Theory of Creation

8/9/2019 Theory of Creation

1/14

INTRODUCTION TO THE NEW SCIENCE THEORY OF CREATION

December, 2013

N. Huntley, Ph.D.

There is clearly a need for a scientific theory of creation. There are many establishedsubjects that current science fails to explain adequately and, in fact, ignores completelyas not even valid or worthy of consideration. For example: spirituality, religion, theparanormal, nature of consciousness and mind. We don't even have a proper science ofmindthe brain is the principal focus. Mainstream scientific community will point outthat the mind is merely a by-product of the brain; and even more disastrous, thatconsciousness' causative role in life is an illusionand again a by-product of the brain.

We might note that we have scientific theories of the universe and life, that is, for

example, the Big Bang theory and Darwin's theory of evolution, but no one hasproduced a science of creation. We may well ask why. Science will state it is simplybecause scientific methodology cannot accept or tolerate a non-scientific term such asGod'; that is, a concept which is a substitute for everything without explaining anything.

The New Science, however, can do much better than this. The more scientifically-inclined individual tends to think that a disagreement with religion must take an oppositestandpoint to that subject. This is actually not a very rational response and this is whatcreates the atheist. The atheist is simply opposing religious dogma, that is, he or she is

only opposing a religious interpretationwhich may be an old man with a white beardsitting on a throne in the sky. If there were no inadequate religious descriptions of God,Atheists would probably be agnostics. Atheists are generally intelligent people and whenthey become aware of the incredible physics of the inner-space regions of theholographic fractal system, interest in a completely different direction will be awakened.

The word creation' relates of course to religion, based on a world created by God. Weshall be using science as far as possible to develop this viewpoint. Firstly, why can't we

just bring together science and religion. These two subjects should be a single body of

knowledge, but they have been set up in a polarity relationship; each will destroy theother if a reconciliation is attempted on that level. Science is imbalanced towards theobjective, and even tries to eliminate all subjectivity. Religion is biassed towardssubjectivitybeliefs and faithwith the dangers of falsehoods being introducedknowingly or unknowingly. The objective and the subjective are two sides of the samecoinyou can't have one without the other. A proper academic course on therelationship between objectivity and subjectivity would resolve many issues, includingthe greatest scientific debate between Einstein and Bohr. (Ref.1)

In reconciling science and religion one must find the hidden contexts that are in conflictand then introduce the higher-order context, which then places each of science andreligion in proper perspectiveeach is then a partial quantum reduction of the highercontext and can be unified within this context, forming, say, a spiritual science orwhatever one wishes to call it. This is explained in other works by the author. (2)


2/14

As far as possible we shall conform to acceptable scientific protocols in formulating atheory of creation, even leave out the word God' and let the reader contemplate thismeaning. In any theory of creation it is so easy to fall into the trap of infinite regression',meaning in this case to question what came before. When an origin requires someexplanation one can so easily expose the inadequacy by asking, What came beforethat?' And repeatedly go into an infinite regression.

A theory of creation must satisfy as far as possible all tests of truth in physicsdualism,infinite regression, preferential axes', generalisations and symmetry, etc. Fortunately wehave terms acceptable to science, such as infinite' and absolute', both of which do notevoke a prior cause. Mainstream science studies essentially the particle interpretation ofreality, and any wholeness is simply an aggregate of particles held together (orinteracting) through forces. This is a composite whole and not a true whole orintegration. In a composite whole the whole equals the sum of the parts. In a natural orharmonic wholeall features of natural creationthe whole is greater than the sum ofthe parts. The latter case is the key to life and ultimately a valid creation theory.

A proper study of the relationship between the whole and the part would be found veryrevealing and, in particular, the recognition of the whole as an undivided unityaquantum state. Note that the New Science Theory of Creation recognises (as doesorthodox science) the wavelength as a natural whole unitthat it can't be divided.(Though in fact it would be made up of particles below even the recognised subatomicrealm, all functioning coherently for one large quantum pulse; the wave is switching onand offamplitude increasing and decreasingas it propagates in wave form.)

As more observations are made and evidence gathered on the whole/part relationship itwill become clear that the whole is hierarchically dominant over the part.* The whole willbe the master control over the part, whether it is an organ (whole) over the cell (part) ora president over the lower ranks, or the wholeness of a work of art as opposed to thepart level (say, bits of paint stuck together by forces), or the holographic learning patternin skills, spanning a group of movements, rather than individual motionsindependenceof fingers is achieved by increasing control via greater wholes of movements. (3) *[Usethe figures at the end of the article where helpful.]

We thus find that there is a special relationship between integration (whole) anddifferentiation (parts) and that this combines with holographic fractal principles. Thus ifthe part/whole relationship within nature and the universe is fractal and holographic wethen know that all systems of creation begin with the whole, and then divide into parts,for example, the highest fractal level of a tree is the tree trunk (whole), which comesbefore the twigs (part).

In fact all that mainstream science has to do to reverse its fundamental tenets (in thecorrect direction) is to recognise the significance of the structures, holographic and

fractal, and how they relate to creationfor example, the learning pattern in skills, whichis a 4D holographic template that houses programmes and converts nonlinearinformation into linear information. In fact the learning pattern is an ideal example of therelation between integration and differentiation, which clearly indicates the wholedetermines the part. (4) The whole (a large wave) carries the smaller parts (fractal


3/14

waves). (5)

A thorough research into the workings of the learning pattern by the author shows thataccuracy and fine control over actions (differentiation) is greater the greater is theorganisation. The wholeness, quantum state, or the amount of movements spanned asone whole is the determining factor. For example, in keyboard technique, the moremovement activity the learning pattern can span simultaneously (integration), the

greater the independence (differentiation) of finger action. (6) There is an extremelyimportant relationship between integration and differentiation. (7)

Let's say this again in a much simpler example. A stimulus response associationbetween two elements; for example, in Pavlov's experiments with dogs, the two items tobe associated are bell sound (stimulus) and salivating (response). These two factorsdon't just stick together as science appears to assume, with no logical explanation. Theconnectivity is frequency resonance and is achieved by a single quantum state ofconsciousness or attention. The attention must span the two events in time, bell sound

and salivation to form the connectionof which the two factors stimulus and responseare then under the control of a third component, a single quantum state (see triadprinciple (8)).

Why doesn't science recognise these greater wholes, these coherent states? Simplybecause the method of detection used, scientific methodology, is in itself a lower orderthan these coherent states, causing collapse of the wave function to the particle level.The mind and consciousness only, can potentially access higher orders without thisquantum reduction (collapse) to lower truths. Science is failing to recognise the natural

principle of orders and their degrees. (9)

The whole, however, even if a coherent energy state, is still quantitative and fails theinfinite regression test. It would thus be unacceptable physics to regard this as a truebeginning, even if we called it the Holy Spirit' (think of a homogeneous unified fieldeverywhere). We must go beyond this, that is, beyond particles/antiparticles, waves,frequency patterns, space and time, since these are all characteristics of a relativesystem and are quantifiable.

We must introduce concepts that science cannot question with for instance, But whatcame before?' Fortunately we have the absolute' term and infinity' or infinite', such asin the quantum realm of infinite possibilities'. Both states absolute' and infinite' areacceptable within science. A beginning state, which is absolute and infinite, cannot haveany degree of objectivity since the latter means there is separation. This separation'would immediately imply a finite condition, such as containing particles, waves, spaceand time.

The Absolute must thus contain nothing'* since everything that is something is finite.The Absolute will be infinitely subjective from a scientific viewpoint and this is, in effect,science's definition of nothing'. However, in the New Science Theory of Creation thisabsolute infinite is very substantial'. For example, it includes the quantum realm ofinfinite potential possibilities. *[Note the inverted commas here: there can be no suchthing as actually nothing.]


4/14

The model of God and all creation is most simplified by the fractal-tree analogyexplained thoroughly in the author's other material. The God concept is clearly at thetree trunk fractal level. We would now imagine three large branches extending from thetrunk (the triad principle or the Trinity) (10) and continuing to multiply in fractal levels,branches to twigs. This is a template, a formatting system to provide different degrees oforders for different aspects of consciousness to explore by activating and selecting from

its infinite possibilities within the quantum realm.

The most important concepts of knowledge on this planet tend to be presented inreverseto put it bluntly. The obvious one is that life comes from matter, rather than asin the New Science that matter (a much lower order) comes from life (high order). Thismight be considered to lead to the ultimate enigma, or simply a joke on mankind.Observations on the basis of the top-down principle (trunk' first) and not science'sbottom-up (twigs' first) principle, tell us that we begin with the Infinite and Absolute.Then from this, quantum-reduce this highest state, that is, format it, to produce finite

properties in a scale of decreasing subjectivity (and therefore increasing objectivity), agradient change from internal to external, forming dimensional levels in this holographicfractal system for the exploration of consciousness. For this system, the Absolute mustexpress in relative terms.

The Absolute must go from an infinite condition to a finite one if it is to explore its infinitepossibilities. This is achieved by interface systems between the absolute and relative;the holograph and fractal mechanisms satisfy this requirement. The fractal gradient isachieved by imagining extending out telescopically' the different orders inherent within

the holograph. This results in a gradient of increasing degrees of objectivity as we moveaway from the subjectivity of the Absolute down this scale. In effect, the Absoluteexpresses outwards/downwards by an incremental system of imposed limitations.

How does the Absolute create these limitations? Firstly since this is a theory of creationwe can take the liberty of resorting to thought as primary. All the Absolute has to do is tocounteract a portion of itself; this causes two opposing flows. This state, experientially,is the same as denying that portion.

Now the big problem for science here is the dualism of Absolute potential energy, whichis non-physical, and the relative states of existences (particles, waves, space and time).How can Absolute nothing' achieve a something'? Taking liberties with creation'sthought process we can mitigate this objection by considering there is a kind ofcondensation (catalytic action). On this basis we can present a weak analogy for this (inparticular, it must not have dualism in it, itself).

Consider the two states of matter, solid and vapour. We can use a fine mist (waterdroplets) for the vapour and consider it invisible, and in dualistic contrast use ice as thesolid. We imagine that through ignorance we consider there is a dualism between these

apparently incompatible aspects, the solid, and an intangible one, the vapour. To us ofcourse there is no dualism, the vapour is a different state and can be condensed intowater, then frozen into ice. Thus the idea is that the Absolute, by thinking outside itself(looking at self or denying a part) by counteraction, creates a degree of objectivitya


5/14

separation giving the first essence of energy (which is a flow) and matter (which isbalanced counteracting flows).

Let us return now to the subject of creation and its constructive limitations. Keep in mindthe triad principle in which the single overseeing state can act independently of thedivided parts that automatically manifest a lower status. That is, the two opposing statesof the Absolute, denying a portion of itself, are automatically overshadowed by the

original (undivided) Absolute. In fact the Absolute is extended into countless portions,atoms, plants, races, planets, etc. with a fractal gradient of overseeing levels all the wayback to the Source, the undivided Absolute.

When one part counteracts another part of itself, a degree of objectivity is created and aseparate viewpoint manifests. Each doesn't know the other across that separation but ifthere is access to the whole Absolute above', then they may take on the whole, theoriginal One again. This counteraction, two opposing flows, forms the basis of polarity, abalanced condition which prevents the motion (waves/energy) from dispersing and thus

creates stable structures. The second significant step would be to form the structure of atemplate (for a particular form). A template would be a specific mathematically-organised morphogenetic field. The same flows that created this would be passed intothis form-holding pattern/mould bringing about manifestation.

We imagine now the extension or divisions continuing down the fractal scale, formingdimensional levels with barriers imposed between levels to prevent all the parts frommerging back into Source. These constructive limitations are of course very muchmanipulated by negative beings, for example, the natural dimensional separation

between the 3D spectrum (our world) and the higher 4D spectrumthe soul levelisabused, controlled, and reinforced. (11)

Thus the different degrees of these ordered dimensions are created by the Absoluteimposing different degrees of not-knowing by the counteraction principle from whichdegrees of separation (of the Absolute) are achieved, with subsequent objectivity(resulting in portions becoming a state of unconsciousness relative to another). Inconsidering the return of portions of consciousness back to Source, we see that basicintelligence and evolution is ascension to higher orders (of the holographic fractalmultiverse). In religion this is what holiness means, becoming more holy; more whole (ofconsciousness), a higher order. Higher orders are achieved by qualitative states ofbehaviour, which quantum regenerate greater wholes.(12) By creating integration withinthe lower level, that is, harmony and alignment (for example, parts into resonance), theinherent higher orders (that already exist) are catalysed, that is, drawn in and the stateis raised to that higher levelthe higher the order, the greater the frequency.

Thus cosmic creation is a system of formatting the Absolute into relative quantities,each (all aspects of existence) containing a portion of that absolute. The formattingtechnology is the template. This will act like a mould, selecting the different finite ordersrequired from the absolute medium' of infinite nonlinear possibilities for the explorationof consciousness. (Ocean analogy described in other work is useful.) (13)

The interface between the input mind (that portion of the Absolute) and the mind


6/14

mechanism itself is actually like the perfect, or ultimate, cyborg system (in principle).That portion of the Absolute, for example, the human pure consciousness (not soulsince this includes a higher order of mind) is extended (also similar in principle tobionics) by the machinery of particles and waves so subtly that one can't tell where itchanges from nothing' the nonquantifiable, to the something', the quantifiable. [Theauthor, in studying the nature of the learning pattern in skills, using introspection,identified by direct inner perception the interface between the input consciousness and

the learning pattern (mind computer system).]

The fractal law allows specific levels (degrees of order) of the extended holograph to bequantum-reduced into material existences in which formatted portions of the absoluteexpress in a specific dimension. This can be a dimensional framework, such as 3D or aphysical organic vehicle (human body), consisting of particles, waves, space and time.This is a formatting procedure so that the subjective infinite Absolute can express infinite ways to extract its possibilities. Thus the fundamental purpose of life is simplyexistence in finite realities for the exploration of the absolute infinite possibilities (thereare of course other purposes: missions, contracts, programmes).

This is a creation theory but as far as possible it is being made compatible with scienceand scientific terminology, allowing of course for a fundamental turn around in the causeand effect principle, that is, New Science's top-down instead of science's bottom-up.

The first basic clarification for the foundations of a creation theory is that science mustrecognise that in life, surrounding us ubiquitously, there are a few nonquantifiablecharacteristics. Let us list these and the quantifiable properties.

Nonquantifiable aspects:The aliveness' property; the experiential; basic sentience or awareness/consciousness.

Quantifiable aspects:Particles, waves, field systems, frequency patterns, holographic and fractal systems,templates, universes, mind, brain, body, all energy patterns whether detectable byscientific method now or after millions of years of development in scientificinstrumentation.

Nonquantifiable characteristics are direct properties of the Absolute and can never bedetected by scientific method. A relative can never evaluate or understand an absolute.However, since all life's aspects, consciousness in different forms, are portions of theAbsolute, life can (or we can) intuitively know such a state by its own nonquantifiablecharacteristics; the experiential or basic awareness/sentience/knowing by being.

What else can be evaluated from the fundamentals? As we have implied, theholographic fractal system is a natural product of formatting an interface between theAbsolute and the relative. Can we derive anything further from this? The infinite

Absolute of no particles, waves, or space and time must be considered to be infinitelynonlinear (a difficult concept). The Absolute cannot really be divided since it is inherentlyholographic and infinitely nonlinear. When any separation or objectivity apparentlyoccurs, every part, no matter how small, contains the whole and manifests on a lowerdimensional level of the fractal organisation of ordered natural limitations (dimensions,


7/14

degrees of freedom/randomness). The total state of knowing is not proportionatelyavailable except by ascension up the fractal hierarchy.

This is where we arrive at expressions such as: Everything is everywhere at once;' Asabove, so below, as within, so without; 'What is here is everywhere, what is not here isnowhere'. Each part is everywhere in the wholethe whole has no right or left, or up ordown, or front or back. Thus the Absolute expresses out by a system of imposed

limitations.

How can we justify assuming that the Absolute is infinitely nonlinear? If it wasn't itwouldn't be complete and would have finite aspects, meaning something or somethinghas preferred' a beginning state (that the origin has already been selected, implying anearlier cause). This would thus fail as a test of truth' in physics. Tests of truth' arereliable, for example, generalisation'. If a principle (or law) explained a few phenomena,and then we find it generalises to more phenomena, its degree of truth is increasing(since it is a higher order than first evaluated). Or if one scientist discovers particles are

spherical, and another scientist says they are cylindrically shaped, then we go for thespherical, since it is the same shape for all observers/viewpoints (moving round theobject). The cylinder has a preferential axis, that is, will be rejected as not beingfundamental. This is similar to comparing the relative encoding system (selected byman) of our computers, which is algebraic in nature; not natural as is the case ofnature/mind that utilises geometry, a universal absolute system. The basic geometry isspheres within spheres (higher-dimensional vortices). We can easily see the fractallevels of a tree (twigs, branches, larger branches to trunk), they are projected out in 3Dfrom the hidden vortices within inner space, which would appear as spinning spheres

within spheres and be recognised as holographic. The universe would be similar butmore complex. (14)

As we have implied, the holographic mechanism is a composite system of differentorders, and the fractal scale begins with the highest order (for example, trunk of a tree).We might see some similarity between this description of the holograph (with differentorders), and the hierarchy of universe dimensions created from the infinite nonlinearAbsolute.

Thus anything less than infinite completeness (infinitely nonlinear) has a preference andmust be unacceptable in a sound and logical theory. Realise that normal thinkingassumes that an imaginary solid 3D uniform entity is complete (totally filled in'). But thesimultaneity, the superposition and the superimposition in an infinitely nonlinear mannergives an imaginary infinite density. Thus all creation must be a (quantum) reduction fromthe greatest whole to finite, formatted aspects appropriate to the dimension to beexplored; that is, assigned to a corresponding limitation for the exploration of its infinitepossibilities. These states are limited orders in a limited dimension with prospects ofascension to greater possibilities and orders.

How might this universe system or cosmos begin? Retaining a logical approach as faras possible we can say that western religion, starting with God' (creator of all) thenprojects out' the Trinity (Holy Spirit, Father and Son). In the New Science, the first state,Spirit, would be a neutral energy state. This state would of course be subject to


8/14

considerable physics speculation. However, we can call it the unified field from whicheverything springsthe whole of this would correspond to the Holy Spirit (note thewords whole' and Holy' from the same root). Since this can be considered to be waybeyond current scientific knowledge, it is acceptable as a temporary speculation for atheory. The other two entities in the triad would follow the Holy Spirit and would have tobe the magnetic and the electrical. Remember this would be a vast division; the One'extending into three. All entities are/contain a corresponding portion of the Absolute,

which have the nonquantifiable characteristics. With our definition of Absolute, everypiece of creation, atoms, species, planets, has a portion of the nonquantifiablecharacteristics, such as consciousness, the experiential, etc. And that includes thetemplates (morphogenetic fields) themselves which hold those portions.

Since this is a creation theory we need to occasionally make the links to religiousknowledge. We agree with quantum physics that underlying all creation are frequencypatterns filling all space, matter, dimensions, etc. Now basically a frequency contains asound component (this is scalar infra sound) and a light component (electromagnetic).

Christianity, in the creation of the universe, refers to the word of God', and then therewas light'. In a scientific creation theory we find that word' is referring to soundthusthe (scalar) sound energy came firstthis will also be found to create the scalar-sonicmagnetic component. Then there was light, which is now the electric (electricity)component. Note that on a higher level, magnetism comes first, not electricity, asemphasised by current science.

To recap, the whole (Absolute) thus limits itself down a gradient scale, the holographicfractal hierarchy, reducing degrees of order and unification, increasing objectivity and

separateness, to experience and discover these relative states, forever qualifying itselfand forever becoming. Note that between these selected dimensional fractal levelsthere is apparent randomness for freewill. The process by which this is achieved is onein which the Absolute simply denies a portion of itselfthis is a counteractionthatportion is still living but is separate from the origin. Immediately a degree of space(objectivity) is createdwith the potential for time. But the original state remains andoversees the divided self or selves in this fractal hierarchy.

A very important feature of the New Science, and another example that indicates howbackward we are on this planet, with no science of the mind, there is no understandingof the principle that to every action there is a consequence (and the New Science willrecognise this as universal). In particular, and of considerable interest is when the actionis detrimental to life or truth in some manner. We call this karma on our planet, but thisis only a reflection of the larger universal principle which might be referred to as animmune system or even an antivirus programme. The purpose is to protect the universeand life in general.

Think of it as follows. The multiverse is fractal and holographic at a basic level since itall came from the Absolute, which is inherently whole, all parts in theexpressed/materialised universe are, at the basic level, in harmony. The elements of theholographic mechanism from small to whole are aiding one another; are in phase. Noflow of energy currents are out of mathematical alignmentit is an aligned system (thisis what Divine means, such as in sacred geometry). Recall that consciousness coming


9/14

into this universe system has gone through a series of energy formatting processes asexplained above, the final product, say, the human being, is endowed with countlessfields in different formats, frequencies and template geometries (99% (not detectable bycurrent scientific instrumentation) extending up the fractal system. Many of these fieldsare aligned with the universeplanets, stars, galaxies, etc.

Keep in mind the holograph as an aligned, holistic system, each portion is supporting

every other portion on all scales. If we personify this we can say that it has a higherstandard of integrity and therefore ethics than humans are displaying on this planet.

The important point to be made now is when, say, the human carries out a harmfulaction on another. In terms of physics, this is a counteraction within the integrity of thewhole system. For one unit of life to harm another to the detriment of the whole that unitmust block off the viewpoint (or already be blocked) of the other. This is an impairmentin the mind. Moreover, as each act is recorded in the mind of the perpetrator there is anincremental conversion of consciousness into unconsciousness. (15)

Note the holographic property of the whole within the part. For the reader not familiarwith the structure of the holograph, if we cut up the hologram photographic plate to anysize, the full holographic image will be projected when the laser is shone through. Thisis a quantitative mechanical reflection of an Absolute property. Thus a tiny speck of theAbsolute within, say, an atom has a tiny degree of intelligence and consciousness, butits higher components (or aspects of consciousness leading all the way back to theinfinite Source, God) are restricted deliberately (by design). Nevertheless the tiny sparkof God essence has a line to Source (even if the tiny spark is unconscious of the

Source), not to mention that the human state similarly goes back to the Source.This means our natural state (prior to massive formatting) is the essence of the quantumrealm (the quantum reality is consciousness). That is, a state of no time or space (as weknow it), a state of pure wholeness, totally inviolate in this condition and (relative to us)functioning on simultaneousness, multidimensionality, instantaneousness, superpositionand superimposition. It is easy to see that flashes of religious enlightenment could occurbut quickly translate into intellectual quantitative properties of spacetime, particles,waves, and the memory of the multidimensional experience is lost. It is also easy to seehow science can become stuck in the quantitative modeof tiny parts stuck together byforces. The parts are separate, that is, not in harmony. The original portion of theAbsolute, the (whole) quantum of consciousness endowment, is not detected (wavefunction collapsed) and science will assign reality to the part. On this planet,consciousness is essentially lost in the complexities of matter and machineryit haslost touch with what it is.

What we are trying to say here is that the craziness' of the quantum reality (quantumphysics) is normal for consciousnessthis indicates how lost we have become. This iswhy perception of unity is so lacking on this planet and there is deterioration in

understanding true art and music, and even behaviour, in fact, qualitative states, ingeneral, are degrading to quantitative states. The true path of intelligence andevolution/ascension is via behaviour, such as responsibility, integrity, ethics,benevolence, humility, etc. These are all frequency patterns that are in cooperation with


10/14

the natural universe and will guarantee the best path of survival (in an existence such asours), the path of the higher orders in the fractal system. It is a question of re-alignmentwith the (Divine) energy patterns of creation. This is what is meant in religion when onerefers to getting back to God.

After all the discussion about what the universe is, what does the New Science tell usabout the human? Clearly we are taking the stance that the human being is not just a

brain and body as orthodox science teaches.

The human is infinitely more complexand we mean infinitely. Firstly, we have a brainand body, both of which degenerate during a typical life (due to the state of the DNA).Secondly, however, there are many more features that do not deteriorate. There is amind, a complex energy system of frequency patterns, and an input to this mind, whichwe relate to our viewpoint, the true self identity, the conscious mind.

This input, however, is not just a portion of the Absolute. It contains higher orders ofmind (inner-space particles and waves of higher frequency). There is now a fractalsystem of conscious minds extending up the hierarchy; what we have referred to ashigher aspects of consciousness. The next fractal level above' us is the abode of thesoul. Thus the soul is a superior, higher aspect of our 3D mind consciousness. We(here) don't have the soul as much as it has usthat is, we are extensions of the soul.At this soul level its input, which is now the second-order mind, contains also the higherorders, third, fourth fractal levels, and so on up the hierarchy. This is what we meant bystating the human is infinitely more complex.

The dimensional system is a standard three orthogonal dimensions (directions at rightangles). At our first fractal level it is denoted by D1, D2, D3. Note that dimensions D2has a higher frequency spectrum than D1, and D3 higher than D2. The second soulfractal level, has dimensions D4, D5, D6. The next level D7, D8, D9 has been called theoversoul level, and so on. This is the most satisfactory design layout of the dimensionsand has been revealed by guardian extraterrestrials. (16) One can now see howcomplex the human being ishaving a mind that goes all the way back to the Absolute

just as a twig connects all the way to the trunk.

What changes would be required for current orthodox science to be compatible with theNew Science Theory of Creation? The many changes (listed in the book The EmergingNew Science) would automatically be revealed by science recognising us on the firstfractal level 3D of the holographic hierarchy of dimensional orders, then removing thebarrier between the third-dimensional spectrum and the fourth. Science would then beelevated from a nonharmonic science with technologies that produce pollution, harmfulenergies and limited energy sources, to a harmonic science from which would bederived abundance of harmonious energies. For example, antigravity and its associatedknowledge fits above the 3D-4D boundary, taking it into the realm of harmonic science(and free energy in the homeno cost). Unfortunately any scientific pioneer or even a

university professor researching antigravity will be warned (which may take the form ofridicule) and the experimental data suppressed. (17)

The following figures, taken from other author articles and books, can be used to aid


11/14

understanding of the above text.

Figure 1, taken from the book: The Emerging New Science.

Figue 25, taken from the book: The Original Great Pyramid and Future Science.
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/Images1/Creation%20Fig%201%20universe.jpg


12/14

Figure 25, taken from the book: The Emerging New Science.


13/14

Figure 26, taken from the book: The Original Great Pyramid and Future Science.


14/14

References:1. Book: The Emerging New Science .2. Ibid. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk. Article: The Fractal Tree .3. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk. Articles on skills, and book: Attainment of Superior Physical Abilities .4. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk. Article: The New EducationReconciling Science and Religion .

5. Book: The Emerging New Science .6. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk. Articles on skills, music and physical abilities.7. Book: The Attainment of Superior Physical Abilities .8. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk. Article: The New EducationTriad Principle .9. Book: The Emerging New Science .10. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk, Article: The New EducationTriad Principle .11. Book: The Original Great Pyramid and Future Science .12. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk. Article: Quantum Regeneration: A Major Scientific Omission .

13. Book: The Emerging New Science .14. Ibid.15. www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk. Article: The Mechanics of Karma .16. Book: Voyagers vol.2 by A. Deane.17. Book: The Emerging New Science .

Documents

Theory of Creation