Upload
grssieee
View
454
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Geodetically Accurate InSAR Data Processor for Time Series Analysis
Howard Zebker, Piyush Shanker, Cody Wortham, Scott Hensley
Stanford University and Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Modern applications need better geodetic accuracy
• InSAR and time series methods (PS, SBAS) require precise SLC alignment from a variety of orbits
• Merging SAR data with other types needs geolocated and orthorectified products
• Processing many scenes (typically dozens) of one area needs to be efficient and on the desktop
Need for new processor
• Existing processing packages largely geodetically inaccurate
• Pixels placed at wrong place
• Lots of resampling to find offsets, and this is where many processors fail
• Now have precise orbits
• Multicore processors have untapped cycles we can use to speed up processing time
Approach
• Use precise orbits to find exact (~10 cm error) satellite position
• Choose a reference orbit for multiple scenes so images are nearly aligned – small offsets
• Reference orbit not physically realizable without constant acceleration, so it’s “virtual”
• Use motion compensation method to make spacecraft “fly” on chosen trajectory
• Be careful to keep geometrical info throughout
Definitions for orbital geometry
Reference orbit
Orbit track projected on reference sphere
Coordinate origin at center of sphere with local Earth radius of curvature
Point to be imaged
Instantaneous squint angle
Remember the basics
Phase and range relations
Doppler relations
Focus and position equations in our geometry
SCH coordinate system
rc – local radius of curvature, not Earth radius
s – along track distanceon local sphere from reference point
c – across-track distance on local sphere
h – height above local sphere
Geometry for motion compensation distance and phase
Actual satellite positionSatellite position on reference orbit at same squint direction
(Figure is projection of imaging geometry onto the reference sphere)
Finding the position on the reference orbit for an actual spacecraft location
Motion compensation distance calculation
Motion compensation baseline is difference between actual range r’ and reference orbit range r
Motion compensation algorithmDerivation of reference distance r:
Mocomp distance and phase corrections:
Phase history for mocomped scatterer
Compare phase histories for ract(t) and r(t)
Focus corrections
Quadratic phase correction from processing at wrong distance:
Frequency domain phase term from range-varying motion compensation phase:
Topographic correction
• Processor computes SLCs assuming perfectly spherical Earth
• No easy closed form solution for position so use iterative method to find pixel location in 3-space
• Apply phase correction based on pixel elevation
Iterative topography correction
Topographic phase correction:
Impulse response
Impulse resolution: 5.3 m range, 4.0 m azimuth
Figure for mocompbaseline of 1500 m(InSAR baseline 3km)
Single look complex image of SFO
Geodetic accuracy – Pinon Flat Corner Reflector Locations
Latitude Longitude Latitude LongitudeMeasurement (deg) (deg) error (m) error (m) Reflector aligned with ascending orbit InSAR location, 33.61233 -116.4570 9 -18unregistered image
InSAR location, 33.61215 -116.4567 -11 9registered image
Ground GPS 33.61225 -116.4568 -- --survey Reflectors aligned with descending orbit InSAR location, 33.61215 -116.4579 -11 0unregistered image
InSAR location, 33.61213 -116.4577 -13 18registered image
Ground GPS 33.61225 -116.4579 -- --Survey
InSAR location, 33.60729 -116.4517 -9 9unregistered image
InSAR location, 33.60727 -116.4516 -11 18registered image
Ground GPS 33.60737 -116.4518 -- --survey
Geodetic accuracy – Image offsets from SRTM DEM
Range offset Azimuth offset Additional stretch
Scene at center (m) at center (m) Range (m) Azimuth (m)
Ventura -15.8 18.2 9.4 15.2
Hawaii -21.5 24.0 14.1 25.4
Iceland 2.0 2.9 44.0 29.4
Ventura, CA – Atmospheric phases
Hawaii – deformation plus atmosphere
Iceland – significant ionospheric artifact
Correlation images
Ventura Hawaii Iceland
Computational efficiency
• Implemented on multicore desktop using F90 and Python scripting
• Computational modules parallelized with OpenMP
• Typical ALOS interferogram ~2-4 minutes
• Working with JPL to produce a package to be distributed to community
• At present we use a standalone version compiled under *nix
Summary
• InSAR and time series analysis requires precise image pixel locations
• Imprecise locations make processing slow and unreliable
• With precise orbits, motion compensation, and particular geometry processor equations are fairly simple and efficient to compute
• Accuracies of 10 m easy to achieve, probably 1 m with further development