19
The Global Study on Child Poverty and Disparity Influencing Policy First National Symposium on Child Poverty in Yemen 24 - 25 November 2008 Alberto Minujin The New School University, New York [email protected] Kurukulasuriya Sharmila [[email protected]]

The Global Study on Child Poverty and Disparity Influencing Policy First National Symposium on Child Poverty in Yemen 24 - 25 November 2008 Alberto Minujin

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

The Global Study on Child Poverty and Disparity

Influencing Policy

First National Symposium on Child Poverty in Yemen

24 - 25 November 2008

Alberto Minujin The New School University, New York [email protected]

Kurukulasuriya Sharmila [[email protected]]

The objective of the child poverty study

• What do we want to do?

• Aim to influence local, national and global policy processes in order that

– decision-making and planning processes, and

– policy dialogue and debates

– at the relevant national, regional, international levels

• are oriented towards the reduction of child poverty and the realization of children’s and women’s rights

Generate new country level evidence Strengthen partnerships, networks Mobilise national interest in child poverty work Focus on children left behind Target key decision makers ADVOCATE FOR POLICY CHANGE

Value-added

THE GLOBAL STUDY:Translating evidence-based analysis and

partnerships into results for children

What is evidence-based advocacy?

• Three strands of work

• Evidence

• Analysis

• Advocacy

• Enrich, expand, analyze available information (quantitative qualitative and other),

• Relate evidence to existing policy & law, conduct analyses on children’s and women’s rights, arrive at policy positions and options

• Based on evidence & analysis, contribute to development planning and policy debates, influence national / global policy agendas

Launch of the Global Study Launched in September 2007– initial results received in June Child poverty from two perspectives: outcomes

and policy with a focus on children left behind National ownership and Independence in

Analysis Linking people with complementary expertise

and shared interests and goals

National, Regional and Global Analyses

A New Initiative

Child Poverty Network

Who stands behind the work….

45 Participating Countries with a network of over 600 members:Government Ministries - National Statistics Offices - AcademiaThink tanks – NGOs - UN Agencies - UNICEF

Measuring Child Poverty

Continuum of Deprivation and Child Poverty

No Deprivation Extreme Deprivation

Mild Moderate Severe

E. g. : Children who have never been to school Children in dwellings with more than five people per room Children whose heights and weights are 3 SD below the norm

Thresholds• Severe nutrition deprivation: children whose heights and weights for their

age were more than -3 standard deviations below the median of the international reference population i.e. severe anthropometric failure.

• Severe water deprivation - children who only had access to surface water (e.g. rivers) for drinking or who lived in households where the nearest source of water was more than 30 minutes away (e.g. indicators of severe deprivation of water quality or quantity).

• Severe deprivation of sanitation facilities – children who had no access to a toilet of any kind in the vicinity of their dwelling, e.g. no private or communal toilets or latrines.

• Severe health deprivation – children who had not been immunised against any diseases or young children who had a recent illness involving diarrhoea and had not received any medical advice or treatment.

• Severe shelter deprivation – children in dwellings with more than five people per room (severe overcrowding) or with no flooring material (e.g. a mud floor).

• Severe education deprivation – children aged between 7 and 18 who had never been to school and were not currently attending school (e.g. no professional education of any kind).

• Severe information deprivation – children aged between 3 and 18 with no access to, radio, television, telephone or newspapers at home.

Child poverty by region circa 2000

56

313032

61

8182

0

20

40

60

80

100

World Sub-SaharanAfrica

S. Asia M. East &N. Africa

LatinAmerica &

C.

E. Asia &Pacific

CentralAsia

%

• Estimate of child poverty using direct method of social deprivation consistent with human rights approach

• Measurement of poverty using direct method helps to focus interventions

Child poverty by type of deprivation, MENA circa 2000

21 21

1416

7

47

25

0

20

40

60

Wate

r

Toilet

Shelte

r

Info

rmat

ion

Health

Nutritio

n

Educatio

n

%

Child poverty by country, MENA circa 2000

48

86

96

63

26

0

20

40

60

80

100

Egypt Iraq Morocco Sudan Yemen

%

Note: Iraq data for 2000

Child poverty in MENA circa 2000

0

25

50

75

100

Egypt

Iraq

Moro

cco

Sudan

Yemen

Educa

tion

Nutrit

ionHea

lth

Info

rmat

ionToile

tWat

erShelte

r

Education Nutrition Health Information Toilet Water Shelter

Note: Iraq data for 2000

Income poverty (2us$) underestimates child poverty circa 2000

43.9

14.3

45.2

64

87

57

0

20

40

60

80

100

Egypt

Moro

cco

Yemen

%Child poverty

2 U$ a day

Sources: Gordon et al, Child poverty in the Developing WorldWorld Bank, World Development Indicators

Social Justice Childrights

Policy analysis framework

Breaking the poverty cycleEstimating and analyzing child poverty Poverty Reduction Starts with Children

Making poverty reduction sustainableDisparity Matters

Ensuring resources and transparencyBudget Initiatives

Policy issues and interventions

Basic Social Services& Social Protection

Child and family protectionLegislative and Institutional reform

What can be done?

• Evidence and Analysis

Estimate child poverty and deprivation

Estimate child disparities by wealth, gender, regions, ethnic group

Use MICS, DHS & othersse MICS, DHS & others

Analyze characteristics and causes of child poverty

Qualitative methods /participatory app.ualitative methods /participatory app.

What can be done?

• Advocacy and Communication

Child situation brief

Regional / national state of children

Partnership with universities /

research centers/religious groups

What can be done?

• Policy

Use evidence, analysis, advocacy and partnerships to leverage policies and resources for children’s and women’s rights

Map, analyze and monitor policies

Conclusions

• Measuring child poverty allows us to make inferences about policy issues

• It is possible to complement the deprivation measurement of child poverty with an income-based measurement and other approaches

• We can influence the nature of policy dialogue