Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Systems for Moving Forward
Systems for Moving Forward
Collaborative Instructional Review
Teacher Evaluation and Support System
Professional Development
Collaborative Instructional Review Process
CIR Model Rationale
Leadership density
Power of teacher
participants
Power of Conversations
Continuous Improvement
in Action
Train all principals in year 2; LOL members in year 3 CHANGE Train campus teams, including
admin and teachers, over 3 years
Criteria for Selection
Campuses that participated in this year’s pilot automatically in
first campus cycle
Cost considerations: three-year cycle
Consider capacity of a cohort, for instance: 1 high
school = 1 cohort
Balance across feeder patterns
Capacity for new initiative
OHI adaptation scores
CIR Model Rollout Plan
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Haltom HSNorth Ridge MSSmithfield MSWatauga MSGreen Valley ESHoliday Heights ESAWBDavid E. Smith ESSmithfield ESACFTGT Interventionists
Birdville HSShannon HSNorth Richland MSHaltom MSNorth Ridge ESMullendore ESSpicer ESBirdville ESFoster Village ESWalker Creek ESRichland ES
Richland HSRichland MSNorth Oaks MSMajor Cheney ESSnow Heights ESPorter ESStowe ESW. T. Francisco ESHardeman ESWatauga ESBinion ES
CIR Participant Panel
Students
Campus
Professional
Rationale for T-TESS
Collaborative&
supportive cultures
Develop habits of self-assessment, reflection, and adjustment
Formalize what highly
effective teachers do
Why change from PDAS?
PDAS 1997INTENDED to be a
professional development system
Became system focused more on
compliance with rules
Education has evolved, so evaluation needs to
follow
T-TESS seeks to create open, collaborative environment with focus
on instructional and professional improvement
What is T-TESS?
Standards
Preparation
Recruitment
Hiring and Induction
Evaluation and
Professional Development
Rewards and Retention
What is T-TESS?
Goal-Setting and
Professional Development
Process10%
Student Growth-Student Learning Objectives
-Value-add scores-Portfolios
-District Pre and Post tests20%
ObservationDescriptive
Rubrics for Each Domain
70%
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System
Three Keys of Evaluation
Ongoing
Relationships
Formative and Timely
T-TESS Domains
Planning Domain
Instruction Domain
Learning Environment Domain
Professional Practices and Responsibilities Domain
Observation Dimensions
Domain: Learning Environment Classroom Environment, Routines and Procedures
3.1Managing Student Behavior
3.2Classroom Culture
3.3
Domain: InstructionAchieving Expectations
2.1Content Knowledge and
Expertise2.2
Communication2.3
Differentiation2.4
Monitor and Adjust2.5
Scripted Evidence and
Rubric Ratings
Practice = Performance
Teacher Self-Assessment and Goal-Setting Process
Post-Conference Plan
What is T-PESS?
Self-Assessment
and Goal Setting
Student Growth or Progress
*student growth increases with tenure in an
assignment
Rubric
Texas Principal Evaluation and Support System
Feedback from Pilot Districts
“This was one of the easiest things we changed this year.”
“I know more about my teachers because of this instrument.”
“Teachers invite me into the classroom more because they see that this is a growth model.”
“Teachers love seeing their appraiser multiple times.”
“Everyone understands that everyone needs to grow.” “Teachers are able to evaluate themselves.”
Comments from Burleson ISD Principals:
Pilot Lessons Learned
Clear, consistent message of support and growth
The rubric is central
Questioning skills - conferencing
It takes time, but time spent is worth it
The “proficient” signal
Feedback from Pilot Districts
• T-TESS Materialswww.teachfortexas.org
• T-PESS Materials http://www4.esc13.net/pdas
• Tim Regal, Director of Educator Evaluation and Support, TEA
Resources
Alignment to BISD Vision
Planning
Collaboration
Student Engagement
Rigor
Relevance
Embracing Change
PDAS or T-TESS?
Implications
• Merging of evaluation and professional development
• A lot to manage – eduphoria launching new program
Implications
Implications
• Merging of evaluation and professional development
• A lot to manage – eduphoria launching new program
• Individual PD Plans and meetings between teachers/appraisers
• Need for more on-demand learning opportunities for teachers/PLCs
• Very much in line with the work we’ve been doing – we have been getting our teachers ready for this!
Timeline
2014-15 • 60 pilot districts• Feedback and data collection
2015-16 • Pilot extended to 200 districts• Refinement
2016-17 • Statewide rollout
Discussion & Decision
Pilot schools 2015-16, add
remaining schools for
2016-17
A
Cohort 1 Cohort 2 Cohort 3
15-16 CIR T-TESS
16-17 T-TESS CIR T-TESS
17-18 CIR
Discussion & Decision
Pilot schools 2015-16, add
remaining schools for
2016-17
Pilot schools 2015-16 and then decide
how to move forward
No pilot 2015-16, all
schools begin 2016-17
Continue using PDAS
with no support from
TEA
A B
C D
Summer PDElementary Conference
Secondary Conference
Gifted and Talented
Advanced Academics
Abydos
Admin Leadership Conference
Administrative Leadership Conference, July 28 - 29
DestinationClassroom Practice
RouteLeading for Learning
RecalculatingMaking Adjustments
DeviceTools and Resources
Session Proposals Due May 1
birdvilleschools.net/GPSadmin
March Leaders of Learners
District POP
Campus POP
Plan for Leading
What’s Next in BISD
