1/19

The Energy-System GMM Model for Integrated Assessment

Leonardo Barreto, Socrates Kypreos

Energy Economics Group. Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI)

ETSAP Meeting, Florence, November 24-25, 2004

2/19

Outline

•The Energy-System GMM model

•Technology clusters in GMM

•The passenger car sector

•The GMM baseline scenario

•Linking GMM to the MAGICC climate model

•Concluding remarks

3/19

The Energy-System GMM Model• GMM (Global Multi-regional MARKAL Model) developed at PSI • “Bottom-up” energy-system model with detailed supply technologies and stylized end-use sectors • Global, 5-region model, time horizon 2000-2050• Calibrated to year-2000 statistics• Clusters approach to technology learning• Transport sector emphasizing passenger cars• Marginal abatement curves for CH4 and N2O• CO2 capture and storage in electricity and hydrogen production• Other synfuel production technologies (H2, alcohols, F-T liquids)

4/19

Technology Clusters in GMM

• Clusters are groups of technologies that co-evolve and cross-enhance each other, among others by sharing common key components (learning spillovers)

• In GMM, 15 key learning components in electricity generation, fuel production, CO2 capture and passenger car technologies are included following Seebregts et al.(2000) and Turton and Barreto (2004)

5/19

15 Key Learning Components• Electricity generation technologies: Wind turbines,

Solar PV, advanced nuclear, gas turbine, stationary fuel cell (5)

• Synthetic fuel production: Gasifier, biomass-to-ethanol, steam methane reformer (3)

• CO2 Capture: Conventional coal power plants (post-combustion, natural gas CC (post-combustion), coal and biomass IGCC (pre-combustion), coal and biomass hydrogen production (pre-combustion) (4)

• Passenger cars: Mobile fuel cell, battery, mobile reformer (3)

6/19

Example of Technology Cluster

Gasifier(GSF)

Coal-Based IGCC Power Plant

Coal-Based Hydrogen Production

Coal-Based Fischer-Tropsch

Synthesis

Biomass-Based Hydrogen Production

Biomass-Based Fischer-Tropsch

SynthesisBiomass-Based

IGCC Power Plant

7/19

The Transportation Sector in GMM

•Passenger car sub-sector with technological detail in automobile technologies (ICEV, HEV, FCV)

•Aggregate air transport sub-sector at the final-energy level with only oil-based technologies

•Aggregate “other transport” sub-sector with generic technologies mimicking final-energy consumption

8/19

Passenger Car Demand in GMM

0

4000

8000

12000

16000

20000

2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

Car

Tra

vel (

billi

on v

ehic

le-k

m)

LAFMASIAEEFSUOOECDNAM

9/19

The GMM Baseline Scenario

•GDP, population, end-use demands (except for cars) and resource assumptions from SRES B2 scenario quantification with the MESSAGE model (Riahi and Roehrl, 2000; Rogner, 1997,2000) but a more fossil-intensive technology dynamics

•Primary energy consumption reaches 960 EJ and energy-related CO2 emissions reach 15 Gt C in the year 2050.

• World demand for passenger cars (vehicle-km) doubles by 2050

10/19

World Primary Energy

0

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

Wor

ld P

rimar

y En

ergy

(PJ)

RenewablesNuclearBiomassGasOilCoal

11/19

World Electricity Generation

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

Wor

ld E

lect

ricity

Gen

erat

ion

(PJ)

GeothermalWindSolarBiomassHydroNuclearGasOilCoal

12/19

Global GHG Emissions (CO2 ,CH4, N2O)

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

C-e

q em

issi

ons

(Mt C

-eq,

CO

2+C

H 4+N

2O)

N2OCH4CO2

13/19

Passenger Cars: Technology Mix

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

Glo

bal P

asse

nger

Car

s U

se (B

illio

n v-

km)

Hydrogen FCVMethanol FCVOil Products FCVHydrogen HEVCNG HEVOil Products HEVCNG ICEVOil Products Advanced ICEVOil Products ICEV

14/19

Key Components: Cumulative Capacity

1

10

100

1000

10000

2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

Cum

ulat

ive

Cap

acity

(GW

)

GasifierStationary Fuel CellMobile Fuel CellGas TurbineSolar PVWind TurbineNew NuclearBatteryStationary ReformerMobile ReformerBiomass-to EthanolCO2 Capture coalCO2 Capture gasCO2 Capture IGCCCO2 capture Hydrogen

15/19

Linking GMM to a Climate Model

•The energy-system GMM model has been linked to the simplified climate MAGICC model version 4.1 (Wigley, 2003)

•Energy-related CO2, CH4 and N2O emissions are computed by GMM. Non-energy-related emissions for these GHGs are extrapolated from U.S EPA (2003)

•Emissions for other GHGs are taken from the SRES-B2 scenario (SRES, 2000)

16/19

GHG Atmospheric Concentrations

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100

CO

2 Atm

osph

eric

Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pmv)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

CH

4,N2O

Atm

osph

eric

Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pbv)

N2O

CO2

CH4

17/19

Temperature Change and Sea-level Rise

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100

Glo

bal T

empe

ratu

re C

hang

e fro

m 1

990

(o C)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Glo

bal S

ea-le

vel R

ise

from

199

0 (c

m)

Temperature Change Sea-level Rise

18/19

Concluding Remarks

• The energy-system GMM (Global, Multi-regional MARKAL) model has been extended as follows:• Clusters approach to technology learning • Passenger car sector • Hydrogen and Fischer-Tropsch production

technologies and CO2 capture technologies• Marginal abatement curves for CH4 and N2O• Link to the climate model MAGICC

19/19

Acknowledgements

•The contributions of Hal Turton, from the Environmentally Compatible Energy Strategies (ECS) Program at IIASA, and Peter Rafaj, from the Energy Economics Group (EEG) at PSI, to these developments are highly appreciated. Several of the extensions in the GMM model are based on previous developments with the ERIS model at IIASA-ECS

•The support from the Swiss National Center of Competence in Research on Climate (NCCR-Climate) funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation is gratefully acknowledged

20/19

Support Slides

21/19

The Energy-System GMM Model

• Clusters approach to technology learning• Transport sector emphasizing passenger cars• Energy-carrier production technologies (H2, alcohols, F-

T liquids, oil products, CNG, etc)• Marginal abatement curves for CH4 and N2O• CO2 capture and storage (CCS) in electricity and

synthetic fuel production• Link to the climate MAGICC model

22/19

Reference Energy System in GMMOil

Natural Gas

Biomass

Other Renewables

Uranium

Coal

Refinery

Alcohol Production

Power Plants

Hydrogen Production

Heat Plants

CO2 Capture

CO2 Capture

Fischer-TropschSynthesis

T&DCompressed

Nat. Gas

CoalNat. GasBiomass

Res/CommThermal

Res/CommSpecific

IndustrialThermal

IndustrialSpecific

Cars

Air Transport

Aggregate other

Transport

Non-commercial Biomass

BiomassNat. Gas

BiomassCoal

T&D

T&D

T&D

T&D

T&D

T&D

23/19

Passenger Car Demand

• Based on estimates of vehicle-km per region for the year-2000 from Turton and Barreto (2004) and growth rates from WBCSD (2004) up to 2050

• Doubling of global vehicle-km traveled over the time horizon 2000-2050

• Faster growth in developing regions but a “car mobility divide” still persists towards the middle of the 21st century

24/19

Car Technologies in GMM

2020253711.060Hydrogen FCV

2020311070.735Methanol FCV

2020357360.656Oil products FCV

Fuel Cell Vehicles (FCV)

2020155980.814Hydrogen HEV

2010144980.658CNG HEV

2010143380.761Oil products HEV

Hybrid-electric Vehicles (HEV)

2000126250.19-0.32 CNG standard ICEV

2010128250.599Oil products advanced ICEV

2000124250.21-0.354Oil products standard ICEV

Internal Combustion Engine (ICEV)

Starting Date

Initial Investment Cost (US$2000 per car)

Fuel Efficiency (v-km/MJ)

Technology

Source: Adapted from Ogden, J.M., Williams, R.H., Larson, E.D., 2004: Societal Lifecycle Costs of Cars with Alternative Fuels/Engines, Energy Policy 32, 7-27.

25/19

Marginal Abatement Curves (MAC)

• Implementation of MACs for methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) following approach of MERGE (Manne and Richels, 2003) and ERIS (Turton and Barreto, 2004)

• Three categories: exogenous baseline, endogenous baseline, non-abatable emissions

• Data from the U.S EPA (2003) study, potentials are relative to baseline emissions

• Technical-progress multipliers to extrapolate abatement potentials beyond 2020

26/19

Technical Multipliers for Non-CO2 Abatement Potentials

0

50

100

150

200

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percentage of Baseline Emissions (%)

Aba

tem

ent C

ost (

US$

/ton

C-e

q)

Technical Multiplier2020 2050

27/19

Hydrogen Production and CCS• Hydrogen production from coal gasification, biomass,

gasification, steam reforming of natural gas, electrolysis, nuclear high-temperature reactors

• CO2 capture technologies for hydrogen production from coal, gas and biomass and electricity production from conventional coal, biomass and coal-based IGCC, NGCC

28/19

CO2 Emissions

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

Ener

gy-r

elat

ed C

O 2 E

mis

sion

s (M

t C)

LAFMASIAEEFSUOOECDNAM