Uber Ltr to CPUC Re Vehicle Inspection Requirement 12 24 2014-2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 Uber Ltr to CPUC Re Vehicle Inspection Requirement 12 24 2014-2

    1/2

    Rasier-CA, LLC

    1455 Market Street , 4th Floor

    San Francisco, CA 94103

    1

    December 24, 2014

    Via Email

    Denise Tyrrell

    Acting DirectorSafety and Enforcement Division

    California Public Utilities Commission

    505 Van Ness AvenueSan Francisco, CA 94102-3298

    [email protected]

    Re: Clarification of TNC Vehicle Inspection Requirement

    Dear Director Tyrrell:

    We write to request that the Commissions Safety and Enforcement Division (SED)

    clarify the manner in which inspections are conducted on vehicles used by Transportation

    Network Company (TNC) drivers who accept trip requests from the Uber smartphoneapplication. Decision 13-09-045, entitled Adopting Rules and Regulations on TNCs, sets

    forth, in Section 2.24, that vehicles used by TNC drivers must be inspected annually:

    Prior to allowing each TNC driver to operate a vehicle, and annuallythereafter, a TNC must inspect the drivers vehicle, or have the vehicle

    inspected at a facility licensed by the California Bureau of Automotive

    Repair, and maintain complete documentation of such inspections. A TNC

    drivers vehicle must, at a minimum, pass a 19 point inspection prior to

    allowing the driver to operate the vehicle under the TNCs platform.

    It is our understanding that Section 2.24 requires vehicles to be inspected by a certified third

    party (i.e.,a licensed California auto repair facility), or, an employee-representative of the TNC

    itself, and Rasier-CA, LLCs (Rasiers) policies continue to reflect that understanding.

    Interpreted differently, however, this requirement may appear to allow a TNC to rely oncontracted driver partners, who are not certified mechanics, to conduct inspections on other TNC

    drivers vehicles. Given that this TNC driver peer-inspection practice exists today in the

    California TNC industry, we are writing to ask for clarification on whether the SED believes thatvehicle inspections conducted by TNC drivers who are not certified mechanics is consistent with

    the letter and intent of Section 2.24.

  • 8/10/2019 Uber Ltr to CPUC Re Vehicle Inspection Requirement 12 24 2014-2

    2/2

    2

    Beginning on February 2, 2015, Rasier will explore the possibility of using its own driver

    peer-inspection program, similar to current practices of others in the TNC industry, unlessotherwise notified by SED that TNC driver peer-inspections are not permitted under Section

    2.24.

    Clarification from the SED on this issue would assist Rasier in ensuring driver partnersreceive the most accurate information. We look forward to your response to our request for

    clarification, and thank you for your consideration.

    Sincerely,

    K. Juvvadi

    Krishna K. JuvvadiSenior Counsel