Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
The Impact of Fluctuations
on QCD Matter
Tina Katharina Herbst
In Collaboration with: B.-J. Schaefer, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Wagner
TKH, J.M. Pawlowski, B.-J. Schaefer, Phys.Lett. B696 (2011) 58
“Three Days on Quarkyonic Island”
May 19th - 21st, 2011
Recipient of a DOC-fFORTE-fellowship of the Austrian Academy of Sciences
at the Institute of Physics.
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
Motivation
Lattice
Models
Critical Point
Quarkyonic Island
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
Motivation
Lattice
Models
Critical Point
Quarkyonic Island
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
Motivation
Lattice
Models
Critical Point
Quarkyonic Island
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
Motivation
Lattice
Models
Critical Point
Quarkyonic Island
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
Motivation
Lattice
Models
Critical Point
Quarkyonic Island
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
Renormalization Group
Phase Transitions:
Fluctuations on all Scales contribute
Microscopic Description →Macroscopic Description
UV → IR
Wetterich Equation [Wetterich, 1993]
∂kΓk [φ] =1
2Tr
{∂kRk
(Γ
(2)k [φ] + Rk
)−1}
Rk . . . regulator
Γk · · · scale dependent effective action
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
Renormalization Group
Phase Transitions:
Fluctuations on all Scales contribute
Microscopic Description →Macroscopic Description
UV → IR
Wetterich Equation [Wetterich, 1993]
∂kΓk [φ] =1
2Tr
{∂kRk
(Γ
(2)k [φ] + Rk
)−1}
Rk . . . regulator
Γk · · · scale dependent effective action
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
Polyakov-Quark-Meson ModelLagrangian
LPQM = q̄[i /D − h(σ + iγ5~τ · ~π)
]q +
1
2(∂µφ)2
− U(σ, ~π) − U(Φ, Φ̄)
φ = (σ, ~π) . . . O(4)-representation of the meson field (Nf = 2)
Φ, Φ̄ . . . Polyakov loop, D/ (Φ) = γµ∂µ − i gγ0A0(Φ)
g . . . gauge coupling
h . . . Yukawa coupling
Meson Potential
U(σ, ~π) =λ
4(σ2 + ~π2 − v2)2 − cσ
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
Polyakov-Quark-Meson ModelLagrangian
LPQM = q̄[i /D − h(σ + iγ5~τ · ~π)
]q +
1
2(∂µφ)2
− U(σ, ~π) − U(Φ, Φ̄)
φ = (σ, ~π) . . . O(4)-representation of the meson field (Nf = 2)
Φ, Φ̄ . . . Polyakov loop, D/ (Φ) = γµ∂µ − i gγ0A0(Φ)
g . . . gauge coupling
h . . . Yukawa coupling
Polyakov Loop Potential
U(Φ, Φ̄)
T 4= −b2(T ,T0)
2ΦΦ̄− b3
6(Φ3 + Φ̄3) +
b4
4(ΦΦ̄)2
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
Polyakov-Quark-Meson ModelLagrangian
LPQM = q̄[i /D − h(σ + iγ5~τ · ~π)
]q +
1
2(∂µφ)2
− U(σ, ~π) − U(Φ, Φ̄)
φ = (σ, ~π) . . . O(4)-representation of the meson field (Nf = 2)
Φ, Φ̄ . . . Polyakov loop, D/ (Φ) = γµ∂µ − i gγ0A0(Φ)
g . . . gauge coupling
h . . . Yukawa coupling
Polyakov Loop Potential
U(Φ, Φ̄)
T 4= −b2(T ,T0)
2ΦΦ̄− b3
6(Φ3 + Φ̄3) +
b4
4(ΦΦ̄)2
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
Backcoupling of Matter Sector I
[Schaefer, Pawlowski, Wambach, PRD 2007]
FRG flow for QCD: [J. Braun et al., PRL 2011]
gluons ghosts quarks mesons
∂tΓk[φ] =12 − − + 1
2∂tΓk[A,C,ψ,φ]
Polyakov Loop potential: ∂tΓk[φ] =12 −∂tΓk[A,C]
T0 → T0(Nf , µ)
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
Backcoupling of Matter Sector I
[Schaefer, Pawlowski, Wambach, PRD 2007]
FRG flow for QCD: [J. Braun et al., PRL 2011]
gluons ghosts quarks mesons
∂tΓk[φ] =12 − − + 1
2∂tΓk[A,C,ψ,φ]
Polyakov Loop potential: ∂tΓk[φ] =12 −∂tΓk[A,C]
T0 → T0(Nf , µ)
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
Backcoupling of Matter Sector I
[Schaefer, Pawlowski, Wambach, PRD 2007]
FRG flow for QCD: [J. Braun et al., PRL 2011]
gluons ghosts quarks mesons
∂tΓk[φ] =12 − − + 1
2∂tΓk[A,C,ψ,φ]
Polyakov Loop potential: ∂tΓk[φ] =12 −∂tΓk[A,C]
T0 → T0(Nf , µ)
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
Backcoupling of Matter Sector II[Fukushima, 2010]
Experiment:chemical freezeout points
entropy (red band)and density suggests position of phasetransition
pure PNJL computation(T0 = 200 MeV, green band)inconsistent
polynomial ansatz for T0(µ)⇒ greater overlap (blue band)
�
��
���
���
���
� ��� ��� ��� ��� ����
�
�� ������
��
� ��������� �������� �� ����
������������� � ��� �!
�� �������� �!
"�#�������� �!
$�!%&�!�'
$�!%&�!�'
[in these plots: Nc = Nf = 3]
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
T0(µ) - How To[Schaefer, Pawlowski, Wambach, PRD 2007]
[TKH, Pawlowski, Schaefer, PLB 2011]
T0 ←→ ΛQCD
perturbative 1-loop estimate:
β(α) = −b(Nf ) α2 +O(α3)
µ 6= 0⇒ HDL/HTL:
b(Nf )→ b(Nf , µ)[Bethke, NPPS 2004]
T0(Nf , µ) = Tτe−1/(α0b(Nf ,µ))
Nf 0 1 2 2 + 1 3
T0 [ MeV] 270 240 208 187 178
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
R E S U L T S
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
Mean Field: T0 = 208 MeV, mπ = 138 MeV
[Schaefer, Pawlowski, Wambach, PRD 2007]
CEP↗
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
RG - PQM: T0 = 208MeV, mπ = 138 MeV
0
50
100
150
200
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
T [M
eV]
µ [MeV]
χ crossoverΦ crossoverΦ* crossoverχ 1st order
[TKH, Pawlowski, Schaefer, PLB 2011; TKH et al., in prep. 2011]
↙ CEP
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
RG - PQM: T0(µ),T0(0) = 208MeV, mπ = 138 MeV
0
50
100
150
200
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
T [M
eV]
µ [MeV]
χ crossoverΦ crossoverΦ* crossoverχ 1st order
[TKH, Pawlowski, Schaefer, PLB 2011; TKH et al., in prep. 2011]
↙ CEP
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
RG - QM: mπ = 0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Tc
[MeV
]
µ [MeV]
0
5
10
15
20
240 250 260 270 280 290
[Schaefer, Wambach, NPA 2005]
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
RG - PQM: T0 = 208MeV, mπ = 0
0
50
100
150
200
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
T [M
eV]
µ [MeV]
2nd order1st orderTCP
[TKH et al., in prep. 2011]
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
RG - PQM: T0 = 208MeV, mπ = 50 MeV
0
50
100
150
200
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
T [M
eV]
µ [MeV]
crossover1st orderCEP
[TKH et al., in prep. 2011]
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
RG - PQM: T0 = 208MeV, mπ = 138 MeV
0
50
100
150
200
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
T [M
eV]
µ [MeV]
crossover1st orderCEP
[TKH et al., in prep. 2011]
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
Summary
PQM model beyond Mean Field
quark-meson fluctuations included within FRG approachImportant feature:back-reaction to gluonic sector
T0 → T0(Nf , µ)
Modifications of the Phase Structure
fluctuations push CEP downwardsT0(µ): chiral and deconfinementtransitions coincide quarkyonic phase shrinks
Mass
splitting in chiral transitionat small T disappears for physical mπ
0
50
100
150
200
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
T [M
eV]
µ [MeV]
χ crossoverΦ crossoverΦ* crossoverχ 1st order
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
Summary
PQM model beyond Mean Field
quark-meson fluctuations included within FRG approachImportant feature:back-reaction to gluonic sector
T0 → T0(Nf , µ)
Modifications of the Phase Structure
fluctuations push CEP downwardsT0(µ): chiral and deconfinementtransitions coincide quarkyonic phase shrinks
Mass
splitting in chiral transitionat small T disappears for physical mπ
0
50
100
150
200
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
T [M
eV]
µ [MeV]
χ crossoverΦ crossoverΦ* crossoverχ 1st order
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)
Introduction Effective Description Phase Structure Conclusion
Summary
PQM model beyond Mean Field
quark-meson fluctuations included within FRG approachImportant feature:back-reaction to gluonic sector
T0 → T0(Nf , µ)
Modifications of the Phase Structure
fluctuations push CEP downwardsT0(µ): chiral and deconfinementtransitions coincide quarkyonic phase shrinks
Mass
splitting in chiral transitionat small T disappears for physical mπ
0
50
100
150
200
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
T [M
eV]
µ [MeV]
χ crossoverΦ crossoverΦ* crossoverχ 1st order
The Impact of Fluctuations on QCD Matter Tina K. Herbst (KFU Graz)