31
The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

  • View
    216

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

1

The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’

ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke

Page 2: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

2

Overview Outline

• Defining Terminology• Defining the Orientation Matrix – By Axial Rotation– By Physical Meaning

• Defining Orientation Effects – RPY Orientation Control– Euler and Robotic Orientation Control

Page 3: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

3

Symbol Interpretation

• Lower Case BOLD letters indicate vectors

• Upper Case BOLD letters indicate a Matrix

• Letters w/ “Hat” indicate Unit Vectors (Unbolded)

• Arrow Above 2 Uppercase Letters indication Start/Stop Points of a vector

r , s , d , a , b , cp , q , v , w , y , zω , α , θ , δ , φ

F , M , J

ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆˆ ˆ, , , , ,i j k I J K

ON��������������

Page 4: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

4

Symbol Interpretation

• Typically the Capitol Letters: A,T,Q & R indicate translational &/or rotation Transformation Matrices

• Transformation are often (Always?) between different Frames of Reference, thus:

• Here, B is a “Body” Frame and G is the “Ground,” “Global” or “Inertial” Frame – later is often labeled the 0 (zero) frame

(or alternatively)

(or alternatively)

G BB G

B GG B

T T

T T

Page 5: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

5

Symbol Interpretation

• Left “Superscript” on a vector indicates frame vector is expressed in– Here a vector ‘r’ expressed in ground

frame• Right “Subscript” on a vector

indicates ‘tip’ point that the vector points to– Here a vector ‘r’ pointing to point ‘P’

expressed in frame G – and implied it is also measured in G frame

Gr

GPr

Page 6: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

6

Symbol Interpretation

• Left Subscript in a vector indicates the Frame of measurement– Here we are

indicating a vector ending at point P as measured in the B Frame but Expressed in the G Frame

GB Pr

Page 7: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

7

Symbol Interpretation

• Right Subscript on angular velocity indicates a Moving Frame while left subscript indicates frame of measurement– Here angular velocity of Frame B w.r.t. G

Frame• Right Superscript on angular velocity

vector indicates frame in which velocity is expressed– Here angular velocity of Frame B1 measured

in G Frame but expressed into B2 Frame

G B

2

1

BG B

For more symbolic interpretations see the text Preface and lists at the end of each chapter!

Page 8: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

8

Dealing With Rotational Kinematics

Note: Vector r positioning point P can be defined in either Frame G (Xp,Yp,Zp) or in Frame B (xp,yp.zp)

Page 9: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

9

Dealing With Rotational Kinematics

• Typically we then need a “Quick” tool to relate these two definitions of the same point!

• Since we are talking about rotations only, we will develop an Orientation Transform to do this (Q)

• It is based in the “Inner Product” approach to geometric relationships

,G B

rot angler Q r

Page 10: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

10

Simple (single axial) Rotational Transformations

• About Z axis (by or rad):

• About Y axis (by or rad):

• About X axis (by or rad):

,

0

0 , about Z

0 0 1Z G

Cos Sin

Q Sin Cos

,

0

0 1 0 , about Y

0Y G

Cos Sin

Q

Sin Cos

,

1 0 0

0 , about X

0X GQ Cos Sin

Sin Cos

Page 11: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

11

A Plan View of a “Pure” Z-Rotation

Page 12: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

12

By Inner Products Meaning:

by Inner Products these two definitions are related:

ˆˆ ˆ

ˆ ˆ ˆ

ˆˆ ˆ ˆ ˆˆ ˆ

ˆˆ ˆ ˆ ˆˆ ˆ

ˆˆ ˆ ˆ ˆˆ ˆ

Bi i i i

Gi i i i

i i i i i

i i i i i

i i i i i

r x i y j z k

r X I Y J Z K

X I r I x i I y j I z k

Y J r J x i J y j J z k

Z K r K x i K y j K z k

Page 13: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

13

Leading to matrix Form:

ˆˆ ˆ ˆˆ ˆ

ˆˆ ˆ ˆˆ ˆ

ˆˆ ˆ ˆˆ ˆ

and by definition:

cos to

Here (example Z rotation):

ˆ ˆˆ ˆ to while 1

so

ˆ ˆ 1 1 ( ) (

i i

i i

i i

I i I j I kX x

Y J i J j J k y

Z kK i K j K k

a b a b a b

I i I i

I i Cos Cos

)

Page 14: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

14

Considering other terms:

ˆ ˆConsidering

ˆ ˆˆ ˆ to 90 & 1

ˆ ˆ 1 1 (90 )

ˆ ˆ (90) (90)

ˆ ˆ 0 1

I j

I j I i

I j Cos

I j Cos Cos Sin Sin

I j Cos Sin Sin

And so on …Until we achieve the original QZ, Matrix

Page 15: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

These Homogenous Transformation Matrices – A Physical Interpretation

1. A representation of a Coordinate Transformation relating the coordinates of a point ‘P’ between 2 like-geometrid (-- ie SO3 --) different coordinate systems

2. A representation of the Position and Orientation (POSE) of a transformed coordinate frame in the “space” defined by a fixed coordinate frame

3. An OPERATION that takes a vector rP and rotates and/or translates it to a new vector rP‘ in the same coordinate frame

These same concepts also apply equally to just the effect of simple (one axial) and complex ROTATIONAL operations as well

Page 16: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

16

Try an Example:

Now lets rotate about the G frames axes: 1st Z of 45; then X of 45; finally Y of 90. The question often asked is where is the P1 point

moved to?

Page 17: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

17

What it means (1)• The point on the

“body” is (5,30,10)G but it is also (5,30,10)B

and the two Frames are originally co-incident

• Looking at the first rotation we can build a rotational matrix:

1 1

,45

,45

,45

45 45 0

45 45 0

0 0 1

.707 .707 0

.707 .707 0

0 0 1

:

5 17.678 5

30 24.749 where 30 is

10 10 10

z

z

G BB P z P

Cos Sin

Q Sin Cos

Q

Thus

r Q r

Page 18: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

18

What it means (2)

• The body Frame (and the body point!) have now moved – as expected, [except for the Z coordinate]

• Now lets take the second rotation (about XG) by 45

• Leading to a new position:

,45

,45

'1 ,45

1 0 0

0 45 45

0 45 45

1 0 0

0 0.707 0.707

0 0.707 0.707

we seek:

17.678 17.678

24.749 10.429

10 24.571

GX

GX

G GX

Q Cos Sin

Sin Cos

Q

P Q

Page 19: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

19

What it means (3)• Again the point

and body frame geometry have changed (except for the X coordinate!)

• Finally lets take a look at the effect of the last Y rotation

,90

,90

"1 ,90

90 0 90

0 1 0

90 0 90

0 0 1

0 1 0

1 0 0

"Moving" the Body Point to:

17.678 24.571

10.429 10.429

24.571 17.678

GY

GY

G GY

Cos Sin

Q

Sin Cos

Q

P Q

But can’t there be an easier way than all of these individual steps – to get final B Frame orientation and a tool for finding the position?

Page 20: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

20

Turns out we can Multiply the 3 “back to back” – in reverse order to accomplish it!

, , ,

( is 90, is 45, is 45)

0 1 0 0 0

0 1 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 1

0 0 1 1 0 0

0 1 0 0 .707 .707

1 0 0 0 .707 .

G G G GZ X Y Y X Z

GZ X Y

Q Q Q Q

Q

Cos Sin Cos Sin

Cos Sin Sin Cos

Sin Cos Sin Cos

.707 .707 0

.707 .707 0

707 0 0 1

.4998 .4998 .707

.4998 .4998 .707

.707 .707 0

Page 21: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

21

Computed in MathCad

And note: Using this Matrix Product “Qeff” built in reverse order when multiplied by the original vector location of PB we get the same answer!

(whew!)

Page 22: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

22

Physical Focus on the Product Matrix

• It is the physical orientation of the Body frame after the three rotations taken w.r.t. the Ground frame

• 1st Column is the projection of xB to the Ground Frame’s axes• And note that each of the columns – or rows – is a unit vector

.500 .500 .707

.500 .500 .707

.707 .707 0

xB yB zB

XG

YG

ZG

Page 23: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

23

Now, What Happens if we “redefine” the Rotating Frame between each step?

• This should take us to a new place!• We can build this overall Orientation Matrix

too – but it must be different if it is ‘moving’ P1 to a new place!?!

• Lets guess that we need just reverse the individual matrix order before doing the overall product … well it sound good …

Our Text’s Author calls this “Local Rotation”

Page 24: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

24

What will it look like?1 2?

,45 ,45 ,45

0 1 0 0 0

0 0 0 1 0

0 0 1 0 0

.707 .707 0 1 0 0

.707 .707 0 0 .707 .707

0 0 1 0 .707 .707

B BG GZ X Y Z X YQ Q Q Q

Cos Sin Cos Sin

Sin Cos Cos Sin

Sin Cos Sin Cos

0 0 1

0 1 0

1 0 0

.500 .500 0.707

.500 .500 .707

.707 .707 0

Page 25: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

25

Now using this matrix (from MathCad)

A different final position (as expected) -- so changing frames of reference between individual operations can be “easily” accounted for by multiplying matrices – in the order of the individual operational events!

Page 26: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

26

So Why do I care in Robotics?

• We will be most interested in Orientation of the End Effectors

• In the “Real World” orientation is defined in various ways:– By Roll-Pitch-Yaw (RPY)– By Euler Angles (EA)

• We find– RPY defines orientation w.r.t. a fixed frame of reference– EA defines orientation in a relative sense with a simple

rotation about a base frame and two subsequent re-defined frames (one axial rotation about a single axis in each frame )• Zinit followed by Xinterm1 followed by Zinterm2

Page 27: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

27

RPY by our Text (I grew up with a different thought as to axis of Roll wrt Z and Yaw wrt X but it is of no consequence)

Meaning Globally

As applied Locally

Page 28: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

28

Considering Euler Angles

Initial Z rotation leads to orientation B’

Secondary X rotation Leads to orientation B”

Final Z rot leads to the final orientation B‴

Page 29: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

29

A last thought about these Q matrices

• The inverse of the matrix is simply its transpose!

11 12 13

21 22 23

31 32 33

11 21 31

12 22 32

13 23 33

then we find:

"transposed" since:

GB

G InverseB

G Inverse BB G

R R R

Q R R R

R R R

R R R

Q R R R

R R R

Q Q

Effectively the “inverse” is a mathematical way of looking at the ground from the viewpoint of the body frame so we must simply reverse which directions are ‘local’ and which are ‘remote’ as the matrix was fundamentally defined

Page 30: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

30

Looking at this Idea (From last MathCad effort)

Wow – That worked!So we can “move” round and round and then back again with

the Orientation matrices

Page 31: The Concepts of Orientation/Rotation ‘Transformations’ ME 4135 -- Lecture Series 2 Fall 2011, Dr. R. Lindeke 1

31

Summary• Orientation effects can be “accounted for” by using a directed series of

Simple Rotations about individual axes when they are multiplied in an appropriate order

• The Orientation Matrix (NQM) defines the axes (XM, YM, ZM) – of the M frame – in the space defined by the N Frame

• The inverse of a Q matrix is simply its transpose and it is (REALLY) just the space being define with the original subscript and superscript exchanging roles (rows exchanged for columns in the 3x3 matrix)!– That is (NQM )

-1 MQN

• Using a Q matrix we are able to define geometries known in the M space into the N space (either way in reality!)

• These Orientations are of interest to robotics in the various ways we define the orientation problem of robot manipulation