The Release of TiO2 and SiO2 Nanoparticles From Nanocomposites

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Nanoparticles

Citation preview

  • le

    ther

    t innopusnannsid, bema.

    the dlymers (partaracterude mrties, bagneton proenviro

    copolymers and nano-TiO2 as environmentally safe. Kubacka et al.[25] state that TiO2 nanoparticles are non-toxic and that nano-TiO2/ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer composites are environ-mentally friendly.

    During the lifecycle, nanoparticles may be released. Such

    composites show that friction leads to the gradual loss of SiO2nanoparticles [27]. In the case that SiO2 nanoparticles are applied intires, one may expect them to be released by wear. It has beenshown that many of the particles released by the interactionbetween tires and road pavement are

  • on aseem proper to consider the impact of nanoparticlate TiO2 andamorphous silica after release.

    2. Titania and amorphous silica nanoparticles can behazardous

    There is now substantial evidence that inhaled TiO2 nano-particles are hazardous to humans [1,4858]. Inhaled TiO2 nano-particles can increase the risk of pulmonary and cardiovasculardisease and will increase such risk in contexts where there isalready a large environmental exposure to non-manufactured smallparticles, as is common in urban areas [1,48,49,5153,58]. There isfurthermore evidence that TiO2 nanoparticles can be translocatedfrom the nasal area to the central nervous system via the olfactorynerve and bulb, thus posing a hazard to the central nervous system[5456]. Ingested titania nanoparticles may also be hazardous [52].Ingestionmay lead of inammation of the intestines and perhaps ofother organs [52].

    There is evidence that TiO2 nanoparticles may exhibit ecotox-icity in water, negatively affecting sh and unicellular organisms including algae, and TiO2 nanoparticles are possibly ecotoxic insoils [48,49,51,52,59,60]. TiO2 may also enhance the bio-accumulation of Cd in sh [61].

    There is evidence that amorphous SiO2 nanoparticles may behazardous to humans [6264] and may exhibit ecotoxicity [65]. Amain molecular mechanism of cytotoxicity in case of both amor-phous SiO2 and TiO2 nanoparticles in the absence of light appears tobe oxidative damage linked to reactive oxygen species, whereasTiO2 particles exposed to light and/or UV radiation may alsodamage cells due to photocatalytically enhanced oxidation [58,6674]. Changes of the nanoparticulate surface, which may beintroduced to achieve a better performance of nanocompositese.g. [8,16,75,76], may in turn affect hazard [1,48,49,51,67,77].

    All in all, amorphous SiO2 and TiO2 nanoparticles can behazardous, with actual hazard to a considerable extent dependenton surface characteristics and in case of TiO2 also on crystal struc-ture [1,4953,58,77]. Claims that nanocomposites are environ-mentally safe [3,24], environment(ally)-friendly [11,24,25] oreco-friendly [12] and that TiO2 nanoparticles are non-toxic [6,25]do not seem to have a rm foundation in empirical data. Moreover,traditional methods of particulate control such as wastewatertreatment plants and lters are often not well suited to efcientlycatching TiO2 and SiO2 nanoparticles [48,49,78].

    3. Options for hazard reduction

    Safety by design extending to the full life cycle of the nano-composite [48,49], would seem a matter to consider for nano-composites. In situ formation of nanoparticles in thenanocomposite is conducive to hazard reduction in the part of thelife cycle up to, and including, the production stage [48,49]. This isnot possible in case of TiO2 nanoparticles which have a coating orcontain dopants, but may be an option for nanocomposites withSiO2 nanoparticles e.g. [18].

    When design is for stability and durability, the full life cycle mayin principle include more than one use cycle, and thus recycling. Insuch a case, from a safety perspective, nanoparticle behaviourduring recycling should also be considered and from the point ofview of performance, the characteristics of the recycled materialmerit consideration.

    There is only very limited research into the performance ofrecycled nanocomposites which contain organic polymers. Onestudy has considered recycling of layered silicate-thermoplasticolen elastomer nanocomposites, focussing on mechanical

    L. Reijnders / Polymer Degradati874performance [79]. In this study it was found that thoughdegradation of the nanocomposite during recycling occurred,mechanical properties remained signicantly better than those ofthe neat polymer. More in general one might expect that theoxidative properties of titania and silica nanoparticles are condu-cive to polymer degradation [80] and will increase thermaldegradation over the level occurring in neat polymer when recy-cling involves heating [7,10]. If nanocomposite design aims atimproving mechanical performance and if degradation would bea substantial problem for the application of the recycled material,the alternative of self-reinforced mono-materials may be worthconsidering [81]. Such self-reinforced mono-materials are nowavailable for the polymers polyethylene, polypropylene and poly(ethylene terephthalate) [81]. An alternative option would seem tobe a persistent suppression of oxidative damage, which in turn cancontribute to nanocomposite stability [82].

    More generally, in designs aiming at reduction of nanoparticlerelease more than safety may be at stake, because loss of nano-particles may lead to a deterioration of characteristics whichnanoparticles should enhance, such as (di)electric behaviour, ameretardant properties, protection against corrosion and gloss e.g.[26,19,24,34,35,37,39]. In designing nanocomposites for stability,better xation of nanoparticles leading to reduced release wouldimprove performance and might reduce hazard.

    On the other hand, there may also be design characteristicswhich are linked to the release of nanoparticles. The rst examplethereof concerns tribomechanical performance. In this respectnanoparticle lled polymer composites have been shown toperform well. The apparent reason therefore is that due to inden-tion and scratch of such nanocomposites, nanoparticles are grad-ually removed [27]. A second example is design of thenanocomposite for biocidal activity using photocatalytically activeTiO2 particles. Due to the photocatalytic activity, the polymer islikely to be degraded near the TiO2 particles, and this may beexpected to further the release of such nanoparticles [51].

    When design is for nanocomposite stability and durability,hazard reduction by changing the surface of nanoparticles seemsworthwhile considering [19,48,49,52]. It has been found thatsurface modication of SiO2 nanoparticles by a variety of silanesconducive to proper nanocomposite formation with polyethylenereduces the generation of reactive oxygen species [80]. On the otherhand, it has been found this reduction in the generation of reactiveoxygen species may be largely lost on incorporation of the modiedSiO2 nanoparticles in the nanocomposite [80]. In such a case,persistent suppression of oxidative damage to polymers by usingsuitable antioxidants may reduce nanocomposite hazard. Reduc-tion of hazard may also come from coating of TiO2 particles withsilicates to strongly reduce photocatalytic activity, which maycontribute to the reduction of environmental hazard of suchparticles [48,49]. Such coating may also be conducive to the dis-persability of the nanoparticles [75] and to the stability of thenanocomposite, thus limiting the release of TiO2 nanoparticles[48,51]. Changes in structure or composition may also be helpful inhazard reduction. For instance, anatase-structured TiO2 is morecytotoxic than rutile-structured TiO2 [52] and dopant ions mayreduce the photocatalytic activity of TiO2, though one should beselective in this respect because a variety of dopants have beenshown to increase chemical interactions with cells which may behazardous [48,51].

    Also, within the context of hazard reduction, design of nano-composites might focus on being conducive to types of release inwhich titania or silica nanoparticles remain included in muchlarger sized pieces of nanocomposites, as (largely) occurs in therelease of platinum-group nanoparticles from catalytic convertersused in motorcars [48]. This would probably limit hazard because

    nd Stability 94 (2009) 873876relatively large particles tend to be less hazardous than smaller

  • coatings. Asia-Pacic Coatings Journal 2007;20:223.[5] Aglan A, Allie A, Ludwick A, Koons L. Formulation and evaluation of nano-

    thermal catalytic activity of micro- and nano-particulate titanium dioxide in

    on aoxidizing condensed mediums. Dyes and Pigments 2007;75:31527.[11] Zan L, Tian L, Liu Z, Peng Z. A new polystyreneTiO2 nanocomposite lm and

    its photocatalytic degradation. Applied Catalysis A General 2004;264:23742.[12] Nkayama N, Hayashi T. Preparation and Characterization of poly (L-lactic acid)/

    TiO2 nanoparticle nanocomposite lms with high transparency and efcientphotodegradability. Polymer Degradation and Stability 2007;92:125564.

    [13] Hsu L, Chein H. Evaluation of nanoparticle emission from TiO2 nanopowdercoating materials. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2007;9:15763.

    [14] Kaegi R, Ulrich A, Sinnet B, Vonbank R, Wichser A, Zuleeg S, et al. SyntheticSiO2 nanoparticle emission from exterior facades into the aquatic environ-ment. Environmental Pollution 2008;156:2339.

    [15] Bandyopadhyay A, Maiti M, Bhowmick AK. Synthesis, characterisation andproperties of clay and silica based rubber composites. Material Science andTechnology 2006;22:81828.

    [16] Takamura M, Yamauchi T, Tsubokawa N. Grafting and crosslinking reaction ofcarboxyl-terminated liquid rubber with silica nanoparticles and carbon blackin the presence of Sc(OTf)3. Reactive and Functional Polymers 2008;68:11138.

    [17] Yan J, Zhou S, Gu G, Wu L. Effect of the particle size of nanosilica on thestructured polymeric coatings for corrosion protection. Surface and CoatingsTechnology 2007;202:3708.

    [6] Allen NS, Edge M, Verran J, Stratton J, Maltby J, Bygott C. Photocatalytic titaniabased surfaces: environmental benets. Polymer Degradation and Stability2008;93:163246.

    [7] Pandey JK, Reddy KR, Kumar AP, Singh RP. An overview on the degradability ofpolymer nanocomposites. Polymer Degradation and Stability 2005;898:23450.

    [8] Lin OH, Akil HM, Ishak ZAM. Characterization and properties of activatednanosilica/polypropylene composites with coupling agents. PolymerComposites 2008; doi:10.1002/pc.20744.

    [9] Chen XD, Wang Z, Liao ZF, Mai YL, Zhang MQ. Role of anatase and rutile TiO2nanoparticles in photooxidation of polyurethane. Polymer Testing2007;26:2028.

    [10] Zeynalov EB, Allen NS, Calvet NL, Stratton J. Impact of stabilizers on theparticles [48]. On the other hand, such a design characteristic maybe at variance with required tribomechanical performance [27].

    Some nanocomposites would seem to be associated witha substantial irreducible hazard. A biocidal coating with photo-catalytically active TiO2 in an organic polymer matrix would seeman example thereof, because a signicant release of relativelyhazardous TiO2 nanoparticles is a likely characteristic. Anotherexample seems to be the use of TiO2 nanoparticles in biodegradablenanocomposites [11,12,25] because the degradation of nano-composites may be expected to further the release of nanoparticlesand because the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanoparticles whichis exploited for the purpose of biodegradation is a major contrib-utor to environmental hazard [1,48,49,51].

    4. Conclusions

    As there is evidence that amorphous SiO2 and TiO2 nano-particles can be hazardous, in the design of nanocomposites withsuch nanoparticles, hazard reduction extending to their full lifecycle would seem a matter to consider. Options for hazard reduc-tion include: better xation of nanoparticles in nanocomposites,including persistent suppression of oxidative damage to polymerby nanoparticles, changes of nanoparticle surface, structure orcomposition, and design changes leading to the release of relativelylarge particles.

    References

    [1] Borm PJA, Beruba D. A tale of opportunities, uncertainties, and risks. NanoToday 2008;3:569.

    [2] Shi H, Liu F, Yang L, Han E. Characterization of protective performance of epoxyreinforced with nanometer-sized TiO2 and SiO2. Progress in Organic Coatings2008;62:35968.

    [3] Mizutani T, Arai K, Miyamoto M, Kimura Y. Application of silica-containingnanocomposite emulsion to wall paint: a new environmentally safe paint ofhigh performance. Progress in Organic Coatings 2006;55:27683.

    [4] Flyunt R, Czihal K, Bauer F, Buchmeier MR. UV-curable lacquers for transparent

    L. Reijnders / Polymer Degradatiperformance of epoxy/silica composite coatings. Journal of Materials Science2005;40:392732.[18] Bandyopadhyay A, de Sarkar M, Bhowmick AK. Epoxidized natural rubber/silica hybrid nanocomposites by solgel technique: effect of reactants on thestructure and the properties. Journal of Materials Science 2005;40:5362.

    [19] Moczo J, Pikanszky B. Polymer micro and nanocomposites: structure, inter-actions, properties. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 2008;14:53565.

    [20] Yang T, Kona P. Dielectric properties of polymer nanoparticle composites.Polymer 2007;48:7918.

    [21] Ding Y, Zhang P, Jiang Y, Xu F, Yin J, Zuo Y. Mechanical properties of nylon-6/SiO2 nanobers prepared by electrospinning. Materials Letters 2009;63:346.

    [22] Batistella M, Cascione M, Fiedler B, Wichmann MHG, Quaresimin M, Schulte K.Fracture behaviour of fumed silica/epoxy nanocomposites. Composites Part A2008;39:18518.

    [23] Zhou TH, Ruan WH, Mai YL, Rong MZ, Zhang MQ. Performance improvementof nano-silica/polypropylene composites through in-situ cross-linkingapproach. Composites Science and Technology 2008;68:285863.

    [24] Mosurkal R, Samuelson LA, Smith KD, Westmoreland PR, Parmar VS, Yan F,et al. Nanocomposites of TiO2 and siloxane copolymers as environmentallysafe ame retardant materials. Journal of Macromolecular Science Part A Pureand Applied Chemistry 2008;45:92446.

    [25] Kubacka A, Serrano C, Ferrer M, Lunsdorf H, Bielecki P, Cerrada ML, et al. Highperformance dual-action polymerTiO2 nanocomposite lms via meltingprocessing. Nano Letters 2007;7:252934.

    [26] Mark JE. Some novel polymeric nanocomposites. Accounts of ChemicalResearch 2006;39:8818.

    [27] Devaprakasam D, Hatton PV, Mobus G, Inkson BJ. Effect of microstructure ofnano- and micro-particle lled polymer composites on their tribo-mechanicalperformance. Journal of Physics Conference Series 2008;126:012057.

    [28] GarciaM,Garcia-Turel J, NorderB, Chavez F, KooiBJ, vanZylWE, et al. Polyamide-6/silica nanocomposites. Advanced Engineering Materials 2004;6:7249.

    [29] Ladewig BP, Knott RB, Hill AJ, Riches JD, White JD, Martin DS, et al. Physicaland electrochemical characterization of nanocomposite membranes of Naonand functionalized silicon oxide. Chemistry of Materials 2007;19:237281.

    [30] Zan L, Fa W, Wang S. Novel photodegradable low-density polyethyleneTiO2nanocomposite lm. Environmental Science and Technology 2006;40:16815.

    [31] Behera D, Banthia AK. BisGMA/TiO2 organicinorganic hybrid nanocomposite.PolymerPlastics Technology and Engineering 2007;46:11816.

    [32] Ogoshi T, Fujiwara T, Bertolucci M, Galli G, Chiellini E, Chujo Y, et al. Tappingmode AFM evidence for an amorphous reticular phase in a condensation-curedhybrid elastomer dihydroxypoly(dimethylsiloxane)/poly(diethoxysiloxane)/fumed silica nanoparticles. Journal of the American Chemical Society2004;126:122845.

    [33] Merkel TC, Freeman BS, Spontak RJ, He Z, Pinnau I, Meakin P, et al. Ultra-permeable reverse-selective nanocomposite membranes. Science 2002;296:51922.

    [34] Kashiwagi T, Morgan AB, Antonucci JM, Vanlandingham MR, Harris Jr RH,Awad WH, et al. Thermal and ammability properties of a silicapoly(methylmethacrylate) nanocomposite. Journal of Applied Polymer Science2003;89:20728.

    [35] Croce F, Apetecci GB, Scrosati B. Nanocomposite electrolytes for lithiumbatteries. Nature 1998;394:4568.

    [36] Zhou H, Chen Y, Fan H, Shi H, Luo Z, Shi B. The polyurethane/SiO2 nano-hybridmembrane with temperature sensitivity for water vapor permeation. Journalof Membrane Science 2008;318:718.

    [37] Voigt A, Heinrich M, Martin C, Llobera A, Gruetzner G, Perez-Murano F.Improved properties of epoxy nanocomposites for specic applications in theeld of MEMS/NEMS. Microelectronic Engineering 2007;84:10759.

    [38] Al-Sagheer F, Ali AAM, Muslim S, Ahmad Z. Thermal and mechanical prop-erties of chemically bonded aramid-silica nano-composites. Science andTechnology of Advanced Materials 2006;7:1118.

    [39] Xi J, Tang X. Novel composite polymer electrolyte comprising poly(ethyleneoxide) and triblock copolymer/mesostructured silica hybrid used for lithiumpolymer battery. Electrochimica Acta 2005;50:5293404.

    [40] Xiong M, You B, Zhou S, Wu L. Study on acrylic resin/titania organicinorganichybrid materials prepared by the solgel process. Polymer 2004;45:296776.

    [41] Yu Y, Chen C, Chen W. Synthesis and characterization of organicinorganichybrid thin lms from poly(acrylic) and monodispersed colloidal silica. Poly-mer 2003;44:593601.

    [42] He Z, Pinnau I, Morisato A. Nanostructured poly(4-methyl-2-pentyne)/silicahybrid membranes for gas separation. Desalination 2002;146:115.

    [43] Chattopadhyay DK, Raju KVSN. Structural engineering of polyurethane coat-ings for high performance applications. Progress in Polymer Science2007;32:352418.

    [44] Kim JH, Ko JH, Bae B. Dispersion of silica nanoparticles in solgel hybrid resinsfor fabrication of multi-scale hybrid nanocomposite. Journal of SolGelScience and Technology 2007;41:24955.

    [45] Ahn S, Lee S, Kook J, Lim B. Experimental antimicrobial orthodontic adhesivesusing nanollers and silver nanoparticles. Dental Materials 2009;25:20613.

    [46] Dahl A, Gharibi A, Swietlicki E, Gudmundsson A, Bohgard M, Ljungman A, et al.Trafc-generated emission of ultrane particles from pavementtire interface.Atmospheric Environment 2006;40:131423.

    [47] Gustafsson M, Blomqvist G, Gudmundsson A, Dahl A, Swietlicki E, Lindbom J,et al. Properties and toxicological effects of particles from the interaction

    nd Stability 94 (2009) 873876 875between tyres, road pavement and winter traction material. Science of theTotal Environment 2008;393:22640.

  • [48] Reijnders L. Hazard reduction in nanotechnology. Journal of Industrial Ecology2008;12(3):297306.

    [49] Reijnders L. Cleaner nanotechnology and hazard reduction of manufacturednanoparticles. Journal of Cleaner Production 2006;14:12433.

    [50] Mueller NC, Nowack B. Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in theenvironment. Environmental Science and Technology 2008;42:444753.

    [51] Reijnders L. Hazard reduction for the application of titania nanoparticles inenvironmental technology. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2008;142:4405.

    [52] Reijnders L. Biological effects of nanoparticles used as glidants in powders.Powder Technology 2007;175:1435.

    [53] NIOSH. Evaluation and health hazard and recommendations for the occupa-tional exposure to titaniumdioxide. NIOSH Current Intelligence Bulletin 2005.November 22.

    [54] Wang J, Chen C, Liu Y, Jiao F, Li W, Lao F, et al. Potential neurological lesionafter nasal installation of TiO2 nanoparticles in the anatase and rutile crystalphases. Toxicology Letters 2008;183:7280.

    [55] Wang J, Liu Y, Jiao F, Lao F, Li W, Gu Y, et al. Time-dependent translocation andpotential impairment on central nervous system by intranasally installed TiO2nanoparticles. Toxicology 2008;254:8290.

    [56] Long TC, Tajuba J, Sama P, SalkehN, Schwartz C, Parker J, et al. Nanosize titaniumdioxide stimulates reactive oxygen species in brain microglias and damagesneurons in vitro. Environmental Health Perspectives 2007;115:16317.

    [57] LiaoC, ChiuangY, Chio C.Assessing airborne titaniumdioxidenanoparticle relatedexposure hazard at workplace. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2008;162:5765.

    [58] Oberdorster G, Stone V, Donaldson K. Toxicology of nanoparticles: a historicalperspective. Nanotoxicology 2007;1:225.

    [59] Navarro E, Baun A, Behra R, Hartmann NB, Filser J, Miao A, et al. Environmentalbehavior and ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to algae, plants andfungi. Ecotoxicology 2008;17:37286.

    [60] Wang J, Zhang X, Chen Y, Sommerfeld M, Hu Q. Toxicity assessment of man-ufactured nanomaterials using the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonasreinhardii. Chemosphere 2008;73:11218.

    [67] Singh S, Shi T, Dufn R, Albrecht C, van Berlo D, Hohr D, et al. Endocytocis,oxidative stress and IL 8 expression in human lung epithelial cells upontreatment with ne and ultrane TiO2 role of the specic surface area and ofsurface methylation of the particles. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology2007;222:14151.

    [68] Park E, Yi J, Chung K, Ryu D, Choi J, Park K. Oxidative stress and apoptosisinduced by titanium dioxide nanoparticles in cultured BEAS-2B cells. Toxi-cology Letters 2008;180:2229.

    [69] Park E, Park K. Oxidative stress, pro-inammatory responses induced by silicananoparticles in vivo and in vitro. Toxicology Letters 2009;184:12633.

    [70] Lanone S, Boczkowski J. Biomedical applications and potential health risks ofnanomaterials: molecular mechanisms. Current Molecular Medicine2006;6:65163.

    [71] Lin W, Huang Y, Zhou X, Ma Y. In vitro toxicity of silica nanoparticles inhuman lung cancer cells. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 2006;217:2529.

    [72] Reeves JF, Davies SJ, Dodd NJF, Jha AN. Hydroxyl radicals are associated withtitanium dioxide nanoparticle-induced cytotoxicity and oxidative damage insh cells. Mutation Research 2008;640:11322.

    [73] Long TC, Saleh N, Tilton RD, Lowry GV, Veronesi B. Titanium dioxide (P25)produces reactive oxygen species in immortalized brain microglia (BV2):implications for nanoparticle neurotoxicity. Environmental Science andTechnology 2006;40:434652.

    [74] Jin C, Zhu B, Wang X, Lu Q. Cytotoxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles inmouse broblast cells. Chemical Research in Toxicology 2008;21:18717.

    [75] Zhao H, Sun R, Luo Y, Li J. A novel method of hyperbranched poly(amide ester)modifying nano-SiO2 and study of mechanical properties of PVC/nano-SiO2composites. Polymer Composites 2008; doi:10.1002/pc.20427.

    [76] Cha H, Park OK, Kim YH, Cha HG, Kang YS. Treatment of TiO2 for thesuppression of photo-catalytic property and dispersion stability. InternationalJournal of Nanoscience 2006;5:795801.

    [77] Warheit DB, Webb TR, Reed KL, Frerichs S, Sayes CM. Pulmonary toxicity study

    L. Reijnders / Polymer Degradation and Stability 94 (2009) 873876876[61] Zhang X, Sun H, Zhang Z, Niu Q, Chen Y, Crittenden JC. Enhanced bio-accumulation of cadmium in carp in the presence of titanium dioxide nano-particles. Chemosphere 2007;67:1606.

    [62] Chen Z, Meng H, Xing G, Yuan H, Zhao F, Liu R, et al. Age-related differences inpulmonary and cardiovascular responses to SiO2 nanoparticle inhalation:nanotoxicity has susceptible population. Environmental Science and Tech-nology 2008;42:898592.

    [63] Chen M, von Mikecz A. Formation of nucleoplasmic protein aggregatesimpairs nuclear function in response to SiO2 nanoparticles. Experimental CellResearch 2005;305:5162.

    [64] Chang J, Chang KLB, Hwang D, Kong Z. In vitro cytotoxicity of silica nano-particles at high concentrations strongly depends on the metabolic activitytype of the cell line. Environmental Science and Technology 2007;41:20648.

    [65] Fujiwara K, Suematsu H, Aoki M, Sato M, Nobuko M. Size dependent toxicity ofsilica nanoparticles to Chlorella kessleri. Journal of Environmental Science andHealth Part A 2008;43:116773.

    [66] Gurr J, Wang ASS, Chen C, Jan K. Ultrane titanium dioxide particles in theabsence of photoactivation can induce oxidative damage to human bronchialepithelial cells. Toxicology 2005;213:6673.in rats with three forms of ultrane-TiO2 particles: differential responsesrelated to surface properties. Toxicology 2007;230:90104.

    [78] Limbach LK, Bereiter R, Muller E, Krebs R, Galli R, Stark WJ. Removal ofnanoparticles in a model wastewater treatment plant: inuence of agglom-eration and surfactants on clearing efciency. Environmental Science andTechnology 2008;42:582833.

    [79] Thompson MR, Jeung KK. Recyclability of a layered silicate-thermoplasticolen elastomer nanocomposite. Polymer Degradation and Stability 2006;91:2396407.

    [80] Roy M, Nelson JJ, MacCrone RK, Scadler LS. Candidate mechanisms controllingthe electrical characteristics of silica/XLPE nanodielectrics. Journal of MaterialsScience 2007;42:378999.

    [81] Reijnders L. Improving resource cascading. In: Loeffe CV, editor. Trends inconservation and recycling of resources. New York: Nova Science Publishers;2007. p. 12750.

    [82] Morlat-Therias S, Fanton E, Gardette J, Dintcheva NT, La Mantia FP,Malatesta V. Photochemical stabilization of linear low-density polyethylene/clay nanocomposites: towards durable nanocomposites. Polymer Degradationand Stability 2008;93:177680.

    The release of TiO2 and SiO2 nanoparticles from nanocompositesIntroductionTitania and amorphous silica nanoparticles can be hazardousOptions for hazard reductionConclusionsReferences