Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE FIGHT AGAINST THE CLEARVIEW LANDFILL
-• 'JW-" •*»•" .-*• - • -
SUBMITTED BY: CHIP BASSETT,.. .. DIRECTOR, EASTWICK P. A. C.
MARCH 7, 1984
Richard Heller began extensive landfilling in the late 1950*son the 16.5 acre site situated in Delaware County between Darby Creekand the Philadelphia County Line. At the time only a few people livedin the r.earby vicinity. By 1970, on average 125 vehicles were receiveddaily, T.cst from the City of Philadelphia. During the -period of operationcne once flat land became a sizeable hill approximately 150 to 200 feethigh, filled with mostly household trash, apparently some industrial waste,ana who knows what else.
_, In October 1969, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania filed a complaintagainst the owners,- the Clearview Land Development Company, Inc., claimingthat they unlawfully operated a garbage and refuse n_spcsal site. Withthat complaint began a series of legal actions.
In December 1970, the State filed an application for a PreliminaryInjunction claiming Clearview operated a landfill without a permit asrequired by the Solid Waste Management Act of 1968. It was not untilNovember 1971, that the Court approved an Interim Consent Order which waspresented by both the Commonwealth and the Redevelopment Authority. The
.„ "Order" stipulated operation procedures and hours, as well as, the?velopment of a land use study and a closure plan. This order was
•3R**/^virtually ignored by the owners.' -'s'.V The Eastwick Project Area Committee (PAC) formed in March 1971, in" order to represent then 16,000 residents of the Eastwick Urban Renewal Area.'After the Court Order, the PAC proceeded to monitor the dump and correspondedwith the state officials responsible for enforcing the Order. Meanwhile,City of Philadelphia garbage trucks, as well as other vehicles, rolled up83rd Street, ascended the hill unimpeded, and dumped their trash and waste.The PAC appealed to Federal, State, and City officials requesting that thecourt order be enforced. Finally, in January 1973, after filing a longlist of violations, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the RedevelopmentAuthority submitted a Petition for Contempt of the Interim Consent Order.
In February 1973, Judge Howard Reed, Jr. filed an Opinion and Order.In his Opinion Judge Reed states that the Clearview Landfill addressed:"a need and demand for solid waste disposal....but as the adjoining areas
AR100007
Tage 13
™ ' -T^i -
substancially changed from waste Jand to useabie land...this operationtransformed into a new unacceptable anachoronism." The order set outa plan similar to the previous Interim Consent Order. A final closureplan was to be submitted by May 1973.
After the Clearvisrw 'Land Development Company, Inc. again failed tocomply, Judge Feed issued a Final Order which stipulated that by Septerser30, 1973, all solid waste disposition shall cease and Clearview mustfellow the prescribed closure plan. The Department of Environmental ResourtlorRJ was instructed periodically t,c inspect the site and report anyviclat-ions. As part of the closure plan, the owners were instructed tograde and cover the entire hill with two feet of compacted earth andthen to fertilize and plant suitable ground cover.
At the same time that the Court was ordering the closure of theLandfill, DER granted ROMA Associates, Inc. a permit to construct andoperate a batch asphalt plant. Despite community protests and an appealsubmitted by State Senator Thomas McCreesh along with the Eastwick PACand the eolwyn Council, DER went ahead and issued the permit. In theend the asphalt plant operated for just three years between 1973 and 1976before closing down.
After the closure of the landfill and then of the asphalt plant, the'community began to regard the site as somewhat innocous. The hill wasn»- -icovered with vegetation and the landfill appeared as simply a large hi!*'The Eastwick PAC remained suspicious of the owner, Richard Heller, howeV^r,nc harmful activity was apparent. At one poin-t. some "gypsies" settledon the site and began a business manufacturing outdoor rustic furniture.
Starting in 1973, as part of the Urban Renewal development, newhouses were beginning to be built by Korman Corporation in the area justeast of the dump. Through the 1970's the residential development expandedwest. The Forrest Creek Community with nearly six hundred homes wasbuilt between 1973 and 1977. New houses were constructed and sold alongthe eastern perimeter of Heller's Dump. In 1979 and 1980 the Hedgerow •Community with nearly 300 houses was built along the scuthern border ofthe dump. At the time no one apparently seriously questioned the possibil-ity of dangers connected with the landfill. There are some reported
AR100008
Page ill
i .-3blems with methane gas leaking to the surface, but there are noreports of toxic wastes or fumes.
In 1977, Richard Heller asked the City tc provide water andsewer service to his property. The Hastwick PAC appealed to MayorRizEo to prevent the City from supplying these services to Heller.He had plans to build a trailer park on the site. Darby Townshipwrote to the City and indicated that Heller had the necessary zoningpermit and that he needed water and Fewer service from Philadelphia.Heller never received water and sewer service frorr Philadelphia.
In November 1981, the new PAC Director, Chip Bassets, discoveredevidence of recent dumping and was concerned aoout the stockpiling
.,_..- of steel drums. The PAC wrote letters to both the U. S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) and DER, first, stating that by Court Orderdumping of any solid waste is prohibited, and second, requesting thatthe site be inspected for violations and tested for leachating andhazardous chemicals.
Shortly, afterwards DER issued a Notice of Violation to ClearviewLand Development Company, and ordered that the piles of debris beicmoved, that all future dumping be stopped, and that a barrier beconstructed to limit access. Also, DeLorenzo was issued a Notice of
M*.V Violation for operating without a permit. The Regional Director forDER wrote to the PAC stating that the steel drums were found to be emptyand DER recently closed a hazardous waste storage and transfer facilitylocated on the bite.
At an on-site conference November 1981 with the DER inspector,Robert Zang, Chip Bassett learned that the Clearview Landfill was notconsidered by DER as a priority site. The DER inspector had been in-specting the site and writing-up violations, however, the administratorsof DER were unwilling to prosecute. In DER's file there is a long listof violations to both the Solid Waste Management Act and to the 1973Court Order involving illeg'al dumping, fires, and other activities. Atthe time of our on-site inspection, Graves Resource Management had justdiscontinued the operation of a toxic waste transfer station because theywere operating without a permit or any notification to DER. The DER
AR100009
Tage IV
"/- f-> -i
inspector discovered ' r, the site barrels leaking chemicals, no safetyequipment, and nc ooi-'-nerts tO'verify the contents, origins or destinat-ions of the hazardous chemicals. Also, DeLorenzo Twin County Disposal Iwas illegally operating a solid waste, transfer station without a permit.Plus, other violations involving dumped debris and fires were cited.However, th^re was no evidence of the dumping of toxic waste.
Heller did nothing to abate the violations. DER issued furthernotices and threatened to take him to court. However, Heller stillillegally dumped on-site, never cleared up the existing debris, a.idonly recently installed a gate at the entrance.
In early Spring 1982, in response to our original request: inNovember 1981, DER conducted tests for leachate and toxic wastes alongthe stream bed of Darby Creek. DER was unable to release the results,-—'instead they submitted the test results to the Environmental ProtectionAgency (EPA). However, in a telephone conversation in October 1983,the DER inspector, Robert Zang, told Chip Bassett that there was evidenceof leachate from the landfill and some traces of toxic chemicals, butnot significant, or dangerous levels.
Unbeknownst to the Eastwick PAC, DER approved a permit in October1982 for DeLorenzo to operate the solid waste transfer station. Withthe aid of the Redevelopment Authority Legal Department, we filed anappeal .on the issuance of the permit. Despite protest letters from theCity, Korman Corporation, Tinicum National Environmental Center, and *,Jthe redevelopment Authority, in th< end DER convinced the Redevelopncr .Authority lawye::s that there was little ground for an appeal. The oneitem that was not sufficiently addressed was the inadequate informationprovided in the permit applicaton under compliance history. The factthat he operated without a permit was not indicated nor was any ofDeLorenzo's activities in New Jersey noted.
Becuase the access road to Heller's Dump crosses the Departmentof Recreation property, the PAC in December 1981, informed the RecreationDepartment that DER had ordered Heller to barricade the entrance. Wealso made it known to DER that much of the illegal damping was takingplace on the City's property. In February 1982, DER responded byissuing a Notice of Violation to the Department of Recreation fordumping. Legally, the property owner is responsible for any illegaldumping on their lanfc.
AR100010
Page V
"- '-The PAC had little hope of closing Heller down, so the Boarddecided to press the City to develop the unimproved portion of theF<?cional Park, and to landscape the site so as to obscure and blockoff Heller's Dump. In June 1982, the Managing Director, Wilson Goode,assured PAC representatives that this site would be developed. Afterseme delay the F.AC followed-up in January 1983 with a letter to theRecreation c omiTiissioner urging him to select the architect for this site .
For years sufficient funds had been allocated for the Regional Parkwithin the" Capitaj. Budget as part cf ~^ a City's commitment to successful""'complete the^astwick Urban Renewal P.i.c.n. However, in FY' 84 under MayorGreen's austerity budget, funds were substantially cut, though thereare still sufficient funds to hire an architect.
Finally, by June 1983, an architect, Howard r'ransnoff, was hired.PAC representatives inspected the site with hiit- and with officials fromtne Re-creation Department, after which the PAC set down the followingpriorities:
1. relocate the access road closer to Darby Creek;2. fence off the recreation site from Heller's Dump and
the access road;3. conduct test borings to insure that1.there are no
toxic wastes on the site;4. clean and fill the site where dumping has occurred;5. construct a walkway linking the existing Regional
Park Walkway with 34th Street; and6. plant trees and grass, possibly leaving some area with
-he natural habitut.y^l / In August 1983, Kevin Nesko of Darby Township obtained from EPAa copy of the results from the test conducted by DER in the spring of 1982Contrary to what the DER inspector tcld Chip Bassett, the documentsappear to show evidence of serious pollution. Two substances identifedin the test include: acetone, possible solvents, possible pesticides,low levels cynide, low levels phenols, possible PCB, and various heavymetals. The fact that the concentration found of these substances werelow does not preclude the fact that tnese toxics are on the site and thawthere may likely be dangerous concentrations of these hazardous substanceselswehere on the site. Also, it must be noted that these tests wereconducted after a heavy rain. This may have diluted normal concentrations
AR100011
Armed with the results of DER's ^?st, Kevin Nesko presented thisinformation to a reporter for the :>e -a-.are County Daily Times whichmade this a front page expose1 on £ep-;-;~ber 1, 1983.
Largely because of the public release of these results, EPA inOctober 1983 conducted more extensive tests in the same general area.Heller initially prohibited the EPA investigators from entering thedump site. After negotiations between lawyers, EPA apprently agreedto test only along the same stream bee already tested by DER. EPAhas indicated that the results of this last rest will be releas edby mid-April 1984. Unfortunately, regardless of the results, the tesisstill will nor measure possible toxic pollution on the opposite sideof the landfill in Eastwick.
Because there may be a potential health hazard connected with HellDump, the Eastwick PAC has written to the City Department of Recrea'icr.and Department of Public Health requesting that comprehensive soil,ground water and air monitoring tests be conducted around the perimeterof the site, and that signs be posted around the dump. The HedgerowResidents' Association has written similiar letters. Also, Hedgerow aswell as Forrest Creek Community Association have distributed flyerswarning their residents of the possible danger and have circulatedpetitions that request EPA, DER, and the City toconduct the necessary
.,,.*_,tests and to close down Heller's Dump.^ ' Members of the Eastwick PAC and the Hedgerow Civic Association ha'"
andjoined forces with Kevin Nesko of Darby Township with other concerned N-*>reslderrc. w. Delaware County in orcar to fcrr?..the c-tiz-ns1 Leaye io;
'&£ ..
~.>^>""Enviornir.ental Action Now (CLEAN). The principle purpose behind CLEANis tc safeguard public health and protect the environment from thehazard of -oxic waste. As one of its first tasks, CLEAN has beeninvestigating the past and present activities connected with Heller'sDump.
Finally, it must be noted that contamination by toxics can onlyoccur either by direct contact with the subtance or through the air.If all the sources of contamination are covered, then it is unlikely thatthe air is polluted. However, smoke from fires on the dump or fumesfrorr open barrells and pits will likely create a hazardous condition.The ground water may be polluted with hazardous chemicals. The onlylikely sources one will come into direct contact with contaminated groundwater are a leachate pond where ground water collects, a leachate stream
AR100012
?aae VII
-
which flows out from the sice of the hill, well water or waterseeping into basements.
AR100013
Fje •
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTB SITESITE INSPECTION REPORT
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS. CompUU Section* I snd'm through XV of lhl» form •• completely •• po •»»>!«. Then u«« thelion «tt this ftfro^o develop a Tent«i*v« Disposition (Section 10. File thU form In it» entirety In th* regloo.I Haswdous W«» LotFll*. B* »u.-« to include all appropriate Suppl*m*ntal R«pbrt» In th« fllo. Submit a copy of th« forms to: U.S. EnvlronmoaUt Pro- 'tactton Aconcy; Sit« Trackinf Syatam; Hazardous Wait* Enforcement T««k Porco (EN-33S)-, 401 M St., SW; W«»hintton, DC 20460.
I. SITE IDENTIFICATIONg. STREET (or o*/icr
> STATE
PftF. COUNTY NAME
G. SITE OPERA TOR INFORMATION
1. SITE DESCRIPTION
J. TYPE OF OWNERSHIP
O »• FEOUR*L Q 2. STATE >• COUNTY 4. MUNICIPAL •• PRIVATE
I!. TEMTATIV2 DISPOSITION :'como/e/» .'««()A. ESTIMATE DATE OF TENTATIVE B. APPARENT SERIOUSNESS OF PROBLEM
C. PPEPARtB INFORMATION
'• 1. TIL.KFMONK NUMBIft
HI. INSPECTION INFORMATIONAPRINCIPAL INSPECTOR INFORMATION . ,v ^
*. ONQANIZATtON
?&\w>ii.-,-Ftf&f.r**,'?;*!?^ - --'*'4- * • (* ' . - - - > . :•-! •• • • i j. TITL*»"' '- "• ':-' •' ' " ' . -" . ' ' ' ' " ' : I
_ _ • _ - — . — — — — — . _ — . — — — —r4;- 'C> W^_CT^_AT^ 77 ;. op
». INSPECTION PARTICIPANTS
1. NAMC S. ORCANtXATIOM t. Ttt.I»HONB NO.
P/t
C. SITE REPRESENTATIVES INTERVICWEO (e9rpor*tm official., wor**r*, r*a/d«nr*>
N,AMIt i. TIT UK ft TKL.KPHONK NO. 9. AOOHGif
He^ez.AR100014
OPflHNinVANIA
OP INVIRONMRNTAL RSSOURCIS
BUREAU OP WATIR QUALITY MANAMMiNr! .., NETWORK WATM OK WASH (Muurr MFORT - SMCIAL ANALYSH
f I 61 0I/ 17ADDITIONAL US ANALVIttLIMITARY TOi
UU Ml£ilPT1CN WHIRt SAMPU TAKfH
V E R E P O R T
Gc
Q U A N T I T A T I V E R E S U L T S
ANAIYSM*
! fffJ -
J-T^
ANAiYSIICOM
fo£&,, SIONATUM t ,
CENTRAL OFFICE
•SUITS ' :
(SHOW MC1MAI POINTS ON HMD
ATI.
.
-X
I*1' I
'?//?i
•T*'" .-.in,!'..
> ;«. i.
.; *'.•r.'- T
- . :=•-*>/
•:f1 JT '
•.f.
,. ^'t iLl
: J^-''fe'
'"fr."ft
l ' '';
. .vj-,
•• f
• if1'-W.-
•-? 1^'f- , SIAR100015
FACILITY SAMPLE
STREAM/RANDOM SAMPLE
NETWORK SAMPLE
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIADEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
BUPCAU OF LABORATORIES
WATER OR WASTE QUALITY REPORTALL CHEMICAL ANALYSES EXPRESSED IN
MO/L UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
04863LAB. Number
CompositeSample
TwriporalSpatial
Aliquot! 67-66
Flow EstimatedMeasured
Condition Above - 1 Normal - 2 Flood - SBelow - 3 No Flow - 4
-a*- CARD (2)
Stream Fkw-CFS (00061)
areamjFJjow-MOD (50051)
Pipe Ftow-MQD (50050)
Qafte Readlng-Ft (00095)
(OOOtO)
(00400)
D.O.
Hal
M
L-.-''/**Day BOD") (OO310)-
Odor
1 \
.
How Shipped'Legal SealReceivedCondition
PH4
pH8Hot
(00411
(00436)
(00437)(00435)
(00665)(00666)
2.
(01105) v
/ Fe-Tol ugVl\:f^_.^
(01051) :
^—N'Zn-TotuB/IJ (01092)<^_——^
-X
O
(oneibT
Kjel-N (00625)
Hardnew
(00945r ~
(00951)
MBAS
(00720)
2,2-zco
\->.
S
C
nonunion 01 OWBL—Z——K-Jyf.————————————— ____ ____ ___________'________ t
-./O.toS'- pU-Jiia/^fc.^-kw^* VwTte&TWALOFFICE * t> L*?~.GV^-Aa^fif>M~Jj*&0±
AR100016
tfl-BLI]nrv i,n ~ »'
ET-•FACILITY SAMPLE
STREAM/RANDOM SAMPLE
NETWORK SAMPLE
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIADEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
BUREAU Of LABORATORIES ' '
WATER OR WASTE QUALITY REPORTALL CHEMICAL ANALYSES EXPRESSED IN
,- MQ/L UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
LAB. Number _04862m
ESTABLISHMENT^ _, __^*-'>flSS*«r'' M^F ' -*•****» j.
^-A^i^^lCASE FACILITY, COLL NUMBER
PROGRAM TYPE TR STO ANALYSIS
CARD (3) LATITUDE 4-10Cnty
LONGITUDE 11-16 E 19-24 TIME 25-26
0! I 1 I 013Wn
KIND 20
USGS-O30-34 BUREAU 35-37 AMIS
o 0SAMPLE NUMBER 36-43
Ol 11*STREAM NAME 44-67 RELATIVE POINT 56
TRIBUTARY TO: ADDITIONAL LAB ANALYSESFULL DESCRIPTION WHERE SAMPLE TAKEN
How Shipped/LegalReceived by!Condition of
00900)
30015)
J092S)
W*4 JM*»
W9S1)
12260)
46002)»730)
»720)
)
2/)
3iij
^
fl p^^^^^B____^
'• ••
,
|
1 U '
,c^
L/I
5t
Y
^7
^
O
Z,
s
//
OFFICE
AR100017
FACiLITY SAMPLE
STREAM/RANDOM SAMPLE
NETWORK SAMPLE
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIADEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCCS
BUREAU OF LABORATORIES
WATER OR WASTE QUALITY REPORTALL CHEMICAL ANALYSES EXPRESSED IN
MQ/L UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
LAB Number K4864
ESTAC COLL NUMBER
MUNICIPALITY PROGRAM. COLL $TD ANALYSIS
CARD (3)Fac
LATITUDE 4-10 LONGITUDE /DATE 19-24 TIME 25-26Hr t Mln
KINO 29
USOS-Q30-34 BUREAU 35-37 AMIS
3 |oSAMPLE NUMBER38-43
I | fa|Q I 3,| 0STREAM NAME 4447 RELATIVE POINT 58
TRIBUTARY TO: ADDITIONAL LAB ANALYSESFULL DESCRIPTION WHERE SAMPLE TAKEN AA.
FIELD ANALYSES
Type Sample
Source of Sample
R0e»on Sampled
S9-60
61-02
•3-64 O
CompositeSample
TempofalSpatial
AJtquota 67-W
EatlmatedMeaaured
Above - 1 Normal - 2 Flood - 5Below - 3 No Flow - 4
Stream Flow-CFS (00061)
• Stream Ftow-MQD {50051}^ri^fe?r-'Pipe Ftow-MQD (50060)
Gage Reedlng-Ft. (00065)
Temp (C)
PH
0.0.
(00010)
(00400)
Hal
How Shipped.Legal Seal No..Received by_Condition of:
Chemlal
(00095)
PM4
pHBHot
(00438)
(00437)(00436)
(00660)
(00665)(00686)
LAB ANALYSES
3
6
2.
m?)52
'I
o
o
Date Analyzed
Set Sotkti
NoA
'NH.N )
Hardneea
Ca"—diM
MBAS
pr7i7
6^
(00900)
(00915)
(00925)
(00049*.
~l«W*0(
(OOBSt)
(32260).
(46002)««730)
(00720)
—— 71
———— )
&\C~s
^j^
,•
s.
if
,
i
&f
\
7.(/jT*
t ^4?^7
&
-r^i
C*\J/
,
O
/
£0&^-t*\fi*»+Wt^^~\*^ hvtfeitEKTRAL OFFICE £ 0 fe ¥-/ - C^^^JU^/^0(> * I--&£****$*
AR100018
J*1
_*. FACILITY SAMPLE
STREAM/RANDOM SAMPLE
NETWORK SAMPLE
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIADEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
BUREAU OF LABORATORIES
WATER OR WASTE QUALITY REPORTALL CHEMICAL ANALYSES EXPRESSED IN
MG/L UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
04872LAB.
ADDITIONAL LAB ANALYSES
—————— V**
Type Sample
S<~ • « ol Sam
flee* on Sampl
CompotffeSample
Row
Condition
FIELD ANALYSES
" "'• 59-60"
pV 61-62
ad 63-64
ProportionalUniform
TemporalSpatial
Aliquot* 67-66
O
oc>65
66
Eatimated „Measured
Above - 1 Normal - 2 Ftood - 5B*low - 3 No Flow - 4 **
Stream Ftow-CFS (00061)
•fee*-' Flow-MGO (50051)
Kp* *-MQ0 (50050)
Gaga Reading- Ft (00065)
Tampff
PH
O.O.
Hal
Spec Co
Appaara
Odor
How!LegalRecetiCondl
:i
nd
noe
>hlptSeal«dttion
(00010)
(00400)
(00300)
Cl (50060)
8r (71871)
1(71866)
(00094)
(46001)
(01330)
f) GUSTxrt'JMlsfrNn &til
7f//
«D(2)
'
,
2^4^ DI^ U. .— .5"
<
"?MM ^j^y?2 *•
^ i*f~sT)/'/!of R«akS=? (j. Sfff
^^ j)//%/&^
f \ ^ w |r I
Color (00080)
Turb (00070)
pH (00403)
Spec. Cond (00095)
Alk (00410)
PH4 (00436)
„... "* (00437)""' ——— (00435)
Cold
T.O.C. (00660)
C.O.D. (00340)
5-Day BOO (00310)
T (00666)
P TO (00eM)
a—""*-*>l-Totug/l) (01106)* ——— — -^
/W-Tot ug/) (01027) ""
^r-ToTug/l) (01034) -
Cu-Tolug^ (01042)*-
Mn-Toiug^K (01065) -
Ni-Tot ug/j) (01067)
'pb-Tol utf/l> (OlOSf)
Zn-Totug/l) (01092)
•
"»
^ i"
•• »•
- ——
»•
-/
^~
^y//
^
z,I
1 — •
9o;•?
Ir>*•3.f0.37•7
OSOo6<—
O20
M.YWS•»
Date Anelyte
Total SoHdi
Suep. Solid*
SetSoltdt
3//7/^-!
(00600)
(00530)
(00648)
Total DIM Soiidi (00619)
NO,N
NO,N
Hardneca
Ca"— diaa
Mg"-dlaa
SO,
Cl •
F
MBAS
""-"Phenofr)^atS^
ode
(00615)
(00620)
(00610)
(00825)
(00900)
(00015)
(00929)
(00945)
(00940)
(00961)
(32260)
Or. (46002)
zS; (00720)
f0za%2*£.>
.
,
<= F« -"— •
4
*• ..^^
I
^
•
'
0
\
s6/
,-t, OFFICEAR100019
AR100020
&t
I
AR100021
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITEAND PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
MOTBi .nrdni wia» •im t* h.lpen »**ll»blu licortU w)d nay b* updawd <m >ubin;u*iil (om> •« • »••!( •( addiliwwl laqulrlw1 : • „•_• \ •• "
OIHIKAL IMSTRUCT1OMS Ct»plt» SMIIMII I *nd in UrMidi X •* t<l»»MMMAf). -riUthUfana In th* R«|lM»l ttoi*rdoa« *»MLM Flit« HH-Au. »«!• Knfo«M.«,| T.Yk K««
• copr to: 0.*. Bmrlronm«iU|.._.__ .._T . - — - .. , Oc J04W..'»»-
1. 1ITI IPENTIPICATIOMA; »ITK MAMK D.
ID rp. cotiHTv NAN!Of t ^ K"
I. IIP CODE
OWNIN/ai>KKAf6i
Jk TYPROFOWNIMHIP
Ql. PKDKMAL D*- "ATI Ql. COUNTY Q*. MUNICIPAL fgjt. FIIIVATC
i. tire OEfcniPTioNPF^ *>t /Trf?J>
V
t. HOW IDENTIFIED fl.M,.«llf»ir« Hf^tfUllf. QMA K.-DATKIOCHTIPIIC,
t.. FRINC1PAU ITATC CONTACTI. MAMR •• TKb«l>M«M« HUMMBK
.11., fKiUMIHARY ASSK5>M6HTfcaiBpl«f«MH« Met/an
i. HIBH ' QI.HKIMUM Q>. LOW D*- NON« Cgft. UNKNOWN
•. MCOMMIHOATION
1. HO ACTION NKEDCO fn*
I. «TC INI»KCTION NCICED
Ql. IMMKDIATE IIT« INI ICTION NICDIO
^
*• >'T> INtPCCTWH NKCOEO ff«.
A. SITE 1TATU1(7~-~ HI. SITE INFOBMATIOH
- S45--/6S7
^^•^v/...;,0/^:^^^
~A^» *™i*rTfV*«««5 ~" IBTTr\ri'Vi'fi7Te*wi»St.M"TirtiTe~iIs«j'tSrff«ftiFY cooHgiMirT*————_. 11- I,* n ivot iaM—«!••.»>•<. i i r. LvoBi'ubc r'*J.-n»«—*">J
_ ftfc. loo ____ J_ •_________I .______t. *ff fri'ititK NuH.D'M'r-l ON fMi; I'Tf
,i «- ...!„
AR100022
^
IV. CMAHACTBWZATrlW Or SITI ACTIVITY
/
C.
' VtfM B*J«r all* •ellvltyflMj «B< <ht*ll« rBlitlni to ••ch icllvlty hr »M%lnfl T In th* •ppwurtm •«•••. v
f 'A. TMANWONTBH - •• tTOM* -
1", NAlk ;' ». PII.E
*. OTMBN fM**'W'
. -^aafev"
. ' ,15 6.
, , •. *THBH— "' ,.-.- -
,. . ^ - .. '••.C. TMCATtH — B. DUP«*CR \ ''"
1. PILTKATION i. LANDFILL
F. KAITB Oik H*"HOCEMIHa '. WMDBM«HOWHa INJBCTIOK
1. »LV«HT •IC9VBIIT 1. OTMIM ftt. OTMCH {ffftiirf , :,-.- :
|»•TKCIPV OKYAIiaOPVT*; ACTIVITIO Al NIKOKO ^. • , •:--,--..
".* :'.$JC rff' TD hlfrT^^er OF Vj*C/TT'O^ O/rT'C1^ t*-/t/9t• -.\- :•':/'>»• '-..- • 'V*" " ' SftTT'ACti-Cty -~^'!'- • - , . - • ••.• ." ' ^5!,*,-
Vr WAIT! RILATCD INFORMATIONA. WACTI TTF«
Ql. HNKNOWM Q&LIQUID C3J.MUD Q*. ILUDOI 'OtOAl '. "
•. WA*TC CMAHACTKM1T1CI .J3l. UNKNOWN CJl, CONKOWVC O*. lOMTAolC Q«, MAOWACTlVK Qt- NI0NLV VOLATILE .. * *:,'- .CD«- TOXIC ' Qr. «i»cTtv« jS'-INm*T Q». PL*I«NA»U«; j . • ' '' ' " '* "*"' •':.
C. «AITI CATC4OIMII .__... __* ^^^ ^^^ • >-.v
2. emtlm.t* tb* •MMntfipMirr wdl of wuunjvf n*M bf CM*c*ryi •«* "Jf to btdlett* «hl«h *•••(•* u* prtcMH. •
• . ILUDOC• MOUNT
UNIT Or HfHtUHt
K'
__
irtPAiMT.
tdMBTALI•IUOCCI
«.*.«
" tSSiV"
» • .
k on.MOUNT
UNIT OP MBAVUMB
£]>»°'i.*n —_J Mt 0 TH **(**ffltr):
«. MM.VCMT1AMOUNT .
ffOf'f'f-f'f tldGt
f II»MOfl-M*La*HTeL. •ObHCNT*
X
*. CKBWCALSAMOUNT .
see**
f,
t) A etc*
IIVICKLIH*
JICAUITIC*
KIO* <l/tNHl
,.,C«N,0-
..PK.-OU.
„.,»
„..-.,.«
1(n<iT»«-(*..M|.
#. (Ob'OIAMC-IMT
UNIT OP MHAIUIIB
,„..„,„.
Ill MIL H»«/
'.' v0':: ;.<*> o ' MI: Hltfftilf),-
r. OTNCMMOUNT .
CA- 2.QONIT OP MUMHI
».«...»*.
,,.«0,0«T.V<
•*» F«m TTOm.* ItC.M)
AR100023
••If
4*. 'v
V. WASTE BELATED IHFORMATIQH ft**"""***N HHICH MAV IIE OM THB »TC ffl«* ta «»«i««rf»
'*. AooTViaNAL ceiwiMTi oit NAi!i«Wivi B«WWTIOII or IITUATION KNOWN on NIMHTIO TCTKXIIT AT TMC VITC. , ,(^^^.'^-•l^^^ : * • ' • ' • ' • • - . • • - ; : - ; ' v * • •-- . : : -"- . . «r v^1''''t
VI. HAtABO OgSCBlPTIOND.OATCOfINCIDIHY
MO MAXAM0
. HUMAN NCAL.TH
. *«(K«R INJUMV
CDNTAMIHATIBM
X
«. PIIH Mlhl. *
.. CONTAMINATION"' OV AIM
1, HOTICIABkl OOONI
1*. PHDPKHtV OAWBBB *', ,--f, .,
11. MltHlt-IT BUUBlH* . jo* * /f
Canlinuo On Hirrl*'
AR100024
• «•.!*•; - ,//ram Fttnl '
'// ~———————.' . . * . . . . ' . . .... ..... ... _ *... -- ———
VII. PERMIT INFORMATION t' /ATK ALL APPLICAVLK PBW4IT1 HBUD »» THE WTf. AL«-
/• i'J - • ; . - . • ' . - .-. ~ • </A. HPWS P«IWHT CD* wee PLAN Q ». ITATE PcrwtiTf
, 23 «. AH»PtWilT» Q •. IMCM. P«»"T D«. HCKA THAMIPOH
[~1 T. MCHA srertctt D •• MCMA THKATKK O '• *CRA DiJ^oten
n ta.OTMINfipMlrrIi n \m, IN COMPLIANCKI
TKH • . •; •;• '
-. F !.- s :r ^x f '" --. ' Vin. PAITRIGULATORY ACTIONS
1771 A. HONK . , . PC ". T«»f.u—— «<»»»!••» f ,
IX. INSPECTION ACTIVITY C»..l or «-*»ln*l
Q A. HONK * " " 1 ! ' - 1 - d*1 V«I f««pl"" '«•«• 1 AJ. ft<»M>i4 ' "* " :- •='•-»•'•"•' i-
i*Jsfec-n»A)^ ^Sire 7v/-$/T^ ••"',(fnv*)iT»K-tft$] —
*'£!'/&'L/I/JM-fteXfttr
'«pSSD£*A
-•",• .: n
4. DEICMIPTIOM •,"."*•;'• . ' il-
&PFE£- ~rf / £-/#/&/ Ai*Ttc&or im.fiT****
X. RIMCDIAL ACTIVITY |-(M*t ar on-dolnj)
*™ ^~GX^13 A. NOHK
,->v^v,
Ll •.vnr«MwtM*HH»J,>.9. ft «».!•»)
- • v;!'*i--
• - 'v. , >;:'•' '^^
• - -•^- • :;
t.OATK «P
(•>•« rf>n*rA>.
. ••-- .
• .PBRPOMMBO• VI
-
'' . 4.DS1CHIVTIOM
NOTE; Band efl tha InfonMtlon in Sectloni 01 throuth X. (Ill out the Preliminary Assessment (Section II)'' [flformatlM on th* flt*t pat* ot this form.
• PAfMnT1070-l(l«-7f} * PACI 4 Or-
AR100025
AR100026
yfe.
'/Clearview Land Development Co.,Mr. Heller. . . .,..,;.. -2-
'•'• -'?'$• '^U Complete removal of all unpermltted wastes such as, but. not limited to,-:''••'$$$-t-J'those wastes listed above. The unpermitted.wastes must be removed to' , .;/ v /. a permitted landfill and/or a permitted demolition waste site.>'•*'••;" '•'• " '-••' . - ' '. " .• -'" ."•• • • .
; ' •'"- 2) Cessation of all future dumping of unpexmitted wastes upon this property.!| $$$ 3)' Construction and use of an artificial barrier to the 84th Street
' '£"^v$. --'-',-;' *ntranc" to the site to prevent possible future vandalism dunping.,v^Af-'4) Removal of the large Grave Resource Management storage container.
:.,=':-v- YOU are to submit to this office, within 7 days from your receipt of thisnotice, an abatement schedule for the correction of these violations. .Contact
- Mr.-Lunsk at 631-2420 for disposal information., ,. ;,, '*?"'*'•; '"***:^l^tf-l^" '&&«± •• > •••"H*i;' -' :-'-l -•'iw^;-i^- ;^.':m-'J'^SJ-"^^, &*•* *• ,- r^-',;.^*-'- - ' - . - , ' - ' " . ' - - V " " '
"VT^-^"''^''.-. ' v,'. •'''•',«••: V-\:ifc"^- " • -• ' '--,.';,r*s. t*&;.:•-.„ .-.-;-• ,•. . • .-^: :-. - , •'
-•!*•'
RZ:rn
cc: Bruce Beitler
r^:^.^-' 1''•"-v :4-7t''^-.>*K.1f-^
Yours truly.
Robert ZangSolid Waste Specialist
'• *
AR100027
FIELD TRIP SUMMARY REPORT
This summary should be prepared in conjunction with the Preliminary AssessmentForm, (EPA Form T2070-2), so that a proper site rating can be assigned. . ,.,
Name of Site C.t eAB.VH? tf / ft?OJ> PH C
EPA Case Number ____________-____
I. If site is active, has owner/operator notified EPA in accordance withSection 3010 of RCRA. Yes______ Ho X
-. If Yes: a) Note EPA I.D. No.__________;_____ " •"'-"— -Vi'.,. • b) Is the site a generator, storer, treater or disposer of -.'•'• ' - hazardous waste? (CIRCLE ONE).
II. If the answers submitted in Part VI (Hazard Description) of EPA Form T2070-2 orobservations warrant a more thorough si^e investigation/sampling, please attacha sketch map showing those areas of concern, (i.e.: lagoons, leachate seeps,drum storage, monitoring wells, etc.).
III. Please 11st site contacts and accompanying inspectors; Include name, title andphone numbers.________________________________________
-~ b. fciC(Q»-fcfl tteLL.e£.j sn
. Set ID
IV. Site observations: (attach a topo map).
A. Population within 1000 ft, of the site is (CHECK ONE)
1. 0-10 people2. 10-100 people
- J> greater than 100 people
B. List surrounding land use: (woodlot, agricultrual, playground, Industrial, etc.)
North:
South: -gfi i f> f./d 1-1 >+ I
East: gf^i^ £i\) r< A LWest: C-P/nmf £cift t
AR100028
TRIP SUMMARY REPORT Page 2
Water supply for area. (CHECK ONE) City
1. Surface Intakes (locate on attached map]2. Municipal wells (locate on attached map)3. Domestic wells:
a. Approximate number within h mile.b. Locate a minimum of 3 wells on attached map and list below:
Property owner _______ _______ ________
Address _______ _______ ________
Phone No. ________ ________ _________
Hell records YES NO YES NO YES NO: Odor problems YES—— NO—— YES—— NO—— YES—— HO——-
• Taste problems YES—— NO— YES—— NO—— YES—— NO——
c. If odor or taste problems are reported please elaborate:__
D. Are surface or subsurface, {leachate}, drainage areas from site apparent?YES .x^HO__. If yes:
1. Here unusual odors or stains noted?2. Has stressed vegetation noted?
a. If yes please note area on map.
E. Are streams or receiving waters adjacent to site? YES V NO """ """?'If yes, 11st observations: (I.e.-change In benthlc coramunTTy, change In plantdensity/diversity, change In color, slltatlon, etc.).
F.
EW-V;«.~*Qt-1-ua.l
.* r.
Site topography:
'.* ^
\^-<MA I
TT o s* "ry f
(I.e. -plateau.
r ty Cr
I -T«.r (
*•£ a t •*
strip mine
-k• _
r^*ravines,
Urt^lc a;
IL M a t - i -
**• ' / v.'*etc.). plfl-
e-4 y
*uLi*ao
6. Other observations: (I.e.-erosion, located In flood plain, etc.)
A
K
AR100029
/FIELD TRIP SUMMARY REPORT Page 3
Here photographs taken? YES HOIf yes: Who has custody of photos?
Name: "Agency : PAPhone Ho.i 3-t S~ -
VI. Is a hydrogeologlcal survey for this site attached? YES NO__If no, Section III D of EPA Form T2070-2 must be completedV
VII. Please attach pertinent copies of reports or data reviewed by Inspector;(I.e.-State monitoring data, consultant reports, etc.).
VIII. Name of Inspector:
Agency:Phone No.:
Time on Site:
Heather Conditions:
-••'"•;- •-f'
*.v«Mr'*?$££
AR100030
^• ;^.$V'^4§
*l#.Wi
S? i4
f*.
•j«jij
AR100031
»«
nr.f -M3 1
a*>
.
' J
I AR100032
ft
. . . - - - . , . ,-..... -'' ^t-rJ-U^ J -^ _ ^ "j • >»-a - - 4*
"—-\.JEa^^V^'^ > • *^-~' »} M-g ?*.f•;s
:- pHT-f'^"—:^T ^^i-'i^ - jijS' i . - • 1 s!;5 s
. , j « - » «I'" __ *l «NH.»»HOI ."**'. »« i '••; "f. S* *Vt.
H !h-»———^—-——ij * ''<——^^—"-Hs ? 2 .( " V . i v " , V u
AR100033
POTENTIAL HAZAROOUI WA»T1 UTBsue INSPECTION REPORT PA -
GENERAL INSTRUCTION Si C««I*U 1*«U«M 1 •»* Ot Umatf XV of tM* (arm •» cMpl*»ly •• p*««ibl«. Tho •» th* toton*.HM »o UtU taw !• 4«v«I*» • TMMf *• DlifMltlM flMllM I/J. HI* U»L» him !» »• «Btirat|p In tlM r*|lqail Hi udow »•»!• L«lF1U. B* »ut* to fnetud* ill »p|M»p»Ul» Suf«l«aMt*t Rvywu !• Ik* (U*. Subwll • copy •( «>• fnm* (•: U.I. E«<rti««aMt>l Pn*-(*CllBa A|*ncy; SIM Vf*cUa( Sr»(M>; HMMdM* WwW l«fMBM»Ml T««k Fwn fKN-MJX «01 M IL. fV; WohiaftM, DC M440.
1. S1T1 IDENTIFICATION
T7Ctf*———
.Ml ..Ml .>«T.»I I
b.^* I -HS-Gft -671Z-
~"f •.7r*Tr~ [TitVT»Bi— ~
t tmmtut ml •IN*)
h rI jTYtfe o» owMeniMi* ~~" ~'~" —^——-
C] '. *to««»u D «. »T*Tt n >. COWMTV
~n 4. *T*TB TT. nT*eao
C)».P«IVATf
I!. TEHTATIVS OtSPOJITIOM ^.tm-iln* -hi* i.ellsn >*i)A. tsyiM.ri DATE Of TfMTATIve
.B. A^PAMKHT IIMIOUINIM Of PWOB1.CM
1IL IN1PECTION INfORUATIOH
?^ I £•(!T•. INl^KCTION »AMTICI^AMTI
1. tCLI*H«Mt H0.
Pr/1
2 /A'- l3)-
ry fl/AR100034
ciHirf Fnm f (onf\
<• 10. INSPECTION INFORMATION fconfinu.d)
1. NAME
Crr^ op PttlL-A-
OTHefcs OrJ«^
>i •<AN*PO<tTr*/HAULM 1
1. HAM*
>t
j
f. ir VAtTK II PRQCCIICD 0
1. MAMB
• DATK OF INSPECTION
B-w.-OnJpJ
rOKMATtOH
u/\yH 1ITI AND AIM tHIff
t. TlLl^MOM* HO.
H. flUB OF tMSPICTIOH
I. ADDHI1*
• •
1. AOOO1I1
K/VtuJfJ
j«^icir«t
O TO OTHtft ttTH, IOIHT1FT OFF'tlTC FACILITICl U1CD FOR OI»f*OtAL.
1. AOOMC11
-
T^/A-
1. ACCCta GAINED av:rtr*ri«>llili BUM »• clwwn In
Q 1. PC MIIIIOH |~) ]. WARRANT
IV. SAMPLING IMFOfiMATIONA. Mirk 'X* far Iha qrp>* o( iwapl«s lih»n »od indleat* nh«* ih*y h*v« b««n ••
•Ic. lad ••tim*t« *h«n lh» rvtu'ti will b« •»«llibl*.
,.,nOUH0«T«R
k. IUHVACB WATBR
1. WAIT!
d. Am
,.-UHO,F
L JClt.^
J- IOIL
/. f?ftaf/¥J"£ SffF^S
I.TYPt
i "
TAltKM
Xy
^x
nt »,(., rBgionol lib, o(h«r EPA l*b, contractor,
,.,AMP.<,<.TTO,
• ///j^ft,53"e^ ^t t/?<e)n it
///•?/? If (SftUK^
^UOCAT.ONOFU.A.^^^T.
^^^ i^) ~
HltUkT*
3/Pt
V/*"-3-
—— /— ————>.-..UUM
AR100035
':;/.ued Front P»*» J
IV. SAMPLING INFORMATION (eon(lnu«0
TYBI Or #HOTOI
fjj"«. 6HOUN0
I- PHOTO! IM CUITOOV
A. lift MAPPCDI (JO
L^ V«>- »*«C'Fr LOCATION
C. COOHOIMATE1. 1. LATITUOC frf*
U *JV. SITE INFORMATION
*. JITC *T*TU*
71 I. ACTIVE (*•*•» MriMC'-l •* | C3 J.JNACTIV1
tat ».«!« ll*«n*fll. >»/•<*. *TI«IM<i/r«» ih« Intlua* »»eft mcM.ni. fin* "•I M«J!| i
* T»rrtc t/tcjrfJtfjffr
! |E '• "
C. AMCA O' >>T< fin «Cf*«J
/ooD. A*C Ttnenc •ui(t>ina> OH THC SITE>
tyi^CHAHACTlHIZATION OF SITE ACTIVITY
Indiect lh« nijor >iu •cil*llxC'*iJ 'id dtl*lli ilUtJnc to tteh «cUnity by airklnf 'X' la 'h« ippropmia bom.
• . 1TOMEH C. TBEATE" D. BHPOIIH
t. l-'MDFA*
(ftlt
C. f UPPieMwhich 0iV7
T Al. HEPOMTS: If (hi >ll" («:!• vllhln
J^ I. »TO"AO4I ». tMC!H«H»f.Q«t
•( >H« tt.4 i. ,hli tar..
1. LAHOriLL
< rt CJ '»•
VO. WASTE RELATED INFORMATION
Pit. MJUC Q 4.
^ I. CONMOIIVC . O>- WNIVA«L«
~ I. TOBIC ' O*
^»CTIVC CJ *• MIOHI.Y VOLATILE
.—I*. OT>.c.r^. .-.,.TB A I f t"e A T JE'dBri f i <
. MCACTIVE (0T,IWI(tT f~l I.
^ *i<l e&lHif?I. A*. H**M* •/ «.*.. tnU
p-.* f *«•*•) ll»-'fj PACE 1 O' to Com i mi* On «*'•'!•AR100036
™
-d From FrontVU. WASTE RELATED INFORMATION
-J. Ettim»t* th« imaunl (•f»ellr unit ol m***uit) at witt* by dlcgor/; m«rli •«• in indic«ia which wtit.i tt, prumi..' * .. 1LUOOI ». OIL *• tOLVCNTl •- CHCMICALl *. lOLIOt
.;\yT,,__i..OTH.«f.
. (-non* ro«Y.
»ICAU«TIC»
1.1UMTANCC
t. fOMH<*•*,* -X-t
>. TOKIC'TYf——» 'XV
t-CAI HUMCEII
3200-.y- 3=*-
35--
VIU. HAZARD DESCRIPTION•>E!.a -:v*LO*T1ON HftZAftO OC1CR PTIONT PUc« *n 'X1 in in* <)«« to indieii* ih*i th* limltd h.i.rd xiin. D*icnb* th>m«rt m '.S» «pic» envldad.
__ ) A. HUMAN HCAI.TH HAXAHO1
AR100037
VU1. HAZARD DHCRtPTIONj-contl.Mi.Jj
' C. WONKCH IHJUMV/EX»O*UN«
i~] P. CONTAMINATION 0^ WATIR
/»o t*6 / t»>
«- COMTAttlNATION OF fOOO CHAIN
2) F- CONTAMINATION OP CftOUNB MATCH
or
0- CONTAMINATION OF tUH'ACC HATCM
is
AR100038
I • ,. VIU. HAZARD DESCRIPTION (e
jt/o0
J. COHT*NIHATIOM Or AIH
(TO CL
?)
L. CONTAMINATION OP SOIL
II'A I'rr- rtJTC-S |IO-7tl
AR100039
VIII. HAZARD PgSCmPTION ftL»JL'J
V"
Te 1CCUMITV
f)
f £0
_; 1, tHCOWHATIILC W*»Tf I
AR100040
\.1 VIII. HA7.ARO DESCRIPTION rcoxxnucd)
(see V" ft*
J>u"> p/d $
»• .•~ fe>£ S /&/<-! ~tyovtr) ^UT~
ftpS d^CU£.#.'iJ&>
IX. POPULATION OiaECTLY AFFECTED BY SITE
• .LOCATION OF •. «p»no». NO.Or PIO^LC AFFf CTKD
or OUILOINOI TO IITCicclfr unlci>
IH VWBI-ICI.*
X. *AT_g.n ANp^HTpaOLOOICAL D A T A
, u rJ /f/v o t*j /J______t____u/vr:
I. NON-eOMMUNITVOlCONHtCTIOHI*
^J —*- COMMUMITT' > II CONNECTION*
FA F»- T1070-1 (IWf) PACE • OP 10
AR100041
. ••*•". '' • -t•"Can'inu.if F™» ftenl
XIV. PtRMIT INFORMATIONall ippLcBbl* pcimiiB Mid by th* «il* »nd prevtd* th* t«Und inlotmtucn.
• . IISOIWOA6IHCV
e. • KPIRATIONDATt
*. IN £OM»1.Utm*,* •*•!
XV. PAST REGULATORY OH ENFORCEMENT aCTIOMI
6Y
NOTE; Based on the information in Sections III throagh XV, (ill out the Tentative Disposition (Seaton II) informationon th* flnt page o( *hi» foim.
If* **.- TH7» {10-Ifl P»OC 'O of 11;
AR100042
tMHT M INVIIOWnNTM MfOUKIl
MMIMI of WMII ouuirr MANAMWMTMll Qi w*«l ttUMITT MKMff - M1CIM AMAl
QUALITAT IVE R E P O R T
g-PgQPftMCMO£
Q U A N T I T A T I V E R E S U L T S
twunw
CENTRAL OFFICE
•nnOHOW MCIMM POMn ON IN
AR100043
•^JH ,\—r " ' «~*-^°STREAMIBANOOU SAMH-t WATER OR WASTE QUALITY REPORT
i-r-t-t-i/k/iAR100044
3 D»FACILITY ttt»LI
H6*fctHA*IOO*l (AHPI.E
NITWDHK IAMF\I
COMMONWEALTH OF WMIVLVWIADtPMTUtHT O> ENVIRONMENTAL BESCHJSCta
•UHAU Of LAKHUTOHUS
WATER OR WASTE QUALITY REPORT
04863
!U 1-6 « (11 I I I I II I I I
AR100045
COWHOHWCOLTH or PEtMBTLVWlAMPMTUIHT or EWnWJHtlENIAl BIJOUBCtt
EFACU.ITT SAMPU
LAB.NumMr
WATER OR WASTE QUALITY REPORTAU CHtWCAL AHA1TMI EIPDEUEO M
fl4864
JO-S4J BUMAU SM7 *UH SAMPLE NUMBERM-I* STREAM •
i l l ! 3 [o |a *J i H I fa lo l j - lo I I I I M I I ITKIiUTAJIT TO:
•UTIVIKMMTM
1 1AOOmONM. Uuf ANALVMS
AR100046
1L
04873
tUNUU W4T *MM SAHCLINUIiMtNM-U
3io lo a|
AR100047
1
IfcE-
AR100048
FACILITY IAUPU
| STHIAhMUHDOU SAM 1^1
NETWORK MUFLt
COMMOMWCALIH OF riWiSTVIAHIAWtlrtNl DF CHVIIKMHtNru HESOUHCt*
KIPOU Of LAKHUTOflHI
WATER OR WASTE QUALITY REPORT
04866
Ul» SAMPlf NUMBER M-O tTHCAMHUIC
O 3J I I / I Al 0| 2.13 I I I I I I I I
AR100049
5 j| : ^ ^ ^2 ^ s t s /** T ?
<* • ^ f< -i
. rt l*?Jw
"J i
* P
*' x
^
V
iii-'.'iB1! 1!*!
AR100050
-,v. roTlHTlALHAXARMUtWAlTKtlTI.riHAL 1TRATECY DETIRHIHATIOH
• *tfr MI U,«- B**lrMMMiil pwWMlM AMMwn^
• *-• • • *'v«|».**",'•.•!' >^,H»' .* .-. r.-. ,":~1V> jTVWJ' --V,' 1..-jWSVJ J • .a-^'Slfcf-VM •-•'••...MMBWAk ACTWM NIUtD.Mirm MKrtrttCM AyAHAtbl t JBfe"A' i-« ' » • - - " • - < * ' • • . ' . *
Lbt »U <«••«•! MttM*. 'mA •• •w.
AR100051
I ~*d*
!t£
fe*
^-^f
fiflifr
i'jfr
-**',
*.'.v
AR100052
T'-b*<V
Q
si
i
/>
P.O. BOX 38, RARtTAN. N.J. 0886980O-526-3874 201 -526-3744
AR100053
COMMONWEALTH OP PFNNSYLVAN'A 'DFPARTMFNT OF E N V I R O N M E N T A L RESOURCES
OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL - EASTERN REGION1314 CHESTNUT STREET - 12th FLOOR
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19107-4786
Telephone: (215) 875-7486
JUKI* I*5 June 17, 1985
Mary Eberle, Esquire410 Market StreetPerkasie, PA 18944
RE: Merit Metals v. DER
Dear Mary:
Enclosed please find a final draft of a Consent Adjudication and Order tobe filed with the Board in order to settle this natter. The changes yourequested have been incorporated in the final draft. You have advised methat you will meet with representatives of Merit on June 24, 1985 and havethe Consent Adjudication executed. I will have the document executed byDER and then sent to the Board for adoption and publication.
Sincerely yours,
JOHN R. EMBICKAssistant Counsel
cc: William H. Jolly, III
JRE 10.5
AR100054
n35TT
-17.
(
C
C
tiJf e
c«""'
rL?
<2.
.v
P.O. BOX 38, RARITAN, N.J. 08869800,526-3874 . 201 -526-3744
AR100055
AiiACILIT A1PLE;TREAM/K~NDOM SAMPLE"ETWORK SAMPLE ___
CASE
BACTERIOL' ^AL ANALYSESLAB. NO. DATE RECEIVED
COLL, NUMBER
COUNTY
II
1 1?ll°1 1|OOm
Pk-WMUNICIPBOrv PROGRAM
TT5"
COLL.NAMI
Lolsi onr u D ETi - IB
01 I
yygyfrwX8 &C
I M/'T• •RelT
JJL
CARD)3).
1
(OPCODE (ALL CARDST4-16
Cntv
USGS-Q 30-34
Mun Est
AGENCY 35-37
Composite Samples:
DP/U 65
Case Fac
Sample No. 38-43
T/S66 Alq 67-68
19-24 KIND 29
STREAM NAME 44-57
Cond. 80Flow:
STATION DESCRIPTION:
HR
Type 59-60
Win
Sou rce 61 -62 Reason 63-64
Cl. Tot. mg/l(50060)
Cl. Fr«e mg/t(50064)
COMMENTS
Field Analysis
A/;?ANALYZED DATE
Total Coliforms(Par 1flD-»U——J3150__)
Fecal Coliforms(Per 100ml) . 3161__)—- —^^
Total Fecal Strep(Par 100ml) (3167__)
Total PlateCount (Per ml) (31751)
I i SAMPLE Exceeds Time Limits of*——> Standard Methods for Valid Analysis
AR100056
U
J
J
, j • E
- i np: i
.7. i^.
ii,-i
:; i—
iu
—
•t >
n _
rj
! - l.iJ
f<C
triI L
If-.. £=i-
-r ID
ii.tf; u-.
i_.i r:
i i
i t
:,"•
• - 10
-X
-T
! ."I •
'. U
l i
i L
L
' •
r '"""-' ; r_
*~- ;-«". («•>
L'—' '-O
rCF
t ID
:- —
-,-;^
!-• rr
Jl'-
i
-;- •:.• i
.r, ±3
o JM
rr-
31 _-:
:r tt\
' ^1
K
\j v
^
j :^"
?:!?-
yo, i "
y r^p^\' t.
i.-i 11.i
.._• y AJ
,- ;n
i- •-. ;-
f-l .=-
' -
!\'
1-
• C' t\.
,! ','l
^i.
-~•1
!.. ' _
i n • i.
t—
tr- :•-
;v ^
~ '-f ? ^
tn :*
-. ;•.
i<-
!"•'- : ' -
- • i "~
~
if' :
i '.
• :' .-
:-;;: ••-• •--
.-' 1 •
U!^
•', ;:B
in
-r
i — i
i i . r
1 1:E
-.1. ,7 i -
'ri rt
it !i_
i _• ". , >
• i
£:!::-! '- -':-;
1;"•
'" '•; rl
" J, ! •'-,••• -; 1 ;j; .;' •
.:: ;;" :;;
'- • t-
••-. ^
..' .
••
:>
..
..
. >
• .'
.1- .f
r-' --
.-• :T
r-' :-'
r r;
-^
: :; r . -'
- ' ;-/
r; J t-
1
:, :..
X I'", : V
!:-
; ! ; !"' :£ :V
:^ ™;:
::. i-;; ... !.: j.-. ;;. iv- !-. -;. If (. !i
: *" :•- ^r-
,r ;•• u.
r-' : • • -'
rz";-.
;. ...
t ...
),i •
r i. i
i ..
)L j.
:f . L
1
-1
' i
:c- .r,
••:••J .
-r
' .
r ".i r.'T
:? i? !!
:/ t,-i
|::--J
TJ- It
-I U
. 1..
'- '''
*?'
•r* .'..
i-• t-'.
ir-
!
AR100057
REV. 1-82 fV^TtxA-S
•• HC=N
ESTABLISHMENT
COUNTY
CARD (3)
1
,-"USGS4
2
330-34
Cnty
1
iTRIBUTARY TO:
10 CMun
OD
.r W«i
WAT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIADEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
BUREAU OF LABORATORIES
ER OR WASTE QUALITY REPORTALL CHEMICAL ANALYSES EXPRESSED IN
MG/L UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
CASE
:MUNICIPALITY 1
PVukE (
TALL C
EAHDSsi
BUREAU 35-37 A
71 0
)4-16Case
MIS
1
Fac
SAMF
O•LENUM
PROGRAM
XtuLA
1BER38-4C
3
TITU
8
DE4-
^
FACILITY
LAB. Number
Date Receive<
jrejeJCCOLL NAME.
10
1 07
LON
, tSTR
GITM
ftEAM
DE 11 18 DATEM
/lo /<4AME 44-57
19-24D Y
|
FULL DESCRIPTION WHERE SAMPLE TAKEN
Type Sample
Source of Sample
Reason Sampled
Com posit*Sample
FIELD ANALYSES
59-60
61-62
63-64
ProportionalUn lorm
TemporalSpatial
Aliquots 67-68
Flow
Condition Above • 1Be ow - 3
Stream Flow-CFS (00061)
Stream Flow-MGD (50051)
Pip* Flow-MGO (50050)
Gage Readlng-Ft (00065)
Temp (C
PH
0.0.
Hal
Spec Co
Appaara
Odor
HowSLegalRecehCondi
:)
nd
nee
hippSealred btion
(00010)
(00400)
(00300)
Cl (50060)
Br (71871)
(71866)
(00094)
(46001)
(01330)
Rfl
No.
y —
EstimatedMeasured
O
(
&
65
66
6,
•Jorma - 2 Flood - 5Mo Flow - 4 ao
< ( 0
CUSTODY LOG
£'P
3
Z.
3<<
ID (2)
cW
^
1_ Date
3f SfWl
Color
Turb
•*P3Spec Cond ]
Atk
pH4
HotpH8
Cold• >> T ' Sme \
^*— — _[s-Day HOC
I»T
TO
J
AI-Toiug/l|\
Cd-Tot ug/l \
Cr-Tol ug/l
Cu-To! ug/l
Fe-Tol ug/l
Mn-Tot ug/l
Ni-Tolug/1
Pb-Tot ug/ 1
Zn-Tot ug/l
k. /
(00080)
100070)
(00403)
(00095)
(00410)
(004361
(70508)(00435)
(0
(0
(0
(010
0680)
0340)
0310)
06650666
(01105)
(01027)
(01034)
(01042)
(01045)
(01055)
(01067)
(01051)
(01092)
LAB AN
•
3J— __ .
ALYSES
Date Analyzec
Total Sol ds
r?*r~[SUSP- Solids*•— ————— -
OQ«7»- -.i, ->
101283 f-"
TYPE TR
TIME 2Hr
019I
F
COLL NUMBER
STD ANALYSIS
SO5-28
Mlr
3 O
KIND 29
RELATIVE POINT 58
ADDITIONAL LAB ANALYSES
(00500)
) (00530)
Set Solids (00545)
-^ ——— .1 Total Diss Solids (OOJflS
NO?N >\
NO.N 1
NH.N 1
Kjel-N /
Hard nest
Ca
SO,
Cl
F
MBAS
'T***\Phenol** \«4li]_ )
Cyanjd*X
^
)
(00615)
(00620)
(00610)
(00625)
(00900)
(00916
(00927
(00945
(00940
(00951
1332601
Dr. (46002)
Os (32730)
(00720)
( i
'
/ /
'
,
,
~
Jl
i
ORIGINALAR100058
ER BWO*32 REV. 1-73NOTE: SEE COPY 2BEFORE 3 1 I N G
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIADEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
BUREAU OF WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENTWASTE DISCHARGE INSPECTION REPORT
DATE.
TIME,
LOCATION (STRE
ACRESUNDERPERMIT
ACRES ALREADYMINED
OPERATOR NAME VALID CERTIFICATE POSTED TELEPHONE NO
RESfONSIBtE OFFICI Z.EPHONE NO
INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTSEBSON INTERIEWED TELEPHONE NO
NUMBER OF UNITSTREATMENT PROCESS
LAWS. REGULATIONS OR PERMIT NO. & COND
SAMPLING POINTW&W QUALITY
REPORT NUMBER PHCHLOR
RES COLOR ODOR TEMP D.O.SPECCOND
AVG. DAILYFLOW (MOD)
RECEIVING STREAM APPEARANCE
IDENTIFICATIONCO
4-5
MUN
6-8
T
9
EST
10-11
CASE
12-13
FACNO. 1
FACNO. 2
FACNO 3
FACNO. A
DATE OFINSPECTION
INSPECTINGAGENCY
14-16 14-16 14-16 14-16 17-22
ts> y / f 7 r23-25
u,* ~TL
FACILITY NAME DIS. VOL. (MGD)
49-52
COMPLIANCE
FED
66
INT
67
FAC
68
OP
69
PERMITCOMP
70
OPEft-STAT
71-72
AR100059
ER BWQ 32 R|V. 4-77 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIAVRTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESO-^CES/BUREAU OF WATER QUALITY MANAGEME )WASTE DISCHARGE INSPECTION REPO...
/J -*> DATE
TIME
ESTABLISHMENT CASE LOCATIONJSTREET/STATE ROl.
OPERATOR NAME VALID CERTIFICATE POSTEDYESQ NOQ
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL ADDRESS
PERSON INTERVIEWED ADDRESS
TREATMENT PROCESS
kriActe. Pi&U Killed inKill -xtitie . YL* st*<KA. <CL+Ufc"M Rrl. O.V\cL
eJ.Kt Cctk«i CrttfcZon.i»iLk. fo, - 1° fi-f A/A Jfarhafe rfi^r^Art
h(!-/v\*wo&'^ ( i lAr.) rtl^^ r ^p* j
NUMBER OF UNITSTOT
- iuJceitv* |
A rltL^bJo
*<• \f\
fJL. ti
IN OP
Nv\ini
•<_ u«cdiA.»*tt
rlis(M /
^ l^'1
JTE) COUNTV
PL.TELEPHONE NO
TELEPHONE NO
0.
MUNICIPALITY
POP ACRES UNDERSERVED PERMIT
PROGRAM
ItUACRES ALREADYMINED
INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTSTELEPHONE NO. 1. 2.
REMARKSTAt/^-J.fjJ*./! .^f Fisl K*U PM IWk,
(rtjus .sUa(4 ntrtdt SuctifiVS . ^-'"-'^ -A*?»n\(i* ftt erWtJL • uikHt docxci - vcU <?f)S
K\«X*l CdL V-trilo ( l^-fr S^t' t'virt* I ^ JOO OCXS Li i ft i » i"
fi_^ D;i SC.TUi" rt Krtl- K(X<; «n, StvnAft.
r-lwur i is. ^>A/i^tnL -frrt.-^ -*i* c«w\ej o/ci. //5 «,///// /ure ewjJi*M4 Tlop
VffE ha H*.ore. no LI, •/
w* .<f CAc! «i; ii c._»4-
v LL /** .. Oi
f*2? -/!*<*. odtfr Q>di icrturij ^iflft nf Hfl/li^ rr<T v»w s4-f ^ \ n
f LUAU. 1 „ A/O
lio^i "Urt_C
otWruiPre iojy\.J.
SAMPUNG POINT ^BT NUMBER "H TS" -LOR ODOR TEMP *£
*=-*— <5^rn fa D#l*c>\3%3$7 • *v* * f " l ^ i3 r I •y.j f v - 7 3
IDENTIFICATION1 C CO MUN T EST CASE
SPEC AVG. DAILYCOND. FLOW(MGD)
tf0 (fM
FAC FAC FAC FAC DATE OF INSPECTINGNO. 1 NO. 2 NO. 3 NO. 4 INSPECTION AGENCY
2 A 4-5 6-8 9 10-11 12-13 14-16 14-16 14-16 14-16 173 x (UoT*Y)t MW*"Vi? 1 O II"iw . F,
+- ^ FACILITY NAME
^~~\
COMPLIADIS. VOL. (MGD) ——— , ——— ,-
FED INT F
49-52 66 67
^' \\\
' \
22 23-25
1 ^13 */ U
NCE PERMTT 0
AC OP ^ S'
\
PERFAT
58 69 70 7t-72
VIOLATIONSn< flwArt*.
•
^-t «
LAWS, REGULATIONS OR PERMIT NO. & COND.
RECEIVING STREAM APPEARANCE
NAME
Cr>U$ C^/c[>,,L fire,UL
ABOVE BELOWDIS APP DIS APP
O K- •*»£*•»
D^cfXj F*SH
PERSON INTERVIEWED (SIGNATURE)
TITLE AND DATE
INVESTIGATOR (SIGNATURE)r\ /~) Cl
TITLE AND DATE^^" £\/jv/0C tdrftSy AR100060
rBL-13.17/83
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIADEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
BUREAU OF LABORATORIES/J/ SPECIAL ANALYSES REPORT
Lab Number
Da.e Received
FACILITY COLL NUMBER
PROGRAM
/Of,COLL NAME/PHONE NUMBER r TYPE TR STD ANALYSIS
LATITUDE 4-10
1LONGITUDE 11-18
0
DATE 19-24
M D Y
i!2l2
TIME 25-28
Hr Min
01 O
KIND 29
cO
SAMPLE NUMBER 38-43 STREAM NAME 44-57 RELATIVE PCHNT58
FULL DESCRIPTION WHERE SAMPLE TAKEN •- f ADDITIONAL LAB ANALYSES
HowShippwl
CUSTODY LOG
Dale
Legal SMI No
R*Miwd by:
^ Seal Condition:QUALITATIVE REPORT
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE
ifttf- Aft
zs/M dL fatten AsrvuL
'
QUANTITATIVE RESULTS
ANALYSIS: UNITS:ANALYSIS CODE
ANALYST,. .'j}-\()jti-\ C(
RESULTS(SHOW DECIMAL POINTS ON LINES)
1
SIGNATURE
AR100061
REQU IMPNESTABLISHMENT
COUNTY
BACTERIOLOGICA' ANALYSES
CASE
MUNICIPALITY
LAB NO
1)27197FACILITY
DAT! RECEIVEDlainriftnFAEtrlOUS
PROGRAM CQI.L. NAME TYPE TR
RESULT
ID CODE (ALL CARDS) 4
Cmy Mun T Est Case Fac
LATITUDE 4-10 LONGITUDE 11 IB
0
DATE 19 24M D
TIME 25 28HFt Mm
KINO 29
4O ««
> O> "S
USGS Q 30 34 BUR/AMIS 35-36
0\ ISample No 38 43 STREAM NAME 44 57 Rel.Pt. 58 Type 59 60 Source 61 62 Reason
Composite SamplesP. U 65 T/S 66 Alq 67 68 Cond 80
FlowSTATION DESCRIPTION
USTODY LOGHOW SHIPPED.
LEGAL SEAL NO
R E C E I V E D BY__
CUST_r< i i-
'L- -reDATE _
CONDITION OF SEAL,
Field AnalysisCl Tot mg/l
(50060)Cl Free mg/l
(50064)COMMENTS
Total Co' i fO'ms(Per 100 mil (3150.
Fecal
Total Fecal Strep(Per 100 ml) (3167-
Total Plate
07 <? 9 9 £?0
'
iTD ANALYSISy A N A L Y Z E D BY
Count (Per ml) IJl/Dl)
DATE
/3-//S D SAMPLE Exceeds Time LStandard Methods (or Val
mits ofd Analysis •
AR100062
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYREGION III
W1 Ch**tnut BuildingPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania 19107
APR 1« 1991Bill BuchananMews of Delaware County
Dear Mr. Buchanan:
As you requested, enclosed is a copy of the "Field Trip
Report of Clearview Landfill" dated January 14, 1991. This
report summarizes the data which was gathered during the site
inspection in September 1990.
If you have any questions on the enclosed report, feel free
to call me at (215) 597-3165.
Sincerely,
Lorie AckerSite Assessment Section
Enclosure
cc: Leanne Nurse (3PAOO)
AR100063
