Upload
duongtram
View
222
Download
6
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CHEM 331
Physical Chemistry
Fall 2014
The Historical Gas Laws
Some of the earliest scientific investigations concerning matter were performed by pneumaticists
trying to understand the physical and chemical properties of gases. It was these studies (~1650-
1800 AD) that helped establish chemistry as a scientific discipline and helped lay to rest the art of
alchemy. During this period a number of gases were discovered:
Gas Year Discoverer
CO2 1630 Jan Baptist van Helmont
H2 1766 Henry Cavendish
N2 1772 David Retherford
O2 1774 Joseph Priestley
In this lecture we wish to consider the development of the Equation of State for a gas which we
will call Ideal. This Ideal Gas will approximate the behavior of real gases only at moderate
temperatures and low pressures; roughly normal atmospheric conditions. Hence the
pneumaticists were able to unravel the form of the Equation of State for this "hypothetical gas"
using known gases. We will see that this Equation of State represents real gases only in the limit
of zero pressure.
Boyle's Law
Robert Boyle was one of the first to examine the physical properties of gases. He discovered the
law that bears his name while trying to disprove Franciscus Linus's argument that a column of
Mercury in a Toricellian tube was not held in place by the external force of the Air, but instead
was held in place by an invisible membrane called a funiculus. It was Linus's argument that this
membrane could only hold a column of Mercury 29 ½ " high. Linus's evidence for this claim
centered on the fact that if you open the end of the Toricellian tube and place your finger over it,
your finger is drawn into the tube.
If you take a tube open at both ends of a good length, suppose forty
inches long, and fill it with mercury, and place your finger on the top as
before, taking away your lower finger, you will find the mercury to
descend even to its wonted station [i.e., to a height of approximately
29 ½ inches], and your finger on the top to be strongly drawn within
the tube, and to stick close unto it. Whence again it is evidently
concluded that the mercury places in its own station is not there upheld
by the external air, but suspended by a certain cord [Linus's alleged
funiculus], whose upper end being fastened to the finger draws and
fastens it after this manner into the tube.
Robert Boyle's Experiments in Pneumatics
Ed. James Bryant Conant
Boyle's experiment designed to disprove this idea involved examining the pressure exerted on
the Air trapped in a bent tube filled with Mercury. One leg of the tube, the shorter, was closed
and contained the trapped Air. The other,
the longer, was open to the atmosphere.
Mercury could be added to the open
section of the tube, and thus made to
increase the pressure on the Air. The
"volume" of Air was determined by noting
the number of tick marks from the top end
of the tube to the level of the Mercury
containing the Air. The pressure on the gas
was determined by adding the pressure
head of the mercury to the atmosphere's
pressure. Boyle's data was published in
1662 in a book titled New Experiments
Physico-Mechanical Touching the Spring
of Air. Some of his data follows.
Boyle noted the P x V product in the final column of the Table. As can be seen, to within
experimental error, this product is constant. This is in essence Boyle's Law:
P x V = constant (at a given temperature)
A P-V plot of his data follows. The curve drawn is known as an Isotherm.
A plot of P vs. 1/V shows the appropriate linear relationship.
Modern, more precise data on O2, Ne and CO2 show that the PV product is not only not constant,
but depends on the pressure and the nature of the gas.
Oxygen Nitrogen Carbon Dioxide
P [atm] V [L/mol] PV P [atm] V [L/mol] PV P [atm] V [L/mol] PV
1.0 22.3939 22.3939 1.00 22.4280 22.4280 1.00 22.2643 22.2643
0.75 29.8649 22.3987 0.67 33.6360 22.4241 0.67 33.4722 22.3148
0.50 44.8090 22.4045 0.33 67.6567 22.4189 0.50 44.6794 22.3397
0.25 89.6384 22.4096 0.33 67.0962 22.3654
0.25 89.5100 22.3897
A plot of this data however shows that extrapolation to zero pressure for each gas converges on
the same intercept.
This suggests we can re-write Boyle's Law as:
That the Law becomes Universal in the limit of zero pressure is not unreasonable. If we view
our gas as being made up of discrete molecules, in the limit of zero pressure all the molecules are
infinitely far apart. So, in this limit, attractive or repulsive forces between the molecules will be
negligible, and the identity of the gas will be unimportant.
Note also that we have written the constant A(t) to indicate that it is dependent upon temperature.
It is this temperature dependence that was discovered by Charles and Gay-Lussac.
Charles' and Gay-Lussac's Laws
Jacques Charles Joseph Louis Gay-Lussac
In 1787, Charles observed that a volume of different gases, when heated to the same temperature,
would increase by the same amount. This result was extended and published by Gay-Lussac in
y = -0.0212x + 22.415
y = 0.0136x + 22.415
y = -0.1516x + 22.416
22.25
22.3
22.35
22.4
22.45
0 0.5 1 1.5
PV
[L
atm
/mo
l]
Pressure [atm]
PV Data for O2, Ne, CO2
1802. It was also re-discovered by John Dalton in 1801. According to these savants, the volume
is linearly dependent on the temperature:
V = Vo (1 + o)
where is the temperature when measured using the Celsius temperature scale and Vo is the gas'
volume at 0oC. is the Coefficient of Thermal Expansion for the gas. Gay-Lussac showed the
pressure is likewise linear in temperature:
P = Poo (1 + )
According to the Law of Charles, a plot of V vs. for any gas should extrapolate to the same
V = 0 point. And this is approximately, but not exactly, true.
We can see this by examining the data for gaseous Ethane:
Temp [oC] Vol. [cm
3] at 1 atm Vol. [cm
3] at 2 atm
26.85 24430 12120
36.85 25264 12544
46.85 26094 12967
56.85 26929 13389
66.85 27759 13810
76.85 28588 14229
Plotted we have:
At P = 1 atm
V = 84.001 + 22165
= 22165 (1 + 0.003790 )
So,
= 0.003790 oC
-1
At P = 2 atm
V = 42.607 + 10972
= 10972 (1 + 0.003883 )
So,
= 0.003883 oC
-1
We see from this data that the slope of
the P vs. plot, , is slightly dependent
on pressure (this is not entirely
unexpected) and so the temperature
when the volume of the gas is zero (V =
0) will also depend slightly on pressure.
We observe that for all gases (Physical
Chemistry by Walter J. Moore), when
extrapolated to zero pressure, the value
of o is indeed the same:
o(P=0) = 0.0036610 oC
-1
y = 84.001x + 22165
y = 42.607x + 10972
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
22000
24000
26000
28000
30000
25 35 45 55 65 75 85
Vo
lum
e
cm3]
Temperature [oC]
Gaseous Ethane
This allows us to state that, universally, for all gases, when their volume is compressed to zero:
0 = Vo (1 + o(P=0) ) = Vo (1 + 0.0036610 oC
-1 To)
allowing us to determine for this coldest possible temperature:
To = - 1/o(P=0) = - 1/ 0.0036610 oC
-1 = - 273.15
oC
We can now define a new Temperature Scale, called the Ideal Gas Temperature Scale, as:
T = + To
where a "degree" on this new scale is referred to as the Kelvin and To is Absolute Zero.
Given this, Charles' Law reduces to:
V = Vo (1 + (T - To)/To) = VoT / To
More generally, we say that V is proportional to T, or:
V / T ~ Constant
when T is measured on the Ideal Gas Temperature Scale.
In 1954, the Tenth Conference of the International Committee on Weights and Measures defined
the Ideal Gas Temperature Scale such that Absolute Zero is taken as 0 Kelvin and the Triple
Point of Water is 273.16 Kelvin.
Triple Point Cell
Water Vapor
Liquid Water
Ice
William Thomson, Lord Kelvin
Avogadro's Hypothesis
Although the next piece of the puzzle concerning the inter-relationship of the State Variables of a
gas was put forth by the Italian chemist Amedeo Avogadro, it took a controversy concerning the
work of Gay-Lussac to bring his ideas to light.
Gay-Lussac noted that gases tend to combine in whole number ratios. For instance when
Hydrogen and Oxygen react to form Water vapor, they do so in a 2:1 ratio, forming 2 volumes of
Water.
Gay-Lussac and others tried explaining his Law of Combining Volumes, the ratio between the
volumes of the reactant gases and the products can be expressed in simple whole numbers, by
assuming equal volumes of gases contain equal numbers of particles. Assuming Water has a
chemical formula of H2O, this leads to a problem. By this account, only one volume of Water
vapor should be formed.
It was Avogadro that had noted the "equal volumes, equal particles"
hypothesis could explain the Law of Combining Volume data if it was
assumed Hydrogen and Oxygen gases contain particles that are
diatomic.
Stanislao Cannizzario discovered Avogadro's little noticed work of
1811 and published supporting data in 1860. It was then that the
importance of Avogadro's work was recognized and the "equal
volumes, equal particles" hypothesis was revived. Thus, it was shown
that:
V ~ N
Beyond reviving the hypothesis
that equal volumes of gases
contain equal numbers of
particles, Avogadro's
Hypothesis had other far
reaching consequences. It
helped to firmly establish the
atomic weights of the elements.
This in turn made possible the
assignment of unambiguous
chemical formulas for
compounds. Upon hearing of
Avogadro's ideas, the chemist
Julius Lothar von Meyer (right)
said " It was as though the scales had been lifted from my eyes.
Doubt vanished and was replaced by a feeling of peaceful clarity."
Equation of State
The State Variables P, V, T, and N can consequently all be related in a single equation of state:
where R is a Universal Gas Constant having the value 0.082057 L atm / K mol.
A molecular model for a gas that obeys this equation of state assumes:
The gas molecules are point particles; having no volume.
There are no attractive interactions between gas molecules.
The gas molecules only interact during brief elastic collisions.
These assumptions provide the basis for the Kinetic Molecular Theory of Gases and are capable
of accounting for all the historical gas laws.
A gas which follows the equation of state PV = NRT is said to be an Ideal Gas.
Consequences
1. Gas Density () is related to the Molar Mass (M).
P = NRT / V
Setting V/N = /M and we have:
P = RT / M
This rearranges to:
M = (/P) RT
Of course, this is only valid in the limit of zero pressure. So,
M =
This is illustrated using density data for Dimethyl Ether at 298.15K:
P [kPa] [kg/m
3] (/P)/10
-5 [kg/Pa m
3]
12.223 0.225 1.84079
25.20 0.456 1.80952
36.97 0.664 1.79605
60.37 1.062 1.75915
85.23 1.468 1.72240
101.3 1.734 1.71174
A graph of these data show that a quadratic fit can be extrapolated to give:
/P = (6.32857 x 10-11
) P2 + (-2.16784 x 10
-8) P + (1.86476 x 10
-5)
M =
= (1.86476 x 10
-5) (8.31447) (298.15)
= 0.04622 kg/mole
= 46.22 g/mole
If a plot of (P) vs. P shows significant curvature, extrapolation to P = 0 may not be
possible. In this case, a plot of (P/) vs. may be more appropriate. Inverting the data
frequently linearizes it enough to make the extrapolation to zero pressure possible.
2. Dalton's Law of Partial Pressures
Pi = Partial Pressure
PTot =
or
0.000017
0.0000172
0.0000174
0.0000176
0.0000178
0.000018
0.0000182
0.0000184
0.0000186
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
/P
[kg
/Pa
m3]
P [kPa]
Dimethyl Ether
Pi = xi PTot where xi is the mole fraction of species i in the gas
3. Constant Volume Gas Thermometry
We can now imagine measuring the temperature of a bath in the following manner. A
bulb of gas is placed in a bath at T1 and its pressure is read with a gauge; P1. The same
bulb is then transferred to a Water bath maintained at its Triple Point, Ttp. The pressure is
again read with the gauge; Ptp.
Some gas is then evacuated from the bulb and the process is repeated. If the process is
repeatedly performed with successively lower gas densities, the pressure data can then be
extrapolated to zero. Then,
If we take Ttp = 273.16K, as specified by the 10th
International Conference on Weights
and Measures, then:
T1 = 273.16 K x
and we have measured the temperature of the Bath at T1 on the Ideal Gas Temperature
Scale. This type of thermometer is a Constant Volume Gas Thermometer.