13
Washington’s Tolling Program Lessons Learned from Project Delays U Joint Legislative and Audit and Review Committee August 14, 2013 David Dean, Deputy Director of Performance Audit Susan Hoffman, Principal Performance Auditor

Tolling across the United States

  • Upload
    les

  • View
    56

  • Download
    5

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Washington’s Tolling Program L essons Learned from Project Delays U Joint Legislative and Audit and Review Committee August 14, 2013 David Dean, Deputy Director of Performance Audit Susan Hoffman, Principal Performance Auditor. Tolling across the United States. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Tolling across the United States

Washington’s Tolling ProgramLessons Learned from Project Delays

UJoint Legislative and Audit and Review Committee

August 14, 2013

David Dean, Deputy Director of Performance AuditSusan Hoffman, Principal Performance Auditor

Page 2: Tolling across the United States

2

Washington is one of four states to adopt statewide all-electronic tolling

Tolling across the United States

Page 3: Tolling across the United States

3

What lessons can be learned from WSDOT’s development and implementation of statewide all-electronic tolling?

Audit Question

Page 4: Tolling across the United States

4

• WSDOT’s comprehensive accounting requirements were new to the tolling industry

• Internal project stakeholders disagreed: o Purchasing a toll collection serviceo Developing an IT and accounting system to collect

tolls

• WSDOT feared losing federal grant funds if they did not meet deadlines

Complicating factors

Page 5: Tolling across the United States

5

What we found

3. Hold the vendor accountable to the contract

Identified risks were not fully incorporated

1. Fully assess and manage project risks

2. Proactively manage and monitor the work

Ineffective project and vendor management

Delayed assessing damages

Page 6: Tolling across the United States

6

1 – Risks not fully integrated into planning

WSDOT recognized some project risks but… • Consensus scoring diminished the advice of

subject-area experts

• Proposal scoring was not weighted to align with identified risks

Page 7: Tolling across the United States

7

1 – Identified risks were not fully integrated into planning

Category Maximum Points

Qualifications 100

Program Delivery Approach 350

Technical Approach (350 total)

• Toll Operations 87.5

• Customer Service 87.5

• Accounting/Financial 87.5

• Information Technology 87.5

Subtotal 800

Price 200

Total 1,000

High risk areas should be given added weight in scoring 

Category Maximum Points

Qualifications 100

Program Delivery Approach 350

Technical Approach (350 total)

• Toll Operations 87.5

• Customer Service 87.5

• Accounting/Financial 87.5

• Information Technology 87.5

Subtotal for qualifications 800

Price 200

Total 1,000

Page 8: Tolling across the United States

8

1 – Identified risks were not fully integrated into planning

Category Maximum Points

Winning Vendor

Qualifications 100 25

Program Delivery Approach 350 42

Technical Approach (350 total)

• Toll Operations 87.5 22

• Customer Service 87.5 13

• Accounting/Financial 87.5 4.5

• Information Technology 87.5 35

Subtotal 800 141.5

Price 200 200

Total 1,000 341.5

High risk area received lowest score 

Category Maximum Points

Qualifications 100

Program Delivery Approach 350

Technical Approach (350 total)

• Toll Operations 87.5

• Customer Service 87.5

• Accounting/Financial 87.5

• Information Technology 87.5

Subtotal for qualifications 800

Price 200

Total 1,000

Page 9: Tolling across the United States

9

WSDOT developed a sound project management plan, but follow-through was ineffective

• Project staff response to vendor problems: reduce reviews, take on some of the vendor’s work

• Some WSDOT managers ignored the plan, dealing directly with the vendor

• Changes to the project management structure created more confusion, for staff and vendor alike

2 – Ineffective project management

Page 10: Tolling across the United States

10

The project contract tied damages to major milestones

• WSDOT feared applying damages could:o Risk losing federal fundingo Lead vendor to withdraw

• In 2011, WSDOT reduced vendor payments by $1.5 million

• In June 2012, WSDOT and the vendor reached a financial settlement valued at up to $6.4 million

3 – Delayed assessing damages

Page 11: Tolling across the United States

11

• The Toll Division lacked clear roles, responsibilities, and decision-making authority

• The Toll Division lacked executive support in managing the vendor

• The Toll Division lacked policies and procedures to guide the effective development and implementation of the project

Lessons learned: New division needed clarity, authority

The Toll Division was created in 2009, responsible for development and operation of tolling systems

Page 12: Tolling across the United States

12

• The Secretary ensure roles, responsibilities, and decision-making authority are clear for projects managed by the Toll Division

• The Assistant Secretary for Tolling establish policies and procedures to guide developing and implementing new tolling projects

• The Department report on its progress as required in the 2013-2015 transportation budget

Recommendations

Page 13: Tolling across the United States

13

Contacts

Susan HoffmanPrincipal

(360) [email protected]

Website: www.sao.wa.gov