2
Disclosure None. Anthony S. Wierzbicki Department of Metabolic Medicine Chemical Pathology, Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Trust, St Thomas Hospital, London, UK Email: [email protected] References 1 Wierzbicki AS. Niacin: the only vitamin that reduces cardiovascular events. Int J Clin Pract 2011; 65: 379–85. 2 The Coronary Drug Project Research Group. Clofi- brate and niacin in coronary heart disease. JAMA 1975; 231: 360–81. 3 AIM-HIGH investigators. AIM-HIGH: blinded treatment phase of study stopped. AIM-HIGH cho- lesterol management program 2011 May 26 [cited 2011 Jul 31]; Available from: URL: http://www.aim- high-heart.com/ 4 Wierzbicki AS. Surrogate markers, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease prevention. Int J Clin Pract 2008; 62: 981–7. 5 Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1577–89. 6 AIM-HIGH investigators. The role of niacin in rais- ing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to reduce cardiovascular events in patients with atheroscle- rotic cardiovascular disease and optimally treated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol Rationale and study design. The Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic syndrome with low HDL high triglyce- rides: Impact on Global Health outcomes (AIM- HIGH). Am Heart J 2011; 161: 471–7. 7 AIM-HIGH investigators. The role of niacin in rais- ing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to reduce cardiovascular events in patients with atheroscle- rotic cardiovascular disease and optimally treated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: baseline charac- teristics of study participants. The Atherothrombo- sis Intervention in Metabolic syndrome with low HDL high triglycerides: impact on Global Health outcomes (AIM-HIGH) trial. Am Heart J 2011; 161: 538–43. 8 Wierzbicki AS. FIELDS of dreams, fields of tears: a perspective on the fibrate trials. Int J Clin Pract 2006; 60: 442–9. 9 Keech A, Simes RJ, Barter P et al. Effects of long- term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 1849–61. 10 Wierzbicki AS. Fibrates: no ACCORD on their use in the treatment of dyslipidaemia. Curr Opin Lip- idol 2010; 21: 352–8. 11 Baigent C, Landray MJ, Reith C et al. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus eze- timibe in patients with chronic kidney disease (Study of Heart and Renal Protection): a rando- mised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2011; 377: 2181–92. 12 Rossebo AB, Pedersen TR, Boman K et al. Intensive lipid lowering with simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1343–56. 13 Wierzbicki AS, Viljoen A, Chambers JB. Aortic ste- nosis and lipids. Does intervention work? Curr Opin Cardiol 2010; 25: 379–84. 14 Ginsberg HN, Elam MB, Lovato LC et al. Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mell- itus. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1563–74. 15 Wierzbicki AS, Morrell J, Hemsley D, McMahon Z, Crook MA, Wray R. The effect of fibrate-statin combination therapy on cardiovascular events: a retrospective cohort analysis. Curr Med Res Opin 2010; 26: 2141–6. 16 HPS2-THRIVE investigators. A randomized trial of the long-term clinical effects of raising HDL choles- terol with extended release niacin laropiprant. Heart Protection Study 2-Treatment of HDL to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events (HPS2- THRIVE). ClinicalTrials gov 2009 February 2NCT00461630. Available from: URL: http://clini- caltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00461630 17 Chapman MJ, Assmann G, Fruchart JC, Shepherd J, Sirtori C. Raising high-density lipoprotein choles- terol with reduction of cardiovascular risk: the role of nicotinic acid – a position paper developed by the European Consensus Panel on HDL-C. Curr Med Res Opin 2004; 20: 1253–68. 18 Khera AV, Cuchel M, Llera-Moya M et al. Choles- terol efflux capacity, high-density lipoprotein func- tion, and atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 127–35. 19 Wierzbicki AS. Raising HDL-C: back to the future? Int J Clin Pract 2007; 61: 1069–71. 20 Barter PJ, Caulfield M, Eriksson M et al. Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary events. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2109–22. 21 Bucher HC, Griffith LE, Guyatt GH. Systematic review on the risk and benefit of different choles- terol-lowering interventions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999; 19: 187–95. 22 Goldfine AB, Kaul S, Hiatt WR. Fibrates in the treatment of dyslipidemias — time for a reassess- ment. N Engl J Med 2011; 19: 481–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02769.x EDITORIAL The Polypill – multiple drug combinations are not the answer It is an interesting concept – combine multiple risk- reducing drugs in one tablet and save the world. In this way drugs are placed ahead of lifestyle changes (which have often failed) and as a single pill adher- ence to medication is projected to increase and cost decrease. This sounds too good to be true and it almost certainly is. The combination proposed includes an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, statin, thiazide diuretic, beta blocker and aspirin, and the target individuals are those with established vascular disease (often referred to as secondary prevention) and those without known vascular disease but who, as a result of multiple risk factors, are at high risk (e.g. smok- ers, hypertensives, diabetics, hyperlipidaemics) – so- called primary prevention. As a concept maximising risk reduction with minimal inconvenience to the patient is everyone’s therapeutic goal. The problem with the Polypill as proposed is first that it mixes drugs that titrate to maximal effect with those with a flat dose–response curve. Titration of ACE inhibitor, statin and beta Editorials 1113 ª 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Int J Clin Pract, November 2011, 65, 11, 1111–1114

The Polypill – multiple drug combinations are not the answer

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Polypill – multiple drug combinations are not the answer

Disclosure

None.

Anthony S. WierzbickiDepartment of Metabolic Medicine ⁄ Chemical Pathology,

Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Trust, St Thomas Hospital,London, UK

Email: [email protected]

References1 Wierzbicki AS. Niacin: the only vitamin that

reduces cardiovascular events. Int J Clin Pract 2011;

65: 379–85.

2 The Coronary Drug Project Research Group. Clofi-

brate and niacin in coronary heart disease. JAMA

1975; 231: 360–81.

3 AIM-HIGH investigators. AIM-HIGH: blinded

treatment phase of study stopped. AIM-HIGH cho-

lesterol management program 2011 May 26 [cited

2011 Jul 31]; Available from: URL: http://www.aim-

high-heart.com/

4 Wierzbicki AS. Surrogate markers, atherosclerosis

and cardiovascular disease prevention. Int J Clin

Pract 2008; 62: 981–7.

5 Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR,

Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose

control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:

1577–89.

6 AIM-HIGH investigators. The role of niacin in rais-

ing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to reduce

cardiovascular events in patients with atheroscle-

rotic cardiovascular disease and optimally treated

low-density lipoprotein cholesterol Rationale and

study design. The Atherothrombosis Intervention in

Metabolic syndrome with low HDL ⁄ high triglyce-

rides: Impact on Global Health outcomes (AIM-

HIGH). Am Heart J 2011; 161: 471–7.

7 AIM-HIGH investigators. The role of niacin in rais-

ing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to reduce

cardiovascular events in patients with atheroscle-

rotic cardiovascular disease and optimally treated

low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: baseline charac-

teristics of study participants. The Atherothrombo-

sis Intervention in Metabolic syndrome with low

HDL ⁄ high triglycerides: impact on Global Health

outcomes (AIM-HIGH) trial. Am Heart J 2011;

161: 538–43.

8 Wierzbicki AS. FIELDS of dreams, fields of tears: a

perspective on the fibrate trials. Int J Clin Pract

2006; 60: 442–9.

9 Keech A, Simes RJ, Barter P et al. Effects of long-

term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events

in 9795 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the

FIELD study): randomised controlled trial. Lancet

2005; 366: 1849–61.

10 Wierzbicki AS. Fibrates: no ACCORD on their use

in the treatment of dyslipidaemia. Curr Opin Lip-

idol 2010; 21: 352–8.

11 Baigent C, Landray MJ, Reith C et al. The effects of

lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus eze-

timibe in patients with chronic kidney disease

(Study of Heart and Renal Protection): a rando-

mised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2011; 377:

2181–92.

12 Rossebo AB, Pedersen TR, Boman K et al. Intensive

lipid lowering with simvastatin and ezetimibe in

aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1343–56.

13 Wierzbicki AS, Viljoen A, Chambers JB. Aortic ste-

nosis and lipids. Does intervention work? Curr

Opin Cardiol 2010; 25: 379–84.

14 Ginsberg HN, Elam MB, Lovato LC et al. Effects of

combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mell-

itus. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1563–74.

15 Wierzbicki AS, Morrell J, Hemsley D, McMahon Z,

Crook MA, Wray R. The effect of fibrate-statin

combination therapy on cardiovascular events: a

retrospective cohort analysis. Curr Med Res Opin

2010; 26: 2141–6.

16 HPS2-THRIVE investigators. A randomized trial of

the long-term clinical effects of raising HDL choles-

terol with extended release niacin ⁄ laropiprant.

Heart Protection Study 2-Treatment of HDL to

Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events (HPS2-

THRIVE). ClinicalTrials gov 2009 February

2NCT00461630. Available from: URL: http://clini-

caltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00461630

17 Chapman MJ, Assmann G, Fruchart JC, Shepherd

J, Sirtori C. Raising high-density lipoprotein choles-

terol with reduction of cardiovascular risk: the role

of nicotinic acid – a position paper developed by

the European Consensus Panel on HDL-C. Curr

Med Res Opin 2004; 20: 1253–68.

18 Khera AV, Cuchel M, Llera-Moya M et al. Choles-

terol efflux capacity, high-density lipoprotein func-

tion, and atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2011; 364:

127–35.

19 Wierzbicki AS. Raising HDL-C: back to the future?

Int J Clin Pract 2007; 61: 1069–71.

20 Barter PJ, Caulfield M, Eriksson M et al. Effects of

torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary

events. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2109–22.

21 Bucher HC, Griffith LE, Guyatt GH. Systematic

review on the risk and benefit of different choles-

terol-lowering interventions. Arterioscler Thromb

Vasc Biol 1999; 19: 187–95.

22 Goldfine AB, Kaul S, Hiatt WR. Fibrates in the

treatment of dyslipidemias — time for a reassess-

ment. N Engl J Med 2011; 19: 481–4.

doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02769.x

ED ITORIAL

The Polypill – multiple drug combinations are not theanswer

It is an interesting concept – combine multiple risk-

reducing drugs in one tablet and save the world. In

this way drugs are placed ahead of lifestyle changes

(which have often failed) and as a single pill adher-

ence to medication is projected to increase and cost

decrease. This sounds too good to be true and it

almost certainly is.

The combination proposed includes an angiotensin

converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, statin, thiazide

diuretic, beta blocker and aspirin, and the target

individuals are those with established vascular disease

(often referred to as secondary prevention) and those

without known vascular disease but who, as a result

of multiple risk factors, are at high risk (e.g. smok-

ers, hypertensives, diabetics, hyperlipidaemics) – so-

called primary prevention.

As a concept maximising risk reduction with

minimal inconvenience to the patient is everyone’s

therapeutic goal. The problem with the Polypill as

proposed is first that it mixes drugs that titrate to

maximal effect with those with a flat dose–response

curve. Titration of ACE inhibitor, statin and beta

Editorials 1113

ª 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Int J Clin Pract, November 2011, 65, 11, 1111–1114

Page 2: The Polypill – multiple drug combinations are not the answer

blocker is not possible unless multiple drug combi-

nation variables are made which will negate the cost

argument.

The second concern is adverse effects. Thiazides

are the worst treatment with regard to causing male

erectile dysfunction. They are biochemically

unfriendly elevating blood glucose, triglycerides and

low-density lipoprotein cholesterol as well as uric

acid and they may adversely affect renal function.

ACE inhibitors can cause a dry hacking cough (often

disturbing sleep), more frequently in women and

people of Chinese origin. Simvastatin is the most

lipophilic statin with the greatest incidence of central

nervous system side effects (memory loss, depression,

lack of concentration, erectile dysfunction) and

muscular aches and pains. Beta blockers may precipi-

tate well-recognised side effects such as asthma but

also lead to fatigue, generalised aches and pains, and

a ‘zombie’ like feeling. Aspirin, especially when not

soluble, may cause varying degrees of gastric

irritation.

We therefore have the possibility of ruining a man

and woman’s sex life, disturbing their day and night

with a dry hacking cough, giving them indigestion or

even gastric bleeding and then rendering them so

lethargic it does not matter anyway, with the only

good news being the simvastatin causes them to for-

get every adverse event.

The Polypill is a blanket approach to an individual

problem which needs individual management focus-

ing on quality as well as quantity of life. To live a

longer but miserable life is not a realistic approach

to reducing risk. Combination therapy is certainly a

patient-friendly form of therapy but is currently and

most effectively composed of carefully targeted drugs.

The ‘one size fits all’ strategy is more about market-

ing than medicine, and I come back to the point that

mixing non-titratable with titratable drugs is not log-

ical. Unravelling adverse effects will add to the

patients’ and physicians’ burden.

Polypill trials will continue and no doubt combi-

nations will be patented, but managing patients as if

they were numbers is the wrong way to reduce risk.

Disclosures

None.

Graham JacksonEditor

Email: [email protected]

doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02819.x

1114 Editorials

ª 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Int J Clin Pract, November 2011, 65, 11, 1111–1114