Upload
allan-skinner
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The current status of HCV, HIV, HBV NAT screening
Ewa Brojer Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, Warsaw,
Poland
38.5 mln - population1mln donations/year
Serology - anti-HCV. anti-HIV, HBsAg
NAT - HCV RNA - since 2000
HIV RNA HBV DNA
•no anti-HBc
since 2005
Number of donationsMethod Tested HCV RNA positive Frequency
Cobas Ampliscreen48 donation
minipool3, 408, 142
491: 69,554
Chiron TMAsingle unit testing
268, 7003
1: 89,567
HCVcAgserological testing
345,0124*
1: 86.253
Total 4,021,854 56 1:71,819
HCV NAT results (March 2000 - Dec 2004)
High frequency of HCV ”window period” donors in Poland (2000-2004)
Number of donations
Tested anti-HCV(-)/ /RNA HCV(+)
USA 39 mln 170
EuropePoland excluded
50 mln 50
Poland 4 mln 56
Study of HCV „window period” donors
• anti-HCV seroconversion in all donors
• introduction of epidemiological questionaire to identify the source and date of infection
• „look back” studies of all repeat donors
Routine “Look back” samples individualy tested/ HCV RNA pos
Mini-pool NAT 26 / 1*
Single donation NAT 3 / 0
HCVcoreAg 1 / 0
*Cobas Ampliscreen positive/ Cobas Monitor negativepost-transfusion hepatitis C in the reciepient
HCV RNA detection in “ look back” samples of HCV RNA positive/anti-HCV negative repeat blood donors
• Reference Lab IHBT, Warsaw:
certification for all NAT Laboratories
• Cobas Ampliscreen (Roche):
24 donation plasma pools
• TMA HCV/HIV/HBV (Chiron):
single donations
Since 2005 - HBV, HCV and HIV NAT
BALTIC SEA
LITHUANIA
RUSSIA
BELARUS
UKRAINE
SLOVAKIA
CZECH REP.
SłupskOlsztyn
Zielona Góra
Wałbrzych
Wrocław
Łódź
Kraków
Radom
Kielce
Katowice
Opole
Szczecin
Lublin
Gdańsk
Bydgoszcz Białystok
Poznań
Kalisz
Racibórz
Rzeszów
WarszawaGERMANY
Why HBV DNA testing in pools „not larger than 24 donations”?
• Effectivity of plasma pool Cobas Ampliscreen testing revealed in preliminary study:
– 2 HBV DNA positives/60 000 dodations tested in 24 donation pools
• No preliminary studies with TMA single donation testing
• Higher sensitivity of Cobas Ampliscreen than Chiron TMA
• Lower price in tenders
HBV DNA detection in HBsAg negative blood donors
Method Tested Positives(frequency)
Discrepant*
Cobas„Pools”
182 382 21: 91 000
ChironSingle
donation
47 075 31: 16 000
9
*Discrepancies between ULTRIO and HBV Discrimination
Serological and molecular characteristics* of HBV DNA (+)/HBsAg(-) donors
Antibodies
HBc HBs HBe
HBeAg
DNAHBVcopies/ml
ALTMutation
in S region
1. Pos Neg Neg Neg 1,82x103 22 Gly145Ala
2. Pos Neg Pos Neg 1,14x102 18 No
3. Neg** Pos Pos Pos 9,55x104 19 nt
5. Pos Neg Pos Neg nt 29 nt
8. Pos Neg Pos Neg 1.26 x102 10 nt
*with participation of dr Zaaijer, dr Koppelman and dr Laperche
** HBsAg pos in PRISM test
Detected by:
mini-pool testing,single dontion testing
Examples of HBV Ultrio discrepant samples
ULTRIONo positives/ tested
Cobas isolation from:
Ultrio Discr: 850 ul 2ml*Final result Serology
3 //5 4 /10 7 /10 posPos
(~2 copies/ml)HBsAb(+)HBcAb(+)
1 / 5 1 /5 6 /10 pos Pos HBcAb(+)
1 /4 0 /3 not done posPos
(~8 copies/ml) negative
*Nuclisens Extractor (Organon Tecnika)
Examples of HBV DNA detection in Ultrio discrepant samples
ULTRIOCobas
isolation from:
No positives/ tested 850 ul 2ml*
Finalresult
Serology
Ultrio 1/ 4 0 pos 6 tested
Neg Neg Neg
Ultrio: 1/2Disc: 0/2
0 pos10 tested
Neg Neg Neg
*Nuclisens Extractor (Organon Technika)
Algorithm for HBV DNA detection in HBsAg negative donors
ULTRIO (+)
HBV Discrimination (+)ULTRIO ( +)
Discrimination (-)
Donor is
HBV DNA positive
(+) Cobas Ampliscreen
DNA from 2 ml of plasma by Nuclisens Extractor;
(-)
Repeat ULTRIO
Donor is
HBV DNAnegative
(+)
(-)