Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Marmot Messenger Staunton State Park
Volunteer Newsletter January - February 2013 Volume 2 Issue 1
Send It – November 10 Volunteer Meeting
Staunton volunteers and climbers
Dave Montgomery, Mike Morin and
Amanda Peterson did a very
interesting and informative
presentation at the November
volunteer meeting on the work they
have accomplished in setting up the
climbing routes at Staunton Rocks.
They also went over the basics of
rock climbing, some of the
equipment and how the climbs are
technically rated. The trio is
currently working on an on-line
climbing guide that will provide
information on all the routes.
They were astonished by the quality
and diversity of climbing routes
available. Developing the routes
entailed quite an extensive process.
They looked at the quality of the
rock, whether there were indications
of prior ascents (i.e., old gear like
pitons in the rock), the presence of
Cont. on p. 2
What’s Inside
Jen’s Column 4
Park Opening in Spring 2013 4
Ed Russell - Man Behind the
(Volunteer Calendar) Curtain 5
Working to Finish the Entrance
Area 6
Managing for Healthy Forests 8
Winter Raptor Monitoring 13
Fauna Feature 15
Flora Feature 16
Volunteer Highlights 19
Friends of Staunton 23
Getting to Know You 24
Announcements 26
Dave, Mike and Amanda
Da
ve M
on
tgo
mer
y
Wayn
e P
ark
inso
n
MARMOT MESSENGER 2
Send It (cont. from page 1)
sensitive plants or raptors, how best to minimize impacts,
and tried to anticipate where the climber interest would
likely be.
Then there was what sort of climbing style to
accommodate. Traditional climbing is where you don’t
have fixed protection (i.e., rock bolts drilled into the rock),
you use various gear such as cams or chocks that you
remove as you complete your ascent and thus leave
nothing behind on the rock face. Sport climbing is where
the climber is protected along the entire route by fixed
protection. Of the approximate 60 routes that they
identified, roughly half are traditional, about 8-10 are
entirely bolted and the rest are a mix between traditional
and sport style with fixed hardware on portions of the
route.
There is also a climbing type called bouldering which is
typically limited to very short climbs. In general you might
climb 15 feet up a rock face. No ropes or other gear is used
other than maybe a crash pad (i.e., bouldering mat) placed
below the climb. The pad is to help break your fall or Dave
also likes to use it as a mat for brushing the teeth of
anesthetized squirrels (part of the Ground Squirrel Dental
Outreach Program). Bouldering is more difficult to manage
and minimize the impacts because climbers tend to sprawl
out around the boulders creating more of a network of
social trails.
The routes can be climbed from the ground up or the top
down. Some routes have rappel anchors at the top so that
climbers can descend back down the rock face using a
rope. Therefore they don’t have to “walk off” from the top
around the backside of the rocks and back down to the
bottom face of the rocks. Minimizing the need to walk off
reduces the trailing around the rocks and the extent of
impacts to soils and vegetation. Most ground disturbance
will be limited to the access trails to and along the base of
the rock formations where the routes start.
Once the park opens it’s likely climbers will propose
additional climbing routes up Staunton Rocks. The
evaluation of future route proposals will be done by a
volunteer climbing committee that will follow an approval
process considering such factors as potential natural
resource impacts, rock quality along the route and the
quality and placement of proposed fixed hardware.
The committee will also make recommendations on
replacing bolts. Having a volunteer committee make these
types of evaluations and recommendations reduces the
liability to the park.
Colin Chisholm is working on a Climbing Management
Plan with the climbing community to work out a plan
tailored to the park. Climbing will be focused on Staunton
Rocks. Although it is a “sacrificial area” proactive
management such as designated trails, minimizing walk off
impacts, avoiding areas of rare plants and potential route
closures to protect nesting raptors will be implemented to
avoid or minimize negative impacts. Consideration of
routes in other areas of the park like Lion’s Head will
require a longer evaluation and approval process.
After the presentation, interested volunteers traveled to
Staunton Rocks for a tour of some of the climbing areas.
Some or maybe most of the climbing routes seem
somewhat daunting. But there are a variety of routes
including some designated on the Whistle Pigs formation
that are targeted for the novice climber. Cont. on p. 3
MARMOT MESSENGER 3
Send It (cont. from page 2)
The name Whistle Pig is a
common name for the various
species of marmots including the
park’s yellow-bellied marmot as
well as others like the
woodchuck and ground hog. So
the park’s marmots who are
currently taking their six to
seven month siesta have been
honored with the naming of
Whistle Pigs as well as Marmot
Tower. Clearly marmots rock.
There were a number of
interesting stories about naming
of the rock formations and
various routes. The Tan Corridor
is probably self-evident. Then
there was the Bombardier Dome
so named for the amount of
loose rock that was dislodged
toward those below while laying
out the route. And while
climbing the Ranch Hand Dome
there was an unexpected
encounter with a newly fledged
peregrine perched on the rock.
The adult peregrines made quite
the ruckus over having people
approaching their fledgling.
All told, a great meeting and
hike. So what if you make a
clean route ascent? No hanging
on your rope to take a break or
catch a fall. A successful ascent
is a send. Send it!
I SPY
Four trail cameras have been set up in the park in areas with significant wildlife habitat resources. Colorado Parks and
Wildlife biologists want to find the best ways to capture photos of wildlife. The cameras will allow staff to increase their
capabilities by conducting monitoring without a human presence. They also wanted to field test the product to see if it was
the best choice for the park.
Discussions are ongoing with Parks and Wildlife biologists who already use cameras to do surveys to determine how to
standardize camera monitoring techniques. The cameras are motion sensored (and are highly sensitive) so if even a mouse
runs in front of the camera 20 feet away, it'll catch it on camera. The CPW biologists haven’t come out to Staunton to
retrieve the cameras yet so they don't know what pictures are on them yet. Stay tuned to see if the cameras record anything
interesting.
Wayn
e P
ark
inso
n
MARMOT MESSENGER 4
Manager’s Message – A Huge Weight Lifted
Park Opening in Spring 2013
There were about 10 days in
the month of October where I
felt I was “carrying the weight
of the world on my shoulders.”
The park opening was looming
in the not-so-distant future and
it was apparent that we were
not ready. Those 10 days were
stressful, sleepless and
frustrating. But I came out of it
successfully and learned a few
important lessons.
Lesson 1: It is okay to stand up
Leadership I needed to make sure my passion for the job
was apparent but to the right degree. I wanted to make sure
they understood, although this was an emotional decision, I
did not let my emotions drive my decision.
Lesson 3: In the end, I realized I wasn’t “carrying the
weight of the world on my shoulders.” The saying comes
from Greek mythology when Atlas was punished by
carrying the weight of the world. I know what I went
through was not a punishment for anything I did. It was all
part of the process.
AND at 9:47 a.m. on October 11 a huge weight was lifted
from my shoulders. Staunton State Park would open to the
public in late spring of 2013.
The “to-do list” hasn’t gotten any shorter since October 11,
but the opportunity to check all the items off the list prior to
welcoming our first visitor now seems real. I could not have
shouldered this weight without the support from each one of
you. Thank you for supporting the success of Staunton State
Park.
Enough philosophizing…Let’s get back to work!
for what you believe in as long as you are respectful and
diplomatic in the deliverance. It was my responsibility to
carry the decision to delay the opening through the chain of
command all the way up to the Director of DNR (Dept of
Natural Resources). At each step I had to make sure my
conversations were thoughtful and deliberate.
Lesson 2: Keep your personal feelings in check during
stressful situations. During my conversations with
Park manager Jen Anderson, after detailing problems to an
Oct. 27 opening of the park, outlined what still needed to be
done, including upcoming volunteer opportunities, during
the volunteer meeting in October.
“It’s disappointing (the park not opening), but the right
decision,” Anderson said.
She added there would be no additional costs for the
opening delay.
Anderson also discussed authority of staff and volunteers
while on duty at the park, using a handout “Law
Enforcement and the ‘Authority of the Resource’” by Dr.
George N. Wallace.
The article defines authority and discusses the “authority of
resource technique” (ART) that can be used to get park
visitors to focus on “undesirable behavior” disrupting the
natural order of the park or the “ability of others to
experience wild nature.” The technique “transfers part of the
expectation back to the visitor by interpreting nature’s
requirements.”
The essence of ART is embodied in three sequential parts
park employees and volunteers can implement during a
situation:
Step 1: Give an objective description of the situation.
Step 2: Explain the implications of the action or situation
that was observed.
Step 3: Tell the visitor how you feel about the behavior and
what can or should be done to improve the situation.
After Jen explained the technique with a variety of examples
she asked volunteers to partner up and, using their own
examples of undesirable behavior, try the technique on each
other to practice responses.
Volunteers who did not attend the meeting can get a copy of
the article from Anderson.
During the meeting, Jen outlined work needing to be
completed before the spring opening and said volunteer
service will be needed. She outlined these needs in the
following list:
*Sign posts to be set
*T posts need to be set on western boundary
*Trail work to be completed
*Fence removal
*buck rail fencing to be installed at various sites
*remodeling of bathroom at Elk Falls cabin
*development of education programs
*park patrols set up
*signs to be posted
*boot camp to take place in spring
Anderson also announced Donna Zimmerly would no longer
be working as volunteer coordinator (her six month season
ended) and she would be picking up those responsibilities.
November volunteer meeting topic was to be rock climbing
and there will be no volunteer meetings in December.
MARMOT MESSENGER 5
Ed Russell - Man Behind the (Volunteer Calendar) Curtain
The many resources and individuals involved in opening a
new state park, especially of the magnitude of Staunton
State Park, are vast – Ed Russell is just one integral part.
Russell is co-owner of Computer Terrain Mapping, Inc.
(CTM) http://www.ctmap.com. His company mapped the
park for the master planning effort.
CTM is dedicated to “…providing high impact maps and
imagery to publications, enhancing their storylines with
compelling visuals.” That’s geospatial technology at its
best.
We called upon Russell’s charity to develop the volunteer
calendar (FREE) so we all could be better organized. We
know his work as In The Zone or the volunteer activities
calendar website www.stauntonpark.com. Ed helped make
the Staunton volunteer summer of 2012 run smooth as silk
by donating his web development skills.
The land use planning work including mapping, videos with
Spike Productions, web development, partnering zones was
challenging but rewarding, Russell said.
“I met a lot of great people: from locals who were
interested and concerned about development to other
stakeholders who were excited about the opportunities
Staunton offered.” The master plan was a balancing act,
which had to satisfy many interests and needs, according to
Russell. “In Colorado, we love our outdoors, but,
particularly among rural people, we love our privacy. In the
master plan, we tried to address both perspectives,” he said.
Russell’s work for the Park also involved imagery for the
partnering efforts to help raise funds and awareness. The
case described here is very compelling.
And, while he made note that the state does not have a lot of
money, especially for (park) maintenance, he believes
partners, including volunteers and financial contributors,
need to “step up and make things happen.” Staunton’s
fundraising efforts are fortunate to be able to use Ed’s initial
graphic applications to launch successful campaigns for
many years to come. The vision is clear in the videos and
website description of funding opportunities. He gets this
stuff.
Russell also believes frustrating budget delays will likely
affect the various planned phases of the park, but he is
optimistic. Staunton’s close proximity to Denver will open
up “really high profile promotion opportunities for
businesses and non-profits.”
All of Russell’s positive input – he never said “no” to any
volunteer calendar project this summer-- shines through in
the crew of 60-plus volunteers who look to the calendar for
guidance.
In the future Russell hopes to help with interpretation and
education programs at the park. “The landscape and
topography play a central role in Staunton’s identity. From a
mapping and visualization standpoint, these are specialty
areas for my company,” he said.
Russell is concerned about the future of public lands and
wonders if citizens of the community will “take ownership”
of these lands or whether public areas will “start to
deteriorate and close down.”
On a personal note, Russell is almost a native, having lived
in Colorado since he was five. He said he “truly loves the
state.” This is very apparent in his gifts to Staunton State
Park. Russell and his wife, Cat, own a “yuppie” farm
outside Lyons where they raise goats, chickens and a couple
of donkeys.
PARTNERING WITH STAUNTON STATE PARK
Go to the In The Zone website and click on the tabs for
more information. www.stauntonpark.com.
MARMOT MESSENGER 6
WORKING TO FINISH THE ENTRANCE AREA
Photos by Wayne Parkinson
When duty calls
↓ mild mannered park drive- thru attendant
turns into super hero extraordinaire → who battles for truth, justice, the American way
and an entrance station trailer with hook-ups
Entrance station coming up the exit drive on the flatbed trailer with
Lion’s Head in the background
View as you drive in entrance (exit drive on
left) with entrance
station center right
Getting ready to lift
Worker shoveling off fresh snow from foundation where station will be set
Almost set
into place
MARMOT MESSENGER 7
WORKING TO FINISH THE ENTRANCE AREA
Photos by Wayne Parkinson
Vault toilet
at the lower (overflow)
parking area
Vault toilet at the picnic ground - weight 55,000 pounds
Entrance gate
Constructing the group picnic area pavilion
MARMOT MESSENGER 8
Managing for Healthy Forests
Colorado’s forests evolved with natural cycles of
disturbance such as fire, windthrow, insects and
disease, which promoted diversity and resiliency.
Natural disturbances like fire promoted biodiversity
by maintaining a variety of vegetation communities
and habitats throughout the landscape, including
even‐aged stands, uneven‐aged stands, open areas
and other ecological systems such as riparian areas
along streams, that are less susceptible to fire.
At Staunton, a 2002 forest inventory indicated that
decades of fire suppression and past logging had
resulted in significantly increased tree densities with
more uniform age stands of trees in much of the park.
Individual trees were in greater competition for light,
water and nutrients, resulting in stressed forest stands
less capable of fighting off insect and disease attacks
and at heightened risk for a large-scale, high intensity
wildfire.
Staunton’s forests have been actively managed to
promote healthier diverse forests and enhance
wildlife habitat while reducing wildfire hazards.
Management methods have included a combination
of mechanized mastication, hand-felling of trees and
prescribed fire. Since 2003, approximately 830 acres
have been thinned or patch cut and about another 530
have been treated with prescribed fire, nearly ⅓ of
the park.
Forest Management Areas at Staunton
MARMOT MESSENGER 9
Managing for Healthy Forests – Ponderosa Pine Forests
Ponderosa pine forests evolved with natural cycles
of mixed intensity fire that often allowed mature pine
trees to survive, but killed competing conifer
seedlings. Areas of old growth ponerosa pines along
the main park road contained artificially dense stands
of trees and encroachment from other conifers
creating an increased risk of large, high-intensity
crown fires and increased susceptibility to native
insects and diseases.
Retaining many of the older ponderosas and
manually thinning the stands has restored more open
woodland conditions and created a fuel break in the
center of the park. It has also increased the remaining
trees’ resistance to insect and disease infestations and
allowed prescribed fire to burn grass, shrubs and
small trees that reduced surface and ladder fuels and
rejuvenated understory vegetation.
Lodgepole pine forests typically develop following
Thinned and prescribed burned ponderosa pine stands
MARMOT MESSENGER 10
Managing for Healthy Forests – Lodgepole Pine Forests
Lodgepole pine forests typically develop following
hot, stand-replacing crown fires. The regeneration
that naturally occurs in the open, sunny areas left in
the fire’s wake often results in dense small diameter
stands referred to as dog-hair stands. Although some
of the park’s lodgepole stands contained a diversity
of trees, much of these lodgepole forests were
characterized as dog-hair stands.
Thinning and patch cuts in some of these very dense
lodgepole pine stands has reduced tree densities and
created forest openings, breaking the continuity of
forest fuels that could slow the progress of a wildfire
and protect surrounding communities. It has also
resulted in forests less prone and better able to
recover from disease and insect infestations (i.e.,
dwarf mistletoe, mountain pine beetles, Ips beetles).
Lodgepole pine stands in Mason Creek
without treatment
Mason Creek lodgepole and aspen
stands after mastication in 2012
Mastication machine used for thinning and
patch cuts
MARMOT MESSENGER 11
Managing for Healthy Forests – Perpetual Undertaking
Removal of lodgepoles and other competing conifers
provides the opportunity for the regeneration of
aspen stands long shaded out by the dark woods.
Cutting some of the older aspens in the stand also
encourages sprouting and expansion of the aspen.
Restoring the health and vigor of the existing aspen
stands and expanding their current extent improves
wildlife habitat for elk and other animals and birds,
landscape heterogeneity and wildfire mitigation.
Thinning of conifers in the western area of the park
and more recently in the Mason Creek drainage will
hopefully increase aspen sprouts to the extent that
they will be abundant enough to withstand extensive
browsing by deer and elk and allow expansion of
aspen stands in the park.
Prescribed fire has been used to revitalize and
rejuvenate grasslands and wetlands in the North Elk
Creek corridor. Prescribed burning in these
communities helps recycle nutrients tied up in old
plant growth, control many woody plants and weeds,
Left: Meadow in northeast
area of the park a few years
after thinning project by
Youth Corps
increase plant growth, reduce the risk of wildfires and
improve wildlife habitat.
Managing Staunton’s forests is a large and perpetual
undertaking. Once forest treatments have been
completed, continued maintenance of these treatments
will be needed in the future. Initial fuel breaks will need
to be treated again.
Future prescription fire can be helpful in maintaining
previous treatments, while also minimizing the need for
future mechanical operations. Hand thinning of seedlings
trees will help to maintain open woodlands. Continued
manual cutting of hazard trees will be needed.
Unfortunately, past land use has also resulted in a ready
source of seeds of invasive noxious weeds that can
spread after mechanical or fire disturbances. Continual
noxious weed removal will also be needed to maintain
native ground cover. Luckily for Staunton volunteers
and special work parties continue to be plentiful.
Active forest management has been and will continue to
be an integral piece of the stewardship of Staunton State
Park.
Aspen stems coming up in an area near
Lion’s Head masticated in 2008
MARMOT MESSENGER 12
Managing for Healthy Forests
Southeast area of the park near future visitor center/campground before (above) and
after (below) mastication in 2010
The mission of the Colorado State Forest Service is to achieve stewardship of Colorado's diverse forest
environments for the benefit of present and future generations. Together with other natural resource
organizations, they strive to provide comprehensive support for the care of our natural environment.
http://csfs.colostate.edu/
The Front Range Fuels Treatment Partnership (FRFTP) was initiated following the record fire season of
2002. It is comprised of the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests, Pike and San Isabel National Forests,
Colorado State Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station and Rocky Mountain National Park. FRFTP
was formed to reduce wildland fire risks through sustained fuels treatment along the Colorado Front Range.
http://frftp.org/
Article Photos: Front Range Fuels
Treatment Partnership and
Colorado State Forest Service
annual reports and Elaine Rideout
MARMOT MESSENGER 13
Winter Raptor Monitoring
Twelve different sites/zones where winter monitoring is done at Staunton State Park
Two winter raptor monitoring routes
have been established for Staunton.
The Lion's Head route is
approximately seven miles in length
with an elevation gain of roughly 900
feet. The Mason Creek route is
approximately 7½ miles in length
with an elevation gain of roughly
1200 feet.
Each route is surveyed every two
weeks if possible with monitors
traveling out and back along each
route. There are seven monitoring
sites along the Lion's Head route and
five monitoring sites along the Mason
Creek route. Monitors stop at each
site for 10 minutes to scan for birds.
Volunteer Dick Prickett worked with
state biologist Sarah Lamagna to help
identify the monitoring routes and
determine a suitable number and
location of observation points. Dick’s
been responsible for organizing,
instructing, and leading a team of
about a dozen volunteers in this
effort.
Dick claims not to be an expert on
birds, although, he’s definitely great
at imparting his knowledge and
observation hints that will help
distinguish one raptor from another or
from other birds. Knowing what to
look for and putting together multiple
clues be it size, shape, markings,
flight patterns, habitat preferences,
etc.
If we could just actually see some
raptors during the monitoring trips.
Although the volunteers are eager to
spot them, the birds are evidently not
quite so enthusiastic about being seen.
On the first monitoring trip on the
Lion’s Head route not a raptor was
seen. The first Mason Creek route trip
started out the same. A few soaring
birds were spotted. Nope – ravens.
But everyone learned what
characteristics distinguished them as
ravens and not hawks.
Most of the time was spent hiking.
Steller jays, chickadees, nuthatches,
crows, ravens, but still no raptors.
Special thanks to
Jeff Thompson
(Stewardship Coordinator)
Sarah Lamagna
(Biological and GIS Technician)
Dick Prickett
(Staunton Volunteer) for all their hard work in setting
up the raptor monitoring
program
MARMOT MESSENGER 14
Winter Raptor Monitoring As fortune would have it, a high
soaring raptor, a red-tail hawk was
spotted at the last site of the day on
the Mason Creek route.
Two weeks later on the Mason
Creek route a red-tail hawk was
spotted. Dick, Randie, Carol and
Ron were fortunate to be the
monitors two days later on the
Lion’s Head route. They not only
spotted three red-tails but an adult
bald eagle flying over. How cool
was that! Another red-tail was
spotted outside the park.
Volunteers will continue winter
monitoring then transition to formal
nest monitoring in late winter early
spring as raptors begin to nest.
If you can stand
around and stare
up into space you are an excellent
candidate for
raptor monitoring.
Photos: Carol Sanberg, Donna Zimmerly and Elaine Rideout
MARMOT MESSENGER 15
Fly with the fastest bird on the planet and through the woods with a goshawk courtesy of BBCWorldwide:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-_RHRAzUHM
Am
eric
an
Per
egri
ne
Falc
on
F
alc
o p
eregri
nu
s an
atu
m
A Species Recovered
The American peregrine falcon breeds in the United States, Canada and Mexico. The historical status of this bird is not known, but the species was probably never common.
An historical estimate is 3,875 nesting pairs in North America.
After World War II - Widespread use of DDT, significantly increases
1940s – Peregrine population decline begins and continues into the early 1970s
1950s – It becomes increasingly apparent to scientists that DDT and other pesticides were entering the food chains of fish and birds like the peregrine
1960s – Precipitous population decline attributed to DDT which was interfering with egg shell formation and birds were laying eggs so thin they were crushed by the weight of the
incubating adult
Late 1960s– Peregrines completely gone from the eastern United States and the Midwest and the population in the western United States, Canada, and Mexico had declined by as
much as 90 percent
1970 – Peregrines listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Conservation Act, the predecessor of the current law
1972 – Agricultural use of DDT is banned in the United States although impacts of residues that had already accumulated in the fatty tissues of fish and wildlife continue
1975 – 324 known nesting pairs of peregrines in North America; national recovery teams established for the East, Alaska, the Pacific States, and the Rocky Mountain/Southwest region
1976 – Only five pairs found at about 30 historical territories in Colorado
1999 – Due to a ban on the use of DDT and successful captive breeding, rearing, and
release of over 6,000 peregrines, there were roughly 1,800 breeding pairs across the United States. The peregrine was removed from the federal endangered species list; peregrines removed from Colorado’s list of threatened species in 1998
2001 – More than 100 pairs found on territory in Colorado
2003 – Peregrine population in North America estimated at 3,005 breeding pairs; In the Northeast and Mid-west, two-thirds of peregrines nested on man-made structures. In other areas, more than 90 percent of peregrine pairs nested on natural formations such
as cliffs.
2015 – Post-delisting monitoring will continue through at least 2015 as part of federal monitoring plan in order to provide data reflecting the status of peregrines over multi generations and to assure their long-term survival
Currently, the levels of contaminants accumulating from their prey are low enough to allow successful reproduction and expansion of the population. Peregrines that winter in
countries in Central and South America that are still using DDT and other pesticides may be at risk of accumulating contaminants from their avian prey, some of which return to nest in the north and are a potential source of contaminants for both migratory and non-
migratory birds.
Although the nest site was not confirmed peregrines were observed in Staunton in 2012. They have
historically nested in the park on Lion’s Head. Thanks to the protections provided by the Endangered Species
Act and the extraordinary partnership efforts between federal agencies, state wildlife agencies, universities,
private ornithological groups, Canadian Wildlife Service, other Provincial agencies and individuals in the
recovery of this species, you too may have the good fortune of seeing this bird here in Staunton.
MARMOT MESSENGER 16
Although the American peregrine falcon and other
raptors like the bald eagle have received wide spread
support in their recovery rarely does the spotlight fall
on the many humbler but equally endangered species
like the budding monkeyflower. This diminutive and
extremely rare plant is only known to occur along
Colorado’s Front Range in about 10 widely-dispersed
locations between 8,400 to 11,120 feet in elevation.
Individual plants are usually clustered in a few, dense
populations that typically occupy less than one square
meter.
The limited number of plants and the very small area
occupied by each population makes them especially
vulnerable to disturbances like wildfire, drought or
inadvertent trampling by people. The limited number
of locations in turn puts this plant at risk for
extinction. In 2003 the Colorado Natural Heritage
Program gave this species its highest possible rank,
G1 (i.e., the species is critically imperiled globally
because of extreme rarity) and S1 (i.e., critically
imperiled in state).
This monkeyflower is highly specialized in its habitat
requirements. It most often grows in moist, seep
habitats on cliff ledges or under rocky overhangs.
Two populations of this plant are found in suitable
habitat within Staunton, one along Black Mountain
Creek and the other along the North Elk Creek. The
Black Mountain Creek population exists in multiple
small patches. These plants are annuals and their
populations can fluctuate rather widely. For instance,
in 2011 about 150 plants were found in one of the
Black Mountain Creek population patches where in
2007 no plants were found in that patch.
This plant is rare but also special because of its unique
method of reproduction. The plants reproduce via tiny
vegetative propagules called bulbils that develop from
embryonic buds that lie at the junction of the stem and
leaf stalks. When the plant dies in late summer or
early fall the dried leaves with attached bulbils fall to
the ground where they wait to germinate the next
summer much like a seed.
Biologists Mark Beardsley, the rock climbing
biologist, with EcoMetrics and Dave Steingraeber
with CSU have been studying this plant for many
years including collecting information on the
populations in Staunton.
Volunteers Jack Darnell and Carol Phelps spent some
time in the field with Mark this past year. They were
hoping to learn more about this species and to
understand the environment in which it exists. They
were clearly struck with how vulnerable these small
populations are, be it from natural events like rock
falls or potential damage by visitors. They emphasized
the need to safeguard these plants and their locations.
The populations are so small that hikers could
Cont. on p. 17
Bu
dd
ing
Mo
nk
eyfl
ow
er
Budding monkeyflower (Mimulus gemmiparus)
Habitat of the budding monkeyflower
MARMOT MESSENGER 17
unknowingly destroy individual plants and
possibly the entire population through the
creation of social trails or by taking a break or
finding shelter from a storm in just the wrong
area.
Protection of these monkeyflower populations
and their habitat is important. It will be
necessary to monitor their populations and
manage recreational use to avoid possible
impacts to populations and habitats. But a
species cannot survive without a home so what
of its survival in the face of environmental
fluctuations like a drought, flash flood, rockfall,
erosion or wildfire that could subtlety or
drastically change its habitat? Could these very
small isolated populations survive changing
environmental conditions? Perhaps they could
use some help.
Part of Mark and Dave’s work with the park has
been to evaluate and implement a “captive
breeding” and reintroduction program for this
species that establishes new populations in the
natural environment as a means of expanding the
number of populations and/or expanding the
range where it occurs and thus hopefully
protecting this plant from extinction. In 2011
bulbils were collected from plants in the park
and germinated in a lab at CSU. Close to 9,000
bulbils from these lab-grown plants were then
harvested and planted this past summer in 35
different sites in the park within the Black
Mountain Creek and North Elk Creek drainages.
These experimental introduction sites as well as
the previously existing population sites were
monitored through this past growing season.
The primary goals of monitoring are to evaluate
the success of establishing new sustainable
populations and to document the environmental
characteristics that influence the habitat
limitations and preferences of the species.
Monitoring entails collecting information about
the plant populations and on 14 different
physical habitat parameters.
This monkeyflower may be tiny but it’s not
inconsequential. Conservation of the biological
diversity of the park is a critically important
element in maintaining the integrity of its
ecosystems and being good stewards. The
The Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP)
The CNHP is a nonprofit organization that tracks and ranks Colorado’s rare and imperiled species and habitat and provides
scientific information and expertise to promote the conservation of Colorado’s wealth of biological resources. The CNHP
ranking system allows targeting the most at-risk species and ecosystems for inventory, protection, research, and management.
Species and ecosystems are ranked on the Global (G), National (N), and Subnational/State/province (S) levels.
Learn more at: http://www.cnhp.colostate.edu/
Mim
ulu
s g
emm
ipa
rus
Newly established M gemmiparus growing alongside
native M floribundus (which is flowering) with temp/light
monitoring sensor which is about the size of a quarter
Brian Kurzel checking out one of the experimental
populations in August
Mark Beardsley
Mark Beardsley
greater the diversity of an ecosystem the better it can
maintain balance and productivity and withstand
environmental stressors. Colorado’s rare plants are an
important and irreplaceable part of the state and
nation’s natural heritage.
What Say You - Send It Jack and Carol have also given some thought to whether
volunteers would be able to assist in the monitoring of these populations over the coming years. The North Elk Creek
populations are more accessible than the Black Mountain
populations. Getting to the upper Black Mountain site from the park entrance area “would be a long, strenuous hike that ends in
steep slopes, boulder field, and some slick rock ledges”.
MARMOT MESSENGER 18
Mim
ulu
s g
emm
ipa
rus
Above is a photo of a nice, robust monkeyflower plant that was grown in the greenhouse at
CSU a few months ago. The plant grew from a bulbil that was collected from the Elk Creek
population at Staunton last year. It produced several flowers, but no seeds or fruits in spite of
hand-pollinations. The only time the researchers have ever seen seeds produced was in the
mid-90s, when Mark crossed some plants from the US Forest Service population site at
Hankins Gulch in the CSU greenhouse and was able to get some seeds. All other attempts
have been unsuccessful, and no one has ever found seeds in the natural/wild populations.
They keep looking, though.
Colorado Natural Areas Program (CNAP)
The CNAP is a statewide program focused on the recognition and protection of areas that
contain at least one unique or high-quality natural feature of statewide significance. By
working cooperatively, CNAP works to conserve the ecosystems, species, geology and fossils
that are 'uniquely Colorado'. CNAP sponsored the research and work to establish new
monkeyflower populations in the park. Special thanks to CNHP coordinator Brian Kurzel
who made this project possible.
Learn more at: http://www.parks.state.co.us/NaturalResources/CNAP/
Seema Sheth
MARMOT MESSENGER 19
Volunteer Highlights
EDIBLE AND MEDICINAL PLANTS
Suzie Wampler and Randie Boldra initiated an October 19
meeting to learn about edible and medicinal plants in the park.
Volunteers reviewed some of the uses of plants such as mullein,
musk and Canada thistle, wild sage, spruce and firs included in
the park’s library reference book Edible & Medicinal Plants of
the Rockies by Linda Kershaw. Then it was into the park,
walking about 100 yards from the Boyd House where there were
lots of examples of the trees, shrubs, herbs, mosses and lichens, as
well as one of the poisonous plants (common snowberry). Native
Plant Master Deborah Darnell described the botanical nature of
the trees and plants observed.
The following weekend was another meeting and walk led by
Pam Little. After looking over some edible/medicinal books and
materials, including lots of great handouts that Pam has put
together over the years, the group ventured outside in the general
area of the Staunton Cabin to see what they could identify. Some
plants were still green and identifiable by their leaves like
pusseytoes which, if you really wanted to you could chew the
stalks like gum. Being late in the year many of plants were only
identifiable by the dried flower heads.
The goal is to put together information for the interpretive
program on some commonly-seen plants at Staunton and how
they were/are used by wildlife, natives and settlers. These are also
great opportunities to improve your plant identification skills.
Photos:
Suzi
Wampler and Elaine
Rideout
MARMOT MESSENGER 20
Volunteer Highlights
BUCKRAIL FENCE PROJECTS
Ron and the Lilliputians Thanks to all the “little people” who helped with the Old Mill buckrail
fence project!
Staunton Cabin Blain Cabin
Above: cutting more rail for the Old Mill fence
Below: the final screw to finish the Old Mill buck rail enclosure project
Old Mill photos by Wayne Parkinson
MARMOT MESSENGER 21
Volunteer Highlights
TRAIL PROJECTS
The trails team is currently working on signage, location of
signs and designating distances of trails for signs. The group
has also been constructing two new trails, including the
climber access trail at Staunton Rocks and Falls Overlook
Trail
More project days are in the works for this fall and next
spring. The group is asking for volunteer help for these
projects, according to Gary Sims, coordinator.
MARMOT MESSENGER 22
Volunteer Highlights
WILDLIFE AND PLANTS
Plant list development has continued and the latest information installed on the computer at Boyd House. The library has
references for volunteer use, according to coordinator Jack Darnell.
The Darnells and Carol Phelps had made trips with biologist Mark Beardsley to mimulus gemmiparus sites. Activities in this
area will continue next summer.
Team activities are shifting to training for interpretation in preparation for the opening of the park in the spring. One plan
includes development of a pocket-sized common plant handbook for volunteers. Digital pictures of common plants
especially taken by staff and volunteers are being requested. A folder for storing these pictures could be stored at Boyd
House.
Training could take several forms. All park interpreters will need to have an introductory familiarity with common plants
visitors will see. This training will include lectures paired with field training when plants are visible and snow is minimal.
Team members are needed to help with the education program. All efforts are welcomed and appreciated.
Example from the plant list which includes web links to various plant information and photos
Boykinia (Telesonix jamesii)
MARMOT MESSENGER 23
Friends of Staunton State Park
Friends of Staunton State Park was created this year as a
supportive organization which raises funds through various
activities.
The organization’s mission is to “support and promote
Staunton State Park by raising funds to preserve and enhance
the park’s natural and recreational resources, protect its
boundaries, increase public awareness and enhance
educational and interpretive activities.”
Currently, the group is working with an attorney and board
member Fred Wells to complete a legal structure, according
to member Susan Festag.
“We have approved Articles of Incorporation and an
attachment to those Articles that Fred will soon be filing with
the Secretary of State’s office to establish Friends as a
Colorado nonprofit corporation,” Festag said. “Once we are
officially incorporated, we will hold a meeting to approve the
bylaws already drafted and select initial officers for the
corporation,” she said.
Once this process is complete, Friends can file IRS form
1023 to request tax-exempt status, so tax-deductible
donations can be accepted.
Until this status is achieved. The group is operating under the
“umbrella” of Friends of Colorado State Parks, so tax-
deductible donations can be made to benefit the park.
Park manager Jen Anderson is gathering a list of needs the
organization can help alleviate. She will also collect
donations and forward them to Festag.
Festag and park volunteer Sally Parkinson created and
completed a calendar project that has been widely successful
in producing funds. The two reviewed hundreds of photos of
the park, taken from a variety of photographers, mostly
volunteers, to select a final group. Jen reviewed the final
selection and the three chose those pictures depicting the
“key features of the park.”
The photos were used to make up a 2013 park calendar and
were originally to be sold at the Conifer Neighbors and
Newcomers Boutique in October. “Incredibly, we sold 65 of
the 100 calendars (that were printed) at the October volunteer
meeting,” Festag said.
Because of a miscommunication, the remaining calendars
were not on sale at the CNN Boutique, but the group hopes to
sell the rest “at smaller neighborhood locations.”
Festag said information for photo locations and
photographers are found in a calendar insert. Anyone
wanting a calendar can purchase them for $15 by contacting
Festag at [email protected] or by calling her at 303-
816-1348.
Note cards with some calendar pictures have been ordered
and will also be available for sale. Festag said no price has
been set yet, but interested buyers can contact her for more
information.
Another project benefiting Friends has been the sale of
firewood from the park. A truck load cost $35. Volunteer
Gary Finely was in charge of this fundraiser.
Current members of Friends include Festag, Kevin Derks,
Wayne Parkinson, Peter Petlak and Fred Wells. The group is
looking for more members and especially need individuals
with skills in the areas of accounting/finance, website
development and updates, marketing and social media and
those with contacts in local businesses.
To make a tax-deductible donation, send a check made out to
Friends of Colorado State Parks and send to:
Friends of Staunton State Park
C/O Staunton State Park
11559 Upper Ranch Drive
Pine, CO 80470
Good job by Ed Samberg and Jack Gunn in installing new
fans with lights in the ceiling of the Boyd house meeting
room. No more huddling under a dim light and squinting at
material by the Friends group during their evening
meetings. The small construction team is also been working
on renovations to the bathroom in the Elk Falls cabin
MARMOT MESSENGER 24
Getting to Know You
Jack and Deborah Darnell
California natives Jack and Deborah Darnell have a
long history of volunteer service and are happy to
join the fellowship of Staunton State Park volunteers.
The couple, co-coordinators of the Wildlife and
Plants team, met while students at Santa Clara
University in California and were married in the
historic Mission Church on the campus. They moved
to Berkeley where Jack completed a masters degree
and later began work at an international
engineering/construction company in San Francisco.
Deborah earned a degree in sociology and spent a
year studying in Rome and traveling in Europe.
The couple has two children, Christine and Brian.
Deborah was a “home-based” mom who eventually
returned to school to earn a graduate degree in
learning disabilities so she could “better care” for her
son. After her return to college, she took botany
classes and became a docent at the UC Berkeley
Botanical Garden. Eventually, she was hired as the
employee of the Friend’s organization there and
served for eight years.
Deborah “developed skill in plant identification” with
other volunteers and staff and hiking and camping
throughout the West with her family and through
“interaction with kids in their school programs.”
Jack is a mechanical engineer working in the electric
power industry. He has worked to design power
plants in a variety of energy sources including coal,
nuclear, natural gas, oil, geothermal, hydroelectric,
solar, wind, biomass and energy storage.
“I served as chief mechanical engineer and was the
U.S. representative to an international committee on
renewable energy resources,” he said.
Jack has also worked for the National Renewable
Energy Laboratory in Golden and was a member of
the Laboratory Management Team there. Currently,
he works part time as an engineer for a company in
Denver. He is interested in the impact of global
warming on the environment.
Jack and Deborah are serious and long-time
volunteers. Jack has enjoyed working with Habitat
for Humanity and also has built wheel chair ramps at
the Senior Resource Center. He has volunteered as a
park patroller at Jeffco Open Spaces and worked at
Chatfield State Park.
“I enjoy working with my hands, giving back to the
community,” he said.
Photos courtesy of Jack and Deborah Darnell
MARMOT MESSENGER 25
Getting to Know You (Jack and Deborah Darnell)
Deborah previously volunteered her time by working
in administrative services for National Geographic,
Lupus Foundation and the American Speech,
Language, Hearing Association in Maryland, where
the couple lived for five years.
Since moving to Colorado, Deborah said she is
fortunate to be involved with the Rock Garden
convention and has learned from “notable experts” in
Colorado flora such as Lorraine Yeattes, William
Weber and Pam Irwin. She has also worked at
Roxborough State Park as a volunteer.
However, after being bitten by a rattlesnake while
leading a refresher hike for volunteers at
Roxborough, “I have cut back my time there and
Staunton State Park became a new opportunity,” she
said.
Deborah says her passion is alpine plants and has
worked as a summer volunteer tour guide for hikes
sponsored by Denver Botanical Gardens on Mount
Evans. This opportunity led to training and a
leadership role she received through Colorado
Natural Areas Program Lead.
Jack said he hopes to spend more time volunteering
and “has helped Deborah with plant activities
including “monitoring populations of rare orchids
and leading alpine wildflower hikes.” He said he is
more of a nature lover than plant specialist, but has
learned much by Deborah’s quizzing on plant
identification during their hikes.
The couple has high hopes for the park and their part
in it. Deborah said she wants to “interpret to fellow
volunteers and the public the incredible plant life (at
SSP).” She said her best memory so far is “seeing
telesonix jamesii (an imperiled plant species)
growing in a natural setting.”
Jack hopes to help develop resources data “beyond
what has been gathered by numerous studies over the
past two decades.” He wants to organize this data for
use by staff and volunteers and continue efforts to
develop a comprehensive plant list (the couple has
already added about 40 species from their hikes) for
the park.
Together, Jack and Deborah would like to use their
many hours of study, knowledge and skills to train
volunteers and “participate in construction and
outdoor projects as time and energy permits.”
MARMOT MESSENGER 26
Announcements
Volunteer Team Coordinators
Staunton State Park Staff
Monthly Volunteer Meetings
January 12 9 a.m.
February 9 9 a.m.
Friends Meetings 3rd
Tuesday 6:30 p.m. Boyd House
Remember: All volunteer activities are listed on the on-line calendar
www.stauntonpark.com
Education Team: Pam Little – [email protected]
Fencing Team: Susan Festag – [email protected]
Fire Mitigation Team: Scott Aaronson – [email protected]
Newsletter Team: Nancy Coburn – [email protected]
Small Construction Team: Sue Ann Vollmar – [email protected]
Trails Team: Gary Sims – [email protected]
Steve Sparer – [email protected]
Wildlife and Plants Team: Jack Darnell – [email protected]
Deborah Darnell – [email protected]
Mary Gulash – [email protected]
Richard Prickett – [email protected]
Jen Anderson Park Manager
Colin Chisholm Park Ranger
Newsletter Team:
Nancy Coburn
Lizzy Hammon
Donna Zimmerly
Elaine Rideout
Marmot mascot designer:
Meagan Webber
Special Thanks to Jen Anderson
ww.parks.state.co.us
www.wildlife.state.co.us