-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
1/35
SPSS OUTPUT and its analysisFrequencies
119 0 2.16
119 0 1.19
119 0 1.61
119 0 1.92
119 0 2.53
119 0 3.32
119 0 3.36
119 0 3.40
119 0 3.38
119 0 2.45
119 0 43.45
119 0 44.20
119 0 3.22
119 0 3.50
119 0 3.23
119 0 3.38
119 0 3.29
119 0 2.17
119 0 3.27
119 0 3.52
119 0 3.29
119 0 3.29
119 0 3.23
119 0 3.23
119 0 3.18
119 0 3.18
119 0 2.87
119 0 3.32
119 0 3.42
119 0 3.26
119 0 3.28
119 0 3.26
Age
Occupation
Department
How often do you
use internet
Main purpose of
using internet
Security concern
over internet
Security concernin
purchase/banking
Would you report
security breakin
concern about
online business
in other countries
convenience or
privacy
credit card stolen
w ill you use credit
card on w eb
put name and
address in
directory
banking w ithout
security
procedures
participate inonline auction
internet making
life easy
security features
basis for
business
w ho to ask
question about
breach/online
security
how secure
metrices help to
value
registration on
site: time
registration on
site: req name
registration on
site:req e-mail
registration on
site:req address
registration on
site:not aw are
how data w ould
be used
registration on
site:not w orth
revealing
information
registration on
site:dont trust the
w ebsite
registration on
site:alw ays
register
registration on
site:other reason
spam
e-mail:practice isf ine
spam e-mail:law
to make it illegal
spam
e-mail:agencies
liable
sapm
e-mail:message
f iltering should be
strong
Valid Missing
N
Mean
Statistics
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
2/35
24 20.2 20.2 20.2
75 63.0 63.0 83.2
5 4.2 4.2 87.4
7 5.9 5.9 93.3
8 6.7 6.7 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
17 - 21
22 - 26
27 - 30
31 - 35
35 +
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Age
Bar Chart
Age
35 +31 - 3527 - 3022 - 2617 - 21
Frequency
80
60
40
20
0
100 84.0 84.0 84.0
15 12.6 12.6 96.6
4 3.4 3.4 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
Student
Teaching
Faculty
Non
Teaching
Faculty
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Occupation
Bar Chart
Occupation
Non Teaching FacultyTeaching FacultyStudent
Freq
uency
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
3/35
47 39.5 39.5 39.5
72 60.5 60.5 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
Engineering
Non
Engineerin
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Department
Bar Chart
Department
Non EngineerinEngineering
Frequenc
y
80
60
40
20
0
46 38.7 38.7 38.7
49 41.2 41.2 79.8
17 14.3 14.3 94.1
2 1.7 1.7 95.8
4 3.4 3.4 99.2
1 .8 .8 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
Daily
Couple oftimes a
week
Once a
week
Once a
fortnight
Once a
month
rarely
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
How often do you use internet
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
4/35
Bar Chart
How often do you use internet
rarely
Once a month
Once a fortnight
Once a week
Couple of times a we
Daily
Frequenc
y
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
13 10.9 10.9 10.9
66 55.5 55.5 66.4
7 5.9 5.9 72.3
31 26.1 26.1 98.3
1 .8 .8 99.21 .8 .8 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
Justsurfing
collecting
study
related
information
collecting
leisure
information
keeping
touch with
friends
shopping6
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Main purpose of using internet
Bar Chart
Main purpose of using internet
6
shopping
keeping touch with f
collecting leisure i
collecting study rel
Just surfing
Frequency
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
5/35
23 19.3 19.3 19.3
13 10.9 10.9 30.3
14 11.8 11.8 42.0
41 34.5 34.5 76.5
28 23.5 23.5 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
least
concerned
some
what
concerned
neutral
concerned
very
concerned
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Security concern over internet
Bar Chart
Security concern over internet
very concerned
concerned
neutral
some what concerned
least concerned
Frequency
50
40
30
20
10
0
22 18.5 18.5 18.5
7 5.9 5.9 24.4
33 27.7 27.7 52.1
20 16.8 16.8 68.9
37 31.1 31.1 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
least
concerned
some
what
concerned
neutral
concerned
veryconcerned
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Security concern in purchase/banking
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
6/35
Bar Chart
Security concern in purchase/banking
very concerned
concerned
neutral
some what concerned
least concerned
Frequenc
y
40
30
20
10
0
12 10.1 10.1 10.1
17 14.3 14.3 24.4
28 23.5 23.5 47.9
35 29.4 29.4 77.3
27 22.7 22.7 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
definitelynot
not
may be
yes
definitely
yes
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Would you report security breakin
Bar Chart
Would you report security breakin
definitely yesyesmay benotdefinitely not
Freq
uency
40
30
20
10
0
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
7/35
17 14.3 14.3 14.3
15 12.6 12.6 26.9
30 25.2 25.2 52.1
20 16.8 16.8 68.9
37 31.1 31.1 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
least
concerned
some
what
concerned
neutral
concerned
very
concerned
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
concern about online business in other countries
Bar Chart
concern about online business in other countries
very concerned
concerned
neutral
some what concerned
least concerned
Frequency
40
30
20
10
0
13 10.9 10.9 10.9
42 35.3 35.3 46.2
62 52.1 52.1 98.3
2 1.7 1.7 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
convenience
privacy
both are
equally
important
neither
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
convenience or privacy
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
8/35
Bar Chart
convenience or privacy
neitherboth are equally impprivacyconvenience
Frequency
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
14 11.8 11.8 11.854 45.4 45.4 57.1
51 42.9 42.9 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
yesno
dont have
a credit
card
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
credit card stolen
Bar Chart
credit card stolen
dont have a credit cnoyes
Frequency
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
9/35
14 11.8 11.8 11.8
9 7.6 7.6 19.3
13 10.9 10.9 30.3
20 16.8 16.8 47.1
12 10.1 10.1 57.1
51 42.9 42.9 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
definitely
not
not
may be
yes
definitely
yes
dont have
a credit
card
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
will you use credit card on web
Bar Chart
will you use credit card on web
dont have a credit c
definitely yes
yes
may be
not
definitely not
Frequency
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
17 14.3 14.3 14.3
19 16.0 16.0 30.3
28 23.5 23.5 53.8
31 26.1 26.1 79.8
24 20.2 20.2 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
definitely
not
not
may be
yes
definitely
yes
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
put name and address in directory
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
10/35
Bar Chart
put name and address in directory
definitely yesyesmay benotdefinitely not
Frequency
40
30
20
10
0
13 10.9 10.9 10.9
11 9.2 9.2 20.2
31 26.1 26.1 46.2
31 26.1 26.1 72.3
33 27.7 27.7 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
definitelynot
not
may be
yes
definitely
yes
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
banking without security procedures
Bar Chart
banking without security procedures
definitely yesyesmay benotdefinitely not
Freq
uency
40
30
20
10
0
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
11/35
17 14.3 14.3 14.3
20 16.8 16.8 31.1
28 23.5 23.5 54.6
27 22.7 22.7 77.3
27 22.7 22.7 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
definitely
not
not
may be
yes
definitely
yes
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
participate in online auction
Bar Chart
participate in online auction
definitely yesyesmay benotdefinitely not
Frequency
30
20
10
0
14 11.8 11.8 11.8
18 15.1 15.1 26.9
23 19.3 19.3 46.2
37 31.1 31.1 77.3
27 22.7 22.7 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
definitely
not
not
may be
yes
definitely
yes
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
internet making life easy
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
12/35
Bar Chart
internet making life easy
definitely yesyesmay benotdefinitely not
Frequency
40
30
20
10
0
13 10.9 10.9 10.9
16 13.4 13.4 24.4
37 31.1 31.1 55.5
29 24.4 24.4 79.8
24 20.2 20.2 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
definitelynot
not
may be
yes
definitely
yes
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
security features basis for business
Bar Chart
security features basis for business
definitely yesyesmay benotdefinitely not
Freq
uency
40
30
20
10
0
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
13/35
29 24.4 24.4 24.4
44 37.0 37.0 61.3
44 37.0 37.0 98.3
1 .8 .8 99.2
1 .8 .8 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
to the
web
master
to the
contact
us link
dont
know whothe right
authority
is
4
5
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
who to ask question about breach/online security
Bar Chart
who to ask question about breach/online security
5
4
dont know who the ri
to the contact us li
to the web master
Frequency
50
40
30
20
10
0
9 7.6 7.6 7.6
17 14.3 14.3 21.838 31.9 31.9 53.8
43 36.1 36.1 89.9
12 10.1 10.1 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
definitely
not
notmay be
yes
definitely
yes
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
how secure metrices help to value
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
14/35
Bar Chart
how secure metrices help to value
definitely yesyesmay benotdefinitely not
Frequency
50
40
30
20
10
0
8 6.7 6.7 6.7
14 11.8 11.8 18.5
34 28.6 28.6 47.1
34 28.6 28.6 75.6
29 24.4 24.4 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
leastconcerned
some
what
concerned
neutral
concerned
very
concerned
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
registration on site: time
Bar Chart
registration on site: time
very concerned
concerned
neutral
some what concerned
least concerned
Frequen
cy
40
30
20
10
0
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
15/35
11 9.2 9.2 9.2
13 10.9 10.9 20.2
45 37.8 37.8 58.0
30 25.2 25.2 83.2
20 16.8 16.8 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
least
concerned
some
what
concerned
neutral
concerned
very
concerned
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
registration on site: req name
Bar Chart
registration on site: req name
very concerned
concerned
neutral
some what concerned
least concerned
Frequency
50
40
30
20
10
0
13 10.9 10.9 10.9
18 15.1 15.1 26.1
31 26.1 26.1 52.1
36 30.3 30.3 82.4
21 17.6 17.6 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
least
concerned
some
what
concerned
neutral
concerned
veryconcerned
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
registration on site:req e-mail
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
16/35
Bar Chart
registration on site:req e-mail
very concerned
concerned
neutral
some what concerned
least concerned
Frequenc
y
40
30
20
10
0
13 10.9 10.9 10.9
20 16.8 16.8 27.7
33 27.7 27.7 55.5
33 27.7 27.7 83.2
20 16.8 16.8 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
leastconcerned
some
what
concerned
neutral
concerned
very
concerned
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
registration on site:req address
Bar Chart
registration on site:req address
very concerned
concerned
neutral
some what concerned
least concerned
Frequen
cy
40
30
20
10
0
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
17/35
15 12.6 12.6 12.6
17 14.3 14.3 26.9
36 30.3 30.3 57.1
28 23.5 23.5 80.7
23 19.3 19.3 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
least
concerned
some
what
concerned
neutral
concerned
very
concerned
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
registration on site:not aware how data would be used
Bar Chart
registration on site:not aware how data would be used
very concerned
concerned
neutral
some what concerned
least concerned
Frequency
40
30
20
10
0
12 10.1 10.1 10.1
26 21.8 21.8 31.9
33 27.7 27.7 59.7
25 21.0 21.0 80.7
23 19.3 19.3 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
least
concerned
some
what
concerned
neutral
concerned
veryconcerned
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
registration on site:not worth revealing information
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
18/35
Bar Chart
registration on site:not worth revealing information
very concerned
concerned
neutral
some what concerned
least concerned
Frequenc
y
40
30
20
10
0
13 10.9 10.9 10.9
23 19.3 19.3 30.3
35 29.4 29.4 59.7
26 21.8 21.8 81.5
22 18.5 18.5 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
leastconcerned
some
what
concerned
neutral
concerned
very
concerned
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
registration on site:dont trust the website
Bar Chart
registration on site:dont trust the website
very concerned
concerned
neutral
some what concerned
least concerned
Frequen
cy
40
30
20
10
0
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
19/35
20 16.8 16.8 16.8
26 21.8 21.8 38.7
36 30.3 30.3 68.9
24 20.2 20.2 89.1
13 10.9 10.9 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
least
concerned
some
what
concerned
neutral
concerned
very
concerned
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
registration on site:always register
Bar Chart
registration on site:always register
very concerned
concerned
neutral
some what concerned
least concerned
Frequency
40
30
20
10
0
13 10.9 10.9 10.9
16 13.4 13.4 24.4
31 26.1 26.1 50.4
38 31.9 31.9 82.4
21 17.6 17.6 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
least
concerned
some
what
concerned
neutral
concerned
veryconcerned
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
registration on site:other reason
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
20/35
Bar Chart
registration on site:other reason
very concerned
concerned
neutral
some what concerned
least concerned
Frequenc
y
40
30
20
10
0
8 6.7 6.7 6.7
19 16.0 16.0 22.7
34 28.6 28.6 51.3
31 26.1 26.1 77.3
27 22.7 22.7 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
leastconcerned
some
what
concerned
neutral
concerned
very
concerned
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
spam e-mail:practice is fine
Bar Chart
spam e-mail:practice is fine
very concerned
concerned
neutral
some what concerned
least concerned
Frequen
cy
40
30
20
10
0
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
21/35
17 14.3 14.3 14.3
11 9.2 9.2 23.5
31 26.1 26.1 49.6
44 37.0 37.0 86.6
16 13.4 13.4 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
least
concerned
some
what
concerned
neutral
concerned
very
concerned
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
spam e-mail:law to make it illegal
Bar Chart
spam e-mail:law to make it illegal
very concerned
concerned
neutral
some what concerned
least concerned
Frequency
50
40
30
20
10
0
12 10.1 10.1 10.1
21 17.6 17.6 27.7
29 24.4 24.4 52.1
36 30.3 30.3 82.4
21 17.6 17.6 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
least
concerned
some
what
concerned
neutral
concerned
veryconcerned
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
spam e-mail:agencies liable
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
22/35
Bar Chart
spam e-mail:agencies liable
very concerned
concerned
neutral
some what concerned
least concerned
Frequenc
y
40
30
20
10
0
22 18.5 18.5 18.5
10 8.4 8.4 26.9
27 22.7 22.7 49.6
35 29.4 29.4 79.0
25 21.0 21.0 100.0
119 100.0 100.0
119 100.0
leastconcerned
some
what
concerned
neutral
concerned
very
concerned
Total
Valid
Total
Frequency Percent
Valid
Percent
Cumulative
Percent
sapm e-mail:message filtering should be strong
Bar Chart
sapm e-mail:message filtering should be s trong
very concerned
concerned
neutral
some what concerned
least concerned
Frequen
cy
40
30
20
10
0
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
23/35
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
24/35
Average respondents responded that internet is making their
life easier.
Average respondents said that they may be concerned about
the security over internet for business.
Chi Square Test:
Crosstabs
119 100.0% 0 .0% 119 100.0%
119 100.0% 0 .0% 119 100.0%
119 100.0% 0 .0% 119 100.0%
convenience
or privacy *
put name
and address
in directory
convenience
or privacy *
banking
without
security
procedures
convenience
or privacy *
participate in
online
auction
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Valid Missing Total
Cases
Case Processing Summary
convenience or privacy * put name and address indirectory
Count
2 4 6 1 13
8 4 11 11 8 42
9 12 12 14 15 62
1 1 2
17 19 28 31 24 119
convenience
privacyboth are
equally
important
neither
convenience
or privacy
Total
definitely
not not may be yes
definitely
yes
put name and address in directory
Total
Crosstab
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
25/35
12.030a
12 .443
14.431 12 .274
.297 1 .586
119
Pearson
Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid
Cases
Value df
Asymp.
Sig.
(2-sided)
Chi-Square Tests
10 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than
5. The minimum expected count is .29.
a.
.014 .049 .277 .781
.000 .000 .c
.c
.023 .081 .277 .781
.031 .021 .534d
.025 .011 .462d
Symmetric
convenience
or privacy
Dependent
put name
and address
in directory
Dependent
convenience
or privacy
Dependent
put name
and address
in directory
Dependent
Lambda
Goodman
and
Kruskal
tau
Nominal
by
Nominal
Value
Asymp.
Std. Errora
Approx. Tb
Approx.
Sig.
Directional Measures
Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.
Using the asymptotic s tandard error assuming the null
hypothesis.b.
Cannot be computed because the asymptotic standard error equals
zero.c.
Based on chi-square approximationd.
.318 .443
.184 .443
.303 .443
119
Phi
Cramer's V
Contingency
Coefficient
Nominal by
Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Value
Approx.
Sig.
Symmetric Measures
Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.
Using the asymptotic s tandard error assuming the
null hypothesis.
b.
convenience or privacy * banking without securityprocedures
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
26/35
Count
2 5 5 1 13
6 3 10 13 10 42
7 6 15 12 22 62
1 1 2
13 11 31 31 33 119
convenience
privacy
both are
equally
important
neither
convenience
or privacy
Total
definitely
not not may be yes
definitely
yes
banking without security procedures
Total
Crosstab
11.058a
12 .524
13.690 12 .321
.400 1 .527
119
Pearson
Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid
Cases
Value df
Asymp.
Sig.
(2-sided)
Chi-Square Tests
12 cells (60.0%) have expected count less than
5. The minimum expected count is .18.
a.
.063 .061 1.004 .315
.018 .087 .200 .841
.093 .061 1.474 .141
.034 .023 .441c
.027 .013 .383c
Symmetric
convenience
or privacy
Dependent
banking
without
security
procedures
Dependent
convenience
or privacy
Dependent
banking
without
security
procedures
Dependent
Lambda
Goodman
and
Kruskal
tau
Nominal
by
Nominal
Value
Asymp.
Std. Errora
Approx. Tb
Approx.
Sig.
Directional Measures
Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.
Using the asymptotic s tandard error assuming the null
hypothesis.b.
Based on chi-square approximationc.
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
27/35
.305 .524
.176 .524
.292 .524
119
Phi
Cramer's V
Contingency
Coefficient
Nominal by
Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Value
Approx.
Sig.
Symmetric Measures
Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.Using the asymptotic s
tandard error assuming the
null hypothesis.
b.
convenience or privacy * participate in online auction
Count
1 2 6 3 1 13
5 5 9 9 14 42
11 13 12 14 12 62
1 1 2
17 20 28 27 27 119
convenience
privacy
both are
equally
important
neither
convenience
or privacy
Total
definitelynot not may be yes definitelyyes
participate in online auction
Total
Crosstab
11.751a
12 .466
12.188 12 .431
.590 1 .442
119
Pearson
Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Valid
Cases
Value df
Asymp.
Sig.
(2-sided)
Chi-Square Tests
10 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than
5. The minimum expected count is .29.
a.
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
28/35
.061 .067 .890 .374
.035 .088 .392 .695
.077 .074 1.004 .315
.037 .027 .370c
.026 .015 .410c
Symmetric
convenience
or privacy
Dependent
participate in
online
auction
Dependent
convenience
or privacy
Dependent
participate in
online
auction
Dependent
Lambda
Goodman
and
Kruskal
tau
Nominal
by
Nominal
Value
Asymp.
Std. Errora
Approx. Tb
Approx.
Sig.
Directional Measures
Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.
Using the asymptotic s tandard error assuming the null
hypothesis.b.
Based on chi-square approximationc.
.314 .466
.181 .466
.300 .466
119
Phi
Cramer's V
Contingency
Coefficient
Nominal by
Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Value
Approx.
Sig.
Symmetric Measures
Not assuming the null hypothesis.a.
Using the asymptotic s tandard error assuming the
null hypothesis.
b.
Privacy and putting name and address in directory
There is a positive correlation between privacy and putting
their
name and address on the online directory
The lambda value is .781 this signifies that we can reduce
the
error by 78.1% of predicting if the person has chosen privacy
or
convenience if we know his response over the question
whether
he will put his name and address in the directory.
Privacy and banking without security procedures
There is high positive correlation between the privacy and
banking without security procedures
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
29/35
The lambda value is .315 which signifies that we can reduce
the
error by 31.5% of predicting if the person will participate
in
banking without knowing the security procedures if we his
response over the question whether he chose privacy or
convenience.
Privacy and participation in online auctions
There is a positive correlation between privacy andparticipating
in an online auction
The lambda value is .374 this signifies that we can reduce
the
error by 37.4% in predicting weather the person would take
part in online auction or not if we know whether he chose
privacy or convenience.
ANNOVA test:
To compare the student department with how often they use
internet and what is the main purpose of them using the
internet.
Oneway
1.461 1 1.461 1.414 .237
120.858 117 1.033
122.319 1184.393E-02 1 4.393E-02 .038 .846
135.603 117 1.159
135.647 118
Between
Groups
Within
Groups
Total
Between
Groups
Within
Groups
Total
How often
do you
use
internet
Main
purpose
of using
internet
Sum of
Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
ANOVA
There is low degree of correlation between the department
and
how often person uses internet but there is a high degree of
correlation in the main purpose of using the internet.
Oneway
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
30/35
3.516 2 1.758 .841 .434
242.350 116 2.089
245.866 118
.552 2 .276 .130 .878
246.910 116 2.129
247.462 118
1.810 2 .905 .452 .637
232.173 116 2.001
233.983 118
Between
Groups
Within
Groups
Total
Between
Groups
Within
Groups
Total
Between
Groups
Within
Groups
Total
Security concern
over internet
Security concern
in
purchase/banking
concern about
online business
in other countries
Sum of
Squares df
Mean
Square F Sig.
ANOVA
Post Hoc Tests
Tukey HSD
-.35 .400 .657 -1.30 .60
-.75 .737 .567 -2.50 1.00
.35 .400 .657 -.60 1.30
-.40 .813 .875 -2.33 1.53
.75 .737 .567 -1.00 2.50
.40 .813 .875 -1.53 2.33
-3.00E-02 .404 .997 -.99 .93
.37 .744 .873 -1.40 2.14
3.00E-02 .404 .997 -.93 .99
.40 .821 .878 -1.55 2.35
-.37 .744 .873 -2.14 1.40
-.40 .821 .878 -2.35 1.55
-.13 .392 .944 -1.06 .80
-.66 .721 .632 -2.37 1.05
.13 .392 .944 -.80 1.06
-.53 .796 .781 -2.42 1.36
.66 .721 .632 -1.05 2.37
.53 .796 .781 -1.36 2.42
(J)OccupationTeaching
Faculty
NonTeaching
Faculty
StudentNon
Teaching
Faculty
Student
TeachingFaculty
Teaching
Faculty
NonTeaching
Faculty
Student
Non
TeachingFaculty
Student
TeachingFaculty
Teaching
Faculty
Non
Teaching
Faculty
Student
NonTeaching
Faculty
StudentTeachingFaculty
(I)OccupationStudent
TeachingFaculty
Non
Teaching
Faculty
Student
TeachingFaculty
Non
TeachingFaculty
Student
Teaching
Faculty
NonTeaching
Faculty
DependentVariableSecurity concern
over internet
Security concern
in
purchase/banking
concern about
online businessin other countries
Mean
Difference(I-J) Std. Error Sig.
LowerBound
UpperBound
95% Confidence
Interval
Multiple Comparisons
Homogeneous Subsets
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
31/35
Tukey HSDa,b
100 3.25
15 3.60
4 4.00
.509
Occupation
Student
Teaching
Faculty
Non
Teaching
Faculty
Sig.
N 1
Subset
for alpha
= .05
Security concern over internet
Means for groups in homogeneous
subsets are displayed.
Uses Harmonic Mean
Sample Size = 9.184
a.
The group sizes are unequal.
The harmonic mean of the
group sizes is used. Type I
error levels are not
guaranteed.
b.
Tukey HSDa,b
4 3.00
100 3.37
15 3.40
.827
Occupation
Non
Teaching
Faculty
Student
Teaching
Faculty
Sig.
N 1
Subset
for alpha
= .05
Security concern in
purchase/banking
Means for groups in homogeneous
subsets are displayed.
Uses Harmonic Mean
Sample Size = 9.184
a.
The group sizes are unequal.
The harmonic mean of the
group sizes is used. Type Ierror levels are not
guaranteed.
b.
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
32/35
Tukey HSDa,b
100 3.34
15 3.47
4 4.00
.579
Occupation
Student
Teaching
Faculty
Non
Teaching
Faculty
Sig.
N 1
Subset
for alpha
= .05
concern about online business in
other countries
Means for groups in homogeneous
subsets are displayed.
Uses Harmonic Mean
Sample Size = 9.184
a.
The group sizes are unequal.
The harmonic mean of the
group sizes is used. Type I
error levels are notguaranteed.
b.
ANOVA test to compare the occupation and their
concern over security on the internet and whether their
comfort level on making purchases online and
conducting business outside of the home country.There is
positive correlation between the occupation and the
security concern on the internet amongst students, teaching
faculty and non teaching faculty
There is very high correlation between the occupation and
whether the person would be making purchases over the
internet.
There is high correlation between the occupation and a
personconducting business online outside the home country.
Kruskal Wallis Test:
NPar Tests
Kruskal-Wallis Test
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
33/35
100 57.24
15 70.57
4 89.25
119
100 59.96
15 65.90
4 38.88
119
100 58.74
15 68.17
4 60.88
119
100 57.58
15 79.50
4 47.50
119
100 58.38
15 70.20
4 62.25
119100 57.63
15 76.47
4 57.38
119
100 60.56
15 58.10
4 53.13
119
100 56.14
15 76.07
4 96.25
119
100 61.49
15 51.00
4 56.38
119
OccupationStudent
TeachingFaculty
NonTeachingFaculty
Total
Student
TeachingFaculty
NonTeachingFaculty
Total
Student
TeachingFaculty
NonTeachingFaculty
Total
StudentTeachingFaculty
NonTeachingFaculty
Total
Student
TeachingFaculty
NonTeachingFaculty
TotalStudent
TeachingFaculty
NonTeachingFaculty
Total
Student
TeachingFaculty
NonTeaching
FacultyTotal
Student
TeachingFaculty
NonTeachingFaculty
Total
Student
TeachingFaculty
Non
TeachingFaculty
Total
registrationon site:time
registration
on site: reqname
registrationon site:reqe-mail
registrationon site:reqaddress
registrationon site:notaware howdata wouldbe used
registrationon site:notworthrevealinginformation
registrationonsite:donttrust thewebsite
registrationonsite:alwaysregister
registrationonsite:otherreason
NMeanRank
Ranks
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
34/35
5.252 2.100 1.034 6.140 1.635 4.113 .243 9.415 1.332
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
.072 .350 .596 .046 .441 .128 .886 .009 .514
Chi-Square
df
Asymp. Sig.
registration
on site:
time
registration
on site: req
name
registration
on site:req
e-mail
registration
on site:req
address
registration
on site:not
aware how
data would
be used
registration
on site:not
worth
revealing
information
registration
on
site:dont
trust the
website
registration
on
site:always
register
registration
on
site:other
reason
Test Statisticsa,b
Kruskal Wallis Testa.
Grouping Variable: Occupationb.
To compare occupation & reasons as to why he doesnt
fill out the online registration forms at websites
Occupation and time taken to fill the form has a low level
of
correlation
Occupation and the fact that it requires to give the name on
the
websites has a positive correlation
Occupation and the fact that it requires to give the email
address on websites has a high positive correlation
Occupation and the fact that it requires to give the address
on
websites has a low level of correlation
Occupation and the fact as to how the registration
information
entered by them on the websites has a positive correlation
Occupation and the fact that person feels that its not worth
revealing the information has a low level of correlation
Occupation and the fact that the person doesnt trust the
website has a high degree of positive correlation
Occupation and the fact the person always registers on
thewebsite has a very low level of correlation
Occupation and other reasons as to why a person doesnt
register on the websites have a high positive level of
correlation.
-
8/14/2019 Threat N AntiVirus Report
35/35
Recommendations & suggestions:
The websites need to make the registration process
shorter
The websites need to make people aware as how their
personal information will be used or even give a
confidentiality information as to that the websites wont
use the personal information given by the users
Strict laws should implemented by the government to
make the spamming illegal.
The rating of how secure a website is helps to attract new
users thus it should be highlighted on the website so as to
make people aware of the security strength of the website.
