u Sluzbi Kontinuiteta-palvestra

7/24/2019 u Sluzbi Kontinuiteta-palvestra

1/16

: 902:39(497.11)

, . . . 6. . 3 (2011)

,

[email protected]

.

-

: o, o, -, . , , "" , - , . -, . -, -, .

:o, , , -, , .

, -, - , (Gosden2005, 95). -, -

, . -, , , , -

, . 177008, -.


2/16

Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology, n. s. Vol. 6. Is. 3 (2011)

580

, - (Gosden 1999, 57; Binford 1979;1983; Schiffer1987; 1995). , , (OBrien et al. 2005, 133-139) -(Hoder 1982; 1986, 103-117; Wylie 1982; Lucas 2001, 179-192)., -, (Gosden 2005, 100; Wylie 1985, 85-94).

, , o . . --, . - , , , - , . , , -. ()-. , -

( ) . - ! , () , -. -, , , - . -(, ) , -

, . -, , .

-, -, : -() .,


3/16

.-

, .. . 6. . 3 (2011)

581

, -. XIX , (-2005).

, , -, (James George Frazer), (Max Mller) , ( 1985, 325-355). ,

--, "" "-, , -" (2001, 217). -, , - , , , 1912: "" (2001,215).

-, . , (Djordjevi 2005; 2007;2009; Pori2007; 2009), , . -, -, (Palavestra andPori2008, 90-97). -() --

j(Shennan 2002; Richerson and Boyd2005; OBrien and Lyman 2000; Tehrani et al. 2010; Palavestra and Pori2008, 90-97).

, , , , XX : -. -


4/16


582

, . , , - , - .- (Johann Joachim Winckelmann), (Wilhelm von Hum-

boldt) (Theodor Mommsen), -(Adolf Furtwngler), (2008, 128-132). -

, -VI , 1934. 1936. (Vasi1934; 1936), . ,, - - , . -, , -, , .

, , 1911/12, , -, , , , II(-) (2008, 48)! - (,, ), -: , , , -"", , , , ,., (1932).

, -, - , . 1954. , -, -"-" -:


5/16

.-

, .. . 6. . 3 (2011)

583

"-. [...] , -, -, , ," (1954, 134, 157).

:

", , -. , , . [...] -, . , - . ,, " (1954, 163).

--, , -,

. , , . -. , (1954), ( 1955) , 1958. (2002), , (1958). -, , - (-, ), () --() (1981). , --

, --. , .

, , -, ""


6/16


584

(2002, 100-101). , , -. "" --(1957) : "---, -, " (2001, 33). , -.

, , "" -. -a . , -, , ., , , -, , -, (Bogdanovi2011, 247-248). , -

, -, "-" -(Bogdanovi2011, 260, 311). , , (1994)-"" (1981, 18). ,:

", -: V: ,

. - (), (-) , ( )" (2002, 194).

,


7/16

.-

, .. . 6. . 3 (2011)

585

, , -, , . - -:

" () , . , , ,

" (2001, 195).

- : -- " ", "" "" -. "-" -, , -, , , , . :

", -[...] -, -, () -, , , . [...] - . - , -" (1981, 22-23).

--, -, "-":

"(, ) -, . [...] -, -" (1981, 26).

, , -, -, (


8/16


586

), ( )., -(2005, 92-93) - -.

" ", , -, , - , XX ,

, . - , :

"-, . -. - . , ; . -

, , , -" (1986, 45, . .).

-(Jean Piaget) " ", , "-" -. , , -, -: "- . " (2002, 75). -

,, , , .

(. , . , . -


9/16

.-

, .. . 6. . 3 (2011)

587

), (1998; 2005; 2007). , -, ,- (1998). , -, -: .

, , -(Jones 1997). (Gustaf Kos-sinna),-(Olsen 2002, 33-35). -, "-" (Kossinna 1941, 264) . -, - ( 1998;2007). :

", . [...] -, .[...] " (1995).

"", -, "(), . - , , " (2001, 142, . .). , , "" , . - (

) -. --, (: 2005; 2010).

-, . -


10/16


588

"" , , -, -, . -, , (Garaanin 1964, 9-

45). , -(, , .). , ,, -, , - (Garaanin 1964, 10-13, 36-38).(-

), - . - ,

, , . -(Todorovi1964), - , 1968. (Benac 1969). -, . - , -"", -, . , , ,

, () "". -. , -, , , , - , (Drechsler-Bii1964; Batovii Otri1969, 264-265; 1951, 148-151). ( ) ,


11/16

.-

, .. . 6. . 3 (2011)

589

. -, , .

" ", , , --: ?(Bin-tlif 1991; Palavestra 1994). "", ,

(Palavestra 1994, Novakovi 1992), "", ( 2004, 200- 201; Kovaevi2010, 19-24), . , "" "", -(Stjuard 1981), , . , , -(Palavestra 1994).

, , -. -

, , "-" , , , . --, -. -, , .

, . 2008. . : Clio.Batovi, ime i Olga Otri. 1969. "Tragovi ilirske kulturne batine u narodnoj kulturi

naeg primorskog podruja". U Simpozijum predslavenski etniki elementi na Bal-kanu u etnogenezi Junih Slovena, ur. Alojz Benac, 245-284. Sarajevo: Centar zabalkanoloka ispitivanja Akademije nauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine.

Benac, Alojz (ur.) 1969. Simpozijum predslavenski etniki elementi na Balkanu u et-nogenezi Junih Slovena. Sarajevo: Centar za balkanoloka ispitivanja Akademijenauka i umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine.


12/16


590

Binford, Luis R. 1979. Organization and Formation Processes: Looking at CuratedTechnologies.Journal of Anthropological Research35: 255-273.

Binford, Luis R. 1983.In Pursuit of the Past.New York: Academic Press.Bintliff, John. 1991 "The contribution of an Annaliste/structural history approach to

archaeology". In The Annales School and Archaeology, ed. John Bintliff, 1-33.Leicester: Leicester University Press.

Bogdanovi, Igor. 2011.La construcci de les identitats collectives dels Balcans cen-trals en la histria de larqueologia srbia. Doktorska disertacija. Departament dePrehistria, Facultat de Filosofia i Lletres, Universitat Autnoma de Barcelona.

, . 2005. : -. 21: 161-172.

Drechsler-Bii, Ruica. 1964. "Pojava kontinuiteta na nekim nalazima kod Japoda".U VI Kongres arheologa Jugoslavije I, ur. Jovan Tordorovi, 69-72. Beograd: Ar-heoloko drutvo Jugoslavije.

Djordjevi, Biljana. 2005. Some Ethnoarchaeological possibilities in the pottery tec-hnology investigation. In Understanding people through their pottery, Procee-dings of the 7thEuropean Meeting on Ancient Ceramics (EMAC03), Trabalhos deArqueologia 42, eds. Maria Isabel Prudncio, Maria Isabel Dias, J. C. Waeren-borgh,61-69. Lisbon: Instituto Portugues de Arqueologia.

, . 2007. " -" Condition of the Cultural and NaturalHeritage in the Balkan Region, Vol. 1, Proceedings of the Regional Conferenceheld in Kladovo October 2006, ed. Mila Popovi-ivanevi, 92-99. Belgrade:National Museum.

, . 2009. (-).XIX-1, : 485-510., .

. 1: 96-108.Garaanin, Milutin. 1964. "Problem kontinuiteta u arheologiji". U VI Kongres arheo-

loga Jugoslavije I, ur. Jovan Tordorovi, 9-45. Beograd: Arheoloko drutvo Ju-goslavije.

Gosden, Chris. 1999. Anthropology and Archaeology. A changing relationship. Lon-don: Routledge.

Gosden, Chris. 2005. Ethnoarchaeology. InArchaeology. The Key Concepts, eds.Co-lin Renfrew and Paul Bahn, 95-101. Oxon: Routledge.

Hodder, Ian. 1982. The Present Past. London: Batsford.Hodder, Ian. 1986.Reading the Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

, 1995. 1995.().: http://istorijabalkana.yuku.com/topic/845/Djordje-Jankovic-intervjuhttp://www.stormfront.org/forum/t174150/

, . 1998. . : ., . 2001. "-

". 1991-2001, . -, 141-161. : .


13/16

.-

, .. . 6. . 3 (2011)

591

, . 2007. 7. 10. . : - -.

, . 1998. -. 14: 315-326.

Jones, Sian. 1997. The Archaeology of Ethnicity. London: Routledge., . 2002. I,11: 69-76.

, . 1985. . . , , 325-355. :.

Kossinna, Gustaf. 1941. Die Deutsche Vorgeschichte, eine hervorragend nationaleWissenschaft. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth Verlag.

, . 1981. -, 45: 143-154.

Kovaevi, Ivan. 2010.Nativna etnografija i nova tradicija. Beograd: Odeljenje za et-nologiju i antropologiju Filozofskog fakulteta, Beograd.

, . 2004. . -. : Stylos.

, . 1954. -. EXVII.

, . (.) 2008. , , : - .

Novakovi, Predrag. 1992. Po Marxu in pred Braudelom: Geografska ola JovanaCvijia in arheologija.Arheo15: 8-28.OBrien, Michael J. and Robert L. Lyman. 2000. Applying Evolutionary Archaeo-

logy. New York: Plenum Press.OBrien, Michael. J., Lee R. Lyman and Michael. B. Schiffer. 2005.Archaeology as a Pro-

cess. Processualism and Its Progeny. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.Olsen, Bjrnar. 2002. Od predmeta do teksta. Teorijske perspektive arheolokih istra-

ivanja. Beograd: Geopoetika.Palavestra, Aleksandar and Marko Pori.2008.Archaeology, Evolution and Darwi-

nism. Etnoantropoloki problemi 3/2008: 81-100.Palavestra, Aleksandar. 1994. Balkanology, Archaeology and Long-term History.

BalcanicaXXV-1: 83-98., . 2005. ".

". : , -21, . , 87-94. -: .

, . 2010. : "". -2/2010: 239-258.

Pori, Marko. 2007. Veza izmeu mobilnosti i stoarstva kroskulturna analiza.Et-noantropoloki problemi1/2007: 55-69.

Pori, Marko. 2009. Nomadic pastoralism in the EBA of the Central Balkans: Evalu-ation of Background Knowledge.Balcanica39: 7-31.


14/16


592

, . 2005. . : .Richerson, Peter and Robert Boyd 2005. Not by Genes Alone. How Culture Transfor-

med Human Evolution. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Schiffer, Michael B. 1987. Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. Salt

Lake City: University of Utah Press.Schiffer, Michael. B. 1995.Behavioral Archaeology: First Principles. Salt Lake City:

University of Utah Press.Shennan, Stephen. 2002. Genes, memes and human history: Darwinian archaeology

and cultural evolution. London: Thames & Hudson., . 1998. , . -

14: 299-314., . 1955. .

EXVIII: 231-237., . 1981. " ". I , . , 15-30. : .

, . 2001. ". , "., , 213-218. : Ars libri.

, . 2001. "- --". , , 27-48. : Ars libri.

, . 2001. " ". , , 191-196. : Ars libri.

, . 2002. "-

". , . -, 77- 103. : ., . 2002. "". -

, . , 151-199.: .

Stjuard, Dulijan. 1981. Teorija kulturne promene, metodologija vielinijske evoluci-je. Beograd: BIGZ.

Todorovi, Jovan. (ur.) 1964. VI Kongres arheologa Jugoslavije I. Beograd: Arheolo-ko drutvo Jugoslavije.

Tehrani, Jamshid J., Mark Collard, and Stephen J. Shennan. 2010. The cophylogenyof populations and cultures: reconstructing the evolution of Iranian tribal craft tra-ditions using trees and jungles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society,B: Biological Sciences365: 3865-3874.

, . 1932.I. : .Vasi, Miloje. 1934. Colons grecs Vina. Revue internationale des tudes balkani-ques1: 65-73.

, . 1936.II-IV. : ., M. 1954. ,

CCXIV, 3: 129-163., . 1951. "-

". 1901-1951, 144-163. : .


15/16

.-

, .. . 6. . 3 (2011)

593

, . 1986. . -. -3: 44-49.

Wylie, Alison. 1982. An Analogy by Any Other Name is Just as Analogical: A Com-mentary on the Gould-Watson Dialogue,Journal of Anthropological Archaeology1: 382-401.

Wylie, Alison. 1985. The reaction against analogy. Advances in Archaeological Met-hod and Theory 8: 63-111.

, . 1958. -, , .. VII-VIII (1956-1957).

Aleksandar Palavestra

Department of ArchaeologyFaculty of Philosophy, Belgrade

In the Service of Continuity. Ethno-archaeology in Serbia

Ethnoarchaeology as a sub-discipline of archaeology primarily entails sur-vey and research of various aspects of contemporary societies, in order to ena-

ble archaeologists to understand the dynamic processes that have created inthe past the phenomena we now recognize as archaeological material, i.e. ar-chaeological record. Ethnoarchaeological studies in Serbia have been ill-fated,

since almost all the roads leading towards this approach have been jammed byvarious conceptions of the idea of continuity. In the Serbian archaeology, con-tinuity has been understood as continuation of direct Aegean and Greek influ-ences, as a metaphysical continuity of spirit, inexplicable "idealtypical" conti-nuity, national continuity, or as a transmission of cultural traditions. Commonto all these paradigms is the understanding of continuity as a given, and thecontemporaneous ethnographic material has been used solely as an illustrationof the long life of certain cultural shapes. The true value of ethnoarchaeologyas a way of overcoming the statics of the archaeological record and gaininginsight into the dynamics of the past has never been realized.

Key words: ethnoarchaeology, continuity, Serbian archaeology, Greek in-fluences, metaphysical continuity of spirit, transmission of cultural traditions

Au service de la continuit. Ethno-archologie en Serbie

Lethno-archologie en tant que sous-discipline de larchologie, se rap-porte en premier lieu lobservation et ltude des diffrents aspects de la


16/16


594

vie des socits contemporaines, qui permettraient aux archologues de com-prendre les processus dynamiques qui par le pass avaient produit ce que nousreconnaissons dans le prsent comme matriel ou comme trace archologique.Les tudes ethnoarchologiques en Serbie nont pas joui dun sort enviabletant donn que presque tous les chemins qui auraient pu y mener taient ob-strus par les diffrentes conceptions de lide de la continuit. Danslarchologie serbe la continuit est ainsi comprise ou comme une suite din-fluences directes gennes et grecques, ou comme continuit mtaphysique delesprit, continuit inexplicable idal-typique, continuit nationale, ou encorecomme transmission des traditions culturelles. Ce qui est commun tous ces

paradigmes est que la continuit est accepte comme quelque chose de natu-rel, alors que le matriel ethnographique contemporain ne faisait quillustrerla longue dure de certaines formes culturelles. La vraie valeur de lethno-archologie, celle dun moyen pour dpasser la trace archologique statique et

pour jeter un clairage sur la dynamique du pass, na pas t exploite.

Mots cls: thnoarchologie, continuit, archologie serbe, influencesgrecques, continuit mtaphysique de lesprit, transmission des traditions cul-turelles.

Primljeno: 06. 08. 2011.Prihvaeno: 25.08.2011.

Documents

u Sluzbi Kontinuiteta-palvestra