7
Review The genetic basis of circadian behavior H. Oster * Laboratory for Chronobiology and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute for Experimental Endocrinology, 30625 Hannover, Germany *Corresponding author: H. Oster, Laboratory for Chronobiology and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute for Experimental Endocrinology, 30625 Hannover, Germany. E-mail: henrik.oster@ mpihan.mpg.de In most species, an endogenous timing system synchro- nizes physiology and behavior to the rhythmic succession of day and night. The mammalian circadian pacemaker residing in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of the hypothalamus controls peripheral clocks throughout the brain and the body via humoral and neuronal trans- mission. On the cellular level, these clockworks consist of a set of interwoven transcriptional/translational feed- back loops. Recent work emphasizes the tissue specificity of some components of these molecular clockworks and the differential regulation of their rhythmicity by the SCN. Keywords: Behavior, circadian, clock genes, physiology, SCN Received 20 January 2005, revised 17 May 2005, accepted for publication 14 June 2005 One of the most prominent characteristic features of life on earth is the constant repetition of night and day. The 24-h rhythm of light and darkness, coupled with warm and cold, exerts a fundamental influence on physiology and behavior of most species dwelling on this planet. Life has coped with this rhythm by evolving biological clocks tracking time and enabling the organism to anticipate and prepare for predict- able environmental changes (Pittendrigh 1993). Biological clocks exist not only to deal with daily rhythms (termed circadian clocks, from the Latin circa dies, meaning about one day) but are also employed to measure shorter (ultradian) or longer (infradian) intervals of time (Wollnik 1989). We are currently beginning to unravel the molecular basis of some of these clocks measuring short and long time spans such as the circannual timekeeper controlling migra- tion behavior in birds (Dawson et al. 2001). This review, however, will focus on the circadian system, the so far best characterized clockwork constituting a unique show- case of the molecular basis underlying the regulation of complex physiological and behavioral processes. Most aspects of temporal homeostasis, the timed co- ordination of the physiological status, are under the control of the internal pacemaker (Perreau-Lenz et al. 2004). The signaling pathways employed to transmit timing information from the central clockwork of the hypothalamus to the var- ious sites controlling metabolism and physiology and the mechanisms that keep these oscillations in phase are still poorly understood (Gachon et al. 2004). Even less is known about the molecules that mediate the circadian control of complex behavioral systems such as the sleep/wake cycle (Monk & Welsh 2003; Pace-Schott & Hobson 2002), anxiety (Jones & King 2001), learning and memory consolidation (Chaudhury & Colwell 2002), behavioral flexibility and atten- tion (Aston-Jones et al. 2000), and social behavior (Insel & Young 2001; Reijmers et al. 2001; Schwartz & Reppert 1985). In addition to its ability of self-sustained oscillation, the endogenous clock also receives input from the environment to synchronize internal and external time. The most promi- nent timing signal or Zeitgeber (German for time cue) of the mammalian circadian system is light. Illuminance levels are measured by special photosensory cells in the retina (Berson 2003) that signal via glutamate and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) to light responsive cells of the central mammalian pacemaker, the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), localized in the ventral part of the hypothalamus (Moore 1978; Rusak & Zucker 1979). Other synchronizing signals have also been identified and include temperature (Rensing & Ruoff 2002), enforced loco- motor activity (Wickland & Turek 1991), sleep deprivation (Mistlberger 1992), injections of melatonin (Korf & Stehle 2002), leptin (Prosser & Bergeron 2003), gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) (McArthur et al. 2000), steroids (Pinto & Golombek 1999) and opioids (Byku & Gannon 2000). Many of these so-called non-photic effectors are thought to oper- ate as feedback mechanisms by which the body affects the central clock. They use signaling pathways to distinct parts of the SCN employing neuropeptide Y (NPY) and serotonin as major neurotransmitters (Mrosovsky 1996). The anatomy of the mammalian circadian timing system The central clockwork of the SCN controls circadian adapta- tion of the physiological state via direct humoral and neuronal Genes, Brain and Behavior (2006), 5 (Suppl. 2), 73–79 # 2006 The Author Journal compilation # 2006 Blackwell Munksgaard doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2006.00226.x 73

The genetic basis of circadian behavior

  • Upload
    h-oster

  • View
    215

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The genetic basis of circadian behavior

Review

The genetic basis of circadian behavior

H. Oster*

Laboratory for Chronobiology and Signal Transduction, Max Planck

Institute for Experimental Endocrinology, 30625 Hannover,

Germany

*Corresponding author: H. Oster, Laboratory for Chronobiology

and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute for Experimental

Endocrinology, 30625 Hannover, Germany. E-mail: henrik.oster@

mpihan.mpg.de

In most species, an endogenous timing system synchro-

nizes physiology and behavior to the rhythmic succession

of day and night. The mammalian circadian pacemaker

residing in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of the

hypothalamus controls peripheral clocks throughout the

brain and the body via humoral and neuronal trans-

mission. On the cellular level, these clockworks consist

of a set of interwoven transcriptional/translational feed-

back loops. Recent work emphasizes the tissue specificity

of some components of these molecular clockworks and

the differential regulation of their rhythmicity by the SCN.

Keywords: Behavior, circadian, clock genes, physiology, SCN

Received 20 January 2005, revised 17 May 2005, accepted

for publication 14 June 2005

One of the most prominent characteristic features of life on

earth is the constant repetition of night and day. The 24-h

rhythm of light and darkness, coupled with warm and cold,

exerts a fundamental influence on physiology and behavior of

most species dwelling on this planet. Life has coped with

this rhythm by evolving biological clocks tracking time and

enabling the organism to anticipate and prepare for predict-

able environmental changes (Pittendrigh 1993).

Biological clocks exist not only to deal with daily rhythms

(termed circadian clocks, from the Latin circa dies, meaning

about one day) but are also employed to measure shorter

(ultradian) or longer (infradian) intervals of time (Wollnik

1989). We are currently beginning to unravel the molecular

basis of some of these clocks measuring short and long time

spans such as the circannual timekeeper controlling migra-

tion behavior in birds (Dawson et al. 2001). This review,

however, will focus on the circadian system, the so far

best characterized clockwork constituting a unique show-

case of the molecular basis underlying the regulation of

complex physiological and behavioral processes.

Most aspects of temporal homeostasis, the timed co-

ordination of the physiological status, are under the control

of the internal pacemaker (Perreau-Lenz et al. 2004). The

signaling pathways employed to transmit timing information

from the central clockwork of the hypothalamus to the var-

ious sites controlling metabolism and physiology and the

mechanisms that keep these oscillations in phase are still

poorly understood (Gachon et al. 2004). Even less is known

about the molecules that mediate the circadian control of

complex behavioral systems such as the sleep/wake cycle

(Monk & Welsh 2003; Pace-Schott & Hobson 2002), anxiety

(Jones & King 2001), learning and memory consolidation

(Chaudhury & Colwell 2002), behavioral flexibility and atten-

tion (Aston-Jones et al. 2000), and social behavior (Insel &

Young 2001; Reijmers et al. 2001; Schwartz & Reppert

1985).

In addition to its ability of self-sustained oscillation, the

endogenous clock also receives input from the environment

to synchronize internal and external time. The most promi-

nent timing signal or Zeitgeber (German for time cue) of the

mammalian circadian system is light. Illuminance levels are

measured by special photosensory cells in the retina (Berson

2003) that signal via glutamate and pituitary adenylate

cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) to light responsive cells

of the central mammalian pacemaker, the suprachiasmatic

nuclei (SCN), localized in the ventral part of the hypothalamus

(Moore 1978; Rusak & Zucker 1979).

Other synchronizing signals have also been identified and

include temperature (Rensing & Ruoff 2002), enforced loco-

motor activity (Wickland & Turek 1991), sleep deprivation

(Mistlberger 1992), injections of melatonin (Korf & Stehle

2002), leptin (Prosser & Bergeron 2003), gastrin-releasing

peptide (GRP) (McArthur et al. 2000), steroids (Pinto &

Golombek 1999) and opioids (Byku & Gannon 2000). Many

of these so-called non-photic effectors are thought to oper-

ate as feedback mechanisms by which the body affects the

central clock. They use signaling pathways to distinct parts of

the SCN employing neuropeptide Y (NPY) and serotonin as

major neurotransmitters (Mrosovsky 1996).

The anatomy of the mammalian circadiantiming system

The central clockwork of the SCN controls circadian adapta-

tion of the physiological state via direct humoral and neuronal

Genes, Brain and Behavior (2006), 5 (Suppl. 2), 73–79 # 2006 The Author

Journal compilation # 2006 Blackwell Munksgaard

doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2006.00226.x 73

Page 2: The genetic basis of circadian behavior

regulation of the metabolic, the endocrine, the immune

and the nervous system (Perreau-Lenz et al. 2004; Reppert

& Weaver 2002) and indirectly via its influence on the

animal’s activity, coupled to body temperature (Schibler

et al. 2003).

Some peptides secreted from the SCN – such as

Prokineticin 2 (PK2; Cheng et al. 2002) or transforming

growth factor a (TGFa; Kramer et al. 2001) – have been

shown to suppress wheel running activity. The expression

pattern of the corresponding receptors, however, suggests a

primary action on adjacent nuclei of the hypothalamus that

conduct relay signals from the SCN. Glucocorticoids

(Balsalobre et al. 2000), retinoic acid (McNamara et al.

2001) and noradrenaline (Terazono et al. 2003) have the

potential to reset specific body clocks, but so far no general

mechanism has been described for peripheral pacemaker

regulation in vivo (Hirota & Fukada 2004; Schibler et al. 2003).

It is not entirely clear whether these peripheral clocks are

self-sustaining pacemakers or merely hourglass-like time-

keepers that need to be regularly reset by SCN signals to

continue working (Yamazaki et al. 2000; Yoo et al. 2004). A

unique organization of coupling between the single neurons

in the SCN may ensure the rhythm persistence within this

nucleus and distinguish it from the rest of the body (Ohta

et al. 2005). In the periphery, in the absence of exogenous

synchronizing signals from the SCN the phases of single cell

oscillators would gradually drift apart resulting in a dampened

oscillation observed on the whole tissue level (Welsh et al.

2004).

While an animal’s locomotor activity rhythms are con-

trolled at least partially via diffusible molecules (Ralph et al.

1990; Silver et al. 1996), some rhythms such as the release

of corticosteroids from the adrenal gland have been shown

to require neuronal input (Dijkstra et al. 1996; Meyer-

Bernstein et al. 1999) emphasizing the importance of intact

SCN projections to other centers of the CNS (Watts &

Swanson 1987; Watts et al. 1987) and indirectly to various

organs of the body (Fig. 1) (Buijs et al. 2003; de la Iglesia

et al. 2003; Terazono et al. 2003; Warren et al. 1994).

Electrophysiological studies have shown that neurons dis-

play circadian firing rhythms in many brain regions outside

the hypothalamus (Aston-Jones et al. 2001; Granados-

Fuentes et al. 2004; Koolhaas et al. 1980; Ono et al. 1986;

Semm & Vollrath 1980; Watts et al. 1987). The SCN projects

to three different neuronal targets: endocrine and autonomic

neurons of the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus

(PVN) and other hypothalamic structures such as the dor-

somedial nucleus of the hypothalamus (DMH) and the sub-

paraventricular zone (Leak & Moore 2001) that relay timing

signals to other parts of the brain. The PVN secretes

hormones that regulate the activity of the pituitary and con-

trols peripheral targets via autonomic innervation (Buijs &

Kalsbeek 2001). The DMH regulates the circadian firing

pattern of the locus coeruleus (LC) (Aston-Jones et al.

2001) that sends noradrenergic projections to many brain

areas and the spinal cord (Aston-Jones 2004), some of

which may house their own circadian clockworks.

A recent series of publications from the group of Steven

McKnight has described one of these brain oscillators and

characterized its specific contribution to the organism’s

circadian timing system. It was found that the forebrain

contains a neuronal PAS protein 2 (Npas2 )-dependent circa-

dian clock (Reick et al. 2001). Npas2-deficient mice show

changed locomotor activity patterns under normal lighting

conditions as well as an altered adaptability to a rapid shift

in the external light schedule (a simulated jet lag) and

daytime feeding paradigms (Dudley et al. 2003). This pioneer-

ing work highlights the functional importance of extra-

hypothalamic oscillators and complements lesion studies

emphasizing the necessity of correct neuronal wiring of the

SCN within the CNS (e.g. Challet et al. 1996; Fischette et al.

1981; Goodless-Sanchez et al. 1991; Harrington & Rusak

1988; Lissak et al. 1975; Schwartz et al. 1986) for the func-

tionality of the circadian system.

SCN

PVNDMH

LC

IML

Pineal

Pituitary

Adrenal

Cortex

Thalamus Cerebellum

Melatonin

CRH

ACTH

Adrenaline/noradrenaline Corticoids

?

via SCG

Figure 1: Circadian regulation of the arousal system. As

shown here in the rodent brain, pacemaker neurons of the SCN

rhythmically innervate a web of nuclei in and outside the

hypothalamus which relay timing information to the brain and

the periphery (exemplified here by the adrenal gland). The bimo-

dal regulatory action of endocrine (dotted lines) and neuronal

signals (solid lines) ensures a co-ordinated control of the organ-

ism’s attention state. Noradrenergic and serotonergic projections

from nuclei of the brainstem activate neurons in various areas of

the brain (including the cerebellum and the cortex), thereby

promoting vigilance and arousal. In addition, these systems

have descending projections by which they can enhance or

modulate muscle tonus and activity in the periphery via endo-

crine pathways (e.g. the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA)

axis and melatonin synthesis by the pineal gland) and the auto-

nomic nervous system (ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone;

CRH, corticotropin-releasing hormone; DMH, dorsomedial

nucleus of the hypothalamus; IML, intermediolateral column of

the spinal cord; LC, locus coeruleus; PVN, paraventricular

nucleus of the hypothalamus; SCG, superior cervical ganglion).

Oster

74 Genes, Brain and Behavior (2006), 5 (Suppl. 2), 73–79

Page 3: The genetic basis of circadian behavior

The molecular clockwork

Circadian clocks have been shown to function in a cell-

autonomous fashion (Welsh et al. 1995), and our current

view is that most if not all cells of the body contain their

own circadian clockwork (Balsalobre et al. 2000). Genetic

tools were first applied to circadian biology by the seminal

work of Konopka and Benzer studying rhythm mutants in

Drosophila (Konopka & Benzer 1971). Yet, it was not until

1994 that the first mammalian clock gene – circadian

locomotor output cycles kaput or Clock – was discovered

in a mutagenesis screen in mice (Vitaterna et al. 1994).

From the late 90’s onward, an increasing number of other

clock genes have been identified and characterized in the

animal model including the Clock partner Bmal1 (or Mop3;

Bunger et al. 2000), Per1, Per2 and Per3 (Bae et al. 2001;

Cermakian et al. 2001; Shearman et al. 2000; Zheng et al.

1999; Zheng et al. 2001), Cry1 and Cry2 (van der Horst

et al. 1999; Vitaterna et al. 1999), Casein kinase1e (CK1e)(Lowrey et al. 2000; Ralph & Menaker 1988), Rev-Erba(Nr1d1) (Preitner et al. 2002) and RORa (Sato et al.

2004). Other genes like the mammalian homolog of

Drosophila timeless, mTim (Barnes et al. 2003) and the

basic helix-loop-helix (bhlh)-PAS (Period-Arnt-Single

minded) proteins Dec1 and Dec2 (Honma et al. 2002)

constitute bona fide candidates but still await thorough

testing in an appropriate animal model.

The molecular clockwork is based on interconnected posi-

tive and negative transcriptional/translational feedback loops

(TTLs; Fig. 2). The transcriptional activators CLOCK and

BMAL1 form heterodimers that activate the expression of

genes containing E-Box cis-regulatory enhancers (including

the Pers, Crys, Rev-Erba and RORa) during the morning

(Gekakis et al. 1998; Hogenesch et al. 1998). PER and CRY

proteins are translated and accumulate in the cytoplasm.

There they form heteromeric complexes together with

CK1e (and maybe d) that eventually translocate into the

nucleus where they interfere with CLOCK/BMAL1-driven

transcription (Griffin et al. 1999; Jin et al. 1999; Kume et al.

1999). In addition, PER and CRY proteins form complexes

which prevent those proteins from being phosphorylated by

CK1 marking them for ubiquitination and degradation (Yagita

et al. 2000). This equilibrium between translation, further

posttranslational modification, translocation, and degradation

postpones the highest inhibitory potential of PER/CRY com-

plexes to the night phase when E-box-driven transcription

declines. The suppressed transcription and subsequent

decrease of PER/CRY protein levels first in the cytoplasm

and later in the nucleus re-activates CLOCK/BMAL1-driven

expression in the early morning and thereby re-initiates the

next circadian cycle.

Specificities for complex formation seem to exist between

different PER and CRY paralogs in vivo (Oster et al. 2002b;

Oster et al. 2003). Together with the opposite regulation of

Per1 and Per2 expression under different lighting conditions

(Steinlechner et al. 2002), this may adjust the duration of

CLOCK/BMAL1 suppression to the photoperiod and may

therefore constitute a mechanism of adaptation of the clock-

work to winter and summer (Daan et al. 2001; Oster et al.

2002a).

Rev-Erba and RORa form additional feedbacks that stabil-

ize the clock rhythm via transcriptional regulation of Bmal1.

These supporting TTLs seem to be less critical for normal

rhythm generation but add to the precision of the clockwork

and its insensitivity to external and internal noise (Preitner

et al. 2002; Sato et al. 2004).

In addition, CLOCK and BMAL1 directly (via E-boxes) or

indirectly control the rhythmic transcription of a set of clock-

controlled genes (CCGs). These CCGs are tissue-specific and

in the SCN include Vasopressin (Avp; Jin et al. 1999) and

CLOCK/BMAL1

E-box

Pers/Crys/Rev-Erbα/Rorα/CCGs

RORE

Bmal1

PERs

PER/CRY/CK1complex

CRYs

PERs CRYs CK1ε(δ)

PP

PP

RORαBMAL1

REV-ERBα

Figure 2: Multiple transcriptional/translational feedback

loops stabilize the cellular core oscillator of the circadian

clock in the SCN. E-box containing clock and first-order

clock-controlled genes (CCGs) are rhythmically activated by

CLOCK/BMAL1. The translated proteins form positive and nega-

tive feedbacks on their own synthesis via regulation of Bmal1

transcription and direct inhibition of the CLOCK/BMAL1 enhan-

cer complex. Complexation, posttranslational modification and

subcellular localization of clock proteins ensure the delayed tim-

ing of this feedback essential for the oscillation of the molecular

clockwork (for details see the text; RORE, retinoic acid-related

orphan receptor response element).

Genetic basis of circadian behavior

Genes, Brain and Behavior (2006), 5 (Suppl. 2), 73–79 75

Page 4: The genetic basis of circadian behavior

Prokineticin2 (Pk2) (Cheng et al. 2002) encoding neuro-

peptides that mediate clock rhythms to other areas in the

brain.

Peripheral clocks

Genomic approaches using microarray technology have

revealed that in most tissues, about 8–10% of all expressed

genes are oscillating in a circadian fashion (Akhtar et al. 2002;

Panda et al. 2002; Storch et al. 2002; Ueda et al. 2002). In the

liver, many transcripts encoding rate-limiting enzymes of

essential metabolic pathways such as glycolysis, fatty acid

metabolism and gluconeogenesis are under circadian regula-

tion (Storch et al. 2002) offering a mechanism for the control

of organ physiology by the circadian clock (Rutter et al. 2002).

Not all of these CCGs are directly controlled by CLOCK/

BMAL1 or their tissue-specific paralogs (like NPAS2 in the

forebrain and in the vasculature; McNamara et al. 2001).

Second-order CCGs may be indirectly regulated via CLOCK/

BMAL1-controlled mediators such as D-element-binding pro-

tein (DBP) that has been shown to control the rhythmic

expression of some metabolic enzymes in the liver (Lavery

et al. 1999). DBP acts together with the basic leucine zipper

transcription factor E4BP4, whose rhythm is opposite to that

of DBP, via inverse effects on D-element cis-regulatory

enhancers of responsive genes (Mitsui et al. 2001).

The cell autonomy of the circadian clockwork is the basis

of tissue and even cell-specific modulation and interpretation

of endocrine or neuronal timing signals from the SCN. This

specificity enables the organism to spatially and temporally

fine tune its body functions in an efficient and economic

manner. The SCN as the central pacemaker synchronizes

the internal rhythm to the environment. It acts like the

conductor of an orchestra that gives the pace he reads

from the score (e.g. the sun). The music, however, is played

by the instruments, the peripheral oscillators controlling the

physiological and the behavioral state of the organism.

References

Akhtar, R.A., Reddy, A.B., Maywood, E.S., Clayton, J.D., King, V.M.,

Smith, A.G., Gant, T.W., Hastings, M.H. & Kyriacou, C.P. (2002)

Circadian cycling of the mouse liver transcriptome, as revealed by

cDNA microarray, is driven by the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Curr

Biol 12, 540–550.

Aston-Jones, G. (2004) Locus Coeruleus, A5 and A7 Noradrenergic

Cell Groups. In: Paxinos, G. (ed), The Rat Nervous System.

Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 259–284.

Aston-Jones, G., Rajkowski, J. & Cohen, J. (2000) Locus

coeruleus and regulation of behavioral flexibility and attention.

Prog Brain Res 126, 165–182.

Aston-Jones, G., Chen, S., Zhu, Y. & Oshinsky, M.L. (2001) A

neural circuit for circadian regulation of arousal. Nat Neurosci

4, 732–738.

Bae, K., Jin, X., Maywood, E.S., Hastings, M.H., Reppert, S.M. &

Weaver, D.R. (2001) Differential functions of mPer1, mPer2,

and mPer3 in the SCN circadian clock. Neuron 30, 525–536.

Balsalobre, A., Brown, S.A., Marcacci, L., Tronche, F.,

Kellendonk, C., Reichardt, H.M., Schutz, G. & Schibler, U.

(2000) Resetting of circadian time in peripheral tissues by

glucocorticoid signaling. Science 289, 2344–2347.

Barnes, J.W., Tischkau, S.A., Barnes, J.A., Mitchell, J.W.,

Burgoon, P.W., Hickok, J.R. & Gillette, M.U. (2003)

Requirement of mammalian Timeless for circadian rhythmicity.

Science 302, 439–442.

Berson, D.M. (2003) Strange vision: ganglion cells as circadian

photoreceptors. Trends Neurosci 26, 314–320.

Buijs, R.M. & Kalsbeek, A. (2001) Hypothalamic integration of

central and peripheral clocks. Nat Rev Neurosci 2, 521–526.

Buijs, R.M., la Fleur, S.E., Wortel, J., Van Heyningen, C.,

Zuiddam, L., Mettenleiter, T.C., Kalsbeek, A., Nagai, K. &

Niijima, A. (2003) The suprachiasmatic nucleus balances sym-

pathetic and parasympathetic output to peripheral organs

through separate preautonomic neurons. J Comp Neurol 464,

36–48.

Bunger, M.K., Wilsbacher, L.D., Moran, S.M., Clendenin, C.,

Radcliffe, L.A., Hogenesch, J.B., Simon, M.C., Takahashi, J.S.

& Bradfield, C.A. (2000) Mop3 is an essential component of

the master circadian pacemaker in mammals. Cell 103,

1009–1017.

Byku, M. & Gannon, R.L. (2000) Effects of the 5HT1A agonist/

antagonist BMY 7378 on light-induced phase advances in

hamster circadian activity rhythms during aging. J Biol

Rhythms 15, 300–305.

Cermakian, N., Monaco, L., Pando, M.P., Dierich, A. & Sassone-

Corsi, P. (2001) Altered behavioral rhythms and clock gene

expression in mice with a targeted mutation in the Period1

gene. Embo J 20, 3967–3974.

Challet, E., Le Maho, Y., Pevet, P., Nobelis, P. & Malan, A. (1996)

Ventromedial hypothalamic lesions prevent the fasting-

induced changes in day-night pattern of locomotor activity.

Behav Brain Res 77, 155–163.

Chaudhury, D. & Colwell, C.S. (2002) Circadian modulation of

learning and memory in fear-conditioned mice. Behav Brain

Res 133, 95–108.

Cheng, M.Y., Bullock, C.M., Li, C., Lee, A.G., Bermak, J.C.,

Belluzzi, J., Weaver, D.R., Leslie, F.M. & Zhou, Q.Y. (2002)

Prokineticin 2 transmits the behavioural circadian rhythm of

the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Nature 417, 405–410.

Daan, S., Albrecht, U., van der Horst, G.T., Illnerova, H.,

Roenneberg, T., Wehr, T.A. & Schwartz, W.J. (2001)

Assembling a clock for all seasons: are there M and E oscilla-

tors in the genes? J Biol Rhythms 16, 105–116.

Dawson, A., King, V.M., Bentley, G.E. & Ball, G.F. (2001)

Photoperiodic control of seasonality in birds. J Biol Rhythms

16, 365–380.

Dijkstra, I., Binnekade, R. & Tilders, F.J. (1996) Diurnal variation

in resting levels of corticosterone is not mediated by variation

in adrenal responsiveness to adrenocorticotropin but involves

splanchnic nerve integrity. Endocrinology 137, 540–547.

Dudley, C.A., Erbel-Sieler, C., Estill, S.J., Reick, M., Franken, P.,

Pitts, S. & McKnight, S.L. (2003) Altered patterns of sleep and

behavioral adaptability in NPAS2-deficient mice. Science 301,

379–383.

Fischette, C.T., Edinger, H.M. & Siegel, A. (1981) Temporary

desynchronization among circadian rhythms with lateral fornix

ablation. Brain Res 229, 85–101.

Gachon, F., Nagoshi, E., Brown, S.A., Ripperger, J. & Schibler, U.

(2004) The mammalian circadian timing system: from gene

expression to physiology. Chromosoma 113, 103–112.

Oster

76 Genes, Brain and Behavior (2006), 5 (Suppl. 2), 73–79

Page 5: The genetic basis of circadian behavior

Gekakis, N., Staknis, D., Nguyen, H.B., Davis, F.C., Wilsbacher, L.D.,

King, D.P., Takahashi, J.S. & Weitz, C.J. (1998) Role of the CLOCK

protein in the mammalian circadian mechanism. Science 280,

1564–1569.

Goodless-Sanchez, N., Moore, R.Y. & Morin, L.P. (1991) Lateral

hypothalamic regulation of circadian rhythm phase. Physiol

Behav 49, 533–537.

Granados-Fuentes, D., Prolo, L.M., Abraham, U. & Herzog, E.D.

(2004) The suprachiasmatic nucleus entrains, but does not

sustain, circadian rhythmicity in the olfactory bulb. J Neurosci

24, 615–619.

Griffin, E.A. Jr., Staknis, D. & Weitz, C.J. (1999) Light-independent

role of CRY1 and CRY2 in the mammalian circadian clock.

Science 286, 768–771.

Harrington, M.E. & Rusak, B. (1988) Ablation of the geniculo-

hypothalamic tract alters circadian activity rhythms of

hamsters housed under constant light. Physiol Behav 42,

183–189.

Hirota, T. & Fukada, Y. (2004) Resetting mechanism of central

and peripheral circadian clocks in mammals. Zoolog Sci 21,

359–368.

Hogenesch, J.B., Gu, Y.Z., Jain, S. & Bradfield, C.A. (1998) The

basic-helix-loop-helix-PAS orphan MOP3 forms transcription-

ally active complexes with circadian and hypoxia factors. Proc

Natl Acad Sci USA 95, 5474–5479.

Honma, S., Kawamoto, T., Takagi, Y., Fujimoto, K., Sato, F.,

Noshiro, M., Kato, Y. & Honma, K. (2002) Dec1 and Dec2 are

regulators of the mammalian molecular clock. Nature 419,

841–844.

van der Horst, G.T., Muijtjens, M., Kobayashi, K., Takano, R.,

Kanno, S., Takao, M., de Wit, J., Verkerk, A., Eker, A.P., van

Leenen, D., Buijs, R., Bootsma, D., Hoeijmakers, J.H. & Yasui,

A. (1999) Mammalian Cry1 and Cry2 are essential for main-

tenance of circadian rhythms. Nature 398, 627–630.

de la Iglesia, H.O., Meyer, J. & Schwartz, W.J. (2003)

Lateralization of circadian pacemaker output: Activation of

left- and right-sided luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone

neurons involves a neural rather than a humoral pathway.

J Neurosci 23, 7412–7414.

Insel, T.R. & Young, L.J. (2001) The neurobiology of attachment.

Nat Rev Neurosci 2, 129–136.

Jin, X., Shearman, L.P., Weaver, D.R., Zylka, M.J., de Vries, G.J.

& Reppert, S.M. (1999) A molecular mechanism regulating

rhythmic output from the suprachiasmatic circadian clock.

Cell 96, 57–68.

Jones, N. & King, S.M. (2001) Influence of circadian phase and

test illumination on pre-clinical models of anxiety. Physiol

Behav 72, 99–106.

Konopka, R.J. & Benzer, S. (1971) Clock mutants of Drosophila

melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 68, 2112–2116.

Koolhaas, J.M., Schuurman, T. & Wiepkema, P.R. (1980) The

organization of intraspecific agonistic behaviour in the rat.

Prog Neurobiol 15, 247–268.

Korf, H.W. & Stehle, J.H. (2002) The circadian system: circuits-

cells-clock genes. Cell Tissue Res 309, 1–2.

Kramer, A., Yang, F.C., Snodgrass, P., Li, X., Scammell, T.E.,

Davis, F.C. & Weitz, C.J. (2001) Regulation of daily locomotor

activity and sleep by hypothalamic EGF receptor signaling.

Science 294, 2511–2515.

Kume, K., Zylka, M.J., Sriram, S., Shearman, L.P., Weaver, D.R.,

Jin, X., Maywood, E.S., Hastings, M.H. & Reppert, S.M. (1999)

mCRY1 and mCRY2 are essential components of the negative

limb of the circadian clock feedback loop. Cell 98, 193–205.

Lavery, D.J., Lopez-Molina, L., Margueron, R., Fleury-Olela, F.,

Conquet, F., Schibler, U. & Bonfils, C. (1999) Circadian expres-

sion of the steroid 15 alpha-hydroxylase (Cyp2a4) and

coumarin 7-hydroxylase (Cyp2a5) genes in mouse liver is

regulated by the PAR leucine zipper transcription factor DBP.

Mol Cell Biol 19, 6488–6499.

Leak, R.K. & Moore, R.Y. (2001) Topographic organization of

suprachiasmatic nucleus projection neurons. J Comp Neurol

433, 312–334.

Lissak, K., Vermes, I. & Telegdy, G. (1975) Effect of midbrain

raphe lesion on diurnal and stress-induced changes in seroto-

nin content of discrete regions of the limbic system and

adrenal function in the rat. Prog Brain Res 42, 327–328.

Lowrey, P.L., Shimomura, K., Antoch, M.P., Yamazaki, S.,

Zemenides, P.D., Ralph, M.R., Menaker, M. & Takahashi, J.S.

(2000) Positional syntenic cloning and functional character-

ization of the mammalian circadian mutation tau. Science

288, 483–492.

McArthur, A.J., Coogan, A.N., Ajpru, S., Sugden, D., Biello, S.M.

& Piggins, H.D. (2000) Gastrin-releasing peptide phase-shifts

suprachiasmatic nuclei neuronal rhythms in vitro. J Neurosci

20, 5496–5502.

McNamara, P., Seo, S.P., Rudic, R.D., Sehgal, A., Chakravarti, D. &

FitzGerald, G.A. (2001) Regulation of CLOCK and MOP4 by

nuclear hormone receptors in the vasculature: a humoral

mechanism to reset a peripheral clock. Cell 105, 877–889.

Meyer-Bernstein, E.L., Jetton, A.E., Matsumoto, S.I., Markuns, J.F.,

Lehman, M.N. & Bittman, E.L. (1999) Effects of suprachiasmatic

transplants on circadian rhythms of neuroendocrine function in

golden hamsters. Endocrinology 140, 207–218.

Mistlberger, R.E. (1992) Nonphotic entrainment of circadian

activity rhythms in suprachiasmatic nuclei-ablated hamsters.

Behav Neurosci 106, 192–202.

Mitsui, S., Yamaguchi, S., Matsuo, T., Ishida, Y. & Okamura, H.

(2001) Antagonistic role of E4BP4 and PAR proteins in the

circadian oscillatory mechanism. Genes Dev 15, 995–1006.

Monk, T.H. & Welsh, D.K. (2003) The role of chronobiology in

sleep disorders medicine. Sleep Med Rev 7, 455–473.

Moore, R.Y. (1978) Neural control of pineal function in mammals

and birds. J Neural Transm Suppl. 13, 47–58.

Mrosovsky, N. (1996) Locomotor activity and non-photic

influences on circadian clocks. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 71,

343–372.

Ohta, H., Yamazaki, S. & McMahon, D.G. (2005) Constant light

desynchronizes mammalian clock neurons. Nat Neurosci 8,

267–269.

Ono, T., Sasaki, K., Nishino, H., Fukuda, M. & Shibata, R. (1986)

Feeding and diurnal related activity of lateral hypothalamic

neurons in freely behaving rats. Brain Res 373, 92–102.

Oster, H., Maronde, E. & Albrecht, U. (2002a) The circadian clock

as a molecular calendar. Chronobiol Int 19, 507–516.

Oster, H., Yasui, A., van der Horst, G.T. & Albrecht, U. (2002b)

Disruption of mCry2 restores circadian rhythmicity in mPer2

mutant mice. Genes Dev 16, 2633–2638.

Oster, H., Baeriswyl, S., Van Der Horst, G.T. & Albrecht, U.

(2003) Loss of circadian rhythmicity in aging mPer1-/-mCry2-/-

mutant mice. Genes Dev 17, 1366–1379.

Pace-Schott, E.F. & Hobson, J.A. (2002) The neurobiology of

sleep: genetics, cellular physiology and subcortical networks.

Nat Rev Neurosci 3, 591–605.

Panda, S., Antoch, M.P., Miller, B.H., Su, A.I., Schook, A.B.,

Straume, M., Schultz, P.G., Kay, S.A., Takahashi, J.S. &

Hogenesch, J.B. (2002) Coordinated transcription of key

Genetic basis of circadian behavior

Genes, Brain and Behavior (2006), 5 (Suppl. 2), 73–79 77

Page 6: The genetic basis of circadian behavior

pathways in the mouse by the circadian clock. Cell 109,

307–320.

Pennington, B.F., Moon, J., Edgin, J., Stedron, J. & Nadel, L.

(2003) The neuropsychology of Down syndrome: evidence for

hippocampal dysfunction. Child Dev 74, 75–93.

Perreau-Lenz, S., Pevet, P., Buijs, R.M. & Kalsbeek, A. (2004)

The biological clock: the bodyguard of temporal homeostasis.

Chronobiol Int 21, 1–25.

Pinto, F.T. & Golombek, D.A. (1999) Neuroactive steroids alter

the circadian system of the Syrian hamster in a phase-

dependent manner. Life Sci 65, 2497–2504.

Pittendrigh, C.S. (1993) Temporal organization: reflections of a

Darwinian clock-watcher. Annu Rev Physiol 55, 16–54.

Preitner, N., Damiola, F., Lopez-Molina, L., Zakany, J., Duboule, D.,

Albrecht, U. & Schibler, U. (2002) The orphan nuclear receptor REV-

ERBalpha controls circadian transcription within the positive limb of

the mammalian circadian oscillator. Cell 110, 251–260.

Prosser, R.A. & Bergeron, H.E. (2003) Leptin phase-advances the

rat suprachiasmatic circadian clock in vitro. Neurosci Lett 336,

139–142.

Ralph, M.R. & Menaker, M. (1988) A mutation of the circadian

system in golden hamsters. Science 241, 1225–1227.

Ralph, M.R., Foster, R.G., Davis, F.C. & Menaker, M. (1990)

Transplanted suprachiasmatic nucleus determines circadian

period. Science 247, 975–978.

Reick, M., Garcia, J.A., Dudley, C. & McKnight, S.L. (2001)

NPAS2: an analog of clock operative in the mammalian fore-

brain. Science 293, 506–509.

Reijmers, L.G., Leus, I.E., Burbach, J.P., Spruijt, B.M. & van Ree, J.M.

(2001) Social memory in the rat: circadian variation and effect of

circadian rhythm disruption. Physiol Behav 72, 305–309.

Rensing, L. & Ruoff, P. (2002) Temperature effect on entrain-

ment, phase shifting, and amplitude of circadian clocks and its

molecular bases. Chronobiol Int 19, 807–864.

Reppert, S.M. & Weaver, D.R. (2002) Coordination of circadian

timing in mammals. Nature 418, 935–941.

Rusak, B. & Zucker, I. (1979) Neural regulation of circadian

rhythms. Physiol Rev 59, 449–526.

Rutter, J., Reick, M. & McKnight, S.L. (2002) Metabolism and

the control of circadian rhythms. Annu Rev Biochem 71,

307–331.

Sato, T.K., Panda, S., Miraglia, L.J., Reyes, T.M., Rudic, R.D.,

McNamara, P., Naik, K.A., FitzGerald, G.A., Kay, S.A. &

Hogenesch, J.B. (2004) A functional genomics strategy reveals

Rora as a component of the mammalian circadian clock.

Neuron 43, 527–537.

Schibler, U., Ripperger, J. & Brown, S.A. (2003) Peripheral

circadian oscillators in mammals: time and food. J Biol

Rhythms 18, 250–260.

Schwartz, W.J. & Reppert, S.M. (1985) Neural regulation of the circa-

dian vasopressin rhythm in cerebrospinal fluid: a pre-eminent role

for the suprachiasmatic nuclei. J Neurosci 5, 2771–2778.

Schwartz, W.J., Busis, N.A. & Hedley-Whyte, E.T. (1986) A

discrete lesion of ventral hypothalamus and optic chiasm that

disturbed the daily temperature rhythm. J Neurol 233, 1–4.

Semm, P. & Vollrath, L. (1980) Electrophysiological evidence for

circadian rhythmicity in a mammalian pineal organ. J Neural

Transm 47, 181–190.

Shearman, L.P., Jin, X., Lee, C., Reppert, S.M. & Weaver, D.R.

(2000) Targeted disruption of the mPer3 gene: subtle effects

on circadian clock function. Mol Cell Biol 20, 6269–6275.

Silver, R., LeSauter, J., Tresco, P.A. & Lehman, M.N. (1996)

A diffusible coupling signal from the transplanted

suprachiasmatic nucleus controlling circadian locomotor

rhythms. Nature 382, 810–813.

Steinlechner, S., Jacobmeier, B., Scherbarth, F., Dernbach, H.,

Kruse, F. & Albrecht, U. (2002) Robust circadian rhythmicity of

Per1 and Per2 mutant mice in constant light, and dynamics of

Per1 and Per2 gene expression under long and short photo-

periods. J Biol Rhythms 17, 202–209.

Storch, K.F., Lipan, O., Leykin, I., Viswanathan, N., Davis, F.C.,

Wong, W.H. & Weitz, C.J. (2002) Extensive and divergent

circadian gene expression in liver and heart. Nature 417,

78–83.

Terazono, H., Mutoh, T., Yamaguchi, S., Kobayashi, M., Akiyama, M.,

Udo, R., Ohdo, S., Okamura, H. & Shibata, S. (2003) Adrenergic

regulation of clock gene expression in mouse liver. Proc Natl Acad

Sci USA 100, 6795–6800.

Ueda, H.R., Matsumoto, A., Kawamura, M., Iino, M., Tanimura, T.

& Hashimoto, S. (2002) Genome-wide transcriptional orchestra-

tion of circadian rhythms in Drosophila. J Biol Chem 277,

14048–14052.

Vitaterna, M.H., King, D.P., Chang, A.M., Kornhauser, J.M.,

Lowrey, P.L., McDonald, J.D., Dove, W.F., Pinto, L.H.,

Turek, F.W. & Takahashi, J.S. (1994) Mutagenesis and map-

ping of a mouse gene, Clock, essential for circadian behavior.

Science 264, 719–725.

Vitaterna, M.H., Selby, C.P., Todo, T., Niwa, H., Thompson, C.,

Fruechte, E.M., Hitomi, K., Thresher, R.J., Ishikawa, T.,

Miyazaki, J., Takahashi, J.S. & Sancar, A. (1999) Differential

regulation of mammalian period genes and circadian rhythm-

icity by cryptochromes 1 and 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96,

12114–12119.

Warren, W.S., Champney, T.H. & Cassone, V.M. (1994) The

suprachiasmatic nucleus controls the circadian rhythm of

heart rate via the sympathetic nervous system. Physiol

Behav 55, 1091–1099.

Watts, A.G. & Swanson, L.W. (1987) Efferent projections of the

suprachiasmatic nucleus. II. Studies using retrograde transport

of fluorescent dyes and simultaneous peptide immuno-

histochemistry in the rat. J Comp Neurol 258, 230–252.

Watts, A.G., Swanson, L.W. & Sanchez-Watts, G. (1987)

Efferent projections of the suprachiasmatic nucleus. I.

Studies using anterograde transport of Phaseolus vulgaris

leucoagglutinin in the rat. J Comp Neurol 258, 204–229.

Welsh, D.K., Logothetis, D.E., Meister, M. & Reppert, S.M.

(1995) Individual neurons dissociated from rat suprachiasmatic

nucleus express independently phased circadian firing

rhythms. Neuron 14, 697–706.

Welsh, D.K., Yoo, S.H., Liu, A.C., Takahashi, J.S. & Kay, S.A.

(2004) Bioluminescence imaging of individual fibroblasts

reveals persistent, independently phased circadian rhythms

of clock gene expression. Curr Biol 14, 2289–2295.

Wickland, C.R. & Turek, F.W. (1991) Phase-shifting effects of

acute increases in activity on circadian locomotor rhythms in

hamsters. Am J Physiol 261, R1109–R1117.

Wollnik, F. (1989) Physiology and regulation of biological rhythms

in laboratory animals: an overview. Lab Anim 23, 107–125.

Yagita, K., Yamaguchi, S., Tamanini, F., van Der Horst, G.T.,

Hoeijmakers, J.H., Yasui, A., Loros, J.J., Dunlap, J.C. &

Okamura, H. (2000) Dimerization and nuclear entry of mPER

proteins in mammalian cells. Genes Dev 14, 1353–1363.

Yamazaki, S., Numano, R., Abe, M., Hida, A., Takahashi, R.,

Ueda, M., Block, G.D., Sakaki, Y., Menaker, M. & Tei, H.

(2000) Resetting central and peripheral circadian oscillators in

transgenic rats. Science 288, 682–685.

Oster

78 Genes, Brain and Behavior (2006), 5 (Suppl. 2), 73–79

Page 7: The genetic basis of circadian behavior

Yoo, S.H., Yamazaki, S., Lowrey, P.L., Shimomura, K., Ko, C.H.,

Buhr, E.D., Siepka, S.M., Hong, H.K., Oh, W.J., Yoo, O.J.,

Menaker, M. & Takahashi, J.S. (2004) PERIOD2:

LUCIFERASE real-time reporting of circadian dynamics reveals

persistent circadian oscillations in mouse peripheral tissues.

Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 5339–5346.

Zheng, B., Larkin, D.W., Albrecht, U., Sun, Z.S., Sage, M.,

Eichele, G., Lee, C.C. & Bradley, A. (1999) The mPer2 gene

encodes a functional component of the mammalian circadian

clock. Nature 400, 169–173.

Zheng, B., Albrecht, U., Kaasik, K., Sage, M., Lu, W., Vaishnav, S.,

Li, Q., Sun, Z.S., Eichele, G., Bradley, A. & Lee, C.C. (2001)

Nonredundant roles of the mPer1 and mPer2 genes in the mam-

malian circadian clock. Cell 105, 683–694.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Ms. Diya Abraham and Drs Gregor Eichele and

Erik Maronde for their critical comments on the manuscript. This

work was supported by the Max Planck Society and the EC

BrainTime grant (QLG3-CT-2002-01829).

Genetic basis of circadian behavior

Genes, Brain and Behavior (2006), 5 (Suppl. 2), 73–79 79