Transforming DERP Panel: Army Perspectiveproceedings.ndia.org/JSEM2006/Wednesday/Newsome.pdf · JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 8 of 7 14 Feb 06 FUDS Program • Army Environmental

JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 1 of 7 14 Feb 06

Transforming DERP Panel:Transforming DERP Panel:Army PerspectiveArmy Perspective

Mr. Rick NewsomeOffice of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army

(Environment, Safety and Occupational Health)

March 22, 2006


TopicsTopics

• Military Munitions Response Program

• Performance-Based Contracting

• Formerly Used Defense Sites Program

• BRAC 2005 & Army Transformation


Military Munitions Response ProgramMilitary Munitions Response Program

FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011

Dol

lars

• Inventory completed as required by Congress• DoD Goals:

– Complete Preliminary Assessments by EOY 2007; Sites Inspections by EOY 2010

• Munitions Response Prioritization Protocol:– Used to assign relative priority; sequencing for

responses– Involves stakeholders in process

• Cross-over of Army IRP to MMRP in POMIRP

MMRP


MMRP Site InspectionsMMRP Site Inspections

• DoD goal: complete SIs by FY2010– Active Sites SI Schedule (154 total) funded by

FY08– FUDS Program SI Schedule (765 total) with

funding thru FY10 at $25M/year

• Need for State involvement in review of SIs and application of Munitions Response Site Prioritization Protocol


What is PBC?What is PBC?• Performance-Based Contracting (PBC) -

mechanism that solicits bids on basis of what RESULTS that you want achieved rather than what ACTIVITIES you want conducted:– Contract for “What,” not “How”

• Characteristics of PBC:– Clearly defined performance expectations and measures

(baseline vs. expected results)– Clearly defined due dates & milestones– Use of incentives for performance– Flexibility in exchange for accountability for results

• Army retains Environmental Liability• Regulators concur with remedy selection and

response complete


Army PBC ResultsArmy PBC Results

PBC Accomplishments (F01 – FY05)• 36 installation at 541 sites

21%Cost Avoidance (from IGE)34%Cost Avoidance (from CTC)

$478$608$723541Cumulative

Contract Award

IGE ($M)

CTC ($M)

# of Sites

IGE = Independent Government Estimate


Formerly Used Defense Sites ProgramFormerly Used Defense Sites Program

• Focus on near-term DoD goals:– Complete SIs by FY2010; Achieve Response

Complete or Remedy-in-Place at all hazard Waste sites by 2020

– $18.7B cost-to-complete; largest amongst Services• MMRP CTC - $12.9B• HTRW CTC - $ 3.2B

– Projects inventory requiring action:• IRP site count = 1,123• MMRP site count = 1,177

• FUDS funding:– FY06 appropriation = $254 million– FY07 budget request = $243 million


FUDS ProgramFUDS Program

• Army Environmental Cleanup Strategic Plan– Applies to Active sites, BRAC, FUDS , and

Compliance Cleanup– Provides goals, objectives, and metrics

• Program Management Plans:– Focus on RIP/RC goal & phase progress– Emphasis on Statewide MAPs

o By end of FY05 36 SMAPs complete/underwayo 7 planned (DC, MD, MT, NH, RI, TN, and VI) in FY06

– Take away … FUDS Program making demonstrative progress, but dependent on funding

FUDS


Army Force TransformationArmy Force Transformation

IGPBS = Integrated Global Presence & Basing Strategy


Army BRAC 2005 SnapshotArmy BRAC 2005 Snapshot

76 Installations Touched by BRAC 800+ Individual Actions in BRAC Recommendations

• 53 Installation Realignments• 50 Active Installations• 3 Reserve Garrisons

• 8 Leased Facilities Closed

• 125 New Armed Forces Reserves Centers

• 13 Full Closures• 5 HQ Installations• 3 Chemical Depots• 4 Ammunition Plants• 1 Reserve Garrison

• 211 Guard Closures• 175 Reserve Closures


BRAC 2005 ProcessBRAC 2005 Process

IntegratesIGPBS

Army Modular ForceInstallation Military Value

Doctrinal EfficienciesJoint Initiatives

Closure Activities

NEPA MILCON

RealignmentClosure

Community Engagement and Reuse Planning

Realigned orClosed

within 6 Yrs

Congress approved BRAC November 2005

Environmental Remediation

Disposed / Transferred ASAP


Joint and MultiJoint and Multi--ComponentComponent

Ft Knox

Ft Benning

Ft MonroeFt Lee

HoffmanBldgs

Ft Jackson

Ft Eustis

Redstone

Aberdeen Proving Ground

AFNavy

AFNavy

ReserveCenter

Ft L’Wood

BRIGADECOMBAT

TEAM

Drill Sgt

Drill Sgt

CulinaryArts

HumanResourcesCommand

TRADOC

ChaplainsSchools

Ordnance School

Accession CommandCadet Command

ArmorSchool

Munitions &Missiles Center

Transportation School

Integrated Global Presence and Basing Study


What Does BRAC 2005 Mean to States?What Does BRAC 2005 Mean to States?

• BRAC is different Funding source:– Identify affected installations in your state and adjust

Attachment A and JEP to ensure smooth transition of funds and activities

• Army Program Management shifting for closing installations: – For Cleanup from USAEC to office on Army Staff (BRAC

Division)– For Compliance from Lead organizations to BRACD

• Army approach - cleanup to like reuse:– Local Redevelopment Authority may proposed reuse

which may require more stringent clean up Environmental Services Cooperative Agreements (ESCA)


Implementing SustainabilityImplementing Sustainability

• Sets course to sustain Army (mission and success) in future

• Requires Army to systematically think and act to integrate mission, ENV, & community

““The Army Strategy for The Army Strategy for the Environment”the Environment”

https://www.asaie.army.mil/Public/IE/default.htmlor

Look at for Army Sustainability display


Army Sustainability InitiativesArmy Sustainability Initiatives• Developed Sustainable Range or Installation

Environmental Activity Responsibilities Matrix• Chartered HQDA Sustainability Committee • Developed Installation Sustainability Plans with

25 year goals at 12 Installations • Developed Army Strategic Planning Model

Inculcating Sustainability into Strategic Plans at IMA installations

• Developing Army Sustainability Campaign Plan:– Sustainability Website:

(https://www.asaie.army.mil/Public/IE/default.html)– Sustainability Poster– Training Video


"Sustain the Mission - Secure the Future"

The Cleanup EquationThe Cleanup Equation

Triple Bottom

Line


Summary

• Army’s cleanup effort is driven by Environmental Cleanup Strategic Plan

• Focus on achieving:– Site Response Complete– Completing SIs

• For FUDS program, emphasis on Statewide MAPs

• BRAC 2005 will challenge all to meet Congressional execution deadlines


BackupBackup


PBC Proposed FY06 PBC Proposed FY06 Candidates

• Aberdeen Proving Ground (Canal Creek) MD

• Fort Richardson / Haines Terminal, AK

• Badger AAP, WI• Dugway Proving Ground, UT• Fort Bragg, NC• Fort Campbell, KY• Fort Story, Fort Lee and Fort

Eustis, VA• Fort Leonard Wood, MO

• Fort McClellan, AL • Fort Riley, KS• Hawthorne Army Depot, NV• Kansas AAP, KS• Letterkenny AD, PA• Picatinny Arsenal (ARDEC), NJ• Radford, VA• Volunteer AAP, TN• White Sands Missile Range, NM• Remedial Action Operation/

Long Term Monitoring (RA(O)/LTM)


Scope of FUDS Program by StateScope of FUDS Program by State

NH 11

MA 112

CT 22RI 42

NJ 47

DC 27

DE 11MD 43

OK55

TX218

AR14

LA24

NC 39TN 24

AL28

MS35

GA46

SC31

FL170

NV41 UT

19

CA482 AZ

103NM143

WA69

MT19

ND4

SD33WY

22

WI25ID

20

MN20

OR29

IA13NE

55CO30 KS

73MO28

ME64

VT 6

NY91

PA68

WV10 VA

43

IN17

OH32

IL65

KY 5

MI66

HI68

AK130

•Northern Mariana Islands 19•Palau (PT) 0•Puerto Rico (PR) 25•U.S. Virgin Islands (VI) 6•American Samoa (AS) 8•Guam (GM) 16

Total Number of Properties Requiring Response Action: 2,965Data: FY05 Defense ENV Program Annual Report to Congress


BRAC 2005 (Major Closures)

Reserves • Charles E. Kelly Spt Ctr, PA• Vancouver Barracks, WA

• Lease – Army Judge Advocate General Agency, VA

• Lease – Crystal City Complex, VA • Lease – Headquarters Army Test and Evaluation Command, VA

• Lease – Hoffman Building, VA • Lease – Rosslyn Complex, VA • Lease – Army Personnel Center, MO

• Ft Gillem, GA • Ft McPherson, GA • Ft Monmouth, NJ • Ft Monroe, VA • Walter Reed Army Medical Center, DC• Kansas Army Ammunition Plant, KS • Lone Star Army Ammunition Plant, TX • Mississippi Army Ammunition Plant, MS • Riverbank Army Ammunition Plant, CA • Umatilla Chemical Depot, OR • Deseret Chemical Plant, UT • Newport Chemical Depot, IN • US Army Garrison – Selfridge, MI


BRAC 2005 (Major Re-alignments)

• Fort Knox, KY• Fort Jackson, SC

• Watervliet Arsenal, NY• Fort Huachuca, AZ• Tobyhanna Army Depot, PA• Fort Hood, TX• Soldier Systems Center, Natick, MA• Fort Eustis, VA• Sierra Army Depot, CA• Fort Dix, NJ• Rock Island Arsenal, IL• Fort Campbell, KY• Redstone Arsenal, AL• Fort Buchanan, PR• Lima Tank Plant, OH• Fort Bragg, NC• Fort Wainwright, AK• Fort Bliss, TX• Fort Sill, OK• Fort Benning, GA• Fort Sam Houston, TX• Fort Belvoir, VA• Fort Rucker, AL• Detroit Arsenal, MI• Fort Richardson, AK• Corpus Christi Army Depot, TX• Fort McCoy, WI• Bailey’s Crossroads Lease Site, VA• Fort Lewis, WA• Anniston Army Depot, AL• Fort Leonard Wood, MO• Adelphi Laboratory, MD• Fort Lee, VA• Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD


RABS for BRAC 2005

Reserves Charles E. Kelly Spt Ctr - NOVancouver Barracks – NO

Property Transfer RealignmentsRed River Army Depot – YESWatervliet Arsenal - NO

Ft Gillem - NO Ft McPherson – NO Ft Monmouth - YESFt Monroe - NO Walter Reed Med Ctr - NO Kansas AAAP – NO Lone Star AAP – NOMississippi AAP – NO Riverbank AAP – NO Umatilla Chemical Depot - YESDeseret Chemical Depot - YESNewport Chemical Depot - YESArmy Garrison Selfridge – NO


Installation Restoration ProgramInstallation Restoration Program

• Focus on DoD goals of Remedy-in-Place/ Response Complete targets

• Efficiency initiatives:– Performance Based contracting focusing on cost

and time savings• Environmental liabilities:

– Chief Financial Officer Act of 1990 requires federal agencies to report liabilities

– Supporting documentation and supervisory controls are key

– Real property reconciliation

Documents

Transforming DERP Panel: Army Perspectiveproceedings.ndia.org/JSEM2006/Wednesday/Newsome.pdf · JSEM 2006 – Transforming DERP Panel 8 of 7 14 Feb 06 FUDS Program • Army Environmental