19
The Tragedy of the Commons . . . and other sad tales

The Tragedy of the Commons... and other sad tales

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Tragedy of the Commons... and other sad tales

The Tragedy of the Commons

. . . and other sad tales

Page 2: The Tragedy of the Commons... and other sad tales

Once upon a time, there was a lovely village

Page 3: The Tragedy of the Commons... and other sad tales

With a lovely commons where the sheep grazed . . .

Page 4: The Tragedy of the Commons... and other sad tales

Happily . . . and produced happy wool. And the village

was happy.

Page 5: The Tragedy of the Commons... and other sad tales

And happy sheep made great wool.

Page 6: The Tragedy of the Commons... and other sad tales

But as more and more sheep joined the commons

Page 7: The Tragedy of the Commons... and other sad tales

The Commons was overused.

Page 8: The Tragedy of the Commons... and other sad tales

The grass ran out.

Page 9: The Tragedy of the Commons... and other sad tales

and tragedy ensued.

Page 10: The Tragedy of the Commons... and other sad tales

The sheep suffered.

Page 11: The Tragedy of the Commons... and other sad tales

And eventually the sheep produced no wool at all. Brrrr.

Page 12: The Tragedy of the Commons... and other sad tales

Understanding the problem . . .• Say 10 owners each turned out 10 sheep to graze

in a commons that has a carrying capacity of 100 sheep. (CC provides maximum sheep quality/price.)

• As long as the owners don’t exceed the carrying capacity, each sheep fleece will bring $100 in the market, or $10,000 total.

• But if one owner decides to add 1 extra sheep, the value of each sheep drops to $95.

• For the owner of 11 sheep, his revenue will be 11 x $95, or $1045. That single owner gains.• However, the total value of the sheep for all

owners will fall to $9,595.00. The whole group loses.

Page 13: The Tragedy of the Commons... and other sad tales

Common vs. individual loss

• When the 11th sheep is added to the Commons, it reduces the total value of the sheep for all owners in total (to $9595.00), but the overusing owner gains in total (to $1045).

• If that owner had only 1/10th of the Commons to graze his sheep, the impact and cost to him of adding a sheep would be 10x as great. No owner would absorb that kind of loss individually.

Page 14: The Tragedy of the Commons... and other sad tales

What did the villagers miss?

• The villagers should have known that the “Commons” was a common resource.

• As such, it was a rival good, meaning that one person’s (or sheep’s) use diminished another’s enjoyment of it.

• Common resources are always subject to overuse--people (and sheep) are, after all,

MAXIMIZERS.

Page 15: The Tragedy of the Commons... and other sad tales

Common resource solutions

• Private property rights: the right of owners to exclude nonowners. People respond to incentives; when they own property, they have an incentive to maintain its profit producing value.

• Use resources sustainably!

Page 16: The Tragedy of the Commons... and other sad tales

Other tragedies of the commons: Ocean fishing

Page 17: The Tragedy of the Commons... and other sad tales

Bluefin Tuna Decline 1995 – 2012 (projected)

Page 18: The Tragedy of the Commons... and other sad tales

Buffalo nearly became extinct by 1900. What prevented their extinction?

More importantly, why have cattle never been threatened with

extinction?

Other common resource tragedies:• African elephants and other large

game• Blast fishing in the Tongan Islands • The Amazon rainforests• Green turtles in the Cayman Islands

Page 19: The Tragedy of the Commons... and other sad tales

Let’s check out a couple things…

Bunny Game!!!

Garrett Hardin