Uk p i Club Ecdis - Navigational and Claims Issues

LP NewsFEBRUARY 2011

UK P&I CLUB

New ECDIS mandatory requirementsPart 1: Introduction��

The backgroundThis introduction to ECDIS is the first in a series of threeshort articles which attempts to provide a user friendlyguide to the mystery surrounding electronic chartdisplay and information systems (ECDIS).

With the amendments to SOLAS Chapter V Regulation19 governing the statutory introduction of ECDIS nowbeing adopted from the 1 January 2011, the ‘tickingtime bomb’ associated with ECDIS mandating processhas now taken on a level of greater urgency with theshipping fraternity ultimately coming to the end of itsbreath holding exercise.

As with the introduction of previous mandatoryrequirements to fit equipment such as Radar, VDR orAIS systems onboard commercially operated vessels,many technical managers will now be faced with thetask of acquiring full compliance with the ECDIScarriage regulations at the lowest possible capitalexpenditure.

Although this approach may undoubtedly resolve theshort term issues it may be prudent on this occasion toadopt a more proactive approach towards theimplementation of ECDIS systems especially when

Chapter V regulation 19 and the other does not. Theserequirements are identified as follows:

� The ECDIS equipment must be type approved to theperformance standards as outlined in IMOResolution A. 817 (19) as amended by MSC 64(67)& MSC 86(70) relating to back up arrangements forECDIS systems and operation in RCDS mode.

SOLAS Chapter VThe amendments to SOLAS Chapter V Regulation 19 –Carriage Requirements for Shipborne NavigationalSystems and Equipment came into effect on 1 January2011.

The amendments to the SOLAS Convention nowclearly include ECDIS systems within the definition ofnautical charts and publications with section 2.4 statingthat “An Electronic Chart Display and InformationSystem (ECDIS) is also accepted as meeting the chartcarriage requirements of this subparagraph.”

A new paragraph 2.10 further identifies a requirementfor ships engaged on international voyages to be fittedwith an ECDIS system under the implementationschedule shown in the chart below.

ECDIS performance standardsAn area which often leads to confusion is the simplequestion of what makes one system an ECDIS and theother an ECS (Electronic Chart System). The answer tothis question is simply that one system complies fullywith the IMO ECDIS performance standards and canbe accepted as meeting the requirements of SOLAS

taking into account that the primary function of ECDISforms in many ways the foundation and cornerstonesupon which safe navigation practices are formed.

With this in mind we now consider the legislationsurrounding the mandatory introduction of ECDISequipment and peer under the veil of technical magicand mystery which has enshrouded this subject overthe last decade.

Illus

trat

ions

by

C S

mar

t

� The system must use official ENC data (VectorisedElectronic Navigational Charts) to IHO S57standard, which must be supplied by or authorisedby a National Hydrographic Office. Such ENC datamust be corrected weekly.

� The vessel must have an adequate back-up system.This may be another ECDIS system or paper charts.

� IMO has ruled that ECDIS equipment having RasterChart Display System (RCDS) capability mayoperate as a primary aid to navigation in the RCDS

JULY JULY JULY JULY JULY JULY JULY JULY JULY JULY2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

NEW PASSENGER SHIPS >500GT

NEW TANKERS >3000GT

NEW CARGO SHIPS >10000GT

NEW CARGO SHIPS >3000GT

EXISTING PASSENGER SHIPS >500GT

EXISTING TANKERS >3000GT

EXISTING CARGO SHIPS >50000GT



ECDIS system implementation schedule

mode. Such charts must also be corrected on aweekly basis.

� When ECDIS equipment is used in RCDS mode, itmust be used in conjunction with an appropriatefolio of paper charts. The definition of ‘appropriate’is to be decided by national administrations.

STCW – Statutory trainingUnder the provisions of the STCW 95 Code, generaltraining obligations relating to the use of ECDIS exist.This is indicated by Table A-II-1 of the Code where it isstated “ECDIS systems are considered to be includedin the word charts.”

The degree of knowledge and competency concerningthe use of charts is explicitly defined within Table A-II-1as requiring the navigational officer to posses “athorough knowledge of and ability to use navigationalcharts and publications”. He must additionally show“evidence of skill and ability to prepare for and conducta passage, including interpretation and applyinginformation from charts”.

The IMO Model Course 1.27 The Operational Use ofElectronic Chart Display and Information System(ECDIS) is regarded as setting minimum requirementsa candidate should have gone through to receive anECDIS certificate and covers all relevant safety aspectsand overall system knowledge expected under ageneric ECDIS training course.

An element of confusion has however developedrelating to the need for training where an ECDIS systemhas been fitted but is to be operated as an aid tonavigation only. Under the forthcoming Manilaamendments to the STCW Code which are scheduledto enter into force on the 1 January 2012, generic andtype specific training will be required even if the ECDISequipment is to be used as an aid to navigation only.

ISM CodeIn addition to the generic training identified under theprovisions of IMO model course 1.27 type specifictraining is required where the equipment used duringthe generic training course differs from that to beactually used onboard.

This requirement is identified under the provisions ofsection 6.3 & 6.5 of the ISM Code which requires notonly effective training but familiarisation of newequipment and regulations with respect to safety andemergency related duties.

Although this requirement may be viewed as a relativelysimple task, the wide range of equipmentmanufacturers in the market may present a dauntingproposition for the ship operator with a diverse fleet

equipped with several models of ECDIS systemsoperating varying generations of system software.

The position of effective type specific training is furthercomplicated by the various views adopted by differentFlag States. An example of this is with reference toComputer Based Training Systems (CBT) whichrequires Flag State approval on a case by case basis.Additionally a CBT system approved by one Flag Statemay be rejected by another.

Port State ControlWith marine casualty investigators continuing to identifyineffective ECDIS operation and substandard levels oftraining as a key link in the chain of causation leading tomarine incidents, an increased focus on ECDIS hasbeen observed during routine inspections completedby Port State Control officers. The following listhighlights key inspection areas which are the subject ofparticular focus:

� Documentation indicating that the ship’s navigationsystem complies with IMO Performance Standardsfor ECDIS

� Written procedures on board the vessel for usingthe ECDIS system

� The master and watch-keeping officers are able toproduce appropriate documentation that genericand type-specific ECDIS familiarisation has beenundertaken

� The ship is equipped with the latest updates andnew editions of ENCs

� The ship is equipped with additional nauticalpublications, as defined by the national carriagerequirements

� There is agreement between sensor data and itspresentation on the ECDIS system.

UK P&I CLUBIS MANAGEDBY THOMASMILLER

For further information please contact:Loss Prevention Department, Thomas Miller P&I LtdTel: +44 20 7204 2307. Fax +44 20 7283 6517Email: [email protected]

� The ship is equipped with an approved back-uparrangement to ensure safe navigation for the entirevoyage, in the event of an ECDIS failure

� The ship is equipped with an appropriate updatedcollection of paper charts, if the ECDIS system isbeing used in RCDS mode.

ECDIS acronymsThe use of Acronyms in the Shipping Industry hasalways been present and part of shipping’s fast pacephilosophy. However this system of abbreviation doescause great confusion especially between similaracronyms. Examples of these are where care inapplication and interpretation is needed are:

ECDIS Electronic Chart Display and InformationSystem

ECS Electronic Chart System

ENC Electronic Navigational Chart

RNC Raster Navigational Chart

RCDS Raster Chart Display System

IBS Integrated Bridge System

NACOS Navigation and Control System

ConclusionWith just a brief introduction into the legislativeguidelines relating to ECDIS and its operation it is quiteeasy to see why this subject is causing so muchconsternation within the shipping industry.

Continuing our review into ECDIS, the second article(of a series of three) focuses further on the criticalchange in skill set that is required by the navigationalofficer when changing from paper to electronicnavigation and the requirements of generic and typespecific ECDIS training and familiarization.

The STCW 95 Manila amendments relating to ECDIStraining will also be discussed with an assessment ofpossible training needs required to operate ships of thefuture reviewed as the present technical revolutioncontinues to gain momentum.

Acknowledgement: Justin Lawes, C Solutions Limited.Email: [email protected]

��

��

The mandatory requirement and introduction of electronic chart display and informationsystems is seen as a major step forward in safe ship operation and protection of the environment

LP NewsMARCH 2011

UK P&I CLUB

New ECDIS mandatory requirementsPart 2: A key to safe operation

IntroductionThis is the second in a series of three short articleswhich considers the operational aspects of ECDIS andthe intrinsic function that electronic chart and navigationsystems have to play in the commercially operated shipof the future.

The mandatory requirement and introduction of ECDISis seen by the regulatory bodies guiding the shippingindustry as a major step forward in safe ship operationand protection of the environment. The transition toelectronic navigation and the operation of a paperlessbridge is however initially viewed differently by theshipping community with increased operational costs ofnew equipment and additional training requirements.

It is also becoming increasingly evident that far fromreducing risk, ineffective operation of complex ECDISsystems resulting from poor management practices ortraining can actually increase the risk of incidents suchas collision and grounding with the interface between

computers extenuating the so called ‘human element’reported as causative in almost every marine casualty.

Automation of traditional manual navigational tasks hasbeen observed as delaying the opportunity for errordetection and recovery allowing a navigational singlepoint failure to develop undetected into a single pointcatastrophic failure ultimately resulting in an incident.

With the key to reducing management costs andnavigational risk intrinsically linked with effective ECDISpractices and procedures we now consider ECDIS andits fundamental operational requirements.

The modern ECDIS systemElectronic chart display and information systems(ECDIS) in their simplest forms are single ‘stand alone’units with basic sensor inputs such as course andspeed displaying the ship’s ‘real time’ position on an

Pho

to E

CD

IS L

td

electronic navigational chart (ENC) that complies withthe performance standards outlined under theprovisions of IMO Resolution A.817(19).

The ENC chart must further comply with the IHO chartdata transfer standard S-57 (S-100 in the future) issuedby an authorized hydrographic office. The system musthave an adequate back up arrangement comprising of asecond independent ECDIS or an adequate up to datefolio of paper charts before the system can beconsidered as meeting the SOLAS Chapter VRegulation 19 chart carriage requirements.

Although the basic ECDIS system may be theequipment introduced during the ‘retro fit’ period forvessels presently in operation, the ship of the future willundoubtedly incorporate the electronic chart displayand information system into the heart of the integratedbridge system (IBS) combining navigational equipmentsuch as radar, differential global positioning systems,automated information systems, propulsion control andsystem alarms into a single monitoring station ornavigation control module.

Although this combination of navigational systems intoa single control panel is undoubtedly the way forward,the change in navigational methodology does presentnew challenges in relation to the requirements of safenavigation of the modern vessel.

Electronic chartsThe subject of electronic charts in relation to ECDISoperation is probably an area which generates anelement of confusion. This is primarily due to the factthat ECDIS can operate under the amendments to theIMO ECDIS performance standards in what is referredto as RCDS (raster chart display systems) modeutilizing raster charts when vector chart coverage of thenavigational area is not available. In order to fullyanalyze this provision and mode of operation a cleardistinction between raster and vector charts must bemade.

ENCs or vector charts are compiled from a database ofindividual items (objects) of digitized chart data anddisplayed as a seamless chart. When used in anelectronic navigation system, the data can then be re-assembled to display either the entire chart image or auser selected combination of data. ENCs are intelligentin that systems using them can be programmed to givewarning of impending danger in relation to the vessel’sposition and movement.

RNCs or raster charts on the other hand are producedby digitally scanning a paper chart image. The resultingdigital file may then be displayed in an electronicnavigation system where the vessels position can beshown.

Since the raster chart display is merely a digitalphotocopy of the original paper chart, the image has nointelligence and other than visually, cannot beinterrogated. The fundamental differences betweenvector and raster charts are identified below:

% Vector charts have no defined boundaries andprovide a seamless visual display where rastercharts operate similar to paper charts.

% Raster chart data cannot itself trigger automaticalarms although some alarms may be enteredmanual by the user.

% Horizontal datum and chart projection may differbetween raster charts.

% Chart features cannot be simplified or removed tosuit particular navigational circumstances.

% Without selecting different scale charts the ‘lookahead’ capability of raster charts may be somewhatrestricted.

% Orientation of the raster display to other than chartup display may affect the readability of the chart.

% Display of a ship specific safety contour or safetydepth cannot be highlighted on a raster chart unlessmanually entered by the user during passageplanning.

% Excessive zooming in or out from the natural scale ofthe raster chart can seriously degrade capability.

Under the present IMO legislation, navigational areasnot covered by ENC charts must be identified at theplanning stage with an ‘appropriate’ portfolio of up-to-date paper charts available onboard to be used inconjunction with the ECDIS equipment when operatedin RCDS mode.

Although the wording ‘appropriate’ used under theprovisions of the IMO Resolution has been defineddifferently by the various authorities of sovereign states,specific guidance can be now be found on the IHOwebsite www.iho-ohi.net/english/encs-ecdis/enc-available/backup-paper-charts.html.

With only a brief review of the requirements ofelectronic charts and their mode of operation inconjunction with ECDIS systems it is apparent that thisis an area which requires careful review by competentwell trained and familiarised officers at all stages of thenavigational passage.

Generic trainingEffective training and familiarisation of the master andofficers in relation to ECDIS operation has beenidentified by the International Maritime Organization

(IMO) as an area of increased concern prompting arevision of the training requirements at the STCW 95conference held in Manila on 21 June 2010.

Under the revised STCW 95 training requirementsentering into force on 1 January 2012 under the tacitacceptance procedure, the Master and those in chargeof a navigational watch are required to complete ageneric ECDIS training course which meets the newstandards laid down under the Manila amendments.This requirement pertains to all vessels fitted withECDIS equipment irrespective of the fact that theprimary form of navigation identified under theprovisions of the company management system may bepaper.

In the UK the present situation has recently beenclarified to some extent by Marine Information Notice(MIN) 405 entitled “Training for ECDIS as PrimaryMeans of Navigation” which was published January2011.The notice clarifies what training is acceptable formasters and deck officers of UK-flagged vessels whichhave ECDIS as their primary means of navigation.

MIN 405 presently does not however make anyreference to training requirements for vessels fitted withECDIS systems identified under the companyoperating procedures to be used as an ‘aid tonavigation only’ with paper charts still identified as theprimary means of navigation. As MIN 405 expires on 31December 2011 it is assumed that a further instructionwill be issued reflecting the Manila amendments prior tothe 1 January 2012.

In addition to the ISM Code requirements, MarineInformation Notice (MIN) 405 paragraph 3 now identifiesa clear requirement for ship specific ECDIS trainingrelating to the make and model of the equipment fitted onthe ship on which the master or navigation officer isexpected to operate. Marine Information Notice 405further clarifies that this training should build on the MCAapproved generic training format and be delivered by themanufacturer; the manufacturer’s approved agent or atrainer who has attended such a programme.

The present requirement relating to type specific trainingfor UK-flagged vessel is now partially clarified under theprovisions of MIN 405. The use of the words ‘and bedelivered’ does however suggest that the presentsolution adopted by many leading manufacturersproviding computer based training programs may not ontheir own merits be considered suitable under the newguidelines.

With the dilemma relating to type specific training nowclearly identified, many shipping operators may befaced with the logistical headache of either training alltheir operational staff in every ECDIS system within thefleet or be required to provide an onboard certified‘trainer’ having previously completed a suitable ‘train thetrainer’ course.

With many shipping operators encountering difficultiesfinding a solution to their type specific trainingrequirements two alternatives have been identifiedbelow;

At the centre for training excellence at CSMARTAlmeria, Amsterdam (www.csmartalmere.com)developed in conjunction with a market leading cruiseship operator, ECDIS equipment has beenstandardised throughout the fleet with the bridge layoutreplicated at the training centre. This standardisationeffectively circumventing the additional requirement fortype specific training as all the systems operated withinthe fleet is the same.

This training has been further advanced by theintroduction of a revolutionary bridge team managementapproach moving away from the traditional rankstructure adopting a function based airline style‘navigator / co-navigator’ system which has been provento effectively reduce the risk of navigational hazards.

An alternative solution to the issue of the trainingrequirements of a multi functional and diverse shippingorganisation operating many different ECDIS systems ofvarious generations has been developed by ECDIS LtdSouthampton (www.ecdis.org) .

Focusing on the needs of the modern ship manager andtheir respective requirements, ECDIS Ltd has

Type specific trainingIn general terms the requirement for type specifictraining for ECDIS has been identified under Section 6of the ISM Code which establishes a clear requirementfor not only effective training but familiarisation withrespect to safety and emergency related duties.

Pho

to C

SM

AR

T

Shallow contour

Chart zeroDisplay

Safety contour (input value)Safety contour (value existing in the

vector chart)

Blue

Light blue

Grey-white

White

Non-navigable area Navigable area

Safety depth

Deep contour

developed a centre of learning excellence providinggeneric training course utilising many different types ofECDIS system in a single training location. Thisprovides increased system knowledge of ECDISsystem operation, as well as complying with UKregulations and issuing MCA / STCW ECDIScertification.

Passage planningEffective passage planning completed by paper chartor by electronic systems is essentially the process ofdefining the safest navigational route in conjunctionwith established safety margins under which the voyagewill be executed.

The passage plan should be comprehensive, detailedand easy to interpret and effectively reduce navigationalrisks and aid the ship and its officers to safely navigatingfrom berth to berth. Electronic navigational planningconsists of three stages namely Appraisal, Planningand Control. Although this section does not attempt tooffer a guide to electronic planning the key elements willbe discussed.

Appraisal – This stage of the plan should identify thatthe required electronic charts are available andcorrected up to date. Areas where ECDIS would beoperated in RCDS mode should be identified withappropriate paper charts available. The requirements ofsovereign states during periods of coastal passagemust be considered (IHO Website) with all relevantpublications and sailing directions reviewed. Safetycontours should be established and information relatingto weather, current, tides, chart datum, draft, speed,environmental limits, air draft, squat and generalhazards such as high traffic concentrations should beprepared and made available.

The concept of safety contours is a key functionspecific to electronic charts and further outlined in thediagram below.

During the cuts, the planning officer will move through aquality control process from a general plan to therefined final track which will be used for navigation andapproved by the master.

It is essential that the built in automatic check function isused throughout the planning stages however it mustbe remembered that the effectiveness of the automaticcheck system relies on the accuracy of the safetyparameters set by the user.

The final track is then often displayed with associatedwaypoint information and navigational notes at thecentral conning station or chart table for reference bythe navigational officer during the Control stage of thepassage planning process.

Planning– After the appraisal stage, the planningofficer now begins the track planning. The planningstage can be divided into three different sub-stages or‘cuts’.

Control – The control stage of the plan establisheshow the vessel’s progress and the navigational systemswill be monitored throughout the passage. This willinclude an effective analysis identifying all risks ofoperation. When official ENC (vector charts) are used,systems of automatic and manual checks must beestablished if the danger of over reliance on automatedsystems is to be avoided.

Traditional track monitoring methods such as parallelindex and visual bearings should be included at thecontrol stage in addition to modern techniques such asradar overlay of the electronic chart. This shouldhowever not obscure the radar picture to the levelwhere acquired targets may be lost or the navigationofficer may be affected by information overload.

Risk analysisOn review of the increased technology available to themodern navigator one of the conundrums must be whyincreased computerisation and automation has notremoved, and perhaps not even reduced the potentialfor failure in the systems in which they were introduced.

In fact new pathways to failure seem to have developedcentered on an initial miscommunication between manand machinery resulting in a misalignment in the reality

Guard sector movesalong with the ship andits direction is always thesame as the ship’sdirection of movement(the guard sector is notdisplayed on the screen)

Ahead sector width, set inthe Char t Alarms menu

Length was input in theSafety Contour frame inthe Alarm Settings >Chart Alarms menu

Safety contour

Ship’s positionwhen the

SAFETY CONTOURalarm occurs

Safety contour




of where the navigator thinks he is and where theautomated system has actually taken him.

Research has shown that humans are poor monitors ofautomated systems and tend to rely more on systemalarms than manual checks especially in relation tothose systems which have proven themselves as highlyreliable.

In several casualty investigations it has beendetermined that automation has resulted in thenavigator developing an ‘operational bias’ relying on theautomated systems rather than the salient cuesprovided visually through the bridge window.

In this respect an extensive risk assessment of ECDISoperation combined with a clear requirement of manualsystem checks of critical automated operations must beestablished within the company Safety ManagementSystem effectively identifying operational risk andintroducing control measures to reduce the effect ofsingle point failures.

Before we consider the assessment process, the termrisk must be defined. Risk in relation to ECDISoperation can be considered as a hazard or source ofnavigational error with the potential to cause loss orharm to personnel, the environment or the ship (or otherships) itself.

The main areas of risk when considering ECDISoperation can be identified under three maincategories:

1. The equipment itself may suffer from failure (bothhardware and software) including power outagessensor input failure and potential virus infection.

2. The charts are operated under permit which mayexpire, charts in use not corrected up-to-date,updates not correctly applied, ENC chart coverageunavailable requiring the system to be used inRCDS mode without the appropriate paper chartfolio being available.

3. The operation of the ECDIS system onboardcarried out by poorly trained crew following poornavigational practices and operational proceduressuch as excessive zooming or operating the chart fornavigation with base information only displayed.

Effective risk assessment as a critical function ofimplementation of electronic navigation is rarelyemphasised when the transfer from paper to digitalnavigation is considered.

As our short review of this subject has hopefullyhighlighted a full and comprehensive risk assessmentclearly identifying the hazards relating to the operationof ECDIS systems should not only assist thoseassociated with the task of transfer between the twomethods of navigation but also accelerated themigration process and the positive aspects ofelectronic chart operation relating to increased crewefficiency whilst reducing operational costs.

ConclusionFrom this short review of ECDIS operation and thefunctions to consider when transferring navigationalpractices from paper to electronic format, it is clear thatthe process, although complex, can if effectivelycompleted, reduce operational cost whilst increasinglevels of safety.

The effect of poor management and training in relationto ECDIS operation can however result in increasednavigational risk and operational costs includingdetention during port state inspections and increasednavigational related incidents.

In conclusion of our review of ECDIS, the third and finalin this series of short articles considers the legalimplications of inefficient ECDIS operation and theeffect increased playback and recording facilities ofmodern bridge equipment may have on the casualtyinvestigation and claims handling process.

The legal effect of failure to meet the statutory ECDIS requirements and the effect on claimswhere levels of operation or knowledge of ECDIS are considered to be a factor or fundamentallink in the chain of causation leading to an incident

LP NewsJUNE 2011

UK P&I CLUB

The key to safe ECDIS operationPart 3: Legal implications

Pho

to N

eum

ayer

Cha

nnel

- A

ntar

tica

IntroductionThis article entitled ‘Legal implications’ is the third in a series of three short articles that consider the effect of thenew mandatory requirements of ECDIS. The first article in the series provided the reader with a generalintroduction to ECDIS and the legislation that governed its operation. The second article focused on theoperational aspects of ECDIS considering the requirements of generic and type specific training in further detail.

This final article in the series now considers the legal effect of failure to meet the statutory ECDIS requirements andthe effect on claims where levels of operation or knowledge of ECDIS are considered to be a factor or fundamentallink in the chain of causation leading to an incident.

Statutory complianceAs previously discussed in the first article of this seriesrelating to the new ECDIS mandatory requirements, theinternational legislation governing ECDIS and itsoperation is provided under:

●●●●● SOLAS Chapter V Regulation 19, which identifiesthe chart carriage requirements.

●●●●● IMO Resolution A.817 (19), which establishesECDIS performance standards.

●●●●● STCW 95 (shortly to be amended by the Manilaamendments) that identifies the trainingrequirements relating to ECDIS operation.

●●●●● MIN 405 training for ECDIS as a primary means ofnavigation for UK flagged vessels that further clarifythe familiarisation requirements relating to ECDISoperation.

●●●●● ISM Code Section 6, which identifies clearrequirements for training and familiarisation withrespect to safety and emergency, related duties.

With Port State Control inspectors operating under theParis and Tokyo MOUs now becoming more familiarwith ECDIS related compliance and operational issues,an increased focus during random port state inspectionis now evident. The effect of failing to meet theestablished legislation governing ECDIS operation canhave severe ramifications including:

●●●●● Detention of the vessel under the provisions of PortState control conventions.

●●●●● Suspension of Class.

●●●●● Evidence leading to the issue of a major non-conformance under the ISM Code resulting insuspension of the ISM DOC / SMC.

●●●●● Automatic termination or alternatively excluding theinsurer for liability for any breach associated with thefailure to comply with the requirements under hulland machinery insurances.

This review into the legal implications of ECDIS will commence with a closer look at the legislation relating toECDIS operation and the effect on the vessel’s ability to operate in the event of a failure to comply with provisions ofSOLAS, STCW 95 or indeed ISM Code statutory legislation.

The consequences of claims in tort, and under contracts of carriage will also be considered with the consequentchange relating to how casualties of the future will be approached from a marine inspector’s viewpoint alsoconsidered.

New ECDIS mandatory requirementsAdmiralty damage claimsClaims arise in many forms resulting from loss during amarine adventure. Incidents such as collision,grounding, machinery failure, heavy weather andcontact damage to docks and jetties are all matterswhere the advent of sophisticated electronic aids tonavigation and permanent recording facilities availableto investigators, will inevitably lead to closer scrutinyand the identification of fault.

Collision

Regulations relating to collision avoidance arecontained in the provisions of S.I 1996 No. 0075 (TheMerchant Shipping Distress Signals and Prevention ofCollisions Regulations 1996). Non-compliance withthese regulations is potentially a criminal offence andwill be evidence of potential negligence in a civil casefor damages.

Electronic record keeping will make it easier toprosecute (or defend) cases where breach of theCollision Regulations is alleged.

Grounding / Stranding

The introduction of ECDIS equipment operated inconjunction with approved ENC charts should makethe accidental grounding of competently operatedvessels a thing of the past. Automatic route checking,monitoring and alarm systems effectively operated inconjunction with electronic chart safety contoursshould not only avoid human errors during planningstages but also effectively monitor the ship’s positionwhilst on passage.

Safeguards against accidental changes to theapproved passage plan, position inputs, speed inputs,position monitoring and cross reference should beestablished under the company SMS. However, in theevent of grounding incident the effective operation ofthe ECDIS system will be carefully examined.

With ECDIS systems having many complex features ofoperation, a failure by the operator to navigate in thecorrect format with only base chart information selected

for example could result in critical information containedin the chart database being missed or undetected.

Where a failure of the requirements relating to trainingor familiarisation in ECDIS operation is established,claims arising from the alleged unseaworthiness of theship are likely to arise and will be of major concern toowners, H&M and P&I insurers.

Limitation of liability

Section 185 of the Merchant Shipping Act 1995incorporates the Convention on Limitation of Liabilityfor Maritime Claims 1976 into English Law. Article 4 ofthe convention states that “A person liable shall not beentitled to limit his liability if it is proven the loss resultedfrom his personal act or omission, committed with theintent to cause such loss or recklessly and with theknowledge that such loss would probably result.”

Although this test imposes a significant burden on theparty attempting to break the right to limitation it willenable creative claimants the opportunity to probe newareas of investigation where clear breaches in trainingand operation of electronic aids to navigation can beestablished.

Claims under contracts of carriageThe provisions of the Hague-Visby Rules are enactedwithin English Law by the Carriage of Goods by SeaAct 1971 (COGSA 1971), Article III identifies arequirement for the carrier to exercise due diligencebefore and at the beginning of the voyage to make thevessel seaworthy and to properly man, equip andsupply the ship.

Article IV of COGSA 1971 subsequently allows thecarrier to be indemnified against cargo claims providingthat; “the carrier nor the ship shall be liable for loss ordamage arising or resulting from unseaworthiness

unless caused by want of due diligence on the part ofthe carrier to make the vessel seaworthy, and to securethat the ship is properly manned, equipped andsupplied.”

With the competence and ability of the master and crewto effectively operate electronic navigational systemsestablished as a critical element in the vessel’s ability toencounter the ‘ordinary perils of the sea’, the cause ofcargo damage will now be closely reviewed in relationto ECDIS certification and operation.

Where the carrier attempts to rely on the provisions ofarticle IV of COGSA 1971 to avoid claims relating tocargo damage, the burden of proof rests firmly with thecarrier to prove that he exercised due diligence.

In this respect if it is proven that there was a failure tocomply with the statutory requirements of ECDISoperation or installation and this failure was consideredcausative in relation to the incident, the presumption ofa lack of due diligence on the part of the carrier may beunavoidable.

Marine insurance claimsThe effect of increasing levels of technology on boardmodern ships and the ability to electronically documentthe events leading to a marine casualty have created atendency within the insurance sector to investigateclaims against perils insured against with defencessuch as seaworthiness and lack of due diligence on thepart of the assured featuring more often.

Insurance policies covering H&M, and P&I may now bereviewed closely by the insurer especially with theprovisions of the ISM Code now linking operationalaspects onboard to the ‘highest level of management’through the designated person.

The lack or efficiency of equipment, navigational aids orcharts has been clearly established as affecting thevessel’s seaworthiness both in relation to contracts of

carriage and under insurance policies. Additionally,sufficiency and competency of crew and their levels oftraining with regard to on board technology can alsoimpinge upon the vessel’s seaworthiness.

With the continuing advancements in technologymaking the question of the dynamics of an incidentresulting in loss an item of fact rather than speculation,combined with the link established between the actionsof those on board to the ‘highest level of management’through the ISM Code, defences to claims relying ontraditional navigational perils insured against andnegligence of the master and crew may become moredifficult to sustain.

Casualty investigationCasualties and incidents of one kind or another arebound to occur from time to time during the navigationand operation of ships. When they do, legal disputes arelikely to arise especially when large sums are involved.

The principle aim of the commercially mindedshipowner, charterer and cargo owner is of course tosettle any disputes quickly and cheaply. If however adispute cannot be resolved between the parties then thematter may refer to arbitration or the courts fordetermination.

In hearing disputes between two parties, arbitrators andjudges rely upon the evidence presented to them toestablish the facts of the case. This evidencetraditionally presented by the parties in the form of bothoral and written statements of witnesses andcontemporary log entries and documentation has in thepast provided the basis on which to decisions have beenmade.

This evidence sometimes required the courts todetermine conflicting statements on a particular issue indispute. In such situations the judge or arbitrator toestablish the facts of the case has heavily relied oncontemporaneous evidence such as photographic,video or electronic information.

In this respect electronic equipment designed with arecording facility such as ECDIS, voyage datarecorders, AIS data and even GPS have become acrucial part of legal proceedings often used todetermine disputed facts.

With literally hundreds of different types of electronicsystems with recording facilities operating differentgenerations of software, the recovery of this informationcan however be a difficult task in itself.

As this critical and at times complex procedure ofelectronic data recovery has been clearly identified itmay be questioned why many ship managers, owners

and operators have failed to provide clear instructionsrelating to the preservation of such data in the event ofan incident.

Additionally, critical information may be lost due to lackof knowledge in relation to the storage space ormemory of the equipment in question or by the databeing simply overwritten if action has not been taken forits preservation.

With this in mind it seems sensible for the ship manageror owner to establish not only what electronicequipment installed on board each vessel hasrecording facilities, but also provide clear instructionsto the master, which identifies the actions to downloadthe data and safeguard this critical evidence. Failure topreserve evidence may be viewed with suspicion andadverse inferences drawn.

The design of a simple checklist (next page) could beused to establish the equipment onboard withrecording facilities and identify the process to befollowed in the case of an incident.

It is important to understand that ECDIS systems arecapable of recording not only the log of events but theparameters of operation set up by the operator at thetime of the incident.

This electronic data may play a crucial part in thelitigation process especially during the transition periodfrom paper to electronic navigation where questionsrelating to the effective operation of ECDIS systemsmay be raised.

This will mean that in the case of a collision for examplewhere vector charts are selected and overlaid on radarshaving a primary collision avoidance designation, it maybe possible for the officer charged with the navigationduties to reach information overload especially if layersin excess of chart base levels are selected.

Bridge data recording equipment checklist

Ship

Flag

Date

Equipment ECDIS/ECS

Type

Recording facility

Storage capacity

Storage medium

Download method

Equipment GPS

Type

Recording facility

Storage capacity

Storage medium

Download method

Equipment AIS

Type

Recording facility

Storage capacity

Storage medium

Download method

Equipment Voyage data recorder

Type

Recording facility

Storage capacity

Storage medium

Download method

Equipment CCTV

Type

Recording facility

Storage capacity

Storage medium

Download method

Equipment System alarm equipment

Type

Recording facility

Storage capacity

Storage medium

Download method




If this ineffective mode of ECDIS operation resulted in atarget going undetected, ultimately resulting in acollision, the failure of the navigator to act inaccordance with the Collision Regulations in this modeof operation may not only result in criminal charges andcivil negligence actions, but may render the vesselunseaworthy with questions as to the exercise of duediligence on the part of those responsible for themanagement of the ship raised by cargo interests orinsurers.

This new technological age also places a greaterresponsibility on the casualty investigator who is taskedto attend incidents and collect evidence. The nextgeneration of casualty investigators now undoubtedlyrequire and extensive understanding in relation to theoperation of equipment such as ECDIS and a practicalknowledge relating to the principles of electronicnavigation.

ConclusionThe ECDIS revolution and the rapid introduction ofcomplex computerised systems and automation onboard ocean going vessels is perceived by the industryas a positive change and an improvement in general

standards of operation, levels of safety and protectionof the environment.

The technological age has also brought with it newlegislation and operational guidance requiring strictcompliance. The additional introduction of voyage datarecorders (VDR) and ECDIS recording systems noweffectively provide the suitably qualified marineinvestigator with a clear picture of events leading to amarine casualty. Combine this with the requirements ofdocumentation under the provisions of the ISM Codeand the preamble and conclusion to a marine casualtyinvestigation is complete.

With the requirement for effective training,familiarisation and operation now receiving increasedfocus, with traditional damage defences of navigationalerror, heavy weather and crew negligence now beingsubjected to additional scrutiny, the ECDIS revolutionmay be the catalyst which sparks a new cycle in theclaims sector and one which may be even more costlythan the introduction of the technology itself…

Documents

Uk p i Club Ecdis - Navigational and Claims Issues