw the best-fit straight line for the points on eachside of the beam.

B. Beam Profile in Horizontal Plane

1. Maximise the echo obtained from a selected hole.2. Record the surface distance, Y, between the probe index

and surface position of the hole, and draw a referenceline across the block marking the rear edge of theprobe.

3. Move the probe away from the edge of the block at rightangle to it until the echo drops by 20dB.

4. Record the distance of the probe centre frora the edge ofthe block, say-Xl

5. Find half the beam spread for this particular value of Yby subtracting 22 mm from XI , where 22 mrn is the holedepth in the lOWmrn block. If a different referenceblock is used, check the hole depth using a wire , forexample a straightened paper clip.

6. Place the probe on the other side of the hole and findthe other half using steps 1 to 5 .

7. Find the beam spread for other holes using the sameprocedure and plot the beam spread against thecorresponding value of Y .

271

Page 267: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

PRACTICAL X : CHECKING EQUIPMENT CHARACTERISTICS

A. Checking the Linearity of an Amplifier

There is nothing we can do to alter the characteristics ofthe amplifier provided in the ultrasonic instrument. Stillits behaviour should be known before undertaking practicaltesting.1. Apply the probe to the test block as shown in Fig. 1 and

obtain the peaks shown in Fig. 2 .2. Note the ratio of the heights of any two consecutivepeaks,3. Alter the degree of sensitivity or the reading on the

attenuator.4. Note the ratio of the height of the same peaks as in

step (2) .5. Compare the ratios in steps (2) and (4). If the ratio

remains constant, the amplifier is linear.Another way of checking whether the amplifier is linearor not is the following :

1. Get the peak as in Fig. 2 .2. Select any peak and bring it to the full screen height

by adjusting the attenuator. Note the new attenuatorreading.

3. Change the attenuator reading to bring the height of theselected peak to half screen height.Note the new readingof the attenuator.

4. The difference between the two readings in steps (2) and(3) should be 6dB. This is because we know that whenthe ratio of echo heights is 2, it means a 6dB change insound pressure level.

5. Get the peaks as in Fig. 2 again. Select a peak andbring- it to full screen height. Note the reading of theattenuator.

6. Change the attenuator reading to bring the echo heightto l/10th of full screen height. Note the attenuatorreading.

7. The difference between the two readings in steps (5) and(6) should be 20 dB. This is because we know that whenthe ratio of echo heights is 10, it means a 20 dB changein sound pressure level.These are the famous 6dB and 20dB criteria which areused to estimate flaw sise in ultrasonic testing. Agood flaw detector must fulfil these criteria to helpin accurate sizing of defects.

272

Page 268: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

Probe

Fig. l

2.5 5.0Fig. 2

7.5 1.0

Caution : Echo heights vary with the amount of pressureapplied to the probes when they are coupledto the test specimen. Therefore an effortshould be made to apply a uniform pressure inboth the cases. This seems difficult in thebeginning but comes gradually with increasingpractice and experience.

B. Checking the Time Base Linearity

1. Place a normal beam probe on the 25mm thick side of theVI block (as in Fig. 1} and obtain four back wall echoesas in Fig. 2 .

2. Set the first and fourth echo on the 2.5 and 10 scaledivisions of the CRT screen.3. Record carefully the positions of the remaining two

echoes. They should be positioned at 5 and 7.5 scaledivisions.4. Determine the percentage error (if any) between therecorded and the actual screen divisions.5. If the error,is within 1% then the time base is linearotherwise it is not.

273

Page 269: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

C. Checking the Resolving Power of the Flaw Detector - ProbeSystem

1. Position the probe on the test block V-1 as in Fig. 3 ,after the time base has been properly calibrated forlOOrnm.

2. Move the probe to maximise the echo heights. We shouldget three bottom echoes corresponding to range? of 85,91and 100mm, as shown in Fig. 4 .

i Probe

Fig. 3

Fig. 49 10

^1. . . . . . . ./,

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Fig 5

274

Page 270: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

If the three echoes are well defined as in Fig. 4 i.e.they are separate from each other, then we say that thetesting system has a good resolving power. On the otherhand if the echoes are- not separate but merge together togive a blurred indication such as in Fig. 5 , theequipment is said to have a poor resolution. A goodresolving capability means that the flaw detector is ableto show small defects such as gas pores lying close to eachother as separate defects whereas for a bad or poorresolution these defects will be indicated as one.3. Try different frequencies to see their effect on

resolution.

Dead Zone Check

1. Place the probe at position A and B as shown in Fig.5-A.

2. See whether the echoes from the 5mm and lOrnrn distancesto the hole can be resolved from the transmission pulse.This will give an idea about the sise of the dead zoneof the flaw detector system.

Fig. 5-A

E. Maximum Penetrative Power

1. Place a normal beam probe on the perspex insert of theVI block (Fig. 6).2. Set the gain control to the maximum value.3. Record the number of peaks visible on the CRT screen and

the height of the last echo.

Fig 6.

Probe position

275

Page 271: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

4. Repeat (1) to (3) for probe with different frequencies(if possible).

5. Also repeat (1) to (3) for other flaw detectors (ifpossible).

276

Page 272: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

PRACTICAL XI : SENSITIVITY SETTING USING AN ANGLE PROBE AND THEASME BLOCK

1. Select- an angle probe; determine its exit point andangle, and calibrate the time base for a maximum rangeof 200 mm.

2. Place the probe on the ASME block and find the holewhich gives the maximum amplitude echo.

3. Maximise the height of this echo by moving the probeforwards and backwards (and rotating it, if necessary),

4. Check that the suppressor control is set to the minimumso that the sensitivity setting can be calibrated andmade reproducible.

5. Adjust the sensitivity control until the echo height is75% of CRT height.

6. This echo constitutes the uncorrected primary referenceecho (PRE).

7. Without altering the sensitivity control, get maximisedechoes for other holes and record than in percentagesof the full CRT screen height as well as their locationon the screen.

8. Plot each echo height vs its screen location on atransparent plastic sheet cut exactly to fit onto theCRT screen. The X and Y axis should be drawn onthis sheet. Data such as time base range, probe anddetector specifications, ASME block thickness andidentification and the uncorrected PRE gain should berecorded on it as well.

277

Page 273: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

PRACTICAL XII : DETERMINATION OF THE ATTENUATION AND SURFACETRANSFER LOSS CORRECTION BETWEEN THE REFERENCECALIBRATION BLOCK AND THE TEST PLATE

1. Place two identical angle probes on the broad side ofthe reference block (ASME block) at one skip distanceapart with a weight on top of one of them. They can bekept in a line by using a straightedge.

2. Peak the signal by probe movement and adjust it to 80%full screen using the unsuppressed gain control andrecord the signal location on the screen.

3. Repeat the above steps for 1, 2, 3 and 4 skipdistances and plot the gain settings VS echo locationson a graph paper.

4. Repeat steps 1 to 3 on the test plate.5. The difference (Y) in gain between the two curves at

the appropriate beam path on the screen is the combinedattenuation and surface loss correction.

6. Plot the DAC curve on a graph paper using one of theprobes.

7. Mow put the two probes on the test plate at one skipdistance apart and adjust the signal to the DAC curve.

8. Without changing the gain setting, put the probes at 2skip distances and find the difference (y) in dBbetween the second peak and the DAC curve.

9. This difference (y) represents the attenuation loss overa beam path of one skip distance. The attenuationconstant is then calculated :-= Y dB/mm where x is the beam path distance

X corresponding to half the skip distance.The attenuation loss over any distance may be calculatedusing this constant.

10. The surface transfer loss correction is then calculated:-S = { Y - y ) dB

11. Plot the correction curve for surface transfer loss andattenuation. This correction is then added to the DACgain to obtain the final sensitivity level for defectevaluation.

278

Page 274: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

PRACTICAL XIII : FLAW SIZING PRACTICE

A. Determination of Defect Size Using a. Normal Beam Probe

1. Select an appropriate normal beam (e.g MB4S-N),2. Calibrate the time base for a oOram range using the VI

block.4. Adjust the gain control to obtain the first back wall

echo at full screen height.3. Place the probe on the surface of the test block with

machined defects.5. Scan the surface of the test block.6. Mark the areas where the.defects are detected.7. Using the 6dB drop method determine the size of the flaw

as follows :-(a) Maximise the echo from the flaw and bring it to full

screen height using the dB control ..(b) Move the probe across the flaw and mark the centre

of the probe on the test specimen surface at alocation where the echo drops to 50% of fullscreen height.

(c) Repeat step (b) to mark all the edges of the flaw.(d) Draw a sketch of the test block showing all the

information about the flaws.3. Compare the size of the defects with the defect sises

shown in the radiographs of the respective test blocks.9. Record any discrepency.

B. Determination of Defect Length With Angle Probes

1. Calibrate the time base for 100mm or 200mm thicknessrange using an angle probe.

2. Place the DAC curve already drawn on the screen of theflaw detector for the same time base calibration as instep (1).

3. Place the probe on the surface of the reference blockIIW, VI at location, A, to scan towards the notch asshown in Figure 1.

4. Adjust the echo height from the notch to obtain a maximumecho.

279

Page 275: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

ÖL..IA I

Fig 1

5. Scan the probe laterally in the direction parallel tothe notch. A ruler can be used for this purpose. Whenthe echo height drops by the specified level, L, markthe position of the centre of the probe on the block.During scanning from A to B on the test block surfacein a straight line with a small to and fro movement themaximum echo height should be constantly achieved.Avoid rotational scanning.

6. The specified level can be 6dB, lOdB, 20ciB or any otherlevel specified in the code being used.

7. To find the end of the notch subtract theat the beam path distance to the notch,found in Practical 9B.

1/2 beam widthUse the value

280

Page 276: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

PRACTICAL XIV : PROCEDURE FOR THE EXAMINATION OF A SINGLE-VEEBUTT WELD ACCORDING TO ASME V

1. Draw to scale,a section of the weld on a graph paper,showing the edge preparation,Draw the centre line of the weld section. Sketch a planview of the weld seam and draw a horisontal line toindicate the seam axis.

2. Choose your probe angle according to the platethickness, t. A frequency of 2.5MHs is recommendedalthough any frequency between 1 to 5 MHz may be used.

For 10 mm t 40 mm, use 70For 40 mm t 60 ma, use 70 or 60 and 45For 60 mm t 100 mm, use 60 and 45

t 100 mm use 60 and 45

3. Use a normal or SE probe to check that the parent metalwithin the full skip distance from each seam edge isfree of laminations or other defects, For thisexamination, set the sensitivity level by bringing thesecond back wall to full screen height. Make sure theplate surface has no weld spatter, loose scale andpaint.

4. Check your equipment characteristics such as (a)linearity of time base, (b) Linearity of receivingamplifier, (c) probe index, (d) probe angle, (e) beamprofile, (f) near surface and depth resolution and (g)dead sone.Maximum deviation in (a) + 5% & (b) 10% of 2:1between 20% & 80% full screen.

5. Set time base range to 10mm or 200mm depending onplate thickness and put the DAC, 50% DAG, and 20% DACcurves on the screen.

6. Set the sensitivity level according to the ASME Code,with correction for transfer losses. For initialscanning, add an additional 6 dB., i.e ScanningSensitivity = (PRE + T.L + 6) dB.

7. Draw a line to represent the weld axis over the centreof the weld seam.

8. Draw two lines on the pai-unt metal surface at each sideof the seam to mark the probe movement from half skip orfull skip distances from the seam centre. Scan the weldroot by moving the probe parallel to the weld seam.

9. Scan the weld for weld body flaws, moving the probe fromthe half skip distance to full skip distance androtating it a bit about the direction of the main

281

Page 277: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

movement. A square scan pattern with overlap isrecommended. The weld must a least be scanned on bothsides of the weld on the same surface. Scanning ratemust, not exceed 152 mm/s (6 in/s).

10. Scan the weld for transverse flaws by moving the probeover the parent metal surface along a line parallel tothe weld axis with the beam slightly inclined towardsthe weld seam at about 10 . This scan must be done onboth sides of the seam with the transducer moved in thesame direction. If not possible, then scan on oppositesurfaces on either side of the weld.NB : The scan for transverse defects is particularly

important for high tensile steel especially forthick welds welded with restraint.

11. Mark out for further investigation the areas from whichsuspect flaw echoes are detected.

12. Transfer the screen readings (beam paths) and the probe-to-weld centre measurements to your graph aftermaximising the echo height on the screen. The probe-to-weld centre distance can be measured with a ruler.

13. Confirm that the echo comes from a flaw and not fromsome surface feature of the weld by scanning frompositions on the opposite side of the weld or theopposite surfaces.

14. Work out from your scaled drawing what these locationsare,

15. Determine the defect length using the 6 dB drop methodwith the sensitivity set at PEL with corrections fortransfer losses. When the defect echo is 20% or less,it may be disregarded. All echoes above 20% must beinvestigated for identification, location and sise.

16. Measure the length of the defect by noting the distanceLI and L2 of the defect extremities from a datum pointof the weld (eg a marked end of the seam).

L2 - 1,1 - defect length17. Identify the type of defect by :-

(a) Studying the behaviour of the echo response toprobe manipulation.

(b) Making use of knowledge of the welding process andprocedure.

(c) Defect location on your graph.(d) Defect orientation, location and sise on a plot

board or on your graph, as explained in steps 18 to22.

13. On your graph, mark out the probe index positioncorresponding to maximum echo height and the defectcentre using the beam path on the screen.

282

Page 278: ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 - …azarata.ir/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ut.pdf · ULTRASONIC TESTING OF MATERIALS AT LEVEL 2 ... General procedure for ultrasonic testing

19. Move the probe towards the weld seam until the defect,echo height is reduced by 20 dB. This is best done bysetting the maximum echo height at 80% and adding 20 dBto the gain control and then move the probe until theecho is again 80% full screen.

20. On the graph, mark out the probe displacement and oneextremity of the defect using the new beam path on thescreen. This extremity point must be on the trailing 20dB edge of the beam.

21. To mark out the defect extremity, draw the beam spreadon a transparent paper and superimpose it over yourgraph.

22. Now repeat steps (23), (24) & (25) but move the probeaway from the weld seam and mark the other extremity ofthe defect which now must be on the leading 20 dB edgeof the beam.

23. From the graph, the width and inclination of the defectcan be determined by joining the defect extremity pointsthrough the centre point with a straight line.

24. For single-vee butt joint (with or without backing) anadditional scan, as follows, is necessary for the weldroot using preferably a 45 probe. The procedure is asfollows:

25. Determine the distance x (see figure below) from theweld centreline to the probe index by drawing orcalculation and position the probe at this distance.

26. Put a probe guide (eg a long ruler) in front or behindthe probe so that the probe can be maintained normal tothe weld axis.

27. Mark on the screen the beam path distance to thecentreline of the weld root.

28. Observe the echo from the weld root relative to thecentreline marked on the screen as the probe is slidealong the probe guide.

29. Evaluate all defect(s) detected in accordance with theASME Code for acceptance or rejection.

30. Submit a complete report written in the manner as shownin a sample test report.

283