-
8/12/2019 u900 Activation Rf Kpi Analysis_cluster2_28_may
2014
1/20
www.huawei.
com
U900 ACTIVATION KPI ANALYSISIMPACT REPORT
-
8/12/2019 u900 Activation Rf Kpi Analysis_cluster2_28_may
2014
2/20
Introduction U900 Carrier is implemented on 14 Sites in RNC401
in cluster2. U900 Carrier was activated
on 01_05_2014. Below given is the geographical location .
Below given is the geographical location
RNC Site Id 3G Site Name Cluster 401 2201 ALFAW_3G Cluster 02401
2202 QARHA_3G Cluster 02401 2206 BIDAYUO_3G Cluster 02401 2207
UMSAYH_3G Cluster 02401 2209 ALAFRADH_3G Cluster 02401 2211
SUWAIQ4_3G Cluster 02401 2214 QARHA2_3G Cluster 02401 2220 WUDAM_3G
Cluster 02401 2222 THARMAD_3G Cluster 02401 2228 SUWAIQ2_3G Cluster
02401 2233 SUWAIQ3_3G Cluster 02401 2234 WUDAM_NAVAL_BASECAMP_3G
Cluster 02401 2235 UMQANEEN_3G Cluster 02401 2203 SUWAIQ_3G Cluster
02
-
8/12/2019 u900 Activation Rf Kpi Analysis_cluster2_28_may
2014
3/20
-
8/12/2019 u900 Activation Rf Kpi Analysis_cluster2_28_may
2014
4/20
KPI Improvement After U900 Activation
(Merits)
-
8/12/2019 u900 Activation Rf Kpi Analysis_cluster2_28_may
2014
5/20
Traffic VolumeIn 3g Network after U900 Activation in cluster 2
an approximate increase of 29.85% is beingobserved in CS traffic
,while 19% is being increased in PS traffic.
2452.2091
3184.1947
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
E r l a n g
Cluster 2 - CS TRAFFIC Combined (F1F2U900)
338744.1183
406151.4582
050000
100000150000200000250000300000350000
400000450000500000
M B y t e s
Cluster 2 - PS DL TRAFFIC Combined (F1F2U900)
U900Cluster2
F127%
U900Cluster2
F223%
U900Cluster2
U90050%
CS Traffic Distribution forYesterday
U900Cluster2
F130%
U900Cluster2
F229%
U900Cluster2
U90041%
PS Traffic Distribution forYesterday
-
8/12/2019 u900 Activation Rf Kpi Analysis_cluster2_28_may
2014
6/20
KPI Degradation After U900 Activation(Demerits)
-
8/12/2019 u900 Activation Rf Kpi Analysis_cluster2_28_may
2014
7/20
-
8/12/2019 u900 Activation Rf Kpi Analysis_cluster2_28_may
2014
8/20
RRC Success Rate havealso shown slightdegradation. Daily
Averageof RRC SR for U900 carrier
is around 98.68%,meanwhile for F1F2 Carrierit is 99.85%.
RRC Success RateCluster level RRC Success rate is degraded from
daily average 99.86% to 99.49%.
99.86%99.49%
97.50%
98.00%
98.50%
99.00%
99.50%
100.00%
Cluster 2 - RRC Success Rate Combined (F1F2U900)99.84%
99.86%
98.68%
98.00%
98.20%
98.40%
98.60%
98.80%
99.00%
99.20%
99.40%
99.60%99.80%
100.00%
U900 Cluster2F1
U900 Cluster2F2
U900 Cluster2U900
RRC SR for Yesterday
-110-105-100-95-90-85
-80-75-70-65-60
95.00%95.50%96.00%96.50%97.00%97.50%98.00%98.50%99.00%99.50%
100.00%
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 1
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 1
1 1 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 1
2 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 2
0 9 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 2
2 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 3
0 7 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 3
1 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 4
0 5 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 4
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 5
0 3 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 5
1 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 6
0 1 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 6
1 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 6
2 3 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 7
1 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 7
2 1 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 8
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 8
1 9 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 9
0 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 9
1 7 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 0
0 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 0
1 5 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 1
0 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 1
1 3 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 2
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 2
1 1 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 2
2 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 3
0 9 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 3
2 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 4
0 7 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 4
1 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 5
0 5 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 5
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 6
0 3 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 6
1 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 7
0 1 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 7
1 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 7
2 3 : 0
0
RRC Successful Rate vs RTWP for U900 Cell Group
-
8/12/2019 u900 Activation Rf Kpi Analysis_cluster2_28_may
2014
9/20
CS Call Drop Rate have alsoshown degradation. At daylevel 59% of
Call Drop areon U900 Cells, Meanwhile
rest of 41% of Call Drops ison F1F2 Carriers.
CS Call Drop RATECluster level CS Call Drop rate is degraded
from daily average of 0.27 % to 1.23 %.
U900Cluster2 F1
21%
U900Cluster2 F2
20%
U900Cluster2
U90059%
CS Call Drop Distribution forYesterday
-110-105-100-95-90-85
-80-75-70-65-60
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
6.00%
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 1
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 1
1 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 1
2 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 2
0 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 2
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 3
0 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 3
1 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 3
2 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 4
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 4
1 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 5
0 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 5
1 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 6
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 6
1 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 6
2 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 7
0 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 7
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 8
0 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 8
1 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 8
2 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 9
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 9
1 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 0
0 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 0
1 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 1
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 1
1 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 1
2 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 2
0 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 2
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 3
0 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 3
1 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 3
2 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 4
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 4
1 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 5
0 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 5
1 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 6
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 6
1 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 6
2 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 7
0 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 7
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 8
0 2 : 0
0
CS Call Drop Rate vs RTWP for U900 Cell Group
0.27%
1.23%
0.00%
0.20%
0.40%
0.60%
0.80%
1.00%
1.20%
1.40%
1.60%
Cluster 2 - CS Call Drop Rate Combined (F1F2U900)
-
8/12/2019 u900 Activation Rf Kpi Analysis_cluster2_28_may
2014
10/20
PS Call Drop Rate have alsoshown degradation. At Daylevel 59% PS
Drop are onU900 meanwhile rest of the
41% PS Drop are on F1F2carrier.
PS Call Drop RateCluster level PS Call Drop rate is degraded
from a daily average of 0.68% to 1.87%.
0.68%
1.87%
0.00%
0.20%0.40%0.60%0.80%
1.00%
1.20%1.40%1.60%1.80%
2.00%
Cluster 2 - PS Call Drop Rate Combined (F1F2U900)
U900Cluster2 F1
21%
U900Cluster2 F2
20%
U900Cluster2
U90059%
PS Call Drop Distribution forYesterday
-110-105-100-95-90-85
-80-75-70-65-60
0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 1
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 1
1 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 1
2 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 2
0 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 2
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 3
0 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 3
1 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 3
2 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 4
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 4
1 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 5
0 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 5
1 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 6
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 6
1 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 6
2 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 7
0 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 7
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 8
0 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 8
1 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 8
2 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 9
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 9
1 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 0
0 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 0
1 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 1
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 1
1 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 1
2 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 2
0 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 2
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 3
0 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 3
1 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 3
2 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 4
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 4
1 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 5
0 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 5
1 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 6
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 6
1 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 6
2 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 7
0 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 7
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 8
0 2 : 0
0
PS Call Drop Rate vs RTWP for U900 Cell Group
-
8/12/2019 u900 Activation Rf Kpi Analysis_cluster2_28_may
2014
11/20
SHO Success RateCluster level SHO Success rate is slight
degraded from a daily average of 99.93% to 99.81% .
SHO Success Rate have alsoshown very slight degradation.
At Day level 72% SHO Failureare on U900 meanwhile rest of
the 28% SHO Failure are onF1F2 Carrier.
99.93%
99.81%
99.70%
99.75%
99.80%
99.85%
99.90%
99.95%
100.00%
Cluster 2 - SHO SuccRate Combined (F1F2U900)
U900Cluster2 F1
15%
U900Cluster2 F2
13%
U900Cluster2
U90072%
SHO Failure Distribution forYesterday
-110-105-100-95-90-85
-80-75-70-65-60
99.30%
99.40%
99.50%
99.60%
99.70%
99.80%
99.90%
100.00%
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 1
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 1
1 1 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 1
2 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 2
0 9 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 2
2 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 3
0 7 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 3
1 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 4
0 5 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 4
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 5
0 3 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 5
1 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 6
0 1 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 6
1 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 6
2 3 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 7
1 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 7
2 1 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 8
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 8
1 9 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 9
0 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 9
1 7 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 0
0 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 0
1 5 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 1
0 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 1
1 3 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 2
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 2
1 1 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 2
2 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 3
0 9 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 3
2 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 4
0 7 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 4
1 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 5
0 5 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 5
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 6
0 3 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 6
1 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 7
0 1 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 7
1 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 7
2 3 : 0
0
SHO SuccRate vs RTWP for U900 Cell Group
-
8/12/2019 u900 Activation Rf Kpi Analysis_cluster2_28_may
2014
12/20
HSDPA Throughput have alsoshown degradation. Dailyaverage of
HSDPAthroughput for U900 Carrier is
around 561 Kbps ,meanwhilefor F1F2 carrier it is around840
Kbps+.
HSDPA Throughput (Kbits)Cluster level HSDPA Throughput is
degraded with 1.14% of degradation.
777.7755012768.9229453
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
k b p s
Cluster 2 - HSDPA Throughput Combined (F1F2U900)
846.9893.7
561.4
0.0
200.0
400.0
600.0
800.0
1000.0
U900 Cluster2F1
U900 Cluster2F2
U900 Cluster2U900
HSDPA Throughput forYesterday
-110-105-100-95-90-85
-80-75-70-65-60
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 1
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 1
1 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 1
2 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 2
0 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 2
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 3
0 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 3
1 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 3
2 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 4
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 4
1 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 5
0 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 5
1 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 6
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 6
1 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 6
2 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 7
0 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 7
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 8
0 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 8
1 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 8
2 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 9
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 9
1 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 0
0 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 0
1 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 1
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 1
1 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 1
2 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 2
0 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 2
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 3
0 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 3
1 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 3
2 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 4
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 4
1 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 5
0 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 5
1 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 6
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 6
1 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 6
2 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 7
0 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 7
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 8
0 2 : 0
0
HSDPA Throughput vs RTWP for U900 Cell Group
-
8/12/2019 u900 Activation Rf Kpi Analysis_cluster2_28_may
2014
13/20
From the above pie chart it isobvious that 44% of HSDPAUser is
on U900 while rest ofthe 56% user is in the vicinity
of F1F2.
HSDPA User NumberCluster level HSDPA average user number has
been increased from about 899 to 1235.
899
1,235
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Cluster 2 - HSDPA User Number Combined (F1F2U900)
U900Cluster2 F1
28%
U900Cluster2 F2
28%
U900Cluster2
U90044%
HSDPA UE NumberDistribution for Yesterday
-110-105-100-95-90-85
-80-75-70-65-60
0
200
400600
800
1000
1200
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 1
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 1
1 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 1
2 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 2
0 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 2
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 3
0 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 3
1 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 3
2 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 4
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 4
1 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 5
0 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 5
1 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 6
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 6
1 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 6
2 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 7
0 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 7
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 8
0 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 8
1 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 8
2 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 9
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 1 9
1 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 0
0 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 0
1 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 1
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 1
1 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 1
2 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 2
0 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 2
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 3
0 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 3
1 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 3
2 2 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 4
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 4
1 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 5
0 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 5
1 4 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 6
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 6
1 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 6
2 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 7
0 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 7
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0 5
/ 2 8
0 2 : 0
0
HSDPA UE Number vs RTWP for U900 Cell Group
-
8/12/2019 u900 Activation Rf Kpi Analysis_cluster2_28_may
2014
14/20
U900 Activation Impact on RNC Level KPI
-
8/12/2019 u900 Activation Rf Kpi Analysis_cluster2_28_may
2014
15/20
-
8/12/2019 u900 Activation Rf Kpi Analysis_cluster2_28_may
2014
16/20
-
8/12/2019 u900 Activation Rf Kpi Analysis_cluster2_28_may
2014
17/20
U900 Activation Impact on 2G
-
8/12/2019 u900 Activation Rf Kpi Analysis_cluster2_28_may
2014
18/20
0
500
1000
1500
2000
E r l a n g
CS Traffic 2G - 3G
U900 Clutser 02 Sites F1O U900 Clutser 02 Sites F2O U900 Clutser
02 Sites U9O U_Cluster_2_GS
After U900 Activating10.24 % of decreasein 2g CS
TrafficObserved.
After U900 Activating 41.58 %of decrease in 2g
PS TrafficObserved.
2G & 3G Traffic Volume Comparison
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
M B
y t e s
PS Traffic 2G - 3G
U900 Clutser 02 Sites F1O U900 Clutser 02 Sites F2O U900 Clutser
02 Sites U9O U_Cluster_2_GS
-
8/12/2019 u900 Activation Rf Kpi Analysis_cluster2_28_may
2014
19/20
Latest RTWP Trend (U900 Carrier)Below given is the latest U900
Carrier RTWP Trend till 05/28/2014. The RTWPis still degraded.
-110
-105
-100
-95
-90
-85
-80
-75
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 1
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 1
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 1
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 2
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 2
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 2
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 3
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 3
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 3
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 4
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 4
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 4
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 5
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 5
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 5
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 6
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 6
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 6
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 7
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 7
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 7
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 8
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 8
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 8
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 9
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 9
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 1 9
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 0
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 0
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 0
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 1
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 1
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 1
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 2
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 2
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 2
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 3
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 3
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 3
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 4
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 4
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 4
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 5
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 5
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 5
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 6
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 6
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 6
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 7
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 7
0 8 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 7
1 6 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 8
0 0 : 0
0
2 0 1 4
/ 0
5 / 2 8
0 8 : 0
0
VS.MeanRTWP(dBm)
-
8/12/2019 u900 Activation Rf Kpi Analysis_cluster2_28_may
2014
20/20
