327
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] WEEKLY LIST No. 33 OF 2019 FROM : 10-12-2019 To 12-12-2019 CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA NOTE :- [ ON 10.12.2019 ] REGULAR HEARING SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate 1 C.A. No. 2011/2008 IX NISHIKANT SUKERKAR SHOBHA GUPTA[P-1] Versus GOVT. OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF MINES AND ORS. ANKUR S. KULKARNI[R-1], V. K. VERMA[R-1], E. C. AGRAWALA[R-1], DIVYAKANT LAHOTI[R-1], ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1], SHISHIR DESHPANDE[R-2] {Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } Connected C.A. No. 2232/2008 IX FERROMET CONCENTRATES J S WAD AND CO[P-1] Versus STATE OF GOA AND ORS. ANKUR S. KULKARNI[R-1], MUKTI CHOWDHARY[R-1], E. C. AGRAWALA[R-1] {Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } 2 C.A. No. 2162/2009 IV-A POP SINGH PAWAR AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAIN Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS. 3 C.A. No. 999/2007 X UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus M/S. MOOL CHAND INDUS. ESTATE P.LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SHRI MOOL CHAND AGARWAL SANJAY JAIN Connected C.A. No. 1000/2007 X MINISTRY OF FINANCE SECRETARY B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus M/S BHAWANI PLASTICS ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI SUDEEP AGARWAL SANJAI KUMAR PATHAK Connected C.A. No. 1003/2007 X UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE JOINT SECRETARY (TRU) B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus INDO GERMAN BRAKES PVT. LTD. DIRECTOR SH. VIPUL DAWAL Connected C.A. No. 1002/2007 X UNION OF INDIA .DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS (CDEC) JOINT SECRETARY AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus WHALE STATIONERY PRODUCTS LTD. C.E.O. SHRI MUKESH GUPTA

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 33 OF 2019 FROM : 10-12-2019 To 12-12-2019

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTHON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEERHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

NOTE:-[ ON 10.12.2019 ]

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 C.A. No. 2011/2008

IXNISHIKANT SUKERKAR SHOBHA GUPTA[P-1]Versus

GOVT. OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARYMINISTRY OF MINES AND ORS.

ANKUR S. KULKARNI[R-1], V. K. VERMA[R-1],E. C. AGRAWALA[R-1], DIVYAKANTLAHOTI[R-1], ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1],SHISHIR DESHPANDE[R-2]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 2232/2008IX

FERROMET CONCENTRATES J S WAD AND CO[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF GOA AND ORS. ANKUR S. KULKARNI[R-1], MUKTICHOWDHARY[R-1], E. C. AGRAWALA[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }2 C.A. No. 2162/2009

IV-APOP SINGH PAWAR AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAINVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS.

3 C.A. No. 999/2007X

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. MOOL CHAND INDUS. ESTATEP.LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SHRIMOOL CHAND AGARWAL

SANJAY JAIN

ConnectedC.A. No. 1000/2007X

MINISTRY OF FINANCE SECRETARY B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S BHAWANI PLASTICS ITSPROPRIETOR SHRI SUDEEP AGARWAL SANJAI KUMAR PATHAK

ConnectedC.A. No. 1003/2007X

UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OFREVENUE JOINT SECRETARY (TRU) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusINDO GERMAN BRAKES PVT. LTD.DIRECTOR SH. VIPUL DAWAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 1002/2007X

UNION OF INDIA .DEPARTMENT OFREVENUE CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISEAND CUSTOMS (CDEC) JOINTSECRETARY AND ANR.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusWHALE STATIONERY PRODUCTS LTD.C.E.O. SHRI MUKESH GUPTA

Page 2: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTConnectedC.A. No. 1005/2007X

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THESECRETARY (TRU) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. INDIAN RUBBER PRODUCTSTHROUGH ITS PARTNER M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedC.A. No. 1011/2007X

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS JOINTSECRETARY (TRU) AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusWHALE GRAPHIC (INDIA) P. LTD.THROUGH ITS CEO SHRI MUKESHGUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 1015/2007X

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE JOINTSECRETARY (TRU) AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. TITAN INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ORS. RAJAN NARAIN

ConnectedC.A. No. 1013/2007X

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE JOINTSECRETARY B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S INDIAN LPG CYLINDERS (A UNITOF VISHAL EQUITY SERVICES PVT.LTD.) THROUGH GENERAL MANAGERSHRI H

ConnectedC.A. No. 1412/2007X

UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

M/S. B.K. WIRE INDUSTRIES LTD. DEBASIS MISRA, NEERAJ KUMARSHARMA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1414/2007X

ASST. COMMNR., CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S STEEL POINT SOLE PROPRIETORSHRI A.K. ARORA

ConnectedC.A. No. 2111/2007X

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFFINANCE THROUGH ITS SECRETARY B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SHAKTI STEELS . AND ORS. SANJAY JAIN

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7315/2007X

SECY.,DEPT.OF REVENUE,C.B.E.C. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND RABIN MAJUMDER

ConnectedC.A. No. 2824/2007X

UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OFINDUSTRIAL POLICY AND PROMOTIONMINISTRY OF COMMERCE ANDINDUSTRIES AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusMAHINDRA MANAGING DIRECTOR E. C. AGRAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No. 2823/2007X

JOINT SEC.TO THE GOVT.OF INDIA ANDORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S ZEBRA ZIPPERS PVT LIMITED SHRIRAMESH KUMAR ARORA

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 13159/2007X

M/S. SANT STEEL AND ALLOYRS PVT.LTD. SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA

VersusGOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND ORS.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23674/2007X

L. V HEAT EXCHANGERS M. P. DEVANATH

Versus

Page 3: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTGOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

4 C.A. No. 3566/2009IV-A

SHAMBULINGAPPA HANUMAPPATHIMSANI ANJANA CHANDRASHEKAR

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

5 C.A. No. 10031/2011IV-A

SHAKILA BEGUM GAURAV AGRAWALVersus

SANDHYA RAO . AND ORS. MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJ, RAM SWARUPSHARMA, ASHOK KUMAR SINGH

ConnectedC.A. No. 10032/2011IV-A

SALIKA (SHAKILA) BEGUM GAURAV AGRAWAL

VersusGEETA GUPTA . AND ORS. ANURADHA MUTATKARFOR ON IA 5/2009

6 C.A. No. 6806/2010IX

UDAYSINHA SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARIVersus

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS. CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI, NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 10875/2010IX

DEVANAND SAHEBRAO ROCHAKARI SUNIL KUMAR VERMA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDANR.

VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU, NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

7 C.A. No. 6648/2008IX

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,CANTONMENT BOARD AND ORS. ANDORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusKARAN SINGH CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI

8 C.A. No. 6048/2008XII-A

THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER II ANDANR. G. N. REDDY[P-1]

VersusM/S VIJAYAVANI EDUCATIONALINSTITUTION BALAJI COMPLEXNANDYAL

ConnectedC.A. No.7390-7396/2008XII-A

THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

Versus

M/S GOWTHAM RESIDENTIALJR.C0LLEGE G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No.6883-6885/2008XII-A

THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER II ANDANR. G. N. REDDY[P-6]

VersusM/S ST. JOSEPHS EDUCATIONALSOCIETY C. S. N. MOHAN RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 6431/2008XII-A

THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER INANDYAL AND ANR. G. N. REDDY[P-2]

VersusM/S KESHAVA RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL

ConnectedC.A. No. 7461/2008XII-A

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,BENZCIRCLEVIJAYAWADA G. N. REDDY[P-1]

VersusM/S GOWTHAM RESIDENTIAL JUNIORCOLLEGE G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

Page 4: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTConnectedC.A. No. 7385/2008XII-A

THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER BENZCIRCLE G. N. REDDY[P-1]

VersusM/S GOWTHAM RES.JUNIOR COLLEGEAND ANR. G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 138/2009XII-A

STATE OF A.P. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

VersusM/S VIKAS MAHILA RESIDENTIALCOL.GUNTUR G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 6054/2008XII-A

COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIALTAXES AND ORS. G. N. REDDY[P-1]

VersusM/S SRI CHAITANYA EDUCATIONALCOMTTTEE C. S. N. MOHAN RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 2401/2009XII-A

THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER G. N. REDDY[P-1]

VersusM/S NARAYANA COACHING CENTRE G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 87/2010XII-A

THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER G. N. REDDY[P-1]

VersusM/S JAWAHAR BHARATHI DEGREECOLLEGE AND ANR. A. V. RANGAM[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 149/2016XII-A

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER GUNTUR PRABHAKAR, G. N. REDDY[P-1]

VersusM/S. VIGNAN PUBLISHERS LTD. G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 5423/2016XII-A

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT)(INT) (FAC) G. N. REDDY[P-1]

VersusM/S. VIGNAN PUBLISHERS LTD.

ConnectedDiary No. 16931-2017XII-A

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ANDANR. G. N. REDDY[P-1]

VersusM/S VISWASANTHI EDUCATIONALINSTITUTIONS (P0 LTD AND ANR.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.65931/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.65932/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

9 C.A. No. 7478/2008IV-A

H.K.VIRUPAKASHAPPA P. R. RAMASESHVersusN.G.PUTTASWAMY . AND ORS. RAJEEV SINGH, E. C. VIDYA SAGARLIST THE APPEALS ON A NON-MISCELLANEOUS DAY IN THE MONTH OF JULY2010 AS PER 23.04.2010

ConnectedC.A. No. 7479/2008IV-A

H.M. REVANASIDDAPPA, THETAHSILDAR AND RETURNING OFFICER,KARNATAKA

ANJANA CHANDRASHEKAR[P-1]

VersusN.G. PUTTASWAMY AND ORS. RAJEEV SINGH[R-1], E. C. VIDYA SAGAR[R-3]LIST THE APPEALS ON A NON-MISCELLANEOUS DAY IN THE MONTH OF JULY2010

10 C.A. No. 848-852/2009IX

COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE,NAGPUR B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S UNIVERSAL FERRO & ALLIEDCHEM.LD.&AN S. NARAIN & CO.

11 C.A. No.4108-4110/2013XVI

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEPATNA

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1][GR], ANILKATIYAR[P-1]

Versus

Page 5: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTM/S. PRABHAT ZARDA FACTORY (INDIA)LTD. PUNIT DUTT TYAGI[R-1]

12 C.A. No.6761-6879/2012IV-A

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC.ETC. SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[P-1]

Versus

BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. AND ORS. ETC.ETC.

PRAVEEN KUMAR[R-1], PUNIT DUTTTYAGI[R-1], PAVAN KUMAR[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1]

13 C.A. No. 2079/2012XIV-A

DHARAM PAL SATYA PAL LTD AND ANR. MITTER & MITTER CO.[P-1], [P-2]VersusTHE COMMISSIONER VALUE ADDEDTAX AND ANOTHER B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No.2879-2880/2014III

DEPUTY COMMERCIAL TAXCOMMNR.APPEALS-3 AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI

VersusVRN CERAMICS LTD. BINDI GIRISH DAVE

ConnectedC.A. No.2881-2888/2014III

ASSISTANT COMMERCIAL TAXCOMMISSIONER (2) ENFORCEMENTDIVISION 7

HEMANTIKA WAHI

VersusRAVI ELECTRONICS

ConnectedC.A. No. 8399/2017XIV-A

SOM FLAVOURS PVT. LTD. AND ANR. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER VALUE ADDEDTAX B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION

14 C.A. No.5437-5438/2012IV-A

M/S. ANANDA SOCIAL ANDEDUCATIONAL TRUST SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4702/2014XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (E) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusFOUNDATION OF OPHTHALMIC ANDOPTOMETRY RESEARCH EDUCATIONCENTRE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 25761/2015XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSAI ASHISH CHARITABLE TRUST

15 C.A. No. 7709/2012XIV-A

DELHI HIGH COURT TH.REGISTRARGENL. C. K. SUCHARITA[P-1]

VersusRAMESH CHAND SANWAL AND ORS. NISHTHA KUMAR[R-1]

16 C.A. No.4950-4951/2012XIV-A

M/S. HONDA SIEL CARS INDIA LTD. M. P. DEVANATH

VersusUNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

17 C.A. No. 5057/2012XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOMETAX(EXEMPTIONS.)NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTHE INSTITUTE.OF CHARTEREDACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA PRAMOD DAYAL

Page 6: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTConnectedC.A. No. 5056/2012XIV-A

THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTEREDACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA PRAMOD DAYAL

VersusTHE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOMETAX (EXEMPTIONS) DELHI AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23975/2012XIV

THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTEREDACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA PRAMOD DAYAL

VersusTHE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION) DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8193/2012XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTHE INSTITUTE OF CHARTEREDACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA PRAMOD DAYAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 5201/2013XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF GENERAL OF INCOMETAX (EXEM) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS VIVEK SINGH

ConnectedC.A. No. 4196/2015XIV-A

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAXNEW DELHI . AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusTHE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED AC. OFINDIA AND ANR. PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5058/2014XIV-A

DIR. GEN. OF I.T AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GSI INDIA THR ITS DIRECTOR VIVEK SINGHFOR FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 109702/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 4374/2015XIV-A

CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX (EXEMPTION) NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. GSI INDIA VIVEK SINGH

ConnectedC.A. No. 21762/2017III

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAHMEDABAD URBAN DEVELOPMENTAUTHORITY HEMANTIKA WAHI

ConnectedDiary No. 39525-2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXCEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGUJARAT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION P. S. SUDHEER[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3358/2018III

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAHMEDABAD URBAN DEVELPMENTAUTHORITY HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3972/2018III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusGUJARAT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION MALAK MANISH BHATT[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3359/2018III

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS)AHMEDABAD

ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 7: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTAHMEDABAD URBAN DEVELOPMENTAUTHORITY HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3971/2018III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusGUJARAT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION MALAK MANISH BHATT[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 10912/2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD

ConnectedC.A. No. 11840/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusERNET INDIA KAVITA JHAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.167064/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 4549/2019XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GS1 INDIA K. PAARI VENDHAN[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]IA No.185572/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 170/2019III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGUJARAT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION MALAK MANISH BHATT

Vide Ld. Registrar's Order dated 28.05.19 CA 170/2019 is be listed on 16.08.19before Ld. Registrar's Court.

ConnectedC.A. No. 5200/2019XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGS1 INDIA (FORMERLY EAN INDIA) K. PAARI VENDHAN[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.18447/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 1643/2019III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAHMEDABAD URBAN DEVELOPMENTAUTHORITY

ConnectedC.A. No. 3971/2019III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAHMADABAD URBAN DEVELOPMENTAUTHORITY

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 6553/2019III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGUJARAT HOUSING BOARD JATIN ZAVERI[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.34330/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.34331/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 15040/2019XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ERNET INDIA KAVITA JHA[R-1]

Page 8: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTConnectedDiary No. 15488-2019III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGUJARAT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.85188/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.85189/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

ConnectedDiary No. 15489-2019III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGUJARAT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.77767/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 15525-2019III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGUJARAT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTCORPORATIONFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.84941/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 15055/2019III

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGUJARAT INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION LTD MALAK MANISH BHATT[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.84881/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 21237-2019III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGUJARAT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION LTD. THROUGHDIRECTOR

MALAK MANISH BHATT[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.93706/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

18 C.A. No. 5006/2012XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DASVersusMANGE LAL MOHAN KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 3909/2015XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

VersusSAYED SHAHID ALI SUBHASISH MOHANTY

19 C.A. No. 8167/2017XII-A

V. SUMITRA REDDY AND ANR. ANANGA BHATTACHARYYAVersus

K. RANGANADHA REDDY . AND ORS. K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI, D. MAHESH BABU,LAWYER S KNIT & CO

20 C.A. No. 4820/2012XIV-A

GADAM ETE S. S. NEHRAVersusDUTER PADU

21 Crl.A. No. 2035/2012II-C

EX-GUNNER VIRENDER PRASAD B. K. PALVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

22 C.A. No. 1681/2016III

MORARJEE TEXTILES LTD. AND ANR. KAUSHIK LAIK[P-1]Versus

Page 9: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF MICRO,SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISESAND ORS.

GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-1], RAMESHWARPRASAD GOYAL[R-3]

23 C.A. No. 166/2017XVI

BHAGWAN SINGH SUBHRO SANYALVersusM.D. CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORP .AND ANR. P. NARASIMHAN

24 C.A. No.7284-7286/2013IV-A

M/S. SAMALKOT POWER LTD. GARIMA PRASHAD[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE II VISAKHAPATNAM B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.7290-7291/2013IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSVISAKHAPATNAM II B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S. SAMALKOT POWER LIMITED ANDANR. E. C. AGRAWALA[R-1]

FOR FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 7-8/2013ConnectedC.A. No.7287-7289/2013IV-A

M/S. RELIANCE INFRASTRUCTURELIMITED GARIMA PRASHAD[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE II VISAKHAPATNAM B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

25 C.A. No.1122-1123/2013XVII

BIDHYADHAR RUCHI KOHLI

Versus

UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4]

26 C.A. No. 10118/2013III-A

SECUR INDUSTRIES LTD. RUPESH KUMARVersusGODREJ AND BOYCE MANUFACTURINGCO. LTD. T. MAHIPAL

27 C.A. No.3293-3294/2017XIV-A

DAYA KISHAN GOEL SUBHASISH MOHANTY[P-1]

Versus

RAMESH CHANDER GOEL . AND ORS. YASHRAJ SINGH DEORA, RAHULGUPTA[CAVEAT], GAGAN GUPTA

28 C.A. No. 6277/2017IV

D.K. MONGA GOPAL JHA[P-1][PR]Versus

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-1], ASHOKMATHUR[R-2]

29 C.A. No. 8493/2014XI-A

M/S. KITEX GARMENTS LTD. ARUNIMA DWIVEDIVersusTHE CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD

30 C.A. No.11346-11348/2016XI-A

M/S LEO RUBBERS . AND ANR. P. S. SUDHEER

VersusSTATE OF KERALA NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

ConnectedC.A. No. 11349/2016XI-A

SHEENA J. MAMPARAMBIL HIMINDER LAL

VersusSTATE OF KERALA NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

ConnectedC.A. No. 11350/2016XI-A

M/S.PARAGON RUBBERS INDUSTRIES P. S. SUDHEER

VersusSTATE OF KERALA NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

Page 10: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

ConnectedC.A. No.11351-11352/2016XI-A

M/S.PARAGON RUBBERS INDUSTRIES P. S. SUDHEER

Versus

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

31 C.A. No. 4931/2016IV-A

M/S INFINITE BUILDERS ANDDEVELOPERS K J JOHN AND CO

VersusTHE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFCOMMERCIAL TAXES ZONE II V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No. 4933/2016IV-A

M/S INFINITE BUILDERS ANDDEVELOPERS K J JOHN AND CO

VersusTHE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFCOMMERCIAL TAXES ZONE II V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No.4936-4937/2016IV-A

M/S CENTUM INDUSTRIES PVT LTD MEERA MATHUR[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.4889-4911/2016IV-A

M/S. KOTHARI SALES AND AGENCIES R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.16639-16645/2016IV-A

STATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Versus

M/S. MANYATA PROMOTERS PVT. LTD. KUNAL VERMA

32 C.A. No. 6679/2013III

SKODA AUTO INDIA P LTD B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[P-1]VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSIMPORTS JNCH B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

33 Crl.A. No. 266/2014II-A

MOHAMMED YAQUB ABDUL MAJIDNAGUL SNEHASISH MUKHERJEE

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 267/2014II-A

MOHD. IQBAL MOHAMMED HANIFSHAIKH SNEHASISH MUKHERJEE

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAFOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 21631/2013 FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA21632/2013

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 268/2014II-A

JAFFAR ABDUL HAQUE SHAIKH SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

and FOR [I/A FOR BAIL] ON IA 32971/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 180776/2018

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.10661/2013II-A

FAROOQUE MOHAMMED YUSUFSHAIKH KAMINI JAISWAL

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAFOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 27170/2013

Page 11: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 666/2014II-A

ASGAR KADAR SHEIKH SNEHASISH MUKHERJEE

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAFOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 1670/2014 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA6295/2014

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 603/2014II-A

AFTAB SAEED AHMED SHAIKH SNEHASISH MUKHERJEE

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAFOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 1554/2014

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 1495/2014II-A

MOHD. SAGIR MOHD. BASHIRCHAUHAN SNEHASISH MUKHERJEE

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAFOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 4076/2014 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA6291/2014

34 C.A. No. 7430/2018IV-A

BURN STANDARD COMPANY LTD SATISH KUMAR[P-1]Versus

M/S SAMADARIYA BUILDERS AND ORS.RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1], CHANDERSHEKHAR ASHRI[R-1]RANJAN MUKHERJEE[IMPL]

ConnectedC.A. No.7431-7434/2018IV-A

STATE OF M.P AND ORS. RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

Versus

BURN STANDARD CO. LTD ETC. SATISH KUMAR[R-1]

35 C.A. No. 4342/2015XVII

BAHADUR RAM MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJVersusU.O.I AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAFOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 4/2015

36 C.A. No. 247-251/2014III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,VAPI B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. SYMPHONY LTD. THROUGHGENERAL MANAGER SHRI PARESH P.MEHTRA

PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL, MILIND KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.10198-10201/2014III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX VAPI B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusNIRMAL R. RUPAREL

ConnectedC.A. No.10202-10211/2014III

COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE &SERVICE TAX, VADODARA-I B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

M/S KISAN MOULDINGS LTD. . ANDORS.

M. P. DEVANATH[R-1], SUPRIYA JUNEJA[R-2],[R-4], MILIND KUMAR[R-3], RAHULNARAYAN[R-5], [R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No.1488-1491/2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CGST CC AND CE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

MIRAJ DRYMIX PRIVATE LTD. AND ORS. PUNIT DUTT TYAGI[CAVEAT]IA No.3959/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.3964/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.3963/2019-EX-PARTE STAY

Page 12: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

ConnectedC.A. No. 9060/2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODSAND SERVICE TAX, CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE, A BLOCK, SURYANAGAR, ALWAR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S MIRAJ DRYMIX PVT LTD CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[CAVEAT]

37 C.A. No. 13522/2015III

COMM. OF SALES TAX AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[P-2]VersusNARENDRA POLY PRINTS LTD ANDANR. S. RAVI SHANKAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 13523/2015III

COMM. OF SALES TAX AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusJINDAL PHOTO LTD SURUCHII AGGARWAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 13524/2015III

COMM. OF SALES TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusUNIVERSAL COMFORT PROD. LTD ANDANR. K J JOHN AND CO

ConnectedC.A. No. 13526/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX &ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusVOLTAS LTD AND ANR. K J JOHN AND CO

ConnectedC.A. No. 13525/2015III

COMM. OF SALES TAX AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusRAMCO INDUSTRIES LTD AND ANR. RAUF RAHIM

ConnectedC.A. No. 13527/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX DADRAAND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusBLUE STAR LTD. & ANR. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedC.A. No. 13928/2015III

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[P-1]

VersusPRISM CEMENT LTD. THROUGH ITSDIRECTOR AND ANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[R-1]

38 C.A. No. 4344/2014XII-A

INCOME TAX COMMISSIONER ANIL KATIYARVersusM/S HOME INDUSTRIES LTD THEDIRECTOR GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO

39 Crl.A. No. 1769/2014II-C

RAJESH GUPTA RANJEETA ROHATGIVersusSTATE THROUGH CENTRAL BUREAU OFINVESTIGATION MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

MATTER RELEASED FROM PART HEARD

40 C.A. No.6399-6401/2014III

OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONTHROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER(HEAD TS)

GAURAV AGRAWAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOM (IMPORT)MUMBAI

41 C.A. No. 8647/2014XVI

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED DANISH ZUBAIR KHANVersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(PORT),KOLKATA A. N. ARORA, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 2/2014

Page 13: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT42 C.A. No. 10584/2014

IIIGODREJ CONSUMERS PRODUCTS LTD M. P. DEVANATHVersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND CUSTOMS INDORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

43 C.A. No. 1648/2015XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S ITC LTD. PACKAGING RAJAN NARAIN

ConnectedC.A. No. 9166/2016XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusITC LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR RAJAN NARAIN

44 C.A. No. 9188/2015XII

M/S.REVATHI ENTERPRISES REP. BY ITSPARTNER MR. R. SRINIVASAN PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusM/S. GOEL INDUSTRIES REP. BY ITSPROPRIETOR MR. RAM NIVAS GOEL

45 C.A. No. 3338/2017IV

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusS.P. CONSTRUCTION NEERAJ SHEKHAR

46 C.A. No.4453-4454/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND SERVICE TAX RAJKOT B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SHREEJI SHIPPING E. C. AGRAWALA

47 C.A. No. 6303/2016XI-A

BHUBANESWAR DEVELOPMENTAUTHORITY UTTARA BABBAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX . ANDORS.

SHIBASHISH MISRA, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

48 C.A. No.6462-6464/2015XIV-A

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

VersusNONGTHOMBAM RAJENDRA SINGH LEISHANGTHEM ROSHMANI KH

49 C.A. No. 14024/2015XI-A

AMMEN KABEER P. (MINOR) RADHA SHYAM JENA[P-1]VersusADMISSION SUPERVISORY COMMITTEEAND FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEEAND ORS.

G. PRAKASH[R-1], VENKITA SUBRAMONIAMT.R[R-2]

FOR VACATING STAY ON IA 2/2015 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ONIA 3/2015 FOR ON IA 1/2015

ConnectedC.A. No. 14029/2015XI-A

SHAHUL BASITH M A SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusADMISSION SUPERVISORY COMMITTEEAND FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEEFOR PROFESSIONAL COLLEGES . ANDORS.

C. K. SASI, VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R[R-2]

FOR ON IA 1/2015ConnectedC.A. No.14025-14026/2015XI-A

THE PRINCIPAL KARUNA MEDICALCOLLEGE RADHA SHYAM JENA

VersusTHE ADMISSION SUPERVISORYCOMMITTEE AND FEE REGULATORYCOMMITTEE FOR PROFESSIONALCOLLEGES OF KERALA AND ANR.

G. PRAKASH, C. K. SASI, VENKITASUBRAMONIAM T.R[R-2]

Page 14: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTFOR VACATING STAY ON IA 3/2015 FOR ON IA 5/2016 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILEANNEXURES] ON IA 7/2016 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA0/2016 FOR ON IA 13/2016

ConnectedC.A. No. 14030/2015XI-A

PRAVEENA T.P RAJI JOSEPH[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R[R-1], [R-3], C. K.SASI[R-2]

FOR ON IA 1/2015ConnectedC.A. No. 14036/2015XI-A

M.E.S. MEDICAL COLLEGE NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[P-1]

VersusADMISSION SUPERVISORY COMMITTEEAND FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEEFOR PROFESSIONAL COLLEGES . ANDORS.

VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R[R-2], C. K.SASI[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 14032/2015XI-A

THE PRINCIPAL, KMCT DENTALCOLLEGE RADHA SHYAM JENA

VersusADMISSION SUPERVISORY COMMITTEEAND FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEEFOR PROFESSIONAL COLLEGES OFKERALA . AND ANR.

C. K. SASI, VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R[R-2]

FOR ON IA 2/2015ConnectedC.A. No. 14035/2015XI-A

NIRANJANADEVI S. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[P-1]

VersusADMISSION SUPERVISORY COMMITTEEAND FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEEFOR PROFESSIONAL COLLEGES . ANDORS.

C. K. SASI[R-1], VENKITA SUBRAMONIAMT.R[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No.14033-14034/2015XI-A

M.E.S. DENTAL COLLEGE NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

Versus

ADMISSION SUPERVISORY COMMITTEEAND FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEEFOR PROFESSIONAL COLLEGES ANDORS.

C. K. SASI

ConnectedC.A. No. 14031/2015XI-A

PRINCIPAL, AZEEZIA COLLEGE OFDENTAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCHMEYYANNOOR KOLLAM

HIMINDER LAL

VersusADMISSION SUPERVISORY COMMITTEEFOR PROFESSIONAL COLLEGES . ANDORS.

C. K. SASI, VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R[R-3]

FOR ON IA 2/2015ConnectedC.A. No. 14037/2015XI-A

FAVAS HAMEED C. RADHA SHYAM JENA

VersusADMISSION SUPERVISORY COMMITTEEAND FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEE .AND ORS.

C. K. SASI, VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R[R-2]

FOR ON IA 2/2015ConnectedC.A. No. 14038/2015XI-A

ASWATHI SURESH HIMINDER LAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. RAMESH BABU M. R.[R-1], VENKITASUBRAMONIAM T.R[R-4]

Page 15: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTConnectedC.A. No. 14039/2015XI-A

MINORITY PROFESSIONAL COLLEGEMANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION RADHA SHYAM JENA

VersusADMISSION SUPERVISORY COMMITTEEAND FEE REGULATORY COMMITTEE .AND ORS.

C. K. SASI, VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R[R-2]

FOR ON IA 2/2016ConnectedC.A. No.8300-8302/2019XI-A

TWINKLE V. SHARON ETC. RADHA SHYAM JENA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

Versus

THE ADMISSION SUPERVISORYCOMMITTEE FOR PROFESSIONALCOLLEGES AND ORS. ETC. AND ORS.

C. K. SASI[R-1], VENKITA SUBRAMONIAMT.R[R-2], ZULFIKER ALI P. S[R-3], G.PRAKASH[R-4]

50 C.A. No. 2691/2017III

THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[P-1]VersusA.M DESAI AND ANR. RAJIVKUMAR[R-1]

51 C.A. No. 6333/2017XVI

AJAI PRAKASH LOHIA RUPESH KUMAR[P-1]VersusAXIS BANK LIMITED . AND ORS. SUMITA RAY[R-1], NIRAJ GUPTA[R-2], [R-3]

52 C.A. No. 1022/2017XII-A

M/S. SURANA TELECOM LTD. THROUGHCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER RUPESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE, HYDERABAD - III B. KRISHNA PRASAD

53 C.A. No. 14654/2015XII-A

ASHANNAGRI JEEVAN REDDY VANDANA SEHGALVersusTALARI SATYARN SATYA MITRA

54 C.A. No. 3108/2016IV

THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. SANJAY KUMAR VISENVersusM/S. IDEA CELLULAR LTD. AND ORS.A.K BHADURI AUTHORISED SIGNATORYAND ORS.

E. C. AGRAWALA, [CAVEAT], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1624/2019XVII-A

VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED (EARLIERKNOWN AS VODAFONE ESSARLIMITED)

PUNIT DUTT TYAGI

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND ANR.FOR ADMISSION and IA No.26151/2019-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.26516/2019-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

55 T.C.(C) No. 120/2015XVI-A

E. GOBINATHVersusTHE BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 121/2015XVI-A

DEVRAJ C.

VersusKARNATAKA STATE LAW UNIVERSITY ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD[R-3]

56 C.A. No. 573-574/2016IV-A

COMMISSINER OF CUSTOMS, ANDCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX,GUNTUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusSRI CHAITANYA EDUCATIONALCOMMITTEE R. PARTHASARATHY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9977/2018XII-A

M/S NRI ACADEMY VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU

Versus

Page 16: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.For Interim Relief

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 11346/2019IX

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFSERVICE TAX PUNE III B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SHREE CHANAKYA EDUCATIONSOCIETYFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.61540/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

57 C.A. No. 1398/2016XII

ITC LTD. THR. ITS REGIONAL MANAGERMR. MANOJ CHAUHAN RAJAN NARAIN[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,(ADJUDICATION) CHENNAI ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

58 C.A. No. 733/2016XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJIVersusM/S. KOMAL CONSTRUCTION S.K. SINHA

59 C.A. No. 3593/2017XIV-A

NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OFINDIA PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI

VersusM/S. HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTIONCOMPANY E. C. AGRAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No. 3594/2017XIV-A

NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OFINDIA PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI

VersusM/S. HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTIONCOMPANY E. C. AGRAWALA

60 C.A. No.5189-5192/2017XVI-A

ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS ETC.ETC.

SUNIL FERNANDES[P-1], PURNIMABHAT[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5], [P-6], [P-7],[P-8], [P-9], [P-10], [P-11], [P-12], [P-13], [P-14],[P-15], [P-16], [P-17], [P-18], [P-19], [P-20],[P-21], [P-22], [P-23], [P-24], [P-25], [P-26],[P-27], [P-28], [P-29], [P-30], [P-31], [P-32],[P-33], [P-34], [P-35], [P-36], [P-37], [P-38],[P-39], [P-40], [P-41], [P-42], [P-43], [P-44],[P-45], [P-46], [P-47], [P-48], [P-49], [P-50],[P-51], [P-52], [P-53], [P-54], [P-55], [P-56],[P-57], [P-58], [P-59], [P-60], [P-61], [P-62],[P-63], [P-64], [P-65], [P-66], [P-67], [P-68],[P-69], [P-70], [P-71], [P-72], [P-73], [P-74],[P-75], [P-76], [P-77], [P-78], [P-79], [P-80],[P-81], [P-82], [P-83], [P-84], [P-85], [P-86],[P-87], [P-88]

Versus

THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIRAND ORS.

ANUPAM RAINA[R-2], [R-17], DANISH ZUBAIRKHAN[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-10], [R-14],[R-15], M. SHOEB ALAM, [R-1], [R-12], D.MAHESH BABU[R-7], [R-24], [R-25]

61 C.A. No. 7344/2016XVII

MOHAMMAD AKBAR V. D. KHANNA[P-1]VersusASHOK SAHU AND ORS. AKSHAY GIRISH RINGE[R-1]

62 C.A. No.9162-9164/2016XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND SERVICE TAX LTU, CHENNAI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusCOGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS(I) PVT. LTD. THR. ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR

PUNIT DUTT TYAGI[R-1][PR]

Page 17: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

63 C.A. No. 9480/2017XIV-A

M/S. OMAXE INFRASTRUCTURE ANDCONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. B. RAMANA MURTHY

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

64 C.A. No. 5453/2017XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusTHE BULLION AND JEWELLERSASSOCIATION(REGD) KISHORE KUNAL

ConnectedC.A. No.5458-5459/2017XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

M/S. J.B. OVERSEAS KISHORE KUNAL

65 C.A. No. 11276/2016IV-A

M/S. BUDHIA AUTO . AND ANR. AWANISH KUMARVersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ANDORS. NISHANTH PATIL[R-1], [R-2]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

66 C.A. No.1480-1481/2017III

KSB PUMPS LTD. K J JOHN AND CO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,PUNE I B. KRISHNA PRASAD

67 C.A. No. 8189/2017XII-A

THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL OF THEANDHRA EVANGELICAL LUTHERNCHURCH

M. SARADA

VersusTHE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THECENTRAL GUNTUR SYNOD . AND ANR. SUMANTH NOOKALA

68 C.A. No. 1220/2017XII-A

K USHA RANI VISHAL ARUNVersusHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATHYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AND THE STATE OFANDHRA PRADESH THR AND ANR.

A. N. ARORA

69 C.A. No. 9001/2017XVII-A

INDO HONG KONG INDUSTRIES PVTLTD BHARGAVA V. DESAI

VersusC.C.E. AND S.T. DELHI (ADJUDICATION) B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

70 W.P.(C) No. 514/2017X

WORLD COLLEGE OF MEDICALSCIENCES AND RESEARCH ANDHOSPITAL AND ANR.VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 56726/2017 FOR APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 79050/2017

71 C.A. No.11044-11046/2017XII

THE TRAFFIC MANAGER CHENNAIPORT TRUST AND ORS. R. NEDUMARAN[P-1]

VersusM/S SATHYA GRANITIES VIKASH SINGH[R-1]

72 C.A. No.10270-10271/2017XIV-A

THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERALAND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. MALA PETROCHEMICALS ANDPOLYMERS ANJALI JHA[R-1]

73 C.A. No. 13070/2017XII-A

CCE C AND T HYDERABAD II B. KRISHNA PRASADVersus

Page 18: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTM/S. PIONEER BUILDERS LTD. RAJESH KUMAR-I[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and IA No.80130/2017-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.80129/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 6663/2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAXHYDERABAD GST B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusVENSA INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED D. ABHINAV RAO[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and IA No.125012/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IANo.125010/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL and IANo.125011/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

74 C.A. No. 9350/2018III

GUJARAT TERCE LABORATORIES LTD USHA NANDINI. VVersusOMRON CORPORATION (A JAPANESECORPORATION) SATYA MITRA GARG[CAVEAT]

75 Crl.A. No. 363/2018II-A

MANOJ KANTILAL NIDHANE AND ANR. SANDEEP SUDHAKAR DESHMUKHVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

76 W.P.(C) No. 690/2018X

AKASH INSTITUTE OF MEDICALSCIENCES AND RESEARCH CENTREAND HOSPITAL AND ANR.

DEVASA & CO.[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. GAURAV SHARMA[R-2]

77 C.A. No. 2966/2019XII

KAJAL AGARWAL SENTHIL JAGADEESANVersusTHE MANAGING DIRECTOR M/S. V.V.D.AND SONS PVT. LTD RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA[CAVEAT]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.140478/2018-PERMISSION TO PLACEADDITIONAL FACTS AND GROUNDS

78 C.A. No. 11183/2018XI-A

K.M. SHAJI PALLAVI PRATAPVersusM. V. NIKESH KUMAR AND ORS. P. V. DINESH[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1230/2019XI-A

M.V. NIKESH KUMAR P. V. DINESH

VersusK.M. SHAJI AND ORS. PALLAVI PRATAP[CAVEAT]IA No.4938/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTand IA No.4939/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.4936/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 249/2019XI-A

K.M. SHAJI PALLAVI PRATAP

VersusT.V. BALAN P. V. DINESH[R-1]FOR FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 5769/2019 FOR PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 15110/2019

79 C.A. No. 37/1992XVII

ABHIRAM SINGH BINA GUPTAVersus

C.D. COMMACHEN (DEAD) BY LRS.. ANDORS.

CHIRAG M. SHROFF, SWARUPAMACHATURVEDI, SHUVODEEP ROY,RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL, PRAKASHKUMAR SINGH, P. V. DINESH, NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,MERUSAGAR SAMANTARAY, HEMANTIKAWAHI, ARCHANA PATHAK DAVE, APARNABHAT, AJAY KUMAR SINGH[R-1][INT]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } To be listed high up on the board

80 C.A. No. 7991/2009XI-A

MAHANADI COALFIELDS LIMITEDTHROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN CUMMANAGING DIRECTOR

M/S ARS ASSOCIATES[P-1]

Versus

Page 19: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTM/S SHYAMLAL AGRAWAL KHAITAN & CO.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

81 C.A. No. 4376/2008XII

CENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONER B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S. CHOLAYIL PHARMACEUTICALSTHROUGH ITS MD AMIT SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No. 5225/2013XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S TRIENI AYURVEDIC RESEARCHPHARMACEUTICALS THROUGH ITSDIRECTORS

AMIT SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6096/2016XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CHENNAI - I B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. CHOLAYIL PHARMACEUTICALSLTD. THR. DIRECTOR AMIT SHARMA

82 Crl.A. No. 2387/2010II

SHASHANK SHEKHAR SHRISH KUMAR MISRA[P-1]Versus

KIRAN PAL . AND ORS. PREETIKA DWIVEDI[R-1], VISHWA PALSINGH[R-4]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2381/2010II

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VISHWA PAL SINGH[P-1]

VersusKIRAN PAL . AND ORS. DEBASIS MISRA[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } READY

83 C.A. No. 5463/2010IV-A

S.N.MALAVALLI SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[P-1]VersusS.PRASANNA KUMAR . AND ORS. E. R. SUMATHY[R-1]

84 C.A. No. 3181/2009IX

MAHARASHTRA STATE COOP.BANKLTD. M. Y. DESHMUKH

Versus

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE, NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR, NARESH KUMAR

To be listed after the judgment in C. A. No. 232/2016 is pronounced as per court'sorder dated 27.11.2019.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 17727/2008IX

THE MAHARASHTRA STATE COOP.BANK LTD. M. Y. DESHMUKH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . ANDORS. RAJESH MAHALE[R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No.3278-3279/2009IX

LIQUIDATOR BOARD,G.D.S.S.K.LTD.,THR. ITS MEMBER PRABHAKAR(PETITIONER NO.1 IS SAME IN BOTHMATTERS)

NARESH KUMAR

Versus

MAHARASHTRA STATE COOP.BANKLTD.. THR. ITS CHIEF OFFICER ANDORS.

RAJESH MAHALE, NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR, SUSHIL BALWADA,RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL, ASHAGOPALAN NAIR

only application for early hearing in C.A.3278-79 of 2009 to be listed

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20915/2008IX

PRAKASH S/O SAHEBRAO GAVALI ANDANR.

AMOL NIRMALKUMAR SURYAWANSHI[P-1],[P-2]

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY . AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE[R-5]

Page 20: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTConnectedC.A. No. 3185/2009IX

PARMESHWAR SAHEBRAO MANDE SUNIL KUMAR VERMA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE, RAMESHWAR PRASADGOYAL, ASHA GOPALAN NAIR

ConnectedSLP(C) No.19398-19399/2008IX

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[P-1]

VersusMAHARASHTRA STATE CO-OP.BK.LIMITED AND ORS.

M. Y. DESHMUKH[R-1], RAJESH MAHALE[R-4],[R-14], SUSHIL BALWADA[R-7]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.20228-20230/2008IX

PRABHANI Z.S.K.UNIONTHR.GEN.SECRETARY CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS. AND ORS.

SHIVAJI M. JADHAV, SUSHIL BALWADA,RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 27740/2011IX

JALGAON DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPBANK LTD. M. Y. DESHMUKH[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS. S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY[R-5], [R-6], [R-7],[R-8]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 28496/2011IX

JALAGAON DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPBANK AND ANR. M. Y. DESHMUKH

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 28042/2011IX

JALGAON DISTRICT CENTRALCOOPERATIVE BANK LTD. M. Y. DESHMUKH

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 30476/2011IX

AUTHORIZED OFICER JALGAON DIST.CO OP BANK LTD. M. Y. DESHMUKH

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA STATEOF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 619/2012IX

JALGAON DISTT. CENTRAL COOP BANKLTD AND ANR. M. Y. DESHMUKH

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.12238-12239/2014IX

MAHARASHTRA STATE COOP. BANKLTD ETC. THROUGH ITS ASSISTANTDIRECTOR MR. SUDHIR MAHADEVMHETRE

M. Y. DESHMUKH[P-1], [P-1]

VersusASHOK GULABRAO CHAVAN AND ORS.ETC. AND ORS.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.12241-12242/2014IX

MAHARASHTRA STATE COOPRATIVEBANK LTD. (THROUGH ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR)

M. Y. DESHMUKH[P-1]

VersusGOPINATH BABURAO JANGLE UDAY B. DUBE[R-1]

85 C.A. No. 4211/2010IX

H.D.F.C.BANK LIMITED K ASHAR & CO.[P-1]Versus

KISHORE K.MEHTA AND ANR. KHAITAN & CO.[R-1]J S WAD AND CO[INT], BINA GUPTA, [INT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9016/2011XII

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. BHARGAVA V. DESAI[P-1]

Versus

Page 21: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTR. SWARUP REDDY AARTHI RAJAN[R-1][PR]

86 C.A. No. 3489/2010IX

MUNIR MEHABUB PALKAR ABHA R. SHARMAVersusMUKHTAR RAJJAK KHATIK . AND ORS. NIRNIMESH DUBE, ASHA GOPALAN NAIR

87 C.A. No. 5675/2010XIV-A

KIRAN AGARWAL PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]VersusHIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH GAURAV AGRAWAL[R-1][ ON THE TOP OF THE BOARD ]

88 C.A. No. 37/2009XVI

WESTINGHOUSE SAXBY FARMER LTD. KUNAL CHATTERJI[P-1]VersusCOMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISECALCUTTA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 } As per ROP dated 22.10.2019, list thematter on 11.12.2019.

89 C.A. No. 3118/2009IX

RAHUL AND ANR. SHIVAJI M. JADHAVVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR.SECRETARY AND ORS.

VISHWAJIT SINGH, SUNIL KUMAR VERMA,NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 3117/2009IX

DHANRAJ NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH[P-1]

Versus

VIKRAM SINGH AND ORS AND ORS. VISHWAJIT SINGH, [R-4], RANBIR SINGHYADAV[R-2]

90 C.A. No. 3226/2011IX

KIRTI UDAY B. DUBEVersus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],ANJANI KUMAR JHA[R-5], NARESHKUMAR[R-8]GOPAL BALWANT SATHE[IMPL], GAURAVAGRAWAL[IMPL]

91 C.A. No. 2054/2009IX

C.C.E.,GOA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]VersusM/S COSTA R. PARTHASARATHY[R-1]

92 C.A. No. 8670/2012IX

UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusMOHD.ASLAM SAYEED

ConnectedC.A. No. 8667/2012IX

THE COMMR.OF CUSTOMS(PREVENTIVE),MUMBAI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

M/S PARAGON ASSETS CO.LTD..THROUGH MANAGER AND ORS.

PURNIMA BHAT[R-1], R.PARTHASARATHY[R-1], PRAVEENKUMAR[R-1], E. C. AGRAWALA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8672/2012IX

COMMISSIONER OFCUSTOMS(PREVENTIVE) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusABDUL SATTAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8673/2012IX

COMMR.OF CUSTOMS(PREVENTIVE) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusBAJIRAO P. GHOSALKAR

ConnectedC.A. No.1564-1567/2018III

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(PREVENTIVE) MUMBAI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusJAGSON INTERNATION LTD. K. V. MOHAN[R-1]

Page 22: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT93 C.A. No. 108/2013

III-AM/S.ASHOKA METAL DECOR PVT.LTD. YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-1]VersusCOMMISSIONER OF TRADETAX,LUCKNOW AND ANR. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-2]

94 C.A. No.7154-7155/2010XI-A

THE NILAMBUR RUBBER CO. LTD. M. P. VINOD

VersusSTATE OF KERALA R. SATHISH, NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

95 C.A. No. 8033/2009XVI

STATE OF WEST BENGAL .AND ORS. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[P-1]VersusHINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED KARANJAWALA & CO.[R-1]

96 C.A. No.5669-5670/2009XII

COMMR.OF CEN.EXC-I,CHENNAI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S DOLLAR CO.P.LTD. THROUGH M.D RAJESH KUMAR-I[R-1]

97 C.A. No.6240-6241/2009IX

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(IMPORT),MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S KAINYA AND ASSOCIATES PVT.LTD. THR. ITS. G.M. AND ANR. BALRAJ DEWAN

98 C.A. No.9706-9708/2010XII

ITC LTD. RAJAN NARAIN

VersusNORASIA CONTAINER LINES LTD. . ANDORS.

M. T. GEORGE, R. NEDUMARAN, ANILKATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.9709-9711/2010XII

ITC LTD. RAJAN NARAIN

Versus

NORASIA CONTAINER LINES LTD.&ORS.ETC.

M. T. GEORGE, S. RAVI SHANKAR, B. KRISHNAPRASAD

99 C.A. No.4008-4009/2009IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. MAGNUS SOCIETY M. P. DEVANATH

100 C.A. No. 7501/2009IV-A

M/S CITY MALL DEVELOPERS (P.) LTD. KANCHAN KAUR DHODIVersusUNION OF INDIA GOVT. OF INDIA ANDORS. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 7139/2012XI-A

CITY CENTRE VIJAY KUMAR

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS.

101 C.A. No.7279-7280/2009III

THE COMMISSIONERCOMMISSIONERATE OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SHRIJEE CONCAST LTD. THROUGHITS MANAGING DIRECTOR BHARGAVA V. DESAI

102 C.A. No. 4071/2009IX

ARVIND CHANDAN RAMAMURTHIVersusRURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTAND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,VISHWAJIT SINGH, [R-2]

103 C.A. No. 7244/2010III

COMMR.OF CUSTOMS PREVENTIVE B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S MUSTAN TAHERBHAI TARA CHANDRA SHARMA[R-1]

Page 23: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

NOTE:-[ ON 10.12.2019 THE MATTERS WHICH MAY NOT BE TAKEN UP BYTHE BENCH OF HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HONBLE S.ABDULNAZEER AND HONBLE SANJIV KHANNA , JJ. AND THE MATTERSSHOWN IN THE WEEKLY LIST WILL BE TAKEN UP ON 11.12.2019 AND12.12.2019 BY THE FOLLOWING BENCH :-]HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAIHONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT

NEW DELHI06-12-2019 17:40:40

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 24: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 33 OF 2019 FROM : 10-12-2019 To 12-12-2019

COURT NO. : 2HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAULHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT

NOTE:-[ CONSTITUTION BENCH ]DIRECION TO COMPLETE THE PLEADINGS AS PER THE COURT ORDER DATED 14.11.2019 NOT COMPLETED WITH

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 W.P.(C) No. 1013/2019

PIL-WMANOHAR LAL SHARMA PETITIONER-IN-PERSONVersus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

BIMAL ROY JAD[CAVEAT], DEBASIS MISRA,SATYAJEET KUMAR[R-1], B. V. BALARAMDAS[R-1]V. K. BIJU[IMPL], K. K. MOHAN[IMPL], ANILKUMAR[IMPL], ABHIMANYU TEWARI[IMPL]P. S. SUDHEER[INT], MAHESH THAKUR[INT],INTERVENOR-IN-PERSON[INT], HARVINDERCHOWDHURY[INT], B. K. SATIJA[INT],ANANTHA NARAYANA M.G.[INT]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION and IA No.118588/2019-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.118589/2019-PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE INPERSON

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 722/2014PIL-W

WE THE CITIZENS RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. AND ANR.

MOHIT CHAUDHARY[INT], [INT], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], SATYAJEET KUMAR[R-2]TALHA ABDUL RAHMAN[IMPL], [IMPL], SATYAMITRA[IMPL], MANJU JETLEY[IMPL], [IMPL],MADHUSMITA BORA[IMPL], K. KRISHNAKUMAR[IMPL], DHARMENDRA KUMARSINHA[IMPL], B. K. SATIJA[IMPL], ANUPAMRAINA[IMPL]SUMIT R. SHARMA[INT], SAHILTAGOTRA[INT], RESMITHA R.CHANDRAN[INT], MANOJ K. MISHRA[INT], M.J. PAUL[INT], [INT], IRSHAD AHMAD[INT],ASHOK MATHUR[INT], [INT], ADEEBAMUJAHID[INT]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } [ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES] FINAL DISPOSAL and IA No.79570/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION and IANo.79897/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION and IA No.81485/2017-impleadingparty and IA No.95744/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION and IANo.96065/2017-impleading party and IA No.110779/2017-VAKALATNAMA ANDMEMO OF APPEARANCE and IA No.110782/2017-impleading party[FORCONSIDERATION OF THE PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 871/2015PIL-W

WEST PAKISTAN REFUGEES ACTIONCOMMITTEE CELL - 1947 . AND ORS. ANIRUDH SHARMA

Versus

Page 25: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 2

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], SATYAJEETKUMAR[R-2]R. D. UPADHYAY[IMPL], DHARMENDRAKUMAR SINHA[IMPL]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 396/2017X

DR CHARU WALI KHANNA D/O M.M.K.WALI BIMAL ROY JAD

Versus

UNION OF INDIA M. SHOEB ALAM[CAVEAT], [R-2], B. V.BALARAM DAS[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION and IA No.43725/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 19618/2017XIV

KUMARI VIJAYALAKSHMI JHA ANIL KUMAR JHA[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], SATYAJEETKUMAR[R-2]RESMITHA R. CHANDRAN[INT]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 756/2017PIL-W

KALI DASS AND ORS. SHILPA SINGH

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], SATYAJEETKUMAR[R-2]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSIONConnectedW.P.(C) No. 398/2018X

RADHIKA GILL AND ORS. DIVYA ROY

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], SATYAJEETKUMAR[R-2]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION and IA No.49478/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING and IA No.49481/2018-PERMISSION TOFILE SYNOPSIS AND LIST OF DATES

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 924/2018PIL-W

REAPAN TIKOO PALLAV MONGIA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION and IA No.109719/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1092/2018X

MAJOR RAMESH UPADHYAY AND ORS. VISHNU SHANKAR JAIN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], SATYAJEETKUMAR[R-2]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1162/2018PIL-W

ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY R. D. UPADHYAY

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], SATYAJEETKUMAR[R-2]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSIONConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1082/2019X

FAROOQ AHMAD DAR M. C. DHINGRA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.DEBASIS MISRA, BIMAL ROY JAD[CAVEAT], B.V. BALARAM DAS[R-2], SATYAJEETKUMAR[R-3], [R-4]V. K. BIJU[IMPL], ANIL KUMAR[IMPL]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION

Page 26: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 2ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1048/2019PIL-W

SHAKIR SHABIR PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.DEBASIS MISRA, BIMAL ROY JAD[CAVEAT], B.V. BALARAM DAS[R-2]ANIL KUMAR[IMPL]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION and IA No.122866/2019-PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1068/2019PIL-W

SOAYIB QURESHI CHARU AMBWANI

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.BIMAL ROY JAD, DEBASIS MISRA[CAVEAT], B.V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], SATYAJEETKUMAR[R-3]ANIL KUMAR[IMPL]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION and IA No.125260/2019-STAY APPLICATION

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1037/2019X

MOHD. AKBAR LONE AND ANR. D. MAHESH BABU

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

DEBASIS MISRA, BIMAL ROY JAD[CAVEAT], B.V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], SATYAJEETKUMAR[R-3]ANIL KUMAR[IMPL]VISHAL ARUN[INT], ARCHANA PATHAKDAVE[INT]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1062/2019PIL-W

INDER SALIM ALIAS INDER JI TICKOOAND ANR. D. ABHINAV RAO

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.BIMAL ROY JAD, DEBASIS MISRA[CAVEAT], B.V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], SATYAJEETKUMAR[R-3]ANIL KUMAR[IMPL]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION and IA No.124539/2019-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.124540/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OFDATES

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1070/2019PIL-W

RADHA KUMAR AND ORS. ARJUN KRISHNAN

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.BIMAL ROY JAD, DEBASIS MISRA[CAVEAT], B.V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]ANIL KUMAR[IMPL]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION and IA No.125529/2019-GRANT OF INTERIM RELIEF

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1099/2019PIL-W

SHAH FAESAL AND ORS. AAKARSH KAMRA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

DEBASIS MISRA, BIMAL ROY JAD[CAVEAT], B.V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], SATYAJEETKUMAR[R-2]ANIL KUMAR[IMPL]OMPRAKASH AJITSINGH PARIHAR[INT], ADILMUNEER ANDRABI[INT]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSIONConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1104/2019X

MUZZAFAR IQBAL KHAN D. MAHESH BABU

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.BIMAL ROY JAD, DEBASIS MISRA[CAVEAT], B.V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], SATYAJEETKUMAR[R-3]ANIL KUMAR[IMPL]

Page 27: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 2{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1165/2019PIL-W

JAMMU AND KASHMIR PEOPLESCONFERENCE AND ANR. PRITHA SRIKUMAR

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.DEBASIS MISRA, [CAVEAT], BIMAL ROYJAD[CAVEAT], B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1],SATYAJEET KUMAR[R-2]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION and IA No.140590/2019-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.140592/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OFDATES

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1210/2019PIL-W

MOHAMMED YOUSUF TARIGAMI P. V. DINESH

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.DEBASIS MISRA, BIMAL ROY JAD[CAVEAT], B.V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], SATYAJEETKUMAR[R-3]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } TO BE TAKEN UP ALONGWITH ITEM NO.501 I.E. W.P.(C)NO.1013/2019 ETC.

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1222/2019X

RIFAT ARA BUTT MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.DEBASIS MISRA[CAVEAT], BIMAL ROYJAD[CAVEAT], B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1],SATYAJEET KUMAR[R-2]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1268/2019PIL-W

JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURTBAR ASSOCIATION SRINAGAR DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. BIMAL ROY JAD[CAVEAT], DEBASISMISRA[CAVEAT], SATYAJEET KUMAR[R-3]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } TO BE TAKEN UP ALONGWITH ITEM NO.501 W.P.(C)NO.1013/2019 ETC.

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1368/2019PIL-W

PEOPLES UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIESAND ANR. ABHIMANUE SHRESTHA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. BIMAL ROY JAD[CAVEAT]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 33 OF 2019 FROM : 10-12-2019 To 12-12-2019

COURT NO. : 2HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDYHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI

NOTE:-[ ON 10.12.2019 ]

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 C.A. No. 5060/2008

IXMANIKCHAND AND ORS. AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROYVersus

Page 28: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 2SAKARCHAND S/O PREMCHANDGUJRATHI AND ORS. AND ORS.

SUMITA RAY, LAWYER S KNIT & COARVIND S. AVHAD[IMPL]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } original record received from high court andtrial court as per court's order dated 18.07.2018

2 C.A. No. 7065/2010XVI

HASMUKH R.PATEL AND OTHERS ANDORS. T. MAHIPAL, SHEKHAR KUMAR

VersusASHOK C. PATEL AND ORS. KHAITAN & CO., BHARTI TYAGI[R-2]

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.221/2010 In C.A. No.7065/2010XVI

HASMUKH R PATEL T. MAHIPAL

Versus

HARISH R PATEL . AND ORS. SHEKHAR KUMAR, RAUF RAHIM

3 C.A. No. 5853/2011IX

THOMAS COOK (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND COVersusM/S BEACH ARK HOTELS PVT.LTD. .AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 5854/2011IX

BEACH ARK HOTELS LTD. M. J. PAUL

VersusTHOMAS COOK (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

4 C.A. No.6531-6532/2012XII-A

M/S.PIONEER BUILDERS Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO

VersusSTATE OF A.P. REP.BY DIST.COLL.. ANDORS. MAHFOOZ AHSAN NAZKI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1005/2000XII-A

M/S PIONEER BUILDERS ENGINEERSAND CONTRACTORS (REGD.) REP. BYITS MANAGING PARTNER P. PRATHAPREDD

Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO

VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP.BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTORKURNOOL AND ORS.

C. K. SUCHARITA

FOR ON IA 78887/2008(application for revival) in Civil Appeal 1005 of 2000 (sincethe matter is recalled) (As per court's order dated 15.05.2009 the application forrevival is to be listed along with Civil Appeal 6531-6532 of 2012 )

ConnectedC.A. No. 1006/2000XII-A

M/S PIONEER BUILDERS ENGINEERSAND CONTRACTORS (REGD.) REP. BYITS MANAGING PARTNER P. PRATHAPREDD

Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO

VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP.BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTORKURNOOL AND ORS.

C. K. SUCHARITA

FOR ON IA 81338/2008 (application for revival) in Civil Appeal 1006 of 2000 (sincethe matter is recalled) (as per court's order dated 15.05.2009 the application forrevival is to be listed along with Civil Appeal No. 6531-6532 of 2012)

ConnectedC.A. No.6533-6534/2012XII-A

M/S.PIONEER BUILDERS Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO

Versus

STATE OF A.P. REP.BYDIST.COLL.KURN.&ORS C. K. SUCHARITA, GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

5 C.A. No. 2440/2014III-A

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATALLAHABAD JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusDHARM VIJAI SINGH AND ANR. ALOK KUMAR

Page 29: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 2

6 C.A. No. 10871/2010XI-A

BARIPADA URBAN CO-OP BANK LTD .AND ANR. RUTWIK PANDA

Versus

BIMALA LOCHAN DAS AND ORS. VINODH KANNA B.[R-1], [R-3], [R-4],PRATIBHA JAIN[R-5]

7 C.A. No.3258-3259/2016XI-A

K.S.RAJACHANDRAN RENJITH. B[P-1]

VersusTHE VILLAGE OFFICER AND ORS. A. V. RANGAM[R-1], G. PRAKASH[R-1]

8 C.A. No.5778-5779/2010XII-A

T.BAL RAJ SRIDHAR POTARAJU

VersusPRINCL.SEC.REV/SPL.CHIEF SEC.TOGOV.&ORS

G. N. REDDY, VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES

9 C.A. No. 1305/2010IV-A

RAMNATH AGRAWAL AND ORS. SUDHANSU PALOVersusFOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA . ANDORS. AJIT PUDUSSERY

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }10 C.A. No. 2571/2009

XIV-ARAVI SHANKAR GUPTA S. K. DHINGRA[P-1]VersusM/S FRIENDS AUTO CORPORATIONTHROUGH ITS PARTNER SHRI MANJITSINGH ANAND AND ORS.

A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[R-1]

11 C.A. No. 3167/2010IX

DYES THROUGH ITS SECRETARY JYOTI MENDIRATTAVersusASSEST RECONSTRUCTION COMPANYINDIA LTD. THROUGH ITS CHAIRMANAND ORS.

K. RAJEEV, RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL,NAVDEEP VORA

12 C.A. No. 7348/2008XII-A

VADLAMUDI VENKATA SUBBA RAO .AND ORS. K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI

VersusADUSUMILLI SEETHA RAMAIAH . ANDORS. G. N. REDDY[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

13 C.A. No. 8253/2009IX

ABHISHEK RAVISHANKAR AGRAWAL S. JANANI[P-1]VersusASSISTANT CHARITY COMMR. ANDANR. NIRNIMESH DUBE

14 C.A. No. 7702/2014III

NIKHIL D DATTAR SATYA MITRA[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ASHA GOPALAN NAIR[R-1], GURMEET SINGHMAKKER[R-1], ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

c.a.no.7702/2014 with I.A. no. 145965/2019.ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 308/2014X

MRS X AND ANR. JYOTI MENDIRATTA[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.[IMPL], [R-4], NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-2], ANILKATIYAR[R-3]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 121/2017X

SAVITA SACHIN PATIL SATYA MITRA

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LAWAND JUSTICE SECRETARY GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-3]

15 C.A. No. 9705/2010XIV-A

M/S SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT(S.AG) BIJOY KUMAR JAIN

VersusDELHI TRANSCO LTD.. AND ANR. RAKESH K. SHARMA, A. V. RANGAM

Page 30: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 2

16 C.A. No.6283-6284/2009XIV-A

M/S OSWAL PRINTERS ANDPUBLISHERS P.LTD. THROUGH ITSDIRECTOR

SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusM/S EVERGREEN PUBLICATIONS .THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR AND ORS. P. K. MANOHAR, ASHOK KUMAR SINGH

17 C.A. No.13345-13346/2015IV-A

SYED MOHAMMED GHOUSE PASHAKHADRI RABIN MAJUMDER[P-1]

VersusSYED MOHAMMED ADIL PASHA KHADRI. AND ORS.

PRITHA SRIKUMAR[R-1], VIKASH SINGH[R-1],P. R. RAMASESH[R-1]

IA NO. 27334/2019 (FOR DELETION OF RESPONDENT NO. 7 AND HIS LRS FROMTHE ARRAY OF PARTIES )IN CA 13345-13346/2016 TO BE LISTED a/w appeal (r/p29.04.2019)

18 C.A. No. 2928/2014IV-A

SHIVANNA AND ORS. S-LEGAL ASSOCIATESVersusB.S.PUTTAMADAIAH R. D. UPADHYAY

19 C.A. No. 927/2013XII

R.V.E.VENKATACHALAGOUNDER(DEAD) BY LRS. VIKAS MEHTA[P-1]

VersusSUB COLLECTOR,TIRUPPUR AND ORS.AND ORS.

K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1], RAKESH K.SHARMA[R-2], VINODH KANNA B.[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 928-929/2013XII

PADMINI SIVASUBRAMANIAM VIKAS MEHTA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.AND ORS.

RAKESH K. SHARMA[R-1], VINODH KANNAB.[R-1], R. NEDUMARAN[R-1], K. V.VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedC.A. No. 933-935/2013XII

R.RAGHAVAN ETC. VIKAS MEHTA

VersusSUB COLLECTOR,TIRUPPUR AND ORSETC. AND ORS. RAKESH K. SHARMA, K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 931/2013XII

S.AVINASHIAPPAN VIKAS MEHTA

VersusTHE SUB COLLECTOR AND ORS. RAKESH K. SHARMA, K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 932/2013XII

S.AVINASHIAPPAN VIKAS MEHTA

VersusSUB COLLECTOR,TIRUPPUR . AND ORS. RAKESH K. SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No. 930/2013XII

MEENAKSHIAMMAT (D)THRU LRS. VIKAS MEHTA

VersusSUB COLLECTOR TIRUPPUR AND ORS RAKESH K. SHARMA

20 Crl.A. No. 1366/2011II-C

K.K.RAMESH G. N. REDDY[P-1]VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA TR.PP. SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

21 Crl.A. No. 1913/2010II-A

ATUL SHIVAJI BHURASE S. RAJAPPAVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

22 Crl.A. No. 991/2011II-A

SURENDRA PAL SINGH T. MAHIPAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

23 Crl.A. No. 2239/2010II

RAJENDRA PRASAD BALRAJ DEWAN[P-1][PR]Versus

Page 31: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 2THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA[R-1][GR]

24 Crl.A. No.1605-1607/2011II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHHOME DEPARTMENT S.H.O. SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]

Versus

JASPAL SINGH ARORA . AND ORS. ANAND VARMA[R-1], SHIVAJI M. JADHAV[R-2],[R-3]

25 Crl.A. No. 963/2012II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH MISHRA SAURABHVersusHARISINGH M. SARADA

26 Crl.A. No.1109-1110/2010II-C

RAVASAHEB @ RAVASAHEBAGOUDAAND ORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1229/2011II-C

SHANKAR AND ANR. N. ANNAPOORANI

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1230/2011II-C

GULAPPA ABHA R. SHARMA

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 213/2012II-C

BEERAPPA ABHA R. SHARMA

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 682/2013II-C

RAMAPPA ABHA R. SHARMA

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHY

27 Crl.A. No. 1546/2011II-A

BHOOP SINGH SHIV KUMAR SURIVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHHOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARY SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

28 Crl.A. No. 102/2011II-C

M. SUBRAMANIAM AND ANR. S. R. SETIA[P-1], [P-2]VersusS. JANAKI AND ANR. K. K. MANI[R-1], M. YOGESH KANNA[R-2]

29 Crl.A. No. 982/2011II

OMBIR SINGH S. R. SETIA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDANR. ANKIT GOEL[R-1], ANIL SHRIVASTAV[R-2]

[OFFICE REPORT FOR DIRECTION]30 Crl.A. No. 862/2011

IIDANISH G.SIVABALAMURUGAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANUVRAT SHARMA[R-1]

31 Crl.A. No. 1661/2010II-B

SK.SAKKAR @ MANNAN RAHUL PRATAP[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

32 Crl.A. No.1759-1760/2010II

CHANDRA BHUSHAN MISHRA . ANDORS. P. V. YOGESWARAN[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH NISCHAL KUMAR NEERAJ[COMP], GARVESHKABRA[R-1]

33 C.A. No. 9948/2014XI-A

KATTAL SREEBHADRAKALI DEVITEMPLE AND ANR. M. P. VINOD[P-1]

Versus

Page 32: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 2MURALEEDHARAN NAIR . AND ORS. K. V. MOHAN[R-1]

34 C.A. No.10916-10917/2016IV-A

DESHRAJ SINGH PARMAR AND ORS. NAVIN PRAKASH

VersusRAM BABU AGARWAL . AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN, FAISAL SHERWANI [R-2.1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10448/2016IV-A

RAM BABU AGARWAL PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusDESHRAJ SINGH PARMAR . AND ORS. NAVIN PRAKASH, PUJA SHARMAto FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 62674/2017 FORCONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 62675/2017 FOR [I/A FOR SETTINGASIDE ABATEMENT - DEFECTIVE AS PER OFFICE REPORT] ON IA 101308/2017FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA38649/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 39086/2019 FORPERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA41352/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 41355/2019

35 Crl.A. No. 462/2011II-B

THAKORE JORAJI PRATAPJI AND ORS. PURVISH JITENDRA MALKAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

36 Crl.A. No.1494-1497/2014II

RAM AVADH @ NANHOO AND ORS.

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ROHIT K. SINGH[R-1]THE CRL. APPEAL NO. 1494 OF 2014 STANDS ABATED VIDE COURT'S ORDERDATED 11.07.2019

37 C.A. No. 10759/2017III-A

NARESH SINGH TUSHAR BAKSHI[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRINCIPALSECRETARY AND ORS.

ADARSH UPADHYAY[R-1], [R-4], SUNNYCHOUDHARY[R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 670/2017X

NARESH SINGH TUSHAR BAKSHI

VersusTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATALLAHABAD AND ANR. SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-1]

38 Crl.A. No. 130/2016II-B

M/S MOUNTAIN FALL INDIA PVT LTDAND ORS. PRAGYA BAGHEL

VersusM/S LAHMEYER INTERNATIONAL(INDIA) PVT LTD MUKUL KUMAR

39 C.A. No. 4035/2015IV-A

M/S ANRIYA PROJECT SERVICEMANAGEMENT PVT. LTD. KUMAR MIHIR[P-1]

VersusSRI.SRINIVASA MURTHY . AND ANR. NULI & NULI[R-1]

40 C.A. No.8595-8596/2016XII

VENUGOPALASWAMY TEMPLE REP. BYEXECUTIVE OFFICER, ETC. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

VersusK.T. VENUGOPALAN AND ORS. ETC.AND ORS. M. A. CHINNASAMY, K. KRISHNA KUMAR

41 SLP(C) No.19641-19642/2017XIV

NATIONAL BUILDINGSCONSTRUCTIONS CORPORATIONS LTD NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN

VersusTHE DIRECTOR GENERAL (MAP) ANDANR. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1], [R-2]

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]

42 C.A. No. 21766/2017XIV-A

GAUHATI HIGH COURT THROUGH THEREGISTRAR GENERAL SNEHA KALITA

Versus

Page 33: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 2

JUMUNA GOGOI PHUKAN AND ANR. NACHIKETA JOSHI[R-1], DEBOJITBORKAKATI[R-2]

43 C.A. No.9021-9022/2018XV

ASHOK KUMAR MEENA SHOBHA GUPTA[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAHUL NARAYAN[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

44 C.A. No. 2402/2019XVI

VIDYA DROLIA AND ORS. SOUMYA DUTTA[P-1]VersusDURGA TRADING CORPORATION T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR[R-1][ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.5605-5606/2019XVI

LINDSAY INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. BIJOY KUMAR JAIN

Versus

IFGL REFRACTORIES LIMITED TARUNA SINGH GOHIL[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.33156/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.33158/2019-PERMISSION TO FILELENGTHY LIST OF DATES

ConnectedDiary No. 40679-2019XVII

CREATIVE INFOCITY LTD AJAY KUMAR

VersusGUJARAT INFORMATICS LTDIA No.175117/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.175118/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.175120/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

45 C.A. No. 1185/2012XIV-A

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ASHOK MATHUR[P-1]VersusMANOJ KUMAR BANSAL AND ORS. ANIL NAG, ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-2]

46 C.A. No. 14075/2015XV

RAJASTHAN FINANCIAL CORP. PRATIBHA JAINVersusM/S MODERN MECHANICAL ANDENGINEERING GROUP SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA

hearing expeditedConnectedC.A. No. 14077/2015XV

RAJASTHAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusM/S ANIS AHMED HABIB KHAN ANDORS. AND ORS. P. NARASIMHAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 14078/2015XV

RAJASTHAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusSOHAN SINGH HANSA AND ORS. ANDORS. SURYA KANT

ConnectedC.A. No. 14079/2015XV

RAJASTHAN FINANCE CORPORATION AMARJIT SINGH BEDI

VersusBABU LAL AND ORS AND ORS. ABHISHEK ATREY, ASHWANI KUMAR

47 C.A. No. 789/2017XII

K.SHANMUGAVEL MUDALIARVersus

COMMNR.,HINDU REL.&CHARI.END.DEPT. AND ORS.

V. J. FRANCIS[R-1], SHOBHARAMAMOORTHY[R-1], P. I. JOSE[R-1], VINODHKANNA B.[R-1][GR], [R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 9075/2017XII

K. SHANMUGAVEL MUDALIAR,MANAGING HEREDITARY TRUSTEEARULMIGU AGATHEESWARAR TEMPLEAND ALLIED TEMPLE

DEBASIS MISRA[P-1]

Versus

Page 34: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 2THE COMMISSIONER, HR AND CE(A)DEPARTMENT NUNGAMBAKKAM,CHENNAI, AND ORS

VINODH KANNA B.[R-1], [R-2], VIKAS SINGHJANGRA[R-3], [R-4][PR]

48 C.A. No. 182/2016IV-A

SHEELA GEHLOT ARUN K. SINHA[P-1]Versus

MOHINI HARDAYAL SINGH . AND ORS.RAM SWARUP SHARMA, NIKILESHRAMACHANDRAN, KARANJAWALA & CO.,ARUN AGGARWAL, ARJUN HARKAULI

ConnectedC.A. No. 190/2016IV-A

PUNJAB AND SIND BANK ARUN AGGARWAL

Versus

MOHINI HARDAYAL SINGH . AND ORS.RAM SWARUP SHARMA, NIKILESHRAMACHANDRAN, KARANJAWALA & CO., A.VENAYAGAM BALAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 191/2016IV-A

JAGMINDER SINGH NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN

Versus

PUNJAB AND SIND BANK AND ORS.SANJAY KAPUR, SENTHIL JAGADEESAN, RAMSWARUP SHARMA, ARJUN HARKAULI, A.VENAYAGAM BALAN

49 C.A. No.6007-6008/2010IV-A

RAVI KANT BANSAL ANISH KUMAR GUPTA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDANR. SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-1][GR]

50 C.A. No. 6388/2010XV

M/S FERRO CONCRETE CONST. (INDIA)PVT. LTD. S. K. VERMA[P-1]

VersusRAJASTHAN STATE (IRRIGATION)BILASPUR PROJECT ANR ORS. AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI[R-1]

51 C.A. No. 4416/2010XII-A

SILLA JAYARAMA GUPTA AND ORS. Y. RAJA GOPALA RAOVersusSTATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPUR

52 Crl.A. No. 164/2010II

MOHAN LAL MAIBAM NABAGHANASHYAM SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

53 C.A. No. 3867/2010XIV-A

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN SAHARYA & CO.

VersusBHAI SARDAR SINGH AND SONS KAVEETA WADIA

54 C.A. No. 3538/2016III-A

STATE BANK OF INDIA THR. ITSCHAIRMAN AND ORS. SANJAY KAPUR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

Versus

ARUNACHALAM MUTHU AND ORS. M. C. DHINGRA, GAURAV AGRAWAL[R-2],SUSHMA SURI[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3539/2016III-A

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITEDTHROUGH ITS AUTHORISEDSIGNATORY

GAURAV AGRAWAL

Versus

ARUNACHALAM MUTHU AND ORS. M. C. DHINGRA, SUSHMA SURI, SANJAYKAPUR, ASHA GOPALAN NAIR

55 C.A. No. 3038/2010IV-A

KAILASH CHANDRA RAWAT LIZ MATHEWVersusORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE . ANDORS. P. PARMESWARAN, PRASHANT KUMAR

56 C.A. No. 6972/2009IV

HARYANA WAKF BOARD EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATESVersus

Page 35: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 2MAHANT HARI GIR CHELA BABAN.G.C.B AND ANR. RAJINDER MATHUR

57 Crl.A. No. 240/2010II-B

HARINARAYAN SINGH NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

58 C.A. No. 10508/2013XVI

KRISHNANAGAR CITY COOP.BANK LTD..AND ORS. AND ORS. DANISH ZUBAIR KHAN[P-1]

VersusMADAN MOHANTA . AND ORS. ANDORS.

SIDDHARTHA CHOWDHURY[R-1], PLRCHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

59 Crl.A. No. 37-38/2010II-C

BASAVARAJ YALLAPPA KALASANNAVARAND ORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

60 Crl.A. No. 269/2011II-B

GURPAL SINGH YADAV NARENDER SINGHVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

61 C.A. No. 11323/2011XII-A

G. RAJA GOPAL AND ORS. M. VIJAYA BHASKARVersusTHE REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGHCOURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ANDORS.

G. N. REDDY, SUNIL FERNANDES, S.. UDAYAKUMAR SAGAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 11324/2011XII-A

K. AJITH SIMHA RAO AND ANR. VISHAL ARUN

VersusTHE REGISTRAR GENERAL ,HIGHCOURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH . ANDORS.

SUNIL FERNANDES, S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR

62 Crl.A. No. 726/2010II-A

MOHAN LAL B. K. SATIJA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1686/2010II-A

SHESHRAO M. A. KRISHNA MOORTHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHHOME DEPARTMENT S.H.O. RAHUL KAUSHIK[R-1]

NOTE:-ON 10.12.2019 THE MATTERS WHICH MAY NOT BE TAKEN UP BY THEBENCH OF HONBLE N.V. RAMANA, HONBLE R. SUBHASH REDDYAND HONBLE B.R. GAVAI , JJ. AND THE MATTERS SHOWN IN THEWEEKLY LIST WILL BE TAKEN UP ON 11.12.2019 AND 12.12.2019 BYTHE FOLLOWING BENCH :-]HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAHONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNAHONBLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI

NEW DELHI06-12-2019 17:46:58

Page 36: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 37: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 33 OF 2019 FROM : 10-12-2019 To 12-12-2019

COURT NO. : 3HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAHHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

NOTE:-[ CONSTITUTION BENCH ]

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate

1 SLP(C) No.9036-9038/2016IV-A

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANJAY KAPUR[P-1]

Versus

MANOHARLAL AND ORS. ETC.

VIKAS KUMAR, [R-1], [R-14], PRATIBHAJAIN[R-1], PRAMOD B. AGARWALA[R-10],[R-11], [R-19], MANISH PALIWAL[R-13]RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE[IMPL],RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[IMPL],MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJ[IMPL], ABHINAVRAMKRISHNA[IMPL]YASH PAL DHINGRA[INT], SATISHKUMAR[INT], M. YOGESH KANNA[INT],ANUPAM RAINA[INT], ANIRUDDHADESHMUKH[INT], ANANNYA GHOSH[INT],ABHIMANUE SHRESTHA[INT], ABHIGYA[INT],DELHI LAW CHAMBERS[INT], BALVINDERKAUR BRAR[INT]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } PART- HEARD BY HON'BLE ARUN MISHRA,HON'BLE INDIRA BANERJEE, HON'BLE VINEET SARAN, HON'BLE M.R. SHAHAND HON'BLE S. RAVINDRA BHAT, JJ.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.9798-9799/2016IV-A

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYAND ETC. AND ANR. SANJAY KAPUR[P-1]

Versus

SHYAM VERMA AND ORS. ETC. ANDORS.

KUNAL VERMA[R-1], AJAY CHOUDHARY[R-2]RAJESH SRIVASTAVA[IMPL], R. V.KAMESHWARAN[IMPL], MANISH K.BISHNOI[IMPL], C. L. SAHU[IMPL], ASHWANIKUMAR[IMPL], ARUN K. SINHA[IMPL],AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA[IMPL]YASHRAJ SINGH DEORA[INT], VIKASMEHTA[INT], VARINDER KUMARSHARMA[INT], SHASHI BHUSHANKUMAR[INT], RAJNISH KUMAR JHA[INT],RAJESH MAHALE[INT], RABINMAJUMDER[INT], PALLAV MONGIA[INT], P. V.DINESH[INT], MUNAWWAR NASEEM[INT],MAHESH THAKUR[INT],K.PARAMESHWAR[INT], HIREN DASAN[INT],DIVYAKANT LAHOTI[INT], V. D. KHANNA[INT]

Page 38: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.ON IA 1/2016 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 3/2017 FORINTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 30398/2018 FOR INTERVENTIONAPPLICATION ON IA 31441/2018 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA34277/2018 FOR impleading party ON IA 36898/2018 FORINTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 36898/2018 FOR INTERVENTIONAPPLICATION ON IA 48707/2018 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA54951/2018 FOR impleading party ON IA 55173/2018 FORINTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 55173/2018 FOR impleading party ON IA64113/2018 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 64113/2018 FORINTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 67460/2018 FORCLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 71640/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T. ON IA 71644/2018 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 74344/2018FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 87282/2018 FOR impleading party ONIA 88380/2018 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 88380/2018 FORimpleading party ON IA 99668/2018 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA99668/2018 FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 99670/2018 FORINTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 112147/2018 FOR INTERVENTIONAPPLICATION ON IA 113032/2018 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA113035/2018 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 113665/2018 FORINTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 113673/2018 FOR INTERVENTIONAPPLICATION ON IA 113677/2018 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA114654/2018 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 114657/2018 FORINTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 114726/2018 FOR impleading party ON IA121517/2018 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 121517/2018 FORINTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 135096/2018 FOR INTERVENTIONAPPLICATION ON IA 135361/2018 FOR impleading party ON IA 144281/2018 FORINTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 144281/2018 FOR INTERVENTIONAPPLICATION ON IA 156601/2018 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA160646/2018 FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 160647/2018 FORINTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 24783/2019 FOR INTERVENTIONAPPLICATION ON IA 24790/2019 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA49461/2019 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 52895/2019 FORimpleading party ON IA 53181/2019 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA53181/2019 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 53197/2019 FORINTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 53874/2019 FOR INTERVENTIONAPPLICATION ON IA 59004/2019 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA84144/2019 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 84146/2019 FORINTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 85622/2019 FOR INTERVENTIONAPPLICATION ON IA 85623/2019 FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 117673/2019

ConnectedSLP(C) No.17088-17089/2016XI

SHREE CHAND SUSHIL BALWADA

Versus

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ABHISTH KUMARDEVENDRA SINGH[IMPL]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } List alongwith Special Leave Petition(C)Nos.9798-9799 of 2016 titled Indore Development Authority Vs Shyam Verma & Ors.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 37375/2016XIV

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY GARIMA PRASHAD

VersusVIRENDER LAL BAHRI AND ORS. SIDDHARTH BATRA[R-1], [R-2]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 37372/2016XIV

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY GARIMA PRASHAD

VersusRAJESH AND ANR.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.16573-16605/2016III

VADODARA URBAN DEVELOPMENTAUTHORITY. AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[P-1]

Versus

HARIBHAI KALIDAS RABARI AND ORS. RASHMI NANDAKUMAR[R-1], GAURAVAGRAWAL, [R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

Page 39: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.15967/2016IX

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER LAWYER S KNIT & CO

Versus

NARAYAN . AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 19356/2017XIV-A

DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD SHASHI KIRAN[P-1]

Versus

TARUN PAL SINGH AND ORS. RACHANA SRIVASTAVA, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 19362/2017XIV-A

DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. SHASHI KIRAN[P-1]

Versus

SANJAY GUPTA . AND ORS. GAURAV GOEL[R-1], RACHANASRIVASTAVA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 19361/2017XIV-A

DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. SHASHI KIRAN

Versus

SAROJ KUMARI GUPTA AND ORS. SIDDHARTHA CHOWDHURY, RACHANASRIVASTAVA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 19358/2017XIV-A

DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. SHASHI KIRAN

VersusVIJENDER KISHAN GUPTA . AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 19357/2017XIV-A

DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD.

Versus

SUDHIR KISHAN GUPTA . AND ORS. SHASHI KIRAN, , SACHIN GUPTA, RACHANASRIVASTAVA, [R-2]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 19360/2017XIV-A

DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. SHASHI KIRAN

VersusVIRENDER KISHAN GUPTA (D) ANDORS. SACHIN GUPTA

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 19359/2017XIV-A

DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD SHASHI KIRAN

VersusRAJENDER KISHAN GUPTA . AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.34752-34753/2016III

STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[P-1]

Versus

JAYANTIBHAI ISHWARBHAI PATEL JAIKRITI S. JADEJA[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 15890/2017III

VADODARA URBAN DEVELOPMENTAUTHORITY (VUDA) AND ORS. AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusBHOGILAL MAGANBHAI PATANWADIA RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION

Page 40: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedC.A. No. 19363/2017XIV-A

LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTAND ORS. RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

VersusSANJAY GUPTA AND ANR. GAURAV GOEL[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 19364/2017XIV-A

LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTAND ORS. RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

Versus

SAROJ KUMARI GUPTA AND ORS.B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], SIDDHARTHACHOWDHURY[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], KESHAVRANJAN[R-11], [R-13], [R-15]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 19412/2017XIV-A

LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTAND ORS. RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

VersusTARUN PAL SINGH AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedMA 1423/2017 in C.A.No. 12247/2016XIV-A

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY GARIMA PRASHAD[P-1]

Versus

SH. KANTA BAHRI AND ORS. SIDDHARTH BATRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], [R-6], RACHANA SRIVASTAVA[R-8]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }IN C.A. No. - 12247/2016,

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 33022/2017XII

C. VENKATESWARA RAO ZOHEB HOSSAIN

Versus

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[R-4][PR]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 128881/2017

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 33127/2017XII

C. RAVI SUBRAMANYAM ZOHEB HOSSAIN

Versus

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[R-4][PR]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.ON IA 129734/2017

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 33114/2017XII

C. RAMAKRISHNA ZOHEB HOSSAIN

Versus

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[R-4][PR]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.ON IA 129656/2017

ConnectedMA 1787/2017 in C.A.No. 10210/2016XIV-A

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ASHWANI KUMAR[P-1]

Versus

M/S BAHRI PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. SIDDHARTH BATRA[R-1], RACHANASRIVASTAVA[R-3]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }IN C.A. No. - 10210/2016,

ConnectedMA 1786/2017 in C.A.No. 10207/2016XIV-A

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ASHWANI KUMAR

Versus

USHA DEVI AND ORS. SIDDHARTH BATRA[R-1], [R-2], RACHANASRIVASTAVA[R-4]

Page 41: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }IN C.A. No. - 10207/2016,

ConnectedMA 45/2018 in C.A. No.6239/2017XIV-A

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ASHWANI KUMAR

Versus

VINOD KUMAR KHANNA AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }IN C.A. No. - 6239/2017,

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 16051/2019XII

K.C. KANDASAMY AND ORS. CHANDAN KUMAR

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. SUDARSH MENON[R-4]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.80041/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.80042/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 23842-2018XIV

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY GARIMA PRASHAD

Versus

KHAZAN SINGH AND ORS. RITESH KHATRI[R-1], RAJ BAHADURYADAV[R-2]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.100096/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.100095/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 30452/2018XIV

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY GARIMA PRASHAD

VersusM/S CARDIO PRODUCTS CORPORATIONAND ORS. CHANDRA BHUSHAN PRASAD[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }2 C.A. No. 4835/2015

IVTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. B. K. SATIJAVersusMAHARANA PRATAP CHARITABLETRUST (REGD) .

DEEPAK GOEL, SHREE PAL SINGHBALAJI SRINIVASAN[INT]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } PART- HEARD BY HON'BLE ARUN MISHRA,HON'BLE INDIRA BANERJEE, HON'BLE VINEET SARAN, HON'BLE M.R. SHAHAND HON'BLE S. RAVINDRA BHAT, JJ.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.30577-30580/2015IV-B

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

Versus

LT. COL. INDER SINGH KALAN ANDORS. ETC. S. NARAIN & CO.

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }3 W.P.(Crl.) No. 113/2016

XKAUSHAL KISHOR MANJU JETLEY[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH GOVT.OF U.P. HOME SECRETARY

SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1], PRADEEPMISRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], [R-5], LAKSHMIRAMAN SINGH[R-2], AJAY VIKRAMSINGH[R-3], MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-5],ABHISHEK[R-1][GR], [R-1]

[ PART-HEARD BY HON'BLE ARUN MISHRA, HON'BLE INDIRA BANERJEE,HON'BLE VINEET SARAN, HON'BLE M.R. SHAH AND HON'BLE S. RAVINDRABHAT, JJ. ]FOR [AD-INTERIM ORDER AND DIRECTIONS] ON IA 14656/2016MR.F.S. NARIMAN, SR.ADV.(A.C.)MR. HARISH SALVE, SR. ADV.(A.C.) and IANo.107414/2017-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

ConnectedDiary No. 34629-2017XI-A

JOSEPH SHINE SUVIDUTT M.S.

VersusTHE CHIEF MINISTER OF KERALA ANDORS.

Page 42: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3

4 Crl.A. No. 377/2007II-C

C.B.I. B. V. BALARAM DAS, MUKESH KUMARMARORIA

Versus

DR. R.R. KISHORE RESPONDENT-IN-PERSONSENTHIL JAGADEESAN, [N-1][INT]

PART-HEARD BY HON'BLE ARUN MISHRA, HON'BLE INDIRA BANERJEE,HON'BLE VINEET SARAN, HON'BLE M.R. SHAH AND HON'BLE S. RAVINDRABHAT, JJ.

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 4364/2011II-A

MANJIT SINGH BALI RAHUL PRATAP[P-1]

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1]FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 11085/2011 FOR [APPLICATION FORDIRECTIONS] ON IA 24008/2011 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA23923/2013 FOR [APPLICATION FOR DIRECTIONS] ON IA 15637/2014 FOR[APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION] ON IA 16152/2014

5 MA 1699/2019 inW.P.(C) No. 215/2005PIL-W

COMMON CAUSE (A REGD. SOCIETY)DIRECTOR SH. H.D. SHOURIE RASHMI NANDAKUMAR

VersusUNION OF INDIA (A) MINISTRY OFHEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARESECRETARY

IN W.P.(C) No. - 215/2005, FOR ADMISSION and IA No.105815/2019-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 33 OF 2019 FROM : 10-12-2019 To 12-12-2019

COURT NO. : 3HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAHREGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate

1 R.P.(Crl.) No. 1139-1140/2000In Crl.A. No. 25-26/2000II-A

NARAYAN CHETANRAM CHAUDHARY AND ANR. SHADAN FARASAT

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRANISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKARANUSHREE PRASHIT KAPADIA[IMPL]RAJAT JOSEPH[INT]

IN Crl.A. No. - 26/2000, IN Crl.A. No. - 25/2000, [ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]2 Crl.A. No. 734/2007

II-BPRAHALAD PRABHUDAS PATEL AND ORS. SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT DEEPANWITA PRIYANKA[R-1][ TO GO BE FORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 736/2007II-B

PRAHALADBHAI PRABHUDAS PATEL . AND ORS. SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT DEEPANWITA PRIYANKA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 735/2007II-B

PRAHALADBHAI PRABHUDAS PATEL . AND ORS. SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT DEEPANWITA PRIYANKA[R-1]

3 C.A. No. 6019/2009IX

RAM PRASAD SOMANI B. K. SATIJAVersusCHAIRMAN SECURITY AND EXCHANGE BOARD OFINDIA AND ORS. BHARGAVA V. DESAI, INDU SHARMA

Page 43: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 34 C.A. No. 9091/2012

XIV-AARUN MEHRA AND ANR. PUJA SHARMA, KHAITAN & CO.VersusRAJDHANI HOUSING SYNDICATES PVT. LTD. ANDORS. CHIRA RANJAN ADDY, ATISHI DIPANKAR

5 C.A. No. 1735/2009III-A

M/S NIKHIL RUBBERS PVT.LTD. AND ANR. RAKESH K. SHARMA[P-1]VersusNEELU KOHLI AND ANR. SAHIL TAGOTRA[R-1], T. MAHIPAL[R-2]

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No. 525/2019in C.A. No. 1735/2009III-A

M/S NIKHIL RUBBERS PVT.LTD. AND ANR. RAKESH K. SHARMA

Versus

NEELU KOHLI AND ORS.

IN C.A. No. - 1735/2009, FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 66915/2019

6 C.A. No. 1117/2010IX

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THESECRETARY MINISTRY OF FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIESAND CONSUMER PROTECTI AND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

VersusSUBHASH ARJUNDAS KATARIA. M/S. LIBERTYOPTICS AND EXPORTS AS SOLE PROPRIETOR BHARGAVA V. DESAI

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ][ MATTER RELEASED FROM PART-HEARD ]ConnectedC.A. No. 1122/2010IX

INSPECTOR OF LEGAL METROLOGY . AND ORS. ASHA GOPALAN NAIR

VersusM/S KITCHEN APPLIANCES INDIALTD..(ELECTRONIC DIVISION) THROUGH ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR AND ANR.

SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

ConnectedC.A. No. 1121/2010IX

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THEINSPECTOR OF THE STANDARDS OF WEIGHTS ANDMEASURES AND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

VersusMOTOROLA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR AND ORS. S. S. SHROFF

ConnectedC.A. No. 1118/2010IX

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THESECRETARY MINISTRY OF FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIESAND CONSUMER PROTECTI AND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

VersusTITAN INDUSTRIES LTD. THROUGH MANAGINGDIRECTOR AND ANR. KAVEETA WADIA, K J JOHN AND CO

ConnectedC.A. No. 1120/2010IX

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THEINSPECTOR OF THE STANDARDS OF WEIGHTS ANDMEASURES AND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

VersusBHARTI AIRTEL LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR AND ORS. ASTHA TYAGI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7874/2015III

LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], ANILKATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 59/2009XI-A

AMCO BATTERIES LTD. RAMESH BABU M. R.[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. C. K. SASI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 118/2010II-C

SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PVT LTD. AND ANR. PRANAB KUMAR MULLICK[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH INSPECTOR OFLEGAL METROLOGY JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1123/2010IX

VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LTD. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusINSPECTOR OF LEGAL METROLOGY . AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 40/2011XVI-A

EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 45/2011XVI-A

M/S. EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI, V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 46/2011XVI-A

M/S. EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusINSPECTOR OF LEGA METROLOGY V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Page 44: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 47/2011XVI-A

M/S. EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI, V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 84/2011XVI-A

M/S. EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusINSPECTOR OF LEGAL METROLOGY . AND ORS.

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 115/2011XVI-A

EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. G. PRAKASH

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 67/2012XVI-A

M/S EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS.

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 67/2014XVI-A

M/S EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. THROUGHASSISTANT MANAGER SF SALES MAR MUZZAMMALZULFAQAR KHAN

E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FOOD CIVILSUPPLIES (DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SUPPLIESTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS.

A. N. ARORA, SUSHMA SURI

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 68/2014XVI-A

M/S EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 69/2014XVI-A

M/S EXIDE INDUSTRIES LIMITED E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. THROUGH ITSSECRETARY SUSHMA SURI

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 66/2014XVI-A

M/S EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA SUSHMA SURI

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 71/2014XVI-A

EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 70/2014XVI-A

M/S EXIDE INDUSTRIES LIMITED E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusSTATE OF A.P. DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL METROLOGY(WEIGHTS AND MEASURES) SUSHMA SURI

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 65/2014XVI-A

M/S EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 72/2014XVI-A

M/S EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 73/2014XVI-A

M/S EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 74/2014XVI-A

EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI, BINA MADHAVAN, [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 81/2014XVI-A

EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI, B. S. BANTHIA

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 79/2014XVI-A

EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRSFOOD PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION THROUGH SECRETARYAND ORS.

SUSHMA SURI

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 78/2014XVI-A

EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA . AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Page 45: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 75/2014XVI-A

M/S EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA SUSHMA SURI[R-1], NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 76/2014XVI-A

EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusINSPECTOR OF LEGAL METROLOGY ASHA GOPALAN NAIR, [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 82/2014XVI-A

EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 77/2014XVI-A

EXCIDE INDUSTRIES LTD . E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF ORISSA SANJEEB PANIGRAHI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], SUSHMASURI[R-5]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 80/2014XVI-A

M/S EXIDE INDUSTRIES LIMITED E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRFOOD PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ORS.

SUSHMA SURI

ConnectedT.C.(Crl.) No. 1/2015XVI-A

MUKUL KANDWAL E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusB.ROUL SUSHMA SURI

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 5902/2018II-C

M/S KANDUKURI GARMENTS AND ORS. GOPAL JHA

VersusTHE INSPECTOR OF LEGAL METROLOGY SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]FOR ADMISSION

7 C.A. No. 2513/2007XVII

CHAIRMAN AND M.D. MTNL AND ORS. MADHU SIKRI[P-1]VersusRELIANCE INFOCOM LTD. AND ANR. ABHIJAT P. MEDH[R-1], RITESH KUMAR[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2906/2007XVII

CHAIRMAN AND M.D., MAHANAGAR TELEPHONENIGAM LTD. MADHU SIKRI[P-1]

VersusOFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, HIGH COURT OF BOMBAYAND ANR. RITESH KUMAR[R-1]

FOR [bring on record subsequent event] ON IA 5/20128 C.A. No. 10053/2014

IIIASIAN ELECTRONICS LIMITED K. R. SASIPRABHUVersusTATA MOTORS LIMITED M. J. PAUL

ConnectedC.A. No. 10054/2014III

ASIAN ELECTRONICS LIMITED K. R. SASIPRABHU

VersusTATA MOTORS LIMITED M. J. PAUL

9 C.A. No. 2364/2011IV-A

PARVATHAMMA AND ORS. NULI & NULI[P-1], [P-2.1], [P-2.4], [P-2.3], [P-2.2], [P-3],[P-4.4], [P-4.3], [P-4.2], [P-4.1], [P-5], [P-6], [P-7], [P-8]

VersusH. THIMMAPPA (D) BY LRS. LALITA KAUSHIK

10 C.A. No. 1778/2008XVII

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA K J JOHN AND COVersusHARINARAYAN G. BAJAJ. AND ANR. E. C. AGRAWALA

11 C.A. No. 1824/2008XVII

M/S NOIDA POWER CO.LTD. VISHAL GUPTA[P-1]VersusU.P.POWER CORP.LTD.. AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA[R-1]

12 C.A. No. 2332-2333/2008XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[P-1], [P-2]VersusMILENIUM DELHI BROADCAST PVT. LTD. NIKHIL MAJITHIA

13 C.A. No. 6355-6369/2009IX

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC.ETC. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKARVersus

BHARTI INFRATEL LTD.& ORS.ETC.ETC E. C. AGRAWALA, VISHWAJIT SINGH, PUNIT DUTT TYAGI,ANAGHA S. DESAI, PAREKH & CO.

14 C.A. No. 453/2009XVI

PAWANPUTRA COMMOTRADE P.LTD. T. V. RATNAMVersusOFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR AND ANR DEBA PRASAD MUKHERJEE, BIJOY KUMAR JAINROP not received till 28.7.2017

15 C.A. No. 2534/2008XVII

M/S. HEWLETT PACKARD(INDIA) P. V. DINESHVersusMAHESH C. ADVANI JATIN ZAVERI

Page 46: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 316 C.A. No. 2097/2008

XVIIM/S TATA STEEL LIMITED MANIK KARANJAWALAVersusORISSA ELECT.REGULATORY COMMISSION &ORS. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA, RUTWIK PANDA

17 C.A. No. 1927-1928/2008XVII

M.P.POORVA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITARAN CO.LTD ASHIESH KUMARVersusUNIVERSAL CABLES LTD. AND ORS. RAJESH PRASAD SINGH

ConnectedC.A. No. 3556-3558/2008XVII

M.P.ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMN. SHARMILA UPADHYAY

VersusM/S SATNA CEMENT WORKS . AND ORS. RAJESH PRASAD SINGH

18 C.A. No. 2578-2579/2008XVII

CHHATISGARH STATE ELECT.BOARD MCLM & CO.VersusCHATTISGARH STATE ELECT.REG.COMMN. ANDANR. MANISH PALIWAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 2941-2942/2008XVII

CHATTISGARH STATE ELECT.BOARD MCLM & CO.

VersusCHATTISGARH STATE ELECT.REG.COMMN. ANDANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 2868/2008XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD MCLM & CO.

VersusG.R.SPONGE AND POWER LTD. AND ANR.

19 W.P.(C) No. 109/2008PIL-W

WILDLIFE FIRST AND ORS. P. K. MANOHAR[P-1]Versus

MINISTRY OF FOREST AND ENVIRONMENT ANDORS.

V. G. PRAGASAM, G. INDIRA[R-1], NEERAJ KUMARSHARMA[R-2], GUNTUR PRABHAKAR[R-3], DEBOJITBORKAKATI[R-4], ANIL SHRIVASTAV[R-5], GOPALSINGH[R-6], DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-6], DHARMENDRAKUMAR SINHA[R-7], RAJAT JOSEPH[R-8], JAYANTMOHAN[R-8], HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-9], SANJAY KUMARVISEN[R-10], RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA[R-13], ANIL K.JHA[R-13], SAURABH MISHRA[R-16], LEISHANGTHEMROSHMANI KH[R-18], RANJAN MUKHERJEE[R-19], P. V.YOGESWARAN[R-20], K. ENATOLI SEMA[R-21], SHARMILAUPADHYAY[R-22], KULDIP SINGH[R-23], ARPUTHAM ARUNAAND CO[R-25], M. YOGESH KANNA[R-26], RACHNAGUPTA[R-29], [R-30], GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-32]SUMEER SODHI[IMPL], SATYA MITRA[IMPL], JOSEPHARISTOTLE S.[IMPL], G. PRAKASH[IMPL], B. V. BALARAMDAS[IMPL]SRISHTI AGNIHOTRI[INT], PRATIK R. BOMBARDE[INT], P. V.DINESH[INT], APARNA BHAT[INT], DEVASA & CO.[INT]

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 514/2006PIL-W

BOMBAY NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY AND ORS. MADHUSMITA BORA[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

ANNAM D. N. RAO[R-1], SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], RAVIPRAKASH MEHROTRA[R-1], PARIJAT SINHA[R-1], GURMEETSINGH MAKKER[R-1], DEBOJIT BORKAKATI[R-5], NISHANTHPATIL[R-7], SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-9], NISHE RAJENSHONKER[R-10], MILIND KUMAR[R-14], ANIL KUMARJHA[R-8], [R-16], PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-18]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 50/2008PIL-W

WILDLIFE TRUST OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. PURNIMA BHAT[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS.

TARA CHANDRA SHARMA[R-1], VINOD SHARMA[R-2], ANILSHRIVASTAV[R-3], DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-5], NISHANTHPATIL[R-6], RAJAT JOSEPH[R-7], HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-8],SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[R-9], ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-10], M.SHOEB ALAM[R-11], GOPAL PRASAD[R-12], G.PRAKASH[R-14], NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-16], RANA RANJIT SINGH[R-17],RANJAN MUKHERJEE[R-18], P. V. YOGESWARAN[R-19], K.ENATOLI SEMA[R-20], SHIBASHISH MISRA[R-21], KARANBHARIHOKE[R-22], MILIND KUMAR[R-23], NARENDRAKUMAR[R-24], M. YOGESH KANNA[R-25], GOPALSINGH[R-26], KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-27], RACHNAGUPTA[R-27], PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-29], CHANCHALKUMAR GANGULI[R-29], V. G. PRAGASAM[R-30], ANIL K.CHOPRA[R-31], ANIL KATIYAR[R-33], G. INDIRA[R-34]B. V. BALARAM DAS[IMPL]

FOR FOR ON IA 1/2008 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 53871/2018 FOR [I/A FOR WAIVER OFCOSTS FILED BY THE STATE OF KERALA] ON IA 61560/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA68563/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 103529/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.ON IA 112065/2019 FOR ADDITION / DELETION / MODIFICATION PARTIES ON IA 129964/2019

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.11408-11409/2009XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SHREEKANT N. TERDAL

Versus

Page 47: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3V.SAMBASIVAM . AND ORS.to be listed with W.P(C) 50/2008 in view of Hon'ble ct order dt 21.08.2009

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 85/2011XVI-A

RANMAT SINGH MARAVI

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH B. S. BANTHIA

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 87/2011XVI-A

KALLU SINGH

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. B. S. BANTHIA[R-2][GR]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 39/2015XVI-A

V. SAMBASIVAM ASHOK KUMAR SINGH

Versus

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY S. RAVI SHANKAR, NARESH KUMAR, M. YOGESH KANNA,ANINDITA PUJARI[R-7]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 41/2015XVI-A

J.V. SHARMA IFS (RETD) AND ORS. D. MAHESH BABU

VersusGOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND ORS. REP BYSECRETARY AND ORS. ANJANA CHANDRASHEKAR[R-6], [R-8]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 59/2015XVI-A

T.N.S. MURUGADOSS THEERTHAPATHI REVATHY RAGHAVAN

VersusTHE SECRETARY OF GOVT. OF INDIA AND ANR. ANJANA CHANDRASHEKAR[R-8]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 103/2015XVI-A

DR. P.G. NAJPANDE REVATHY RAGHAVAN

VersusUNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OF TRIBAL AFFAIRSSECRETARY ANJANA CHANDRASHEKAR[R-8]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 132/2015XVI-A

THE KARNATAKA RETIRED FOREST OFFICERSASSOCIATION THROUGH PRESIDENT BALAJI SRINIVASAN

VersusUNION OF INDIA

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 3/2016XVI-A

THE SOCIETY OF RETIRED FOREST OFFICER,ORISSA SHIBASHISH MISRA

Versus

GOVT. OF INDIA AND ORS. RADHA SHYAM JENA, PRITHA SRIKUMAR[R-10], [R-11],[R-14], [R-15], [R-16], [R-18]

ConnectedMA 1747/2018 in W.P.(Crl.)No. 1061/1982X

BANWASI SEVA ASHRAM RACHNA GUPTA

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1]

IN W.P.(Crl.) No. - 1061/1982, Only M.A. No. 1747/2018 to be listed on 26.9.19

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 12/2018XVI-A

SEVANIVRUTTA VANA KARMACHARI SANGH (SNVKS)AND ORS. D. S. MAHRA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

20 Crl.A. No. 1250-1252/2009II

T. RAGHU ETC. JYOTI MENDIRATTAVersusD.B.RAVINDRANATH AND ANR. ANNAM D. N. RAO, D. MAHESH BABUAs per R.P. dated 29.11.2018, matter was to be listed in the 3rd week of January, 2019, hence please updatenext date accordingly.

21 C.A. No. 3180/2009IV

PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS. ANURAG PANDEY[P-1]VersusM/S MEHNDI MACS TRADE PVT. LTD AND ANR. SURUCHII AGGARWAL[R-1], DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-2]

22 C.A. No. 877/2014III

PUNE MUNICIPAL CORP.. J S WAD AND COVersusHARAKCHAND MISIRIMAL SOLANKI . AND ORS. ASHA GOPALAN NAIR, ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEEI.A.NO.3/2014 IN C.A.NO.877/2014 TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES

ConnectedC.A. No. 881/2014III

PUNE MUNICIPAL CORP. J S WAD AND CO

VersusAJAY ARUN SHIRODKAR ASHA GOPALAN NAIR, ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEEFOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 3/2014

ConnectedC.A. No. 878/2014III

PUNE MUNICIPAL CORP. AND ANR. J S WAD AND CO

VersusABHAY PRIYHVIRAJ BOTHRA . AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, ASHA GOPALAN NAIRFOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 4/2014

ConnectedC.A. No. 883/2014III

PUNE MUNICIPAL CORP. AND ANR. J S WAD AND CO

Versus

Page 48: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3SURYAKUMAR SHANKAR NIRGUDKAR . AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, ASHA GOPALAN NAIRFOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 3/2014

ConnectedC.A. No. 885/2014III

PUNE MUNICIPAL CORP. J S WAD AND CO

VersusPANNALAL KUNKAD CHARITY SANSTHA . AND ORS. ASHA GOPALAN NAIRFOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 3/2014

ConnectedC.A. No. 880/2014III

PUNE MUNICIPAL CORP. AND ANR. J S WAD AND CO

VersusGULABAI MOTILAL GADIA . AND ORS. ASHA GOPALAN NAIRFOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 3/2014

ConnectedC.A. No. 882/2014III

PUNE MUNICIPAL CORP. J S WAD AND CO

VersusPADAMNAGAR CONSTRUCTIONS P.LTD.. AND ORS. VIKAS MEHTA, ASHA GOPALAN NAIRFOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 6/2014

ConnectedC.A. No. 884/2014III

PUNE MUNICIPAL CORP. AND ANR. J S WAD AND CO

VersusM/S.GOLDEN ERECTORS . AND ORS. ASHA GOPALAN NAIRFOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 3/2014

23 C.A. No. 7711-7712/2009IX

MURALIDHARRAO(DEAD) THR. LRS. NIRNIMESH DUBEVersusRAJESH DEORAO MESHRAM MONIKA GUSAIN

24 C.A. No. 1106/2009XVII

B.B.PATEL . AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHIVersusDLF UNIVERSAL LTD. RAJAN NARAIN

25 C.A. No. 7062-7063/2009XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusJ.S.GUJRAL . AND ANR. KANCHAN KAUR DHODI, DEVENDRA SINGH[R-2.1], [R-2.2]ONLY CA NO. 3819/2011 IS TO BE LISTED IN THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THEAPPROPRIATE BENCH.

ConnectedC.A. No. 3819/2011XI-A

COMMR.OF CUSTOMS COCHIN B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusANKINEEDU MANGANTI

26 C.A. No. 8170/2009XIV-A

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION THROUGH HONY.SECRETARY DR. NARESH CHAWLA HINGORANI & ASSOCIATES[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-1], GAURAV SHARMA[R-2],PURNIMA BHAT[R-3], DIPAK KUMAR JENA[R-4], [R-5]ANIL KATIYAR[IMPL]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8171/2009XIV-A

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION HINGORANI & ASSOCIATES

Versus

ARMY COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND ORS. DIPAK KUMAR JENA, [R-2], AMIT KUMAR[R-4], PURNIMABHAT[R-5]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 320/2009X

RACHIT GUPTA AND ORS. HINGORANI & ASSOCIATES

VersusGURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIV.THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR PURNIMA BHAT, DIPAK KUMAR JENA

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 528/2009X

ASHIMA MUTNEJA HINGORANI & ASSOCIATES

VersusGURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIV.&ANR DIPAK KUMAR JENA, PURNIMA BHAT

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 192/2010X

ASHIMA MUTREJA HINGORANI & ASSOCIATES

VersusGURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITYTHR. ITS REGISTRAR ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No. 266/2011In W.P.(C) No. 320/2009X

RACHIT GUPTA HINGORANI & ASSOCIATES

Versus

GENERAL VIJAY KUMAR SINGH . AND ORS. DIPAK KUMAR JENA

IN W.P.(C) No. - 320/2009,

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No. 419/2011In C.A. No. 8170/2009XIV-A

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION THROUGH DR.NARESH CHAWLA THROUGH ITS MEMBER MEDICALEDUCATION COMMITTEE AND ANR.

HINGORANI & ASSOCIATES

VersusPRADEEP KUMAR AND ORS.

Page 49: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3

IN C.A. No. - 8170/2009,27 C.A. No. 7403/2009

XVIICENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD. M/S ARS ASSOCIATES[P-1]VersusM/S.DLF POWER LTD.. AND ANR. KARANJAWALA & CO.[R-1], FARRUKH RASHEED[R-2]

ConnectedT.P.(C) No. 743/2010XVI-A

CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD. M/S ARS ASSOCIATES[P-1]

VersusDLF POWER LTD. DUA ASSOCIATES[R-1]FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2010

ConnectedC.A. No. 4166/2012XVII

BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD. AMIT SHARMA[P-1]

VersusEASTERN INDIA POWERTECH LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 2/2012 FOR [PERMISSION TOFILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 3/2012 FOR ON IA 86287/2012 FOR ON IA 87209/2013

ConnectedC.A. No. 7432/2012XVII

EASTERN INDIA POWER TECH.LTD. (FORMERLYKNOWN AS DLF POWER LTD.) KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusBHARAT COKING COAL LTD. AMIT SHARMA[R-1]FOR ON IA 87818/2012

ConnectedC.A. No. 624/2013XVII

BHARAT COKING COAL LTD. AMIT SHARMA[P-1]

VersusEASTERN INDIA POWERTECH LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.[R-1]FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2015 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTON IA 3/2015

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No. 43/2013In C.A. No. 7403/2009XVII

EASTERN INDIA POWERTECH LTD. (FORMERLY K KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

GOPAL SINGH CHAIRMAN & MNG DIRECTOR CENT KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY[R-1]

28 Crl.A. No. 1967/2009II

DEBESWAR BORA CHAIRMAN AND ORS. COAC, [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]VersusASSAM ROLLER FLOUR MILLS ASSOCIATION ANDANR.

JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA, RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL,[R-2]

29 C.A. No. 1653/2012IX

MAHATMA GANDHI MISSION TRUST . AND ANR. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

30 C.A. No. 884/2010XVII

DELHI ELECT. REGULT. COMMISSION PRITHA SRIKUMAR[P-1]Versus

BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. CYRIL AMARCHAND MANGALDAS AOR[R-1], HARPREETSINGH AJMANI[R-1][PR]

ConnectedC.A. No. 980/2010XVII

DELHI ELECT. REGULT. COMMISSION PRITHA SRIKUMAR[P-1]

VersusBSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED . CYRIL AMARCHAND MANGALDAS AOR, [R-1]FOR FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2010 FOR ON IA 7/2014

ConnectedC.A. No. 9003-9004/2011XVII

DELHI ELECT.REGUL.COMMN. TR.SEC. PRITHA SRIKUMAR[P-1]

VersusM/S BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD.. AND ORS. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-1]FOR FOR ON IA 5/2014

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No. 141/2014In W.P.(C) No. 328/1999PIL-W

DAMODAR VALLEY CORPORATION (DVC) THROUGHITS DIRECTOR (COMMERCIAL) SIDDHARTHA CHOWDHURY

VersusSRI LALIT JALAN CHAIRMAN AND PRESIDENT BSESYAMUNA POWER LTD. AND ORS. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR, ABHIJAT P. MEDH

FOR ON IA 1/2014ConnectedC.A. No. 1854-1855/2014XVII

DELHI ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION PRITHA SRIKUMAR[P-1]

VersusBSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD AND ORS. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-1], K. V. MOHAN[R-10]FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 1/2014

ConnectedC.A. No. 4012/2014XVII

BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusDELHI ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION PRITHA SRIKUMAR[R-1]FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2014 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ONIA 2/2014

ConnectedC.A. No. 4011/2014XVII

BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusDELHI ELECTRICTY REGULATORY COMMISSION PRITHA SRIKUMAR[R-1]

Page 50: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2014 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ONIA 2/2014

ConnectedC.A. No. 4013/2014XVII

BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusDELHI ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION PRITHA SRIKUMAR[R-1]FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 1/2014

ConnectedC.A. No. 4010/2014XVII

BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusDELHI ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION PRITHA SRIKUMAR[R-1]FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 1/2014

ConnectedC.A. No. 8387-8389/2014XVII

BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusDELHI ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONAND ORS.

PRITHA SRIKUMAR[R-1], LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH[R-2],ARJUN KRISHNAN[R-2]

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 4/2014ConnectedC.A. No. 8464-8466/2014XVII

BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusDELHI ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONAND ORS.

PRITHA SRIKUMAR[R-1], LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH[R-2],ARJUN KRISHNAN[R-4]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 4/201431 C.A. No. 6258/2013

IIISHOBHA CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRIVersus

HARIBHAI AMRUTLAL PACCHIGAR . AND ORS. RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI, RAKESH K. SHARMA, ANAGHA S.DESAI

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.1669/2017 in C.A. No.6258/2013III

HARIBHAI AMRUTLAL PACCHIGAR AND ANR. ANAGHA S. DESAI

Versus

RAMESHWAR GANPATLAL BAGADI AND ORS.SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], [R-5], JAIKRITIS. JADEJA[R-3], RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-7], SANDEEPSUDHAKAR DESHMUKH[R-6]

IN C.A. No. - 6258/2013,32 C.A. No. 10127/2011

IVBCI STAFF COLONY RESIDENTIAL WELFARE ASSON. RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRAVersusAPPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR INDUSTRIAL ANDFINANCIAL RECOSTRUCTION AND ORS.

J S WAD AND CO, [CAVEAT], SIBO SANKAR MISHRA, RAKHIRAY, GAGAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 10128/2011IV

RAJIV KUMAR AND ORS. SIBO SANKAR MISHRA

VersusBCI STAFF COLONY RESIDENTIAL WELFAREASSOCIATION

J S WAD AND CO[CAVEAT], RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA,RAKHI RAY, GAGAN GUPTA

33 C.A. No. 10279-10280/2010XVII

MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTIONCO. LTD. NEERAJ SHEKHAR[P-1]

VersusM/S JSW STEEL LTD. AND ANR. ROHIT K. SINGH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2286/2012XVII

MAH.STATE ELECT.DISTR.CO.LTD. LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH

Versus

UTTAM VALUE STEELS LTD. GAGRAT AND CO, UDAY B. DUBE, S. GOWTHAMAN, RAKESHK. SHARMA[CAVEAT]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2012 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 2/201334 C.A. No. 7416-7418/2012

XVSMT. YOGESHWARI KUMARI AND ORS. PARIJAT SINHAVersus

LAKE SHORE PALACE HOTELS PVT. LTD. AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA, PRATIBHA JAIN, CHRISTI JAIN, ANILKUMAR MISHRA

FOR ON IA 1/2015 FOR ON IA 4/2015 FOR ON IA 7/2015 FOR ON IA 10/2015 FOR RECALLING THE COURTSORDER ON IA 13/2016

ConnectedC.A. No. 7419-7424/2012XV

YOGESHWARI KUMARI AND ORS. PARIJAT SINHA

VersusLAKE SHORE PALACE HOTELS P.LTD &ORS. ANDANR.

E. C. AGRAWALA, PRATIBHA JAIN, CHRISTI JAIN, ANILKUMAR MISHRA

35 Crl.A. No. 1369/2011II-A

BANARSI PASWANVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. GOPAL SINGHMr. Vivek C. Solshe, Advocate is Amicus Curia on behalf of the Appellant on behalf of the SCLSC.

36 C.A. No. 4987/2012XIV-A

KASHMIR SAREE KENDRA S. K. BHATTACHARYAVersusRAMESH CHANDER ARORA ASHWANI KUMAR

Page 51: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 337 SLP(C) No. 20214-20216/2011

XIIT. VALSAN (D) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. AND ORS. RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSAVersusK.KANAGARAJ AND ORS. ETC.ETC. V. G. PRAGASAM, S. R. SETIA[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]

38 Crl.A. No. 1614-1618/2012II-A

MANIK AND ORS. SHIVAJI M. JADHAVVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

39 C.A. No. 4392/2017III

HEIR OF(D)THAKORE VASRAM AKHAMENABEN &ORSOMANATHA PADHAN[P-1.1.1.11], [P-1.1.1.9], [P-1.1.1.1],[P-1.1.1.8], [P-1.1.1.6], [P-1.1.1.5], [P-1.1.1.4], [P-1.1.1.3],[P-1.1.1.2]

VersusPOPATJI KHEMAJI KOLI (D) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. MOHAN PANDEY

40 C.A. No. 4304-4350/2016IV-A

G.BASAVARAJ . AND ORS. NARESH KUMAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA STATE OF KARNATAKA .AND ORS.

SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1], (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[R-2],[R-3], P. V. YOGESWARAN[R-4]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }41 C.A. No. 9339/2013

IIIVITHAL S SHETTY(D) THR LR. SHIV KUMAR SURIVersusSUNDER K SHETTY LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH

42 Crl.A. No. 2204/2011II-B

SANT RAJ SUSHIL BALWADAVersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN

43 C.A. No. 2410/2016XII-A

DUDDUMPUDI RAJAGOPAL @ TATABHAI A. SUBBA RAOVersusDUDDUMPURI VENKATARAYUDU G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

44 C.A. No. 4668-4669/2012XVII

RAHUL KUMAR GAURAV SHARMAVersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS

45 Crl.A. No. 168/2013II-C

JOGENDER @ JOGESHWAR MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF[P-1]VersusSTATE OF DELHI B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

46 C.A. No. 14944-14946/2017XI-A

K. POLY P. R. RAMASESH[P-1]Versus

PAVUNNY DEAD THROUGH HIS LRS. AND ORS. ETC.ETC.

USHA NANDINI. V[CAVEAT], [R-24], [R-26], C. K. SASI[R-8],[R-9], [R-10], [R-11], [R-12], [R-13], [R-14], VIPIN NAIR[R-15],K. RAJEEV, [R-16], [R-17], [R-18], [R-19], [R-20], ROMYCHACKO, [R-21]

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.1293-1295/2018 in C.A. No.14944-14946/2017XI-A

K. POLY P. R. RAMASESH

Versus

PAVUNNY (DEAD) BY LRS.

IN C.A. No. - 14944/2017, IN C.A. No. - 14945/2017, IN C.A. No. - 14946/2017, FOR ADMISSION47 Crl.A. No. 776/2012

II-AASHRAT @ ARSHAD SHAFIQ AHMAD ANSARI FARRUKH RASHEEDVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES] DEATH CASE

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 796-797/2012II-A

MOHD.HASAN MOHD.@ SHAIKH@HASANBATERIWALA AND ANR. FARRUKH RASHEED

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 777-778/2012II-A

FEHMIDA SNEHASISH MUKHERJEE

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

48 C.A. No. 9842-9843/2013XI-A

PRANA KRUSHNA SATAPATHY (D) TR.LRS. CHANDRA BHUSHAN PRASADVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]WITH DEFECTIVE DIARY NO. 56646 OF 2015 (APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION) FILED BY MR. CHANDRABHUSHAN PRASAD, ADV.

49 C.A. No. 8749/2013III

ASSISTANT DEFENCE ESTATES OFFICER (NOWDEFENSE ESTATE OFFICE) MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

VersusCOMMUNIDADE OF COTOMBI . AND ANR.

50 C.A. No. 5722-5723/2012IV-A

VIVEK KANKANE RAHUL KAUSHIKVersusDILIP AWASTHI . AND ORS. SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-2]

51 Crl.A. No. 1217-1221/2012II-C

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1]Versus

Page 52: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3

JEPPAIR AND ANR. ETC.S. THANANJAYAN[R-2], MAHESH THAKUR[R-3], S.GOWTHAMAN[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], SENTHILJAGADEESAN[R-1], [R-10]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 320-324/2014II-C

M.G.DEVASAHAYAM R. SATHISH[P-1]

Versus

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ORS.DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA[R-2], MAHESH THAKUR[R-3],S. GOWTHAMAN[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], SENTHILJAGADEESAN[R-10]

52 W.P.(C) No. 365/2012X

MINOR C.V.GAYATHRI .REP BY HER FATHER ANDNATURAL GUARDIAN S. VAITHEESWARAN AND ORS. L. K. PANDEY

Versus

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU HEALTH DEPARTMENTREP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT

M. YOGESH KANNA, K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1], B. BALAJI,RAJEEV MAHESHWARANAND ROY[R-4]G.SIVABALAMURUGAN[INT]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 460/2013X

R HARSHINI L. K. PANDEY

VersusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR. B. BALAJI

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 641/2014X

MINOR R.AKSHAYA AND ORS. L. K. PANDEY

VersusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR. B. BALAJI

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 519/2015X

MINOR D. LOKESWARI REP. BY HER FATHER ANDNATURAL GUARDIAN MR. S. DEIVA KALYANI ANDORS.

G.SIVABALAMURUGAN

VersusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR. B. BALAJI

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 533/2015X

N. MEYYAMMAI AND ANR. G.SIVABALAMURUGAN

VersusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR. B. BALAJI

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 558/2015X

T. VARSHINI (MINOR) REP. BY HER FATHER ANDNATURAL GUARDIAN A.P. THIRUVADI VIKASH SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 618/2015X

MINOR M. POOJALAKSHMI G.SIVABALAMURUGAN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1], NARESH KUMAR[R-3]

53 C.A. No. 6268-6269/2012XVII

SHIV SHANKAR AGARWAL RAJESH GOYAL[P-1], [P-2]VersusANIL PRAKASH SAXENA . AND ANR. ANISH KUMAR GUPTA

54 Crl.A. No. 2172/2014II

SOMCHANDRA VARINDER KUMAR SHARMAVersusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND RAHUL KAUSHIK

55 Crl.A. No. 2084-2085/2012II

INAPANURI KARUNA BABU ATUL SHARMAVersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D. MAHESH BABU[R-1], [R-2]

56 C.A. No. 8454/2016III

KAMLESH LAXMANBHAI PATEL RAHUL PRATAPVersus

MOONSHINE FILMS PVT. LTD. . AND ORS. EJAZ MAQBOOL[CAVEAT], VIKAS MEHTA, ROHIT K. SINGH,NIRNIMESH DUBE

ConnectedC.A. No. 8456/2016III

MOONSHINE FILMS PVT.LTD THROUGH ITSDIRECTOR AND ORS. GAGAN GUPTA

VersusRAJESH PATIL AND ORS. EJAZ MAQBOOL[CAVEAT], VIKAS MEHTAFOR [I A FOR BRINGING LRS. AND C D ] ON IA 19896/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 8455/2016III

JAYVANT VIRCHAND SHAH THROUGH POWER OFATTORNEY HOLDER SHRI ARUNKUMAR SHAH ANDANR.

FARRUKH RASHEED

Versus

M/S MOONSHINE FILMS PVT. LTD. . AND ORS. EJAZ MAQBOOL[CAVEAT], ROHIT K. SINGH, NIRNIMESHDUBE[R-5], [R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2645/2017III

M/S MOONSHINE FILMS PVT. LTD. T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS, [P-2][PR], [P-3][PR],[P-4][PR], [P-5][PR]

VersusRAJESH PATIL AND ANR. NIRNIMESH DUBE[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2831/2017III

JAYVANT VIRCHAND SHAH, THR POWER OFATTORNEY HOLDER BEEJ ARUNKUMAR SHAH FARRUKH RASHEED

VersusM/S. MOONSHINE FILMS PVT. LTD. . AND ORS. NIRNIMESH DUBE[CAVEAT]

Page 53: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 357 Crl.A. No. 672-677/2015

II-ARAVINDRA PANDEY AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEY[P-1]Versus

GUDDU RAI AND ANR. ETC.KUNAL VERMA[R-1], ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-2], SARLACHANDRA[R-4], MANJU JETLEY[R-5], CHANDRAPRAKASH[R-3], [R-6], HASAN ANZAR[R-7]

58 C.A. No. 7423/2014III

NATIONAL TEXTILLE CORPORATION LTD. KAUSTUBH ANSHURAJVersusBYRAMJEE JEEJEEBHOY PVT LTD . AND ANR. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV, BHARGAVA V. DESAI, B. SUNITA RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 7482/2014III

THE NATIONAL TEXTILE CORP. (S. MAHA)LTD KAUSTUBH ANSHURAJ

VersusBYRAMJEE JEEJIBHOY PVT. LTD. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

ConnectedT.P.(C) No. 215/2018XVI-A

BYRAMJEE JEEJEEBHOY PVT. LTD. AND ORS. BHARGAVA V. DESAI[P-1]

VersusTHE NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR AND ORS. KAUSTUBH ANSHURAJ[R-1], [R-2], ANIL KATIYAR[R-3]

FOR ADMISSION59 C.A. No. 9149/2013

IVONKAR CHANDER JAGPAL ARUN K. SINHA[P-1]VersusDROPTI DEVI (D) THR. LRS. SURENDER SINGH HOODA[R-1]

60 C.A. No. 13/2013XVII

MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. PRAMOD DAYAL, YASH PAL DHINGRAVersusHARYANA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMM. ANDANR. CHANDRA PRAKASH[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4753/2013XVII

DAKSHI HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. CHANDRA PRAKASH[P-1]

VersusHARYANA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COM. ANDANR. PRAMOD DAYAL[R-2]

FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 105408/2019

ConnectedC.A. No. 7945-7946/2014XVII

TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTIONCORPORATION LTD. SATYA MITRA GARG[P-1]

VersusTAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY CONSUMERSASSOCIATION AND ANR. AARTHI RAJAN[R-1], SHILPA SINGH[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4881/2015XVII

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. CHANDRA PRAKASH

VersusHARYANA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONAND ANR. PRAMOD DAYAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 6976/2016XVII

M/S JINDAL STAINLESS (HISAR) LIMITED(FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S JINDAL STAINLESSLIMITED)

SIDHARTH SETHI[P-1]

VersusHARYANA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION. AND ORS.FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 1/2016

61 T.C.(C) No. 98/2012XVI-A

CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE VELLORE PAREKH & CO.[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

AMIT KUMAR, TARA CHANDRA SHARMA[R-1], SUSHMASURI[R-1], R. CHANDRACHUD[R-1], [R-4], PRAGATINEEKHRA[R-1], ASTHA TYAGI[R-1], [I-2][IMPL], VAIJAYANTHIGIRISH[R-1], GAURAV SHARMA[R-2], K. V.VIJAYAKUMAR[R-3]

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGE ]ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 100/2012XVI-A

A.P.PVT.MEDICAL DENTAL COLLEGE MGT.ASSO. C. S. N. MOHAN RAO

VersusDR.N.T.R.UNIV.OF HEALTH SCIENCES . Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO, AMIT KUMAR

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 101/2012XVI-A

A.P.PVT.MEDICAL C. S. N. MOHAN RAO

Versus

DR.N.T.R.UNIV.OF HEALTH SCIENCES .Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO, T. C. SHARMA, AMIT KUMAR, GAURAVSHARMA[R-2], TARA CHANDRA SHARMA[R-3], PRASHANTBHUSHAN, [R-4]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 102/2012XVI-A

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH G. N. REDDY[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. UGRA SHANKAR PRASAD, GAURAV SHARMA[R-2], KAUSHIKPODDAR[R-3]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 103/2012XVI-A

KUM P.MOUNIKA SRI BHAVANI . AND ORS.

Versus

Page 54: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.TARA CHANDRA SHARMA[R-1], AMIT KUMAR[R-1], G. N.REDDY[R-2], GAURAV SHARMA[R-3]KAUSHIK PODDAR[I-1][IMPL]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 104/2012XVI-A

DD MEDICAL COLLEGE AND DD HOSPITAL K. K. MANI[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI[R-1], GAURAV SHARMA[R-2], K. V.VIJAYAKUMAR[R-3], B. BALAJI[R-3]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 105/2012XVI-A

DD MEDICAL COLLEGE AND DD HOSPITAL K. K. MANI[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.SUSHMA SURI[R-1], GAURAV SHARMA[R-2], K. V.VIJAYAKUMAR[R-3], B. BALAJI[R-3], TARA CHANDRASHARMA[R-4]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 107/2012XVI-A

PARENTS ASSO.MED.DENTAL.

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR, SURUCHII AGGARWAL

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 108/2012XVI-A

YASHSVI J.JHAVERI AND ORS.

Versus

MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA (MCI) AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR, , TARA CHANDRA SHARMA, HEMANTIKAWAHI

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 99/2012XVI-A

CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE VELLORE ASSO.SECRETARY PAREKH & CO.

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.AMIT KUMAR, KAUSHIK PODDAR[IMPL], SUSHMA SURI,GAURAV SHARMA[R-2], R. CHANDRACHUD, [R-3], K. V.VIJAYAKUMAR[R-3]

FOR [I/A FOR SEEKING PERMISSION TO AMENDMENT OF THE WRIT PETITION] ON IA 38622/2018ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 119/2012XVI-A

VOKKALIGARA SANGHA AND ORS.

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI[R-1], GAURAV SHARMA[R-3], TARA CHANDRASHARMA[R-4]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 120/2012XVI-A

J.J.M.MEDICAL COLLEGE AND ORS.

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.SUSHMA SURI[R-1], TARA CHANDRA SHARMA[R-1], GAURAVSHARMA[R-3]KAUSHIK PODDAR[I-1][IMPL]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 125-127/2012XVI-A

BIJAPUR LIBERAL DISTRIC EDUCATIONASSOCIATION (BLDE) UNIVERSITYVersus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI[R-1], GAURAV SHARMA[R-3], TARA CHANDRASHARMA[R-4]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 110/2012XVI-A

STATE OF TAMIL NADU K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. AMIT KUMAR[R-1], SUSHMA SURI[R-1], GAURAVSHARMA[R-2], TARA CHANDRA SHARMA[R-3]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 111/2012XVI-A

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. GAURAV SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], KAUSHIK PODDAR[IMPL],SUSHMA SURI[R-1]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 112/2012XVI-A

KARNATAKA PVT.MEDICAL LAWYER S KNIT & CO[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.SUSHMA SURI[R-1], VIPIN KUMAR JAI[IMPL], KAUSHIKPODDAR[IMPL], GAURAV SHARMA[R-3], TARA CHANDRASHARMA[R-4]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 113-114/2012XVI-A

SRI.SIDDARTHA ACADEMY OF HIGHER EDUCATION E. R. SUMATHY[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI[R-1], GAURAV SHARMA[R-2], GOPALSINGH[R-3]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 115-116/2012XVI-A

KLE ACADEMY AND HR.EDUCATION . LAWYER S KNIT & CO

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.SUSHMA SURI, TARA CHANDRA SHARMA[IMPL], , KAUSHIKPODDAR[IMPL], AMIT KUMAR, GAURAV SHARMA[R-2],GOPAL SINGH, [R-3]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 117-118/2012XVI-A

JSS UNIVERSITY SUSHIL BALWADA[P-1]

Versus

Page 55: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.SUSHMA SURI[R-1], GAURAV SHARMA[R-2], GOPALSINGH[R-3]TARA CHANDRA SHARMA[I-1][IMPL], KAUSHIKPODDAR[I-1][IMPL]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 123-124/2012XVI-A

BIJAPUR LIBRAL DISTT.EDU.ASSON.UNIV. SUSHIL BALWADA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI, TARA CHANDRA SHARMA[IMPL], , AMITKUMAR, GAURAV SHARMA[R-2], GOPAL SINGH, [R-3]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 128-130/2012XVI-A

J.S.S. UNIVERSITY AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI[R-1], GAURAV SHARMA[R-3], TARA CHANDRASHARMA[R-4]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 131/2012XVI-A

DEVARAJ URS ACADEMY HR.EDU. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 132-134/2012XVI-A

KARNATAKA PVT.MEDICAL DENTAL COLL. RAMESH BABU M. R.[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR[R-1], T. C. SHARMA[R-1], [R-4], V. N.RAGHUPATHY[R-2], GAURAV SHARMA[R-3]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 138-139/2012XVI-A

YENEPOYA UNIVERSITY AND ANR.

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR, GAURAV SHARMA[R-3]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 144/2012XVI-A

SANTOSH MEDICAL COLLEGE AMIT ANAND TIWARI

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 145/2012XVI-A

SANTOSH MEDICAL COLLEGE

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GAURAV SHARMA[R-2]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 142/2012XVI-A

MR.MAITY EDUCATIONAL

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI[R-1], AMIT KUMAR[R-2], KAUSHIKPODDAR[R-3]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 23-24/2013XVI-A

KARNATAKA RELIGIOUS AND LINGUISTIC MINORITYPROFESSIONAL COLLEGE ASSOCATION (REGD.)VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[CAVEAT], AMIT KUMAR

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 5/2013XVI-A

PONDICHERRY LING.MIN.M D COL.WEL.ASSOC A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

VersusMEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR, TARA CHANDRA SHARMA

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 7/2013XVI-A

ASSOCIATION OF MANAGEMENTS OF UNAIDEDPRIVATE MEDICAL AND ANR. RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. M. Y. DESHMUKH, GAURAV SHARMA

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 1/2013XVI-A

SRI RAMACHANDRA UNIVERSITY ASHWARYA SINHA[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GAURAV SHARMA[R-1]

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 2/2013XVI-A

SRM MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL ANIL KUMAR MISHRA-I

VersusGOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND ORS. TARA CHANDRA SHARMA

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 3/2013XVI-A

SRI RAMACHANDRA UNIVERSITY AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GAURAV SHARMA[R-2], TARA CHANDRA SHARMA[R-3]

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 4/2013XVI-A

PONDICHERRY LINGUISTIC MINORITY MEDICAL A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

VersusMEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ORS. GAURAV SHARMA, [R-1]

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 11/2013XVI-A

DATTA MEGHE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES . LAWYER S KNIT & CO[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GAURAV SHARMA, [R-3]

Page 56: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 37-38/2013XVI-A

NITTE UNIVERSITY (DEEMED UNIVERSITY) . LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 59/2013XVI-A

ERAS LUCKNOW MEDICAL COLLEGES ARPUTHAM ARUNA AND CO

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY(MEDICAL EDUCATION) AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 8/2013XVI-A

U.P. UNAIDED MEDICAL COLLEGES WELFAREASSOC. ALOK SHUKLA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 9/2013XVI-A

SANTOSH DENTAL COLLEGE AMIT ANAND TIWARI

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 10/2013XVI-A

SUNIL MADHAVRAO PATIL . AND ORS. GAURAV SHARMA

VersusTHE MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA . AMIT KUMAR

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 12-13/2013XVI-A

RAKSHITH UTHAPPA . AND ANR.

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GAURAV SHARMA, [R-2], TARA CHANDRA SHARMA[R-6]

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 16/2013XVI-A

MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICALSCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GAURAV SHARMA

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 17/2013XVI-A

GOVERNEMENT OF PUDUCHERRY V. G. PRAGASAM

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 18/2013XVI-A

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH GAURAV SHARMA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. AMIT KUMAR

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 14-15/2013XVI-A

NITTE UNIVERSITY(DEEMED UNIVERSITY) . LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GAURAV SHARMA[R-3]

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 19/2013XVI-A

DARUS SALAM EDUCATIONAL TRUST LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusMEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AMIT KUMAR, GAURAV SHARMA[R-1]

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 20/2013XVI-A

KLE ACADEMY OF HIGHER EDU. AND RESEARCHDEEMED UNIVERSITY LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 21-22/2013XVI-A

LAXMI MEMORIAL EDUCATION TRUST .

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GAURAV SHARMA, [R-3]

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 25/2013XVI-A

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH GAURAV SHARMA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 28-29/2013XVI-A

LAXMI MEMORIAL EDUCATION TRUST AND ORS. GAURAV SHARMA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 30/2013XVI-A

CBCI SOCIETY FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION AND ANR. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GAURAV SHARMA

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 48/2013XVI-A

MANIPAL UNIVERSITY AND ORS. LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 49/2013XVI-A

MANIPAL UNIVERSITY . AND ORS. LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Page 57: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 31-32/2013XVI-A

KLE ACADEMY OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 33-36/2013XVI-A

MANIPAL UNIVERSITY AND ORS. LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 39/2013XVI-A

DR. SRIKANT BEHERA DUSHYANT PARASHAR

VersusTHE STATE OF ODISHA AND ORS.

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 40/2013XVI-A

TANISHKA NIMISH BAKSHI . AND ORS. DUSHYANT PARASHAR

VersusMEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA .

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 42/2013XVI-A

SATHYABAMA UNIVERSITY DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 41/2013XVI-A

ASSOCIATION OF PVT. MEDICAL AND DENTALCOLLEGES OF U.P. DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 43/2013XVI-A

SRM KATTTANKULATHUR DENTAL COLLEGE DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA

VersusGOVERNMENT OF INDIA

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 44/2013XVI-A

SRM KATTTANKULATHUR DENTAL COLLEGE DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA

VersusGOVERNMENT OF INDIA

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 46/2013XVI-A

RAGAS DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 45/2013XVI-A

MADHA DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 47/2013XVI-A

RAGAS DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 60/2013XVI-A

SRM MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL AND RESEARCHCENTRE, SRM UNIVERSITY GAURAV SHARMA

VersusGOVERNMENT OF INDIA AMIT KUMAR

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 61/2013XVI-A

KASTURBA HEALTH SOCIETY . BINA GUPTA[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR[R-3]

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 62/2013XVI-A

KU. AYESHA . AND ANR.

VersusMEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA . GAURAV SHARMA, [R-1]

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 63-65/2013XVI-A

KARNATAKA PVT. MEDICAL AND DENTAL COLLEGESASSOCIATION .VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GAURAV SHARMA, [R-1]

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 66-69/2013XVI-A

DR. LAXMIKANTHA L AND ORS.

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. GAURAV SHARMA, [R-1]

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 70-71/2013XVI-A

JSS UNIVERSITY .

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GAURAV SHARMA, [R-1]

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 72/2013XVI-A

THE ALL KERALA DENTAL COLLEGE MANAGEMENTCONSORTIUMVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GAURAV SHARMA, [R-2]

Page 58: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 73/2013XVI-A

ASSN. OF COMBINED ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS ALOK SHUKLA[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GAURAV SHARMA, [R-3]

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 75/2013XVI-A

PRAVARA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GAURAV SHARMA[R-2]

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 76/2013XVI-A

PRAVARA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR, GAURAV SHARMA[R-2]

ConnectedT.C.(C) NO. 108/2013XVI-A

SOCIETY OF PVT. UNIVERSITY AND COLLEGES GAURAV SHARMA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 443/2016X

CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE LUDHIANANSOCIETY AND ANR. RAKESH K. SHARMA

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS.

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 750/2016PIL-W

SANKALP CHARITABLE TRUST AND ANR. AMIT KUMAR

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-1], GAURAV SHARMA[R-2],HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-4]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 28223/2016IX

ASSOCIATION OF MANAGEMENTS OF UNAIDEDPRIVATE MEDICAL AND DENTAL COLEGES,MAHARASHTRA

RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR, INDIALAW

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 25/2019XVI-A

P.A. INAMDAR AND ORS. PRAGYA BAGHEL

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

IN T.P.(C) No. - 284/2017,62 C.A. No. 4136/2013

XVIIEX NAIK KANSHI RAM MADHUSMITA BORA[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

63 Crl.A. No. 1674/2015II-A

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR,ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORA B. KRISHNA PRASADVersus

ASHOK RAMCHANDER CHUGANI AND ANR. V. D. KHANNA[R-1], NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-2]

64 Crl.A. No. 403/2013II-B

ROSHAN @ RUSTAM RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSUREVersusSTATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGH[R-1]

65 C.A. No. 9152-9154/2013XII

USILAMPATTI NATTATHI NADARGAL URAVINMU.AND ANR. G. INDIRA[P-1]

VersusP.SECRETARY -SCHOOL EDU.CHENNAI & ETC. ANDORS.

K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1][GR], GAUTAM NARAYAN[R-1],ARAVINDH S.[R-1]

FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 45351/2017

66 C.A. No. 9654/2014XVII

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE THROUGHTHE SECRETARY AND ANR. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

VersusEX NAIK RAM SINGHFOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2014 FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 3/2014

67 Crl.A. No. 268/2016II-A

SHIVJI SINGH CHANDRA PRAKASH[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. SANTOSH KUMAR - I[R-1], PRAMIT SAXENA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5]

68 C.A. No. 9359/2013III

PARSOTTAMBHAI KUBERBHAI PATEL AND ORS. MANISHA T. KARIAVersusRAMANBHAI PARSOTTAMBHAI PATEL . AND ORS. NIKHIL GOEL[CAVEAT]

69 C.A. No. 8249/2013XVII

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA BHARGAVA V. DESAIVersusSHRI SUNIL KRISHNA KHAITAN AND ORS. LEX-PERITIA AND CO.

ConnectedC.A. No. 1762/2014XVII

S.E.B.I BHARGAVA V. DESAI

VersusMADHURI S. PATTI AND ORS. DHEERAJ NAIR[CAVEAT]

70 Crl.A. No. 534-538/2015II-A

ZAHID KHAN ABDUL AZEEM KALEBUDDE, [P-1]Versus

Page 59: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1], KUNAL VERMA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6]

71 Crl.A. No. 210/2015II-C

KAMDEV JAIL PETITIONVersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ASWATHI M.K.[R-1]Mr. Yatish Mohan Verma, Advocate may be shown as Amicus Curiae

72 C.A. No. 667-671/2014XVII-A

SUNIL KUMAR GOEL VIKAS SINGH JANGRA, [P-1]VersusCOMMNR.OF CUSTOMS,NEW DELHI B. KRISHNA PRASADFOR ON IA 13629/2014

ConnectedC.A. No. 682-686/2014XVII-A

M/S SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PVT LTD VIKAS SINGH JANGRA[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]FOR ON IA 13630/2014 and IA No.903/2018-EARLY HEARING APPLICATION

73 Crl.A. No. 46/2017II-B

PRAKASH @ DINESHBHAI CHATURBHAI PATEL VIKASH SINGH[P-1]VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 987/2018II-B

KRUSHNAKANT @ KISHANBHAI REVATHY RAGHAVAN[P-1][SCLSC]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

74 C.A. No. 1447-1448/2015III

ARVIND KUMAR FATEHCHAND MANGHIRMALANI DINESH KUMAR GARGVersusRAJESHREE PRAVIN SONAWANE . AND ORS. ANAGHA S. DESAI

75 C.A. No. 10528/2017XII-A

THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER I CADDEPARTMENT

VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4],[P-5], [P-6]

VersusM/S JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LTD SHARMILA UPADHYAY[CAVEAT]

76 Crl.A. No. 169/2017II-A

VIJAYA VASANT SAWANT ALIAS VIJAYA SUBODHPARAB JYOTI MENDIRATTA

Versus

SHUBHANGI SHIVLING PARAB AND ORS. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-6], K J JOHNAND CO[R-5]

77 C.A. No. 4552-4553/2014III

SHRIGONDA TALUKA SAKHAR KAMGAR UN. RAVINDRA S. GARIAVersus

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[CAVEAT], SUNIL KUMAR VERMA,NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR, J S WAD ANDCO

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES]78 C.A. No. 5988/2014

III-ANAGAR NIGAM LUCKNOW YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-1]VersusSMT. KRISHNA DEVI AND ORS. AMIT PAWAN[R-1], [R-2], KAMINI JAISWAL[R-3], [R-4]WITH IA No.74797/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IA No.74798/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.77885/2017-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS and IANo.77887/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T."

79 Crl.A. No. 1222/2014II

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusRAM PAL AND ANR. DEBASIS MISRA

80 Crl.A. No. 1378/2014II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HARSH PARASHAR[P-1]VersusSANJU RAJAK S. RAMAMANI[R-1]

81 C.A. No. 6857/2018XII

AIDQUA HOLDINGS(MAURITIUS) INC E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1]Versus

TAMIL NADU WATER INVESTMENT COMPANYLIMITED LTD. AND ORS.

M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1], SURESHAN P.[R-1], T. V. S.RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1], [R-3], BRAJ KISHOREMISHRA[R-4], VINODH KANNA B.[R-5], RABINMAJUMDER[R-6], SIDHARTH SETHI[R-7]

82 C.A. No. 5961/2014XVII

UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S.DISHNET WIRELESS LTD.,CHENNAI E. C. AGRAWALA[R-1]FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2014 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES ON IA 2/2014 FOR[PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 3/2014 FOR MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER ON IA 4/2016

ConnectedC.A. No. 5783/2014XVII

U.O.I.,DOT ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S.AIRCEL LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA[R-1]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SYNOPSIS AND LIST OF DATES ON IA 2/2014 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILEANNEXURES] ON IA 3/2015 FOR MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER ON IA 4/2016

ConnectedC.A. No. 7212/2014XVII

M/S TATA TELESERVICES LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[P-1]

Versus

Page 60: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3UNION OF INDIA GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-1], BINA GUPTA[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6339/2014XVII

M/S TATA TELESERVICES LTD. AND ANR. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-1], BINA GUPTA[R-3]

83 C.A. No. 7033/2016XII-A

NIIT LIMITED DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHAVersusCOMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT COMMERCIALTAX OFFICER AND ORS. VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No. 7037/2016XII-A

NIIT LTD. DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA

VersusCOMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT COMMERCIALTAX OFFICER VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No. 7038/2016XII-A

NIIT LTD DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA

VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ABIDS DIVISIONDEPUTY COMMISSIONER (CT) AND ORS. VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No. 7035/2016XII-A

NIIT LTD. THOUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA

VersusABIDS DIVISION DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (CT) VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES

84 Crl.A. No. 586/2015II-B

MEHAR SINGH LAXMI ARVIND[P-1][SCLSC]VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGH, [R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1555/2015II-B

JAIPAL AND ANR. RICHA KAPOOR[P-1][SCLSC]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGH, [R-1]

85 Crl.A. No. 591/2015II

KISHAN SINGH KUNWAR SUSMITA LAL[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1][GR]

86 C.A. No. 8478/2014XVII

NABHA POWER LIMITED BHARAT VINOD SHARMA[P-1], [P-2]VersusPUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. ANDANR. K. V. MOHAN[R-1], ANURADHA MUTATKAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8694/2017XVII

NABHA POWER LIMITED E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusPUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED ANDORS. K. V. MOHAN[CAVEAT], NIKUNJ DAYAL[R-2][PR]

FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 53619/2017 FOR EX-PARTESTAY ON IA 53622/2017 and IA No.121851/2017-I/A FOR PERMISSION TO FILE CONVENIENCECOMPILATION - PER BY JAGMOHAN SIR, BO

ConnectedC.A. No. 8739/2017XVII

TALWANDI SABO POWER LTD. B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[P-1][PR]

VersusPUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ORS. NIKUNJ DAYAL[R-1][PR], K. V. MOHAN[R-2]

IA FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 54399/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT ON IA 54400/2017

87 Crl.A. No. 1541/2015II

SHIV PAL SINGH . AND ANR. RABIN MAJUMDER[P-1]VersusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANKUR PRAKASH[R-1]

88 Crl.A. No. 612/2019II-A

BIBI SIDHIKA SATYA MITRA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[R-1][ TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES] DEATH CASE

89 Crl.A. No. 2522/2014II-A

BABULAL PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOMEDEPARTMENT STATION HOUSE OFFICER SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

I.A.No.184434/18( Application for bail )90 Crl.A. No. 2393/2014

II-CKHUB RAM M. C. DHINGRA[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1][GR]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 200/2015II-C

RAM SINGH VIKRANT NARAYAN VASUDEVA[P-1][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ANR. VINOD SHARMA[R-1][GR]FOR SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE ON IA 1672/2015

Page 61: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 391 Crl.A. No. 1488/2017

II-CRAJESH KUMAR R. N. PODDAR[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1489/2017II-C

SHER SINGH APARNA JHA[P-1][SCLSC]

VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1]

92 SLP(Crl) No. 354-365/2015II

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH RUCHIRA GOEL[P-1]Versus

DURGA DEEN RAJPUT AND ORS.RAJNISH KUMAR JHA[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8],[R-9], [R-10], [R-11], [R-13], [R-20], SOMESH CHANDRAJHA[R-1], [R-2], [R-12], [R-14], [R-15], [R-16], [R-18], [R-19],[R-22]

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]93 C.A. No. 3385/2016

XIV-AVIACOM 18 MEDIA PVT LTD LIZ MATHEWVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-1]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 888/2016X

NEW DELHI TELEVISION LTD. AND ORS. B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON

VersusUNION OF INDIA GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-1]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1006/2017X

VIACOM 18 MEDIA PVT. LTD. AND ANR. LIZ MATHEW

VersusUNION OF INDIA GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-1]

94 C.A. No. 3279/2017XVI

SAJJAN KUMAR SARAF AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersusKABARI PVT. LTD AND ORS. KHAITAN & CO.

95 C.A. No. 11584/2016XIV-A

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD. N. ANNAPOORANI[P-1]VersusM/S. APPLIED ELECTRONICS PUNEET SINGH BINDRA[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]

96 C.A. No. 5018/2015XVII

PPN POWER GENERATING COMPANY PRIVATE LTD. SENTHIL JAGADEESANVersusTAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTIONCORPORATION LTD. AND ANR. C. K. RAI

97 C.A. No. 3253/2015XVII

BSE LTD. K J JOHN AND COVersus52 WEEKS ENTERTAINMENT LTD.(FORMERLYKNOWN AS SHANTANU SHEOREY AQUAKULT LTD.)AND ANR.

BHARGAVA V. DESAI, AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEY

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 4/2015 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA6/2015

ConnectedC.A. No. 4204/2015XVII

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA BHARGAVA V. DESAI

Versus52 WEEKS ENTERTAINMENT LTD.(FORMERLYKNOWN AS SHANTANU SHEOREY AQUAKULT LTD.)AND ANR.

AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEY[CAVEAT], K J JOHN AND CO

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2015 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 2/201598 Crl.A. No. 1206/2017

II-CKAMAL AND ORS. MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJ[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH NISHANTH PATIL[R-1]WITH I.A. NO. 60052 OF 2018 APPLICATION FOR BAIL IN RESPECT OF APPELLANT NOS. 3, 6 TO 9 & 11 TO14

99 Crl.A. No. 1031/2015II-A

VIJAY SINGH @ VIJAY KR. SHARMA AJAY KUMAR SINGHVersus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJISHANTANU SAGAR[INT]

Mr. Shantanu Sagar, Advocate has filed V/A On behalf of the Informant. His name may be shown in the CauseList.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1036/2015II-A

TANIK SINGH @ AWADH BIHARI PRASAD SINGH AJAY KUMAR SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJI

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1579/2017II-A

KRISHNANDAN SINGH . AND ORS. AMIT SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]and FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 105917/2017

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1578/2017II-A

BHAGWAN SINGH @ BHAGWAN PRASAD SHARMA AMIT SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]

Page 62: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 5417/2017

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 765/2017II-A

SHYAMNANDAN SINGH FAUZIA SHAKIL

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]

100 Crl.A. No. 1129/2017II

VIJAI PRAKASH RANJIT KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH HOMEDEPARTMENT SECRETARY ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD[R-1]

101 Crl.A. No. 1673/2017II-B

ASHOK KUMAR NIDHI[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGH[R-1]

102 C.A. No. 2575-2578/2016XIV-A

LARSEN AND TOUBRO LTD. PAREKH & CO.VersusPURI CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. AND ORS. M. R. SHAMSHAD, B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON

ConnectedC.A. No. 2580-2581/2016XIV-A

MOHINDER PURI M. R. SHAMSHAD

VersusLARSEN AND TOUBRO LTD. . AND ORS. PAREKH & CO., , B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON

ConnectedC.A. No. 2579/2016XIV-A

PURI CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. AND ORS. B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON

VersusLARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED AND ORS. PAREKH & CO.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 24531-24532/2017XIV

SHARDA KAPUR PRIYA PURI

VersusANGEL BROKING LTD VIKAS KUMAR

103 C.A. No. 8851-8853/2015XVII

CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1]Versus

PRAVEEN PATKAR AND ORS.MOHIT D. RAM[R-4], PIYUSH SHARMA[R-5], MERUSAGARSAMANTARAY[R-6], PUNEET TANEJA[R-7], MISHRASAURABH[R-3]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 2612/2016XVII

BHUPESH SEHGAL AND ORS. VANDANA SEHGAL[P-1], SATISH KUMAR[P-1], PRAVEENSWARUP[P-1]

Versus

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (DDA) AND ORS. GARIMA PRASHAD[R-1][PR], E. C. AGRAWALA[R-1][PR], K. R.SASIPRABHU[R-2], ANUP JAIN[R-3]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 316/2016PIL-W

DR. NARESH CHAND GUPTA PRASHANT BHUSHAN[P-1]

VersusNEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTAUTHORITY AND ORS. CHAIRMAN AND CEO ANDORS.

RAVINDRA KUMAR[R-1], ANUP JAIN[R-2]RAM KISHOR SINGH YADAV[IMPL]AMIT PAWAN[INT]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } and IA No.28784/2018-impleading partyConnectedW.P.(C) No. 387/2016X

HARISH CHAND TIWARI ABHISHEK GAUTAM

VersusUNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS THROUGH SECRETARY PRADEEP KUMAR MATHUR[R-3], ADARSH UPADHYAY[R-4]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 2/2017 FOR ONIA 4/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 5/2017

ConnectedT.P.(C) No. 1481/2018XVI-A

JUHI CHAWLA MEHTA AND ORS. APARNA BHAT

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION

104 C.A. No. 16435-16436/2017XVII

LT. COL GUNJAN CHOWDARY PANKAJ KUMARVersusUNION OF INDIA MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

105 Crl.A. No. 452/2017II-A

PRAKASH SHANTILAL VARMA NACHIKETA JOSHI[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-1],SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 458/2017II-A

PRAKASH SHANTILAL VARMA NACHIKETA JOSHI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-1],SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 450-451/2017II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

VersusRAMDEO AND ORS. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

Page 63: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3106 Crl.A. No. 188-189/2016

II-ADR. NITIN . AND ORS. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARIVersus

BALIRAM AND ANR. SHASHIBHUSHAN P. ADGAONKAR, NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR, [R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 187/2016II-A

BALIRAM SHASHIBHUSHAN P. ADGAONKAR

Versus

DR. NITIN AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR, [R-7],SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 2309/2017II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

Versus

DR. NITIN AND ORS. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6]

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 4282/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA4986/2017

107 Crl.A. No. 201/2017II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[P-1]VersusHEMRAJ REVATHY RAGHAVAN[R-1]

108 C.A. No. 19583-19585/2017III

GODREJ AGROVET LTD. SANTOSH KRISHNANVersusAGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE,PANVEL . AND ORS. ANAGHA S. DESAI, [R-2]

109 C.A. No. 511/2016XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersus

COURTS ON ITS OWN MOTION THR. REGISTRAR,HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI . AND ORS.

ANNAM D. N. RAOVARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[IMPL], CHIRAG M.SHROFF[IMPL]SUDHIR NAAGAR[INT], PRASHANT BHUSHAN[INT],GEETANJALI MOHAN[INT]

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]ConnectedC.A. No. 512/2016XIV-A

SANSKRITI SCHOOL B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[P-1]

Versus

COURTS ON ITS OWN MOTION . AND ORS. ANNAM D. N. RAO, [R-1], RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN[R-10],CHIRAG M. SHROFF[R-11]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No. 6619/2016XIV

FEDERATION OF RAILWAY OFFICERS ASSOCIATIONS GEETANJALI MOHAN

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP ON IA 1/2016

110 Crl.A. No. 196-200/2017II-A

KRISHNA MOHAN KISHOREVersus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1], SHAKIL AHMED SYED[R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11]

111 SLP(C) No. 6039-6041/2016IX

SHAIKH MIYA S/O SHAIKH CHAND ETC. ETC. NACHIKETA JOSHIVersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 6042/2016IX

MUSTER ASSISTANT KARMACHARI SANGHATNA AREGISTERED TRADE UNION BEARINGREGISTRATION NO. P.N. 3226

ANURAG PANDEY

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

and IA No.26058/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IA No.26061/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 17964/2019X

THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ORS. RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

VersusDR. SUSHILA JHA AND ANR.

112 Crl.A. No. 530/2016II-B

AMBALAL CHHAGANBHAI PARMAR RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 736/2016II-B

NATUBHAI SOMABHAI PATEL MANOJ C. MISHRA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 6190/2016

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 735/2016II-B

GUNVANTSINH BANESINH ZALA MANOJ C. MISHRA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 7711/2016

Page 64: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3113 C.A. No. 3102/2017

IVLAXMI NARAIN (DEAD) BINA GUPTAVersus

THE STATE OF HARYANA A. N. ARORA, SANJAY KUMAR VISEN, DHARMENDRA KUMARSINHA

TO LIST ALONGWITH IA NO. 95778/2018 (APPLICATION FOR BRING ON RECORD THE LEGAL REP)114 SLP(C) No. 15482/2016

XIVKHUNJAMAYUM BIMOTI DEVI PRATIK R. BOMBARDE[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS.ASHUTOSH DUBEY[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], TATINI BASU[R-4], [R-5]PURUSHOTTAM SHARMA TRIPATHI[IMPL], DIVAKARKUMAR[IMPL]

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]IA No.95243/2017-impleading party and IA No.95245/2017-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS and IA No.95249/2017-impleading party and IA No.95251/2017-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS[As per order dated 10.09.2018 the matter be not to deleted from thedate already notified for listing]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 15589/2016XIV

LEIMAPOKPAM ANANDI DEVI AND ORS. PRATIK R. BOMBARDE[P-1], [P-2], PUKHRAMBAM RAMESHKUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-4], [P-5], ANISH R. SHAH[P-3]

Versus

STATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS.

ASHUTOSH DUBEY[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], TATINI BASU[R-5],KUMAR MIHIR[R-11], D. ABHINAV RAO[R-15], [R-21], [R-36],[R-51], [R-53], [R-65], [R-87], [R-89], [R-94], [R-95], [R-96],[R-103], [R-104], [R-105], [R-107], [R-111], [R-115],RAJKUMARI BANJU[R-56], [R-119], LEISHANGTHEMROSHMANI KH[R-543], [R-664]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 18133/2016XIV

HEISNAM SURESH SINGH AND ORS. PRATIK R. BOMBARDE[P-1], [P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7], [P-8]

Versus

THE STATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS.ASHUTOSH DUBEY[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], TATINI BASU[R-5],RAJKUMARI BANJU[R-7], [R-417], [R-617], D. ABHINAVRAO[R-8], [R-15], [R-51], [R-94], [R-95], [R-96],LEISHANGTHEM ROSHMANI KH[R-10], [R-543], [R-664]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 18136/2016XIV

LOUREMBAM SURCHAND SINGH AND ORS. PRATIK R. BOMBARDE[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

Versus

THE STATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS.ASHUTOSH DUBEY[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], TATINI BASU[R-5],D. ABHINAV RAO[R-15], [R-104], [R-105], [R-106], [R-107],[R-111]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 18128/2016XIV

TOURANGBAM BABITA DEVI PRATIK R. BOMBARDE

VersusTHE STATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS. ASHUTOSH DUBEY[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 817/2016X

KHOIROM SANGITA DEVI AND ORS. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

VersusSTATE OF MANIPUR . AND ORS.

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 824/2016X

MAIBAM JEEVANLATA DEVI SOMIRAN SHARMA

VersusSTATE OF MANIPUR THROUGH ITS CHIEFSECRETARY

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 1017/2016X

CH. SUNITA DEVI ROLL NO. 588 AND 646 AND ORS. F. I. CHOUDHURY

VersusTHE STATE OF MANIPUR THROUGH THE CHIEFSECRETARY AND ORS.

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 9/2017X

THOKCHOM DINESH SINGH (ROLL NO. 11588) ANDORS. F. I. CHOUDHURY

VersusTHE STATE OF MANIPUR CHIEF SECRETARY ANDORS.

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 22/2017X

LAISHRAM RANIBALA DEVI RAJ KUMAR MEHTA

VersusTHE STATE OF MANIPUR GOVT. OF MANIPUR

115 C.A. No. 6549/2016XVII

ISMT LTD. MITTER & MITTER CO.VersusMAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION . AND ANR. CHANDRA PRAKASH[R-2]

116 Crl.A. No. 1680/2017II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH N. ANNAPOORANI[P-1][GR]VersusLAL SINGH @ LALA VIPLAV SHARMA[R-1][PR]

117 C.A. No. 235/2018XIV-A

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]VersusDISH TV INDIA LIMITED AND ORS. PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 241/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

Versus

Page 65: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3PRIME PAPERS AND PACKERS AVINASH KR. LAKHANPALFOR DELINKING THE PETITION ON IA 2/2017 FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 3/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 239/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusPRIME PAPERS AND PACKERS AVINASH KR. LAKHANPALFOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 1/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 2/2016 FOR DELINKING THE PETITION ON IA 3/2017 FOR EX-PARTE STAYON IA 4/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 240/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusPRIME PAPERS AND PACKERS AVINASH KR. LAKHANPALFOR DELINKING THE PETITION ON IA 2/2017 FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 3/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 236/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1], [P-2]

VersusPRIME PAPERS AND PACKERS AVINASH KR. LAKHANPALFOR [APP FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS] ON IA 1/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 2/2016 FOR DELINKING THE PETITION ON IA 3/2017FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 4/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 237/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusPRIME PAPERS AND PACKERS AVINASH KR. LAKHANPAL[R-1]FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 1/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 2/2016 FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 3/2017 FOR DELINKING THE PETITIONON IA 4/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 238/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusPRIME PAPERS AND PACKERS AVINASH KR. LAKHANPALFOR [APP FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS] ON IA 1/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 2/2016 FOR DELINKING THE PETITION ON IA 3/2017FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 4/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 242/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER TRADE AND TAXES B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusVIZIEN ORGANICS ZOHEB HOSSAIN[R-1]FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 2/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 243-351/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAXDEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND TAXES AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

Versus

M/S MUNSHI RAM RAM PRAKASH AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-8], ZOHEB HOSSAIN[R-11], KEDARNATH TRIPATHY[R-58]

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 110/2017ConnectedC.A. No. 352/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusSHAILA ENTERPRISESonly

ConnectedC.A. No. 4014/2019XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusM/S ASIAN POLYMERS VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 353/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusM/S M.S. ELECTRICALS SANJAY JAIN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9900/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusM/S I SMART MOBILE TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTDIA

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20129/2017XIV

COMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAXDEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND TAXES AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusM/S. S K ENGG. WORKSFOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 70393/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 354/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAXDEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND TAXES AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1], [P-2]

VersusM/S INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTORS

ConnectedC.A. No. 1489-1490/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS

Versus

Page 66: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3M/S VANSH ELECTROMECHANICAL DEVICES (P)LTD.IA No.6922/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.6923/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7796/2018XIV

COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusM/S VANSH ELECTROMECHANICAL DEVICES (P) LTDIA No.42202/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 18320-18321/2018XIV

COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusSHIV SHAKTI METALS PVT. LTD.FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 86945/2018

118 Crl.A. No. 376/2018II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[P-1][GR]VersusMEETHA LAL DUSHYANT PARASHAR[R-1][PR]

119 C.A. No. 3062/2017III

SAHARBHAI MOTIBHAI DESAI AND ORS. SHAMIK SHIRISHBHAI SANJANWALAVersusLAXMANJI BHALAJI AND ORS. AURA & CO., , [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

120 Crl.A. No. 870/2016II-C

SANJEEV AND ANR. CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI[P-1][PR], [P-2][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]

121 Crl.A. No. 1222/2018II-A

KOMAL PRASAD SHAKYA ANUJ BHANDARI, [P-1]VersusRAJENDRA SINGH AND ORS. RAJESH SINGH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], RAHUL KAUSHIK[R-4]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1223-1224/2018II-A

RAKESH MISHRA AND ANR. MANJU JETLEY[P-1]

Versus

RAJENDRA SINGH AND ORS. RAJESH SINGH, [R-1], [R-2], [R-3], RAHUL KAUSHIK[R-4],ANUJ BHANDARI[R-5], BIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA[R-6]

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 18533/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA18535/2016

122 Crl.A. No. 698/2017II-A

DR. PANCHANAND PRASAD JAYANT MOHANVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]

123 C.A. No. 11803-11804/2016XII-A

M/S. VATTI SUNDARI, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETRIXVATTI SUNDARI HITENDRA NATH RATH

VersusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP. BY ITS PRINCIPALSECRETARY, REVENUE (CT), DEPARTMENT, ANDHRAPRADESH AN AND ORS.

GUNTUR PRABHAKAR, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

124 C.A. No. 5698-5699/2018XII

UNION OF INDIA MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersus

A.N. NATCHIMUTHU AND ORS. ETC. AND ANR. K. PAARI VENDHAN[R-1], [R-1], K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

125 C.A. No. 2335/2017XII-A

M/S RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LIMITED ASHWANI KUMARVersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRALEXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

126 C.A. No. 3340/2017XVII

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA RAJNISH PRASADVersusGUJARAT INDUSTRIES POWER COMPANY LTD ANDANR. LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH

ConnectedC.A. No. 9020/2016XVII

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS. AVINASH SHARMA[P-1]

VersusHIMACHAL PRADESH SOCIETY OF CHEMISTS ANDDRUGGISTS ALLIANCE AND ORS.

DIVYESH PRATAP SINGH[R-1], [R-2], ANSAR AHMADCHAUDHARY[R-3], ADITYA VERMA[R-5], KHAITAN & CO.[R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 134/2017XVII

GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED AND ANR. KHAITAN & CO., RAJNISH PRASAD

VersusGUJARAT INDUSTREIS POWER COMPANY LTD. . ANDANR. LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH

IA ONLY and IA No.4162/2018-PERMISSION TO PLACE ADDITIONAL FACTS AND GROUNDS127 C.A. No. 1363/2017

XVIIDLF HOME DEVELOPERS LTD AND ANR. S. S. SHROFF, GARIMA BAJAJVersusESS CEE SECURITIES PVT LTD AND ORS. AURA & CO.

128 C.A. No. 3936/2017XII-A

N. SIVARAJ MADIGA ANJANI AIYAGARI[P-1]VersusM. DURGA REDDY . AND ORS. D. BHARATHI REDDY[R-1]

129 C.A. No. 15035/2017III-A

B.D. SHARMA MANJU JETLEY[P-1]Versus

Page 67: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3STATE OF UP AND ORS. VISHWAJIT SINGH[R-2], RAVINDRA KUMAR[R-6]

130 C.A. No. 20965/2017XVII

AIR VICE MARSHAL AK BHATTACHARYA RABIN MAJUMDERVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

131 W.P.(C) No. 240/2017X

AMAR SINGH P. S. SUDHEERVersusUNION OF INDIA UNION OF INDIA MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1][ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]

132 C.A. No. 5419/2017XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S BRAHMA DEVELOPERS THROUGH ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR P. SOMA SUNDARAM[R-1][PR]

133 C.A. No. 9334/2017XII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ANDCUSTOMS VISAKHAPATNAM I B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S ESSAR STEEL INDIA LTD (FORMERLY HY GRADEPELLETS LTD.) ANIRUDDHA DESHMUKH[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.50173/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.50175/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

134 C.A. No. 9332/2017XII-A

M/S ANDHRA CEMENTS LTD T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYASVersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICETAX AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, GUNTUR PRABHAKAR[R-2]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.97611/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS135 C.A. No. 15502/2017

III-AGHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RAVINDRA KUMARVersusDEEPAK KUMAR SINGH AND ORS. SUBHASISH MOHANTY[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 33376/2017XI

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RAVINDRA KUMAR[P-1]

VersusM/S EEMVEE BUILDWELL AND ORS. APARNA BHAT[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

ConnectedC.A. No. 765/2018III-A

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RAVINDRA KUMAR[P-1]

VersusKARAN SINGH AND ORS. SUBHASISH MOHANTY[R-1], [R-4]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 18357-18358/2019XI

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA

VersusISHAN INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION SOCIETY ANDANR.

SMARHAR SINGH[CAVEAT], RAVINDRA KUMAR[R-2], [R-3],[R-4]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.99370/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT.

136 C.A. No. 10189-10190/2018XIV-A

MD. MUSTAKIN ALI @ MUSTAKIN KHA AND ANR. MADHUSMITA BORAVersus

THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], SHUVODEEP ROY[R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5]

137 Crl.A. No. 1401/2017II-A

ANIL KUMAR SINGH ANISHA UPADHYAY[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR SECRETARY AND ORS. NIRANJANA SINGH[R-1], ABHISHEK SINGH[R-2], [R-3]FOR ADMISSION and IA No.57966/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.57965/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE SLP

138 Crl.A. No. 1600/2017II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[P-1]VersusHEMAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.66078/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.66085/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.130213/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS and IA No.130214/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

139 Crl.A. No. 1473-1474/2017II-C

IRAPPA SIDDAPPA MURGANNAVAR GAURAV AGRAWALVersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1][GR][ TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES] DEATH CASE<b>(1)</b>Non-mentioning OF the number of daysof delay, with affidavit and court fee.<b>-</b><u>DELAY DAYS NOT MENTIONED </u><b>(2)</b>Noninclusion of complete listing proforma filled in, signed in the paper-books.<b>-</b><u>SECTION NOTCORRECT </u><b>(3)</b>Annexures..............referred to in the petition not true copies of the documentsbefore the court below/ annexures not in chronological order as per list of dates.<b>-</b><u>MARGINALDATES NOT TALLY WITH FINDINGS OF ALL ANN.S AND ALSO NOT IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER, LIST OFDATES TO MBE FILED PROPERLY AND CHECKED LATER ON </u><b>(4)</b>Other<b>-</b><u>RESULTOF CRL.A.2802/13NOT MENTIONED IN LIST OF DATES </u><b>(5)</b>Other<b>-</b><u>CUSTODYCERTIFICATE REQUIRED AND TO BE FILED IN ALL PAPER BOOKS ALSO,NAME OF THE PETITIONER NOTTALLY WITH I/ORDER, MENTION PARA 1A OF SLP , D.NO. NOT MENTION IN FIR FORMAT </u> FORCONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 66488/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 66493/2017 and IA No.76626/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS

Page 68: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3140 Crl.A. No. 2189/2017

II-CSHAIL KUMARI NANITA SHARMA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1]with interim relief and for final disposal

141 C.A. No. 15501/2017XII-A

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANR. GUNTUR PRABHAKARVersusM/S. TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE INTERNATIONALVENTURES LIMITED AND ORS. BELA MAHESHWARI[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R.142 C.A. No. 17356/2017

IIIKOKILABEN JAWAHAR PANDYA AND ANR. BINA GUPTAVersus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-4], M/S ARS ASSOCIATES[R-2],[R-3]

143 C.A. No. 19629/2017III-A

JAGBEER SINGH AND ORS. MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJVersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. VISHWAJIT SINGH[R-2]

144 C.A. No. 6827/2018XVII

EX. CADET MOHIT KUMAR JAKHAR SANJAY KUMAR VISENVersus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], KANCHANKAUR DHODI[R-5]

145 C.A. No. 4801/2018XVII

INDIAN WIND POWER ASSOCIATION (NRC) VISHAL GUPTAVersus

CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION(CERC) AND ANR.

SAURABH MISHRA[R-1]M. P. DEVANATH[IMPL]LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH[INT], K. R. SASIPRABHU[INT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4939/2018XVII

U.P. SUGAR MILLS CO GEN ASSOCIATION VISHAL GUPTA[P-1]

VersusCENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION(CERC) SAURABH MISHRA[R-1]

FOR FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 69968/2018ConnectedDiary No. 22737-2018XVII

GREEN ENERGY ASSOCIATION ANANNYA GHOSH

Versus

CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION SAURABH MISHRA[R-1]SHIPRA GHOSE[INT]

IA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 102836/2018 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING ON IA 102837/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 45274-2018XVII

SANJIV PRAKASHAN SESHATALPA SAI BANDARU

VersusCENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONIA FOR PERMISSION TO FILE APPEAL ON IA 2807/2019 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA2808/2019

ConnectedC.A. No. 2007/2019XVII

SARAF EXPORT PALACE SESHATALPA SAI BANDARU

VersusCENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONAND ANR.IA No.24851/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.24849/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE APPEAL and IA No.24850/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 3392-2019XVII

JAI MANGAL INFRAPOWERS PVT. LTD. SESHATALPA SAI BANDARU

VersusCENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONAND ANR.IA No.24018/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.24015/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE APPEAL and IA No.24017/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 3478-2019XVII

SIR KASTUR CHAND DAGA SOLAIRE INC. SESHATALPA SAI BANDARU

VersusCENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONAND ANR.IA No.23954/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.23946/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE APPEAL and IA No.23951/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 2008/2019XVII

KISHAN GOPAL RUNGTA PVT. LTD. SESHATALPA SAI BANDARU

VersusCENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONAND ANR.IA No.24223/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.24221/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE APPEAL and IA No.24222/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 3485-2019XVII

MAYUR DYECHEM INTERMEDIATES LLP SESHATALPA SAI BANDARU

VersusCENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONAND ANR.

Page 69: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3IA No.23726/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.23721/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE APPEAL and IA No.23725/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL [ TO BETAKEN UP ALONG WITH ITEM NO. 27 I.E. D. NO. 3710/2019 ]

ConnectedDiary No. 3710-2019XVII

SIR KASTUR CHAND DAGA SOLAR POWER INC. SESHATALPA SAI BANDARU

VersusCENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONAND ANR.IA No.22261/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.22259/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE APPEAL and IA No.22256/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 6135-2019XVII

NATIONAL ENTERPRISES SESHATALPA SAI BANDARU

VersusCENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONAND ORS.IA No.42707/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.42704/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE APPEAL and IA No.42705/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 2527/2019XVII

RAJ OVERSEAS SESHATALPA SAI BANDARU

VersusCENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONAND ANR.IA No.32847/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.32840/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE APPEAL and IA No.32843/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 4281/2019XVII

SNCA ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. MADHURIMA TATIA

VersusCENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONAND ANR.IA No.57188/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.57191/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.57163/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE APPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 8683-2019XVII

TITHAL TRADING PVT. LTD. MADHURIMA TATIA

VersusCENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONAND ANR.IA No.43439/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.43435/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE APPEAL and IA No.43437/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 8961-2019XVII

NAVEEN DISTRIBUTORS MADHURIMA TATIA

VersusCENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONAND ANR.IA No.47708/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.47704/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE APPEAL and IA No.47707/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 3966/2019XVII

NAVKAR WOOLLENS PVT. LTD. MADHURIMA TATIA

VersusCENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONAND ANR. SAURABH MISHRA[R-1]

IA No.54023/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.54020/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.54022/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING APPEAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 5161/2019XVII

KSHITIJ SYNERGY CORPORATION PVT. LTD SESHATALPA SAI BANDARU

VersusCENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONAND ANR. SAURABH MISHRA[R-1]

IA No.80402/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.80400/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE APPEAL and IA No.80401/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

146 Crl.A. No. 1234/2018II-A

NIJAMUDDIN SARTAJUDDIN MUNSHI PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMARVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

147 Crl.A. No. 901/2018II-B

MAHIPAL SINGH AND ANR. N. ANNAPOORANIVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-1]IA No.82248/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

148 SLP(Crl) No. 8047-8048/2019II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1]VersusPHOOLCHAND RATHORE[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]

149 C.A. No. 250-252/2019XVII

TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA RITESH KUMARVersus

M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. AND ORS. ETC.S. S. SHROFF[CAVEAT][CAVEAT], K. R.SASIPRABHU[CAVEAT], HARSHKAUSHIK[CAVEAT][CAVEAT][CAVEAT][CAVEAT][CAVEAT][CAVEAT][CAVEAT][CAV

Page 70: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3150 C.A. No. 4560/2019

XI-ADIRECTOR, MES MEDICAL COLLEGE ARVIND GUPTAVersusTHASNEEM TAJ E. AND ORS. LAKSHMEESH S. KAMATH[CAVEAT], [R-2]

151 C.A. No. 6145/2019III

COMMISSIONER OF CGST MUMBAI WEST B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S JMSM SATELLITE (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[CAVEAT]

152 C.A. No. 2105/2009XVII

ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMARVersusPOWER GRID CORP.OF INDIA LTD. . AND ORS. PRAMOD DAYAL

153 C.A. No. 2229/2008XVII

PURVANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. ANDORS. AND ORS. RAKESH UTTAMCHANDRA UPADHYAY

VersusM/S JALAN CONCAST LTD. AND ORS. AND ORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL, TUSHAR BAKSHI

154 C.A. No. 4964/2008XVII

VOCATION INVESTMENT NEERAJ SHEKHAR, [P-2], [P-3]VersusADITYA BIRLA NUVO LTD. . AND ANR. S. S. SHROFF, BHARGAVA V. DESAI[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4205/2008XVII

AIDEK TOURISM SERVICES PVT. LTD. NEERAJ SHEKHAR

VersusADITYA BIRLA NUVO LTD. . AND ORS. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN, S. S. SHROFF, BHARGAVA V. DESAI

ConnectedC.A. No. 7218/2009XVII

M/S.AIDEK TOURISM SERVICES P. LTD. AND ORS.AND ANR. NEERAJ SHEKHAR

Versus

SECURITIES AND EXCH.BD.OF INDIA AND ORS. S. S. SHROFF, BHARGAVA V. DESAI, K J JOHN ANDCO[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6669/2009XVII

AIDEK TOURISM SERVICE PVT. LTD. NEERAJ SHEKHAR[P-1]

Versus

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ANDORS.

K J JOHN AND CO[CAVEAT], BHARGAVA V. DESAI[R-1], S. S.SHROFF[R-2], SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[R-3], [R-5], E. C.AGRAWALA[R-6]

155 C.A. No. 7380-7381/2008XVII

EMERSON NETWORK POWER INDIA PRIVATE LTD.(FORMERLY KNOWN AS TATA LIEBERT LTD.) ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusTHE DIRECTOR AND ANR. SHALLY BHASIN

156 C.A. No. 7104/2009XIV-A

MAGMA LEASING LTD. THROUGH ITS CONSTITUTEDATTORNEY MR. VIJAY JOSHI SUSMITA LAL

VersusM/S.HCL INFOSYSTEMS LTD. THROUGH ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR ARPUTHAM ARUNA AND CO

157 C.A. No. 4104-4107/2008XVII

TIRUMALA BALAJI ALLOYS PVT.LTD. . AND ORS. SHIBASHISH MISRAVersus

M/S JINDAL STEEL AND ORS. T. MAHIPAL, RASHMI SINGH, PRAMOD DAYAL, KHAITAN &CO.

158 C.A. No. 3607-3610/2008XVII

M/S JINDAL STEEL AND POWER LTD. KHAITAN & CO.VersusCHATTISGARH STATE ELECT. REG. COMMN.. ANDORS. RAM SWARUP SHARMA, PRAMOD DAYAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 4968-4969/2010XVII

CHHATISGARH STATE POWER DISTRN.CO.LTD. MCLM & CO.[P-1]

VersusARYAN COAL BENEFICATIONS P.LTD. AND ANR. PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1], M. R. SHAMSHAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5683-5685/2010XVII

CHHATISGARH STATE POWER DISTRN.CO.LTD. MCLM & CO.[P-1]

VersusSALASAR STEEL AND POWER LTD. AND ORS ANDORS.

SHARMILA UPADHYAY[R-1], PRAMOD DAYAL[R-2],DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3134/2011XVII

M/S. JAYASWAL NECO INDUSTRIES LTD. DEVASHISH BHARUKA

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE REGULATORY COMM. PRAMOD DAYAL, RAM SWARUP SHARMAFOR ON IA 1/2011

ConnectedC.A. No. 5934-5935/2016XVII

SALASAR STEEL AND POWER LTD. LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTIONCOMPANY LTD. . AND ANR. RAM SWARUP SHARMA, C. K. RAI

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 3/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 2873/2018XVII

CHHATTISHGARH STATE POWER DISTRICUTION CO.LTD APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATISGARH STATE ELECT. REGLT. COMMISSIONTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANR. PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1]

Page 71: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 28721/2018 FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 28723/2018

ConnectedC.A. No. 22944/2017XVII

GODAWARI POWER AND ISPAT LIMITED HASAN MURTAZA

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTIONCOMPANY LTD. AND ANR. APOORV KURUP[R-1], PRAMOD DAYAL[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1598-1599/2018XVII

SALASAR STEEL AND POWER LTD. HASAN MURTAZA

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTIONCOMPANY LTD. AND ANR. APOORV KURUP[R-1], PRAMOD DAYAL[R-2]

IA FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 9918/2018ConnectedC.A. No. 3038/2018XVII

SKS ISPAT AND POWER LTD RAJESH KUMAR

VersusCHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION CO.LTD AND ANR. PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1]

IA FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 23209/2018ConnectedC.A. No. 1841-1842/2018XVII

M/S API ISPAT AND POWERTECH (P) LTD HASAN MURTAZA

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTIONCOMPANY LTD AND ANR.IA FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 16131/2018

ConnectedC.A. No. 3032/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION CO.LTD. APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ANR. PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1], HASAN MURTAZA[R-2], [R-2]

IA No.22538/2018-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.22536/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL andIA No.22537/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedC.A. No. 3026/2018XVII

CHHATISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION CO.LTD. APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ANR. PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1], HASAN MURTAZA[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3031/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION CO.LTD. APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATROYCOMMISSION AND ANR. PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1]

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 27641/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 27642/2018

ConnectedC.A. No. 3028/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COLTD APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ANR. HASAN MURTAZA[R-2]

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL ON IA 26902/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 26909/2018 FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 26914/2018 [ TO BE TAKEN UPALONGWITH ITEM NO. 8 I.E. D.NO.2647/2018 ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3035/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COLTD APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ANR. PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1], RAJ KISHOR CHOUDHARY[R-2]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 28012/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 28015/2018

ConnectedC.A. No. 3034/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COLTD APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ANR. PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1]

FOR PERMISSION TO PLACE ADDITIONAL FACTS AND GROUNDS ON IA 27697/2018 FOR EX-PARTE STAYON IA 27700/2018

ConnectedC.A. No. 3033/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION CO.LTD. APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ORS. PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1]

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 28337/2018 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILINGON IA 28340/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 28342/2018 FOR EX-PARTESTAY ON IA 28345/2018[ TO BE TAKEN UP ALONGWITH ITEM NO. 8 I.E. D.NO.2647/2018 ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3023/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COLTD APOORV KURUP

Versus

Page 72: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3CHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ANR. PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1], HASAN MURTAZA[R-2]

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL ON IA 28638/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 28640/2018 FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 28643/2018[ TO BE TAKEN UPALONGWITH ITEM NO. 8 I.E. D.NO.2647/2018 ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3022/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION CO.LTD. APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ANR. PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1]

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL ON IA 27999/2018 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS AND GROUNDS] ON IA 28001/2018 FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 28002/2018 [ TOBE TAKEN UP ALONGWITH ITEM NO. 8 I.E. D.NO.2647/2018 ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3029/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COLTD APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ANR. PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1], HASAN MURTAZA[R-2]

FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 28468/2018 FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 28469/2018

ConnectedC.A. No. 3027/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COLTD APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ANR. PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1], HASAN MURTAZA[R-2]

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 28473/2018 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILINGON IA 28474/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 28475/2018 FOR [AD-INTERIM EX-PARTE STAY] ON IA 28476/2018[ TO BE TAKEN UP ALONGWITH ITEM NO. 8 I.E.D.NO.2647/2018 ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6114/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COLTD APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ANR. PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1], HASAN MURTAZA[R-2]

FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 63462/2018 FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 63463/2018

ConnectedC.A. No. 6116/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION CO.LTD. APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1], HASAN MURTAZA[R-2], [R-2]

FOR FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL GROUNDS AND DOCUMENTS] ON IA 63272/2018159 C.A. No. 4279/2008

XVIITATA STEEL LTD. . AND ANR. MANIK KARANJAWALAVersusJHARKHAND STATE ELECT.REGU.COMMISSION FARRUKH RASHEED

160 C.A. No. 4733/2008XVII

POWERGRID CORP.OF INDIA LTD.VersusNORTH EASTERN ELECT.POWER CORP.LTD. ANDORS.

SHARMILA UPADHYAY, T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR[R-6],PRAMOD DAYAL, [R-8], GOPAL SINGH[R-8]

161 C.A. No. 5298-5299/2008XVII

M/S.INDRAPRASTHA POWER GEN.CO.LTD. K. V. MOHANVersus

DELHI ELECT.REGU.COMM.. AND ORS. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR, RAKESH K. SHARMA, RAJKUMAR MEHTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 5300-5301/2008XVII

M/S.PRAGATI POWER CORP.LTD.THR.DIR. K. V. MOHAN

Versus

DELHI ELECT.REGU.COMMISSION RAKESH K. SHARMA, RAJ KUMAR MEHTA, PUKHRAMBAMRAMESH KUMAR

162 C.A. No. 2535-2544/2008XVII

TRANSMISSION CORP.OF A.P.LTD.(A.P. TRANSCO)AND ANR. SARLA CHANDRA[P-1]

VersusA.P.STATE ELECT. REGULATROY COMMN. AND ANR. K. V. MOHAN[R-1], MCLM & CO.[R-2][PR]

163 C.A. No. 5408/2008XVII

JAGRAN PRAKASHAN LIMITED P. I. JOSEVersusRAVI SHANKAR PANDEY . AND ANR. RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON

164 C.A. No. 6500/2009XVI

KAMARHATTY CO.LTD. LEGAL OPTIONSVersusC.E.S.C.LIMITED AND ORS. KHAITAN & CO.

165 C.A. No. 1326-1327/2010XI-A

THE SUB REGISTRAR ERNAKULAM KOCHI 16 C. K. SASIVersusK. SYED ALI KADAR PILLAI AND ANR. ROMY CHACKO, [R-2], SUMITA HAZARIKA

166 C.A. No. 4085-4088/2009IX

PADMINI TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED KARANJAWALA & CO.[P-1]VersusSECURITIES EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA BHARGAVA V. DESAI[R-1]

Page 73: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 3167 C.A. No. 6532/2008

XVIIGUNTUR COMMUNCIATION NETWORK(P) LTD. PROMILAVersusM/S RAGHAVENDRA CABLE NETWORK AND ANR. RAJESH SRIVASTAVA

168 C.A. No. 6473/2012IX

BHARATIYA MAZDOOR SANGH SHIVAJI M. JADHAVVersus

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR, E. R.SUMATHY

169 C.A. No. 2104/2009XVII

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA K J JOHN AND COVersusMEGA CORP.LTD. A. V. RANGAM

170 C.A. No. 3/2009XVII

PRASAR BHARATI (BROADCASTING CORPORATIONOF INDIA) RAJEEV SHARMA

VersusENTER 10 TELEVISION P. LTD. PRADEEP MISRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 5/2009XVII

PRASAR BHARATI RAJEEV SHARMA

VersusZEE TUNER LTD. ABHINAV MUKERJI

171 C.A. No. 2358/2009XVII

MARATHWADA INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersusMAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION

NEW DELHI06-12-2019 17:38:01

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 74: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 33 OF 2019 FROM : 10-12-2019 To 12-12-2019

COURT NO. : 4HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 C.A. No. 2742/2009

IV-AMONAPPA KOTTARI(D) BY LRS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]Versus

DAVID PINTO AND ANR. ANIL KUMAR MISHRA-I[R-1], ROMYCHACKO[R-2]

2 C.A. No. 5782/2008IV

INDUSTRIAL CABLES (I) LTD. MANJU JETLEYVersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX,PATIALA B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

and IA No.96571/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTSConnectedC.A. No. 7688/2009IV

INDUSTRIAL CABLES (INDIA) LIMITED MANJU JETLEY

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYARand FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 96574/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 5784/2008IV

INDUSTRIAL CABLES (I) LTD. MANJU JETLEY

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA(PUNJAB) B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

and FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 96568/2017ConnectedC.A. No. 5785/2008IV

INDUSTRIAL CABLES (INDIA) LTD. MANJU JETLEY

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA(PUNJAB) B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

and FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 96579/2017

3 C.A. No. 13516/2015XII

FERRODOUS ESTATES (PVT) LTD. GEETHA KOVILAN[P-1][PR], VIKASMEHTA[R-1][PR], [P-1]

VersusP.GOPIRATHNAM (DEAD) AND ORS. ANDORS.

VIJAY KUMAR[R-1], K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-6],[R-7]

4 C.A. No.3964-3971/2007IV-A

M/S. BANGALORE CLUB GAUTAM NARAYAN[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

5 C.A. No. 2019/2010IX

SHRIDHAR C.SHETTY (DECEASED) THR.LRS. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusADDL.COLLECTOR AND COMPETENTAUTHORITY AND ORS. ASHA GOPALAN NAIR, ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

Page 75: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 46 C.A. No. 6032/2008

XVIIBIHAR STATE FINANCIAL CORP. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARYVersusM/S SINGH REFRACTORIES WORKS SHARMILA UPADHYAY

7 C.A. No. 4202/2010IV-A

M/S AGRO SOLVENT PRODUCTS(P) LTD. BRIJ BHUSHAN[P-1]VersusADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX AND ANR. AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

8 C.A. No. 4013/2007XVII

K.S.MANI VIJAY KUMARVersusM.N.SUKUMARAN ROMY CHACKO[R-1]

9 C.A. No. 1725/2010IV-A

IQBAL BASITH AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHYVersusN. SUBBALAKSHMI . AND ORS. PURUSHOTTAM SHARMA TRIPATHI[R-1], [R-3]

10 C.A. No. 8651/2009XI-A

M/S TRAFALGAR HOUSECONSTRUCTION (T) SATYAMSHANKARANARAYANA (JV)

(MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA

VersusSTATE OF ORISSA AND ORS. SHIBASHISH MISRA, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

11 C.A. No. 6589/2009XVI

BIHAR STATE CREDIT ANDINVESTMENT CORPN. LTD. ANISHA UPADHYAY

VersusM/S HOTEL NANAKSONS PVT. LTD. GAURAV AGRAWAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 6586/2009XVI

BIHAR STATE CREDIT ANDINVESTMENT CORPN. LTD. AND ANR. ANISHA UPADHYAY

VersusM/S SHIVALIK RECLAMATIONS PVT.LTD. RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4066/2009XVI

BIHAR STATE CREDIT ANDINVESTMENT CORP. LTD. AND ANR. ANISHA UPADHYAY[P-1]

VersusM/S.NAV BHARAT LINK CHAINMFG.P.LTD AND ANR. MOHIT KUMAR SHAH

ConnectedC.A. No. 1990/2009XVI

M/S BIHAR STATE CREDIT ANDINVESTMENT CORPN. LTD. ANISHA UPADHYAY[P-1]

VersusM/S EASTERN FOOD INDUSTRIESP.LTD. NAVIN PRAKASH[R-1]

12 C.A. No. 6139/2013XII

M/S A.K. TRADERS AND ORS. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA[P-1]Versus

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1]ZOHEB HOSSAIN[IMPL][PR]

13 C.A. No. 10186/2010XI-A

SHRI NABA KISHORE DAS AND ANR. SARLA CHANDRAVersus

STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS. SURESH CHANDRA TRIPATHY, SHARMILAUPADHYAY, PAREKH & CO.

14 C.A. No. 922/2010IX

JANATA SAHAKARI BANK LD.,PUNE V. N. RAGHUPATHYVersusM/S A.P.HEALTH CARE P.LTD. AND ORS.AND ORS. NIRAJ SHARMA

to be list alongwith C.P. 383 of 2014ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.383/2014 In C.A. No.922/2010IX

KAMAL KOTHARI SHEKHAR KUMAR

Versus

Page 76: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4NITIN ASHOK PEDGAONKAR DIRECTORAND ORS. NIRAJ SHARMA[R-1], [R-2]

to be listed along with C.A. 922 of 2010

15 C.A. No.7130-7133/2011XII

S.V.MATHAPRASAD P. VINAY KUMAR

VersusLALCHAND MENGHRAJ AND ORS ANDORS.

S. THANANJAYAN, SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY,A. T. M. SAMPATH

16 C.A. No. 3265/2016IV-A

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF GIFTTAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S BPL LIMITED GAUTAM NARAYAN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3272/2016IV-A

M/S. B.P.L. LTD. GAUTAM NARAYAN[P-1]

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF GIFT TAX ANIL KATIYAR

17 C.A. No. 5844/2011XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOMETAX(EXEMPTION) B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusRAUNAQ EDUCATION FOUNDATION RAJIV TYAGI

18 C.A. No. 7664/2009IV-A

KARNATAKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCEAND INDUSTRY, HUBLI KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,HUBLI B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1955/2015XI-A

M/S. TRAVANCORE EDUCATIONSOCIETY G. PRAKASH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) COCHIN ANIL KATIYAR

19 Crl.A. No. 60/2009II

MUNNA VISHWAJIT SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 61/2009II

CHANDRA PAL AND ANR. ABHISTH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-1]

20 C.A. No. 2692/2010IV

GAMDOOR SINGH RANI CHHABRAVersusADDITIONAL STATE TRANSPORTCOMMISSIONER AND ANR. K. K. MOHAN, UTTARA BABBAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2693/2010IV

AVTAR SINGH SHALU SHARMA[P-1]

VersusSTATE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONERAND ANR. UTTARA BABBAR[R-1], K. K. MOHAN[R-1]

21 C.A. No. 202/2012XI-A

GOVERNMENT OF KERALA AND ANR. C. K. SASI, [P-2]VersusMOTHER SUPERIOR ADORATIONCONVENT M. P. VINOD

ConnectedC.A. No. 203/2012XI-A

GOVERNMENT OF KERALA AND ANR. C. K. SASI[P-1], [P-2]

VersusPROVINCIAL SUPERIOR JEEVANDHARA M. P. VINOD[R-1]

Page 77: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No. 204/2012XI-A

ADMINISTRATOR,JOS GIRI HOSPITAL RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusGOVT.OF KERALA . AND ANR. C. K. SASI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 207/2012XI-A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. C. K. SASI

VersusUNITY HOSPITAL(P) LTD. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 206/2012XI-A

THE TAHSILDAR (ASSESSINGAUTHORITY) (BUILDING TAX). ANDANR.

C. K. SASI

VersusT. T. THOMAS, PRESIDENT, EBENEZERINTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION SAJITH. P

ConnectedC.A. No. 205/2012XI-A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. C. K. SASI

VersusADMINISTRATOR, SAN JOE COLLEGE OFNURSING HOSTEL T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 905/2012XI-A

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. C. K. SASI

VersusADMINISTRATOR CHRISTURAJASCHOOL OF NURSING P. A. NOOR MUHAMED

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 35112/2011XI-A

JUBILEE MISSION MED.COLL HIMINDER LAL[P-1]

VersusGOVT. OF KERALA . AND ORS. C. K. SASI[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.38498-38499/2012XI-A

ADMINISTRATOR,CHRISTU RAJHOSPITAL P. A. NOOR MUHAMED[P-1]

VersusGOVERNMENT OF KERALA REP. BYADDITIONAL SECRETARY TO THEGOVERNMENT AND ANR.

NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1], [R-2], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5036/2015XI-A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ANR. LIZ MATHEW, C. K. SASI[P-1], [P-2]

VersusCARMAL PRAYER HOUSE

ConnectedC.A. No. 8351/2014XI-A

STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. C. K. SASI[P-1]

VersusTHE OEM PUBLIC SCHOOL

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 12235/2014XI-A

THE STATE OF KERALA REP. BYSECRETARY AND ORS. C. K. SASI

VersusMUSLIM EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY REP.BY DIRECTOR MEDICAL COLLEGEHOSPITAL

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 13874/2014XI-A

THE STATE OF KERALA REP. BYSECRETARY AND ORS. C. K. SASI

VersusTHE MANAGER, MAR ATHANASIOSCOLLEGE JOSE ABRAHAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 8352/2014XI-A

STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. C. K. SASI

VersusVIMALA HOSPITAL

Page 78: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No. 4445/2015XI-A

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. C. K. SASI

VersusJAMIYA SALAFIYYA EDUCATIONALASSOCIATION

ConnectedC.A. No. 4446/2015XI-A

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. C. K. SASI

VersusMUSLIM EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY

ConnectedC.A. No. 4447/2015XI-A

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. C. K. SASI

VersusMUNDAKKAYAM MEDICAL TRUSTHOSPITAL M. P. VINOD

ConnectedC.A. No. 6589/2015XI-A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ANR. C. K. SASI[P-1]

VersusREV. FATHER ANTO CHIRAPARAMBILReady as per Registrar's Order dt.8-9-2017.

ConnectedC.A. No. 7368/2016XI-A

TAHSILDAR AND ANR. LIZ MATHEW, G. PRAKASH

VersusMOTHER SUPERIOR ST. JOSEPHCONVENT

ConnectedC.A. No. 10298/2016XI-A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. C. K. SASI

VersusMANAGING TRUSTEE, DIOCESANEDUCATIONAL TRUSTReady as per Registrar's Order dt.8-9-2017.

ConnectedC.A. No. 10297/2016XI-A

TAHSILDAR, VADAKARA TALUK, . ANDORS. C. K. SASI

VersusSREE GOKULAM EDUCATIONAL ANDMEDICAL TRUST PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

Ready as per Registrar's Order dt.8-9-2017.ConnectedC.A. No. 10881/2016XI-A

STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. C. K. SASI

VersusDR. J. HAREENDRAN NAIRReady as per Registrar's Order dt.8-9-2017.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 31757/2016XI-A

QUILON MEDICAL TRUST RADHA SHYAM JENA

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. C. K. SASI, [R-2]

22 C.A. No. 4686/2009IV

FOOD CORP.OF INDIA. AND ORS. INDRA SAWHNEYVersus

M/S PANNA LAL AND SONS JITENDRA NATH SANYAL, R.NEDUMARAN[R-1]

23 C.A. No. 3127/2009XVI

UNIVERSAL PETRO CHEMICALS LTD. PARIJAT SINHAVersusB.P.PLC AND OTHERS KHAITAN & CO.

ConnectedC.A. No. 3128/2009XVI

ARAL AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

VersusUNIVERSAL PETRO-CHEMICALS LD. KHAITAN & CO.

24 C.A. No. 13/2011XIV-A

THE COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR, [P-1]Versus

Page 79: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4M/S RADHA KRISHNA JALAN KAVITA JHA[R-1]

25 Crl.A. No. 442/2009II

RAMJI @ RAMJILAL ANSAR AHMAD CHAUDHARY[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1][GR]

26 C.A. No. 7575/2009IV

MANJIT SINGH . AND ANR. (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[P-1]Versus

MANORATH SINGH KOHLI (D) THR. LRS. ANAND MISHRA[R-1][LR/S], AJITPUDUSSERY[R-1][LR/S]

27 Crl.A. No. 956/2012II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1][GR]VersusNIRMAL KAUR @ NIMMO AND ORS. C. L. SAHU[R-1][PR]Mr. P. S. Narsimha, Senior Advocate, appointed as Amicus Curiae vide order dated14.08.2018.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 957/2012II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1][GR]

VersusBHAG SINGH ALIAS BAGGA AND ORS. R. NEDUMARAN[R-1][SCLSC]FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 4276/2009 Mr. P. S. Narsimha, Senior Advocate,appointed as Amicus Curiae vide order dated 14.08.2018.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 959/2012II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1][GR]

VersusANGREJO DEVI AND ORS. NIDHI[R-1][SCLSC]Mr. P. S. Narsimha, Senior Advocate, appointed as Amicus Curiae vide order dated14.08.2018.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 958/2012II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1][GR]

VersusDULA RAM AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR[R-1][PR]Mr. P. S. Narsimha, Senior Advocate, appointed as Amicus Curiae vide order dated14.08.2018.

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 761/2014II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1][GR]

VersusDHARAM PAL AND ORS.FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1913/2014 Mr. P. S. Narsimha, Senior Advocate,appointed as Amicus Curiae vide order dated 14.08.2018.

28 Crl.A. No. 1052/2009II-B

KIRPAL SINGH JYOTI MENDIRATTAVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB KARAN BHARIHOKE

29 C.A. No. 1361/2013III-A

U.P. POWER CORPORATION LTD. ANDORS. RAKESH UTTAMCHANDRA UPADHYAY

VersusM/S BHARAT UDYAG AND ORS. JATIN ZAVERI

30 C.A. No. 7118/2009XII

PATTAPPA GOUNDER(D) BY L.RS. V. BALACHANDRANVersusS.RAGHUNATHA GOUNDER (DEAD) THRLRS SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

31 Crl.A. No.1860-1861/2009II-A

MADAN MOHAN(DEAD) THR. LRS ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[P-1], [P-1.6], [P-1.5],[P-1.4], [P-1.3], [P-1.2], [P-1.1]

VersusKAMAL KEDARNATH GANDHI AND ANR.

32 Crl.A. No. 1008/2009II-B

RAJ SINGH SATYENDRA KUMARVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. UTTARA BABBAR, REKHA PANDEY[R-2]

Page 80: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1007/2009II-B

KAKA SINGH @ KULDIP SINGH SATYENDRA KUMAR

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB UTTARA BABBAR[R-1]

33 Crl.A. No. 745/2010II

DAYAMOY DEB SUDHA GUPTAVersusTHE STATE OF TRIPURA

34 C.A. No.7027-7028/2009XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusMANJU ARORA AND ANR. I. B GAUR

ConnectedC.A. No.7150-7151/2009XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

KANTA SURI AND ANR. PIYUSH SHARMA, SARAD KUMARSINGHANIA[R-2]

35 C.A. No. 7952/2009XIV-A

EX. HAV. HANSRAJ SINGH (DEAD)THR.LRS VIJAY KUMAR[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFDEFENCE THROUGH SECRETARY ANDORS.

ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1]

36 C.A. No.7353-7354/2009XIV-A

RAJESH KUMAR ABHISHEK SINGH[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH CHIEF OFARMY STAFF AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], [R-2], ANILKATIYAR[R-3]

37 C.A. No. 6629/2016XIV-A

LT. COMMANDER M.P. VERMA ALOK GUPTA[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-2]

38 Crl.A. No. 1600/2009II-B

THE STATE OF PUNJAB RANJEETA ROHATGI[P-1]VersusKULWANT SINGH AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

39 Crl.A. No. 626/2009II-C

SOMU @ SOMASUNDARAM V. N. RAGHUPATHYVersusTHE STATE REP. BY DY.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

40 Crl.A. No. 660/2010II-C

JAITUN BEE GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ANDORS.

SUMEER SODHI[R-1], AKSHATSHRIVASTAVA[R-2][PR], [R-3][PR]

41 Crl.A. No. 239/2010II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMARVersusBAJRANG LAL AND ANR. YASH PAL DHINGRA, [R-2]

42 C.A. No. 5797/2009XIV-A

AMAR NATH K J JOHN AND CO[P-1]VersusGIAN CHAND AND ANR. DEVENDRA SINGH[R-1]

43 C.A. No. 5796/2009XII-A

BANDARU @ BELLAM VENKATRAMAIAH. AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusK.SURYA KUMARI . Y. RAJA GOPALA RAOFOR ON IA 10/2016 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 11/2016 FOR[PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 12/2017

Page 81: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No. 5798/2009XII-A

B.RAMAMANI V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusK.SURYA KUMARI Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO

44 C.A. No. 1089/2010XIV-A

HIMACHAL PRADESH STATEINDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION LIMITED

BALRAJ DEWAN

VersusM/S. MANSON (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ANDORS.

45 C.A. No. 9619/2010IX

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 ANIL KATIYARVersusM/S. KALYANI EXPORTS ANDINVESTMENT PVT. LTD. ARUNA GUPTA

46 Crl.A. No. 1076/2010II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHVersusDEVILAL KUSHWAHA RAJESH

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1072/2010II-A

S.H.O.

VersusJAGDISH GAUTAM RAJESH

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1065/2010II-A

STATE OF M.P.

VersusPRAMOD KUMAR GAUTAM S. USHA REDDY

47 Crl.A. No. 1858/2009II-B

DHARAMBIR @ DHARMA RISHI MALHOTRAVersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN

48 Crl.A. No. 837/2011II-B

THANKAPPAN @ KOCHUMANI P. VINAY KUMAR[P-1]VersusSTATE OF KERALA C. K. SASI[R-1]

49 Crl.A. No. 2003/2010II

RAGOLU MANMADHA RAO RISHI MALHOTRAVersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D. MAHESH BABU

50 Crl.A. No. 2043/2009II-A

PRAHALAD B. K. SATIJA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 983/2010II-A

MOHAN SHARMILA UPADHYAY[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]B. SUNITA RAO[IMPL]

IA No.18308/2018-impleading party51 C.A. No. 5719/2009

XII-APRATAPA (JAYANTHI) PADMAJA JOHN MATHEW[P-1]VersusJAYANTHI SURYA CHANDRA SHEKAR TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1]

52 Crl.A. No. 1066/2010II-A

RAM SHARAN CHATURVEDI S. JANANI[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

53 Crl.A. No. 754/2010II

SUBHAJOY TRIPURA . AND ANR. B. SUNITA RAOVersusTHE STATE OF TRIPURA HOMEDEPARTMENT SECRETARY SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1]

Page 82: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 454 Crl.A. No.

2157-2159/2013II

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[P-1]

VersusSURAJ NIDHI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2160/2013II

MUNNU SYED MEHDI IMAM[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-1]FOR GRANT OF PAROLE ON IA 86878/2019

55 Crl.A. No. 2286/2010II-B

JASBIR SINGH RAJIV MEHTA[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

56 C.A. No. 9334/2010III-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMAVersusRAM BAHADUR YADAV YASH PAL DHINGRA

57 C.A. No. 4387/2010XIV-A

R.P.SINGH CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRIVersus

M/S. DHIMAN RICE MILLS AND ORS.BHASKAR Y. KULKARNI[R-1], NARESH K.SHARMA[R-2]ASTHA SHARMA[IMPL]

58 Crl.A. No. 1472/2010II-C

AMIR HAMZA ANSARI AFTAB ALI KHAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF DELHI B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

59 Crl.A. No. 365/2010II

SHAMSHER @ SHAKAAL ABHA R. SHARMAVersusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA

60 Crl.A. No. 1388/2010II

ALLURI SRINIVASA RAO Y. RAJA GOPALA RAOVersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D. MAHESH BABU

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1389/2010II

JANGAM KUMAR SWAMY Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO

VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D. MAHESH BABU

61 Crl.A. No. 513/2011II

ANIL HALDAR AJAY KUMAR SINGH[P-1]Versus

MONINDER SINGH PANDHER AND ORS.MADHU MOOLCHANDANI[R-1], SARVESHSINGH BAGHEL[R-3], ARVIND KUMARSHARMA[R-4]

62 C.A. No. 6310/2010IV

M/S. SONALIKA AGRO INDUSTRIESCORP. YASHRAJ SINGH DEORA

VersusM/S. LOTIA AUTO INDUSTRY S. S. SHROFF

63 C.A. No. 1670/2010XVII

SUDESH SINGH MANOJ K. MISHRAVersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

64 Crl.A. No. 1855/2011II

ANIL KUMAR JAIL PETITION[P-1], SHASHI BHUSHANKUMAR[P-1][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1][GR]

65 Crl.A. No. 1181/2010II

KUDUMULA VENKATAIAH SANGEETA KUMAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D. MAHESH BABU

66 C.A. No. 6240/2011III-A

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH CHIEFSECURITY COMMISSIONER AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA, [P-2], [P-3]

Versus

Page 83: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4JAIBEER SINGH (D) THROUGH LRS. (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA

67 C.A. No. 3532/2011XVI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusNIHAL AHMAD KHAN SHAKEEL AHMED

68 C.A. No. 2842/2011X

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFDEFENCE SECRETARY AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAKESH KUMAR (NO. 15347148 P) DAYA KRISHAN SHARMA

69 Crl.A. No. 1926/2010II-C

KRISHNARAJ V. G. PRAGASAMVersusTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY DEPUTYSUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 468/2013II-C

KATHIRESAN SAMIAR K. RAJEEV

VersusTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY DEPUTYSUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE PANRUTISUB DIVISOIN

M. YOGESH KANNA

70 Crl.A. No. 1452/2011II-C

KAPIL SATNAMI E. R. SUMATHY[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ASWATHI M.K.[R-1]FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 3514/2011 AND PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS ON I.A. NO. 10437/2015

71 Crl.A. No. 569/2013II-A

RAMESHWAR RAM AND ANR. KEDAR NATH TRIPATHYVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR GOPAL SINGH

72 Crl.A. No. 190/2011II-C

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[P-1]VersusM.S.MANDER RAM NARESH YADAV[R-1]

73 Crl.A. No. 1044/2011II-B

BASTI RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGH[R-1]

74 Crl.A. No. 1908/2011II-A

SHIVRAJ SINGH NILOFAR KHAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[R-1]

75 C.A. No. 279/2016III

MAHARASHTRA STATE FIN.CORPN. PRAMIT SAXENAVersusDILIP KUMAR G. BADLANI . AND ORS. R. N. KESWANI

76 Crl.A. No. 441/2011II-B

CHAKKIARTH DASAN AND ORS. ANKIT ANANDRAJ SHAH[P-1], [P-1], [P-2],[P-3], [P-4], [P-5]

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH, [R-1]

77 Crl.A. No.1205-1208/2011II-C

MOOSA @ TADA MOOSA @ MOOSAMOHIDEEN AND ORS.

GAURAV AGRAWAL, [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10], [P-11], [P-12],[P-13], [P-14]

VersusTHE STATE REP. BY THE AD.S.P.SITCBCID M. YOGESH KANNA

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 23617/2012 FOR [PERMISSIONTO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 23742/2012 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ONIA 23746/2012 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 26927/2012 FOR[PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 26923/2012 FOR GRANT OF BAIL ONIA 21909/2014 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 761/2015 FORGRANT OF BAIL ON IA 17723/2016

Page 84: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.2789-2792/2012II-C

S.VEZHAVENDAN AND ORS. P. V. YOGESWARAN, [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

Versus

BASITH @ MOHAMED BASITH AND ORS.

M. YOGESH KANNA, [R-5], A. VENAYAGAMBALAN, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8],[R-9], [R-10], [R-11], [R-12], [R-13], [R-14],[R-15], [R-16], [R-17], [R-18], [R-19], [R-20],[R-21], [R-22], [R-23]

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.766-768/2012II-C

S.VEZHAVENDAN AND ORS. P. V. YOGESWARAN, [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

Versus

ASHARAF AND ORS.M. YOGESH KANNA, [R-3], G. BALAJI, [R-2],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11],[R-12], [R-13], [R-14], [R-15], [R-16]

FOR ON IA 1989/2012 FOR ON IA 1992/2012ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 765/2012II-C

A.THAJUDDIN MD. SHAHID ANWAR

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADUFOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 1985/2012

ConnectedCrl.A. No.2227-2228/2011II-C

OZIR @ ABDUL OZIR @ TADA OZIR ANDANR. S. GOWTHAMAN, [P-2][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU CBCID REP.BY TH AD.S.P. SIT

78 Crl.A. No. 566/2012II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusKISHAN LAL . AND ORS. SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI[R-3], [R-4]

79 C.A. No. 812/2011XVII

ARUN KHOSLA M. A. CHINNASAMY[P-1]VersusGURUCHARAN SINGH

80 Crl.A. No.1298-1299/2011II-B

GURMUKH SINGH @ BINDA AND ORS. GOPAL PRASAD

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN

81 C.A. No.1663-1664/2012XI-A

M/S. MANJOO AND COMPANYREPRESENTED BY PROPRIETOR M. P. VINOD

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KANNUR ANIL KATIYAR

82 C.A. No. 2888/2012XI-A

A.J. MICHAELVersusBEXY MICHAEL A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

83 C.A. No. 5828/2019XI-A

KONNAPALAM KANDI P.K.V.CHOYICHI(DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. RANJITH K. C.[P-1]

VersusKUNHALI AND ORS. MALINI PODUVAL, RENJITH. B, K. RAJEEV

ConnectedC.A. No. 5829/2019XI-A

KINARULLA PARAMBATH UPPENNUAND ORS. K. RAJEEV

VersusKUNHALI AND ORS. MALINI PODUVALFOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 123898/2019 FOR CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 123900/2019

84 Crl.A. No. 1797/2011II-A

SRIPATI ADARSH UPADHYAYVersus

Page 85: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

85 C.A. No. 2784/2012XVI

LALTI DEVI T. MAHIPALVersusSURESH KUMAR LAL SHEKHAR KUMAR

86 C.A. No.6886-6887/2011XVII

MANISH KUMAR RAI VINEET BHAGAT

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFDEFENCE AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS

87 Crl.A. No. 1651/2012II-A

KAMADEO MAHARA T. MAHIPALVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR NOW THE STATEOF JHARKHAND GOPAL PRASAD

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 2331/2015II-A

DUKHI MAHARA AND ANR. JAIL PETITION

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND GOPAL PRASAD[R-1]

88 Crl.A. No. 2010/2011II-A

BHAGWAT CHAITRAM TALTE K. RAJEEV[P-1][SCLSC]Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

89 C.A. No. 5166/2012III-A

STATE OF U. P. THR. PRINCIPALSECRETARY AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusCOMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT THR.ITS SECRETARY/MANTRI AND ANR. ABHIJIT SENGUPTA[R-1]

90 C.A. No. 2606/2012XIV-A

EX.CT. MAHADEV RUNAMONI BHUYAN[P-1]VersusTHE DIRECTOR GENERAL BORDERSECURITY FORCE AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

91 Crl.A. No. 720/2012II-C

JITENDER KUMAR GAURAV AGRAWALVersusTHE STATE OF DELHI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

92 Crl.A. No. 1402/2014II-C

ROOPLAL VERMA JAIL PETITION[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1][GR]FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 20585/2012 THE NAME OF MR. JEETENDRA SINGH,ADVOCATE MAY BE SHOWN AS AMICUS CURIAE

93 C.A. No. 5103/2012IV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) BANGALORE B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusMEENAKSHI AMMA ENDOWMENTTRUST E. C. AGRAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No. 5923/2012IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. D.P.R. CHARITABLE TRUSTTHROUGH ITS MANAGER KHAITAN & CO.

ConnectedC.A. No. 5468/2013IV-A

THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAXEXEMPTION AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BANGALORE ORTHOPAEDICSOCIETY K. V. MOHAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 2979/2016IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), BHOPAL ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 86: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4SEWA DRISHTI SAMITI

ConnectedC.A. No.5418-5419/2016IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

M/S MANIPAL ALUMNI OFNEPHROLOGY TRUST

ConnectedC.A. No. 6057/2017IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION), MANGALORE ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKSHATRIYA GHANCHI SAMAJSANGHATANA

ConnectedC.A. No. 9794/2017IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKESHAV RASTROTHAN SAMITI

ConnectedC.A. No. 17337/2017IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDR. GEETA GUPTA CHARITABLE TRUST

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 2251/2018IV-B

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSHRI SHIRDI SAI DARBAR CHARITABLETRUST (DHARAMSHALA) JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1277/2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXJAIPUR II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD TARUN GUPTA

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 8142/2019XI

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSRI SAI DARBAR TRUSTFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.50968/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 11775-2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKUND KUND SHIKSHAN KENDRATRUST

ConnectedC.A. No. 4996/2018IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S PRAGATHI SOCIAL WELFARETRUST

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 28194/2018XI

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGUJARATI SAMAJ KANPUR U.P. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8063/2018IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GAYATHRI NITHYA VIDYA TRUST

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 19233/2018IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) BANGALORE ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GAYATHRI NITHYA VIDYA TRUST

Page 87: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No. 7139/2018III-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBABU RAM EDUCATION SOCIETY

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20519/2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD TARUN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 21980/2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) JAIPUR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD JANPATH TARUN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26111/2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXEXEMPTION JAIPUR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSWAMI SHREE 108 SHREE MURLIRAMMAHARAJ SADHU PANCHAYAT TRUST

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29258/2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXEXEMPTIONS ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD TARUN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4840/2019XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSHEKHWATI PUBLIC SCHOOL SAMITILOSAL TARUN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 8761/2019IV-B

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S PARTAP EDUCATION ANDRESEARCH SOCIETY A. KARTHIK[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.46137/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

94 C.A. No. 7840/2011III-A

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX(INV.) AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM.D. OVEREAS LIMITED THROUGH ITSDIRECTOR PAREKH & CO.[R-1]

Hon'ble Court vide order dated 18.11.2011 directed to High Court to disposed ofW.P. No. 75 of 2010 and connected matters expeditiously and High Court informedvide letter dated 16.5.2014 Writ Petition No. 75 of 2010 and other connectedmatters have been dismissed on 12.9.2013.

95 Crl.A. No. 1635/2013II

G.SUDHAKAR NAIDU M. VIJAYA BHASKARVersusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANR. D. MAHESH BABU, GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1634/2013II

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D. MAHESH BABU

VersusMOTUPALLE VENUGOPAL NAIDU GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

96 Crl.A. No. 1614/2014II-C

TAMESHWAR PATEL RABIN MAJUMDER[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH NISHANTH PATIL[R-1][GR]

97 C.A. No. 8773/2012XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[P-1]VersusCAMRUS ZAMAN GHAFOOR PARIAT (D)THR.LRS RISHI MALHOTRA[R-1]

Page 88: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 498 Crl.A. No. 392/2012

II-BVINUBHAI SHANABHAI VANKAR TULIKA PRAKASH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

99 C.A. No. 586-593/2012XIV-A

DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusSHINE SATELITE PUBLIC COMPANYLTD THROUGH ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR

T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 915/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S INTELSAT CORP. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 27679/2012XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTHAICOM PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 24054/2013XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusTHAICOM PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 27680/2012XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTHAICOM PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4142/2013XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION ) ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusTHAICOM PUBLIC COMPANY LTD. T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 169/2013XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusTHAICOM PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8913/2012XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION II ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusTHAICOM PUBLIC COMPANY LTD. T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7735/2014XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOMETAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusTHAICOM PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED. T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 796/2013XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusTHAICOM PUBLIC CO. LTD. T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 922/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S INTELSTAT CORPORATION H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO, BHARGAVA V. DESAI

ConnectedC.A. No. 1282/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX-I NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusINTELSAT CORPORATION BHARGAVA V. DESAI

ConnectedC.A. No. 8353/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-II ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

Versus

Page 89: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4M/S SHIN SATELLITE PUBLIC LTD. T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10300/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX,(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-II, NEWDELHI

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SHIN SATELITE PUBLIC CO. LTD. T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[R-1]

100 C.A. No. 1189/2015III-A

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1]VersusURMILA KOHLI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. ALOK SHUKLA[R-1.3], [R-1.2], [R-1.1]As per Hon'ble Court Order dated 29.05.2019, List the appeal after summervacation before the appropriate Bench.

101 C.A. No. 8000/2015XVI

ARVIND KUMAR SINHA ARUP BANERJEEVersusSADHANA SINHA ARUN K. SINHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 8301/2015XVI

ARVIND KUMAR SINHA ARUP BANERJEE

VersusSADHANA SINHA ARUN K. SINHA

102 C.A. No. 7408/2012XII

R.VIJAYAKUMAR K. K. MANIVersus

THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR AND ANR. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[CAVEAT], PRABHASWAMI[CAVEAT]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.10876-10878/2013XII

R. VIJAYAKUMAR K. K. MANI

Versus

OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR HIGH COURTMADRAS AND OR SENTHIL JAGADEESAN, B. BALAJI

103 Crl.A. No. 976/2012II

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VISHWA PAL SINGH[P-1]VersusRAIS @ BEHRA AND ANR.please show the name of mr. pradeep kumar Adv. (AC) Non A.O.R. in the causelist.

104 C.A. No.8151-8181/2013XII-A

GOVT.OF A.P.& ORS.ETC.ETC. VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES

Versus

GOVT.OF A.P..ETC.ETC. AND ORS.

LAWYER S KNIT & CO[CAVEAT],VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU, NAVINPRAKASH, G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, G.MADHAVI, E. R. SUMATHY, D. BHARATHIREDDY[CAVEAT], C. S. N. MOHAN RAO, BIJOYKUMAR JAIN, A. V. RANGAM[CAVEAT]

and IA No.107111/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILINGConnectedC.A. No.8314-8315/2013XII-A

CHAITANYA BHARATHI INST.OF TECHYAND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO, [CAVEAT]

Versus

STATE OF A.P. . AND ORS. NAVIN PRAKASH, VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 154/2013X

CHAITANYA BHARATHI INSTITUTE OFTECHNOLOGY LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusADMISSION AND FEE REGULATORYCOMMITTEE GOPAL SINGH, G. N. REDDY

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 155/2013X

CHAITANYA BHARATI EDUCATIONALSOCIETY AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusADMISSION AND FEE REGULATORYCOMMITTEE G. N. REDDY, HARISH PANDEY[R-5]

Page 90: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 567/2013X

CHAITANYA BHARATHI INSTT. OFTECH. AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ANDANR. G. N. REDDY

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 547/2013X

CHAITANYA BHARATI EDUC.SOCITY .AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ANDANR. G. N. REDDY

105 C.A. No.8733-8734/2018IV-A

ENGINEERING ANALYSIS CENTRE OFEXCELLENCE PRIVATE LIMITED B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.8735-8736/2018IV-A

GE INDIA TECHNOLOGY CENTREPRIVATE LIMITED B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.8737-8941/2018IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. .ETC .ETC ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.8942-8947/2018IV-A

M/S SONATA SOFTWARE LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.8950-8953/2018IV-A

HEWLETT PACKARD INDIA PVT. LTD. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.8948-8949/2018IV-A

HEWLETT PACKARD INDIA SOFTWAREOPERATIONS PVT. LTD. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4419/2012IV-A

M/S. IBM INDIA LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4420/2012IV-A

M/S. IBM INDIA LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 10114/2013IV-A

SASKEN COMMUNICATIONS TECHLIMITED KAVITA JHA

Versus

Page 91: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.10107-10108/2013IV-A

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT.LTD. KUNAL VERMA

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.10109-10111/2013IV-A

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 10097/2013IV-A

TEJAS NETWORKS INDIA LTD KUNAL VERMA

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.10112-10113/2013IV-A

MPHASIS BFL LTD. KUNAL VERMA

Versus

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 10106/2013IV-A

MPHASIS BFL LTD. KUNAL VERMA

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.8954-8955/2018IV-A

ALCATEL-LUCENT INDIA PVT. LTD. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.10115-10117/2013IV-A

M/S. SUNRAY COMPUTERS PVT. LTD. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

Versus

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8956/2018IV-A

M/S. EDS TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.4623-4628/2014IV-A

SYNOPSYS INTERNATIONAL OLD LTD. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

Versus

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXBANGALORE AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8957/2018IV-A

SASKEN COMMUNICATIONS TECH LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

Page 92: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No. 8990/2018XIV-A

CITRIX SYSTEMS ASIA PACIFIC PTY LTD. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

VersusDIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 10103/2013IV-A

TEJAS NETWORKS INDIA LTD. KUNAL VERMA

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 10104/2013IV-A

TEJAS NETWORKS INDIA LTD. KUNAL VERMA

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.8974-8975/2018IV-A

M/S EDS TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.

Versus

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6376/2016XIV-A

DIR. OF INCOME TAX.(INT.T), NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. METAPATH SOFTWAREINTERNATIONAL LTD S. R. SETIA

ConnectedC.A. No.6382-6383/2016XIV-A

DIR.OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

M/S ERICSSON RADIO SYSTEMS A.B. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8966/2018IV-A

M/S RATIONAL SOFTWARECORPORATION INDIA LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8959/2018IV-A

M/S RATIONAL SOFTWARECORPORATION INDIA LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8973/2018IV-A

M/S RATIONAL SOFTWARECORPORATION INDIA LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8963/2018IV-A

M/S RATIONAL SOFTWARECORPORATION INDIA LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8962/2018IV-A

M/S RATIONAL SOFTWARECORPORATION INDIA LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

Page 93: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No. 8958/2018IV-A

M/S RATIONAL SOFTWARECORPORATION INDIA LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8965/2018IV-A

M/S RATIONAL SOFTWARECORPORATION INDIA LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8972/2018IV-A

M/S SONATA INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY LTD H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8961/2018IV-A

M/S SONATA INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8969/2018IV-A

M/S SONATA INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8960/2018IV-A

M/S SONATA INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8971/2018IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE DIRECTOR (COMMISSIONER) OFINCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8970/2018IV-A

M/S SONATA INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8964/2018IV-A

M/S SONATA INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8967/2018IV-A

M/S SONATA INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8968/2018IV-A

M/S SONATA INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

Page 94: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No. 4629/2014IV-A

ANSYS SOFTWARE PVT. LTD. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4631/2014IV-A

ANSYS SOFTWARE PVT. LTD. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4630/2014IV-A

ANSYS SOFTWARE PVT. LTD. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.6386-6387/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) NEWDELHI

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusERICSSON A.B.,NEW DELHI KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10105/2013IV-A

ADITYA BIRLA MINACS WORLDWIDELTD KHAITAN & CO.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6377/2016XIV-A

C.I.T-XVI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVIJAY GOPAL JINDAL PUJA SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No. 7852/2012IV-A

M/S. ING VYSYA LIFE INSURANCE CO.(P) LTD.VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.1416-1418/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 1403/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY LIMITED AND ANR.

H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO, AMBHOJ KUMARSINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 1405/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 1410/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 1421/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

Versus

Page 95: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 1409/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 1415/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY LIMITED ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 1414/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 1412/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 1413/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 1419/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 1411/2013IV-A

M/S. IBM INDIA LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 1420/2013IV-A

M/S. IBM INDIA LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 1404/2013IV-A

M/S IBM INDIA LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 1406/2013IV-A

M/S. IBM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 1408/2013IV-A

M/S. IBM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

Page 96: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No. 1407/2013IV-A

M/S. RATIONAL SOFTWARECORPORATION INDIA LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 2304/2013IV-A

TATA ELXSI LIMITED KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 2305/2013IV-A

TATA ELXSI LIMITED KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 2306/2013IV-A

TATA ELXSI LIMITED KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.10098-10102/2013IV-A

M/S. LG SOFT INDIA PVT. LTD. V. BALACHANDRAN

Versus

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6381/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF I.T. (INTERNATIONALTAXATION ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusCIT ALCATEL RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.2307-2308/2013IV-A

HEWLETT PACKARD GLOBALSOFT PVT.LTD. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6380/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) NEWDELHI

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNOKIA NETWORKS OY RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 6388/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)NEWDELHI

ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusNOKIA NETWORKS OY, SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6385/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) NEWDELHI

ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusNOKIA NETWORKS OY RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 6384/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION),NEWDELHI

ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusNOKIA NETWORKS OY, RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Page 97: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No.4666-4667/2013IV-A

M/S. IBM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

Versus

INCOME TAX OFFICER BANGALORE ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6764/2013IV-A

M/S. IBM INDIA LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4634/2014IV-A

SYNOPSYS INTERNATIONAL LTD. KUNAL VERMA

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8976/2018IV-A

M/S FLEXTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES(INDIA) PVT. LTD. RONY OOMMEN JOHN[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.8977-8988/2018IV-A

IBM INDIA PVT LTD H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

Versus

I.T. OFFICER ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 31/2017XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. HALLIBURTON EXPORT INC. SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.12276-12277/2016IV-A

SYNOPSYS INTERNATIONAL LTD. KUNAL VERMA

Versus

THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OFINCOME-TAX (INTERNATIONALTAXATION) AND ORS.

ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10218/2016IV-A

SYNOPSYS INTERNATIONAL LTD. KUNAL VERMA

VersusTHE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOMETAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) . ANDANR.

ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 37580/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusALCATEL LUCENT FRANCE USA INC.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 28867/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ALCATEL LUCENT ITALIA SPA

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 28868/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ALCATEL LUCENT FRANCE KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10673/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ALCATEL LUCENT FRANCE KISHORE KUNAL

Page 98: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No. 8721/2018XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX-6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S M. TECH INDIA PVT. LTD.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29571/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ALCATEL LUCENT ITALIA SPA

ConnectedC.A. No. 10674/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ALCATEL LUCENT FRANCE KISHORE KUNAL

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 36782/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusALACTEL LUCENT FRANCE

ConnectedC.A. No. 2425/2017XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusERICSSON A.B. RSM AND CO

ConnectedC.A. No. 3402/2017IV-A

ON MOBILE GLOBAL LTD KUNAL VERMA

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8718/2018XIV-A

DIRECTOR INCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8719/2018XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX 1 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1]FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING ON IA 73883/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 9366/2017XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10758/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusCOMPTEL OY KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8617/2017XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 27872/2017IV-A

SYNOPSYS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED KUNAL VERMA

VersusTHE JOINT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 9486/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusCOMPTEL OYJ KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

Page 99: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No. 9784/2018XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S VINZAS SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT LTD

ConnectedC.A. No. 20932/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusZTE CORPORATION HARPREET SINGH AJMANI[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.123259/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.123261/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 8711/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusCOMPTEL OYJ KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 21832/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusZTE CORPORATION HARPREET SINGH AJMANI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 18311/2017XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusZTE CORPORATION HARPREET SINGH AJMANI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 19837/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusZTE CORPORATION HARPREET SINGH AJMANI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 17532/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusZTE CORPORATION HARPREET SINGH AJMANI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8713/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ASPECT SOFTWARE INC. BRAJ KISHORE MISHRA[R-1]IA No.119567/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.119568/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No. 8712/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ASPECT SOFTWARE INC. BRAJ KISHORE MISHRA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.116868/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.116870/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No. 8714/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ASPECT SOFTWARE INC. BRAJ KISHORE MISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8715/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ASPECT SOFTWARE INC. BRAJ KISHORE MISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8716/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ASPECT SOFTWARE INC. BRAJ KISHORE MISHRA[R-1]

Page 100: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No. 8722/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIOANAL TAXATION) 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNET APP BV RUNAMONI BHUYAN[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.46713/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.46714/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No. 9414/2018XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX (INTERNATINALTAXATION) 2

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNET APP BV RUNAMONI BHUYAN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8724/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1(CENTRAL) NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusCOMPTEL OYJ KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8725/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusCOMPTEL OYJ KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9551/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNET APP B.V RUNAMONI BHUYANFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.120741/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 10844/2018XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNORTAL NETWORK INDIAINTERNATIONAL INC. HARPREET SINGH AJMANI[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11196/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION 3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSHANGHAI ELECTRIC GROUP CO. LTD. HARPREET SINGH AJMANIFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.159318/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 38336-2018XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION 3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSHANGHAI ELECTRIC GROUP CO. LTD.THROUGH DIRECTORFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.159777/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 450/2019XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGE INDIA INDUSTRIAL PVT. LTD.

ConnectedDiary No. 42821-2018XIV

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusSHANGHAI ELECTRIC GROUP CO. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.182500/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.182501/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No. 1995/2019XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION 3 ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 101: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4SHANGHAI ELECTRIC GROUP CO. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.29303/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.29304/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 1415/2019XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION 3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSHANGHAI ELECTRIC GROUP CO. LTDFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.13004/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.13005/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 10127/2019IV-A

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT.LTD. KUNAL VERMA

VersusASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFOR ADMISSION

ConnectedC.A. No. 2006/2019IV-A

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT.LTD. KUNAL VERMA

VersusDEPUTY COMMISIONER OF INCOMETAX

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 21425/2019XIV

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION 1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBENTLY NEVADA LLCFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.128779/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 8312/2019XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBENTLY NEVADA LLCFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.160196/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

106 C.A. No. 2986/2012XIV-A

CONST. AMAR SINGH RAJ SINGH RANA[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

107 Crl.A. No. 1398/2012II-C

P. RAMA RAO LAWYER S KNIT & COVersusTHE STATE (THROUGH CBI) MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1399/2012II-C

RUNU GHOSH ANIL NAG[P-1]

VersusC.B.I MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1400/2012II-C

SUKH RAM AJIT SHARMA[P-1]

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1]IA FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 30997/2018

108 Crl.A. No. 1310/2012II-A

SURESH MENDE NEERAJ SHEKHAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

109 C.A. No. 9105/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.,NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S SUN PHARMACEUTICALSINDUSTRIES LIMITED. SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]

Page 102: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No. 8755/2017III

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBANK OF INDIA JAY KISHOR SINGH

ConnectedC.A. No. 9107/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. CHEIL COMMUNICATIONS INDIAPVT LTD KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 9108/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BOMBAY CYCLE RAKESH K. SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No. 9109/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S DOUBLE DOT FINANCE LTD KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 9110/2017XII-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXIII ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSWARNA ADHARA IJMII INTEGRATEDTOWNSHIP DEV. PVT LTD

ConnectedC.A. No. 9112/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusVISISTH CHAY VYAPAR LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 9113/2017XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DELHI-2 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. BHARTI INFOTEL LTD. (NOWBHARTI AIRTEL LTD.)

ConnectedC.A. No. 9887/2018III

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (IT)-II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BLACK VEATCH PRICHARD, INC. KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

110 Crl.A. No. 1008/2012II-B

SHAILESH @ MUKESH RADKABHAIKOLI PATEL RADHA SHYAM JENA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

111 C.A. No. 8545/2015XII-A

DURGAM ANITHA AND ANR. T. V. RATNAMVersusSTATE BANK OF HYDERABAD AND ORS. A. V. RANGAM, ABHIJIT SENGUPTA[R-2]

112 C.A. No. 5673/2012XVII

HARMEET SINGH BALRAJ DEWANVersusP.K. BHARDWAJ ALIAS SHRIPUSHPENDER KUMAR

113 C.A. No. 4006/2012XVII

SANDHYABATI CHAND SIBO SANKAR MISHRAVersus

COMMANDING OFFICER . AND ORS. BINU TAMTA, ANURAG PANDEY, MUKESHKUMAR MARORIA[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], [R-5], [R-7]

114 Crl.A. No. 1645/2012II-A

NANABHAU MALHARI KOTKAR MANJU SHARMAVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

115 C.A. No.3418-3420/2017III

MANISH SONI AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Versus

Page 103: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAMINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT SECRETARY AND ORS.

ANAGHA S. DESAI, NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR

116 C.A. No. 2413/2016IV

HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL ANDINFRASTRUCTURE DEV. CORPN. ANDANR.

SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

VersusM/S. LOS ANGELES FOOD PROCESSINGLTD. AND ANR. ANUP KUMAR

117 Crl.A. No. 1245/2013II

DAYA SHANKAR ANIS AHMED KHAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH RUCHIRA GOEL[R-1]

118 C.A. No. 1656/2015IV-A

NORTHERN COALFIELDS LTD.. ANDORS.VersusSUSHEE HI TECH CONSTRUCTIONSP.LTD. S. C. BIRLA

ConnectedC.A. No. 1658/2015IV-A

SUSHEE HI TECH CONSTRUCTIONSP.LTD.(NOW KNOWN AS SUSHEE INFRAPRIVATE LIMITE)

S. C. BIRLA

VersusNORTHERN COAL FIELDS LTD.. ANDORS.

119 C.A. No.3761-3762/2017XIV-A

DHARAM SINGH VAID KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

VersusM.A.BHARTI (D) THR. LRS. AND ANR. RAKESH K. SHARMA

120 Crl.A. No.598-600/2013II

AJAI ALIAS AJJU AND ORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-2], [P-3]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SARVESH SINGH BAGHEL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 337/2014II

MUKESH JAIL PETITION

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHPlease show the name of Ms. Deep Shikha Bharati,Advocaste Amicus Curiae in thecause list on behalf of the Appellant in Jail Petition.

ConnectedCrl.A. No.745-748/2015II

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH HOMEDEPARTMENT SECRETARY SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI[P-1]

VersusAJAI @AJJU RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1]ready

121 Crl.A. No. 282/2016II

JAGADAMBA PRASAD RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ADARSH UPADHYAY

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 283/2016II

GAJRAJ @ HAJJI AND ANR. ANURAG KISHORE[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANKIT GOEL[R-1]

122 C.A. No. 9720/2014IV-A

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED ABHIJIT SENGUPTAVersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXBANGALORE AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

123 Crl.A. No. 1679/2012II

RAM KALP CHAUDHARY V. MAHESHWARI & CO.VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANUVRAT SHARMA[R-1]

Page 104: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4124 C.A. No.

3312-3314/2017XIV-A

M/S NAVSHAKTI INDUSTRIES P.LTD. OMPRAKASH AJITSINGH PARIHAR[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No.3315-3317/2017XIV-A

M/S NAVSHAKTI INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. OMPRAKASH AJITSINGH PARIHAR[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

125 Crl.A. No. 170/2014II-A

UMANAND MEHTA DIPAK KUMAR JENA[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1]

126 Crl.A. No. 699/2013II

GODE YESU R. V. KAMESHWARANVersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D. MAHESH BABU

127 Crl.A. No. 1866/2013II-B

LAKHWINDER SINGH AMITA GUPTA[P-1]VersusSURJIT SINGH AND ORS. RITESH KHATRI, [R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2197/2014II-B

STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[P-1]

Versus

SURJIT SINGH . AND ORS. RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3]

FOR ISSUE OF BAILABLE WARRANT OF ARREST ON IA 10811/2013 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 10812/2013

128 C.A. No. 2830/2016XVI

BERGER PAINTS INDIA LTD MEERA MATHURVersusC.I.T. KOLKATA-IV AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 2832/2016III

M/S.JMC PROJECTS (I) LTD. MANISHA T. KARIA

VersusC.I.T. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 2831/2016III

GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORTCORPN. NACHIKETA JOSHI

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II,AHMEDBAD ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 2833/2016III

CHECKMATE SERVICES P LTD AARTHI RAJAN[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANIL KATIYAR, [R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 32361/2015XI-A

M/S. MERCHEM LIMITED MALANKARACENTRE, M.G. ROAD KOCHI-682035 RADHA RANGASWAMY

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 24548/2016XI-A

KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIESCORPORATION LTD. RAMESH BABU M. R.

VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 159/2019III

DHRUVI PHARMA PVT. LTD., THROUGHITS DIRECTOR MOHIT D. RAM

VersusJOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX(OSD)

Page 105: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedSLP(C) No. 1358/2019XI-A

M/S POPULAR VEHICLES ANDSERVICES PVT. LTD. RADHA SHYAM JENA

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.185472/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3250/2019III

MAX VIGIL SECURITIES PVT. LTD. MANISHA T. KARIA

VersusASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.11547/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.11549/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.11548/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 17739/2019III

ASK ME LAB CON SERVICES PVT. LTD. PURVISH JITENDRA MALKAN

VersusINCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1)(4) ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]FOR ADMISSION

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23388/2019III

SUZLON ENERGY LIMITED ANUSHREE PRASHIT KAPADIA

VersusPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 4FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23295/2019III

SUZLON ENERGY LIMITED ANUSHREE PRASHIT KAPADIA

VersusPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 4FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 25483/2019XI-A

KERALA STATE WAREHOUSINGCORPORATION JUDY JAMES

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

129 C.A. No. 1399/2013XVII

U O I . AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusMAJOR RABINDRA SINGH RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALFOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2013

ConnectedC.A. No. 2806/2013XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

VersusBIRENDRA SINGH TOMAR (RETD. . ANDORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10657/2013XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

VersusMAJ SHIV KUMAR AND ORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALFOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2013

130 Crl.A. No. 576/2014II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1]VersusUDAY SINGH JAIN

131 C.A. No. 9829/2014XI-A

ORISSA MINING CORPORATION LTD. .AND ORS. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA

VersusSATYASAI MINES AND MINERALS LTD. .AND ANR. NIRNIMESH DUBE, [R-2]

Page 106: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No. 9677/2014XI-A

ORISSA MINING CORPORATION LTDAND ORS. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA

VersusM/S MAA VAISHNNAVI SPONGE LTDAND ANR. NIRNIMESH DUBE

ConnectedC.A. No. 9830/2014XI-A

ORISSA MINING CORPORATION LTD. .AND ORS. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA

VersusM/S ADITYA SPONGE AND POWER (P)LTD. . AND ANR. NIRNIMESH DUBE, [R-2]

132 Crl.A. No. 1923/2014II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1]VersusKUNTHI BAI AFTAB ALI KHAN[R-1]

133 Crl.A. No. 721/2014II

VIRENDRA GUPTA ANSAR AHMAD CHAUDHARYVersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANUVRAT SHARMA

134 Crl.A. No. 160/2014II

KRISHNA KANT CHATURVEDI SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SRISHTI SINGH[R-1]FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 7756/2017 ONLY IA 7756/2017 TO BE LISTED.

135 C.A. No. 981/2014III-A

NOORUL SUBAH (DEAD) THR. LRS. ANDANR. JAYANT KUMAR MEHTA

VersusVIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA MANJU JETLEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 3828/2014III-A

BRIJNANDAN (D) THR. LRS. S. K. VERMA

VersusZIAUL HAQ THROUGH MUTUWALINUKUL SHUBAH (D) THR. LRS. ANDANR.

JAYANT KUMAR MEHTA

136 Crl.A. No. 392/2015II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1]VersusRAGHVENDRA VIVEK NARAYAN SHARMA[R-1]

137 Crl.A. No. 1645/2013II-C

SANJAY PUNEET TANEJA[P-1]VersusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

138 Crl.A. No. 2016/2013II

MEKALA SIVAIAH RAVINDRA S. GARIAVersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D. MAHESH BABU

139 Crl.A. No. 808/2014II

RAJESHWAR VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANKUR PRAKASH[R-1]

140 Crl.A. No. 957/2014II

RAM KARAN ANKIT GOEL[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

141 C.A. No. 4071/2014XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYARVersusPSA SICAL TERMINALS LTD THROUGHITS DIRECTOR NARESH KUMAR

142 C.A. No. 8745/2015XII

C.MANI AND ANR. PRITHA SRIKUMAR[P-1], [P-2]Versus

V.S.MUTHUPANDIAN . AND ORS. RAJESH GOYAL[R-1][PR], HIMANSHUMUNSHI[R-1]

and IA No.18395/2018-XTRA

Page 107: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4143 C.A. No. 7910/2015

XII-ASALADI MAMILLAIAH SUDHA GUPTAVersusTAMMINISETTI NAGARATHNAM GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 7911/2015XII-A

SALADI MAMILLAIAH SUDHA GUPTA

VersusTAMMINISETTI NAGARATHNAM GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO

144 Crl.A. No. 149/2015II

KRISHNA PAL @ KRESH PAL ANURAG KISHORE[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH HOMEDEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL SECRETARYAND ANR.

ANKUR PRAKASH[R-1], GP. CAPT. KARANSINGH BHATI[R-2]

145 Crl.A. No. 596/2014II

RAGHAV PRASAD AND ORS. MANJU JETLEY[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH RUCHIRA GOEL[R-1]

146 C.A. No. 11287/2013XVII

K.S. SAHU DEEPAK GOELVersus

UOI . AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

and IA No.1402/2018-EARLY HEARING APPLICATION147 C.A. No. 618/2015

XIV-AR.S.AZAD RANA RANJIT SINGHVersusM/S.MAHABIR STEEL ROLLING MILLS . PRAVIR KUMAR JAIN[CAVEAT], [R-2][CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 619/2015XIV-A

HARPAL SINGH RANA RANJIT SINGH

VersusM/S MAHABIR STEEL ROLLING MILLS . PRAVIR KUMAR JAIN[CAVEAT], [R-2][CAVEAT]

148 C.A. No. 3800/2017XIV-A

ASHOK KUMAR CHOUDHARY AND ORS. S. K. VERMA[P-2], [P-3], [P-4]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

149 C.A. No.5962-5963/2014XIV-A

BANSAL COMMODITIES AND ORS. SUBODH S. PATIL[P-1]

VersusRAKESH KUMAR AGGARWAL AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], ANIL KATIYAR[R-2]

150 C.A. No.1134-1135/2016XVI-A

SNEH LATA SUDARSHAN SINGH RAWAT[P-1]

Versus

RATNO DEVI AND ORS. UMANG SHANKAR[R-1], MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

151 C.A. No.4374-4375/2016XI-A

KIRAN KUMAR PARIDA RAJ KAMAL[P-1]

VersusPRAVEENA SAMAL S. RAVI SHANKAR[R-1]

152 C.A. No. 6989/2014XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX V ANIL KATIYARVersusM/S. RAYALA CORPORATION P. LTD

153 C.A. No.9506-9507/2017IV

AJAY KUMAR PANDEY RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE UNIONHOME SECRETARY, MINISTRY OFHOME AFFAIRS, GOVT OF INDIA NORTHBLOCK AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1][GR], [R-4][GR],KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-2][GR], [R-3][GR]

154 C.A. No. 10503/2014XII-A

MATTAPALLI LAXMI NARASIMHAINDUSTRIES SRIDHAR POTARAJU

Versus

Page 108: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ANDHRA PRADESH STATE FINANCIALCORPORATION AND ANR.

Y. PRABHAKARA RAO, VENKATESWARA RAOANUMOLU

155 C.A. No. 2851/2015III

ISMAILBHAI I. KANSARA(D) TH. LR RAUF RAHIM[P-1]VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT, THROUGH THECHIEF SECRETARY AND ANR.

NIKHIL GOEL[R-1], ANIRUDDHA P.MAYEE[R-1], [R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

156 C.A. No. 11128/2016XIV-A

C.I.T.,DELHI ANIL KATIYARVersusBHARTI HEXACOM LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11129/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11131/2016XIV-A

CIT, DELHI-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S.BHARTI HEXACOM LTD KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11148/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBHARTI TELENET LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11134/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBHARTI HEXACOM LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11130/2016XIV-A

C.I.T.,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBHARTI HEXACOM LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11132/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S.BHARTI CELLULAR LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11136/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S.BHARTI CELLULAR LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11133/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBHARTI CELLULAR LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11135/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BHARTI CELLULAR LTD KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11137/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBHARTI AIRTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11146/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BHARTI TELENET LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11140/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 109: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4M/S BHARTIINFOTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11141/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BHARTI INFOTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11139/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BHARTI INFOTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 11142/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL)-III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONS LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 11143/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONS LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 11145/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,(CENTRAL) - III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. MICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONSLTD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 163/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI - I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1]FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2015

ConnectedC.A. No. 11147/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 162/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI I NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED KAVITA JHA[R-1]FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2015

ConnectedC.A. No. 11149/2016III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. IDEA CELLULAR LTD. THROUG ITSDIRECTOR E. C. AGRAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No. 1564/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - V ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. NEW DELHI TELEVISION LTD. B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 10524/2017IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S IDEA CELLULAR LTD THROUGH ITSM.D. E. C. AGRAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No. 4839/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3/2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S IDEA CELLULAR LTD E. C. AGRAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 17501/2017XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 110: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10529/2017XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW DELHI TELEVISION LIMITED B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 16367/2018XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSCHNEIDER ELECTRIC INDIA PVT LTD MAHUA KALRAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.81021/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 6897/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBHARTI TELEMEDIA LIMITED KAVITA JHAFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.89542/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4394/2019XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S S.T. ERICSSON INDIA PVT LTD KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.18782/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 4178-2019IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S AMBA RESEARCH INDIA PVT. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.33118/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 5703-2019IV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S NXP SEMI CONDUCTORS INDIAPVT. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.34814/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 24740/2019XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20863/2019XIV

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26256/2019IX

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 14 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S IDEA CELLULAR LIMITEDFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.160823/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

157 C.A. No.9831-9832/2014XVII

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFDEFENCE THROUGH SECRETARY MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

VersusEX. CORPORAL PRAVEEN KUMARMISHRA RABIN MAJUMDER

158 C.A. No. 9526/2017XII-A

LINGALA SATHYANARAYANA DEAD BYLR. VINOD KUMAR TEWARI

Versus

Page 111: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4KOYYADA ANDALU ANNAM D. N. RAO[CAVEAT]

159 Crl.A. No. 1551/2014II

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusBABU LAL AND ORS.

160 C.A. No. 4287/2017IV

AJAY MAHAJAN @ AJAY GUPTA S. N. BHATVersusNAJAR SINGH AND ANR. R. C. KAUSHIKI.A. No. 37654/2018 is disposed of by Hon'ble Court's order dated 14.01.2019. Onlyappeal is to be listed.

161 Crl.A. No. 590/2017II

MUJAMMIL AND ANR. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[P-1], [P-2]Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SHAKEEL AHMED[COMP], VISHWA PALSINGH[R-1]

162 Crl.A. No. 383/2017II-A

RAM NARESH PRASAD ATUL KUMARVersus

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS.TAPESH KUMAR SINGH, RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON[R-2], RAJESH PRASAD SINGH[R-3],HIMANSHU SHEKHAR[R-4]

163 Crl.A. No. 736/2017II

KOVELAMUDI SEETHARAMAIAH K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI[P-1]Versus

S V S RAVI KRISHNA AND ORS.G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], TATINIBASU[R-2], [R-3], S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-4]

164 C.A. No. 5525/2016XVI

BINA BASAK AND ORS DANISH ZUBAIR KHANVersusSRI BIPUL KANTI BASAK AND ORS ABHISHEK SINGH[R-1]

165 C.A. No.2665-2666/2016XII-A

BOYAPATI SRINIVASA APPA RAO ANDANR. SRIDHAR POTARAJU

Versus

V KAMESWARA RAO AND ORS. SURESHAN P., SHEKHAR KUMAR, K. SHIVRAJCHOUDHURI[R-5]

166 C.A. No. 1853/2015XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusPRADEEP KUMAR SHANKARRAOYANGER LAMBAT AND ASSOCIATES

FOR [I A FOR EARLY HEARING] ON IA 29325/2017167 C.A. No. 1584/2017

XVIBIPLAB BHOWAL ANURAG PANDEYVersusBIPASHA BHOWAL SARLA CHANDRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2340/2017XVI

BIPLAB BHOWAL ANURAG PANDEY

VersusBIPASHA BHOWAL SARLA CHANDRA[R-1]

168 C.A. No. 10527/2017XII-A

M/S GULF OIL CORPORATION LTD. A. SUBBA RAOVersusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

169 C.A. No. 3503/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]VersusMOODYS ANALYTICS KNOWLEDGESERVICE RESEARCH (MAURITIUS)LIMITED

BHARGAVA V. DESAI

170 C.A. No.3022-3023/2019XII

LAKSHMI P. V. YOGESWARAN

Versus

Page 112: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4KASIAMMAL (D) THROUGH LRS.N.SURIYA DEEPAN S. RAJAPPA

171 C.A. No. 11806/2018XIV-A

M/S. MIRKANA ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. MOHIT D. RAM[P-1]VersusKANTA MEHTA AND ANR. KARANJAWALA & CO.[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11807/2018XIV-A

M/S. MIRKANA ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. MOHIT D. RAM[P-1]

VersusEINO S. MEHTA AND ANR. KARANJAWALA & CO.[R-1]

172 C.A. No.14970-14971/2017XVI-A

MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE KATRA ANDORS. M. SHOEB ALAM[P-2], [P-3]

Versus

ASHWANI KUMAR SUNIL FERNANDES[P-1], [R-1], SAKSHIKAKKAR[R-1]

173 Crl.A. No. 250/2016II-B

THAKORE UMEDSING NATHUSING NACHIKETA JOSHI[P-1]VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 4693/2016II-B

THAKOR UMEDSING NATHUSING NACHIKETA JOSHI

VersusSTATE OF GUJARATFOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 10657/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 10658/2016

ConnectedCrl.A. No.218-219/2016II-B

THAKORE LAXMANSING HALSING . ANDORS. RAUF RAHIM[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]ONLY FOR [EXEMP. FROM CERTIFIED COPY OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER] ON IA4697/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 4699/2016 FOR[PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 4701/2016 FOR [PERMISSION TOFILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 6394/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA6396/2016

174 C.A. No. 3672/2017XIV-A

SANJEEV KUMAR RAMPAL AND ORS. FARRUKH RASHEED[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], DEEPAKGOEL[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], NEERAJSHEKHAR[R-7], [R-8]

175 C.A. No. 4390/2016XII-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), HYDERABAD ANIL KATIYAR

VersusC. SWAPNA A. SUBBA RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 7328/2016XII-A

CENTRAL GOVT. INDUSTRIALTRIBUNAL LABOUR COURTCOMMISSIONER

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusG VENKATA LAKSHMI A. SUBBA RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 10452/2016XII-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) HYDERABAD. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusC. SWAPNA A. SUBBA RAO

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22242/2017XII-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) HYDERABAD ANIL KATIYAR

VersusG. VENKATA LAKSHMI A. SUBBA RAO[R-1][PR]

Page 113: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No. 1512/2018XII-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL) HYDERABAD ANIL KATIYAR

VersusG. SANJAY CHOWDHARY A. SUBBA RAO

176 Crl.A. No. 803/2017II-A

DHANANJAY RAI @ GUDDU RAI SMARHAR SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR NIRANJANA SINGH[R-1]

177 C.A. No. 7326/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI 1 ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

ANSAL LANDMARK TOWNSHIP (P) LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1], K. V.MOHAN[R-1][IMPL]

FOR [I A FOR IMPLEADMENT] ON IA 30250/2017 FOR [I A FOR IMPLEADMENT]ON IA 30251/2017 FOR [I A FOR IMPLEADMENT] ON IA 30253/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 7998/2019XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

CAPARO INDIA LTD. PUNEET SINGHBINDRA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT][CAVEAT][CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8005/2019XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NOIDA SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGYPARTK LTD.IA No.152673/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.152675/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

178 Crl.A. No.1742-1743/2017II

INDRAJIT MALLAH KRISHNA PAL SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH HOMEDEPARTMENT SPECIAL SECRETARY TOGOVERNMENT OF UTTAR PRADESHFOR ON IA 16298-99/2016-Application for juvenilety

179 C.A. No. 1567/2017IV-A

SIDDARAJU RUKHSANA CHOUDHURYVersus

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.(MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[INT], V. N.RAGHUPATHYABHINAV RAMKRISHNA[IMPL]

TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGESConnectedR.P.(C) No. 36/2017 InC.A. No. 5389/2016XV

UNION OF INDIA MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

Versus

ARUN SINGHVI . AND ORS.IA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING REVIEW PETITION ON IA 1/2017FOR ON IA 2/2017 FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 109754/2017

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 21197/2017XII-A

UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OFSPACE ANIL KATIYAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5]

VersusSYED GHOUSE BASHA PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMARFOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA43171/2017

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4650/2019IV-A

MUKESH KUMAR SAHU AMITA SINGH KALKAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. PRADEEP MISRA[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6092/2019IV

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA, SUDARSHANRAJAN[P-3]

Versus

Page 114: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4POONAM MANCHANDA PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6095/2019IV

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

VersusBALBIR SINGH MD. SHAHID ANWAR[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

180 C.A. No. 6419/2017III

SANJAY KUMAR RAI G. BALAJIVersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOMEAFFAIRS THE SECRETARY AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

181 Crl.A. No. 185/2018II

MUNNA (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-1]

182 C.A. No. 4585/2018XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersus

PROBIR GHOSH AND ORS.

DIKSHA RAI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7],[R-8], [R-11], [R-14], [R-15], [R-16], [R-17],[R-18], [R-19], [R-20], [R-22], [R-23], [R-24],[R-26]D. BHARATHI REDDY[IMPL]

ConnectedC.A. No.4586-4587/2018XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

Versus

BITUPAN RABA AVIJIT ROY[R-1]FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 134331/2017

183 C.A. No. 6838/2017XVII

EX. JWO VISHNU DEO TIWARI TARUNA SINGH GOHIL[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

FOR ON IA 1/2017 FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON ON IA2/2017

184 C.A. No.9004-9005/2017XVII

ARMY NO. 3192522L SEP HARDEVSINGH KARUNAKAR MAHALIK

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

185 C.A. No. 13120/2017XVII

RAVINDER CHNANA AND ORS. PRAVEEN JAIN, DEVVRAT[P-2]Versus

DELHI SECRETARIAT AND ORS.

D. N. GOBURDHAN[R-5], AVIJIT ROY[R-6],PREM PRAKASH[CAVEAT], [R-9], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-10], PRAVEEN SWARUP[R-2],YOGINDER HANDOO[R-3]SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[INT]

186 C.A. No. 10851/2017XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusMAJ. GEN. DVS RANA CHAMBERS OF KARTIK SETH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11135/2017XVII

UNION OF INDIA MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[P-1]

VersusCOL MAHESH KUMAR SINGH GAICHANGPOU GANGMEI[R-1]FOR FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 80497/2017

187 C.A. No.7659-7662/2017XVII

PARSN SENIOR CITIZENS GROUP GAUTAM NARAYAN

VersusTHE CORPORATION OF COIMBATOREAND ORS. SRIRAM P.[CAVEAT], M. YOGESH KANNA[R-3]

Page 115: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No.7401-7404/2017XVII

MAYFLOWER SHAKTHI GARDENOWNERS ASSOCIATION GAUTAM NARAYAN

VersusTHE CORPORATION OF COIMBATOREAND ORS.

SRIRAM P.[CAVEAT], [R-1], M. YOGESHKANNA[R-4], [R-5]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 41587/2017 FOR PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 42315/2017 FORAPPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 28590/2019

188 C.A. No. 10258/2017III-A

U.P. POWER CORPORATION LTD ANDORS. RAKESH UTTAMCHANDRA UPADHYAY

VersusYASH PAL SINGH AND ORS. GORKELA LAW OFFICE[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7406/2018III-A

U. P. POWER CORPORATION LIMITEDAND ORS. PRADEEP MISRA

VersusSHIV RANSHU CHHUNEJA AND ORS. HIMANSHU BHUSHAN[CAVEAT]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.25680-25681/2018XI

SHIV RANSHU CHHUNEJA HIMANSHU BHUSHAN

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

189 Crl.A. No. 1394/2017II

GOVERDHAN PRATIBHA JAINVersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1][GR]

190 C.A. No. 21769/2017III

MAHARASHTRA HEAVY VEHICLES ANDINTERSTATE CONTAINER OPERATORSASSOCIATION AND ANR.

KRIPA SHANKAR PRASAD

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SANTOSH KRISHNAN[CAVEAT], P. N.PURI[R-1]

191 Crl.A. No.1964-1968/2017II-A

RAM VILAS PASWAN JAIKRITI S. JADEJA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1], PRANABPRAKASH[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], HARSHPARASHAR[R-6]

192 C.A. No. 1614/2018XII-A

ANDHRA BANK THROUGH ITSAUTHORISED OFFICER AMAN GUPTA

VersusK. V. KRISHNA REDDY ANJANI AIYAGARI[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1615/2018XII-A

NALLAMILLI BHEEMESWARA REDDY ANNAM D. N. RAO

VersusK.V. KRISHNA REDDY AND ORS. ANJANI AIYAGARI[CAVEAT], [R-1]

193 MA 1563/2017 in C.A.No. 4226/2012XI-A

ANWAR P.V. G. PRAKASH

VersusP K. BASHEER AND ORS.

IN C.A. No. - 4226/2012, FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 131448/2017[ TOGO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]

ConnectedMA 1709/2017 in C.A.No. 4226/2012XI-A

ANWAR P.V. G. PRAKASH

Versus

P K. BASHEER AND ORS.

Page 116: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4

IN C.A. No. - 4226/2012, FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 133740/2017194 Crl.A. No. 244/2018

II-ABALAJI GANPAT GIDDE JAIKRITI S. JADEJAVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 669/2018II-A

HANMANT GANPAT GIDDE JAIKRITI S. JADEJA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS[INT]FOR FOR [I/A FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL GROUNDS] ON IA89011/2018 FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION ON IA17675/2019

195 C.A. No. 8156/2018XVI

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL 1 KOLKATA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S JIS FOUNDATION SARLA CHANDRA[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 25738/2018XVI

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL 1 KOLKATA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S JIS FOUNDATION SARLA CHANDRA[R-1]

196 Crl.A. No. 326/2019II-B

ANRABHAI @ ANDU DEVLABHAIRATHAVA KAMAKSHI S. MEHLWAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

197 C.A. No. 2702/2019III

MAHESH C MATHUR ABHA R. SHARMAVersusROHINTON ERUCH SHROFF AND ORS. K J JOHN AND CO[CAVEAT], [R-2], [R-3]

198 C.A. No. 98/2019XV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJASTHAN STATE MINES ANDMINERALS LTD. TARUN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.2934-2935/2019XV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

RAJASTHAN STATE MINES ANDMINERALS LTD

ConnectedDiary No. 13648-2019XV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJASTHAN STATE MINES ANDMINERALS LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.69182/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.69181/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

199 W.P.(C) No. 250/2019PIL-W

OJASWA PATHAK AND ANR. M. P. VINODVersus

UNION OF INDIA CAVEATOR-IN-PERSONPRASANTH P.[INT], FAUZIA SHAKIL[INT]

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]

200 C.A. No. 1951/2011IX

HARISHCHANDRA MOTILAL JAIN(DEAD) THROUGH HIS LEGALREPRESENTATIVES

KAUSHIK PODDAR[P-1]

Versus

Page 117: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ARUN GOVINDRAO SUTANE (DEAD)THROUGH HIS LEGALREPRESENTATIVES AND ORS.

ANAGHA S. DESAI[R-1], CHANDER SHEKHARASHRI[R-2], PAVAN KUMAR[R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6]

201 C.A. No. 818/2011IV-A

MALLANNA NARENDRA KUMARVersusSMT. SARASWATI ANJANI KUMAR JHA

202 Crl.A. No. 2010/2010II-A

PRAKASH NAYI @ SEN AFTAB ALI KHANVersusTHE STATE OF GOA

203 Crl.A. No. 1607/2009II-B

JAFAR T. N. SINGHVersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH

204 C.A. No. 2045/2011IV

DR. NIRMAL SINGH PANESAR JASPREET GOGIAVersusPARAMJIT KAUR PANESAR @ AJINDERKAUR PANESAR@ AJINDER K PANESA MADHURIMA TATIA

205 C.A. No. 2581/2011III-A

NAIK NATWAR LAL HARJIWAN DAS MUSHTAQ AHMADVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR, [R-2], [R-3]

206 C.A. No. 50/2010III

THE COMMISSIONER.OF INCOME TAX-IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSWAPNIL FINANCE PVT.LTD. P. S. SUDHEERFOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 2/2010

207 C.A. No.9869-9871/2014III

BAPU NATHU BORATE M. Y. DESHMUKH

VersusDADASO DINKARRAO JAGDALE T. HARISH KUMAR

208 C.A. No. 3767/2010XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGHVersusARBIND JEE LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH

209 Crl.A. No. 1844/2009II-C

SITARAM DEEPAK GOEL[P-1]VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

210 C.A. No. 556/2012IX

SHRIPATI LAKHU MANE ABHA R. SHARMAVersusTHE MEMBER SECRETARYMAHARASHTRA WATER SUPPLY ANDSEWERAGE BOARD AND ORS. AND ORS.

ANAGHA S. DESAI

211 C.A. No. 3035/2010IV-A

AJAY KASHYAP RAJESHVersusHEMLATA KASHYAP NIRAJ SHARMA

212 C.A. No.6964-6965/2015XIV-A

SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

VersusC.I.T.,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.6966-6967/2015XIV-A

KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES BHARGAVA V. DESAI

Versus

C.I.T. NEW DELHI. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6971/2015XIV-A

C.I.T. DELHI - XVII ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES KISHORE KUNAL

Page 118: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedC.A. No.6969-6970/2015XIV-A

C.I.T., DELHI-92 ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

M/S AIR FRANCE VINAY GARG

ConnectedC.A. No. 6968/2015XIV-A

BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS)DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6972/2015XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,N.DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6974/2015XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6973/2015XIV-A

C.I.T-XVII,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

ConnectedDiary No. 12449-2018XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 08 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SRL RANBAXY LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.58304/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

213 C.A. No. 10077/2010XVI

LOPAMUDRA DASGUPTA SANDEEP NARAINVersusDIPANKAR DASGUPTA RANJAN MUKHERJEE

NEW DELHI06-12-2019 17:37:14

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 119: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 33 OF 2019 FROM : 10-12-2019 To 12-12-2019

COURT NO. : 5HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROYREGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 C.A. No. 7850/2009

XVBALWANT SINGH (D) THR. L.RS. P. S. SUDHEERVersusDUNGAR SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. PRATIBHA JAIN

2 C.A. No. 2057/2009XV

GYARSA (D) THR. LRS RANBIR SINGH YADAVVersus

THE BOARD OF REVENUE . AND ORS.SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA, VINOD KUMARTEWARI[R-4], K. L. JANJANI[R-5], [R-5.4],[R-5.3], [R-5.2], [R-5.1], [R-6.3], [R-6.2], [R-6.1],[R-6], [R-6.7], [R-6.6], [R-6.5], [R-6.4]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } [ HIGHER UPON THE BOARD ]

3 C.A. No.3504-3505/2010III

M/S.GAS AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.THROUGH SHRI A.K. RUDRAEXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusM/S.INDIAN PETROCHEM.CORP.LTD.THROUGH ITS MANAGER AND ORS. KHAITAN & CO.

4 C.A. No. 9509/2010III-A

SARAD CHANDRA RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

5 C.A. No. 6311/2010IX

VITTHALGHANSHYAM PAWAR ABHA R. SHARMAVersusSATARA ZILLA PARISHAD AT SATARATHROUGH ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER AND ORS.

VISHWAJIT SINGH, ASHA GOPALAN NAIR

6 C.A. No. 8720/2010IV

POONAM SHARMA AND ORS. AJAY KUMAR SINGHVersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI, [R-1]

7 C.A. No. 6821/2009XI-A

STATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPURVersusC.K.KARUNAKARAN

8 C.A. No. 9976/2011IV

DALJIT SINGH AND ORS.VersusGURMUKH DASS(D) THRU L.RS. UGRA SHANKAR PRASAD

9 C.A. No. 2344/2011XV

JAYANA (D) THR. LRS. PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN THR. THECOLLECTOR AND ORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1], GP. CAPT. KARANSINGH BHATI[R-4]

10 C.A. No. 8496/2009XVI

SHEO NATH PRASAD B. K. SATIJAVersus

Page 120: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 5UTTAR BIHAR KSHTRIYA GRAMIN BANKAND ORS. J S WAD AND CO

11 C.A. No. 6794/2010IV-A

BATA INDIA LTD. NEERAJ SHEKHAR[P-1]VersusWORKMEN OF BATA INDIA LTD ANDANR. S-LEGAL ASSOCIATES[R-1]

12 C.A. No. 1346/2010XIV-A

MILKHI RAM AJIT SINGH PUNDIRVersusHIMACHAL PRADESH STATEELECTRICITY BOARD NARESH K. SHARMA

13 C.A. No. 6763/2013IV

RAM KUMAR DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHAVersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VISHWA PAL SINGH, KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

14 C.A. No. 5752/2011III-A

M/S PFIZER LTD. P. V. DINESH[P-1]Versus

STATE OF UP AND ANR. SAMAR VIJAY SINGH[R-1], MONA K.RAJVANSHI[R-2]

15 C.A. No. 1426/2013XVI

RAM CHANDRA PRASAD YADAV E. C. VIDYA SAGARVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR STATE OF BIHARAND ORS. GOPAL SINGH

16 C.A. No. 7127/2013IV-A

SHIVNARAYAN MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJVersusMOTILAL . AND ORS. RAJESH, ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

17 C.A. No. 9826/2013III-A

VINOD KUMAR DIXIT S. R. SETIA[P-1]VersusMANJU LATA AWASTHI . AND ANR. M. P. SHORAWALA[R-1], ABHA JAIN[R-1]

18 C.A. No. 881-883/2012XII

THIRUKURUNKUDI JEEYAR MUTTVersus

SUNDARA SUBRAMANIAN (FORTHEMSELVES AND ASREPRESENTATIVES OF SAIVAITES) ANDORS. AND ORS.

B. BALAJI[CAVEAT], Y. RAJA GOPALARAO[CAVEAT], VIPIN NAIR[P-1], , SUMITKUMAR, SATYA MITRA GARG, P. B. SURESH,M. YOGESH KANNA, VINODH KANNA B.[R-2],[R-3], K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-4]

and IA No.31464/2018-EARLY HEARING APPLICATION19 C.A. No. 6111/2013

IVMANMEET KAUR RANJIT KUMAR SHARMAVersusRAGHBIR SINGH DHRUV PALL

ConnectedC.A. No. 6114/2013IV

GURNAM SINGH RANJIT KUMAR SHARMA

VersusRAGHBIR SINGH DHRUV PALLand IA No.80466/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedC.A. No. 6113/2013IV

RATTAN CHAND (D) THR. LRS. . ANDORS. RANJIT KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]

VersusRAGHBIR SINGH DHRUV PALL[R-1]and IA No.80464/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedC.A. No. 6112/2013IV

SURINDER SINGH AND ANR. RANJIT KUMAR SHARMA

VersusRAGHBIR SINGH DHRUV PALLand IA No.80461/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

20 C.A. No.2204-2205/2016XVI

WEST BENGAL UNIV.OF ANIMAL ANDFISHERY SCIENCES AND ANR. KUNAL CHATTERJI

Versus

Page 121: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 5

PRASUN MAITY AND ORS. SNEHASISH MUKHERJEE, PRAVEEN SWARUP,GOPAL SINGH

21 C.A. No. 6257/2014XVI

M/S KEWAL COURT PVT LTD AND ANR.AND ANR. VIKAS MEHTA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORSAND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], L. C.AGRAWALA[R-5], ANURAG PANDEY[R-6],CHIRA RANJAN ADDY[R-10]

22 C.A. No.4627-4635/2013IV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

VersusGULREJ KHAN . AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA

ConnectedC.A. No. 4636/2013IV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

VersusJITENDRA PATEL AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA

23 C.A. No. 4523/2013IV

NIRMAL KUMARI SHARMA AND ANR. MANJU SHARMAVersusMADAN LAL ASHWANI BHARDWAJ

24 C.A. No.8128-8131/2018XI-A

S.ABDUL SALAM AND ORS. ETC. ANIL KUMAR MISHRA-I[P-1]

VersusNATIONAL AVIA.CO.OF INDIA LTD. ANDANR. ETC.

SHIV KUMAR SURI[R-1], GURMEET SINGHMAKKER[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8132/2018XI-A

PATRICIA D SOUZA . AND ORS. A. RAGHUNATH

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SHIV KUMAR SURI

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 53/2012X

RAJESH KUMAR AND ANR. ARUN K. SINHA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SHRISH KUMAR MISRA, MUDIT SHARMA,DEBASIS MISRA, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

25 C.A. No. 3166/2014III-A

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPT OFFOREST, UP AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA THR. GENERALMANAGER AND ORS.

SHREEKANT N. TERDAL[R-1], ALOKSHUKLA[R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 12064/2014III-A

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1]

VersusRAIL VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED CHIEFPROJECT MANAGER AND ORS. ALOK SHUKLA[R-1], ANIL KATIYAR[R-2], [R-3]

26 C.A. No.9280-9281/2014IV-A

N.C. SANTHOSH RAJESH MAHALE

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } LIST THE APPEALS IN THE MONTH OFDECEMBER, 2019.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 34878/2013IV-A

SAYEDA FARHEEN BANAO PURUSHOTTAM SHARMA TRIPATHI

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 24169/2015IV-A

SANTOSH. RAJESH MAHALE[P-1]

Versus

Page 122: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 5THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT.REVENUE DEPARTMENT SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }27 C.A. No. 4610/2017

IIISANJAY GUPTA S. K. BHATTACHARYAVersusNETWORK STOCK BROKING LTD MOHAN LAL SHARMA[R-1]

28 C.A. No. 3381/2016XII

M. JOSEPH RAKESH K. SHARMAVersusPURASAWAKKAM P. BENEFIT FUNDLTD. AND ANR. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

29 C.A. No. 1473/2016XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1], APPLICANT-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Versus

NAVENDRA KUMAR AND ORS. PURVISH JITENDRA MALKAN[R-1], MUKESHKUMAR MARORIA[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1476/2016XIV-A

CBI THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[P-1]

Versus

NAVENDRA KUMAR AND ORS. PURVISH JITENDRA MALKAN[R-1]SUSHIL BALWADA[INT]

FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 3/2014ConnectedC.A. No. 1477/2016XIV-A

NAVENDRA KUMAR PURVISH JITENDRA MALKAN

Versus

UNION OF INDIA B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-2], [IMPL]

FOR [application for impleadment] ON IA 1/201530 C.A. No. 4613/2017

XI-AUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[P-1]VersusHARIDAS K SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[R-1]

31 C.A. No. 14166/2015XVI

RAJENDRA PRASAD VARINDER KUMAR SHARMAVersusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR

32 C.A. No.3868-3873/2015XVI

KANHAIYA BHALOTIA ETC ABHISHEK VIKAS[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA ETC ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], ANUP JAIN[R-3][PR]

33 C.A. No. 7133/2015IV

STATE OF HARYANA SANJAY KUMAR VISENVersusKRISHAN KUMAR DAYA KRISHAN SHARMA

34 C.A. No. 12067/2018III

DHARAM PAL SATYA PAL LTD. SANJAI KUMAR PATHAKVersusCOMMISSIONER OF FOOD SAFETYMUMBAI AND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,O. P. BHADANI[R-4]

35 C.A. No. 10658/2014III

MUNICIPAL CORP. OF GREATERMUMBAI REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONERAND ORS.

J S WAD AND CO

VersusM/S CRESCENT PROPERTYDEVELOPERS REP. BY ITS PARTNER RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

36 C.A. No. 1071/2016XII

A. VELAYUTHAM NARESH KUMARVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU GOVT.LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT(E2)DEPARTMENT REP. BY ITS PRINCIPALSECRETARY AND ORS.

K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR

Page 123: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 537 C.A. No. 1256/2017

IIISOU. SHRADHA W/O SUMIT FOGLA ANAGHA S. DESAIVersusSUMIT S/O NARAYANPRASAD FOGLA CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

38 C.A. No. 8287/2015XV

JAIPUR ZILA DUGDH UTPATAKSAHAKARI SANGH LTD. AJAY CHOUDHARY

VersusAVINASH SHARMA AND ORS. S.K. SINHAI.A. FOR VACATING STAY

39 C.A. No. 1309/2017III

BISWAS NAIR ADITYA SINGHVersusSHINIE BISWAS NAIR ASHUTOSH DUBEY

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.241/2016 In SLP(C) No.31208/2015IX

SHINIE BISWAS NAIR ASHUTOSH DUBEY

Versus

BISWAS NAIR AND ANR. AJIT PUDUSSERY, ADITYA SINGHFOR ON IA 1/2016 FOR INITIATING CRIMINAL PROCESSDINGS U/S 340 OF CRPCON IA 2/2016

40 C.A. No. 14695/2015III

AHMEDABAD DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVEBANK GAUTAM TALUKDAR[P-1]

VersusTHE DEPOSIT INSURANCE AND CREDITGUARANTEE CORPORATION AND ORS.

BIJOY KUMAR JAIN[R-1], ANIRUDDHA P.MAYEE[R-2], O. P. BHADANI[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 14696/2015III

THE GUJARAT STATE COOPERATIVEBANK LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGER GAUTAM TALUKDAR[P-1]

VersusTHE DEPOSIT INSURANCE AND CREDITGUARANTEE CORPORATION AND ORS.

BIJOY KUMAR JAIN[R-1], ANIRUDDHA P.MAYEE[R-2], O. P. BHADANI[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No.8170-8171/2016III

THE GENERAL CO-OPERATIVE BANKLTD. (IN LIQUIDATION) O. P. BHADANI

VersusDEPOSIT INSURANCE & CREDITGUARANTEE CORPORATION & ORS.ETC.

BIJOY KUMAR JAIN, ANIRUDDHA P.MAYEE[R-2]

41 C.A. No. 3464/2018XII-A

IPPAGUNTA VENKATA KRISHNA REDDY VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLUVersusIPPAGUNTA LALITHAMMA ABHIJIT SENGUPTA

42 C.A. No. 2604/2016XI-A

DR. P. BONNY NATESH NEERAJ SHEKHARVersusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 2605/2016XI-A

P. BONNY NATESH NEERAJ SHEKHAR[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS. SIDDHARTHA JHA[R-3]

43 C.A. No. 5372/2017XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SECRETARYAND ORS. SHREEKANT N. TERDAL, [P-1]

VersusBINITA MITRA AND ORS. BIJAN KUMAR GHOSH[R-1]

44 C.A. No. 4677/2017III-A

RAKESH CHANDRA MAURYA VIVEK GUPTA[P-1]VersusSMT. MADHU MAURYA PALLAVI PRATAP

45 C.A. No. 7271/2016XI-A

K.R. ANILKUMAR HIMINDER LALVersusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS. C. K. SASI

Page 124: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 546 C.A. No. 8426/2016

XIV-AASHES KIRAN PRASAD DIVYAKANT LAHOTI[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1], [R-5]

47 C.A. No. 11831/2018XII-A

G. NARAYAN REDDY ANNAM D. N. RAOVersusP. NARAYANA REDDY REP. BY HIS G.P.A(P. MOHAN REDDY) B. RAMANA MURTHY

48 C.A. No. 10797/2018XII

N. MARAPPAN AND ANR. AND ANR. BALAJI SRINIVASANVersusV.S.T. SENGOTTAIAN AND ORS. ANDORS. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

49 C.A. No. 6799/2017XI-A

M/S LISIE MEDICAL INSTITUTIONS K. V. MOHAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. C. K. SASI[R-1], [R-2][TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES][ PART-HEARD BY : HON. R.BANUMATHI, HON. A.S. BOPANNA AND HON. HRISHIKESH ROY, JJ. ]

50 C.A. No. 10075/2018XI-A

SARAT CHANDRAN NAIR LAKSHMI N. KAIMALVersusR. MOHAN SANAND RAMAKRISHNAN[R-1]

51 C.A. No. 10126/2018XVI

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ANDORS. RAJAN K. CHOURASIA[P-1]

Versus

ABDUL HAQUE . AND ORS.

REENA PANDEY[R-1], MADHUMITABHATTACHARJEE[R-1], ANURAG PANDEY[R-2],[R-3], NANDINI SEN MUKHERJEE[R-19], PLRCHAMBERS AND CO.[R-20], SHASHIKIRAN[R-21], [R-22], [R-23], [R-25], HARSHPARASHAR[R-17], [R-21], [R-22], [R-23], [R-24],[R-25]RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON[I-14][IMPL]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10127/2018XVI

BANANI DAS VIPIN NAIR[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF BENGAL AND ORS.

RAJAN K. CHOURASIA[R-1], PLR CHAMBERSAND CO.[R-1], ANURAG PANDEY[R-1], [R-3],[R-9], SHALINI KAUL[R-4], HARSHPARASHAR[R-3], [R-11], [R-12], [R-13], SHALUSHARMA[R-15], [R-16], [R-17]

and FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESON IA 139011/2017 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 37979/2019 FORCLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 55338/2019

52 C.A. No. 8726/2018IV-A

SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELD LTD. ANDORS. ASHWARYA SINHA

VersusGULSHAN PRAKASH VIKRANT SINGH BAIS

ConnectedC.A. No. 8728/2018IV-A

SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELD LTD ANDORS ASHWARYA SINHA

VersusAVINASH SALOMAN VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No. 8727/2018IV-A

SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD ANDORS. ASHWARYA SINHA

VersusAMIT KUMAR MASHIH VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA

53 C.A. No. 4938/2017IV-A

RAMAN KUMAR NAIR @ RAMAN KUMARCHOUKSEY PRAVEEN CHATURVEDI[P-1]

VersusDINESH KUMAR GUPTA AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[R-1]

Page 125: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 5FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA2/2017

54 C.A. No. 8612/2017XIV-A

SAJU @ ROOP LAL RAJESH SRIVASTAVAVersusKANSHI RAM AND ANR. AJAY MARWAH[R-1]

55 C.A. No. 94-95/2012XIV-A

ROBIN SHARMA ABHIJIT SENGUPTA[P-1]Versus

BHABESWAR DEKA AND ORS. RAJIV MEHTA[R-1], DEBOJIT BORKAKATI[R-2],[R-3], [R-5]

56 C.A. No. 9336/2017XII

R.BALAJI AND ORS. AND ORS. SATYA MITRA GARG[P-1]VersusTHE SECRETARY TAMIL NADU PUBLICSERVICE COMMISSION AND ORS. ANDORS.

PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1], K. V.VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1], VINODH KANNAB.[R-2][GR]

57 C.A. No.8555-8556/2018III-A

KEDARWA (D) THR.LRS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]

Versus

CONSOLIDATION OFFICER BABERUVISHWA PAL SINGH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], S. R.SETIA[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-11],PRASHANT CHAUDHARY[R-9], [R-10]

58 C.A. No. 9917/2011XIV-A

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK MITTER & MITTER CO.VersusM.L.KALRA (D) THR.LRS. AND ANR. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

59 C.A. No. 11812/2016IV-A

AUDREY FRANCIS DSOUZA S. N. BHATVersusCHARLES REGO . AND ORS. SHAILESH MADIYAL

60 C.A. No.7705-7707/2009XII

KUSHAL CHAND SHIYAL V. BALACHANDRAN

VersusS.V.RAMASAMY AND ORS. AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA

61 C.A. No. 7169/2010IV

RAMANDEEP SHARMA AND ORS. SHIEL SETHI[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF PUNJABKARAN BHARIHOKE[R-1], AJAY PAL[R-2],TUSHAR BAKSHI[R-3], [R-3], [R-4], G. N.REDDY[R-5], MUSHTAQ AHMAD[R-6], [R-7],[R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11], [R-12], [R-13], [R-14]

62 C.A. No. 9773/2011IV-A

VIJAYA BANK AND ORS. RAJIV NANDAVersusMOHAN DASS RAMANA SHETTY

63 C.A. No. 6039/2010XII

T.NADU FORESTDEP.STAF.COOP.THRIF.STY.LTD REP. BYITS SPECIAL OFFICER

R. NEDUMARAN[P-1]

VersusSPL.DEPUTY COMMR.OF LABOUR ANDANR.

VINODH KANNA B.[R-1], GAUTAMNARAYAN[R-2]

64 C.A. No. 8430/2009XIV-A

KULDIP RAJ NARANG (DEAD) THR. LRS. BALRAJ DEWAN[P-1]VersusRADHIKA NARANG AND ORS. KARANJAWALA & CO.[R-1]

65 C.A. No. 2821/2010XI-A

V.S.VARDA A. RAGHUNATHVersusC.S.ANITHA AND ORS. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER, G. PRAKASH

66 C.A. No.5288-5289/2010IV

MEHANGA RAM (D) THR. LRS.. ABHIJAT P. MEDH

VersusSAGAR CHAND (D) THR.LRS. ROHIT KUMAR SINGH

Page 126: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 5{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 } MR. ABHIJAT P. MEDH, ADVOCATEEXPIRED. VIDE ORDER DATED 24.10.2019, MR. ROHIT SHARMA, ADVOCATEUNDERTAKES TO FILE VAKALATNAMA. MATTER TO BE LISTED IN FIRST WEEKOF DECEMBER, 2019.

67 C.A. No. 1367/2011IV-A

SHANKARAPPA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]VersusEARAMMA M. SHOEB ALAM[R-1]

68 C.A. No. 867-870/2013IV

CHANDIGARH CONSTRUCTION CO.PVT.LTD. AJAY MARWAH

VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 }

69 C.A. No.9230-9231/2016IV

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

SEHDEV PASWAN AND ORS. RASHMI SINGH[IMPL], KMNP LAW AOR[IMPL]UTTARA BABBAR[R-1], [INT]

{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 } APPEALS TO BE LISTED BEFORE THEAPPROPRIATE BENCH IN THE MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2019. VIDE COURT'SORDER DATED 02.08.2019.

70 C.A. No. 955/2017III

DILAVARSINH KHODUBHA (SINCEDECEASED) REPRESENTED TH.BALBHADRASINH NIRUBHA JADEJA

RAJIVKUMAR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. ANDORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1], [R-2]

{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 }71 C.A. No. 8360/2016

XVIKANHAIYA PRASAD SMARHAR SINGHVersusSUSHILA DEVI RAM KISHOR SINGH YADAV[CAVEAT]{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 } [ HIGHER UP ON THE BOARD ]

72 C.A. No. 2940/2010III-A

V.K.KAPOOR SHEKHAR KUMAR[P-1]VersusVISITOR SANJAY GANDHI POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICALSCIENCES AND ORS.

SOMIRAN SHARMA[R-1], [R-3], ANKITGOEL[R-4], JITENDRA KUMAR[R-1], [R-5]

{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 } [ AS ITEM NO. 101 ]73 C.A. No. 8473/2011

IV-AMSK MILLS GULBARGA KAUSTUBH ANSHURAJ[P-1]VersusMSK MILLS NAUKARARA SABHA ANKUR S. KULKARNI[R-1]

74 C.A. No.5041-5042/2012IX

CHANDRABHAN RUPCHAND DAKALE(D)BY LRS.SINCE DECEASED BY KARTAOF THE HINDU UNDIVIDED FAMILYSHRI SUR

RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRADEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ANDFOREST THROUGH SECRETARY ANDORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,JYOTI MENDIRATTA

75 C.A. No. 1472/2011XV

KESHU RAM ANIS AHMED KHANVersusCHENNA RAM . AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

76 C.A. No. 7377/2010XI-A

THANKAMMA AND ORS. T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR[P-1]Versus

MATHAI MATHEW AND ORS. ROMY CHACKO[R-1], PRAKASH RANJANNAYAK[R-4], [R-5]

Page 127: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 5LIST THE MATTER AFTER RECEIPT OF THE REPORT FROM THE MEDIATIONCENTRE. AS PER COURT'S ORDER DATED 30.07.2019.

77 C.A. No. 1204/2010III-A

SUDHANSHU DAWAR JAYANT KUMAR MEHTAVersusANUP SUD INDRA SAWHNEY

78 C.A. No. 3368/2012XI-A

E.S.I. CORPORATION, REP. BYREGIONAL DIRECTOR SHIV KUMAR SURI[P-1]

VersusM/S ENDOCRINOLOGY ANDIMMUNOLOGY LAB

79 C.A. No. 4942/2014XII

K.PARTHASARATHY AND ORS.. ANDORS. V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN[P-1]

VersusT.NADU WATER SUPPLY AND ANR. VINODH KANNA B.[R-1][GR]

80 C.A. No. 4483/2010IV

RANBIR SINGH SATISH KUMARVersusEXECUTIVE ENG.P.W.D. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA, VISHWA PAL SINGH

81 C.A. No. 6826/2010X

STATE OF U.P (NOW UTTARKHAND) JATINDER KUMAR BHATIAVersusSHRI. BASANT COLLECTIVEAGRICULTURAL FARMINGCOOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. AND ANR.

GEETANJALI MOHAN

82 C.A. No. 4613/2013IV-A

P.B.NAYAK AND ORS. RAJEEV KUMAR BANSAL[P-1]VersusM.D. B.S. PLANT . AND ORS. SANTOSH KUMAR - I[R-2], [R-2], [R-1]

NEW DELHI06-12-2019 17:56:45

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 128: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 33 OF 2019 FROM : 10-12-2019 To 12-12-2019

COURT NO. : 6HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI

NOTE:-[ ON 10-12-2019 ]

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate

1 C.A. No.11124-11125/2017XII-A

DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LTD. K. V. MOHAN[P-1]

Versus

THE SECRETARY GOVT. OF INDIA ANDANR.

V. K. VERMA, MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-1][GR], GURMEET SINGHMAKKER[R-1], [R-1]

FOR SEEKING PERMISSION TO PLACE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 2-3/2016and IA No.139861/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

2 C.A. No. 3968/2009XII-A

B.S.MURTHY . AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRAVersus

A.RAVINDER SINGH . AND ORS. BELA MAHESHWARI, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1]

Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate has filed VakalatnamaConnectedC.A. No. 3967/2009XII-A

A. VIJAYA LAKSHMI AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRA

Versus

A.RAVINDER SINGH AND ORS.

BELA MAHESHWARI, [R-2], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8],[R-17], [R-18], [R-19], [R-20], [R-21], [R-22],[R-23], [R-24], [R-25], [R-26], [R-27], [R-28],[R-29], [R-30], [R-31], [R-32], [R-33], [R-34],[R-49]

ConnectedC.A. No.3969-3982/2009XII-A

B.S.MURTHY AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-1]

Versus

G. VIKRAM REDDY AND ORS. BELA MAHESHWARI

3 C.A. No. 11104/2014III

KESHAV BHAURAO YEOLE (D) BY LRS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersusKUNDLIK DAMODAR MODHAVE (D) .AND ORS. RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE

4 C.A. No. 585/2010XII-A

JANAKI BAI (D) TH.LRS. NAR HARI SINGHVersusRAGHUNATH PERSHAD (D) BY LRS. .AND ORS. SUDARSHAN SINGH RAWAT, PRAMIT SAXENA

and IA No.104267/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION and IA No.26371/2018-BRINGING ON RECORD and IA No.26372/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 586/2010XII-A

JANAKI BAI (D) BY LRS. AND ORS. NAR HARI SINGH

Versus

Page 129: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6RAGHUNATH PERSHAD (D) BY LRS. .AND ORS. HIMINDER LAL, PRAMIT SAXENA

and IA No.104374/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTIONConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.16/2010 In C.A. No.585/2010XII-A

MANGLA DEVI AND ORS. PRAMIT SAXENA

Versus

RAVINDER LAL . AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO, VENKATESWARA RAOANUMOLU, NAR HARI SINGH

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.17/2010 In C.A. No.585/2010XII-A

MAGLA DEVI AND ORS. NAR HARI SINGH

Versus

M/S VENUS DEVELOPERS . AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

5 C.A. No. 871/2011IV

PARAMJIT KAUR . AND ANR. KULDIP SINGHVersusDULLA SINGH (D) BY LR. UGRA SHANKAR PRASAD

6 C.A. No. 6252/2008IV-A

SAYED ABDUL HAMID (D) BY LRS. ANDORS.

RAUF RAHIM, [P-1.2], [P-1.1], [P-2], [P-3.1],[P-3.2], [P-4], [P-5], [P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9],[P-10]

Versus

ABDUL SATTAR DURRANI (D) BY LRS.AND ORS.

RAJESH MAHALE, [R-2], [R-3.4], [R-3.3], [R-3.2],[R-3.1], [R-3.6], [R-3.5], V. N.RAGHUPATHY[R-4], [R-5]

7 C.A. No. 3875/2010III

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYARVersusM/S OCEANIC SHIPPING E. C. AGRAWALA

8 C.A. No. 8427/2009IV-A

KEMPAIAH VAIJAYANTHI GIRISHVersusM.NANJUNDAPPA @ M. NANJUNDAREDDY AND ORS. S. N. BHAT

9 C.A. No. 244/2007IV

M/S. ABHISHEK INDUSTRIES LTD BHARGAVA V. DESAIVersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 351/2007IV

M/S. PUNJAB TRACTORS LTD. RAJIV TYAGI[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3208/2007IV

M/S RICO AUTO INDUSTRIES LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No.4804-4807/2007IV

M/S ABHISHEK INDUSTRIES LTD. KAVITA JHA

Versus

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4051/2007IV

M/S. VARINDER AGRO CHEMICALS LTD KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I

ConnectedC.A. No. 4045/2007IV

M/S VARINDER AGRO CHEMICALS LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I

Page 130: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No. 4046/2007IV

M/S ABHISHEK INDUSTRIES LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I

ConnectedC.A. No. 4047/2007IV

M/S ABHISHEK INDUSTRIES LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I

ConnectedC.A. No. 4121/2007IV

M/S VARINDER AGRO CHEMICLAS LTD. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4049/2007IV

M/S VARINDER AGRO CHEMICALS LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I

ConnectedC.A. No. 4122/2007IV

M/S ABHISHEK INDUSTRIES LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX I AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4043/2007IV

M/S VARINDER AGRO CHEMICALS LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I

ConnectedC.A. No. 4044/2007IV

M/S VARINDER AGRO CHEMICALS LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I

ConnectedC.A. No. 5629/2007IV

M/S VARINDER AGRO CHEMICALS KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX-I

ConnectedC.A. No. 5001/2008XVII

M/S VEE GEE INDUSTRIESENTERPRISES THRU ITS CHIEFOPERATING OFFICER

AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3270/2009IV-B

M/S.VARDHMAN TEXTILES LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I ANDORS AND ORS.

10 Crl.A. No. 989/2007II-A

DEVI LAL AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

11 C.A. No. 6100/2008IV

RAM PIARA (D) BY LRS. B. SUNITA RAOVersusSHAM LAL S. JANANILet the matter be listed before appropriate Bench for orders vide Chamber Judgeorder dt. 23.10.2017.

12 C.A. No. 5924/2008IV-A

STATE OF KARNATAKAVersus

Page 131: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6

SAHASRA LINGESSHWARA TEMPLE .AND ORS.

V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1], [R-1], T. G.NARAYANAN NAIR[R-1], SUSHILBALWADA[R-1], S. N. BHAT[R-1], RAUFRAHIM[R-1], RAJEEV SINGH[R-1],RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA[R-1],PURUSHOTTAM SHARMA TRIPATHI[R-1],PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI[R-1], P. R.RAMASESH[R-1], K. V. BHARATHIUPADHYAYA[R-1], H. CHANDRA SEKHAR[R-1],BALAJI SRINIVASAN[R-1], ANJANACHANDRASHEKAR[R-1], A. SUMATHI[R-1],VAIJAYANTHI GIRISH[R-1], LAWYER S KNIT &CO[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.5899-5900/2008IV-A

RAMACHANDRA AND ORS. G. BALAJI[P-1]

Versus

SHIVARAM (D) THR. LRS. . AND ORS. RAUF RAHIM[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], S. N.BHAT[R-6], V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-7]

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.338-339/2009 In C.A.No. 5899-5900/2008IV-A

KASHINATH

Versus

SHIVARAM . AND ORS.FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 1/2009 FOR [I.A. FOR PRODUCINGADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS] ON IA 3/2009 FOR [EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.]ON IA 5/2009

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.175-176/2015 In C.A.No. 5899-5900/2008IV-A

KASHINATH GANESH HEGDE G. BALAJI

Versus

R. DILIPFOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 1/2015

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.419-420/2015 In C.A.No. 5899-5900/2008IV-A

VINAYAK PARMESHWAR, ARCHAK ANDORS. GAUTAM TALUKDAR[P-1]

Versus

K.S. SUNKAD . AND ORS. SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. [EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.] ON IA1/2015

ConnectedC.A. No.4103-4228/2016IV-A

STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS ETC. ETC. SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[P-1]

Versus

SHRI MAHA GANAPATI SHANKARADEVASTHANA AND ORS ETC. ETC.

K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA[R-1]BALAJI SRINIVASAN[IMPL]

IA No.80460/2017-VACATING STAY in C.A No. 4103-4228 of 2016 only to be listedbefore the Court.

ConnectedC.A. No.3288-3320/2016IV-A

H.C. HANUMANTHAIAH AND ORS. ANURADHA MUTATKAR, HARISH PANDEY,LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA . AND ORS.ONLY CA 3288-3320/16 TO BE LISTED BEFORE REGISTRAR COURT

13 C.A. No. 7289/2009XII

C.M.D.,CITY UNION BANK LIMITED .AND ANR. K. K. MANI

VersusR.CHANDRAMOHAN KRISHAN KUMAR

Page 132: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6

14 C.A. No. 10232/2010XII-A

M/S SUBEDAR SAHEB CHOULTRYTRUST BOARD P. N. RAMALINGAM

VersusCHINTALA UDYA SHANKAR AND ORS. RAKESH K. SHARMA, G. MADHAVIand IA No.97825/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

ConnectedC.A. No.10234-10243/2010XII-A

BODAPATI PADMAVATI AND ORS. P. N. RAMALINGAM

Versus

CHINTALA UDAY SHANKAR . AND ORS. G. MADHAVI

ConnectedC.A. No. 10233/2010XII-A

THE SECRETARY RAKESH K. SHARMA

VersusCHINTALA UDAY SHANKAR AND ORS. P. N. RAMALINGAMand IA No.133191/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

15 C.A. No. 289/2011III-A

SHAMBHU SINGH (D) THROUGH LRS. MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.[P-1]Versus

SHANKER RAI AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], MANOJK. MISHRA[R-5]

16 C.A. No. 10364/2010XII

R. KRISHNADHAD MANI SATYA MITRA GARG[P-1]Versus

S.R. BHOOPETHY DHASAN . AND ORS. VIJAY KUMAR[R-1], S. THANANJAYAN[R-1], K.V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-2], [R-3]

17 C.A. No. 6939/2009III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYARVersusM/S AMIT ALCOHOL

18 C.A. No. 5628/2007XII

M/S TVS MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED RADHA RANGASWAMYVersusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX COMPANY CIRCLE III(2) B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

19 C.A. No.6015-6018/2010XII

STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR. A. V. RANGAM

VersusV. ELAYAPERUMAL AND ANR. S. R. SETIA

20 C.A. No.6502-6503/2009X

CHIEF ENGINEER IRRIGATION DEPT..AND ANR. JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA

VersusGOVIND PRASAD KEDIYAL T. MAHIPAL

21 C.A. No. 2834/2010XII

A.V.SURESHBABU AND ANR. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHYVersusP.PERUMAL . AND ORS. SHIV PRAKASH PANDEY, V. G. PRAGASAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 2842/2010XII

S.KARTHIKEYAN AND ORS. AND ORS. REVATHY RAGHAVAN

VersusR.CHELLAPPA AND ORS. AND ORS. SHIV PRAKASH PANDEY

22 C.A. No. 1114/2009IV-A

MAHADEV MALLAPPA HULLYAGOL RAJESH MAHALE[P-1]VersusSATIGOUDA YALAGOUDA PATIL (DEAD)THR. LRS. AND ORS.list the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per RP dated 15.11.2019

23 C.A. No. 4679/2007XI-A

E.C.CHERIYAN ROMY CHACKOVersusC.RAMACHANDRAN AND ANR. G. PRAKASH

24 C.A. No. 353/2008XVII-A

M/S DAIMLER CHRYSLER INDIAPVT.LTD. VIVEK JAIN[P-1]

Versus

Page 133: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6M/S CONTROLS AND ANR. M. A. CHINNASAMY, NIRANJANA SINGH

ConnectedC.A. No.19536-19537/2017XVII-A

MERCEDES BENZ INDIA PRIVATELIMITED AND ANR. SIDHARTH SETHI

VersusCG POWER AND INDUSTRIALSOLUTIONS LTD AND ORS. P. S. SUDHEER[R-1]

IA No.115716/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.115713/2017-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.115711/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL and IA No./- and IANo.118473/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedC.A. No. 2633/2018XVII-A

M/S. CG POWER AND INDUSTRIALSOLUTIONS LTD. P. S. SUDHEER

VersusMERCEDES BENZ INDIA PVT. LTD. ANDORS. SIDHARTH SETHI[CAVEAT]

IA No.17088/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.17089/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 30173/2018XVII-A

M/S EASY ELEVATORS INDIA PVT LTD RAKESH KUMAR

VersusM/S NISSAN MOTORS INDIA PVT LTDAND ANR. MANJULA GUPTA[R-1]

25 C.A. No. 8935/2011XII

THANGAM AND ANR. AND ANR. K. K. MANI[P-1]VersusNAVAMANI AMMAL SUVENDU SUVASIS DASH[R-1][PR]

26 C.A. No. 5260/2010XII-A

ARSHA VIJNANA TRUST SRIDHAR POTARAJUVersusCENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXESREP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

27 C.A. No. 2794/2010XV

GOPAL LAL SHOBHA GUPTAVersusGOKUL NARAIN (DEAD) THR. LRS. ANDORS. SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA, H. S. PARIHAR

28 C.A. No. 1497/2008IV

JHABBAR SINGH (D) BY LRS. AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR[P-1]VersusJAGTAR SINGH KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1498/2008IV

BALAK RAM AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR

VersusJAGTAR SINGH KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA, S. JANANI

29 C.A. No. 1400/2013XIV-A

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX-IV,DELHI ANIL KATIYARVersusM/S DAEWOO MOTORS INDIA LTD.

30 C.A. No. 1113/2013XII

J.PARASMUL(DEAD) THROUGH LRS.AND ORS. KUNAL CHATTERJI

Versus

J.NAVAL KISHORE M. A. CHINNASAMY, PUKHRAMBAM RAMESHKUMAR

31 C.A. No. 8090/2011XVI

NUNU MANDAL AND ANR. G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASADVersusKRISHNA CHANDRA JHA . AND ORS. JITENDRA KUMAR, JOHN MATHEWFOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 2/2009 FOR CONDONATION OFDELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 3/2009

32 C.A. No. 2435/2010XII-A

MOTURU NALINI KANTH Y. RAJA GOPALA RAOVersusGAINEDI KALIPRASAD DEVASA & CO.

Page 134: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6

33 C.A. No.2461-2462/2011XV

BASANT KISHORE (D) AND ANR.GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1.4], [P-1.3],[P-1.2], [P-1.1], [P-1], [P-2.3], [P-2.2], [P-2.1],[P-2]

VersusRAJESHWAR PRASAD S. L. ANEJA

34 C.A. No. 6576/2008XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHII ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S DHARAMPAL PREM CHAND LTD. BINA GUPTA

35 C.A. No. 363/2009XIV-A

M/S YAMU INDUSTRIES LTD. S. RAJAPPAVersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

36 C.A. No. 7339/2013III

ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR, [P-1][P-PET]

VersusRAJNIKANT K.MARFATIA BHARGAVA V. DESAI

ConnectedC.A. No. 7344/2013III

ASSTT. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1][P-PET]

VersusMAHENDRA S. MARFATIA(D)THR.LRS. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

ConnectedC.A. No. 7343/2013III

ASST. COMM. OF INCOME TAX, SURAT ANIL KATIYAR, [P-1][P-PET]

VersusLATE PINAK MAHENDRA MARFATIA(D)THR. LR. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

37 C.A. No.6326-6329/2011XII-A

ORGANTI BALARAM . AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO, V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Versus

GURUKUL GHATKESAR TRUST . ANDORS.

ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA, T. MAHIPAL, S. K.VERMA, RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL, MANUSHANKER MISHRA, VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-4], [R-6], [R-8]

(Application for vacating stay)I.A.../2012 (Application for permission to filemodification)I.A.../2012 (Application for modification)

ConnectedC.A. No.6330-6339/2011XII-A

O. NARASIMHA . AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA

Versus

GURUKUL GHATKESAR TRUST . ANDORS.

ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA, RAMESHWARPRASAD GOYAL, VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-2], [R-5], [R-7], [R-9],[R-11], [R-13], [R-15], [R-17], [R-19]

FOR ON IA 1-10/2008 FOR [IANO. 11-12/2009 (APPLICATION FORIMPLEADMENT)] ON IA 39113/2009 FOR ON IA 41-50/2016

ConnectedC.A. No. 6340/2011XII-A

GANGULA NARASIMHA AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

VersusGOVERNMENT OF A.P. REP. BY ITSPRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUEDEPARTMENT AND ORS.

C. K. SUCHARITA, ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA,VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-2],[R-3]

FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 122659/2018 FOR CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 122665/2018

38 C.A. No. 431/2010IV-A

RAM KRISHNA ASHRAM AND ORS. NIRMAL CHOPRA[P-1]Versus

SHASHWAT PANDEY . AND ORS.PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1], ANIL KATIYAR[R-8],ATUL KUMAR[R-10], TARA CHANDRASHARMA[R-11]

Page 135: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 639 C.A. No.

4534-4535/2009XV

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. IRSHAD AHMAD

VersusSAWAMI VISHOKA NAND BHARTI ANDANR. MADHUSMITA BORA

40 C.A. No. 2768/2009IV

M/S.STEEL STRIPS LTD. TARUN GUPTA[P-1]VersusM/S. O.P. STEEL TRADERS AND ORS. UMANG SHANKAR[R-1]

41 C.A. No. 507/2011III-A

INDIAN VETERINARY RESEARCHINSTITUTE (IVRI) THROUGH ITSDIRECTOR

PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF U.P. THROUGH PRINCIPALSECRETARY AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1]

42 C.A. No. 2640/2009IV

HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEV.CORPN. LTD VISHWA PAL SINGH

VersusM/S PARAMOUNT SCIENTIFIC WORKS KAMALDEEP GULATI

43 C.A. No. 827/2011XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGHVersus

UMA KANT AND ORS. VISHNU SHARMA, SUNIL KUMAR VERMA, K.V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA

44 C.A. No. 9-12/2011XV

RAJDADIJI SMT. BADAN KANWARMEDICAL TRUST PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][P-RES]

45 C.A. No. 7218/2010III

CIT,AHMEDABAD B. V. BALARAM DASVersusM/S NIRMA CHEMICAL WORK LIMITED P. S. SUDHEER

46 C.A. No. 4447/2014XII

M/S.ASHOK LEYLAND LTD., RADHA RANGASWAMYVersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

47 Crl.A. No. 1441/2009II

CHAD SINGH PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN V. N. RAGHUPATHY, MILIND KUMAR[R-1][GR]

48 C.A. No. 6893/2008XVII-A

SHRUTI VIHAR MEMBERS WELFAREASSOCIATION GARIMA PRASHAD[P-1]

Versus

SRI RAM HOUSING FINANCE ANDINVESTMENT AND ORS.

GOPAL PRASAD[R-1], RAVINDRA KUMAR[R-5],KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-6], BHAKTI VARDHANSINGH[R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6894/2008XVII-A

TRIVENI K.S.A.SAMITI LTD. GOPAL PRASAD

VersusSURUTI VIHAR MEMBERS WELF.ASSN..AND ORS. GARIMA PRASHAD

49 C.A. No. 5311/2010XII

M/S SHAW WALLACE GAGAN GUPTA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR. T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR[R-1], E. R. SUMATHY[R-2]

50 C.A. No. 4784/2009XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusC.RAJAMMA AND ORS. E. M. S. ANAMIA No.91490/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION FILED BY MR. ZULFIKER ALIP.S., ADVOCATE.

Page 136: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6

51 C.A. No. 5863/2011XI-A

SUNIL KUMAR DASS(D) TR.LRS.. ANDORS.Versus

REV. DIV. COMMNR.,CENTRAL DIV., .AND ORS.

SURESH CHANDRA TRIPATHY, UTTARABABBAR, RAJESH SRIVASTAVA, SIBO SANKARMISHRA[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5864/2011XI-A

PRABIR ROY CHOWDHURY(DEAD) THR.LRS. UTTARA BABBAR[P-1]

VersusTHE REVENUE DIVISIONCOMMISSIONER, CENTRAL DIVISIONAND ORS.

SIDDHARTHA CHOWDHURY[R-1], SIBOSANKAR MISHRA[R-1], RAJESHSRIVASTAVA[R-1]

52 C.A. No. 10306/2016XVI

SHANKAR PRASAD KAMAL MOHAN GUPTAVersusRAMANUJ PRASAD(D) THR. LRS. . ANDORS. M. SHOEB ALAM, [R-3]

53 C.A. No. 8967/2012III-A

DEVI PRASAD NAVIN PRAKASH[P-1]VersusVISHWANATH PRASAD(D) TR.LRS.. ANDORS. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8970/2012III-A

GIRI (D) TH. LRS. AND ORS. SHANKAR DIVATE

VersusVISHWANATH PRASAD(D) TR.LRS.. ANDORS.

EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES, NAVINPRAKASH[R-15]

54 C.A. No.7008-7009/2011XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusP.V.JAYASANKER . AND ORS.

55 C.A. No. 3630/2011IV

PUNJAB NURSES REGISTRATIONCOUNCIL UGRA SHANKAR PRASAD

Versus

GULSHANBIR KAUR AND ORS. GOPAL PRASAD, RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-2],[R-3]

FOR MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER ON IA 1/201056 C.A. No. 3047/2010

XVII-APUNJAB URBAN PLANNING RACHANA JOSHI ISSARVersusGURCHARAN SINGH GILL AND ANR. UGRA SHANKAR PRASADand IA No.102846/2017-PERMISSION TO PLACE ADDITIONAL FACTS ANDGROUNDS

57 C.A. No. 2024/2012XII

THE COMMISSIONERTANJOREMUNICIPALITY R. V. KAMESHWARAN

VersusB.GUNASEKARAN AND ORS. AND ORS. VINODH KANNA B.[R-2], [R-3]

58 C.A. No. 7285/2008XI-A

GOURAHARI MOHAPATRAVersus

RAMESH CHANDRA DASH AND ANR. KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY[R-1], SIBO SANKARMISHRA[R-2]

59 Crl.A. No. 175/2011II-A

AFJAL HUSSAIN GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]VersusSTATE OF BIHAR (NOW JHARKHAND) KRISHNANAND PANDEYA

60 C.A. No. 5877/2009IV-A

T.BALAKRISHNAM NAIDU (D) BY L.RS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-2], DEVASA & CO.,[P-1.3], [P-1.2], [P-3]

VersusR. MUNIRAJU AND ANR. S. N. BHAT, [R-1], JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.[R-1]

Page 137: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6

61 C.A. No. 7219/2009IX

THE DIRECTOR OF PRINTING MINISTRYOF URBAN AFFAIRS EMPLOYMENT ANDANR.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusUDAY JAMBAWALIKAR ABHA R. SHARMAIA No.20232/2018

62 C.A. No.3291-3294/2009XV

THE BANK OF RAJASTHAN LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedDiary No. 4078-2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXJAIPUR II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSTATE BANK OF INDIAIA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 26889/2018 FOR EXEMPTIONFROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 26892/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 4085-2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXJAIPUR II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSTATE BANK OF BIKANER AND JAIPURMANAGERIA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 33950/2018 FORCONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS ON IA33951/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTON IA 33953/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 8968/2018XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXJAIPUR II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSTATE BANK OF INDIA (EARLIER STATEBANK OF BIKANER AND JAIPUR)FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA36656/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 25465-2018IX

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHDFC BANK LTD THROUGH MANAGER KAVITA JHA[R-1], [R-1]FOR FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 97018/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA97019/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 45834-2018IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHDFC BANK LTD. THROUGH MANAGER, KAVITA JHA[R-1]FOR FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 15825/2019 FORCONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS ON IA15827/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTON IA 15829/2019

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 24841/2019IX

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S INDUSIND BANK LTD.FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA151225/2019

63 Crl.A. No. 1201/2010II-B

NAND KISHORE @ BALLI . AND ORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersus

STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN, RISHI MALHOTRA,CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1210/2010II-B

SANJAY @ PAPU BINAY KUMAR DAS

Versus

Page 138: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN

64 Crl.A. No. 431/2009II-B

BIKKAR SINGH YASH PAL DHINGRAVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB KARAN BHARIHOKE, [R-1]

65 Crl.A. No.586-589/2009II-C

S.MADHU B. S. BANTHIA

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHYFOR ON IA 90855/2008

66 Crl.A. No. 1298/2009II-C

P.C.SRIVASTAVA VISHNU SHARMAVersusLALIT MADHAN KUSUM CHAUDHARY

67 Crl.A. No. 1319/2010II-C

SEKAR(DEAD) VIJAY KUMAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE REPRESENTED BY THEINSPECTOR OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

68 C.A. No. 4973/2011III-A

PARVATI DEVI SHAKIL AHMED SYED[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

GARIMA PRASHAD[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], RAKESHUTTAMCHANDRA UPADHYAY[R-5]SATISH KUMAR[I-1][IMPL]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4975/2011III-A

NON-FORMALEDU.INSTR.SUPERV.WEL.ASSO. SHAKIL AHMED SYED[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS.

TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],RAKESH UTTAMCHANDRA UPADHYAY[R-5]SHAIL KUMAR DWIVEDI[I-1][IMPL], ALOKSHUKLA[I-3][IMPL]

FOR FOR [APPL. FOR IMPLEADMENT FILED BY MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SY] ON IA3/2012 FOR [APPL. FOR IMPLEADMENT FILED BY MR. ALOK SHUKLA] ON IA5/2013 FOR ON IA 6/2013 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 2/2011 FORINTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 7/2016 FOR ON IA 8/2016 FORINTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 9/2016 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATIONON IA 10/2016 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 11/2017 FORINTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 12/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T. ON IA 13/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 14/2017 FORimpleading party ON IA 40592/2017 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA40592/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 4976/2011III-A

PANKAJ DUBEY AND ORS.DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA[P-1], [P-2],[P-3], [P-4], [P-5], [P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10],[P-11], [P-12], [P-13], [P-14], [P-15]

Versus

REKHA AND ORS.P. I. JOSE[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6],[R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11], [R-12],KRISHNANAND PANDEYA[R-15], [R-13], [R-14],[R-16], [R-17]

69 C.A. No. 6937/2008XVII-A

S.K.JAIN TEJAS PATEL[P-1]VersusKAMLESH GUPTA . AND ORS. AJAY KUMAR[R-1]

70 Crl.A. No. 135/2009II-B

STATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGHVersus

SURINDER SINGH . AND ORS. SUDHIR MENDIRATTA, ARVIND GUPTA[R-1],[R-1], (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA

71 C.A. No.10201-10202/2010XI-A

M/S.MUTHOOT LEASING AND FINANCELTD. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTORAND ANR.

E. M. S. ANAM[P-1]

Versus

Page 139: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCOCHIN

ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]A. RAGHUNATH[I-1][IMPL]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10204/2010XI-A

ART LEASING LTD. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOTTAYAM B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10203/2010XI-A

M/S.KERALA STATE FINANCIALENTERPRISES LTD. V. K. MONGA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXTHRISSUR B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.10205-10206/2010XI-A

M/S BELL LEASING AND HIREPURCHASE (P) LTD. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,COCHIN B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10207/2010XI-A

M/S RIGHT LEASING AND HIREPURCHASE CO. P. LTD. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX,TRICHUR B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4441/2011XI-A

M/S ROYAL HIRE PURCHASE(P) LTD. A. RAGHUNATH

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX,TRICHUR B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4905/2014XI-A

M/S.MULAMOOTTIL LEASING E. M. S. ANAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX A. N. ARORA, ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4907/2014XI-A

M/S VYAPARAVIJAYAM HIRE PURCHASEP.LTD. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 4903/2014XI-A

M/S VARTHAKAKSHEMAM HIRE PURCH.AND LES. LTD. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4906/2014XI-A

M/S VARTHKAKSHEMAM HIRE PURC. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4904/2014XI-A

M/S VARTHAKAKSHEMAM HIRE PURCO.P.LTD. E. M. S. ANAM[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6388/2013XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-ICHENNAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTVS FINANCE AND SERVICES LTD. RADHA RANGASWAMY

72 Crl.A. No. 2300/2009II-A

BALARAM AND ANR. ASHOK PANIGRAHI[P-2]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[R-1]

Page 140: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 673 Crl.A. No. 1055/2010

II-CS. SHANKAR @ SHIVASHANKAR RAJEEV SINGHVersusH.B. PRAKASHMUMAR JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.

74 Crl.A. No. 1631/2008II-B

MADAN LAL SHARMA SANJAY JAINVersusPUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

75 C.A. No.6915-6916/2008IX

HIRABAI SHVAYYA SWAMI (DEAD) BYLRS. K. N. RAI, ANJANI KUMAR JHA[P-1]

VersusSAYED MUJAHID SYED SAJID JAGIRDARETC.

SHAKIL AHMED SYED, NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedC.A. No.6311-6312/2013III

HIRABAI SHVAYYA SWAMI (DEAD)THROUGH ITS TRUSTEES ANJANI KUMAR JHA[P-1]

VersusSYED MUJAHID SYED SAJID JAGIRDAR &ORS.

J. P. DHANDA, SHAKIL AHMED SYED,NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4116/2012IX

SAYYED SAJIT HUSSAINI (DEAD)THROUGH LRS SHAKIL AHMED SYED

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA . COLLECTOR/ DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND ORS.

76 C.A. No. 8694/2009XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]VersusMANGLAM RICINUS LTD. SHALLY BHASIN[R-1]

77 Crl.A. No. 1725/2015II-A

HARENDRA RAI ABHAY KUMAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1726/2015II-A

HARENDRA RAI ABHAY KUMAR[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.M. SHOEB ALAM[R-1], SUNNYCHOUDHARY[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6],[R-7], [R-8]

78 Crl.A. No. 804/2011II-B

RAM PARTAP NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[R-1]

79 C.A. No. 1956/2011III

C.I.T,AHMEDABAD ANIL KATIYARVersusASHOK SHANTILAL SHAH MANISHA T. KARIA

80 Crl.A. No.2247-2248/2009II-C

HARSHA ANIRUDH SANGANERIA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

81 C.A. No. 6746/2012XI-A

FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA ANDORS. AJIT PUDUSSERY

Versus

G.S.RAJU AND ORS. K. V. MOHAN, P. V. DINESH, G. PRAKASH,BINA MADHAVAN

82 C.A. No. 7899/2009XVII-A

CONSUMER EDUCATION RESEARCHSOC. . AND ANR. PAREKH & CO.

VersusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. M. K. DUA, CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRIFOR ON IA 26062/2009 FOR DISPENSING WITH SERVICE OF NOTICE ON IA1/2009

Page 141: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No. 7900/2009XVII-A

CONSUMER EDUCATION RES.SOCIETY .AND ANR. PAREKH & CO., CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

VersusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. M. K. DUA

83 C.A. No. 5070/2011XII

THE MANAGEMENT OF CHEMPLASTSANMAR LIMITED K. V. MOHAN

VersusA. ROBERT

84 C.A. No. 9994/2011III-A

U.P.PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONTHROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN SHRISH KUMAR MISRA[P-1]

VersusSHAILENDRA SINGH AND ANR. ANKIT GOEL[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9995/2011III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH SECRETARY ANKUR PRAKASH[P-1]

VersusSHAILENDRA SINGH AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-6]

85 Crl.A. No. 1564/2009II-A

MANJIT SINGH KUSUM CHAUDHARYVersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND ANIL K. JHA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 288/2013II-C

SURINDER GROVER KUSUM CHAUDHARY

VersusSTATE OF(NCT OF DELHI) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

86 C.A. No. 1720/2010XII

N.CHELLAPPA GURUKKAL S. GOWTHAMAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU HIGHWAYSDEPARTMENT AND ORS. REP. BY CHIEFENGINEER

T. HARISH KUMAR, P. SOMA SUNDARAM, B.BALAJI

87 Crl.A. No. 840/2009II-C

M.K.MALBOOL KHAN RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]VersusTHE REGISTRAR GENERAL SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

88 C.A. No. 8347/2009XVII-A

NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIALTD. RABIN MAJUMDER

VersusSUPREME SECURITIES SERVICES LTD.

89 C.A. No. 6353/2012XII

NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIALTD. RABIN MAJUMDER[P-1]

VersusASST.PROVIDENT FUNDCOMMISSIONER AND ANR. BRAJESH KUMAR[R-1][PR]

90 C.A. No. 5081/2011XV

COMMR.KVS AND ORS. S. RAJAPPAVersusSURENDRA KUMAR VINEET BHAGAT

ConnectedDiary No. 28290-2017XV

SURENDRA KUMAR MANJU JETLEY

VersusCOMMISSIONER KENDRIYA VIDYALAYASANGATHAN AND ORS.IA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 92642/2017

91 C.A. No. 2518/2012XIV-A

STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. SANJAY KAPUR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]VersusP. ZADENGA DEEPAK GOEL[R-1]

92 C.A. No. 3589/2010IV

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. RANJEETA ROHATGI[P-1]VersusPARDUMAN SINGH TUSHAR BAKSHI, [R-1]

Page 142: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6ORIGINAL RECORD IN THE MATTER RECEIVED.

93 C.A. No.2463-2464/2011III-A

HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD. PARIJAT SINHA

VersusBRINDABAN . AND ANR. ASHA GOPALAN NAIRAs per order dated 15.02.2019 passed in I.A. No. 40272/2018 in C.A. No. 2468/2011

ConnectedC.A. No. 2468/2011III-A

BRINDABAN TR.B.M.SANGH ASHA GOPALAN NAIR

VersusM/S HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD..AND ORS. PARIJAT SINHA

94 Crl.A. No.1384-1385/2009II-A

RANVIR SINGH . AND ORS. SHAKIL AHMED SYED

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 700/2011II-A

SARDAR SINGH SHAKIL AHMED SYED[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]and FOR SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE ON IA 55313/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. ON IA 55315/2017

95 C.A. No. 24/2013III

BHARTIBEN CHANDRAKANTBHAITHAKOR NACHIKETA JOSHI

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI

96 C.A. No.3913-3931/2011XI-A

A.GIJI PAUL AND ANR ETC HIMINDER LAL

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS ETCNISHE RAJEN SHONKER, SUMITA HAZARIKA,M. T. GEORGE, G. PRAKASH, A. VENAYAGAMBALAN

I.A. NOS. 1-19 OF 2010 : APPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTION97 Crl.A. No. 524/2010

II-AGULAM WAHID AFTAB ALI KHANVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHHOME DEPARTMENT STATION HOUSEOFFICER

SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

98 Crl.A. No. 1868/2009II

SRI ASHISH BHUTANI AMBAR QAMARUDDIN[P-1]VersusTHE HONBLE GAUHATI HIGH COURTAND ORS. P. I. JOSE[R-1], K. V. MOHAN[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1869/2009II

SRI PREETOM SAIKIA K. V. MOHAN[P-1]

VersusTHE HONBLE GAUHATI HIGH COURTAND ORS. P. I. JOSE[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1867/2009II

GUNA TAMULY PHUKAN KARANJAWALA & CO.[P-1]

VersusDR. ASHISH BHUTANI . AND ANR. AMBAR QAMARUDDIN[R-1], K. V. MOHAN[R-2]FOR EXEMPTION FROM SURRENDERING ON IA 16760/2009

99 C.A. No. 8516/2011IX

UCO BANK AND ORS. RAJESH SINGHVersusM.B.MOTWANI (DEAD) THR. LRS. ANDORS.

100 Crl.A. No. 396/2010II-B

PHULEL SINGH T. L. GARGVersusSTATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGH

Page 143: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

101 C.A. No. 7227/2010XII

THE EXECUTIVE OFFICERARTHANAREESWARAR TEMPLE M. A. CHINNASAMY[P-1]

VersusR.SATHYAMOORTHY AND ORS ANDORS.

SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[R-1], B. BALAJI[R-1],VINODH KANNA B.[R-21]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7228/2010XII

THE COMMISSIONER HINDURELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLEENDOWMENTS

VINODH KANNA B.[P-1]

VersusR SATHYAMOORTHY ANDORS AND ORS. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10475/2010XII

K.M. ELANGOVAN . AND ORS. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[P-1]

Versus

R. RUKMANI . AND ORS. M. A. CHINNASAMY[R-1], VINODH KANNAB.[R-14]

ONLY IA NO FOR RECTIFICATION OF COURTS ORDER TO BE LISTED IN CA NO10475/10 FOR [Appl. seeking rectification of order dt. 3.12.2010] ON IA115218/2014

102 C.A. No. 1870/2010XII

NACHIMUTHU MUDALIAR DANISH ZUBAIR KHANVersusG. V. ANANTHAPADMANABHAN ANDORS. AND ORS. BALAJI SRINIVASAN

103 C.A. No. 2187/2011IV-A

MOHAMMED KHALEEL (D) THR. LRS.AND ORS.

SUKANT VIKRAM[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7]

VersusJAYAMMA P. R. RAMASESH[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } list in the month of december 2019 beforeappropriate bench.

104 C.A. No. 9261/2014III-A

SHAILENDRA SINGH AND ORS. ANURAG KISHORE[P-1]Versus

U.P. POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD THR.ITS MEMBER SECRETARY AND ORS.

PRADEEP MISRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-4], SATPALSINGH[R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

105 C.A. No. 5688/2012XII-A

K.JAYASEKHAR D. BHARATHI REDDY[P-1]VersusSECY. TO GOVT.AGRL AND ANR. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR[R-1], [R-2]

106 C.A. No. 5038/2012IX

RAM @ RAMDAS SHESHRAO NEHARKAR ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA IIVersusSHESHRAO BABURAO NEHARKAR . ANDORS.

107 C.A. No.3370-3371/2012XII

G.SHANMUGAM (D) BY LRS. V. BALACHANDRAN[P-1]

VersusCOMMR.HR & CE (ADMN) DEPT.. ANDORS. R. N. KESWANI[R-1], VINODH KANNA B.[R-1]

108 C.A. No.9030-9031/2014XII

A.PARVATHY MANJEET CHAWLA

VersusBHARATHIAR UNIVERSITY AND ANR. R. GOPALAKRISHNAN

109 C.A. No. 7395/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRAVersus

M/S. TARA CHAND SHAM LAL AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY, RANJEETAROHATGI[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7400/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

Versus

Page 144: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6M/S ATMA RAM CHARAN DASS ANDORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7398/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S. SATDEV HARIRAM AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7396/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S. PURAN CHAND ASHWANI KUMARAND ORS.

K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY, RANJEETAROHATGI[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7407/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S JAI JAGDAMBE RICE MILLS K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7408/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S AMBAY RICE MILLS AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7403/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S HANSRAJ TARSEM CHAND ANDORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7399/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S BABU RAM CHARNJIT AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7397/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S. RAMA FOODS AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7409/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S DURGA RICE MILLS AND ORS. INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7410/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S SEHAJ RAM RAM KISHAN DASSAND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7401/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S GARG TRADING CO. AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7406/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S SATPAL RAJKUMAR INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7402/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD CHANDIGARHAND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S RAVINDERJEET SINGH RAJINDERKUMAR AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7411/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

Versus

Page 145: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6M/S BADRI PARSHAD BANARASI DASSAND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7413/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusJAI DURGA TRADING COMPANY ANDORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7405/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S BADRI DASS CHARAN DASS ANDORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7416/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S KESHO RAM AND BROTHERS ANDORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7412/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S DURGA TRADING COMPANY . ANDORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7404/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S NEW PUNJAB TRADERS AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7415/2014IV

PUNJAB MANDI BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S SHAM LAL AND SONS AND ORS. K. K. MOHAN, INDRA SAWHNEY

ConnectedDiary No. 8741-2019IV-B

PUNJAB STATE AGRICULTURALMARKETING BOARD AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusM/S BANSAL RICE FACTORY AND ANR.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.52678/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.52682/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

110 Crl.A. No. 789/2011II-C

AMAR (MINOR) THR.LEGALGUARD.MOTHER AMBAR QAMARUDDIN

VersusCHATURBHUJ MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJ

111 C.A. No. 283/2014III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR.ITS DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION (BASIC)AND ORS.

KRISHNANAND PANDEYA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

Versus

SMT. SUSHILA SRIVASTAVA . AND ORS. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY[R-1], [R-2], [R-8],[INT], [IMPL], JITENDRA KUMAR[R-9]

112 Crl.A. No. 1730/2015II-C

PARDESHI RAM SHAKEEL AHMED[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusSTATE OF M.P.(NOW CHHATTISGARH) SUMEER SODHI[R-1]

113 C.A. No. 10345/2011XI-A

M/S.ORISSA POWER GEN. CORPN. LTD. NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN[P-1]VersusRADHESHYAM BARIK (DEAD) AND ANR. RAUF RAHIM[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10344/2011XI-A

M/S. ORISSA POWER GEN. CORPN.LTD. NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN[P-1]

VersusAKRURA DHURUA . AND ANR. RAUF RAHIM[R-1]

Page 146: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6114 C.A. No. 78/2018

XIISONITHA KALLAT E. M. S. ANAMVersus

RAJARAM KALLAT AND ORS AND ORS.M. P. VINOD, [R-2][PR], [R-3][PR], [R-4][PR],[R-5][PR], [R-7][PR], [R-8][PR], JAMES P.THOMAS[R-12][PR]

115 C.A. No. 3102/2016IV

HARDEEP SINGH KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

116 Crl.A. No. 1676/2011II

MAHBOOB AND ORS. S. S. NEHRA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P.(NOW UTTARAKHAND)AND ANR.

JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA[R-1], SANJAYKUMAR DUBEY[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 783/2013II

MANSAB SANJAY KUMAR DUBEY[P-1][PR]

Versus

AKBAR SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[R-1], NARESHBAKSHI[R-1], JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 784/2013II

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA

VersusAKBAR . AND ORS. NARESH BAKSHI, SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

117 C.A. No. 8624/2014XII

KASTHURI AND ANR. AND ANR. M. A. CHINNASAMYVersusS.M. SIVASWAMI AND ORS. AND ORS. T. HARISH KUMAR

118 C.A. No. 8329/2011XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]VersusINDIAN NAVY CIVILIAN DESIGNOFFICERS ASSOCIATION THROUGHSHRI SWAPAN DEB

EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[R-1]

IA No.3 (D.no.20220/12) to be listed along with Main matter119 C.A. No. 6793/2013

III-AALLAHABAD BANK AND ANR. MITTER & MITTER CO.[P-1]VersusSECRETARY ALLAHABAD BANK TALHA ABDUL RAHMAN, [R-1]

120 Crl.A. No. 1264/2011II-C

DHASIM @ MOHAMMAD DHASIM A. VENAYAGAM BALANVersusSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 4853/2016II-C

SYED ALI AND ANR. ANANTHA NARAYANA M.G.[P-1], [P-2]

VersusSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

FOR FOR ON IA 112952/2017121 C.A. No. 471/2016

XI-AN.K. SASIDHARAN . AND ANR. G. PRAKASHVersusM/S. NELLIAMPATHY PLANTATIONSLTD. USHA NANDINI. V

ConnectedC.A. No. 472/2016XI-A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. RAMESH BABU M. R.

VersusM/S NELLIYAMPATHY PLANTATIONSLTD. USHA NANDINI. V, RENJITH. B

FOR ON IA 6/2016

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 13460/2016XI-A

CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTSAND ORS. G. PRAKASH

VersusNELLIYAMPATHY PLANTATIONS USHA NANDINI. V

Page 147: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 1/2017 FOR [IA FOR VACATINGTHE INTERIM ORDER] ON IA 36978/2017 FOR PERMISSION TO PLACEADDITIONAL FACTS AND GROUNDS ON IA 42831/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. ON IA 42833/2017

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.921/2017 In SLP(C) No.13460/2016XI-A

NELLIYAMPATHY PLANTATIONS ANDORS. USHA NANDINI. V

Versus

L. CHANDRASEKHARAN G. PRAKASH[R-3]and IA No.28211/2018-I.A. FOR EXEMPTION FROM PERSONAL APPEARANCE andIA No.28212/2018-I.A FOR EXEMPTION FROM PERSONAL APPEARANCE

122 C.A. No. 7661/2011XII-A

DG CSIR AND ORS. PRAVEEN SWARUPVersusD. ATCHUTA RAO KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH[R-1]

123 C.A. No. 5517/2012IV-A

SYNDICATE BANK RAJIV NANDAVersusB GANESH PAI MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJAT THE TOP OF THE HEARING MATTERS.

124 C.A. No. 7236/2012III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH HOMEDEPARTMENT THR. PRINCIPALSECRETARY AND ORS.

PRADEEP MISRA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusVINAYAK SHANKAR CHATURVEDI S. C. BIRLA[R-1]

125 Crl.A. No. 1288/2012II-C

RAVISHANKAR @ SHISHUPAL JAIL PETITION[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ASWATHI M.K.[R-1]Ms. Ritu Rastogi, Adv. is appointed as AC for the petitioner

126 C.A. No. 1944/2015III

MOHAN AND ORS. R. R. DESHPANDEVersus

KALYAN AND ORS.RUTWIK PANDA, SHIRISH K. DESHPANDE,[R-3], [R-4], ANJANI KUMAR JHA[R-1], [R-2],[R-5], [R-6], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10]

127 Crl.A. No. 748/2012II-C

STATE OF KARNATAKA MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusB.T.RAMESH RAJESH MAHALE

128 Crl.A. No. 460/2014II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusJANVED SINGH ANIL SHRIVASTAV

129 C.A. No. 9746/2011XIV-A

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1]

Versus

RAJ KUMAR AND ORS.PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], UMANG SHANKAR[R-4]SANDEEP JINDAL[INT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9747/2011XIV-A

ANURAG SHARMA AND ORS. UMANG SHANKAR[P-1], RAMJEE PANDEY[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], VARINDER KUMARSHARMA[R-2], PUKHRAMBAM RAMESHKUMAR[R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

130 Crl.A. No. 124/2015II-A

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND ARVIND KUMAR SHARMAVersusBHAGWAN PRASAD GAURAV AGRAWAL

131 C.A. No. 7546/2012XVII-A

ASHUTOSH SANJAY KUMAR TYAGIVersusRAJPUT GUN SERVICE(FAC)REVA SARVESH SINGH BAGHEL

Page 148: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6

132 C.A. No. 9696/2011XVII-A

CHAIRMAN KISAN SAHKARI CHINIMILLS LTD. PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH[P-1]

VersusPOST MASTER GENERAL BAREILLY .AND ORS.

ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

133 C.A. No. 10853/2014XVII

KAMLA GANGOLI PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5]VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHANDDEPARTMENT OF URBANDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BUILDINGTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS.

KRISHNANAND PANDEYA, GOPAL PRASAD

134 C.A. No.6827-6828/2014IV

RAKESH KUMAR CHOPRA SANTOSH MISHRA

Versus

NARINDER KUMAR . AND ORS. M. C. DHINGRA, JYOTI MENDIRATTA, GAURAVDHINGRA, (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA

135 Crl.A. No. 245/2013II

KANAHAIYA SHILPA SINGHVersusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH (NOWUTTARAKHAND) SAURABH TRIVEDI

136 C.A. No. 10317/2011XVII-A

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. DEBASIS MISRA[P-1]VersusPUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD E. C. VIDYA SAGAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2025/2012XVII

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORP.LTD. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR[P-1]

VersusUNITED INDIA INS.CO.LTD. DEBASIS MISRA[R-1]

137 Crl.A. No. 1795/2013II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[P-1]

Versus

SAU GITA AND ORS. ANAGHA S. DESAI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-5],GAURAV AGRAWAL[R-4]

138 C.A. No.11389-11392/2011XII

S.ASOKAN G. BALAJI

VersusE.DHARMAN ETC.ETC. ANSAR AHMAD CHAUDHARYINTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 127847 OF 2017- APPLICATION FORDIRECTION TO SET ASIDE ORDER DATED 18.2.2016

139 C.A. No. 4612/2013III-A

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[P-1]VersusSURESH PAL SINGH R. C. KAUSHIK[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29491/2012XI

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[P-1]

VersusJAI PRAKASH (DEAD) THR. LRS. @ JAIPRAKASH KHANNA

140 C.A. No. 804-806/2013XIV-A

MR. KEZHOLEL RHETSO JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND ORS. N. ANNAPOORANI, ASHOK KUMARSINGH[R-5], [R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 807/2013XIV-A

TOBA ANGAMI SOMANATHA PADHAN[P-1], [P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND ORS.BALAJI SRINIVASAN[R-1], SRIDHARPOTARAJU[R-3], ASHOK KUMAR SINGH[R-5],[R-9]

Page 149: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6141 Crl.A. No. 681/2012

IITARSEM @ SEMA @ JAGGA SANDEEP NARAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

142 Crl.A. No.1518-1519/2015II

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD

Versus

RAJENDRA P. N. RAMALINGAM[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5]

143 Crl.A. No. 1287/2012II

BADAL DEB JAVED MAHMUD RAO[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF TRIPURA NIDHI[R-1][GR]

144 Crl.A. No.2205-2206/2011II-C

DEEPAK GOPAL GAVADE ANU GUPTA[P-1]

Versus

RAJESH & ANR ETC. AND ANR. RAJESH MAHALE[R-1], SHUBHRANSHUPADHI[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2312/2011II-C

RAJESH RAJESH MAHALE

VersusDEEPAK GOPAL GAVADE AND ORS. ANU GUPTA

145 Crl.A. No. 442/2013II

MOHAN KISHORI JAIL PETITION[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]Mr. Radha Krishna Kumar, Advocate has been appointed as amicus curiae in theinstant matter.

146 Crl.A. No.1215-1217/2014II-C

STATE (NCT OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

Versus

RAVI KANT SHARMA AND ORS. SUDARSHAN RAJAN[R-1], SUPRIYAJUNEJA[R-2], CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI[R-3]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1218-1219/2014II-C

STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) DEPARTMENTOF HOME B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

Versus

VED PRAKASH SHARMA AND ANR. ANIL KUMAR MISHRA-I, [R-1], PRADEEPKUMAR BAKSHI[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1220/2014II-C

PRADEEP SHARMA SUSHIL BALWADA[P-1]

VersusSTATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

147 Crl.A. No. 190/2015II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusUDAYVEER SINGH KUSWAHA SANJAY K. AGRAWAL

148 Crl.A. No. 72/2013II-A

STATE THROUGH SPE, CBI, PATNA ARVIND KUMAR SHARMAVersusMANKESHWAR SINGH T. MAHIPALMs. Meenakshi Arora, Senior Advocate (A.C.) for Respondent Accused

149 Crl.A. No. 2432/2014II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusNARESH AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1], [R-2]

150 C.A. No. 10992/2013IV

HARNEK SINGH . AND ANR. AWANISH SINHAVersusGRAM PANCHAYAT AND ORS. SHOMILA BAKSHI[CAVEAT]

151 Crl.A. No. 1661/2013II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusHEMRAJ AND ANR. MINAKSHI VIJ[R-2]

Page 150: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6152 C.A. No. 7824/2013

III-AOM PRAKASH UPADHYAY VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU[P-1]Versus

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-1], PRADEEPMISRA[R-2], [R-3]

153 C.A. No. 6649/2013III-A

SARLA KUMARI (D) THR. LR. ANKUR YADAV[P-1]VersusBOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6651/2013III-A

ANURADHA AGARWAL AND ORS. NAMITA CHOUDHARY[P-1]

VersusBOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6654/2013III-A

RAJIV KUMAR AND ANR. NAMITA CHOUDHARY[P-1]

VersusBOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6652/2013III-A

PRADEEP KUMAR AND ANR. NAMITA CHOUDHARY[P-1]

VersusBOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6655/2013III-A

PRADEEP KUMAR SINGHAL NAMITA CHOUDHARY[P-1]

VersusBOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6653/2013III-A

ADARSH KUMAR . AND ORS. NAMITA CHOUDHARY[P-1]

VersusBOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS. VISHWA PAL SINGH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6650/2013III-A

AJAI KUMAR AND ORS. NAMITA CHOUDHARY[P-1]

VersusBOARD OF REVENUE AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

154 C.A. No. 4859/2014XVI

BALESHWAR RAI AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRAVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

155 C.A. No. 7694/2013XVII-A

THE ORIENTAL INS. COMPANY LTD.KADAPA BRANCH DEBASIS MISRA

VersusK. NARASIMHA REDDY V. N. RAGHUPATHY

156 C.A. No.4531-4533/2013XVII-A

NAVJIVAN ROLLER FLOUR AND PULSEMILLS LTD (THROUGH EXCUTIVEDIRECTOR)

BHARTI TYAGI[P-1]

VersusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTDTHROUGH THE CHAIRMAN GAURAV SHARMA

FOR ON IA 2/2013 FOR ON IA 16888/2013

157 C.A. No.4053-4069/2014XIV-A

SHANKER TRADING (P) LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF I.T., NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4072/2014XIV-A

SHARP BUSINESS SYSTEM THR.FINANCE DIRECTOR MR. YOSHIHISAMIZUNO

KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IIIN.D. ANIL KATIYAR

Page 151: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedSLP(C) No. 16277/2014XII

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX CHENNAI V ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S PENTAMEDIA GRAPHICS LTD. K J JOHN AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 24756/2014XII

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX COMPANY CIRCLE-V(2) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S.PENTASOFT TECHNOLOGIESLTD.(PAN AAACP1895R) THROUGH ITSM.D

K J JOHN AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4189/2019XII

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ASIANET STAR COMMUNICATIONSPVT. LTD. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA[CAVEAT]

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 14104/2019

158 Crl.A. No. 1957/2013II

TARSEM KAUR AND ANR. GAURAV AGRAWAL[P-1][PR], RAJKAMAL[P-2][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1][GR]For final disposal.

159 C.A. No. 9146/2012XIV-A

SULTAN SINGH AND ORS. TARA CHANDRA SHARMA[P-1], [P-3], [P-4],[P-5], [P-7], [P-9], [P-10], [P-11], [P-12], [P-14]

VersusTHE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

ANIRUDH SHARMA, RAJEEVSHARMA[CAVEAT]

NAMES OF THE APPELLANTS AS PER ORDER DATED 25.02.2019 ARE : SH.SULTAN SINGH, SH. RAMESHWAR, SMT. SANTOSH, SH SANDEEP, SH PANKAJ,MS. GEETA, JAI BHAGWAN, SH. OM PRAKASH, SH MANOHAR, SH UMED SINGH,MS SUMAN, MS SHEETAL, SH SUMIT AND SH DEEPAK

160 Crl.A. No. 122/2013II

VIJAYA SINGH AND ANR. ANAGHA S. DESAIVersusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND DINESH KUMAR GARG

161 C.A. No. 8762/2012IV-A

THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUNDCOMMISSIONER AND ORS. SIDDHARTH[P-1]

VersusDODDABALLAPUR SPINNING MILLSPRIVATE LIMITED

162 Crl.A. No. 972/2013II

JABIR AND ORS. VIKRANT SINGH BAIS[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY[R-1][GR]

163 Crl.A. No. 2269/2014II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AJAY CHOUDHARY, MILIND KUMAR[P-1]VersusRAM MURTI

164 C.A. No. 1001/2013III

CHANDRAKANT(DEAD) THR. LRS. RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI[P-1]VersusSITALSINGH ASARAM NAIK . AND ORS. ATUL BABASAHEB DAKH[R-1]

165 C.A. No. 8954/2013IV-A

R. VENKATESH SHAILESH MADIYALVersusT.UMA DEVI RAJESH MAHALE[CAVEAT]

166 C.A. No.4337-4338/2013IV-A

PROTYUSH CHATTERJEE AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA

VersusSURER AUTO FORGE PRIVATE LIMITEDAND ANR. DIKSHA RAI, B. BALAJI

Page 152: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6167 C.A. No.

9697-9698/2014III-A

HARI PRAKASH SHUKLA . AND ORS. SATPAL SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR.DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER ANDANR.

KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], [R-2]

168 Crl.A. No. 377/2015II-C

SURESH @ NAINA SURESH S. GOWTHAMANVersusTHE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 337/2015II-C

SARAVANAN @ KILANGU SARAVANANAND ANR. S. GOWTHAMAN, [P-2][PR]

VersusTHE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

169 Crl.A. No. 2049/2014II-C

FULESHWARI BAI JAIL PETITION[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ASWATHI M.K.[R-1][GR]FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 18504/2014MR. VIJAY KUMAR L. PARDESHI ,ADVOCATE MAY BE SHOWN AS AMICUS CURIAE

170 C.A. No. 9457/2013III-A

U.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPRTCORPORATION THR. ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR AND ANR.

GARIMA PRASHAD[P-1]

VersusAMAR DAS V. MAHESHWARI & CO.[R-1]

171 C.A. No. 2953/2014IV

RANI TARA DEVI RISHI MALHOTRAVersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 2954/2014IV

SHAKUNTLA DEVI RISHI MALHOTRA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 1439/2017IV

RANI TARA DEVI KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX

172 C.A. No. 7323/2016XIV-A

MIZORAM UNIVERSITY AND ANR. ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASADVersusDR.LALROKIMA CHENKUAL AND ORS. T. MAHIPAL, KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7291/2016XII-A

N.C.H. VARADARAJU SATISH KUMAR

VersusTHE GOVERNMENT OF A.P REP. BY ITSPRL SECRETARY FOR HIGH EDUCATIONAND ORS.

T. V. RATNAM, ANJANI AIYAGARI, VENKATPALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES

173 Crl.A. No. 567/2014II-C

DOSS @ VATTAAKKAN @ PERUMAL @PETHAPERUM ANKUR PRAKASH[P-1]

VersusSTATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

174 C.A. No. 6944/2015XI-A

STATE OF ORISSA AND ANR. SHIBASHISH MISRA[P-1]VersusORISSA KHADI AND VILLAGEINDUSTRIES BOARD KARMACHARISANGHA AND ANR.

KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY[CAVEAT], G.RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], V. K.VERMA[R-2]

175 C.A. No. 10658/2016IV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]Versus

Page 153: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6RADHELAL GOUD

176 C.A. No. 10612/2013IV

BALBIR SINGH AND ORS. YADAV NARENDER SINGH[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-1], [R-2], SATISHKUMAR[R-5], [R-7], [R-8], SHREE PALSINGH[R-9]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8607/2014IV

KULJIT SINGH AND ORS. TUSHAR BAKSHI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-1], [R-1], MANJUJETLEY[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9],[R-11], [R-12]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.27779-27780/2016IV-B

GURPARTAP SINGH ETC. TUSHAR BAKSHI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF PUNJAB ETC. AND ORS. UTTARA BABBAR[R-1]

177 Crl.A. No. 62-63/2014II-A

ANOKHILAL K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HARSH PARASHAR[R-1][TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES] [DEATH CASE ] [ RETAIN ITSPOSITION ] MR. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA, ADVOCATE HAS FILED VAKALATNAMON BEHALF OF MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE.

178 Crl.A. No. 2567/2014II-C

CHEETRAM JAIL PETITIONVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHTHE NAME OF MS. SAVITRI PANDEY, ADVOCATE MAY BE SHOWN AS AMICUSCURIAE

179 C.A. No. 9302/2014XII

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCHENNAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S COLORPLUS FASHIONS P.LTD. K J JOHN AND CO

180 C.A. No. 10827/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGHVersusMD. BARKAT HUSSAIN T. MAHIPAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 10831/2014XVI

STATE OF BIHAR GOPAL SINGH

VersusDEEPAK KUMAR PATHAK AND ORS. T. MAHIPAL

181 Crl.A. No. 1805/2014II-B

VINODBHAI BABUBHAI PARMAR PREETI SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

182 Crl.A. No. 301/2014II-B

SURAJMAL (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTAVersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN

183 Crl.A. No.132-133/2017II

STATE OF U.P. AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[P-1]

VersusAJMAL BEG ETC. SHEKHAR KUMAR[R-1]

184 C.A. No.8447-8448/2014XVI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAJEEV SHARMA, [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5]

VersusNAYEEMA AHMAD SHAKIL AHMED SYED

185 C.A. No. 7177/2015XII-A

M/S.NAGARJUNA FERTILIZERS ANNAM D. N. RAOVersus

Page 154: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6M/S.UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.AND ORS.

TATINI BASU, RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA,GAURAV SHARMA, AJAY PAL

186 C.A. No. 11382/2016IV

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR MILKPLANT BATHINDA DEVVRAT

VersusDALIP SINGH AND ORS. R. C. KAUSHIK

187 Crl.A. No. 1615/2019II-C

MUNU SEN VANITA MEHTA[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ASWATHI M.K.[R-1][GR]

188 C.A. No. 3000/2017XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ANIL KATIYARVersusSHRI SWARAN SINGH SAMPLA BALRAJ DEWAN

189 C.A. No. 5921/2015XII-A

METPALLI LASUM BAI SINCE DEAD GUNTUR PRABHAKARVersusMETPALLI MUTHAIAH(D) BY LRS ANDORS. ANJANI AIYAGARI

ConnectedC.A. No. 5922/2015XII-A

METPALLI MUTHAIAH (D) BY LRS. ANJANI AIYAGARI

VersusMETPALLI LASUM BAI (DEAD) BY LRS .AND ORS. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

IA

190 C.A. No. 7220/2015XII

UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF INDIAUNION OF INDIA SUSHMA SURI

VersusNOORAJAHAN SATYA MITRA GARG[CAVEAT]

191 C.A. No. 12147/2017XVI

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGHVersusTHE ORGANIZER DEHRI C.D. AND C.M.UNION LTD. AND ORS. KUNDAN KUMAR MISHRA[R-2], [R-3]

192 C.A. No. 20830/2017IV-A

PEOPLES UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES(PUCL) THROUGH ITS GENERALSECRETARY AND ANR.

PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SUMEER SODHI[R-2]

193 Crl.A. No. 1306/2017II-B

YOGESH HITENDRA NATH RATH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN, [R-1]FOR FINAL DISPOSAL

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1307/2017II-B

ANUJ M. C. DHINGRA

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1308/2017II-B

PARDEEP RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA SANJAY KUMAR VISENFOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 24979/2014

194 C.A. No. 20918/2017XII-A

M. LUCY RANI AND ORS. K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURIVersusSIDDABOINA LAXMINARAYANA . ANDORS. VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU[CAVEAT]

195 C.A. No. 3801/2017XIV-A

MANAGING COMMITTEE, RABEA GIRLSPUBLIC SCHOOL . AND ORS. RANJEETA ROHATGI[P-1]

VersusABDUL REHMAN AND ANR. MAHUA KALRA[R-1], B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-2]

Page 155: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6

ConnectedC.A. No. 3802/2017XIV-A

HAMDARD EDUCATION SOCIETY ANDANR. RANJEETA ROHATGI[P-1]

VersusSHRI ABDUL REHMAN AND ANR. MAHUA KALRA[R-1], B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3803/2017XIV-A

MANAGING COMMITTEE, RABEA GIRLSPUBLIC SCHOOL AND ORS. RANJEETA ROHATGI

VersusNAUMAN AHMAD KHAN MAHUA KALRA

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7737/2018XIV

VARINDER KAUR V. ELANCHEZHIYAN

VersusSCHOOL MANAGEMENT OF GURUHARKRISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL ANDORS.

ABINASH KUMAR MISHRA[CAVEAT]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.41869/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.and IA No.41870/2018-DELETING THE NAME OF RESPONDENT

196 Crl.A. No. 721/2015II

VIJAI BANKEY BIHARI[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1]and IA No.16196/2018-SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE/BAIL

197 Crl.A. No. 2460/2014II-B

PARKASH CHAND SHREE PAL SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1]

198 C.A. No. 2150/2015XVII-A

M/S DLF UNIVERSAL LTD FORMERLYKNOWN AS DLF COMMERICALCOMPLEXES LTD

KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusKUSHAL K RANA BANKEY BIHARI

ConnectedC.A. No. 5858/2015XVII-A

ROHIT CHAUDHARYAND . AND ANR. SAMAR VIJAY SINGH

VersusM/S. VIPUL LTD. M. R. SHAMSHADIA No.121933/2017-EARLY HEARING APPLICATION and

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22949/2017XVII-A

EMAAR MGF LAND LTD AND ANR. P. V. YOGESWARAN

VersusCHANBIR SINGH MANN AND ANR. KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH[R-1], [R-2]IA No.47176/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.47177/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING and IA No.79678/2017-PERMISSION TOFILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

199 Crl.A. No. 2485/2014II-C

RADHEY SHYAM B. SRIDHARVersusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI

200 C.A. No. 3390/2017XIV-A

KURMA RAO M M. A. CHINNASAMYVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

201 C.A. No. 8424/2015XI-A

STATE OF ODISHA . AND ORS. ANINDITA PUJARIVersus

BIJAY KUMAR NANDA . AND ORS. TEJASWI KUMAR PRADHAN, DIPESH SINHA[R-11]

202 Crl.A. No.1030-1031/2017II-A

RAJA MISHRA @ RAJA RAM MISHRAAND ORS. KUMAR MIHIR

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1]ABHISHEK SINGH[I-1][IMPL]

Page 156: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6203 C.A. No. 1663/2015

IIIARUN EKNATH PAGARE AND ORS. APARNA JHA[P-1]VersusLAXMIBAI BHASKAR DHANRAO . ANDORS. SRM LAW ASSOCIATES[R-1]

204 Crl.A. No. 391/2015II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AJAY MARWAH[P-1][GR]VersusPANKAJ KUMAR KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH[R-1][PR], [R-1]

205 C.A. No. 2746/2015XII

SAROJA KSN & CO.[P-1]VersusLAKSHMIAMMAL AND ORS. AND ORS. V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN[R-1], G. BALAJI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3090/2015XII

KALYANA SUNDARI R. NEDUMARAN[P-1]

VersusLAKSHMIAMMAL . AND ORS. G. BALAJI[R-1]

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.640/2015 In C.A. No.2746/2015XII

SAROJA KSN & CO.

Versus

LAKSHMIAMMAL . AND ORS.

206 C.A. No. 959/2017III

SHAIKH SALEEMUDDIN AND ORS. UDAY B. DUBEVersus

BABA QUERASHI AND ANR. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI, [R-2],SHASHIBHUSHAN P. ADGAONKAR

207 C.A. No. 3673/2015XVII-A

M/S SUPER LABEL MFG. CO. AP & J CHAMBERSVersusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANYLIMITED VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA

208 Crl.A. No.602-603/2017II-A

DR. GANESH JAGANNATH DHUMAL RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE[P-1]

Versus

SANDEEP SHRIRAM GUPTA AND ANR. R. P. GUPTA[R-1], NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-2]

209 C.A. No. 6416/2015XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYARVersusM/S. COLOURPLUS FASHIONS PVT. LTD.

210 C.A. No. 7228/2015XVII-A

HIND OFFSHORE PVT. LTD. KUSH CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusIFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCECO. LTD TATINI BASU[R-1]

211 C.A. No.5502-5503/2017III

PHYSICAL RESEARCH LABORATORYPROCESS TO BE SERVED THR.DIRECTOR AND ANR.

GURMEET SINGH MAKKER

VersusN.K. SHAH . AND ORS. NACHIKETA JOSHI[CAVEAT]

212 C.A. No. 2674/2016XVI

SHASHI BHUSHAN MUKESH RAJ KISHOR CHOUDHARYVersusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANDORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER

213 C.A. No. 531-535/2016III-A

U.P FOREST CORPORATION KAVITA JHAVersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX . ANDANR. VISHNU SHARMA, ANIL KATIYAR

214 Crl.A. No.763-764/2016II-A

SHATRUGHNA BABAN MESHRAM BALAJI SRINIVASAN

Versus

Page 157: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES] [ DEATH CASE ]

215 C.A. No.6608-6609/2016XII

ANIMILLI ATCHIYAMMA K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI[P-1][PR]

VersusTHE STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITYPONDICHERRY AND ORS BALAJI SRINIVASAN[R-1]

216 C.A. No. 6359/2016XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[P-1]VersusVINAY KUMAR SYED MEHDI IMAM[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7234/2016XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER

VersusSANTOSH WADHWA, SCIENTIST-E . ANDORS. ANIS AHMED KHAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 2575/2017XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER

VersusIQBAL HASAN AND ORS. M. C. DHINGRA

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29605/2018IV-B

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER

VersusKRISHAN LALFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.152134/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

217 C.A. No. 4400/2016XIV-A

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHAND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1]

Versus

SHASHI KANTAVISHAL ARUN[IMPL], PRAVEENAGRAWAL[R-1], AKSHAY VERMA[R-1]AJAY MARWAH[IMPL]

218 C.A. No. 10132/2016XVII-A

AVAS AYUKT, U.P. AVAS EVAM VIKASPARISHAD . AND ORS. VISHWAJIT SINGH

VersusRAJENDRA PRASAD SHARMA KUNDAN KUMAR LAL

219 C.A. No. 8226/2016XIV-A

SHIV PRAKASH SAXENA . AND ORS. MANOJ SWARUP AND CO., GAURAV AGRAWALVersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. S. RAJAPPA[R-4], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No.16364-16366/2017XII

N.KALYANARAMAN AND ORS. AND ORS. K. V. MOHAN

Versus

CHAIRMAN OF THE EXPORTINSPECTION COUNCIL AND ORS. S. RAJAPPA

ConnectedC.A. No.16367-16369/2017XII

N. SRINIVASAN AND ORS. K. V. MOHAN

Versus

CHAIRMAN EXPORT INSPN COUNCIL .AND ORS. S. RAJAPPA

FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 149272/2018ConnectedT.P.(C) No. 321/2011XVI-A

SUKRITI BHUSHAN ROY MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFCOMMERCE AND INDUSTRY AND ORS. S. RAJAPPA

Page 158: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedT.P.(C) No. 323/2011XVI-A

DIPAK BHATTACHARYYA AND ORS. MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. S. RAJAPPA

220 C.A. No.5339-5341/2016XVI-A

NHPC LTD AND ORS. PUNEET TANEJA

Versus

ALL INDIA NHPC DIPLOMA ENGINEERSCOUNCIL AND ANR. ETC.

ASHOK MATHUR, , [R-11], [R-12], P. D.SHARMA, [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]RAJESH SRIVASTAVA[IMPL]

221 C.A. No. 5994/2016XVII

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIAAND ANR. ARJUN KRISHNAN

VersusFAIVELEY TRANSPORT RAILTECHNOLOGIES INDIA LTD. AND ANR.

B. SUNITA RAO, MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-2]

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 3/2017 List on a non-misc. dayvide court's order dated15.11.2016

ConnectedC.A. No. 5993/2016XVII

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA ARJUN KRISHNAN

VersusESCORTS LTD. AND ANR. ANIL SHRIVASTAV

ConnectedC.A. No. 5334/2016XVII

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIAAND ANR.

ARJUN KRISHNAN, MUKESH KUMARMARORIA

VersusSTONE INDIA LTD. AND ANR. ASHOK MATHUR

ConnectedC.A. No.9680-9690/2016XVII

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIAAND ORS. SHADAN FARASAT

Versus

A.R. POLYMERS PVT. LTD. ETC. ETC.AND ANR.

RITESH KUMAR, KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY[R-3],[R-10], SHARMILA UPADHYAY[R-11],RAJKUMARI BANJU[R-4], [R-5], [R-9], [R-12]

ConnectedC.A. No.10981-10985/2016XVII

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA RUCHI KOHLI

Versus

M/S. NARENDRA EXPOSIVES LTD. . ANDORS.

222 Crl.A. No.640-641/2016II-A

ARVIND SINGH AJIT SINGH PUNDIR

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRANISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1], [R-1], GAURAVAGRAWAL

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES] DEATH CASEConnectedCrl.A. No.1515-1516/2017II-A

RAJESH S/O DHANNALAL DAWARE DEEPAK ANAND

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRANISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1]RISHI JAIN[INT]

FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 59024/2019223 C.A. No. 2823/2017

IIISTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKARVersusDR. RAMDAS LAXMANRAO KHESAR ANDORS.

SHASHIBHUSHAN P. ADGAONKAR, [R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9]

224 C.A. No. 10888/2016XVII

AMARNATH JHA GAURAV AGRAWALVersus

Page 159: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6THE STATE OF JHARKHAND STATE OFJHARKHAND AND ANR THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ANR.

KAUSHIK PODDAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 10891/2016XVII

VIJAY KUMAR GAURAV AGRAWAL

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGHTHE SECRETARY AND ORS. KAUSHIK PODDAR, RACHITTA PRIYANKA[R-6]

IA FOR ON IA 2/2017ConnectedC.A. No. 10892/2016XVII

BIJENDRA KUMAR SINGH GAURAV AGRAWAL

VersusSTATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ANR. KAUSHIK PODDAR, RACHITTA PRIYANKA[R-6]

IA FOR ON IA 2/2017ConnectedC.A. No. 10889/2016XVII

AJAY KUMAR GAURAV AGRAWAL

VersusINDUSTRIAL DEPARTMENT THROUGHTHE SECRETARY AND ORS. KAUSHIK PODDAR, RACHITTA PRIYANKA[R-6]

IA FOR ON IA 1/2017ConnectedC.A. No. 10890/2016XVII

SHASHI KANT VISHWAKARMA GAURAV AGRAWAL

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORSTHROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ORS. KAUSHIK PODDAR, RACHITTA PRIYANKA[R-6]

IA FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA2/2016 FOR ON IA 3/2017

225 C.A. No. 7388/2016XVII-A

MADAN MOHAN PANDA SANTOSH KUMAR - IVersusNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANYLIMITED GAURAV SHARMA

226 C.A. No. 7327/2016XVI

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[P-1]VersusKALYANI SAMANTA (MONDAL) . ANDORS.

RAUF RAHIM[R-1], KUNAL CHATTERJI[R-2],[R-3]

[ RETAIN ITS POSITION ][ WITHIN FIRST TEN MATTERS ]

227 C.A. No. 3946/2017XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusPAVITRA COMMERCIALS LTD KAVITA JHA

ConnectedDiary No. 33962-2019IX

PRINCIPAL COMMISSSIONER OFINCOME TAX 5 MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKANAIYALAL M SHETHFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.151376/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

228 Crl.A. No.938-939/2016II-C

PUSHPENDER KAVEETA WADIA

VersusSTATE B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], RAKESH KUMAR-I

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 8553/2016II-C

PHOOLWATI KAVEETA WADIA

VersusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1][GR]

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 3527/2017II-C

R. HARSHINDER KAVEETA WADIA

Versus

Page 160: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2025/2017II-C

BABU LAL KAVEETA WADIA

VersusSTATE B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 131494/2018

229 C.A. No. 9691/2016III-A

AKHILESH CHANDRA PORWAL @ A.C.PORWAL TARA CHANDRA SHARMA[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA THR. SECRETARY .AND ORS. RAJ KISHOR CHOUDHARY[R-2], [R-3]

230 Crl.A. No. 906/2016II

PULEN PHUKAN AND ORS. AND ORS. CHANDRA BHUSHAN PRASADVersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM DEBOJIT BORKAKATI

231 C.A. No. 10800/2016XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. SAMIR ALI KHAN[P-1]Versus

SUBHASH CHANDRA AND ORS. RAJESH PRASAD SINGH[R-1], [R-2], BALAJISRINIVASAN[R-1], [R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10799/2016XVI

RAJENDRA AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY .AND ORS. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA[P-1]

Versus

SUBHASH CHANDRA . AND ORS.RAJESH PRASAD SINGH[R-1], M. SHOEBALAM[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], PRAVEENSWARUP[R-6]

232 C.A. No. 12200/2016III-A

SHRI KRISHNA SINGH AND ANR. GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1], [P-2]VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HUMANRESOURCE DEVELOPMENT THROUGHSECRETARY AND ORS.

T. V. GEORGE[R-2], ABHISHEK YADAV[R-6],VISHWA PAL SINGH[R-7], ARVINDKUMAR[R-8], KAUSAR RAZA FARIDI[R-9]

233 Crl.A. No. 2035/2017II-A

KARU MANJHI RANJAN KUMAR[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusSTATE OF BIHAR DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1]

234 Crl.A. No. 342/2017II-C

SHIV RAM ANIL NAG[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1][GR]

235 C.A. No.8289-8290/2018XII

A. KARPAGAM KARUNAKAR MAHALIK[P-1]

VersusVPG HOUSING PVT LTD AND ORSTHROUGH DIRECTOR VGP BABUDASAND ORS.

M. P. VINOD[R-1], RAJESH KUMAR[R-5], K. V.VIJAYAKUMAR[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-3][GR]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8291/2018XII

V.G.P HOUSING PVT LTD. ABHINAV AGRAWAL[P-1][GR]

VersusTHE LAND COMMISSIONER, CHEPAUK,CHENNAI AND ORS AND ORS.

RAJESH KUMAR[R-1], K. V.VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1], [R-2], B. BALAJI[R-1]

236 C.A. No. 434/2017III

SHREE NILKANTH DEVELOPERS SANTOSH KRISHNANVersusPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

I.A.NO. 3957/2019( Application for stay) to be listed before the Hon'ble Court)237 Crl.A. No. 5-6/2018

II-AVEERENDRA RISHI MALHOTRAVersusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ARJUN GARG[R-1][ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ] [ DEATH CASE ]

Page 161: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6238 C.A. No.

11020-11029/2017X

M/S. KOTDWAR STEELS LTD. SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA

VersusUTTARANCHAL POWER CORPORATIONLIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN SHIRIN KHAJURIA

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 11/2017 FOR EX-PARTE STAY ONIA 21/2017 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 31/2017

ConnectedC.A. No.12190-12198/2016X

M/S. AMRIT VERSHA UDYOG PVT. LTD.DIRECTOR SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA

VersusUTTARANCHAL POWER CORPORATIONLTD. CHAIRMAN SHIRIN KHAJURIA

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2016ConnectedC.A. No. 1/2017X

M/S ARUNA STEEL PVT LTD DIRECTOR SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA

VersusUTTARANCHAL POWER CORPORATIONLTD CHAIRMAN SHIRIN KHAJURIA

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2017

239 Crl.A. No. 462/2019II

SITA RAM AND ORS. SUSHIL BALWADA[P-1][PR], [P-2][PR],[P-3][PR], [P-4][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

240 C.A. No. 10753/2017XII

PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TOGOVERNMENT, HOME SC DEPARTMENTAND ANR.

M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1][GR]

VersusY JOHN NICHOLSON, I.P.S. AND ORS. B. BALAJI[R-1]

241 C.A. No. 18835/2017XII

R ANGAYARKANI G.SIVABALAMURUGANVersusTHE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT, UOIAND ORS.

V. G. PRAGASAM[R-1][PR], [R-2][PR],HRISHIKESH BARUAH[R-3][PR]

ConnectedC.A. No. 18836/2017XII

M.S.SHARMILA L. K. PANDEY

VersusUNION OF INDIA THE SECRETARY TOTHE GOVERNMENT UNION OF INDIAAND ORS.

V. G. PRAGASAM[R-1][PR], [R-2][PR],HRISHIKESH BARUAH[R-3][PR]

242 Crl.A. No.1398-1400/2017II

NARAYAN SINGH AND ORS. P. V. SARAVANA RAJA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

243 C.A. No. 703/2018III

COMPETENT AUTHORITY ANDADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF RAJKOT HEMANTIKA WAHI

VersusLILAVANTI JAYANTILAL PAREKH SINCEDECEASED THROUGH LRS. PURVISH JITENDRA MALKAN[R-1]

244 C.A. No. 21006/2017XII

MCT M. CHIDAMBARAM TRUST G. BALAJIVersusV. RAVICHANDRAN KSN & CO.[CAVEAT]

245 Crl.A. No. 168/2018II-A

BANTI GUPTA @ KAMAL KUMAR GUPTA@ KAMAL KISHORE GUPTA RAJ KAMAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR NIRANJANA SINGH[R-1]

246 C.A. No. 23508/2017XVII-A

M/S. COIMBATORE PIONEERFETILIZERS LTD. SAKSHI KAKKAR

Versus

Page 162: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANYLTD.

247 C.A. No. 214/2018XI-A

THE STATE OF ODISHA AND ORS. MILIND KUMARVersusMANGING COMMITTEE OF BHARATIHIGH SCHOOL AND ORS.

SUDARSH MENON[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11]

Mr. Somanatha padhan, Mr. A.Lakshmi Narayanan, Advocates for Interventionapplicaiton and Mr. Sudarsh Menon Advocate for application for Revocation of SLP

248 C.A. No. 19867/2017XV

MALVIYA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OFTECHNOLOGY ADARSH UPADHYAY

VersusMUKESH KUMAR SHAH TARUNA SINGH GOHIL[ AS FIRST ITEM ]

249 C.A. No. 20917/2017XVII-A

ABHISHEK KUMAR AND ANR. ASTHA SHARMAVersusNITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PVT.LTD. KMNP LAW AOR[R-1]

250 C.A. No.8998-8999/2018XVII-A

M/S ARFAT PETRO CHEMICALS PVT.LTD. VIVEK JAIN

VersusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. SAKSHI MITTAL[R-1]

251 Crl.A. No. 1630/2018II

SAREPALLI SREENIVAS AND ORS. ANU GUPTAVersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH GUNTUR PRABHAKAR[R-1]

252 C.A. No. 2372/2019XVII-A

HEBRON DEVELOPERS (P) LTD. P. V. DINESHVersusVINEYARD MEADOWS VILLA OWNERSASSOCIATION BIJU P RAMAN[R-1], C. K. SASI[R-6]

253 C.A. No. 11725/2018XVI

SANAT KUMAR BISWAS AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.VersusBISHNUPRIYA DEY SHASHI KIRAN[CAVEAT]

254 Crl.A. No. 400/2019II-A

VILAS RICHA KAPOORVersus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

255 C.A. No. 4979/2019XVII-A

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. MANJEET CHAWLAVersusVEDIC RESORTS AND HOTELS PVT. LTD. SUSMIT PUSHKAR[CAVEAT]

256 C.A. No. 7042/2019XVII-A

M/S LAUREATE BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. RAJESH P.VersusCHARANJEET SINGH HIMANSHU SHEKHAR[R-1]IA No.125808/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.125807/2019-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T.

257 C.A. No. 6377/2009XVII-A

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA J S WAD AND COVersusMANBAI NANJI BHUDIA

258 C.A. No.5465-5468/2011XVII-A

M/S. INCON ENGINEERS LIMITED ANDANR. NIRAJ GUPTA

VersusSHRI M.A.MUNVARASEEM . AND ORS.

259 C.A. No.1858-1859/2016XII

NAGABHUSHANAMMAL (D) THRU LRS VIJAY KUMAR

VersusC.CHANDIKESWARALINGAM K. K. MOHAN

Page 163: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6260 C.A. No. 5241/2009

XVII-AJAI SHREE MINE PRODUCTS P.LTD. RAJIV MEHTAVersusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD.. ANDANR. MANJEET CHAWLA

261 C.A. No. 4461/2010XVII-A

CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, H.U.D.A. . ANDANR. NARESH BAKSHI

VersusCAPT. A.C.MOHAN GEETANJALI MOHAN

262 C.A. No. 4070/2009XVII-A

M/S.PREMIER TRANSPORT LTD. SUNIL KUMAR JAINVersusNEW INDIA ASSURANCECO.LTD..THROUGH ITS REGIONALMANAGER AND ANR.

PRAMOD DAYAL, AJAY CHOUDHARY

263 R.P.(Crl.) No.286-287/2012 In Crl.A.No. 98-99/2009II-C

MOHD.ARIF @ ASHFAQ MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF, [P-1]

Versus

STATE(NCT OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1][ PART-HEARD BY HON'BLE UDAY UMESH LALIT, HON'BLE INDU MALHOTRAAND HON'BLE R. SUBHASH REDDY ,JJ. ]CRLMP.NO.11759-60/2016 INRP(CRL)286-287/2012 IN CRL.A.NO.98-99/2009 .[ TO GO BEFORE THREEHONBLE JUDGES ] [ DEATH CASE ]

264 SLP(Crl) No. 2264/2015II-C

RAHUL HARINDER MOHAN SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF DELHI MINISTRY OFHOME AFFAIRS AND ANR.

B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1](MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[I-1][IMPL][PR]

{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 } [ DEATH CASE ][ TO GO BEFORE THREEHON'BLE JUDGES ] [ Ms. Sonia Mathur, learned Senior Counsel appointed asAmicus Curiae for the appellants-accused.

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.3171-3172/2015II-C

RAVI KUMAR HARINDER MOHAN SINGH[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 }

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.597-598/2016II-C

VINOD @ CHHOTU S. USHA REDDY

Versus

THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHIHOME AFFAIRS B. V. BALARAM DAS

{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 } IA No.109664/2017-I/A FOR PERMISSIONTO FILE ANNEXURES A-1 TO A-39 IN THE FORM OF VOLUME II - LEGAL AIDMATTER

265 C.A. No. 5726/2009XVII-A

M/S KIRAN OVERSEAS EXPORTS LTD. TARA CHANDRA SHARMA[P-1][PR]VersusTHAI AIRWAYS INTERNATIONAL LTD. MANJEET CHAWLA[R-1]

266 C.A. No. 7575/2011XVII-A

HARYANA URBAN DEVT. AUTH0RITYETC. SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

VersusARJUN SINGH SENGER B. K. SATIJA

267 C.A. No. 7693/2009XVII-A

MUKHTIAR KAUR CHANCHAL KUMAR GANGULIVersusL.I.C.OF INDIA . AND ANR. INDRA SAWHNEY

268 C.A. No. 8154/2009XVII-A

REGISTRAR, KARNATAKA UNIVERSITY ANKUR S. KULKARNIVersusSIRIN H MAKANDAR ANKOLEKAR GURUDATTAFOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2009

Page 164: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 6

269 C.A. No. 5426/2010IV-A

CHANNABASAPPA GAVISIDDAPPAMATTUR AND ANR. RAJESH MAHALE

VersusHANUMAPPA NAREGALLAPPA MATTURAND ORS. S. N. BHAT, SHANKAR DIVATE, ANIL KUMAR

270 C.A. No. 2178/2011XIV-A

MD.ABDUL RAHIM AVIJIT BHATTACHARJEEVersusMANAGEMENT OF CACHAR PAPERMILL SHEKHAR KUMAR

271 C.A. No. 7166/2010IV

MOHD.FARUQ AND ORS. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATESVersusTAJBIR SINGH AND ANR. R. C. KAUSHIK

ConnectedC.A. No. 7191/2010IV

MOHD.FARUQ . AND ORS. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES

VersusRAJINDER SINGH . AND ANR. R. C. KAUSHIK

ConnectedC.A. No. 7168/2010IV

MOHD.FARUQ AND ORS. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES

VersusBALDEVA (D) THR LRS . R. C. KAUSHIK

ConnectedC.A. No. 7199/2010IV

MOHD. FARUQ AND ORS. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES

VersusMANSA RAM R. C. KAUSHIK

272 C.A. No.1120-1121/2011XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1], [P-2]

VersusKARAM CHAND AND ORS. ANIL NAG[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

273 C.A. No. 2825/2010XVII-A

JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. PRATIBHA JAINVersusMAL SINGH

274 C.A. No. 88/2012XII

THIRUMAGAL MILLS LTD. K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYAVersusDEPUTY CHIEF INSPECTOR OFFACTORIES AND ANR. CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI

NOTE:-ON 10.12.2019 THE MATTERS WHICH MAY NOT BE TAKEN UP BY THEBENCH OF HONBLE UDAY UMESH LALIT AND HONBLE INDUMALHOTRA AND HONBLE KRISHNA MURARI, JJ. AND THE MATTERSSHOWN IN THE WEEKLY LIST WILL BE TAKEN UP ON 11.12.2019 AND12.12.2019 BY THE FOLLOWING BENCH :-]HONBLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALITHONBLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRAHONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY

NEW DELHI06-12-2019 17:40:14

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 165: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all
Page 166: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 33 OF 2019 FROM : 10-12-2019 To 12-12-2019

COURT NO. : 7HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARIREGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate

1 C.A. No.6053-6054/2014IV-A

M/S. I.C.D.S. LIMITED K. V. MOHAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXMANGALORE AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS

[ AT TOP ]2 C.A. No. 5961/2009

IIICOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYARVersusNIRMA LIMITED P. S. SUDHEER[ AT TOP ]

3 C.A. No. 3314/2011XIV-A

C.I.T. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]VersusVODAFONE WEST LIMITED B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[ AT TOP ]

4 C.A. No. 7865/2009XV

SHREE CHOUDHARY TRANSPORT CO. SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIAVersusINCOME TAX OFFICER B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR[ AT TOP ]

5 C.A. No. 6417/2010XIV-A

HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE FORESTCORPORATION LTD. KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH[P-1]

VersusC.I.T SHIMLA ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][ AT TOP ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6418/2010XIV-A

H.P.STATE CORPORATION LTD. KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH

VersusC.I.T,SHIMLA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6421/2010XIV-A

H.P.STATE CORPORATION LTD. KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH[P-1]

VersusC.I.T,SHIMLA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6419/2010XIV-A

H.P.STATE CORPORATION LTD. KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH

VersusC.I.T,SHIMLA

6 C.A. No. 7615/2009XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYARVersusGUJARAT GUARDIAN LIMITED KAVITA JHA[ AT TOP ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2414/2010XIV-A

C.I.T., DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 167: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7M/S. SHYAM TELELINKS LTD. KAVITA JHA

7 C.A. No.2899-2902/2011XIV-A

M/S SHIV SHAKTI FLOUR MISSL (P)LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS[ AT TOP ]

8 C.A. No.8135-8146/2010IX

TATA MOTORS LTD. (FORMERLYKNOWN AS TATA ENGINEERING ANDLOCOMOTIVE COMPANY LTD

KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE PIMPRI CHINCHWAD MUNICIPALCORPORATION FORMED UNDER THEBOMBAY PROVINCIAL MUNICIPALCORPORATION

V. N. RAGHUPATHY

[ AT TOP ]ConnectedC.A. No.8147-8152/2010IX

TATA MOTORS LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

PIMPRI CHINCHWAD MUN.CORP. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

9 C.A. No. 3826/2012IV-A

M/S UNIVERSAL CABLES LTD. MANJEET KIRPALVersusC.I.T-II,JABALPUR ANIL KATIYAR[ AT TOP ]

10 C.A. No.6112-6114/2011IV-A

M.P. RAJYA VAN VIKAS NIGAM LTD. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, BHOPAL ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][ AT TOP ]

11 C.A. No. 1961/2011IX

M/S ORIENT(GOA) PVT. LTD. MITTER & MITTER CO.VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR[ AT TOP ]

12 C.A. No.7566-7568/2012IV-A

M/S. BRINDAVAN BEVERAGES LIMITED SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS

[ AT TOP ]ConnectedC.A. No. 7569/2012IV-A

M/S ELECTREX (INDIA) LTD. K. V. MOHAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS

ConnectedC.A. No. 7570/2012IV-A

M/S. UNITED GLASS BOTTLESMANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

13 C.A. No.3571-3572/2012XII

M/S MACRO MARVEL PROJECTS LTD.THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR K J JOHN AND CO

VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX CIRCLE IV(1) AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

[ AT TOP ]

Page 168: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No.3573-3574/2012XII

M/S PRODAPT INFRASTRUCTUREHOLDNGS P LTD THROUGH ITSDIRECTOR

K J JOHN AND CO

VersusASST.COMMR.OF INCOME TAX CIRCLEIV (1)CHENNAI AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

14 C.A. No. 9775/2011XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DASVersusU.A.E.EXCHANGE CENTRE SAHARYA & CO.[ AT TOP ]

15 C.A. No. 2774/2012IV-A

M/S PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS(P)LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

[ AT TOP ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2777/2012IV-A

M/S PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS (P)LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 2776/2012IV-A

M/S. PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS(P)LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 2775/2012IV-A

M/S. PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS(P)LTD. BINA GUPTA

VersusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

16 C.A. No. 5882/2011IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I B. V. BALARAM DASVersusKOLHAPUR ZILLA SAHAKARI DUDHUTPADAK SANGH LTD. RAUF RAHIM

[ AT TOP ]

17 C.A. No. 8937/2010IX

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFGREATER MUMBAI AND ANR. SUCHITRA ATUL CHITALE

VersusJAYANTILAL SHANTILAL JOBALI RASHMIKUMAR MANILAL VITHLANI[ AT TOP ]

18 C.A. No. 201/2005XI-A

PANKAJAKSHI(DEAD) THROUGH L.RS. T. G. NARAYANAN NAIRVersusCHANDRIKA . AND ORS. MALINI PODUVAL, M. T. GEORGE

ConnectedC.A. No. 8576/2014XI-A

PULPARAMBIL VASUDEVAN NARESH KUMAR

VersusNANGANADATH PULPARAMBILDEVADSAN AND ORS. VIJAY K. MEHTA, E. M. S. ANAM

19 C.A. No. 9863/2013III

VASUDEORAO@ DADASAHEBDESHPANDE(D)TH.LR& YASH PAL DHINGRA

VersusTULSABAI (D) TH. LR. . AND ORS. SUJATA KURDUKARMediation Report received

20 C.A. No. 3683/2007XII-A

M/S. USHAKIRON MOVIES PAREKH & CO.Versus

Page 169: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH GUNTUR PRABHAKAR, S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 3684/2007XII-A

M/S. USHAKIRON MOVIES PAREKH & CO.

Versus

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, A.P. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR, S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 13933/2015III

TATA SONS LIMITED AND ANR. SHIV KUMAR SURI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDANR. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedC.A. No.5456-5459/2016IV-A

STATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Versus

M/S. UNITED BREWERIES LTD. KHAITAN & CO.

ConnectedC.A. No. 8368/2018III

MAHYCO MONSANTO BIOTECH (INDIA )PVT LTD RAHUL GUPTA[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], [R-3], KUNALCHEEMA[R-2], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8347/2018III

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusMAHYCO MONSANTO BIOTECH (INDIA)PRIVATE LIMITED . AND ORS. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1], KUNAL CHEEMA[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8416/2018III-A

M/S DOMINOS PIZZA OVERSEASFRANCHISING BV THROUGH ITSAUTHORISED SIGNATORY, MR. ACHALCHAWLA

KISHORE KUNAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8417/2018III-A

M/S DOMINOS PIZZA INTERNATIONALFRANCHISING BV THROUGH ITSAUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR. ACHALCHAWLA

KISHORE KUNAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5668/2017III-A

THE COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIALTAXES, U.P. RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA

VersusS/S KAMLA KANT AND CO. ANUBHA AGRAWAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5641/2017III-A

THE COMMISSIONER COMMERCIALTAXES U.P. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[P-1]

VersusS/S KAMLA KANT AND CO. ANUBHA AGRAWAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8348/2018III

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDANR.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[P-1]

VersusM/S SUBWAY SYSTEM INDIA PVT LTDAND ORS.

KHAITAN & CO.[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-5]

21 C.A. No. 2808/2013III-A

SANT PRASAD MISHRA AND ORS. ASHOK MATHURVersus

PUSHPRAJ SINGH AND ANR. PARIJAT SINHA, , RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON[R-3], PRAMOD B. AGARWALA[R-3]

Page 170: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 722 C.A. No. 437/2013

IVSURINDER SINGH (D) THR. LR. SANJAY JAINVersus

RAM PIARI AND ORS. AVINASH KR. LAKHANPAL[R-1], [R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4], SUDARSHAN SINGH RAWAT[R-6]

23 C.A. No. 3274/2019XI-A

VARKEY MATHEW (DEAD) THR. LRS.AND ORS. ROMY CHACKO

Versus

TAHSILDAR DEVIKULAM . AND ORS.P. V. DINESH, G. PRAKASH[R-8]RAMESH BABU M. R., [INT], ASHWANIBHARDWAJ, [INT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3275/2019XI-A

MANJU MATHEW AND ANR. ROMY CHACKO

VersusTAHSILDAR . AND ORS. P. V. DINESH

24 C.A. No. 5649/2008IX

M/S COLFAX (I) PRIVATE LIMITED RAJESH KUMAR[P-1]Versus

STATE OF GOA . AND ORS. A. SUBHASHINI[R-1], JAYANT MOHAN[R-1],SAMEER SHRIVASTAVA[R-2]

25 C.A. No. 9591/2011XVI

M/S MRF LTD. MEERA MATHUR[P-1]VersusASST.COMMNR. COMMERCIAL TAXES .AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9593/2011XVI

M/S. MRF LTD. MEERA MATHUR[P-1]

VersusASSTT. COMMNR COMMERCIAL TAXESCORPORATE DIVN . AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9594/2011XVI

M/S. M.R.F. LTD. MEERA MATHUR[P-1]

VersusASSTT. COMMNR COMMERCIAL TAXESCORPORATE DIVISION AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9592/2011XVI

M/S. MRF LTD. MEERA MATHUR[P-1]

VersusASSTT.COMMNR COMMERCIAL TAXESCORPORATE DIVN . AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3]

26 C.A. No.5534-5594/2011XIV-A

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHAND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusGOEL BUS SERVICE KULLU AND ORS.MR. SIDDHARTH BHATNAGAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE TO APPEAR AS AMICUSCURIAE TO BE ASSISTED BY MR. BUDDY A. RANGANADHAN, ADVOCATE.

27 C.A. No. 8512/2009XI-A

SPECIAL SEC. TO GOVT. OF ORISSA SHIBASHISH MISRA[P-1]Versus

BANSIDHAR NAIK (DEAD) BY LRS. ANDORS.

M. QAMARUDDIN[R-1]A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[IMPL], RAJEEVMAHESHWARANAND ROY[I-1][IMPL],[I-2][IMPL], K. RAJEEV[I-3][IMPL], [I-4][IMPL],[I-5][IMPL], [I-6][IMPL], [I-7][IMPL]

FOR ON IA 3/2009 FOR ON IA 86972/200928 C.A. No. 6076/2009

IV-ASHIVAKUMAR AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]Versus

SHARANABASAPPA AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE[R-1], ANJANACHANDRASHEKAR[R-2], [R-4]

Page 171: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7

29 C.A. No. 4502/2009XI-A

ALL KERALA DISTRIBUTORSASSOCIATION, REPRESENTED BY ITSSECRETARY

RANJITH K. C.[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1], P. S.SUDHEER[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 878/2010XI-A

THE OTTAPPALAM TALUK PRIVATE BUSOPERATORS ASSOCIATION AND ANR. ABHISTH KUMAR[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1], [R-2], P. S.SUDHEER[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 879/2010XI-A

PALAKKAD DISTRICT LORRY OWNERSASSOCIATION AND ANR. AVIJIT BHATTACHARJEE[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS.NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1], [R-2], P. S.SUDHEER[R-3], ABHISTH KUMAR[R-1], [R-4],[R-5]

30 C.A. No.10680-10683/2011IV-A

M/S HIGH RANGE COFFEE CURINGPVT.LTD. MITTER & MITTER CO.

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY, RADHA RANGASWAMY

ConnectedC.A. No. 10684/2011IV-A

M/S HIGH RANGE COFFEE CURINGPVT.LTD. MITTER & MITTER CO.[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],RADHA RANGASWAMY[R-4]

31 Crl.A. No.1431-1434/2010II-B

STATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGH

Versus

SURINDER ETC. YASH PAL DHINGRA, RAVI KUMAR TOMAR,HARINDER MOHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-1]

32 Crl.A. No. 2057/2009II-C

CHANNAPPA VITHOBHA BIRADAR NULI & NULI[P-1]VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

33 C.A. No. 4490/2008XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S. ASSOCIATED CONTAINERTERMINAL LTD. RUPESH KUMAR

34 C.A. No. 1636/2010XVII

TATA MOTORS LTD.FORMERLY KNOWNAS M/S TATA ENGINEERING ANDLOCOMOTIVE COMPANY LTD.

MANIK KARANJAWALA

VersusSTATE OF JHARKHAN(FOR.KNOWN.ASTHE STATE OF BIHAR) GOPAL PRASAD

35 C.A. No. 8128/2009IX

PATNUS GRAM PANCHAYAT AND ANR. ABHA R. SHARMAVersusTATA POWER COMPANY LTD. . ANDORS. KARANJAWALA & CO.

36 C.A. No. 4380/2010III-A

INTIZAR AHMAD AND ORS. SHAKIL AHMED SYED[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusPRESCRIBED AUTHORITY KAIRANA ANDANR. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2]

37 C.A. No. 6677/2008IV-A

WIPRO FINANCE LTD. ABHINAV MUKERJIVersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BANGALORE

Page 172: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7list C.A 7906/2009 alongwith these matter after two weeks as per order dated01.10.2019

ConnectedC.A. No. 2696/2010IV-A

WIPRO FINANCE LTD. ABHINAV MUKERJI

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BANGALORE B. V. BALARAM DAS

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 9274/2009IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BANGALORE ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. WIPRO FINANCE LTD. ABHINAV MUKERJI

ConnectedC.A. No. 7906/2009IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BANGALORE B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusM/S WIPRO FINANCE LIMITED ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2666/2011IV-A

COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX,BANGALORE AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusM/SCHILDRENS EDUCATION SOCIETY SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

38 C.A. No. 3545/2009XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYARVersusM/S EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANR. HINGORANI & ASSOCIATESAS PER ROP DATED 03.10.2019, LIST THIS APPEAL AFTER 2 WEEKS.

39 C.A. No. 572-577/2009IX

COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE ANIL KATIYARVersusM/S DISHTI INDUSTRIES LTD. . ANDORS. PRAVEEN KUMAR

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

40 Crl.A. No.2116-2117/2008II-B

THE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[P-1]

VersusSIRAJUDDIN MAYUDDIN SAIYED ETC. SANJAY JAIN[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

41 C.A. No. 48/2009IV-A

ASIA SUGAR AND CHEMICAL CO.,DEVANGERE SANJEEV KUMAR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 25469/2009IV-A

M/S INDIAN SUGAR AND GENERALEXPORTS IMPORT CORPORATIONLTD PAREKH & CO.[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA . AND ORS. SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

42 C.A. No. 6680/2009XVII

THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THESENIOR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGITA ENTERPRISES . AND ORS. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA, ANIL K. JHA{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA1/2008 FOR ON IA 238/2009 FOR ON IA 8926/2013 FOR ON IA 67772/2013

43 Crl.A. No. 281/2009II-B

BASAB RAMBABU KRIPA SHANKAR PRASAD[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 954/2009II-B

BABU ROY AND ORS. T. MAHIPAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

44 C.A. No. 1856/2011IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,MYSORE AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 173: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7M/S. R.P.G. CABLES LTD. KHAITAN & CO.

45 C.A. No. 2416/2010IV

RAJ PAL SINGH RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXHARYANA B. V. BALARAM DAS

46 C.A. No. 4287/2011XIV-A

MADHU GAUR K. S. RANAVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI, ANIL KATIYAR[R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4292/2011XIV-A

M/S FIVE STAR TRADING ANDINVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED KRISHNA KUMAR

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR, SUSHMA SURI, SAHARYA &CO.

ConnectedC.A. No.4288-4289/2011XIV-A

M/S. MARVELOUS EXPORTS P.LTD. MONIKA GUSAIN

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI, , ANIL KATIYAR, SAHARYA &CO.[R-5]

47 C.A. No.7308-7309/2010X

SHABIR HUSSAIN (D) BY LRS. P. NARASIMHAN

VersusKESHAV CHAND (D) BY LRS.

48 C.A. No.8592-8593/2010XII

INCOME TAX OFFICER AND ANR. ANDANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusV.MOHAN AND ANR. AND ANR. M. P. VINOD

49 C.A. No. 54/2009XIV-A

ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTERSOFTWARE EXPORT PROMOTIONCOUNCIL

SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA

VersusCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSIONTHROUGH ITS REGISTRAR AND ORS. ASHA JAIN MADAN

50 C.A. No. 4705/2014XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]VersusMOSER BAER INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4704/2014XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusMOSER BAER INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1]

51 C.A. No. 6267/2010XVI

SUBORNO BOSE DINESH CHANDRA PANDEY[P-1]VersusENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE ANDANR ANIL KATIYAR

52 C.A. No. 1764/2010XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXUDAIPUR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S CHETAK ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. RANI CHHABRA

53 C.A. No. 5184/2011XII

SARASWATHI (DEAD) BY LRS AND ORS.AND ORS. REVATHY RAGHAVAN

VersusS. A. PALANISAMY AND ORS. AND ORS. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

54 C.A. No. 4088/2016IV

M/S VARDHMAN TEXTILES LIMITED KAVITA JHAVersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I B. V. BALARAM DAS

Page 174: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 4089/2016IV

M/S VARDHMAN TEXTILES LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIOSNER OF INCOME TAX I B. V. BALARAM DAS

55 C.A. No. 8589/2010III

ADDL.DIR.OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT B. V. BALARAM DASVersusSUVIDHA ASSOCIATION THR.ITSPRESIDENT BHARGAVA V. DESAI

56 C.A. No. 6486/2009IV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYARVersusTHE NEW FRIENDS COOPERATIVEHOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD UDITA SINGH[R-1]

57 C.A. No. 7389/2009XVII

PROJECT OFFICER,U.O.C.C.OFM/S.COAL.LTD. M/S ARS ASSOCIATES[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF JHARKHAND . AND ORS. RATAN KUMAR CHOUDHURI

58 C.A. No. 32/2010III-A

SUBEY RAM RISHI MALHOTRA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. RAVINDRA KUMAR[R-4]

59 C.A. No. 4831/2009IX

COMMR.OF CUSTOMS(IMPORT)MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S VODAFONE ESSAR GUJ LTD.(FORMERLY KNOWNS AS KASCELLIMITED)

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedC.A. No.5989-5990/2012IV-A

M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED .ETC M. P. DEVANATH[P-1]

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,BANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8512/2012IV-A

M/S MANGALORE REFINERY ANDPETROCHEMICALS LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-1]

FOR [APPLICATION FOR DE TAGGING] ON IA 4/2016ConnectedSLP(C) No. 17947/2014IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedC.A. No. 7613/2014III

JABIL CIRCUIT INDIA PVT. LTD. PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,PUNE-III B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3347/2015XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BHARTI TELEMEDIA LTD KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.9201-9202/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

M/S. MANGALORE REFINERY ANDPETROCHEMICALS LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[R-1]

Page 175: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7

ConnectedC.A. No. 5376/2016XII-A

M/S. SURANA TELECOM LTD. (NOWKNOWN AS M/S. SURANA TELECOMAND POWER LTD.) THROUGH ITSMANAGING DIRE

RUPESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONER B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 5368/2016XII-A

M/S. BHAGYANAGAR METALS LTD.(NOW KNOWN AS M/S. BHAGYANAGARINDIA LTD.)

RUPESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 5369/2016XII-A

M/S. BHAGYANAGAR METALS LTD.(NOW KNOWN AS M/S. BHAGYANAGARINDIA LTD.) THORUGH ITS MANAGINDIRECTOR

RUPESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE, GOA.

ConnectedC.A. No.11078-11083/2018XVII-A

TEJAS NETWORKS INDIA LTD. GAUTAM NARAYAN

Versus

THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 17260/2019ConnectedC.A. No. 5863/2019XVII-A

M/S UNITED TELECOM LIMITED CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSBANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.110020/2019-STAY APPLICATIONConnectedC.A. No. 5860/2019XVII-A

M/S UNITED TELECOMS LIMITED CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE BANGALORE IFOR ADMISSION and IA No.109914/2019-EX-PARTE STAY

60 C.A. No. 6551/2010XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]VersusM/S. GILLETE INDIA LTD. AND ANR. MANIK KARANJAWALA[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4006/2011X

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BAJAJ AUTO LTD. THR. ITS SENIORMANAGER AND ORS. K J JOHN AND CO, RAHUL KAUSHIK[R-2]

61 C.A. No. 10458/2010IV-A

IQBAL AHMED AND ANR. ANJANA CHANDRASHEKAR[P-1]VersusABDUL SHUKOOR MD. FARMAN[R-1]

62 C.A. No. 1353/2010IV

MOHAN RISHI MALHOTRA[P-1]VersusRATTAN SINGH PREETI SINGH[R-1]

63 C.A. No. 7412/2009IV-A

SYED ALI AHMAD HUSSAINI AND ORS. R. R. DESHPANDEVersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Page 176: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 764 C.A. No.

10509-10510/2013XVI

BIDYUT SARKAR AND ANR. SHIPRA GHOSE

VersusKANCHILAL PAL AND ANR. BIJAN KUMAR GHOSH

65 C.A. No. 1303/2010IV-A

S.V.GURURAJ NANDA KISHOREVersusK.G.SRINATH PRABHU . AND ORS.

66 C.A. No. 7561/2009III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]VersusM/S HINDALCO INDUSTRIESLTD.(FOILS DIVISION) THROUGH ITSDIRECTOR

R. PARTHASARATHY[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 5205/2013III

COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.& CUS.THANE-I B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S PLUSPACK CONTAINERS(P) LTD. M. P. DEVANATH{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No.7552-7555/2013XVII-A

CCE JAIPUR-I B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

S.R. FOIL AND TISSUES LTD.(FORMERLY KNOWN AS R.S. HYGIENEPVT. LTD.) AND ORS.

M. P. DEVANATH

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }67 C.A. No. 8426/2011

XVIIJHARKHAND STATE ELECT.BAORD HIMANSHU SHEKHARVersusM/S.STAN COMMODITIES PVT.LTD. DEVASHISH BHARUKA

68 C.A. No.6033-6035/2009III

COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE ANDCUSTOMS AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S.RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR K. R. SASIPRABHU

ConnectedC.A. No.10825-10826/2010III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE,RAJKOT B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. K. R. SASIPRABHU

ConnectedC.A. No. 5714/2011III

COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.AND SER TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. THR.ITS DIRECTOR K. R. SASIPRABHU

69 C.A. No.6228-6229/2009IX

C.C.E.,MUMBAI, THANE-II B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S.CONWOOD PRE-FAB PVT.LTD. THR.ITS. M.D. AND ANR. E. C. AGRAWALA

70 C.A. No. 8829/2010XVII

HAR NARAYAN TEWARI (D) THR. LRS.AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[P-1]

VersusCANTONMENT BOARD,RAMGARHCANTONM.. AND ORS. MADHURIMA TATIA[R-1], [R-2]

FOR ON IA 70392/2009 FOR ON IA 61341/201071 Crl.A. No. 319/2011

II-ARAM SEVAK MODI SHANKAR DIVATE[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

Page 177: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7

72 C.A. No. 1599/2011IX

PRABHAT GEN.AGENCIES AND ORS..AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA

Versus

THE JAMMU AND KASMIR BANK LTD.AND ORS AND ORS.

RAJENDER PD. SAXENA, VIKAS SINGHJANGRA, PAREKH & CO., MAHESHTHAKUR[R-5]

73 C.A. No.3852-3853/2017XI-A

A.M.PADMINI AMMA AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Versus

V.P.MURALEEDHARAN . AND ORS.VIPIN NAIR[R-1], VINODH KANNA B.,SURESHAN P., SUBHASISH BHOWMICK, P. V.DINESH, ABHIJEET SINHA

74 C.A. No. 3961/2010XVI

TRILOKI NATH SINGH S. K. BHATTACHARYAVersusANIRUDH SINGH (D) THR. LRS . ANDORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

75 C.A. No.6401-6403/2010XIV-A

D.D.A. SAHARYA & CO.

VersusM/S. PRIDE CONSTRUCTIONS JAGDISH KUMAR CHAWLA{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

76 C.A. No.6262-6263/2011XVI

MAURYA REALTORS PVT.LTD. RANI CHHABRA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS

77 C.A. No. 9546/2010IV-A

ASHA JOHN DIVIANATHAN S. NARAIN & CO.VersusVIKRAM MALHOTRA . AND ORS. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR

78 C.A. No. 494-495/2016XVI

SMT. PREMLATA DEVI AND ORS. UJJAL BANERJEE[P-1]Versus

RADHA DEVI(D) BY LRS. AND ORS.T. MAHIPAL[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6],RANJAN MUKHERJEE[R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10],[R-11], [R-12], [R-13], [R-14]

79 C.A. No.3646-3647/2017III-A

HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LIMITED

VersusKRISHNA DULARI (D) THR LRS. ANDORS.

ANURAG KISHORE, GUNNAMVENKATESWARA RAO

80 C.A. No. 9643/2013XII

B. RAJAM AMMAL (D) BY LRS. K. K. MANIVersusLAND COMMISSIONER, CHEPAUK ANDORS. AND ORS. K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-2][GR]

81 C.A. No. 1957/2011XII-A

NASEEM KAHNAM AND ORS. PRABHA SWAMIVersusZAHEDA BEGUM (D) BY LR. AND ORS. ANU GUPTA, S. MAHENDRAN

82 C.A. No. 7923/2013XVI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusCOLLECTOR LAQ BUDGAM COLLECTORAND ORS.

M. SHOEB ALAM, D. MAHESH BABU[R-2],[R-3], [R-6]

83 C.A. No. 3548/2017XIV-A

M/S K.P.MOZIKA R. C. KAUSHIKVersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA, [R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

Page 178: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 3554/2017XIV-A

M/S D.C.JAIN REPRESENTED BY ITSPARTNER SHRI DHARAM CHAND JAIN JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3549/2017XIV-A

M/S. SITARAM ENERGY AND LOGISTICSLTD. R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPN LTD .AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3551/2017XIV-A

M/S D.C.JAIN REPRESENTED BY ITSPARTNER SHRI DHARAM CHAND JAIN R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3552/2017XIV-A

SANJIB KAKATY R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CO. LTD. ANDORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3556/2017XIV-A

M/S MOTLIB ALI SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3560/2017XIV-A

M/S. JAY KUMAR JAIN SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3558/2017XIV-A

M/S D.P.AGARWALA R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3550/2017XIV-A

DIPAK NATH R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3553/2017XIV-A

M/S PURBANCHAL TRANSPORT PROP.SHRI PURANJOY BARUAH R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3555/2017XIV-A

M/S K.C.CHHAWACHARTYA R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3561/2017XIV-A

M/S. SHIV KUMAR AGARWALLA SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3562/2017XIV-A

M/S P.M.AGARWALLA SUMEET LALL

Versus

Page 179: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3564/2017XIV-A

M/S B.K.MOZIKA R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3563/2017XIV-A

M/S DIPAK NATH SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3559/2017XIV-A

M/S. NAGALAND TRANSPORT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CO.LTD . ANDORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3557/2017XIV-A

M/S ECOS ENGINEERS SUMEET LALL

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CO.LTD . ANDORS.

PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3565/2017XIV-A

PURBANCHAL TRANSPORT R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No.3566-3569/2017XIV-A

GHANA GOGOI AND ORS. R. C. KAUSHIK

Versus

OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 3570/2017XIV-A

M/S. N.K.SHARMA AND ORS. R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORP. LTD. ANDORS.

ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA, SHUVODEEPROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3571/2017XIV-A

M/S. NAGALAND TRANSPORT CO-OPSOC.LTD. R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CO.LTD. ANDORS. PRERNA MEHTA, SHUVODEEP ROY[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3572/2017XIV-A

M/S JYOTI PRASAD BORGOHAINTHROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MR. JYOTIPRASAD BORGOHAIN (DEAD) TH. LRS.AND ORS.

ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPN.LTD.AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI, SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7954/2012XIV-A

M/S SITARAM ENERGY AND LOGISTICSLTD. R. C. KAUSHIK[P-1]

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8714/2012XIV-A

M/S J.K JAIN RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

Page 180: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3573/2017XIV-A

M/S BISWAJIT DUTTA RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM FINANCEDEPARTMENT AND ORS.

SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3575/2017XIV-A

M/S. PROSENJIT DUTTA RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. CORPORATE LAW GROUP, SHUVODEEP ROY,KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3574/2017XIV-A

M/S. RANAJIT BHUYAN RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRA MISHRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 3577/2017XIV-A

M/S BRAHMAPUTRA VALLEYCONSTRUCTION AND SUUPLIERSREPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRIMRIDUL KUMAR ADH

RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM FINANCEDEPARTMENT REPRESENTED BY THECOMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TOTHE GOVERNMEN AND ORS.

SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8705/2012XIV-A

M/S DIPAK MECH RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3576/2017XIV-A

M/S BRAHMAPUTRA VALLEY CONST.AND SUPPLIERS RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY, KAMLENDRA MISHRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 3579/2017XIV-A

MRIDUL KUMAR ADHYAPAK RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. ANDORS.

SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8710/2012XIV-A

M/S. R.P. KAKOTI RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, ASSAMAND ORS.

SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3578/2017XIV-A

M/S PURANA AMULAPATTY JUBAKSOMABAI SAMITY LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8693/2012XIV-A

M/S ROBIN BORDOLOI RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4658/2013XIV-A

MOTIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Page 181: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7

ConnectedC.A. No. 9291/2012XIV-A

M/S. P.K.AGARWALA MOHAN PANDEY[P-1]

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8715/2012XIV-A

M/S. D.P AGARWAL MOHAN PANDEY, [P-1]

Versus

O.N.G.C. LTD. AND ORS.KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], B.KRISHNA PRASAD[R-4], [R-5], SHUVODEEPROY[R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4657/2013XIV-A

M/S ALI BROTHERS ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 4659/2013XIV-A

MOTILIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVEDIRECTOR EASTERN REGION ONGCNAZIRA AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 4662/2013XIV-A

MOTLIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD. AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 4661/2013XIV-A

MOTIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 4660/2013XIV-A

MOTIB ALI ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 383/2013XIV-A

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED HRISHIKESH BARUAH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF TAXES, ASSAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 3580/2017XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

M/S ALI BROTHERS AND ORS. AND ORS. ANIL SHRIVASTAV, SHUVODEEP ROY[R-4],[R-5], [R-6]

84 C.A. No. 8821/2011IX

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKARVersusNATIONAL ORGANIC CHEMICALINDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANR.

85 C.A. No. 6222/2014XII

SELVRAJ @ URKAVALAN G. BALAJIVersusALAGAR AND ANR. AND ANR. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

86 C.A. No. 5345/2013III-A

M/S SHEETALA BARA LALAPURCHANDMORI AND ANR. YUGANDHARA PAWAR JHA[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

Page 182: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

ARUN K. SINHA[R-3], TANMAYAAGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-4]

87 C.A. No. 614/2013III-A

M/S PRATAP PHARMACEUTICALS AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. SECRETARYFINANCE CIVIL SECRETARIAT AND ORS. ANKIT GOEL[R-1]

88 C.A. No. 3597/2012XIV-A

KUNTI DEVI BIMAL ROY JADVersusDEEP KUMAR (D) THR. LRS. AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA[R-2], [R-3]

89 C.A. No.8075-8076/2010XII

AMBALAVANAR TRUST BOARDTR.TRUSTEE BHARGAVA V. DESAI[P-1]

VersusK.THIRUNAVUKKARASU MUDALIYARAND ORS.

GAICHANGPOU GANGMEI[R-1][PR], NARESHKUMAR[R-2], T. HARISH KUMAR[R-3]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 15148/2011XII

R. PARTGIBAN AND ANR. RAKESH K. SHARMA

VersusAMBALAVANAR TRUST . AND ORS. GAUTAM NARAYAN[CAVEAT]and IA No.120464/2017-IA FOR BRINGING LRS ON RECORD ALONG WITHAFFIDAVIT and IA No.120470/2017-IA FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING ORIGINALDEATH CERTIFICATE OF PETITIONER NO 2 and IA No.120473/2017-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. and IA No.120477/2017-IA FOR SETTING ASIDE ABATEMENTAGAINST THE DECEASED and IA No.120479/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING(Case is to be listed alongwith CA 8075-8076/2010)

90 Crl.A. No. 10/2011II-B

HARJINDER SINGH SANJAY JAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 371/2013II-B

MANJIT SINGH PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[P-1][AMICUSCURIAE]

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA, [R-1]

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.2787-2788/2016II-B

SATWANT SINGH PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 5355/2016 FOR CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN REFILING ON IA 5359/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 6126/2016

91 C.A. No. 8826/2011IV-A

GURAPPA AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]VersusTHE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITIONOFFICERList before court/bench [in its own turn]

92 C.A. No. 1958/2011XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]VersusANU MEHRA MOHINDER JIT SINGH[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 11426/2012XIV

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SUSHMA SURI

VersusVIKAS JAIN AND ANR.

93 C.A. No.10159-10161/2010III

COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.AHMEDABAD B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S URMIN PRODUCTS P.LTD. . ANDORS. M. P. DEVANATH

Page 183: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 5146/2015XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CHANDIGARH B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S. FLAKES-N-FLAVOURZ M. P. DEVANATH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 959/2019XVII-A

C.CE S.T. ALWAR B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusTARA CHAND NARESH CHAND RAJAT MITTAL[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and IA No.170411/2018-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.170409/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 6938-2019XVII-A

C.C.E AND S.T. JAIPUR I B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S A.M PRODUCTS AJAY CHOUDHARY[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and IA No.41836/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IANo.41835/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedDiary No. 14581-2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND SERVICE TAX MEERUT II B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SOM PAN PRODUCTS PVT. LTD M. P. VINOD[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.84500/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.84501/2019-STAY APPLICATION

94 C.A. No.10180-10181/2010XII-A

RAMANAVARAPU SAMPATH KUMAR G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

VersusPIDIKITI VENKATARATNAM (D) BY LRS. DUA ASSOCIATES[CAVEAT], SATYA MITRA

95 C.A. No. 6515/2012IV

M/S. KARNAL MILK FOODS LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1], PAWANSHREEAGRAWAL[INT]

IA No.67821/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION ONLY IN C.A. NO. 6515 OF 2012and IA No.89861/2017-XTRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6522/2012IV

M/S. BHARAT DAIRY UDYOG AND ANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6520/2012IV

M/S. DAILY FOODS (INDIA) AND ANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA ANIMALHUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6525/2012IV

M/S. KWALITY DAIRY INDIA LTD. ANDANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6530/2012IV

M/S.G.K.DAIRY AND MILK PRODUCTSPVT. LTD AND ANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6523/2012IV

M/S STERLING AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD. M. P. DEVANATH, R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6524/2012IV

M/S MODERN DAIRIES LTD. AND ANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], M. P.DEVANATH[P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

Page 184: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 6528/2012IV

M/S. SMRITI PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. ANDANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6527/2012IV

M/S HARYANA MILK FOODS LTD. ANDANR. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6518/2012IV

M/S GOLDMINE MILKFOOD .LTD. M. P. DEVANATH

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 6519/2012IV

KMG MILK FOOD LTD R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11193/2014IV

M/S MEHSANA DISTRICT COOPERATIVEMILK PRODUCERS UNION LIMITED CHANDRA BHUSHAN PRASAD

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

96 C.A. No. 5593/2012III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR.SECRETARY AND ORS. ANUVRAT SHARMA

Versus

AJIT SINGH AND ORS. RAVINDRA KUMAR, A. VENAYAGAM BALAN,[R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5594/2012III-A

AJIT SINGH AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR.ITS SECRETARY AND ORS.

ANUVRAT SHARMA, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],RAVINDRA KUMAR, [R-5]

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.267/2011 In C.A. No.5593/2012III-A

AJIT SINGH AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

Versus

D.AGGARWAL . AND ORS.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 10262/2016XI

AJEET SINGH AND ORS AND ORS. SHANTANU SAGAR

VersusSTATE OF U.P ANUVRAT SHARMA

97 C.A. No. 8777/2012IX

MAHADEO BALIRAM NAWALKAR(DEAD)THROUGH LRS. NITIN BHARDWAJ[P-1]

Versus

AMBADAS AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

98 C.A. No. 7238/2011XIV-A

PRITHI SINGH AND ANR. EJAZ MAQBOOL[P-1]VersusSURINDER SINGH AND ORS. ASHWANI KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

99 C.A. No. 1392/2011XI-A

MADHAVAN (DEAD)THROUGH LRS. ANDANR. KIRAN BHARDWAJ[P-1]

VersusKANAKAVALLY JOGY SCARIA[R-1]I.A.NO. 2 : APPLICATION FOR VACATING STAY

100 C.A. No. 9485/2013XI-A

VELAYUDHAN NADAR NARAYAN NADAR SUMITA HAZARIKAVersusB.K.THANKAPPAN AND ORS. M. P. VINOD

Page 185: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7101 C.A. No. 10215/2011

IV-ASHIVSHANKARA AND ANR. NARENDRA KUMAR[P-1]VersusH.P.VEDAVYASA CHAR RITESH KUMAR CHOWDHARY[R-1]

102 C.A. No. 6667/2013XII-A

PYLA DEMUDAMMA K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURIVersusCHEEPURUPALLI CHANDRAMMA ANDORS. AND ORS.

M. A. CHINNASAMY[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5]

IA No.89692/2017-EARLY HEARING APPLICATION and103 C.A. No. 886-887/2016

IV-ASHARANABASAPPA LAWYER S KNIT & COVersusNAGENDRA . AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22517/2011IV-A

NAGENDRA . AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusSHARANABASAPPA . AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

104 C.A. No. 6380/2012III

KAPILABEN AMBALAL PATEL HEIRS OFDECEASED AMBALAL P. PATELTHROUGH ATTORNEY RAJESHBHAIRAMANBHAI PAT AND ORS.

GAURAV AGRAWAL[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4],[P-5], [P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10], [P-11],[P-12], [P-13], [P-14], [P-15], [P-16], [P-17],[P-18], [P-19]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT REVENUEDEPARTMENT THROUGH SECRETARYAND ANR.

HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1]

105 C.A. No. 4290/2017XVI

BHUPAL SINGH (D) THR. LRS . ANDORS. T. MAHIPAL

Versus

GANESH AHIR . AND ORS. MANU SHANKER MISHRA, KIRAN KUMARJAIPURIAR

IA No.62636/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.59809/2017-XTRA and IA No.62630/2017-DELETION THE NAME OF RESPONDENT NO, 25 andIA No.62635/2017-IA FOR DELETION THE NAME OF RESP. NO. 73 and IANo.64835/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.64840/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.69892/2017-DISCHARGE OF ADVOCATE ON RECORD and IA No.70060/2017-PERMISSION TOFILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IA No.70062/2017-EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. and IA No.78896/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS and IA No.78898/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

106 C.A. No.12048-12049/2018IV-A

SINGAMASETTY BHAGAVATH GUPTHAAND ANR. ANNAM D. N. RAO

VersusALLAM KARIBASAPPA(D) BY LRS./ALLAMDODDABASAPPA (D) BY LRS. AND ORS.

V. N. RAGHUPATHY, ABDUL AZEEMKALEBUDDE[R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11]

ConnectedC.A. No.12050-12053/2018IV-A

ALLAM KARIBASAPPA(D) BY LRS. ANDORS. .ETC .ETC ABDUL AZEEM KALEBUDDE

VersusSINGAMASETTY VENKATARAMAIAH .AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE

107 Crl.A. No. 627/2012II-C

MUTHU AND ANR. T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR, M. A. CHINNASAMYVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 803/2012II-C

RAMACHANDRAN AND ORS.T. HARISH KUMAR[P-2], T. R. B.SIVAKUMAR[P-1], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],SURESHAN P.[P-6]

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]FOR 10.12.2019 AS DAILY BOARD MATTER

Page 186: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7108 C.A. No.

8220-8221/2012IX

MARMAGOA STEEL LTD. .AND ANR. UMESH KUMAR KHAITAN

VersusTHE STATE OF GOA AND ORS. AND ORS. A. SUBHASHINI

109 Crl.A. No. 818/2014II

NARAYAN DUTT JAIL PETITION[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND STATEOF UTTARAKHAND KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1]

110 C.A. No.7825-7828/2013XII

V.N.A.S.CHANDRAN ZOHEB HOSSAIN[P-1][PR]

Versus

MRS. S. VENILLA AND ORS. AND ORS. ARAVINDH S.[R-1], R. AYYAM PERUMAL[R-2],[R-2], P. V. YOGESWARAN[R-3]

111 Crl.A. No. 1856/2012II-C

RAJRANI ARJUN GARGVersusSTATE OF M.P. (NOW STATE OFCHHATISGARH) PRANAV SACHDEVA[R-1]

112 C.A. No. 2614/2012XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMAVersusTEXMACO LIMITED . AND ORS. KHAITAN & CO.

113 C.A. No. 928/2016IV-A

RAMKALI SONI AND ORS. MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJ[P-1]VersusMUKTA SONI AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[R-1]

114 C.A. No. 2920/2014IV

SATYA PAL SHARMA AND ANR. ROHIT KUMAR SINGHVersusASHA VERMA (D) THR. LRS. PIYUSH SHARMA

115 C.A. No.3405-3407/2012III

COMMR.OF CUS.CEN.EXC.SER.TAXRAJKOT B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusNARSIBHAI KARAMSIBHAI . AND ORS. NIKHIL JAIN[R-1]

116 Crl.A. No.1358-1359/2012II-B

SUBRAN ANKUR S. KULKARNI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH, [R-1]

117 C.A. No.4670-4671/2012XII-A

DASTGIR AHMED VADIVELU DEENADAYALAN[P-1]

VersusKHAIRUNNISA RAHANA AND ANR. SHAKIL AHMED SYED

118 Crl.A. No. 794/2013II-B

BHAG SINGH J. P. DHANDA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

119 C.A. No.7791-7796/2013III

KALUBHAI KHATUBHAI AND ORS. PURVISH JITENDRA MALKAN

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI

120 C.A. No. 7283/2012IV-A

M/S SHREE RENUKA SUGARS LTD. KUSH CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE . AND ANR.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No.5066-5073/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. SHREE RENUKA SUGAR LTD. ETC.ETC.

KUSH CHATURVEDIHARISH PANDEY[INT]

Page 187: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7121 C.A. No. 4750/2013

III-ASTATE OF U.P. AND ANR. SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusTEJPAL SINGH CHAUHAN (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[R-1]

122 C.A. No. 8903/2012XIV-A

BISHAN DEVI (D) TR. LRS. MOHIT D. RAMVersusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ANDORS.

SAHARYA & CO.[CAVEAT], SUSHMA SURI,RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

ConnectedC.A. No. 8904/2012XIV-A

M/S GUPTA MACHINE TOOLS LTD. MOHIT D. RAM

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SAHARYA & CO.[CAVEAT], SUSHMA SURI,RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

ConnectedC.A. No. 5538/2017XIV-A

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ASHWANI KUMAR

VersusHARSH GUPTA . AND ORS. MOHIT D. RAM, ATUL KUMAR

123 C.A. No. 9145/2012XIV-A

NARAYAN SINGH(D) THR LRS. BANKEY BIHARIVersusSH. BHULLE AMBAR QAMARUDDIN

ConnectedSLP(C) No.28238-28243/2012XIV

PREM PRAKASH(D) TR.LRS. PAREKH & CO.

Versus

SARLA SHARMA(D) TR.LRS. AND ORS. P. V. YOGESWARAN[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], AMIT ANAND TIWARI[R-7]

124 Crl.A. No. 1594/2013II

KALAWATI AND ANR. TULIKA PRAKASH[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P. (NOW STATE OFUTTARAKHAND) KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1595/2013II

MANVENDRA SINGH TULIKA PRAKASH[P-1][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND FARRUKH RASHEED[R-1][GR]UID FOR [I A FOR BAIL] ON IA 58393/2017 FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATIONON IA 104936/2018

125 Crl.A. No. 762/2015II

IRFAN S. S. NEHRA[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1][GR]IA No.108849/2017 APPLICATION FOR BAIL IA No.108852/2017-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. IA No.18562/2015 APPLN. U/S 7A OF JUVENILE JUSTICE ACTETC. IA No.18563/2015 EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

126 Crl.A. No. 1348/2014II

NITYA NAND P. K. JAIN[P-1]Versus

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-1]MANJU JETLEY[IMPL]

127 C.A. No. 1966/2013IV-A

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]Versus

B.R MURALIDHAR AND ORS. JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.[R-2], PRITHASRIKUMAR[R-3], LAWYER S KNIT & CO[R-4]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 18942/2013IV-A

M/S CHANDRA SPINNING ANDWEAVING MILLS PVT. LTD. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

Versus

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY, JOSEPH ARISTOTLES.[R-3]

128 Crl.A. No. 257/2013II-A

FIROZ KHAN AKBARKHAN VIPIN KUMAR JAI[P-1][SCLSC]Versus

Page 188: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

129 C.A. No. 6859/2014IV-A

PARVATHI NAIRTHI AND ORS. BINA GUPTAVersusLAXMI NAIRTHY (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.AND ORS. MADHUSMITA BORA[R-1.3], [R-1.2]

130 C.A. No. 3312/2015XII-A

GUNDLURI GOVINDA REDDY SESHATALPA SAI BANDARUVersusMALLU VENKATARAMANA REDDY ANDORS. Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO[CAVEAT]

131 Crl.A. No. 2206/2014II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1]VersusLAXMAN AND ORS.

132 C.A. No.14053-14054/2015XII

S. SHIVAKUMAR PURUSHOTTAM SHARMA TRIPATHI

VersusS. VALLIKANNU @ VALLIAMMAL ANDORS S. MAHENDRAN

133 Crl.A. No. 549/2015II-B

RAJINDER SINGH @ RAVINDER SINGH VANITA MEHTA[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

134 Crl.A. No. 1320/2014II-A

KISHORE SHANKAR PATIL ADITYA SINGHVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDANR. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

135 Crl.A. No. 1529/2014II-A

HARJITSINGH RAJ KAMALVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1539/2014II-A

RAMAKANT RAMRAO DENGALE ANDANR. AMOL NIRMALKUMAR SURYAWANSHI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1530/2014II-A

TUKARAM V. K. SIDHARTHAN

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1541-1544/2014II-A

RAJENDRA SHIVAJIRAO THORAT ANDANR. UDAY B. DUBE

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1531/2014II-A

ABA @ DNYANDEO TULIKA PRAKASH

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1545-1547/2014II-A

ABDUL HAQ FAKIR MOHAMMADKURESHI SAMAR VIJAY SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1534/2014II-A

HARDIK SUDHA GUPTA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1533/2014II-A

BALKISAN SUDHA GUPTA

Versus

Page 189: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1532/2014II-A

RUCHIN SUDHA GUPTA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKARFOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS ON IA 114874/2018

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1538/2014II-A

AJAY AMOL NIRMALKUMAR SURYAWANSHI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1535/2014II-A

VASANT ASTHA SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1536/2014II-A

RAGHUNATH RAMNATH ZOLEKAR KAILAS BAJIRAO AUTADE

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1540/2014II-A

AKASH SAMAR VIJAY SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1548/2014II-A

CHETAN RAJEEV SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No.2161-2164/2014II-A

ASHOK ARVIND S. AVHAD[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.705-706/2015II-A

VILAS SAMAR VIJAY SINGH

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

136 C.A. No.9228-9231/2013XII

LAKSHMI MOHAN AND ANR. SHAKUN SHARMA

VersusM/S. AIRTECH PROJECTS ENGINEERSPVT. LTD. AND ANR.

V. BALACHANDRAN[CAVEAT], M. A.CHINNASAMY[R-2]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.1441-1446/2014XII

M/S AIRTECH PROJECTS ENG. PVT LTD V. BALACHANDRAN, [CAVEAT]

Versus

LAKSHMI MOHAN & ORS SHAKUN SHARMA, M. A. CHINNASAMY[R-3]

ConnectedDiary No. 31322-2018XII

THE CHIEF MANAGER ANDAUTHORIZED OFFICER M. A. CHINNASAMY

VersusM/S AIRTECH PROJECTS ENGINEERSPVT. LTD AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.136132/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

137 C.A. No.5667-5668/2014IV-A

M LAKSHMANA RAO AND ORS. SHAILESH MADIYAL

Versus

Page 190: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7S NARAYANA RAO AND ORS. ABDUL AZEEM KALEBUDDE

138 C.A. No. 455/2015III-A

JAI PRAKASH GAUR K. S. RANAVersusBUDHA DEVI AND ORS. RABIN MAJUMDER, JAYANT KUMAR MEHTA

139 Crl.A. No. 386/2015II

UMED SINGH . AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAINVersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR

140 Crl.A. No. 1304/2014II-C

JAGA ALIAS JAGDISH S. N. BHAT[P-1]VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2423/2014II-C

H.R.GANESH RAJESH SRIVASTAVA

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

141 C.A. No. 35/2019XIV-A

HAROLI BLOCK INDUSTRIESASSOCIATION DHEERAJ NAIR[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], MANSOORALI[R-4], ANIL KATIYAR[R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 36-38/2019XIV-A

HIMACHAL PRADESH VYAPAR MANDAL SIDDHARTH SINGLA[P-1], SANTOSHKRISHNAN[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], ABHAYKUMAR[R-3], ANIL KATIYAR[R-6], MANSOORALI[R-9], [R-10]

ConnectedC.A. No. 39/2019XIV-A

SANYUKT VYAPAR MANDAL RAJAN NARAIN[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], ANILKATIYAR[R-4], MANSOOR ALI[R-5]KUNDAN KUMAR MISHRA[INT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 40/2019XIV-A

RETAILERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA NIHARIKA AHLUWALIA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], MANSOORALI[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 43/2019XIV-A

NATIONAL RESTAURANT ASSOCIATIONOF INDIA KUNAL VERMA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], MANSOORALI[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 44-46/2019XIV-A

INDIAN CONFECTIONERYMANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION DUA ASSOCIATES[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS. VINOD SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 41-42/2019XIV-A

BRANDED EDIBLE OIL MANUFACTURESASSOCIATION AND ANR. DHEERAJ NAIR[P-1]

Versus

SANJEEV KUMAR AND ORS. VINOD SHARMA[R-2], [R-3], [R-9], [R-10], ANILKATIYAR[R-7], [R-11]

142 C.A. No. 15098/2017XIV-A

M/S AGRICULTURE PRODUCE MARKETCOMMITTEE AND ANR. ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1]

VersusMAHESH UDYOG MANAGED BY M/SSHANKAR TRADING CO. LTD AND ANR. ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-1], [R-2]

Page 191: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7143 C.A. No. 6451/2019

XI-AUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusINSTITUTE OF ADVANCE STUDIES NISHE RAJEN SHONKER{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } [ WITHIN FIRST FIVE MATTERS OF THELIST ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6460/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA DEPT. OF REVENUESECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCEAND ANR.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusCHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK PARALLEL{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6452/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFFINANCE SECRETARY AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusST. THOMAS COLLEGE AND ORS. M. T. GEORGE[R-3]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6457/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusP.V MANOJ KUMAR P. GEORGE GIRI{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6456/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusGEORGIAN COLLEGE, ARUVITHURA .AND ORS. M. T. GEORGE

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 6462/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusKERALA PARALLEL COLLEGES ASSO. .AND ANR.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6454/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusK. RAMAKRISHNAN . AND ORS. P. GEORGE GIRI{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6458/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFFINANCE AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusMALAPPURAM DIST. PARALLELCOL.ASSO AND ORS. P. GEORGE GIRI

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 6453/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusST.ANTONYS EDUCATIONAL ANDCHARITABLE SOCIETY P. GEORGE GIRI

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 6455/2019XI-A

UOI AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusTOM T. JOSEPH{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6461/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusK.V. VELAYUDHAN AND ORS.

Page 192: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6469/2019XI-A

UOI AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S KOLLAM DIST. PARALLEL COLLEGEASSOCIATION AND ANR.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6459/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusMAHATAMA COLLEGE AND ANR.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6463/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusTHE KASARAGOD DIST. PARALLELCOLLEGE ASSOCIATION AND ANR.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6695/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

PERAYAM SUBASH AND ORS. JAMES P. THOMAS[R-9], [R-10], [R-14], [R-17],[R-33], [R-40], [R-42], [R-48]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 6468/2019XI-A

SUPERINT.OF C.E.KANHANGAD RANGE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusCALICUT EDU.TRUST KOZHODIE EMASCOMPLEX{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6471/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusTOMY M.A. AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6467/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusWOMENS ACADEMY{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6465/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusKANNUR DISTRICT PARELLEL COLLGEASSOCIATION . AND ANR.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6464/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusTHE PALAKKAD COOPERATIVE ARTSAND ANR. M. T. GEORGE

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 6466/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusCHINMAYA MISSION COLLEGE SANAND RAMAKRISHNAN{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

Page 193: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No. 6470/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusNAJEEB K AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6472/2019XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusTHE PRABHATH COLLEGE TRUST . ANDANR. E. M. S. ANAM

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6473/2019XI-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISESERVICE TAX AND CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S TANDEM INTEGRATED SERVICES A. KARTHIK[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No.8386-8391/2019XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND SERVICE TAX CHANDIGARH II B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SWIFT FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCHAND EDUCATION SOCIETY{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } IA No.148743/2019-CONDONATION OFDELAY IN FILING and IA No.148742/2019-STAY APPLICATION

144 C.A. No.6325-6326/2015XII-A

AKELLA LALITHA SURENDER KUMAR GUPTA

VersusKONDA HANUMANTHA RAO AND ANR.

145 C.A. No. 1986/2019IV

RAM PIARI(D)THR. LRS AND ANR. VIVEK GUPTAVersusSUKHDEVI(D)THR. HER LRS AND ORS. VINEET BHAGAT{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } [ PART-HEARD BY : HON. A.M.KHANWILKAR AND HON. DINESH MAHESHWARI, JJ. ]

146 Crl.A. No. 531/2017II-A

SAMABAI BHANUDAS KSHRISAGAR DR.RAJEEV SHARMA[P-1]VersusTUKARAM GANGARAM KSHIRSAGARAND ANR.

GEETHA KOVILAN[R-1], NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-3]

147 Crl.A. No. 521/2015II-A

SURESH DNYANDEO KATE ATUL BABASAHEB DAKHVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

148 C.A. No. 9253/2017III

MAHARASHTRA DISTILLERIES LTD(NOW KNOWN AS UNITED SPIRITSLIMITED)

KHAITAN & CO.

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRATHROUGH ITS SECRETARY SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

149 C.A. No. 9725/2014IV-A

M/S. MARUTI ISPAT AND ENERGY PVTLTD.Versus

THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-1]VIKAS MEHTA[INT], RANJAN KUMAR[P-1],[INT], E. C. AGRAWALA[INT]

IA No.140166/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION and IA No.21230/2018-INTERVENTION APPLICATION

ConnectedC.A. No.10355-10357/2014IV-A

M/S COASTAL ENERGY PVT LTD R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

Versus

Page 194: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAXGUNTUR AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10497/2014IV-A

DAVANGERE SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED MEERA MATHUR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 523/2015IV-A

HIRANYAKESHI SAHAKARI SAKKAREKARKHANE NIYAMIT M. P. DEVANATH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,MANGLORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 9271/2014IV-A

M/S ZUARI CEMENT LIMITED MEERA MATHUR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAXGUNTUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 10299/2014IV-A

DECCAN CEMENTS LTD. RUPESH KUMAR

VersusCOMMIISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAXGUNTUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 429/2015IV-A

M/S AGARWAL COAL CORPORATION PVTLTD. PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSAND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 7/2015IV-A

TOPWORTH STEEL AND POWERPVT.LTD PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusCOMMISIONER OF CUSTOMS,VISHAKAPATNAM AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 430-432/2015IV-A

M/S SWASTIK COAL CORP. PVT LTD PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 11920/2014IV-A

M/S COASTAL ENERGY PVT LTD R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3131/2015IV-A

M/S. KESORAM INDUSTRIES LTD. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX,GUNTUR

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3769/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSMANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S DEVANGERE SUGAR COMPANYLTD. MEERA MATHUR

ConnectedC.A. No.5999-6000/2015III

M/S. WEST COAST PAPER MILLS LTD. GAUTAM NARAYAN

Versus

Page 195: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSCENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX

ConnectedC.A. No.5722-5723/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,MANGALORE CUSETC. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSWASTIK COAL CORPORATION PVT.LTD. ETC. PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 2638/2016IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S COASTAL ENERGY PVT. LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5877/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,MANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S COASTAL ENERGY PVT. LTD. M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedC.A. No.8916-8917/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS,CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

ZUARI CEMENT LTD AND ANR. MEERA MATHUR[R-1], CHARANYALAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3118/2016IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSVIJAYAWADA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusSHREE JAYAJOTHI CEMENTS LTD RAJESH KUMAR-I[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4976/2016IV-A

ADANI ENTERPRISES LTD. HARISH PANDEY

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDSERVICE TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedDiary No. 9241-2019XVII-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSKANDLA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S ORIENT ABRASIVES LTD.IA No.78833/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.78836/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.78835/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.78834/2019-CONDONATION OFDELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 12289-2019XVII-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMSJAMNAGAR (PREV) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S AQUAGEL CHEMICALS PVT. LTD.IA No.73729/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTand IA No.73728/2019-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.73727/2019-CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

150 C.A. No. 10292/2014IV-A

VIBGYOR SCHOOL, N S PALYA AND ORS. M. RAMBABU AND CO.VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. VIPIN KUMAR JAI, V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No. 10293/2014IV-A

CHRIST SCHOOL (ICSE) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. VIPIN KUMAR JAI

ConnectedC.A. No. 10294/2014IV-A

ST. MIRAS SCHOOL PRABHA SWAMI

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. VIPIN KUMAR JAI, V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Page 196: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedSLP(C) No.21715-21717/2018III

RAJKOT KELAVANI SAMAJ (ST. MARYENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL MORBI )THROUGH PRINCIPAL DAVIS MANJALY

GAUTAM TALUKDAR

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22396/2018III

AYYAPPA EDUCATION CENTRE(SABARIVIDYALAYA) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA116654/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155917/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No.23243-23244/2018III

JAMNAGAR EDUCATIONAL ANDCHARITABLE TRUST JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA120296/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155937/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23035/2018III

STELLA MARIS TRUST JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESON IA 156008/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No.22368-22370/2018III

MAR GREGORIOS ORTHODOX SYRIANCHURCH BARODA JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA116486/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155959/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23227/2018III

GUJARAT EDUCATION BOARD OFCATHOLIC INSTITUTIONS JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESON IA 155870/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23037/2018III

BASIL TRUST BARODA JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118805/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155895/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No.23173-23174/2018III

SACHIDANANAD VIDYALAYA TRUST JOSE ABRAHAM

Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[CAVEAT], [R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA119734/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155908/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30083-2018III

ASHADHAMSEVA MANDAL VAPI (ST.XAVIERS SCHOOL KHILODA) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]

Page 197: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP ON IA 118455/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 118459/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30108-2018III

MATRU JYOTHI EDUCATIONALTRUST(SCHOOL JAM KAMABALIYA) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP ON IA 118749/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 118750/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30117-2018III

ST. ANNES HIGH SCHOOL TRUST (STANNES SCHOOL NADIAD) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 116907/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA116908/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30122-2018III

THE PROVINCIAL SOCIETY OF THECONGREGATION OF JESUS AND MARY(CONVENT OF JESUS AND MARY GIRLSSCHOOL

JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 118759/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118760/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30160-2018III

AUXILIUM SOCIETY (AUXILIUMCONVENT SCHOOL) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 118761/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118762/2018 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 155970/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30164-2018III

DAKOR SALESIAN SOCIETY (DONBOSCO ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL) JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP ON IA 118499/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 118500/2018

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22983/2018III

GUJARAT EDUCATION BOARD OFCATHOLIC INSTITUTIONS AND ANR. JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA118414/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 30413-2018III

DIVINE CHILD SEVA KENDRA AND ORS. JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]FOR FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 119622/2018 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA119627/2018

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 581/2019X

GUJARAT EDUCATION BOARD OFCATHOLIC INSTITUTIONS JOSE ABRAHAM

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION

151 Crl.A. No. 2555/2014II-C

ATMARAM NITIN BHARDWAJ[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1][GR]

Page 198: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7

152 C.A. No. 6282/2015XII

THE STATE INDUSTRIES PROMOTIONCORP. OF TAMIL NADU LTD SUDARSH MENON

VersusT. H. INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD ANDANR. P. S. SUDHEER, GARIMA PRASHAD

153 Crl.A. No. 1265/2015II

RAM BETI C. K. RAI[P-1]VersusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH GARVESH KABRA[R-1]

154 Crl.A. No. 1962/2017II-A

M/S. KITPLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED RABIN MAJUMDER[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1], AMIT K. NAIN[R-2],ASHISH RANA[R-3]

155 Crl.A. No. 1683/2017II-C

SURESHA AND ORS. DEVASA & CO.[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10], [P-11], [P-12]

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. SHUBHRANSHU PADHI, [R-1], MUKESHKUMAR MARORIA[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1684/2017II-C

PRABHUSWAMY RAJESH MAHALE

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1], JOSEPHARISTOTLE S., , MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-2]

156 C.A. No. 372/2018IV

M/S. ALPHA G. CORP. DEVELOPMENTPVT. LTD. SUPRIYA JUNEJA[P-1]

VersusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION AMRITSARAND ORS. P. N. PURI[R-1]

157 C.A. No.5094-5098/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX, DAMAN B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. WELLKNOWN SYNTHETICS PVT.LTD. THROUGH ITS GENERALMANAGER

RAHUL GUPTA[R-2], [R-3], [R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 820-823/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CUSTOMS & SRVICE TAX, VAPI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S BHILOSA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. .AND ORS. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-1]

FOR FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 9/2017 FOR PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 88605/2018

ConnectedC.A. No.9214-9235/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,SURAT - I, (GUJRAT) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. GARDEN SILK MILLS LTD. ANDORS. PAREKH & CO.

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 45/2015

ConnectedC.A. No. 7240/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISECUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusGARDEN SILK MILLS LTD. THROUGHITS CHAIRMAN MANAGING DIRECTOR PAREKH & CO.

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2015

Page 199: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No.1111-1117/2016III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

M/S. BEEKALYON SYNTHERICS PVT.LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR

RAHUL GUPTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 15/2016

158 C.A. No.9269-9275/2017III

STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. ETC. HEMANTIKA WAHI

VersusB.G. EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTIONINDIA LIMITED AND ORS. ETC. ANDORS.

K. R. SASIPRABHU[CAVEAT], HARISHPANDEY[CAVEAT], JURIS CORP.[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9264/2017III

RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD THRU ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR K. R. SASIPRABHU, [CAVEAT]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI

ConnectedC.A. No.9265-9268/2017III

B.G. EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTIONINDIA LTD. HARISH PANDEY

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. ETC. ETC.AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI

ConnectedC.A. No. 11114/2017III

THE STATE OF GUJARAT HEMANTIKA WAHI

VersusOIL AND NATURAL GAS COMMISSIONAND ANR. JURIS CORP.[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.51744/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

159 Crl.A. No. 1418/2015II-A

TALASHO DEVI @ TARAWATI DEVI SUBHRO SANYALVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJI

160 C.A. No. 14622/2015XVI

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[P-1]VersusRAM GOPAL AGARWALA . AND ORS. DHEERAJ NAIR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 14623/2015XVI

THE STATE OF BENGAL AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[P-1]

VersusBRC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PVT.LTD. . AND ANR. APARNA SINHA[R-1]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 39165/2019161 Crl.A. No. 1067/2017

IIHANSRAJ LAXMIDAS MERCHANT P. V. DINESH[P-1]VersusRAJESH RATHI AND ORS. PRERNA MEHTA[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-2]

162 C.A. No. 720-722/2019XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. IRSHAD AHMADVersusJ.K. TYRE AND INDUSTRIES LIMITEDFORMERLY KNOWN AS J.K. INDUSTRIESLIMITED

G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

163 C.A. No.23986-23987/2017IV

SUSHIL KUMAR AJAY KUMAR SINGH

VersusTAPTESH KAUR @ TAAPTESH KAURAND ANR. SHIV SAGAR TIWARI

Page 200: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7

164 Crl.A. No. 588/2016II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[P-1]

VersusSALMAN SALIM KHAN D.S.K. LEGAL[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 589/2016II-A

FIROZ SHAIKH AND ANR. VIPIN NAIR

VersusSALMAN SALIM KHAN . AND ANR. D.S.K. LEGAL

ConnectedW.P.(Crl.) No. 48/2016PIL-W

PT. PARMANAND KATARA PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

165 Crl.A. No. 529/2016II-B

MAKVANA DAMJIBHAI LAKHMANBHAI RAUF RAHIMVersusSTATE OF GUJARAT HEMANTIKA WAHI{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } REF; HON'BLE COURT ORDER DATED22.02.2019 THE CRIMINAL APPEAL BE POSTED FOR FINAL HEARING IN THETHIRD WEEK OF NOVEMBER, 2019.

166 C.A. No. 10020/2017IV

SEEMA DAHIYA AND ANR. GAUR & NEHRA LAW FIRM[P-1]Versus

COL. DHARAMPAL (RETD.) AND ANR. MUKUL KUMAR[R-1][PR], HARSH V.SURANA[R-2][PR]

and IA No.128745/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.128746/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.129743/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FOR ON IA 1/2016 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 2/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T. ON IA 3/2017

167 C.A. No. 5957/2016XVI

STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. SUNIL KUMAR JAINVersusCOMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE,CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAXBHUBANESWAR II

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

168 Crl.A. No. 230/2017II-A

KAMLESH PRASAD FARRUKH RASHEED[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. SANTOSH KUMAR - I[R-1], DEBASISMISRA[R-2]

and IA No.88981/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

169 C.A. No. 1317/2017III-A

M/S. GANGOTRI SAHKARI AVAS SAMITILTD. VINAY GARG

VersusM/S. PUSHPA SAHKARI AVAS SAMITILTD. SANJAY KUMAR SINGH

170 Crl.A. No. 901/2016II-B

MAINUDDIN GAZI SHEKHAR KUMAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

171 C.A. No. 8202/2016XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CHENNAI IV B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSANTEL COMMUNICATION PVT LTDTHR. FINANCIAL ADVISOR

ConnectedDiary No. 9270-2017XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,CHENNAI-IV B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusSANTEL INDUSTRIESIA No.42446/2017-STAY APPLICATION

172 C.A. No. 20903/2017XIV-A

MANOJ CHATURVEDIVersus

Page 201: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7SANGEETA CHATURVEDI SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

173 Crl.A. No.592-593/2017II-C

SRI M. H. SURESHA K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1]

174 C.A. No.10624-10625/2017IV-A

SRINIVASAIAH, (D) BY LRS AND ORS. RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA

VersusA C PUTTASWAMY (DEAD) BY LRS ANDORS. VAIJAYANTHI GIRISH

175 Crl.A. No. 60-63/2017II-A

HIRA MANDAL ANIL K. CHOPRA[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1], AJAY KUMARTALESARA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

176 Crl.A. No. 281/2017II

KAILASH CHANDRA M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1][GR]

177 C.A. No. 1344/2017XVI

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. NIRANJANA SINGH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusINSTAKART SERVICES PRIVATELIMITED RONY OOMMEN JOHN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1346/2017XVI

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. NIRANJANA SINGH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusWS RETAIL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5379/2017III

M/S AMAZON SELLER SERVICES PVT.LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 15149/2017IV-A

M/S. INSTAKART SERVICES PVT. LTD. RONY OOMMEN JOHN[P-1], [P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDANR. SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1], [R-2]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

178 C.A. No. 6077/2018XIV-A

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPALCORPORATION THROUGH ITSCOMMISSIONER

VANDANA SEHGAL

VersusBHARAT BHUSHAN JAIN ADVOCATE ABHAY KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6078/2018XIV-A

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPALCORPORATION VANDANA SEHGAL

VersusBHARAT BHUSHAN JAIN ABHAY KUMAR

179 C.A. No. 3918/2017IV

ATMA RAM (DECEASED) THR LEGALREP. DHARMPAL GOYAL ASHOK PANIGRAHI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-1][GR], BIRENDRAKUMAR MISHRA[R-2][GR], RAM NARESHYADAV[R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8]

180 C.A. No. 19652/2017XIV-A

PIONEER OVERSEAS CORPORATION ADITYA VERMAVersusKAVERI SEED COMPANY LIMITED ANDOTHERS RANJAN KUMAR PANDEY[CAVEAT]

Page 202: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No.19653-19654/2017XIV-A

REGISTRAR OF PLANT VARIETIES ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1], [P-2]

VersusPRABHAT AGRI BIOTECH LIMITED ANDORS.

RANJAN KUMAR PANDEY[CAVEAT], ABHAYKUMAR[R-3]

IA No.53223/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.53227/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

181 C.A. No. 7269/2018XVI-A

THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR M. SHOEB ALAMVersusTHE JAMMU AND KASHMIR STATEACCOUNTABILITY COMMISSION ANDORS.

SATYA MITRA[R-1], [R-2]

182 C.A. No. 3021/2019XV

BRIJ BIHARI AGARWAL (BHAGAT) ANDANR. SHOBHA GUPTA

VersusSUNIL CHAND KOTHARI B. S. BANTHIA[R-1]

183 C.A. No. 454/2018III

NABABAI DEVCHAND SHINDE AND ORS. RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSUREVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

184 Crl.A. No. 660/2019II-A

ARUN KUMAR VERMA AND ANR. SAMEER SHRIVASTAVAVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDANR.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1], LIZ MATHEW[R-2]

185 C.A. No. 10329/2018III

INDUS TOWER LTD. NEERAJ SHEKHARVersus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-2], [R-5], HEMANTIKAWAHI[R-1], [R-3], [R-4]

186 C.A. No. 2374/2019III

M/S FEDERAL BANK PALLAVI PRATAPVersus

JYOTI H. MEHTA AND ORS.S. R. SETIA[CAVEAT], ANURADHAMUTATKAR[R-4], ARVIND KUMARTEWARI[R-6], K J JOHN AND CO[R-7]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION and IA No.36551/2019-EX-PARTE STAYTO BE TAKEN UP AFTER CA NO. 3241/2019

ConnectedC.A. No. 3291/2019III

KISHORE J JANANI ANURADHA MUTATKAR[P-1]

VersusJYOTI H. MEHTA AND ORS. S. R. SETIA[R-1], ARVIND KUMAR TEWARI[R-6]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 6078/2019III

JYOTI H MEHTA AND ORS. S. R. SETIA[P-1]

Versus

KISHORE J. JANANI AND ORS.ANURADHA MUTATKAR[R-1], PALLAVIPRATAP[R-2], ARVIND KUMAR TEWARI[R-4], KJ JOHN AND CO[R-5]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION and IA No.110798/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL and IA No.110800/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING and IA No.110801/2019-PERMISSION TOFILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES

187 Crl.A. No. 703/2019II-A

SADHU DAS RAKESH KUMARVersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND TAPESH KUMAR SINGH[R-1]

188 C.A. No. 1161/2006IV

RAN SINGH (D) BY LRS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersusKESHAR BAI (D) BY LRS. AND ORS. SHALU SHARMAMATTER RESTORED VIDE ORDER DATED 23.08.2019 PASSED IN M.A. NO.1673/2019.

Page 203: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7189 Crl.A. No. 1587/2008

IIBIRBAL NATH P. D. SHARMAVersus

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR, RISHI MATOLIYA[R-3][PR],[R-4][PR], [R-5][PR], [R-6][PR], [R-7][PR]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1588/2008II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[P-1]

VersusJETH NATH @ JETHU NATH . AND ORS.

190 C.A. No. 8308/2010XI-A

VOLTAS LIMITED K J JOHN AND CO[P-1]VersusSTATE OF ORISSA KIRTI RENU MISHRA[R-1]

191 Crl.A. No. 1894/2010II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMARVersus

MEH RAM AND ORS. SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA[R-1][PR],[R-2][PR], [R-4][PR], [R-5][PR]

192 C.A. No. 7157/2008XVII-A

M/S.L.R.BROTHERS,INDO FLORA LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR RUPESH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusCOMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

193 C.A. No. 1854/2009XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ,MIN.OF FIN.AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusSAMALPATHI POWER COMPANY P LTD.AND ORS. AND ORS.

E. C. AGRAWALA[R-1], VINODH KANNA B.[R-2],[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No.1859-1860/2009XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusGMR POWER CORP. (P) LTD. AND ORS.ASSOCIATE VICE PRESIDENT I.VENKAARAMANA AND ORS.

E. C. AGRAWALA, B. BALAJI

ConnectedC.A. No. 1858/2009XII

THE DY. COMM. OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusMADURAI POWER CORP. P. LTD. ANDORS. DIVISIONAL ENGINEER AND ORS.

E. C. AGRAWALA[R-1], B. BALAJI[R-1], VINODHKANNA B.[R-2], [R-3]

194 Crl.A. No. 1033/2013II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]Versus

RAJDHAR SINGH . AND ORS. MERUSAGAR SAMANTARAY[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4]

195 Crl.A. No. 2151/2010II-A

SOU. DHONDABAI BALKRISHNACHINCHANE RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

196 C.A. No.2360-2376/2009XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S D.L.STEELS THROUGH ITSMANAGER RUPESH KUMAR

197 C.A. No.8051-8054/2009X

PERFETTI VAN MELLE INDIA PVT.LTD. DUA ASSOCIATES

VersusCOMMISSIONER, TRADETAX/COMMERCIAL TAX JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA

198 C.A. No. 1000/2012XI-A

RAMAN NAMBOODIRI E. M. S. ANAMVersus

Page 204: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 7NEELI ANTHARJANAM (DEAD) THR.LRS. . AND ORS. K. RAJEEV

199 C.A. No. 4443/2010XI-A

M/S.TRAVANCORE TITANIUMPRODUCTS LTD. E. M. S. ANAM

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIALTAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM R. SATHISH, C. K. SASI

200 C.A. No.9212-9213/2012XIV-A

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDANR.

ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1], VARINDER KUMARSHARMA[P-2]

VersusTHE RECOVERY OFFICER, DEBTRECOVERY TRIBUNAL AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No.8980-8981/2012XIV-A

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS. PROMILA[P-1]

VersusM/S A. J. INFRASTRUCTURES PVT. LTD.AND ANR.

A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[R-1], SANJAYKAPUR[R-2]

201 C.A. No. 5982/2009XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S JAGATPAL PREM CHAND LTD. REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR R. GOPALAKRISHNAN[R-1]

202 C.A. No.3132-3137/2009XVII-A

COMMR.OF CEN.EXCISE,ALLAHABAD B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S VARANASI BOTTLING CO. PVT.LTD.AND ORS. M. P. DEVANATH

203 C.A. No. 2944/2009XVII-A

COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE.DELHI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]VersusM/S VISHAL BEVERAGES(P) LTD. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-1]

204 C.A. No.6387-6391/2011XII

UNION OF INDIA ANIL KATIYAR[P-1][GR]

VersusM/S SUN PHARMACEUTICAL IND. LTD. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1]

205 C.A. No. 8620/2011XIV-A

M/S ANKIT EXIM PVT.LTD. PRAVEEN SWARUPVersusUNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OFREVENUE AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

206 C.A. No. 4432/2009III

MANISHA PHARMO PLAST PVT.LTD.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTORAND ANR.

ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

NEW DELHI06-12-2019 17:57:26

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 205: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 33 OF 2019 FROM : 10-12-2019 To 12-12-2019

COURT NO. : 8HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGIREGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate

1 Crl.A. No.142-144/2008II-C

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1]

Versus

MOHAMMED SAFI AND ORS.A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[R-1], REVATHYRAGHAVAN[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-6], [R-8],ANZU. K. VARKEY[R-7]

RETAIN ITS POSITION2 Crl.A. No. 1041/2007

II-CSHIVARAJ . AND ANR. SUPREETA SHARANAGOUDA, [P-1], [P-2]Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1], JOSEPHARISTOTLE S.[R-1]

3 Crl.A. No.1616-1618/2008II

JAYASREE DESAI AND ANR. YOGINDER HANDOO[P-1]

Versus

SANJAY MUTHA AND ORS. SUDHA GUPTA[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-1], [R-2]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 6705/2013XVII-A

DR. P. SAMPATH KUMAR YOGINDER HANDOO

VersusMR. SANJAY MUTHA . AND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[CAVEAT]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 4626/2013XVII-A

JAYASHREE DESAI YOGINDER HANDOO

VersusSANJAY MUTHA . AND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[CAVEAT]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 5226/2013XVII-A

SANJAY MUTHA . AND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI, [CAVEAT]

VersusDR. JAYASHREE DESAI . AND ORS. YOGINDER HANDOO{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

4 C.A. No. 2646/2009XVII-A

BAR OF INDIAN LAWYERS THROUGHITS PRESIDENT JASBIR SIGH MALIK DAYA KRISHAN SHARMA

VersusD.K.GANDHI PS NATIONAL INSTITUTEOF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES ANDANR.

RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON

ConnectedC.A. No. 2647/2009XVII-A

DELHI HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATIONTHROUGH ITS PRESIDENT MOHINDER JIT SINGH[P-1]

Versus

Page 206: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8D.K.GANDHI PS NATIONAL INSTITUTEOF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES ANDANR.

RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON

ConnectedC.A. No. 2648/2009XVII-A

BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA THROUGH BYITS SECRETARY MR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD

VersusD.K.GANDHI . PS NATIONAL INSTITUTEOF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES ANDANR.

DAYA KRISHAN SHARMA, RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON

ConnectedC.A. No. 2649/2009XVII-A

M.MATHIAS DAYA KRISHAN SHARMA

VersusD.K.GANDHI PS NATIONAL INSTITUTEOF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON

ConnectedC.A. No. 6959/2011XVII-A

PANDIT DNYANDEV UBALE ASHOK KUMAR SINGH

VersusDNYANESHWAR RAMHARI PHOPLE

ConnectedC.A. No. 8214/2017XVII-A

A. RAGHAVENDRA ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

VersusM. RAJAMANNAR N. ANNAPOORANI

5 C.A. No.3180-3182/2016III

K.J.SOMAIYA MEDICAL COL. AND ANR. PAREKH & CO.

Versus

MAHARASHTRA UNIV.OF HEALTH SC..AND ORS.

AMIT KUMAR, SARLA CHANDRA, NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR, GAURAVAGRAWAL

ConnectedC.A. No.3183-3185/2016III

K.J.SOMAIYA MED.COLLEGE AND ANR. PAREKH & CO.

Versus

MAHARASHTRA UNIV.OF HEALTH SC..AND ORS.

GAURAV AGRAWAL, SARLA CHANDRA,NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,GOPAL SINGH, GAURAV SHARMA

6 C.A. No.9981-9982/2011IV

MAHANT GURMUKH SINGH(D) BY LRS. ROHIT KUMAR SINGH

VersusSHROMANI GURDWARAPRABND.COMMITT.

KAMALDEEP GULATIJYOTI MENDIRATTA[INT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9983/2011IV

MAHANT GURMUKH SINGH (D) TR.LRS. JYOTI MENDIRATTA

VersusSHIROMANI GURDWARA PRABANDAKCOMMIT. KAMALDEEP GULATI

7 C.A. No. 6991/2015XII

THE DIRECTOR OF TEACHERSTRAINING RESEARCH EDUCATION ANDANR.

K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[P-1][GR]

VersusO.M.JESSYMOL V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6992/2015XII

A.S.KUPPUSAMY RAKESH K. SHARMA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU . AND ORS. K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1][GR]

8 C.A. No. 2297/2011XVI

M/S.K.B.TEA PRODUCT PVT.LTD. ANDANR. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,SILIGURI .AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

Page 207: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8AS PER ROP DATED 15.10.2019, LIST AFTER TWO WEEKS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 2302/2011XVI

M/S LOCHAN TEA LTD. AND ANR. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

Versus

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER . AND ORS. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2301/2011XVI

M/S.DALMIA ENTERPRIESES AND ANR. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

Versus

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER . AND ORS. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2303/2011XVI

M/S M.B.TEA AND ALLIED PRODUCTSPVT. LTD. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,SILIGURI .AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2305/2011XVI

M/S.SHIB SHAKTI TEA PACKETERS ANDANR. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,SILIGURI .AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2298/2011XVI

M/S MODANWAL TEA CENTRE ANDANR. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusASSISTANT COMMR.OF COMMERCIALTAX . AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2300/2011XVI

M/S.M.S.TEA .AND AGRO CO. AND ANR. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,SILIGURI .AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2299/2011XVI

MADHU BANSAL AND ANR. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,SILLIGURI .AND ORS.

PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1], MADHUMITABHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2304/2011XVI

M/S VIKASH PACKERS AND EXPORTSAND ANR. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

Versus

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER . AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1], MADHUMITABHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

9 C.A. No. 10639/2010XVI

AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES[P-1]VersusDILIP BHUSHAN AND ORS. SARLA CHANDRA[R-1], SUSHMA SURI[R-1]

10 C.A. No. 1949/2010XI-A

KANIKA DEY RUTWIK PANDA[P-1]Versus

TRUPTIRANI PARIDA AND ORS. SUNIL KUMAR JAIN[R-1], SIBO SANKARMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-3], K. L. JANJANI[R-4]

11 C.A. No. 4203/2010XIV-A

MUNICIPAL CORPN OF DELHI RAKESH KUMAR-IVersusM/S. KAY KAY CORPN.

12 C.A. No. 4064/2010IX

RAMCHANDRA SAKHARAMGALANDE(D)TR.LRS.&OR ANAGHA S. DESAI

VersusSITARAM DNYANU GALANDE(D)TR.LRS.. AND ORS. K. N. RAI

Page 208: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 813 C.A. No.

8904-8907/2010IV

M/S.SHIVALI ENTERPRISES ETC. RISHI MALHOTRA

Versus

GODAWARI (D) THR.LRS. AND ORS. ETC.M. A. CHINNASAMY, AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA,ABHISHEK ATREY, [R-1.4], [R-1.6], A.VENAYAGAM BALAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 8908/2010IV

AJIT SINGH AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

VersusM/S SHIVALI ENTERPRISES

14 C.A. No.6182-6183/2009XIV-A

BAINI PRASAD (D) THR. LRS. (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[P-1]

VersusDURGA DEVI RAJESH SRIVASTAVA[R-1]

15 C.A. No. 3603/2011XI-A

T. P. SARASA HIMINDER LAL[P-1]Versus

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. G. PRAKASH[R-1], BIJU P RAMAN[R-1],ASHWANI BHARDWAJ[R-1]

16 C.A. No. 4247/2009XII-A

N.RAVINDRA MURTHY ANJANI AIYAGARIVersus

VEERBHADRA SWAMY TEMPLE ANDORS.

V. N. RAGHUPATHY, [R-4][PR], GUNTURPRABHAKAR, VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES[R-2], [R-3]

and IA No.89629/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS17 C.A. No. 2003/2009

XIV-AHAVALDAR VED PRAKASH SANGWAN JAGDEV SINGH MANHASVersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFDEFENCE THROUGH THE SECRETARYAND ANR.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

18 C.A. No. 4645/2011XII

S.RAMASWAMY S. R. SETIAVersusMANAGEMENT OF CANARA BANK . ANDORS. MADHU SIKRI

19 C.A. No. 6144/2010XV

M/S PEACOCK INDUSTRIES LTD. PRATIBHA JAINVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

20 C.A. No. 5178/2008IV-A

ACC LTD. GAGRAT AND CO[P-1]VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,BALGAUM-I B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

21 C.A. No. 6378/2009IV

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusMAJOR (MRS.) DIMPLE SINGLA ASHOK K. MAHAJAN

22 C.A. No.7138-7147/2009IX

COMMR.OF CUSTOMS(EXPORTS)NHEVASHEVA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusBAKUL PAREKH ETC. ETC.

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.2522/2010IX

THE UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

A.S. VASAN AND SONS (BOMBAY) K. L. JANJANI

23 C.A. No. 6234/2009XVI

COMMR.OF COMMERCIAL TAXES ANDORS. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[P-1]

VersusM/S ESKAY STEEL FABRICATORS ANDANR. SOUMYA DUTTA[R-1], [R-2]

Page 209: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8

24 C.A. No. 8225/2009IX

CHOWGULE & COMPANY LTD. PAREKH & CO.VersusASSISTANT DIRECTOR GEN.OFFOREN.TRD.&ORS ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

25 C.A. No. 3110/2011X

COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE,MEERUT1 ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]

VersusM/S RISHABH VALVELEEN (P) LTD. THR.ITS DIRECTOR RAJINDER MATHUR

ConnectedC.A. No. 3109/2011X

COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE,MEERUT SHREEKANT N. TERDAL

VersusM/S RISHABH VALVELEEN(P) LTD.DIRECTOR RAJINDER MATHUR

26 C.A. No.6471-6472/2008III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. BHAGAT EXPORTS AND ANR. ANDANR. RAHUL NARAYAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 6473/2008III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE

VersusM/S. KIRAN SYNTEX LTD. RAHUL NARAYAN

27 Crl.A. No. 2178/2009II-B

RAJBIR K. K. MOHANVersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } List the matter on 04.12.2019. (ref. : R/Pdated 27.11.2019)

28 C.A. No. 266-268/2010XVII-A

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KHADIEVAM GRAMODHYOG COMMISSIONAND ORS.

CHANDRA PRAKASH

VersusABDUL MATIN AND ORS. MUSHTAQ AHMAD

29 Crl.A. No. 1721/2009II

KESHAV KUMAR GUPTA SONAL JAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANKIT GOEL[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

30 Crl.A. No. 1096/2009II-B

DILBAGH SINGH @ BAGHA UGRA SHANKAR PRASAD[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-1]list the appeal after two weeks. (Ref. : R/P dated 19.11.2019).

31 C.A. No. 5689/2010XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusSMT. SUMITRA ALIAS SUMMAN RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

32 C.A. No. 2759/2009XVII-A

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTDTHROUGH ITS MANAGER MANJEET CHAWLA

VersusM/S.BHUSHAN STEEL MANIK KARANJAWALAFOR ON IA 3/2009 FOR ON IA 29850/2009

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 10001/2009XVII-A

BHUSHAN STEEL KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD.

Page 210: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.5242-5243/2009XVII-A

BHUSHAN STEEL KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. MANJEET CHAWLAFOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA3/2009 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL ON IA 1/2009

33 C.A. No.6690-6692/2009XVII-A

S.BALACHANDRAN SIDDHARTHA CHOWDHURY

VersusM/S RAMANIYAM REAL ESTATES LTD. NISHE RAJEN SHONKERFOR ON IA 110373/2011

34 C.A. No.1802-1803/2009IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,BANGALORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S.OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY (I) LTD. PRAVEEN KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 251/2010IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,BANGALORE I B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S OTIS ELEVATOR CO.(INDIA) LTD. PRAVEEN KUMAR

35 C.A. No.6929-6930/2009XIV-A

EX. SQN. LDR. R.SOOD ABHA R. SHARMA[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFDEFENCE THROUGH SECRETARY ANDORS.

ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

36 C.A. No. 1415/2010XII

M/S. S.P.S. JAYAM AND CO. K. V. VIJAYAKUMARVersusTAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIALTRIBUNAL THE REGISTRAR . AND ORS. R. NEDUMARAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 1416/2010XII

M/S. S.P.S. JAYAM AND CO. THR.PROPRIETOR MADHUSMITA BORA[P-1]

VersusT.N.TAXATION SPL.TRIBUNAL AND ORSTHE REGISTRAR R. NEDUMARAN[R-1]

37 Crl.A. No. 1722/2010II-B

NARESH KUMAR APARNA JHAVersusSTATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGH

38 Crl.A. No. 987/2011II

MUKESH KHARE . AND ORS. SUNIL KUMAR JAINVersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND ANDANR.

T. MAHIPAL, ARDHENDUMAULI KUMARPRASAD

39 Crl.A. No. 515/2009II-A

AVINASH BHOSALE COACVersus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR, [R-2], NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-3]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 516/2009II-A

DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusAVINASH BHOSALE AND ORS. COAC[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 7611/2009II-A

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FEMA/PMLAENFORCEMENT DIRECTORTE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

PHILIP ANANDRAJ AND ANR. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1], NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-2]

Page 211: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8

40 C.A. No. 1798/2010XVI

COMMR.OF CUSTOMS (AIRPORTADMIN.)KOLKATA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusEKTARA EXPORTS PVT.LTD. SARLA CHANDRA[R-1]

41 C.A. No. 5666/2017III

RUNNING STAFF ASSOCIATION ANDORS. RANI CHHABRA, [P-2], [P-3]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA, [R-2]

42 Crl.A. No. 870/2010II-B

JAGJIT SINGH PRAGATI NEEKHRAVersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 871/2010II-B

DILBHAJAN SINGH USHA NANDINI. V

VersusCBI CHANDIGARH ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

43 Crl.A. No.1296-1297/2010II-A

PRABHULAL AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN, [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5], [P-6],[P-7], [P-8]

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

44 C.A. No. 8830/2012XII

RAMATHAL AND ORS. AND ORS. NISHE RAJEN SHONKERVersusK.RAJAMANI (DEAD) THROUGH LRSAND ANR. AND ANR. K. K. MANI

45 C.A. No.7236-7237/2009XVI

C.C.E.,KOLKATA III B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S.KALYANI SPINNING MILLS LTD. SHEKHAR KUMAR

46 C.A. No. 5642/2009IX

BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATIONLTD. PARIJAT SINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISENASHIK COMMISSIONERATE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No.4197-4199/2010III

COMMR.OF CEN EXC.& CUS-I,VADODARA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusOIL & NATURAL GAS COMMN.LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.8061-8062/2010III

COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.VADODARA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

M/S GAIL(I) LTD. PUNIT DUTT TYAGI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.8063-8069/2010III

COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXC.& CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

O.N.G.C.LTD. CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8060/2010III

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEVADODRA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S GAIL (INDIA) LTD. PUNIT DUTT TYAGI[R-1]

Page 212: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.8025-8027/2010XVI

COMMR.OF CEN.EXC.KOLKATA II B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

M/S INDIAN OIL CORP.LTD. E. C. AGRAWALAand FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 136589/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 5686/2014XVII-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusINDIAN OIL CORP. LTD THROUGH ITSCHAIRMAN E. C. AGRAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No. 806/2017IV-A

M/S. KOCHI REFINERIES LTD. (NOWFORMING PART OF BHARATPETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.)

PARIJAT SINHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,COCHIN B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.8219-8224/2017III

OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATIONLTD CHARANYA LAKSHMIKUMARAN[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,RAIGAD B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

undertaking given by the advocate.

ConnectedC.A. No. 9838/2017XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISECOIMBATORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusBHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATIONLTD. PARIJAT SINHA[R-1][PR]

FOR ADMISSION and IA No.57692/2017-STAY APPLICATION and IANo.57688/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 3465/2018IV-A

M/S. KOCHI REFINERIES LIMITED PARIJAT SINHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE COCHIN B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

READY FOR COURT.ConnectedC.A. No. 5516/2019XVII-A

CCEX AND S. TAX PATNA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. I.O.C.L.IA No.89535/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.89537/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.89536/2019-EX-PARTE STAY

47 C.A. No. 1878/2010XI-A

KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORTCORPORATION DEEPAK PRAKASH[P-1]

VersusA.SAINULABDIN RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1879/2010XI-A

KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORTCORP. DEEPAK PRAKASH[P-1]

VersusP.D.OUSEPH PRASANTH P.[R-1]FOR ON IA 2/2012 : APPLICATION FOR DIRECTIONS

48 C.A. No. 7494/2009XI-A

AMIYA KUMAR GIRI . AND ORS. ASHOK PANIGRAHI[P-1]Versus

PRADYUMNA KUMAR PURI . AND ORS.RUTWIK PANDA[R-1], SHIBASHISHMISRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]TEJASWI KUMAR PRADHAN[IMPL]

Page 213: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No. 7495/2009XI-A

AMIYA KUMAR GIRI . AND ORS. ASHOK PANIGRAHI

VersusMAHENDRA KUMAR SATPATHY ANDORS. KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY, SHIBASHISH MISRA

49 C.A. No. 8313/2009IV-A

KRISHNA KUMARI SAURABH TRIVEDI[P-1]VersusASHOK KUMAR AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } REMAIN ON BOARD

50 C.A. No. 2857/2011IX

SHRI NASHIK PANCHAVATI PANJARPOLTRUST PRESHIT VILAS SURSHE[P-1]

Versus

THE CHAIRMAN AND ANR. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1], NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2858/2011IX

SHREE NASIK PANCHAVATIPANJARAPOLE TRUST AND ORS. PRESHIT VILAS SURSHE[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ANR.NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1], ANIRUDDHA P.MAYEE[R-2]

51 C.A. No. 2225/2011IX

SANT BHAGWAN BABA SHIKSHANMANDAL THROUGH ITSSECRETARYSHAN MANDAL AND ORS.

SHIVAJI M. JADHAV[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

Versus

GUNWANT AND ORS. ANJANI KUMAR JHA[R-1], NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-2][GR]

52 C.A. No. 992-994/2010III

M/S MADHUSUDAN RAYONS PVT. LTD. EJAZ MAQBOOLVersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND CUSTOMAS B. KRISHNA PRASAD

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FIRST WEEK OF AUGUST 2019I.A. NO.83679/2019 EARLY HEARING APPLICATION

53 C.A. No.4840-4844/2011IV-A

M/S. RAMAPURAM HOLIDAY RESORTSETC. ETC. MITTER & MITTER CO.

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC.ETC. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No. 4845/2011IV-A

M/S. SIDDHARTA RESORTS MEERA MATHUR

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No. 4847/2011IV-A

M/S. HOTEL VRINDA PRAKASH ANANTHA NARAYANA M.G.

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No. 4846/2011IV-A

M/S. HOTEL VRINDA PRAKASH ANANTHA NARAYANA M.G.

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

54 C.A. No. 3271/2011III-A

M/S.SAMTEL COLOR LIMITED KAVITA JHA[P-1]VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER(ASSESSMENT) AND ANR. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3272/2011III-A

M/S. SAMTEL INDIA LTD. THROUGH ITSCHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTORSATISH K KAURA

KAVITA JHA

Versus

Page 214: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER., TRADETAX,NOIDA ZONE AND ORS. GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO, [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3273/2011III-A

M/S ELIN ELECTRONICS LTD.U.P.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR KAVITA JHA

VersusSTATE OF U.P. THROUGHCOMMISSIONER AND ORS. GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO, [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 30584/2015XI

J K LAKSHMI CEMENT LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER(ASSESSMENT) TRADE TAX . AND ANR. RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA

55 Crl.A. No. 63/2011II-C

KRISHNAMURTHY SENTHIL JAGADEESANVersusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

56 C.A. No. 4654/2012III-A

UTTARAKHAND JAL SANSTHAN THR.ITS SECRETARY KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1]

Versus

NARESH CHAND ATRI AND ORS.MEHA ASHOK AGGARWAL[R-1], SHWETAGARG[R-2], GUNNAM VENKATESWARARAO[R-3], SAURABH TRIVEDI[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4655/2012III-A

D.D. DIMRI PARMANAND PANDEY[P-1]

Versus

NARESH CHAND ATRI AND ORS.MEHA ASHOK AGGARWAL[R-1], GUNNAMVENKATESWARA RAO[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2]

57 C.A. No. 7118/2011XI-A

AKSHYA KUMAR MISHRA MONIKA GUSAINVersusAGRICULTURAL SCIENTISTRECRUITMENT BOARD CHAIRMAN ANDANR.

PRAVEEN SWARUP, [R-2]

58 C.A. No. 7906/2010XV

MAHESH CHAND BARETH AND ANR. RISHI MATOLIYA[P-1], MUKUL KUMAR[P-1],GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

FOR ON IA 1/2015 FOR ON IA 2/2015 FOR ON IA 3/2015 FOR ON IA 4/2015 FORON IA 5/2015 and IA No.10227/2018-INTERVENTION APPLICATION

ConnectedC.A. No.9328-9331/2010XV

BRIJESH KUMAR YADAV AND ORS ANDORS. PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS ANDORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1], SATPAL SINGH[R-23]

and IA No.14889/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.ConnectedC.A. No. 8302/2010XV

DEVI PRASAD AND ORS AND ORS. P. K. JAIN[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. ANDORS. RUCHI KOHLI, MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10281/2010XV

SARLA SHARMA PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.SECRETARY AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

Page 215: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.2800-2802/2011XV

ARUNA PAREEK DEBASIS MISRA[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.NIRMAL CHOPRA[R-1], SANDEEP KUMARJHA[R-1], RANBIR SINGH YADAV[R-1], MUKULKUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.2806-2808/2011XV

RAMANAND TANK AND ANR. DEBASIS MISRA[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2803/2011XV

GOVIND NARAYAN DEBASIS MISRA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.2804-2805/2011XV

KAILASH CHAND SAINI DEBASIS MISRA[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. SANDEEP KUMAR JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.8656-8668/2011XV

RAMESHWAR PRASAD JAT AND ORS. DEBASIS MISRA

Versus

STATE OF RAJASTHAN . AND ORS. SUSHIL BALWADA, RUCHI KOHLI

ConnectedC.A. No. 2982/2011XV

DAYANAND KUMAWAT AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2980/2011XV

RAJ KUMARI SHARMA PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2978/2011XV

MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2979/2011XV

ANITA GAUTAM PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2981/2011XV

BHANWAR LAL KAHAR PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

Page 216: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No. 2921/2011XV

RAKESH KUMAR GAUTAM PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2976/2011XV

DILIP KUMAR CHOPDAR PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2977/2011XV

RAJESH KUMAR NAMA PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3730/2011XV

MANSUKH RAY SHARMA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGHCHIEF SECRETARY AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4569/2011XV

MAMTA BANSAL AND ORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. SANDEEP KUMAR JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3732/2011XV

MATADEEN MISHRA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 5180/2011XV

MADHUSUDAN SHARMA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5183/2011XV

GIRDHARI LAL SHARMA AND ORS. GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1], [P-2],[P-3], [P-4], [P-5], [P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1].

ConnectedC.A. No. 3731/2011XV

GOVIND SINGH TANWAR GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 5182/2011XV

RUDMAL YADAV AND ORS. GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1], [P-2],[P-3]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 7646/2011XV

HARENDRA SINGH AND ANR. P. K. JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. PRAGATI NEEKHRA[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9618/2011XV

BHANA RAM

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

Page 217: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No. 10709/2011XV

BABU LAL SHARMA SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1], RUCHI KOHLI

ConnectedC.A. No. 10712/2011XV

KRISHAN KANT KALAVATIA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 10711/2011XV

RAM GOPAL SHARMA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1], RUCHI KOHLI

ConnectedC.A. No. 10710/2011XV

YOGESHWARI GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1], RUCHI KOHLI

ConnectedC.A. No. 6898/2012XV

SURENDRA SINGH NIRWAN P. K. JAIN

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 1668/2012XV

MAHESH CHAND SAINI DEBASIS MISRA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1038/2012XV

JITENDRA SINGH PARMAR AND ORS. DEBASIS MISRA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11332/2011XV

SURAJ MAL JAT AND ANR. DEBASIS MISRA

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.FOR FOR ON IA 3/2013 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 87186/2017FOR impleading party ON IA 104886/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 11442/2011XV

SHIMBUDAYAL SHARMA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11407/2011XV

RAMKARAN GURJAR GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 1210/2012XV

BHAGIRATH MAL THALOR GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4559/2012XV

SHYAM SUNDER SHARMA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. PRAGATI NEEKHRA[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.6096-6104/2012XV

GAJENDRA GAUR & ORS.ETC.ETC. ANDANR. AJAY CHOUDHARY

VersusGAJENDRA GAUR .ETC.ETC. AND ORS. MUKUL KUMAR, MILIND KUMAR

Page 218: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No. 8661/2012XV

PRADEEP KUMAR SHARMA AND ORS. DEBASIS MISRA

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. RUCHI KOHLI

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 34742/2013XV

KUMARI SARITA AND ORS. AND ORS. PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS.FOR ON IA 4/2017 (Application for impleadment)

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 34663/2013XV

GHISA RAM MALI AND ORS. AND ORS. PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 322/2013XV

BALDEV SINGH AND ORS. AND ORS. RAKESH DAHIYA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. ANDORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

59 C.A. No. 7470/2011XII

ANIL AND SUNIL TRADERS AND ANR. K. K. MANI[P-1]Versus

T.L.PRASAD AND ANR. M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1], M. A.CHINNASAMY[R-1]

60 C.A. No. 6942/2011XIV-A

THE DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNT AND ORS. ANIL KATIYARVersusR.K.KAPOOR RAKESH K. SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No.6943-6949/2011XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTS AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

ANIL KUMAR MEHRA RAKESH K. SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No.6950-6954/2011XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNT AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

CHETAN KUMAR RAJPUT AND ORS. RAKESH K. SHARMA

61 C.A. No. 2477/2012III-A

STATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPUR[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], VIKASSINGH JANGRA[R-4], [R-5], [R-6]ANIL KATIYAR[I-7][IMPL][GR]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2476/2012III-A

STATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPUR[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], VIKASSINGH JANGRA[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8],[R-9], [R-10]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10570/2018III-A

STATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPUR

VersusSAMARTH NARAIN AND ORS. VIVEK KISHORE[CAVEAT], [R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

62 Crl.A. No. 1755/2011II-A

HARIBHAU @ BHAUSAHEB DINKARKHARUSE AND ANR. K. N. RAI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKARHEARING EXPEDITED.

Page 219: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedCrl.A. No.150-151/2013II-A

SUBHASH RAGHUNATH PAWAR K. N. RAI

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HOMEDEPARTMENT SECRETARY

63 Crl.A. No. 1241/2011II

MD. YAKUB SHAREEF VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLUVersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ANDANR.READY

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 57/2012II

SIDDAM RAJAIAH V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusSYED YAKUB PASHA S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-2]

64 C.A. No.8608-8609/2011XIV-A

KRISHAN MURARI AND ORS. SATISH KUMAR

VersusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS

65 C.A. No. 7483/2011XVII-A

GULSHAN KUMAR MENDIRATTA . ANDORS. SAURABH MISHRA

VersusUNION OF INDIA INDIAN RAILWAYSTHROUGH GENERAL MANAGER ANDANR.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

66 C.A. No. 4410/2012XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]VersusSURESH KUMAR SINGH NEERAJ SHEKHAR[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } LIST IN THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2019VIDE HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 8.3.2019

67 C.A. No. 9909/2013III-A

MIRZA ANIS AHMED(DEAD) THROUGHLRS. ANOOP KR. SRIVASTAV

VersusRAMJAS SINGH YADAV (DEAD) ANDANR. GARVESH KABRA

As per order dated 30.05.2019, the appeal to be listed before the appropriateBench after summer vacation.

68 C.A. No. 1077/2013XVII-A

M/S. ISNAR AQUA FARMS C. K. RAIVersusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. DEBASIS MISRA

69 Crl.A. No. 155/2014II-A

DEO RAI MOHIT KUMAR SHAHVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR GOPAL SINGH

70 C.A. No. 8634/2012XIV-A

SUSHIL SHARMA DEEPAK GOEL[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

71 C.A. No.11302-11303/2016XIV-A

RUPESH KUMAR MEENA S. K. VERMA[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-2], PRIYA PURI[R-3]

72 C.A. No. 5326/2013XII

CHAIRMAN HIMANSHU MUNSHI, [CAVEAT]VersusM.GOPALKRISHNAN . AND ORS. S. RAVI SHANKAR, G. INDIRA

73 C.A. No. 801/2014XV

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE MILIND KUMAR[P-1]VersusINDRA RAJ SINGH ABHISHEK GUPTA[R-1]

Page 220: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8

74 Crl.A. No. 457/2012II

GUDIPALLI SIDDHARTHA REDDY G. N. REDDY[P-1]VersusSTATE C.B.I. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

ConnectedCrl.A. No.894-895/2012II

SAROJINI DEVI P. VINAY KUMAR

Versus

CBI CBI AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA, G. N. REDDY[R-2]

75 C.A. No. 6027/2014XVI

SAMIR KUMAR MAJUMDAR UTTARA BABBAR[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], PLR CHAMBERSAND CO.[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

76 C.A. No.4788-4790/2012III-A

SANJAY SHARMA AND ORS. SAMIR ALI KHAN[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], SHRISH KUMARMISRA[R-2]

77 C.A. No. 4829/2012XVII-A

MILTON ROY INDIA PVT. LTD SHIV KUMAR SURIVersusR.P. RAJARAJAN ENTERPRISES ROHINI MUSA

78 C.A. No. 6688/2016III-A

SHIV SHANKARLAL SRIVASTAVA MONIKA GUSAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS. VISHNU SHANKAR JAIN

As per Order dated 12.06.2019, list immediately after vacation.79 C.A. No. 8242/2013

IV-AUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusVIJENDER PRAKASH GAUTAM VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA

80 C.A. No. 6987/2014XII

R. RAJMOHAN P. SOMA SUNDARAM[P-1][PR]VersusTHE ADDL. CHIEF SEC. TO GOVT. . ANDORS.

81 C.A. No.1129-1130/2013III

K.S JORAWARSINHJI GODJI(D) TH HEIRS& LE ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT . AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI

82 C.A. No. 2325/2013XVI

LIFE INSURANCE CORP. OF INDIA . ANDORS. ASHOK PANIGRAHI[P-1]

VersusRAJEEV LOHIA AMIT PAWAN[R-1]As per Court's order dated 12.11.2018, appeals to be listed in the month ofFebruary, 2019.

ConnectedC.A. No. 6043/2013XI-A

L.I.C.OF INDIA AND ANR. ASHOK PANIGRAHI

VersusSRIKANTA MOHAPATRA AND ANR. PARIJAT SINHA, PUNAM KUMARI

ConnectedC.A. No. 6044/2013XI-A

SR.DIV.MANAGER, LIC OF INDIA . ANDANR. ASHOK PANIGRAHI

VersusTRIPATI PANDA SIBO SANKAR MISHRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 4860/2017XI-A

VINCEN MATHEW V. SHYAMOHAN

VersusLIFE INSUREANCE CORPORATION OFINDIA AND ORS. ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

Ready as per Ld. Registrar Order dt.19.11.2018.

Page 221: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 883 C.A. No. 2066/2014

IVSATISH KUMAR AND ANR. RAVI PANWAR[P-1]VersusSTATE OF HARYANA . AND ORS. MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1]LIST AFTER FOUR WEEKS.

84 C.A. No. 5459/2013XVII-A

ASSAM BROOK LTD ABHIJEET SINHAVersusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTDAND ANR. RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA[R-1], [R-2]

85 Crl.A. No. 898/2014II-A

PRAFULLA PREMDAS MOREY SHAKEEL AHMEDVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedDiary No. 42217-2018II-A

MANJU@ ANIL PREMDAS MOREY MANIKA TRIPATHY PANDEY

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAONLY FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 176791/2018

86 Crl.A. No. 223/2014II-B

PATEL DANABHAI KANABHAI AND ANR. AMBAR QAMARUDDIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

87 Crl.A. No. 2013/2014II-B

BALWINDER SINGH AND ANR. AJAY PAL[P-1], [P-2]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB UTTARA BABBAR[R-1]

88 C.A. No. 9686/2014XII

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONREP. BY ITS SECRETARY BINU TAMTA

VersusM. MAHALAKSHMI

89 C.A. No.5655-5656/2014XIV-A

MAHENDRA SINGH RAVINDRA BANA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. GHANSHYAM JOSHI[CAVEAT]

90 C.A. No. 8967/2014XIV-A

INDIAN FOREIGNSERVICE(B)GAZETTED OFFICERSASSOCIATION AND ANR.

ABHA R. SHARMA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], [R-3]

91 C.A. No.8629-8630/2014XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusJOGESHWAR SWAIN KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY[R-1]

92 C.A. No. 7758/2014III-A

STATE OF U.P AND ORS. ANKIT GOEL[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusYOGESH CHANDRA GAUTAM AND ANR. SUSHIL BALWADA[R-1]

93 C.A. No. 9084/2017XVII-A

HINDUSTAN COCA-COLA BEVERAGESPVT.LTD. RAJIV TYAGI

VersusPURUSHOTTAM GAUR AND ANR. ANDANR.

94 C.A. No. 6641/2015XVI

U.O.I.. AND ORS. D. S. MAHRA[P-1]VersusASIT KUMAR DAS VIPIN KUMAR JAI[CAVEAT], SARLA CHANDRA

95 C.A. No. 631/2016III

ATUL S/O ARVIND CHIVHE AND ORS. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE, [R-8],SHREEKANT N. TERDAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

Page 222: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No. 634/2016III

SAMBHAJI VISHNUPANT KOLI . ANDORS. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY . AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

96 C.A. No. 7107/2014XV

J.S. PARMAR PRATIBHA JAINVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. D. S. MAHRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

97 C.A. No. 4269/2018XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. SUSHMA SURIVersusRAM CHANDER PANDEY ANURAG PANDEY[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No.4270-4271/2018XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

SAILENDRA SINGH YASH PAL DHINGRA

98 Crl.A. No. 437/2015II-C

ANEES V. MAHESHWARI & CO.[P-1]VersusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

99 C.A. No. 8744/2015XII

CHAIRMAN, CHENNAI PORT TRUSTAND ANR. SUSMITA LAL

VersusA KANNABIRAN VINODH KANNA B.

100 C.A. No. 4200/2015III-A

THE STATE OF UP AND ORS. SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI[P-1]VersusNEERAJ CHAUBEY AND ORS. K.PARAMESHWAR[R-1]

101 Crl.A. No. 921/2015II-C

DARSHAN KUMAR SUNIL FERNANDES[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1][GR]FOR FINAL HEARING VIDE HON'BLE COURTS' ORDER DATED 29.02.2016.

102 C.A. No.13999-14000/2015XII

KAILASH BEN T. SOLANGI AND ETCAND ANR. M. A. CHINNASAMY

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. REP. BYTHE GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRYAND ORS.

V. G. PRAGASAM, BINU TAMTA

103 C.A. No. 21854/2017III

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. KAUSHIK PODDAR[P-1]Versus

DR. S.J. KAMBLE AND ORS.VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU[R-1], B.KRISHNA PRASAD[R-2], DUAASSOCIATES[R-3], [R-5]

104 Crl.A. No. 1421/2015II-C

NAND LAL AND ORS. VIKAS UPADHYAY[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1470/2017II-C

CHARANDAS JANGDE . AND ORS. JAIL PETITION[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1][GR]Mr. Shailendra Tiwary, Adv, Amicus Curiae

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1422/2015II-C

PALTAN JANGDE VIKAS UPADHYAY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1]

Page 223: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.6134-6135/2019II-C

TULSI JANGDE AND ORS. RENJITH. B[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]

Versus

THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARHFOR ADMISSION

105 C.A. No.4264-4266/2015XVII-A

KARE ELEVATORS AND ENGG. CO. PVT.LTD. N. ANNAPOORANI

Versus

P.G. PAI AND ORS. VIKAS MEHTA, S. S. SHROFF, M. V. KINI &ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No. 5693/2015XVII-A

CHAIRMAN/SECRETARY BHAGWATIHOUSE VIKAS MEHTA

Versus

P.G.PAI . AND ORS. S. S. SHROFF, N. ANNAPOORANI, M. V. KINI &ASSOCIATES

106 C.A. No.5622-5623/2015XII

S. NANDHIVARMAN GAURAV AGRAWAL[P-1]

Versus

J. KUMARAN AND ORS. ETC. AND ORS. V. G. PRAGASAM[R-1], GAUTAMNARAYAN[R-4], [R-4], K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-6]

107 T.C.(C) No. 78/2015XVI-A

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[P-1]Versus

SURAJ SINGH AND ORS. AND ORS.

LIZ MATHEW[R-3], AMITA SINGHKALKAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-5], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9],[R-12], [R-13], [R-15], [R-20], [R-21], [R-24],[R-29], [R-33], [R-35], [R-39], [R-40], [R-42],[R-44]

108 Crl.A. No. 1007/2017II-B

MANJINDER KAUR ALIAS BHOLI SANJAY JAINVersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1006/2017II-B

RACHHPAL SINGH SANJAY JAIN

VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA

109 C.A. No. 15140/2017XVI

KISHORE KUMAR RAI MUSHTAQ AHMAD[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 15141/2017XVI

DIN BANDHU PATHAK AND ANR. KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. THESECRETARY AND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 675/2015X

AMRENDRA KUMAR THAKUR MUSHTAQ AHMAD

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 665/2015X

HARI SHANKAR PRASAD SINGH KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH

VersusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 15142/2017XVI

SUDHIR CHANDRA PATHAK AND ORS. KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORSTHROUGH ROAD CONSTRUCTIONDEPARTMENT AND ORS.

ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

Page 224: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No. 15143/2017XVI

BRIJANANDAN SINGH AND ORS. MUSHTAQ AHMAD

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARYAND ORS.

ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 15144/2017XVI

BIPIN KUMAR SINHA AND ANR. SMARHAR SINGH, [P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR STATE OF BIHARAND ORS. THR. PRINCIPAL SECRETARYAND ORS.

ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

and IA No.92089/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.110 Crl.A. No. 1619/2015

II-AASHOK SARAF AND ORS. KUNAL VERMAVersusSANTOSHI MISHRA AND ORS. VIKAS UPADHYAY[ LIST IN THE MONTH OF JULY 2019 ]List the Appeal on a non-miscellaneous dayin the month of July 2019 vide Court's Order dated 1st April 2019.

111 C.A. No. 2680/2016IV-A

C.G. SUPRASANNA RASHMI NANDAKUMARVersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. HRISHIKESH BARUAH

112 C.A. No. 3583/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. ROHIT K. SINGH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusRAJU SINGH AND ORS. AND ORS. DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA[R-8]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3584/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1]

VersusRAJENDRA PRASAD NAPIT

ConnectedC.A. No. 3585/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI

VersusSANJAY KUMAR SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No. 4615/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI

VersusNARESH SURANA

ConnectedC.A. No. 3588/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI

VersusRAVINDRA MATHUR

ConnectedC.A. No. 3586/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI

VersusSATYA NARAYAN SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No. 4613/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI

Versus

PRABHU SINGH AND ORS. AND ORS.GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], SHALU SHARMA[R-6], [R-7],[R-8], [R-9], [R-13], [R-14], [R-15], [R-16]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4614/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI

VersusBABU LAL PRAJAPAT AND ORS. ANDORS. SHALU SHARMA, [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-7], [R-8]

Page 225: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No. 4617/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI

VersusPRATAP RAM AND ORS. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4619/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI

VersusMAHENDRA PAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 4618/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORSAND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI

VersusPADAM SINGH AND ORS AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4621/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI

VersusBHAGIRATH SINGH AND ORS. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4461/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI

VersusSHYAM LAL AND ANR. AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4462/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI

VersusTULCHA RAM SINGARIA

ConnectedC.A. No. 4616/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI

VersusHEENA JOSHI AND ORS. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4463/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.AND ANR. RUCHI KOHLI

VersusPREETAM SINGH AND ORS. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4620/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI

VersusANAND PATEL AND ORS. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4623/2016XV

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. ANDORS. RUCHI KOHLI

VersusMANEESH SAINI AND ORS. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4624/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI

VersusOM PRAKASH SHARMA

113 C.A. No.8859-8860/2016XI-A

DIRECTOR GENERAL, ALL INDIA RADIO ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]

Versus

Page 226: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8

PURUSHOTHAMAN C. AND ORS. ETC.ETC. AND ORS.

SHREE PAL SINGH[R-1], P. SOMASUNDARAM[R-1], BIJAN KUMAR GHOSH[R-1],NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-29], [R-30], [R-31],[R-32], [R-33], [R-34], [R-35], [R-36], [R-37],[R-38], [R-39], [R-40], [R-41], [R-42], [R-43],[R-44], [R-45], [R-46], [R-47], [R-48], [R-49],[R-50], [R-51]YADAV NARENDER SINGH[IMPL], RAVIPANWAR[IMPL], MUKESH KUMAR SINGH ANDCO.[IMPL], DHARMENDRA KUMARSINHA[IMPL]

FOR [I A FOR IMPLEADMENT] ON IA 27939/2017 FOR [I/A FOR IMPLEADMENT,DIRECTION INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 40752/2017 FORINTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 45724/2017 and IA No.125610/2017-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT and IA No.125612/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION and IA No.125616/2017-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT and IA No.125617/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION and IA No.32793/2018-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

ConnectedDiary No. 22646-2018XVI-A

PRASAR BHARTI BROADCASTINGCORPORATION OF INDIA AND ORS.

GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[P-1], [P-2], [P-3],[P-4], [P-5]

VersusSHAFEEQ AHMAD SOFI AND ORS.IA No.92636/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.92638/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

114 C.A. No. 4071/2016XIV-A

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD ANDORS. RAHUL KAUSHIK

VersusSUBHASH CHAND GUPTA RANI CHHABRA

115 Crl.A. No.1434-1438/2017II-A

DHRUB SINGH . VISHAL ARUN[P-2], [P-5], [P-6], PANKAJKUMAR MISHRA[P-1], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]

116 C.A. No. 8212/2016XVII-A

M/S. RAUNAQ ICE AND COLD STORAGE M. A. CHINNASAMYVersusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. . ANDANR. VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA

117 C.A. No.12174-12176/2018XVII-A

FARMERS SERVICE COOP.SOCIETY LTD.(COMMON IN ALL MATTERS) SRIDHAR POTARAJU

VersusAGRICULTURE INSURANCE CO OFINDIA FORMERLY KNOWN AS GENERALINSURANCE COOPERATION OF INDIA(FORMERLY

TUHIN, GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

ConnectedC.A. No.12177-12187/2018XVII-A

MANAGER, AGRICULTURE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. ETC. ETC. PRAKASH RANJAN NAYAK

Versus

AGRICULTURE INSURANCE COMPANYOF INDIA LTD. . AND ORS.

RANJAN KUMAR PANDEY[R-1], V. N.RAGHUPATHY[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6],[R-7], [R-8]

118 C.A. No. 7121/2016XVII-A

DENA BANK ANISHA UPADHYAYVersusMAHARASHTRA TOURISMDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANYKARANJAWALA & CO.[INT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7157/2016XVII-A

DENA BANK ANISHA UPADHYAY

VersusMUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGIONDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANYYASHRAJ SINGH DEORA[INT]

Page 227: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedDiary No. 16863-2017XVII-A

MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGIONDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY

VersusDENA BANK ANISHA UPADHYAY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 20878/2017XVII-A

MAHARASHTRA TOURISMDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY

VersusDENA BANK ANISHA UPADHYAY[R-1]

119 C.A. No. 3141/2018III

MOHIT AND ORS. ANAGHA S. DESAI[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1], CHANDER SHEKHARASHRI[R-1], ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-15]

120 Crl.A. No.2017-2019/2017II-A

JAI PRAKASH KUNWAR SHISHIR PINAKI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. SANTOSH KUMAR - I[R-1], FAUZIASHAKIL[R-3]

121 C.A. No.9938-9939/2016III

MOHD. JALILUDDIN MOHAMMEDMUKTARUDDIN ASHUTOSH DUBEY

VersusAL-FAROOQUI SOCIAL ANDEDUCATIONAL SOCIETY - JALNA ANDORS.

SHAKIL AHMED SYED

122 Crl.A. No. 1846/2017II

RAJ KUMAR YADAV VIPIN KUMAR JAIVersus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANUVRAT SHARMA[R-1], AMIT PAWAN[R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

123 Crl.A. No. 17/2017II-A

PRAMOD TIWARY AND ANR. SHANTANU SAGAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]

124 C.A. No.4722-4723/2017XI-A

TAPAN KUMAR BARIK ANKUR SOOD[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4]

125 C.A. No. 1080/2017III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARYAND ANR.

ROHIT K. SINGH[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA AND ORS. S. K. VERMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

126 C.A. No. 1318/2017XII

M/S EDELWEISS ASSETCONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. M. RAMBABU AND CO.[P-1][PR]

Versus

R. PERUMALSWAMY AND ORS. ANDORS.

SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY[R-1], D. L.CHIDANANDA[R-1], M. YOGESHKANNA[R-3][GR], K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-3]RAKESH K. SHARMA[IMPL], ASTHATYAGI[IMPL]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } TOP OF THE BOARD[ INSTANT MATTER ISRELEASED FROM PART HEARD ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1319/2017XII

W.S. INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTDTHROUGH ITS CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER MR. SWAMINATHAN

E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1]

Versus

Page 228: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8

R. PERUMALSWAMY AND ORS.

SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY[R-1], K. V.VIJAYAKUMAR[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], M.RAMBABU AND CO.[R-7]RAKESH K. SHARMA[IMPL], ASTHATYAGI[IMPL]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR FOR [FOR REFERRING THE DISPURTTO THE MEDIATION] ON IA 96550/2018 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ONIA 107510/2018 FOR impleading party ON IA 107620/2018 FORINTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 107620/2018

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.1906/2017 in C.A. No.1319/2017XII

W. S. INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

Versus

R. PERUMALSWAMY S. GOWTHAMAN[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }IN C.A. No. - 1319/2017,

127 C.A. No. 20841/2017III-A

PRATHAMA BANK AND ORS. ALDANISH REINVersusVED PRAKASH CHAUHAN ANIL K. CHOPRA

128 C.A. No. 5697/2017XVII

COAL INDIA LIMITED S. S. SHROFF[P-1]VersusCOMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIAAND ANR AND ANR.

RISHAD AHMED CHOWDHURY[R-1], HIRENDASAN[R-2]

LIST FOR FINAL DISPOSAL VIDE COURT'S ORDER DATED 18.02.2019

129 C.A. No.2827-2829/2018XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

Versus

ROHIT NATHAN AND ANR. HARSH PARASHAR[CAVEAT]HIMA LAWRENCE[INT][PR]

130 C.A. No. 1942/2019III-A

HARIDAS VERMA K. N. RAIVersusCOMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT OFDISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.AND ANR.

AAKARSH KAMRA[R-1], SUNNYCHOUDHARY[R-2]

131 Crl.A. No. 1263/2018II

ANIL KUMAR PRIYANJALI SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SARVESH SINGH BAGHEL[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.57100/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

132 C.A. No. 1479/2006IX

DIVYAGNAKUMARI HARISINH PARMARAND ORS. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 } PART HEARD BY HON. DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND HON. AJAY RASTOGI, JJ.

ConnectedC.A. No. 1480/2006IX

MOHANSINH LAXMAMSINH SOLANKI .AND ORS. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 1482/2006IX

SHAMJIBHAI PARAGBHAI (D) BY LRS. .AND ORS. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 1483/2006IX

LALLA MOTIA CHAUHAN (D) TH. LRS. .AND ORS. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

Versus

Page 229: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 1487/2006IX

MANGILAL CHANDANMALJI SHAH (D)TH.LRS. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 1488/2006IX

RANACHHODBHAI GOVANBHAI (D)TH.LRS.AND ORS. AND ORS. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 1484/2006IX

PRABHATSINH JAISINH SOLANKI .(D)THROUGH LRS AND ANR. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 1489/2006IX

VALLABHBHAI MANGALBHAI PARMARAND ORS.. AND ORS. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 1486/2006IX

KHANDUBHAI RAMBHAI (D) TH. LRS.AND ORS.. AND ORS. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 1481/2006IX

OKCHAND PREMCHAND (D) TH.LRS.AND ORS. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY . AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 1485/2006IX

NALINIBEN SHRIKRISHNA DALVI SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 1181/2017III

DAMUBHAI DAHYABHAI (D) THR.LRS.AND ORS. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 } List after two weeks vide Hon'ble Court'sorder dt.9.7.2019

133 Crl.A. No. 2024/2008II-C

PAPPATHI @ KUPPATHAL S. RAVI SHANKAR[P-1]Versus

THE STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICEAND ORS. ETC.

M. YOGESH KANNA, [R-1], GEETHAKOVILAN[R-2][PR], [R-3][PR], [R-4][PR],[R-5][PR], [R-6][PR], [R-7][PR]

134 C.A. No. 5564/2009IV

IMPROVEMENT TRUST ROPAR BIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA[P-1]VersusSHASHI BALA AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

135 C.A. No. 5731/2009XII

SANTOSH MAIZE THROUGH ITSMANAGER K. K. MANI[P-1]

Versus

Page 230: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8THE STATE OF TAMIL NADUREPRESENTED BY THE SPECIALCOMMISSIONER AND COMMISSIONEROF COMMERCIAL TAXES AND ANR.

K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1]

[ AT TOP ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5732/2009XII

SANTOSH MAIZE THROUGH ITSMANAGER K. K. MANI[P-1]

VersusTAMILNADU REPRESENTED BY THESPECIAL COMMISSIONER ANDCOMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIALTAXES EZHILAGAM AND AND ANR.

K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1]

136 C.A. No. 9582/2011III-A

M/S MAJHOLA DISTILLERY ANDCHEMICAL WORKS PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX/COMMERCIAL TAX U.P. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9583/2011III-A

M/S MAJHOLA DISTILLERY ANDCHEMICAL WORKS PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX/COMMERCIAL TAX U.P. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9585/2011III-A

M/S.MAJHOLA DISTIL.ANDCHEM.WORKS, MAJHOLA, PILIBHIT PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF TRADETAX/COMMERCIAL TAX COMMISSIONER GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 9584/2011III-A

M/S MAJHOLA DISTILLERY ANDCHEMICAL WORKS THROUGH GENERALMANAGER

PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX/COMMERCIAL TAX.U.P. LUCKNOW GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 9590/2011III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[P-1]

VersusM/S KESAR ENTERPRISES LTD.

137 C.A. No.2338-2339/2010XI-A

HEINZ INDIA LIMITED PAREKH & CO.[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6633/2012XII

GLAXO SMITHKLINE PARMACEUTICALSLTD. THROUGH THE MANAGINGDIRECTOR

PAREKH & CO.

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU

ConnectedC.A. No. 6635/2012XII

GLAXOSMITHKLINEPHARMACEUTICALS LTD. PAREKH & CO.

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU

138 C.A. No. 5461/2010IV

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusENGLISH INDIAN CLAYS LTD. AND ORS. R. PARTHASARATHY

139 C.A. No. 6561/2008IX

CCE,MUMBAI-III B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S BUNTS INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. K. RAJEEV

Page 231: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.6562-6563/2008IX

CCE, MUMBAI -III B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

M/S. BUNTS INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. K. RAJEEV

140 C.A. No. 6695/2009XIV-A

THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND ANR. SHUVODEEP ROYVersusM/S.SWAPAN KUMAR PAUL AND ORS. RAJIV MEHTA, , RAJIV NANDA[R-2]

141 C.A. No. 5526/2011III

COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXC.ANDCUS.SURAT II B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S HEUBACH COLOUR P.LTD. THR ITSDIRECTOR RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

142 C.A. No.2039-2040/2011XII

C.C.E., TIRUCHIRAPALLI B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S KOTHARI SUGARS AND CHEMICALSLTD PAREKH & CO.

143 C.A. No. 2576/2010IV

M/S. MUNJAL SHOWA LTD. RAJESH KUMARVersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE (DELHI IV) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 5608/2011IV

M/S FRIENDS TRADING CO. ANAGHA S. DESAI

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADservice complete. ready matter

144 C.A. No.4279-4280/2009IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL ANDSERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. HITECH AUTO CRAFTS RADHA SHYAM JENA

ConnectedC.A. No. 8613/2009IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,TRIVANDRUM B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusKERALA STATE TRANSPORTCORPORATION RADHA SHYAM JENA

145 C.A. No. 570/2010XII

LAKSHMI VIDHYA SANGAM REP. BY ITSSECRETARY AND TREASURER MS.SHOBHANA RAMACHANDRAN

V. BALACHANDRAN

VersusTHE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICERAND ANR. T. HARISH KUMAR

146 C.A. No. 7269/2009XVI

M/S STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]VersusCOMMR.CEN.EXCISE ANDCUS.BHUBANESHWAR

ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1]

147 C.A. No.2589-2599/2011XII-A

COMMR.OF CENTRALEXCISE,HYDERABAD B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SHRIRAM REFRIGERATIONINDUSTRIES M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3554/2016XI

M/S. HONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTSLTD. KISHORE KUNAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE, MEERUT - II B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Page 232: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8

148 C.A. No. 8615/2011III

COMMISSIONER CENTRAL EXCISE ANDCUSTOMS SURAT I B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S.. SWAGAT SYNTHETICS THROUGHMANAGING DIRECTOR RAHUL NARAYAN

149 C.A. No. 4001/2009IX

COMMR.OF CEN.EXE. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]VersusM/S BAJAJ ALLIANZ INSURANCECO.LTD. THR. ITS MANAGER R. PARTHASARATHY[R-1]

150 C.A. No.3166-3167/2009IX

M/S.NANDAN PETROCHEM.LTD. THR.DIRECTOR (FINANCE) (IN A.NO.1930/03)

SIDDHARTHA CHOWDHURY

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,BALAPUR, MUMBAI-IV, VI (IN A.NO.1930/03)

ANIL KATIYAR, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

151 C.A. No. 3634/2009XV

M/S RAGHUVEER METAL INDUSTRIESLTD. M. P. DEVANATH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE JAIPUR II ANIL KATIYAR, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

152 C.A. No. 8056/2009IX

COMMR.OF CEN.EXCISE & CUS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S SHREE VENKATESH STEELS LTD. S. NARAIN & CO.

153 C.A. No. 3992/2009IV-A

COMMR.OF CEN,EXC.HYDERABAD B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusCENTRE FRO DEVT.OF ADVANCEDCOMPUTING M. P. DEVANATH

154 C.A. No.9367-9369/2011XIV-A

SECR.,MINISTRY OF DEFENCE ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

Versus

BABITA PUNIYA AND ORS.DEVENDRA SINGH, HARISH PANDEY[CAVEAT]VIVEK NARAYAN SHARMA[R-1], [IMPL],ARCHANA PATHAK DAVE[IMPL]

{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 } TOP OF THE BOARD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 192-196/2012XIV-A

SQN. LDR. NITU THAPLIYAL (RETD) ANDORS.

DEEPAK GOEL[P-1], [P-2], [P-4], [P-5], [P-13],[P-15], [P-16], ARCHANA PATHAK DAVE[P-8],[P-9], [P-11], [P-12], [P-17], [P-25], [P-33], [P-40],[P-41]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4]ANUPAM RAINA[IMPL]

{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 } FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA9730/2018

ConnectedC.A. No. 79-82/2012XIV-A

WG.CDR. A.U. TAYYABA ( RETD). ANDORS.

SRIDHAR POTARAJU[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4],[P-5], [P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10], [P-11],[P-12], [P-13]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4]

{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 83-84/2012XIV-A

WG.CDR.KALPANA CHAMOLI (RETD.) SRIDHAR POTARAJU[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4]

{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 }

Page 233: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No. 3151/2012XIV-A

FLT. LT. RENU BAHRI (RETD) DEEPAK GOEL[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],SRIDHAR POTARAJU[R-7]

{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No.1127-1128/2013XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[P-1]

Versus

MAJOR ANUPAMA DALAL (AOC) ANDORS. HARISH PANDEY[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 5164/2012XIV-A

SQN. LDR. BHUPINDER KAUR (RETD.) DEEPAK GOEL[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. D 31542/2013XVII

LT. COL. MAHIPAL SINGH (MS 13921Y) ANIL KUMAR BAKSHI

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 } Tagged with C.a. no. 9367-69 of 2011 videcourt's order dt.24.9.2015

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20638/2015XIV

LT. COL. (RETD.) PRIYAMVADA AMARDIKAR . AND ORS. DEEPAK GOEL

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 }ConnectedSLP(C) No.30791-30796/2015XIV

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[P-1]

Versus

LD. CDR. ANNIE NAGARAJA, EXECUTIVEOFFICER AND ORS.

POOJA DHAR[R-2], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-11],DEEPAK GOEL[R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-16],HARISH PANDEY[R-10], LIZ MATHEW[R-13],MOHIT D. RAM[R-12], [R-14], [R-15]

{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 } NOT TO LIST BEFORE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 30337/2016XIV

CDR.SUPRIYA SETHU (RETD) AND ANR. DEEPAK GOEL

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No.10225-10230/2016XVII

CDR PRIYA KHURANA ETC ETC ANDANR.

SANTOSH KRISHNAN[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4],[P-5], [P-6]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1], [R-2]{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2016

ConnectedC.A. No. 3359/2017XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

VersusCDR. PRIYA KHURANA SANTOSH KRISHNAN[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 5392/2019XVII

LT. CDR. BARKHA RATHORE DEEPAK GOEL

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Page 234: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 8{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 52261/2017

ConnectedDiary No. 26406-2017XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

VersusBARKHA RATHORE DEEPAK GOEL[CAVEAT]{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 } IA No.138754/2017-I/A FOR LEAVE TOAPPEAL and IA No.138761/2017-EX-PARTE STAY

ConnectedC.A. No. 15599/2017XVII

LR. COMMANDER GOPIDAS GIREESH ARUNIMA DWIVEDI

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 }

ConnectedDiary No. 2879-2018XVII

FLT. LT. MANEESH KUSHWAHA GAICHANGPOU GANGMEI

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4]

{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 } IA No.22700/2018-LEAVE TO APPEAL U/S31(1) OF THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL ACT, 2007

ConnectedDiary No. 5087-2018XVII

CDR SANJEEV SHARMA (RETD.) HARISH PANDEY

VersusUNION OF INDIA SECRETARY AND ANR.{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 } IA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING ON IA 116851/2018 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING ON IA116852/2018 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING/REFILING SLP ON IA116852/2018 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN RE-FILING APPEAL ON IA116852/2018 FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL U/S 31(1) OF THE ARMED FORCESTRIBUNAL ACT, 2007 ON IA 116857/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 116861/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 27060-2019XVII

LT. CDR. KABERI KASTURI SANTOSH KRISHNAN

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[CAVEAT]{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 } [ TO BE TAKEN UP ALONG WITH ITEM NO.101 I.E. C.A. NO. 9367-9369/2011 ETC. ]. .I.R. and IA No.113917/2019-GRANT OFINTERIM RELIEF and IA No.114050/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES and IA No.113920/2019-LEAVE TO APPEAL U/S31(1) OF THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL ACT, 2007

ConnectedDiary No. 27061-2019XVII

LT. CDR. VIJETA YADAV SANTOSH KRISHNAN

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IANo.113927/2019-GRANT OF INTERIM RELIEF and IA No.113928/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.113929/2019-LEAVE TO APPEAL U/S 31(1) OF THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNALACT, 2007

ConnectedDiary No. 29196-2019XVII

LT CDR LAXMI SHUKLA MD. ALI

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[CAVEAT], [R-1],[R-2], [R-3]

{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 } FOR ADMISSION and IA No.127772/2019-GRANT OF INTERIM RELIEF and IA No.127773/2019-LEAVE TO APPEAL U/S 31(1)OF THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL ACT, 2007

NEW DELHI06-12-2019 17:56:38

Page 235: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 236: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 33 OF 2019 FROM : 10-12-2019 To 12-12-2019

COURT NO. : 9HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHAREGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate

1 C.A. No. 6990/2014IV

STATE OF HARYANA THROUGHSECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OFHARYANA

MONIKA GUSAIN[P-1]

Versus

JAI SINGH AND ORS. RAVINDRA BANA[R-1], CHANDER SHEKHARASHRI[R-1], ASHOK KUMAR SINGH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6991/2014IV

SOHAN SINGH (DEAD) THROUGHPROPOSED LR. K. K. MOHAN

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. UGRA SHANKAR PRASAD, MONIKAGUSAIN[R-1], B. K. SATIJA[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6992/2014IV

GYASI RAM R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusCOLLECTOR AND ORS. B. K. SATIJA, ANKUR MITTAL[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6997/2014IV

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. MONIKA GUSAIN

VersusBIRSA SINGH

ConnectedC.A. No. 7001/2014IV

NISHAN SINGH AND ORS. UGRA SHANKAR PRASAD

Versus

GRAM PANCHAYAT AND ORS. P. N. PURI, KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA, SANJAYKUMAR VISEN[R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.31052-31053/2014IV-B

BHOPAL SINGH AND ANR. SURENDER SINGH HOODA

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. RANBIR SINGH YADAV, MONIKA GUSAIN,ARVIND MINOCHA, B. K. SATIJA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4435/2015IV

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

VersusVIR SINGH AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No.6610-6612/2016IV

BHAG SINGH AJAY PAL

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. A. N. ARORA, B. K. SATIJA[R-3], MANJUJETLEY[R-5]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 28528/2017IV-B

M/S. ASF BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. GAUTAM TALUKDAR

Versus

Page 237: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. B. K. SATIJA[R-4]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 1072/2018IV-B

THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. B. K. SATIJA

Versus

SURAJ BHAN AND ORS.GAUTAM TALUKDAR[CAVEAT], ANUBHAAGRAWAL[CAVEAT], RAKESH DAHIYA[R-3],[R-4], [R-5]

ConnectedDiary No. 14965-2018IV-B

DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATSDEPARTMENT HARYANA AND ANR. B. K. SATIJA

VersusRAM SINGH AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.67107/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.67108/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29607/2018IV-B

RABINDRA NATH GUPTA AND ANR. K. V. MOHAN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.205-210/2019IV-B

DROPTI AND ORS. SUBHASISH BHOWMICK

Versus

THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.211-217/2019IV-B

GURPAL SINGH AND ANR. SUBHASISH BHOWMICK

Versus

THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.IA No.179567/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.179569/2018-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION and IA No.179568/2018-PERMISSION TO FILEPETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.179571/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 220/2019IV-B

DEVKI AND ORS. SUBHASISH BHOWMICK

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.IA No.183843/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.183844/2018-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION and IA No.183846/2018-PERMISSION TO FILEPETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.183847/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3507/2019IV-B

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL BAHADURGARH SUBHASISH BHOWMICK

VersusPEHLAD SINGH G. BALAJI[R-1]TO BE TAKEN UP ALONG WITH ITEM NO. 102 I.E. C.A.NO. 6990/2014

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3559/2019IV-B

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, BAHADURGARH SUBHASISH BHOWMICK

VersusSUNITA DEVI G. BALAJI[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4062/2019IV-B

PALA RAM AND ANR. AJAY PAL

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ROBIN KHOKHAR[R-4]TO BE TAKEN UP ALONG WITH ITEM NO. 102 I.E. C.A.NO. 6990/2014

2 C.A. No. 2232/2006XVI

SHREE DIGAMBAR JAIN VIDYALAYAAND ANR. BIJOY KUMAR JAIN

VersusMAHENDRA NARAIN PATHAK ANDOTHERS RADHA RANGASWAMY, PRADEEP MISRA

Page 238: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9

3 T.C.(C) No. 113/2005XVI-A

NIFTY CHEMICALS PVT. LTD. JYOTI MENDIRATTA, MANISH KUMAR SARAN,CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS.[ REMAIN ON THE BOARD ]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 118/2005XVI-A

M/S. GUPTA DOMESTIC FUELS PVT.LTD. CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. V. K. VERMA[R-1], UDDYAM MUKHERJEE[R-2],[R-3]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 120/2005XVI-A

TEXELA INDUSTRIES FACTORY CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. V. K. VERMA[R-1], UDDYAM MUKHERJEE[R-2],[R-3]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 122/2005XVI-A

M/S. SARASWATI ENTERPRISES . ANDORS.Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. V. K. VERMA[R-1], UDDYAM MUKHERJEE[R-2],[R-3]

4 C.A. No. 3934/2006IV-A

P. ANJANAPPA (D) BY LRS. AND ORS. NAVEEN R. NATH[P-1]Versus

A.P. NANJUNDAPPA AND ORS.DEVASA & CO.[R-1], [R-2], S. N. BHAT[R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6.4], [R-6.3], [R-6.2], [R-6.1],RAJEEV SINGH[R-9]

[ REMAIN ON THE BOARD ]

5 C.A. No. 3453/2007IX

ASHWINI SAHAKARI RUGNALAYA &RES. CENTRE P. S. SUDHEER[P-1]

VersusCHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX . AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

6 C.A. No. 2169/2007IV-A

MYSORE SALES INTERNATIONAL LTD.ETC. NANDA KISHORE[P-1]

VersusTHE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX (TDS) I AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

adjourned for two weeks as per order dated 10.07.2019

ConnectedC.A. No. 2168/2007IV-A

THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER,KARNATAKA AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]

VersusMYSORE SALES INTERNATIONAL LTDAND ORS. ETC.

NANDA KISHORE[R-1], ANIL KATIYAR[R-2],[R-3], [R-4], RAJESH MAHALE[R-5]

7 C.A. No. 1844/2010IV-A

H.S.GOUTHAM BHARTI TYAGI[P-1]VersusRAMA MURTHY AND ANR. ETC. P. R. RAMASESH[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1845/2010IV-A

H.M.RAVINDRA KUMAR ROHIT AMIT STHALEKAR[P-1]

Versus

RAMA MURTHY AND ORS. ETC. P. R. RAMASESH[R-1], [R-2], A. SUBBARAO[R-3]

8 C.A. No. 7684/2009IX

DAGADU(DEAD) THROUGH LRS. ANDORS. VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI, NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

9 C.A. No. 414/2007XVII

GRID CORPORATION OF ORISSA LTD. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA[P-1]Versus

Page 239: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9WESTERN ELECTRICITY SUPPLYCOMPANY OF ORISSA LTD. AND ORS.ETC.

RAJESH KUMAR[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-1], K.V. MOHAN[R-1], KIRTI RENU MISHRA[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 417/2007XVII

ORISSA POWER TRANSMISSION CORP.LTD. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA[P-1]

Versus

WESTERN ELECTRICITY COMPANY OFORISSA LTD. AND ORS.

RAJESH KUMAR[R-1], SOM RAJCHOUDHURY[R-1][PR], RUTWIKPANDA[R-2][PR], K. V. MOHAN[R-2], P. K.MANOHAR[R-12]

ConnectedC.A. No. 759/2007XVII

ORISSA ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION RUTWIK PANDA[P-1]

VersusNORTH EASTERN ELECTRICITY SUPPLYCO. OF ORISSA LTD.

RAJESH KUMAR[R-1], ABHISTH KUMAR[R-11],SURESH CHANDRA TRIPATHY[R-12]

ConnectedC.A. No. 572/2011XVII

GRIDCO LIMITED RAJ KUMAR MEHTA[P-1]

VersusWESTERN ELECT. SUP. CO. OF ORISSALD.

SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY, [R-1], RUTWIKPANDA[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 463/2011XVII

GRIDCO LIMITED RAJ KUMAR MEHTA[P-1]

VersusNORTH-EASTERN ELEC.SUP.CO.OFORISSA LTD. (NESCO) AND ORS.

SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY[R-1], RUTWIKPANDA[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No.2942-2943/2011XVII

WESTERN ELECT.SUP.CO.OF ORISSALTD.ETC. SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY

VersusORISSA ELECT. REGULATORY COMMN.. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA, RUTWIK PANDA

ConnectedC.A. No.2939-2941/2011XVII

WESTERN ELECT.SUPPLY CO.OFORISSA LTD. SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY[P-1]

Versus

ORISSA ELECT. REGULATORY COMMN.. RUTWIK PANDA[R-1], RAJ KUMARMEHTA[R-2], P. K. MANOHAR[R-8][PR]

ConnectedC.A. No.3595-3597/2011XVII

ORISSA ELECT. REGUL. COMMN. RUTWIK PANDA[P-1]

Versus

WESTERN ELECT.SUP.CO.OF ORISSALTD. AND ORS. SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2674/2013XVII

ODISHA ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION RUTWIK PANDA

VersusGRID CORPN.OF ORISSA LTD. . ANDORS. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA

ConnectedC.A. No.10251-10263/2013XVII

ORISSA ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION RUTWIK PANDA

Versus

SOUTHERN ELECTRICITY SUPPLYCOMPANY OF ORISSA LTD. (SOUTHCO)AND ORS.

SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY, SHIV KUMARSURI[CAVEAT], RAJ KUMAR MEHTA,KRISHNAYAN SEN, ANINDITA PUJARI,SHIBASHISH MISRA[R-55]

ConnectedC.A. No.2625-2638/2014XVII

SOUTHERN ELECT. SUPPLY COMPANYOF ORISSA AND ORS. SHIV KUMAR SURI[P-1]

Versus

Page 240: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9ORSSA ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ORS.

RUTWIK PANDA[R-1], RAJ KUMARMEHTA[R-1], SHIBASHISH MISRA[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No.3858-3860/2014XVII

ODISHA ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION RUTWIK PANDA

VersusWESTERN ELECTRICITY SUPPLYCOMPANY OF ORISSA LTD. AND ORS.

SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY, SHIV KUMAR SURI,ANINDITA PUJARI

ConnectedC.A. No.1380-1382/2015XVII

ODISHA ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION RUTWIK PANDA[P-1]

Versus

NORTH EASTERN ELECTRICITY SUPPLYCOMPANY OF ODISHA LTD. (NESCO)AND ORS.

RAJ KUMAR MEHTA[INT], RAJESHKUMAR[R-1], SHIBASHISH MISRA[R-2],ANINDITA PUJARI[R-15]ABHISHEK SINGH[IMPL]

ConnectedC.A. No.8037-8039/2015XVII

GRIDCO LIMITED RAJ KUMAR MEHTA

Versus

NORTH EASTERN ELECTRICITY SUPPLYCOMPANY OF ODISHA LTD. AND ORS.

SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY[R-7], SHARMILAUPADHYAY, RUTWIK PANDA, RAJESH KUMAR,ANINDITA PUJARI

10 C.A. No. 7017/2011XIV-A

SANGITA AND ORS. RAJESH SRIVASTAVAVersus

KULDEEP SINGH AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], NARESHBAKSHI[R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-13], [R-14]

11 C.A. No. 4983/2009X

THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND ANDANR. RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

VersusRAVI KUMAR (D) THR. LRS . AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN, AP & J CHAMBERS

ConnectedC.A. No. 4988/2009X

STATE OF UTTARANCHAL (EARLIERSTATE OF U.P.) RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

VersusVIRENDER KR(D) TH. LRS . AND ANR. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN, AP & J CHAMBERS

ConnectedC.A. No. 4984/2009X

STATE OF UTTARANCHAL THR. THECOLLECTOR RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

VersusVIRENDER KR(D) THR. LRS. . AND ANR. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN, AP & J CHAMBERS

ConnectedC.A. No. 4985/2009X

THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

VersusRAVI KUMAR (D) THR. LRS. AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN, AP & J CHAMBERS

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.165-168/2007 In C.A.No. 4983/2009X

RAVI KUMAR A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

Versus

R.K.SUDHANSHU AND ORS. RAKESH K. SHARMA, P. N. GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No.4989-4992/2009X

STATE OF UTTARKHAND KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1][GR]

Versus

RAVI KUMAR (D) TH. LRS. ETC. ANAGHA S. DESAI[R-1], A. VENAYAGAMBALAN[R-1]

12 C.A. No. 5105/2009XIV-A

NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVEDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI

Versus

Page 241: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-V,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5106/2009XIV-A

NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVEDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, DELHI I ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5107/2009XIV-A

NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVEDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, DELHI I

13 C.A. No. 1900/2010XVI

PARGAN SINGH AND ORS. T. MAHIPALVersusBHIKHAR SINGH @ SUDARSHAN SINGHAND ORS. BRIJ BHUSHAN

and IA No.62622/2017-XTRA and IA No.62625/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.70066/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTSand IA No.70067/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

14 C.A. No.1843-1844/2009X

STATE OF U.P.(NOW UTTARAKHAND)THR. COLLECTOR HARIDWAR AND ANR. VINAY ARORA[P-1][GR]

VersusR.B.NARAIN SINGH SUGAR MILLS LTD.THR. CHAIRMAN SARDAR HARDEVSINGH AND ANR.

VINEET BHAGAT[R-1], MRIDULA RAYBHARADWAJ[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } [ PART-HEARD BY : HON. ASHOKBHUSHAN AND HON. NAVIN SINHA, JJ. ]

ConnectedC.A. No.1845-1846/2009X

TOWN AREA COMMITTEE THR.EXECUTIVE OFFICER SRIDHAR POTARAJU

VersusR.B.NARAIN SINGH SUGAR MILLS LTD.THR. CHAIRMAN AND ORS. VINEET BHAGAT

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 35030/2015X

M/S. RAI BAHADUR NARAYAN SINGHSUGAR MILLS LIMITED THROUGH ITSRESOLUTION SHRI KAILASH JOSHI(GENERA

VINEET BHAGAT[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGHCOLLECTOR GAICHANGPOU GANGMEI[R-4], [R-5]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS

15 C.A. No. 1312/2009XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusS.RAJU AND ORS. AND ORS. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR

16 Crl.A. No. 932/2008II-B

D.C.SANKHLA ETC ABHAY KUMAR, [P-1]Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1], ARVIND KUMARSHARMA[R-2]

List the matters after two weeks. (Ref.: R/P dated 18.7.2019)ConnectedCrl.A. No. 992/2008II-B

SOM DUTT TYAGI AMARJIT SINGH BEDI[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1], ARVIND KUMARSHARMA[R-2]

17 C.A. No. 8590/2010XV

RAJASTHAN STATE ELECTRICITYBOARD JAIPUR ROHIT K. SINGH[P-1]

Versus

Page 242: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX (ASSESSMENT) AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8591/2010XV

RAJASTHAN STATE ELECTRICITYBOARD JAIPUR ROHIT K. SINGH[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

18 C.A. No.1890-1891/2010XII

ASSOCN. OF VASANTH APPTS. OWNERS PRANAV SACHDEVA[P-1]

Versus

V. GOPINANTH AND ORS. AND ORS.R. NEDUMARAN[R-1], P. V. DINESH[R-1], M.YOGESH KANNA[R-1], VINODH KANNA B.[R-6],[R-7], K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-8]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7334/2013XII

M/S KEYARAM HOTELS P.LTD. NEHA RATHI[P-1][PR]

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. B. BALAJI[R-1], VINODH KANNA B.[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No.7847-7848/2013XII

ASSN.OF VASANTH APARTMENTSOWNERS PRANAV SACHDEVA

VersusSTATE OF T.NADU AND ORS B. BALAJI, VINODH KANNA B.[R-3]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 591/2015X

CREDAI TAMIL NADU D. L. CHIDANANDA

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. VINODH KANNA B.[R-3]

19 C.A. No. 7439/2010XII-A

C.CHANDRA PRAKASH . AND ORS. ANU GUPTAVersusC.SETHRAMMA RAO AND ORS. D. BHARATHI REDDY

20 C.A. No. 4557/2012XVI

DIPALI BISWAS . AND ORS. RAUF RAHIMVersus

NIRMALENDU MUKHERJEE . AND ORS. SATISH KUMAR, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6],[R-7]

21 C.A. No. 5758/2009XVI

SHYAMAL KANTI DAS MRIDULA RAY BHARADWAJVersus

SANKAR KUMAR GHOSH AND ORS. RUPESH KUMAR, PLR CHAMBERS ANDCO.[R-14], [R-15], [R-16], [R-17]

[ RETAIN ITS POSITION ] [ REMAIN ON THE BOARD ]22 C.A. No. 8641/2009

IVMUKESH KUMAR KAVEETA WADIAVersusS.KULDEEP SINGH ALOK GUPTA, PRAVEEN CHATURVEDI

ConnectedC.A. No. 7328/2010IV

SHANTA RANI KAVEETA WADIA

VersusNASIB KAUR PRAVEEN CHATURVEDI

23 C.A. No. 6835/2009IV

GURCHARAN SINGH AND ORS. R. C. KOHLIVersusANGREZ KAUR AND ANR. P. N. PURI

24 C.A. No.7086-7087/2009III-A

SYED MOHAMMAD SAJJAD ALI KHAN (D) IRSHAD AHMAD[P-1]

VersusSYED MOHD. AHMAD ALI KHAN ANDORS.

EJAZ MAQBOOL[R-1], PRADEEP MISRA[R-1],[R-2], [R-4]

and IA No.128491/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.128493/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

25 Crl.A. No. 1353/2008II-A

KETAN V. PAREKH KAMINI JAISWALVersus

Page 243: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA, MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1349/2008II-A

B.RAGHUVIR ACHARYA

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1200/2008II-A

HITEN P.DALAL V. D. KHANNA

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1352/2008II-A

M.K.ASHOK KUMAR K J JOHN AND CO

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1201/2008II-A

SARANATHAN MOHAN JATIN ZAVERI

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1131/2008II-A

SHRENIK JHAVERI E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1585/2008II-A

PALLAV SHETH KUSUM CHAUDHARY

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1250/2008II-A

NAVINCHANDRA N.PAREKH KAMINI JAISWAL

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

26 Crl.A. No. 1758/2012II-A

AMAR SINGH AMIT PAWANVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1491/2018II-A

BABULAL AMIT PAWAN

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ARJUN GARG[R-1]FOR FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 57627/2018

27 C.A. No. 3477/2010X

DAVESH NAGALYA AND ORS. BRAJ KISHORE MISHRAVersusPRADEEP KUMAR (D) THR.LRS. ANDORS. SHARMILA UPADHYAY[R-2]

28 C.A. No.9049-9053/2011XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusM/S K.C.SHARMA AND CO.. AND ORS. NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN[R-1]

29 C.A. No. 8277/2009IV

BUDHAWANT SINGH (D) THR. LRS. ANDORS. DEEPAK GOEL

VersusGURUDWARA DERA SANT KILLEY WALAAND ORS. MITTER & MITTER CO.

30 C.A. No.3964-3965/2009XII

R.M. SUNDARAM @R.MEENAKSHISUNDARAM V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusSRI KAYAROHANASAMY ANDNEELAYABHAKSHI AMMAN TEMPLE T. HARISH KUMAR

Page 244: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9

31 C.A. No. 9778/2010IV-A

BHARAT PETROLEUM CORP.LTD. . ANDORS. PAREKH & CO.

VersusANIL PADEGAONKAR PRATIBHA JAIN

ConnectedC.A. No. 9779/2010IV-A

ANIL PADEGAONKAR PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusBHARAT PETROLEUM CORP.LTD.. ANDORS. PAREKH & CO.

32 Crl.A. No. 2037/2011II-C

GURDEV SINGH NARENDRA KUMAR[P-1]VersusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

33 Crl.A. No. 2201/2011II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMARVersusGURBACHAN SINGH R. D. UPADHYAY

34 Crl.A. No. 621/2009II-A

RISHI KUMAR AGARWAL ARVIND GUPTA, [P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDANR.

SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, [R-1], (MRS. )VIPIN GUPTA[R-2]

35 Crl.A. No. 1158/2009II-B

SOWARAN SINGH ABHISHEK ATREY[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB UTTARA BABBAR[R-1]

36 Crl.A. No. 1639/2010II-B

MAJOR SINGH ABHISHEK ATREYVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB KULDIP SINGH, RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-1][ PART-HEARD BY HONBLE ASHOK BHUSHAN AND HON'BLE NAVIN SINHA, JJ. ][ REMAIN ON THE BOARD ]

37 C.A. No. 3185/2011IX

MANOJ B. JOSHI BHASKAR Y. KULKARNIVersusTHE 8TH INCOME TAX OFFICER ANDORS. AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

38 C.A. No. 1125/2009XI-A

MEENA PAUL AND ORS. ROMY CHACKO[P-1]VersusBIYATREES @ CHINNAMMA (DEAD) BYLRS. AND ORS.

P. GEORGE GIRI[R-1.4], [R-1.3], [R-1.2], [R-1.1],[R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 23534/2009XI-A

BIYATREES @ CHINNAMMA . (DEAD)THR. LRS. AND ORS. P. GEORGE GIRI[P-1]

VersusC.G.MANNUEL @ KUNJACHAN . (DEAD)THR. LRS. AND ORS.I.A. No. 1 Application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP

39 C.A. No. 2444/2010XVI

KALAWATI DEVI MANJEET CHAWLAVersusPRABHAWATI DEVI DEAD THR. LRS.AND ANR. AND ANR. S. K. VERMA

40 C.A. No. 134/2009XII

T.DHANPAL AND ORS. AND ORS. ANUP KUMARVersusDHANAPAL AND ANR. AND ANR. L. K. PANDEY

41 Crl.A. No. 1738/2010II-A

SHIVA MANSOOR ALIVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1][ REMAIN ON THE BOARD ]

42 Crl.A. No. 2032/2009II-C

R.C.SHARMA(DEAD) THROUGH LRS. LILY ISABEL THOMASVersusSTATE (C.B.I.) MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

Page 245: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9[ REMAIN ON THE BOARD ]. .FOR ON IA 12987/2010 FOR ON IA 29201/2011 FORON IA 81598/2011

43 Crl.A. No. 2172/2011II-B

THAN KUNWAR SARLA CHANDRA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1]

44 C.A. No. 6157/2013XIV-A

MAHANT SURENDRA NATH SUMITA HAZARIKA[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RACHANA SRIVASTAVA[R-2], BINUTAMTA[R-3]

45 Crl.A. No. 900/2010II-C

SHANMUGAM V. RAMASUBRAMANIANVersusSTATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

46 C.A. No. 17355/2017XII

PALANIAMMAL AND ORS. V. G. PRAGASAMVersusKAMALAKANNAN AND ORS. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[ RETAIN ITS POSITION ]

47 C.A. No. 7230/2012XIV-A

HIMACHAL ROAD TRANSPORTCORPORATION AND ANR. HIMANSHU TYAGI[P-1], VINOD SHARMA[P-2]

VersusHIMACHAL ROAD TRANSPORTCORPORATION RETIRED EMPLOYEESUNION

PRIYA PURI, [R-1]

48 C.A. No. 4394/2010XIV-A

BOLORAM BORDOLOI RAJIV MEHTA[P-1]VersusLAKHIMI GAOLIA BANK . AND ORS. MITTER & MITTER CO.[R-1], [R-1], [R-2], [R-5]

49 C.A. No.5800-5801/2017XII-A

YARLAGADDA PARTHASARADHI K. SARADA DEVI

VersusYARLAGADDA TULASAMMA . AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY, K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI

50 Crl.A. No. 2103/2010II-B

V.P.SINGH SUDARSHAN RAJANVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-1], [R-1][ RETAIN ITS POSITION ]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2104/2010II-B

NITIN SHYAM PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

Versus

THE STATE OF PUNJAB PREM MALHOTRA, [R-2], KARANBHARIHOKE[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2105/2010II-B

SARABJIT SINGH JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

51 C.A. No. 5167/2010IV

KHUSHI RAM AND ORS. RANBIR SINGH YADAV[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusNAWAL SINGH AND ORS. ROHIT KUMAR SINGH[R-1]

52 C.A. No. 1083/2012XII

T.NADU ELECT.BOARDAND ORS. ANDORS. M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1][GR]

VersusK.SUBRAMAIAM S. GOWTHAMAN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1084/2012XII

TAMILNADU ELEC.BOARD AND ANR. M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1][GR]

VersusM.RANGANATHAN(DEAD) THROUGHLRS MADHUSMITA BORA[R-1]

Page 246: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No. 1085/2012XII

TAMILNADU ELEC.BOARD AND ANR.AND ANR. M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1][GR]

VersusA.CYRIL ANZU. K. VARKEY[R-1]

53 Crl.A. No. 5/2010II

N.RAGHAVENDER SOMIRAN SHARMA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP. BYCBI MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1]

54 Crl.A. No. 581/2010II-C

PARAMASIVAM K. RAM KUMAR[P-1]VersusSTATE BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

55 C.A. No. 9493/2010III

KAMLABEN(D) TR.LRS.. AND ORS. NACHIKETA JOSHI[P-1.4], [P-1.3], [P-1.2],[P-1.1], [P-1], [P-2.1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT . AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1]

56 Crl.A. No. 1271/2010II-C

SHANKRAPPA SHARNAPPA KACHANURAND ORS. SUPREETA SHARANAGOUDA[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1], JOSEPHARISTOTLE S.[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1272/2010II-C

SIDDU @ SIDDANNA AND ORS. R. D. UPADHYAY[P-1]

VersusHOME DEPARTMENT SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

57 Crl.A. No.1750-1751/2009II-B

FAROOQ RASULBHAI KURESHI SANJAY JAIN[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1], B. V. BALARAMDAS[R-2]

58 C.A. No. 756/2013IV

GIAN SINGH . AND ORS. JYOTI MENDIRATTAVersusMADAN SAIN @ KULWANT SINGH ANDORS. S. JANANI

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

59 C.A. No. 5389/2012XII-A

KALLAKURI PATTABHIRAMASWAMY(D)TR.LRS. G. MADHAVI

VersusKALLAKURI KAMARAJU . AND ORS. SUDHA GUPTA, P. VINAY KUMAR

60 C.A. No. 6218/2012IV-A

BIDAR INSTITUTE OF MEDICALSCIENCES P. R. RAMASESH

VersusABDULLA KHAN (D) BY LRS. AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY, S. USHA REDDYFOR [APPLICATION FOR TRANSPOSITION] ON IA 5/2016

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 35935/2016IV-A

ABDULLA KHAN (D) BY LRS. REP. BYGPA HOLDER MR. SHAMRAO S. USHA REDDY

Versus. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BIDAR . ANDORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.880/2017IV-A

BIDAR INSTITUTE OF MEDICALSCIENCES REP BY ITS DIRECTOR/PRINCIPAL

P. R. RAMASESH

VersusABDULLA KHAN (D) THR LRS AND ORS.(1)Non filing of required number of Paperbooks (1+3) (2)Non mentioning ofvolume number With page numbers in Index of Paper-books. (3)Affidavit

Page 247: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7361/2017IV-A

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusABDULLA KHAN (D) BY LRS

61 C.A. No. 4020/2010III-A

U.P.HSG. AND DEVELOPMENT BOARDAND ANR. VISHWAJIT SINGH

VersusNAMIT SHARMA PRASHANT KUMAR

62 Crl.A. No. 1078/2010II-A

SURENDRA BANGALI @ S.S. ROUTELE PRAMOD DAYAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND ANIL K. JHA[R-1]

63 Crl.A. No. 1050/2010II-C

SATBIR SINGH @ GATTU D. N. GOBURDHAN[P-1]VersusSTATE(GOVT.OF N.C.T.OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

64 Crl.A. No. 1008/2010II-C

R.DAMODARAN S. GOWTHAMANVersusTHE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

65 C.A. No.8721-8722/2010XI-A

KERALA REVENUE VILLAGE STAFFORGANISATION (KRVSO),REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY

RADHA SHYAM JENA[P-2]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. C. K. SASI

66 C.A. No. 8163/2009IV

TEK CHAND JAGRATI SINGH[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], MAYURIRAGHUVANSHI[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5862/2012XIV-A

SHRI SANJIB DEB ROY AND ANR. MAYURI RAGHUVANSHI[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], B. K.SATIJA[R-5], [R-8], JAGRATI SINGH[R-4], [R-6],[R-7]

67 Crl.A. No. 361/2010II-A

ARIFVALI MUHAMMED SHAIKH HIMANSHU MUNSHI[P-1][SCLSC]Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

68 C.A. No.4616-4618/2010IV

JAGMOHAN SINGH DHILLON ETC.ETC. D. MAHESH BABU

Versus

SATWANT SINGH AND ORS. VINEET BHAGAT, KAVEETA WADIA, KARANBHARIHOKE[R-5]

69 Crl.A. No. 1910/2010II-A

BALU SUDAM KHALDE AND ANR. K. L. JANJANIVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

70 Crl.A. No. 1404/2010II-A

SHRINIWAS TRIPATHI M/S ARS ASSOCIATES[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HARSH PARASHAR[R-1]

71 C.A. No. 3034/2012XII

RAMACHANDRA REDDY AND ORS. G. BALAJI[P-1]VersusRAMULU AMMAL SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR[R-1]

72 C.A. No.2037-2038/2010XI-A

ITTY P. K. MANOHAR

VersusIVY ABRAHAM AND ORS. LIZ MATHEW, [R-2]

Page 248: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 973 C.A. No. 500-501/2011

IV-AJ. UTTAMCHAND BALAJI SRINIVASANVersusSUSHEELAMMA AND ORS. M. A. CHINNASAMY{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } List the appeal in the month of December,2019 as per order dated 12.07.2019

74 Crl.A. No. 2463/2014II-C

SHAILENDRA SWARUP JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRAVersusTHE DEPUTYDIRECTOR,ENFORCEMENTDIRECTORATE

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

75 C.A. No.5199-5201/2011XIV-A

UNMUKT BHATNAGAR AND ORS. KUSUM CHAUDHARY[P-1]

VersusMANOJ BHATNAGAR (D) BY LRS.. ANDANR.

SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY[R-1.2], RAJIVRANJAN DWIVEDI[R-1]

76 Crl.A. No. 2004/2010II

HIMMATA RAM MUKUL KUMAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

77 C.A. No.9998-10009/2011III

AMRUTBHAI SOMABHAI PATEL RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA

VersusSPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER .AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26300/2015III

PATEL DASHRATHLAL RAMANLAL SUMITA RAY

VersusONGC LTD AND ANR.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26807/2015III

LASIBEN JIVANJI THROUGH HERPOWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDERDASHRATHBHAI PATEL

SUMITA RAY

VersusONGC LIMITED . AND ANR.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26833/2015III

THAKOR PAPATJI GABHAJI THROUGHHIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDERDASHRATHBHAI PATEL

SUMITA RAY

VersusONGC LIMITED . AND ANR.

78 C.A. No. 3876/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYAVersus

JAMEA HIDAYAT TRUST AND ORS.R. D. UPADHYAY, PRATIBHA JAIN, PRAGATINEEKHRA, K. L. JANJANI, EQUITY LEXASSOCIATES, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3874/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVT.AUTH. S. K. BHATTACHARYA[P-1]

Versus

M/S S.M.S.INVESTMENT CORP.P.LTD.AND ORS.

COAC[R-1], R. D. UPADHYAY[R-1], PRATIBHAJAIN[R-1], K. L. JANJANI[R-1], EQUITY LEXASSOCIATES[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3872/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYA

Versus

M/S RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT. LTDAND ORS. AND ORS.

COAC, R. D. UPADHYAY, PRATIBHA JAIN,PRAGATI NEEKHRA, K. L. JANJANI, EQUITYLEX ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No. 3873/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYA

Versus

Page 249: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9

M/S S.M.S.INVESTMENT CORP.P.LTD.AND ORS.

COAC, R. D. UPADHYAY, PRATIBHA JAIN,PRAGATI NEEKHRA, K. L. JANJANI, EQUITYLEX ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No. 3875/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYA

Versus

M/S RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT. LTD.AND ORS. AND ORS.

COAC, R. D. UPADHYAY, PRATIBHA JAIN,PRAGATI NEEKHRA, K. L. JANJANI, EQUITYLEX ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No. 3871/2017XV

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

Versus

M/S S.M.S.INVESTMENT CORP. . ANDORS.

PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-2],[R-3], S. K. BHATTACHARYA[R-4], EQUITY LEXASSOCIATES[R-10], K. L. JANJANI[R-11], [R-12],[R-13]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3882/2017XV

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusM/S RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH P.LTD..AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, SARVESH SINGHBAGHEL, R. D. UPADHYAY, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3883/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

Versus

M/S SMS INVESTMENT CORPPORATION(P) LTD. AND ORS.

SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN, R. D. UPADHYAY,PRATIBHA JAIN, K. L. JANJANI, B. KRISHNAPRASAD, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3877/2017XV

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusJAMEA HIDYAT TRUST . AND ORS. R. D. UPADHYAY, B. KRISHNA PRASAD, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3881/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusTHE JAMEA HIDAYAT TRUST AND ORSAND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, R. D. UPADHYAY, K. L.JANJANI, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3878/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

Versus

M/S. RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT. LTD.AND ORS. AND ORS.

SARVESH SINGH BAGHEL, R. D. UPADHYAY,PRATIBHA JAIN, K. L. JANJANI, B. KRISHNAPRASAD, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No. 3880/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

Versus

M/S SMS INVESTMENT CORP.P.LTD.AND ORS.

SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN, R. D. UPADHYAY,PRATIBHA JAIN, K. L. JANJANI, B. KRISHNAPRASAD, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No.15528-15531/2017XV

ABDUL RASHID MIR AND ANR. MUKUL KUMAR

Versus

M/S. RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT.LTD.AND ORS AND ORS.

B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-5], [R-6], ROHIT K.SINGH[R-2]

79 Crl.A. No. 108/2012II-A

GUNA MAHTO R. D. UPADHYAYVersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND GOPAL PRASAD

Page 250: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 980 Crl.A. No. 2251/2010

II-CFEDRICK CUTINHA S. N. BHAT[P-1]VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2265/2010II-C

KRISHNAPPA @ KITTU NAIKA N. ANNAPOORANI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

81 C.A. No. 7334/2010XII

ARUCHAMY GOUNDER @ARUMUGHAM(D)TH:LR AND ORS. V. BALACHANDRAN[P-1]

VersusM. BALASUBRAMANIAM VIKAS MEHTA[R-1]and IA No.92110/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.92111/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

82 C.A. No. 8070/2010IV-A

GOVT. TOOL ROOM AND TRAININGCENTRE S. N. BHAT[P-1]

VersusH.N. YOGA RAJAN AND ANR. NARESH KUMAR[R-1]

83 Crl.A. No. 811/2011II-C

NAGOOR PICHAI @ BADUSHA VIPIN KUMAR JAIVersusTHE STATE THROUGH SUB INSPECTOROF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

84 Crl.A. No. 1380/2012II-A

MD. ASLAM JAIL PETITION[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR GOPAL SINGH[R-1]Mr. Sanjay Mani Tripathi, Advocate is NOR Amicus curiae

85 C.A. No. 4749/2011XII

P.P.RATHI V. BALACHANDRANVersusARULMIGU MALLIGESWARARTHIRUKOIL AND ORS. AND ORS. R. SATHISH

86 Crl.A. No.1663-1664/2015II

ANIL KUMAR RAJEEV SINGH[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHPRADEEP MISRA[R-1], YADAV NARENDERSINGH[R-2], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], EQUITY LEXASSOCIATES[R-3], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10]

ONLY IA No.110881/2017- APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION FOR VACATION OFSTAY TO BE LISTED IN CRL.A. NO. 1663-64/2015 ONLY ON 01.05.2018

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1665-1666/2015II

ANIL KUMAR RAJEEV SINGH[P-1]

Versus

RIZWAN . AND ORS. COAC[R-1], PRADEEP MISRA[R-1], EQUITY LEXASSOCIATES[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1667-1668/2015II

ANIL KUMAR RAJEEV SINGH[P-1]

Versus

BADRUDDIN . AND ORS. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1669/2015II

ANIL KUMAR DHAKA RAJEEV SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDANR.

PRADEEP MISRA[R-1], EQUITY LEXASSOCIATES[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1670/2015II

ANIL KUMAR RAJEEV SINGH[P-1]

Versus

WASEEM AND ANR. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[R-1], PRADEEPMISRA[R-2]

Page 251: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9

87 C.A. No.1137-1138/2011IV

ZILE SINGH ETC. AND ANR. RISHI MALHOTRA

Versus

CHATTER SINGH (DEAD) THR. LRS. ANDORS.

(MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA, VINOD SHARMA[R-1.4],[R-1.3], [R-1.2], [R-1.1], [R-8.2], [R-8.1], [R-8.6],[R-8.5], [R-8.4], [R-8.3]

88 Crl.A. No. 2418/2010II-C

C.VILVANATHAN SANGEETA KUMARVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

89 Crl.A. No. 2035/2011II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]VersusNIRBHAY SINGH IRSHAD AHMAD[R-2]

90 C.A. No. 9774/2011XVI

AWADESH SINGH K. R. CHITRA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } LIST IN THE MONTH OF DECEMBER 2019VIDE HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 22.7.2019

91 C.A. No. 7580/2012XI-A

PRAKASAN M.P.. AND ORS. A. RAGHUNATH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],SANAND RAMAKRISHNAN[P-6], [P-7], [P-8]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA . AND ANR. G. PRAKASH[R-1]

92 C.A. No. 10766/2011III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH COLLECTOR AND ANR. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

NANWA (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ANR. S. R. SETIA[R-1], SUDHIRKULSHRESHTHA[R-2]

93 Crl.A. No. 191/2011II-C

K.RAJENDRAN V. RAMASUBRAMANIANVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

94 C.A. No.1869-1871/2018XII

BALASUNDARAM AND ORS. AND ORS. VIPIN NAIR[P-1][PR], [P-2][PR], [P-3][PR]

VersusRAMALINGAM AND ORS. AND ORS.ADVOCATE NAME: MR. VIPIN NAIR(FOR PETITIONER)

95 C.A. No. 97-98/2012XIV-A

INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURALRESEARCH THROUGH THE DIRECTORGENERAL AND ANR.

PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

RAJINDER SINGH . AND ORS. SUDARSHAN RAJAN[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], [R-9]

96 C.A. No. 11196/2011IV-A

STATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPURVersusA.G.D. REDDY S. N. BHAT

97 Crl.A. No. 233/2013II-B

BISHNUPADA DUTTA AND ANR. RANJAN MUKHERJEEVersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

98 C.A. No. 3927/2018XII-A

G. MADHUSUDHANA PRASAD AND ORS.

V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1], [P-2][PR], [P-3][PR],[P-4][PR], [P-5][PR], [P-6][PR], [P-7][PR],[P-8][PR], [P-9][PR], [P-10][PR], [P-11][PR],[P-12][PR], [P-13][PR], [P-14][PR], [P-15][PR],[P-16][PR], [P-17][PR], [P-18][PR], [P-19][PR],[P-20][PR], [P-21][PR]

Versus

Page 252: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9

M. LAKXMIKANT AND ORS.G. N. REDDY[R-1], [R-6][GR], [R-7][GR],VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-6]SADINENI RAVI KUMAR[I-1][IMPL],[I-2][IMPL], [I-3][IMPL]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3928/2018XII-A

P.V.RAMAPATHI RAO AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Versus

GOVERNMENT OF A.P. AND ORS. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR, VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3929/2018XII-A

M.B. HEMLATHA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Versus

M. LAXMIKANTH AND ORS. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR[R-6][GR], [R-7][GR],VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-6], [R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3930/2018XII-A

N. VIJAY KUMAR C. K. RAI[P-1]

Versus

G. MOHAN REDDY AND ORS.ABHIJIT SENGUPTA[R-1], GUNTURPRABHAKAR[R-6][GR], [R-7][GR], VENKATPALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-7]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3931/2018XII-A

K.ANANTHA REDDY AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]

Versus

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESHAND ORS.

VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-1],[R-2], [R-2], GUNTUR PRABHAKAR[R-1][GR],[R-2][PR], ANIS AHMED KHAN[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3932/2018XII-A

M.PENCHALA RAJU AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]

Versus

M.LAXMIKANTH AND ORS.G. N. REDDY, SADINENI RAVI KUMAR[R-1], C.S. N. MOHAN RAO[R-1], GUNTURPRABHAKAR[R-6][GR], [R-7][GR], VENKATPALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-6]

FOR ON IA 11/2014 (Application for impleadment FILED BY MR. C.S.N. MOHANRAO)

99 C.A. No. 6640/2013III-A

VIKAS JAINVersusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

100 C.A. No. 3795/2012XII

AROCKIAMARY AND ORS. AND ORS. V. BALACHANDRANVersusKULANDAIAMMAL AND ORS. AND ORS. P. V. YOGESWARAN, SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA

101 C.A. No. 11341/2013XIV-A

SHANKAR KUMAR T. L. GARGVersusRAM NARAIN AND ANR. PAHLAD SINGH SHARMA, VISHWA PAL SINGH

102 C.A. No.5785-5788/2011III-A

SHAUKAT NARESH KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7]

VersusSTATE OF U.P. . AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2]

103 C.A. No. 652/2019XII

S.GAJAGANAPATHY RAKESH K. SHARMAVersusS.RATHINASABABATHY (DEAD) THR LRSAND ORS AND ORS. SUMIT KUMAR, S. R. SETIA[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 653/2019XII

SHANKAR P. N. RAMALINGAM

VersusS.RATHINASABABATHY (DEAD)THROUGH LRS. AND ORS. SUMIT KUMAR, S. R. SETIA

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2012

Page 253: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9104 Crl.A. No. 1627/2013

II-BMAHENDRABHAI NATHABHAI RAVAL DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

105 C.A. No. 6213/2016IV

TRUST MANDIR THAKUR RAMLACCHAMN JI MAHRAJ ARJUN SINGH BHATI

Versus

PURAN (D) THR. LRS. . AND ORS. A. N. ARORA, RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI,KRISHAN KUMAR, SHILPA SINGH[R-5]

106 C.A. No. 7810/2013XIV-A

JAI KISHAN BANSAL(D) TR.LRS. PETITIONER-IN-PERSONVersusMOHD.ISHTYAQUDDIN K. S. RANA

ConnectedC.A. No. 7813/2013XIV-A

JAI KISHAN BANSAL(D) TR.LRS. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusMOHD ISHTYAQUDDIN K. S. RANA

ConnectedC.A. No. 7812/2013XIV-A

JAI KISHAN BANSAL(D) TR.LRS. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusMOHD.IMTIYAZ K. S. RANA

107 Crl.A. No. 1265/2012II-C

T.G.KRISHNAMURTHY. AND ORS. AMAN MOHIT HINGORANIVersusSTATE OF KARNATAKATHROUGHTARIKERE POLICE AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

108 C.A. No. 5859/2012IV

OM PRAKASH AMAN MOHIT HINGORANIVersusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

109 C.A. No.4459-4460/2016IV-A

CHINNAMMA AND ORS. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR[P-1]

VersusMUNI REDDY . AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE[R-1], UDAY B. DUBE[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

110 C.A. No. 356/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 361-363/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusC.I.T. AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 357/2015IV-A

M/S. INDO AMERICAL EXPORTS SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusC.I.T. AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 366-367/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 358-360/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 374-376/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

Page 254: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 368-373/2015IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 379/2015III

C.I.T-VIII MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 387/2015III

C.I.T 8 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 380/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX V ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. THROUGHITS MANAGER RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 381/2015III

COMM. OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. THROUGHITS MANAGER RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 386/2015III

COMM. OF INCOME TAX VIII ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusMONOSANTO INDIA LTD. RAHUL GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 389/2015IV-A

M/S INDO AMERICAN EXPORTS SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4584/2015IV-A

M/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX .AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101654/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No. 4579/2015IV-A

M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE 11(4) AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101667/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No. 4578/2015IV-A

M/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101664/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No. 4583/2015IV-A

M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM, [P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX . ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101644/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

Page 255: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4577/2015IV-A

M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4582/2015IV-A

M/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

and IA No.101655/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No. 4585/2015IV-A

M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX .AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101658/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7567/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TAX CBUILDING AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101669/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7566/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT. LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.List alongwith C.A. No. 356 of 2017

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 6464/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ADVANTA LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.106019/2017-XTRA

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7558/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ADVANTA LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101679/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 19939/2015IV-A

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 9949/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - IBANGALORE . AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101686/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 11727/2015IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101675/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3547/2016IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT. LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.[P-1]

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR], [R-2][GR]

Page 256: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3505/2016IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3624/2016IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3789/2016IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3804/2016IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(OSD) ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3705/2016IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(OSD) ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3703/2016IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][GR]

111 C.A. No. 7883/2012XVII

MANJU SINGH CHANDRA PRAKASHVersus

SHANTI DEVIS. K. VERMAHITENDRA NATH RATH[IMPL], RACHITTAPRIYANKA[I-3][LR/S][PR]

[ REMAIN ON THE BOARD ]112 C.A. No. 9289/2013

IIIB.P. SINGH RAHUL KAUSHIKVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

113 Crl.A. No. 1179/2012II-B

NARENDRASINH KESHUBHAI ZALA RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA[P-1][SCLSC]VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

114 C.A. No. 1537/2016XII

R.JANKIAMMAL VIKAS MEHTAVersus

S.K.KUMARASWAMY (D) THR.LRS. ANDORS.

SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY, S. RAVI SHANKAR,PRABHA SWAMI, K. V. MOHAN, PALLAVILANGAR[R-2], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1538/2016XII

S.R. SOMASUNDARAM AND ANR. S. RAVI SHANKAR, GAURAV AGRAWAL

VersusS.K.KUJMARASWAMY (D) THRU LRS. .AND ORS. AND ORS.

SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY, VIKAS MEHTA, K.V. MOHAN

FOR FOR ON IA 5/2017 FOR [BRINGING ON RECORD LRS] ON IA 90850/2018

Page 257: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9115 C.A. No. 6610/2015

XVILAKHAN SAO(D) THR. HIS L.RS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersus

PARWATI DEVI . AND ORS. BANKEY BIHARI SHARMA, SUBHASISHBHOWMICK

116 Crl.A. No. 759/2013II-B

SAMABHAI RAMSUBHAI KISHORI MANISHA T. KARIA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]REF; HON'BLE COURT ORDER DATED 06.06.2019 LIST THE MATTER AFTERVACATION

117 C.A. No.10423-10424/2017IV-A

H.M.SHIVANNA(D) BY LRS. AND ANR.AND ANR. BALAJI SRINIVASAN

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.AND ORS.

ANKUR S. KULKARNI, V. N. RAGHUPATHY,VAIJAYANTHI GIRISH

IA NO. 152152/2019(FOR DIRECTION) IN CA 10423-24/2017 ONLY TO BE LISTEDBEFORE THE HON'BLE COURT

118 Crl.A. No. 1290/2012II

MAHAVEER SINGH MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

119 C.A. No. 11161/2017IV-A

GURUSHANTAYYA ANIL KUMARVersusGOURAVVA AND ORS. TULIKA PRAKASH, ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

ConnectedC.A. No. 11162/2017IV-A

NEELAKANTAYYA TULIKA PRAKASH

VersusGURUSHANTAYYA AND ORS. ANIL KUMAR, AFTAB ALI KHAN

120 Crl.A. No.148-151/2014II

ANJUM KHAN SHAKEEL AHMED[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETRY

AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-1], P.NARASIMHAN[R-1], [R-2]

121 C.A. No. 5921/2014XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SHAKEEL AHMED[P-1]Versus

K. KAJNA . AND ORS. AJAY VIKRAM SINGH[R-1], P.NARASIMHAN[R-1], [R-2]

122 C.A. No. 15150/2017XIV-A

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROYVersus

MUKUT RANJAN SARMA . AND ORS.

SHAILESH MADIYAL, [R-6], [R-7], [R-10],[R-11], RAHUL PRATAP[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], [R-8], [R-9], [R-13], [R-14], [R-15], [R-16],[R-17], [R-18], [R-19], [R-20], [R-21], [R-22],[R-23], [R-24], [R-25], [R-26], [R-27], [R-28],[R-29], [R-30], [R-31], [R-32], [R-33], [R-34],[R-35], [R-36], [R-37], [R-38], [R-39], [R-40]

123 C.A. No.6776-6777/2013III

KAZI AKILODDIN CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

124 C.A. No. 8772/2013III

SHIVAJI RAMCHANDRA SAWANT ABHA R. SHARMA[P-1]VersusDINESH RAMCHANDRA SAWANT ANDORS. S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY[R-1], [R-2]

125 Crl.A. No. 1122/2017II-A

NANDESHWAR KUMAR SUBHRO SANYAL[P-1]Versus

RAJENDRA PRASAD PANDEY AND ORS. KUMAR MIHIR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],SANTOSH KUMAR - I[R-6]

Page 258: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9126 C.A. No. 6422/2015

XII-ACOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III ANIL KATIYARVersusSPECTRA SHARES AND SCRIPS (P)LIMITED TATINI BASU

ConnectedC.A. No. 6427/2015XII-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXIII ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSPECTRA SHARES AND SCRIPS PVT LTD TATINI BASU

ConnectedC.A. No. 14094/2015XII-A

PR. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SPECTRA SHARES AND SCRIPESPVT. LTD. TATINI BASU

ConnectedC.A. No. 14613/2015XII-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SPECTRA SHARES AND SCRIPESPVT. LTD. TATINI BASU

127 C.A. No. 9884/2013XI-A

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. C. K. SASIVersusK. BHANAMMA VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R

ConnectedC.A. No. 9885/2013XI-A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. C. K. SASI[P-1]

VersusP.M.ANTONY VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 33132/2015XI-A

STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. C. K. SASI

VersusSAJITHA P.M. . AND ANR.

128 W.P.(C) No. 984/2013PIL-W

TELANGANA VIKAS KENDRA MANOJ C. MISHRA[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. C. K. SUCHARITA[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 207/2014PIL-W

VISHNU ALLURI AND ANR. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.RAJESH SRIVASTAVA[R-1], CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], AMIT SHARMA[R-1], S.. UDAYAKUMAR SAGAR[R-5]

FOR FOR ON IA 5/2017 FOR ON IA 7/2017 and IA No.86398/2017-impleading partyand IA No.86412/2017-PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW AN IA

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 166/2014PIL-W

M. RAJAMOHAN REDDY SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-3]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 161/2014PIL-W

K. RAGHU RAMAKRISHNA RAJU ANDANR. N. RAJARAMAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-2], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-4]

Office Report for DirectionsConnectedW.P.(C) No. 203/2014PIL-W

M. GOPI KRISHNA

VersusUNION OF INDIA SUSHMA SURI, CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON

Page 259: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 210/2014PIL-W

MANOHAR LAL SHARMA ADVOCATE PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], GUNTURPRABHAKAR[R-2], S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-3]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 211/2014PIL-W

KARNATAKA TELUGU PRAJA SAMITHI NARESH KUMAR[P-1]

Versus

U.O.I. AND ANR. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], C. K. SUCHARITA[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 217/2014PIL-W

MATTEGUNTA RAMAKRISHNA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], SUSHMASURI[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 215/2014PIL-W

PENDURTHI VENKATESH A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIAB. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], SUSHMA SURI[R-1],CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], S.. UDAYAKUMAR SAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 219/2014PIL-W

VUNDAVALLI ARUN KUMAR PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Versus

UOI AND ANR. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 223/2014PIL-W

MUPPALLA SUBBARAO AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

UOI AND ANR. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 224/2014PIL-W

RASTHRIYA PRAJA CONGRESS(SECULAR) A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.B. KRISHNA PRASAD, SUSHMA SURI[R-1],CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], S.. UDAYAKUMAR SAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 218/2014PIL-W

K. PRABHAKAR RAJU AND ANR. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 228/2014PIL-W

NALLARI KIRAN KUMAR REDDY ANDORS. ANNAM D. N. RAO[P-1]

Versus

UOI AND ORS. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-4]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 225/2014PIL-W

RAYAPATI SAMBASIVA RAO AND ANR. ANNAM D. N. RAO[P-1]

Versus

UOI AND ORS. CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-4]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 275/2014PIL-W

B. SANJEEVA RAO PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-2], S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-4]

Page 260: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 230/2014PIL-W

MATTA JAYAKAR AND ANR. M. VIJAYA BHASKAR[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], D. MAHESH BABU[R-2], C. K.SUCHARITA[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 271/2014PIL-W

K.K SHERWANI R. C. KAUSHIK[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 289/2014PIL-W

P.R. KRISHNAN AND ANR. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1], M. A.CHINNASAMY[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS.

ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], DEBOJIT BORKAKATI[R-3], [R-4],ASWATHI M.K.[R-5], SUMEET LALL[R-6],ASHOK KUMAR SINGH[R-7], P. V.YOGESWARAN[R-8], ANINDITA PUJARI[R-9],UTTARA BABBAR[R-10], RUCHI KOHLI[R-11],GOPAL SINGH[R-12], RAJIV NANDA[R-13],PARIJAT SINHA[R-14]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 344/2014PIL-W

BANDI SREEKANTH & 3 ORS CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI

VersusUOI AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 306/2014PIL-W

CHANAMOLU LAKSHMI ANUPAMA ANDORS. R. NEDUMARAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], SUSHMA SURI[R-1],S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1471/2017XII-A

D.SURAYANARAYANA AND ORS. K. SARADA DEVI

VersusGOVT. OF INIDA SUSHMA SURI, D. BHARATHI REDDY

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 742/2014PIL-W

HARITHA SARANGA AND ORS. AND ORS. V. K. MONGA

VersusUNION OF INDIA GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 456/2014PIL-W

VISHNU ALLURI DEBASIS MISRA[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SUSHMA SURI[R-1]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 470/2014PIL-W

DR.M.SHARATH CHANDRA REDDY VIPIN KUMAR JAI

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 804/2014PIL-W

MUTTEEVI VENKATAPPA LAKSHMI ANDORS. P. VINAY KUMAR

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI, S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR,GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 132/2018PIL-W

PONGULETI SUDHAKAR REDDY D. MAHESH BABU

Versus

Page 261: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-3], GURMEETSINGH MAKKER[R-4], B. V. BALARAMDAS[R-5], [R-6], ANIL KATIYAR[R-7], S.. UDAYAKUMAR SAGAR[R-8], GUNTURPRABHAKAR[R-9]AMIT K. NAIN[IMPL]APPLICANT-IN-PERSON[INT]

129 Crl.A. No.278-279/2016II-A

BHUNESHWAR YADAV AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEY[P-1]

Versus

NIRMAL SINGH AND ORS. SHANTANU SAGAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], [R-5],NIRANJANA SINGH[R-3]

130 C.A. No. 4464/2014III

BASANT LAL S/O MOTILAL TIWARI(DEAD) THROUGH LRS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusRAMASHANKAR S/O KAMTAPRASADTIWARI AND ORS.

NITIN BHARDWAJ[R-1], KARUNAKARMAHALIK[R-1]

131 C.A. No. 5943/2014III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHMEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES THR.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS.

ANKIT GOEL[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusDR. OM PRAKASH AGGARWAL

132 Crl.A. No.2314-2319/2014II-A

SHIV SHANKAR SAHI CHANDRA PRAKASH[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1], SUBHROSANYAL[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

133 C.A. No. 6815/2014III-A

U.P. RAJKIYA NIRMAN NIGAM LIMITED TUSHAR BAKSHIVersusL.N. GUPTA

134 Crl.A. No. 1856/2014II-C

RAHIL AND ANR. MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF[P-1]VersusSTATE(GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 927/2015II-C

SURAIYA MUSHTAQ AHMAD

VersusSTATE OF (GOVERNMENT OF N.C.T. OFDELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

135 C.A. No. 773/2017XVI-A

THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIRAND ORS. M. SHOEB ALAM, [P-2], [P-3]

VersusSALEEM JAHANGIR RESHI J. P. DHANDA

136 C.A. No. 5477/2016X

MANOJ KUMAR . AND ORS. ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND . THROUGHPRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS.

KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], [R-2], DEBASISMISRA[R-3], [R-4]

137 Crl.A. No. 1039/2015II-B

OM PARKASH SINGH ANIS AHMED KHAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

138 C.A. No. 9735/2016III

NAGPUR SHIKSHAN MANDAL AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersus

VARSHA VINOD SAYAM AND ANR. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,ANAGHA S. DESAI

ConnectedC.A. No. 9734/2016III

NAGPUR SHIKSHAN MANDAL AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Versus

Page 262: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9

NANDA WAKDE AND ANR. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,ANAGHA S. DESAI

139 C.A. No. 1443/2017XIV-A

ROSHAN LAL GUPTA (DEAD) THROUGHLRS. PIYUSH SHARMA[P-1.4], [P-1.3], [P-1.2], [P-1.1]

VersusIDBI BANK LIMITED AND ANR. RABIN MAJUMDER

140 Crl.A. No. 334/2015II-A

SATISH PURUSHOTTAM AUSHAL ANDANR. ANAGHA S. DESAI, [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKARFOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 18856/2016

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 1306/2015II-A

VILAS PURUSHOTTAM AUSHAL ANAGHA S. DESAI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

141 Crl.A. No. 106/2018II-C

MALTI @ K.S. PRIYA @ SHANTI @PREMKUMARI AND ANR. KAMINI JAISWAL[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1][GR]

142 C.A. No.5208-5211/2017XII

V. MASILAMANI AND ORS. ETC. ETC.AND ANR.

ANKUR S. KULKARNI, GURMEET SINGHMAKKER

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.AND ANR. VIJAY KUMAR, SRIRAM P.

IA No.91307/2017-EARLY HEARING APPLICATION IS TO BE LISTED.143 C.A. No. 9879/2017

XVTHE INDIAN HUME PIPE CO. LTD. AMARJIT SINGH BEDIVersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.FINANCE DEPARTMENT SECRETARY TOGOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

MATTER RESTORE BY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN AND HON'BLEMR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA ON 15.07.2019

ConnectedC.A. No.9880-9886/2017XV

THE INDIAN HUME PIPE CO. LTD. AMARJIT SINGH BEDI

Versus

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN . AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No.9887-9891/2017XV

INDIAN HUME PIPE CO. LTD. AMARJIT SINGH BEDI

Versus

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.FINANCE DEPARTMENT SECRETARYAND ORS.

MILIND KUMAR

144 C.A. No. 5780/2015XV

IRSHAD(D)THROUGH LRS. SHOBHA GUPTA[P-1]VersusSHARAFAT HUSSAIN PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1]

145 Crl.A. No. 828/2015II-A

SANJAY VITHHAL PACHAGHARE B. K. PALVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

146 Crl.A. No. 1203/2015II-B

RAKESH KUMAR SINGH VIVEK NARAYAN SHARMA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

147 C.A. No. 132/2016XIV-A

CANON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAOVersus

Page 263: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 135/2016XIV-A

SONY ERICSSON MOBILECOMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT.LTD.(NOW) MERGED WITH SONY INDIA PVTLTD) NEW DELHI

AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 138/2016XIV-A

SONY ERICSSON MOBILECOMMUNICATION INDIA PVT. LTD.(NOW MERGED WITH SONY INDIA PVTLTD)

AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 137/2016XIV-A

CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[P-1]

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 3(1) NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

FOR PERMISSION TO PLACE ADDITIONAL FACTS AND GROUNDS ON IA102664/2018

ConnectedC.A. No. 136/2016XIV-A

CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[P-1]

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 3(1) ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 139/2016XIV-A

CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD. KISHORE KUNAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 141/2016XIV-A

CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD. THR. MASAONAKA, MD KISHORE KUNAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 140/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

M/S. CANNON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO, ANIL KUMARGAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 2669/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S HAIER APPLIANCES INDIA PVT.LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 143/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S DAIKIN AIR-CONDITIONING INDIAPVT. LTD. ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 2668/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. HAIER APPLICANCES INDIA PVT.LTD.

Page 264: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No. 142/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VNEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S REEBOK INDIA COMPANY LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 144/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SHARP BUSINESS SYSTEMS INDIALTD. POOJA DHAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 151/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. DAIKIN AIR - CONDITIONING INDIAPVT. LTD. ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No. 145/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD KISHORE KUNAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 146/2016XIV-A

REEBOK INDIA COMPANY LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 148/2016XIV-A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 3 (1) NEW DEHI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3937/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDISCOVERY COMMUNICATION INDIA SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 149/2016XIV-A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

Versus

M/S. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO, ANIL KUMARGAUTAM[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 521/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. AMADEUS INDIA PVT. LTD. SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 527/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTOSHIBA INDIA PVT. LTD. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 526/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI - 8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SHARPA BUSINESS SYSTEM(INDIA) PVT. LTD. POOJA DHAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 152/2016XIV-A

REEBOK INDIA COMPANY KAVITA JHA

VersusADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 1219/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[R-1]

Page 265: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No. 2703/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE 3(1) ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4808/2016XIV-A

HAIER APPLIANCES (INDIA ) P. LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 5024/2016XIV-A

HAIER APPLIANCES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 4809/2016XIV-A

HAIER APPLIANCES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

ConnectedC.A. No. 4412/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -IVNEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHAIER APPLIANCES INDIA PVT LTD

ConnectedC.A. No. 5909/2016XIV-A

DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusHONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.5905-5906/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA)PVT. LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 5903/2016XIV-A

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA)PVT. LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 5904/2016XIV-A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA)PVT. LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6485/2016XIV-A

THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX RANGE 2 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA )PVT LTD PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 3953/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 3954/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA

Page 266: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No.11110-11111/2016XIV-A

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMARand FOR AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 119430/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 5514/2017XIV-A

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-09 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S TOSHIBA INDIA PVT LTD AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8403/2017XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX DELHI-2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BOSE CORPORATION INDIA PVTLTD HARISH PANDEY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11201/2017XIV-A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLE PASSAGE TO INDIA TOURS ANDTRAVELS (P) LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1]

IA No.80934/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.80937/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No. 15498/2017XIV-A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLE PASSAGE TO INDIA TOURS ANDTRAVELS (P) LTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 17811/2017XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE INDIAPVT LTD PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 21852/2017XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 19984/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1826/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHONDA SIEL POWER PRODUCTS LTD.IA No.14992/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No.13384-13385/2018XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

AMADEUS INDIA PVT LTD SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA64556/2018

ConnectedDiary No. 10952-2018XIV

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVALVOLINE CUMMINS PVT. LTD.

Page 267: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No. 4652/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAVERY DENNISON (INDIA) PVT. LTD.

ConnectedDiary No. 13295-2018XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVALVOLINE CUMMINS PVT. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.55855/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.55856/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20829/2018XV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GILLETTE INDIA LTD. TARUN GUPTA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.76572/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.76573/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 20837/2018XV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GILLETTE INDIA LTD DIRECTOR TARUN GUPTA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.86519/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 17094/2018XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMAKE MY TRIP INDIA PVT. LTD SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9624/2018XV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXALWAR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GILLETTE INDIA LTD. TARUN GUPTA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.118232/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.118233/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.118234/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHYLIST OF DATES

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22239/2019XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SONY INDIA PVT. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.134327/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.134329/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.134326/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 15803/2019XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SONY INDIA PVT LTDIA No.94691/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

148 C.A. No. 10433/2016III

SMT. SUSHILABAI TUKARAM PATIL ANDANR. SACHIN PATIL

VersusSUBHASH KAKASAHEB PATIL . ANDORS. S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY

149 Crl.A. No.1410-1412/2015II-A

RAJKUMAR SHASHIBHUSHAN P. ADGAONKAR

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA POLICESTATON INCHARGE AND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1], AMOL B.KARANDE[R-2]

Page 268: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedSLP(Crl.)...CRLMP No.4705-4706/2016II-A

LAXMAN S/O DADARAO KARANDE AMOL B. KARANDE

Versus

RAJKUMAR AND ANR.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1823/2017II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

VersusRAJKUMAR

150 Crl.A. No.1419-1420/2015II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

VersusRAMESH JIJEBA LAHANE MANJU JETLEYMR. MAHABIR SINGH, SENIOR ADVOCATE APPOINTED AS AMICUS CURIAE TOASSIST THE HON. COURT IN THE INSTANT MATTER

151 C.A. No.21828-21831/2017XII

M.R. SRINIVASAN AND ORS. ETC. ANDORS. GAGAN GUPTA[P-1]

VersusASSOCIATION OF TAMIL NADUHIGHWAYS ENGINEERS AND ORS. ETC.

PRANAV SACHDEVA[R-1], VINODH KANNAB.[R-2], K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-3][GR]

152 Crl.A. No. 616/2016II

DHARAMPAL AND ANR. VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH RUCHIRA GOEL[R-1], FARRUKHRASHEED[R-1]

and IA No.7690/2018-BAIL APPLICATION153 C.A. No. 9927/2016

III-AGYANENDRA SINGH ABHA R. SHARMAVersusJOINT DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION ANDORS.On mentioning, as per Hon'ble Court's Order dated 15.04.2019, List the matter on24.04.2019 before the appropriate Bench as per the roster.

154 C.A. No. 7257/2016III-A

VIPIN KUMAR SINGH YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P THR. PRINCIPALSECRETARY . AND ORS.

GARIMA PRASHAD[R-1], TANMAYAAGARWAL[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7258/2016III-A

SHRAVAN KUMAR ASHA GOPALAN NAIR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

KRISHNANAND PANDEYA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],VINAY GARG[R-4]

and IA No.105549/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.155 C.A. No. 6122/2016

XVISAHID ALIM AND ORS. AND ORS. CHANDRA PRAKASHVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. ANDORS. SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

156 C.A. No. 7397/2016III-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusGAJENDRA TEWARI ANURAG KISHORE[R-1]

157 Crl.A. No. 44/2017II-C

MOHD. VAKIL AFTAB ALI KHAN[P-1]VersusSTATE(GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

158 Crl.A. No. 1121/2016II-C

ANWAR ALI AND ANR. ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA[P-1][PR], [P-2][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1][GR]FOR FINAL ARGUMENTS VIDE HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 02.07.2018.

159 Crl.A. No. 1078/2017II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[P-1]Versus

Page 269: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9RAMESH ANIS AHMED KHAN[R-1]

160 Crl.A. No. 1688/2017II-C

SHIV KUMAR ALIAS JAWAHAR SARAF SUBHASISH BHOWMICK[P-1]VersusRAMAVTAR AGARWAL T. HARISH KUMAR

161 Crl.A. No. 1229/2017II-C

CHAMAN LAL RADHIKA GAUTAM[P-1][PR]VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AJAY MARWAH[R-1][GR]HEARING EXPEDITED VIDE HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 21.07.2018 AND04.07.2018.FOR FINAL ARGUMENTS AND DISPOSAL VIDE HON'BLE COURT'SORDER DATED 04.07.2018.

162 Crl.A. No. 117/2017II-A

ATUL M. PAREKH KAMINI JAISWALVersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 139/2017II-A

SUDHIR S. MEHTA KAMINI JAISWAL

VersusCENTRAL BUREAUOF INVESTIGATION MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1]FOR FOR APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION ON IA 139015/2019

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 138/2017II-A

DEEPAK BHUPATRAI MEHTA KAMINI JAISWAL

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1]FOR

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 136/2017II-A

R. SITARAMAN ABHIMANUE SHRESTHA

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAFOR

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 140/2017II-A

COODLI RAVI KUMAR AND ANR. JAYANT KUMAR MEHTA

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONAND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 137/2017II-A

SEETHAPATHY SURESH BABU JATIN ZAVERI[P-1]

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1]

163 C.A. No. 4934/2017III

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusADANI ENTERPRISES LTD TARUNA SINGH GOHIL[R-1]

164 C.A. No. 82/2019III

SURAT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MUNAWWAR NASEEM[P-1]VersusGAURAV KANVAR JUNEJA AND ORS. RUPESH KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

165 Crl.A. No. 1730/2017II-B

VINOBHAI M. P. VINODVersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

166 Crl.A. No. 1801/2017II-A

THE STATE OF BIHAR NIRANJANA SINGH[P-1]VersusKAMESHWAR PRASAD YADAV ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY[R-1]

167 Crl.A. No. 1537/2017II-B

JAYRAJSINH TEMUBHA JADEJA R. C. KOHLI[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]RAHUL GUPTA[I-1][IMPL]

Page 270: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1538/2017II-B

AMARJITSINH ANIRUDHDHSINH JADEJAAND ANR. E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]RAHUL GUPTA[I-1][IMPL]

168 Crl.A. No. 132/2018II-C

SHRI DEEPAK SRIVASTAV RITESH KUMAR CHOWDHARYVersusTHE STATE OF DELHI B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 133/2018II-C

RAJENDER SRIVASTAV RITESH KUMAR CHOWDHARY

Versus

STATE OF DELHI DEBASIS MISRA[CAVEAT], B. V. BALARAMDAS[R-1]

169 C.A. No. 2201/2018IV-A

ASHOK KUMAR GOYAL AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAINVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS. B. S. BANTHIA[CAVEAT], ARJUN GARG[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2202/2018IV-A

ASHOK KUMAR GOYAL AND ANR. CHRISTI JAIN

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS. B. S. BANTHIA[CAVEAT], ARJUN GARG[R-1]

FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA159123/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 159125/2018

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.1072/2018 in C.A. No.2201/2018IV-A

ASHOK KUMAR GOYAL AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAIN

Versus

ABHAY CHAUDHARY AND ORS. B. S. BANTHIA[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], [R-5]

IN C.A. No. - 2201/2018,

ConnectedC.A. No.4533-4534/2019IV-A

FIRM M/S GWALIOR LAND DEALS ANDFINANCE THROUGH PARTNER HARISHANKAR GOYAL(DEAD) THROUGH LRS

CHRISTI JAIN

VersusSURESH KUMAR AND ORS. ABHINAV RAMKRISHNA[R-4.1]

170 Crl.A. No. 404/2018II-C

ARUN KUMAR AMIT AGRAWALVersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 405/2018II-C

ARUN KUMAR AMIT AGRAWAL

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.31495/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP

171 C.A. No. 11923/2018XIV-A

MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. (EARLIERKNOWN AS MARUTI UDYOG LTD.) KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

[ RETAIN ITS POSITION ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11924/2018XIV-A

MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. (EARLIERKNOWN AS MARUTI UDYOG LTD.) KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMSSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11841/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 271: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9MARUTI UDYOG LTD. KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11842/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.119420/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 32929/2018XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED(FORMERLY KNOWN M/S. MARUTIUDYOG LTD.)

KAVITA JHA

IA No.140408/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.140410/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No. 11919/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6(FORMERLY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX II) NEW DELHI

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED(FORMERLY MARUTI UDYOG LTD.) NEWDELHI

KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.137205/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.137207/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No. 11920/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. MARUTI UDYOG LTD. KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.155109/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.155110/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 33387-2018XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED(FORMERLY MARUTI UDYOG LTD.) KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.151988/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.151989/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 11921/2018XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. THROUGHDIRECTOR KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.142970/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING [ TO BE TAKEN UP ALONG WITH ITEM NO.45 I.E. SLP(C)NO.9074/2018 ]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11977/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6(FORMERLY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX II)

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED(FORMERLY MARUTI UDYOG LTD.) KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.143757/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 11835/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI LIMITED KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.157069/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

Page 272: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No. 34/2019XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.154277/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No. 33/2019XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.159765/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3826/2019XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.181936/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.181938/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 6631/2019XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MARUTI UDYOG LIMITED (NOWKNOWN AS MARUTI SUZUKI INDIALIMITED

KAVITA JHA[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.13185/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.13192/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 44704-2018XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]

ConnectedDiary No. 23919-2019XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]

172 C.A. No. 4418/2018XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFWEALTH TAX, I NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ORIENTAL BUILDING ANDFURNISHING CO. LTD MANAGINGDIRECTORFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.54053/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.54056/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No. 4417/2018XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFWEALTH TAX 1 DELHI TA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ORIENTAL BUILDING ANDFURNISHING CO. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.54114/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.54115/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

173 Crl.A. No. 725/2019II

AJAY P. MATHEW PROMILAVersus

THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND ANR. S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-1], AJAY VIKRAMSINGH[R-2]

174 C.A. No. 8989/2018III

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX AHMEDABAD ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NIRMA LIMITED MOHIT D. RAM[R-1]

Page 273: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No. 9815/2018III

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX AHMEDABAD ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NIRMA LIMITED MOHIT D. RAM

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 27976/2018III

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S NIRMA LIMITED MOHIT D. RAM[R-1]

175 C.A. No. 1833/2008IV-A

ABDUL KHUDDUS NAVEEN R. NATH[P-1]Versus

H.M. CHANDIRAMANI(DEAD) THR LRS.AND ORS.

AMAN GUPTA[R-1], E. C. VIDYA SAGAR[R-2],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], SHUBHRANSHUPADHI[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1834/2008IV-A

COMMISSIONER BANGALOREMAHANAGARA PALIKE E. C. VIDYA SAGAR[P-1]

Versus

H.M. CHANDIRAMANI (DEAD) BY LRS.AND ORS.

AMAN GUPTA[R-1.4], [R-1.3], [R-1.2], [R-1.1],MANJULA GUPTA[R-2], SHUBHRANSHUPADHI[R-3]

176 C.A. No. 7647/2009III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH SECRETARY AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusCHAMPA DEVI

ConnectedC.A. No. 8882/2011III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDANR. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

ASHOK KUMAR KAMANI . AND ORS.RITESH AGRAWAL[R-9], [R-10], GARIMAPRASHAD[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6],[R-11], [R-12], [R-13], [R-14]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8881/2011III-A

RAI PUSHPALATA (D) P. K. JAIN[P-1]

VersusVARANASI VIKAS PRADIKARANSECRETARY AND ORS.

ARUN K. SINHA[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 8870/2011III-A

SMT. SNEHLATA GOEL T. MAHIPAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH COMPETENT AUTHORITYAND ORS.

KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], ARUN K.SINHA[R-2], E. C. VIDYA SAGAR[R-3]

and IA No.24543/2018-PERMISSION TO PLACE ADDITIONAL FACTS ANDGROUNDS and IA No.24544/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

ConnectedC.A. No. 825/2018III-A

STATE OF U.P. AND ANR. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1]

Versus

MALHU . AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA[R-1], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]UTKARSH SHARMA[IMPL]

ConnectedC.A. No. 826/2018III-A

STATE OF U.P . AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1]

VersusANIL KUMAR . AND ORS. MANJU JETLEY[R-1]FOR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 17731/2019XI

KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

VersusMOOLA DEVI AND ORS. DEEPAK GOEL[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

Page 274: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedSLP(C) No. 17733/2019XI

KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

VersusBRIJ LAL AND ORS. PIYUSH DWIVEDI[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 12467/2019XI

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA

VersusMOOLA DEVI AND ORS. DEEPAK GOEL[CAVEAT]

177 Crl.A. No. 816/2010II-A

AJIT B KERKAR E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1]VersusTRADE WINGS HOTELS LTD. AND ORS. BHARGAVA V. DESAI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 817/2010II-A

ABK ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusTRADE WINGS HOTELS LTD. AND ORS. BHARGAVA V. DESAI[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 32116/2015IX

TULIP HOTELS PVT. LTD. AND ANR. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusTRADE WINGS LTD. A PUBLIC LIMITEDCOMPANY AND ORS. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

IA No.73920/2017-STAY APPLICATION178 C.A. No. 3404/2011

XVIRAJESHWAR MAHTO (D) AND ORS. ROHIT K. SINGH[P-3], [P-4]VersusKESHAV MAHTO AND ORS. SHARMILA UPADHYAY

179 C.A. No. 241/2014IV-A

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHYVersusBAPU KUNNI BEARY AND ORS. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR[ RETAIN ITS POSITION ]

180 C.A. No. 92/2009IV

RAJ PAL TR.SHEELA DEVI AJAY KUMAR SINGHVersusKIRPAL KAUR AND ORS. RAJESH AGGARWAL[R-2]ALTERNATIVE ARRANGEMENT NOTICE ISSUED ON 27.06.2018. AD card received.Service complete.

181 C.A. No. 11323/2013XVI

MAHANTH MUKUNDANAND SARSWATI(DEAD) AND ANR. T. MAHIPAL

VersusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR, GOPAL SINGH

182 C.A. No. 5910/2009XII

K.RAKKIANNA GOUNDER K. K. MANIVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.AND ANR. M. YOGESH KANNA

183 Crl.A. No. 885/2010II-C

PRAKASH VISHNU SHARMA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.[R-1]

184 C.A. No.8214-8215/2016X

THE STATE OF UTTARAKHANDUTTARAKHAND PEY JAL S.V.E.N.NIGAMMANAGING DIRECTOR

SHIRIN KHAJURIA[P-1]

Versus

JAGDISH CHANDRA PANDEYRASHMI NANDAKUMAR[R-3], ANURAGKISHORE[R-5], GARVESH KABRA[R-6][PR],[R-7][PR], [R-8][PR], [R-9][PR], [R-10][PR],[R-11][PR], [R-12][PR], [R-14][PR]

{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 }

Page 275: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedC.A. No.8216-8217/2016X

SUBHASH CHANDRA ANURAG KISHORE

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTARAKHANDSECRETARY AND ORS.

SHIRIN KHAJURIA[R-2], [R-3], GARVESHKABRA[R-16][PR]

{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 }185 C.A. No. 6077/2009

IV-AGURUWARI BAI SANTOSH KUMAR TRIPATHIVersusJAGDISH PRASAD BANSAL SHARMILA UPADHYAY

186 Crl.A. No.1477-1478/2015II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1][GR]

Versus

KRISHAN LAL PRADHAN AND ORS.RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1][PR],[R-4][PR], [R-5][PR], [R-6][PR], [R-7][PR],[R-8][PR]

187 C.A. No. 7297/2010IV-A

B.C.RAJAGOPAL NANDA KISHOREVersusLAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND ANR. ANKUR S. KULKARNI

188 C.A. No. 2892/2009III-A

GIRIJA PRASAD TIWARI (D) THR. LRS. SUNIL KUMAR VERMA[P-1]Versus

RAMAPATI TIWARI (DEAD) AND ORS. AJIT SINGH PUNDIR[R-1], TANMAYAAGARWAL[R-2], [R-3]

189 Crl.A. No. 228/2010II-C

R.RAMACHANDRAN M. C. DHINGRAVersusTHE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

190 C.A. No.6721-6722/2009III

CHAMPALAL JAVANTRAJ SHETH E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.

MINAKSHI VIJ[R-4], [R-18], [R-20], RASHMISINGHANIA[R-8], SHEELA GOEL[R-9],HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2][GR], [R-3][GR],[R-11][GR], [R-12][GR], [R-13][GR], ARCHANAPATHAK DAVE[R-16], LAKSHMI RAMANSINGH[R-19], T. MAHIPAL[R-5], [R-6], [R-7],[R-17], [R-28], [R-29], [R-30], [R-31]

FOR ON IA 96406/2009

191 C.A. No. 1330/2010XI-A

THE LAW SECRETARY . LAW (B)DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF KERALA ANDORS.

G. PRAKASH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusK.P.GEORGE A. RAGHUNATH[R-1]

192 C.A. No. 2760/2010XIV-A

INDIAN BANK AND ANR. MADHU SIKRI, [P-2]VersusMAHAVEER KHARIWAL VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU

193 C.A. No. 5094/2011IV-A

DEREK A C LOBO AND ORS. PRITHA SRIKUMAR[P-2], [P-3], [P-4]VersusULRIC M A LOBO(DEAD) BY LRS. ANDORS. DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-2], [R-3]

194 C.A. No. 9472/2010XII

A.SUBRAMANIAN AND ANR. G. BALAJIVersusR.PANNERSELVAM E. R. SUMATHY

195 R.P.(C) No.786-787/2019 in C.A.No. 8442-8443/2016XIV-A

M/S SHANTI CONDUCTORS (P) LTD DEVASHISH BHARUKA

Versus

Page 276: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 9ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDAND ORS. SNEHA KALITA[R-1]

IN C.A. No. - 8442/2016, IN C.A. No. - 8443/2016, [ TO BE LISTED BEFORE ASPECIAL BENCH COMPRISING HON'BLE ASHOK BHUSHAN , HON'BLE S.ABDULNAZEER AND HON'BLE NAVIN SINHA, JJ. AS PART-HEARD MATTER ON11.12.2019 AT 2.00 P.M. ]

ConnectedR.P.(C) No. 789/2019 inC.A. No. 8450/2016XIV-A

M/S. BRAHMAPUTRA CONCRETE PIPEINDUSTRIES DEVASHISH BHARUKA

VersusTHE ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITYBOARD SNEHA KALITA[R-1], [R-1]

IN C.A. No. - 8450/2016,ConnectedR.P.(C) No. 788/2019 inC.A. No. 8445/2016XIV-A

M/S TRUSSES AND TOWERS (P) LTD DEVASHISH BHARUKA

Versus

ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDAND ANR. SNEHA KALITA[R-1]

IN C.A. No. - 8445/2016,ConnectedR.P.(C) No.1365-1366/2019 in C.A.No. 8442-8443/2016XIV-A

M/S SHANTI CONDUCTORS (P) LTD.AND ANR. RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI

Versus

ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDSAND ORS. SNEHA KALITA[R-1], [R-1]

IN C.A. No. - 8442/2016, IN C.A. No. - 8443/2016,ConnectedR.P.(C) No.1367-1368/2019 in C.A.No. 8442-8443/2016XIV-A

M/S SHANTI CONDUCTORS (P) LTD.AND ANR. RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI

Versus

ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDAND ORS. SNEHA KALITA[R-1]

IN C.A. No. - 8442/2016, IN C.A. No. - 8443/2016,

ConnectedDiary No. 27516-2019XIV-A

ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDAND ORS. SNEHA KALITA

VersusM/S SHANTI CONDUCTORS (P) LTD.AND ANR.

IN C.A. No. - 8442/2016, IN C.A. No. - 8443/2016,

NEW DELHI06-12-2019 17:55:35

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 277: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 33 OF 2019 FROM : 10-12-2019 To 12-12-2019

COURT NO. : 11HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTAREGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 C.A. No. 14023/2015

XVIIMUKESH SHARMA SHARMILA UPADHYAYVersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

2 Crl.A. No. 831/2015II-C

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3],[P-4], [P-5]

VersusR. KARTHIK ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

3 C.A. No. 5751/2017XVII

BRIG. NALIN KUMAR BHATIA SARVESH SINGHVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS . AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

ConnectedC.A. No. 5629/2017XVII

BRIG V. N. CHATURVEDI SARVESH SINGH

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

ConnectedC.A. No. 4653/2018XVII

LT. COL NK GHAI (RETD) NARESH KUMAR

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and IA No.55866/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILINGAPPEAL and IA No.55865/2018-LEAVE TO APPEAL U/S 31(1) OF THE ARMEDFORCES TRIBUNAL ACT, 2007

4 C.A. No.10630-10632/2017XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3],[P-4]

VersusEX. SWR SANJAY KUMAR AND ANR. SHEKHAR KUMAR

5 C.A. No. 9197/2017XVII

KARNATAKA STATE PLASTICASSOCIATION KUNDAN KUMAR MISHRA

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORSDEPARTMENT OF FORESTENVIRONMENT AND ECOLOGY ANDORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 18313/2017XVII

CANARA PLASTICS MANUFACTURESAND TRADERS ASSOCIATION KUNDAN KUMAR MISHRA

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. MANJU JETLEY[R-4]

6 W.P.(C) No. 1043/2018X

JAYANT KUMAR CHANDUBHAI PATEL PREM PRAKASHVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

Page 278: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 11

7 C.A. No.6642-6643/2010IX

KALINDI DAMODAR GARDE(D) BY LRS. SRIRAM P.[P-1.1], JOHN MATHEW[P-1.4],[P-1.3], [P-1.2], [P-2.3], [P-2.2], [P-2.4]

VersusMANOHAR LAXMAN KULKARNI ANDORS. AND ORS.

ABHA R. SHARMA, VISHWAJIT SINGH, ASHAGOPALAN NAIR

8 C.A. No. 5673/2009XII

VARADARAJAN RAKESH K. SHARMAVersusKANAKAVALLI AND ORS. AND ORS. CHIRA RANJAN ADDY

9 C.A. No.3040-3041/2017XVI

SHOHIDULLAH RAUF RAHIM[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH[R-4], [R-5],[R-6]

As per record of proceeding dated 25.7.2019, list the appeals after three monthsConnectedC.A. No.3042-3043/2017XVI

THE STATE OF BENGAL AND ORS. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[P-1]

Versus

SHYAMSUNDER MOHANTO . AND ORS.SOMNATH MUKHERJEE[R-1], MITHILESHKUMAR SINGH[R-1], DEVASHISHBHARUKA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3044/2017XVI

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[P-1]

Versus

BISHALI BANERJEE AND ORS. S.K. SINHA[R-1], MITHILESH KUMARSINGH[R-1], AMIT PAWAN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3278/2017XVI

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[P-1]

Versus

SAUVIK GHOSH AND ORS. MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH[R-1], AMITPAWAN[R-1]

FOR VACATING STAY ON IA 115708/2017 FOR PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 100050/2019

10 C.A. No. 6354/2009IV

JASMER SINGH JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. UTTARA BABBAR[R-1], C. S. N. MOHAN RAO,[R-2]

11 C.A. No. 1649/2010XV

DEVENDRA PRATIBHA JAINVersusANITA AND ANR. V. J. FRANCIS

12 C.A. No. 9173/2010XVI

NARAYAN YADAV (D) THR.LRS. AMIT KUMARVersus

THE STATE OF BIHAR . AND ORS. V. P. APPAN, JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA, GOPALSINGH

13 C.A. No. 5886/2008IV-A

M.H.SRINIVASA . AND ANR. S. N. BHATVersusLAKSHMI M. A. CHINNASAMY

14 C.A. No. 2631/2017IV-A

KRISHNA KUMAR AND ORS. AFTAB ALI KHANVersusMAHARANI TR.LRS.. AND ORS. M. A. KRISHNA MOORTHY

15 C.A. No. 7074/2008IV-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS. RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1]

VersusRAKESH SETHI . AND ANR.

16 C.A. No. 5869/2009XII

V.ARJUNAN P. N. RAMALINGAMVersus

Page 279: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 11LALITHA AND ORS. AND ORS.

17 C.A. No. 6319/2009IV

PATRAM PREM MALHOTRAVersusGRAM PANCHAYAT KATWAR AND ORS. SANJAY JAIN

18 C.A. No. 4570/2011XV

SOCIETY FOR UN-AIDED PVT.SCHOOLOF RAJ. JAIPUR PRESIDENT DAMODARPRASAD GOYAL

SHOBHA GUPTA

VersusCHILDRENS GARDEN PLAYSCHL.EDUN.STY . AND ORS. PARMANAND GAUR

19 C.A. No. 6085/2008XVI

DULAL CHANDRA KARVersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORSAND ANR.

SATISH KUMAR, PLR CHAMBERS ANDCO.[R-1], CHANCHAL KUMAR GANGULI

ConnectedC.A. No. 7555/2008XVI

CHAIRMAN,W.BENGAL REG.SCHOOLSERC.COMMISSION MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH[P-1]

VersusSUBRATA PATRA AND OTHERS ANDANR.

SATISH KUMAR[R-1], PLR CHAMBERS ANDCO.[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3939/2009XVI

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[P-1], CHANCHALKUMAR GANGULI[P-1]

VersusSUBRATA PATRA AND ORS. MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH[R-1]

20 C.A. No. 5826/2009XIV-A

INDIAN FOREST SERVICE ASSO.GENERAL SECRETARYVersusTHE STATE OF TRIPURA AND ORS. SHUVODEEP ROY

21 C.A. No.4366-4367/2010XI-A

NRUSINGH CHARAN NAYAK C. V. SUBBA RAO

VersusHEMANTA KUMARI NAYAK SHIBASHISH MISRA

22 C.A. No. 2526/2012IV-A

INAYATH RAJASAB ATTAR V. N. RAGHUPATHYVersusSHANTAVVA SHANKAR DIVATE

23 C.A. No. 279/2012IV-A

DHEERENDRA KUMAR MISHRA V. MAHESHWARI & CO.[P-1]Versus

STATE OF M.P.. AND ORS. HARSH PARASHAR[R-1], SAMAR VIJAYSINGH[R-3]

24 C.A. No. 8814/2010XII-A

M.VANAJA KEDAR NATH TRIPATHYVersusM.SARLA DEVI (DEAD) T. V. RATNAM

25 C.A. No. 11429/2011XI-A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ANR. C. K. SASIVersusEATHAMMA DOMINIC . AND ORS. M. P. VINOD, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11430/2011XI-A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ANR. C. K. SASI

VersusEATHAMMA DOMINIC . AND ORS. R. CHANDRACHUD, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

26 C.A. No. 101/2013III

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

VersusSUDHAKAR SHANKAR SHINDE NIDHI

ConnectedC.A. No. 103/2013III

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

Versus

Page 280: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 11ANIL GUJANAN LIKHITE

27 C.A. No. 6550/2010XVI

LATIKA BHAR AND ORS. RANJAN MUKHERJEEVersusJYOTSNA DEY AND ANR PRANAB KUMAR MULLICK

28 C.A. No. 8971/2010XIV-A

KIRPA RAM (D) TR.LRS. . AND ANR. P. N. PURIVersusSURENDER DEO GAUR AND ORS. VISHWA PAL SINGH, ASHWANI KUMAR

29 C.A. No. 4595/2010IX

RAJENDRA . AND ORS. RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDIVersusSUMANTIBAI . AND ORS. ANJANI KUMAR JHA, P. SOMA SUNDARAM

30 C.A. No. 8449/2009IX

KRUSHI UTPANNA BAZAR SAMITI ANDANR. ANAGHA S. DESAI

VersusVIJAY JANARDHAN GHORLE

31 C.A. No. 8365/2009IV-A

N.VENKATASWAMY REDDY G. N. REDDYVersusASHOK AND ORS. S. N. BHAT, [R-2.1]

32 C.A. No.3523-3526/2010XII

A.R.MADANA GOPAL ETC.ETC. RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA

VersusM/S RAMNATH PUBLICATIONS P.LTD..AND ANR. ETC. ETC. NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN

33 C.A. No.4997-4998/2009XII

KARUPPIAH V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusARUMUGAM VIJAY KUMAR

34 C.A. No. 8648/2009III-A

KANPUR ELECT.SUPPLY CO.LTD. DR.RAJEEV SHARMA[P-1]VersusASHOK

35 C.A. No. 6145/2010XVII

JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITYBOARD AND ORS. MANISH KUMAR SARAN

VersusM/S RAMAKRISHNA FORGING LIMITED DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-1]

36 C.A. No. 5815/2009XI-A

ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER,KOTTAYAM AND ORS. G. PRAKASH

VersusESTHAPPAN CHERIAN AND ANR. HIMINDER LAL

37 C.A. No. 4755/2011IV-A

STATE OF M.P.. AND ORS. RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1][GR]VersusMAHESH KUMAR DAIYA . AND ORS.

38 C.A. No. 5261/2011IV-A

M.P.HOUSING BOARDTHR.EXEC.ENGNR.,RATLAM B. S. BANTHIA

VersusDASHRATH PAHLAD SINGH SHARMA

39 C.A. No. 2196/2012III-A

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK MITTER & MITTER CO.[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA THR. ITS SECRETARYAND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],MANJULA GUPTA[R-4], A. V. RANGAM[R-8]

40 C.A. No. 9792/2010IV-A

MADHYA BHARAT GRAMIN BANK SANJAY KAPURVersusPANCHAMLAL YADAV R. D. UPADHYAY

41 C.A. No. 5884/2009IV-A

AKKAMMA AND ORS. ANJANA CHANDRASHEKARVersus

Page 281: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 11

VEMAVATHI AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[IMPL]

42 C.A. No.5033-5034/2009IV-A

K.N.NAGARAJAPPA AND ORS. S. N. BHAT[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5]

VersusH.NARASIMHA REDDY NANITA SHARMA

43 C.A. No. 5533/2011IV-A

GURUSIDDAYYA R. D. UPADHYAYVersusGURUSANTHAYYA GURUBASAYYAHIREMATH AND ORS. S. N. BHAT

44 C.A. No.6878-6879/2008XVI

DAMODAR VALLEY CORP. AND ANR. SIDDHARTHA CHOWDHURY

VersusRAJESH KUMAR AND OTHERS RITESH AGRAWAL

ConnectedC.A. No.7548-7551/2008XVI

UOI AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

RAJESH KUMAR AND OTHERS RITESH AGRAWAL, SIDDHARTHACHOWDHURY

ConnectedC.A. No. 7547/2008XVI

CHIEF SECRETARY.GOVT.OF WESTBENGAL PARIJAT SINHA, PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[P-1]

Versus

RAJESH KUMAR AND ORS RITESH AGRAWAL, SIDDHARTHACHOWDHURY

45 C.A. No. 7522/2009XVI

SHEO SHANKAR CHEMICALINDUSTRIES LTD. ARUN K. SINHA

VersusMAHENDRA PRASAD SINGH . AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH, SHAKEEL AHMED

46 C.A. No. 8709/2010IV-A

VISVESVARAYA INDUSTRIAL ANDTECHNOLOGICAL MUSEUM AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY, NAVEEN R. NATH

47 C.A. No. 4393/2010XIV-A

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OFINDIA AND ORS. A. V. RANGAM

VersusOM PARKASH DEBASIS MISRA

48 C.A. No. 1981/2010IV-A

KRISHI UPPAJ MANDI SAMITI,SHUJALPUR VINAY GARG

VersusRAJKUMAR SINGH VANDANA SHARMA[R-1]

49 C.A. No. 8286/2009XVI

MANORANJAN PRASAD SINGH SATISH VIGVersusBIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD ANDORS. NAVIN PRAKASH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

50 C.A. No. 5788/2012XVI

SECRETARY, MNG. COMMITTEE . ANDANR. RANJAN MUKHERJEE[P-1]

VersusBINATA DAS (MANNA) . AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

51 C.A. No.1802-1806/2010XI-A

KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION VIPIN NAIR[P-1]

Versus

K.N. RADHAMANI AND ORS. ETC. ETC. V. K. SIDHARTHAN, NISHE RAJEN SHONKER, ,G. PRAKASH

Page 282: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 11

ConnectedT.C.(C) No. 60/2014XVI-A

THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICECOMMISSION THROUGH ITSSECRETARY

VIPIN NAIR[P-1]

VersusYESUDAS, KANNATHAYIL HOUSE,MANGALAM . AND ORS. MOHAMMED SADIQUE T.A.[R-1]

52 C.A. No. 6405/2011IV

HARJOT SINGH AMIT PAWANVersus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. A. N. ARORA, UTTARA BABBAR[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], ASHWANI BHARDWAJ

53 C.A. No. 6825/2008IV

STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAINVersusHARNAM SINGH(DEAD) THR. LRS. . ANDORS. R. C. KAUSHIK, ASHOK K. MAHAJAN

54 C.A. No. 2925/2010XII

M/S.BLUE DART AVIATION PAREKH & CO.VersusM/S.POLYENE FILM INDUSTRIES ANRANR. AND ANR. V. BALACHANDRAN, DEBASIS MISRA

55 C.A. No. 8548/2009XII-A

P. ISHWARI BAI ANU GUPTAVersusANJANI BAI AND ANR. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

56 C.A. No. 5922/2010XIV-A

M/S CONTINENTAL FOUNDATION JOINTVENTURE AND ANR. CHANCHAL KUMAR GANGULI[P-1]

VersusRAM BHAGATI AND ORS.

57 C.A. No. 3657/2010XVI

DEBABRATA SAHA S. K. BHATTACHARYA[P-1]VersusSERAMPORE MUNICIPALITY ANDOTHERS V. D. KHANNA[R-1], RANJAN MUKHERJEE[R-3]

58 Crl.A. No.1280-1281/2013II-B

SAMAR GANGULY . AND ORS. RANJAN MUKHERJEE[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL CHANCHAL KUMAR GANGULI[R-1]

59 C.A. No. 7365/2013IV

SARWAR KUMAR ANOOP KR. SRIVASTAV[P-1]VersusEXEC.ENG.PROVINCIAL DIVISION ANDANR.

SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[R-1], MONIKAGUSAIN[R-1]

60 C.A. No. 9143/2012XI-A

K.C.MANOJ A. RAGHUNATH[P-1]Versus

MANU M.. AND ORS. GARVESH KABRA[R-1], C. K. SASI[R-2], VIPINNAIR[R-3]

61 C.A. No. 9341/2010XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGHVersusBIBHA SINGH SANTOSH MISHRA

62 C.A. No. 5160/2010XII

J.CHITRA SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY[P-1]Versus

DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI[R-1], M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1],VINODH KANNA B.[R-4]

63 C.A. No. 8223/2009XI-A

CHAIRMAN, STATE BANK OF INDIA ANDANR. A. V. RANGAM

VersusM.J.JAMES T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR

Page 283: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 1164 C.A. No.

4039-4053/2009XI-A

KOMALAN ETC. ETC. HIMINDER LAL[P-1], VISHAL ARUN[P-2], [P-3]

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA REP. BYSECRETARY TAXES(A) DEPARTMENTAND ORS. ETC.

G. PRAKASH[R-1], V. K. BIJU[R-1], NARESHKUMAR[R-1]

I.A. NOS. 1-15 AND 16-30 OF 2013 : APPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTION FILEDBY MR. V. K. BIJU, ADVOCATE

ConnectedC.A. No.8506-8508/2009XI-A

SIBIL AND ANR. HIMINDER LAL

Versus

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. G. PRAKASH, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8509/2009XI-A

P.K.SURENDRAN AND ORS. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

VersusSTATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.5910-5911/2010XI-A

AJITH AND OTHERS ETC. HIMINDER LAL

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. G. PRAKASH, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.4986-4987/2009XI-A

A.S.JOY, ETC. ETC. HIMINDER LAL, [P-2], [P-3]

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. ETC. G. PRAKASH, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], NARESHKUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 5391/2009XI-A

BINOY AND ANR. HIMINDER LAL

VersusSTATE OF KERALA REP. BY SECRETARYTAXES (A) DEPARTMENT AND ORS. BINA MADHAVAN, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 5392/2009XI-A

RAJU . AND ORS. HIMINDER LAL

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. BINA MADHAVAN, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 7650/2009XI-A

RAJESH . AND ORS. HIMINDER LAL

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. G. PRAKASH, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.8337-8339/2009XI-A

PRADEEP AND ANR. ETC HIMINDER LAL

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. LIZ MATHEW, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8652/2009XI-A

GIRISH NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8653/2009XI-A

VIJAYAN AND ANR. HIMINDER LAL, [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. LIZ MATHEW, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.1125-1129/2010XI-A

SEKHARAN AND ORS ETC HIMINDER LAL

Versus

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. R. SATHISH, NARESH KUMAR

Page 284: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 11ConnectedC.A. No.2245-2251/2010XI-A

GUNASINGH AND ANR. ETC. HIMINDER LAL

Versus

STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. ETC. G. PRAKASH, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.4581-4593/2010XI-A

SIVARAJAN ETC. HIMINDER LAL

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERSETC. LIZ MATHEW, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 4730/2010XI-A

M.R.MUKUNDAN RANJITH K. C.

VersusSTATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. LIZ MATHEW, NARESH KUMAR, K. RAJEEV

ConnectedC.A. No. 7345/2010XI-A

ASHOKAN HIMINDER LAL

Versus

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. LIZ MATHEW, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], NARESHKUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.10054-10057/2010XI-A

PAPPACHAN AND ORS ETC. HIMINDER LAL

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERSETC. BINA MADHAVAN, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.2441-2442/2010XI-A

LALU AND ORS. HIMINDER LAL

Versus

STATE OF KERALA & ORS.ETC. ANDANR. NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.3263-3266/2011II-B

SUDHAKARAN NADUMURI HIMINDER LAL

Versus

STATE OF KERALA JOGY SCARIA, NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 5078/2011XI-A

SURENDRAN AND ANR. HIMINDER LAL

Versus

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. BINA MADHAVAN, NARESH KUMAR, G.PRAKASH

ConnectedC.A. No.7223-7224/2011XI-A

SAHADEVAN AND ORS. ETC. HIMINDER LAL

Versus

STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 6760/2012XI-A

SADANANDAN AND ANR. HIMINDER LAL

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. RAMESH BABU M. R., NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.1233/2016XI-A

SANTHOSH . AND ANR. HIMINDER LAL, [P-2]

Versus

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. G. PRAKASH[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

65 C.A. No. 8172/2009XIV-A

DHANI RAM AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]Versus

Page 285: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 11SHIV SINGH SUSHIL BALWADA[R-1]

66 C.A. No. 2149/2010IV

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. KARAN BHARIHOKE[P-1]VersusPARAMPRIT SINGH GILL (DEAD) THR.LRS. ARUN K. SINHA[R-1]

67 C.A. No. 8513/2009XI-A

CHANCELLOR, ORISSA UNIVERSITY OFAGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY(OUAT) AND ANR.

C. K. SUCHARITA, [P-2]

VersusPRASANTA KUMAR PRADHAN NAGARKATTI KARTIK UDAY[R-1]

68 Crl.A. No. 212/2012II-B

MITESH @ T.V.VAGHELA BALRAJ DEWAN[P-1][SCLSC]VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

69 C.A. No. 6780/2010XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGHVersusBRAJ KISHORE SINGH

ConnectedC.A. No. 8169/2010XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH[P-1]

Versus

RAM LAKHAN SHUKLA AND ORS. SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-2]

70 Crl.A. No.618-620/2015II-C

J.M. ARUMUGAM ETC. DEVVRAT[P-1], [P-2]

VersusSTATE REP. BY DEPUTYSUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ANDORS.

M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1], PROMILA[R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.625-629/2015II-C

S.JAYAPAL AND ORS. DEVVRAT[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5]

Versus

I.PERIYASAMY AND ORS.

K. K. MANI[R-3], SATYA MITRAGARG[R-5][CAVEAT], D.KUMANAN[R-5],PAREKH & CO.[R-1], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9],[R-10], [R-11], [R-12], V. G. PRAGASAM[R-1],[R-16], [R-17], BALAJI SRINIVASAN[R-18], M.YOGESH KANNA[R-2], [R-4], [R-13], [R-14],[R-15], [R-19]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.621-622/2015II-C

P. RAVINDRAN DEVVRAT[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1], PROMILA[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.613-616/2015II-C

STATE REP. BY ITS DEPUTYSUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

Versus

S.RAGHUPATHY AND ORS. KAUSHAL YADAV, [R-2], [R-4], GEETHAKOVILAN, [R-3]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 624/2015II-C

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

VersusM. KULANTHAI AND ANR. V. G. PRAGASAM, [R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 623/2015II-C

THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

VersusI. PERIASAMY

Page 286: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 11ConnectedCrl.A. No. 617/2015II-C

THE STATE REP. BY ITS DEPUTYSUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

Versus

K.N NEHRU AND ORS. V. G. PRAGASAM, [R-2], D.KUMANAN[R-1],[R-3], [R-7], G. BALAJI[R-4], [R-5]

71 Crl.A. No. 2275/2010II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HARSH PARASHAR[P-1]VersusBISSU @ VISHRAM JYOTI MENDIRATTA[R-1]REMAIN ON BOARD

72 C.A. No.2379-2411/2010XII

NATIONAL SEED CORPORATION LTD. GHANSHYAM JOSHI[P-1]

Versus

M. RAJAMANICKAM AND ORS. AND ORS.

VIJAY KUMAR[R-1], [R-3], [R-4], [R-7], [R-10],[R-20], [R-21], [R-22][PR], [R-23][PR],[R-24][PR], [R-25][PR], [R-26][PR], [R-27][PR],[R-28][PR], [R-29][PR], [R-30][PR], [R-31][PR],[R-32][PR], [R-33][PR], [R-34][PR], [R-35][PR],[R-36][PR], [R-37][PR], [R-38][PR], [R-39][PR],PRAGYA BAGHEL[R-1], [R-2], [R-5], [R-6], [R-9],[R-11], [R-13], [R-14], [R-19], NIDHI[R-18][PR]

73 C.A. No.2835-2836/2011IV

LAJJA RAM AND ORS. NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN

VersusRATI CHAND AND ORS. ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA

74 Crl.A. No.2410-2411/2009II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[P-1]

VersusBALWANTA RAM SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

75 C.A. No. 2032/2011IV-A

M/S. DIVGI METAL WARES LTD. K. RAJEEV[P-1]VersusM/S. DIVGI METAL WARES EMPLOYEESASSOCIATION AND ANR. VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2035/2011IV-A

DIVGI METAL WEAVERS LTD. K. RAJEEV[P-1]

VersusTHE DIVGI METAL WORKS EMPLOYEESASSOCIATION AND ANR. VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2033/2011IV-A

DIVAGI METAL WARES LTD. K. RAJEEV

VersusDIVGI METAL WORKS EMPLOYEESASSOCIATION AND ORS.

76 C.A. No.7440-7441/2012XIV-A

NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL .AND ANR. YOGINDER HANDOO

Versus

MANJU TOMAR AND ORS. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-11], M. C. DHINGRA[R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No.7442-7444/2012XIV-A

DELHI SIKH GURDWARAMGT.COMMITTEE M. C. DHINGRA

Versus

MANJU TOMAR AND ORS. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-9], [R-11],[R-12], [R-15]

FOR FOR ON IA 1/2016

77 C.A. No. 5500/2011XIV-A

THANESAR SINGH SODHHI (D) THR.LRS. ANZU. K. VARKEY[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

Page 287: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 11ConnectedCrl.A. No. 730/2014II-A

SUJATA SANTOSH SHETTY DEEPAK ANAND[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA SECRETARY AND ORS.

78 C.A. No. 1807/2013IV-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS. HARSH PARASHAR[P-1][GR]

VersusM/S SHAMBHOO MARKETING PRIVATELTD. T. MAHIPAL[R-1]

79 C.A. No. 6195/2013IV-A

LAXMIBAI AND ANR. DEBASIS MISRA, H. CHANDRA SEKHARVersusKAMALAWWA AND ANR.

80 C.A. No. 10343/2011XII-A

CMC LIMITED AWANISH SINHAVersusDEPUTY DIRECTOR EMPLOYEES STATEINSURANCE CORPORATION VAIBHAV MANU SRIVASTAVA[R-1]

81 C.A. No. 7020/2012XII

J.RAJESH(MINOR) THR. HIS MOTHERAND NATURAL GUARDIAN J. GOMATHI ANKOLEKAR GURUDATTA[P-1]

VersusM. KUMARAN . AND ORS. K. K. MANI[R-1]

82 C.A. No. 11179/2011XIV-A

TIKKA SHATRUJIT SINGH AND ORS. PRAMOD DAYALVersusSUKJIT SINGH AND ANR. SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR, PAREKH & CO.

83 C.A. No. 8741/2015XII

M.D.,TAMILNADU INDS.INV.CORP.LTD.AND ANR. G. INDIRA

VersusA. MOHAN V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No. 8742/2015XII

TAMILNADU INDUST.INVEST.CORP.LTD.REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTRORAND ANR.

G. INDIRA

VersusG.K.ANBU T. HARISH KUMAR

84 C.A. No.7565-7567/2011XI-A

G.P. SANGEETHA AND ORS ETC ETC K. RAJEEV[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. ROMY CHACKO[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9060/2011XI-A

SHARAFAUDEEN M K. RAJEEV[P-1]

Versus

INDU T.K. AND ORS. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1], HARIKUMARV.[R-3]

85 C.A. No. 1626/2015III-A

PRAMOD KUMAR DINESH KUMAR GARGVersusTHE KISAN COOPERATIVE SUGARFACTORY LTD. AND ANR. SIDDHARTH MITTAL, SAURABH AJAY GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No. 1628/2015III-A

JAI SINGH (D) THRU LRS. AND ORS. DINESH KUMAR GARG[P-1]

VersusTHE KISAN COOPERATIVE SUGARFACTORY LTD. AND ANR.

SAURABH AJAY GUPTA[R-1], SIDDHARTHMITTAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1627/2015III-A

SHYAM LAL DINESH KUMAR GARG[P-1]

VersusKISAN COOPERATIVE SUGAR FACTORYLTD. AND ANR.

SAURABH AJAY GUPTA[R-1], SIDDHARTHMITTAL[R-2]

Page 288: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 11ConnectedC.A. No. 1629/2015III-A

VIKRAM SINGH ANIL KUMAR GUPTA-II

VersusM/S PRADHAN PRABHANDHAK KISHANSAHAKARI CHINI MILL AND ORS. VISHWAJIT SINGH

ConnectedC.A. No.18485-18487/2017III-A

JAI PRAKASH SINGH M. A. CHINNASAMY

Versus

DUGDH UTPADAK SAHKARI SANGHLTD. VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA

86 C.A. No. 8620/2015III-A

STATE OF U.P. THROUGH HOMESECRETARY U.P AND ANR. SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI

VersusMOTI LAL

87 C.A. No. 11338/2011XIV-A

THE NORTH EASTERN ELECTRICPOWER CORPORATION LTD. (NEEPCO.LTD.) AND ORS.

NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN[P-1]

VersusSHRI MADAN OWARY RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1]

88 C.A. No. 1019/2013XVI

SHANTI DEVI AND ORS. MANU SHANKER MISHRA[P-1]VersusBISHUNDHARI PRASAD AND ORS. MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH[R-1], [R-2]

89 Crl.A. No. 1537/2014II

KRISHNA SHANKAR MEHTA C. L. SAHU[P-1][PR]VersusSTATE ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1][GR]

90 Crl.A. No. 1016/2013II-A

DILIP KUMAR CHATURBEDI VIKAS MEHTA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR SANTOSH KUMAR - I[R-1]

91 Crl.A. No. 2038/2013II-C

MANOJ KUMAR SURESHAN P.[P-1]VersusSTATE(NCT OF DELHI) B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

92 C.A. No.3989-4000/2012XI-A

PARADIP PORT TRUST NIRNIMESH DUBE

Versus

NILAKANTHA PANDA . AND ORS. AMARJIT SINGH BEDI, S. N. BHAT, AJAYCHOUDHARY

93 Crl.A. No.1086-1088/2013II-B

JAVANSING SINIA RATHVA . AND ANR. SHIRIN KHAJURIA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]REF; HON'BLE COURT ORDER DATED 16.05.2019 LIST THESE APPEALS AFTERTHE SUMMER VACATION, 2019 ON A NON MISCELLANEOUS DAY.

94 C.A. No. 9649/2013III-A

DR. KUHU DUTTAGUPTA VINEET BHAGAT[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR.DIRECTOR AND ORS. SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

95 C.A. No. 5415/2015XII

VIJAYARANGAM SENTHIL JAGADEESANVersusUNNAMALAI @ BABY A. SUMATHI

96 Crl.A. No. 673/2014II-A

WESTERN MAHARASHTRADEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ANDORS.

RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDANR.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1], RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON[R-2]

Page 289: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 11

97 C.A. No. 4059/2015XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]VersusR.K SHARMA BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH[R-1]

98 C.A. No.1068-1069/2017XIV-A

ALL INDIA CPWD ENGG.ASSOCIATIONAND ANR. SUDHIR NAAGAR

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI

99 C.A. No.10302-10303/2014XII

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFDEFENCE REP BY SECRETARY ANDANR.

SHREEKANT N. TERDAL[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusD. PALANIAPPAN

100 C.A. No. 3667/2018XII

SACHIDHANANDAM BALAJI SRINIVASANVersusE VANAJA AND ORS. AND ORS. M. A. KRISHNA MOORTHY

ConnectedDiary No. 7823-2018XII

E. VANAJA M. A. KRISHNA MOORTHY

VersusSACHIDANANDAM AND ORS.IA No.42022/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING[TO BE TAKEN UPALONGWITH ITEM NO. 10 I.E. SLP (c) NO. 22155/2014]

101 C.A. No. 6611/2015XVI

JYOTIRMAY RAY IRSHAD AHMADVersusFIELD GENERAL MANAGER, PUNJABNATIONAL BANK AND ORS. MITTER & MITTER CO.

102 C.A. No. 5392/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI[P-1]VersusHAMIR SINGH CHOUHAN . AND ORS. SARLA CHANDRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5393/2017XV

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR. RUCHI KOHLI

VersusDR. DEVI SINGH RAJPUROHIT . ANDORS. SARLA CHANDRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5391/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI

VersusDR. MAN SINGH CHOUDHARY SARLA CHANDRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5394/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI

VersusAMBA CHAND MATHUR AND ANR. CHARU MATHURFOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 27383/2019

103 C.A. No. 8304/2015XVI

THE STATE OF BENGAL AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[P-1]VersusSHYAMAL KUMAR GHOSH AND ANR. SHEKHAR KUMAR[R-1]

104 C.A. No. 8253/2015III-A

ST. JOSHEPHS COLLEGE AND ANR. MOHIT PAULVersusSMT. SHEHERNAZ GANDHI AND ORS. BHAGABATI PRASAD PADHY

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3446/2018XI

RAJVIR SINGH YADAV AND ORS. MEERA AGARWAL

VersusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.137784/2017-APPLICATION FORSUBSTITUTION and IA No.137783/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IANo.137779/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP and IA No.137787/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN.

Page 290: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 11

105 C.A. No. 1347/2017XIV-A

THE MANAGEMENT OF RAMJAS PUBLICSCHOOL GAURAV KEJRIWAL

VersusDHARMENDER KUMAR . AND ORS. PRANAYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA, P. N. PURIand IA No.87668/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTIONFOR ON IA 1/2016 FOR ON IA2/2016 FOR ON IA 3/2016 FOR ON IA 4/2016 FOR ON IA 5/2016 FOR ON IA 6/2016FOR ON IA 7/2016 FOR ON IA 8/2016MATTER WAS DIRECTED TO BE LISTEDAFTER 20 DAYS AS PER COURTS ORDER DATED 22.3.2017

106 C.A. No.7159-7164/2016III

PRESIDENT, BAHUJAN SAMAJPRABODHAN SHIKSHAN SANSTHA,KOTUL AND ORS.

PREM SUNDER JHA

VersusBALASAHEB RAMCHANDRA BURKEETC. ETC. AND ANR. SHIRISH K. DESHPANDE

ConnectedC.A. No. 10684/2017III

PRESIDENT AND ORS. MANJULA GUPTA

VersusSOPAN NAMDEO GHOLAP AND ANR. SHIRISH K. DESHPANDE

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.863-866/2017 IN c.anos. 7159-60, 7162-63of 2016 @ C.A. No.7159-7164/2016III

BALASAHEB RAMCHANDRA BURKE ETCETC AND ORS. SHIRISH K. DESHPANDE

Versus

DATTATRYA AND ORS. AND ORS. MANJULA GUPTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

IN C.A. No. - 7163/2016, IN C.A. No. - 7162/2016, IN C.A. No. - 7160/2016, IN C.A.No. - 7159/2016,

107 C.A. No. 719-721/2016III

RAKESH RAI POOJA DHAR[P-1]VersusM/S. NATIONAL AVIATION CO. OF INDIALTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR AND ANR.

MUDIT SHARMA[R-1]

108 C.A. No.2592-2593/2016XVI

PANCHANAND SAH AND ORS. AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.RAJESH PRASAD SINGH[R-1], GAURAVAGRAWAL[R-1], (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[R-1], P.V. YOGESWARAN[R-6], ADITYA SINGH[R-12]

ConnectedC.A. No.2594-2595/2016XVI

BRAJESH KUMAR AND ORS. SANTOSH MISHRA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

RAJESH PRASAD SINGH[R-1], (MRS. ) VIPINGUPTA[R-1], CHANDAN KUMAR[R-15],GAURAV AGRAWAL[R-1], [R-13], [R-17], [R-24],[R-26], [R-27], P. V. YOGESWARAN[R-11],[R-31], [R-39]

LIST FOR FINAL HEARING IN THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2019 ALONGWITHCONNECTED MATTERS VIDE HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 3.5.2019

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.3757-3758/2017XVI

SATISH DAS (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA

Versus

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. ETC. ETC.FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2017

109 C.A. No. 7390/2016XI-A

PRAFULLA KUMAR SAHU (DEAD) THR.LRS. AND ORS. SHIBASHISH MISRA

Versus

Page 291: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 11

SHAKUNTALA SAHOO . AND ORS. UTTARA BABBAR, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-7], [R-8], [R-9]

110 C.A. No. 11721/2018IV

M/S INDUCTION FURNACEASSOCIATION OF NORTH INDIA MOHIT D. RAM

VersusPUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATIONLIMITED AND ORS.

RAM SWARUP SHARMA, KARUNAKARMAHALIK

ConnectedC.A. No.11722-11723/2018IV

RANJEEV ALLOYS LTD. AND ANR. MOHIT D. RAM

Versus

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATIONLIMITED (PSPCL) AND ORS.

RAM SWARUP SHARMA[R-1], KARUNAKARMAHALIK[R-3]

FOR111 C.A. No. 2285/2018

IV-AAJAY KUMAR JAIN RAKHI RAYVersusBILASPUR RAIPUR KSHETRIYA GRAMINBANK AND ORS. AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

112 Crl.A. No. 31/2019II-A

VIRAM @ VIRMA CHRISTI JAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 32/2019II-A

VANSHILAL AND ORS. CHRISTI JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[R-1]FOR FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 77697/2018 FORCONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING ON IA 77699/2018 FOR CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN FILING/REFILING SLP ON IA 77699/2018

ConnectedW.P.(Crl.) No. 138/2019X

HAZARI AND ANR. CHRISTI JAIN

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.NOTICE TO LD. ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR INDIA AS PER ORDER DATED12.06.2019

113 Crl.A. No.901-902/2019II-B

RAJPUT DALA SAVA AND ORS. GAURAV KHANNA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]REF; HON'BLE COURT ORDER DATED 13.05.2019 LET THE APPEALS BE LISTEDAFTER THE SUMMER VACATION, 2019.

114 C.A. No. 6875/2008IV-A

BHAGWAT SHARAN (DEAD THR. LRS.)) PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1.4], [P-1.3], [P-1.2], [P-1]Versus

PURUSHOTAM . AND ORS.NIRAJ SHARMA, YASH PAL DHINGRA,MANJEET KIRPAL, B. K. SATIJA, ARJUNGARG[R-3], SUHAAS RATNA JOSHI[R-4.2],[R-4.1]

ConnectedC.A. No.6876-6877/2008IV-A

BHAGWAT SHARAN (DEAD THR. LRS.)) PRATIBHA JAIN, [P-1.2], [P-1.1], [P-1.4], [P-1.3]

Versus

PURSHOTTAM . AND ORS.NIRAJ SHARMA, YASH PAL DHINGRA, S. K.VERMA, MANJEET KIRPAL, B. K. SATIJA,ARJUN GARG, SUHAAS RATNA JOSHI[R-4.2],[R-4.1], VIKRANT SINGH BAIS[R-8]

115 C.A. No. 6855/2008IX

MOHD.CHAND MUJAWAR (D) THR.LRS.AND ANR. RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE

VersusRAGHUNATH SHANKAR KELKAR ABHA R. SHARMA{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 }

Page 292: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 11116 C.A. No. 3932/2011

XI-ASURESH KUMAR . AND ANR. E. M. S. ANAM[P-1]VersusNOUSHAD . AND ORS. K. RAJEEV[R-1], G. PRAKASH[R-3]

117 Crl.A. No. 119/2010II-B

MD.YOUNUS ALI TARAFDAR RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

118 C.A. No. 2567/2017IV-A

M.R.VINODA K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYAVersusM.S.SUSHEELAMMA(D) BY LRS.. ANDORS.

E. C. VIDYA SAGAR, RAJESH MAHALE, AFTABALI KHAN

119 C.A. No. 8887/2011XII

G.R.SELVARAJ R. AYYAM PERUMALVersusK.J.PRAKASH KUMAR . AND ORS. PRAMOD DAYAL

120 C.A. No. 2806/2010XIV-A

A.BRAJAMANI SHARMA . AND ORS. P. NARASIMHANVersus

L.K.ABUNG RONGMEI . AND ORS.RAJIV MEHTA, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6],[R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11], [R-12], [R-13],ASHOK KUMAR SINGH[R-14], [R-15]

FOR APPOINT A GUARDIAN OF A MINOR ON IA 1/2009 FOR ON IA 44303/2009FOR ON IA 14280/2010 FOR ON IA 38399/2011 FOR ON IA 87187/2013

121 C.A. No. 4270/2010XII

MURTHY AND ORS. V. G. PRAGASAMVersusC.SARADAMBAL AND ORS. K. K. MANI

122 C.A. No. 468/2010IV-A

B.S.RANGASWAMY S. N. BHAT[P-1]Versus

N. SRINIVAULU AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE[R-1], SHUBHRANSHUPADHI[R-2], [R-3]

123 C.A. No.11393-11394/2011XII

P. VELAYUTHAM AND ORS. AND ORS. REVATHY RAGHAVAN

VersusP. GANESAN AND ORS. AND ORS. M. M. KASHYAP, R. SATHISH

124 C.A. No.8119-8123/2011IV

R.P. BHARDWAJ . AND ORS. AMITA GUPTA

VersusPUNJAB UNIVERSITY AND ANR. GOPAL PRASAD

125 Crl.A. No. 2205/2014II-A

HAJARILAL . AND ANR. T. MAHIPAL[P-1], MINAKSHI VIJ[P-1], [P-2]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HARSH PARASHAR[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 }

126 C.A. No. 8448/2015XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusUMAKANTA DASH{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2015MR.AMAR DAVE, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO. 1

127 C.A. No. 2647/2017III

LALITKUMAR JIVABHAI THAKKAR ANDANR. NIKHIL GOEL

VersusSTATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. SANJEEV MALHOTRA, P. SOMA SUNDARAM

128 C.A. No. 2777/2010IX

KULDIP SRINIVAS KULKARNI R. R. DESHPANDEVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAREVENUE DEPARTMENT THROUGH ITSSECRETARY AND ANR.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

129 C.A. No. 249/2010IV-A

AZGAR BARID (D) BY LRS. LALITA KAUSHIKVersus

Page 293: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 11MAZAMBI @ PYAREMABI . AND ORS. VAIJAYANTHI GIRISH

130 C.A. No. 4979/2011XII

UNION OF INDIA THE DIRECTOR OFEDUCATION V. G. PRAGASAM[P-1][GR]

VersusR.VANITHA KAMINI JAISWAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4982/2011XII

UNION OF INDIA REP. BY THEDIRECTOR OF EDUCATION. V. G. PRAGASAM

VersusM.SIMEERA A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 4984/2011XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. AND ANR. V. G. PRAGASAM

VersusV.VISHNUDEVI VIJAYAMEENAKSHI.AND ORS. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 4981/2011XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR REP.BY.SEC.TO GOVT. OF PONDICHERRY V. G. PRAGASAM

VersusGRANDHI GHKS PRABHAKAR AND ORSAND ORS. GAUTAM NARAYAN[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4983/2011XII

UNION OF INDIA REP. BY DIRECTOR OFEDUCATION. V. G. PRAGASAM

VersusSINDHU JAYARAJAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 4980/2011XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. AND ANR. V. G. PRAGASAM

VersusP.SHANTHI YUSUF[R-1]

131 C.A. No. 7878/2012III-A

BHATKHANDE MUSIC INSTITUTE ANDANR. RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA[P-1]

Versus

MANJULA PANT AND ORS.JYOTI MENDIRATTA, [R-1], ATULSHARMA[R-2][PR], SANJAY KUMARTYAGI[R-3][GR]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7879/2012III-A

RUCHI KHARE ATUL SHARMA[P-1]

Versus

MANJULA PANT AND ORS. JYOTI MENDIRATTA, [R-1], TANMAYAAGARWAL[R-4][GR]

132 C.A. No. 3778/2010XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR D. S. MAHRA[P-1]VersusD.SOM AND ORS ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

133 C.A. No.5666-5668/2009XI-A

STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS. SIBO SANKAR MISHRA

VersusM/S UTKAL DISTILLERIES LTD. AFTAB ALI KHAN

134 C.A. No. 3642/2011XVI

KRISHNANAND YADAV AND ORS. MUSHTAQ AHMADVersusRAMAWATI DEVI (DEAD) THR. LRS. .AND ORS. RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI

135 C.A. No. 6372/2011XII

THE DISTRICT MANAGER TAMIL NADUSTATE MARKETING CORPORATION LTD. MONA K. RAJVANSHI

VersusS.KOTTAISAMY R. R. DESHPANDE

ConnectedC.A. No. 6374/2011XII

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR TASMACLTD. AND ANR. MONA K. RAJVANSHI[P-1]

Versus

Page 294: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 11P.SURESH NIDHI[R-1]

136 C.A. No. 2990/2011III

EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCECORPORATAION REGIONAL DIRECTORAND ORS.

SANJEEV ANAND

VersusK.KHODIDAS PATEL . AND ANR. SHEELA GOEL

NEW DELHI06-12-2019 17:52:00

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 295: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 33 OF 2019 FROM : 10-12-2019 To 12-12-2019

COURT NO. : 12HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANTNOTE:-[ ON 10-12-2019 ]

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate

1 C.A. No. 7472/2011XV

RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORTCORP . MANAGING DIRECTOR ANDANR.

S. K. BHATTACHARYA

VersusRAMESH KUMAR SHARMA ETC.

ConnectedC.A. No. 7475/2011XV

RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRNS CORPAND ANR. S. K. BHATTACHARYA

VersusDEVENDRA SINGH YASH PAL DHINGRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 7474/2011XV

RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRNS CORPAND ORS. S. K. BHATTACHARYA

VersusRAM KISHORE SHARMA BANKEY BIHARI SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No. 7473/2011XV

RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRNS CORPAND ORS. S. K. BHATTACHARYA

VersusHIMMAT SINGH

ConnectedC.A. No. 7476/2011XV

RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRNS CORPAND ANR. S. K. BHATTACHARYA

VersusRIYAZ AHMED PARMANAND GAUR

2 C.A. No. 9337/2013IV

JASWANT SINGH RISHI MALHOTRAVersusMOHINDER KUMAR AND ORS. JYOTI MENDIRATTA{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } MATTER TO RETAIN ITS POSITION ON THEBOARD.

ConnectedC.A. No. 9338/2013IV

AMARJIT SINGH PREM MALHOTRA

VersusAMAR SINGH AND ORS. JYOTI MENDIRATTA, KANHAIYA PRIYADARSHI{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

3 C.A. No. 6209/2010IV-A

BAJRANGA (DEAD) BY LRS. PRATIBHA JAINVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS. HARSH PARASHAR[R-1]

4 C.A. No. 1198/2011IX

CHAIRMAN,MAHARANI RADHABAIVIDYARTHI VASTIGRAH . AND ANR. NARESH KUMAR[P-1]

Versus

Page 296: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 12MAHADEV MURLIDHAR GANBAWALE .AND ANR.

T. HARISH KUMAR[R-1], NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

5 C.A. No. 8287/2009IV-A

MOOLCHAND (DEAD) THROUGH HISLRS. ANIS AHMED KHAN

VersusSHRAMIK PACHHS INDUSTRIESPRIVATE LTD. THROUGH ITS PARTNERS BELA MAHESHWARI

6 C.A. No.8111-8112/2009IV-A

M/S ALSTOM PROJECTS LTD S. S. RANA & CO.

VersusA.AZIZ V. G. PRAGASAM

7 Crl.A. No. 2437/2009II-C

SURESHA K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYAVersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHY

8 C.A. No. 10133/2010XV

RAMESH CHANDRA ABHISHEK CHAUDHARYVersusJAGDISH CHANDRA PANCHOLI . ANDORS.

SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA, PRAVEENCHATURVEDI, NARESH KUMAR

9 C.A. No. 3294/2012XII-A

SARASWATI PRASAD SINGH ANJANI AIYAGARIVersusABDUL REHMAN (DEAD) BY LRS. K. RAJEEV

10 C.A. No.3542-3543/2010XI-A

SHRI GOVINDA CHANDRA TIRIA SHIBASHISH MISRA[P-1]

Versus

SIBAJI CHARAN PANDA AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1], SHREEKANT N.TERDAL[R-2], [R-3], ABHIJIT SENGUPTA[R-4]

11 C.A. No. 10844/2013III

SUNIL NARAYAN WADEKAR AND ORS. VISHWAJIT SINGHVersusPRATAP RAMCHANDRA WADEKAR . ANDORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO, APARNA JHA

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.177/2010 In C.A. No.10844/2013III

SUNIL NARAYAN WADEKAR AND ORS. VISHWAJIT SINGH

Versus

PRATAP RAMCHANDRA WADEKAR ANDANR. LAWYER S KNIT & CO, MONA K. RAJVANSHI

12 C.A. No.7720-7721/2012IX

NANDKISHOR ANAGHA S. DESAI

Versus

ZILLA PARISHAD, AKOLA . AND ORS. CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI, RAVINDRAKESHAVRAO ADSURE

13 C.A. No.10169-10170/2013XII

PAZHANATHAL (D) BY LRS. N. L. GANAPATHI

VersusALAMATHAL(D) TR.LRS. RAKESH K. SHARMA, VISHWA PAL SINGH

14 C.A. No. 3600/2009XI-A

MANAGEMENT OFDIRECTOR,MICROWAVE ETR. RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI[P-1]

VersusWORKMEN,REP.BYPRES.O.T.M.M.SANGHA AND ANR. TEJASWI KUMAR PRADHAN[R-1]

I.

ConnectedC.A. No. 747/2013XI-A

C.M.D. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.AND ORS. PIYUSH SHARMA

VersusPUNIA SAHOO AND ORS. SHIBASHISH MISRA[CAVEAT]

Page 297: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 1215 C.A. No. 924-925/2010

IV-AVENKATESH NAVEEN R. NATHVersusCHIKKATHAYAMMA AND ORS. S. N. BHAT, VAIJAYANTHI GIRISH

16 C.A. No. 438/2013III

KU. JAYSHREE ANAGHA S. DESAIVersusHIGH SCHOOL SOCIETY SAONER. ANDORS.

CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI, ASHA GOPALANNAIR

17 Crl.A. No. 1444/2009II-B

RAJENDRA SINGH @ MONU AND ANR. VISHWAJIT SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1445/2009II-B

BIKRAM SINGH BAKSHI @ LUPPI ANDANR. VISHWAJIT SINGH[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 803/2010II-B

B.RAMBABU KRIPA SHANKAR PRASAD[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2227/2009II-B

SANJAY THAKUR @ RAM NARESH T. MAHIPAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.2228-2230/2009II-B

R.CHINNI @ R.RAMBABU AND ORS. T. MAHIPAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1824/2009II-B

B.SRINIVAS RAO @ SINU AND ANR. KRIPA SHANKAR PRASAD[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]

18 C.A. No.1108-1109/2010IX

SOLID STATE ELECTRONICS COMPANYPVT. LTD. VIKAS MEHTA

VersusBALDEV R KALIA(D) TR.LRS. AND ORS.AND ETC.. AND ORS.

LAWYER S KNIT & CO, RUKHSANACHOUDHURY, ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

19 C.A. No.5181-5187/2018IV-A

KHAIRUNISHA KHAN AND ORS. B. K. SATIJA[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF CHHATTISARH . AND ORS. ASWATHI M.K.[R-1], ANANTHA NARAYANAM.G.[R-1]

20 C.A. No. 1917/2012XV

VINOD KUMAR GUPTA AND ANR ETCAND ANR. DEVVRAT[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR. RUCHI KOHLI[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-1],ANSAR AHMAD CHAUDHARY[R-1]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 1950/2012XV

JAI SINGH AND ORS. SHANKAR DIVATE[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR. PRAGATI NEEKHRA[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 1949/2012XV

BHAVNESH KUMAR JAIN AND ORS. SHANKAR DIVATE[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. PRAGATI NEEKHRA[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

Page 298: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 12ConnectedC.A. No. 1857/2012XV

VIRENDRA SINGH SHANKAR DIVATE

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR. SURYA KANT{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ONIA 7933/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 7934/2019

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 7837/2012XV

ANIL KUMAR K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL ANDORS.

SURYA KANT, RUCHI KOHLI

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILINGON IA 1/2012

ConnectedC.A. No. 3392/2012XV

KRISHNA MURARI MEENA K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

21 C.A. No. 8851/2014IV

STATE OF HARYANA THROUGHCOMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY ANDORS.

MONIKA GUSAIN

VersusDEVENDER KUMAR SANEHI(D)THROUGH LR.{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

ConnectedC.A. No. 8852/2014IV

THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. MONIKA GUSAIN[P-1]

VersusBALBIR SINGH RATHEE (DEAD) THR.LRS.

RAVI PANWAR[R-1.4], [R-1.3], [R-1.2], [R-1.1],[R-1.5]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }ConnectedC.A. No. 8853/2014IV

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. MONIKA GUSAIN

VersusSHYAM JIWAN PATHAK DAYA KRISHAN SHARMA{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

22 Crl.A. No. 121/2014II-C

PHOOL CHAND (DEAD) PREETI SINGH[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF DELHI AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], PRAVEENAGAUTAM[R-2]

23 Crl.A. No. 897/2014II-A

ASHOK MANIKA TRIPATHY PANDEY[P-1][SCLSC]Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

24 Crl.A. No. 476/2016II-B

RAJESH AGARWAL KEDAR NATH TRIPATHYVersusSRINIVAS GUNDLURI AND ANR. TATINI BASU, SIBO SANKAR MISHRA

25 Crl.A. No. 517/2015II-B

SHER SINGH SHREE PAL SINGHVersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN

26 C.A. No. 6389/2017III

M/S LA' BUILDE CORPORATION SUNIL KUMAR VERMA[P-1]Versus

UOI AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], [R-5], SHIVKUMAR SURI[R-3]

27 C.A. No. 5697/2015III

REGIONAL TEXTILE COMMISSIONERAND ORS. SHREEKANT N. TERDAL[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

Versus

Page 299: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 12DHANIRAM RAMCHANDRA

28 Crl.A. No. 1493/2014II

JALLU MD. FARMAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SARVESH SINGH BAGHEL[R-1]FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 7753/2017

29 C.A. No. 1490/2017III

SHANTABAI TARACHAND PARDESHISINCE DECEASED THR. LRS SHRILAXMAN TARACHND PARDESH ANDORS.

SACHIN PATIL

VersusSAYYAD MURTUZA SAYYAD ALI SINCEDECEASED THRO. LRS AND OTHERS VIKAS MEHTA

List the appeal itself alongwith the pending applications vide Hon'ble Court's orderdt.14.8.2018

30 C.A. No. 7198/2015XII

K S SAVARINATHAN K. V. MOHANVersusSEETHALAKSHMI RAJESH KUMAR

31 C.A. No. 517-518/2017XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SUSHMA SURIVersusMANPREET SINGH POONAM ETC. ANDANR.

RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON, MONIKA GUSAIN,BINU TAMTA

32 Crl.A. No. 753/2017II

ARVIND KUMAR @ NEMICHAND . ANDORS. ABHISHEK GUPTA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]SUDARSHAN SINGH RAWAT[INT]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 756/2017II

RAMNARAYAN ANAND MISHRA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1]FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 75421/2019

ConnectedCrl.A. No.754-755/2017II

HARLAL SINGH SANJAY JAIN[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN HOMEDEPARTMENT SECRETARY AND ORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1], ABHISHEK GUPTA[R-2],[R-3], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10],[R-11]

33 C.A. No. 4814/2017XVI

VIJAYA BANK . AND ORS.Versus

ASHOK KUMAR SINGH . AND ORS. RAJESH SINGH[R-1], MITTER & MITTERCO.[P-1], [R-2], [R-3]

34 C.A. No.3761-3763/2016III-A

STATE OF UP THR. SECRETARY RUCHIRA GOEL[P-1]

VersusDHARMENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYAAND ORS ETC

AJAY KUMAR TALESARA[R-1], ASHA GOPALANNAIR[R-2]

35 C.A. No. 9444/2016XIV-A

ABID-UL-ISLAM P. S. SUDHEER[P-1]VersusINDER SAIN DUA RESPONDENT-IN-PERSONI.A. No. 48977/2017 Permission to Place on Record Subsequent facts I.A. No.68038/2017 Exemption from filing O.T.

36 C.A. No. 7024/2019III

SAGAR CO OPERATIVE HOUSINGSOCIETY LIMITED PRADEEP MISRA

VersusDR. ADRIANO AFONSO (SINCEDECEASED THORUGH LRS) AND ORS. YASHRAJ SINGH DEORA[R-1.1]

Page 300: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 12

37 C.A. No. 4905/2018III-A

COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT INDIRAGANDHI JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLTHROUGH ITS MANAGER

ABHISTH KUMAR

VersusRAJENDRA PRASAD SHARMA AND ANR. PARUL SHUKLA[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

38 C.A. No. 6392/2019XII

SAM ALBERT P. V. YOGESWARANVersusSHOBANA

39 C.A. No. 8339/2010IV

NAND KISHORE JITENDRA KUMARVersusGIAN KAUR

40 C.A. No.10651-10652/2010XVI-A

SURESH SHARMA SADOTRA SUMITA HAZARIKA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIRTHROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND ORS.

M. SHOEB ALAM[R-1], [R-2], RAJIVTALWAR[R-3], MANJULA GUPTA[R-4]

41 C.A. No. 2670/2009III-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[P-1]VersusRAM MISHRA

42 C.A. No. 5736/2012IV

STATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPURVersusK.K.SHOREE AND ANR. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

43 C.A. No.5107-5108/2011XIV-A

CENTRAL ENGINEERING CLASS-I ASSN.AND ORS. MADHU SIKRI[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SHIV RAM SHARMA[R-1], B. V. BALARAMDAS[R-1], [R-1]

44 C.A. No. 2754/2010XII

KANDASAMY(DEAD) THROUGH LRS. SATYA MITRA GARGVersusMUTHU GOUNDER (D) THR.LRS. V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

45 C.A. No. 3285/2010IV

RAGHVIR SINGH GOEL PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH[P-1]VersusSUBHASH DAHIYA SATISH KUMAR[R-1]

46 C.A. No. 2985/2010XVI

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[P-1]Versus

AKHILESWAR PATRA AND ORS ANURAG PANDEY[R-1], TARA CHANDRASHARMA[R-1]

47 C.A. No. 8587/2018III-A

SRI RAMAN DAS RAJAT SINGH[P-1]Versus

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5]

{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 }

48 C.A. No. 658/2012III

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH GENERALMANAGER AND ANR. SUSHMA SURI

VersusPASCHIM RAILWAY KARAMCHARIPARISHAD THROUGH ITS GENERALSECRETARY SH. RAGHUVIR SINGHSISODIA

RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

49 C.A. No.8255-8257/2009XVI

LT.GOVERNER AND OTHERS G. INDIRA[P-1]

VersusSHAJAN T.OOMAN AND OTHERS ANDANR.

ABHA JAIN[R-1], MONA K. RAJVANSHI[R-2],RAUF RAHIM[R-3], [R-4]

Page 301: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 12ConnectedC.A. No. 7971/2011XVI

LT GOVERNOR ANDMAN AND NICOBARISLANDS AND ANR. G. INDIRA

VersusR.K. DAKUA

ConnectedC.A. No. 7969/2011XVI

LT GOVERNOR ANDAMAN AND ANR. G. INDIRA

VersusSHAJAN T OOMMEN ABHA JAIN

ConnectedC.A. No. 7970/2011XVI

LT GOVERNOR ADMIN AND ANR. G. INDIRA

VersusVENKAT RAMANA

50 C.A. No. 983/2011XII-A

T.BIKSHAPATHY (D) BY LRS. AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP.BY MANDAL REVENUE OFFICERHIMAYATHNAGAR MANDAL

VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES[R-1]

51 C.A. No. 9550/2010IV-A

CHINNANNA @ CHINNAPPA (D) BY LRS. ANJANA CHANDRASHEKARVersusG.YELLAPPA (D) THROUGH LRS. . ANDORS. RAJESH MAHALE

52 C.A. No. 11395/2011III-A

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.THROUGH ITS CHIEF GENERALMANAGER AND ORS.

PAVAN KUMAR, [P-2], [P-3]

VersusYAD RAM RATHORE AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 11396/2011III-A

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.THROUGH ITS CHIEF GENERALMANAGER AND ORS.

PAVAN KUMAR, [P-2], [P-3]

VersusSATYA PRAKASH VARSHNEY AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 20855/2011III-A

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.THROUGH ITS CHIEF GENERALMANAGER AND ORS.

PAVAN KUMAR, [P-2], [P-3]

VersusALLAUDDIN AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 20854/2011III-A

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.THROUGH ITS CHIEF GENERALMANAGER AND ORS.

PAVAN KUMAR, [P-2], [P-3]

VersusMAHENDRA PRAKASH SAXENA ANDANR. PRAVEEN SWARUP

ConnectedC.A. No. 20856/2011III-A

BHARAT SANCHAL NIGAM LTD.THROUGH ITS CHIEF GENERALMANAGER AND ORS.

PAVAN KUMAR, [P-2], [P-3]

VersusLEELA DHAR PIPPAL AND ANR. PRAVEEN SWARUP

ConnectedC.A. No. 11420/2011III-A

BHARAT SANCHAL NIGAM LTD.THROUGH ITS CHIEF GENERALMANAGER AND ORS.

PAVAN KUMAR, [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5], [P-6]

VersusMAHENDRA RAI AND ANR. RAVINDRA KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 8663/2013XI

CHIEF GENL.MANAGER, TELECOMBSNL AND ORS. PAVAN KUMAR

VersusTAUHID AHMAD SIDDIQUI . AND ANR. NAFIS A. SIDDIQUI[R-1], ANIL KATIYAR[R-2]

Page 302: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 1253 C.A. No. 4732/2011

IXRUKMINIBAI AND ORS. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARIVersus

LIMBABAI AND ORS. CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI, ARVIND S.AVHAD[R-14]

54 C.A. No.2622-2623/2012XII

A.C.JOSEPH A. V. RANGAM

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. K. SARADA DEVI

55 C.A. No. 6345/2010XVI

RATINDRA NATH CHATTOPADHYAY ANDANR. SOMNATH MUKHERJEE

Versus

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1], CHANCHALKUMAR GANGULI

56 C.A. No. 2936/2011XVI

BHAGWAN SINGH AND ORS. MANU SHANKER MISHRAVersusDINESH KUMAR SINGH AND ORS. PREM PRAKASH

57 C.A. No.3663-3667/2010III-A

RAM MOHAN (DEAD) THR. LRS. ANDANR. ASHA GOPALAN NAIR, [P-2]

VersusSANT SEWAK AND ORS. MONIKA GUSAIN, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

NOTE:-[ ON 10.12.2019 THE MATTERS WHICH MAY NOT BE TAKEN UP BYTHE BENCH OF HONBLE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL AND HONBLE SURYAKANT, JJ. AND THE MATTERS SHOWN IN THE WEEKLY LIST WILL BETAKEN UP ON 11.12.2019 AND 12.12.2019 BY THE FOLLOWINGBENCH :- ]HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAULHONBLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH

NEW DELHI06-12-2019 17:51:19

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 303: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 33 OF 2019 FROM : 10-12-2019 To 12-12-2019

COURT NO. : 13HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPHNOTE:-ON 10.12.2019

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 C.A. No. 3890/2010

III-AM/S OUDH SUGAR MILLS LTD. PRAVEEN KUMARVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SUSHMA SURI, MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

ConnectedC.A. No. 3891/2010III-A

M/S. OUDH SUGAR MILLS LTD. PRAVEEN KUMAR

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ANR. SUSHMA SURI, [R-2]

and FOR AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 90239/20172 C.A. No. 6366/2010

XVII-ARAJU SITARAM LANDGEVersusSADGURU PARK COOP. HOUSINGSOCIETY. AND ORS.

K. S. RANA[R-1], SUDHANSHU S.CHOUDHARI[R-3], VISHWAJIT SINGH[R-4]

3 C.A. No. 103/2010XVII-A

M/S S AND S INTERBUILD PVT. LTD. MANIK KARANJAWALAVersusPRASHANT SANGHI . AND ANR. DUA ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No. 104/2010XVII-A

M/S S KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusPRASHANT SANGHI . AND ANR. BIJAN KUMAR GHOSH

4 C.A. No. 5273/2008XVII-A

HONGKONG ANDSHANGHAI BANKINGCORP. LTD.Versus

AWAZ . AND ORS. SHIEL SETHI, H. S. PARIHAR, CHANCHALKUMAR GANGULI, GAGAN GUPTA[P-1], [R-5]

FOR MODIFICATION ON IA 4/2009 FOR ON IA 8422/2009 FOR STAY APPLICATIONON IA 3/2009 FOR ON IA 13811/2009 FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2008 FORINTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 5/2017

ConnectedC.A. No. 5294/2008XVII-A

CITIBANK,N.A CHANCHAL KUMAR GANGULI

Versus

AWAZ . AND ORS.SHIEL SETHI, S. S. SHROFF, [INT], H. S.PARIHAR, [R-4], BINA GUPTA, GAGAN GUPTA,[R-5], [R-7]

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 2/2008 FOR ON IA 64103/2008 FOR ON IA 8358/2009ConnectedC.A. No. 5627/2008XVII-A

AMERICAN EXPRESS BANKING CORP. RAJAN NARAIN

Versus

AWAZ . AND ORS. SHIEL SETHI[R-1], H. S. PARIHAR[R-4], ARUNKUMAR BERIWAL[R-5], [R-8]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2008

Page 304: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 13

ConnectedC.A. No. 5278/2008XVII-A

STANDARD CHARTERED BANK ARUN KUMAR BERIWAL, GAGAN GUPTA[P-1],[R-5]

Versus

AWAZ . AND ORS. SHIEL SETHI, MANISH K. BISHNOI, H. S.PARIHAR, CHANCHAL KUMAR GANGULI

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 4/2009 FOR ON IA 70679/2008 FOR ON IA8423/2009 FOR ON IA 34602/2009

ConnectedC.A. No. 6679/2008XVII-A

AWAZ . AND ORS. S. RAMAMANI[P-1]

Versus

RBI . AND ORS.RAJAN NARAIN[R-1], H. S. PARIHAR[R-1],GAGAN GUPTA[R-1], CHANCHAL KUMARGANGULI[R-1]

FOR ON IA 85989/2008 FOR ON IA 110353/2011 FOR ON IA 101224/2012

5 C.A. No. 6439/2008XVII-A

M/S RAJ CELLO CHEM PRODUCTSP.LTD. MANJEET CHAWLA

VersusPUNJAB AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 588/2009XVII-A

PUNJAB AND SIND BANK THROUGHCHAIRMAN MANAGING DIRECTOR ANDANR.

KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

VersusM/S.RAJ CELLO CHEM.PRODUCTSPVT.LTD.THROUGH CHAIRMANFOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2008 FOR ON IA 87298/2008 FOR STAYAPPLICATION ON IA 3/2009

6 C.A. No. 6745/2009IX

MTNL EAST 1 RASHMI MALHOTRA[P-1]VersusASST. COMM.,B.M.M. AND ORS. SUCHITRA ATUL CHITALE

7 C.A. No. 6689/2009XVII-A

SARDAR BHUPENDER SINGH PARMANAND GAUR[P-1]VersusM.D.,M.P.FINANCIAL CORP.. AND ANR. B. K. SATIJA[R-1]

8 C.A. No. 6597/2008XVII-A

STAR INDIA(P) LTD. MANIK KARANJAWALAVersusSOCIETY OF CATALYSTS . AND ANR. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE

ConnectedC.A. No. 6645/2008XVII-A

BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. ASTHA TYAGI[P-1]

VersusSOCIETY OF CATALYSTS . AND ANR. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE

9 C.A. No. 7003/2009XVI

STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. SANJAY KAPUR[P-1]VersusSANJEEV KUMAR SINHA MRITUNJAY KUMAR SINHA[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

10 C.A. No. 7987/2009XVII-A

CORPORATION BANK GAURAV KEJRIWAL[P-1]Versus

SANDHYA SHENOY . AND ANR. RAJESH MAHALE[R-1], VIRESH B.SAHARYA[R-2]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2009 FOR ON IA 91568/2008 FOR ON IA69379/2009 FOR ON IA 113217/2012 FOR CHANGE OF ADVOCATE ON RECORDON IA 3/2012

11 C.A. No. 5812/2009IV

M/S GLAXO SMITHKLINE CON.HEALTHCARE.LTD. MEERA MATHUR

VersusJAGJIT SINGH AND ORS. P. N. PURI

12 Crl.A. No. 1856/2010II-A

ISHAK SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HARSH PARASHAR[R-1]

Page 305: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 13{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

13 C.A. No. 7951/2009XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]Versus

BHUPINDER SINGH AND ORS. S. GOWTHAMAN[R-1], [R-2], REKHAPANDEY[R-3]

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }14 Crl.A. No. 1339/2010

II-BVIRENDER LALITA KAUSHIKVersusSTATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

15 C.A. No.1798-1799/2014IV-A

M.S.BHAVANI AND ANR. YASHRAJ SINGH DEORA

VersusM.S.RAGHU NANDAN AND ANR. S. N. BHAT{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

16 Crl.A. No. 413/2013II

C.B.I. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusSHYAM BIHARI . AND ORS. PRAVEEN CHATURVEDI{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 } BEFORE APPROPRIATE BENCH

17 C.A. No.3804-3805/2015IV-A

INDIRA (DEAD) BY LRS. MADHUSMITA BORA

VersusRAJANI . AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY, S. N. BHAT

18 C.A. No. 971/2014XVII-A

M/S.RAJANKUMAR AND BROTHERS(IMPEX) RAJESH KUMAR

VersusORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. ANDORS. ARTI SINGH

19 Crl.A. No. 257/2016II-C

KISHORE KUMAR PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1]VersusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

20 Crl.A. No.1356-1357/2014II-A

THE STATE OF BIHAR DEVASHISH BHARUKA[P-1]

Versus

SIKANDAR SADA AND ORS.SHANTANU SAGAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11],[R-12]

21 C.A. No. 5955/2015III

SWAYAM RELATORS BINDI GIRISH DAVE[P-1]Versus

THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY FORINDUSTRIAL AND FINANCIALRECONSTRUCTIONS AND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-3], [R-10], PAREKH &CO.[R-5], MEERA MATHUR[R-7], SHISHIRDESHPANDE[R-8], SUCHITRA ATULCHITALE[R-9], ANIL SHRIVASTAV[R-13]

22 Crl.A. No. 613/2016II

ADUKKALPATTU MANI ABHIJIT SENGUPTAVersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ANDANR. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1818/2014II

ADUKKALPATTU MANI ABHIJIT SENGUPTA

VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH GUNTUR PRABHAKARREADY

23 C.A. No. 8879/2014XVII-A

R. KAMALAKANNAN T. R. B. SIVAKUMARVersusBRANCH MANAGER, SHRIRAMTRANSPORT FINANCE CO. LTD MOMOTA DEVI OINAM

Page 306: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 1324 Crl.A. No. 2452/2014

II-CINAL YADAV @ SHYAM SUNDER (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

25 Crl.A. No. 1126/2015II

SRI SWAPAN KR. DATTA RAJAN K. CHOURASIA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF TRIPURA SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1]

26 C.A. No. 3299/2017III

M/S UNITED WHITE METALS LTD DILIP ANNASAHEB TAURVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA STATEOF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS.

P. V. DINESH, NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR, MUKTI CHOWDHARY

ConnectedC.A. No. 3351/2017III

OTIS ELEVATOR CO. (I) LTD MUKTI CHOWDHARY

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAMINISTRY OF LABOUR ANDINDUSTRIAL DEPARTMENT AND ORS.

P. V. DINESH, NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR, , DILIP ANNASAHEB TAUR

27 Crl.A. No. 93/2015II-C

TARANDAS SATNAMI(IN JAIL) AND ANR. RUNAMONI BHUYAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1]

28 Crl.A. No. 216/2015II-B

KALABHAI HAMIRBHAI KACHHOT ANIRUDH SHARMA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 3227/2015II-B

MULUBHAI MARKHIBHAI NANDANIYA NACHIKETA JOSHI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 290/2018II-B

VAJASHIBHAI RAMSHI BHAI KACHHOT SUMITA RAY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 40996/2017 FORGRANT OF BAIL ON IA 63621/2019

29 Crl.A. No. 1046/2015II-B

OZI RAZAQ OLA NITIN BHARDWAJ[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU,CHANDIGARH AND ANR. MANISH VASHISHTHA[R-1], AJAY PAL[R-2]

30 C.A. No.2971-2972/2017IV-A

SYED MURTHUZA AHMED @ SYEDSHAKUL AHMED AND ORS. LALITA KAUSHIK[P-1]

VersusK.M. SHAFI AHMED ABHISHEK SINGH[R-1]

31 Crl.A. No. 749/2015II

SUDHIR AND ORS. SONAL JAIN[P-1]VersusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-1]

32 C.A. No.7657-7658/2017IV-A

NADAKERAPPA SINCE DECEASED BYLRS. AND ORS. BALAJI SRINIVASAN[P-1]

VersusPILLAMMA SINCE DECEASED BY LRS. .AND ORS.

ASHOK BANNIDINNI[R-1], SHUBHRANSHUPADHI[R-2]

33 Crl.A. No. 1173/2016II

HARGOVIND AND ORS. RAKESH DAHIYA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH RUCHIRA GOEL[R-1]

34 C.A. No. 3736/2018XVI

RASHMI METALIKS LIMITED AND ANR. S. S. SHROFF[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]As per R/p dated 06.04.2018 list for final hearing on 17 July 2018.

Page 307: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 13ConnectedC.A. No. 3737/2018XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. RASHMI METALIKS LTD. AND ANR. S. S. SHROFF[CAVEAT]As per R/p dated 06.04.2018 list for final hearing on 17 July 2018.

ConnectedC.A. No.3738-3741/2018XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

BAGADIYA BROTHERS PRIVATELIMITED AND ANR.

T. MAHIPAL[CAVEAT][CAVEAT], E. C.AGRAWALA[CAVEAT]

As per R/p dated 06.04.2018 list for final hearing on 17 July 2018.35 C.A. No. 7339/2016

XVIIAMARENDRA KUMAR SAHAY SARLA CHANDRAVersusSHANTANU KUMAR CHAUDHARY ANDORS.

MANOJ SWARUP AND CO., ATUL KUMAR,ANIL K. JHA

ConnectedC.A. No. 7340/2016XVII

AMARENDRA KUMAR SAHAY SARLA CHANDRA

VersusSHANTANU KUMAR CHOUDHARY . ANDORS. MANOJ SWARUP AND CO., ABHINAV MUKERJI

FOR VACATING STAY ON IA 3/2015 FOR ON IA 4/2015 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILEANNEXURES] ON IA 5/2015

ConnectedC.A. No. 7341/2016XVII

STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THEDEPUTY COMMISSIONER ANIL K. JHA

Versus

SAVITRI DEVI . AND ORS. SARLA CHANDRA, MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.,ATUL KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 7342/2016XVII

SAVITRI DEVI AND ORS. ATUL KUMAR

VersusSANTANU KUMAR CHAUDHARY . ANDORS.

SARLA CHANDRA, MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.,ANIL K. JHA

FOR FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 2/2016 FOR EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. ON IA 3/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.7296-7297/2016XVII

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS. ANIL K. JHA

Versus

SANTANU KUMAR CHAUDHARY . ANDORS.

SARLA CHANDRA, MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.,ATUL KUMAR

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 3/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. ON IA 5/2016

36 C.A. No. 3903/2019XVII-A

A.J. MOHAMMED SHAH @ AJ SHANAVAS P. I. JOSEVersusKERALA INSTITUTE OF MEDICALSCIENCE (KIMS) AND ANR. T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR, JOGY SCARIA

ConnectedC.A. No. 3904/2019XVII-A

KERALA INSTITUTE OF MEDICALSCIENCE (KIMS) RADHA SHYAM JENA

VersusA.J. MOHAMMED SHAH @ A.J.SHANAVAS AND ANR. T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR, P. I. JOSE

ConnectedC.A. No. 3905/2019XVII-A

DR. K.R. VIKRAMAN SUREGEON T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR

VersusA.J. MOHAMMED SHAH @ A.J.SHANAVAS AND ANR. P. I. JOSE[R-1]

Page 308: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 13

37 C.A. No. 5919/2015XII-A

PERATI VAMAN REDDY (D) BY LR ANDORS. SADINENI RAVI KUMAR

VersusTHE SINGARENI COLLERIES COMPANYLTD. AND ANR. P. PARMESWARAN[R-1]

38 C.A. No. 581/2016XVI

UJJWAL BARTER PVT. LTD. . AND ANR. APARNA SINHA[P-1]Versus

STATE OF WEST BENGAL . AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1]KAMLENDRA MISHRA[I-1][IMPL]

As per R.P dated 23.8.2019, the hearing of appeal be expedited

39 C.A. No.7111-7113/2017XII

B. HAYAR UNNISA BIBI ETC. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.ETC. AND ANR. K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7114/2017XII

T. CHANDRA AND ORS. AND ORS. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.AND ANR. K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1], [R-2]

40 C.A. No. 7131/2015XII-A

MEKA VENKATA PRATAPA APPA RAO Y. RAJA GOPALA RAOVersusREVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/LANDACQUISITION OFFICER NUZVID GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

41 Crl.A. No. 1455/2015II-C

P.S. KUSUMALATHA ANUP JAINVersusSTATE BY KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTAPOLICE

SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1], JOSEPHARISTOTLE S.

Service complete in all matters.ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1605/2015II-C

GOVINDARAJU ANUP JAIN

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKALOKAYUKTHA POLICE

SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1], JOSEPHARISTOTLE S.

FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 19965/2015ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1606/2015II-C

M.ONKARAMURTHY AND ORS. ANUP JAIN

VersusTHE STATE BY KARNATAKALOKAYUKTHA POLICE AND ANR.

SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1], JOSEPHARISTOTLE S.

FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 19980/201542 Crl.A. No. 41/2016

IIRANVIR SINGH SIDDHARTH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH HOMEDEPARTMENT SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 578/2016II

RAM SINGH SIDDHARTH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ADARSH UPADHYAY[R-1]

43 C.A. No. 566/2017III-A

SHYAM SINGH MANOJ K. MISHRA[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P. THROUGH HOMESECRETARY AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

44 Crl.A. No. 527/2017II

ALLA RAMAKRISHNA REDDY(R.L.) A. VENAYAGAM BALANVersusTHE STATE OF TELANGANA ANTICORRUPTION BUREAU AND ANR.

S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-1], GUNTURPRABHAKAR[R-2]

Page 309: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 13ConnectedW.P.(Crl.) No. 162/2017PIL-W

ALLA RAMAKRISHNA REDDY A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

VersusTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and IA No.109678/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS and IA No.113815/2017-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

45 C.A. No. 687-688/2017IV

AJINDER SINGH MANN (D) THR LRSAND ORS. KAVEETA WADIA

VersusBATHINDA IMPROVEMENT TRUST . ANDANR. BIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA

To be listed before Hon. Court vide this Court's order dated 27.9.2019 passed inSLP(c)No.32694/2017.

ConnectedC.A. No. 1579/2017IV

TARSEM KUMAR AND ORS. UGRA SHANKAR PRASAD, UMANGSHANKAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusBHATINDA IMPROVEMENT TRUST,BHATINDA AND ORS. BIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA

ConnectedC.A. No.8032-8033/2017IV

SATISH KUMAR SHALU SHARMA

Versus

BHATINDA IMPROVEMENT TRUST BIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA

ConnectedC.A. No.3332-3334/2017IV

VIMAL MITTAL CHRISTI JAIN[P-1]

Versus

BATHINDA IMPROVEMENT TRUST BIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.4606-4609/2017IV

MADAN LAL AND ORS. T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS

Versus

BHATINDA IMPROVEMENT TRUST ANDORS. BIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.5450-5451/2017IV

GURBAKHSH SINGH (SINCE DECEASED)THR LRS AND ORS. T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS

VersusBHATINDA IMPROVEMENT TRUST,BHATINDA AND ORS. BIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.5295-5298/2017IV

BUTA SINGH AND ORS. T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS

Versus

BHATINDA IMPROVEMENT TRUST ANDANR. BIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.4885-4886/2017IV

GURTEJ SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.AND ORS. T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS

VersusBHATINDA IMPROVEMENT TRUST. ANDANR. BIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.4932-4933/2017IV

SHEELA DEVI (D) THR. LRS. AND ORS. T. V. S. RAGHAVENDRA SREYAS

Versus

BHATINDA IMPROVEMENT TRUST,BHATINDA AND ANR. BIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA[R-1]

Page 310: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 13ConnectedSLP(C) No. 32694/2017IV-B

GAJJAN SINGH RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. VINEET BHAGAT[R-2]List along-with Civil Appeal Nos. 687-688/2017 vide Court's order dated27.09.2019.

46 Crl.A. No.994-995/2017II-B

KRISHAN KUMAR AND ORS. RISHI MALHOTRA

VersusSTATE OF HARYANA SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[R-1]Post after 4 weeks as per Record of Proceedings dated 09.10.2018.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 996/2017II-B

ANUP SINGH SNEHASISH MUKHERJEE

VersusSTATE OF HARYANA SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[R-1]

47 C.A. No. 4566/2017XVII-A

SUDHANSHU JAYASWAL AND ORS. SHAILESH MADIYALVersusM/S RPS INFRASTRUCTURE LTD . ANDORS. MAHUA KALRA[R-1]

48 C.A. No. 9134/2018III

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFGREATER MUMBAI AND ORS. THROUGHTHE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

SUCHITRA ATUL CHITALE

VersusSMT. DEEPA ARUN SHINDE URMILA SIRUR

ConnectedC.A. No. 9135/2018III

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFGREATER MUMBAI SUCHITRA ATUL CHITALE

VersusMAHAPALIKA AROGYA SEVAKARMACHARI SANGHATANA, MUMBAI URMILA SIRUR

ConnectedC.A. No. 9136/2018III

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFGREATER MUMBAI AND ORS. SUCHITRA ATUL CHITALE

VersusDEEPA ARUN SHINDE URMILA SIRUR

ConnectedC.A. No. 9137/2018III

BRIHANMUMBAI MAHANAGARPALIKA SUCHITRA ATUL CHITALE

VersusMAHAPALIKA AROGYA SEVAKARMACHARI SANGHATANA MUMBAIAND ANR.

URMILA SIRUR

FOR FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 103346/2018

ConnectedC.A. No. 9122/2018III

MAHAPALIKA AROGYA SEVAKARMACHARI SANGHATANA URMILA SIRUR

VersusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFGREATER MUMBAI SUCHITRA ATUL CHITALE[CAVEAT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9123/2018III

ANJALI VISHOK JAGTAP URMILA SIRUR

VersusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFGREATER MUMBAI SUCHITRA ATUL CHITALE

49 Crl.A. No. 1446/2017II

BIMLA JOSHI RAJAT JOSEPH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 377/2018II

ANAND JOSHI RAJAT JOSEPH

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA[R-1]FOR

Page 311: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 1350 Crl.A. No. 2106/2017

II-BAMARJIT SINGH JOLLYVersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]Post after 4 weeks as per Record of Proceedings dated 09.10.2018.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2148/2017II-B

MOHINDER SINGH AJAY PAL

VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 117262/2017

51 Crl.A. No. 1635/2018II-C

RATNU YADAV JAIL PETITION[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1][GR]MR. SHRIDHAR YESHWANT CHITALE, ADVOCATE MAY BE SHOWN AS AMICUSCURIAE

52 C.A. No. 6924/2009IV-A

MANAGEMENT OF MSKMILLS,GULBARGA KAUSTUBH ANSHURAJ[P-1]

VersusSAIFANSAB (DEAD) BY LRS. PARTHA SIL[R-1.4], [R-1.3], [R-1.2], [R-1.1]

53 C.A. No. 763/2013III

BALASAHEB CHANDRARAO MORE ANDORS. M. Y. DESHMUKH[P-1]

Versus

SURESH KISANRAO PORJE . AND ORS.SHIVAJI M. JADHAV[R-1], NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-1],ANAGHA S. DESAI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1179/2015III

GORAKSHANATH Y. SARODE AND ORS. ABHA R. SHARMA

Versus

SURESH KISANRAO PORJE AND ORS.SHIVAJI M. JADHAV, ANAGHA S. DESAI,NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-10]RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL, [INT]

54 C.A. No. 2649/2011IV

RAJINDER SINGH (D) THR. LRS. ANDORS.

RAVI PANWAR[P-1.8], [P-1.3], [P-1.7.2], [P-1.2],[P-1.7.1], [P-1.1], [P-1.6.3], [P-1.6.2], [P-1.6.1],[P-1.9.2], [P-1.5], [P-1.9.1], [P-1.4]

VersusMEHAR SINGH AND ORS. SHAKEEL AHMEDService complete in both the appeals

ConnectedC.A. No. 2650/2011IV

SURJIT KAUR AND ORS.RAVI PANWAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6.3], [P-6.2], [P-6.1], [P-7.2], [P-7.1], [P-8],[P-9.2], [P-9.1]

VersusMEHAR SINGH AND ORS. AJAY KUMAR

55 C.A. No. 6986/2009XVII-A

ESTATE OFFICER, CHANDIGARH GOPAL SINGHVersusJASWINDER KAUR . AND ANR.

56 C.A. No. 2299/2010XI-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersus

MANUJURANI ROUTRAY AND ANR. SHIBASHISH MISRABRIJ BHUSHAN[INT]

57 C.A. No. 5454/2010XVII-A

SAKET MEDICARE ANSAR AHMAD CHAUDHARYVersusPUNJAB NATIONAL BANK FIN.LTD. M. A. CHINNASAMYFOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2009 FOR ON IA 58266/2009

58 C.A. No. 1362/2009XVII-A

SANJAY KUMAR SINGH TOMAR S/OLATE P.S.TOMAR AND ORS. VISHNU SHARMA

Versus

Page 312: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 13L.I.C.OF INDIA THROUGH ITSDIVISIONAL MANAGER AND ANR. RAKESH K. SHARMA

59 C.A. No.2433-2434/2009IV

RAJ KUMAR AND ORS. S. K. VERMA[P-1]

VersusTHE COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITIONAND ORS. RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-1]

SERVICE IS COMPLETE.ConnectedC.A. No. 4190/2009IV

BHURA SINGH(D) TR.LRS. AND ANR. VIVEK GUPTA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.6273-6274/2009IV

FIRANGI LAL AND ANR. S. K. VERMA[P-1]

Versus

THE COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITIONAND ANR. RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-2]

60 C.A. No. 24/2012XIV-A

MANISH SETHI . AND ANR. PUJA SHARMA[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRYOF URBAN DEVELOPMENT . AND ORS.

SUSHMA SURI[R-1], RACHANASRIVASTAVA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], ANILKATIYAR[R-5]

61 C.A. No. 7068/2009XI-A

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. BINA MADHAVANVersusSIBU SKARIA . AND ORS. P. A. NOOR MUHAMED

62 C.A. No. 81/2011XVI-A

S.KULDEEP SINGH AND ANR. KAVEETA WADIAVersusS.PRITHPAL SINGH S. N. BHAT[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 }

63 Crl.A. No. 1563/2011II

BHAGWAN DAN . AND ORS. DEVASHISH BHARUKA[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1][GR]RAVI PANWAR[INT][PR]

{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 }ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1564/2011II

NARAYAN DAN AND ORS. SNEHASISH MUKHERJEE[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1][GR]{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 } READY

64 C.A. No. 2817/2015XI-A

JAYAKRISHNA V. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. G. PRAKASH, [R-1], [R-2], [R-3]{Fixed Date by Court for 11-12-2019 }

65 C.A. No. 1816/2010XIV-A

STATE OF MIZORAM AND ANR. ASTHA SHARMA[P-1]Versus

SRI K.THANCHHUNGA . AND ORS.HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11],[R-12], [R-13], [R-14], [R-15], [R-16], [R-17],[R-18]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 33098/2010XIV

K.THANCHHUNGA . AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHI

VersusTHE STATE OF MIZORAM AND ANR. P. V. YOGESWARANfor final disposal vide Court's order dated 24.09.2012

66 C.A. No. 3587/2012IV

JAGDISH SINGH (DEAD) THR. LRS SUSHIL BALWADA[P-1]Versus

Page 313: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 13

THE STATE OF HARYANA UGRA SHANKAR PRASAD, KAMAL MOHANGUPTA

67 C.A. No.9496-9497/2013III

NAGESH RAJARAM SHELKE AND ORS. MRINAL GOPAL ELKER, [P-2], [P-3]

Versus

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS.NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1], [R-2], SHIVAJI M.JADHAV[R-3]

68 C.A. No. 7402/2009XVII-A

THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. MANJEET CHAWLA[P-1]Versus

M/S J.K.CEMENT WORKS PRASHANT CHAUDHARY, SANJEEVAGARWAL[R-1]

FOR RECALLING THE COURTS ORDER ON IA 5/2014

69 C.A. No.7589-7597/2011XVII-A

M/S SCOOTER INDIA LTD. MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.

VersusDIPAK DAS . AND ORS. RANJAN MUKHERJEE, BIJOY KUMAR JAIN

70 C.A. No. 1944/2010IV-A

MUNICIPAL CORP.OF BURHANPUR B. S. BANTHIA[P-1]VersusSANTOSH AND ORS. AND ORS. KULDIP SINGH[R-1], MISHRA SAURABH[R-2]

71 C.A. No. 35/2011XII-A

PODEM KRISHNA C. S. N. MOHAN RAOVersusDAMERA VENKATA NARSIMHA APPARAO (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.

ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD, , VENKATPALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES

72 C.A. No.5382-5389/2013XI-A

SAIRA K.S. AND ORS. A. RAGHUNATH

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. P. V. DINESH, G. PRAKASH

ConnectedC.A. No.5390-5394/2013XI-A

THOMAS THOMAS AND ANR. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

Versus

THE CHIEF ENGINEER LOCAL SELFGOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT AND ORS. P. V. DINESH, G. PRAKASH[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No.5395-5403/2013XI-A

MANOJ KUMAR ACCOTTILAM A. RAGHUNATH

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. G. PRAKASH

ConnectedC.A. No.5404-5421/2013XI-A

SURESH BABU AND ORS. T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR

Versus

GOVERNMENT OF KERALA CHIEFSECRETARY AND ORS. P. V. DINESH, VIPIN NAIR[R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No.5425-5426/2013XI-A

SHEEJA S NAIR . AND ORS. A. RAGHUNATH

Versus

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. BINA MADHAVAN

ConnectedC.A. No.5422-5424/2013XI-A

A.P.INDIRA A. RAGHUNATH

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. P. V. DINESH

73 C.A. No.7357-7376/2010XVII-A

M/S NANDAN BIOMATRIX LTD. LIZ MATHEW

Versus

Page 314: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 13S.AMBIKA DEVI AND ORS. RANJITH K. C.

74 C.A. No. 8114/2010XIV-A

M/S BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHIVersusMADAN MOHAN RATAWAL . AND ANR. PIYUSH SHARMA, ANIL KATIYAR

75 Crl.A. No. 1823/2014II

SHEKHAR CHANDRA JAIL PETITION[P-1]VersusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 } KINDLY SHOW THE NAME OF DR. ALOKKUMAR SHARMA, NON-AOR (A.C.) FOR THE APPELLANT IN THE CAUSE LIST

76 Crl.A. No. 1905/2014II-B

VIKRAM JINENDRA JAIN[P-1]VersusSTATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 12-12-2019 }

NOTE:-ON 10.12.2019 THE MATTERS WHICH MAY NOT BE TAKEN UP BY THEBENCH OF HONBLE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR AND HONBLEK.M. JOSEPH , JJ. AND THE MATTERS SHOWN IN THE WEEKLY LISTWILL BE TAKEN UP ON 11.12.2019 AND 12.12.2019 BY THEFOLLOWING BENCH :-]HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDARHONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER

NEW DELHI06-12-2019 17:46:21

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 315: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 33 OF 2019 FROM : 10-12-2019 To 12-12-2019

COURT NO. : 14HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

NOTE:-ALTERNATIVE BENCHREGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate

1 C.A. No. 6797/2008X

M/S LAXMI CONTINENTALCONSTRN.COMPANY MUKESH KUMAR SHARMA[P-1][PR]

VersusSTATE OF U.P. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1][GR]

2 C.A. No. 8607/2010IX

NOY VALLESINA ENGNR.SPA (NKA NOYAMBIENTE S.P.A.) A CORP. ORGANISEDAND EXISTING UNDER THE LAWS OF I

DUA ASSOCIATES

VersusJINDAL DRUGS LTD. THR. M.D. ANDORS. D.S.K. LEGAL[R-1]

3 C.A. No.8885-8886/2012IV-A

KAMLESH PURI DIVYAKANT LAHOTI[P-1]

Versus

HARI SINGH AND ORS. PUNEET TANEJA, SURYA KANT,DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA

{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

4 C.A. No. 2653/2009XVII-A

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD.THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER. ANDANR.

CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

VersusAVTAR SINGH S/O TARSEM SINGH

5 C.A. No. 7699/2009XI-A

M/S KUTTY HASSAN KUTTY ANDCOMPANY E. M. S. ANAM

VersusESI CORPORATION SANJEEV ANAND

6 C.A. No. 5678/2010IX

ASHOKKUMAR CHAGANLAL JAIPURIAAND ANR AND ANR. ANAGHA S. DESAI

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

7 C.A. No.6076-6077/2011XVII-A

M/S BALAJI COLD STORAGE P.LTD.. ANDANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusRAM DHYAN CHAUDHARY @RAMDHYAN YADAV UGRA SHANKAR PRASAD

8 C.A. No. 4949/2009XII

SRI PAMBANKUMARAGURUPARASWAMY TEMPLE SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

VersusK.SUBRAMANYA MUDLIAR(D) THR.LRS..AND ORS. R. AYYAM PERUMAL

Page 316: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 149 C.A. No. 1460/2010

IV-AB.K. RAVICHANDRA AND ORS. KSN & CO.[P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-2], ANIL KATIYAR[R-1],[R-3]

10 C.A. No. 2684/2010III-A

KAFEEL AHMAD (D) THR. LR. MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF[P-1]VersusSTATE OF U.P. THROUGH COLLECTORAND ORS.

TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], PRADEEPMISRA[R-3]

11 C.A. No. 572-573/2010XVII-A

AMAN SEMI-CONDUCTORS (PVT.) LTD. T. L. GARGVersusHARYANA STATEINDUST.DEV.CORP.LTD.. AND ANR. RAVINDRA BANA

12 C.A. No. 3983/2010XI-A

STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. G. PRAKASH[P-1]VersusDR. S. MEERA BHAI AMMA . AND ORS. M. T. GEORGE[R-1], ROMY CHACKO[R-2]

13 C.A. No. 6937/2009XIV-A

NAR BAHADUR KHATIWADA BRIJ BHUSHAN[P-1]VersusSTATE OF SIKKIM . THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ANR. NARENDRA KUMAR[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6938/2009XIV-A

NAR BAHADUR KHATIWADA BRIJ BHUSHAN[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF SIKKIM . AND ANR. NARENDRA KUMAR[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.275/2009 In C.A. No.6937/2009XIV-A

NAR BAHADUR KHATHIWADA BRIJ BHUSHAN

Versus

SHRI R.P. CHINGAPA (S.C.S.) AND ANR. ARPUTHAM ARUNA AND CO[R-1]

IN C.A. No. - 6937/2009,14 C.A. No. 877/2009

XIV-AJAIDEV NAGRATH AND ANR. JASPREET GOGIA[P-1]VersusBIKRAMJIT NAGRATH (D)THR. LRS. ANDORS.

B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[R-1], LEGALOPTIONS[R-2], [R-3], ANIL NAG[R-6.3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 949/2009XIV-A

RASHMI DEV NAGRATH AND ANR. LIZ MATHEW[P-2]

Versus

BIKRAMJIT NAGRATH (D) AND ORS.B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[R-1], LEGALOPTIONS[R-2], [R-3], JASPREET GOGIA[R-4.2],[R-4.1], [R-4], ANIL NAG[R-5]BRAJESH KUMAR[IMPL]

15 Crl.A. No. 238/2011II-A

CHHOTA AHIRWAR P. V. YOGESWARAN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[R-1]

16 C.A. No. 5049/2009IV-A

SABIR HUSSAIN AND ORS. PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH[P-1]VersusSYED MOHAMMAD HASSAN (DEAD) TH.LRS AND ANR. PRASHANT KUMAR[LR/S]

17 C.A. No. 903/2011XI-A

STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. G. PRAKASHVersusM/S POPULAR ESTATES (NOWDISSOLVED) AND ANR. LIZ MATHEW, [R-2]

18 C.A. No. 10877/2011XVI

SUDHANSHU KUMAR SINGH(D) THR.LRS. AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR

Versus

Page 317: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 14DEO PRASAD SINGH (DECEASED) . ANDORS. AMIT PAWAN, DEBASIS MISRA

19 C.A. No. 1114/2011XIV-A

PREM BHARDWAJ AND ORS. ANURADHA MUTATKAR[P-1]Versus

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ANDORS.

ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], ANILNAG[R-4], BIMLESH KUMAR SINGH[R-5],IRSHAD AHMAD[R-6]

20 C.A. No. 5861/2009IV

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. RANJEETA ROHATGI[P-1]VersusMEHAR DIN R. GOPALAKRISHNAN[R-1]

21 C.A. No. 6360/2011IV-A

RAMESHWAR DAYAL(D) THR. LRS. PRATIBHA JAINVersus

SHAKUNTALA DEVI . AND ORS. NIRAJ SHARMA, VANDANA SEHGAL, B. K.SATIJA, RAHUL KAUSHIK[R-18]

22 Crl.A. No. 1390/2010II

RASHID AHMAD @ RAHEES AHMAD M. P. SHORAWALA[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

SHASHANK SHEKHAR SINGH[R-1], S. K.VERMA[R-2], [R-3], AJAY KUMARTALESARA[R-4]

23 Crl.A. No. 1372/2010II-B

SURESH SUNIL KUMAR VERMA[P-1], [P-2], [P-2]VersusSTATE OF HARYANA SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

24 Crl.A. No. 837/2012II

RAJU B. SUNITA RAO[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SARVESH SINGH BAGHEL[R-1]

25 Crl.A. No.1313-1314/2010II-B

IGNATIUS HIMINDER LAL

VersusSHAJI AND ANR. G. PRAKASH, NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-2]

26 C.A. No.6902-6904/2009IX

HARISH VASANTRAO BHUJADEETC.ETC. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

VersusSCHEDULE TRIBES CASTCERTIF.SCRUT.COMMIT THROUGH ITSMEMBER SECRETARY

ASHA GOPALAN NAIR, GAURAV AGRAWAL

to be listed in the first week of December, 2019 as per Hon'ble Court's order dated04.11.2019

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 24894/2009IX

MAH.ADIWASI THAKUR JAMATSWARAKSHAN SAMITI CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 9335/2013III

SUMEET DATTATRAY PAWAR SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 15714/2010IX

SACHIN SHANTARAM MHASKAR SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS. SECRETARY AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 5894/2010IX

SANTOSH B MASKE SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

Page 318: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 14ConnectedSLP(C) No. 13502/2010IX

BHARATI BHALCHANDRA SHRIKAR @SHOBHA MOHANRAO SURYAWANSH SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SECRETARYAND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1], [R-1], [R-2], [R-4],BHARGAVA V. DESAI[R-3]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 14026/2010IX

DHONDI S PALVE SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

VersusTRIBAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT ANDORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8605/2010IX

SANGITA BHIKAJI MASAGE SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

Versus

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 38154/2013IX

RUPALI YASHWANT THAKUR SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 8603/2010IX

SHILPA VISHNU THAKUR SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGHITS SECRETARY NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 28075/2010IX

BHAGHASHREE PRAMOD THAKUR SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

Versus

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAMEERA MATHUR, NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKARGAURAV AGRAWAL[IMPL]

FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 147968/2019ConnectedSLP(C) No. 13598/2012IX

DINESH RAMESH THAKUR SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS.

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 15746/2012IX

VINA EKNATH SAINDANE @ VIJAYA P.THAKUR SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 38557/2012IX

SOMESHWAR S/O WAMAN THAKUR SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA STATEOF MAHARASHTRA AND ORSSECRETARY AND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 469/2018IX

VIJAY JAYSING BHOJE AND ANR. R. P. GUPTA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], [R-5]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.29015-29016/2018IX

MONIKA SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

Page 319: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 14ConnectedC.A. No.3922-3923/2019III

SAGAR S/O RAVINDRA SURYAWANSHI SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

27 C.A. No.7050-7051/2010III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ANDORS.

ROHIT K. SINGH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5]

Versus

MILKIYAT SINGH AND ORS. P. NARASIMHAN[R-1], P. K.CHAKRAVARTY[R-1], ANUVRAT SHARMA[R-1]

28 C.A. No. 109/2010IV

RUSSI FISHERIES P. LTD.. AND ANR. GARIMA PRASHAD[P-1]VersusBHAVNA SETH . AND ORS. ABHAY KUMAR[R-1]service complete.

29 C.A. No. 7229/2009IX

NARAYAN @ N.M.KABRA JATIN ZAVERIVersusASHALATA . AND ANR. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

30 C.A. No. 727/2012IV-A

MANGI LAL(DECEASED) THR.LRS. ANDANR. M. A. KRISHNA MOORTHY

VersusRAMAWATAR AND ORS. AJAY KUMAR SINGH

31 Crl.A. No. 1582/2010II-C

MEHTU RAM PROMILAVersusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE ASWATHI M.K.[R-1]

32 C.A. No. 8527/2010IV-A

THE MYSORE SALES INTERNATIONALLIMITED S. N. BHAT

VersusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTDAND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, DEBASIS MISRA

list after two weeks as per order dt 19-09-2019

ConnectedC.A. No. 8529/2010IV-A

THE MYSORE SALES INTERNATIONALLTD S. N. BHAT

VersusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, DEBASIS MISRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 8530/2010IV-A

M/S MYSORE SALES INTERNATIONALLTD S. N. BHAT

VersusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTDAND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, DEBASIS MISRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 8531/2010IV-A

M/S MYSORE SALES INTERNATIONALLTD S. N. BHAT

VersusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, DEBASIS MISRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 8533/2010IV-A

M/S MYSORE SALES INTERNATIONALLTD S. N. BHAT

VersusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTDAND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, DEBASIS MISRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 8528/2010IV-A

M/S MYSORE SALES INTERNATIONALLIMITED S. N. BHAT

VersusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTDAND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, DEBASIS MISRA

Page 320: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 14ConnectedC.A. No. 8532/2010IV-A

M/S MYSORE SALES INTERNATIONALLTD S. N. BHAT

VersusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTDAND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, DEBASIS MISRA

33 Crl.A. No. 169/2011II-C

SENGUTTUVAN P. V. YOGESWARANVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

34 Crl.A. No. 2439/2009II-C

SABAR BHATTI PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1]VersusN.C.T.OF DELHI B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

35 C.A. No. 7698/2013III

JAGANNATH NARAYAN PATIL ANJANI KUMAR JHA[P-1]VersusYAMUNABAI . AND ORS. K. RAJEEVAs per order dated 1.10.2019 list the matters after original record received

ConnectedC.A. No. 7699/2013III

JAGANNATH NARAYAN PATIL ANJANI KUMAR JHA[P-1]

VersusYAMUNABAI . AND ORS. K. RAJEEV

36 C.A. No. 3936/2013III

ANANTA CHANDRAKANTBHONSULE(D)BY LRS SHIPRA GHOSE

VersusTRIVIKRAM ATMARAM KORJUENKAR(D)BY LRS. VISHWAJIT SINGH

37 Crl.A. No. 1258/2010II-A

RAMVIR @ SAKET SINGH VARUN PUNIA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[R-1]

38 Crl.A. No. 161/2010II-C

M.KARIAPPA S. MAHENDRANVersusTHE STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OFPOLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

39 C.A. No. 8656/2014III

DOSIBAI NANABHOY JEEJEEBHOY (D)BY LRS. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

VersusUNION OF INDIA ANIL KATIYAR

40 Crl.A. No. 1755/2010II-A

SANJABIJ TARI RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersus

KISHORE S.BORCAR AND ANR. T. MAHIPAL, MERUSAGARSAMANTARAY[R-2][GR]

41 Crl.A. No. 1680/2013II

SURYA BAKSH SINGH RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ADARSH UPADHYAY[R-1]

42 Crl.A. No. 268/2010II-A

MONICA @ MONA DSOUZA COAC[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF GOA RAJAT JOSEPH[R-1]

43 C.A. No. 10430/2011XI-A

IRIC SOHAN PRAKASH RANJAN NAYAK[P-1]VersusJ. KUMARADASAN NAIR . AND ORS. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1], [R-2]

44 C.A. No. 3661/2011IV-A

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[P-1]VersusGANDHI JEEVAN COLLECTIVE FARMINGCOOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED ASHWANI BHARDWAJ[R-1]

45 Crl.A. No. 1435/2010II

BHAWANI SINGH GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]Versus

Page 321: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 14

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.MILIND KUMAR[R-1][GR], T.MAHIPAL[R-2][PR], SARAD KUMARSINGHANIA[R-3][PR]

46 Crl.A. No. 1337/2010II-A

VIJAY SHANKAR PRAGATI NEEKHRA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]{Fixed Date by Court for 10-12-2019 }

47 C.A. No. 8037/2011IV

SATNAM SINGH BHASKAR Y. KULKARNIVersusSATNAM SINGH KUSUM CHAUDHARY

48 Crl.A. No. 1651/2011II-A

MARKUS KUJUR JAIL PETITIONVersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND GOPAL PRASAD

49 Crl.A. No.1664-1666/2010II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR

Versus

RAJU PURI AND ANR. GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

50 Crl.A. No. 21/2012II-C

MOHD. TAYUB SHIV RAM SHARMA[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR M. SHOEB ALAM[R-1][GR]FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 16963/2010

51 Crl.A. No. 1309/2011II-C

SEENU @ SEENIVASAN A. RADHAKRISHNANVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1659/2011II-C

SENTHIL P. SOMA SUNDARAM

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

52 Crl.A. No. 443/2012II

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANUVRAT SHARMAVersusRAM SWAROOP @ BARKAT JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

53 Crl.A. No. 2087/2010II-B

JASBIR SINGH JASPREET GOGIAVersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN

54 C.A. No. 8236/2009IX

DNYANESHWAR S.S.K.LTD. AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

ConnectedC.A. No. 8237/2009IX

DNYANESHWAR SAHAKARI SAKHARKARKHANA K. N. RAI

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.AND ORS. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

ConnectedC.A. No. 6196/2013III

SAHAKAR MAHARSHI BHAUSAHEBTHORAT AND ANR. M. Y. DESHMUKH

Versus

U.O.I . AND ORS.NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-2], [R-3], SHIVAJI M.JADHAV[R-4]

55 C.A. No. 162/2011IX

GULAM MOHMAD KHAN (SINCEDECEASED) AND ORS. VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA

VersusGULAM NABI CHANNU MIYA (SINCEDECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL HEIRSKHATIJATUAL KUBRA AND ORS.

ANAGHA S. DESAI

Page 322: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 1456 Crl.A. No. 1676/2010

II-AMUNNALAL @ KALU ANSAR AHMAD CHAUDHARY[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HARSH PARASHAR[R-1]

57 Crl.A. No. 364/2010II

SYYED ABBAS HUSSAIN ANU GUPTAVersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR

58 C.A. No.4736-4737/2011IV

ANIL KUMAR MODI AND ORS. ANKIT GOEL[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5]

VersusTARSEM KUMAR GUPTA GAGAN GUPTA

59 C.A. No. 18767/2017III-A

M/S MEKASTER TELEMATICS LTD.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR RAJESH SRIVASTAVA[P-1]

VersusM.D.,PRADESHIYA INDUSTRIAL ANDINVESTMENT CORPORATION OF U.P..AND ORS.

RUPESH KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], TANMAYAAGARWAL[R-3]

60 C.A. No.2919-2920/2012IX

MHALSABAI DAGU GADAK ABHA R. SHARMA

VersusRUNJA KHANDU GAWARE,DECD.TR.LRS.BAIJRAO RUNJA GAWARE SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

61 C.A. No. 9953/2011IV

AVTAR SINGH . AND ORS. DEEPAK GOELVersusSURJIT KAUR AND ORS. HIMANSHU SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-4]

62 C.A. No.7467-7470/2014XII

SALEM MUSLIM BURIAL GROUNDPROTECTION COMMITTEE P. PARMESWARAN[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. ANDORS.

NARENDRA KUMAR[R-1], SHAKIL AHMEDSYED[R-1], RAKESH K. SHARMA[R-1], VINODHKANNA B.[R-2], K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1], [R-3]

63 C.A. No. 10834/2010XIV-A

SUKHBIRI DEVI AND ORS. LAXMI ARVIND[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. BINU TAMTA[R-1], ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], RAHULPRATAP[R-5]

64 C.A. No. 8987/2017XI-A

KOLIKKAT AYYADA SAROMMABI ANDORS.

A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4],[P-5], [P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10], [P-11],[P-12], [P-13]

VersusMRS. P.V.P. PATHUMMA BI AND ORS. K. RAJEEV[R-6]

65 Crl.A. No. 634/2010II-B

JARNAIL SINGH AND ANR. SANJAY JAINVersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 633/2010II-B

BALKAR SINGH UGRA SHANKAR PRASAD[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

66 C.A. No. 9226/2010XI-A

KERALA BUILDERS FORUM AND ORS. SAJITH. PVersusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS. LIZ MATHEW, C. K. SASI

ConnectedC.A. No.5335-5338/2011XI-A

THE STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERSETC. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[P-1]

VersusM/S. ANU ISAC AND ANOTHER ETC. C. K. SASI[R-1]

67 C.A. No. 1113/2012XI-A

LAILA BEEVI @ LAILA BUHARI VIJAY KUMARVersus

Page 323: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 14N.SUMINA @ SUMMAYYA . AND ORS. E. M. S. ANAM

68 Crl.A. No. 954/2011II-A

HIRALAL AND ANR. SANJAY JAINVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 955/2011II-A

ANIL DAGGI SANJAY JAIN

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

69 C.A. No. 3958/2011IV

KARNAIL SINGH AND ANR. VIJAY KUMARVersusJASWANT SINGH AND ANR.

70 Crl.A. No. 1048/2013II-A

BALRAM MAHTO AND ORS. VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU, [P-2], [P-3],[P-4], [P-5], [P-6]

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND KUNAL VERMA, TAPESH KUMAR SINGH

71 C.A. No. 4117/2013IV

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. MONIKA GUSAINVersusSHIVA ICE FACTORY THROUGH ITSPROPRIETOR (DEAD) THROUGH LR. LALITA KAUSHIK

ConnectedC.A. No. 4118/2013IV

THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. NARESH BAKSHI

VersusSATPAL AND ORS. ROHIT KUMAR SINGH

72 Crl.A. No. 2400/2009II-B

RULDU AND ANR. SHIV PRAKASH PANDEY[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 108/2010II-B

SITA RAM SHIV PRAKASH PANDEY

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGH

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 384/2010II-B

HARNAM SINGH SHIV PRAKASH PANDEY

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGH

73 C.A. No.7928-7937/2010IV-A

BRUHATH BENGALOORU HOTELSASSOCIATION AND ANR. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA . AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

74 C.A. No. 2644/2016III

LOONKARAN GANDHI(D) TR.LR. MRSSHAMA BHIWAPURKAR RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Versus

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS. ANAGHA S. DESAI, NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR

75 C.A. No. 1366/2011IV-A

CHANDRASHEKHARAPPA S. N. BHATVersusBASAPPA (D) THR. LRS AND ANR. RAJEEV SINGHMediation report has been recieved

76 C.A. No. 5710/2019IV-A

SHIVAPUTRAPPA GURAPPA BELLADAND ORS. MAHESH THAKUR

VersusTHE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITIONOFFICER AND ASST. COMMISSIONER,BELGAUM AND ANR.

NIKUNJ DAYAL[R-2]

AT THE TOP OF THE BOARD SUBJECT TO OVERNIGHT PART HEARD

Page 324: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 14ConnectedC.A. No. 5711/2019IV-A

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (E) O ANDM DIVISION HESCOM BELGAUM NIKUNJ DAYAL

VersusSHIVAPUTRAPPA GURAPPA BELLADAND ORS. MAHESH THAKUR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

77 C.A. No.4412-4413/2010XVII-A

M/S. ASSOCIATED ROAD CARRIERS LTD. VIJAY K. JAIN[P-1]

Versus

M/S. KAMLENDER KASHYAP AND ORS. ANIS AHMED KHAN[R-1], SUDARSHAN SINGHRAWAT[R-2]

78 C.A. No. 10299/2011IV-A

PILLAMMA AND ORS. ANJANA CHANDRASHEKAR, [P-5], RAJEEVSINGH[P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-6], [P-7]

VersusH. RAMAIAH REDDY S. N. BHAT

79 C.A. No. 138/2012XI-A

MURALI ALIAS DHANANJAYAN NISHE RAJEN SHONKERVersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH

80 C.A. No.2671-2672/2016III

WALCHANDNAGAR INDUSTRIES LTD. JATIN ZAVERI

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,UDAY B. DUBE

81 C.A. No. 6087/2009IV-A

SAROJA @ SAROJINI ANJANA CHANDRASHEKARVersusCHANNABASAPPA @ CHANDRA KUMARKARMADI (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA

82 C.A. No.5769-5770/2011IV-A

V. ESWARA RAO AND ANR. K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA

VersusGAYATHRIDEVI AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY, (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA

83 C.A. No. 5068/2016XIV-A

SANJEEV GOSWAMI (D) THROUGH LRS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersusSMT. KANIKA DEVI AND ORS. SHAILESH MADIYAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

84 C.A. No. 5869/2011XII

GOMATHI AMMAL Y. RAJA GOPALA RAOVersusSELVI AND ORS. AND ORS. REVATHY RAGHAVAN

85 C.A. No.1047-1048/2012IX

GAUTAMCHAND ABAD . AND ORS. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDANR.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,ASHA GOPALAN NAIR

86 C.A. No. 3565/2010IV-A

SMT. KODAMMA AND ORS. NANDA KISHOREVersusSMT. PAPAMMA AND ANR. P. R. RAMASESH, V. N. RAGHUPATHY

87 C.A. No. 1533/2017XII

ATLANTA LIMITED THR. ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR CHIRAG M. SHROFF[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BYCHIEF ENGINEER MILITARYENGINEERING SERVICE

MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1][GR]

88 C.A. No. 7975/2009XV

RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD SURYA KANTVersusTHE REVENUE BOARD AND ORS.CHAIRMAN AND ORS. SHOBHA GUPTA

Page 325: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 14ConnectedC.A. No.7976-7978/2009XV

RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD

Versus

REVENUE BOARD AND ORS. SHOBHA GUPTA

89 C.A. No. 2410/2011XVII-A

M/S RANGAR BREWERIES LTD. YASH PAL DHINGRAVersusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. VIRESH B. SAHARYA

90 C.A. No. 4537/2009XVII-A

PIARA SINGH M. K. GARGVersusSECRETARY, HEALTH SERVICES GOVTOF PUNJAB. AND ORS.

KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],ANIS AHMED KHAN

91 C.A. No. 2455/2011XVI

NAWIN KUMAR AMIT PAWANVersusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. GOPAL SINGH, VIPIN KUMAR JAI

92 C.A. No. 2536/2011XIV-A

DR. INDIRA SARANATH PRATEEK K CHADHA[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1]

93 C.A. No.3875-3876/2009IV

RAMESH KUMAR NIKHIL GOEL

VersusBHATINDA INTEGARATEDCOOPERATIVE COTTON SPINNING MILLAND ORS.

MISHRA SAURABH, SAURABH MISHRA

ConnectedC.A. No.9185-9196/2017IV

GURJANT SINGH ETC ETC SRIDHAR POTARAJU

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH ITS CHIEFSECRETARY , DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, CHANDIGARH, PUNJABAND ORS.

T. MAHIPAL, RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-1][GR]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 9470/2010IV-B

BANT SINGH AND ORS AND ORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB S. JANANI

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 15117/2010IV-B

GURBACHAN SINGH(D) BY LRS.. ANDANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ANDORS. KUMUD LATA DAS, SAURABH MISHRA

94 C.A. No. 429/2011IV-A

MAHENDRA KUMAR AHIRWAR PETITIONER-IN-PERSONVersusM.P.STATE ELECT.BOARD . AND ORS. T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.284/2009 In C.A. No.429/2011XVI

MAHENDRA KUMAR AHIRWAR PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

Versus

ER. SHRI SANTOSH TIWARI JI AND ORS.

95 C.A. No. 2445/2010IV-A

B.S.RAMASWAMY(D) BY LRS. RAJESH MAHALE[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], NULI & NULI[R-2]

96 C.A. No. 8095/2009XVII-A

ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD B. K. SATIJAVersusM/S TRIVENI ENGG. AND ORS. LIZ MATHEW, PUNEET TANEJA

Page 326: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all

COURT NO. : 14

97 C.A. No.6406-6407/2010XI-A

KATTUKANDI EDATHIL KRISHNAN ANDANR. K. RAJEEV, [P-2]

VersusKATTUKANDI EDATHI VALSAN ANDORS. LIZ MATHEW, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

98 C.A. No. 310/2015XIV-A

NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL PRASHANT KUMAR[P-1]VersusGANGA DEVI . AND ANR. AARTHI RAJAN[R-1], B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 313/2015XIV-A

NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL PRASHANT KUMAR

VersusPREM LATA . AND ANR. AARTHI RAJAN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 311/2015XIV-A

NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL PRASHANT KUMAR[P-1]

VersusMALARVIZHI ELANGOVAN . AND ANR. AARTHI RAJAN[R-1], B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 312/2015XIV-A

NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL PRASHANT KUMAR[P-1]

VersusISRAEL ALI . AND ANR. AARTHI RAJAN[R-1], B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-2]

NEW DELHI06-12-2019 17:46:37

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 327: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE ... · [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before all