Upload
arch
View
44
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Trace-based Evaluation of Rate Adaptation Schemes in Vehicular Environments. Kevin C. Lee WiVeC 2010, 5/17/10. Rate Adaptation Overview. The 802.11 a/b/g/n standards allow the use of multiple transmission rates 802.11b, 4 rate options (1,2,5.5,11Mbps) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Trace-based Evaluation of Rate Adaptation Schemes in Vehicular
EnvironmentsKevin C. Lee
WiVeC 2010, 5/17/10
Rate Adaptation Overview
• The 802.11 a/b/g/n standards allow the use of multiple transmission rates– 802.11b, 4 rate options (1,2,5.5,11Mbps)– 802.11a, 8 rate options (6,9,12,18,24,36,48,54
Mbps)– 802.11g, 12 rate options (11a set + 11b set)
• The method to select the transmission rate in real time is called “Rate Adaptation”
Why Rate Adaptation?
• Ideally, the transmission rate should be adjusted according to the channel condition
Sender Receiver
54MbpsSignal is good
12MbpsSignal is weaker
Motivation
• MANY rate adaptation algorithms yet no fair comparison– Unrealistic propagation (unrealistic)– Dynamic changing conditions (non-repeatable)– Long system setup and device driver
implementation (impractical)
Framework & Goal
Physical Layer
MAC Layer
Use field-collected SNR to replace synthetic value
Implementation of various rate adaptations schemes
Realistic SNR to reflect the environment
Rapid deployment independent of hardware spec
Implementation of different application Application Layer
…
Repeatable evaluation of rate adaptation schemes
Physical Layer
• Collect SNR traces from moving cars– Server broadcasts @ 6Mbps– 2 Clients receive and record SNR
• Increase range and power of signal with an external 7dBM antenna
• Replace SNR logic with SNR from the field
• Derive BER and then bit error probability
Trace Collection
• Traces from 3 different areas: City, Residential, and Highway
Trace Collection Map
Static Traffic Route
• Car A centered at the mid point, stationary• Car B and C move back and forth toward and
away from A
Rate Adaptation Schemes Implementation
• RRAA-DYN adjusts rates before the current estimation windowm
Static Traffic Route Result
• SNR from 440s to 540s
• 40 seconds to complete one loop
• Signal strengthdirectly proportional to the distance between them
Instantaneous Throughput for All Algorithms
• Packet-based rate adaption schemes react similarly to the SNR-based scheme (RAM)
• Sample rate plateau from 460-470s and 500-530s
Throughput in Different Transmission Rates
• Throughput increases with transmission rate• ARF, RRAA-DYN, and RAM top 3• AMRR and Sample bottom 2
Rate Distribution for All Schmes• 6Mbps occupies the largest fraction for top 3
schemes but there are other rates => short-term lossy channel
• Sample & AMRR can’t adapt to short-term fluctuation
Success of ARF
• Comes from the fact that rate increases conservatively and decreases drastically
• Not too good if the channel condition does not change frequently
• Conclusion: Packet-based scheme does a subpart job because of fixed parameters of packet statistics; adaptive parameters to improve
Impact of Environments
• Throughput degradation from residential, highway, city; speed & traffic density play a factor
• RRAA-DYN beats RRAA & RRAA-BASIC=> changing trans-mission wind. helpsimprove responsive-ness
Impact of Propagation Model• Rayleigh has higher throughput b/c it considers
fading where there is no dominant propagation along a line of sight between transmitter and receiver
• A more accurate prop. model to useb/c lead car and trailing car are oftenseparated by cars in between
Conclusion
• An integrated framework that utilizes empirical data collected from the testbed to objectively compare different rate adaption schemes– Repeatable– Rapid– Realistic