188
The UC Davis Agricultural and Resource Economics PhD Program The First 50 Years Alex F. McCalla, Julian M. Alston, and K. Aleks Schaefer

The UC Davis Agricultural and Resource Economics …...of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ARE) at the University of California, Davis, has much to be proud of and celebrate, including

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • The UC Davis Agricultural and Resource Economics

    PhD Program

    The First 50 Years

    Alex F. McCalla, Julian M. Alston, and K. Aleks Schaefer

  • The UC Davis Agricultural and

    Resource Economics PhD Program

    The First 50 Years

    Alex F. McCalla, Julian M. Alston, and K. Aleks Schaefer

  • Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics University of California, Davis One Shields Avenue Davis, CA 95616 https://are.ucdavis.edu

    Copyright ©2017 The Regents of the University of California Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics

    All Rights Reserved

    Photos on the book cover by Joshua Bingham:

    Pictured on the front and continuing to the back is the courtyard of Voorhies Hall. Voorhies was home to the Department of Agricultural Economics from 1965 to 1994. The inset picture on the back is the Social Sciences and Humanities Building, where the department (changed to the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics in 1995) has been based since 1994.

    Suggested Citation:

    McCalla, Alex F., Julian M. Alston, and K. Aleks Schaefer. The UC Davis Agricultural and Resource Economics PhD Program: The First 50 Years. Davis, CA: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis, 2017.

    The University of California does not discriminate in any of its policies, procedures, or practices. The university is an affrmative action/equal opportunity employer.

    ISBN 978-0-692-91192-1

    http:https://are.ucdavis.edu

  • This manuscript was prepared for the celebration of the 50th anniversary of the PhD program in Agricultural (and Resource) Economics at the

    University of California, Davis, held at the UC Davis Conference Center, March 20–21, 2015. The authors are listed in descending

    order of age and years at Davis.

    AUTHORS

    Alex F. McCalla is a professor emeritus of Agricultural and Resource Economics and professor emeritus of Management, University of California, Davis. He began with UC Davis in 1966. Information about his career, research, honors, published works, and more can be found at https://are.ucdavis.edu/people/faculty/emeriti/alex-mccalla/

    Julian M. Alston is a distinguished professor in the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at the University of California, Davis. He began with UC Davis in 1988. Information about his career, research, honors, published works, and more can be found at https://are.ucdavis.edu/people/faculty/julian-alston/

    K. Aleks Schaefer will receive his PhD in 2017 from the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics at the University of California, Davis. He began with UC Davis in 2012.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    The authors gratefully acknowledge comments from colleagues on drafts; in particular, Rich Sexton and Gordon Rausser. Much appreciation is given to the alumni who, “In Their Own Words,” share recollections that touch on the comradery of our department. We thank each PhD alumna/us for making this book and ARE what they are. A special thanks is given to

    Tina Saitone for her contributions of time and energy toward organizing the reunion celebration. We also thank Joshua Bingham and

    Julie McNamara for helping with the fnal book design.

    https://are.ucdavis.edu/people/faculty/julian-alstonhttps://are.ucdavis.edu/people/faculty/emeriti/alex-mccalla

  • TABLE OF CONTENTS

    INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 PART 1: ANTECEDENTS, ANCESTORS, AND INSTITUTIONAL INFLUENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

    Our University of California Antecedents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Foundations and Evolving Infuences at Davis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Landmark Events in Our History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

    PART 2: THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Agricultural Economics at Davis Begins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 25 Years of Growth and Consolidation, 1965–1990 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

    1966–70 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 1971–75 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 1976–80 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 1981–85 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 1986–90 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

    25 Years of Adaptation, 1991–2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 1991–95 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 1996–2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2001–05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2006–10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 2011–15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

    Ever-Changing Interests and Background of Faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

    PART 3: THE PHD PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Critical Events in the Evolving History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

    Foundations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 1970s. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 1980s. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Adaptation, 1991–2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 2005–14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Back to the Future . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42

    Evolving Relationship with Other Departments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Economics Department, UCD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Environmental Science and Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 ARE and GSM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Davis and Berkeley and the Giannini Foundation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

    Program Administration: The GAC, Program Staff, and Other Staff Support . . . . . . . . . 46

  • Dissertations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Evolving Topical Emphasis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 Outstanding Advisors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

    PART 4: ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND RECOGNITION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 Department-Wide Achievements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Our Students: Origins and Outcomes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 Our Students: Accomplishments and Impacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 Our Students: Professional Service, Honors, and Laurels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58

    PART 5: LIFE AND TIMES OF THE GRADUATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 In Their Own Words . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66

    1965–1974 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Richard Adams (1975 Graduate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66

    1975–1984 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 Nicole Ballenger (1984 Graduate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68

    1985–1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 Frances Homans (1993 Graduate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 Carole Nuckton (1986 Graduate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 Cathy Roheim (1990 Graduate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 Mike Creel (1990 Graduate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 Ken Foster (1990 Graduate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 Sergio Ardila (1991 Graduate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 Ila Temu (1991 Graduate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74

    1995–2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 Brad Rickard (2003 Graduate), Joe Balagtas (2004 Graduate), Siwa Msangi (2004 Graduate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75

    2005–2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 Ricky Volpe (2011 Graduate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79

    PART 6: REUNION CELEBRATION: MARCH 20–21, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 Davis, CA: 268 Participate in 50th Anniversary Party, Including 113 PhD Alums . . . . . . 83

    Special Awards and Other Recognitions Were Also Given Out to Attendees: . . . . . . . . 86

    APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 Appendix A: In Memoriam: Alumni . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 Appendix B: In Memoriam: Faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 Appendix C: UCD at ERS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 Appendix D: Supplementary Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 Appendix E: Dissertations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 Appendix F: Historical Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161

  • BOXES

    1. Davis Campus Defning Events, 1946–1980. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

    2. The Rise and Decline of Agricultural Science and Agricultural Economics in It . . . . . . 11

    3. Foundations of Agricultural Economics in the University of California . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

    4. Hiring Our Own Graduates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

    5. Administrative Roles Taken by ARE Faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

    6. The Giannini Foundation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

    7. 50th Anniversary Celebration Agenda . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87

    8. Back to Davis (to the tune of “Summertime”) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89

    TABLES

    1. Department Chairs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

    2. Shifting Research Emphasis of Faculty, 1965–2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

    3. Graduate Administrative Committee (GAC) Chairs, 1965–2017. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

    4. Leading Dissertation Advisors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50

    5. Outstanding Dissertation Award . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

    6. Fellows and Other Lifetime Achievement Awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59

    7. Planning Committee for the UC Davis ARE PhD Program 50th Anniversary Celebration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83

    C-1. Record of UC Davis PhD Graduates at the Economic Research Service. . . . . . . . . . 110

    D-1. ARE Faculty by Individual, 1900–2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115

    D-2. ARE Staff, 1965–2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120

    D-3. The Evolving ARE Faculty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123

    D-4. Our Graduates by the Numbers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126

    D-5. Davis Alumni Who Have Served as Editors of the American Journal of Agricultural Economics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128

    D-6. Alumni Recipients of Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (AAEA) Awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129

  • FIGURES

    1. The Evolving Agricultural Economics Faculty, 1965–2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

    2. The Evolution of Faculty Research, 1965–2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

    3. An Increasingly Diverse Faculty (Demographics), 1965–2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

    4. An Increasingly Diverse Faculty (Gender), 1965–2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

    5. An Increasingly Diverse Faculty (Domestic vs. International), 1965–2015 . . . . . . . . 26

    6. PhD Graduates Every 5 Years, 1965–2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

    7. Gender of PhD Graduates, 1965–2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

    8. Balance of Dissertation Topics over Time. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48

    9. National Origin of Our Graduates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55

    10. Top 10 Non-U.S. Countries of Origin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55

    11. Employment of Our Graduates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56

    F-1. Letter from the Dean Approving the PhD Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163

    F-2. Original Student List. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164

    F-3. Letter from Ben French to Alex McCalla Refecting the Creation of the ARE Department. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168

    F-4. Letter from Ben French to Alex McCalla Describing Davis and the ARE Program Circa 1966 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169

    F-5. Challenge Letter from GSA President Spiro Stefanou to UCB ARE . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172

    F-6. Letter from Samson Olayide (1967) to UC Davis Chancellor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173

  • ABBREVIATIONS

    AAAS............................................................ American Association for the Advancement of Science

    AAEA........................................................................ Agricultural & Applied Economics Association

    AARES......................................................... Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society

    AAWE ............................................................................ American Association of Wine Economists

    AEPP .............................................................................. Applied Economics Perspective and Policy

    AERE .............................................................Association of Environmental and Resource Economists

    AG............................................................................................................................. Agriculture

    AG EC........................................................................................................Agricultural Economics

    AJAE ............................................................................ American Journal of Agricultural Economics

    AJARE ......................................................Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics

    AME...................................................................................Agricultural and Managerial Economics

    AOB-IV .........................................................................................Academic Offce Building No. 4

    ARE........................................................................................Agricultural and Resource Economics

    ASA ..............................................................................................American Statistical Association

    BREAD..................................................Bureau for Research and Economics Analysis of Development

    BS..................................................................................................................Bachelor of Science

    CA&ES ...............................................................College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences

    CAES .............................................................................. Canadian Agricultural Economics Society

    CSE.................................................................................................Consumer Subsidy Equivalents

    DESP ..................................................................... Department of Environmental Science and Policy

    DEV......................................................................................................................... Development

    E&NR ....................................................................................Environmental and Natural Resources

    EAAE......................................................................European Association of Agricultural Economists

    EBM ................................................................................. Environmental Biology and Management

    EDF .................................................................................................... Environmental Defense Fund

    ENP ................................................................................Environmental Planning and Management

    EPAP............................................................................. Environmental Policy Analysis and Planning

    ERS ....................................Economic Research Service of the United States Department of Agriculture

    ESP ....................................................................... Department of Environmental Science and Policy

    FAO ..........................................................Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

    FTE................................................................................................................. Full-Time Equivalent

    GAC ....................................................................................... Graduate Administrative Committee

  • GARESC.......................................Giannini Agricultural and Resource Economics Student Conference

    GMO ............................................................................................ Genetically Modifed Organism

    GPC.............................................................................................. Graduate Program Coordinator

    GRE ...............................................................................................Graduate Record Examinations

    GSA............................................................................................... Graduate Students Association

    GSM .......................................................................................... Graduate School of Management

    I&R......................................................................................... Instruction and Department Research

    IO............................................................................................................Industrial Organizations

    IAAE .................................................................. International Association of Agricultural Economists

    JARE........................................................................ Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics

    MBA........................................................................................... Master of Business Administration

    MS................................................................................................................... Master of Science

    MSO................................................................................................Management Services Offcer

    NAREA.............................................. Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association

    NGO ..........................................................................................Non-Governmental Organization

    NSLP ............................................................................................. National School Lunch Program

    OECD ..................................................... Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development

    PhD ...............................................................................................................Doctor of Philosophy

    PNG.............................................................................................................. Papua New Guinea

    PSE ...................................................................................................Producer Subsidy Equivalents

    RAE............................................................................................. Review of Agricultural Economics

    SAEA .......................................................................... Southern Agricultural Economics Association

    SNAP ............................................................................ Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

    SS&H ...................................................................................Social Sciences & Humanities Building

    TA .................................................................................................................... Teaching Assistant

    UC............................................................................................................ University of California

    UCB ......................................................................................................................... UC Berkeley

    UCD............................................................................................................................. UC Davis

    USAID ............................................................... United States Agency for International Development

    USDA ................................................................................. United States Department of Agriculture

    VERIP...........................................................................Voluntary Early Retirement Incentive Program

    WAEA ..........................................................................Western Agricultural Economics Association

    WIC............................ The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children

  • INTRODUCTION

    INTRODUCTION

    At age 50 in 2015, the Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) program in the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ARE) at the University of California, Davis, has much to be proud of and celebrate, including the successful careers and manifold accomplishments of some 376 graduates through 2014, with another 87 in

    the pipeline. Among the world’s PhD programs in agricultural and resource economics,

    for decades the program at Davis has shared top billing with its sister program at

    UC Berkeley, from which it began as an offshoot. During the 50 years since the program was

    founded in 1964, much has changed in the world of agricultural and resource economics as well

    as within the University of California, the Davis campus, the UC Agricultural Experiment Station,

    the College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences (CA&ES), and the broader community

    including the city of Davis in which the campus sits. These various infuences have shaped and

    colored the progress of the PhD program at UC Davis as it has progressively evolved into a very

    different entity from the nascent program that produced its frst four graduates in 1967: Chauncey

    Ching, Dustan Ireri, Ken Duft, and Samson Olayide.

    This monograph documents the story of the ARE PhD program at UC Davis, paying attention to

    the changes in the institutional setting in which the program is conducted, changes in the program

    itself, and the causes of those changes; as well as the people, their lives, and their accomplishments,

    including faculty and staff as well as the principal players—the graduates. In documenting this

    history we have sought to capture the essence of the lives and times of the participants during—and

    to some extent since—their time at Davis, dealing with the social life of the program as well as the

    working life, which takes center stage for the most part.

    The nature of the specifc foundations—that we came with the rest of the College of Agriculture

    from Berkeley, in the frst instance, and were managed and directed from our sister department at

    Berkeley at the outset—was an important infuence over the developments that followed. In Part 1:

    Antecedents, Ancestors, and Institutional Infuences, we document and discuss these aspects, including

    the key events, decisions, and signifcant steps taken during the frst years of transition to an

    independent operation, which paved the way for subsequent development of the department and PhD

    program at Davis. We also document the key developments subsequently in the UC, the Davis campus,

    and the CA&ES as they shaped the development of the department and within it, the PhD program.

    1

  • INTRODUCTION

    In Part 2: The Department, we tell the story of the ARE department and its evolution over time,

    highlighting the contrast, before and after 1994, which was a watershed year in many ways, with the

    shift to a new building, the loss of a third of the faculty in very brief time (1990–1994), and some

    structural changes to the PhD program. In addition to documenting the defning events and important

    episodic changes such as these, we discuss and document the more evolutionary aspects and gradual

    changes that to some extent drove the more obvious, big, episodic events. These included:

    • the long-term decline in public (state and federal formula) funding for the Experiment

    Station and Cooperative Extension as well as other shifts in funding, which meant a

    progressive shift to the use of research grants rather than core funds to support research

    assistants;

    • changes in the size of the department’s undergraduate program, increasing from 545 majors

    in 1995 to 1,096 in 2000, 1,435 in 2010 (including 349 pre-managerial economics), and

    over 1,492 in spring quarter of 2016, with implications both for the demand for PhD

    students as teaching assistants (and sometimes as associate instructors) and for the tension

    between demands of the graduate program and the undergraduate program in decisions

    about faculty hires;

    • shifts in the primary felds of interest of the students and thus their demand for different

    kinds of coursework and supervision, as well as funding; and

    • changes in the curriculum and modus operandi within the PhD program.

    Over its 50 years, the PhD program has involved participation by dozens of staff and faculty who

    have played various roles that have contributed to the success of the program. Part 3: The Program

    documents the details on these participants, who did what and when, and on the program itself, in

    terms of the formal structure, the curriculum, requirements, numbers of participants, and funding.

    These aspects involved some gradual processes and some large episodic changes, as did changes

    in the department more broadly. These include transformations required to adapt to different

    funding models; shifts in the ethnic and gender balance of the faculty and the students; shifts in the

    emphasis of student interest, their dissertations and other research away from traditional agricultural

    economics to resource, environmental, and development economics; and changes to the curriculum

    in response to evolving demands of the students and the market.

    Part 4: Accomplishments and Part 5: Life and Times of the Graduates aim to convey a richer sense

    of what life was like for graduate students at Davis across the fve decades of the PhD program. We

    document the overall achievement of the program in terms of the total numbers of our graduates

    over time, their gender, nationality and ethnic mix, who they are, where they have ended up, how the

    program infuenced their lives, and what they did at Davis and since. We also discuss achievements

    of the graduates, including various laurels and other academic distinctions they have earned, senior

    leadership positions they have held, and other professional accomplishments. Part 6: The Reunion

    documents the PhD program’s 50th anniversary event.

    2

  • PART 1: ANTECEDENTS, ANCESTORS, AND INSTITUTIONAL INFLUENCES

    PART 1 Antecedents, Ancestors, and Institutional Infuences

    Quad, East Hall,

    North Hall, Creamery,

    Judging Barn, circa 1908.

    University Archives Photographs,

    Special Collections, UC Davis Library.

    Picnic Day Parade, circa 1920. University Archives Photographs, Special Collections, UC Davis Library.

    3

  • PART 1: ANTECEDENTS, ANCESTORS, AND INSTITUTIONAL INFLUENCES

    Quad, North Hall, South Hall, undated. University Archives Photographs, Special Collections, UC Davis Library.

    Creamery, East Hall,

    North Hall, circa 1909–1911. University Archives

    Photographs, Special Collections,

    UC Davis Library.

    4

  • PART 1: ANTECEDENTS, ANCESTORS, AND INSTITUTIONAL INFLUENCES

    Every story has to have a beginning and sometimes that beginning is stretched out over a long period and is complicated. Our early origins trace from the establishment of the University of California (UC) as a land-grant institution in the late 1860s. Agricultural Science and Agricultural Economics at the University of California began at Berkeley, and Davis

    grew from that foundation. Having antecedents and ancestors at Berkeley shaped us in a number

    of ways. In 1906 the University Farm at Davisville was established and it slowly morphed into a

    UC Campus, which by 1959 was a General Campus of UC. Over that time and since, we became

    progressively more independent from Berkeley, to be shaped more and more by infuences based

    on the Davis campus.

    The radical decentralization of UC in 1958–60 had further profound impacts on the least-

    centralized UC enterprise—the university-wide College of Agriculture—on UC Davis, and on

    Agricultural Economics. Prior to 1958, the University of California consisted of two general

    campuses, Berkeley and UCLA, and a specialized medical campus in San Francisco. In 1958–59 three

    specialized units were designated to become general campuses: Riverside in April 1959 (College of

    Agriculture plus Citrus Experiment Station), Santa Barbara in September 1958 (former Normal

    School), and Davis in October 1959 (Colleges of Agriculture and Letters & Science and the School

    of Veterinary Medicine). Three additional campuses were approved in 1960 for Santa Cruz, Irvine,

    and San Diego, making a total of nine. UC Merced was approved in 1995, and took its frst students

    in 2006 to become the tenth campus.

    Although now very much a creature of the Davis campus, our department remains a part of the

    broader University of California—comprising 10 campuses, with 251,700 students, over 210,000

    faculty and staff, and a budget of $28.7 billion in 2016.1 Agricultural Economics was the last feld

    within the college to break from Berkeley, fnally becoming an independent department at Davis in

    March of 1966, two years after our PhD program was approved. We came from Berkeley, refecting

    what had been going on at Berkeley. To quote Loy Sammet, the Berkeley department chair who

    oversaw the separation:

    “Programmatic developments in Agricultural Economics at Berkeley were refected also

    in the department’s activities at Davis. This was true in the undergraduate program frst

    developed at Davis and in the PhD graduate program introduced there in 1964. This is not

    surprising given the administrative and academic oversight from Berkeley and the fact that

    nearly all the appointees in Agricultural Economics at Davis after WWII were recent PhD

    recipients from the department at Berkeley.

    1 http://regents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/nov13/f6attach.pdf

    5

    http://regents.universityofcalifornia.edu/regmeet/nov13/f6attach.pdf

  • PART 1: ANTECEDENTS, ANCESTORS, AND INSTITUTIONAL INFLUENCES

    With the passage of time, shifts in emphasis in the two-campus program appeared. …The

    program at Berkeley progressively gave less attention to farm management and agricultural

    marketing and more to resource, trade and policy issues. At Davis there was continued

    emphasis on farm management, marketing and market structure; an increasing concern about

    resource and policy matters; and a growing involvement in agribusiness management. At the

    time of separation in 1966, the program at Davis was well on its way in the development of

    the comprehensive program presently offered….”2

    We inherited 13 members of faculty stationed at Davis (plus two Extension specialists) to offer

    a newly minted PhD program (approved in February 1964) to about a dozen students, a Master of

    Science (MS) in agricultural business management (approved in 1959) with about 30 students, and a

    Bachelor of Science (BS) in agricultural economics (fully functional since the early 1950s) with about

    100 undergraduate majors. There were 20 undergraduate courses and 10 graduate courses on the

    books. We certainly did not start from scratch because we inherited fully developed core parts of a

    traditional agricultural economics PhD program from Berkeley with a young faculty (with an average

    age of 41 years) basically focused on farm management/production economics and marketing.

    Our University of California Antecedents

    The Agricultural and Resource Economics PhD program at UC Davis is cradled in the history of the

    University of California as a land-grant university. What we are today is very much a function of how

    we got here. If we had grown up in a different university, ours would be a very different department

    and PhD program.

    Under the Morrill Act of 1862 each state was entitled to a gift of federal lands, the proceeds from

    the sale of which were to be used to establish a “People’s University” focused on “agriculture and the

    mechanic arts” (hence the moniker still used in some places: A&M). The University of California

    was established in 1868, frst offering classes in 1869 on the campus of the College of California

    in Oakland. It moved to its own new campus in nearby Berkeley in 1873. The frst academic unit

    established in 1869 was the College of Agriculture. Almost from the beginning there was a heated

    debate between the frst professor of agriculture, Ezra Carr, and UC President Gilman over whether

    the college should be a separate practical school devoted to helping new California farmers, or

    a science-based teaching and research institution embedded in the university. The battle got the

    attention of the state Legislature, which initiated an investigation. The upshot was that Gilman

    resigned and Carr was fred. This led to the hiring of a new dean and professor of agriculture,

    2 From March 1985, reprinted in W.E. Johnston and A.F. McCalla eds. A.P. Giannini and the Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics, 2009, p. 263.

    6

  • PART 1: ANTECEDENTS, ANCESTORS, AND INSTITUTIONAL INFLUENCES

    Eugene Hilgard, a distinguished scientist who strongly believed that the college should be an integral

    part of a quality scientifc institution. Hilgard was in place for 30 years (1875–1905) and, along

    with President Benjamin Ide Wheeler (1899–1919), shaped the College of Agriculture as a premier

    scientifc player in all felds of agricultural teaching and research. This is a defning legacy that has

    indeed shaped us.

    The battle over the mission—scientifc or practical—never went away and was rekindled in debate

    over the establishment of the University Farm. As the college grew, it needed space for feld plots,

    experimentation, and animal rearing. Berkeley, even in the 1880s and 1890s, was space-constrained

    and too urban to serve as the location of an experimental farm. Further, it was in a climatic zone that

    had little resemblance to any agricultural region in California except fog-prone coastal hills. A search

    for a University Farm ensued, creating an intense competition as to where, in an already diversifed

    agricultural state, it should be located. At one point there were over 70 competing locations. The

    decision to create a University Farm also brought back the debate as to whether it should be a

    separate practical college distinct from Berkeley.

    In 1899 there emerged a persistent and persuasive protagonist for the farm, Peter J. Shields—

    then secretary of the California State Agricultural Society (appointed a Judge in 1901)—who lobbied

    hard for a Northern California site, preferably in the Sacramento Valley and in particular in Yolo

    County. In 1905 the state Legislature passed a “University Farm Bill,” which provided funding for “a

    special Agricultural Campus” and established a State Farm Commission to pick the site. Some of the

    sites they were considering were in Yolo County, which led two prominent Davisville farmers, Jacob

    La Rue and George Pierce, to persuade the Davisville Chamber of Commerce to take out an option

    on the 730-acre Sparks ranch (which was part of the original Jerome Davis stock farm). In their

    proposal to the commission, they proposed adding two additional tracts to make the total area nearly

    780 acres, southwest of Davisville. The site was offered for an average price of just over $125/acre

    with water rights thrown in. This was all playing out as Hilgard neared retirement. Edward Wickson,

    who eventually succeeded Hilgard as dean, played a critical role in the fnal selection. In early 1906,

    Governor Pardee accepted the Davisville offer, whereupon the owner, M.V. Sparks, auctioned off his

    cattle and machinery and turned over the keys to the farm gate to Wickson.

    Foundations and Evolving Infuences at Davis

    On September 1, 1906, Dean Wickson opened the gate and “thus was born the University Farm”

    (Scheuring, p. 19).(A symbolic reconstruction of the gate was dedicated in 1983, on the 75th anniversary

    of the campus. It stands between Voorhies and Young halls.) Wooden buildings started going up in 1907:

    The frst three were the Wyatt Pavilion, University House, and the Creamery. Also in 1907, Davisville

    became the town of Davis. In 1908 the frst students arrived, to be housed in the newly fnished

    7

  • PART 1: ANTECEDENTS, ANCESTORS, AND INSTITUTIONAL INFLUENCES

    North Hall. In 1909 a two-

    year, non-degree Farm School

    Program was established.

    Also, some senior production

    agricultural students from

    Berkeley started spending their

    fnal year(s) at Davis. It was

    under this program that Edwin

    C. Voorhies frst came to Davis

    in 1914 as a member of the

    Animal Husbandry Division.

    Over the next 55 years,

    much of the agricultural

    research establishment at

    Berkeley transferred to Davis,

    with the most intense period of

    transfer being post-World War

    II. The frst transfers involved

    people doing applied feld and

    animal research. By the 1930s,

    most Berkeley departments had

    Davis branches, and by the end

    of the 1950s many Berkeley

    departments had closed and

    completely moved to Davis.

    Davis began offering its own four-year bachelor’s degree in 1938 and the frst graduates were granted

    their degrees in 1948 (the campus was closed and turned over to the U.S. Army Signal Corps, 1943–

    1945).

    In 1952 a formal Davis College of Agriculture was founded and the frst dean, Fred Briggs, was

    appointed. His college consisted of 17 departments, 10 joint with Berkeley, 645 undergraduates, 147

    graduate students, 252 non-degree students, and 233 academic staff. Davis was heading out on its own.

    Landmark Events in Our History

    UC events and developments at Davis shaped our origins and continue to infuence us today,

    along with the broader environment in which we operate. A variety of these events and forces

    Two original buildings: Wyatt Livestock Judging Pavilion and The Creamery, 1907.

    Re-creation of original campus gate, dedicated September 23, 1983, on UC Davis’ 75th Anniversary.

    8

  • PART 1: ANTECEDENTS, ANCESTORS, AND INSTITUTIONAL INFLUENCES

    were critical as they infuenced the University of California, the Davis campus, the Department

    of Agricultural and Resource Economics, and the PhD program, as we developed and massaged

    it subject to these infuences. But in our history, two periods—a quarter century apart—of “big

    bang” magnitude changes stand out: 1964–66 and 1991–94. The nature of each is summarized

    here as a backdrop for the

    more detailed histories of

    the department and the

    PhD program that follow

    in subsequent sections.

    The years 1964–66 saw

    a confuence of signifcant

    changes, each of which alone

    would have been signifcant.

    First, there was the need

    to implement the new

    PhD program: redesigning

    courses already offered at

    Davis and adding courses

    that, under the old integrated

    program, were taught by

    Berkeley faculty in Berkeley;

    using traditional networks

    and advertisements to

    solicit students for the

    new program; setting up

    admission standards and

    procedures, and so on, to be

    ready to admit students for

    the academic year 1964/65.

    Second, this process was

    complicated by the fact that

    the University of California

    was switching from a

    semester system to a quarter

    system, effective fall 1966.

    Box 1. Davis Campus Defning Events,1946–1980

    1946 School of Veterinary Medicine approved, opened1948

    1952 College of Letters and Science established; founding members were College of Agriculture faculty in the basic disciplines hired in previous years to teach Aggies

    1956 Economics Department separated from a social science department, SAGE (Sociology, Anthropology, Government, and Economics)

    October 1959 Davis becomes a General Campus of UC, Emil Mrak appointed chancellor

    1960 The pace of development accelerates; enrollment 2,157 undergraduates plus 719 graduate students, to total 2,876

    1961 The Graduate Division is created signaling independent administration of uniquely UC Davis graduate programs

    1962 College of Engineering founded, drawing core faculty from the Department of Agricultural Engineering

    1964 School of Law opened

    Feb. 3, 1964 PhD in agricultural economics approved

    1964/65 Economics PhD approved

    1965/66 Home Economics Department is abolished and its teaching program is broken into its disciplinary components; consumer economics is transferred to Agricultural Economics

    March 1966 Department of Agricultural Economics formally established

    1966 School of Medicine opened; campus enrollment 8,916

    1967 College of Agriculture is renamed College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences (CA&ES) at the culmination of a revolutionary revision of college teaching programs

    1970s Explosive growth: enrollment increases from 12,941 in 1970 to 16,861 in 1975 and 18,370 in 1980

    1970 Divisions of Biological Sciences (DBS) and Environmental Studies (DES) are established. DBS becomes College of Biological Sciences in 2005 and DES is absorbed into CA&ES in 1986

    1979 Graduate School of Administration (now Graduate School of Management) is established

    9

  • PART 1: ANTECEDENTS, ANCESTORS, AND INSTITUTIONAL INFLUENCES

    This required that all semester courses be completely restructured and revised, either by contraction

    or division, to ft 10 weeks instead of 15.

    The third was the splitting of the College of Agriculture budget. As part of Clark Kerr’s major

    restructuring of UC, all instruction was decentralized to the newly expanded number of general

    campuses, with the teaching budget—called Instruction and Department Research (I&R)—of the

    individual campuses to be managed by campus chancellors. Implementing this restructuring was

    a big task for the UC-wide College of Agriculture. The College had been run out of the President’s

    Offce and administered by the UC dean of agriculture as a single budget. The college had

    comingled teaching and Experiment Station funds, but now each department (indeed, each faculty

    member) would be budgeted partly from campus funds and partly from Experiment Station funds.

    A department’s choice in 1965 made a big difference subsequently, when teaching budgets doubled

    in the early 1970s and the Experiment Station took a 10% cut in 1972. Some departments applied

    the same split to their entire faculty but others gave each faculty member a unique split based on

    individual teaching loads. Agricultural Economics chose to put more of its budget on the teaching

    side and gave everyone the same split—43% in I&R using campus funds administered by the College

    (A&ES) and 57% in Organized Research (OR) in the statewide Experiment Station. Resolving these

    issues was a time-consuming task for a new department that formally was not approved until March

    of 1966. And fourth, of course, came the non-trivial task of getting an independent Department of

    Agricultural Economics up and running.

    The next landmark period came a quarter century later. The early 1990s included several

    momentous changes in Agricultural Economics at Davis, culminating in the watershed year of 1994.

    This was the year of the third and fnal offering of the Voluntary Early Retirement Incentive Program

    (VERIP-III), which was introduced as a desperate measure in a budgetary crisis that extended well

    beyond UC Davis. When the dust settled, the three VERIPs had reduced the senior faculty by 10

    professors; one-third of the department gone! In total, 13 faculty members left during the 1991–95

    period while four were newly hired, so that the total number of academic senate faculty members in

    the department was reduced by almost one-third—from 31 to 22.

    1994 was also the year of moving out of Voorhies Hall, our comfortable home for 34 years,

    into the Social Sciences & Humanities Building (SS&H). We had been promised larger individual

    offces, a larger library, and better common areas; closer proximity to the Economics department;

    and consolidation of the ARE department, including the graduate students (who had been housed

    in AOB-IV) and ancillary elements (such as the Agricultural Issues Center and the Center for

    Cooperatives).

    10

  • PART 1: ANTECEDENTS, ANCESTORS, AND INSTITUTIONAL INFLUENCES

    We watched with increasing apprehension while the new building grew up as a prison: grey,

    erratically shaped—a cement monster complete with guard towers and catwalks; the only things

    missing were guards and machine guns. But it was worse inside: We had yet to experience how

    dysfunctional the layout

    would be with smaller offces,

    small windows you could not

    open, and faculty scattered

    across even more wings and

    foors than in Voorhies Hall.

    Theoretically, we were going

    to be reunited in the same

    building with Economics, but

    you could not get to them

    without leaving the building

    even though they were only

    one foor down! It was a year

    of trauma, which portended

    changes in the power structure

    of the department; a changing

    of the guard had already begun

    with a spate of new hires in the

    late 1980s to be reinforced by

    the shock of VERIP, and this

    was compounded by other

    stresses, including a series of

    signifcant changes in the PhD

    program. In the midst of all

    this a new chair, Rich Sexton,

    took offce on July 1, 1994.

    Box 2. The Rise and Decline of Agricultural Science and Agricultural Economics in It

    The land-grant college system with its associated Agricultural Experiment Stations was born about 150 years ago. It grew slowly for the frst 50 years and more. The big burst of growth in agricultural science in the middle years of the 20th century was accompanied by the emergence of agricultural (and, later, resource) economics departments and programs along with other specialisms within the colleges of agriculture, not just in the United States, but worldwide.

    The growth of the Department of Agricultural Economics at Davis between 1965 and 1990 was mirrored all around the country and around the other high-income countries, with similar timing. Likewise, in the years since then, the same kinds of changes as have happened at Davis can be seen in the feld more generally. A natural question to ask is whether the concept of departments of “agricultural economics” or “agricultural and resource economics” has had its day.

    Several sources of tension have colored the history and challenged the sustainability of the model of a separate department of agricultural economics located within a college of agriculture. First, political support and funding for agricultural science has been losing ground since the golden years of the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. Second, agricultural economists have been better funded than their counterparts in their sister economics departments, which causes resentment. Third, economists (along with other social scientists) have been an “odd-man-out” in colleges that are dominated by biological scientists, and this is made worse when the economists are better paid for reasons that only the economist can understand. Fourth, over time, the demand for undergraduate classes in agricultural and resource economics per se, along with the rest of the core agricultural science curriculum, has not kept pace with other demands.

    In many places, including Davis, the ARE department has responded by providing undergraduate coursework in managerial and business economics. This development has led to tension between the undergraduate teaching mission and Experiment Station mission, with which the graduate program tends to be more closely aligned.

    11

  • First UC Davis administration offce

    building, undated. University Archives

    Photographs, Special Collections,

    UC Davis Library.

    Students riding bicycles through the bicycle parking area, circa 1960. University Archives Photographs, Special Collections, UC Davis Library.

    12

  • PART 2: THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS

    PART 2

    The Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics

    13

  • PART 2: THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS

    Voorhies Hall, undated.

    University Archives Photographs,

    Special Collections, UC Davis Library.

    Arboretum, Mrak Hall in the distance, circa 1976–1980. University Archives Photographs, Special Collections, UC Davis Library.

    14

  • PART 2: THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS

    Agricultural Economics at Davis Begins

    The history of Agricultural Economics at Davis begins with the history of Agricultural Economics at Berkeley—from which the campus, department, and PhD program at Davis were all spawned—as documented by Loy L. Sammet (1985).3 Prior to the mid-1960s, Agricultural Economics was conducted at Davis as a branch of the

    department at Berkeley, to some extent with out-posted Berkeley faculty and students, but

    progressively with faculty appointed to be stationed at Davis. The early emphasis was clearly on

    production economics and farm management, and this was the subject of the frst agricultural

    economics course offered at Davis, in 1929. Courses were offered regularly through the 1930s. Among

    the teachers was, famously, John Kenneth Galbraith in 1933 who taught several courses at Davis

    while a graduate student at Berkeley.

    The campus was closed during

    the years of World War II, 1943–

    1945. In 1947 Trimble (Ted) R.

    Hedges was the frst faculty member

    hired in Agricultural Economics

    at Berkeley and assigned to be at

    Davis full-time. In 1949 and 1950,

    two more members were added:

    one, Jerry Foytik, was a new PhD

    graduate in agricultural economics

    from Berkeley; the other, James

    Tinley, was a Berkeley full professor

    who was transferred to Davis. In the

    rest of the 1950s, 11 new faculty

    members were hired for Davis (Chet

    McCorkle, Herb Snyder, Ed Faris,

    Russell Shaw, Fritz Mueller, Jerry

    Dean, Gordy King, Steve Sosnick,

    Box 3. Foundations of Agricultural Economics in the University of California

    1875/76 First courses in political economy offered at Berkeley

    1904/05 First course in the College of Letters explicitly addressing agriculture: American Agriculture: Leading Factors in the Development of Agriculture in the United States

    1908/09 First course in the College of Agriculture: Farm Management and Farm Policies

    1911/12 Two more new courses: Farm Management individual study and Farm Management Research

    1915 Division of Rural Institutions is established

    1920 Division of Farm Management is created

    1925 These two are merged to create Division of Agricultural Economics, which becomes the Department of Agricultural Economics in 1948

    1928 A.P. Giannini’s gift of $1.5 million leads to the establishment of The Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics

    3 Reprinted in “Agricultural Economics in the University of California, Berkeley” in W.E. Johnston and A.F. McCalla eds. A.P. Giannini and the Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics, 2009.

    15

  • PART 2: THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS

    Hal Carter, Allen Richards, and Ben French), and Ed Voorhies transferred from Berkeley. One of the

    new hires (Mueller) left before the decade ended, such that net additions for the decade were 11

    faculty plus two Extension specialists who were assigned to Davis (Doyle Reed and Philip Parsons).

    Then, during the years 1960–1965, a further four new hires were added (Curtis Harris, Oscar Burt,

    Warren Johnston, and Sam Logan), and one, D. Barton DeLoach, was transferred from UCLA when

    the agriculture program at UCLA was closed. During the same years, four left (Shaw, Richards,

    Harris, and Burt) and one retired (Tinley), leaving the total numbers unchanged.

    The city of Davis was growing, too. Between 1950 and 1960, the population more than doubled

    from 3,554 to 8,910, and in the next decade it more than doubled again, to 23,488. From then on,

    the growth rate tapered off. It took 20 years for the population to double to 46,209 in 1990, and it

    increased by less than that in the next 26 years, to over 66,000 in 2016.

    25 Years of Growth and Consolidation, 1965–1990

    When the PhD program became operational in 1964/65 and the new department was born in 1966,

    the emphasis was on farm management, production, and marketing, as dictated by decisions from

    Berkeley. Five faculty members were specialized in farm management/production economics, six

    in marketing/demand analysis, one in land/resource economics, and one in resource economics/

    land appraisal. The two Extension specialists were farm management

    1965 • Campus enrollment:

    7,723

    • Major enrollment: 100

    • ARE faculty: 13 professorial and 2 Extension specialists 4

    economists.

    The infuence of Berkeley was still strong, at least indirectly, even

    after the break was made: seven of the 13 Davis faculty members and one

    of the Extension specialists had their PhDs from Berkeley! Responsibility

    for consumer economics was transferred to the department in 1965/66

    with the abolition of the Department of Home Economics. Hiring

    consumer economics faculty did not occur until 1969.

    The subsequent years saw signifcant changes in both the subject matter emphasis of the faculty,

    and where they were trained. Figure 1 shows total faculty members and Extension specialists in the

    department over time. Figure 2 further disaggregates the faculty by primary feld of specialization.

    The discussion that follows highlights the main events for each of the 10 fve-year periods in the

    evolution of the department and the faculty; the corresponding discussion of the PhD program is

    presented later.

    4 Enrollment data throughout this section is from: http://budget.ucdavis.edu/data-reports/enrollment-reports.html

    16

    http://budget.ucdavis.edu/data-reports/enrollment-reports.html

  • 1965

    1970

    1975

    1980

    1985

    1990

    1995

    2000

    2005

    2010

    2015

    1965–6

    9

    1970–7

    4

    1975–7

    9

    1980–8

    4

    1985–8

    9

    1990–9

    4

    1995–9

    9

    2000–0

    4

    2005–0

    9

    2010–1

    4

    PART 2: THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS

    In the University of California, departmental leadership is provided by department chairs

    usually selected from the faculty to serve for three to fve years. Chairs are recommended by the

    dean and appointed by the chancellor. The department’s founding chair was Ben French, who

    served just four months at the end of his fve-year term as vice-chair of the Berkeley department

    responsible for Davis. Herb Snyder took over as the frst full-term chair on July 1, 1966, and served

    until June 30, 1970.

    Figure 1. The Evolving Agricultural Economics Faculty, 1965–2015

    40

    35

    Extension Faculty Academic Faculty

    Num

    ber

    of F

    acul

    ty 30

    25

    20

    15

    10

    5

    0

    Figure 2. The Evolution of Faculty Research, 1965–2015†

    100% 90% 80% 70% Other 60% Development 50% Natural Resource 40% & Environment 30% Agriculture

    20% 10% 0%

    † In this fgure and in other places we have allocated individual faculty members to particular primary felds of specialization (or occasionally among several) based on our best guess, but knowing that whatever we do will be wrong in particular because the emphasis in many instances has changed over time. Specifc results should therefore be interpreted with some care, though the general indications are likely to be on target.

    17

  • PART 2: THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS

    Table 1. Department Chairs Department Chair Period of Service Comments

    Ben French† March 1, 1966 – June 30, 1966 Founding Chair

    Herb Snyder July 1, 1966 – June 30, 1970 First Full-Term Chair

    Hal Carter July 1, 1970 – June 30, 1976

    Ben French July 1, 1976 – June 30, 1981 Second Term

    Warren Johnston July 1, 1981 – June 30, 1986

    Hal Carter/Gordy King July 1, 1986 – June 30, 1989 Second Term for Carter

    Hoy Carman July 1, 1989 – June 30, 1994

    Rich Sexton July 1, 1994 – June 30, 1998

    Colin Carter July 1, 1998 – June 30, 2001

    Jim Chalfant July 1, 2001 – August 31, 2005

    Richard Howitt September 1, 2005 – September 30, 2011

    Rich Sexton October 1, 2011 – June 30, 2016 Second Term

    Rachael Goodhue July 1, 2016 –

    † Ben was vice-chair of the combined department until March 1966 when the department at Davis was created. He then served as the founding chair March to June 1966.

    1966–70

    Ten new faculty members were added (fve in 1970 alone) in areas that diversifed the department: two

    were in consumer economics (Sylvia Lane and Edith Parker); two primarily in econometrics and other

    quantitative methods (Gordon Rausser and Quirino Paris); two in labor (Ted Lianos and Varden Fuller);

    two in agricultural policy and trade (Alex McCalla and Elmer Learn); one in resource economics (David

    Hansen); and one in marketing (Hoy Carman); some also had interests in development economics

    (Hansen and McCalla). But one production economist (Faris) left, such

    that the net gain for the period was nine faculty members, and one

    Extension specialist (marketing) was hired (Leon Garoyan), bringing the

    total establishment to 22 faculty members and three Extension specialists

    in 1970. Three of the faculty hires were senior full professors: Sylvia Lane,

    our frst consumer economist and our frst female faculty member; Elmer

    Learn, recruited by the chancellor as executive vice-chancellor, became

    a member of the faculty, but did not teach until much later; and Varden

    Fuller transferred from Berkeley.

    1971–75

    The department was under new leadership from Chair Hal Carter for the entire period. An additional

    seven new faculty members were added (fve in 1975 alone), including three in consumer issues

    1970

    • Campus enrollment: 12,941

    • ARE faculty: 22 professorial and 3 Extension specialists

    • City of Davis population: 23,488

    18

  • PART 2: THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS

    and fnance (John Kushman, Lor Shepard, and

    Barbara Zoloth), and one each in agribusiness (Daryl

    Carlson), econometrics (Richard Green), farm labor

    (Will Rochin), and resources (Richard Howitt), but

    with no net gain since three left (Rausser, Lianos, and

    Parker), three retired (Hedges, DeLoach, and Fuller)

    and one died (Jerry Dean). Three Extension specialists

    were hired: two in marketing (Jim Cothern and James

    Youde), and one in small

    farms (Des Jolly) but one

    retired (Parsons) such

    that the net gain was

    two. By 1975, then, the

    total establishment of the

    department had almost

    1975

    • Campus enrollment: 16,861

    • ARE faculty: 22 professorial and 5 Extension specialists

    doubled in size in the 10 years since foundation, to a

    total of 27, including still 22 ladder faculty and now

    fve Extension specialists.

    1976–80

    Ben French returned as chair in 1976 to lead the

    department during this period. The late 1970s

    was a period of further

    consolidation, with a focus

    on farm production and

    resources. An additional

    eight new faculty members

    were added, including

    two each in production

    economics (Rulon Pope

    and John Antle) and

    1980

    • Campus enrollment: 18,370

    • ARE faculty: 27 professorial and 4 Extension specialists

    • City of Davis population: 36,640

    resource economics (Del Gardner and Jim Wilen), and one

    each in agricultural fnance (Robert Collins), managerial

    economics (Peter Farquhar), farm labor (Phil Martin), and

    econometrics (Art Havenner). The net gain in the faculty

    was fve, since three left (Carlson, Pope, and Farquhar),

    Box 4. Hiring Our Own Graduates

    In the early 1970s, the department had its frst of many debates about hiring our own graduates. Gordon Rausser enrolled as a PhD student in 1965/66 and, while still working on his own dissertation, became a candidate for our vacant econometrics position. This generated a serious faculty discussion about whether a current graduate student could teach his fellow students PhD econometrics, and more seriously should we, at such an early stage of our PhD program, be hiring our own? There were strongly held views about inbreeding, considered to have been a problem at Berkeley and Minnesota and probably many other places. Others argued Gordon was so good that he would be a great advertisement of the quality of our program if he went to a big name school and did well.

    When the dust settled, Gordon was hired as an acting assistant professor in 1969 and upon completion of the PhD in 1971, the acting title was removed and he was advanced to the top step of assistant professor. He was granted tenure in 1972. In 1973, he was offered (and ultimately accepted) a full professorship at Iowa State. Eventually he returned in 1978/79 to Berkeley where he served three terms as department chair and two terms as dean of the College of Natural Resources.

    The issue of hiring our own has come up many times since. The next round involved the hiring of Richard Howitt in 1975. We hired Chris Heaton in 1981, but she decided instead to get another PhD and never took up the position. Debates in the 1990s ended in stalemates. The next case was bringing back Shermain Hardesty (PhD 1984) in 2002 as an Extension specialist. The most recent cases were Pierre Mérel in 2007 and Tina Saitone (Cooperative Extension) on June 1, 2016.

    19

  • PART 2: THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS

    while one Extension (farm management and production) specialist (Kent Olson) was added, one left

    (Youde), and one retired (Reed), making the total establishment 31, including now 27 ladder faculty

    members and back to four Extension specialists.

    1981–85

    A new chair, Warren Johnston, took over on July 1, 1981, and led the department until mid-1986. During

    the early 1980s, six new members of faculty were added, generally with an off-farm emphasis. They included

    four in agricultural marketing, consumer economics, and demand analysis 1985 (Fran Antonovitz, Dale Heien, Richard Sexton, and Tom Hazlett), one in

    • Campus enrollment: quantitative methods (Ray Nelson), and one in development economics (Tu 19,337

    Jarvis). But three retired (Foytik, Lane, and Snyder) and three left (Collins, • Major enrollment: 500 Zoloth, and Nelson), so the total remained at 27 faculty members. In addition,

    • ARE faculty: 27 three Extension specialists were added with an emphasis on production professorial and 4

    (Klonsky and Siebert) or marketing (Cook), while one retired (Garoyan) and Extension specialists two left (Siebert and Olson), leaving the total at four.

    1986–90

    A new surge of growth marked the late 1980s. A total of 10 new faculty members were hired: fve in

    the area of natural resource and environmental economics (Oscar Burt, Cathy Kling, Mike Caputo,

    Gloria Helfand, and Doug Larson; also, a sixth, John Loomis, in the Department of Environmental

    Science and Policy), four in the area of agricultural policy and international trade (Colin Carter, Rob

    Innes, Julian Alston, and Marilyn Whitney), and one in labor/development economics (Ed Taylor).

    The net gain in the faculty was only four, since six left or retired in the same period (Hansen, Kushman,

    Gardner, Antle, Antonovitz, and King). Two of the new hires were hired at a more senior level with

    tenure: Oscar Burt (returning after having spent 22 years at Montana State University) as a senior

    1990

    • Campus enrollment: 23,318

    • ARE faculty: 31 professorial and 5 Extension specialists

    • City of Davis population: 46,209

    full professor and Colin Carter as an associate professor. Meanwhile, one

    Extension specialist retired (Cothern) but another two were hired (Bees

    Butler, dairy, and Steve Blank, fnance). During this period, Hal Carter

    again served as chair from July 1, 1986, to June 30, 1989. Gordy King

    served as Hal’s co-chair. Hoy Carman was appointed chair on July 1, 1989.

    The year 1990 marks a crucial point in this history. The department

    had reached a peak of nearly three times its original number of faculty

    members, with a total establishment now including 31 ladder faculty and

    fve Extension specialists. The mixture was quite different, too. The emphasis had defnitely shifted away

    from farm production economics—as recorded in the famous quote from John Antle when he left for

    20

  • PART 2: THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS

    Montana State in 1987, saying: “There are only two and a half production economists at Davis, and one of

    them is leaving.” The total of 36 ladder faculty members and Extension specialists included fve women.

    25 Years of Adaptation, 1991–2015

    Growth and diversity sometimes comes at a cost. This period saw the beginning of tensions among

    the faculty, refecting in part a greater diversity of types of economists in terms of their ambitions

    and energy, as well as in their felds of focus, and a shift of the balance among types. The large

    infux of energetic and talented new faculty members added new vigor to the department but also

    put increased pressure on the faculty as a whole to become more productive. This was refected in

    rising tensions in the merit and promotion review processes. The faculty was also becoming more

    diverse in terms of perceptions about the collective purpose and expectations for participation in the

    department and its programs, as well as individual productivity.

    While faculty numbers grew, driven to a great extent by growth in undergraduate student

    numbers, Experiment Station and Extension funding from both state and federal sources contracted,

    and regular fnancing available to support faculty research progressively shrank. Departmental

    funding for research assistants had virtually disappeared by 1990. A new era of faculty needing to

    obtain extramural funds to fnance their research and support graduate students had begun and

    was soon to become dominant, after the budget crisis of the early 1990s. Over the longer term, the

    funding changes led to an increase in the I&R (teaching) share of new appointments and, ultimately,

    a rebalancing of the I&R share for all faculty members.

    The early 1990s was a period of very tight budgets—and not just in California. State support to the

    university was substantially reduced, a trend that had begun in the 1980s, and UC needed to reduce

    its budget by 25 percent. UC adopted an economically absurd policy of encouraging early retirement

    by granting additional years (eventually, a maximum of eight additional years) of retirement credit

    to those members of faculty who opted to retire under the Voluntary Early Retirement Incentive Plan

    (VERIP).5 The incentives were powerful for those who were eligible, and the logic inescapable (for

    the great majority, at least). Consequently, over just a few years, VERIP reduced the total UC faculty

    by well over 20 percent.6 Our department was not spared.

    5 Details on the history of the UC retirement system including the various VERIPs can be found here: http://ucrpfuture.universityofcalifornia.edu/fles/2010/09/peb_ax_l-13-ucrs-historical-perspective_0910.pdf

    6 “Ultimately these programs would result in the retirement of more than 10,000 UC staff and nearly 2,000 tenured UC faculty members—the latter group representing more than 20 percent of all regular UC faculty” (p. 2 Notice Vol. 25, No. 1 October 2001). Later in the same publication, actual numbers of faculty retiring are cited as VERIP I, 675; VERIP II, 1,371; VERIP III, 938, implying a total of 2,984, which is closer to 30 percent, and the Division of Agricultural Sciences lost over 30 percent.

    21

    http://ucrpfuture.universityofcalifornia.edu/files/2010/09/peb_ax_l-13-ucrs-historical-perspective_0910.pdf

  • PART 2: THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS

    1991–95

    VERIP captured a total of 10 members of our faculty with its increasingly seductive incentives; all

    but two department members over the age of 56 took the program and retired (French, H. Carter,

    Burt, Logan, Johnston, Rochin, McCalla, McCorkle, Sosnick, and Learn). In addition, we saw three

    resignations (Innes, Kling, and Loomis). Of these 13, seven became fellows of the Agricultural &

    Applied Economics Association (AAEA).

    Four new hires included some senior appointments, mostly in agricultural marketing and policy

    areas, which partly compensated for the loss of senior faculty through the VERIP. These included a

    “normal” replacement (Garth Holloway); a transfer of a tenured associate professor from Berkeley (Jim

    1995

    • Campus enrollment: 22,372

    • Major enrollment: 545

    • ARE faculty: 22 professorial and 5 Extension specialists

    Chalfant); the foundation appointment of a senior full professor (Dan

    Sumner) to the department’s frst endowed chair position (the Frank H.

    Buck, Jr. Chair), which the faculty opted to fll externally rather than

    from within its own ranks; and a full professor (Cathy Morrison Paul, a

    production economist). Even so, the net loss was nine, reducing the faculty

    to 22; a great loss of human capital. Hoy Carman chaired the department

    through this turbulent period, stepping down on June 30, 1994. Rich

    Sexton took over as chair of a much smaller department on July 1, 1994.

    The transition from the mid-1980s to the mid-1990s represented a massive transformation of

    the faculty. A total of 14 new hires over this 10-year period were more than offset by a total of 20

    resignations or retirements, for a net loss of six. At the end of this process, none of the founding

    faculty members from 1965 remained, and some elements of the old departmental culture and

    identity were lost.

    The VERIP resulted in a tremendous loss of wisdom and experience and institutional knowledge

    (283 years of experience in the department, with a heavier emphasis on traditional agricultural

    economics felds relative to the areas of more recent growth). The other resignations fell

    disproportionately in another direction, because the loss of Cathy Kling was compounded by the

    resignation of John Loomis, leaving only two environmental economists on the campus.

    In 1995 the department changed its name to the Department of Agricultural and Resource

    Economics, refecting the evolving balance of the faculty, students, and their interests, and in keeping

    with a national trend to change the names of departments, professional associations, scholarly

    journals, and other organizations to broaden them away from and weaken the links to agriculture.

    The drift of the balance of the department has continued in that direction.

    22

  • PART 2: THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS

    1996–2000

    Funding recovered somewhat in the latter 1990s, and four new faculty members were appointed,

    including a full professor as the foundation appointment to the Daniel Barton DeLoach endowed

    chair (Jeffrey Williams, commodity markets), a tenured associate professor (Scott Rozelle,

    development economics), and two assistant professors (Hossein Farzin, resource economics, and

    Rachael Goodhue, agricultural marketing).

    These gains were offset by the loss of four faculty members who resigned (Whitney, Helfand,

    Hazlett, and Holloway). The closure of the Food Research Institute at Stanford was serendipitous in

    making Williams and Rozelle available to us, which was timely in facilitating a burst of activity at

    Davis related to development economics in China, in particular. The net outcome was to leave us

    still with a total of 22 faculty and fve Extension specialists. Rich Sexton stepped down as chair on

    June 30, 1998, to be replaced by Colin Carter, who served into the new century, stepping down on

    June 30, 2001.

    Partly as a consequence of the budget pressures in the early- to

    mid-1990s, the Graduate School of Management (GSM) threatened to

    introduce a new undergraduate business major, to compete directly

    with our undergraduate program. This gave rise to concern within

    ARE because enrollment in the agricultural and managerial economics

    (AME) major supported many faculty and staff positions in ARE and

    provided employment and funding for many of our PhD students. In

    response, ARE dropped “agricultural” and thus changed the name of its

    major to managerial economics in 1999. The name change contributed

    to the increase in enrollment from 804 in 1998, to 1,080 in 1999, and

    2000

    • Campus enrollment: 25,075

    • Major enrollment: 1,196

    • ARE faculty: 22 professorial and 5 Extension specialists

    • City of Davis population: 60,308

    1,196 in 2000.

    2001–05

    Only two new faculty members were hired, one econometrician (Aaron

    Smith) and one development economist (Steve Boucher), and Shermain

    Hardesty joined the department as director of the Center for Cooperatives

    (half-time) and Extension specialist (half-time).

    Two members of faculty retired (Heien and Shepard) and one resigned

    (Caputo), making for a net loss of one, and leaving us with a total of 21

    faculty members and six Extension specialists. (These numbers do not

    include Steve Vosti, who joined us as a research associate in 1999 and

    2005

    • Campus enrollment: 28,154

    • Major enrollment: 739 (plus 277 pre-ME)

    • ARE faculty: 21 professorial and 6 Extension specialists

    23

  • PART 2: THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS

    was appointed as an assistant adjunct professor in 2001, and has since been promoted to adjunct

    professor.)

    Enrollment in the major continued to grow, but additional full-time equivalent (FTE) faculty to

    teach these students were not forthcoming and we were advised to “manage enrollment.” This we

    did, by introducing a minimum GPA requirement, which caused hundreds of students to divert to

    economics, which helped for a time, but nevertheless, the ratio of managerial economics majors to

    ARE faculty remained signifcantly higher than before the change in name of the major.

    Jim Chalfant was chair from July 1, 2001, until August 30, 2005, when Richard Howitt assumed

    offce. Howitt served until September 30, 2011.

    2010

    • Campus enrollment: 30,449

    • Major enrollment: 784 (plus 350 pre-ME)

    • ARE faculty: 24 professorial and 5 Extension specialists

    • City of Davis population: 65,622

    2015

    • Campus enrollment in fall 2015–16: 36,104

    • Major enrollment: 1,492 in spring quarter 2016

    • ARE faculty: 23 professorial and 3 Extension specialists

    • City of Davis population: 66,742 (2014)

    2006–10

    Five new faculty members were hired across a range of felds including

    environmental and resource economics (Cynthia Lin, jointly with ESP,

    and Katrina Jessoe), development economics (Travis Lybbert; and

    Michael Carter, hired as a senior full professor to fll the gap caused by

    the loss of Rozelle, who resigned), and agricultural economics (Pierre

    Mérel). These were offset by one retirement (Carman) and one death

    (Cathy Morrison Paul), so the net gain was three. One Extension

    specialist also retired (Jolly).

    2011–15

    Three new faculty members were hired across felds including energy

    economics (Kevin Novan), econometrics (Dalia Ghanem), and

    agricultural marketing (Tim Beatty, appointed as a tenured associate

    professor), but these were more than offset by four retirements (Farzin,

    Howitt, Havenner, and Martin). One Extension specialist resigned

    (Blank) and one retired (Klonsky).

    Rich Sexton returned for a second period as chair on October 1,

    2011, and served through June 30, 2016. Professor Quirino Paris and

    Extension Specialist Roberta Cook retired June 30, 2016.7

    7 Four new faculty members have joined the department since spring quarter of 2015: Kristin Kiesel as a lecturer with security of employment, Ashish Shenoy as an assistant professor, Jens Hilscher as an associate professor, and Tina Saitone as an Extension specialist.

    24

  • PART 2: THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS

    The department in 2015 was very different from its fedgling form in 1965. Having begun with

    13, it grew to a peak of 31 (professorial ranks) faculty members in 1990 but has numbered in the

    low twenties since 1994, as it was in the early 1970s, while the Extension cohort is also down by

    more than half from its peak of six specialists.

    Over the years, ARE

    faculty have served in

    many administrative roles

    on campus (See Box 5).

    The total faculty count is

    about the same as it was

    in 1975, but enrollment in

    our undergraduate major

    has roughly tripled (while

    total enrollment on the

    campus has doubled) and

    the graduate program has

    also grown, including a

    large master’s program in

    conjunction with the PhD

    program that is the main

    focus of this monograph.

    The composition of

    the faculty has changed

    markedly, compared with

    the founding group, to

    be more diverse in many

    dimensions. It is generally

    older (average age 54 in

    2015 compared with 41

    in 1965), though with

    a greater range of ages,

    more international, more

    female, and more likely

    to have a PhD in general

    economics rather than

    Box 5. Administrative Roles Taken by ARE Faculty ARE faculty members have served the University of California in a variety of roles entailing signifcant responsibilities outside the department in addition to their regular faculty roles.

    Chet McCorkle: • Vice-chancellor of academic affairs UCD, 1964–69 • Dean, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences

    (CA&ES), 1969/70 • Senior vice-president UC system, 1970–78

    Elmer Learn: • Executive vice-chancellor UCD, 1969–84

    Alex McCalla: • Associate dean, graduate division UCD, 1968/69 • Dean, CA&ES UCD, 1970–75 • Founding dean, Graduate School of Administration

    (now Management, GSM), 1979–81

    Sam Logan: • Associate dean, graduate studies and research UCD, 1974–78

    Del Gardner: • Last externally recruited director of the Giannini Foundation, UC,

    1976–82

    Lee Garoyan: • Founding director, UC Center for Cooperatives, 1978–83

    Hoy Carman: • Associate dean, CA&ES UCD, 1983–86

    Lor Shepard: • Vice-chancellor of university relations UCD, 1985–89

    Hal Carter: • Founding director of the UC Agricultural Issues Center, 1985–96

    Dan Sumner: • Director, UC Agricultural Issues Center, 1997–

    Tu Jarvis: • Divisional associate dean, CA&ES UCD, 1999–2009 • Director, Blum Center for Developing Economies, 2010–

    Michael Carter: • Director, BASIS Assets and Market Access Collaborative Research

    Support Program (AMA CRSP), 2012–

    25

  • 1965

    1970

    1975

    1980

    1985

    1990

    1995

    2000

    2005

    2010

    2015

    1965

    1970

    1975

    1980

    1985

    1990

    1995

    2000

    2005

    2010

    2015

    0.7 0.6

    0.5

    PART 2: THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS

    1.0Figure 3. 40 0.9 An Increasingly 35 0.8

    30

    25 Diverse Faculty

    (Demographics), 1965–2015 Extension Faculty N

    umbe

    r of

    Fac

    ulty

    20

    0.4 15 0.3

    10 Academic Faculty 0.2 Share of Faculty 5 0.1 with Ag Econ PhD

    0 0.0 Share of Faculty Working on Agriculture Share of Faculty with Berkeley PhD

    2013

    2007

    2010

    2001

    2004

    1995

    1998

    1989

    1992

    1983

    1986

    1977

    1980

    1971

    1974

    1965

    1968

    Figure 4. An Increasingly Diverse Faculty

    (Gender), 1965–2015

    Female Academic Female ExtensionMale Extension

    Male Academic

    40 30 20 10 0 10 Number of Faculty

    Figure 5. 30 An Increasingly 25 Diverse Faculty

    Num

    ber

    of F

    acul

    ty

    20 (Domestic vs.

    15International), 1965–2015 10

    5

    Year

    s of

    Age

    Pe

    rcen

    t

    Domestic Faculty Average Age

    International Faculty 0

    26

    53

    48

    43

    33