18
Technological Developments in Fiber Glass for Lightweight Automotive Components Juan Camilo Serrano SPE ACCE 2012

Technological Developments in Fiber Glass for … · Technological Developments in Fiber Glass for Lightweight Automotive Components Juan Camilo Serrano SPE ACCE 2012

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Technological Developments in Fiber Glass for Lightweight Automotive Components

Juan Camilo Serrano

SPE ACCE 2012

Outline

• Technology Drivers

• Technology developments through the value chain

• Automotive composites – Reinforcements and technologies

• Fiber reinforcement landscape

• Areas of reinforcement opportunity (Fiber Glass) – High stiffness: Structural beams

– High stiffness: Exterior body panels

– High strength/Toughness: Integrated components

– High temperature: Under the hood components

– Impact/Energy management: Underbody panels

• Summary

Technology Drivers

Drivers for the utilization of composite materials in automotive applications include: – New CAFE standards for fuel economy

– Reduction in CO2 emissions

– Recyclability

*Source US Department of Energy, US Department of transportation.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

New

Veh

icle

Fu

el E

con

om

y (m

pg)

Passenger car

Domestic

Imported

passenger car CAFE

Light truck CAFE

Light truck (<8,500 lbs GVWR)d

1nm 1μ 1mm 1cm

Technology developments through the value chain

Sizing Chemistry (strength, process ability)

Fiber Composition (strength + stiffness)

Fiber Volume Fraction (strength + stiffness)

Insert bumper

beam photo

Automotive composites – Reinforcements and technologies

High potential for light weighting

Fiber reinforcement landscape

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

50 60 70 80 90 100

Fib

er

Ten

sile

Str

en

gth

(M

Pa)

Tensile Modulus (GPa)

S Glass

R Glass

INNOFIBER XM Fiber Glass

INNOFIBER HP Fiber Glass

E Glass

Target Value Proposition : 1. Higher stiffness composites

2. Higher energy absorption

composites

Lighter, thinner parts

*Strand tensile strength and modulus per ASTM D2343

Glass composition changes to drive performance

Glass composition combined with state of the art sizing technology

• Yarn-based product for specialty fabrics

• High strain to failure

• High strength

• Low density

• Low CTE

New family of fiber glass compositions

Proprietary sizing technology for thermosets

Proprietary sizing technology for long fiber thermoplastics

• Direct draw roving product

• High modulus of elasticity

• High fatigue performance

Additional benefits

Low density glass compositions, global footprint and competitive cost structure further enhance the value proposition

*Fiber density measured with helium pycnometer

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Rel

ativ

e Fi

ber

Co

st (

x E-

glas

s)

Relative Fiber Cost

2.65 2.61 2.55

2.49 2.41

1.7

1.5

1.7

1.9

2.1

2.3

2.5

2.7

2.9

E-Glass INNOFIBERXM Fiber

Glass

R Glass S2 Glass INNOFIBERHP Fiber

Glass

Carbon

Fib

er

De

nsi

ty (

g/cc

)

Fiber Density

Solutions for semi-structural parts

Higher stiffness glass composites – Lighter weight / thinner parts

*Testing performed according to ISO 527-5. FVF measured by ISO 1172. Values represent average of 5 test specimens. Thermoset and thermoplastic resins included.

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

40 45 50 55 60 65 70

UD

Co

mp

osi

te T

en

sile

Mo

du

lus

(GP

a)

Fiber Volume Fraction (%)

E-Glass

INNOFIBER XM Fiber Glass

Leveraging fiber glass reinforcements in automotive applications

Image sources: PPG Marketing and Communications, Department of Transportation, www.magna.com

Case 1. Bumper beam

Beam material Area Density Weight* Moment of Inertia (MOI) E E * MOI Weight savings

m2 kg/m3 kg cm4 GPa %

Steel beam 0.0006 7850 9.8 16.5 200

3300

0

E-Glass/epoxy beam 0.0027 1948 9.7 80.7 42 -0.9

INNOFIBER XM Fiber Glass/ epoxy beam

0.0021 1926 7.6 71.4 46.5 -22.7

Combining higher material properties with innovative design can result in equivalent stiffness parts with considerable weight savings

Steel Baseline

Load direction

*Composite mechanical properties : HYBON 2026 XM rovings, 1200 gsm UD stitch-bonded fabric laminates & epoxy resin

E-Glass Solution INNOFIBER XM Fiber Glass Solution

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

Car

bo

nFi

ber

Lam

inat

e

Alu

min

um

INN

OFI

BER

® X

M F

iber

Gla

ssC

om

po

site

E-G

lass

Co

mp

osi

te

PC

/AB

S

Stee

l

We

ight (g)

Th

ick

ne

ss

(m

m)

Thickness

Weight

Case 2. Exterior body panels Higher stiffness: INNOFIBER XM fiber glass composites can further reduce body panel thickness and weight.

48” x 36” plate with dummy distributed load. All edges simply supported. All plates designed for equivalent flexural stiffness

*Deformation calculations performed per guidelines on Roark’s formulas for stress and strain.

INNOFIBER XM fiber glass data obtained from [0/90] HYBON® 2026 XM roving & vinyl ester prepreg laminate (ISO 14125)

Industry standards

Case 3: Integrated components

New grades of PP specific sizing products continue to push the envelope of mechanical performance for semi structural applications.

Industry standards

Case 3. Under hood components

Nylon grade LFT sizings continue to advance towards higher strength and impact performance where higher temperature is a concern.

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

ASH%

DENSITY (g/cc)

TENSILESTRENGTH

(MPa)

FLEXURALSTRENGTH

(MPa)

UN NOTCHEDCHARPY

IMPACT (kJ/m2)

NOTCHEDCHARPY

IMPACT (kJ/m2)

4510 - 60GF PA 4588 -60GF PA

114

97

33

38

190 234

1.66 57%

362

310

16% improvement in notched charpy 18% higher un-notched charpy 16% higher flexural strength 23% higher tensile strength

Industry standard TUFROV 4510 Direct Roving

Industry standard TUFROV 4510 Direct Roving

Improved Impact performance for glass fiber laminates • ~7% lower specific gravity than E-Glass

• ~25% higher strain to failure than E-Glass

• ~9% higher strength than E-Glass

100% 218% 0%

50%100%150%200%250%

E-Glass INNOFIBER® HPFiber Glass

Energy to Maximum Load*

100% 132% 0%

50%

100%

150%

E-Glass INNOFIBER® HPFiber Glass

Total Energy Absorbed*

*LVI performance of equivalent 7781/epoxy prepreg laminates. Hemispherical impactor

Case 4. Underbody panels

INNOFIBER HP fiber glass laminate

E-Glass laminate

Hybrid composites with INNOFIBER HP fiber glass for improved damage tolerance of carbon fiber laminates.

Case 5. Exterior body panels

CF laminate CF + INNOFIBER HP fiber glass

laminate

Higher energy absorption and damage tolerance for carbon fiber structural laminates

*LVI performance measured on 3mm BIAX NCF carbon fiber epoxy laminates and INNOFIBER HP fiber glass (7781 fabric)

CF + 1 layer INNOFIBER

HP fiber glass

CF + 2 layer INNOFIBER

HP fiber glass

Summary PPG’s studies have shown that combining innovative design practices with new generation of fiber glass products for automotive can result in:

INNOFIBER XM Fiber Glass: 1. 22% weight savings compared to steel bumper beams.

2. 9% weight savings in comparison to Fiber Glass body panels and equivalent weight to Aluminum based body panel solutions.

INNOFIBER HP Fiber Glass: 1. 32% total energy absorbed compared to E-glass laminates and potential

for hybrid body panel solutions

TUFROV G-LFT products: 1. ~18% in flexural strength and ~30% in impact properties for PP GLFT

applications.

2. ~16% in impact properties and ~18% in flexural properties for PA GLFT applications.

Thank you for your attention

For more information

Contact:

Juan Camilo Serrano

[email protected]