Upload
grssieee
View
761
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Advances in the generation of deformation time series from SAR data sequences in areas affected by large dynamics
IREA-CNR Napoli, Italy
F. Casu, A. Manconi, A. Pepe, M. Manzo, R. Lanari
IGARSS 2010 – [email protected] 2010 – [email protected]
SummarySummary
This approach has been tested on an ENVISAT ASAR data archive (Track 61, Frames 7173-7191) related to the Galàpagos Islands, focusing on Sierra Negra caldera (Galapagos Islands).
Results have been finally compared to continuous GPS measurements.
In this work, we applied the SBAS strategy to the sequence of the range and azimuth Pixel-Offset estimates, achieved from the same set of small baseline data pairs.
Therefore, to exploit conventional InSAR time series algorithms (such as the PSI or the Small BAseline Subset ones), which are phase based, would become extremely difficult.
In areas characterized by large and rapid deformation dynamics, deformation can not be easily retrieved by exploiting conventional InSAR, due to high fringe rates (possible PhU problems) and misregistration.
A way to overcome this limitation is to exploit the amplitude information.
IGARSS 2010 – [email protected] 2010 – [email protected]
Key idea of the SBAS algorithm Key idea of the SBAS algorithm (Berardino et al. 2002)(Berardino et al. 2002)
For each coherent pixel, the time series deformation is computed by searching for an LS solution with a minimum norm constraint (the SVD method is applied).
IGARSS 2010 – [email protected] 2010 – [email protected]
Why small baseline data pairs?Why small baseline data pairs?
Small baseline InSAR interferograms are less affected by noise effects (decorrelation) and are easier to process (registration / unwrapping steps).
ENVISAT Amplitude: Galàpagos
Baseline: 1000mBaseline: 40m
IGARSS 2010 – [email protected] 2010 – [email protected]
Further constraints: deformation amountFurther constraints: deformation amount
Conventional InSAR Possible PhU problems Co-Registration problems
Eruptive eventEruptive event
IGARSS 2010 – [email protected] 2010 – [email protected]
Conventional SBAS-InSAR results: GalàpagosConventional SBAS-InSAR results: Galàpagos
26 ASAR Envisat scenes, T61In collaboration with F. Amelung
Azi
mu
th
?
Sierra Negra
Fernandina
IsabelaOctober, 21st
2005
<-3
>3cm
/yr
IGARSS 2010 – [email protected] 2010 – [email protected]
Pixel-Offset SBAS (PO-SBAS): key ideaPixel-Offset SBAS (PO-SBAS): key idea
We exploit the AMPLITUDE information in order to retrieve deformation in areas characterized by large dynamics.
In particular, we apply the well known SBAS approach to the Pixel-Offsets retrieved via cross-correlation of the amplitude (AMPCOR routine) relevant to small baseline SAR image pairs.
Note that, we may directly use the already registered SAR image pairs computed to generate the SBAS-InSAR time series.
IGARSS 2010 – [email protected] 2010 – [email protected]
Why (again) small baseline data pairs?Why (again) small baseline data pairs?
Perp. Bas. 40m Perp. Bas. 1000m
IGARSS 2010 – [email protected] 2010 – [email protected]
Pixel-Offset SBAS (PO-SBAS): “good pixels” vs. baselinePixel-Offset SBAS (PO-SBAS): “good pixels” vs. baseline
Small Baseline Constraint
Quadratic relationship
IGARSS 2010 – [email protected] 2010 – [email protected]
PO-SBAS results: GalàpagosPO-SBAS results: Galàpagos
RangeAzimuth (mostly North)
Conventional SBAS-InSAR maskPixel-Offset SBAS mask
<-3
>3cm
/yr
IGARSS 2010 – [email protected] 2010 – [email protected]
Validation of RANGE displacements: SAR vs GPS Validation of RANGE displacements: SAR vs GPS time seriestime series
GPS data from Chadwick, et al. 2006, Geology
GV01GV03
GV05GV02
GV06
GV04
SAR- GPS
IGARSS 2010 – [email protected] 2010 – [email protected]
Validation of AZIMUTH displacements: SAR vs GPS Validation of AZIMUTH displacements: SAR vs GPS time seriestime series
GPS data from Chadwick, et al. 2006, Geology
GV03
GV02GV04
SAR- GPS
IGARSS 2010 – [email protected] 2010 – [email protected]
GV03
GV04
GV06
Validation of displacements: SAR vs GPS Validation of displacements: SAR vs GPS baseline changebaseline change
GPS Estimates,from Geist, et al. 2008, Bull. of Volc.
IGARSS 2010 – [email protected] 2010 – [email protected]
Summary Summary accuracy ca. accuracy ca. 1/201/20 of pixel of pixel
IGARSS 2010 – [email protected] 2010 – [email protected]
Conclusions and further developmentsConclusions and further developmentsWe present the results achieved by exploiting the amplitude information in order to retrieve deformation in areas characterized by large dynamics (eg. Volcanic and Seismogenic areas).
We show that the well known SBAS approach can be successfully applied also to the Pixel-Offsets retrieved via cross-correlation of the amplitude relevant to small baseline SAR image pairs .
We obtain deformation time series relevant to displacements in both range and azimuth direction in areas where no interferometric phase could be exploited; the achieved accuracy is of about 1/20 of pixel.
The exploitation of higher resolution SAR images (TERRASAR-X, COSMO-Skymed) is envisaged.
The retrieved offset information can be further used in order to properly register the analyzed data pairs, thus “restoring” the possibility of generating interferogram sequences, following Sang-Ho Yun et al., GRL, 2007.
IGARSS 2010 – [email protected] 2010 – [email protected]
Pixel-Offsets: X-Band case studyPixel-Offsets: X-Band case study
12-Jan-2010 Haiti earthquake, Mw 7.012-Jan-2010 Haiti earthquake, Mw 7.0
COSMO-SkyMED, X-band, COSMO-SkyMED, X-band, wavelength wavelength ~ 3.1cm~ 3.1cm12-Dec-2009 / 21-Jan-2010 Spotlight SAR images12-Dec-2009 / 21-Jan-2010 Spotlight SAR images1 meter ground resolution1 meter ground resolution
Am
plit
ud
e Im
ag
e
Azi
muth
Range
IGARSS 2010 – [email protected] 2010 – [email protected]
low coherence
1.56
0cm
Ph
ase
COSMO-SkyMED, X-band, COSMO-SkyMED, X-band, wavelength wavelength ~ 3.1cm~ 3.1cm12-Dec-2009 / 21-Jan-2010 Spotlight SAR images12-Dec-2009 / 21-Jan-2010 Spotlight SAR images1 meter ground resolution1 meter ground resolution
Azi
muth
Range
Pixel-Offsets: X-Band case studyPixel-Offsets: X-Band case study
Interferometric PhaseInterferometric Phase
IGARSS 2010 – [email protected] 2010 – [email protected]
low coherence
>50
<-50
cm
Ran
ge O
ffse
ts
COSMO-SkyMED, X-band, COSMO-SkyMED, X-band, wavelength wavelength ~ 3.1cm~ 3.1cm12-Dec-2009 / 21-Jan-2010 Spotlight SAR images12-Dec-2009 / 21-Jan-2010 Spotlight SAR images1 meter ground resolution1 meter ground resolution
Azi
muth
Range
Pixel-Offsets: X-Band case studyPixel-Offsets: X-Band case study
Range Amplitude Pixel-Offset MapRange Amplitude Pixel-Offset Map
IGARSS 2010 – [email protected] 2010 – [email protected]