36
The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in

Advanced Lung Cancer

Alan Sandler, MD

Page 2: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

Outline

• NSCLC - background

• EGFR inhibition– Preclinical– Previously treated patients– Chemotherapy-naïve patients

• Questions and future directions

Page 3: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer:Metastatic Disease

• NSCLC accounts for ~135,000 cases of lung cancer annually

• Approximately 30-40% of these patients will have metastatic disease

• Untreated patients have a median survival of ~4 - 5 months

Page 4: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

10%<5%0%2-Yr:

30%20%10%1-Yr:

8 mo6 mo4 moMST:

New:Old:BSC:Surv:

NSCLC SurvivalState of the Art 2003

Page 5: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

NSCLC TherapyState of the Art

• Chemotherapy > BSC

• 2 drugs > 1 drug regimens

• 3 drugs 2 drug regimens– more toxic & more expensive

• Second-line therapy “works”

• Quality of life is improved– 1st & 2nd line CT improve Q of L

Page 6: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

Targeted Therapy in Oncology• Goals

– Identify agents that target tumor-specific molecules, thus sparing normal cells

• Increased specificity leads to decreased toxicity

– Identify ideal drug target• Drives tumor growth• Turns on key mechanisms of cancer progression • Reversible by inhibition with agent • Dispensable in normal cells• Target measurable in tumor tissue

Page 7: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

Biological Agents for Solid TumorsSignal Transduction/Cell-Cycle

Inhibitors– Farnesyl transferase– Flavopiridol– Retinoids– UCN-101

Gene Therapy– GM-CSF– Wild-type p53– Antisense

– c-myc– PKC

Vaccines– Tumor cells– Peptides– Dendritic cells– Viral vaccines

Angiogenesis Inhibitors

– SU5416/SU6668

– Anti-VEGF antibodies

– Interferon-a/b

– Marimastat

– ZD6474

– LY317615

– TNP-470

– Endostatin/angiostatin

Receptor-Targeted Therapy– Trastuzumab

– Anti-EGFR

– ZD1839

– C225

– OSI-774

Page 8: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

Potential Treatment Options for NSCLC:Integration With Current Therapies

Pre-malignancy

Localizeddisease

Locally or regionally advanced

disease

Advanced/ metastatic

disease

S (RT) CT + RT CT

Biological agents

Page 9: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

Preclinical Anti-Tumor Activity of EGFR-TK Inhibitors1-8

• Growth inhibition/regression observed in multiple tumor types in xenografts

• Enhanced growth inhibition/regression observed with both chemotherapy and radiation

• Activity observed in hormone-resistant tumor cell models

Sirotnak FM et al. Sirotnak FM et al. Clin Cancer ResClin Cancer Res. 2000;6:4885-4892; Ciardiello F et al. . 2000;6:4885-4892; Ciardiello F et al. Clin Cancer ResClin Cancer Res. 2000;6:2053-2063. . 2000;6:2053-2063. Ciardiello F et al. Ciardiello F et al. Clin Cancer ResClin Cancer Res. 2001;7:1459-1465; Williams KJ et al. . 2001;7:1459-1465; Williams KJ et al. Proc AACRProc AACR. 2001;42:715. Abstract 3840.. 2001;42:715. Abstract 3840.McClelland RA et al. McClelland RA et al. EndocrinologyEndocrinology. 2001;142:2776-2788; Gee JM et al. . 2001;142:2776-2788; Gee JM et al. ProcProc ASCOASCO. 2001;20:71a. Abstract 282. . 2001;20:71a. Abstract 282. Fujimura M et al. Fujimura M et al. Proc AACRProc AACR. 2001;42:804. Abstract 4317; Chan KC et al. . 2001;42:804. Abstract 4317; Chan KC et al. Br J SurgBr J Surg. 2001;88:412-418.. 2001;88:412-418.

Page 10: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

Targeting EGFR in NSCLCPhase I Results - EGFR Blockade

Yes

No

No

Rash, Diarrhea

Emesis

Rash

Rash

Hypersensitivity

250 mg daily PO

500 mg daily PO

Under study

1600 mg IV weekly

ZD1839

ABX-EGF

EMD7200

NoRash, Diarrhea150 mg daily POErlotinib

NoRash, diarrhea, hypersensitivity, thrombocytopenia, emesis,stomatitis

Under studyCI-1033

NoRash

Hypersensitivity

400 mg IV load

250 mg IV weekly

IMC-C225

Response in NSCLC

Adverse EffectsPhase II DoseAgent

Page 11: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

EGFR Receptor Targeted Therapies Currently in Clinical DevelopmentCompound Description Phase

Herceptin Genentech/Roche

ErbB-2 monoclonal antibody

Approved

IMC-C225 Imclone

ErbB-1 monoclonal antibody

Phase II/III

ZD1839 AstraZeneca

ErbB-1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Phase III

OSI-774 OSI Pharmaceuticals

ErbB-1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Phase lll

PKI-166 Novartis

ErbB-1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Phase I

CI-1033 Pfizer

Pan-ErbB tyrosine kinase inactivator

Phase I

Page 12: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

EGFR Blockade

Previously Treated Patients

Page 13: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

OSI-774

• NSCLC positive for EGFR (>10% cells by IHC)

• Progression/relapse after platinum-based therapy

• All patients with at least one prior chemotherapy regimen (most with more)

• No active brain metastasis allowed

• 150 mg/day set dose

• 1 CR (1.8%), 7 PR (12.5%); 15 stable disease (26.8%)

• ORR = 14.3%

• Median survival = 257 days

• 1-Year survival of 48%

Trial Design Clinical Data

Perez-Solar et. Al, ASCO 2001

Page 14: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

Schema of IDEAL Trials

Continue ZD1839 until PD or intolerable toxicity.

Primary Endpoints:• ORR• Safety profile

Secondary Endpoints:• Sx improvement rate• Disease control rate• PFS & OS• Change in Q of L

Eligible Patients:• Recurrent NSCLC• 1-2 prior CT

(& 1 platinum CT)

R

A

N

D

O

M

I

Z

E

ZD 1839:• 250 mg / day

ZD 1839:• 500 mg / day

Page 15: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

ZD1839 in Recurrent NSCLCIDEAL Phase II Trial Results

5.9 mo6.5 mo8.0 mo7.6 moMST:

35%43%37%40%SxRR:

9%12%19%18.4%ORR:

100%100%43%44%3rd Line:

114102106104Pt No:

500 mg:250 mg:500 mg:250 mg:

Kris et al:(ASCO 2002 abst #1166)

Fukuoka et al:(ASCO 2002 abst #1188)Factor:

Page 16: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

Phase II Trial of ZD1839 in NSCLCCharacteristics Associated with Response

30 4Other

4313Adenocarcinoma

31 3Men

4919Women

32154 Prior regimens

44103 Prior regimens

39 82 Prior regimens

3614PS 2

40 9PS 0-1

Symptom Improvement Rate (%)

Response Rate (%)

Page 17: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

ZD1839 in NSCLCObservations from Monotherapy Trials

• RR in women > men

• RR in Adeno > SqCCa

– “Best” RR in BAC?

• RR unrelated to ECOG PS?

• RR not affected by number of

previous therapies

Page 18: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

EGFR Blockade

Chemotherapy-Naïve Patients

Page 19: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

Targeting EGFR in NSCLC

ZD1839: Phase I Combinations in NSCLC Patients

Combinations of ZD1839 plus

carboplatin/paclitaxel – 6/24 Partial Responses

gemcitabine/cisplatin - 9/18 Partial Responses

No new or increased toxicities or significant drug-drug interactions

Gonzalez-Larriba JL et al. Proc ASCO 2002, 21:95a (abs 376)Miller VA et al. Proc ASCO 2001; 20 : 326a (abs 1301)

Page 20: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

Stage III/IV NSCLC N=1029/Trial *Gemcitabine/cisplatin (trial 14) *Paclitaxel/carboplatin (trial 17)

Randomize

Chemotherapy * x6 cycles + 250 mg ZD1839

Chemotherapy * x6 cycles + 500 mg ZD1839

Chemotherapy * x6 cycles + Placebo

Continue ZD1839 or placebo until disease progression

Primary endpoint: Survival

ZD1839 Randomized Trials With Chemotherapy in Advanced NSCLC

Page 21: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

Randomized ZD 1839 Trials

Intact-1 Intact-2Chemotx CG PC

Patients 1093 1037

*M/F 74/26 60/40

Age 61 (32-86) 63 (27-87)

*PS 0/1/2 33/57/10 36/53/11

*IIIA/IIIB/IV 3/27/70 4/17/79

*per cent

Page 22: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

0.62.3 1

31.5 32.7 32.5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Res

pons

e R

ates

(%

)

CR

PR

Placebo(n=289)

250 mg/day(n=306)

500 mg/day(n=308)

Intact-2: Response Rates

Population = evaluable for response

Page 23: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

TTP - INTACT 2TTP - INTACT 2

Group 500 mg/day

Group 250 mg/day

Placebo

Population: intention-to-treatTick marks indicate censored observationsPopulation: intention-to-treatTick marks indicate censored observations

11111212

44244244

25025066

27271010

64164122

1037103700

At risk:At risk:Months:Months:

919188

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

0 2 4 6 8 12 1610 14Survival time (months)

Pro

po

rtio

n e

ven

t fr

ee

500 mg: 250 mg: Placebo:

PFS: 4.67 mo 5.32 mo 5.06 mo

Log rank: -1.6338 -1.5833

(p=0.1023) (p=0.1133)

Page 24: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

Population: intention-to-treatTick marks indicate censored observationsPopulation: intention-to-treatTick marks indicate censored observations

Survival - INTACT 2Survival - INTACT 2

58858888

4154151212

1411411616

18182020

81481444

1037103700

At risk:At risk:Months:Months:

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Survival time (months)0 4 8 12 16 20 24

Pro

po

rtio

n e

ven

t fr

ee

Group 500 mg/day

Group 250 mg/day

Placebo

500 mg: 250 mg: Placebo:

MST: 8.74 mo 9.82 mo 9.92 mo

1-Year: 0.37 0.41 0.42

Log rank: 0.4641 -0.4254

(p=0.6425) (p=0.6705)

Page 25: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

Survival - INTACT 2Landmark Analyses

Survival - INTACT 2Landmark Analyses

Chemotherapy: No:Median Survival (mo):

500 mg: 250 mg: Placebo:

• 90 days: 599 14.1 14.9 13.0

• 90 d + Adeno: 334 16.1 17.1 13.6

• 90 d + Stage IV: 458 12.0 15.1 12.6

• 90 d + Adeno + IV: 260 13.7 19.7 12.5

• 120 days: 510 15.0 15.5 13.6

• 120 d + Adeno: 287 18.3 17.3 14.3

Page 26: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

Survival - INTACT 2CT 90 days + Adeno

Survival - INTACT 2CT 90 days + Adeno

Page 27: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

ZD1839

Paclitaxel/Carboplatin X 4

(PS 0-1, IIIB-pl eff, IV) Placebo ZD1839

Primary Endpoint: PFSPaclitaxel: 225 mg/m2 & Carboplatin: AUC = 6, ZD1839: 250mg/d Correlative Studies: Tumor: p27, EGFR pathway

S0318: Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel/Carboplatin Early vs Late

ZD1839 in Advanced NSCLCRANDOMIZE

CRPRSD PD

PI: R Herbst

Page 28: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

*S0023: ZD1839 following Chemoradiotherapy

(N=840)

ZD1839 Chemoradiation(PE/RT -> Docetaxel) as in S9504 Placebo

Correlative Studies: Tumor tissue: p27, EGFR, K-RAS, B-tubulin

Plasma: K-RAS *SWOG, NCI-C, NCCTG

RANDOMIZE

Page 29: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

NSCLCno previous

chemotherapy(N=1050)

OSI 774 150 mg/d* PO+ Chemotherapy

Placebo 150 mg/d* PO+ Chemotherapy

vs*study drug continued at disease progression

Chemotherapy = paclitaxel/carboplatin or gemcitabine/cisplatin80% power to detect a 25% survival benefit, =0.05Similar power to detect a 33% 1-year survival benefit

Chemotherapy +/- OSI 774

Page 30: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

Ongoing Trials: C-225

Docetaxel + C225

Carboplatin/Paclitaxel + C225

Gem/Carboplatin + C225

Second-line

First-line

First-line

Page 31: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

ABX-EGF: PHASE I STUDY

ABX-EGF Human Monoclonal Antibody to EGFR

Biological activity at 1mg/kg/wk. DLT ‘Cutaneous Toxicity’

Studies Planned:PC +/- ABX-EGF: Random. Phase II

Docetaxel +/- ABX-EGF

Figlin et al, Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 20:276a(#1102), 2001

Page 32: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

Future Directions and Questions:

EGFR Inhibitors in NSCLC

• Standardize definitions of EGFR + and their role

• Validate Abs for p-EGFR (and downstream components)

• Characterize molecular profile of responding patient and validate prospectively

Page 33: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

Future Directions and Questions:

EGFR Inhibitors in NSCLC

• Optimize schedule of EGFR-inhibitors and chemotherapy– Sequential?

• Studies with XRT, locoregional disease• Develop rational molecularly targeted

doublets

Page 34: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

Targeted Therapy Combinations

• Overexpression of EGFR results in increased VEGF expression

• Blockade of EGFR results in decreased VEGF production

• Co-blockade of EGFR and VEGF results in increased cure rates in murine models

Page 35: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD
Page 36: The Rationale for EGFR Inhibition in Advanced Lung Cancer Alan Sandler, MD

Ant-VEGF plus OSI-774

• Phase I/II study of anti-VEGF and OSI-774 in previously treated NSCLC– MDACC and Vanderbilt– Establish MTD with correlative studies

• EGFR and HER-2 (IHC and FISH)• Angiogenesis - endothelial cell apoptosis

and microvessel density

Mininberg, et al Submitted ASCO, 2003