TES 211E_ PROJECT III

FALL 2020_monday& thursday_ assoc.prof.dr. özge cordan & res. assist. sıla burcu başarır

> course description and purpose

The Project III course provides the student with the ability to read, write, speak and listen effectively, ability to gather, assess, record, apply and comparatively evaluate relevant information within the coursework and design processes. Critical thinking - conceptualizing - interpreting - problem definition and problem solving are the main stages of the studio.

The main objective of the course is enabling the students to perceive, investigate, interpret, and analyze human - space - object (product) - environment relationships in the context of Nature and Culture, to gain creative problem solving skills and to gain the expertise in using the fundamental terminology of the profession. Students can develop design alternatives in relation with the natural, cultural and conceptual context and by taking into consideration the structural, material, construction parameters related to the scale of design through this course.

> studio milieu & projects descriptions

The aim of the studio is to design a comprehensive interior architectural project. Thus the students are

expected to address the design issues through experimenting, and pushing their abilities to assess,

select and integrate appropriate combinations of spatial elements, palettes of interiors, aesthetics and

building technologies into the design solutions. The students are expected to keep a written/visual log

of their design process in a project diary; where they keep their sketches, notes and ideas regarding

their projects. These project diaries will be included in the assessment process. The students are

expected to use various techniques (drawings, diagrams, collages, writing etc.) in representing his/her

ideas.

The project investigates ‘inhabiting’ and ‘interiority’ issues in very poetic natural and cultural context of Cappadocia. “Void”, as a metaphorical understanding of these relationship, is chosen as a driven design concept to explore the dialogue between culture and nature, urban and interior, inside and outside, program and envelope, sequence and boundary. “Void” can also be defined as a mediator for investigating design possibilities and doing research related to place and subject. It can also be defined to explore the potential of void for becoming space. In this sense, the students are expected to define the subject and scenario, and the potential user for the given space. The design proposals reinterpret the context while providing new design scenarios for users.

During the semester, other activities such as virtual field trips, seminars, juries are considered to support ongoing activities related to studio process. The participation to these activities are mandatory.

> methodology

The design research will be done by “situation analysis”, including an initial research to get data from literature review, interview and environmental walkthrough, survey analysis and so on, and presented through mapping, diagrams, drawings and conceptual study and physical / digital models. These methods will be carried out throughout the whole semester and will address ‘magnitudes, relationships and processes of interventions and space’ rather than defining ‘form’. Representations of physical space and form will be through rendered collages in mixed media (and software) rather than photo-realistic renders. Subsequently, the individual process can be supported by sketches, photos or movies, diagrams, charts or any graphic information that can influence the design methodology.

> evaluation criteria & expected learning outcomes

Evaluation criteria and expected learning outcomes are applicable for all projects.

Reflection of interdisciplinary learning and graphic representation: Integrating interdisciplinary learning and representation techniques into individual projects.

Situation analysis and group presentation about the site, proposals about the site, by using posters, mapping and diagramming, sketches, photographs and field notes.

Common Module (CM) / Common Seminars + Workshop

Common activities contain three seminars and a workshop, which are detailed below.

CM/S1: “Measurable” by Sevim Aslan

This seminar will offer students an insight to theory and practice of measuring, surveying, and

documenting in architecture. The students are expected to put into practice the gained insight in their

term projects where they deal with measure, scale, and representation.

CM/S2: “Immeasurable” by Aslıhan Şenel

This seminar will offer a critique of traditional mapping practices, which claim objectivity in knowledge of

place, and propose an alternative view towards producing multiple and subjective knowledge of a place

in architecture. The students are expected to put into practice the gained point of view in their term

projects where they deal with observation and representation.

CM/S3: “Video Making, Online Archive, and Visual Material” by Özge Çelikaslan

This seminar will be the start of the one-month video making workshop of our Common Module. It will

offer students’ knowledge and philosophy on video making as a critical and creative tool in documenting

and representing a place. The students are expected to put into practice the gained knowledge and

point of view through their collective video in the Common Module Workshop.

CM/W1: “Video Making as an Architectural Storytelling Tool”

This workshop will give students the opportunity to use the Internet as an open source in making a video,

work collectively across disciplines in order to understand and represent a place, and create a living

archive for further architectural studies. There will be experts to give students specific technical

knowledge and direct towards sufficient references and resources. The task will include each student to

bring together knowledge of a place gathered remotely and in situ, develop an architectural storytelling

technique and make a tripartite video produced by a group of students responding to each other.

Research

Preparation of a booklet about the site of the main project. Presentation and discussions on design, culture and nature.

Main Project

Group discussions and presentations about the site, seminars, proposing initial ideas and developing individual proposals/projects about the site.

Activities Quantity Effects of

Grading

ASSESSMENT

CRITERIA

COMMON MODULE

Outcome Submissions

1 % 10

MIDTERM EVALUATION

Jury Evaluations

3 % 50

FINAL EVALUATION

Final Submission

1 % 40

* Minimum requirements for final submission:

• Mapping and diagrams

• Technical drawings (plans, elevations, sections (in appropriate scales, which will be announced later)

• 3D expressions (different types of perspectives)

• Storyboards, transcripts, serial sections, models

• Panoramas

• Students may use additional materials.

• Digital versions will be uploaded to a drive folder (will be announced).

> studio attendance

• It is important that students attend the studio and actively participate in all the activities/discussions carried out/held during the course hours.

• 70% Attendance (Students are only allowed a maximum of 5 absences. The 6th absence will automatically cause the student to fail the course.)

• In case of justified absence (extended health issues) it is required an official declaration from an official entity (official doctor’s report or similar).

> grades

• AA (Excellent) _work is exceptional in exceeding the stated problem objectives and requirements and in showing solid evidence of creativity and/or insight; a high level of proficiency is evident; salient issues are clearly mastered.

• BA (Very Good) _work exceeds the minimum stated requirements of the problem and addresses the stated objectives well, shows evidence of creativity and/or insight, work shows that salient issues are understood well, reveals superior skills for this level of expectations.

• BB (Good) _work meets important objectives and requirements in the project statement; shows good evidence of creativity and/or insight, and respectably developed; evidence of understanding the salient issues, fine skills for this level of expectations.

• CB (Satisfactory) _work meets the essential objectives and requirements in the project statement; shows some evidence of creativity and/or insight, though not well developed; some evidence of understanding the salient issues, reveals suitable skills for this level of expectations.

• CC (Sufficient) _work meets the minimum objectives and requirements as specified in the problem statement; shows little or insignificant creativity or insight; little or trivial understanding prominent issues; work only reveals the minimum expectations required for this level or it is significantly incomplete.

• FF (Fail) _work meets failure to address the minimum objectives as specified in the project statement; substantially incomplete work; excessive absences from studio; failure to submit required course work; reveals the inability to perform conceptually and practically at the level of competency for this studio level.

> schedule

Week Date Module Studio Topic Method

week 1 October

19 Mo 22 Thu

P CM

Introduction to the studio CM/S1:“Measurable" Sevim Aslan

Site Survey:

Photos, Movies, Audios, Sketches, Charts, Diagrams Mapping, Drawings

week 2 October 26 Mo

P Seminar: “Negative Space”, Aslı Özbay Virtual Excursion to Cappadocia

Presentation

Photos, Movies, Audios, Sketches, Charts, Diagrams Mapping, Drawings

29 Thu

NATIONAL HOLIDAY

week 3 November 02 Mo 05 Thu

CM CM/S2: “Immeasurable” Aslıhan Şenel Reading WS

Presentation Situation Analysis

Poster Sketches + Charts, Diagrams + Tech drawings

week 4 November 09 Mo 12 Thu

P Studio Sketch& Narrative&Scenario

Layout Sketches + Charts, Diagrams + Tech drawings

week 5 November 16 Mo 19 Thu

P CM

Jury I

CM/S2: “Video Making, Online Archive, and Found Visual Material” Özge Çelikaslan

Presentation & Crit

Mapping+Sketches + Charts, Diagrams + Tech drawings+Conceptual Study+

week 6 November 23 Mo 26 Thu

P

Studio Pin-Up 1

Layout Presentation & Crit

Mapping+Sketches + Charts, Diagrams + Tech drawings+Conceptual Study+Physical7Digital Model

week 7 November December

30 Mo 03 Thu

P Studio Layout+3D Study model + Tech drawings + 3D

week 8 December 07 Mo 10 Thu

P Studio Layout+3D Study model + Tech drawings + 3D

week 9 December 14 Mo 17 Thu

P Studio Layout+3D Study model + Tech drawings + 3D

week 10

December 21 Mo 24 Thu

P CM

Jury II

CM/W1: “Video Making as an Architectural Storytelling Tool”

Presentation & Crit Presentation & Crit

Study model + Tech drawings + 3D Video making

week 11

December 28 Mo 31 Thu

P Studio

Layout+3D Study model + Tech drawings + 3D

week 12

January 04 Mo 07 Thu

P Studio Detail Design Study model + Tech drawings + 3D detail drawings

week 13

January 11 Mo 14 Thu

P Studio

Detail Design Detail drawings

week 14

January 18 Mo 21 Thu

P Jury III Studio

Presentation & Crit Detail Design

Study model + Tech drawings + 3D detail drawings

Final * Final Submission

NOTE: The Schedule prevails unless the instructor will inform otherwise. In case of alteration, this will be done both by verbally (during studio hours) and by writing (email and studio posted announcement). *It will be announced later…

> references

1. Aran, K. Barınaktan Öte; Anadolu Kır Yapıları, (2000) Tepe Mimarlık Kültürü Merkezi, Ankara.

2. Bachelard, G., (1961) La Poétique de l’espace, Presses Universitaires de France. (1996, Mekanın Poetikası, Kesit Yayınları)

3. Berger, J., (2013), Bento’nun Eskiz Defteri, Metis Yayınları.

4. Borges, J.L., (1999) Kum Kitabı, İletişim Yayınları 5. Borges, J.L., (2007) Ficciones: Hayaller ve Hikayeler, İletişim Yayınları. 6. Calvino, I., (2002) Görünmez Kentler, YKY

7. Günçe, K., İç Mimarlik Stüdyosunda Boşluk Üzerinden ‘İç’in Kurgulanma Deneyimi, İÇMEK Bildiriler

Kitabı, İKÜ, İstanbul, 88-101.

8. Harmanşah, Ö. (1997) Mekansal Hikayeler-Kentin Kalbine Bir Yürüyüş, Mimarlık Dergisi, 274:22-25

9. Lefebvre, H., (1991), Production of Space, çev: Donald Nicholson Smith, Blackwell. 10. Lefebvre, H.,(1996), "The Right to the City", in Kofman, Eleonore; Lebas, Elizabeth, Writings on

cities, Cambridge, Massachusetts Wiley-Blackwell. 11. Pallasmaa, J., (2011), Tenin Gözleri, YEM Yayın 12. Perec, G (2017) Mekan Feşmekan, Everest Yayınları. 13. Perrot, M (2013) Odaların Tarihi, YKY 14. Wagenfeld, M., 2011, The Porous-City: Atmospheric Conversations of the Urban I Interior, Urban

Interior Informal Explorations, Interventions and Occupations, Edited by Rochus Urban Hinkel, Spurbuchverlag, Germany.

15. Yürekli, H. & Yürekli, F. (2004) Mimarlık Bir Entelektüel Enerji Alanı, Yapı Yayın.

16. Whyte, W. (1979) Belgesel Film: ‘Social Life of Small Urban Spaces’, The Street Life Project, Municipal Art Society of New York.

17. Şamlıoğlu T. ve Kuloğlu N., (2011) Formdaki Boşluğu Tasarlama Sürecinde ‘Kavramlar’, 23. Uluslararası Yapı Yaşam Kongresi, Bursa, 189-197.

18. Şamlıoğlu, T. ve Kuloğlu, N., (2009) The Concept of Void as Spatial Eff ect, Livenarch IV, Proceedings Volume I, Vizyon Printing, Trabzon, 145–162.

Internet Sources

https://architizer.com/blog/inspiration/collections/lyon/ https://futurearchitectureplatform.org/projects/d2b51dec-11c0-41a7-9e8d-292674cc8160/ http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12618085/index.pdf

> project area

UÇHİSAR EVLERİ

ZEMİN KAT PLANI

Çizim: Özlem Ayan-Melike Uzer

Kesme taş ve moloz taş duvar kesiti

Kaya kesiti

Tarih: Şubat 2001

Kontrol: Feyza Cansever

Ölçek:1/200

PROJE:

MAL SAHİBİ:

577

599

600

581

592

621

620

581

618 619

603

604

605

376

576

KOMŞU ODA

KOMŞU ODA

KOMŞU ODA

578 PARSEL

KOMŞU PARSEL

KOMŞU PARSEL

579 PARSEL

KAYABASI SOKAK

V.D.: Beşiktaş V.N.: 7820057284

Acısu Sok. No. 8 / 2, 80680 Vişnezade, Beşiktaş / İst.

Tel.: 0. 212. 260 19 08 Fax: 0. 212. 260 60 86

Mimarlık, Peyzaj Mimarlığı, Restorasyon, San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti.

V.D.: Göztepe V.N.: 8430000881

Tel.: 0. 216. 449 02 48 Fax: 0. 216. 336 83 57

Gazimuhtarpaşa Sok. No. 20 / 4, Feneryolu / İst.

TEZYİNMİMARLIK, DEKORASYON, DANIŞMANLIK VE TİC. LTD. ŞTİ.

UÇHİSAR EVLERİ 1. AŞAMA

FİKİR PROJESİ

PAFTA . 02

BEZiRHANE EVi

576

376

605

604

603

619 618

581

620

621

592

581

600

599

577

PROJE:

Ölçek:1/200

Kaya kesiti

Kesme taş ve moloz taş duvar kesiti

1. KAT PLANI

UÇHİSAR EVLERİ

KOMŞU ODA

KOMŞU ODA

579 PARSEL

KOMŞU PARSEL

KOMŞU PARSEL

578 PARSEL

KOMŞU PARSEL

KAYABASI SOKAK

MİMARLIK, DEKORASYON, DANIŞMANLIK VE TİC. LTD. ŞTİ. TEZYİN

Gazimuhtarpaşa Sok. No. 20 / 4, Feneryolu / İst.

Tel.: 0. 216. 449 02 48 Fax: 0. 216. 336 83 57

V.D.: Göztepe V.N.: 8430000881

Mimarlık, Peyzaj Mimarlığı, Restorasyon, San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti.

Tel.: 0. 212. 260 19 08 Fax: 0. 212. 260 60 86

Acısu Sok. No. 8 / 2, 80680 Vişnezade, Beşiktaş / İst.

V.D.: Beşiktaş V.N.: 7820057284

MAL SAHİBİ:

Tarih: Şubat 2001

Kontrol: Feyza Cansever

Çizim: Özlem Ayan-Melike Uzer

FİKİR PROJESİ

UÇHİSAR EVLERİ 1. AŞAMA

PAFTA . 03

BEZiRHANE EVi

KOMŞU ODA

UÇHİSAR EVLERİ

Kesme taş ve moloz taş duvar kesiti

Kaya kesiti

Ölçek:1/200

PROJE:

577

599

600

581

592

621

620

581

618 619

603

604

605

376

576

579 PARSEL

KOMŞU PARSEL

KOMŞU PARSEL

578 PARSEL

KAYABASI SOKAK

Tarih: Şubat 2001

Kontrol: Feyza Cansever

Çizim: Özlem Ayan-Melike Uzer

MAL SAHİBİ:

V.D.: Beşiktaş V.N.: 7820057284

Acısu Sok. No. 8 / 2, 80680 Vişnezade, Beşiktaş / İst.

Tel.: 0. 212. 260 19 08 Fax: 0. 212. 260 60 86

Mimarlık, Peyzaj Mimarlığı, Restorasyon, San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti.

V.D.: Göztepe V.N.: 8430000881

Tel.: 0. 216. 449 02 48 Fax: 0. 216. 336 83 57

Gazimuhtarpaşa Sok. No. 20 / 4, Feneryolu / İst.

TEZYİNMİMARLIK, DEKORASYON, DANIŞMANLIK VE TİC. LTD. ŞTİ.

FİKİR PROJESİ

UÇHİSAR EVLERİ 1. AŞAMA

BEZiRHANE EVi

PAFTA . 04

KOMŞU ODA

2. KAT PLANI

59 m²

16.8 m²

DIŞ TERAS≈87 m²

17.25 m2

HOL31.5 m2

KÜÇÜK MAHZEN52 m2

MUTFAK geçiş ??

WC

ŞAPELÜST KAT PLANI ALT KAT PLANI

15.74 m²

100

253,26

243

223,06

316,83

156,49

65

65

286,48

96,02

73

24,91

93

286,31

38,79

23,52

29,98

SHAPEL: ALT KAT 132 m2 + ÜST KAT 112 m2 = 244 m2