View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Transmission of HIV-1Where Epidemiology Meets Biology
Myron S. Cohen, MD
J. Herbert Bate Professor
Medicine, Microbiology and Immunology and Epidemiology
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Epidemic Spread of HIV
Ro = bDC
When Ro >1 epidemic is sustained
b = Efficiency of transmission (…a biological event)
D = Duration of infectiousness
C = Number of people (partners) exposed
Transmission of HIV:Biological Requirements
Infectious Susceptibility
Inoculum (concentration) Hereditary resistance
Phenotypic factors Innate resistance
Acquired (immune)
resistance…from Cohen and Galvin
Nature Microbiology Reviews 2:33-42, 2004
UNC HIV Transmission Group
• The Swanstrom Lab (and CFAR)
• The Fiscus Lab
• The Eron Clinical Research Group (ACTG)
• The Kashuba Pharmacology Group
• The Hobb’s STD Research Group (CRC)
• The Hoffman Malawi Research Team
…and most recently the Margolis Lab
semensemenSI HIV (T-tropic)SI HIV (T-tropic)
NSI HIV (M-tropic)NSI HIV (M-tropic)
lamina proprialamina propriadendritic celldendritic cellCD4+CD4+CCR5+CCR5+DC-SIGN+DC-SIGN+
exposureexposureat mucosalat mucosalepitheliumepithelium
T cellT cell
CD4CD4
CCR5CCR5DC-SIGNDC-SIGN
migrationmigrationto lymphoid organsto lymphoid organs
V3 isn't variable for subtype C.
Routes of Exposure and H.I.V. INFECTION ROUTE RISK OF INFECTION
Sexual Transmissiona. Female-to-male transmission…………1 in 700 to 1 in 3,000b. Male-to-female transmission……...…..1 in 200 to 1 in 2,000c. Male-to-male transmission………...….1 in 10 to 1 in 1,600d. Fellatio??…………………………….. .0 (CDC) or 6% (SF)
Parenteral transmissiona. Transfusion of infected blood………….95 in 100b. Needle sharing………………………….1 in 150c. Needle stick…………………………..…1 in 200d. Needle stick /AZT PEP…………………1 in 10,000
Transmission from mother to infanta. Without AZT treatment………...…….1 in 4b. With AZT treatment………………….Less than 1 in 10
Royce, Sena, Cates and Cohen, NEJM 336:1072-1078, 1997
Coital Frequency per Month by Age
10.02
8.98 9.11
7.44
15-24 25-29 30-34 35-59
Age
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Co
ital
fre
qu
ency
per
Mo
nth
2.6%
9.4%
2.0%
6.0%
2.1%
4.0%3.6%
4.1%
2.3%
11.0%12.2%
7.9%5.8%
13.8%
4.1%
14.4%
31.2%
25.0%
28.9%
26.3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
55%
Age 15
Males
Females
95% Confidence Interval
Age 16 Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Age 23 Age 24
HIV Prevalence by Age and Gender among South African youth age 15-24 years
Pettifor A, et al. AIDS 2005, 19: 1525,
Pettifore et al. AIDS 2007 21:2007 862.
0
5
10
15
20
25
<=14 15 16 17 18 19 20+
Age of coital debut
Pe
rce
nta
ge
of
yo
un
g w
om
en
ou
t o
f to
tal p
op
ula
tio
n SA girls
US girls
Comparison of age of coital debut among young women aged 18-24 years in South Africa (SA) in 2003 and the United States (US) in 2002 (Pettifore et al., submitted)
Hypothesis
1) Estimated transmission rates from earlier studies are too low to explain the epidemic
2) HIV transmission is intermittently
AMPLIFIED by increased genital tract shedding
3) AMPLIFIED transmission is critical to the spread of HIV
Factors that Amplify HIV Transmission INFECTIOUSNESS• Stage of Disease … ACUTE INFECTION?• Systemic co-infections
-Malaria, Tuberculosis, Helminthic infections (?)• Genital Tract Changes -Bacterial vaginosis, STDs!!!• Circumcision • Hormonal contraception• Genetic factors (HLA B and C)SUSCEPTIBILITY• STDs!!!• Bacterial vaginosis• Inate immunity• Circumcision• Hormonal contraception• Genetic factors (CCR5)
A. Fauci, 2006
Why is Acute HIV Important? Pilcher and Cohen, J Clin Invest, 2005
• Vaccine Development (CHAVI)
• Prevention Opportunities (HPTN)
• Treatment
-for secondary prevention (HPTN)
-for viral load reduction (ACTG)
- to attack “persistance” (ACTG)
The acute retroviral syndrome
• 49-89% of patients “symptomatic” within 3 mos. Schacker Kinloch-de Loes
Fever 93% 87%Fatigue 93 26Pharyngitis 70 48Weight loss 70 13Myalgias 60 42Headache 55 39
….BUT LESS THAN 1,000 subjects with acute/early HIV have been reported out of 60,000,000 infected!!
EclipsePhase I II III IV V VI
Western + (p31+)
Western blot +/-
(Fiebig, AIDS 2003)v RNA+
Western blot + (p31-)*
* Env SGA sequence analysis of plasma virus populationTransmitted virus
Fiebig Classification of HIV-1 Infection
A
Individual testing on 10 specimens
10 pools of 10 screened
20 Screening Pools Tested
N=2000
Pooling Serum Specimensto Detect HIV RNA
(Pilcher et al JAMA 288:216-221, 2002)
NAAT+
-
F/U Testing(Ab+NAAT) - +
Acute HIVHIV Negative
-
EIA/WB +
LS-EIA at UNC
Likely recent “Detuned”
+
Unknown duration
-
Long Term HIV Positive
HIV Testing in North Carolina (n=109,250)
(Pilcher, Cohen et al NEJM 352: 1873, 2005
106 477 23
0123456789
10
Established HIV+ (n=66)
Acutely HIV + (n=21)
Lo
g H
IV R
NA
cp
/ml
median 209,18329,347
Viral Loads at Initial Detection
ADDED BENEFIT OF ROUTINE AHI SCREEINGLOCATION TESTING
POPULATIONN ANTIBODY + HIV
PREVALENCE, %INCREASED YIELD
WITH AHI, %
NORTH CAROLINA1 ALL PUBLIC TESTING
109,250 0.5 3.6
SAN FRANCISCO2 STD CLINIC 3075 3.4 10.5
LOS ANGELES3 STD CLINIC 1712 0.8 7.1
SEATTLE4 MSM ONLY 6395 2.4 13.5
ATLANTA5 VCT AND
STD CLINIC
2202 3 6.1
JOHANNESBERG, SOUTH AFRICA6
VCT AND
STD CLINIC
1906 35.2 1.8
LILONGWE, MALAWI7
STD CLILIC
MALE
929 46.8 5
LILONGWE, MALAWI8
STD CLINIC
ALL
1450 40.5 3.6
PORTO ALEGRE, BRAZIL9
VCT CLINIC 933 19.1 2.8
1PILCHER, 2KLAUSNER, 3PATEL, 4STEKLER, 5PRIDDY, 6STEVENTS, 7PILCHER, 8FISCUS, 9 deSOUZA
Infection by testing site: NC(Pilcher et al. NEJM, 2006)
0
50
100
150
200
250
STD HIV Testing
“Other” Prison,Jail
N= 44656 11688 7575 3053
Not shown: Prenatal/OB FP Drug Treatment General Medical TB Field visits
Acute
Recent
Unknown Duration
16/23 Acute Infections from STD Clinics
STDs Amplify HIV-1 Transmission• Reducing physical/mechanical barriers
• Increasing HIV in genital lesions, semen or both
• Evoking a more infectious HIV variant
• Increasing the number of receptor cells or the density of receptors per cell
…and co-transmission of HIV and STDs leading to clusters of subjects with acute HIV infection
Malawi Overview
• Population 10 million
• 90% rural
• Per Capita income $190
AIDS impact• 900,000 people living with HIV
• 15% adult prevalence
• STD Clinic: 47% prevalence
The Tidziwe Center Lilongwe Central HospitalLilongwe, Malawi
Dean Roper Visits Malawi
Acute HIV Infection and STDsPilcher et al. AIDS 18:1-8, 2004
• 1,361 men screened in STD and Dermatology Clinics in Lilongwe Malawi
• 47% antibody + (chronic HIV Infection)• 2.1% (28) with acute HIV (antibody -, RNA +)
Inguinal nodes: 11.4% acute HIV
Genital ulcer (HSV): 7.8% acute HIV
CSW exposure: 9.1% acute HIV
Acute HIV was detected ONLY in symptomatic STD patients (!!) implying co-transmission or “staged” transmission of an STI followed by HIV, or vice-versa.
0
2
4
6
8
10
Lo
g H
I V R
NA
cp
/ ml
HIV Ab+ HIV Ab- (acute)
Viral Loads in Malawi: Chronic and Acute HIV Infection
1
3
5
7
9
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28
log
10 H
IV-1
RN
A c
op
ies
per
mL
Weeks Since HIV infection
HIV-1 viremia (grey) and Semen (black) Pilcher et al. AIDS August 2007
Grey=Blood and Black=semen (95% CI)
HIV-1 Viremia and SheddingPilcher et al. AIDS August 2007
wk4 wk8 wk16
Established HIV Infection
CD4<350
1
3
5
7
9
CD4>350
Acute HIV Infection
log
10H
IV-1
RN
A c
opie
s p
er m
L
HIV
RN
A in
Sem
enH
IV R
NA
in S
emen
(Log
(Log
1010
copi
es/m
l) c
opie
s/m
l)
Acute Infection
Acute Infection
3 wks3 wks Asymptomatic
Asymptomatic
InfectionInfection
HIV Progression
HIV ProgressionAIDSAIDS
00
33
55
77
1/1000 - 1/1000 - 1/10,0001/10,000
1/500 - 1/500 - 1/20001/2000
1/100-1/100-1/10001/1000
Risk of TransmissionRisk of TransmissionReflects Reflects Genital Genital Viral Burden Viral Burden
1/30-1/30-1/2001/200
Sexual Transmission of HIV (Cohen and Pilcher, JID May 2005)
HIV
RN
A in
Sem
enH
IV R
NA
in S
emen
(Log
(Log
1010
copi
es/m
l) c
opie
s/m
l)
Acute Infection
Acute Infection
3 wks3 wks STD Episode
STD Episode
STD Episode
STD EpisodeAIDSAIDS
00
33
55
77
Acute HIV and STD episodes(Cohen and Pilcher, JID, 2005
Prevention of HIV1. STD control, behavior change, condoms2. Vaccines (Trials Ongoing) 3. Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis (Planning)4. Topical microbicides (Trials Ongoing)5. The diaphragm (Trial Completed)6. Male circumcision (Trials Ongoing)7. HSV-2 treatment/prevention (Trials Ongoing) 8. Antiretroviral therapy (Trials Ongoing)9. Societal (structural) interventions: needle
exchange, poverty reversal, etc…ALL WORK
Impact of MC on HIV : Evidence from observational studies and RCTs
85 80 70 60 .50 1
Reduction of risk
(95% CI)
South Africa (RCT) 60 ( 76, 33)
Kenya (RCT) 59 ( 76, 30)
Uganda (RCT) 51 ( 82, 14)
Overall 58 ( 66, 48)15
17
1
1
Reduction of risk (0%)
Bailey et al. Lancet 2007; 369: 643–56
Weiss et al. AIDS 2000, 14:2361-70
Auvert et al. PLoS Med 2005(11): e298.2006
Gray et al. Lancet, 2007, 657–66
Antiviral TherapyCohen et al. Annals Internal Med. 2007
Effect on Sexual Transmission of HIV
?
ART to Prevent Sexual Transmission of HIV
• Treatment of the infected person?
• Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP)?
• Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PREP)?
NFV (5%)
LPV (5%)
SQV (3%)
EFV (3%)
RTV (3%)
d4T (2%)
ENF (ND)
Male Genital Tract Exposure percent of blood plasma
Kashuba et al. and CROI 13 Abstract 569 (Vourvahis), 13th CROIAbstracts 396 (Stekler), Abstract 618 (Katzenstein)
IDV (100%)
NVP (70%)APV (20%)
0 50% 100% 150% 200% 500% 600%
TDF (500%) 3TC (600%)ZDV (200%)ABC (150%)
NNRTIPI FINRTI
NVP (80%)
APV (50%)
ABC (40%)
ABC (150%)
Female Genital Tract Exposure(percent of blood plasma)
Dumond et al. Abstract 129, 13th CROI
ZDV (200%)
IDV (200%)
0 200% 400% 600%
TDF (400%)
3TC (400%)
NNRTIPINRTI
LPV (30%)
ATV (30%)
RTV (20%)
DLV (20%)
FTC (600%)ddI (100%)
SQV(ND)
EFV (0.6%)
d4T (4%)
HIV-RNAHIV-RNA HIV-DNAHIV-DNA
00
2020
4040
6060
8080
100100
Pa
tient
s (%
) w
ithP
atie
nts
(%)
with
det
ect
ab
le H
IV in
se
me
nd
ete
cta
ble
HIV
in s
em
en
n=55n=55
n=114n=114
Controls (drug naive) Controls (drug naive)
Potent ARTPotent ART
p<0.0001p<0.0001
p=0.025p=0.025
ART Suppresses HIV in Semen:ART Suppresses HIV in Semen:Biological PlausabilityBiological Plausability
Vernazza, Cohen Vernazza, Cohen et al.,et al., AIDS, 2000 AIDS, 2000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140
25
50
75
100
Number of rectal exposures
% U
nin
fect
ed a
nim
als
Controls (n = 18)
Injectable FTC (n = 6); p = 0.005 [HR = 3.9]
Injectable FTC/Tenofovir (n = 6)
Oral truvada (n = 6); p = 0.0004 [HR = 7.8]
Oral TDF (n = 4); p = 0.095
Potential end-points of HIV-vaccine efficacy trials
UNAIDS–97100 1 August 1998
“normal” infectionwith variable levels
of viral load
no protection
no infection
protection against HIVsterilizing immunity
protection against disease (modification of the course of HIV infection in vaccine recipients)
initial infection“controlled”
establishment of chronic infection with low viral load
This CHAVI web site is at http://www.chavi.org
Interdisciplinary CHAVI 001 Studies
CHAVI 001Acute HIV-1 Infection
T Cell DiscoveryGood vs. Bad T cells
B Cell DiscoveryAntibody Studies
Genetic Data
Sexual BehavioralSexual NetworksSexual Dynamics
Transmitted SequencesViral Biology
Structural Biology
Apoptosis
Computational BiologyRo Analyses
Mucosal ImmunityInnate Immunity
Cytokines
HIV- Acute HIV
• Massive reduction in mucosal CD4+ T cells even in acute infection
The Consequences of Acute Infection
Douek and Schacker 2004J Exp Med
Onset of Innate Immune Responses During Acute HIV-1
Infection
(Kessler/Borrow/Norris)
Summary of changes in plasma cytokine levels in AHI
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
Time relative to T100
Vira
l loa
d or
cyt
okin
e le
vel
IFN
Plasma viraemia
IL-15
IL-18 TNF
IFN
IL-10
SAA elevated
Apoptosis of CCR5+, CD4+ T Cells is a Hallmark of
Pathogenic Retrovirus Infections
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
0
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
Transmission
Vir
us
Conce
ntr
ati
on in E
xtr
ace
llula
r Fl
uid
or
Pla
sma (
Copie
s/m
l)
Tumor Necrosis Factor Related Apoptosis Inducing Ligand (TRAIL) And Apoptosis In
Acute HIV-1 Infection
Time Post Exposure (days)
0 5 10 15 20 30 3525 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Pla
sma M
arke
rs
TRAIL
Plasma Apoptotic Microparticles
Window of Opportunity
Viral Load
Smith, Crossman, Haynes, 2007
Onset of Antibody Responses in Acute HIV-1 Infection
Summary Of Antibody Responses Immediately Following Acute HIV-1
Infection
0
2
4
6
8
10
-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Viral Load
gp41 gp140 Env V3 CD4BS
2F5, 4E10,2G12
Transmission
Non-Neutralizing MPER
Cluster II
Vir
al L
oa
d O
r A
ntib
ody
Re
spo
nse
s
Days Of Observation
Autologous NAb
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
0
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
Transmission
Vir
us
Conce
ntr
ati
on in E
xtr
ace
llula
r Fl
uid
or
Pla
sma (
Copie
s/m
l)CD8 T Cell Responses In Acute HIV-1
Infection: Too Little Too Late
Time Post Exposure (days)
0 5 10 15 20 30 3525 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
Anti-HIV-1CTL Activity
CTL A
ctivity
Viral Load
Window of Opportunity
Limit of detection of
assay for plasma virus
R. Koup, D. Watkins, A. McMichael et al.
Acute HIV and the Virus
• A unique signature sequence using single gene amplification?
• Glycosylation sites?
• Antibody neutralization resistance?
• Envelope length?
• Transmitted drug resistance?
The Transmitted Virus HIV Env Characterization by SGA
The Transmitted Virus HIV Env Characterization by SGA
cDNAsynthesiscDNA
synthesis
1:21:2
1:41:41:81:8
1:161:161:321:321:641:64
1:1281:1281:2561:256
100%100%
100%100%100%100%92%92%67%67%33%33%17%17%0%0%
sequencesequencegenotypegenotype
phenotypephenotypeclone/
pseudotypeclone/
pseudotype
1:641:64
serial dilutionsserial
dilutions
The Transmitted/Early Virus-The First 15 Days of Infection
• In 77 subjects (80%), one monophyletic env lineage, suggesting productive infection by a single viral infectious unit.
• In 19 subjects (20%), more than one monophyletic env lineage was identified, indicating productive infection by multiple viral infectious units.
• In 13 (14%) multiply infected subjects, recombinants were identified.
The Transmitted/Early Virus-The First 15 Days of Infection
• Sensitive to MPER antibodies 2F5, 4E10
• Sensitive to HIV-1 entry drugs, Fuzeon (T20) and T1249
• Variably sensitive to sCD4, HIV Ig, Mab 1b12
• Insensitive to V3 antibodies
• R5 co-receptor usage
Phylogenetic analysis of SGA-derived env from donor blood/semen vs. recipient plasma
X4-tropic
R5-tropic
1. 36 amplicons from donor blood—4.7% nucleotide diversity 11-X4 tropic, 25 R-tropic2. 15 amplicons from donor semen (S)—1.5% nucleotide diversity all X4-tropic3. 29 amplicons from recipient blood—0.2% nucleotide diversity all X4-tropic
Results:
Conclusions:1. Single X4-tropic variant transmitted2. Recipient env populations were extremely homogenous3. Donor env populations are heterogenoeous4. Semen compartment has significantly less diversity and localized enrichment of variants vs. blood plasma5. Transmission of X4-tropic variant that was detected in donor blood and not semen, suggests cell-associated vs. transmission of minor variant
Treatment of Acute HIV??Walker et al., 2004, Kinloch-de Loes, JID 2006
• Many examples of lack of benefit measured by REBOUND VIREMIA (Streck et al. JID, 2006)
• AIDRP and CASCADE: Some modest benefit?• SPARTAC ongoing (Fidler, Weber et al.)
…But remember limited by
i) small n
ii) subject heterogeneity
iii) rebound as the definition of success/failure
Effects of ART on “The Latent Pool” Margolis: AHI (CROI 2007, Triangles) Chun: Early HIV (JID 2007, Squares)
UNC HIV Transmission Group
• The Swanstrom Lab (and CFAR)
• The Fiscus Lab
• The Eron Clinical Research Group (ACTG)
• The Kashuba Pharmacology Group
• The Hobb’s STD Research Group (CRC)
• The Hoffman Malawi Research Team