35
The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison Irina Sandu, Andy Ackerman, Peter Blossey, Chris Bretherton, Johan van der Dussen, Adrian Lock, Stephan de Roode, Bjorn Stevens

The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

  • Upload
    sienna

  • View
    42

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison. Irina Sandu, Andy Ackerman, Peter Blossey, Chris Bretherton, Johan van der Dussen, Adrian Lock, Stephan de Roode, Bjorn Stevens. Lagrangian analysis of the air mass flow. How?. Trajectories + Re-analysis + Satellite data. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

The composite Lagrangian cases:LES intercomparison

Irina Sandu,

Andy Ackerman, Peter Blossey, Chris Bretherton, Johan van der Dussen, Adrian Lock, Stephan de Roode, Bjorn Stevens

Page 2: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Lagrangian analysis of the air mass flow

MODIS (Terra, Aqua)AMSR-E

ERA-INTERIMHYSPLIT(ERA-INTERIM)

Trajectories + Re-analysis + Satellite data

2002-2007 (May to October in NE, July to December SE)Starting time: 11 LT, Duration: 6 days, Height: 200m

How?

When?

Where? Klein&Hartmann (1993) zones : NE/SE Atlantic, NE/SE Pacific

NEA

SEA

NEP

SEP

Sandu, Stevens and Pincus, ACP, 2010

Page 3: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

An ensemble of composite cases: slow, intermediate and fast transitions

CF MODIS

SST LTS D

3 days

refslowfast

Composites NEP JJA 2006-2007

Page 4: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Our questions

Are the LES able to reproduce:

the observed changes in cloudiness induced by changes in the SST/LTS?

the transition’s pace and its dependence on the inversion strength?

Do they agree in term of :

The decrease in cloud albedo and cloud cover during the 3 days

The time evolution of the cloud fraction

The growth rate of the boundary layer

Page 5: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Outline

Simulations : initial conditions, requirements, models

First results for the reference case

The fast/slow cases

Conclusions & Next steps

Page 6: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Composite REF case : NEP - JJA 2006-2007Initial profiles (10 LT) Forcing

Calipso

Time (days)

l (K) qt (g/kg)

u (m/s) v (m/s)

Time (days)

D (x106 s-1)

SST (K)

Page 7: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Initial conditions l

ql

SST

refslowfast

Cts divergence (the same)No advective tendency

Page 8: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Simulations

initial time : 10 LT, duration: 72 hours

initial date: 15 July (but 15 June for UCLA )

diurnal cycle of solar radiative forcing taken into account

cloud droplet number concentration: 100 cm-3

resolution : x = 35m, z = 5m (at cloud top)

domain size : 4.48 X 4.48 X 3.2 km (128 x 128 X 428 points)

Page 9: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Models & participants

UCLA-LES (Irina Sandu)

DALES (Johan van der Dussen, Stephan de Roode)

UKMO (Adrian Lock)

SAM (Peter Blossey, Chris Bretherton)

DHARMA (Andy Ackerman)

REF FAST SLOW

Page 10: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Outline

Simulations : initial conditions, requirements, models

First results for the reference case

The fast/slow cases

Conclusions & Next steps

Page 11: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Difficult to compare to the observed cloud cover

( ! Qualitative comparison only)

UCLA

Page 12: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

The simulated SCT (UCLA – big domain)

Albedo decreases by 41 %

Page 13: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

The simulations capture the major observed features of the SCT, and corroborate the conceptual model proposed by Bretherton (1992) to explain it

CF

w’v’

UCLA

Page 14: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Do the models agree? (I –time series)

Page 15: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Do the models agree? (I – time series)

Page 16: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Hopefully, it does not matter a lot…

Page 17: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Do the models agree ? (II – decoupling)

UCLA SAM DALES DHARMA

w’v’ (10-4 m2/s3)

Page 18: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Do the models agree ? (III – cloud fraction)

Cloud fraction

UCLA SAM DALES DHARMA

Page 19: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Do the models agree ? (IV – entrainment rate)

Page 20: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Do the models agree ? (V – FT state)

l qt ql

CFqr w’’v

w’2

SW

LW

Page 21: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Do the models agree ? (V – FT state)

l qt ql

CFqr w’’v

w’2

SW

LW

Page 22: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Do the models agree ? (V – FT state)

l qt ql

CFqr w’’v

w’2

SW

LW

Page 23: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Is there a drift in time ? (UCLA)

1h12h24h36h48h60h68h

Page 24: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Is there a drift in time ? (SAM)

1h12h24h36h48h60h68h

Page 25: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Is there a drift in time ? (DALES)

1h12h24h36h48h60h68h

Page 26: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Is there a drift in time ? (DHARMA)

1h12h24h36h48h60h68h

Page 27: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Outline

Simulations : initial conditions, requirements, models

First results for the reference case

The fast/slow cases

Conclusions & Next steps

Page 28: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Slow against fast SCT (UCLA – big domain)

Page 29: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Slow against fast SCT

Page 30: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Role of the inversion strength

Page 31: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Role of the inversion strength

Boundary layer growth rate during the first 24 hours

Page 32: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Conclusions

LES reproduce well not only the main features of the SCT, but also subtle details like differences between slow and fast transitions (UCLA)

The SCT timescale is mostly related to the strength of the temperature inversion capping the Sc topped boundary layer (UCLA)

striking resemblance of the 4 simulations of the reference case (differences well rather understood)

Page 33: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison

Next steps

fix l,qt at 3km

check why LWD is different in DHARMA (fix LWD)

correct surface fluxes in UCLA-LES

re-run the 3 cases (same domain) - perhaps just the reference case in the beginning

Page 34: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison
Page 35: The composite Lagrangian cases: LES intercomparison