UBC_1967_A7 W8

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    1/75

    SINGLE PLATE CONNECTIONS FOR STEEL BEAMS

    by

    URS WYSS

    B. Eng. Swiss Federal Ins t i tu te of Te chn olo gy, 1963

    A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF

    THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF

    MASTER OF APPLIED SCIENCE

    i n the Department

    of

    C i v i l Engineering

    We accept t h i s t h e s i s as conforming to the

    required standard

    THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA

    APRIL, 1967

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    2/75

    In presenting th is thesis inpartial fulfilmentof therequirements

    foranadvanced degreeat theUniversity ofBritishColumbia,Iagree

    that dieLibrary shallmakei tfre ely availableforreference and

    study. Ifurther agree that permissionforextensive copyingofthi s

    thesisforscholarlypurposesmay begrantedby the Head of my

    Departmentor by hisrepresentatives. It isunderstood that copying

    or publicationofthi s thesisforfinan cia l gain shallnot beallowed

    without,my written permission.

    Departmentof C i v i l Engineering

    The UniversityofB r i t i s h ColumbiaVancouver8 S Canada

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    3/75

    ABSTRACT

    Single plate connections fors t e e lbeams,connectedby

    high strength bolts to the beam web andweldedto thecolumn,

    were investigated todetermine their, behaviour.

    Testswereperformed on theconnections i n theabsenceand

    i n thepresence ofshear,andshearwasfound not toaffectthe

    r i g i d i t y of theconnec tions.

    Varying thegauge distance,theweld s i z e , thep i t c hand

    thenumberofbolts i n thetest specimens, showed that only

    the p i t c h and thenumberofbolts influencedther i g i d i t y

    of theconnections. Anincreasei n thep i t c h and thenumberof

    bol ts causes anincreasei n ther i g i d i t y of theconnections.

    In a l l cases themajor s l i p valuewas greater thanthe

    usually assumed value.

    Undertheactionofpuremoment thecentreof rotation

    was found to be s l i g h t l y abovethecentroid of theco nnection,

    whereas undertheactionof moment andshear thecentreofrota tion

    was s l i g h t l y belowthecentroid of theco nnection.

    Themaximum momentdeveloped by theconnections varied from

    45kip-inchesfo r thetwo-bolt connection ,to 355kip-i nches

    for thesix-bolt connection.

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    4/75

    i i .

    TABLEOF CONTENTS

    TITLE PAGE

    I - INTRODUCTION 1

    Scope

    Advantages of the New TypeofConnection s

    Aim of the Investigation

    EarlyWork

    Method of Investigation

    II - DESCRIPTION OFTESTS 5

    1. PureMoment Set-up

    TypeofConnections Investigated

    Description ofApparatus

    Description of Tests

    Observations

    Moment-Rotation Curves

    2. Moment Shear Set-up

    TypeofConnections Investigated

    Description ofApparatus

    Description of Tests

    a) Without Appl ied Rota tion

    b) With Appl ied Rota tion

    Observations

    Shear D e f l e c t i o n Curves

    Moment-Rotation Curves

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    5/75

    i i i .

    TABLEOF CONTENTS (Cont'd)

    TITLE PAGE

    III -ANALYSISANDRESULTSOFTESTS 28

    1. Capacityof theConnections

    Definitions

    S l i p Values

    2. R i g i d i t y of theConnections

    Definitions

    Semi-Rigid Connection Fact ors from Pure

    Moment and Moment Shear Set-up

    3. Influenceof theDifferent Variables

    on theRigi dity

    4. CentreofRotat ion

    IV-DERIVATIONOFTHEORETICAL CAPACITYAND 35

    RIGIDITYOF THE CONNECTIONS

    1. T h e o r e t i c a l Capacity

    Derivation

    Comparison with Experiments

    2. Discussion of Rigidity

    Approximation of

    Rig idity

    Comparison with Experiments

    V- CONCLUSIONS 40

    BIBLIOGRAPHY 42

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    6/75

    I V .

    TABLEOF CONTENTS (Cont'd)

    TITLE PAGE

    APPENDIX"A" 44

    Moment-Rotation Curves from PureMoment

    Set-up

    APPENDIX"B" 50

    Shear-Deflection Curves fromMoment Shear

    Set-up without Applie d Rotat ion

    APPENDIX"C" 56

    Moment-RotationandResultant Bolt Force-

    Resultant Displacement Curves fromMoment

    Shear Set-up with Appli ed Rotat ion

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    7/75

    LIST OF TABLES

    TABLE PAGE

    I Summary ofConnections Tested 4

    II Summary of Failures 22

    III Maximum Bolt ForcesatMajor Slip 31

    IV Semi-Rigid Connection Fac tor s 33

    V Centres ofRota tion 34

    VI T h e o r e t i c a l Capacityof

    Connections 35

    VII ComparisonofSemi-Rigid Connection

    Factors

    38

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    8/75

    v i .

    LISTOFILLUSTRATIONSAND PLATES

    FIGURE PAGE

    1. Single Plate Connectionfo rS t e e lBeams 3

    2. T y p i c a lMoment Rotation Curve f o rSemi-Rigid 3

    Connection

    3. Test Specimens 4

    4. PureMoment Set-up 6

    5. T y p i c a l

    Moment Rotation Curves from Pure

    12

    Moment Set-up

    6. Moment Rotation Curves from PureMoment Set-up 13

    7. Moment Shear Set-up 16

    8.. T y p i c a lShear D e f l e c t i o nCurves fromMoment 25

    Shear Set-up withoutAppli ed Rotati on

    9. T y p i c a lMoment Rotation Curves fromMoment 27

    Shear Set-up with Applied Rotation

    10. CentreofRotation 34

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    9/75

    v i i .

    LISTOFILLUSTRATIONSAND PLATES (Cont'd)

    PHOTO PAGE

    1. Test Specimen Mounted on the Beam i n the 8

    PureMoment Set-up

    2. PureMoment Set-up i n theTin ius Olsen 8

    Testing Machine

    3. PureMoment Set-up. Showing the 21 WF 62 9

    Beam with theTest Specimen and the

    D i s t r i b u t i n g Beam.

    4. Test Specimen Mounted i n the Moment Shear 18

    Set-up

    5. EndView of the Moment Shear Set-up Showing 18

    End Frame with Load C e l l s andHyd raulic

    Jacks at Top

    6. Typ ic al Test Specimen f o r the Moment Shear 23

    Set-up Showing theDeformations a f t e rthe

    Test

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    10/75

    v i i i .

    ACKNOWLEDGMENT

    The author wishes toacknowledge g r a t e f u l l y thevalu able

    aidandguidance affordedbyhis advisor, ProfessorS.L.Lipso n,

    throughout theentirework coveredi nthis thesis.

    Acknowledgmentandthanksarealsodue toa l ltheC i v i l

    Engineering'Department Technicians for their assistance throughout

    the experiments. ToMessrs.P.Demco,F.ZurkirchenandJ . Sharp

    for their assistancei nperforming experiments; to Mr. W. Schmidt

    for hi s aidi nsetting upelectronicsequipment.

    S p e c i a l acknowledgmenti salsodue toMissL.Cowdell

    forhervaluable aidi n thetypingofd r a f t copies.

    This post-graduate studywassponsoredby theCanadian

    I n s t i t u t eofSt eel C onstru ction.

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    11/75

    1.

    1 I N TRO DUCT IO N

    Scope.- This thesis covers the behaviour of singleplate

    connections forsteelbeams,connected by high strength bolts

    to thebeamweb and welded to thecolumn, (see Fig. 1)

    Advantagesof t h i sTypeof Connections.- Comparedwith the

    riveted or bolted standard, double angle, connections as they

    arerecommendedi n theManualof SteelConstruction by the

    A.I.S.C.and C.I.S.C.,the singleplate connections with high

    strength bolts aremoreeconomical for the following reasons:

    1. In the case of high strengthbolts of the f r i c t i o n type,

    bearing stress i s not the governing factorfor thenumber

    of bolts, and for the thickness of the connection plate>

    as i t i s fo r the double angle connections.

    2. Easyerection con dit ion s: the connection platew i l l be

    shopwelded to thecolumnand f i e l d bolted to thebeam web.

    Connecting thebeami n the f i e l d would be very simple.

    Aim of the Investigations.- The behaviour and the features

    of the singleplate connections forsteelbeamshave been

    investigatedunder different conditions and variables.Qf

    specialInterest are the capacity and r i g i d i t y of these

    connections.

    EarlyWork.- In the 1930's,C. Batho and H.C. Rowanin

    1 2Great B r i t a i n , and J.C. Rathbuni n the United States conducted

    tests to f i n d a relationshipbetweenthemomentapplied toa

    riveted connection and the corresponding rotation.

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    12/75

    2.

    A series of tests tocompare the r i g i d i t y ofwelded and

    r i v e t e d connections were conducted by CR. Young and K.B. Jackson

    3

    i n 1934 i nCanada . J.L. Brandes and R.M. Mains reported tests4

    ofwelded top- plat e and seat connections i n 1944 . A progress

    report, pub li sh ed i n 1947 by theAmerican I n s t i t u t e of Steel

    Construction, recommended that a dependable percentage of restraint

    of se ve ra l types of semi-rigid connections could be used in

    design^.

    A l l this experimental rese arch has been undertaken to study

    the behaviour of such connections, and to investigate the

    p o s s i b i l i t y of including their e l a s t i c r e s t r a i n t i n the design

    of s t r u c t u r a l framework. The findings of these research groups

    indicate that an approximate linear relationship exists within

    a s p e c i f i c regionbetween the appliedmoment and the relative

    rotation of thebeam and column, as shownin Fig. 2.

    Method of Investigation.- The single plate connections

    for s t e e lbeamshave been testedunder three d i f f e r e n t conditions,

    i n order to investigate,t h e i r behaviour completely:

    1. In the "PureMoment Set-up" each connection was sub jected

    to apure bending moment i n the absence of shear.

    (see Fig . 4)

    2. In the"Moment Shear Set-up" the same connections were

    tested under r e a l i s t i c beam end shears and rotations,

    (see F i g . 7)

    3. In the same"MomentShear Set-up" the connections were

    tested also i n the presence ofbeam end shears, but under

    very small rotations only.

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    13/75

    Fig. 2 -TypicalMomentRotationCurvefor Semi-Rigid Connection.

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    14/75

    4.

    >/'X

    t

    /

    * * 0

    /

    f

    jr4t

    'vi

    i7 i j /

    &i

    / / 1

    /\ / /

    \

    ?

    \\

    /

    ?

    \

    \

    /

    /

    \

    >

    \

    /

    /

    s

    \

    /

    ?\

    \

    /

    ?

    s

    v

    \

    (

    /

    \\

    /

    ?

    s r f\ \ /

    Fig. 3 - Tes t Specimens

    *4

    A. ForPureMoment Set-up

    B. For Moment Shear Set-up

    Series Method X y Size

    No. Tested in. in. of

    Weldin.

    1 PureMoment 2 1/2 3 1/4

    2 1 3/4 3 1/4

    3 1 3/4 2 1/4 1/4

    4 Moment Shear 2 1/2 3 1/4

    5 no rotation 1 3/4 3 1/4

    6 4 3 1/4

    7 2 1/2 2 1/4 1/4

    8 1 3/4 2 1/4 1/4

    9 Moment Shear 2 1/2 3 1/410 with rotation 1 3/4 3 1/4

    11 2 1/2 3 3/16

    12 2 1/2 3 1/4 one side

    TABLEI -SUMMARYOF CONNECTIONS TESTED

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    15/75

    11DESCRIPTION OF TESTS

    1. PureMoment Set-up

    TypeofConnections Inve stig ated .- Thetype of connections

    investigated were s i n g l e plate connections fors t e e lbeams a

    shown i nF i g .1. Thev a r i a b l e swere the number ofb o l t s ,the

    gauge distanceand thep i t c h ; they varied as shown i nTableI.

    Each series consistedof f i v e specimenswith d i f f e r e n t numbers

    of b o l t s , from two bolts tos i x ,i n c l u s i v e . Thethicknessof

    the connection plates was 1/4 i n .fo ra l lspecimens and the

    size of the f i l l e t weldswas 1/4 i n .f ora l l cases except s e r i e s 11

    The b o l t s employed i na l ltestswereA.S.T.M.A-325 high

    strength b o l t s . Each b o l t was tightenedto a torqueof 356 f t . lbs

    using a c a l i b r a t e d torquewrench.

    D e s c r i p t i o n ofApparatus.- Inorder toobtainthemoment

    r o t a t i o n c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of theconnections under theactionof

    pure bending and no shear, thetest specimens (seeF i g .3A and

    Photo #1) were mounted i n themiddle pf asymmetrically loaded

    simplebeam. Two shortwide flange sections(21 WF 62) were

    bolted toeach sideof thetest specimen, which consistedof

    two 1/4 i n . connection-plates,welded on e i t h e r side to a 1 i n .

    intervening plate.

    The beamwas placed on the bed of the 200,000 l b . capacity

    Tinius Olsen testingmachine,and was supported onhigh rocker s

    at e i t h e r end. Thebeamwas then symmetrically loaded, l ' - 6 "

    on e i t h e r sideof theconnection c entrebymeansof a distributing

    beamandrockers. (seeF i g . 4andPhoto#2,#3)

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    16/75

    6.

    P fApp//eat//oper7p-LCr/OA/ f/M )

    2-Bol t Connections from Moment Shear Set-up without Applied Rotation.

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    62/75

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    63/75

    53.

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    64/75

    54.

    100,

    so

    5-Bolt Connections fromMoment Shear Set-up without Applie d Rotati on.

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    65/75

    55.

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    66/75

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    67/75

    57.

    /

    /

    /

    4*

    /

    /

    I

    /

    /

    1/

    //\/

    /

    1

    //

    //

    /' 1

    //

    cf

    /

    X -Jf

    //V

    fh

    x-

    X'

    a

    Z'h" y=3 web

    ^ 3 we/d

    I'M" y=3 ve/d

    Z'/a." y-3 e&

    ft"

    :*//*

    ones/cfe.

    O 0.002 O.OO*/ 0.006

    /?07xr/o/v

    f/^n/AA/s- J

    2-Bolt Connections fromMoment Shear Set-up with Appl ied Rota tion .

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    68/75

    58.

    /OO

    SO

    \I

    60

    90

    1 y/ /

    / // /

    / /[ S

    1 /

    / /

    f / >1 / /

    * A*

    /

    ///

    /*

    /

    fAfheore

    x-2'A'y=3"r/e/d:'/>,"y-3' we/d:Wy=3"we/d:'/v"o>

    5/'de7one

    20

    OO.OOZ O.0O

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    69/75

    59.

    2O0T

    4-BoltConnections fromMomentShear Set-up withApplied Rotation.

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    70/75

    60.

    fOOr

    320

    O 0.002 O.OOV 0.006

    /por/\r/o/v (mo/AMs)

    5-Bolt Connections fromMoment Shear Set-up with Applied Rotation.

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    71/75

    6-BoltConnections fromMomentShear Set-up withApplied Rotation.

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    72/75

    20

    /6

    /2.

    / ///

    //X X . J*

    ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

    B^j

    7/ / i

    f

    theone.

    /= /fy\

    X*l'A A

    fNr f//V.)

    4-BoltConnections fromMomentShear Set-up withApplied Rotation.

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    74/75

    64.

    2DX , _ , , : 1 1

    O 0.0/ 0.02. 0.03 0.04f?St/Lr/INr DISPLACEMENT f//V. )

    5-Bolt Connections fromMomentShearSet-upwith Applied Rotation.

  • 8/10/2019 UBC_1967_A7 W8

    75/75