21
TOPDRIM: Update WP2 March 2013 Rick Quax, Peter M.A. Sloot

TOPDRIM: Update WP2

  • Upload
    elga

  • View
    49

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

March 2013. Rick Quax, Peter M.A. Sloot. TOPDRIM: Update WP2. Outline. Our research so far ( bird’s eye view) Information dissipation (ID) in networks ID in immune response to HIV ID in financial market Addressing WP2 tasks Ideas for collaboration. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: TOPDRIM: Update WP2

TOPDRIM: Update WP2

March 2013

Rick Quax, Peter M.A. Sloot

Page 2: TOPDRIM: Update WP2

Outline

• Our research so far (bird’s eye view)

• Information dissipation (ID) in networks

• ID in immune response to HIV

• ID in financial market• Addressing WP2 tasks• Ideas for collaboration

Page 3: TOPDRIM: Update WP2

Our view of a complex system

node dynamics + complex network = complex system

+ =

Each node has a statewhich it changes over time

Nodes interact with each otheri.e., their states influence each other

The system behavior is complexcompared to an individual node

Page 4: TOPDRIM: Update WP2

Our view of a complex system

node dynamics + complex network = complex system

+ =

Each node has a statewhich it changes over time

Nodes interact with each otheri.e., their states influence each other

The system behavior is complexcompared to an individual node

problem

Page 5: TOPDRIM: Update WP2

Information processing in complex systems

Node A Node B

state state

interaction

• Let’s say the state of A influences the state of B…

Page 6: TOPDRIM: Update WP2

Information processing in complex systems

Node A Node B

state state

interaction

• We would like to ‘see’ influence spreading

Page 7: TOPDRIM: Update WP2

Information processing in complex systems

• Different influences spread through the network simultaneously

Node A

state state

interactionNode B

Node C

state

Node D

state

How to makemake this quantitative?

Page 8: TOPDRIM: Update WP2

Solution: information theory?

Node A

state

Entropy:

( ) logA i A ii

H A p p (H )

Mutual information

( ; ) ( ) ( | )I A B H B H B A (I Node A

state

Node B

state

; )

How much informationis stored in A?

How much informationin A is also in B?

(pitfall: MI = causality + correlation)

Page 9: TOPDRIM: Update WP2

Information dissipation

Info

rmat

ion

diss

ipat

ion

time

Information dissipation length

measures of influence of a single nodeto the behavior of the entire network!

How long is the informationabout a node’s state

retained in the network?

How far can the informationabout a node’s state reach

before it is lost?

Page 10: TOPDRIM: Update WP2

Our research #1

Page 11: TOPDRIM: Update WP2

Information dissipation time

• Node dynamics: (local) Gibbs measure

• I.e., edges represent an interaction potential to

which a node can quasi-equilibrate• Network structure

• Large

• Randomized beyond degree distribution

• grows less than linear in

1( | ,...) exp ( , )t t ti j j

j

p s x s E x s

maxk N

Page 12: TOPDRIM: Update WP2

Results: analytical and numerical

Number of interactionsof a node

Info

rmat

ion

diss

ipat

ion

time

D(s

)of

a n

ode

s

proof: D(s) will eventually bea decreasing function of ks

Page 13: TOPDRIM: Update WP2

Our research #2

Page 14: TOPDRIM: Update WP2

Susceptibility of HIV immuneresponse to perturbation

Cell types in immune responseand their interactions

Susceptibility of immune system

0 0provirus( );CD4( )I t t t

Agent-based simulations

IDT

Page 15: TOPDRIM: Update WP2

Our research #3

Page 16: TOPDRIM: Update WP2

Leadingindicatorin financialmarkets

We are now working onan agent-based model ofbanks that create a dynamic network of IRS contracts, to studycritical transitions

Page 17: TOPDRIM: Update WP2

How this fit the Tasks in WP2

Page 18: TOPDRIM: Update WP2

Task 2.1

• “(…) In particular, UvA will derive an analytical expression for the information dissipation.”

• We have defined and analyzed both information dissipation time as well as information dissipation length• IDT in review process at J. R. Soc. Interface

• IDL in review process at Scientific Reports

1

1

log log( ) , wherelog

( ) .1 ( )

i

k

ki i

i s

ID sI

k p k IIk H i

1

1

( ) ( ), where

( ) ( | )j

k

t tj i k

I U k k T k

T k I s s

( 1) ( ) where a 1.T k a T k

Page 19: TOPDRIM: Update WP2

Task 2.2

Susceptibility of immune system

Cell types in immune responseand their interactions

• “UvA will study the decay rate of information as function of noise to identify it as a universal measure of how susceptible the system is to noise (…) for a variety of network topologies”

• We did not yet start this exact task– Possible collaboration: compare this measure

with the ‘barcode’ of the network– We are exploring an implementation in the

Computational Exploratory (Sophocles)• However, we are studying a more specific problem:

• “How susceptible is the HIV immune response to perturbations (such as therapy) over time?”

• Application: at which moment in time should HIV-treatment be started?

• ‘Complex’ network in the sense that thenode dynamics are complex, not the network topology

Page 20: TOPDRIM: Update WP2

Task 2.3

• “UvA will develop a critical dissipation threshold which any system must exceed before it can transition as a whole.”

• We do not (yet) have an analytical expression for a threshold

• We have studied the use of ‘information dissipation length’ to detect a critical transition (Lehman Brothers) in the financial derivatives market (real data)

• In revision process at Scientific

Reports

Page 21: TOPDRIM: Update WP2

Task 2.4

• Refine and integrate• …