Upload
graham-jackson
View
216
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Disclosure
None.
Anthony S. WierzbickiDepartment of Metabolic Medicine ⁄ Chemical Pathology,
Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Trust, St Thomas Hospital,London, UK
Email: [email protected]
References1 Wierzbicki AS. Niacin: the only vitamin that
reduces cardiovascular events. Int J Clin Pract 2011;
65: 379–85.
2 The Coronary Drug Project Research Group. Clofi-
brate and niacin in coronary heart disease. JAMA
1975; 231: 360–81.
3 AIM-HIGH investigators. AIM-HIGH: blinded
treatment phase of study stopped. AIM-HIGH cho-
lesterol management program 2011 May 26 [cited
2011 Jul 31]; Available from: URL: http://www.aim-
high-heart.com/
4 Wierzbicki AS. Surrogate markers, atherosclerosis
and cardiovascular disease prevention. Int J Clin
Pract 2008; 62: 981–7.
5 Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR,
Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose
control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:
1577–89.
6 AIM-HIGH investigators. The role of niacin in rais-
ing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to reduce
cardiovascular events in patients with atheroscle-
rotic cardiovascular disease and optimally treated
low-density lipoprotein cholesterol Rationale and
study design. The Atherothrombosis Intervention in
Metabolic syndrome with low HDL ⁄ high triglyce-
rides: Impact on Global Health outcomes (AIM-
HIGH). Am Heart J 2011; 161: 471–7.
7 AIM-HIGH investigators. The role of niacin in rais-
ing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to reduce
cardiovascular events in patients with atheroscle-
rotic cardiovascular disease and optimally treated
low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: baseline charac-
teristics of study participants. The Atherothrombo-
sis Intervention in Metabolic syndrome with low
HDL ⁄ high triglycerides: impact on Global Health
outcomes (AIM-HIGH) trial. Am Heart J 2011;
161: 538–43.
8 Wierzbicki AS. FIELDS of dreams, fields of tears: a
perspective on the fibrate trials. Int J Clin Pract
2006; 60: 442–9.
9 Keech A, Simes RJ, Barter P et al. Effects of long-
term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events
in 9795 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the
FIELD study): randomised controlled trial. Lancet
2005; 366: 1849–61.
10 Wierzbicki AS. Fibrates: no ACCORD on their use
in the treatment of dyslipidaemia. Curr Opin Lip-
idol 2010; 21: 352–8.
11 Baigent C, Landray MJ, Reith C et al. The effects of
lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus eze-
timibe in patients with chronic kidney disease
(Study of Heart and Renal Protection): a rando-
mised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2011; 377:
2181–92.
12 Rossebo AB, Pedersen TR, Boman K et al. Intensive
lipid lowering with simvastatin and ezetimibe in
aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1343–56.
13 Wierzbicki AS, Viljoen A, Chambers JB. Aortic ste-
nosis and lipids. Does intervention work? Curr
Opin Cardiol 2010; 25: 379–84.
14 Ginsberg HN, Elam MB, Lovato LC et al. Effects of
combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mell-
itus. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1563–74.
15 Wierzbicki AS, Morrell J, Hemsley D, McMahon Z,
Crook MA, Wray R. The effect of fibrate-statin
combination therapy on cardiovascular events: a
retrospective cohort analysis. Curr Med Res Opin
2010; 26: 2141–6.
16 HPS2-THRIVE investigators. A randomized trial of
the long-term clinical effects of raising HDL choles-
terol with extended release niacin ⁄ laropiprant.
Heart Protection Study 2-Treatment of HDL to
Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events (HPS2-
THRIVE). ClinicalTrials gov 2009 February
2NCT00461630. Available from: URL: http://clini-
caltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00461630
17 Chapman MJ, Assmann G, Fruchart JC, Shepherd
J, Sirtori C. Raising high-density lipoprotein choles-
terol with reduction of cardiovascular risk: the role
of nicotinic acid – a position paper developed by
the European Consensus Panel on HDL-C. Curr
Med Res Opin 2004; 20: 1253–68.
18 Khera AV, Cuchel M, Llera-Moya M et al. Choles-
terol efflux capacity, high-density lipoprotein func-
tion, and atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2011; 364:
127–35.
19 Wierzbicki AS. Raising HDL-C: back to the future?
Int J Clin Pract 2007; 61: 1069–71.
20 Barter PJ, Caulfield M, Eriksson M et al. Effects of
torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary
events. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2109–22.
21 Bucher HC, Griffith LE, Guyatt GH. Systematic
review on the risk and benefit of different choles-
terol-lowering interventions. Arterioscler Thromb
Vasc Biol 1999; 19: 187–95.
22 Goldfine AB, Kaul S, Hiatt WR. Fibrates in the
treatment of dyslipidemias — time for a reassess-
ment. N Engl J Med 2011; 19: 481–4.
doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02769.x
ED ITORIAL
The Polypill – multiple drug combinations are not theanswer
It is an interesting concept – combine multiple risk-
reducing drugs in one tablet and save the world. In
this way drugs are placed ahead of lifestyle changes
(which have often failed) and as a single pill adher-
ence to medication is projected to increase and cost
decrease. This sounds too good to be true and it
almost certainly is.
The combination proposed includes an angiotensin
converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, statin, thiazide
diuretic, beta blocker and aspirin, and the target
individuals are those with established vascular disease
(often referred to as secondary prevention) and those
without known vascular disease but who, as a result
of multiple risk factors, are at high risk (e.g. smok-
ers, hypertensives, diabetics, hyperlipidaemics) – so-
called primary prevention.
As a concept maximising risk reduction with
minimal inconvenience to the patient is everyone’s
therapeutic goal. The problem with the Polypill as
proposed is first that it mixes drugs that titrate to
maximal effect with those with a flat dose–response
curve. Titration of ACE inhibitor, statin and beta
Editorials 1113
ª 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Int J Clin Pract, November 2011, 65, 11, 1111–1114
blocker is not possible unless multiple drug combi-
nation variables are made which will negate the cost
argument.
The second concern is adverse effects. Thiazides
are the worst treatment with regard to causing male
erectile dysfunction. They are biochemically
unfriendly elevating blood glucose, triglycerides and
low-density lipoprotein cholesterol as well as uric
acid and they may adversely affect renal function.
ACE inhibitors can cause a dry hacking cough (often
disturbing sleep), more frequently in women and
people of Chinese origin. Simvastatin is the most
lipophilic statin with the greatest incidence of central
nervous system side effects (memory loss, depression,
lack of concentration, erectile dysfunction) and
muscular aches and pains. Beta blockers may precipi-
tate well-recognised side effects such as asthma but
also lead to fatigue, generalised aches and pains, and
a ‘zombie’ like feeling. Aspirin, especially when not
soluble, may cause varying degrees of gastric
irritation.
We therefore have the possibility of ruining a man
and woman’s sex life, disturbing their day and night
with a dry hacking cough, giving them indigestion or
even gastric bleeding and then rendering them so
lethargic it does not matter anyway, with the only
good news being the simvastatin causes them to for-
get every adverse event.
The Polypill is a blanket approach to an individual
problem which needs individual management focus-
ing on quality as well as quantity of life. To live a
longer but miserable life is not a realistic approach
to reducing risk. Combination therapy is certainly a
patient-friendly form of therapy but is currently and
most effectively composed of carefully targeted drugs.
The ‘one size fits all’ strategy is more about market-
ing than medicine, and I come back to the point that
mixing non-titratable with titratable drugs is not log-
ical. Unravelling adverse effects will add to the
patients’ and physicians’ burden.
Polypill trials will continue and no doubt combi-
nations will be patented, but managing patients as if
they were numbers is the wrong way to reduce risk.
Disclosures
None.
Graham JacksonEditor
Email: [email protected]
doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02819.x
1114 Editorials
ª 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Int J Clin Pract, November 2011, 65, 11, 1111–1114