Upload
elijah-ferguson
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The SESAR Definition Phase is co-financed by the European Community and EUROCONTROL
An Introduction to
• NexSAT Steering Group,
• Air-Ground Communications Focus Group,
• ICAO ACP WG-C
Brussels, Sept 18th, 2006
Jens Federhen, SESAR Project Directorate
SESAR DEFINITION PHASE
Page : 2
SESAR Lifecycle
2005 2010 2015 2020
DefinitionDefinition
DevelopmentDevelopment
DeploymentDeployment
SESAR Phases
Currentwork
Implementation
Development work
Planning work
Converging Industry, EC & EUROCONTROL
Needs:
Turn off fragmented approach
Accelerate ATM evolution in response to challenges
Synchronise & integrate plans from research to operations
Synchronise airborne and ground deployments
Converging Industry, EC & EUROCONTROL
Needs:
Turn off fragmented approach
Accelerate ATM evolution in response to challenges
Synchronise & integrate plans from research to operations
Synchronise airborne and ground deployments
A European Plan to unlock Viable Growth in Air Transport
Page : 3
SESAR Definition Phase: Objectives
• Define European air transport system performance requirements up to 2020 and beyond.
• Identify globally interoperable and harmonised ATM solutions
• Establish a detailed and phased implementation and deployment plan,
• Produce the detailed Research and Technology and validation work programme,
• Propose the legislative, financial and regulatory framework
Source: CALL FOR TENDERS Nº AO/03/HQ/EC/05, Requirement Specification for Core Activity, p. 5&6
Page : 4
The SESAR Definition Phase
From agreed performance requirements to implementation of the future European ATM Network
The SESAR Definition Phase is funded by the European Commission’s TEN-T Programme and EUROCONTROL
One ATM Master Plan: developed by the SESAR Consortium,
to be shared by ALL stakeholders
The SESAR Definition Phase is co-financed by the European Community and EUROCONTROL
CONSORTIUM
Page : 6
Consortium: a broad basis of expertise
Lufthansa
Iberia
Air France
AEA
ERA
IAOPA
IATA
LVNL
LFV
Austrocontrol
AENA
DFS
DSNA
ENAV
NAV
NATS
BAA
FRAPORT
AAS
AENA
LFV
BAE Systems
EADS
Airbus
Selex SI
INDRA
ThalesATM
ThalesAvionics
Research Centres (10)
CAA UK
BOEING, Rockwell, Honeywell
EURAMID
IFATCA
ATC EUC
JATWMG
EBAA
ECA
Potential Project Associates
Airspace Users Basic Consortium
Members (8)
ANSPsBasic Consortium
Members (9)
Airports Basic Consortium
Members (7)
Supply Industry Basic Consortium
Members (7)
EADS
Airbus
ThalesSA
ThalesATM
Project Directorate(Secretary)
Air Traffic Alliance GIE
GLOBAL CONSORTIUM (co-contracting arrangements)
Content Responsibility (4 Basic Consortia and Project Associates)
Subcontracting arrangements
for admin purposes
Military(Observer)
Users(4)
ANSPs(3)
Airports(2)
Supply Industry (1)
PROJECT EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (10 voting rights)
Project Directorate
KLM
Munich Airport
ADP
+ EUROCONTROL
The SESAR Definition Phase is co-financed by the European Community and EUROCONTROL
MANAGEMENT
Page : 8
SESAR Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)
EURC RCT ARPTUser
Pilots US-IND
ANSP MILIND
CTRLSR
1. Institutional Framework Definition
and longer term
1.4 Cost Benefit Modelling
1.3 Financial & Investment
Task 1.3.2: Prepare a proposal for the Financial and Investment Plan, including financing schemes and incentive policies
Task 1.3.1: Review existing financial mechanisms and identify investment needs for the whole programme
1.5 Legislation & Regulation
Task 1.4.2: Consolidate & update the CBA model with data supporting the trade-offs and Financial Plans
1.1 Air Transport Value Chain
Task 1.1.3: Security
Task 1.1.2: Evaluation of ATM System within the Air Transport Value
Task 1.1.1: Analysis of the Air Transport Value Chain
1.2 Decision Making Mechanisms & Triggers
Task 1.2.2: Definition of new mechanisms for timely and harmonised decision making
Task 1.2.1: Identification of existing mechanisms and triggers for decision making
Task 1.1.4: Environment
Task 1.7.3: Determination of social factors to be taken into account
Task 1.7.2: Harmonised recruitment, training and licensing policy
Task 1.4.1: Review of existing tools and preparation of the CBA model
Task 1.7.1: Social impacts of the evolution of roles, tasks and functionalities and the new set of skills to be required in the
1.7 Human Resources
Task 1.6.2: Compliance and synchronisation with ICAO Safety standards
Task 1.6.1: Study of impact of new concepts and procedures on safety regulations
1.6 ATM Safety Regulation
Task 1.5.2: Identification of potential modifications to existing legislation and regulation to be undertaken within or beyond the scope of short-, mid- and long-term packages
Task 1.5.1: Legislative and regulatory benchmarking with third countries (US mainly)
2. Performance Requirements & System Definition2.1 Performance Requirements
Task 2.1.1: Assessment on Current Baseline
Task 2.1.2: Define Strategic Objectives (Safety, Security, Capacity, Environment, Cost, World-wide Interoperability, …)
Task 2.3.1: Compute and Map Operational Concepts & Airspace KPIs based on identified available tools and methodologies
2.2 ATM Network Concepts of OperationTask 2.2.1: Inventory of on-going initiatives (promising function resulting from Research, …)
Task 2.2.2: Definition of ATM operations based on new concept including airspace redesign
Task 2.3.2: Investigate needs for new appropriate modelling and validation tools and methodologies
Task 2.2.3: Identification of underlying ATM functions and procedures
Task 2.2.4: Resulting set of recommendations for operational concepts trade-offs analysis
2.3 Modelling and Performance Assessment
2.5 Technology AssessmentTask 2.5.1: Identification of future technical needs for the implementation of the long term baseline
Task 2.5.2: Inventory of potential aeronautical technologies, benchmarking with other technologies, assessment of limitations.Analysis of expected technical performance compared
2.4 System ArchitectureTask 2.4.1: Overall architecture & alternatives, including allocation of functions on the various systems and related data flow
Task 2.4.2: Description of responsibility
Task 2.4.3: Analysis of the various technical sub-systems/functions supporting the architecture
Task 2.4.4: Resulting set of recommendations for architecture trade-offs analysis
Task 2.5.3: Mapping to technical needs and recommendation for development of innovative technologies required to fill the gap
Task 2.5.4: Resulting set of recommendations for technology trade-offs analysis
Task 2.6.1: Identification of critical elements for the long term baseline
2.6 Standardisation & Interoperability
Task 2.6.2: Contribution to Standardisation Identification and potential creation of the appropriate standardisation groups
4. Work Programme for 2007-2012
Task 4.3.2: MidTerm / Baseline 2012 Development definition of the research & validation activities
Task 4.3.3: LongTerm / Baseline 2017+ , Assessment:definition of the innovative research activities
4.1 Management Structure & ProcessTask 4.1.1: Programme and Governance rules
Task 4.1.2: Definition of Roles & Responsibilities
Task 4.1.3: Risk Management
4.3 Work-Programme Content for 2007-2012Task 4.3.1: Short-term / Baseline 2007 Development: definition of activities required for the deployment of the short term baseline
4.2 Methodology Development & ToolsTask 4.2.1: System Engineering Development & Validation Process
Task 4.2.2: Standardisation, Interoperability & Harmonisation Process: define interoperability and its attributes
Task 4.2.3: Modelling, Simulation & Validation Tools Definition required during the development lifecycle
3. Implementation Plan Definition
Task 3.4.2: Deployment Planning
Task 3.4.3: R&T/D Program Planning
Task 3.4.4: Benefit Planning
Task 3.4.5: Financial & Investment Planning
Task 3.4.6: Regulatory / Legislative Planning
Task 3.4.7: Risk Assessment
3.3 Deployment scenarios & trade-offsTask 3.3.1: Methodology for transition strategy trade-offs
Task 3.3.2: Establishment of deployment costs for the deployment scenarios as input into 3.3.3
Task 3.4.1: ATM Master Plan consolidation
Task 3.3.3: Trade-off analysis and selection of deployment scenarios
3.4 ATM Master Plan 2007-2020
Task 3.2.4: Establishment of deployment costs for the short term improvements
Task 3.2.5: Standardisation activity (operational & technical) required for the short term baseline
Task 3.2.6: Description & schedule of the Short Term Baseline
Task 3.2.7: Description & schedule of the Short Term Baseline
Task 3.2.3: Trade-off analysis and selection of short term improvements
3.1 Integration of European ATM Initiatives & ProgrammesTask 3.1.1: Integration with on-going initiatives
Task 3.1.2: Impacts of external initiatives
Task 3.1.3: Recommendation for an effective integration of the future ATM network
3.2 Short-term improvements & Deployment PlanTask 3.2.1: Identification of limits/Blocking points. For airspace environment
Task 3.2.2: Identification of limits/Blocking points. For airport environment
Workpackage
Task
Inst
itu
tio
na
l
Sy
ste
m D
efin
itio
n
Imp
lem
en
tati
on
Pla
n
Wo
rk P
rog
ram
me
Page : 9
ATM Target Concept selection
M3
PRODUCT
Deployment sequence analysis
M4
DEPLOYMENT
Build the ATM Master Plan
M5
ACTIONPLAN
Define organisation & work- programme 2007-2012
M6
GO AHEAD
Performance requirements
M2
SPECIFICATION
Analyse air transport value and role of ATM
M1
MARKET
The Project Milestones
Building the Master Plan for the FutureBuilding the Master Plan for the Future
Page : 10
Relationship Process / Content
Project Directorate
Executive Committee
process content
CIT
WBS
Collocation
Participants
Responsibility assignment
Personnel assignment
Sequence of activities
WP Coordinators R/O/W resp.
Milestone Manager
Content IntegratorsD6
D5D4
D3D2
D1
Reporting lines
The SESAR Definition Phase is co-financed by the European Community and EUROCONTROL
COMMUNICATION&
Buy-In
Page : 12
Buy-in
The SESAR Consortium gathers a wide range of expertise
Still, a wider consultation is crucial:
The Air Transport Community at large
Pro-active Communication strategy to involve external organisations and integrate their comments/positions within the six main deliverables of the Project• SESAR Forum organisation
• Feed-back process on Deliverables
Page : 13
AGCFG - SESAR cooperation
AGCFG can assist the SESAR project in particular • to understand the Future Communication Study assessment, results and
recommendations• In contributing to create common SESAR/AGTF positions
SESAR can assist AGCFG in particular by• enlarging the dissemination of FCS work• providing stakeholder feedback to AGTF• endorsing through this feedback common reference positions
AGCFG/SESAR cooperation is key to both projects• Through this we could achieve :
Consensus on key technologies
Harmonised selection of aviation related technology, with no unjustified proliferation of multiple technologies addressing the same needs.
Global interoperability
Page : 14
Where can AGCFG assist?
AGCFG experts support is needed on communications strategy :
• To disseminate,and to explain the initial communications strategy This is particularly scope of D1 phase of SESAR (Mar - June 06)
• To create full understanding & rationale between AGCFG & SESAR stakeholders on choices, methodology, candidate technologies, issues etc. related to the future communications strategy
This is particularly the scope of D3/D4 phase of SESAR (Sep 06 - Oct 07);
• Openly respond to SESAR stakeholders questions
Page : 15
Interoperability : a Key Objective
Interoperability of systems, Constituents and Procedures : one of the four packages from the SES legislation
Standardisation : - a key aspect for interoperability
In the Definition Phase :• Dedicated Work Packages
• US Industry partners
• Buy-in – They are involved : JURG, RTCA, EUROCAE, ETSI, CANSO, FAA / ICAO through EUROCONTROL
Page : 16
Work package 2.5
Working package 2.5 Technology Assessment
The overall goals of this WP are:• Identification and characterisation of candidate technologies (available and
new / innovative ones) in order to support the concept of operation and the architecture options for mid & long-term objectives
• Identification of risks and blocking points concerning the introduction of the candidate technologies (e.g. open technical issues or technology availability)
• Development of a strategy how to resolve the identified risks and blocking points
A consensus is needed on a technology roadmap. The roadmap must:
• operationally support future ATS • be applicable worldwide and institutionally accepted
• include supporting R&D themes
Page : 17
Paving the way for the Single European Sky
Implementation
Page : 18
Backup slides
Page : 19
Where does the SESAR ATM Master Plan fit ?
2-year Definition
Phase2006-2008
2-year Definition
Phase2006-2008
SESAR Implementation Programme
Phase 1: 2008-2013
R&T/D, ValidationDeployment
SESAR Implementation Programme
Phase 1: 2008-2013
R&T/D, ValidationDeployment
Air transport industry
unsolicited proposal to
EC31-03-04
Air transport industry
unsolicited proposal to
EC31-03-04
‘SESAR’
Air Navigation Service Providers, Airlines, Airports, Manufacturing Industry, Military users/providers, Professional Associations, Regulators, EUROCONTROL
and Research Organisations
To the 2020 ATM concept To the 2020 ATM concept
SESAR is a European ATM Implementation Programme:
SESARATM
MasterPlan
SESARATM
MasterPlan
Page : 20
TEN-T Funding Structure
Total:60M€
~50M€
EC30M€
Euro30M€
10.6M€
9.4M€effort
20
40M€cash
10
• First Lot allocated under the 2004 TEN-T programme (14m€)
• Second Lot to be allocated in 2005 (plus 2006?)
• Member States support essential
Page : 21
SESAR Definition Phase Governance
European Commission
Industry Consultation Body
Single European Sky Committee
EC/EUROCONTROL Steering Board
EUROCONTROLStakeholder Consultation
Group
Consortium
European Commission
EUROCONTROL Agency
Consortium
Contractual Relationship
Information & Consultation Mechanisms
Page : 22
Project Directorate organisation
Project Director
Project Assistant
Quality & Risk Manager
Contract & Finance Manager
PMOPerformance
ManagerCommunication
Managers
Configuration & Data Manager
Milestone Manager
WP Coordinators
Project Directorate• Ensures the Project control, time and cost
management,• Handles a master project plan, integrating the
dashboards associated to the processes under monitoring (progress, risks, quality,…).
• Reports to the Executive Committee, and to the Purchaser and the European Commission within the mandate attributed to it by the Executive Committee.
Page : 23
Management of Multi-disciplinary Activities (SOW)
• Challenge: Overcome traditional barriers
between stakeholder groups, nations,
etc.
• Solution: Create a “customer-contractor”
type of relationship through three levels
of responsibility
• R (“Requirement”) level
• O (“Operational”) level
• W (“Work”) level
R levelOverall operational responsibility at WP level (baseline: SOW), including
• Specification of individual Tasks• Content coordination within Work
Packages• Overall Work Package consistency• Endorsement and integration
O levelResponsibility on Task level (according to requirements defined by R level), inclduding:
• Technical content• Output of deliverables.
W level• Contribution work within a given
Task under the control of O level• may be performed by multiple
Participants.
Page : 24
Linking content and process
SESAR Definition Phase can only be successful in a collaborative effort.
Collaboration without guidance (better: “organisation”) is risky.
• ATM comprises many disciplines.• For each of these disciplines there
are specialised entities.• None of these entities has enough
knowledge of the other disciplines to take leadership over them.
• Such a claim would not be acceptable for the other entities.
• No entity is willing, nor able, to be main contractor
• Cost/Schedule problems• Efficiency losses• Unsatisfactory quality of project
results• Frustration of stakeholders and loss
of buy-in• Project may lose track!• In addition, the Purchaser and the
general public need a well-defined interface to the project
Separation of “Content” and “Process”
• Content: R/O/W• Process and Interface: Project Directorate
Reconciliation of “Content” and “Process”: Content Integration Team (CIT)
Page : 25
Definition Phase: a new Approach
Shared objectives
Shared Expertise:• ~ 50 participating companies / associations / …
• contributing to the Buy-in of results by the Air Transport Community at large
Shared Governance:• The ExCom
• The Content Integration Team
• The Project Directorate
Shared Processes:• … working together in a coherent way
Page : 26
What after the Definition Phase ?
The ATM Master Plan : foundation for the Implementation phase • Development Phase: necessary development /validation work to be
conducted, accompanying regulatory measures
• Implementation Phase: deployment of the developed Master Plan in the European ATM.
SESAR Joint Undertaking being currently proposed by the EC:• to manage the Development Phase
• to rationalise European technological development efforts
Page : 27
Management of Content Integration via Content Integration Team
Ensure consistency of results while:• WBS contains 20 WPs and 64 Tasks.• 40 to 50 organisations are working on R, O, and/or W level.• Timescale is tight (24 months) and many WPs and tasks run in parallel.
Establishment of a “Content Integration Team”:• Composed of Experts bringing expertise of the Basic Consortia.
Users (1)
ANSP (2)
Industry (2)
EUROCONTROL (tbd)
• Definition of, and agreement on, Milestone Objective Plan with R levels (with O support).
• Integrating output of Tasks and WPs into Milestone Deliverables.
Page : 28
Main functions of the Project Directorate
Day-to-day management of the Project• Interface to EUROCONTROL and Project Associates in contractual matters• Point of contact for external parties• Practical / logistics organisation of events
Ensure that the Project is carried out efficiently• Cost/Schedule planning and controlling• Control of adequate resource allocation• Quality Management, Risk Management, etc.• Manage E-Room and other common tools
Facilitate work of R/O/W to produce satisfactory results• Work-Package Co-ordinators, Milestone Co-ordinators, Performance
Manager Detect potential problems
Act as a moderator / facilitator amongst stakeholders
Page : 29
Executive Committee
The Executive committee is in charge of the overall direction and major decisions with a strategic and high level operational role.
It gives appropriate mandate to the project directorate for the daily project operations.
It supervises the work of the Content Integration Team.
It decides upon use of the Project reserve.
It is composed of :• 4 Users representatives including the Chairman,
• 3 ANSPs representatives,
• 2 Airports,
• 1 Industry,
• 1 Military observer.
All decisions should be based on consensus, where required voting mechanism applies with at least 75% for decision.
Page : 30
At M1 –Status of Current Situation & Future Expectations (D1)
• Capture of Current Situation with clear identification of Rationale
• Strengths, Weaknesses, Deficiencies, Overview of Current Initiatives, etc.
• Expectations for Future
At M2 – will have Set of Requirements for Future ATM System Network
(D2)• Outline Vision of Future Air Transport Industry & Role of ATM
• Performance Requirements for Future Network
• Identification of “Best Practice” & Principles upon which to Build
At M3 – will have Definition of Future ATM Target Concept (D3)
• Concept of Operations
• Architecture for Future ATM System Network
• Set of Enabling Technologies Identified
• Outline of Total Cost & Preliminary Assurance that Target is Viable
Key Objectives at each Milestone (1 of 2)
Page : 31
At M4 – will have a “Best” Deployment Sequence (D4)• Confirmation of Viability (Technical, Financial, Institutional, etc.)• Options for Deployment Sequence & Recommended “Best” Approach• Definition of Deployment Packages (Transition from Legacy
Systems/Framework)
At M5 – will have the SESAR ATM Master Plan (D5)• Detailed Plan of Actions which All Relevant Organisations need to
undertake to Implement Changes• Inputs to Future Business Plans, R&T/D Plans, Risk Assessment
Régimes, Development of Future Management Processes, etc.
At M6 – will have Basis of SESAR Implementation Programme of Work for 2008-2013 (D6)
• Proposed Management Structure for SESAR Implementation Phase• Proposed Structured Lifecycle & Methods to Support Implementation• Detailed Programme of Work for First 5 Years of Implementation
Phase
Key Objectives at each Milestone (2 of 2)
Page : 32
D1 recommendations; Air Transport Framework & Air Traffic Management from a business perspective
Integrated “partners”• Link their businesses
• Amortise effects of sudden fall in demand
Empowerment• ATM industry to make own business decisions
De-Fragmentation
Performance framework: a basis for decision making
Liberalised approach for the provision of Air Navigation
Page : 33
D1 recommendations: The Institutional View of ATM
Consistent framework of legislation & regulation
“Constructive tension”• Between institutional & business frameworks
Unambiguous ATM safety regulatory framework• Across the whole air transport industry
Global interoperability• By performance-based regulation & a simplified approach to developing
standards
“Overarching” governance structure for implementation
Page : 34
Role of the Human in ATM Today
PROACTIVE APPROACH TO CHANGE MANAGEMENT
Collaboration, transparency & inclusiveness
Involvement of staff at all levels
Significant improvement
Resource planning
Licensing
Page : 35
D1 recommenadtion:Safety, Environment, Security& Transition Aspects
SAFETY• Accurate measurement of current level of safety
• Stronger emphasis on safety design criteria
• Importance of human in ATM
ENVIRONMENT• Proactive management approach
SECURITY• Security of future ATM System matching the risk
APPROACH TO TRANSITION• Flexibility in System’s architectural design
• European ATM System “design authority” role must be central
Page : 36
D1 Recommendations:Operational & Technical View of the current ATM “System”
A- One Single “design” authority for European ATM System
empowered to define, plan & manage the implementation
of the System which has:• One functional architecture
• An integrated ground-based and airborne systems design
• Separation of Services: ATM services
Supporting (technical) services
Physical assets
• Flexibility
B- Focused R&D
Page : 37
D2 “ATM Performance Targets “ Overall Scope
An outline “vision” of the future air transport
industry and the role of ATM within it.
Framework of economic, safety, environmental and
security regulation enabling a long term sustainable air transport
Identification of performance gaps and the potential for improvements
Flexibility to quickly adapt to market changes
A viable transition path needs to be achievable
Short term solutions to resolve the present urgent blocking
points needs to be included
Business model supported by all stakeholders to achieve
optimum benefits
Page : 38
D2 Key messages
Results First brain storming session Excom
Future market environment- Growing but following effects need to be considered.
• Changes in market segments: UAV/VLJ/MIL/GA/BA
• Security measures/risks
• New traffic patterns within Europe and between continents
• Fleet composition ( I.e effect A 380)
• Open Sky Agreement
• Fuel costs
• Potential constraints InfrastructureEnvironment
Page : 39
D2 Key messages (Continued)
ATM services- Providing maximum added value (performance) to European Air transport noting:
• Resolving fragmentation- Reduction ANSPs/Unbundling of services/Cost effectiveness
• Commitment and business objectives from each stakeholder
• Differential services/funding/financing/charging principles
• Ownership of assets
• Governance of R&D, network and services
• Potential for competition/market mechanisms
• ATM security
• Need to improve predictability/flexibility/ adaptability of services
• Changing human role in future ATM services
Page : 40
D3 Scope: ATM target concept
ATM target concept a concept being a combination of :
Operational concept element
The principles of operation
The architectural principles
The technical infrastructure
The supporting technologies