37
Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing & Administration Guidelines August 2013

Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

Transportation Development Act (TDA)

Claim Filing & Administration Guidelines

August 2013

Page 2: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................................... 3

COMMONLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT TDA ........................................................................................................... 4

I. ESTIMATING AND APPORTIONING TDA FUNDS .................................................................................................... 6

1. ANNUAL ESTIMATES OF TDA FUNDS .............................................................................................................................. 6

2. APPORTIONING LTF FUNDS ............................................................................................................................................ 6

3. APPORTIONING STA FUNDS ........................................................................................................................................... 6

4. FORMAL APPROVAL ......................................................................................................................................................... 7

5. REVISING TDA APPORTIONMENTS ................................................................................................................................. 7

II. FILE A CLAIM FOR FUNDS TO SLOCOG ................................................................................................................... 9

1. SUBMIT QUARTERLY TRANSIT DATA DUE 45 DAYS AFTER QUARTER END. ................................................................ 10

2. SUBMIT STATE CONTROLLER REPORT (ARTICLE 5.5, SECTION 6665) DUE SEPT 30 ................................................ 10

3. SUBMIT FISCAL/COMPLIANCE AUDIT TO SLOCOG (ARTICLE 5.5, SECTION 6664)-DUE DEC 31 ............................. 10

4. REPORT STATUS OF FOLLOW UP ACTIONS TO AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS (DUE EARLY MAY) ................................. 11

III. SCHEDULE FOR TDA CLAIMANTS FILING A CLAIM .......................................................................................... 12

IV. TRANSIT SYSTEM FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIOS ............................................................................................ 14

1. DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................................................................. 14

Operating Cost (PUC 99247-a) ................................................................................................................................. 14

Fare Revenues (Article 2, Section 6611-2) .............................................................................................................. 14

Local Support (Article 2, Section CCR 6611-3) ....................................................................................................... 14

Serving Urbanized Areas (PUC 99217) ................................................................................................................... 15

Serving a Non-Urbanized Area (Article 2, Section 6613.2) ................................................................................... 15

2. CALCULATING FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO ................................................................................................................. 15

3. DETERMINING MINIMUM REQUIRED FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO ............................................................................... 15

4. NON -COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO.................................................................................. 16

V. OTHER SLOCOG RESPONSIBILITIES .................................................................................................................... 17

1. TRANSIT NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND UNMET TRANSIT NEEDS ...................................................................................... 17

2. PREPARING AND DISTRIBUTING FUND ALLOCATION INSTRUCTIONS ............................................................................ 17

3. KEEPING RECORDS ....................................................................................................................................................... 18

4. RESERVING LTF OR WITHHOLDING STA FUNDS ........................................................................................................ 18

Reserving LTF Funds .................................................................................................................................................. 18

Withholding STA Funds .............................................................................................................................................. 18

5. PERFORMING TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDITS ........................................................................................................ 19

6. SUBMITTING ANNUAL FISCAL AUDITS OF ALL CLAIMANTS ........................................................................................... 19

APPENDIX A – CLAIM FORM ..................................................................................................................................... 20

EXHIBIT A – LTF, STA AND RTF ALLOCATIONS ..................................................................................................... 26

EXHIBIT B – CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL ............................................................................................................ 28

EXHIBIT C – QUARTERLY REPORTING DATA ........................................................................................................ 30

EXHIBIT D – SLOCOG STAFF REPORT D-5 EXPANDED RIDE-ON TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MONITORING 31

APPENDIX B – USES OF LTF FUNDS ........................................................................................................................... 33

APPENDIX C – CLAIM APPROVAL LETTER ................................................................................................................ 34

APPENDIX D – QUALIFYING AND NON-QUALIFYING SOURCES OF REVENUES ............................................ 35

APPENDIX E – LOCAL CONTACTS ............................................................................................................................... 36

APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ........................................................................................................ 37

Page 3: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

3

INTRODUCTION

This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development Act (TDA) guidelines prepared by the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG). There are no major changes to the guidelines for the regional apportionment and filing of TDA claims by local recipients. The guidelines address the following:

a) How the region annually “apportions” funds among eligible recipients and conditionally approves the fund estimates at the start of each fiscal year

b) What are the different categories of TDA funds and their allowable uses

c) How to prepare a TDA claim and ensure all reporting requirements are met

d) What are eligibility and/or update requirements for claims’ approval by SLOCOG

e) What is the minimum farebox recovery ratio applicable to each transit operator

f) How to compute farebox recovery ratios (transit claimants-only) and assess compliance

with the minimum required ratio(s)

g) What are SLOCOG’s responsibilities in administering the TDA program and how those impact the TDA claim review, approval and schedule

Page 4: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

4

Commonly Asked Questions About TDA

WHAT IS THE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA)?

The Transportation Development Act (TDA) was enacted by the State Legislature in 1971 to make funds available for transit, pedestrian way and bikeway projects, transportation planning, ridesharing and street and road improvements. Funds for the TDA come from 1/4 cent of the retail sales tax (for LTF), and from sales taxes on diesel fuel (for STA). These funds are allocated annually by the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) to eligible claimants under two funding programs: the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and the State Transit Assistance (STA). The TDA program is governed by the rules and statutes contained in the Public Utilities Code (PUC), the California Code of Regulations (CCR), and by non-TDA statutes contained in the California Vehicle Code (CVC). Specific sections of the PUC, the CCR and the CVC are cited as needed in the guidelines.

WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LTF AND STA PROGRAMS?

LTF monies are available for pedestrian and bicycle facilities, for public transit, administration and planning, street and road improvements, and other transportation projects. These funds are apportioned among the municipalities within San Luis Obispo County on a population basis after making “off-the-top” contributions for regional planning and administration, ridesharing, and specialized transportation programs that benefit all the municipalities and communities in the region. STA funds are distributed to public transit operators and other eligible recipients for the sole purpose of planning, administering, operating, and providing capital needs in support of public transportation service delivery. Such funds cannot be used for pedestrian, bikeway or streets and roads projects.

WHO ARE THE ELIGIBLE RECIPIENTS OF TDA FUNDS?

Eligible claimants are the County, the Cities within the County, the San Luis Obispo Regional Transit Authority (RTA), the South County Transit (SCT), and SLOCOG. Eligible claimants also include providers of specialized transit services as approved by SLOCOG such as Ride-On Transportation, the designated Consolidated Transportation Services Agency (CTSA) for the region.

WHICH ARTICLE(S) DO I CLAIM FOR TRANSIT FUNDING?

• ARTICLE 3 (PUC 99245): Fiscal audit of public transportation activities (all ARTICLE 4 recipients)

• ARTICLE 4 (PUC 99260): General public transportation systems - Operations, Capital, Planning and Administration (local and regional transit programs-namely the Cities of San Luis Obispo, Atascadero, Morro Bay and Paso Robles), the County-funded general public services (Cambria and Avila trolleys, Nipomo DAR, Shandon DAR), the South County Transit and the Regional Transit Authority

• ARTICLE 4.5 (PUC 99275): Specialized transportation services - Operations, Capital,

Planning and Administration (such as Ride-On Transportation)

Page 5: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

5

• ARTICLE 6.5 (PUC 99313 & 99314): STA Funding – revenue based and discretionary

• ARTICLE 8 (PUC 99400): Contract services for special users - Operations and Capital - namely subsidized senior vans (Cambria and Cayucos) administered by RTA on behalf of the County.

HOW ARE TDA FUNDS RECEIVED?

The funds are distributed in small payments annually to the County by the State, and are held in trust in the County Treasury until being disbursed to recipients. The County Auditor makes payments from the funds based on instructions received from SLOCOG. Claimants receive payments quarterly or as funds become available. It is SLOCOG's responsibility to ensure that payments are made and funds used are in compliance with the TDA statutes. Both the LTF and STA funds have stringent performance and fiscal audit requirements for approved expenditures. In summary, the process of receiving TDA funds involves:

� File a claim � Include the California Highway Patrol (CHP) Certification (Safety Compliance/Terminal Record

Update) with the claim � Provide quarterly transit data (within 45 days following the end of each quarter) by mode � Submit a copy of the State Controller’s Report (including a PDF version) at the same time as

submitted to the State � Submit one copy of the fiscal audit (and a PDF version)

Page 6: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

6

I. ESTIMATING AND APPORTIONING TDA FUNDS

1. ANNUAL ESTIMATES OF TDA FUNDS

STA Funds. In January, SLOCOG receives an estimate from the State Controller of STA monies to be made available for apportionment and allocation in the next fiscal year. This fund is allocated under PUC Sections 99313 and 99314. The total STA apportioned each year is based on the amount estimated to be approved in the annual state budget; it was approximately $1.6 million in 2012/13. If an estimate is not available, the most recent estimate for the current fiscal year is used. LTF Funds. In February, the County Auditor furnishes the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) with an estimate of LTF monies to be made available for apportionment and allocation in the next fiscal year in compliance with Section 6620 of the Administrative Code. This amount represents the portion of the retail sales tax projected to be generated in this County during the next fiscal year. The amount is not known precisely until the end of that year: it was approximately $11.8 million in 2012/2013. LTF funds are apportioned to Cities, the County, public transportation providers, Regional Rideshare, and SLOCOG based on the original estimate plus any carryover balance available.

2. APPORTIONING LTF FUNDS

During March and April, SLOCOG reports to all prospective claimants the estimated LTF funds being apportioned for distribution the next fiscal year. These estimates have been reviewed by the SLOCOG’s advisory committees prior to the SLOCOG Board meeting.

LTF. SLOCOG apportions revenues from the LTF Fund according to the priorities outlined in the Public Utilities Code (PUC 99233). Appendix B describes the uses of LTF funds allowed by TDA. These consist of:

• Setting aside the “Off the Top” contributions to SLOCOG, pedestrian and bicycle facilities (2% of the balance after Admin./Planning and Reserve) and CTSA

• Allocating the balance of those funds to the Cities and the County, using a population-based formula

• Adjusting the above population-based allocations to account for the local contributions to their annual budget estimates for the next fiscal year (when available), based on the Joint Powers Authority (JPA) agreements for the RTA and SCAT

3. APPORTIONING STA FUNDS

In April, SLOCOG reports to all prospective claimants the estimated STA funds being apportioned for distribution the next fiscal year. These estimates have been reviewed by the SLOCOG’s advisory committees prior to the SLOCOG Board meeting. STA. STA funds are apportioned in two categories:

• Revenue Formula Allocation (PUC 99314) - in the order of $150,000 in 2012/13; apportioned by the State only to public transit operators (Article 4 claimants) - based on fare revenues from a prior year reported in the "Annual Report of Financial Transactions of Transit Operators" submitted to the State Controller and SLOCOG.

Page 7: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

7

• Discretionary Funding (PUC 99313) – approximately $1.9 million (including carry-forward) in

2012/2013; apportioned by SLOCOG per adopted regional criteria.

STA Fund Recipients (PUC 99314.6 (a)): The cost-containment test (based on the State Consumer Price Index) requirement has been lifted until the end of 2013/14. Once this requirement is back in place, transit recipients will need to pass a cost-containment test to be eligible for STA funds to be used towards operations. If they do not pass this test, the funds are held in the trust fund for up to three (3) years before being returned for re-allocation. The cost-containment test, performed by SLOCOG, measures increases in transit operating cost per hour against increases in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) over a two year period or an average over a 3 year period. The percent increase in operating cost per hour cannot exceed the percent increase in the CPI over the same period; some components may be excluded from operating costs per PUC 99314.6 (b) and (f) for the purpose of this test. Those components include:

i. Fuel increases from the prior year beyond the change in the CPI ii. Start-up costs for new services for a period of no more than two years (differs

from Total Operating Costs of Service Extension allowed for Farebox ratio) iii. Increases from the prior year beyond the change in CPI in liability insurance

premiums iv. Increases in ADA complementary services above the CPI (only applies to

RTA)

4. FORMAL APPROVAL

At the June Board meeting, SLOCOG adopts a resolution conditionally approving all claims to be submitted over the course of the next six months. The Board authorizes the Executive Director to review each claim as it is submitted for accuracy and completeness, and either approve the claims or return them for more information. It is the claimant’s responsibility to identify the total amount approved by SLOCOG in June, file a claim and meet the associated reporting requirements (see Section II “File A Claim For Funds To SLOCOG”).

5. REVISING TDA APPORTIONMENTS

SLOCOG may need to revise apportionments as follows:

LTF: SLOCOG may issue a revised determination of apportionments based on a revised or updated estimate of funds furnished by the County Auditor or the State Controller. SLOCOG will modify 4th Quarter allocation instructions and disbursements to all affected claimants if the original apportionments exceed the actual amount received. If the amount received is greater than the original apportionment, the additional amount will be carried over into the next fiscal year’s fund balance for apportionment in that year.

STA: The amount of STA funds apportioned usually changes in August of the claim year, based on the adopted State Budget (which identifies the actual amount to be distributed). SLOCOG notifies each claimant of their revised STA apportionment, which they should note and initial on their file copy of the claim.

Page 8: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

8

Claimants should revise their claim anytime during the fiscal year if warranted. Claimants may decide to use the funds differently than originally proposed as long as the use is for transportation purposes. If a claimant wishes to revise their claim, they must send a copy of the changes made to their file copy. For those claimants in a designated urbanized area receiving Federal transit monies, the operator should carefully assess Federal grant match ratio requirements in making the TDA distribution.

Page 9: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

9

II. FILE A CLAIM FOR FUNDS TO SLOCOG

TDA recipients must file a claim with SLOCOG for the fiscal year that the claim applies based on the total amount available per claimant. Claim forms are e-mailed, and claimants may also download a copy from the SLOCOG website. The claims require at minimum: agency name; the total amount claimed; the fiscal year for which funds are claimed; the purposes for which the funds will be used (transit, bikeways, street/road maintenance, etc.), and required CHP certifications. Additional information may be necessary, depending on the source of funds (LTF or STA). Table 1 below is from the claim form. It lists the different categories in the “Annual Project and Financial Plan” portion of the claim which are cross referenced by column number from Appendix A, Exhibit A. Appendix B further elaborates how LTF Funds can be used in each category.

TABLE 1 Annual Project and Financial Plan: Your TDA will be distributed according to this plan.

CATEGORY ARTICLE/SECTION* Bikeways (2%) see Exhibit A (Col. 3)

LTF Article 3, Sec. 99233.3

RTA see Exhibit A (Col. 4) LTF Article 4, Sec. 99260 RTA Operated Local Transit see Exhibit A (Col. 7)

SCT see Exhibit A (Col. 8)

LTF Article 4, Sec. 99260

Triennial Performance Audits (SLOCOG) (Col. 9)

LTF Article 8, Sec. 99402

Discretionary (to be filled in): TDA Audit (Col. 11)

LTF Article 3, Sec. 99245

Local Public Transit System (Col. 12)

LTF Article 4, Sec. 99260

Roads Maint./Rail/ Bikeways/ Ped. (Col. 13)

LTF Article 8, Sec. 99400(a)

Misc. Transp. Allocations/Sr. Van Programs/ Subsidized Taxi (Col. 14)

LTF Article 8, Sec. 99400(c)

CTSA (Col. 2) LTF Article 4.5, Sec. 99400 TOTAL LTF BEING CLAIMED (Should correspond to Exh. A) (Col. 15)

TOTAL RURAL TRANSIT FUND (RTF) BEING CLAIMED (Should correspond to Exh. A) (Col. 16)

LTF Article 4, Section 99260

TOTAL CARRYOVER RURAL TRANSIT FUND (RTF) BEING CLAIMED (Should correspond to Exh. A) (Col. 17)

LTF Article 4, Section 99260

Page 10: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

10

Transit (Col. 19)

STA Article 6.5, Sec. 99314 (State Apportioned)

Transit (Col. 20)

STA Article 6.5, Sec 99313 (Discretionary)

TOTAL STA BEING CLAIMED (Should correspond to Exh. A) (Col. 21)

GRAND TOTAL (LTF, RTF, CARRYOVER RTF AND STA)

(Col. 22)

*Source: April 2013 TDA Guidebook, CALTRANS Use of TDA Funds as Proposed All claimants must spend or earmark TDA monies in accordance with the "Annual Project and Financial Plan" included in each claim. If unforeseen situations result in a need to spend these transportation funds in a way other than that included in the approved “Annual Project and Financial Plan,” the claimant must submit a request to revise this plan, in writing, to SLOCOG. The annual audit must certify that the funds were used as proposed or that the funds were set aside and earmarked to pay for a future transportation project consistent with the Annual Project and Financial Plan. All interest earned on reserved TDA funds must be used for the proposed purpose. Claim Supporting Documents In addition to the claim form, the following document need to be submitted:

1. SUBMIT QUARTERLY TRANSIT DATA - DUE 45 DAYS AFTER QUARTER END.

Transit claimants will need to submit the quarterly statistics shown in Appendix A Exhibit C.

2. SUBMIT STATE CONTROLLER REPORT (ARTICLE 5.5, SECTION 6665) - DUE SEPT 30 OR (OCT 20 IF

FILED ELECTRONICALLY).

Expenditures of TDA funds must be reported to the State Controller within 90 days after the close of the fiscal year. Copies of these reports must be submitted to SLOCOG at the same time the reports are submitted to the Controller. A PDF file is also required. These reports are typically prepared by the agency’s accounting/finance staff but sometimes are prepared by the agency’s independent auditor. The State Controller uses the data from these reports to prepare estimates of the revenue-based STA fund allocations for the next fiscal year. In the case of transit claimants, the transit operating statistics included in the State Controller’s Report should be consistent with the estimated operating data from the prior fiscal year.

3. SUBMIT FISCAL/COMPLIANCE AUDIT TO SLOCOG (ARTICLE 5.5, SECTION 6664) - DUE DEC 31

A copy of the claimant’s TDA fund fiscal audit (conducted by an independent auditor) must be submitted to SLOCOG before TDA funds are released to the claimant. A PDF file is also required. The official state deadline is within 180 days (Dec 31st) after the end of the fiscal year. SLOCOG may

Page 11: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

11

grant an extension of up to 90 days (March 31st) upon receipt of a written request to the Executive Director by the claimant. TDA funds will not be released until the audit is received unless approved by the Executive Director. The audit report shall include a certification that the TDA funds allocated to the claimant the previous year were expended in conformance with applicable laws, rules and regulations. The report shall present two years of financial information comparatively. No allocation shall be made to any claimant that is delinquent in its submission of a fiscal audit report. To minimize the cost of preparing and submitting fiscal/compliance audits, SLOCOG prepares and distributes Request for Proposals (RFP’s) every 3-4 years to independent auditors to prepare these TDA mandated audits (see Appendix F). Claimants may select one of the auditors who responds to the bid, or may select their own independently of SLOCOG’s RFP process. The claimant may also expand the scope of their agency annual fiscal audit to meet the audit requirements of other funding sources, as long as it includes a certification of compliance with the TDA and clearly states the calendar for submittal of the TDA fiscal audit. Under no circumstances will SLOCOG release current year TDA funds to jurisdiction without a completed fiscal audit of the prior year by March 31st.

4. REPORT STATUS OF FOLLOW UP ACTIONS TO AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS (ARTICLE 4, PUC

SECTION 99244) - DUE EARLY MAY

The transit claimants report to SLOCOG progress made in implementing the most recent triennial performance audit recommendations in the current fiscal year. Examples of follow up actions may be: transit service changes, completion of capital projects, fare increases, cost-savings measures (such as a new operating contract, shared functions with other claimants, lower overhead expenses) or other steps meant to improve efficiency and effectiveness. In the event major changes took place since the last triennial performance audit or the most recent Short Range Transit Plan, the transit claimants should identify how they have dealt with those changes to date. SLOCOG brings an annual update to the board on the reported status of triennial performance audit recommendations and, depending on status, might adopt supplemental actions to be taken by the claimant in the next fiscal year. This is especially relevant if the claimant shows repeated non-compliance with the farebox ratio.

Page 12: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

12

III. SCHEDULE FOR TDA CLAIMANTS FILING A CLAIM

The following is a timeline for the TDA process. CURRENT FISCAL YEAR First Quarter 1. July – December – Claimants complete and submit claims with CHP safety compliance report.

SLOCOG must have the claim, the CHP certification, and the most current transit data available in order to complete the first quarter allocation instructions. Regarding transit data specifically, claimant must have submitted the prior year’s third quarter transit data if claim is submitted in first 45 days of first quarter (before August 15th). If claim is submitted after August 15th, the fourth quarter transit data must be submitted by August 15th.

2. July – December – As claims are received, SLOCOG issues allocation instructions to the County Auditor to distribute first quarter funds to claimants.

3. September 30th – Claimants submit State Controller’s Report to SLOCOG and the state.

Second Quarter 4. October 20th – Claimants can electronically submit State Controller’s Report to SLOCOG and

the state.

5. November 15th – Claimants submit first quarter transit data (July-Sept.).

6. December – SLOCOG issues allocation instructions to the County Auditor to distribute second quarter funds to claimants. SLOCOG must have the claim, the CHP certification, first quarter transit data, the fiscal audit, and the State Controller’s report to complete second quarter allocation instructions.

7. December 31st – Claimants submit fiscal audits to SLOCOG. If Claimant is unable to submit

fiscal audit by December 31st, Claimant must submit a request for a 90-day extension prior to December 31st.

Third Quarter 8. February 15th – Claimants submit second quarter transit data (October-December). 9. March – SLOCOG issues allocation instructions to the County Auditor to distribute third quarter

funds to claimants. SLOCOG must have the claim, the CHP certification, second quarter transit data, the fiscal audit, and the State Controller’s report to complete third quarter allocation instructions.

Fourth Quarter 10. May 15th – Claimants submit third quarter transit data (January-March). 11. June – SLOCOG issues allocation instructions to the County Auditor to distribute fourth quarter

funds to claimants. SLOCOG must have the claim, the CHP certification, the fiscal audit, the

Page 13: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

13

State Controller’s Report, and the third quarter (January-March) transit data to complete fourth quarter allocation instructions.

FOLLOWING FISCAL YEAR 12. August 15th – Claimants submit fourth quarter transit data (April-June). 13. December – SLOCOG sends out public notices on the unmet transit needs process. 14. February – SLOCOG receives LTF estimates from SLO County and receives STA estimates

from the State Controller’s Office. 15. February – SLOCOG conducts unmet transit needs hearing. 16. February – April – SLOCOG reviews the requests for unmet transit needs. 17. April – June – SLOCOG determines whether TDA recipients with transit programs have made

reasonable progress in implementing the most recent audit recommendations in the current fiscal year and whether operators are making continued progress to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the services, including increased coordination. In the event TDA recipients have not made progress, SLOCOG could take action, including: consultation, withholding increased LTF from prior year, and/or withholding STA (such as Farebox Ratio penalties).

18. April – June – SLOCOG determines whether there are any unmet transit needs reasonable to

meet and notifies claimants of conditions of approval. 19. April – Based on fund estimates, SLOCOG apportions LTF and STA funds. 20. June – SLOCOG approves LTF, STA and RTF allocations. 21. June – SLOCOG releases claim forms and regional guidelines.

Page 14: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

14

IV. TRANSIT SYSTEM FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIOS

No claimant can receive TDA funds if the ratio of the sum of fares and eligible local support to transit operating cost falls below the TDA minimum, called farebox recovery ratio. This applies to both STA and LTF funds.

1. DEFINITIONS

Operating Cost (PUC 99247-a)

"’Operating cost’ means all costs in the operating expense object classes exclusive of the costs in the depreciation and amortization expenses object class of the uniform system of accounts and records adopted by the Controller (PUC Section 99243) and exclusive of all subsidies for commuter rail services operated under the jurisdiction of the Interstate Commerce Commission and of all direct costs for providing charter services and exclusive of all vehicle lease costs.” Other allowed cost exclusions are Ridesharing services costs (PUC Section 99268.16).

Fare Revenues (Article 2, Section 6611-2)

“All revenues in the following account classes of the uniform system of accounts and records adopted by the State Controller pursuant to PUC Section 99243”:

• 401.000 Passenger Fares for transit services • 402.000 Special Transit Fares • 403.000 School Bus Service Revenues

“Fare revenues” include revenues earned under contractual arrangements with public or private entities, either (1) for transit fares for a specified group of employees, members, or clients, or (2) to guarantee a minimum revenue on a line operated especially for the benefit of the paying entity (e.g. an employer, shopping center, university, etc.). They may also include cash donations made by individual passengers or community organizations in lieu of a prescribed fare. Local support treated as fare revenues also include advertising revenues. (See Appendix D for “qualifying” and “non-qualifying” local support for computing farebox recovery ratios.)

Local Support (Article 2, Section CCR 6611-3)

“All revenues in the following account classes of the uniform system of accounts and records adopted by the State Controller pursuant to PUC Section 99243”:

• 406.000 Auxiliary Transportation Revenues • 408.000 Taxes Levied Directly by Transit System • 409.010 Local Cash Grants and Reimbursements • 410.000 Local Special Fare Assistance • 440.000 Subsidy from Other Sectors of Operation

Page 15: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

15

Serving Urbanized Areas (PUC 99217)

“The boundaries of the urbanized areas are those reported in the Federal Decennial Census.” As of February 2012, the urbanized areas in San Luis Obispo County are: the San Luis Obispo area, the Atascadero/Paso Robles/Santa Margarita/Templeton area and the Arroyo Grande/Grover Beach area. As a result, transit claimants serving an urbanized area are:

• SLO Transit • Atascadero Transit • Paso Express and • Regional Transit Authority • South County Transit

Serving a Non-Urbanized Area (Article 2, Section 6613.2)

“An operator which is serving a non-urbanized area” is an “operator or transit service claimant that is not an operator serving an urbanized area.” Transit claimants in the region serving non urbanized areas are:

• Morro Bay Transit and Trolley • other County-funded general public transit services (Cambria and Avila trolleys, Nipomo and

Shandon DARs)

2. CALCULATING FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO

For the annual Fiscal/Compliance audit, the State Controller’s report and the Triennial Performance Audit, the farebox recovery ratio is computed as follows: Divide the audited fare revenues (as defined above, including qualifying local support) from the prior year by the total audited operating costs (as defined above). No cost exclusions other than the ones stated under PUC 99247(a) are allowed for such purposes. Yet, if the resulting farebox recovery ratio falls below the minimum required by TDA (see below), for the sole purpose of claims approval, one cost exclusion is allowed by PUC Section 99268.17 as of January 1, 2007:

• The additional costs to provide ADA complementary paratransit services, if those costs exceed the operator’s cost in the prior year as adjusted for the Consumer Price Index (CPI)

No additional exclusion is allowed for fuel costs, insurance liability premium, or for the purpose of the claim approval.

3. DETERMINING MINIMUM REQUIRED FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO

The TDA required minimum farebox ratios vary by types of transit operators as follows: • 20% for transit claimants (or local operators) serving an Urbanized Area (PUC Section 99268.3) • 15.95% for the Regional Transit Authority serving both Urbanized and Non Urbanized Areas

(regional policy effective July 1, 2005 per PUC Section 99270.1). This is a blended ratio using a vehicle hour-based formula.

Page 16: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

16

• 10% for transit claimants serving a Non-Urbanized Area (PUC Section 99268.4) In the case of operators with several forms of general public transit services (such as fixed route and Dial-A-Ride) over the same service area, the minimum farebox recovery ratio applies to all services combined, resulting in a blended farebox ratio. Other PUC Sections with interim exemptions for meeting the mandated farebox recovery ratio are respectively:

• Exemption for Extension of Services (PUC Section 99268.8) –a two-year exemption is granted from the start up of the extended services-defined as addition of geographical area or route miles, improvements in service frequency or hours of service greater than 25% of the route total, or the addition of new days of service, or the addition of a new type of service. SLOCOG can work with the claimant on how to derive the “adjusted” ratios-both the costs and the fares derived from the extension are excluded from the interim farebox ratio for the balance of the transit system (applies to all Operators)

• Exemption for New Urbanized Areas (PUC Section 99270.2) - up to a five-year exemption is

granted from the first full fiscal year after the Census Bureau designation as a new Urbanized Area (only applies to newly Urbanized Operators, namely South County Transit)

• Local Support Ratios (CCR 6633.2(d)) – a lower general public DAR ratio of 15% in urbanized service area with locally operated RTA

• Farebox Recovery Ratio Equivalent (for Article 8 Claimants) – SLOCOG reserves the right to

use farebox ratio equivalent ratios for determining productivity, such as riders per revenue hour or passengers per mile. These ratios are expected to be equivalent to similar services (only applies to Special Services eligible for Article 8, namely Ride-On Transporation).

• Claim Evaluation Criteria (for Article 4.5 Claimants) – SLOCOG has the discretion to adopt performance criteria, local match requirements or farebox ratio requirements (only applies to the CTSA).

4. NON -COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO

In the event a transit claimant does not meet its Farebox ratio, SLOCOG will comply with the

provision of 6633.9. (Non Compliance with Required Revenue Ratio):

• The first year of non-compliance is the grace year.

• The second year of non-compliance is the non-compliance year.

• The third year is the determination year.

• The fourth year is the penalty year: TDA funds are reduced by the difference between the

required revenues (in non-compliance year) and the actual revenues.

Page 17: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

17

V. OTHER SLOCOG RESPONSIBILITIES

1. TRANSIT NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND UNMET TRANSIT NEEDS

Prior to making any allocation not directly related to public transportation, specialized transportation services, and facilities provided for the exclusive use of pedestrians and bicycles, SLOCOG makes a finding that there are no "unmet transit needs reasonable to meet" that could be "reasonably met" with TDA funds (per Section 99401.5). SLOCOG achieves this by: In October, SLOCOG presents regional criteria for the definitions of “unmet transit needs” and “unmet transit needs, reasonable to meet.” Following review by the regional advisory committees and the Board, the criteria are finalized and adopted for the next fiscal year Unmet Transit Needs determination. In December, SLOCOG updates the Annual Transit Needs Assessment. The update reviews the size and location of identifiable groups likely to be transportation disadvantaged, including senior, low-income and disabled persons. The annual update also presents recent trends in ridership for all existing public transit providers and analyzes factors impacting those trends. The annual transit needs assessment is presented to the Social Services Transportation Advisory Council (SSTAC) for their input, adopted by the SLOCOG Board and forwarded to Caltrans. In February, SLOCOG holds a public hearing to receive public testimony on unmet transit and bikeway needs. Each request for transit services is evaluated according to the adopted criteria of "unmet transit needs" and "reasonable to meet." In April, following staff evaluation of all requests, determination is made that:

1. There are no unmet transit needs within the jurisdiction of the claimant, or 2. There are unmet transit needs that are not reasonable to meet, or 3. There are unmet transit needs that can reasonably be met through expansion of

existing transit systems, by adding new transit services, or by contracting for community transportation services.

All unmet transit needs, reasonable to meet, must be served, before any LTF funds are released for street and road improvements in the next fiscal year. These findings are reviewed by SLOCOG Advisory Committees for their input before being brought to the Board for a final determination.

2. PREPARING AND DISTRIBUTING FUND ALLOCATION INSTRUCTIONS

SLOCOG conveys allocation instructions to the County Auditor to make payments from the TDA trust fund. SLOCOG generally conveys four allocation instructions annually for each claimant: first, to distribute the first payment after a claim for funds is received and approved (along with a CHP Safety Certification), and then to distribute the remaining payments after the required documents are received (Fiscal audit, State Controller’s report, and quarterly Transit Data). In general, payments for subsequent quarters are made in the third month (to allow time for LTF deposits to accumulate). By exception, the CTSA and RTA may receive payments earlier in the quarter, subject to receipt of the claim and prior quarter transit data, for cash flow reasons. These advance payments are to be made no earlier than the start of the quarter. Advance payments for future quarters can be approved by SLOCOG with required information as long

Page 18: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

18

as funds are readily available. Note: All payments are subject to funding availability and in some instances may be delayed pending distribution of TDA funds from the State Controller. The Executive Director may advance funding if need is substantiated and adequate funding is available. Each allocation instruction is numbered for record keeping and reporting purposes. Allocations made to the same claimant for purposes authorized under different sections of the Act are identified separately. The instructions describe how the funds have been apportioned and how they should be disbursed.

3. KEEPING RECORDS

SLOCOG and the County Auditor maintain accounting records of the two TDA trust funds including interest payments. SLOCOG is informed by the Auditor at quarterly intervals by written memorandum of the status of the funds in compliance with Section 6622. In practice, this requirement is fulfilled by SLOCOG having access to the County’s reporting system.

4. RESERVING LTF OR WITHHOLDING STA FUNDS

SLOCOG may specify that TDA monies allocated to a claimant be reserved for future payment to the claimant for a specific capital project (Section 6648). Funds may also be withheld from allocation to an operator in the event that the operator has not met the efficiency standards as described in PUC 99314.6.

Reserving LTF Funds

An allocation shall be reserved in the Fund only by allocation instruction, and monies that are reserved in the fund shall be authorized for payment only by a separate allocation instruction. Any monies allocated and reserved in the Fund and not released for payment within three years after the date of allocation shall cease to be reserved and shall be treated as an unallocated apportionment retained in the Fund for later allocation. Such monies may be reallocated to the same claimant for the same project or for a different purpose, or maybe allocated to another claimant in the same area of apportionment (i.e. service area). At any earlier time, SLOCOG, with the consent of the claimant, may rescind or revise an allocation of monies reserved in the Fund. SLOCOG shall not authorize any payment to a claimant from an allocation reserved in the Fund if the claimant is holding in its own accounts a reserve of monies originally allocated in a previous year from the Fund.

Withholding STA Funds

Each transit claimant must undergo an annual STA Eligibility Fund test done by SLOCOG. If an operator is ineligible to receive STA funds in a given year, the funds that were apportioned will be held in the trust fund until that operator becomes eligible (for up to three years). After three years, the unclaimed amount will be reapportioned. Note: The cost-containment test (based on the State Consumer Price Index) requirement has been lifted until the end of 2013/14.

Page 19: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

19

5. PERFORMING TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDITS

SLOCOG must designate entities other than itself to prepare performance audits of its activities and the activities of each transit operator to which it allocates TDA funds within SLOCOG’s jurisdiction (PUC Section 99246). The performance audit must evaluate the efficiency, effectiveness, and economy of the operation of the entity being audited. Performance audits are conducted triennially pursuant to a schedule established by SLOCOG. SLOCOG must transmit audits to Caltrans and certify in writing that the performance audits of operators located in the area under its jurisdiction have been completed.

The triennial auditor examines the following areas of performance:

• Compliance with applicable TDA requirements during the 3-year audit period; • Status of the prior audit recommendations in view of changes that may have taken place since

the prior audit; • Quantitative review of required TDA performance indicators and multi-year trends1; • Functional review of the agency or the operator being audited; and • Findings and Recommendations for the next three years.

SLOCOG submits all Triennial Performance Audit reports to Caltrans by June 30th. Prior to September 1 of each year, SLOCOG provides to Caltrans a schedule of performance audits to be submitted during the current fiscal year and a list of all operators or claimants who operated or commenced operations in the prior fiscal year.

6. SUBMITTING ANNUAL FISCAL AUDITS OF ALL CLAIMANTS

SLOCOG is responsible for ensuring that all claimants submit three copies of an annual certified fiscal audit conducted by an entity other than itself (PUC Section 99245). The audit must be submitted to SLOCOG 180 days after the end of the fiscal year (Dec. 31), unless an extension is requested by the entity and granted by the SLOCOG Executive Director for up to 90 more days (March 31) as deemed necessary.

1 Transit Providers only.

Page 20: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

20

APPENDIX A – CLAIM FORM

SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 2013/2014 TDA CLAIM FORM

Please enter information in the spaces provided. Once all the data has been entered, the form may be mailed (1114 Marsh Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401), e-mailed ([email protected]), or faxed 781-5703. Item 1. Claimant Information

Agency Name:

Date:

Contact Person:

Fiscal Year: 2013/2014

Title:

This Claim is Original Revised

Address:

Phone:

Email:

Fax:

This claimant, qualified pursuant to Section 99203 of the Public Utilities Code, hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes of 1971, as amended and applicable rules and regulations, that an allocation be made for the purposes and in the respective amounts as described in the attached Project and Financial Plan claim form. The total amounts correspond to the allocations approved by the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments on June 5, 2013. See attached Exhibit A.

CATEGORY DOLLAR AMOUNT (see Exhibit A)

a) Annual Local Transportation Funds (LTF)

b) Annual Rural Transit Funds (RTF)

c) Carryover Rural Transit Funds (RTF)

d) Annual State Transit Assistance (STA) Funds

TOTAL FUNDS BEING CLAIMED ARE:

This claim was conditionally approved by the San Luis Obispo Council of Governments at a meeting on June 5, 2013. SLOCOG office use only

/ / #

Ronald L. De Carli, Executive Director Date Claim #

Page 21: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

21

Item 2. Certifications By providing the required information and marking each applicable box below, the authorized official certifies compliance with all of the required TDA Certifications. (All claimants complete Part I; Transit Claimants complete Part II as well).

PART I.

The proposed expenditures are in conformity with the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) (CCR 6754(a)(1). All maintenance projects are consistent with the RTP; any capital project is identified as follows: ___________________________________________________.

A jurisdictional fund will be established for pedestrian and bicycle allocations pursuant to PUC 99233.3 (JPA's and the CTSA are exempt).

Is the allocation for pedestrian and bicycle going to be used to meet a bicycle request from the annual Unmet Needs hearing? _________ (Y/N)

If yes, please describe:_______________________________________________________ Equivalent reduced transit fares and identification cards for senior citizens and handicapped

persons are available pursuant to PUC 99155. Agency will program or implement services to meet all unmet transit needs per the adopted 2013

SLOCOG resolution if applicable. Prior to disbursement of TDA funds, the following documents will be submitted: 1. This claim for funds will be submitted to SLOCOG. 2. Safety Compliance Report/Terminal Record Update certification by the California Highway

Patrol (CHP) verifying compliance with Section 1808.1 of the Vehicle Code. 3. State Controller’s report (LGFA) will be submitted to SLOCOG and State Controller by

September 30 (or October 20 if submitted electronically). 4. Annual statistics will be sent electronically. See Exhibit C. 5. One hard copy (and one PDF copy) of a certified fiscal audit of all TDA funds received the

prior fiscal year will be submitted to SLOCOG (by December 31 for 2nd quarter payment). Prior to submittal of the final version of the fiscal audit, the operator should provide a copy of the draft fiscal audit for SLOCOG review (at least one week before due date). If the operator’s financial auditor is not able to meet the December 31st due date, the operator should request from SLOCOG an extension (up to 90 days) with a written justification for the delay submitted by December 16, 2013. The operator should inform its fiscal auditor of the need to meet the above deadlines.

PART II. ALL TRANSIT CLAIMANTS MUST ALSO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING:

Farebox ratio (fares/operating costs) for system is expected to exceed 10% (rural operators), 16% (RTA), 20% (urban operators), and 15% (North County DARs).

Full use is being made of federal funds available under the Urban Mass Transportation Act for transportation purposes (CCR 6754).

Fixed-route operator accepts and handles Regional Day Pass issued by the Regional Transit Authority with revenue-sharing participation per adopted formula among regional and local fixed-route providers (2008 Region wide Fare Improvement Study-Policy A).

Fixed-route provider accepts Region ALL Pass issued by the Regional Transit Authority with revenue-sharing participation per adopted formula among regional and local fixed-route providers (2008 Region wide Fare Improvement Study-Policy B).

The transit system is not precluded by contract from employing part time drivers or from contracting with common carriers of persons operating under a franchise or license (CCR 6754-(b)-2).

Page 22: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

22

Compliance with CVC Section 1808.1 (PUC 99155) "Drivers Pull Notice Participation" Program and Section 12804.6 "Transit Bus drivers; Required Certifications and Employee Records" Program (must be within 13 months of claim submittal date).

The transit system has an adopted Short Range Transit Plan or is part of a subregional plan.

The transit system will not receive TDA funds (LTF plus STA) in excess of operating costs minus fare revenues (CCR 6754 (a) 4). Those funds exclude RTF capital awards.

Item 3. Annual Project and Financial Plan: Your TDA will be distributed according to this plan.

CATEGORY ARTICLE/SECTION Bikeways (2%) see Exhibit A (Col. 3)

LTF Article 3, Sec. 99233.3

RTA see Exhibit A (Col. 4)

LTF Article 4, Sec. 99260

RTA Operated Local Transit see Exhibit A (Col. 7)

SCAT see Exhibit A (Col. 8)

LTF Article 4, Sec. 99260

Performance Audits (SLOCOG) (Col. 9)

LTF Article 3, Sec. 99246

Discretionary (Col. 10)

TDA Fiscal Audit (Col. 11)

LTF Article 3, Sec. 99245 To be filled in

Local Public Transit System (Col. 12)

LTF Article 4, Sec. 99260 To be filled in

Roads Maint./Rail/ Bikeways/ Ped. (Col. 13)

LTF Article 8, Sec. 99400(a) To be filled in

Misc. Transp. Allocations/Sr. Van Programs/ Subsidized Taxi (Col. 14)

LTF Article 8, Sec. 99400(c) To be filled in

CTSA (Col. 10, Row i)

LTF Article 4.5, Sec. 99400 To be filled in (if CTSA)

Discretionary Must Total:

$

TOTAL LTF BEING CLAIMED (Should correspond to Exhibit A) (Col. 15)

TOTAL RURAL TRANSIT FUND (RTF) BEING CLAIMED (Should correspond to Exhibit A) (Col. 16)

LTF Article 4, Section 99260

TOTAL CARRYOVER RURAL TRANSIT FUND (RTF) BEING CLAIMED (Should correspond to Exhibit A) (Col. 17)

LTF Article 4, Section 99260

Transit (Col. 19)

STA Article 6.5, Sec. 99314 (State Apportioned)

Page 23: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

23

Transit (Co. 20)

STA Article 6.5, Sec 99313 (Discretionary Based)

TOTAL STA BEING CLAIMED (Should correspond to Exhibit A) (Col. 21)

GRAND TOTAL (LTF, RTF, CARRYOVER RTF AND STA) (Col. 22)

Item 4. Annual Fiscal Audit: Identify actions taken to comply with the most recent fiscal audit recommendations (if applicable). If no actions were taken, describe what actions you plan to take in the first two quarters.

Item 5. Triennial Performance Audit: Identify efforts made to implement transit productivity improvements recommended in prior performance audit (transit claimants-only), mainly those follow-up actions recommended for the most recent fiscal year or actions contemplated in the upcoming fiscal year. If no near term action is contemplated, elaborate on reasons for delay or describe alternate course of action.

Item 6. Short Range Transit Plan or Sub Regional Plan: Identify progress made to date in implementing recommendations or improvements developed in the prior or most recent plan (including draft recommendations, if pending adoption). Include the actions related to operations, maintenance, capital projects, marketing, customer service, fare policy and other areas of the transit program covered by the plan. Include initiatives in coordinating improvements or consolidating functions with other providers.

Item 7. 2013/2014 Transit System Budget (transit claimants-only) – See Excel file, “Transit Budget for 13/14)

Page 24: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

24

Item 8. Did the 2013/2014 operating budget increase over 15% from the adopted 2012/2013 budget?

YES NO

If the answer is yes, please provide a statement identifying and substantiating the reason or need for the increase in the transit operating budget in excess of 15% above the preceding year, and identify substantial increases or decreases in the scope of operations or capital provisions for major new service (transit claimants-only, if applicable). In the case of the County, such determination is needed by individual services. In the case of Ride-On, this determination only applies to the CTSA activities/program.

Item 9. In the case of Federal transit grants, indicate required match ratios by grant type, identify source of matching funds and compliance with minimum match ratios. For Federally funded capital projects, give status and anticipated completion timeline.

Item 10. To be completed by RIDE-ON Transportation ONLY. For FY13/14 expanded reporting requirements, please see attached April 3, 2013 staff report approved by SLOCOG Board. Please provide an estimate of the number of rides, and the cost per ride expected for each program in fiscal year 2013/2014 pursuant to Article 4.5, Section 99275.5. State the productivity (in riders per hour) and operating assumptions used to project the annual ridership and cost effectiveness by CTSA program (Tri-Counties Regional Center, Community Interaction Program, Medi-Cal Transportation, Private Pay, Veteran’s Express and Agricultural Workers Vanpools). When reporting quarterly data, track actual performance versus those budget assumptions and compare with actual performance of the two previous years.

H:\2013-14 OWP\1000 TDA\1100 TDA Admin\13 14 TDA Claim Form.doc

Page 25: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

25

Page 26: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

26

EXHIBIT A – LTF, STA AND RTF ALLOCATIONS

EXHIBIT A

LTF

2013/2014 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) FUND - Adopted 6/5/13, Administrative Amendment 8/7/13

LTF - Committed Funds LTF - Discretionary Uses

Col. 1 Col. 2 Col. 3 Col. 4 Col. 5 Col. 6 Col. 7 Col. 8 Col. 9 Col. 10 Col. 11 Col. 12 Col. 13 Col. 14 Col. 15

Jurisdiction/

Transit PropertyLTF AVAIL TO

APPORTION

Net LTF Avail - To Be Shown on

Claim

(Col 1 - Col 5)

Bikeway/

Ped. Art. 3

Sec. 99233

Net RTA Art. 4 Sec. 99260

note 1

RTA RTF Contrib

Total RTA Contrib Art.

4 Sec. 99260

(Col 4&5) note 2

RTA

Operated

Local

Tansit note

3

SCAT Art. 4 Sec.

99260

Perf

Audits Sec. 99246

note 4

TBD By

Claimant (Col

1 less 3-5, 7-9)

TDA

Fiscal

Audit Art. 3 Sec.

99245

Transit

Ops &

Plng Art. 4

Sec. 99260

Roads

Maint Art. 8 Sec.

99400 (a)

Transit

Cap/Sp

Srvcs Art.

8 Sec.

99400 (c)

NET LTF

Allocated (Col 3,4, 7-10)

a. Arroyo Grande 818,973 791,279 16,379 172,442 27,694 200,136 143,404 6,514 452,540 0 0 0 0 791,279

b. Atascadero 1,348,788 1,303,178 26,974 284,000 45,610 329,610 0 1,316 990,888 0 0 0 0 1,303,178

c. Grover Beach 623,406 602,325 12,467 131,264 21,081 152,345 109,153 4,958 344,483 0 0 0 0 602,325

d. Morro Bay 486,619 470,164 9,732 102,462 16,455 118,917 0 475 357,495 0 0 0 0 470,164

e.Paso Robles

1,431,580 1,383,170 28,630 301,432 48,410 349,842 0 16,397 1,036,711 0 0 0 0 1,383,170

f. Pismo Beach 363,520 351,227 7,270 76,542 12,293 88,835 63,610 2,890 200,915 1,000 0 191,815 8,100 351,227

g. SLO Transit 2,458,576 2,365,007 49,169 582,623 93,569 676,192 0 17,700 1,715,515 0 1,715,515 0 0 2,365,007

h.

SLO County (note 3,5) 5,327,088 5,072,371 106,536 1,586,028 254,717 1,840,745 597,490 60,222 9,750 2,712,345 0 n/a 0 n/a 5,072,371

i.

Ride-On/CTSA (note 6) 662,519 662,519 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 662,519 0 0 0 0 662,519

j.

Contingency

Fund 1,500,000 1,500,000 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 1,500,000

k. TOTAL 15,021,069 14,501,239 257,157 3,236,792 519,830 3,756,622 597,490 376,389 60,000 9,973,411 1,000 1,715,515 191,815 8,100 14,501,239

(RTA LTF) (RTA LTF) (SCAT LTF)

Direct Recipients Notes:

l.

SLOCOG Admin. Art. 3 - 99233.1 159,386 159,386 n/a 1. Col 4 is the number that goes on claim form for total contribution to RTA. RTA's budget was approved on 5/1/13; SCAT budget on 4/24/13.

m.SLOCOG Plng

Art. 8 - 99402 672,011 672,011 n/a 2. If the RTF was not exchanged for LTF, RTA would need the Col. 6 amount in LTF.

n.

R/S & SLOCOG

Art. 3/99233.3 13,535 13,535 13,535 3. Col 7 represents transfer of transit duties from County to RTA. It is directly allocated to RTA. RTA's LTF is the sum of Col 4 & 7.

o.RTA

col 4 & col 7

totals

col 4 & col 7

totals n/a 4. The 4/3/13 SLOCOG Board approved budget included $60k in LTF from transit operators for Performance Audits: Paso Robles, SLO City, RTA & SCAT.

p. SCAT see col 8 total see col 8 total n/a 5. All SLO County transit LTF, RTF and STA Funds are directly allocated to RTA and expended by RTA on behalf of SLO County.

q. Total 844,932 844,932 13,535 6. Ride-On's Discretionary STA budget includes $35K contribution to Senior Shuttle and up to $15K "local match" for Vet's Shuttle.

7. RTA's STA includes SLO County Op. Rev STA of $2,160 & SLO County Discr. STA of $96,135.

r.FINAL TOTALS 15,866,001 15,346,171 270,692 8. On 8/7/13, an Administrative Amendment was done to increase Op. Rev STA based on 8/1/13 letter from SCO office with revised STA estimates.

Page 27: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

27

EXHIBIT A (continued)

RTF & STA

Rural Transit Fund State Transit Assistance Grand Total

Col. 16 Col. 17 Col. 18 Col. 19 Col. 20 Col. 21 Col. 22

Jurisdiction/

Transit Property

TOTAL RTF

AWARD Sec. 99260

TOTAL LTF &

RTF (Col 15 & 16)

TOTAL RTF

CARRY-OVER Sec. 99260

TOTAL LTF, RTF

& RTF CARRY-

OVER

Op. Rev. Art. 6.5 Sec. 99314

note 8

Discretionary Art. 6.5 Sec. 99313

note 6 TOTAL STA

LTF, STA, & RTF

& RTF Carryover (Col 18 & 21)

a. Arroyo Grande 0 791,279 0 791,279 0 0 0 791,279 a.

b. Atascadero 0 1,303,178 0 1,303,178 6,189 54,876 61,065 1,364,243 b.

c. Grover Beach 0 602,325 0 602,325 0 0 0 602,325 c.

d. Morro Bay 6,755 476,919 23,208 500,126 651 16,920 17,571 517,697 d.

e.Paso Robles

0 1,383,170 0 1,383,170 11,073 62,450 73,523 1,456,693 e.

f. Pismo Beach 0 351,227 0 351,227 0 0 0 351,227 f.

g. SLO Transit 0 2,365,007 0 2,365,007 38,724 143,574 182,298 2,547,305 g.

h.

SLO County (note 3,5) 0 5,072,371 0 5,072,371 See note 7 See note 7 0 5,072,371 h.

i.

Ride-On/CTSA (note 6) 0 662,519 0 662,519 0 50,000 50,000 712,519 i.

j.

Contingency

Fund 0 1,500,000 0 1,500,000 0 145,984 145,984 1,645,984 j.

k. TOTAL 6,755 14,507,994 23,208 14,531,202 56,637 473,804 530,441 15,061,643 k.

Direct Recipients

l.

SLOCOG Admin. Art. 3 - 99233.1 25,000 184,386 0 184,386 0 n/a 0 184,386 l.

m.SLOCOG Plng

Art. 8 - 99402 0 672,011 0 672,011 0 n/a 0 672,011 m.

n.

R/S & SLOCOG

Art. 3/99233.3 0 13,535 0 13,535 0 275,000 275,000 288,535 n.

o.RTA

488,075 488,075 135,000 623,075 101,701 569,135 670,836 1,293,911 o.

p. SCAT 0 0 70,000 70,000 8,690 94,188 102,878 172,878 p.

q. Total 513,075 1,358,007 205,000 1,563,007 110,391 938,323 1,048,714 2,611,721 q.

r.FINAL TOTALS 519,830 15,866,001 228,208 16,094,209 167,028 1,412,127 1,579,155 17,673,364 r.

Page 28: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

28

EXHIBIT B SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

CONDITIONS TO BE MET BEFORE RECEIVING TDA FUNDING

June 5, 2013

Transportation Development Act claimants shall meet the following conditions prior to receiving TDA funds:

1. A claim for funds is submitted to SLOCOG which includes:

a. The fiscal year and amount being claimed. b. The proposed uses of those funds (transit, bikeways, road improvements, etc.). c. Budget information to determine eligibility for funding (transit claimants only).

d. Written justification for an increase or a decrease in total transit budget exceeding 15% (transit claimants

only).

e. Chief Financial Officer or equivalent certification of the following: • Claimant’s proposed expenditures are in conformance with the Regional Transportation Plan

(RTP) as verified by the SLOCOG Executive Director. CCR 6754 (a) (1). • A jurisdictional fund will be established for pedestrian and bicycle allocations for current year

or future year expenditures (non-transit claimants). PUC 99233.3. • If fare reductions (i.e., discount fares relative to the base adult fare) are offered to seniors,

equivalent rates of reduction shall be available to disabled patrons. PUC 99155 (b). This eligible group also includes holders of Medicare identification cards (valid forms of identification for reduced fares) pursuant to PUC 99155 (e).

• If another transit operator has issued a fare discount card to a patron, the same fare reduction privileges shall be granted to that individual while traveling within any other transit service area. PUC 99155 (c).

2. Transit Claimants must also comply with the following requirements:

a. Claimant is making full use of federal funds available under the Urban Mass Transit Act of 1964 as amended by Intermodal Surface Transportation Equity Act (ISTEA); Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA 21); Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act – A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU); and Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21).

b. Claimant has made a reasonable effort to implement the productivity improvements recommended, but not limited to those recommendations related to productivity (such as farebox ratio mandates), in its triennial performance audit as verified by the SLOCOG Executive Director. CCR 6754 (b) (1), PUC 99244, and 99247 (a) through (j).

c. STA Claimant is not precluded by any contract entered into on or after June 28, 1979 from employing part-time drivers or from contracting with common carriers of persons operating under a franchise or license. PUC 99314.5.

d. Claimant has been issued a certification by the California Highway Patrol (CHP) verifying that the operator is in compliance with sections 1808.1 and 34501 of the California Vehicle Code. CCR 6754 (b) (3) and PUC 99251.

e. Article 4.5 claimants only (providers of transit services for persons who cannot use conventional transit services) are responding to special transportation needs not otherwise met by traditional public transit; provide opportunities for service integration when appropriate; and will provide an estimate of revenues, operating costs, and patronage. PUC 99275.5 (c) (4). (Ride-On CTSA only.)

f. Priority consideration has been given to claims to offset reductions in federal operating assistance and the unanticipated increase in the cost of fuel, to enhance existing public transportation services, and to meet high priority regional, countywide, or area wide public transportation needs. CCR 6754 (5).

g. Claimants requesting funding for multiple transit systems shall:

Page 29: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

29

• Break out a claim for funds for each separate system; • Account for fiscal and ridership performance data for each separate system; • Comply with mandated farebox ratio and performance recommendations for each system.

h. Within 45 days after the end of the quarter, the operator shall furnish to SLOCOG the following statistics for tracking quarterly performance of their services by mode (if available; if not readily available, provide an estimate of the modal breakdown):

1. The number of riders by mode over the recent quarter; 2. The number of revenue service hours and revenue service miles by mode over the recent

quarter; 3. The ratio of riders per revenue service hour with a comparison to the latest Short Range

Transit Plan (SRTP) standard; 4. The ratio of riders per revenue service mile; 5. The operating costs (excluding vehicle lease costs); 6. The overhead costs; 7. The total operating costs; 8. The unit operating cost per revenue hour; 9. The unit operating cost per rider; 10. The estimated farebox revenues itemizing passenger fares and other supplemental fares; 11. Any recent public information material developed in support of a service change, a fare

adjustment, or any other change that could have significantly impacted the above statistics up or down;

12. The average fare per rider; 13. The average operating subsidy per rider (costs minus fares); 14. The operator should substantiate any significant variation in the above statistics

(exceeding 5 percent up or down). Note: The mode categories shall include, but not be limited to: local bus fixed route; local trolley; express bus

fixed route; general public dial-a-ride; specialized dial-a-ride; senior shuttle; senior van; or any other services using TDA subsidies.

i. The transit system will not receive TDA funds (LTF plus STA) in excess of operating costs minus fare revenues in FY 13/14 (CCR 6754 (a) 4). Those funds exclude RTF capital awards.

3. The required annual State Controller’s Report is submitted to the State Controller and SLOCOG by September 30th (or the date set by the State Controller) (all claimants).

4. One (1) certified copy of the agency’s compliance audit of prior year TDA funds, with a PDF file, are

submitted to SLOCOG by December 31 st (all claimants). These audits will be conducted in accordance with the applicable sections of CCR 6661, 6663, 6664, 6666, and 6667. If the operator’s financial auditor is not able to meet the December 31st due date, the operator shall request from SLOCOG an extension (up to 90 days) with a written justification for the delay prior to the December 31st due date. The operator should inform its fiscal auditor of the need to meet the deadline.

5. All agencies shall receive their allocations on a quarterly basis. After receipt of claim, Q1 payments are

made as soon as possible. In general, payments for subsequent quarters are made in the third month (to allow time for LTF deposits to accumulate). By exception, the CTSA and RTA may receive payments earlier in the quarter, subject to receipt of the claim and prior quarter transit data, for cash flow reasons. These advance payments are to be made no earlier than the start of the quarter.

Advance payments for future quarters can be approved by SLOCOG with required information as long

as funds are readily available. Note: All payments are subject to funding availability and in some instances may be delayed pending distribution of TDA funds from the State Controller. The Executive Director may advance funding if need is substantiated and adequate funding is available.

Page 30: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

30

Exhibit C – Quarterly Reporting Data

Page 31: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

31

Exhibit D

MEETING DATE: APRIL 3, 2013 ITEM: D-5

SUBJECT: Expanded Ride-On Transportation Performance Monitoring

SUMMARY

This follows up the February 2013 attendance at the Ride-On Transportation Board and their action to accept enhanced performance monitoring and SLOCOG grant funding acknowledgment needs from their management. As stated to the Ride-On Transportation/United Cerebral Palsy (UCP) Board and supported by their staff, the requirements listed below are not burdensome for the non-profit organization. This report lists the new/expanded requirements, due to become effective on July 1, 2013 and each fiscal year thereafter. Such requirements are fully consistent with the June 2011 TDA triennial performance review by an independent party under contract to SLOCOG as well as the input received from the Sacramento state branch of the Division of Mass Transportation (DMT), as it relates to the interpretation of annual reporting needs on the use of Article 4.5 funds (Special Transit with functions consolidated among multiple social services partners) by a Consolidated Transportation Services Agency (CTSA); these improved reporting steps will also help to set the stage for the update to the 2006 Short Range Transit Plan (overdue by 2 years) by giving to the consultant team more readiness to proceed with the Plan development.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Staff: Approve the expanded reporting requirements SSTAC: Concur with staff recommendation TTAC: Concur with staff recommendation CTAC: Concur with staff recommendation

DISCUSSION

The reporting requirements for the CTSA are shown below in 5 sections; the 5th section was specifically added as a follow up to the recognized need for SLOCOG to expand its visibility among the general public as to what its functions are and what types of funding sources it is responsible to allocate among local agencies or organizations. The Ride-On Board is fully supportive of this new approach.

The following agreement will be in effect until June 30, 2013 when the TDA Claim period ends. The same Addendum will be part of the TDA Claim for each year, starting on July 1st. If either party would like to modify the Addendum, they must notify the other party by March 30th in writing of proposed changes. 1. Quarterly Reports from Ride-On Transportation: The Quarterly Reports will be submitted to San

Luis Obispo Council of Governments (SLOCOG) within 45 days after the end of the preceding quarter with the following data for each of the four categories of transportation provided by Ride-On: CTSA, Senior Services, TMA Services and Commuter Vanpool Services.

1. Riders

2. Revenue Hours

3. Revenue Miles

Page 32: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

32

4. Riders/Hour

5. Riders/Mile

6. Operating Cost

7. Overhead Costs

8. Total Costs

9. Operating Cost per Revenue Hour

10. Operating Cost per Rider

11. Revenues-fares only

12. Revenue-fares and contract income

13. Farebox Recovery-Fares only

14. Farebox Recovery-All Revenues

15. Average Fare/Rider

16. Average Subsidy per Rider-Fares only

17. Average Subsidy per Rider-All Revenues (transportation and other sources)

18. Entire Service- Number of Complaints

19. Entire Service- Number of Vehicle Breakdowns

20. Entire Service- Number of Accidents

2. TMA Services and Vanpool Services: Ride-On Transportation has developed a cost allocation plan

to recover their cost of operating the vehicles and providing the drivers on an hourly basis. Ride-On Transportation will track the income received from the Transportation Management Association (TMA) for their transportation services and the cost to the CTSA to provide the vehicles. If at the end of the year (June 30th), the cost of using the CTSA vehicles is greater than the income, then the CTSA will bill the TMA for the difference. These calculations will insure that the TDA funding received by Ride-On Transportation is only going towards CTSA Services.

3. State Controller’s Reports: Ride-On will only include the income from the TMA based on an hourly

rate for using the vehicles and drivers. Ride-On will use their financial reports from Ride-On to complete the Controller’s Report and will record the ridership numbers for the four categories: CTSA, RTA contract Services, TMA Services and Vanpool Services. The TMA Services and Vanpool Services costs beyond the use of the vehicles and drivers will be paid by the TMA.

4. Role of Ride-On as the Consolidated Transportation Services Agency (CTSA): Ride-On

Transportation is responsible for coordinating the delivery of social services transportation among local non-profit or government agencies serving specialized customers. As part of the annual TDA report, Ride-On Transportation shall give to SLOCOG an update on the progress made in the prior fiscal year on bringing new partners under its umbrella for the delivery of specialized transportation functions. This update shall as a minimum consist of a roster of CTSA-only members and the types of services which Ride-On provides to each of them. In addition, Ride-On Transportation is accountable for the proper allocation of state Article 4.5 TDA funds toward social services transportation; and to that effect will provide a breakdown of TDA dollars spent on each CTSA partner. This update shall be prepared annually at the end of each fiscal year together with the 4th quarter report.

5. Acknowledgment of SLOCOG as funding agency: Ride-On Transportation shall acknowledge

SLOCOG as a funding partner in CTSA services as appropriate in press releases, newsletter articles or other advertising.

Staff report prepared by Eliane Wilson OWP 12/13/Board agendas/April 13/D-5 Ride-On Performance monitoring

Page 33: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

33

Appendix B – Uses of LTF Funds

Local Transportation Funds (LTF) can be used as follows:

1. Off-the-top Contributions

a. Administration Allocations (Article 3, PUC 99233.1) - An amount approved in the annual Overall Work Program for SLOCOG to administer the requirements of the TDA, including but not limited to: 1) the annual Needs Assessment, 2) the annual Unmet Transit/Bikeways Needs hearings and evaluation, 3) the preparation and/or review and distribution of all TDA fiscal audits and State Controller’s Reports, audit reports or the trust funds, and the triennial performance audits.

b. Planning and Programming Allocation (Article 3, PUC 99233.2) - An amount allocated to SLOCOG to implement the Overall Work Program and to match federal grants. The SLOCOG Board approves this amount in the annual Overall Work Program.

c. Pedestrian and Bicycle Allocations (Article 3, PUC 99233.3) - Two percent of the remaining money in the LTF fund is made available to the Cities and the County for pedestrian and bicycle facilities; some of these funds may be used for bicycle safety education.

d. Community Transit Service Allocations (Article 3, PUC 99233.7) - Up to 5 percent of the remaining money in the LTF fund shall be made available to claimants including the CTSA for transit services which link intra-community origins and destinations for those, such as the disabled, who cannot use conventional transit services (per Article 4.5, PUC 99275 a) and b)).

2. Rural Transit Fund (RTF) – The RTF program involves an exchange of Federal Section 5311 funds

“swapped” with LTF funds within the Regional Transit Authority (RTA) budget. The exchange benefits the region by reducing federal processing requirements and allows rural areas to access transit capital funds. The exchange has no impact on the total amount of LTF required from the jurisdictions to operate the RTA. The RTF funds are essentially not provided to RTA so that they can be dispersed to the successful RTF grant award recipients. For a complete description of the RTF process, contact Peter Rodgers at SLOCOG at 781-5712.

3. All remaining funds from the LTF fund are allocated by population among the seven Cities and the

County for transportation purposes. Transportation purposes include: a. Public Transportation System (PUC 99262), which consists of fiscal audits, operations and

maintenance, planning and capital projects; b. Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities (PUC 99234); c. Streets and Roads (Article 8, PUC 99400 a); d. and other claims for operating and capital assistance for contract operation, such as

subsidized taxi programs (Article 8, PUC 99400 c) and e). Each claimant determines the distribution of these funds among the various funding categories.

Page 34: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

34

Appendix C – Claim Approval Letter

TDA Claim Approval Notification Date Name Org Address City, State, Zip Dear Name: Your TDA claim for FY 2013/2014 was:

Approved on .

Held pending receipt of: Upon approval, your Allocation Instruction will read as follows:

AUTHORIZATION DESCRIPTION AMOUNT

LTF ARTICLE 3 SECTION 99233.3 (Bikeways)

LTF ARTICLE 4 SECTION 99260 (Transit)

LTF ARTICLE 4 SECTION 99260 (Rural Transit Fund)

LTF ARTICLE 8 SECTION 99400 (a) (Road maint., other bike and pedestrian projects)

LTF ARTICLE 8 SECTION 99400 (c) (Misc. transp., allocations, senior van programs)

LTF ARTICLE 3 SECTION 99245 (Audit costs)

LTF ARTICLE 8 SECTION 99402 (Planning)

LTF. ARTICLE 4.5 SECTION 99275 (CTSA)

STA ARTICLE 6.5 SECTION 99314 (Revenue formula)

STA ARTICLE 6.5 SECTION 99313 (Discretionary)

TOTAL

Local Transportation Funds (LTF). You will receive one quarter of your direct LTF allocation within two weeks (upon availability of funds) and the remaining LTF allocation on a quarterly basis – upon receipt of your annual TDA audit and State Controller’s Report. These funds will be disbursed as they become available, approximately in December, April, and June. All RTA and SCT member LTF contributions will be made directly to RTA and SCT on your behalf, also on a quarterly basis, upon receipt of their annual claim and documents as noted above. State Transit Assistance (STA). Your agency is is not an STA recipient . Please contact Lori Kramer at 597-8024 if you have any questions about the fund disbursement process. H:\2013-14 OWP\1000 TDA\1100 TDA Admin\TDA Claim Approval ltr 13 14.doc

Page 35: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

35

Appendix D – Qualifying and Non-Qualifying Sources of Revenues Given below are different sources of operating revenues which qualify as “fares” for computing the farebox recovery ratio.

• Passenger fares collected by the provider. • Fare subsidies from a public or private entity: such as Try Transit Month subsidies from the Air

Pollution Control District, California Polytechnic State University, or North Cuesta College subsidies toward free rides by students.

• Local support-such as passenger donations and local business contributions made to benefit the

employees, customers, visitors, residents-such as Avila Beach Trolley.

• Parking revenues used as fare subsidies.

• Advertising revenues derived from the public transportation program such as local trolleys.

• Support from private non-profits to supplement discount or zero fares-such as Avila Beach Foundation.

All of the above sources of operating revenues are used to determine whether the Article 4 claimant meets the minimum required farebox recovery ratio(s). Other sources of operating revenues are part of the annual operating support for maintaining the levels and/or types of services provided by Article 4 claimants. Yet such sources do not qualify as “fares” for computing farebox recovery ratios; examples of “non-qualifying revenues” are:

• General operating assistance from a private entity-such as annual operating subsidies by a private employer, a developer, a shopping center, an educational institution or a hospital, when such funds are not used for services operated especially for the benefits of the entity.

• General operating assistance from a public body-such as annual operating subsidies by a public

employer, a university, when such funds are not dedicated to services operated especially for the benefits of such a body-such as Cuesta College operating support (general public services w/out fare subsidies toward the target group).

• Operating assistance grants (formula, discretionary or demonstration funds) from state or Federal

transportation agencies or grant matching funds from other non-transportation agencies (example: County Department of Social Services).

• In-kind services such as senior volunteer drivers.

• Parking in lieu fees.

Page 36: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

36

Appendix E – Local Contacts

General inquiries, local TDA issues, and claim filing: http://www.slocog.org/cm/Programs_and_Projects/Transit_Planning_and_Coordination/TDA_Administration.html

Pete Rodgers Eliane Wilson Administrative Chief Transportation Planner III San Luis Obispo Council of Governments San Luis Obispo Council of Governments 1114 Marsh St. 1114 Marsh St. San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Tel. 805.781.5712 Tel. 805.781.5711 Fax. 805. 781.5703 Fax. 805.781.5703 e-mail. [email protected] e-mail. [email protected] Lori Kramer Tim Gillham Administrative Services Officer Transportation Planner San Luis Obispo Council of Governments San Luis Obispo Council of Governments 1114 Marsh St. 1114 Marsh St. San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Tel. 805.597.8024 Tel. 805.781.1520 Fax. 805. 781.5703 Fax. 805.781.5703 e-mail. [email protected] e-mail. [email protected]

Performance Audits, Unmet Transit Needs Reports, Schedule of Triennial Audits:

Gordon Arruda, Associate Transportation Planner Department of Transportation Division of Mass Transportation (DMT) P.O. Box 942874 – MS 39 Room 3300 Sacramento, CA 94274-0001

• Tel. 916.654.9396 • [email protected]

Page 37: Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim Filing ... · APPENDIX F – SAMPLE OF FISCAL AUDITORS ..... 37. 3 INTRODUCTION This is an update to the July 2012 Transportation Development

37

Appendix F – Sample of Fiscal Auditors Pressley & Associates, Inc. 5001 California Ave., Suite 140 Bakersfield, CA 93309 Attn: Robert Schiffler, CPA John Barnhart, CPA 3183 Collins Drive, # B Merced, CA 95340 Kathi Niffenegger Glenn, Burdette, Phillips & Bryson 1150 Palm Street San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Ron Levy, CPA Moss Levy & Hartzheim, LLP 802 East Main Street Santa Maria, CA 93454 Carlos Reynoso, CPA 935 Riverside, Suite 8 Paso Robles, CA 93447 R.J. Riccardi, CPA 1000 Fourth Street, Suite 725 San Rafael, CA 94901 Terry E. Krieg, CPA 50 Old Courthouse Square, Suite 603 Santa Rosa, CA 95404 Meyer Hoffmon McCann 2301 Dupont Drive, #200 Irvine, CA 92612

J. Hayes Hayes & Hayes, CPAs 124 W. Carmen Lane, Suite A Santa Maria, CA 93454 Brown Armstrong Benjamin R. Reyes, Principal 4200 Truxtun Ave., #300 Bakersfield, CA 93409 Berryman & Henigar 11590 W. Bernardo Ct., #100 San Diego, CA 92127