Upload
aaroncmansfield
View
235
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/11/2019 Twitter -- Media Relations
1/16
O R I G I N L R E S E R C H
International journal
o
Sport Comm unication 2013 6 394-408
2013 Human Kinetics Inc.
Phenom enological Investigation
Into How Twitter Has Changed
the NatureofSport Media Relations
hris Gibbs Richard Haynes
Ryerson University Canada Stirling University Scotland
This article uses the phenomenological method to explain how Twitter
has
changed
the natureof sport media relations.Theresearch wasbasedonsemistructured
interviews with
18
Canadian
and U.S.
sport m edia professionals having
an
average 16yr ofexperience. This exploratory study usesthelived experienceof
sport m edia professionals to identify 3 clusters that help explain how Twitter has
changedthenatureofsport media relations: media landscape, mech anical job
functions,
and
sport media relations.
The
results
of
this research
are
significant
because they help explain how the practices and norm s related to the role
of
sport
media relations are changingas aresultofTwitter.This research presentsa new
argument: that Twitter has flattened
the
sport hierarchy
and
could
be
considered
the most influential social-media platforminsport today.
eywords
social media, sport communications, phenomenology, new media
Before the Internet and digital-m edia c ultures, the distr ibutionofsport con tent
was traditionally controlled
and
managed
by
broadc asters , journal is ts ,
and
other
m e m b e r softraditional m edia (Hutch ins Rowe, 2012). After thelaunchof the
World Wide
Web and
team-based
Web
sites,
by the
late 1990s teams
had
started
to distr ibute content directly tofans rather than through traditional m edia (Boy le
& H aynes , 2004) .A further shiftin theteam distributionofsport content occurred
withtheintroduction of social-media applications suchasYouT ube, T witter,and
Facebook.Insport , the microb logging format of Tw itter has openedup anew chan -
nel of com mu nicat ion
for
athletes, team s, coac hes, fans,
and
sport media mem bers
to distr ibute their own c ontent (S anderson, 2012 ). On e corollary of Twitter has been
the instant bypassing
of
journal ism
and
sport officials
in the
circulation
of
sport
comm unica t ions , wh ichhas tbepotentialtound erm ine their gateke eping function
in
the
spor t media nexus (H utchins , 2011) .
Twitter has created new jobsandresponsibili t iesforthosewhoworkin sport
media re la t ions . However ,it has also created uncertainty and change (Boyle
Hay nes, 2011 Sand erson, 201 2). Rese archers have explored how Tw itter is affecting
8/11/2019 Twitter -- Media Relations
2/16
8/11/2019 Twitter -- Media Relations
3/16
9
Gbbs and Haynes
million followers. From a management perspective, the surging popularity and use
of Twitter in sport raises new challenges for sport organizations, many of which
have introduced social-media policies to manage the flow and nature of messages
from the locker room . For exam ple, in response to a halftime tweet by NBA player
Charles Villanueva, the NBA introduced a policy on serial media that embargoed
player tweets 45 m inutes either side ofagame and mitigated against any messages
deemed to be inappropriate by the league (Stein, 2009).
To understand how Twitter has changed sport journalism , Schultz and Sheffer
(2010) surveyed 146 sport journalists in September 2009 and observed that little
had changed in the daily news routines ofmanysport journalists. However, there is
evidence that journalists have begun to use Twitterasa promotional tool for pointing
readers to their work, and broadcast journalists also value the interactive nature of
social media for communicating directly with fans. Schultz and Sheffer's survey
predated m uch of the immersion of sport journalists into the use ofTwitter which
is now increasingly central to setting the sport news agenda (Boyle, 2012; Boyle
Haynes, 2013). The increased adoption of Twitter by journalists is a reflection
of a broader amplification of Twitter's influence on the traditional media's use of
tweets as a significant source for news (Meikle Young, 2012).
Qualitative research by Kian and Zimmerman (2012) also provides insights into
the use of new online media platforms in sport communications. By interviewing
eight prominent sport journalists w ho transitioned from newsprint to the Internet,
that study revealed the need for journalists to develop new skills to adapt to new
technology and succeed in their everyday practice. Although the research did not
focus specifically on Twitter, it nevertheless demonstrated the value of phenom eno-
logical research for understanding the impacts of technology on media practitioners.
Previous research has examined the changing landscape of sport journalism
as a result of technology, yet no research has to date looked at the change in the
nature of sport m edia relations as a result of Twitter or other forms of technology.
In the this study we provide the first detailed insight into the transformation of
sport media relations in response to social-media and digital-media culture through
interviews with18sport media professionals: nine team media-relations em ployees,
five sport-public-relations/digital experts, and four sport journalists
Twitter has been the subject of empirical studies related to athlete tweets
(Browning Sanderson, 2012; Clavio, Burch, Frederick, 2012; Clavio Kian,
2010; Frederick, Lim, Clavio, Walsh, 2012 ; Hambrick, Simmons, Greenhalgh,
Greenw ell, 2010 ; Lebel Danylchuk, 2012; Pegoraro, 2010; Shockley,2 11),
athlete-fan interaction (Kassing Sanderson , 2010), sport journalism (Schultz
Sheffer, 2010; Sheffer Schultz, 2010), and team use of Twitter (Clavio et al.,
2012; Gibbs O'Reilly, 2013), but less is known about Tw itter's overall role in
present-day sport media relations. This phenomenological study will draw on the
lived experiences of sport media professionals.
etho ology
This study focused on understanding how Twitter has changed the nature of sport
8/11/2019 Twitter -- Media Relations
4/16
Spo rt Med ia Relations and Twitter 97
Due to the limited previous research available about the topic, an inductive approach
was deemed appropriate for this study. The use of phenomenology was selected
because insights are extracted from the lived experiences ofthe people involved in
the phenomenon that is being researched (Goulding, 2005). Phenomenology has
been used to understand participation in extreme sports (Willig, 2008), Internet
sport bloggers (Kian, Burden , Shaw, 2011), the transition of sport journa lists
from newspaper to the Internet (Kian Zimm erman, 2012), and the culture of
sport comm unication in college athletics (Battenfield, 2013). Due to the emergent
nature of Twitter in sport, the lived experiences of people who work in different
roles in sport media appear to offer the best source for identifying and dem onstrat-
ing the impact of the technology. The research started unhindered by hypotheses
or preconceptions about the work of sport media professionals and was therefore
particularly effective at bringing relevant experiences to the forefront that were
used to create new conceptions of sport media practice.
Each respondent was asked a range of questions in a semistructured interview
that probed the extent to which Twitter had had an impact on their work and sport
media relations more generally. Respondents were asked to provide examples
wherever possible from their lived experience. In this respect, questioning focused
on the following: what practitioners believed to be the most disruptive social-media
platform for sport media relations; how Twitter changed the daily ac tivities of their
job;the ways in which Twitter enhanced, amplified, or intensified their work; what
is made obso lete or replaced by the use of
their views on how Twitter has
changed media relations in their particular sport; and, in connection with this,
respondents were asked to provide their best example to describe how Twitter has
changed media relations.
ampling election
At the start of this project, the subjects of the interviews were primarily media-
relations managers. However, after several interviews at the start of the research
process , three problems with this process were identified, (a) The fact that a person
works in a media-relations role does not guarantee that he or she had any prior
knowledge about sport media relations before Twitter. A person who has worked
in media relations for 2-3 years only knows the post-Twitter media role and lacks
the historical perspective needed to explain the change that Twitter caused, (b)
Interviewing only team med ia-relations staff narrows the expertise and knowledge
available, (c) Collecting data from different types of informants such as sport jour-
nalists, who are the traditional gatekeepers of sport news, would allow for
form of
data triangulation that incorporates input from different perspectives (Groenewald,
2004 ). Thus, the interviews conductedwithjournalists were an important resource
that broadened the understanding of how Twitter has changed the overall nature
and job responsibilities in sport media relations.
From these considera tions, two sets of criteria were established for informants.
First, they had to have worked in sport media before 2008. As usage of Twitter in
sport became popular around 2009 , this stipulation would ensure they had experi-
8/11/2019 Twitter -- Media Relations
5/16
398 Gibbs and Haynes
Eighteen informants were recruited through a mix of personal contacts and the
snowball technique (one interviewee nominates others). At the end of each inter-
view with a primary informant or personal contact of the researchers, additional
informants were recommended, which helped identify an informal professional
network of sport media practitioners inU.S.and Canadian sport organizations. The
use of the snowball technique enabled us to recruit an additional eight interview
participants, which gave the study a more diverse set of informants who were
highly relevant to the study and extended beyond our geographic and professional
boundaries.
The informants were contacted via
e mail
and asked to schedule hour of time
for the interview. A total of 18 people who work in sport media were interviewed,
with the average length of sport media work experience being 16 years (Table
).
Consequently, most ofthe informants had worked for multiple different teams and
leagues , and their experience spanned multiple different roles. From the interview
group, 9 were currently working for a team or league in a mediaOrelations capac-
ity, 4 were sport journalists, and 5 were sport or public-relations/digital-media
experts. With the exception of the sfKjrt journalists, all informants worked for
Table
Sport Media Relations Interview Summary
Informant
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Date of
interview
May 2
June 21
July 12
July 18
July 21
May 30
May 31
June 4
June 5
June 6
June 6
June 7
June 8
June 8
June 8
June 11
June 12
June 18
Role
Team media relations
Team media relations
Team media relations
Team media relations
Team media relations
Team media relations
Sport journalists
Sport PR/digital
Sport PR/digital
Sport PR/digital
Sport journalists
Team media relations
Sport journalists
Sport journalists
Team media relations
Team media relations
Sport PR/digital
Sport PR/digital
Sports organization
working with
NHL and NBA
CFL
CFL
CFL
CFL
NHL
Newspaper
NHL
NBA, NFL, and NH L
Broadcast
Newspaper + Broadcast
NHL
Newspaper
Broadcast
NBA
NBA
NBA , NFL, and NHL
NBA
Years of
experience
12
4
4
10
9
6
17
27
7
16
17
17
19
36
32
24
24
30
ote
NHL = N ational Hockey Leagu e; NBA
=
National Basketball Association; CFL
=
Canadian Football Leagu e;
PR = public relations; NFL = National Football League.
8/11/2019 Twitter -- Media Relations
6/16
Sport Media Relations and Twitter 99
professional-league teams or league offices in Canada and the United States during
their career. Generally, team media-relations informants only worked for one or
potentially two different teams, whereas the sport or public-relations/digital-media
experts consistently worked for multiple teams.
Data Collection and nalysis
A formal interview protocol was used to ensure that the interviews were conducted
using standard procedures. The interviewer asked a preset list of questions, as well
as additional probing questions. In keeping with the pbenomenological approach,
probing questions were directed at the participants' feelings, beliefs, and experi-
ences related to the question (Welman & Kruger, 1999). During the interviews,
the researcher would frequently follow up with more questions or ask for further
explanation to probe deeper into the phenomenon. All interviews were conducted
by telephone between June and July 2012, recorded, transcribed, and coded for
analysis in Nvivo.
analyze the transcribed interview s, four steps for data explication were used:
(1) bracketing and phenomenological reduction, (2) delineating units of mean-
ing, (3) clustering of units of meaning to form themes, and (4) extracting general
and unique themes that make a composite summary (Groenewald, 2004; Hycner,
1985). The only modification to the steps created by Hycner was the review of the
interview summary by the interviewee. Time limitations made the possibility of
a second interview not feasible. To offset this missing step, the researchers spent
extra time in the review and coding process to ensure that the lived experiences of
the informants were captured.
Results
Twitter and Sport Media Practitioners
In this study. Twitter emerged as the most used and influential social-media plat-
form in sport media relations. Even after probing questions related to Facebook
or YouTube w ere asked. Twitter was still considered the most disruptive platform.
Though the literature review alluded to this aspect of Twitter, the interviews con-
firmed that Twitter was the most influential form of social media for sport media
relations. A digital-media expert who works with multiple teams commented,
The most disruptive I suppose it would have to be T w it te r. .. . Probably gotten
the most headlines and caused tbe most challenges just because it's real-time and
so convenient and can travel with players in the locker room or on the sidelines
(Informant #9 sport PR/digital expert NBA, NFL, and NHL). This viewpoint was
also shared by someone w ith more than 32 years of sports experience: Twitter,
because it has given a direct voice for the athlete, the coach, and the manager to
the fans (Informant #15 team media relations, NBA).
With the identification of Twitter confirmed as the most disruptive social-media
platform, three themes of change emerged from the interviews: media landscape,
8/11/2019 Twitter -- Media Relations
7/16
4 Gibbs and Haynes
Media Landscape
The category media landscap e includes the lived experiences that changed as a
result of Twitter and other media. This category was labeled and segmented out
from other categories because it provides general insights into lived experiences
that are relevant to all forms of media relations and technology not limiting the
experiences of respondents to sport or Twitter. Overall, two clusters of concepts
emerged from the informants' experiences: speed and media competition.
peed
The speed of Twitter as a news-distribution platform was one ofthe expe-
riences mentioned most by informants, several of whom frequently highlighted
Twitter in comparison with other forms of media: It's an avenue to break things
much, much faster than traditional media (Informant #6 team media relations,
NH L); Twitter is faster to access things (Informant #18 team media relations,
NBA). When sharing experiences about Twitter, many informants discussed the
speed of Twitter in comparison with the past: Where in the old days . . . (Infor-
mant #14sport journalist). The results of this increased speed of media com-
munication means that media-relations staff must react more quickly to issues as
they arise in real time.
Media Competition The media-competition category consists of comments
about how Twitter has increased the competition among traditional media outlets
and how teams now compete against traditional media for exposure. The experi-
ences discussed by the informants are also relevant to media relations in a nonsport
context because journalis ts are often in competition with other forms ofnewmedia.
The increased competition among journalists was common in comments by team
media-relations informants: Twitter nowadays is like the biggest source of competi-
tion for mem bers oftheprint media (Informant #6team m edia relations, NHL).
Time Demands One of the interesting comments from a digital-media expert,
which was echoed by other informants, was related to the shifts in the work sched-
ule for people working in sport media. Twitter creates an environment wherein
media-re lations staffs constantly follow Twitter to be aware of issues: It's changed
the rhythm of sports, where it was already bad enough. It now truly is 24/7 365
(Informant #17 sport PR/digital expert, NBA, NFL, and NH L).
Mechanical Job unctions
The mechanical job functions category was derived from comments related to
new job functionsnow performed by sport-media-relations staffthat did not
exist before Twitter. Unlike media-landscape category items, which could have
been caused by other forms of digital technology or could be applicable to media
relations in other verticals or industries, the category of mechanical job functions
is specific to Twitter.
This category includes a summary of the new tasks performed as a result of
Twitter. The termmech nic lcame from one of the informants with more than 21
years of experience,whodescribed how Twitterhaschanged sport communications:
8/11/2019 Twitter -- Media Relations
8/16
Sport Media Relations and Twitter 4 1
MonitoringTwitter Importance By far the most-reported changes in the lived
experience of sport m edia relations are related to the function of monitoring Twitter.
What was particularly interesting about these monitoring activities was the cross-
monitoring between the different informants: In addition to monitoring players,
both team media relations and Sportjournalist informants reported m onitoring each
other. Informants continuously expressed the importance of monitoring Twitter:
Twitter is the first place that I go when I get off
plane to know w hat's going on
(Informant #7 Sportjourna list); It makes us follow social media a lot during the
da y (Informant #12 team m edia relations, NH L). Twitter has become so impor-
tant to some sport journalists that it has become their primary monitoring tool. One
informant, who spends 5 hours a day online and used to follow four or five Web
sites every day, now only monitors Twitter; if
story or content is interesting, the
informant will then go to Web sites. For team med ia-relationsstaff the importance
of m onitoring Twitter is similar to that of sport journalists. The lived experiences
demonstrate the necessity of monitoring a multitude of groups for different purposes
at all times of the day, providing further insight into how Twitter has changed the
job functions of sport media relations.
Monitoring
an
Service Before Twitter, sport-media-relations staff had
very limited contact with individual sport fans, as their primary focus was the
relationships with traditional-med ia outlets and the team. With the onset of Twit-
ter, media-relations staff must now monitor fan activity and respond to fan issues:
I'll k ind of monitor the Twitter account during g a m e s . . . . It's just such an easier
form of communication and it is very informal and everybody can see it. . . . [I
can respond to] questions that are answered easily (Informant #3 team media
relations, CF L).
The action of monitoring fan tweets has become necessary due to the impor-
tance of
speedy response and the increased significance of
this
mode of fan inter-
action. Several informants shared experiences in which monitoring Twitter during
a game enabled them to respond to pressing fan issues. In some cases, the issues
were related to the television broadcast, and one example even concerned game
officiating. The media-relations staff understand the importanee of direct contact
with individual fans to meet their expectation of receiving an immediate response.
Monitoring
Twitter Players All team media-relations staff reported monitoring
the players' Twitter activities. One team media-relations informant used Twitter
to monitor and flag and did not use it to regulate because I want them to do it and
I treat them as brand ambassadors (Informant #3team media relations, CFL).
Most of the players are on Twitter, so it's kind of hard to keep
real close watch
during nonbusiness hours and weekends. We see a good tweet by a player,
and we'll say that's very smart, that's the way you should be using it; and if
someone sends us something that is a little off side we will certainly be there
to say you can't be doing that. (Informant #12team media relations, NHL)
The general tone of the experiences with Twitter and m onitoring athletes was
8/11/2019 Twitter -- Media Relations
9/16
4 2 Gibbs and Haynes
Rather than seeming frustrated at the new activity, which was hypothesized to
be the case as a result of increased workload , informants typically did not consider
it burdensome, considering the act of monitoring Twitter a new job function. We
posit that this positive attitude toward increased responsibilities could be linked
to several motivations: (a) People working in sport media are often also devout
fans,
which may lead them to find these insights into a player's life interesting
and noteworthy; (b) managing a player's brand through Twitter may have made
their job more streamlined, as it offers a single platform by which sport media
personnel can manage a sport brand in real time. For example, many sport
media staff reported spending less time on the phone and face-to-face with other
media professionals, which many would see as a significant advantage of Twitter;
and/or (c) being proactive with this new media platform may give media-relations
staff an advantage over colleagues who have not embraced this new communica-
tion tool, which could help in their career advancement.
onitorin
Media
The last group that team media relations frequently
monitor was sport journalists. They monitored sport journalists to keep aware of
issues on which to brief
pl yers
or coaches. Team media-relations staff commented,
It really will enable the media relations department to stay one step ahead of the
media, . . . to be as prepared as possible (Informant #6 ^ te a m media relations,
NHL), and W e're always following on tweet deck and just trying to be a step
ahead of the media or on the same step at least (Informant #12 team media
relations, NH L). This monitoring o fthe media is related to the increased speed of
communications and the need for the media-relations staff to prepare their coach
or players before the media have an opportunity to meet with them .
Tweeting Press Release
Team media relations all monitor Twitter and tweeted
information. Two common techniques emerged from the team media-relations
informants: reduced emphasis on the press release and timely game updates. Sev-
eral informants reported that the traditional press release was no longer important
because of
Although these organizations still produce press releases, they
may use Twitter first and, if given a choice, will tweet versus a press release due
to its immediate, broad exposure to fans and other stakeho lders. While many com -
ments were related to reduced emphasis on the press release,twocomm ents by team
media-re lations staff really stood out: Press releases are pretty useless because
by the time you send it out, the news is already out there on Twitter (Informant
#2 team media relations, CFL ) and We continue to e-mail newsletters and press
releases and still deal w ith the media on daily basis, but Twitter probably reduced
the emphasis on it (Informant #4 team media relations, CF L).
Tweeting: Updates
Before Twitter, sport-media-relations staff would be in
contact with the traditional-media outlets to update them on roster issues related
to injuries, trades, or other items. Now these updates are simply tweeted out.
One NBA executive with 24 years of experience commented that Twitter has
affected what we do prgam e: We tweet out our starting lineup; we tweet out
any injuries. . . . Same thing within games with the records or anything that is
8/11/2019 Twitter -- Media Relations
10/16
Sport Media Relations
nd
Twitter 403
of traditional communication. Similar to the decrease in importance ofthe press
release, informants have experienced a decrease in the use of phone calls as a
form of comm unication w ith sport journalists. One informant reported spending
less and less time on the phone than I ever have be fore (Info rm an t # 6 team
media relations, NHL). And another
said.
In some cases it reduces face-to-face dialogue with reporters. Instead of me
go ing around to 25 reporters spread throughou t the arena watch ing p ractice to
relay an item o f in form ation , I can just send out a tweet. . . . So, it does take
away the face-to-face dialogue. (Inform ant #12 team media relations, NH L )
Specific to Sport edia Relations
The category specific to media relations consists of the lived experiences related
to how Twitter is changing the nature of sport media relations. Three clusters of
concepts emerged from the informants' experiences: direct access, management
control,
and changing hierarchy.
Direct Access The direct-access cluster o f concepts is related to how T witter is
eliminating the traditional intermediary in the sport communications paradigm.
Although it can be argued that the Internet and team Web sites were the first
platforms that helped reduce the importance of intermediaries in sport communi-
cations over time, the category of direct access supports the greater importance
of Twitter based on informant experiences. Within the category of direct access,
two clusters of concepts support the statement that Twitter was the first platform
to actively prom ote a closer connection between media-relations staff
nd
the fan :
filter elim ina tion and direct fan access.
The concept of filter elimination is based on the experiences of team media-
relations staff that demonstrate how Twitter enabled them to speak to a sport fan
without using traditional media
s
an intermediary. Before Tw itter, the facilitatio n
of com mu nication between media-relations staff
nd
sport fans was lim ited to in-
person experiences
nd
Web-based com mu nication platforms like chat
rooms.
Team
media-relations staff reported an un filtered connection to our fans. We do n't have
to worry about newspaper writers or radio guys putting their own spin on things
or misinterpreting things (Informant #5team media relations, C FL ), and We
were the ones that gave the info rm atio n to the m edia, and the media communicated
to the fans. Now the teams can directly comm unicate wit h the fans (Inform ant
#16team media relations, NBA).
It is interesting that team media-relations informants reported that they were
aware Twitter has changed the sport media paradigm, allowing them to actively
engage in dialogue with fans. One team media-relations informant spoke about
having lim ited direct access to fans before Twitter: We did n't have many opportuni-
ties to be directly engaged w ith our fans, even at a game. We can wander around a
game and shake hands w ith people, but it's only a sm all percentage o f the people
that are there (Inform ant #5team m edia relations, C FL ).
The direct access to fans has brought about a change in sport entities' com-
8/11/2019 Twitter -- Media Relations
11/16
4 4 Gibbs and Haynes
informants have modified how and what they tweet to increase intimacy between
the fan and the particular sport franchise that they work for:
We will retweet fun things. Or just humorous fun for our fa n s .. .. Sometimes
we will retweet reporters who have written really good stories about our guys,
and we want the fans to see it (Informant #4^team media relations, CFL), and
It really enhances the return of engagement; I can now
tru y
engage with fans
(Informant #3team media relations, CF L).
ManagementControl Throughthisdirect access with fans, it could be argued that
team media-relations informants are using Twitter to enact more control. H owever,
experiences of
the
sport-media informants would suggest that Twitter can be tough
to control during a conflict. Although some elements of Twitter make communica-
tions more controllable, other elem ents m ake it more erratic. A review of the lived
experiences will identify these conflicting viewpoints. Two examples that identify
Twitter as a controllable communications tool include, Trying to set the record
straight with tweets that prevent the coach after the game from having to answer a
speculative question from the media (Informant
12team media relations, NHL)
and We are our own publicity tool now, where in the past we weren't. And that
is one of the good things about also being in Twitter, is you control your message
a little bit more (Informant #16 team media relations NBA). Two examples
that identify Twitter as a com munications tool that can become uncontrollable for
sport teams include, Oh, it's created an unpredictable environment. You know, a
guy could tweet out something long after I've gone to bed, and I could wake up,
turn on the radio, and it's leading off the newscasts on all sports radio (Informant
#12 team media relations, NH L), and We always joke too that your iPhone or
your Blackberry should have a breathalyzer with it (Informant #8 sport PR/
digital expert, NHL).
Twitter presents
a
complex form of communications to manage. Some feel that
it provides m anagement w ith m ore control, and others find that it makes comm uni-
cations less manageable. To manage Twitter effectively, teams need to understand
the nuances of the system that make it controllable and uncontrollable. Without an
understanding of these nuances, it makes the sport communication process much
more challenging for media-relations staff
ier rchic l
Change Another theme from the interviews indicated how Twitter
is changing traditional hierarchical roles in sport. Traditionally, team sports have
represented a very hierarchical business. The players must follow the coach's
instructions or risk losing playing time, and the coach follows the general m anager's
instructions or risks losing
his
job.Team managem ent is tightly con trolled, and the
actors in the business stay on course for fear of being fired, released, suspended,
fined, or punished internally. Lived experiences of the informants suggest that
Twitter is changing hierarchical roles:
[Twitter] exponentially changes their workload. It changes the coloration of
what their work is; they no longer have the control, and this is something I
talk about often. In sports, it's a very hierarchical culture. The GM tells the
8/11/2019 Twitter -- Media Relations
12/16
Sport Media Relations and Twitter 405
DiscussionandConciusion
Twitter has opened up comm unication channels
for
athletes, coaches, sport-organi-
zation
staff,
and fans (Sanderson, 2012). Long-standing practices and norms related
to sport media relations are changing
140
characters
at
a
time.
The unfiltered access
that Twitter provides
the
sport community
is
slowly diminishing
the
gatekeeping
functions related
to the
nature
of
traditional media relations.
The
empirical
evi-
dence presented in this research supports the statement that Twitter is the dominant
social-media platform
in
sport, causing paradigm shifts
in
the m anagement of sport
media relationsandflatteningthe sport media hierarchy.
Similar
to the
paradigmatic change from paper
to
electronic communication
identified by Battenfield (2013), Twitter represents the next step
of
transformation
in sport comm unication. Those
in
sport media relations have successfully adapted
their strategiesto incorporate Twitterbyrespondingtoathletes use, giving fans
direct access to their teams and creating new job responsibilities that have changed
the nature
of
media relations
in
sport. Twitter has made the role
of
media relations
in sport more complex, requiring its people to learn a new communication platform,
as well
as
nuanced strategies
to
manage this platform (Hutchins
Rowe, 2012).
The model
of
sport media relations and Twitter
in
Figure
1
represents
a
visual
representation
of
the findings from this research. Though
the
press-agentry-pub-
licity model
of
public relations (Grunig
Grunig, 1992)
has
been considered
the
most relevant model
for
understanding sport media relations (Stoldt
et
al., 2011),
the direct access teams have
to
fans through Twitter is changing
the
nature
of
sport
media relations. This research also provides empirical evidence to support the role
of Twitterincausing aparadigmatic changein thenatureofsport m edia relations.
As such, future versions
of
sport communication textbooks
may
need
to
consider
updating their definitions
and
descriptions
of
media-relations responsibilities.
Although some of these changes could be predicted based on previous research
and observations,the most notable shift thathasbeen undocumented is thehier-
archical change
in
sport media organizations.
The
findings from this research
support
the
statement that Twitter
is
making
the
sport media hierarchy
flatter.
The
SPORT
ME I
R E U T I O N S
MEDIA LANDSCAPE
Speed
Media Competition
Time Demands
MECHANICAL
JOB FUNCTIONS
Monitoring Twitter
Tweeting
HO W
TWIHER
HAS CHANGED
THE NATURE OF
SPORT MEDIA
RELATIONS
SPORT MEDIA RELATIONS ^ \
8/11/2019 Twitter -- Media Relations
13/16
6 Gibbsand Haynes
choice of the word
flat
is derived from Thomas L. Friedman's book
The World
Is Flat
(2006), in which he presents a convergence of forces to support his argu-
ments about globalization. The content of sport is no longer solely controlled and
distributed by traditional-media organizations. What was once a one-way mode
of communication as explained by the modern model for sports-media-audience
com munications (Schultz, Caskey, Esherick, 2012) is now a two-way mode of
communication that represents a form of departure from traditional media models.
Limitations
This research can claim new contributions to sport-media-relations literature,
but they cannot necessarily be generalized to all people who work in sport media
relations. Although the informants had a considerable amount of experienceall
had more than 5 years of experience in professional sport roles and averaged 16
years of experience in sport mediathe results of this study were based only on
18 interviews with a varied mix of sport media experiences: team media relations,
sport journalists, media consultants, and league staff This mix of sport media
experiences helps to triangulate the research findings.
uture Research
This study represents one of the few investigations into how Twitter is changing
the nature of sport media relations. Future studies could look at Twitter's impact
on other industries or the impact of other potentially game-changing, disruptive
platforms of communications. The empirical results ofthisstudy dem onstrate that
Twitter is a paradigm-shifting platform for sport media relations, but would it also
prove to be paradigm shifting for more traditional media relations roles such as
corporate communications?
Since the first investigations into Twitter from a sport-media-relations jjerspec-
tive.
Twitter has also started to play a significant role in celebrity and entertainm ent
culture. Has Twitter changed celebrity and entertainment culture in a similar or
different way?
A study of the use of Twitter as a form of revenue generation by sport teams
could also prove significant. Professional sport has found a way to monetize most
forms of traditional media; can sport teams also monetize Twitter?
References
Battenfield, F.L. (201.1). The culture of communication in athletics. In P. Pedersen (Ed.),
Routledge handbo ok of sport comm unication(pp. 441 -449 ). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Boyle, R. (2012). Social media sport: Journalism, public relations and sport. In R. Krovel
T. Roksvold (Eds.),
Mediated fan culture
Oslo, Norway: Nordicom.
Boyle, R., Haynes, R. (2004).
Eootball
n
the new media age
London, UK: Routledge.
Boyle, R., Haynes, R.
2011).
Sport, the media and strategic communications management.
8/11/2019 Twitter -- Media Relations
14/16
Sport Med ia Relations and Twitter 4 7
Brow ning, B., Sanderson, J. (2012). The positives and negatives of Twitter: Exploring
how student-athletes use Twitter to respond to critical tweets.International Journalof
Sport Communication,5(4),
503-521.
Clavio, C Burch, L., Frederick, E.L. (2012). Networked fandom: Applying systems theory
to sport Twitter analysis.Internationa lJournalof Sport C omm unication.5(4), 522-538 .
Clavio, G., Kian, E.M . (2010). Uses and gratifications ofaretired female a thlete 's Twitter
followers. International Journal of Sport C omm unication, .^4). 485-500.
Corbin, J.M., Strauss, A.L. (2008).Basics of qualitative research:Techniquesa nd pro-
cedures for developing grounded theory.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Frederick, E.L., Lim, C.H., Clavio, G., Walsh, P (2012). Why we follow: An examina-
tion of parasocial interaction and fan motivations for following athlete archetypes on
Twitter International Journal of Sport Comm unication,5(4), 481-50 2.
Friedman,
T.L.
(2006).The world is
lat:
A briefhistoryofthetwenty firstcentury.Vancouver,
BC,Canada: Farrar Straus Giroux.
Gibbs, C ,
O Reilly,
N. (2013).Professional team sportand
Twitter:
Gratificationssought
and obtained by followers. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Golijan, R.
(2013,
June
15).
Tw itter celebrates 7th birthday, 200 m illion users. NBC N ews:
http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/twitter-celebrates-7th-birthday-200-million-
users-lC8995970
Goulding, C. (2005). Grounded theory, ethnography and phenomenology: A comparative
analysis of three qualitative strategies for marketing research.European Journal of
Marketing .?9(3/4), 294-308. doi: 10.1108/03090560510581782
Groenewald,
T.
(2004).
A
phenomenological research design illustrated.International Journal
of Qualitative Methods, 3{\), 1-26.
Grun ig, J.E., Grunig, L.A. (1992). Models of public relations and comm unication. In
J.E. Grunig D.M. Dozier (eds.).Excellence in public relations and com munication
management(pp. 28.5-325). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hambrick, M.E., Simmons, J.M., Greenhaigh, G .P ,
Greenwell,T.C. (2010). Understanding
professional athle tes' use of Twitter: A content analysis of athlete tweets. International
Journal of Sport C omm unication, 3(4).454-471.
Hutchins, B. (2011). The acceleration of m edia sport culture.Information Comm unication
and Society,', 14(2).237-257. do i: iai0 80 /13 69 l 18X.2010508534
Hutchins, B., Rowe, D. (2012).Rou tledge Research in Cultural and M edia Studies: Vol.
40.Sport beyondtelevision:The
Internet
digitalmediaandthe riseofnetworked media
sport.New
York:
Routledge.
Hycner, R.H.(1985). Some gu idelines for the phenomeno logical analysis of interview data.
Human Studies,S(3), 279-3 03. do i:lOI007/BF001 42995
Kassing, J.W., Sanderson , J. (2010). Fan -athlete interaction and Twitter tweeting
through the
Giro:
A case study.
International Journal
of Sport C omm unication,.?, 11 3-
128.
Kian, E.M., Burden, J.W., Jr., Shaw, S.D.(2011
).
Intemet sport hlogg ers: W ho are these
people and w here do they com e from?Journal of Sport Adm inistration Supervision,
.?(1),FSIO
Kian, E.M., Zimm erman, M.H. (2012). The medium of the future: Top sports writers
discuss transitioning from newspapers to online journalism.International Journal of
Sport Communication,5(3), 285-30 4.
Lebel, K., Danylchuk, K. (2012). How tweet is it: A gendered analysis of professional
tennis players' self-presentation on Tw itter International Journal of Sport Com muni-
cation, 5(4). 46\-4S0 .
8/11/2019 Twitter -- Media Relations
15/16
4 8 Gibbs and Haynes
Mullin, B.J., Hardy, S., & Sutton, W.A, (2007), Spo rt marketing(3rd ed .). Cham paign, IL:
Human Kinetics.
Pegoraro, A. (2010). Look w ho's talkingA thletes on
Twitter A
case study.
International
Journal of Sport
Communication,
3(A),
501-514.
Sanderson, J. (2012). Introduction to this special issue of
IJSC
on Twitter.
Internationat
Journal of Sport
Communication,
5(4),4 3 3 ^ 3 4 .
Schultz,B.,Caskey, P., & E shedck , C. (2012).
Med ia relations in
sport.Morgantown, WV:
Fitness Information Technology.
Schu ltz, B., & Sheffer, M.L. (2010). An exploratory study ofhowTwitter is affecting sports
joumalism.
International Journal of Sport
Communication,
3,
226-239.
Sheffer, M .L., & Schultz, B. (2010). Paradigm shift or passing fad? Twitter and sports jour -
nalism.
Internationat Journal of Sport
Comm unication.
3(4),
472-484.
Shockley, J. (201 1).Unfiltered A
c ontent ana lysis of pro ath letes
use
(Master's
thesis). East Tennessee State University, Johnson City.
Stein, M. (2009). NBA to unveil policy this week. Retrieved October 12,2 009, from http://
sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=4508595
Stoldt, G.C., Dittmore, S.W., & Branvold, S.E. (2012).
Sport public relations: M anaging
stakeholder commun ication
(vol. 2). Cham paign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Stoldt, G.C., Dittmore, S.W., & Pedersen, P.M. 2011
).
Comm unication in the sport indus-
try. InP.Pedersen, J. Parks, J. Quarterman, & L. Thibault (E ds.),
Contemp orary sport
management
(4th ed.). Cham paign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Weiman, J.C., & Kruger, S.J. 1999).
Research methodology for the business and adminis-
trative sciences.
Johannesburg: South Africa International Thom pson.
Willig, C. (2008).Aphenom enological investigation ofthe experience of taking partin extreme
sports. Journal
of
HealthPsychology, 13(5).690 -702 . doi: 10.1177/1359105307082459
Wright, D.K., & Hinson, M.D. (2010). An analysis of new communications media use
in public relations: Results of a five-year trend study. The Public Relations
Journal,
4(2), 1-15,
8/11/2019 Twitter -- Media Relations
16/16
C o p y r i g h t o f I n t e r n a t i o n a l J o u r n a l o f S p o r t C o m m u n i c a t i o n i s t h e p r o p e r t y o f H u m a n K i n e t i c s
P u b l i s h e r s , I n c . a n d i t s c o n t e n t m a y n o t b e c o p i e d o r e m a i l e d t o m u l t i p l e s i t e s o r p o s t e d t o a
l i s t s e r v w i t h o u t t h e c o p y r i g h t h o l d e r ' s e x p r e s s w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n . H o w e v e r , u s e r s m a y p r i n t ,
d o w n l o a d , o r e m a i l a r t i c l e s f o r i n d i v i d u a l u s e .