13

Click here to load reader

The Influence of Force Control Agents on the Cohesive-Adhesive Balance

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

aa

Citation preview

  • KONA No.23 (2005) 109

    INTRODUCTION

    Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) represent a significantadvance in pulmonary drug delivery, mainly by over-coming patient related issues of co-ordination withconventional pressurised metered dose inhaler sys-tems. The f luidisation, de-aggregation and dispersionof a dry powder formulation are achieved via thepatients inspiratory action. Arguably more so than

    P. Begat and R. Price1

    Pharmaceutical Technology Research Group Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology University of Bath*H. Harris, D.A.V. Morton and J.N. StaniforthVectura Ltd.**

    The Influence of Force Control Agents on the Cohesive-Adhesive Balance in Dry Powder Inhaler Formulations

    Abstract

    The aim of the study was to investigate the specific inf luence of force control agents (FCAs)(leucine, lecithin and magnesium stearate) on the interfacial properties of a salbutamol sulphate-lactose dry powder inhaler formulation. The inf luence of FCAs on the cohesive and adhesiveforce balance was directly assessed via an atomic force microscopy (AFM) colloid probe technique,with a recently developed cohesive-adhesive balance (CAB) graphical analysis procedure. Co-processing of constituent particles was conducted by a novel dry mechanical fusion method(Mechanofusion). The in vitro deposition profile of the model salbutamol sulphate formulationswas investigated using a Monohaler DPI device with a next generation impactor (NGI) apparatus.The CAB-graph analysis of a salbutamol sulphate-lactose binary system suggested a predispositionfor an interactive mixture. However, the reduced intermixing coefficient (Fdrug-lactose/Fdrug-drug) sug-gested that a significant amount of energy would be required to overcome the strong adhesive inter-action for ef ficient dispersion of the drug from a lactose surface. The processing of lactose withleucine, lecithin or magnesium stearate, prior to formulating with the drug, significantly reducedthe adhesive interactions of the salbutamol with modified lactose samples. The CAB analyses indi-cated that the reduced intermixing coefficients shifted to such an extent that cohesive drug interac-tions dominated. These dramatic shifts in the balance of forces were shown to lead to poor blendhomogeneity and potential for significant segregation between drug and carrier particles. Con-versely, the conditioning of salbutamol sulphate with leucine, lecithin and magnesium stearate,which modified both the adhesive and cohesive interactions, formed homogenous interactive blendswith advantageously weaker drug-lactose interactions. Formulations with pre-conditioned drug, incontrast to conditioned lactose, of fered the best drug delivery performances. The use of the colloidAFM technique in combination with the cohesive-adhesive balance (CAB) approach provided a veryaccurate means of predicting dry powder formulation behaviour and the specific inf luence of partic-ulate interactions on aerosol performance.

    Key words: Inter-particulate, AFM, Magnesium stearate, DPI, Inhalation, Aerosols, Mechanofusion, Nanotech-nology

    Accepted: August 12, 2005* Bath, BA2 7AY, UK** 1 Prospect West, Chippenham, SN14 6FH, UK1 Corresponding author

    TEL: +44 (0) 1225 383644FAX: +44 (0) 1225 386114E-mail: [email protected]

  • other drug delivery platforms, the characteristic prop-erties of the dry powder formulation are criticallyimportant to the effective performance of a DPI sys-tem1, 2).

    The formulation should exhibit good f low proper-ties to aid metering, f luidisation and avoid excessivedevice retention. Meanwhile, the f luidised powdermust disperse into a fine aerosol (5 m) for effi-cient drug delivery3, 4). This leads to the well-knownparadox that respirable sized particles tend to behighly cohesive, which causes entrainment problemsdue to their poor f lowability and limits the dispersibil-ity into an aerosol cloud5, 6). In addition, strong cohe-sion forces hinder the handling of the powder duringmanufacture.

    To overcome the highly cohesive nature of res-pirable powders, the drug is commonly co-processed(blended) with larger carrier particles of an inertexcipient to aid f lowability and drug re-dispersion.This carrier based formulation approach is limited bythe restrictive availability of excipient materials. Theonly widely approved excipients for use as carriersare lactose and glucose. Thus, the development of adry powder formulation is a highly specialised, com-plex and unpredictable operation. A formulation istypically required to go through several iterative andoptimisation steps before a product specification canbe achieved, and even then variability over time andbetween batches is common.

    By blending a micronised drug with a carrier, theshear forces generated may be sufficient to overcomethe cohesive (drug-drug) interactions in forming aninteractive mixture. Drug particles need to be suf-ficiently attracted to the carrier during mixing tosupport blend homogeneity, device filling and formu-lation stability. Yet the active ingredient must be read-ily detached from the carrier upon activation to forma fine particle cloud. Thus, the balance of inter-partic-ulate forces within the carrier-based formulation iscritically important.

    Numerous techniques have been applied to modifyparticulate interactions in dry powder formulations.The majority have targeted the physical propertiesof the carrier. These include modifying the shape7),size8), or surface features such as rugosity 9-12) of theexcipient. Other methods involve the manufacture ofmore uniform respirable drug particulates by particleengineering technologies such as spray drying13) orsupercritical f luid precipitation14). One of the mostsimple and popular advances is via the addition of aternary agent, such as fine particles of lactose. Forthese complex blends, it is proposed that the ternary

    agent occupies high energy sites on the carrier parti-cles, such as clefts and areas of increased moleculardisorder15, 16). As a consequence, only low energysites remain available for drug-carrier adhesive inter-action. The possibility of a marked reduction in parti-cle adhesion would facilitate more effective drugdetachment upon device actuation. Extensive workon the use of fines in dry powder formulations andtheir inf luence on delivery performances have beenreported17-19).

    In addition to passifying active sites, researchershave shown that the addition of fine ternary particlesmay lead to the formation of fine particle multiplets ormetastable agglomerates20). The critical formation ofagglomerate particles, which remain adhered to thecoarse carrier lactose during processing and handling,may dramatically reduce the inspirational energy re-quirements in elutriating and de-aggregating drugparticles upon aerosolisation.

    The co-processing of carrier particles with low sur-face free energy materials has also been reported as apossible means of increasing the aerosolisation effi-ciencies of dry powder inhaler formulations19, 21, 22).The primary role of these materials is to modify theinterfacial properties of the excipient particles todecrease drug-excipient adhesion. These force con-trol agents (FCAs) preferably exhibit anti-adherentand/or anti-friction properties. Typical FCAs includeamino acids such as leucine, phospholipids such aslecithin or fatty acid derivatives such as magnesiumstearate (MgST)23).

    To optimise the efficiency of a carrier based for-mulation, the force control agent must be specifi-cally introduced into the dry powder formulation toselectively target the particle interactions to be modi-fied. In this study, the FCA was mechanically fusedvia a highly intensive co-processing system termedMechanofusion to ensure a nanometre thick coatingof the specific components of the formulation24). Thisapproach was recently developed by Staniforth andMorton for inhalation powders25). In contrast to otherlow energetic mixing or even intensive mixing, thisdry coating process is designed to provide a relativelycomplete ultra thin coating onto the host particles viathe application of high shear forces (Fig. 1). Suc-cinctly, a Mechanofusion mixer is composed of alarge rotor with rounded blades revolving in a steelvessel at very high speed (typically of the order of5000rpm). The gap size between the rotor bladesand the vessel wall can be adjusted in order to varythe mixing energy delivered to the powder blend. Asa result, the particles experience very high shear

    110 KONA No.23 (2005)

  • forces as they are compressed between the innerdrum wall and the rotor.

    The aim of this study was to investigate the specificinf luence of force control agents (leucine, lecithin andmagnesium stearate) on the interfacial properties of asalbutamol sulphate-lactose dry powder inhaler for-mulation. The inf luence of the FCAs on the cohesiveand adhesive force balance was directly assessed viaan AFM colloid probe technique, with a recentlydeveloped CAB-graph analysis procedure. This novelprocedure allows quantification of cohesive-adhesivebalances (CAB) in a dry powder formulation26), and,thus, can be directly utilised to highlight their specificaffect on formulation behaviour and delivery charac-teristics27). The in vitro deposition profile of the modelsalbutamol sulphate formulations was investigated toelucidate any correlation between the cohesive andadhesive nature of the modified formulations withtheir aerosol delivery performance.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    MaterialsMicronised salbutamol sulphate, donated by Vectura

    Ltd., and Sorbalac 400 lactose (Meggle, Wasserburg,Germany) were used as supplied. The use of Sorbalac400 lactose particles (10m) with respect to moreconventional carrier sizes (63-90m) was dictatedby the need to minimise the potential inf luence oflarger carrier particles over f luidisation and de-aggre-gation processes of particle agglomerates. L-Leucinewas supplied from Ajinomoto Co. (batch number601FK72, Tokyo, Japan), lecithin from Lipoid GmbH(batch number 25661113-1/14, Ludwigshafen, Ger-many) and magnesium stearate from Avocado(batch number H1028A, Heysham, UK). All materialswere used as supplied. Ultra pure water was producedby reverse osmosis (MilliQ, Millipore, Molsheim,France).

    Preparation of powder formulationsPowder mixing was achieved in two successive

    steps involving different energetic processes. Pre-blends of salbutamol sulphate and FCA (5% w/w) orlactose and FCA (5% w/w) were prepared using aMechanofusion system. (Hosokawa-Alpine, Augsburg,Germany). Powders to be processed were sealed intothe Mechanofusion system core. Cold-water circula-tion was applied using an incorporated water jacketto dissipate localised heating. Samples were mixedat 5000rpm for 10 minutes to achieve the requiredprocess intensity and mechanically fuse the FCA tothe host particles.

    The formulations were subsequently prepared bygeometrically mixing 1g of pre-blend and 1g of eitherlactose or drug depending on the nature of the pre-blend in 100mg increments via a Whirlimixer (FisonsScientific Apparatus, Loughborough, UK). The result-ing mixture was further mixed in a Turbula (GlenCreston Ltd., Middlesex, UK) at 46rpm for 30 min-utes. This blend design was not intended to ref lectany commercial available or relevant DPI powder for-mulation. This formulation was selected solely to suitthe objectives of the study of the cohesive-adhesivebalance between drug and lactose components.

    Preparation of compressed powder substratesModel surfaces of the powder formulations were

    prepared by high-pressure compression (TA HDITexture analyser, Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK).Approximately 250mg of material was weighed into a10mm stainless steel die and compacted over 3min,with a load of 500kg.

    Scanning electron microscopyThe morphology of the various powder formula-

    tions of was investigated using a scanning electronmicroscope (SEM) (Jeol 6310, Jeol, Tokyo, Japan).Samples were gold-coated (Edwards Sputter Coater,Crawley, UK) prior to imaging.

    Force measurements by atomic force microscopy(AFM)

    Prior to force measurements, salbutamol sulphate,lactose and the corresponding conditioned particles(n3 for each material) were fixed onto standardV-shaped tipless cantilevers (DNP-020, Digital Instru-ments, CA, USA) using an epoxy resin glue (Araldite,UK). The spring constant (k) of the cantilevers wasdetermined by the thermal noise method (k0.2820.039N/m)28, 29).

    The AFM was housed in an environmental chamber

    KONA No.23 (2005) 111

    Fig. 1 Schematic representation of Mechanofusion particle mix-ing mechanisms.

    Simple mixing Intensive mixing Mechanofusion

  • to maintain constant temperature of 25C (0.2C)and relative humidity of 35% RH (3%). The partialwater vapour pressure was controlled via a custom-built perfusion unit coupled to a highly sensitivehumidity sensor (Rotronic AG, CH). The interactionforces were measured by recording the def lectionof the AFM cantilever as a function of the substratedisplacement (z) by applying Hookes law (Fkz).Individual force curves (n4096) were conductedover a 10m10m at a scan rate of 4Hz and a com-pressive loading of 10nN. These parameters werekept constant throughout the study.

    Cohesive-adhesive balance (CAB) graphs The wealth of information from AFM measure-

    ments of the interparticulate forces were analysedusing a recently developed cohesive-adhesive balanceprocedure. Detailed information regarding the CABgraphical analysis is described elsewhere26). Brief ly,the construction of a CAB-graph requires a set ofprobes (n3) and well-defined substrates of eachrespective material to investigate all possible interac-tions (drug-drug, drug-excipient and excipient-excipi-ent).

    The adhesive force measurements between drugand excipient are plotted on the X-axis; the relatedcohesive forces of the respective materials are plottedon the Y-axis. The relative position of the alignedplots with respect to the bisector indicates an affinityfor the probe material to develop adhesive interac-tions (below the bisector.) or a dominancy of cohesiveproperties (above the bisector).

    To express the affinity of the drug (material 1) tointeract with the carrier (material 2), the reducedintermixing coefficient (12) was introduced. The 12corresponds to the ratio of the adhesive interactions(F12) and cohesive interactions (F11) of two interactingmaterials and can be directly calculated from theslope:

    12 (1)

    The position of 12 with respect to unity is a directindication of the predisposition (121) or the reluc-tance (121) for the drug particles to blend withanother material.

    For direct visualisation of the inf luence of the addi-tion of the FCA on the interfacial behaviour of drugand excipient interactions, the CAB graphs for the vir-gin and treated surfaces have been superimposed.The graph in the foreground corresponds to the inter-actions observed between the micronised drug ()

    1k12

    F12ad

    F11co

    and lactose () probes and the virgin substratesurfaces of the drug and excipient (Fig. 1). Thebackground graph corresponds to the interactionmeasurements when a ternary agent was processedeither with the drug () or the lactose ().

    Content uniformity measurements The content uniformity of the salbutamol sulphate-

    lactose blends was measured by analysing the quan-tity of active in 10mg0.5mg samples (10). Relativestandard deviation between samples was calculated toassess the homogeneity of the different blends. Drugcontent was analysed by UV-spectrometry (CECILinstruments, CE7200, Cambridge, UK). Salbutamolsulphate was analysed using a 0.06M NaOH solventand a UV detection wavelength set at 295nm.

    In vitro aerosol deposition studiesApproximately 10mg of the carrier formulations

    was accurately weighed into a gelatine capsule to beloaded into a Monohaler device (Miat SpA, Milan,Italy). In vitro deposition investigations were per-formed using a next generation impactor (NGI)(Copley Scientific, Nottingham, UK). The loaded de-vice was connected to the throat of the NGI via amoulded mouthpiece. In vitro analysis was performedupon each actuation of the device (n3). Testing wasperformed at 60L.min1 f low rate with a 5 secondexposure. Each NGI plate was rinsed with solventand the subsequent solution was collected in a 50mlvolumetric f lask. Statistical analysis of the data wasperformed using one-way ANOVA. The levels of sig-nificance are indicated in the legend of the respectivegraphs.

    RESULTS & DISCUSSIONS

    Previous studies have emphasized the relativestrength of the adhesive salbutamol sulphate-lactoseadhesive forces with respect to salbutamol sulphatecohesive forces26). The initial part of this study wasto investigate possible variations in formulation behav-iour upon modifying the cohesive and adhesive bonds,quantified by AFM measurements, via the introduc-tion of a force control agent. This was achieved byfirst conditioning the lactose with various force con-trol agents using a Mechanofusion system, prior tomixing with the drug.

    The CAB-graph obtained for a salbutamol sulphate-lactose binary system, without the presence of a FCA,is shown in Fig. 2. The relative position of the databelow the bisecting line indicated a stronger affinity

    112 KONA No.23 (2005)

  • between salbutamol sulphate and lactose than theircohesive forces. This suggested a predisposition foran ordered blend. However, the quantitative measure-ment of the relative strength of the cohesive-adhesiveratio indicated that the adhesive salbutamol sulphate-lactose interaction was approximately six timesgreater (126.25) than the cohesive salbutamol sul-phate bond. It should be stressed that previousassessments performed with model crystal substratesrevealed a salbutamol sulphate-lactose reduced inter-mixing coefficient of 16.8827). This disparity may beexplained by the inevitable increase in surface rough-ness by using compressed powder substrates in con-trast to smooth crystalline substrates. This wouldhave a considerable effect on both van der Waalsforces and capillary forces30, 31). Nevertheless, bothstudies revealed a consequent adhesively led system,suggesting that a significant amount of energy wouldbe required to overcome the adhesive interaction forefficient dispersion of the drug from a lactose sur-face.

    Thus, the introduction of a FCA was intended toadvantageously lower the adhesive interactions be-tween drug and excipient to facilitate the detachmentof the drug particles from the carrier upon aerosolisa-tion provided that an adhesive-led system is main-tained.

    1. Carrier-based formulations with conditionedlactose

    The CAB-graphs obtained for the interaction ofsalbutamol sulphate probes and conditioned lactoseprobes with leucine, lecithin and MgST are shownin Fig. 3A, 3B and 3C, respectively. As expected,

    KONA No.23 (2005) 113

    Fadhesion (nN)

    F coh

    esio

    n (nN

    )

    0

    250

    200

    150

    100

    50

    050 100 150 200 250

    Salbutamol tipsLactose tipsFcohesionFadhesion

    y0.4951xR20.9444

    y0.16xR20.7928

    Fig. 2 CAB-graph of a salbutamol sulphate lactose binary system(with the use of compressed tablet substrates).

    200 200

    150

    100

    50

    0150

    10050

    0

    150

    100

    50

    0

    y0.16xR20.79

    y0.86xR20.58

    A

    B

    C

    y1.04xR20.95

    y0.50xR20.94

    F coh

    esio

    n (nN

    )

    F coh

    esio

    n (nN

    )

    Fadhesion (nN)

    Fadhesion

    (nN)

    0 50100 150

    200

    Salbutamol tipsLactose-leucine tips

    FcohesionFadhesionSalbutamol tipsLactose tips

    200 200

    150

    100

    50

    0150

    10050

    0

    150

    100

    50

    0

    y0.16xR20.79

    y0.50xR20.94

    F coh

    esio

    n (nN

    )

    F coh

    esio

    n (nN

    )

    Fadhesion (nN)

    Fadhesion

    (nN)

    0 50100 150

    200

    Salbutamol tipsLactose-lecithin tips

    FcohesionFadhesionSalbutamol tipsLactose tips

    y0.87xR20.61

    y1.13xR20.92

    200 200

    150

    100

    50

    0150

    10050

    0

    150

    100

    50

    0

    y0.16xR20.79

    y0.50xR20.94

    F coh

    esio

    n (nN

    )

    F coh

    esio

    n (nN

    )

    Fadhesion (nN)

    Fadhesion

    (nN)

    0 50100 150

    200

    Salbutamol tipsLactose-MgST tips

    FcohesionFadhesionSalbutamol tipsLactose tips

    y0.90xR20.99

    y1.65xR20.88

    Fig. 3 Inf luence of the coating of lactose with a force controlagent on the cohesive-adhesive balances in a salbutamolsulphate-lactose system.

  • the addition of FCAs significantly modified thesalbutamol-lactose interactions. In all cases, the intro-duction of the ternary agent significantly reduced theadhesive interactions of the salbutamol probe withthe various modified lactose substrates. However,particle adhesion decreased to such an extent thatthe reduced intermixing coefficient (Fdrug-lactose/Fdrug-drug), calculated from the gradient of the CAB plots,was below 1 (Table 1). This shift moved the CABsystem to one synonymous of a cohesive-led system.The conditioning of lactose with MgST resulted in thelowest intermixing coefficient value (120.61) whilethe addition of leucine and lecithin reduced the inter-mixing coefficient to 0.96 and 0.88, respectively.Thus, the pre-conditioning of lactose particles withleucine, lecithin or MgST transformed a systemwhich was dominated by the adhesive drug-lactoseforces into a cohesive system. Such lowering of theinteractions between drug and excipient via the intro-duction of the FCAs may possibly lead to an unstableformulation, subjected to undesirable segregation.

    Consequently, to highlight the inf luence of themodifications of the intermixing coefficient on theblending characteristics via the introduction ofFCAs, scanning electron microscopy and drug con-tent uniformity analyses of the blends were investi-gated. Representative SEM images of formulations ofsalbutamol sulphate mixed with lactose-leucine, lac-tose-lecithin and lactose-MgST conditioned particlesare shown in Fig. 4A, 4B and 4C, respectively. Asanticipated from the intermixing coefficient measure-ments, scanning electron micrographs highlighted ahigh degree of drug segregation resulting from intro-duction of the FCAs. A very limited adhesive interac-tion was apparent between agglomerated salbutamolsulphate particles and conditioned lactose-leucine

    (Fig. 4A). However, large quantities of drug particleswere present as loose agglomerates. This segregationwas even more pronounced for lecithin (Fig. 4B) andMgST (Fig. 4C) conditioned lactose particles. Virtu-

    114 KONA No.23 (2005)

    Conditioning MixingReduced intermixing coefficient (12)

    Content uniformity

    Mechanofusion, 10min @ 5200rpm Turbula, 30min @ 46rpm (% RSD)

    Salbutamol sulphate (non conditioned) Sorbalac 400 6.25 04.20

    Sorbalac 400 Leucine Salbutamol sulphate 0.96 08.92

    Sorbalac 400 Lecithin Salbutamol sulphate 0.88 09.31

    Sorbalac 400 MgST Salbutamol sulphate 0.61 15.51

    Salbutamol sulphate Leucine Sorbalac 400 1.89 02.92

    Salbutamol sulphate Lecithin Sorbalac 400 2.13 03.00

    Salbutamol sulphate MgST Sorbalac 400 1.52 03.62

    Table 1 Mixing sequences of salbutamol, lactose, force control agent formulations and resulting reduced intermixing coefficients and contentuniformities.

    Fig. 4 Representative scanning electron micrographs of ternarymixtures of salbutamol sulphate and lactose pre-con-ditioned with leucine (A), lecithin (B) or magnesiumstearate (C).

  • ally no interaction was observed between drug andthe conditioned lactose surfaces, which resulted inthe formation of large drug agglomerates. Interest-ingly, the mechanofused Sorbalac 400 lactose parti-cles appeared to be smoother after pre-conditioningwith leucine, lecithin or magnesium stearate, com-pared to the as supplied Sorbalac27). This suggested asmooth continuous coating of the FCAs over the sur-face of the lactose particles.

    As anticipated, dose content uniformity measure-ments revealed an increase in the relative standarddeviation of salbutamol sulphate of each blend. TheRSD of 4.2% for micronised salbutamol sulphatemixed with lactose increased to 8.92% with the condi-tioning of lactose with leucine, 9.31% for lactose-lecithinand 15.51% for lactose-MgST. These observations sug-gested a good correlation between the reduction ofthe intermixing coefficients, which were all signifi-cantly below 1, and the content uniformity measure-ments of salbutamol sulphate in the correspondingcarrier-based formulations.

    The de-agglomeration and dispersion behaviour ofthe salbutamol sulphate particles from the model car-rier based formulations are shown in Fig. 5. Theemitted dose of the salbutamol sulphate-lactose for-mulation via the low resistance Monohaler devicewas quite high (76.57%). However, a significant per-centage of the drug was recovered in the throat andthe first stage of the NGI apparatus. These results

    were in accordance with a previous in vitro studyconducted with a Rotahaler and Turbuhaler DPIdevices2). This study suggested that the observeddeposition pattern was due to the limited detachmentof the drug from the carrier upon actuation caused bythe highly adhesive salbutamol sulphate-lactose inter-actions.

    The mechanical fusion of leucine with lactoseresulted in a similar drug emission efficiency to theconventional blend. However, the amount of salbutamolsulphate recovered in the first stage of the NGI signif-icantly increased with respect to the non coated lac-tose blend. The coating of lactose with either lecithinor MgST slightly reduced the device retention of theactive ingredient from 23.43% to 18.73% and 18.99%,respectively. Although the interaction between drugand coated lactose surfaces were significantly de-creased, a large amount of drug was still recoveredon the upper stage of the in vitro apparatus.

    These results were consistent with the assessmentfrom the CAB-graphs. The CAB analysis indicatedthat the energy of interaction between the drug andcoated lactose would reduce to such an extent thatthe adhesively led salbutamol sulphate-lactose formu-lation would shift to an unfavourable cohesive system.The aerosolisation performances of the modifiedlactose carrier-based formulations may have not im-proved since the dramatic shift in the force balancewas shown to lead to poor blend homogeneity and the

    KONA No.23 (2005) 115

    Device Throat Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Stage 6 Stage 7 Stage 8

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    Salbutamol sulphatelactoseSalbutamol(lactose-leucine)Salbutamol(lactose-lecithin)Salbutamol(lactose-MgST)

    Perc

    enta

    ge o

    f nom

    inal

    dos

    e

    **

    **

    **

    *

    * *

    Fig. 5 In vitro deposition of salbutamol sulphate carrier-based formulations with conditioned lactose (meanS.D., n3). * p0.05, ** p0.01, *** p0.001: significant difference compared to without force control agent by ANOVA one-way.

  • potential for significant segregation between drugand carrier particles.

    2. Carrier-based formulations with conditioneddrug

    The conditioning of excipient particles with a FCAmodified the adhesive interaction between drug-car-rier and excipient-excipient interactions. In contrast,the processing of the micronised drug particles withthe FCA would alter both the cohesive (drug-drug)and adhesive (drug-lactose) interactions. To furtherinvestigate the possibility of selectively modifyingboth these interactions within a carrier based formu-lation, the drug was mechanofused with the FCAs.

    The CAB-graphs obtained for the interaction be-tween conditioned salbutamol sulphate with leucine,lecithin or MgST and lactose are shown in Fig. 6A,6B and 6C, respectively. The balance remained adhe-sive for all three systems, although the drug-lactoseforces decreased by more than a half of its originalvalue. The conditioning of salbutamol sulphate withleucine, lecithin and MgST led to an intermixingcoefficient of 1.89, 2.13 and 1.52, respectively. Thesemixtures would therefore be expected to form homoge-nous interactive blends with advantageously weakdrug-lactose interactions. As expected, the lactoseforce balance transformed from an adhesive to a cohe-sive system. Nevertheless, it can be speculated thatthis shift should not greatly affect the formulationproperties as this change of behaviour is predomi-nately due to a decrease of the adhesive (drug-lactose)forces and not in an increase of the lactose cohesivebonds.

    Representative scanning electron micrographs ofthe lactose particles blended with conditionedsalbutamol sulphate-leucine, salbutamol sulphate-lecithin, and salbutamol sulphate-MgST are shown inFig. 7A, 7B and 7C, respectively. In contrast to theternary mixture of drug and conditioned lactoseshown in Fig. 4, the conditioned drug particlesstrongly interacted with the lactose particles for allthree FCAs. This suggested an effective adhesive dis-position, in agreement with the CAB data analyses.The corresponding content uniformity measurementsof the ternary mixtures ref lected an adhesive led sys-tem with low relative standard deviations for lactosemixed with salbutamol sulphate-leucine (2.92%),salbutamol sulphate-lecithin (3.00%) and salbutamolsulphate-MgST (3.62%) conditioned particles.

    These observations suggested good correlation be-tween the reduced intermixing coefficients and thecharacteristics of the respective carrier-based formu-

    116 KONA No.23 (2005)

    200 200

    150

    100

    50

    0150

    10050

    0

    150

    100

    50

    0

    y0.16xR20.79

    y0.53xR20.76

    y2.07xR20.91

    y0.50xR20.94

    F coh

    esio

    n (nN

    )

    F coh

    esio

    n (nN

    )

    Fadhesion (nN)

    Fadhesion

    (nN)

    0 50100 150

    200

    Salbutamol tipsLactose tips

    FcohesionFadhesionSalbutamol-leucine tipsLactose tips

    200 200

    150

    100

    50

    0150

    10050

    0

    150

    100

    50

    0

    y0.16xR20.79

    y0.47xR20.92

    y1.30xR20.95

    y0.50xR20.94

    F coh

    esio

    n (nN

    )

    F coh

    esio

    n (nN

    )

    Fadhesion (nN)

    Fadhesion

    (nN)

    0 50100 150

    200

    Salbutamol tipsLactose tips

    FcohesionFadhesionSalbutamol-lecithin tipsLactose tips

    200 200

    150

    100

    50

    0150

    10050

    0

    150

    100

    50

    0

    y0.16xR20.79

    y0.66xR20.98

    y2.58xR20.54

    y0.50xR20.94

    F coh

    esio

    n (nN

    )

    F coh

    esio

    n (nN

    )Fadhesion

    (nN)

    Fadhesion

    (nN)

    0 50100 150

    200

    Salbutamol tipsLactose tips

    FcohesionFadhesionSalbutamol-MgST tipsLactose tips

    A

    B

    C

    Fig. 6 Inf luence of the coating of salbutamol sulphate with aforce control agent on the cohesive-adhesive balances in asalbutamol sulphate-lactose system.

  • lations. Such formulations would be expected to bestable during handling and storage, and may lead to agreater de-agglomeration and dispersion efficiency ofthe respirable particles.

    The in vitro deposition profile of conditionedsalbutamol sulphate carrier-based formulations areshown in Fig. 8. The Mechanofusion of the forcecontrol agents to the salbutamol sulphate particlesresulted in a significant decrease in device retentionfrom 23.42% for the FCA free formulation to 12.51%with leucine, 14.52% with lecithin and 8.23% withMgST. These results suggested a lubrication effect ofthe FCA and subsequent reduction in interactionbetween the powder bed and the capsule, while theformulation conserved its metastability as suggestedby the CAB analyses. More dramatic was the signifi-cant decrease of the percentage of drug deposited onthe first stage (cut off diameter 8.06m) of the NGIapparatus. Stage 1 deposition decreased from 22.89%to 6.16% for the conditioning of salbutamol sulphatewith leucine, 9.20% for salbutamol sulphate-lecithinand 7.99% for salbutamol sulphate-MgST. This indi-cated a greater de-agglomeration efficiency of thecoated salbutamol sulphate particles in the carrierbased formulations. This was further highlighted bythe increase deposition of the active ingredient inthe lower stages of the in vitro apparatus. Thesedata clearly indicated that the characteristic proper-ties of carrier based formulations can be controllably

    KONA No.23 (2005) 117

    Fig. 7 Representative scanning electron micrographs of ternarymixtures of lactose and salbutamol sulphate pre-con-ditioned with leucine (A), lecithin (B) or magnesiumstearate (C).

    Device Throat Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Stage 6 Stage 7 Stage 8

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    Salbutamol sulphatelactose(Salbutamol-leucine)lactose(Salbutamol-lecithin)lactose(Salbutamol-MgST)lactose

    Perc

    enta

    ge o

    f nom

    inal

    dos

    e

    **

    **

    ***

    ***

    *** *

    **

    *** *

    **

    ***

    ***

    ***

    ***

    ***

    ****

    **

    **

    **

    **

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    *

    Fig. 8 In vitro deposition of salbutamol sulphate carrier-based formulations with conditioned drug (meanS.D., n3).* p0.05, ** p0.01, *** p0.001: significant difference compared to without force control agent by ANOVA one-way.

  • enhanced by judicious selection of the interparticu-late interactions to be modified by the introduction ofthe FCAs.

    A summary of the device retention, fine particlefraction (% respirable particle of the emitted dose)and total fine particle fraction (% respirable particlefrom total recovered dose) of the salbutamol sulphatecarrier-based formulations is shown in Fig. 9. A clearpattern of formulation performance was observeddepending on whether the force control agent wasfused either with the drug or the lactose. Formula-tions with pre-conditioned drug, in contrast to con-ditioned lactose, offered the best drug deliveryperformances. It is suggested that the conservation ofan adhesive system for the pre-conditioned drug par-ticles directly led to the increased de-aggregation per-formance. Meanwhile, the selective decrease of thedrug-lactose interfacial interaction for conditionedlactose particles led to a dominant cohesive (drug-drug) system, which resulted in poor blend homo-geneity and poor f luidisation. The highest %FPF ofthe emitted dose was obtained for formulations withleucine and lecithin coated salbutamol sulphate parti-cles (73.72% and 71.87%, respectively). The low drugretention of salbutamol sulphate-MgST conditionedparticles (8.23% device retention) contributed to deliveran equivalent total fine particle dose as for leucineand lecithin (64.43% for leucine, 61.41% for lecithinand 63.79% for MgST).

    CONCLUSIONS

    The inf luence of force control agents on the proper-ties and performances of model salbutamol sulphatecarrier based formulations was investigated. Thecohesive and adhesive dependencies were controlledby conditioning either the drug or the carrier beforemixing in order to create selective modifications ofthe inter-particulate interactions within a dry powderformulation. The conditioning of these fine inhalationpowders was conducted via a Mechanofusion system.This new technique was intended to enable effectiveparticle covering with a nano-scale coating, a processwhich is difficult to achieve via conventional ap-proaches.

    The colloid probe AFM technique together with thenovel cohesive-adhesive balance (CAB) analysis pro-cedure was utilised to measure the variations in inter-particulate forces of binary and ternary blends. TheCAB-graph method successfully predicted substantialmodifications in the behaviour of the formulations,dependant on whether the FCAs were conditionedwith the drug or the lactose. This novel approach ofapplying FCA to the drug is in contrast to previouswork in this area where force control agents have tra-ditionally been applied to carrier particles.

    This work emphasized that the CAB analysismethod can be utilised for pre-formulation studiesand in the design of new formulation systems for drypowder inhalers. The work also confirmed the poten-

    118 KONA No.23 (2005)

    100

    80

    60

    40

    20

    0

    Perc

    enta

    ge o

    f nom

    inal

    dos

    e

    ***

    ***

    ***

    ***

    ***

    ***

    ***

    *

    **

    ***

    ***

    *

    *

    Salbutamol sulphate-lactoseSalbutamol-(lactose-leucine)Salbutamol-(lactose-lecithin)Salbutamol-(lactose-MgST)(Salbutamol-leucine)-lactose(Salbutamol-lecithin)-lactose(Salbutamol-MgST)-lactose

    Device retention (%) Fine particle Fraction (%) Total Fine particle (%)

    Fig. 9 Fine particle fraction and emission efficiency of salbutamol sulphate carrier-based formulations (meanS.D., n3). * p0.05, ** p0.01, *** p0.001: significant difference compared to without force control agent by ANOVA one-way.

  • tial value of the use of force control agents togetherwith the Mechanofusion process in DPI formulations.

    REFERENCES

    1) D. Ganderton and N. M. Kassem. Advances in Pharma-ceutical sciences., Academic Press, London, 1992.

    2) A. R. Clark. Medical Aerosol Inhalers Past, Present,and Future. Aerosol Science and Technology 22: 374-391(1995).

    3) D. Ganderton and T. Jones. Drug Delivery to the Respira-tory Tract., Camelot Press, Southampton, 1987.

    4) W. C. Hinds. Aerosol technology: Properties, Behaviourand measurements of airborne particles, Wiley, NewYork, 1999.

    5) J. C. Feeley, P. York, B. S. Sumby, and H. Dicks. Deter-mination of surface properties and f low characteristicsof salbutamol sulphate, before and after micronisation.International Journal of Pharmaceutics 172: 89-96(1998).

    6) X. M. Zeng, G. P. Martin, and C. Marriott. ParticulateInteractions in Dry Powder Formulations for Inhalation,Taylor & Francis, London, 2001.

    7) X. M. Zeng, G. P. Martin, C. Marriott, and J. Pritchard.The inf luence of crystallization conditions on the mor-phology of lactose intended for use as a carrier for drypowder aerosols. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacol-ogy 52: 633-643 (2000).

    8) X. M. Zeng, G. P. Martin, S. K. Tee, A. Abu Ghoush, andC. Marriott. Effects of particle size and adding se-quence of fine lactose on the deposition of salbutamolsulphate from a dry powder formulation. InternationalJournal of Pharmaceutics 182: 133-144 (1999).

    9) R. Price, P. M. Young, S. Edge, and J. N. Staniforth. Theinf luence of relative humidity on particulate interac-tions in carrier-based dry powder inhaler formulations.International Journal of Pharmaceutics 246: 47-59(2002).

    10) M. D. Louey and P. J. Stewart. Particle interactions in-volved in aerosol dispersion of ternary interactive mix-tures. Pharmaceutical Research 19: 1524-1531 (2002).

    11) M. D. Louey, P. Mulvaney, and P. J. Stewart. Characteri-sation of adhesional properties of lactose carriers usingatomic force microscopy. Journal of Pharmaceutical andBiomedical Analysis 25: 559-567 (2001).

    12) Y. Kawashima, T. Serigano, T. Hino, H. Yamamoto, andH. Takeuchi. Effect of surface morphology of carrierlactose on dry powder inhalation property of pranlukasthydrate. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 172:179-188 (1998).

    13) L. Yu. Amorphous pharmaceutical solids: preparation,characterization and stabilization. Advanced Drug Deliv-ery Reviews 48: 27-42 (2001).

    14) P. York. Strategies for particle design using supercriticalf luid technology. Pharmaceutical Science and Technol-ogy Today 2: 430-440 (1999).

    15) X. M. Zeng, K. H. Pandhal, and G. P. Martin. The inf lu-

    ence of lactose carrier on the content homogeneity anddispersibility of beclomethasone dipropionate from drypowder aerosols. International Journal of Pharmaceutics197: 41-52 (2000).

    16) N. Islam, P. J. Stewart, I. Larson, and P. G. Hartley. Lac-tose surface modification by decantation: Are drug-finelactose ratios the key to better dispersion of salmeterolxinofate from lactose interactive mixtures? Pharmaceu-tical Research 21: 492-499 (2004).

    17) S. K. Tee, C. Marriott, X. M. Zeng, and G. P. Martin.The use of different sugars as fine and coarse carriersfor aerosolised salbutamol sulphate. International Jour-nal of Pharmaceutics 208: 111-123 (2000).

    18) S. K. Tee, G. P. Martin, A. R. Leeds, C. Walker, A. Kicman, D. A. Cowan, and C. Marriott. The inf luenceof a tertiary component on the in vivo disposition ofsalbutamol isomers aerosolised from a dry powderinhaler formulation. Thorax 56: P51 (2001).

    19) X. M. Zeng, G. P. Martin, S. K. Tee, and C. Marriott.The role of fine particle lactose on the dispersion anddeaggregation of salbutamol sulphate in an air stream invitro. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 176: 99-110 (1998).

    20) P. Lucas, K. Anderson, and J. N. Staniforth. Proteindeposition from dry powder inhalers: Fine particlemultiplets as performance modifiers. PharmaceuticalResearch 182: 562-569 (1998).

    21) M. J. Clarke, M. J. Tobyn, and J. N. Staniforth. The for-mulation of powder inhalation systems containing ahigh mass of nedocromil sodium trihydrate. Journal ofPharmaceutical Sciences 90: 213-223 (2001).

    22) J. N. Staniforth. Improvement in dry powder inhalerperformance: surface passivation effects. Proceedings ofDrug Delivery to the Lungs VII 86-89 (1996).

    23) P. Begat, M. Green, D. A. V. Morton, A. Whittock, and J.N. Staniforth. PowderHale: A Novel High PerformanceDry Powder Inhaler Formulation Technology for Tar-geted and Systemic Drug Delivery. Drug Delivery to theLung XII 119 (2001).

    24) R. Pfeffer, R. N. Dave, D. G. Wei, and M. Ramlakhan.Synthesis of engineered particulates with tailored prop-erties using dry particle coating. Powder Technology117: 40-67 (2001).

    25) J. N. Staniforth and D. A. V. Morton. Powder Technol-ogy Research Leading to Improvements in InhalerProducts. Powder Science and Engineering 34: 60-64(2002).

    26) P. Begat, D. A. V. Morton, J. N. Staniforth, and R. Price.The cohesive-adhesive balances in dry powder inhalerformulations I: Direct quantification by atomic forcemicroscopy. Pharmaceutical Research 21: 1591-1597(2004).

    27) P. Begat, D. A. V. Morton, J. N. Staniforth, and R. Price.The cohesive-adhesive balances in dry powder inhalerformulations II: Inf luence on fine particle delivery char-acteristics. Pharmaceutical Research 21: 1826-1833(2004).

    28) J. L. Hutter and J. Bechhoefer. Calibration of Atomic-

    KONA No.23 (2005) 119

  • Force Microscope Tips. Review of Scientific Instruments64: 1868-1873 (1993).

    29) T. J. Senden and W. A. Ducker. Experimental-Determi-nation of Spring Constants in Atomic-Force Microscopy.Langmuir 10: 1003-1004 (1994).

    30) R. Price, M. Tobyn, and J. N. Staniforth. Variation inParticle Adhesion Due to Capillary and Electrostatic

    Forces. Respiratory Drug Delivery VII (2000).31) J. C. Hooton, C. S. German, S. Allen, M. C. Davies, C. J.

    Roberts, S. J. B. Tendler, and P. M. Williams. An atomicforce microscopy study of the effect of nanoscale con-tact geometry and surface chemistry on the adhesion ofpharmaceutical particles. Pharmaceutical Research 21:953-961 (2004).

    120 KONA No.23 (2005)

    Authors short biography

    Philippe Begat

    Dr Philippe Begat is currently an Inhalation Project leader at Pfizer Inc. Philippehas an MSc in Chemistry. He joined Vectura Ltd in 2001, working on the optimiza-tion of PowderHaleTM technology. In 2002, he joined the pharmaceutical surfacescience research group at the University of Bath, as an Experimental Officer, todevelop novel methods for characterizing and improving dry powder formulations.He was awarded his PhD in 2005. Philippe has since joined Pfizer Inc. to managethe development of new drug products for their dry powder inhaler programmes.

    Robert Price

    Dr Robert Price is a senior lecturer at the Department of Pharmacy and Pharma-cology at the University of Bath. He gained a BSc in Physics and a PhD in PhysicalChemistry from Cardiff University. He leads the pharmaceutical surface scienceresearch group, investigating physico-chemical properties governing inter-particu-late interactions, surface stability issues of processes particles and the general areaof particle engineering and crystal growth. He has published a series of originalresearch articles in the areas of surface electrochemistry, crystal growth, atomicforce microscopy and pharmaceutical technology.

    Haggis Harris

    Haggis is currently a postgraduate student at Bath University in the Department ofPharmacy and Pharmacology investigating inter-particle interactions in dry pow-der inhaler formulations.Prior to studying at Bath University, Haggis was employed at Vectura for four yearswhere his primary focus was research and development of high intensity blendingtechniques to be used in dry powder inhaler formulation.

    David A.V. Morton

    Dr David Morton is currently Head of Intellectual Property and Technology atVectura Group plc. He gained a PhD from Bristol University in Structural Chem-istry. In 1997, David joined the Centre for Drug Formulation Studies at theUniversity of Bath to manage their dry powder inhaler product development pro-grammes. In 1999, this group spun out into the drug delivery company Vectura,and David was appointed Head of Pulmonary Research, where he co-developed theemerging PowderHaleTM technology. He is also known in the inhalation field forhis lead role in organising the Aerosol Society Drug Delivery to the Lung confer-ence series.

  • KONA No.23 (2005) 121

    Authors short biography

    John N. Staniforth

    Professor John Staniforth is Chief Scientific Officer and a Founder of VecturaGroup plc. He has a BSc in Pharmacy and a PhD in Pharmaceutical Technology.He became Professor of Pharmaceutical Technology and Head of Pharmaceutics atthe University of Bath, Department of Pharmacy. In 1999, he led the spin-out of twogroups based at the University to establish Vectura. John is a registered Pharma-cist and a Chartered Chemist. He has been elected a Fellow of a number of interna-tional scientific societies, including the American Association of PharmaceuticalScientists and is a Member of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain.