163
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] WEEKLY LIST No. 30 OF 2017 FROM : 07-11-2017 To 09-11-2017 CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN NOTE :- CONSTITUTION BENCH PART-HEARD REGULAR HEARING SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate 1 C.A. No.-2357/2017 XIV GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI CHIRAG M. SHROFF[P-1] Versus UNION OF INDIA ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], K. R. SASIPRABHU[R-1][INT], B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1] {Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.105506/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION Connected CONMT.PET.(C) No.-175/2016 INDU PRAKASH SINGH SATYA MITRA[P-1] Versus RAJIV MEHRISHI . AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR {Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } Connected C.A. No.-2360/2017 XIV GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI SHADAN FARASAT Versus M.A. USMANI . AND ORS. GARGI KHANNA, B. KRISHNA PRASAD[Caveat] {Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } Connected C.A. No.-2359/2017 XIV GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI CHIRAG M. SHROFF Versus RAJENDER PRASHAD B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [Caveat] {Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } Connected C.A. No.-2363/2017 XIV GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI CHIRAG M. SHROFF Versus SANDEP TIWARI . AND ORS. NIKHIL NAYYAR, B. KRISHNA PRASAD[Caveat] {Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } Connected C.A. No.-2362/2017 XIV GOVT. OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI SHADAN FARASAT Versus NARESH KUMAR . AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[Caveat] {Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } Connected C.A. No.-2358/2017 XIV GOVT. OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI NAVEEN R. NATH Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [Caveat] {Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 30 OF 2017 FROM : 07-11-2017 To 09-11-2017

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTHON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKARHON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUDHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

NOTE:-CONSTITUTION BENCHPART-HEARDREGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 C.A. No.-2357/2017

XIVGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI CHIRAG M. SHROFF[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIAANIL KATIYAR[R-1], K. R.SASIPRABHU[R-1][INT], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.105506/2017-INTERVENTIONAPPLICATION

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C)No.-175/2016

INDU PRAKASH SINGH SATYA MITRA[P-1]

VersusRAJIV MEHRISHI . AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-2360/2017XIV

GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITALTERRITORY OF DELHI SHADAN FARASAT

VersusM.A. USMANI . AND ORS. GARGI KHANNA, B. KRISHNA PRASAD[Caveat]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-2359/2017XIV

GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITALTERRITORY OF DELHI CHIRAG M. SHROFF

VersusRAJENDER PRASHAD B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [Caveat]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-2363/2017XIV

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI CHIRAG M. SHROFF

VersusSANDEP TIWARI . AND ORS. NIKHIL NAYYAR, B. KRISHNA PRASAD[Caveat]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-2362/2017XIV

GOVT. OF NATIONAL CAPITALTERRITORY OF DELHI SHADAN FARASAT

VersusNARESH KUMAR . AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[Caveat]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-2358/2017XIV

GOVT. OF NATIONAL CAPITALTERRITORY OF DELHI NAVEEN R. NATH

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD, [Caveat]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

Page 2: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTConnectedC.A. No.-2361/2017XIV

GOVT. OF NATIONAL CAPITALTERRITORY OF DELHI CHIRAG M. SHROFF

Versus

SANDEEP TIWARI . AND ORS. MONIKA GUSAIN, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[Caveat]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedCrl.A. No.-277/2017II-C

UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. CHIRAG M. SHROFF[Caveat], SENTHILJAGADEESAN[R-2]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-2364/2017XIV

UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI . AND ANR. CHIRAG M. SHROFF{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

2 SLP(C) No.-18889/2012III

GOOLROKH M. GUPTA SHIRAZ CONTRACTOR PATODIAVersusMR. BURJOR PARDIWALA.... DEAD (DELETED) AND ORS.

KARANJAWALA & CO., SIDDHARTHACHOWDHURY, LAWYER S KNIT & CO

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.114561/2017-INTERVENTIONAPPLICATION and IA No.114567/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION and IANo.114574/2017-INTERVENTION APPLICATION

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 30 OF 2017 FROM : 07-11-2017 To 09-11-2017

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTHON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKARHON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD

NOTE:-[ IF THE CONSTITUTION BENCH DOES NOT SIT FOR ANY REASON OR THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE THECONSTITUTION BENCH IN THIS COURT ARE OVER, THE FOLLOWING MATTERS WILL BE TAKEN UP BY THIS BENCH]

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 C.A. No.-5060/2011

III-ARAMJI AND ORS. MANOJ SWARUP AND CO., [P-2], [P-3]VersusKEDAR RAM (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. MANOJ K. MISHRA

2 C.A. No.-1432/2008XIV

M/S. JACKSON AND CO. PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHIVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. VIJAY PANJWANI, GURMEET SINGH MAKKER

ConnectedC.A. No.-1433/2008XIV

INDIAN GENERATOR MANUFACTURERSASSON. THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFENVIRONMENT THROUGH ITSSECRETARY AND ANR.

ANIL KATIYAR, VIJAY PANJWANI[R-2]

Page 3: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

3 C.A. No.-4523/2005IV-A

KARNATAKA STATE ELECTIONCOMMISSION SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusH.C.YATHEESH KUMAR V. N. RAGHUPATHY

4 C.A. No.-1104/2007IV-A

INDU JAIN JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRAVersusPUSHPENDRA SINGH BAGHEL ANDORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA

ConnectedC.A. No.-1105/2007IV-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDANR.VersusPUSHPENDRA SINGH BAGHEL ANDORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA

5 C.A. No.-10348/2010III-A

A.S.I. THROUGHSUPDT.ARCHAEOLOGIST ANNAM D. N. RAO

VersusUP SUNNI CENTRAL WAKF BOARD ANDORS.

A. N. ARORA, SHAKIL AHMED SYED[R-1],[R-2], AFTAB ALI KHAN[R-5]

6 C.A. No.-3392/2006XIV

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHCHIEF SECRETARY VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]

VersusRAVINDER KUMAR SANKHAYAN (DEAD). AND ORS.

SANJAY JAIN[R-1], ANIL NAG[R-3], NARESH K.SHARMA[R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No.-3393/2006XIV

H.P. TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPN.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR NARESH K. SHARMA

VersusSH. RAVINDER KUMAR SANKHAYAN(DEAD) . AND ORS.

SANJAY JAIN[R-1], VARINDER KUMARSHARMA[R-3], ANIL NAG[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No.-3394/2006XIV

HIMACHAL PRADESH TOURISMDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION NARESH K. SHARMA

VersusRAVINDER KUMAR SANKHAYAN ANDORS.

SANJAY JAIN[R-1], VARINDER KUMARSHARMA[R-3], ANIL NAG[R-4]

7 Crl.A.No.-1369-1375/2005II-C

AJAY K. AGRAWAL PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[P-1]

VersusSRICHAND P.HINDUJA . AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-2]

8 C.A. No.-6416/2005IX

GURUKRIPA TRUST ARAVINDH S.VersusTHE CUSTODIAN AND ORS. AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR TEWARI

ConnectedC.A. No.-7234/2005IX

B.C.DALAL ARAVINDH S.

VersusTHE CUSTODIAN . AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No.-7185/2005IX

SAINATH CHARITABLE TRUSTTHROUGH MILAN DALAL ARAVINDH S.

VersusTHE CUSTODIAN APPOINTED UNDERSPECIAL COURT (TRIAL OF OFFENCESRELATING TO TRANSACTION INSECURITIES AND ORS.

9 W.P.(Crl.) No.-319/2005PIL-W

CITIZEN FORUM AGAINSTCORRUPTION PRASHANT BHUSHAN

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. P. PARMESWARAN

Page 4: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT10 C.A. No.-3847/2006

XI -AHEMANTA KUMAR MEHERVersus

SHIBA PRASAD KHAMARI . AND ANR. SURESH CHANDRA TRIPATHY[R-1], PRANABKUMAR MULLICK[R-2]

11 C.A. No.-3131/2009III-A

GUJARAT PIPAVAV PORT LIMITED. SHIV KUMAR SURIVersusSPECIAL COMMISSIONER. AND ORS. RACHANA SRIVASTAVA

12 C.A. No.-6660/2009XII-A

PAIDIPALLI RAJAIAH JOHN MATHEWVersusMOHD. KHADER BAKSH(DEAD)THR.LRS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

13 C.A. No.-5348/2009XIV

SHYAM LAL BANSAL HARIKUMAR V.[P-1]Versus

STATE OF ASSAM . AND ORS. CORPORATE LAW GROUP[R-1], DEBOJITBORKAKATI[R-1]

14 C.A. No.-326/2009IV-A

KAMLARAJE CHARITABLE TRUST KARANJAWALA & CO.VersusSTATE OF M.P. . AND ORS. B. S. BANTHIA, ADARSH UPADHYAY

ConnectedC.A. No.-328/2009IV-A

YOGESH KALRA . AND ORS. VIKAS MEHTA

VersusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH . ANDORS. B. S. BANTHIA, ADARSH UPADHYAY

15 C.A. No.-4576/2009III

NEHRU MARG CABIN OWNERS ASSCN. PRATIBHA JAINVersusJAYANTILAL NATHALAL SHETH . ANDORS. HARESH RAICHURA, HEMANTIKA WAHI

FOR ON IA 48101/2009 and IA No.108572/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION andIA No.108573/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

ConnectedC.A. No.-4577/2009III

MODASA NAGARPALIKA HARESH RAICHURA

VersusJAYANTILAL NATHALAL SHETH ANDORS.

16 C.A. No.-10765/2010IV

PUNJAB AGRICULTUAL UNIVERSITYTEACHERS ASSOCIATION AND ANR.Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB . AND ORS.SANJAY JAIN[R-1], VIKAS MEHTA[R-1], KARANBHARIHOKE[R-1], KAILASH CHAND[R-1], AJAYPAL[R-1]

17 C.A. No.-3610/2006XII

U.P. CHESS ASSOCIATION SHAILENDRA SWARUPVersusTAMILNADU CHESS ASSOCIATION &ORS. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

ConnectedC.A. No.-3611/2006XII

RAJASTHAN CHESS ASSOCIATION SHAILENDRA SWARUP

VersusTAMIL NADU CHESS ASSOCIATION ANDANR. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

ConnectedC.A. No.-3612/2006XII

P.T.UMMER KOYA E. M. S. ANAM

VersusT.NADU STATE CHESS ASSN. AND ORS. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN, USHA NANDINI. V

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-13806/2006XII

ALL KERALA CHESS ASSOCIATION E. M. S. ANAM

Versus

Page 5: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTTAMIL NADU STATE CHESSASSOCIATION AND ORS AND ORS. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

18 C.A. No.-1882/2008XVI

SARAN JILA MUKHIYA SANGH AND ANR. RAVI KUMAR TOMARVersusSTATE OF BIHAR . AND ORS. AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEY, GOPAL SINGH

19 C.A. No.-1463/2008XVI

STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER,BIHAR PATNA AND ORS. AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEY

VersusJANAKDHARI PRASAD . AND ORS.

20 C.A. No.-2771/2012III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR.ITS SECRETARY AND ORS. ANUVRAT SHARMA[P-1]

VersusJYOTI BHUSHAN MISHRA AND ANR. PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH[R-1], P. N. PURI[R-2]

21 C.A. No.-4687/2013IV

PEM RAJ SANJAY JAINVersusDARSHANA R. C. KOHLI

22 C.A. No.-6620/2008XII-A

LAKSHMI SREENIVASACOOP.BLDG.SOTY. LTD. K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI

VersusPUVVADA RAMA RAO (D) BY LRS . ANDORS. M. A. CHINNASAMY, C. BALAKRISHNA

ConnectedC.A. No.-6625/2008XII-A

THE LAKSHMI SREENIVASA COOPERATIVE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD.REGD. G2705 REP. BY ITS PRESIDENTKOKKU SU

K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI

VersusALLU APPALANARAYANA (D) BY LRS.AND ORS. M. A. CHINNASAMY, C. BALAKRISHNA

23 C.A. No.-4952/2008XI -A

WILD LIFE WARDEN NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[P-1]VersusKOMARRIKKAL ELIAS K. RAJEEV[R-1]

24 C.A. No.-8109/2010XII-A

GOLI KANNAYYA (DEAD) BY LRS. ANDORS. JAYANT MOHAN[P-1]

Versus

YENDRA SATHIRAJU (DEAD) BY LRS.HARSH PARASHAR[R-2.1][Pr], NARESHKUMAR[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7],[R-8], [R-9], [R-10]

and IA No.98322/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.98324/2017-I A FOR ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IA No.98327/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

ConnectedC.A. No.-8110/2010XII-A

Y.SATHIRAJU (D) TR.HIS LRS . AND ORS. M. VIJAYA BHASKAR, HARSHPARASHAR[P-1][Pr]

VersusGOLI KANNAYYA (DEAD) BY LRS. . ANDORS. JAYANT MOHAN, [R-1], [R-3]

25 C.A. No.-3886/2009XIV

PITAMBER SINGH . AND ANR. PURNIMA BHATVersusROOP CHAND (D) TH.L.RS. BALAJI SRINIVASAN

26 C.A. No.-6384/2010III-A

MAHENDRA PRATAP DUBEY MOHAN PANDEYVersusMANAGING OFFICER,EVACUEEPROPERTY AND ORS. E. C. AGRAWALA, [R-3], [I-1][IMPL], [I-2][IMPL]

27 C.A. No.-2846/2007XI -A

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. G. PRAKASHVersusMANAGER MALANKARA ORTHODOXSYRIAN CHURCH MEDICAL COLLEGE LAWYER S KNIT & CO

Page 6: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTConnectedW.P.(C) No.-350/1993X

ISLAMIC ACADEMY OF EDUCATIONAND ANR. HETU ARORA SETHI, BHARAT SANGAL

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA . AND ORS.

S. N. BHAT, RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE,RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL, NARESHKUMAR, G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, EJAZMAQBOOL, ARPUTHAM ARUNA AND CO, ANILKUMAR TANDALE, ABHINAV MUKERJI

ConnectedC.A. No.-2847/2007XI -A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. P. V. DINESH

VersusKERALA SELF FINANCING ENGR.COLLEGE MANAGEMENTSASSOCIATION

ROMY CHACKO, RADHA SHYAM JENA, K. R.NAMBIAR, ABHIJIT SENGUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No.-2848/2007XI -A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ANR. P. V. DINESH

VersusALL KERALA SELF FINANCING DENTALCOLLEGE MANAGEMENT CONSORTIUM(AKSDMC) AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No.-2849/2007XI -A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. P. V. DINESH

VersusCHIEF EXE.TRUSTEE (FR. MATHEWMUTTAMTHOTTY) AND ORS. ROMY CHACKO

ConnectedC.A. No.-2850/2007XI -A

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. P. V. DINESH[P-1]

VersusPUSHPAGIRI MEDICAL SOCIETY ANDORS. ROMY CHACKO[R-1], AMIT KUMAR[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No.-2852/2007XI -A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. P. V. DINESH

VersusASSN.OF MGT.OF SELF FINCNG.N.C.OFKERALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-2851/2007XI -A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. P. V. DINESH

VersusCALICUT UNIVERSITY NEWLYSANCTIONED COLLEGE OF TEACHEREDUCATION MANAGERS ASSOCATIONAND ORS.

ROMY CHACKO

ConnectedC.A. No.-2853/2007XI -A

STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. P. V. DINESH

Versus

MUSLIM EDUCATIONAL SOCIETYE. M. S. ANAM, RANJITH K. C., R.NEDUMARAN, M. P. VINOD, ASHA GOPALANNAIR

28 C.A. No.-5569/2010XII-A

DAR-US-SALAM EDUCATIONAL TRUST SHAKIL AHMED SYEDVersus

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ANDORS.

GUNTUR PRABHAKAR, ANANGABHATTACHARYYA, [R-2][Pr], VENKAT PALWAILAW ASSOCIATES

29 C.A.No.-4367-4368/2009XII-A

ANWAR AND ANR.

VersusM/S MEENAKASHI STEELROLNG.MIL.P.LD. AND ANR. M. C. DHINGRA

and IA No.71259/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

Page 7: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT30 C.A. No.-2061/2011

XIIT.RAMARAJ REVATHY RAGHAVAN[P-1]Versus

P.KUMAR AND ORS. AND ORS. M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1][Gr], M. VIJAYABHASKAR[R-1]

31 C.A. No.-8426/2011XVII

JHARKHAND STATE ELECT.BAORD HIMANSHU SHEKHARVersusM/S.STAN COMMODITIES PVT.LTD. DEVASHISH BHARUKA

32 C.A.No.-3646-3647/2017III-A

HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LIMITED NIKHIL NAYYAR

VersusKRISHNA DULARI (D) THR LRS. ANDORS.

ANURAG KISHORE, GUNNAMVENKATESWARA RAO

As per Court's order dated 27.02.2017, the instant matter to be listed after threeweeks, except Monday and Friday, for final hearing.

33 Crl.A. No.-462/2011II-B

THKORE JORAJI PRATAPJI . AND ORS. PURVISH JITENDRA MALKANVersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT HEMANTIKA WAHI

34 Crl.A. No.-1035/2013II-A

BIRJU BHUIYAN SANGEETA KUMARVersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND KRISHNANAND PANDEYA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

35 C.A. No.-6452/2012IX

EMP.PROVIDENT FUND ORGN . ANDORS. DEVVRAT

VersusSUDARSHAN KUMAR . AND ANR. RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON

36 C.A. No.-10189/2010XIV

UNION OF INDIA SUSHMA SURIVersusMANVINDER SINGH BEDI YASH PAL DHINGRAFOR ON IA 47700/2011

37 C.A. No.-7238/2011XIV

PRITHI SINGH AND ANR. EJAZ MAQBOOL[P-1]VersusSURINDER SINGH AND ORS. ASHWANI KUMAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

38 C.A. No.-1392/2011XI -A

MADHAVAN (DEAD)THROUGH LRS. ANDANR. KIRAN BHARDWAJ[P-1]

VersusKANAKAVALLY JOGY SCARIA[R-1]I.A.NO. 2 : APPLICATION FOR VACATING STAY

39 C.A. No.-9016/2015IV

ANIL AGGARWAL SANDEEP BHALLAVersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. RAHUL GUPTA, P. N. PURI, KAILASH CHAND

ConnectedC.A. No.-9065/2015IV

KUSUM GARG ANIL KUMAR SANGAL

Versus

THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. P. N. PURI, VISHWA PAL SINGH, SIDDHARTHSANGAL, RAHUL GUPTA, KAILASH CHAND

ConnectedC.A. No.-9008/2015IV

HORIZON RUBBER PRODUCTS LTD ANDORS. VIKAS MEHTA

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA . AND ORS. P. N. PURI, RAHUL GUPTA, KAILASH CHAND,(MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[Caveat]

ConnectedC.A. No.-9062/2015IV

M/S. SUNDWEEP ENGINEER P. LTD ANDORS. VIKAS MEHTA

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA . AND ORS. RAHUL GUPTA, VISHWA PAL SINGH, P. N.PURI, KAILASH CHAND

Page 8: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTConnectedC.A.No.-8993-8995/2015IV

YOGESH VERMA ETC ETC. PRAVEEN KUMAR

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAILASH CHAND, RAHUL GUPTA, P. N. PURI,(MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[Caveat]

ConnectedC.A. No.-9011/2015IV

ANNUP DAMANI TULIKA PRAKASH

Versus

THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAILASH CHAND, RAHUL GUPTA, P. N. PURI,(MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[Caveat]

ConnectedC.A. No.-9027/2015IV

M/S TRG PACKAGING PVT. LTD. TATINI BASU

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAILASH CHAND, RAHUL GUPTA, P. N. PURI

ConnectedC.A.No.-9036-9050/2015IV

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENTAUTHORITY KAILASH CHAND

Versus

HORIZON RUBBER PRODUCTS LTD.(MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[Caveat], VIKAS MEHTA,ROHIT KUMAR SINGH, RAJESH SRIVASTAVA,RAHUL GUPTA, PRAVEEN KUMAR, ANILKUMAR SANGAL

ConnectedC.A. No.-9031/2015IV

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENTAUTHORITY KAILASH CHAND

VersusM/S. INDIKA WIRE PRODUCTS AND ORS. PRAVEEN KUMAR

40 Crl.A. No.-627/2012II-C

MUTHU AND ANR. T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR, M. A. CHINNASAMYVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNAFOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 5875/2017

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-803/2012II-C

RAMACHANDRAN AND ORS.T. HARISH KUMAR[P-2], T. R. B.SIVAKUMAR[P-1], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],SURESHAN P.[P-6]

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

41 C.A. No.-1992/2014XIV

M/S PUNJ SONS P.LTD. VIKAS MEHTAVersus

RAVINDER PRAKASH PUNJ AND ORS. SANJAY JAIN[Caveat], VIKAS SINGH JANGRA,SAHARYA & CO.[Caveat]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 3/2017ConnectedC.A. No.-1993/2014XIV

RAVINDER PRAKASH PUNJ SANJAY JAIN

VersusNILENDER PRAKASH PUNI AND ANR. VIKAS MEHTA, NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-1994/2014XIV

RAVINDER PRAKASH PUNJ SANJAY JAIN

VersusNILENDER PRAKASH PUNJ AND ANR. NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

42 Crl.A. No.-1348/2014II

NITYA NAND P. K. JAINVersusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH MANJU JETLEYand IA No.68600/2017-I/A FOR BAIL

43 C.A.No.-8442-8443/2016XIV

M/S SHANTI CONDUCTORS(P) LTD. ANDANR. DEVASHISH BHARUKA

Versus

Page 9: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD &ORS.

DUSHYANT PARASHAR, SNEHA KALITA, P. I.JOSE

TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGESRETAIN ITS POSITION FORINTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 9/2016 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATIONON IA 5/2014 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 7/2015

ConnectedC.A. No.-8445/2016XIV

M/S TRUSSES AND TOWERS(P) LTD. ACOMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THECOMPANIES ACT 1955

DEVASHISH BHARUKA

VersusASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDAND ANR SNEHA KALITA

ConnectedC.A. No.-8448/2016XIV

ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDAND ANR. SNEHA KALITA

VersusM/S TRUSSES AND TOWERS P.LTDREPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR SRI MADHU KANT SHARMA

DEVASHISH BHARUKA

ConnectedC.A. No.-8450/2016XIV

M/S. BRAHMAPUTRA CONCRETE PIPEINDUSTRIES DEVASHISH BHARUKA

VersusTHE ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITYBOARD SNEHA KALITA

44 C.A. No.-3846/2017XVI

W.B. MINERALS DEVELOPMENT DEBA PRASAD MUKHERJEEVersusSHYAM SEL AND POWER LTD. . ANDANR. PAREKH & CO.

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } As per court's order dated 6.3.2017, the matter is tobe heard within six month.

45 C.A. No.-4954/2015XI -A

RUKMINI P. VINAY KUMARVersusSATHYABHAMA SANTOSH KRISHNANWEEK COMMENCING 31ST OCTOBER, 2017 ALONGWITH IA 2/2017 (DIRECTION)

46 Crl.A. No.-116/2017II

KASHIKANT JHA AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHAVersusSTATE OF SIKKIM ARPUTHAM ARUNA AND CO[R-1][Gr]

47 C.A.No.-5467-5469/2017XII

DRAVIDA MUNNETRA KAZHAGAM(DMK) AMIT ANAND TIWARI

Versus

SECRETARY GOVERNORS SECRETARIATAND ORS

VINODH KANNA B.[R-1][Gr], [R-2][Gr],[R-3][Gr], [R-4][Gr], T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR, M.YOGESH KANNA

and IA No.88453/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION FORWITHDRAWL OF CASE ON IA 70429/2017

ConnectedC.A. No.-5470/2017XII

R. JOTHISWARAN MALAVIKA JAYANTH

VersusTHE SECRETARY THE GOVERNORSSECRETARIAT AND ORS

M. YOGESH KANNA, VINODH KANNAB.[R-2][Gr], [R-3][Gr]

ConnectedC.A. No.-5471/2017XII

P.K. GANESAN R. P. GUPTA

Versus

THE SECRETARY AND ORS VINODH KANNA B.[R-1][Gr], [R-2][Gr],[R-3][Gr], [R-4][Gr], T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR

and IA No.88126/2017-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS and IA No./- and IANo.89009/2017-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS

48 C.A.No.-10624-10625/2017IV-A

SRINIVASAIAH, (D) BY LRS AND ORS. RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA

Versus

Page 10: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTA C PUTTASWAMY (DEAD) BY LRS ANDORS. VAIJAYANTHI GIRISH

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

49 C.A.No.-5420-5421/2017III-A

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SHIACOLLEGE AND THE SCHOOL ANDOTHER CONNECTED INSTITUTIONSAND ANR.

SHAKIL AHMED SYED

VersusDR. SYED AKHTAR HASAN RIZVI . ANDORS. ANUPAM LAL DAS

50 C.A. No.-3942/2017IV

MONIKA SANJAY JAINVersus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.SATISH VIG, MONIKA GUSAIN, MITTER &MITTER CO.[Caveat], R. C. KAUSHIK[R-12][Pr],[R-19][Pr], [R-21][Pr]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/201751 Crl.A. No.-296/2016

II-CPRANAV SARVAM RITAM KHAREVersusTHE STATE OF DELHI B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-649/2016II-C

VIJAY ALIAS RAJESH PRIYA PURI

VersusSTATE(NCT OF DELHI)

52 C.A. No.-5635/2017XI -A

VALSAN MATATHIL M. T. GEORGEVersusE.N. CHANDRAN K. RAJEEV[Caveat]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR ON IA 1/2017 (DIRECTION)

ConnectedC.A. No.-9913/2017XI -A

E.N. CHANDRAN K. RAJEEV

VersusVALSAN MATAHIL M. T. GEORGE[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

53 C.A. No.-5676/2017III

REKHA DEEPAK LOHBANDE NACHIKETA JOSHIVersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARIIA No.89866/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION and IANo.89869/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

54 W.P.(C) No.-326/2017X

DR. PHILIPOSE PULIYELIL ABRAHAM MOHIT PAULVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB MEDICALEDUCATION AND RESEARCH GOVT. OFPUNJAB SECRETARY GENERAL

KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-1], GAURAVSHARMA[R-4]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedW.P.(C) No.-327/2017X

DR. JIJU GEORGE ZACHARIAH MOHIT PAUL

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB MEDICALEDUCATION AND RESEARCH GOVT OFPUNJAB SECRETARY

KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-1], GAURAVSHARMA[R-4]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }55 C.A. No.-10229/2017

IV-ALAXMIKANT PATEL SANJAY K. AGRAWALVersusSAROJ SAKET AND ORS. SARVESH SINGH[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-10820/2017IV-A

RANI AGRAWAL SANJAY K. AGRAWAL

VersusAJAY KUMAR PATHAK AND ORS. SARVESH SINGH[R-1]

Page 11: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

56 C.A. No.-7081/2008XII

THE DEAN STANLEY MEDICALCOLLEGE AND ANR. B. BALAJI

VersusK.G. HEMAVATHY NARESH KUMAR, GEETHA KOVILAN

57 C.A. No.-7292/2009XII

R. DHANASUNDARI @ R. RAJESWARI M. A. CHINNASAMYVersus

A.N. UMAKANTH AND ORS AND ORS. D. BHARATHI REDDY, SUNIL FERNANDES, P.V. YOGESWARAN

58 Crl.A. No.-448/2011II-A

PANKAJ SINGH RANI CHHABRAVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

59 C.A.No.-8075-8076/2010XII

AMBALAVANAR TRUST BOARDTR.TRUSTEE BHARGAVA V. DESAI[P-1]

VersusK.THIRUNAVUKKARASU MUDALIYARAND ORS.

Gaichangpou Gangmei[R-1][Pr], NARESHKUMAR[R-2], T. HARISH KUMAR[R-3]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.99176/2017-EARLY HEARINGAPPLICATION

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-15148/2011XII

R. PARTGIBAN AND ANR. RAKESH K. SHARMA

VersusAMBALAVANAR TRUST . AND ORS. GAUTAM NARAYAN[Caveat]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

60 C.A. No.-4290/2017XVI

BHUPAL SINGH (D) THR. LRS . ANDORS. T. MAHIPAL

Versus

GANESH AHIR . AND ORS. MANU SHANKER MISHRA, KIRAN KUMARJAIPURIAR

IA No.62636/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.59809/2017-XTRA and IA No.62630/2017-DELETION THE NAME OF RESPONDENT NO, 25 andIA No.62635/2017-IA FOR DELETION THE NAME OF RESP. NO. 73 LIST THEMATTER FOR HEARING IN THE WEEK COMMENCING FROM 31ST JULY, 2017.and IA No.64835/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.64840/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.69892/2017-DISCHARGE OF ADVOCATE ON RECORD and IA No.70060/2017-PERMISSION TOFILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IA No.70062/2017-EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T. and IA No.78896/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS and IA No.78898/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

61 Crl.A. No.-2080/2012II-A

ASGAR MIAN @ ASGAR ANSARI T. MAHIPALVersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND KRISHNANAND PANDEYA

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-311/2013II-A

BINOD KUMAR ANUP KUMAR

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND TAPESH KUMAR SINGH

62 Crl.A. No.-58/2013II-C

SENTHIL KUMAR MALAVIKA JAYANTHVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

63 C.A. No.-4460/2017XVI

BIHAR LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS.

B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], ABHISHEK[R-2],[R-3], MOHIT D. RAM[R-4], [R-5], ABHA R.SHARMA[R-6], [R-7], SHANTANU SAGAR[R-9],[R-10], [R-11], [R-12]ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA[I-1][IMPL],[I-2][IMPL], [I-3][IMPL], [I-4][IMPL], [I-5][IMPL],[I-6][IMPL]

Page 12: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURTD.No.16380/2015 has been linked with D.No.19816/2015 arising out of samejudgment. IA NO. 4/2017 (APPLICATION FOR IMPLEADMENT)

ConnectedC.A. No.-4461/2017XVI

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIAELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIAELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA

MOHIT D. RAM[P-1]

VersusDEVESH CHANDRA THAKUR ANDOTHERS AND ORS.

ABHISHEK[R-1], [R-2], ABHA R. SHARMA[R-4],[R-5], [R-8], ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-6]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-15229-/2017XVI

DR. DILIP KUMAR JAISWAL AND ORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS SECRETARYAND ORS. SANTOSH MISHRA[Caveat]

ConnectedDiary No. 16380-2017XVI

DINESH PRASAD SINGH AND ORS. B. K. SATIJA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.46410/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.46414/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.46417/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IANo.46407/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE SLP

ConnectedDiary No. 20007-2017XVI

SUNIL KUMAR SINGH AND ORS. CHANDAN KUMAR

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

64 C.A. No.-5064/2015XVII

MUK PERTIN RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersusLOMBO TAYENG HRISHIKESH BARUAH{Mention Memo for 07-11-2017 } FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA1/2016

65 Crl.A. No.-919/2016II-C

DILE RAM M. C. DHINGRAVersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

66 Crl.A. No.-1508/2014II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHVersus

PRAYAG SINGH AND ORS. R. P. GUPTA[R-1], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7],[R-8], [R-9], [R-10]

67 Crl.A. No.-521/2015II-A

SURESH DNYANDEO KATE ATUL BABASAHEB DAKHVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

68 C.A.No.-7117-7118/2017III-A

M/S. STERLING INDUSTRIES RAJ SINGH RANA

VersusJAYPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LTD. ANDORS. UNUC LEGAL LLP

Let the matter be added to the hearing list in thelast week of August, 201769 C.A. No.-455/2015

III-AJAI PRAKASH GAUR K. S. RANAVersusBUDHA DEVI AND ORS. RABIN MAJUMDER, JAYANT KUMAR MEHTA{Fixed Date for 09-11-2017 }

70 C.A. No.-1547/2011IV

THE JAI COOPERATIVE TRPT. SOCIETYLTD. RUPESH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATETRIBUNAL

KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-2], ATISHIDIPANKAR[R-3]

Page 13: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT71 C.A. No.-7172/2010

XVSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR. MILIND KUMARVersusM/S. CADILA HEALTH CARE LTD. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

72 C.A.No.-2339-2340/2011IV

DARSHAN SINGH UGRA SHANKAR PRASAD

VersusSUPERINTENDENT CANAL OFFICERAND ORS.

73 C.A. No.-8436/2011IV

SURJIT KAUR KAILASH CHAND[P-1]Versus

AMARJIT KAUR AND ORS.RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL, P. N. PURI[R-2],S. L. ANEJA[R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11],[R-12], [R-13], [R-14], [R-17], [R-18], [R-19],[R-20]

NEW DELHI03-11-2017 16:48:04

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 14: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 30 OF 2017 FROM : 07-11-2017 To 09-11-2017

COURT NO. : 2HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 C.A. No.-7313/2003

XIVCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S. OM PETRO CHEMICALS . AND ANR. D. BHARATHI REDDY{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-7405/2004IX

JINDAL DRUGS LTD. AND ANR. JAY SAVLA

VersusTHE UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. A. V. RANGAM{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-88/2010XIV

M/S.SONIA OVERSEAS PVT.LTD. ANDANR. RAJAN NARAIN

VersusASST.COMMNR.OF CUSTOMS AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

2 C.A.No.-7747-7748/2009XVII

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENTAUTHORITYAUTHORITY (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA

VersusCHANDRA SWAROOP SRIVASTAVA ANDANR. YASH PAL DHINGRA

3 C.A.No.-8351-8352/2009III-A

BARAM DEEN SINGH RAJESH

VersusRAM BHAWAN AND ORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL, K. S. RANA

4 C.A. No.-257/2009III-A

CHHANGUR (D) BY LRS. P. NARASIMHANVersusRAM HARAK (DEAD) THR. LRS. ANDORS. AND ORS. A. N. ARORA, YASH PAL DHINGRA

5 Crl.A. No.-1376/2014II

M.VENKATESWARLU ABHIJIT SENGUPTAVersusBOYA PEDDA MADDULETI AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO, D. MAHESH BABU

6 C.A. No.-1851/2006IV

SHASHI KATARIA MANJU JETLEYVersus

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. ARPUTHAM ARUNA AND CO, KARANBHARIHOKE[R-1], JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

{Mention Memo for 07-11-2017 } AS PER MENTIONING PROCEEDING DATED11.07.2017, APPEAL TO BE LISTED IN MONTH OF OCTOBER, 2017 ON A NON-MISCELLANEOUS DAY. FOR 24.10.2017

7 C.A. No.-3503/2008III-A

KHAJAN SINGH (D) THR. LRS. YASH PAL DHINGRAVersusBANKEY (DEAD) BY LRS. . AND ORS. MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.

Page 15: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 2

8 C.A. No.-2937/2007XIV

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFPERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES ANDPENSIONS THROUGH ITS SECRETARYAND ORS.

P. PARMESWARAN, ABHISTH KUMAR

VersusM. P. JAIN ATISHI DIPANKAR

9 Crl.A. No.-380/2011II

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SAMIR ALI KHAN[P-1]VersusKHEM CHANDRA . AND ORS.

10 C.A. No.-5222/2006XV

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.FINANCE DEPARTMENT AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusUDAI SINGH UDAWAT P. D. SHARMA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

11 C.A. No.-953/2007IV

STATE OF PUNJAB JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA[P-1], UTTARABABBAR[P-1]

Versus

TRILOK NATH GUPTA AND ORS. ASHOK K. MAHAJAN[R-1], JATINDER KUMARBHATIA[R-1]

SERVICE IS COMPLETE12 C.A. No.-3938/2007

IVKANWAR DHARAM PAL SINGH P. N. PURIVersus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA, SANJAY KUMARVISEN, RAHUL GUPTA

13 Crl.A. No.-1525/2009II-B

VINUBHAI RANCHHODBHAI PATEL ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEEVersus

RAJIVBHAI DUDABHAI PATEL . ANDORS.

HEMANTIKA WAHI, [R-14], R. P. WADHWANI,[R-3], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-10], [R-11],[R-12]

ConnectedCrl.A.No.-1526-1527/2009II-B

THE STATE OF GUJARAT HEMANTIKA WAHI

Versus

RAVJIBHAI DUDABHAI PATEL . ANDORS.

14 C.A.No.-5352-5353/2007XVII

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. P. S. SUDHEER[P-1]

Versus

HARSOLIA MOTORS AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRA, , SANTOSH KUMAR -I[INT]

FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 1/2006 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILEANNEXURES] ON IA 2/2015 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 1/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-5355/2007XVII

PREM VASHISHT GARIMA PRASHAD

VersusPUNJAB NATIONAL BANK M. T. GEORGE, SHALU SHARMA, [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No.-5356/2007XVII

V.K. VASHISHT GARIMA PRASHAD

VersusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. SHALU SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No.-5354/2007XVII

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. MANJEET CHAWLA

VersusM/S. DIWAKAR GOIRAM PORKHAYAT NIKHIL GOEL

ConnectedC.A. No.-2821/2012XVII

NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. P. S. SUDHEER[P-1]

Versus

Page 16: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 2

M/S ANKUR . AND ANR. RAJIV RANJAN DWIVEDI[R-1], (MRS. ) VIPINGUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-31862/2015XVII

SH. SATISH MAHESHWARI PROPRIETOR AWANISH SINHA

VersusM/S MSC AGENCY (INDIA) PVT. LTD.AND ANR.FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL ON IA 1/2016 FORCONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING ON IA 2/2016

15 C.A. No.-1299/2009III-A

CHANDRIKA (DEAD) BY LRS. T. N. SINGHVersusSUDAMA AND ORS. AND ORS. P. NARASIMHAN

16 C.A. No.-3723/2007XVI

RAM LAKHAN PRASAD ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEEVersusSTATE OF BIHAR GOPAL SINGH, PAREKH & CO.[R-2], [R-3]

17 C.A. No.-5959/2007IV

SATYA VIR SINGH AND ANR. ANITHA SHENOYVersusHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB ANDHARYANA RAHUL GUPTA

18 C.A.No.-6281-6282/2009XI -A

K.S.RAJAN (DEAD) THROUGH L.RS. ROMY CHACKO

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. RADHA SHYAM JENA, C. K. SASI

19 C.A.No.-6115-6116/2009XVII

PRIYA POOJA DEVELOPERS AND ORSAND ORS. BIJOY KUMAR JAIN

VersusRAJIV RADHEY SHYAM AGARWAL . ANDORS. BALRAJ DEWAN, SUDHIR NAAGAR

FOR ON IA 37051/2007 FOR ON IA 21305/2008 FOR ON IA 80255/2010 FOR ON IA22550/2011

20 C.A. No.-8349/2009XVII

SHASHIKANT ABHISHEK KUMAR B. K. SATIJAVersusVAISHALI ROAD CARRIERS PVT.LTD..AND ORS. CHANDAN KUMAR[R-1]

PART HEARD BY HON. J. CHELAMESWAR AND HON. S. ABDUL NAZEER, JJ.

21 C.A. No.-786/2008IV

HARNEK SINGH(DEAD) THR.LRS. ANDORS. M. A. CHINNASAMY, YASH PAL DHINGRA

Versus

HUKAM CHAND (DEAD) KAILASH CHAND, UMANGSHANKAR[R-1][LR/S]

IA No.57065/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTIONAPPLN.FOR [I.A. FOR BRINGING ON RECORD LRS.] ON IA 34583/2017 FORINTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 80013/2007 IN BOTH THE APPEALS

ConnectedC.A. No.-1206/2008IV

HARNEK SINGH(DEAD) THR. LRS. ANDORS. M. A. CHINNASAMY

VersusHUKUM CHAND (DEAD) KAILASH CHANDIA FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 34587/2017 FORCONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ON IA 57062/2017

22 C.A. No.-751/2008IX

SAVATRAM RAMPRATAP MILL D. M. NARGOLKARVersusRADHEYSHYAM S/O LAXMINARAYANGOENKAR (D) THR. LRS. AND ANR. ANDANR.

SUJATA KURDUKAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-9700/2014III

SAVATRAM RAMPRASAD MILLS D. M. NARGOLKAR

Versus

Page 17: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 2MADHUKAR LAXMANRAO SONTAKKEAND ANR. CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

ConnectedC.A. No.-9704/2014III

SAVATRAM RAMPRASAD MILLS D. M. NARGOLKAR

VersusMODERN TAILORS CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

23 C.A.No.-5666-5668/2008XII

CENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONER B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S AIRCEL CELLULAR LTD.

24 C.A. No.-2223/2011IX

JAMILABIBI(D) TH:LRS. ABHIJAT P. MEDHVersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-1][Gr]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-2224/2011IX

CHANDRAKANT R.SHROFF AND. ORS. ABHIJAT P. MEDH

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. DEPUTYCOMMISSIONER AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-1][Gr]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } for final disposal in view of Order dated 21.08.2017

25 C.A. No.-606/2009XII

M/S.ANURAG FOODS AND APPLIANCESLTD. ANKUR S. KULKARNI

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ANIL KATIYAR, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

26 C.A.No.-7014-7015/2011XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE,TRICHIRAPALLI AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S A. R. SYED IBRAMSA SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

27 C.A. No.-6079/2017IV

M/S. GOYA RESORTS PVT LTD YASHRAJ SINGH DEORA[P-1], ANILKATIYAR[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.KULDIP SINGH[R-2], MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-1], [R-3], KARANBHARIHOKE[R-4][Gr]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-6081/2017IV

M/S TRAVELS STAR HOTELS (I) LTD. ASHOK K. MAHAJAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], KARANBHARIHOKE[R-1][Gr]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-6068/2017IV

B.S.MAHAL YASHRAJ SINGH DEORA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR, KULDIP SINGH{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6067/2017IV

FIFTH MILESTONE PARTY GARDENSPVT.LTD. PAREKH & CO.

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR, JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA,KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-4][Gr]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-6069/2017IV

M/S BRAR HOTELS P.LTD. S. JANANI

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR, KULDIP SINGH{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

Page 18: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 2ConnectedC.A. No.-6080/2017IV

M/S DEOL CITY HEART GARDENS AMIT DAYAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[Caveat], KULDIP SINGH{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A.No.-6086-6089/2017IV

GAJE SINGH . AND ORS. JYOTI MENDIRATTA, A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

Versus

THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA, MONIKA GUSAIN,ANUBHA AGRAWAL

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6070/2017IV

THE PUBLIC HEALTH EMPLOYEESCOOPERATIVE HOUSE BLD. SOCIETYLTD.(REGD.)

PRAGATI NEEKHRA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6093/2017IV

MUNISH JAIN AND ANR. ABHIJAT P. MEDH

Versus

THE STATE OF HARYANA KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA, ROHIT KUMARSINGH, MONIKA GUSAIN

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A.No.-6074-6075/2017IV

RATTAN SINGH . AND ORS. MISHRA SAURABH

Versus

SURESH GOEL . AND ORS. MONIKA GUSAIN, S. USHA REDDY{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-9014/2017IV

RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION(REGD.) NIKHIL GOEL

VersusSHRI D.S. DHESI IAS AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA, ANUBHA AGRAWAL{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C)No.-458/2012

DISTT.TOWNPLANNER,ENFOR.,GURG.,HARYANA KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

VersusMUNISH JAIN ABHIJAT P. MEDH{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5565/2017IV

COL.EDUCATION SOCIETY AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5447/2017IV

COL.EDUCATION SOCIETY AND ANR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA, ANUBHA AGRAWAL{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

28 C.A. No.-904/2011XII

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,MANDAVELI ASSES. CIRCLE M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1][Gr]

VersusM/S. KONE ELEVATORS INDIA PVT. LTD.REP BY ITS SECRETARY K. K. MANI[R-1]

29 C.A. No.-1377/2011XII

AUSTRALIAN FOODS LTD. THROUGHITS VICE PRESIDENT NIKHIL NAYYAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Page 19: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 2

30 C.A.No.-4330-4331/2012XIV

KASHI NATH ROY APARNA JHA

VersusSTATE OF BIHAR . AND ORS. PAREKH & CO., GOPAL SINGH

31 C.A.No.-4333-4334/2013XIV

J.J.SINGH(D) TR.LRS. DEBASIS MISRA

VersusAIR MARSHAL SATISH C LAL (RTD.) ANDORS. PRAVEENA GAUTAM

32 Crl.A. No.-547/2012II-B

K.MOHAMMED P. S. SUDHEER[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

33 Crl.A. No.-2099/2014II-C

DEIVAM @ DEIVENDRAN KAILASH CHANDVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

34 Crl.A. No.-721/2015II

VIJAI BANKEY BIHARIVersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH PRAGATI NEEKHRA

35 C.A.No.-10629-10631/2014XVI

COMPETENT AUTHORITY CALCUTTA,UNDER LAND (CEILING ANDREGULATION) ACT 1976 AND ANR. ANDANR.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[P-1]

Versus

DAVID MANTOSH AND ORS. AND ORS. ANKOLEKAR GURUDATTA[R-1], [R-2], [R-4],[R-5], [R-6], [R-7], K J JOHN AND CO[R-8]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } As per Court's Order dated 19.9.2017 list on31.10.2017 FOR ON IA 11-13/2017 (Application for direction) FOR ON IA14-16/2017 (Application for direction). It is in person matter and noted by inperson for 31.10.2017.

ConnectedC.A.No.-9829-9830/2016XVI

APOLLO GLENAGLES HOSPITALS LTD K J JOHN AND CO

Versus

DAVID MANTOSH AND ORS. RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON, MADHUMITABHATTACHARJEE, ANKOLEKAR GURUDATTA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } IA 7-8 and 9-10 (Application for directions)ConnectedC.A. No.-9900/2016XVI

APOLLO GLENEAGLES HOSPITALS LTD K J JOHN AND CO

Versus

DAVID MANTOSH AND ORS. RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON, MADHUMITABHATTACHARJEE, ANKOLEKAR GURUDATTA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }36 Crl.A. No.-2555/2014

II-CATMARAM NITIN BHARDWAJVersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA

37 C.A.No.-4264-4266/2015XVII

KARE ELEVATORS AND ENGG. CO. PVT.LTD. N. ANNAPOORANI

Versus

P.G. PAI AND ORS. VIKAS MEHTA, S. S. SHROFF, M. V. KINI &ASSOCIATES

List after Diwali Vacation vide Court's order dated 21.09.17

ConnectedC.A. No.-5693/2015XVII

CHAIRMAN/SECRETARY BHAGWATIHOUSE VIKAS MEHTA

Versus

P.G.PAI . AND ORS. S. S. SHROFF, N. ANNAPOORANI, M. V. KINI &ASSOCIATES

Page 20: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 238 C.A.

No.-3538-3539/2017XVI -A

ANIL RAZDAN AND ANR. LAWYER S KNIT & CO, [P-2]

Versus

NISHA SARAF DHARITRY PHOOKAN, [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7],[R-10], BHARAT SANGAL[R-2], [R-3], [R-8], [R-9]

and IA No.112570/2017-I/A FOR PERMISSION TO BRING ON RECORDDOCUMENTS - I - XI

39 C.A. No.-10762/2017XVII

HI-LIFE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. ANDANR. ANKOLEKAR GURUDATTA

VersusK.D. SUCHAK . AND ORS. ABHA R. SHARMA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } list the matter in the fourth week of Oct. 2017 withinfirst five matters on the Board as per Court's Order dated 11.08.2017.

40 C.A.No.-9239-9240/2015XIV

C.C.E. AND S.T. JAMMU AND KASHMIR B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusOSAKA ALLOYS AND STEELS PVT. LTD. RUPESH KUMAR, [R-1]FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 7/2015

41 C.A. No.-3105/2017XVI

HARI NIWAS GUPTA CHANDRA PRAKASHVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. GOPAL SINGH, PAREKH & CO., [R-2]{Mention Memo for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A.No.-3106-3107/2017XVI

KOMAL RAM ETC. ASHA GOPALAN NAIR

Versus

STATE OF BIHAR . AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], PAREKH &CO., [R-5], [R-6]

{Mention Memo for 07-11-2017 }

42 C.A.No.-5308-5309/2015XIV

C.C.E. KANPUR B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S J.S. FABRICS ETC. SUNIL KUMAR VERMAFOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 3/2015

43 Crl.A. No.-483/2016II-B

SATPAL AND ANR. RAJ KAMAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

44 C.A.No.-4341-4342/2017XVI

ABP PVT. LTD. . AND ANR. EJAZ MAQBOOL

VersusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL . AND ORS. CHANCHAL KUMAR GANGULI, [R-2], [R-3]NOT TAKEN UP

ConnectedC.A.No.-4349-4350/2017XVI

MERLIN PROJECTS LIMITED ABHIJEET SINHA

Versus

STATE OF WEST BENGAL ORS. ANDANR. CHANCHAL KUMAR GANGULI, [R-2], [R-3]

NOT TAKEN UP

45 C.A. No.-668-670/2017III

LT. GEN. SHANTONU CHOUDHRY ANDORS. ETC. RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. ANDORS.

YASH PAL DHINGRA, NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR, J S WADAND CO, GURMEET SINGH MAKKER, M. V.KINI & ASSOCIATES

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.85543/2017-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

Page 21: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 2ConnectedC.A. No.-673/2017III

ADARSH CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETYLTD. KUSH CHATURVEDI

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS.YASH PAL DHINGRA, PINKYBEHERA[R-1][IMPL], GURMEET SINGHMAKKER

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-672/2017III

ADARSH CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD KUSH CHATURVEDI

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. J S WAD AND CO{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-671/2017III

ADARSH CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETYLTD. KUSH CHATURVEDI

Versus

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRA, J S WAD AND CO, M. V.KINI & ASSOCIATES

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-674/2017III

SURGEON CAPTAIN DR. P.SHYAMSUNDER TAMPI (RETD.) ANDORS.

BANKEY BIHARI

Versus

UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRA, GURMEET SINGHMAKKER

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

46 C.A. No.-4374/2017XII

THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR REVENUE(SOUTH) OFFICE OF THECOLLECTORATE, GOVT. OFPUDUCHERRY AND ORS.

V. G. PRAGASAM

VersusM/S NAVASKATHI TOWNSHIPDEVELOPERS PVT LTD REP. BY ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR K.I.MANIRATHINAM

NARESH KUMAR

47 C.A. No.-1344/2017XVI

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. E. C. VIDYA SAGARVersusINSTAKART SERVICES PRIVATELIMITED KISHORE KUNAL[Caveat]

ConnectedC.A. No.-1346/2017XVI

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR

VersusWS RETAIL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED KISHORE KUNAL[Caveat]

ConnectedC.A. No.-5379/2017III

M/S AMAZON SELLER SERVICES PVT.LTD. M. P. DEVANATH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1], [R-2]and IA No.96567/2017-REVOCATION OF COURT ORDER

ConnectedC.A. No.-15149/2017IV-A

M/S. INSTAKART SERVICES PVT. LTD. KISHORE KUNAL

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDANR.FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

48 C.A. No.-3918/2017IV

ATMA RAM (DECEASED) THR LEGALREP. DHARMPAL GOYAL ASHOK PANIGRAHI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-1][Gr], BIRENDRAKUMAR MISHRA[R-2][Gr], KAILASHCHAND[R-5][Pr], [R-6][Pr], [R-7][Pr], [R-8][Pr]

Page 22: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 249 Crl.A. No.-988/2017

II-BSABITRI SAMANTARAY DEBESH PANDAVersusTHE STATE OF ODISHA KRISHNAYAN SEN{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } ONLY SLP (CRL.) 3881/2017 IS LISTED AGAINSTTHIS MATTER FOR CONSIDERATION OF BAIL

50 C.A.No.-1880-1889/2003XVI

M/S. SHIVAM ENTERPRISES AND ORS. RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI

VersusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH

ConnectedSLP(C)No.-21923-21925/2003XVI

M/S. BANDANA FUEL INDUSTRIES ANDORS. AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEY

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. ANDORS. GOPAL SINGH

ConnectedC.A. No.-2273/2005XVI

BHAGWATI COKE INDUSTRIES PVT.LTD. AND ORS. SUSHIL BALWADA

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH

ConnectedC.A. No.-2255/2005XVI

BHAGWATI COKE INDUSTRIES PVT.LTD. SUSHIL BALWADA

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR GOPAL SINGH

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.-3881/2017II-B

BIDYADHAR PRAHARAJ DEBESH PANDA

VersusTHE STATE OF ODISHA ANINDITA PUJARI[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

51 C.A.No.-5299-5304/2003XVII

TATA ENGINEERING AND LOCOMOTIVECOMPANY LTD. RAJAN NARAIN

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHANDDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTTHROUGH THE TRANSPORTCOMMISSIONER AND ORS.

RATAN KUMAR CHOUDHURI, ANIL KATIYAR

FOR AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 8/2011ConnectedC.A. No.-6591/2003XVI

M/S. L.M.L. LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusSTATE OF BIHAR GOPAL SINGH

ConnectedC.A. No.-8-12/2004XVII

M/S. R.K. AUTOMOTIVES AND ORS. R. C. KOHLI

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS. RATAN KUMAR CHOUDHURIand FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 104758/2017

52 Crl.A.No.-906-912/2017II-C

STATE REPRESENTED BYSUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[P-1]

VersusJ DURAIMUNUSAMY AND ORS. DINESH KUMAR GARG[R-1], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

53 C.A. No.-3932/2009XVI

ASHIM RANJAN DAS (D) BY LRS. S. K. BHATTACHARYAVersus

SHIBU BODHAKRAUF RAHIM, [R-2], CHANCHAL KUMARGANGULI[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]SHEKHAR KUMAR[I-1][IMPL]

As per court's order dated 25.07.2017, list the matter after four weeks. (not listedon 24.8.2017) FOR ON IA 2/2013 application for impleadment filed by Mr. ShekharKumar, Advocate. FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 3/2013 FOR[PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 4/2013

Page 23: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 254 Crl.A. No.-127/2009

IIRAM ACHAL RAJBHAR SHAIL KUMAR DWIVEDI[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

PRAGATI NEEKHRA[R-1], SAMIR ALIKHAN[R-1], P. S. SUDHEER[R-2], EJAZMAQBOOL[R-3], [R-6], [R-10], [R-12], BHATIA[R-5], ANOOP KR. SRIVASTAV[R-7], M. C.DHINGRA[R-11]

ConnectedCrl.A.No.-128-129/2009II

RAM ACHAL RAJBHAR SHAIL KUMAR DWIVEDI[P-1]

Versus

BENI PRASAD VERMA . AND ORS.JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA[R-1], BHATIA [R-1],PRAGATI NEEKHRA[R-2], [R-3], EJAZMAQBOOL[R-5], [R-8], M. C. DHINGRA[R-6], P.S. SUDHEER[R-7]

55 C.A. No.-3914/2007XVII

RAM PRAVESH SHARMA SANTOSH MISHRAVersusSTATE OF JHARKHAND CHIEFSECRETARY

GOPAL PRASAD, GOPAL SINGH, ASHOKMATHUR, PAREKH & CO.

PART-HEARD BY HONBLE J.CHELAMESWAR AND HONBLE S. ABDUL NAZEER ,JJ. FOR ON IA 20255/2007 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 3/2017FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 4/2017

56 Crl.A. No.-989/2007II-A

DEVI LAL PRATIBHA JAINVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

57 Crl.A. No.-1096/2007II-A

ASHOK KUMAR JAIN PARMANAND GAURVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH MISHRA SAURABH

58 C.A. No.-276-277/2012XI -A

M/S. PURVI BHARAT STEELS LTD. SATYA MITRA GARG[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SHIBASHISH MISRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

59 C.A. No.-8111/2014XII

K.V JAYARAMAN R. NEDUMARANVersusK.V GOBI VIJAY KUMAR

60 Crl.A. No.-834/2017II-C

THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ANDORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusDEVENDER ANAND AND ORS. BHARGAVA V. DESAI[R-1][Pr]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } IA No.93177/2017-VACATING STAY

61 Crl.A. No.-1845/2008II-A

VISHWAMBARRAO SHANKARRAO MANE SHIVAJI M. JADHAVVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDANR.

NEW DELHI03-11-2017 16:48:49

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 24: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 30 OF 2017 FROM : 07-11-2017 To 09-11-2017

COURT NO. : 3HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate

1 C.A. No.-364/2005IX

ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECH.EDUCATION REP BY ITS MEMBERSECRETARY

GAURAV SHARMA

VersusSHRI PRINCE SHIVAJI MARATHABOARDING HOUSES COLLEGE OFARCHITECTURE THROUGH ITSINCHARGE PRINCIPAL S

V. N. RAGHUPATHY, SUSHMA SURI,SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI, BHARTI TYAGI,ASHA GOPALAN NAIR

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES ]ConnectedSLP(C)No.-17765-17766/2012XI -A

C.V.RAMAN COLLEGE OF ENG. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

BIJU PATNAIK UNIV.OF TECHNOLOGYAND ORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1][Caveat], GAUTAMNARAYAN[R-2], SHIBASHISH MISRA[R-3],GAURAV SHARMA[R-4]

IA No.59894/2017-WITHDRAWL OF CASE is to be listed before Hon'ble Judge inChambers.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-3964/2008IX

COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTURE NAVEEN R. NATH

VersusM.M.MANDALS COLLEGE OF ARCH. .AND ORS.

NARESH KUMAR, VISHWAJIT SINGH, T. C.SHARMA, SUSHMA SURI

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-5400/2011IV-A

RAJEEV GANDHI PROUDYOGIKIVISHWAVIDYALAY NIRAJ SHARMA

VersusBHARTIYA VIDYA MANDIR SHIKSHASAMITI

ASHOK MATHUR, NAVEEN R. NATH, GAURAVSHARMA

THE INSTANT MATTER IS TAGGED WITH ITS MAIN MATTER I.E. CIVIL APPEALNO. 364 OF 2005

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-8443/2011IV-A

BHARTIYA VIDYA MANDIR SHIKSHASAMITI ASHOK MATHUR

VersusSTATE OF M.P.. AND ORS. NAVEEN R. NATH, GAURAV SHARMATHE INSTANT MATTER IS TAGGED WITH ITS MAIN MATTER I.E. CIVIL APPEALNO. 364 OF 2005

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-20460/2011IV-A

COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTURE INDIAHABITAT CENTRE REGISTRAR MRVINOD KUMAR

NAVEEN R. NATH

VersusBHARTIYA VIDYA MANDIR SHIKSHASAMITI (A SOCIETY REGISTEREDUNDER THE PROVISIONS OF MPSOCIETIES REGI

ASHOK MATHUR, GAURAV SHARMA

Page 25: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 3THE INSTANT MATTER IS TAGGED WITH ITS MAIN MATTER I.E. CIVIL APPEALNO. 364 OF 2005

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-20655/2012XI -A

BIJU PATNAIK UNIVERSITY OFTECHNOLOGY CHARU MATHUR[P-1]

Versus

DHARITRI DAS . AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1][Caveat],[R-2][Caveat], SHIBASHISH MISRA[R-4]

ConnectedSLP(C)No.-12801-12803/2012XI -A

STATE OF ORISSA SHIBASHISH MISRA

Versus

AJAY BINAY INSTITUTE OFTECHNOLOGY AND ORS.

ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, NAVEEN R.NATH[R-2][Caveat]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17765/2014XIV

ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICALEDUCATION (AICTE) THROUGH ITSSECRETARY AND ANR.

GOPAL SINGH

VersusINDIAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNING ANDMANAGEMENT THROUGH MR TAPANCHAKRABORTY SENIORADMINISTRATIVE MANAG AND ANR.

ANUPAM LAL DAS

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17764/2014XIV

ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICALEDUCATION REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR(LEGAL)

GOPAL SINGH

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HUMANRESOURCE DEVELOPMENT THR. ITSSECRETARY

ROMY CHACKO[Caveat]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No.-759/2014X

SGI SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

VersusSTATE OF ODISHA AND ORS.

2 C.A. No.-9694/2013XIV

UNITED INDIA INS.CO.LTD. LAW ASSOCIATESVersusSUNIL KUMAR NIDHI, AJAY KUMAR TALESARA[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES ]

3 C.A. No.-14739/2015XV

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OFINDIA AND ORS. D. N. GOBURDHAN

VersusSHREE LAL MEENA ANSAR AHMAD CHAUDHARY[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES ]

ConnectedSLP(C)No.-5716-5719/2016XII-A

M. VENKATESWARA RAO AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN

Versus

ANDHRA BANK REPRESENTED BY ITSCHAIRMAN MANAGING DIRECTOR ANDORS.

T. V. RATNAM

and IA No.88792/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTSConnectedC.A. No.-10904/2016III

SADANAND PUTHRAN CHRISTI JAIN

VersusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. MOHIT PAUL[R-1]

4 C.A. No.-1696/2016IV-A

SUBHASH CHANDRA SESHATALPA SAI BANDARUVersusGULAB BAI AND ORS.[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES ]

Page 26: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedC.A. No.-1697/2016IV-A

SUBHASH CHANDRA SESHATALPA SAI BANDARU

VersusGULAB BAI . AND ORS.

5 Crl.A. No.-1656/2015II-A

LALITA TOPPO KAUSHIK PODDAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANR. GOPAL PRASAD[R-1], SHIV KUMAR SURI[R-2][ TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES ]

6 W.P.(Crl.) No.-48/2014X

UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASADVersus

V. SRIHARAN @ ,MURUGAN AND ORS.

RENJITH. B[IMPL], RANJEETAROHATGI[IMPL], R. V. KAMESHWARAN[IMPL],MERUSAGAR SAMANTARAY[OBJ][Gr],LAKSHMI N. KAIMAL[IMPL], JAGJIT SINGHCHHABRA[IMPL], S. GOWTHAMAN, M.YOGESH KANNA, GEETHA KOVILAN, ANILKUMAR MISHRA-I

{Mention Memo for 07-11-2017 } [ TO GO BEFORE THREE HONBLE JUDGES ]FORSTAY APPLICATION ON IA 5089/2014 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA13677/2014 FOR DIRECTIONS ON IA 6280/2017 FOR DIRECTIONS ON IA6281/2017NOT TO BE DELETED FROM THE CAUSE LIST DATED 20.11.2017 VIDER/P DATED 10.10.2017(MM)

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1215/2011II-B

NAVAS @ MULANAVAS S. C. PATEL

VersusSTATE OF KERALA NISHE RAJEN SHONKER{Mention Memo for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedW.P.(Crl.) No.-66/2014X

SWAMY SHRADDANANDA @ MURALIMANOHAR VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA STATE OFKARNATAKA THROUGH CHIEFSUPERINTENDENT AND ANR.

ANITHA SHENOY, MISHRA SAURABH

{Mention Memo for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedW.P.(Crl.) No.-150/2014X

SUKH SAGAR MISHRA PANKAJ KUMAR

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOMETHROUG THE SECRETARY AND ANR. SUSHMA SURI, SAMIR ALI KHAN

{Mention Memo for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedW.P.(Crl.) No.-185/2014X

SHAFI VAZRUDDIN QURESHI ABHA R. SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA STATEOF MAHARASHTRA . THROUGH THESUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ANDANR.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

{Mention Memo for 07-11-2017 }7 C.A. No.-4479/2006

IXCOMMNR. OF CUSTOMS (I) B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S. AASU EXIM PVT. LTD. M. P. DEVANATH

8 C.A. No.-1067/2009XIV

COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, JAIPUR B. KRISHNA PRASAD, ANIL KATIYARVersusM/S. KHABROS STEEL (INDIA) LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR RAM SWARUP SHARMA

9 C.A. No.-4598/2009XII-A

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA RACHNA GUPTAVersusP.NARASIMHA RAO (MAJOR) AND ORS. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

Page 27: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 310 C.A. No.-3087/2008

III-AKARAN SINGH PRASHANT KUMARVersusSTATE OF U.P. THROUGH THEPRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS.

11 C.A. No.-2073/2010X

ORISSA STATE FINANCIALCORPORATION SUNIL KUMAR JAIN

VersusM/S VIGYAN CHEMICALS INDUSTRIESAND ORS. USHA NANDINI. V

12 C.A. No.-5002/2008XVI

M/S EASTERN BAKERIES PVT.LTD. SHIBASHISH MISRAVersus

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER . AND ORS. ANIP SACHTHEY, CHANCHAL KUMARGANGULI

not taken up13 C.A. No.-8623/2011

IXRAJKUMAR ANANDRAO MORE NARESH KUMAR[P-1]VersusSADHU BABU TOHMBARE . AND ORS. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV[R-1]

14 C.A. No.-79/2008XI -A

B.N. FIROS V. K. SIDHARTHAN[P-1]VersusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS. G. PRAKASH[R-1], [R-3], P. V. DINESH[R-4]

15 C.A.No.-4900-4901/2008XII

SERVICE TAX COMMISSIONER B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S MALABAR MANGT.SERV.P.LTD. NIKHIL NAYYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-2007/2010IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEHYDERABAD B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S LOUIS BERGER INTERNATIONALINC. SUDHA GUPTA

16 C.A. No.-4914/2008IX

MUMBAI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTSP.LTD. THROUGH VICE PRESIDENT(LEGAL)

SIDDHARTHA CHOWDHURY

VersusFLEMINGO DUTYFREE SHOP P.LTD.THROUGH VICE PRESIDENT (LEGAL)AND ORS.

ANUPAM LAL DAS, B. KRISHNA PRASAD, M. V.KINI & ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No.-4915/2008IX

DFS VENTURE SINGAPORE PVT. LTD.AND ANR. BINA GUPTA

VersusFLEMINGO DUTY FREE SHOP PVT. LTD.AND ORS ANUPAM LAL DAS, M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES

17 C.A. No.-8807/2012XV

MADAN LAL AND ORS. T. R. B. SIVAKUMARVersusSUKH RAJ @ SUKH RAM . AND ORS. SURYA KANT

ConnectedC.A. No.-8808/2012XV

SUKHRAJ AND ORS. SURYA KANT[P-1]

VersusMADAN LAL . AND ORS. T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR[R-1]

18 Crl.A. No.-809/2010II-C

BALAKRISHNAN AND ORS.S. GOWTHAMAN[P-2], PROMILA[P-5], [P-7], A.RADHAKRISHNAN[P-1], [P-3], [P-4], [P-6], [P-8],[P-9]

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 6325/2017 and IA No.70143/2017-PERMISSION TOFILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IA No.70145/2017-EXEMPTION FROMFILING O.T.

Page 28: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 319 Crl.A. No.-1371/2008

II-CSHANKAR DEV VISHAL ARUN[P-1][Pr]VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[R-1][Gr]

20 C.A. No.-452-453/2011XII

THIAGARAJAN AND ORS. AND ORS. GEETHA KOVILANVersusN.JAYALAKSHMI AND ORS. AND ORS. SANTOSH KUMAR TRIPATHI, PRACHI BAJPAI

21 Crl.A. No.-121/2010II-B

MANGE SHALU SHARMAVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB KULDIP SINGH

22 Crl.A. No.-2037/2010II-B

AJAY KUMAR RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]and IA No.90693/2017 (Application for withdrawal of the appeal

23 Crl.A. No.-903/2012II-A

KAMESHWAR SINGH AND ANR. M. A. CHINNASAMY[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.GOPAL SINGH[R-1], VINOD KUMARTEWARI[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], SHANTANUSAGAR[R-5]

FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 7856/201724 C.A. No.-5850/2009

XIVCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S BHARAT PETROLEUMCORPORATION LTD. THROUGH THEDIRECTOR

PARIJAT SINHA

and IA No.111805/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-904/2012II-A

TARKESHWAR SINGH VINOD KUMAR TEWARI, NARESHKUMAR[P-2], [P-4]

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR GOPAL SINGH[R-1]SHEKHAR KUMAR[I-1][IMPL]

and FOR [I A FOR BAIL] ON IA 65326/2017

25 Crl.A.No.-1323-1324/2014II-A

DHANANJAY CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI[P-1]

Versus

RAM AND ORS.SHIVAJI M. JADHAV[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-6]

26 C.A. No.-8490/2009XIV

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]VersusM/S BHEL THROUGH DIRECTOR NARESH KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A.No.-1325-1326/2014II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[P-1]

Versus

RAM SHIVAJI M. JADHAV[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5]

27 Crl.A. No.-1367/2015II-B

JACOB STEPHEN @ STEPHENJI ROMY CHACKOVersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

28 C.A.No.-3164-3165/2017XI -A

KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDAND ANR. A. RAGHUNATH[P-1]

VersusKURIEN E. KALATHIL AND ANR. E. M. S. ANAM[R-1], G. PRAKASH[R-2]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1368/2015II-B

JOSE T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR[P-1]

Versus

Page 29: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 3STATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1370/2015II-B

ASHRAF T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH, RAMESH BABU M. R.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1369/2015II-B

RAJENDRAN NAIR @ RAJAN T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1371/2015II-B

BABU MATHEW T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1372/2015II-B

VARGHESE T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A.No.-1374-1377/2015II-B

USHA AND ORS. VENKITA SUBRAMONIAM T.R

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH, RAMESH BABU M. R.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1378/2015II-B

K THANKAPPAN ZULFIKER ALI P. S

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH, RAMESH BABU M. R.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1373/2015II-B

ALIYAR @ ALI LAKSHMI N. KAIMAL

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH, RAMESH BABU M. R.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1383/2015II-B

AJI LAKSHMI N. KAIMAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A.No.-1387-1388/2015II-B

SUNNY GEORGE @ MOTOR SUNNY .AND ANR. K. RAJEEV

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH, RAMESH BABU M. R.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1379/2015II-B

SHAJI @ JIMMY LAKSHMI N. KAIMAL

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH, RAMESH BABU M. R.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1380/2015II-B

DAVOOD LAKSHMI N. KAIMAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

Page 30: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1384/2015II-B

CHERIAN SANJAY JAIN

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH, RAMESH BABU M. R.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1386/2015II-B

DHARMARAJAN P. S. SUDHEER

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH, RAMESH BABU M. R.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1381/2015II-B

UNNIKRISHNAN NAIR LAKSHMI N. KAIMAL

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH, RAMESH BABU M. R.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1382/2015II-B

ANIL @ ANI HARSHAD V. HAMEED[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1385/2015II-B

RAJU T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH, RAMESH BABU M. R.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.-9290/2014II-B

SREEKUMAR @ BABU E. M. S. ANAM

VersusSTATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

29 Crl.A. No.-455/2010II-C

SELVARAJ AND ANR. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN, [P-2]VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

30 C.A.No.-9162-9164/2016XII

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND SERVICE TAX LTU, CHENNAI B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusCOGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS(I) PVT. LTD. THR. ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR

S. GOWTHAMAN

and IA No.73308/2017-PERMISSION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF AMOUNT IS TO BELISTED BEFORE HON'BLE COURT.

31 C.A. No.-3445/2011IX

MAHARASHTRA STATE CO-OPERATIVEBANK LTD. M. Y. DESHMUKH

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS. AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

32 Crl.A. No.-577/2011II-B

BINDHYACHAL SINGH JITENDRA KUMARVersusTHE NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

33 Crl.A. No.-1538/2010II-C

VIJAYAN @ VIJI AND ANR. S. THANANJAYAN[P-1], S. GOWTHAMAN[P-2]VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]and IA No.82934/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.82936/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

34 Crl.A.No.-697-698/2012II-C

SHAJAHAN S. GOWTHAMAN

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

Page 31: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 3FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 8705/2016 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES]ON IA 11261/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 11263/2016

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-481/2015II-C

BASHEER AND ANR. AMIT KUMAR, [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNAFOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 4569/2015

35 C.A. No.-9007/2011XII

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(APPEALS) AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S PEN FOODS P.LTD. K. R. SASIPRABHU[R-1]

36 Crl.A. No.-1193/2011II-C

CHANDRU @ CHANDRASEKARAN S. THANANJAYAN[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADUK. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1], M. YOGESHKANNA[Caveat]ANIL KUMAR MISHRA-I[I-1][IMPL]

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 13149/2016 FOR EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. ON IA 13150/2016 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES]ON IA 6697/2017 FOR IMPLEADMENT ON IA 9126/2012

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.-2306/2011II-C

SIVA @ SIVAPRAKASH RAJ KAMAL[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.M. YOGESH KANNA[Caveat], K. V.VIJAYAKUMAR, [R-1], ANIL KUMAR MISHRA-I[R-2]

37 C.A. No.-8167-/2017XII-A

V. SUMITRA REDDY AND ANR. ANANGA BHATTACHARYYAVersus

K. RANGANADHA REDDY . AND ORS. K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI, D. MAHESH BABU,LAWYER S KNIT & CO

FOR ON IA 48953/201338 C.A. No.-1343/2013

XVI -AVISHAL BAR AND RESTAURANT RANI CHHABRA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIRAND ORS.

M. SHOEB ALAM[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], (MRS. )VIPIN GUPTA[R-4]

39 C.A.No.-11346-11348/2016XI -A

M/S LEO RUBBERS . AND ANR. P. S. SUDHEER

VersusSTATE OF KERALA NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

ConnectedC.A. No.-11349/2016XI -A

SHEENA J. MAMPARAMBIL HIMINDER LAL

VersusSTATE OF KERALA NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

ConnectedC.A. No.-11350/2016XI -A

M/S.PARAGON RUBBERS INDUSTRIES P. S. SUDHEER

VersusSTATE OF KERALA NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

ConnectedC.A.No.-11351-11352/2016XI -A

M/S.PARAGON RUBBERS INDUSTRIES P. S. SUDHEER

Versus

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

40 C.A. No.-4931/2016IV-A

M/S INFINITE BUILDERS ANDDEVELOPERS K J JOHN AND CO

VersusTHE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFCOMMERCIAL TAXES ZONE II V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Page 32: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 3ConnectedC.A. No.-4933/2016IV-A

M/S INFINITE BUILDERS ANDDEVELOPERS K J JOHN AND CO

VersusTHE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFCOMMERCIAL TAXES ZONE II V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A.No.-4936-4937/2016IV-A

M/S CENTUM INDUSTRIES PVT LTD MEERA MATHUR

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA ANITHA SHENOY

ConnectedC.A.No.-4889-4911/2016IV-A

M/S. KOTHARI SALES AND AGENCIES M. P. DEVANATH[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKAV. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], MERUSAGARSAMANTARAY[R-2][Pr], ANUP JAIN[R-4][Pr],PIYUSH SHARMA[R-5][Pr], KUSHCHATURVEDI[R-5], SATYA MITRA[R-10]

ConnectedSLP(C)No.-16639-16645/2016IV-A

STATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Versus

M/S. MANYATA PROMOTERS PVT. LTD. KUNAL VERMA

41 C.A. No.-3381/2016XII

M. JOSEPH RAKESH K. SHARMAVersusPURASAWAKKAM P. BENEFIT FUNDLTD. AND ANR. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

42 C.A. No.-667-671/2014XIV

SUNIL KUMAR GOEL M. P. DEVANATH, VIKAS SINGH JANGRA[P-1]VersusCOMMNR.OF CUSTOMS,NEW DELHI B. KRISHNA PRASADFOR ON IA 13629/2014

ConnectedC.A. No.-682-686/2014XIV

M/S SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICSPVT LTD VIKAS SINGH JANGRA[P-1], M. P. DEVANATH

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]FOR ON IA 13630/2014

43 C.A. No.-7208/2015III

STATE OF GUJARAT HEMANTIKA WAHIVersusKIRAN KUMAR RAMESHBHAI DEVMANI ANURAG PANDEY

44 C.A. No.-10584/2014III

GODREJ CONSUMERS PRODUCTS LTD M. P. DEVANATHVersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEAND CUSTOMS INDORE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

45 Crl.A. No.-257/2016II-C

KISHORE KUMAR VIKAS MEHTA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF DELHI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

46 Crl.A. No.-1136/2014II-B

BALWINDER SINGH @ BINDA NIKILESH RAMACHANDRANVersusNARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1933/2014II-B

SATNAM SINGH SANJAY JAIN

VersusNARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU,CHANDIGARH B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 5439/2016

Page 33: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 3

47 C.A. No.-11268/2016XVI

STOCK HOLDING CORPORATION OFINDIA LTD. MOHINDER JIT SINGH

VersusINDUSING BANK LTD. AND ANR. PAREKH & CO.[Caveat]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } as per Court's order dated 05.09.2017, list the matterafter two weeks.

48 C.A. No.-6333/2017XVI

AJAI PRAKASH LOHIA AMARJIT SINGH BEDI[P-1]VersusAXIS BANK LIMITED . AND ORS. SUMITA RAY[R-1], NIRAJ GUPTA[R-2], [R-3]List the matter after Dussehra Holidays as per Court's Order dated 20.9.2017. (nottaken up)

49 C.A. No.-959/2017III

SHAIKH SALEEMUDDIN AND ORS. UDAY B. DUBEVersus

BABA QUERASHI AND ANR. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI, [R-2],SHASHIBHUSHAN P. ADGAONKAR

50 C.A. No.-5453/2017XIV

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusBULLION AND JEWELLERSASSOCIATION(REGD) KISHORE KUNAL

ConnectedC.A.No.-5458-5459/2017XIV

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

M/S. J.B. OVERSEAS KISHORE KUNAL

51 C.A. No.-2612/2016XVII

BHUPESH SEHGAL AND ORS. VANDANA SEHGAL[P-1], SATISH KUMAR[P-1],PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1]

Versus

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY(DDA) AND ORS.

GARIMA PRASHAD[R-1][Pr], E. C.AGRAWALA[R-1][Pr], K. R. SASIPRABHU[R-2],ANUP JAIN[R-3]

ConnectedC.A.No.-8851-8853/2015XVII

CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATIONOF INDIA

Versus

PRAVEEN PATKAR AND ORS.ANUP JAIN[R-4], PIYUSH SHARMA[R-5],MERUSAGAR SAMANTARAY[R-6], PUNEETTANEJA[R-7]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No.-316/2016PIL-W

DR. NARESH CHAND GUPTA PRASHANT BHUSHAN[P-1]

VersusNEW OKHLA INDUSTRIALDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS.CHAIRMAN AND CEO AND ORS.

RAVINDRA KUMAR[R-1], ANUP JAIN[R-2]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No.-387/2016X

HARISH CHAND TIWARI ABHISHEK GAUTAM

VersusUNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS THROUGHSECRETARY

PRADEEP KUMAR MATHUR[R-3], ADARSHUPADHYAY[R-4]

FOR FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 2/2017 FOR ON IA 4/2017FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 5/2017

52 Crl.A. No.-611/2017II-C

STATE OF KARNATAKA MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusR. MANTHRA MURTHY VIJAY KUMAR{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

53 C.A.No.-9427-9474/2017XVI

M/S JASODA BIRI PRODUCTS AND ORS. PRAVEEN KUMAR

Versus

Page 34: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 3COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEKOLKATA III AND ANR.as per court's order list the matter after two weeks and IA No.70959/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS(not taken up)

54 Crl.A. No.-88-89/2010II-C

PRESSY PINTO V. N. RAGHUPATHYVersusSHASHIKALA KOTIANFOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 15338/2009 FOR ON IA 20419/2011 FOR ON IA21271/2011

55 Crl.A.No.-1727-1730/2010II-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

SABYASACHI JYOTI AND ORS.NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-3], ALOK GUPTA, [R-1],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

56 Crl.A.No.-2301-2302/2014II-B

GURWINDER SINGH @ SONU AND ANR. DEEPAK GOEL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. UTTARA BABBAR[R-1], MOHIT D. RAM[R-2]FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA NOS. 4088-4089/2017 (APPLICATION FOR BAIL ONBEHALF OF APPELLANT IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2301/2014)

57 Crl.A. No.-531/2017II-A

SAMABAI BHANUDAS KSHRISAGAR RAJEEV SHARMAVersusTUKARAM GANGARAM KSHIRSAGARAND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,GEETHA KOVILAN

58 C.A. No.-10528/2017XII-A

THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER ICAD DEPARTMENT S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR

VersusM/S JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LTD SHARMILA UPADHYAY[Caveat]

59 C.A. No.-3108/2016IV

THE STATE OF HARYANA SANJAY KUMAR VISENVersusM/S. IDEA CELLULAR LTD. AND ORS.A.K BHADURI AUTHORISED SIGNATORYAND ORS.

E. C. AGRAWALA[Caveat]

List after ensuing summer vacation as per Hon'ble Court order dated 02.05.2016.

NEW DELHI03-11-2017 16:51:12

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 35: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 30 OF 2017 FROM : 07-11-2017 To 09-11-2017

COURT NO. : 4HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKURHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 C.A. No.-3516/2006

XII-AKONKEESA YESHODA AND ORS. SRIDHAR POTARAJUVersusJAGRUTHI COOPERATIVE HOUSINGSOCIETY LIMITED AND ORS.

GUNTUR PRABHAKAR, ANIL KUMARTANDALE, LAWYER S KNIT & CO

2 C.A. No.-5645/2006XII-A

M. DURGA SINGH AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHYVersus

YADAGIRI . AND ORS.SUDHA GUPTA, V. G. PRAGASAM, G.RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, VENKAT PALWAILAW ASSOCIATES

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }3 C.A. No.-7009/2009

III-AGIRJESH SINGH AND ANR. ROHIT SINGH[P-1]Versus

RUDRA NARAIN SINGH AND ORS. ANIL KUMAR JHA[R-1], [R-2], [R-5], SANTOSHKUMAR TRIPATHI[R-3]

4 C.A.No.-4086-4087/2010IV-A

DEVAMMA @ DEVEERAMMA (D) BY LRS.AND ANR. E. R. SUMATHY, ANJANA CHANDRASHEKAR

VersusSARASWATHAMMA . AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE

5 C.A. No.-8434/2010XV

PEETHA AND ANR. SARLA CHANDRA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.TEHSILDAR AND ORS.

GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[R-1], RUCHIKOHLI[R-1]

6 C.A. No.-10033/2010XII-A

NAWAB BASHEER JUNG (D) BY LRS.AND ORS.Versus

M/S. M.A. BARI . AND ORS.ANIS AHMED KHAN, DEVENDRA SINGH, D.MAHESH BABU, VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES

IA No.92164/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and AS PER COURT'SORDER DATED 11.07.2017 MATTER NOT TO BE PLACED BEFORE A BENCH OFWHICH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.F. NARIMAN IS A MEMBER and IANo.87080/2017-VAKALATNAMA AND MEMO OF APPEARANCE and IANo.87084/2017-XTRA

ConnectedC.A. No.-10034/2010XII-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

VersusNAWAB MAZAHARUDDIN KHAN . ANDORS. VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES

7 C.A. No.-1229/2006III-A

KRISHI UTPADAN MANDI SAMITI PRADEEP MISRAVersusGODFREY PHILIPS INDIA LTD. RAJAN NARAINand IA No.69913/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.69914/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

Page 36: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 48 C.A. No.-26/2008

XVRAM KUMAR AND ORS. MANISH K. BISHNOIVersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. COMMISSIONERAND ORS.

MILIND KUMAR

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

9 C.A. No.-917-918/2010III-A

COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENTTHROUGH ITS MANAGER ONKAR NATHAGRAWAL

VISHWAJIT SINGH

Versus

THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATIONAND ORS.

SHRISH KUMAR MISRA, M. R. SHAMSHAD, ,[R-2], [R-6], PRAVEEN CHATURVEDI[R-3],[R-4], [R-5]

List after two weeks (Vide Hon'ble Court's order dated 30.08.2017)ConnectedC.A. No.-919/2010III-A

VIJAY LAXMI TIWARI AND ORS. VISHWAJIT SINGH, [P-2], [P-3]

VersusDIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION,U.P. AND ORS.

NIRANJANA SINGH, M. R. SHAMSHAD, [R-2],[R-6], DEBASIS MISRA[R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

10 C.A. No.-9040/2013XIV

AFTARUDDIN(DEAD) REP. THR. LRS. MADHU MOOLCHANDANIVersusRAMKRISHNA DATTA ALIAS BABULDATTA AND ORS. RAJIV MEHTA

11 C.A. No.-9836/2014III-A

PRAVESH KUMAR SACHDEVA AMIT PAWANVersus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

M. P. SHORAWALA, VINAY GARG, T. MAHIPAL,ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD, SHASHIKIRAN[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No.-9838/2014III-A

PAWAN KUMAR AGARWAL AND ANR. ANNAM D. N. RAO

VersusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-21229/2007XI

PAWAN KUMAR AGARWAL ANNAM D. N. RAO

VersusASHOK MITRA AND ORS. ANITHA SHENOYMAIN MATTER C.A. NO. 9836/2014

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-5406/2008XI

DHARMENDRA PRATAP SINGH ANDORS. ABHIJAT P. MEDH[P-1]

Versus

PARVESH KUMAR SACHDEVA AND ORS.T. MAHIPAL[R-1], VINAY GARG[R-1], S. R.SETIA[R-1], M. P. SHORAWALA[R-1],ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD[R-1],ANITHA SHENOY[R-1]

MAIN MATTER C.A. NO. 9836/2014ConnectedC.A. No.-9837/2014III-A

PAWAN KUMAR AGARWAL . AND ANR. ANNAM D. N. RAO

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THR.SECRETARY REVENUE AND ORS.

T. MAHIPAL, VINAY GARG, S. R. SETIA, M. P.SHORAWALA, ARDHENDUMAULI KUMARPRASAD, ANITHA SHENOY, SHASHIKIRAN[R-5]

12 C.A. No.-6252/2008IV-A

SAYED ABDUL HAMID (D) BY LRS. RAUF RAHIMVersusABDUL SATTAR DURRANI (D) BY LRS. &ORS. AND ANR. RAJESH MAHALE, V. N. RAGHUPATHY

and IA No.107062/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.107065/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

Page 37: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 413 C.A. No.-394/2009

III-AMAHANT LALITA SHARANJI T. N. SINGHVersusDEOKI DEVI . AND ANR. AND ANR. DEEPTAKIRTI VERMAIA No.89467/2017-APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION FOR BRINGING SUBSEQUENTEVENTS ON RECORD

14 C.A. No.-4518/2007XI -A

CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR ANIP SACHTHEY[P-1]Versus

M/S JAI DURGA IRON (P) LTD. AND ORS. RAJEEV SINGH[R-1], [R-2], GURMEET SINGHMAKKER[R-7]

15 C.A. No.-413/2008IV-A

RAJAJINAGAR HNG.CO-OP.SOCIETY LTD. VAIJAYANTHI GIRISHVersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA . AND ORS.

16 C.A. No.-5793/2008IV-A

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHYVersusKARNATAKA PAWN BROKERS ASSN. .AND ORS. S. R. SETIA

17 C.A.No.-2038-2039/2009IX

VISHWASRAO STWARAO NAIK AND ORS.AND ORS. C. G. SOLSHE

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

18 C.A. No.-1303/2008IV-A

ST. ANNS EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY R. SATHISHVersusLAKSHMI AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

19 C.A. No.-1906/2011IV

JASPAL SINGH AND ORS. RAKESH K. SHARMA, RANJAN KUMARPANDEY

VersusSHIROMANI GURUDWARAPARBANDHAK COMM. KAMALDEEP GULATI

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

20 C.A. No.-5800/2009III-A

SHISH PAL SINGH (D) TH. LRS. ANDANR. MONIKA GUSAIN

Versus

BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P. AND ORS. SUDARSHAN SINGH RAWAT, [R-4], [R-5], M. C.DHINGRA, [R-7], VINAY GARG[R-3], [R-6]

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C)No.-53/2008

NAROTTAM SINGH AND ORS. CHITRA MARKANDAYA

VersusMAHTAB SINGH AND ANR.

21 C.A. No.-1497/2008IV

JHABBAR SINGH (D) BY LRS. AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR[P-1]VersusJAGTAR SINGH KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-1498/2008IV

BALAK RAM AND ORS. AMIT KUMAR

VersusJAGATAR SINGH KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA, S. JANANI

22 C.A. No.-5149/2011XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MADHU SIKRIVersusSUPRIYA BASU PARTHA SILas per court's order dated 19.1.2015 passed in I.A. No.2 (application for earlyhearing in Connected matter i.e. CA No.5148/2011) hearing of appeal to beexpideted. And as per office note dated 3.1.2015 matter not to be listed beforeHon'ble Mr. Justice A.K. Sikri.

ConnectedC.A. No.-5148/2011XVI

SUPRIYA BASU PARTHA SIL

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MADHU SIKRI

Page 38: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 423 C.A. No.-8512/2009

XI -ASPECIAL SEC. TO GOVT. OF ORISSA SHIBASHISH MISRA[P-1]Versus

BANSIDHAR NAIK (DEAD) BY LRS.

M. QAMARUDDIN[R-1]A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[IMPL], RAJEEVMAHESHWARANAND ROY[I-1][IMPL],[I-2][IMPL], K. RAJEEV[I-3][IMPL], [I-4][IMPL],[I-5][IMPL], [I-6][IMPL], [I-7][IMPL]

FOR ON IA 3/2009 FOR ON IA 86972/2009

24 C.A. No.-5796/2009XII-A

BANDARU @ BELLAM VENKATRAMAIAH. AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusK.SURYA KUMARI . Y. RAJA GOPALA RAOFOR ON IA 10/2016 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 11/2016 FOR[PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 12/2017

ConnectedC.A. No.-5798/2009XII-A

B.RAMAMANI V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusK.SURYA KUMARI Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO

25 C.A. No.-2996/2012XVI

UNION OF INDIAVersus

RAJ KUMAR RAJESH PRASAD SINGH, ARVIND KUMARSHARMA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-3002/2012XVI

UNION OF INDIA

VersusSUDHIR KUMAR RAJESH PRASAD SINGH{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A.No.-3004-3006/2012XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Versus

ABHAY KUMAR SINGH RAJESH PRASAD SINGH{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-2999/2012XVI

UNION OF INDIA

VersusNAWAL KISHORE SAH RAJESH PRASAD SINGH{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C)No.-11600-11602/2010XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Versus

SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH . AND ORS.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A.No.-6218-6220/2016XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

Versus

KISHUN PRASAD AND ETC AND ANR. GAURAV AGRAWAL[R-1], SHASHI BHUSHANKUMAR[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }26 C.A. No.-8640/2010

XVI -AAYODHYA NATH GHAN SHYAM VASISHTVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYARREMAIN IN THE LIST

27 C.A.No.-3366-3367/2010IV

SHASHI KIRAN IRSHAD AHMAD

Versus

Page 39: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 4SANT LONGOWAL INSTITUTE OFENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL ANDORS.

JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA, , RANJEETAROHATGI[R-2], BRAJ KISHORE MISHRA[R-3]

Not to be listed before Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel

28 C.A.No.-6887-6890/2014XII-A

P.NARSING RAO AND ORS. C. K. SUCHARITA

VersusPASHAM RAMESHWAR RAO ANJANI AIYAGARI

29 C.A. No.-7236/2011XIV

DANDUP WANGAIL NEGI AND ORS. BHASKAR Y. KULKARNI[P-1]Versus

RAMESH CHANDER CHAJTA AND ORS. PRAGATI NEEKHRA[R-1], DHARMENDRAKUMAR SINHA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 3/2015 FOR ON IA 2/2015 FOR STAYAPPLICATION ON IA 4/2015On the top of the Board subject of overnight partheard matter.

30 C.A.No.-2646-2647/2016XVI -A

BASHIR AHMAD KHAN LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH[P-1]

Versus

SIRAJ AHMAD SHAH AND ORS.SHAKIL AHMED SYED[R-1], [R-2], [R-7], [R-14],[R-18], M. SHOEB ALAM[R-3], [R-5], [R-13],[R-17]

31 C.A.No.-2202-2203/2013XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR ON IA 7/2016 FOR ON IA 9/2016 (TOP OF THEBOARD)

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-20156/2012XII-A

SANGMARMAR KHAN VIKAS SAMITI EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES

Versus

UNION OF INDIA IRSHAD AHMAD, ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.114300/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T. and IA No.114307/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-21220/2012XV

MOHD.ALI SISODIYA AND ORS EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS AND ORS. IRSHAD AHMAD, ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 4/2014 FOR EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. ON IA 5/2014

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-36527/2012XV

DALLODI AND ORS. AND ORS. K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. PRAGATI NEEKHRA, ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedSLP(C) No.-35934/2012XV

JAMIL AHMED K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. PRAGATI NEEKHRA, ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedSLP(C) No.-36923/2012XV

M/S H.S. HUSSAIN BUX FAZALJI K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. PRAGATI NEEKHRA, ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

Page 40: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 4ConnectedSLP(C) No.-1486/2013XV

HAJI MOHD.(D) THROUGH LRS. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-1387/2013XV

ABDUL REHMAN (D) THR. LRS. ANDORS. AND ANR. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. . AND ORS. PRAGATI NEEKHRA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-1484/2013XV

M/S GOLDEN STATE MINES OWNERMAKRANA AND ANR. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS AND ORS. PRAGATI NEEKHRA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-8230/2013XV

GAREHEERA MARBLE MINES MADHURIMA TATIA[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA RUCHI KOHLI[R-1], ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }32 C.A. No.-9145/2012

XIVNARAYAN SINGH(D) THR LRS. BANKEY BIHARIVersusSH. BHULLE AMBAR QAMARUDDIN{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C)No.-28238-28243/2012XIV

PREM PRAKASH(D) TR.LRS. PAREKH & CO.

Versus

SARLA SHARMA(D) TR.LRS. AND ORS. P. V. YOGESWARAN[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], AMIT ANAND TIWARI[R-7]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

33 C.A.No.-4625-4626/2012XI -A

THE UNION TERRITORY OFLAKSHADWEEP AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

Versus

SEASHELLS BEACH RESORT AND ORS. GAUTAM NARAYAN[R-1], S. S. SHROFF[R-1], B.KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } MR. GAURAV PACHNANDA, SENIOR ADVOCATE(AMICUS CURIAE) I.A. NOS. 5-6 : APPLICATIONS FOR IMPLEADMENT ALONGWITH UNREGISTERED APPLICATIONS FOR DIRECTIONS AND UNREGISTEREDAPPLICATIONS FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS I.A.NOS.15-16 : APPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTIONS ALONG WITH UNREGISTEREDAPPLICATIONS FOR DIRECTIONS. I.A.NOS. 17-18 : APPLICATIONS FORDIRECTIONS. I.A.NOS. 19-20 : APPLICATIONS FOR DIRECTIONS. I.A.NOS. 21-22 :APPLICATIONS FOR DIRECTIONS.

34 C.A. No.-5955/2015III

SWAYAM RELATORS BINDI GIRISH DAVE[P-1]Versus

THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY FORINDUSTRIAL AND FINANCIALRECONSTRUCTIONS AND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-3], [R-10], PAREKH &CO.[R-5], MEERA MATHUR[R-7], SHISHIRDESHPANDE[R-8], ABHIJAT P. MEDH[R-9],ANIL SHRIVASTAV[R-13]

35 C.A. No.-773/2017XVI -A

THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIRAND ORS. M. SHOEB ALAM, [P-2], [P-3]

VersusSALEEM JAHANGIR RESHI J. P. DHANDA

36 C.A. No.-517-518/2017XIV

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SUSHMA SURIVersus

Page 41: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 4MANPREET SINGH POONAM ETC. ANDANR.

RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON, MONIKA GUSAIN,BINU TAMTA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS ON IA 49058/2017 Respondent-In-Person Matter

37 C.A. No.-2692/2017III

METROPOLITAN INFRAHOUSING PVT.LTD. AP & J CHAMBERS

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,BINDI GIRISH DAVE

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-2694/2017III

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

VersusMETROPOLITAN INFRA HOUSINGPRIVATE LIMITED AP & J CHAMBERS

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }38 C.A. No.-750-751/2009

XVSAPPU BEGUM AND ORS. AND ORS. SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1], K. L. JANJANI[R-1]

39 C.A. No.-557/2008XII

DIRECTTOR OF HANDLOOM ANDTEXTILES AND ANR. M. YOGESH KANNA

VersusR.MANOHARAN MADHUSMITA BORA

40 C.A. No.-2924/2010XII

ST. MARYS HIGHER SECONDARYSCHOOL ANANTHA NARAYANA M.G.

VersusR.WILSON AND ORS AND ORS. ARPUTHAM ARUNA AND CO

41 C.A. No.-3149/2009XII

K.VISHWANATHAN AND ORS. AND ORS. G. BALAJIVersus

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND ORS. ANU GUPTA, RANI CHHABRA, ARVIND KUMARSHARMA

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C)No.-253/2011

M.SUBRAMANIAN AND ANR. AND ANR. ARJUN GARG

VersusR.CHANDRASHEKHAR AND ORS. ANDORS.

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C)No.-403/2012

M.SHANMUGAMN RANI CHHABRA

VersusR.K. UPADHYAY . AND ORS. RAJNISH PRASAD

42 C.A. No.-5306/2011IV

MUKHTIAR SINGH K. RAM KUMAR, [P-1]VersusTHE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONERHARYANA AND ORS.

KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA, , RITESH KHATRI,RAJINDER MATHUR

43 C.A. No.-1645/2012XVI -A

SHABANA NAZ MEERA AGARWAL[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR M. SHOEB ALAM[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF[R-6], [R-7]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

44 C.A.No.-1134-1135/2016XVI -A

SNEH LATA SUDARSHAN SINGH RAWAT[P-1]

Versus

RATNO DEVI AND ORS. INDRA SAWHNEY[R-1], MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

and IA No.72292/2017-DELETING THE NAME OF RESPONDENT

Page 42: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 445 C.A. No.-3130/2015

XI -APLANTERS FORUM AND ANR. LALITA KAUSHIKVersusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. NISHE RAJEN SHONKERFOR ON IA 4/2017

ConnectedC.A.No.-8570-8571/2011XI -A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. LIZ MATHEW[P-1]

Versus

KUMARI VARMA USHA NANDINI. V[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C)No.-4015-4016/2014XI -A

R. UNNIKRISHNAN V. K. SIDHARTHAN

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. ANDANR. V. SHYAMOHAN, RAMESH BABU M. R.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-6537/2015XI -A

JOSE PUNNOOSE G. PRAKASH, C. N. SREE KUMAR[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. RAMESH BABU M. R.[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No.-3129/2015XI -A

NELLIAMPATHY PLANTATIONS USHA NANDINI. V

VersusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS. RAMESH BABU M. R.

ConnectedSLP(C)No.-6919-6920/2015XI -A

P.K. HARIS AND ORS. E. M. S. ANAM

Versus

THE STATE OF KERALA STATE OFKERALA . THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARYAND ORS.

RAMESH BABU M. R., [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedSLP(C)No.-13580-13581/2015XI -A

N.A PLANTATIONS P. V. DINESH

Versus

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. RAMESH BABU M. R.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-20241/2015XI -A

T. ASHOK KUMAR A. RAGHUNATH

VersusSTATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. RAMESH BABU M. R.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-26438/2015XI -A

STATE OF KERALA THE CHIEFSECRETARY AND ORS. RAMESH BABU M. R.

VersusS. MUHAMMED ISMAIL USHA NANDINI. V

ConnectedC.A. No.-4464/2016XI -A

PAYYASEERI THANDUPARAKKALHAMSA AND ORS. A. RAGHUNATH

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THECHIEF SECRETARY AND ANR. G. PRAKASH

46 C.A. No.-9441/2016XVI

IMRAN ALAM AND ANR. DEBASIS MISRAVersus

STATE OF BIHAR . AND ORS. M. SHOEB ALAM[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10]

47 C.A. No.-2884/2015XVI -A

JAGDISH SINGH KATOCH SANGEETA KUMAR[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]LIST ON 21.09.2017 AS PH

Page 43: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 4

48 C.A. No.-2921/2009XII-A

SINGARENI COLLIERIES COMPANYLTD.. AND ANR. P. PARMESWARAN

VersusG. SURENDER . AND ORS. KRISHNA PAL SINGH, B. SUNITA RAO

NEW DELHI03-11-2017 16:51:57

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 44: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 30 OF 2017 FROM : 07-11-2017 To 09-11-2017

COURT NO. : 5HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPHHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 Crl.A. No.-60-61/2004

II-CV. NARASIMHAIAH ROMY CHACKO[P-1]VersusR.G HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGHCOURT AND ORS.

V. N. RAGHUPATHY, [R-1], RAJESHMAHALE[R-2][Pr], [R-3][Pr], [R-4][Pr]

2 C.A. No.-8505/2009IX

SHEIKH YAKUB(D) BY LRS. R. C. KAUSHIKVersusSAKINABI (D) BY LRS. ANAGHA S. DESAIIA No.66830/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.66832/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA1/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 2/2017

3 C.A.No.-1970-1975/2009XII-A

D.RAGHU AND ORS. ABHIJIT SENGUPTA

Versus

R.BASAVESWARUDU AND ORS.V. N. RAGHUPATHY, , ANJANI AIYAGARI, B.KRISHNA PRASAD[R-2], SRIDHARPOTARAJU[R-17]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-1976/2009XII-A

VIJAY B. KAPOOR . AND ORS. PRAVEEN AGRAWAL

VersusCHARIMAN CENTRAL BD.OF EX. T. V. RATNAM, RAUF RAHIM{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

4 C.A. No.-10703/2011IV-A

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. PAVAN KUMARVersusK.NAGARATHNAMMA .

5 C.A. No.-2636/2009XI -A

P.G.LALITHAMBIKA ROMY CHACKOVersusINDIAN RARE EARTHS LTD. AND ORS. C. N. SREE KUMAR

6 C.A. No.-2011/2009XVI

UNION OF INDIA G. INDIRAVersusA.RAYER K. RAJEEV, RANJITH K. C.not taken up

7 C.A.No.-3003-3006/2008IV-A

SUSHEELA AND ANR. AMIT KUMAR

VersusPEERAMBI . AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHYservice not complete

8 C.A. No.-5996/2009IV-A

V.M. MANOMANI AND ORS. ROMY CHACKOVersusSHANTHI BHARAT SANGAL

Page 45: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 59 C.A. No.-963/2009

XI -AJ. LINET V. K. SIDHARTHANVersusTHE ASSTT. MANAGER (DEPOT) FOODCORP. OF INDIA AND ORS. AJIT PUDUSSERY

10 C.A.No.-8018-8019/2013IV-A

ABDUL JABBAR NAFIS A. SIDDIQUI

VersusRAM BIHARI PANDY AND ORS. T. MAHIPALIA No.108566/2017-WITHDRAWL OF CASE In Connected Case C.A.No.008020-008021/2013 and

ConnectedC.A.No.-8020-8021/2013IV-A

GOVARDHAN NAFIS A. SIDDIQUI

Versus

BHENGAR YADAV . AND ORS. T. MAHIPALIA No.108566/2017-WITHDRAWL OF CASE and and IA No.110870/2017-XTRA

11 C.A. No.-1714/2009IX

SUNIL SHAMRAO JADHAV AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHYVersusKOLHAPUR MUNICIPAL CORP. THR. ITSCOMMISSIONER AND ORS.

EJAZ MAQBOOL, NARESH KUMAR, K. N. RAI,DIPAK KUMAR JENA

and IA No.78718/2017-XTRA

ConnectedC.A. No.-1715/2009IX

BASHIR AHMED MOHAMED HUSSAINMAKANDAR INDRA SAWHNEY

VersusKOLLHAPUR MUNCIPAL CORPORATIONAND ORS. NARESH KUMAR

12 C.A.No.-7446-7447/2011XIV

MD. ABDUL QADIR SIDDIQUE BHAGABATI PRASAD PADHY[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH ANDORS. ANIL SHRIVASTAV[R-1]

and IA No.88020/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

13 C.A.No.-6634-6635/2010XV

LAXMAN SINGH SURYA KANT

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. V. K. VERMA

14 C.A. No.-8872/2011X

M.K.JAIN (DEAD)THR. LRS. PRATIBHA JAINVersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH DINESH KUMAR GARG

15 Crl.A. No.-920/2006II-C

KULDEEP MANSUKHANI JASPREET GOGIAVersusCOURT ON ITS OWNMOTION,TH.REGISTRAR,DHC AND ANR.AND ANR.

C. K. SUCHARITA, MINAKSHI VIJ[R-1][SCLSC],GAURAV SHARMA[R-2][Pr]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

16 C.A. No.-6282/2012III-A

DIRECTOR STATE COUNCIL OFEDUCATONAL RESEARCH ANDTRAINING AND ORS.

M. R. SHAMSHAD

VersusBIPIN KUMAR SINGH

17 Crl.A. No.-1368/2006II

RAMESHWAR DAYAL YADAV RAJESHVersusREGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT OFJUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ASHOK K. SRIVASTAVA

18 C.A. No.-2403/2008IV-A

DORIS JOHN AND ANR. ANJANA CHANDRASHEKARVersusJANE WESLEY JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

Page 46: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 519 C.A. No.-5409/2008

IV-AKAMALA (DEAD) THR. LRS. ROMY CHACKOVersus

KALYANI SHERIGARTHI . AND ORS. MADHUSMITA BORA, RAMESHWAR PRASADGOYAL

20 C.A. No.-7501/2011IV

PARAS RAM . AND ORS. MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. SANJAY KUMAR VISENSHOWN IN WEEKLY LIST DATED 11-13TH JULY, 2017 IN COURT NO. 6, ITEM NO.12.

ConnectedC.A. No.-7510/2011IV

JAI RAJ MANOJ SWARUP AND CO.

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA SANJAY KUMAR VISENshown in weekly list. court no. 6, item 12

21 Crl.A. No.-1734/2010II

PREM SINGH RAVINDRA S. GARIA[P-1][Pr]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA[R-1][Gr]

22 C.A. No.-1920/2008IX

CASTE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE V. N. RAGHUPATHYVersusSANTOSH AND ANR. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV, RAJEEV SINGH

23 C.A. No.-4676/2012XI -A

T.I. JOSE AND ORS. A. RAGHUNATH[P-1]VersusM.D., KERALA WATER AUTHORITY . ANDANR. P. S. SUDHEER[R-1], JOGY SCARIA[R-2]

24 C.A. No.-1332/2008IV-A

GOPALAKRISHNA (D) BYLRS. AND ORS. ANJANA CHANDRASHEKARVersusNARAYANAGOWDA (DEAD) BY LRS. .AND ORS. VIJAY KUMAR

25 C.A. No.-6577/2010IV-A

MOHIB SAYYED CHOTU MULLA M. QAMARUDDINVersusM/S. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.AND ANR. M. K. DUA, RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

26 C.A. No.-4761/2008IV-A

PRAMODA R.BHAT AND ORS. H. CHANDRA SEKHARVersusM. BALAKRISHNA RAO (D) THR. LRS.AND ANR. S. N. BHAT, ANKUR SOOD

27 C.A. No.-483/2009IV-A

H. PRABHAKAR BALIGA AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHYVersusVASUDEVA RAO KANEMAR @ V.R.KANEMAR AND ANR. RAJEEV SINGH

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

28 C.A. No.-7471/2008IV

GURBACHAN SINGH (D) THR. LRS . ANDANR.

BHASKAR Y. KULKARNI[P-1], SMITAMAAN[P-1][LR/S]

VersusGURDIAL SINGH (D) THR. LRS . ANDORS. ANU GUPTA[R-1], SHREE PAL SINGH[R-2]

and IA No.109510/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.29 C.A. No.-5052/2012

XVIISUCHANO KEREKETTAVersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHANDDEAPRTMENT OF P.H.E.D THROUGHENGINEER IN CHIEF CUM SECRETARY

GOPAL SINGH, ASHOK K. MAHAJAN, ANIL K.JHA

30 C.A. No.-6617/2008IV-A

SHABEER AHMED ANJANA CHANDRASHEKARVersusJABBEN AND ANR.

Page 47: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 5

31 C.A. No.-2742/2009IV-A

MONAPPA KOTTARI(D) BY LRS. ANDORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusDAVID PINTO AND ANR. ROMY CHACKO, ANIL KUMAR MISHRA-I

32 C.A. No.-4679/2007XI -A

E.C.CHERIYAN ROMY CHACKOVersusC.RAMACHANDRAN AND ANR. G. PRAKASH

33 C.A.No.-8793-8794/2013XVI

ATUL CHANDRA DAS(D) TR.LRS. ANDORS. SHEKHAR KUMAR[P-1]

VersusRABINDRA NATHBHATTACHARYA(D)TR.LRS.&ORS

RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL, [R-2], [R-3],[R-4]

not taken up34 C.A. No.-9984/2011

IV-AASHOKA . AND ANR. K. V. MOHANVersus

M.C. SUJATA(DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY, ANJANACHANDRASHEKAR

35 C.A. No.-7418/2009IV-A

R.S. ANJAYYA GUPTA SHAILESH MADIYALVersus

THIPPAIAH SETTY AND ORS. RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA, ABHIJAT P.MEDH

36 C.A. No.-9580/2010XI -A

DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONSAND ORS. C. K. SASI[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusMANAGER, U.H.S.S. . AND ORS. A. RAGHUNATH[R-3]

ConnectedC.A.No.-9581-9585/2010XI -A

DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS .AND ORS. G. PRAKASH

VersusJOSHI P.K. AND ORS. M. T. GEORGE

37 C.A. No.-119-120/2011XVI

EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD. GAUTAM AWASTHIVersusBIBHAS CHANDRA BAKSHI . AND ORS. GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[R-2], [R-3]not taken up

38 C.A. No.-7127/2009XII-A

MAJETI BALA BABURAO T. V. RATNAMVersusMAJETI BALA GANGADHARA RAO . ANDANR. LAWYER S KNIT & CO

39 C.A. No.-1181/2009XI -A

CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIR.,NALCO . AND ORS. SUNITA SHARMA

VersusSARBADARSHI PATNAIK AND ORS. ABHISTH KUMAR

40 C.A. No.-4332/2009XVI

SWADESHI COMMERL.CO.LTD. ANDANR. SHEKHAR KUMAR

VersusUNION OF INDIA SUSHMA SURI{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } not taken up

41 C.A. No.-2808/2013III-A

SANT PRASAD MISHRA AND ORS. ASHOK MATHURVersusPUSHPRAJ SINGH AND ORS. PRAMOD B. AGARWALA, PARIJAT SINHA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

42 C.A. No.-5188/2009XIV

DIRECTOR(BEE KEEPING) H.P AND ORS. VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusSANJEEV KUMAR IRSHAD AHMAD, [R-1]

Page 48: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 543 Crl.A. No.-5/2009

II-CSUKUMARAN DEEPAK ANANDVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA, K. V. VIJAYAKUMARand IA No.86933/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

44 C.A. No.-7702/2013III

GITABAI MARUTI RAUT (DEAD) THR.G.P.A. HOLDER SH. CHANDRAKANT M.RAUT AND ANR.

SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

Versus

PANDURANG MARUTI RAUT . AND ORS.NIRNIMESH DUBE, [R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], ARVIND S. AVHAD[R-6], [R-7], T.MAHIPAL[R-8], ANIL KUMAR TANDALE[R-11],[R-12], [R-13]

45 C.A. No.-8163/2009IV

TEK CHAND B. K. SATIJA[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], MAYURIRAGHUVANSHI[R-4]

not to be listed before Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel.ConnectedC.A. No.-5862/2012XIV

SHRI SANJIB DEB ROY AND ANR. MAYURI RAGHUVANSHI

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY AND ORS.

B. K. SATIJA[Caveat], R. C. KAUSHIK,CAVEATOR-IN-PERSON, ANIL KATIYAR

46 C.A. No.-7365/2013IV

SARWAR KUMAR ANOOP KR. SRIVASTAVVersusEXEC.ENG.PROVINCIAL DIVISION ANDANR. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA, MONIKA GUSAIN

ConnectedC.A. No.-7366/2013IV

SAMUNDER

VersusEXEC.ENG.PROVINCIAL DIVISION ANDANR. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ready matterConnectedC.A. No.-7367/2013IV

DHARMENDER

VersusEXEC.ENG.PROVINCIAL DIVISION ANDANR. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

ready matter47 C.A. No.-11812/2016

IV-AAUDREY FRANCIS DSOUZA S. N. BHATVersusCHARLES REGO . AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY, SHAILESH MADIYAL{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } PART HEARD BY: HONBLE KURIAN JOSEPH ANDHONBLE R. BANUMATHI, JJ.

48 C.A. No.-5081/2011XV

COMMR.KVS AND ORS. S. RAJAPPAVersusSURENDRA KUMAR VINEET BHAGAT{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedDiary No. 28290-2017XV

SURENDRA KUMAR MANJU JETLEY

VersusCOMMISSIONER KENDRIYA VIDYALAYASANGATHAN AND ORS.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } IA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA92642/2017

49 C.A. No.-10829/2014III-A

AJAY KUMAR SINGH AND ANR. KABIR DIXIT, VISHWAJIT SINGHVersus

Page 49: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 5

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

LAWYER S KNIT & CO, SURESH CHANDRATRIPATHY, GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO,CHIRA RANJAN ADDY, SAHARYA & CO.

ConnectedC.A. No.-10828/2014III-A

SHIV KUMAR SINGH SHEKHAR KUMAR

Versus

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.LAWYER S KNIT & CO, GUNNAMVENKATESWARA RAO, CHIRA RANJAN ADDY,SAHARYA & CO.

50 C.A. No.-6221/2013XVI

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. PARIJAT SINHA, CHANCHAL KUMAR GANGULIVersusWEST BENGAL DAIRYMENS ASSO. . ANDORS.

SHEKHAR KUMAR, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11], [R-12]

As per Court's Order dated 20.6.2017 list the matter after summer vacation.(NOTTAKEN UP)

51 Crl.A. No.-243/2017II

TARA SINGH AND ANR. RAJIV RANJAN DWIVEDIVersusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND RAHUL KAUSHIK

52 C.A. No.-7188/2013XIV

UNNIKRISHNAN CV AND ORS. VINOD KUMAR TEWARI[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1]FOR [IA FOR DIRECTIONS] ON IA 14612/2017 FOR ON IA 3/2017

53 Crl.A. No.-2366/2014II-A

RAJENDRA SINGH ABHA R. SHARMA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } Application for Bail (IA No.66984/2017)

54 Crl.A.No.-1426-1428/2014II

YOGENDRA PRASAD CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI

Versus

SEEMA AZAD AND ORS. VIVEK SINGH, SARVAM RITAM KHARE, SAMIRALI KHAN

Only D. No. 15363/17 should be listed."Issue Notice is returnable for 6 weeks."55 C.A. No.-6815/2014

III-AU.P. RAJKIYA NIRMAN NIGAM LIMITED TUSHAR BAKSHIVersusL.N. GUPTA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } List On (Date)(18-07-2017),Other(as 1st item)

56 C.A. No.-6801/2015XII-A

RAVI DURGA PRASADA RAO G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASADVersusVEMULAPALLI RAJESHWARI DEVI ANDORS. K. SHIVRAJ CHOUDHURI

and IA No.102657/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.102659/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

57 C.A. No.-646/2017III

THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. ANDANR. HEMANTIKA WAHI

VersusNAINABEN MADANSINH SHAPA ANDORS. PAREKH & CO.

58 C.A. No.-10910/2016IV-A

BAJAJ ALLIANZ LIFE INSURANCE CO.LTD. ASHWANI KUMAR

VersusMANJUNATH S. V. N. RAGHUPATHY{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

59 C.A.No.-4562-4564/2017XIV

THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH

Versus

JAYANTA CHAKRABORTY AND ORS. P. SOMA SUNDARAM, ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE,(MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA

Page 50: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 5{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR ON IA 1/2015 FOR ON IA 13/2017 and IANo.64344/2017-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS and IA No.64350/2017-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS [ PART HEARD ]

ConnectedC.A. No.-4880/2017XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. AND ORS. ABHA R. SHARMA[P-14]

Versus

SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH AND ORS. ANDORS.

ARPUTHAM ARUNA AND CO[R-1],ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1], A. SUMATHI[R-1],KRISHAN SINGH CHAUHAN[R-1]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A.No.-4878-4879/2017XVI

DEVENDRA RAJAK AND ORS. ARPUTHAM ARUNA AND CO[P-1]

Versus

SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH AND ORS.

SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1], ANIRUDDHA P.MAYEE[R-1][Caveat], [R-2][Caveat],[R-3][Caveat], [R-4][Caveat], [R-5][Caveat], M.SHOEB ALAM[R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10],[R-11], [R-12], [R-13], [R-14], [R-15], [R-16],[R-17], [R-18], [R-19]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A.No.-4876-4877/2017XVI

SCHEDULED CASTES/SCHEDULESTRIBES EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION .AND ANR.

KRISHAN SINGH CHAUHAN[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. ETC. ANDORS.

ARPUTHAM ARUNA AND CO[R-1],ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1], A. SUMATHI[R-1],ABHA R. SHARMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11], [R-12],[R-13], [R-14]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-4881/2017XVI

NARENDRA KUMAR AND ANR. A. SUMATHI

Versus

SUNIL KUMAR SINGH . AND ORS.ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[Caveat], ABHA R.SHARMA[R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11],[R-12], [R-13], [R-14], [R-15], [R-16], [R-17],[R-18], [R-19]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-4882/2017XVI

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. AND ORS. ABHA R. SHARMA[P-1]

VersusSUNIL KUMAR SINGH AND ORS. ANDORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[Caveat]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5247/2016IV-A

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH . ANDORS.

MISHRA SAURABH, KRISHAN SINGHCHAUHAN

Versus

R B RAI AND ORS.SANDEEP DEVASHISH DAS, GAURAVAGRAWAL, B. SRIDHAR, ANIRUDDHA P.MAYEE, LALITA KAUSHIK

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-11817/2016IV-A

DR. G.K. VERMA . AND ORS. SHASHI KIRAN

VersusDR. T.P. VAIDHYA . AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-11816/2016IV-A

MADHYA PRADESH ANUSUCHITJATI/JANJATI ADHIKARI EVAMKARAMCHARI SANGH .

SHASHI KIRAN

Versus

Page 51: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 5ANIL KUMAR SINGH . AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-11820/2016IV-A

RAM KUMAR DADORIYA . AND ORS. PRERNA MEHTA

VersusVISHWABANDHU CHAUDHARY . ANDORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-4833/2017IV

RAM CHANDER AND ORS. KRISHAN SINGH CHAUHAN[P-1][Pr]

VersusPOST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OFMEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCHAND ORS.

M. K. DUA[R-1][Pr], RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON[R-6][Pr]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } IA No.60803/2017-PERMISSION TO APPEAR ANDARGUE IN PERSON

ConnectedC.A. No.-701-704/2017IV-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS. SHASHI KIRAN

VersusMANISH TRIPATHI AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A.No.-11822-11825/2016IV-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDANR. SHASHI KIRAN

VersusDR. P. L. SHARMA AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, LALITA KAUSHIK{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A.No.-11837-11840/2016IV-A

STATE OF MP AND ORS. ETC. SHASHI KIRAN

Versus

DR. KEDAR SINGH TOMAR ANDORS.ETC. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A.No.-11842-11845/2016IV-A

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS. SHASHI KIRAN

Versus

PRAKASH CHANDRA JAIN AND ORS. LALITA KAUSHIK{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A.No.-11829-11832/2016IV-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS. ETC. SHASHI KIRAN

VersusDEVENDRA SINGH BHADORIYA ANDORS. ETC. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A.No.-11847-11850/2016IV-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ANDORS. ETC. SHASHI KIRAN

VersusSANTOSH KUMAR GUPTA AND ANR.ETC.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-11828/2016IV-A

YASHWANT KUMAR SHILPKAR SHASHI KIRAN

VersusSANTOSH KUMAR GUPTA . AND ORS.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

Page 52: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C)No.-11/2017

JAYANTA CHAKRABORTY AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

VersusY.P. SINGH, CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT.OF TRIPURA AND ANR. GOPAL SINGH[R-1], [R-2]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C)No.-13/2017

GENERAL OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEESWELFARE SOCIETY (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA

VersusY.P. SINGH, CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT.OF TRIPURA AND ANR. GOPAL SINGH[R-1], [R-2]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.110979/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTIONConnectedDiary No. 31145-2017IV-B

RISHI PAL AND ORS. KRISHAN SINGH CHAUHAN

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } IA No.102076/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

60 C.A. No.-1256/2017III

SOU. SHRADHA W/O SUMIT FOGLA ANAGHA S. DESAIVersusSUMIT S/O NARAYANPRASAD FOGLA CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

61 Crl.A.No.-1571-1573/2015II

RAKESH AGARWAL RAJEEV SHARMA

VersusHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATALLAHABAD SUNNY CHOUDHARY

62 C.A. No.-11943/2016III

PRABHAKAR DATTATRAY KHADILKARAND ANR. APARNA JHA

VersusVINAYAK GAJANAN PARANJAPE ANDANR. SHIRISH K. DESHPANDE, GAURAV AGRAWAL

63 Crl.A. No.-1156/2015II

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusTHOKCHAM KUNJE @TOLLEN SINGH{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.102409/2017-STAY APPLICATION and IANo.102412/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.102415/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

64 C.A. No.-5203/2016XI -A

ABDUL JAWAD M.F AND ANR. ZULFIKER ALI P. S[P-1]Versus

R. RAJ PRADEEP . AND ORS.HIMINDER LAL[R-1][Caveat], [R-2][Caveat],[R-3][Caveat], [R-4][Caveat], [R-5][Caveat],NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-6], P. V.DINESH[R-9], PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL[R-10]

FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 1/2016 FOR ON IA 2/2016ConnectedC.A.No.-5204-5205/2016XI -A

STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. ETC. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[P-1]

Versus

R. RAJ PRADEEP AND ORS. ETC. ANDORS.

HIMINDER LAL[R-1][Caveat], [R-15][Caveat],ZULFIKER ALI P. S[R-13], P. V. DINESH[R-19]

ConnectedC.A. No.-6055/2016XI -A

STATE OF KERALA JOGY SCARIA

VersusD. RAJAN AND ORS. V. K. SIDHARTHAN

ConnectedC.A. No.-6059/2016XI -A

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. JOGY SCARIA[P-1]

VersusD, RAJAN SECRETARY AND ORS. HIMINDER LAL[R-2][Caveat], [R-3][Caveat]

Page 53: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedC.A. No.-6057/2016XI -A

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. JOGY SCARIA[P-1]

VersusM.P PRAMOD . AND ORS. HIMINDER LAL[R-2], ZULFIKER ALI P. S[R-13]

ConnectedC.A. No.-6056/2016XI -A

THE STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. JOGY SCARIA

VersusFRANCIS KALAPPURACKKAL . AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No.-8460/2016XI -A

KERALA PANCHAYAT SECRETARIESASSOCIATION . AND ORS. ZULFIKER ALI P. S[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1], HIMINDERLAL[R-3], [R-4]

FOR DIRECTIONS ON IA 2/201665 C.A. No.-8426/2016

XIVASHES KIRAN PRASAD SARVESH SINGHVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA, [R-5]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 2/2017LIST THE MATTER TOP OF THE LIST.

66 C.A. No.-8172/2016III

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGHITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY IRRIGATIONDEPTT. AND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

Versus

KIRAN OMKAR KHARAT . AND ORS.BALAJI SRINIVASAN, [R-2], [R-3], POOJA DHAR,[R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11],[R-12]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER ON IA6/2017

67 C.A. No.-4940/2017XI -A

STATE OF ODISHA KRISHNAYAN SEN[P-1]VersusDR. (MRS.) BIDYUT PRAVA MISHRA ANDANR. SUDARSH MENON[R-1]

MR. SUDARSH MENON, ADVOCATE FILED APPLICATION FORCLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 78021/2017 MR. SUBHASISH MOHANTY,ADVOCATE FILED APPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA93130/2017, INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 93142/2017,CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 93149/2017 AND CLARIFICATION/DIRECTIONON IA 93153/2017 and IA No.113687/2017-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT and IANo.113691/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION and IA No.113699/2017-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT and IA No.113702/2017-APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONS

68 C.A.No.-9382-9384/2017III-A

IEL SUPREVISOR ASSOCIATION ETC.ETC. AND ANR. SATYA MITRA

VersusDUNCAN INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANR. BIMAL ROY JAD[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } As per Court's order dated 17.07.2017, the instantcivil appeal to be listed in the first week of September, 2017 at the top of the list.

69 C.A. No.-4938/2017IV-A

RAMAN KUMAR NAIR @ RAMAN KUMARCHOUKSEY PRAVEEN CHATURVEDI[P-1]

VersusDINESH KUMAR GUPTA AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2017 FOR EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. ON IA 2/2017

70 C.A. No.-629/2009XII

S. RAMANATHAN V. N. RAGHUPATHYVersus

GOVT. OF INDIA . AND ORS. SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN, SUSHMA SURI, BINUTAMTA, B. BALAJI

71 C.A. No.-1312/2009XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS.Versus

Page 54: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 5S.RAJU AND ORS. AND ORS. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR

72 C.A. No.-5911/2009XII

DIRECTOR, VECTOR CONTROLRESEARCH CENTRE AND ANR. ANDANR.

MADHU SIKRI

VersusK.MADHAVAN KUTTY NAIR AND ORS.AND ORS. NAVEEN R. NATH

73 C.A. No.-7557/2009XI -A

GEETHA LAKSHMI K K. RAJEEVVersusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. G. PRAKASH[R-1], VIPIN NAIR[R-2], [R-3]

74 C.A. No.-1849/2012XII

DR. T. MURUGAN MADHU SIKRIVersusTHE CHAIRMAN NAVODAYA VIDYALAYASAMITI AND ORS. AND ORS. S. RAJAPPA

FOR [I A FOR EARLY HEARING] ON IA 27466/201775 Crl.A. No.-1725/2015

II-AHARENDRA RAI ABHAY KUMARVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1726/2015II-A

HARENDRA RAI ABHAY KUMAR[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. GOPAL SINGH[R-1], SUNNY CHOUDHARY[R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8]

76 C.A. No.-134/2009XII

T.DHANPAL AND ORS. AND ORS. ANUP KUMARVersusDHANAPAL AND ANR. AND ANR. L. K. PANDEY

77 C.A. No.-10449/2011III-A

RAJENDRA KUMAR VERMA (D) TH.LRS. ASHA GOPALAN NAIRVersusADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE(CIVIL SUPPLIES) AND ORS. VINAY GARG, , BINU TAMTA[R-2]

LIST IN THE NEXT WEEK VIDE HON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 31.10.201778 C.A. No.-9318/2014

IVMUNISH KAKKAR MUKUL KUMARVersusNIDHI KAKKAR CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRIMEDIATION REPORT IS RECEIVED AS PER COURT'S ORDER DATED 14.08.2017.NOW LIST THE MATTER

79 C.A. No.-10854/2014XII

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION BINU TAMTAVersusM.SATHIYA PRIYA AND ORS. CHANDRA PRAKASHIA No.55625/2017-EARLY HEARING APPLICATION and

80 C.A. No.-6409/2017XV

KAILASH SINGH PRASHANT BHUSHANVersusTHE MANAGING COMMITTEE MAYOCOLLEGE AJMER AND ORS. AND ORS. RUCHI KOHLI, ANUJ BHANDARI

ConnectedC.A. No.-6410/2017XV

JEFFRY JOBARD JYOTI MENDIRATTA, RUCHI KOHLI

VersusTHE MANAGING COMMITTEE MAYOCOLLEGE AJMER AND ORS. AND ORS. SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA

81 C.A. No.-1473/2017XIV

VLS FINANCE LTD. BINA GUPTAVersusSOUTHEND INFRASTRUCTURE PVT.LTD. AND ANR.

SHANTANU SAGAR, BIRENDRA KUMARMISHRA

FOR GRANT OF INTERIM RELIEF ON IA 53940/2017

Page 55: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 5ConnectedC.A.No.-11111-11113/2017XIV

VLS FINANCE LTD. HARISH PANDEY

Versus

BMS IT INSTITUTE PVT. LTD. . AND ORS.ABHAY KUMAR[IMPL], DIVYAKANTLAHOTI[R-2], TATINI BASU[R-4], [R-5], [R-6],[R-7], [R-8], [R-9]

IA No.67125/2017-VACATING STAY and and IA No.67123/2017-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

82 C.A. No.-1936/2006XII-A

B. LAXMAIAH (SINCE DEAD) BY LRS. Y. RAJA GOPALA RAOVersusRAJAIAH . AND ORS. NEERU VAID, SHADAN FARASAT

ConnectedC.A. No.-1937/2006XII-A

B. LAXMAIAH (DEAD) BY LRS. Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO

VersusYADAIAH (DEAD) BY L.R.

83 C.A. No.-1900/2010XVI

PARGAN SINGH T. MAHIPALVersusBHIKHAR SINGH @ SUDARSHAN SINGH BRIJ BHUSHANand IA No.62622/2017-XTRA and IA No.62625/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.70066/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTSand IA No.70067/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

84 Crl.A. No.-2286/2010II-B

JASBIR SINGH RAJIV MEHTAVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB KULDIP SINGH

85 Crl.A. No.-10/2011II-B

HARJINDER SINGH SANJAY JAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-371/2013II-B

MANJIT SINGH PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(Crl)No.-2787-2788/2016II-B

SATWANT SINGH PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 5355/2016 FOR CONDONATIONOF DELAY IN REFILING ON IA 5359/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 6126/2016

86 Crl.A. No.-2393/2014II-C

KHUB RAM M. C. DHINGRA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AJAY MARWAH[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-200/2015II-C

RAM SINGH NARESH KUMAR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHAND ANR. AJAY MARWAH, [R-1]

FOR SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE ON IA 1672/2015

87 C.A. No.-8505/2014XIV

CAPTAIN G.S. BINDRA PETITIONER-IN-PERSON, APPELLANT-IN-PERSON[P-1]

VersusAIR INDIA THROUGH CHAIRMAN CUMMANAGING DIRECTOR NATIONALAVIATION COMPANY OF INDIA

MUDIT SHARMA[R-1][Caveat]

{Fixed Date for 09-11-2017 } FOR ON IA 28040/2013 FOR ON IA 3/2013 FOR ON IA5/2014 and IA No.95817/2017-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS

Page 56: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

NEW DELHI03-11-2017 16:56:58

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 57: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 30 OF 2017 FROM : 07-11-2017 To 09-11-2017

COURT NO. : 6HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANREGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate

1 Crl.A.No.-142-144/2008II-C

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1]

Versus

MOHAMMED SAFI AND ORS.A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[R-1], REVATHYRAGHAVAN[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-6], [R-8],BALAJI SRINIVASAN[R-7]

2 C.A.No.-4616-4617/2009XII-A

VASANT CHEMICALS LTD. KRISHNA KUMAR

VersusHYDERABAD METROPOLITAN WATERSUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD THEMANAGING DIRECTOR

D. BHARATHI REDDY, N. L. GANAPATHI

ConnectedC.A.No.-4618-4619/2009XII-A

VASANT CHEMICALS LIMITED (EARLIERVASANT ORGANICS LTD.) KRISHNA KUMAR

VersusTHE MANAGING DIRECTORHYDERABAD METROPOLITAN WATERSUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD ANDORS.

D. BHARATHI REDDY

3 C.A. No.-5822/2005XVI

PASUPATI NATH DAS(DEAD) SATISH KUMAR, ZULFIKER ALI P. S[P-1][LR/S]VersusCHANCHAL KUMAR DAS(D) THR. LRSAND ORS.

SHIPRA GHOSE, SHEKHAR KUMAR, PARTHASIL

As per Court's order dated 19.9.2017 adjourned by one week(not taken up)4 Crl.A. No.-543/2011

II-BJAFEL BISWAS . AND ORS. G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL CHANCHAL KUMAR GANGULI[R-1]

5 Crl.A. No.-1039/2007II-B

ROJINA BEGAM V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]Versus

FIROZ MUNSHI AND ORS. SATISH VIG[R-1], NANDINI SEN MUKHERJEE,[R-1]

6 C.A. No.-871/2011IV

PARAMJIT KAUR . AND ANR. KULDIP SINGHVersusDULLA SINGH (D) BY LR. UGRA SHANKAR PRASADshown in weekly list. Court no. 7, item no. 40

7 C.A. No.-5166/2010IV

VEENA KUMARI ABHISHEK ATREYVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. KULDIP SINGH, UTTARA BABBAR[R-1]

8 Crl.A. No.-1426/2009II

HUSSAIN SHAH MUKESH KUMAR SHARMAVersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. PURNIMA BHAT

Page 58: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 11067/2006 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING ON IA 13858/2006

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1427/2009II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN HOMESECRETART MILIND KUMAR

Versus

RAM LALPURNIMA BHAT[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11], [R-12],[R-13], [R-14], [R-15], [R-16], [R-17], [R-18],[R-19]

9 Crl.A. No.-2075/2009II

VISHRAM GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.MILIND KUMAR[R-1], PRAVEEN SWARUP[R-2],[R-3], [R-5], KRISHAN SINGH CHAUHAN[R-4],SUBHASH SHARMA[R-6]

10 C.A. No.-8427/2009IV-A

KEMPAIAH VAIJAYANTHI GIRISHVersusM.NANJUNDAPPA @ M. NANJUNDAREDDY AND ORS. S. N. BHAT

11 C.A. No.-268/2008XI -A

SRI. GANGADHARAN . AND ORS. A. RAGHUNATH[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6]

VersusDEVAKI . AND ORS. K. RAJEEV[R-1]and IA No.68357/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.68359/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

12 Crl.A. No.-462/2012II

HARAK CHAND AND ORS. VIKAS MEHTAVersusHIMMAT MAL GANDHI . AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR, [R-2][Gr]

13 C.A. No.-464/2008IX

SHRI VITHAL SHETKARI SAHAKARI SUTG.LTD. RABIN MAJUMDER[P-1]

VersusMAHADEO PARMESHWAR MALI ANDORS. AND ORS.

SHIVAJI M. JADHAV[R-1], NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-1]

14 Crl.A. No.-1499/2008II

LATIF KHAN HASAN ANZAR[P-1][Pr]VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR[R-1][Gr]READY

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1501/2008II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR

VersusNAHAR SINGH K. SARADA DEVIREADY

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1500/2008II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR

VersusSHAKTI SINGHREADY

15 Crl.A. No.-1190/2009II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH B. S. BANTHIAVersusHARJEET SINGH AND ANR. PARMANAND GAUR, [R-2]

16 C.A. No.-3890/2010III-A

M/S OUDH SUGAR MILLS LTD. PRAVEEN KUMARVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SUSHMA SURI, MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAand IA No.90234/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedC.A. No.-3891/2010III-A

M/S. OUDH SUGAR MILLS LTD. PRAVEEN KUMAR

Versus

Page 59: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ANR. SUSHMA SURI, [R-2]

and FOR AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 90239/201717 Crl.A. No.-572/2009

IIM/S. MEGA MOTORS (CVD) ABHAY KUMARVersus

RAVI KANT AND ANR. MANIK KARANJAWALA, JATINDER KUMARBHATIA

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-574/2009II

M/S. MEGA MOTORS (CVD) ABHAY KUMAR

Versus

M/S. TATA MOTORS LTD. AND ORS. MANIK KARANJAWALA, JATINDER KUMARBHATIA

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-573/2009II

M/S. MEGA MOTORS (CVD) ABHAY KUMAR

Versus

STANDARD CHARTERED BANK ARUN KUMAR BERIWAL, MANIKKARANJAWALA, GAGAN GUPTA

18 C.A. No.-2231/2011IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXKARNATAKAII ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. MOVIE EXHIBITORS

ConnectedC.A. No.-2232/2011IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusM/S. MOVIE EXHIBITOR (AOP-II)

19 Crl.A. No.-216/2008II-B

MANJINDER SINGH R. P. WADHWANI[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. JASPREET GOGIA[R-1], M. K. GARG[R-2], PREMMALHOTRA[R-1], [R-3]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-217/2008II-B

THE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[P-1]

VersusCHAMKAUR SINGH AND ANR. M. K. GARG[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.-2658/2008II-B

DURLABH SINGH PREM MALHOTRA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

20 Crl.A. No.-517/2009II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMARVersusHIRA KHAN AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN

21 Crl.A. No.-2024/2008II-C

PAPPATHI @ KUPPATHAL S. RAVI SHANKAR[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1], GEETHAKOVILAN[R-2][Pr], [R-3][Pr], [R-4][Pr], [R-5][Pr],[R-6][Pr], [R-7][Pr]

22 C.A. No.-1220/2006IV-A

HANUMESH V. N. RAGHUPATHYVersusCHANNAMMA C. V. SUBBA RAO

23 Crl.A. No.-1711/2008II-B

THE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[P-1]VersusAMRIT LAL JAIN ANR ANR. AND ANR. P. N. PURI[R-1], AJAY KUMAR SINGH[R-2]

24 Crl.A. No.-1465/2009II-C

HIMANSHU PRASHANT KUMARVersusB. SHIVAMURTHY AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-2][Gr]FOR ON IA 10878/2009

Page 60: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6

25 C.A. No.-629/2008III-A

DAKSHINANCHAL VIDYUT VITRANNIGAM LTD.AND ORS. THROUGH ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR AND ORS.

PRADEEP MISRA, [P-2], [P-3]

VersusNEERAJ JAIN MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF

26 Crl.A. No.-2424/2010II-B

STATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGHVersusSEHRUDEEN @ SEHRU ABHISTH KUMAR[R-2]

27 Crl.A. No.-1581/2008II-A

SABU @ SHAHBUDDIN B. K. SATIJAVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

28 Crl.A. No.-1961/2009II-A

RAJU AMBADAS GANGEKAR K. N. RAIVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

29 C.A. No.-4688/2009IV

BHAGWANTI AND ORS. A. P. MOHANTYVersusARJAN SINGH(DEAD) THROUGH LRS. P. N. PURI

30 C.A.No.-5901-5902/2009XII

GANESAN (D) TH:LRS. S. MAHENDRAN

VersusKALANJIAM . AND ORS. K. K. MANI

31 C.A. No.-208/2007IV-A

BESAHNI KEWAT (D) THR LR. MANJEET KIRPALVersusDADNU (D) TH:LRS. AND ORS. AFTAB ALI KHAN, MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF

32 C.A. No.-5628/2007XII

M/S TVS MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED RADHA RANGASWAMYVersusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX COMPANY CIRCLE III(2) B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

33 C.A. No.-4013/2007XIV

K.S.MANI VIJAY KUMARVersusM.N.SUKUMARAN V. G. PRAGASAM

34 C.A.No.-8469-8475/2009XII-A

V. LINGAMMA AND ORS. BRIJ BHUSHAN

Versus

GOVT. OF A.P. AND ORS.VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES, C. K.SUCHARITA, [R-2][Gr], [R-3][Gr], [R-4][Gr],[R-5][Gr]

35 C.A. No.-999/2007X

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. MOOL CHAND INDUS. ESTATEP.LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SHRIMOOL CHAND AGARWAL

SANJAY JAIN

AT TOPConnectedC.A. No.-1000/2007X

MINISTRY OF FINANCE SECRETARY B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S BHAWANI PLASTICS ITSPROPRIETOR SHRI SUDEEP AGARWAL SANJAI KUMAR PATHAK

ConnectedC.A. No.-1003/2007X

UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OFREVENUE JOINT SECRETARY (TRU) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusINDO GERMAN BRAKES PVT. LTD.DIRECTOR SH. VIPUL DAWAL

Page 61: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6

ConnectedC.A. No.-1002/2007X

UNION OF INDIA .DEPARTMENT OFREVENUE CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISEAND CUSTOMS (CDEC) JOINTSECRETARY AND ANR.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusWHALE STATIONERY PRODUCTS LTD.C.E.O. SHRI MUKESH GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No.-1005/2007X

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THESECRETARY (TRU) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. INDIAN RUBBER PRODUCTSTHROUGH ITS PARTNER M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedC.A. No.-1011/2007X

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS JOINTSECRETARY (TRU) AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusWHALE GRAPHIC (INDIA) P. LTD.THROUGH ITS CEO SHRI MUKESHGUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No.-1015/2007X

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE JOINTSECRETARY (TRU) AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. TITAN INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ORS. RAJAN NARAIN

ConnectedC.A. No.-1013/2007X

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE JOINTSECRETARY B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S INDIAN LPG CYLINDERS (A UNITOF VISHAL EQUITY SERVICES PVT.LTD.) THROUGH GENERAL MANAGERSHRI H

ConnectedC.A. No.-1412/2007X

UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. B.K. WIRE INDUSTRIES LTD. DEBASIS MISRA

ConnectedC.A. No.-1414/2007X

ASST. COMMNR., CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S STEEL POINT SOLE PROPRIETORSHRI A.K. ARORA

ConnectedC.A. No.-2111/2007X

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFFINANCE THROUGH ITS SECRETARY B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S SHAKTI STEELS . AND ORS. SANJAY JAIN

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-7315/2007X

SECY.,DEPT.OF REVENUE,C.B.E.C. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND RABIN MAJUMDER

ConnectedC.A. No.-2824/2007X

UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OFINDUSTRIAL POLICY AND PROMOTIONMINISTRY OF COMMERCE ANDINDUSTRIES AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusMAHINDRA MANAGING DIRECTOR E. C. AGRAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-2823/2007X

JOINT SEC.TO THE GOVT.OF INDIA ANDORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S ZEBRA ZIPPERS PVT LIMITED SHRIRAMESH KUMAR ARORA

Page 62: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No.-2822/2007X

JOINT SECRETARY, MIN.OF COMMERCEAND INDUSTRIES AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. FORBES GOKAK LIMITED ANDORS. M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-13159/2007X

M/S. SANT STEEL AND ALLOYRS PVT.LTD. SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA

VersusGOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND ORS.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-23674/2007X

L. V HEAT EXCHANGERS M. P. DEVANATH

VersusGOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

36 Crl.A. No.-1041/2007II-C

SHIVARAJ . AND ANR. SUPREETA SHARANAGOUDA, [P-1], [P-2]VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S., [R-1]

37 C.A. No.-8694/2009XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYARVersusMANGLAM RICINUS LTD. THROUGHTHE MANAGING DIRECTOR SHALLY BHASIN

ConnectedC.A. No.-5014/2015III-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ZILA SAHKARI BANK LTD.

38 C.A. No.-1303/2010IV-A

S.V.GURURAJ NANDA KISHOREVersusK.G.SRINATH PRABHU . AND ORS.FOR ON IA 47207/2013

39 Crl.A. No.-2046/2009II-B

SANJIV KUMAR KAILASH CHANDVersusSTATE OF PUNJAB KULDIP SINGH

40 C.A. No.-7334/2010XII

ARUCHAMY GOUNDER @ARUMUGHAM(D)TH:LR AND ORS. V. BALACHANDRAN[P-1]

VersusM. BALASUBRAMANIAM VIKAS MEHTA[R-1]and IA No.92110/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.92111/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

41 Crl.A. No.-579/2011II-C

MOHD. SADIQ ANSARI DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHAVersusTHE STATE (GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI)FOR ON IA 93374/2010

42 C.A. No.-812/2011XIV

ARUN KHOSLA M. A. CHINNASAMY[P-1]VersusGURUCHARAN SINGHFOR WITHDRAWL OF CASE ON IA 2/2014

43 C.A. No.-8122/2013XII

COMMR.OF I.T CHENNAI-IV B. V. BALARAM DASVersusM/S IDEAL ENTERTAINMENT P.LTD.THROUGH ITS M.D. R. CHANDRACHUD

44 Crl.A. No.-1264/2011II-C

DHASIM @ MOHAMMAD DHASIM A. VENAYAGAM BALANVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.-4853/2016II-C

SYED ALI AND ANR. T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR[P-1], ANANTHANARAYANA M.G.[P-2]

Versus

Page 63: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6STATE M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]FOR FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 5045/2017 and IA No.112952/2017-XTRA

45 C.A. No.-7840/2011III-A

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX(INV.) AND ORS.

ANIL KATIYAR, PAREKH & CO., [P-1], [P-2],[P-3], [P-4]

VersusM.D. OVEREAS LIMITED THROUGH ITSDIRECTORHon'ble Court vide order dated 18.11.2011 directed to High Court to disposed ofW.P. No. 75 of 2010 and connected matters expeditiously and High Court informedvide letter dated 16.5.2014 Writ Petition No. 75 of 2010 and other connectedmatters have been dismissed on 12.9.2013.

46 Crl.A. No.-603/2012II-B

FATTA AND ORS. KAILASH CHAND, SHREE PAL SINGH,SATYENDRA KUMAR

VersusSTATE OF HARYANA SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[R-1][Gr]WITH GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 8191/2017

47 C.A. No.-2723/2015III

DIST.COLLECTOR SATARA AND ANR. ASHA GOPALAN NAIRVersus

MANGESH NIVRUTTI KASHIDSHIRISH K. DESHPANDE, R. V.KAMESHWARAN, GAGAN GUPTA, C. S. N.MOHAN RAO, ANIL KUMAR TANDALE

ConnectedC.A. No.-2727/2015III

VISHNUPANT MOTABA KESARKAR RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI

VersusMADHUKAR GOPAL YALGAR . AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A.No.-2730-2731/2015III

KRISHNA DHONDU PARKAR ABHA R. SHARMA

Versus

ABDUL KAYYUM TAMBOLI & ORS. ETC. NARESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-2732/2015III

SUPRADA PRAKASH PHATERPEKAR SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

Versus

VANITA SATISH ACHARYA . AND ORS. ANIL KUMAR, SUCHITRA ATUL CHITALE, AJITSHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No.-2728/2015III

SUJATA RAJESH PATHAK SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusJYOTI MAHENDRA VAITY . AND ORS. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

ConnectedC.A. No.-2734/2015III

LALITA K YADAV @ NEE LALITAT.KAMBLE RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE

VersusSANJIVANI SANJAY NATE . AND ORS. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

ConnectedC.A. No.-2733/2015III

ABHIJIT PRABHAKAR TAYSHETTE SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

VersusSAMBHAJI YASHWANT ARADE AND ORS. ANAGHA S. DESAI

ConnectedC.A.No.-2735-2736/2015III

SYED MUJAHID IQBAL LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH

Versus

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS. CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI, NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedC.A.No.-2724-2725/2015III

DILIP ANKOLEKAR GURUDATTA

Versus

SYED ABDULLA SYED YASIN . AND ORS. D. M. NARGOLKAR

Page 64: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No.-2726/2015III

SYED ABDULLA SYED YASIN D. M. NARGOLKAR

VersusDILIP S/O DADASAHEB RANDHVE . ANDORS.

ConnectedC.A. No.-2729/2015III

SOU UMA UDAY HINGAMIRE SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusAPASARA JAKEER PATHAN . AND ORS. NARESH KUMAR, ANIL KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-2738/2015III

NARESH MAHADEV BOKADE MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

ConnectedC.A. No.-2737/2015III

SANJAY KUMAR SITARAM KAKDE K. N. RAI

VersusNARENDRA SAMPATLAL GOLECHHA .AND ORS. AMIT SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No.-2739/2015III

NILAM VIKAS DOLAS SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI

VersusCAST SCRUTINY VERIFICATIONCOMMITTEE &AN

ConnectedC.A. No.-2741/2015III

SACHIN PRALHAD CHAVAN SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

VersusMADAN BANDOPANT CHODANKAR .AND ORS. VISHWAJIT SINGH

ConnectedC.A. No.-2740/2015III

GEETA SHRIKRISHNA CHAVAN AMOL NIRMALKUMAR SURYAWANSHI[P-1]

VersusMINAL MOHAN LOKEGAONKAR . ANDORS.

UDAY B. DUBE[R-1], GAGAN GUPTA[R-1],BHARGAVA V. DESAI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-2742/2015III

SWATI SHRIKANT AMBEKAR SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusKAVITA VIJAY DEGAONKAR AND ORS.

48 Crl.A. No.-14/2013II-C

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusR.M.SHARMA (IC 28420W) AND ANR. SHEKHAR KUMARONLY CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 796-797/2016 (DIARY NO. 4586/2014 TO BELISTED BEFORE THE LD. REGISTRAR FOR COMPLIANCE (ORIGINAL RECORDNOT YET RECEIVED).

ConnectedCrl.A.No.-796-797/2016II-C

EX. COL. R.M.SHARMA SHEKHAR KUMAR

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

49 Crl.A.No.-1046-1062/2012II-A

THE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJI

Versus

AJAY SINGH AND ORS.CHANDRA PRAKASH, POOJA DHAR, [R-3],[R-5], [R-9], [R-11], [R-12], [R-13], [R-14], [R-15],[R-16], [R-17], [R-18], [R-19], [R-20], [R-21],[R-22], [R-23]

ConnectedCrl.A.No.-1079-1094/2012II-A

KISHUN CHOUDHARY AND ORS. GAURAV AGRAWAL, SHANTANU SAGAR,RAJEEV SINGH

Versus

Page 65: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6STATE OF BIHAR . AND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI

50 C.A. No.-2165/2012IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ESSAR TELEHOLDINGS LTD.THROUGH ITS MANAGER E. C. AGRAWALA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } At request, the matters stand adjourned to31.10.2017 as per record of proceeding dt. 4.10.2017.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-36560/2012IX

. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S HINDUJA VENTRUES LTD. V. N. RAGHUPATHY{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-117/2015XIV

C.I.T-III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SELECT HOLIDAY RESORTS P.LTD. KAVITA JHA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5101/2012IX

C.I.T-5 MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ESSAR INVESTMENTS LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-118/2015XIV

C.I.T-V ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6727/2015XIV

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S H.B. PORTFOLIO LTD.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-119/2015XIV

C.I.T-IV NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusESCOTRAC FIN. AND INVESTMENT P.LTD. ARUNA GUPTA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-116/2015XIV

C.I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SUN INVESTMENTS P.LTD. KAVITA JHA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-194/2015XIV

COMM. OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI-IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDCM SHRIRAM CONSOLIDATED LTD. NAVEEN KUMAR{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-114/2015XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI-IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusESCORTS FINANCE INVESTMENTS ANDLEASING ARUNA GUPTA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-120/2015XIV

C.I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI

Page 66: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-7395/2012XIV

C.I.T.-IV, NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S DCM SHRIRAM CONSOLIDATEDLTD. JAGDISH KUMAR CHAWLA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-7394/2012XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMOHAIR INVESTMENT AND TRADINGCO.P.LTD. KAVITA JHA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-121/2015XIV

C.I.T.,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S CHEMINVEST LTD. KAVITA JHA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-122/2015XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusCHEMINVEST LTD. KAVITA JHA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C)No.-8507-8509/2012IX

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

MANOJ V WADHWA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-110-112/2015XIV

EICHER MOTORS LTD. ETC KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMR.OF I.T NEW DELHI{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-104-109/2015XIV

MAXOPP INVESTMENT LTD.. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMR.OF I.T NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-128/2015XIV

C.I.T -III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSUN INVESTMENTS P.LTD. KAVITA JHA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-115/2015XIV

C.I.T-IV NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusINDIAN SUGAR EXIM CORP.LTD. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-21294/2012IX

C.I.T-4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S WALLFORT FINANCIAL SERVICESLTD B. S. BANTHIA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-113/2015XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSTAINLESS INVESTMENTS LTD.

Page 67: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-7797/2012XIV

C.I.T DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-381/2013XIV

C.I.T-II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S JALCO FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT.LTD. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-7426/2012XIV

COMM. OF INCOME TAX-II,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S LIQUID INVESTMENT ANDTRADING CO. LTD. KAVITA JHA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-123/2015XIV

COMMR. OF INCOME TAX DELHI III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SUNRAYS PROPERTIES ANDINVESTMENT CO. PVT. LTD. RAJIV TYAGI

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-6590/2015XIV

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S SUNRAYS PROPERTIES ANDINVESTMENT CO. PVT. LTD. RAJIV TYAGI

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-8195/2012XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S AMWAY INDIA ENTERPRISES PVTLTD{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-126/2015XIV

C.I.T DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusESCORTS FINANCE LTD. ARUNA GUPTA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8800/2012XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusEICHER LTD. KAVITA JHA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-3273/2013XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S AMWAY INDIA ENTERPRISESPVT.LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedSLP(C) No.-10986/2013XVI

CIT-CENTRAL-II, KOLKATA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. DHUNSERI PETR. KHAITAN & CO.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

Page 68: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No.-124/2015XIV

C.I.T.,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusEICHER LTD. KAVITA JHA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-1101/2013XIV

C.I.T.III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S KAMA HOLDING LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-129/2015XIV

C.I.T. DELHI-V ANIL KATIYAR

VersusORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-125/2015XIV

C.I.T.-II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJAY PEE VENTURES PVT. LTD. KAVITA JHA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-3267/2013XIV

C.I.T DELHI I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAPOLLO FINANCE LTD. RAJIV TYAGI{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-127/2015XIV

C.I.T.-VI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSTATE TRADING CROP. LTD. MUNAWWAR NASEEM{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-4308/2014III

C.I.T. -6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S CROMPTON GREAVES LTD. POOJA DHAR[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.97969/2017-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-21844/2013IX

C.I.T. -6 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S CROMPTON GREAVES LTD. POOJA DHAR[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.97967/2017-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-19614/2013IX

C.I.T.-2 MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHDFC BANK LTD., MUMBAI KHAITAN & CO.[Caveat]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-21845/2013IX

C.I.T. MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S RELIANCE INFOCOMINFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-6313/2013III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S CEAT LTD. PUNIT DUTT TYAGI, [R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

Page 69: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No.-5469/2013III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S CROMPTON GREAVES LTD. POOJA DHAR[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.97974/2017-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedC.A. No.-6733/2013III

C.I.T INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT 6 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S CEAT LTD. PUNIT DUTT TYAGI[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5471/2013III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S CROMPTON GREAVES LTD. POOJA DHAR[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.97979/2017-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedC.A. No.-5470/2013III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S CROMPTON GREAVES LTD. POOJA DHAR[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.97954/2017-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedC.A. No.-6191/2013III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S JINDAL SOUTH WEST HOLDINGLTD.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8921/2013III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX-7,MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NATIONAL SECURITIES CLEARINGCORPORATION LIMITED{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6192/2013III

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL-III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSHANTI SARUP RENIWAL{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-7169/2013III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S CROMPTON GREAVES LTD POOJA DHAR[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.97971/2017-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedC.A. No.-7166/2013III

COMMISSIONER ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusCROMPTON GREAVES LTD POOJA DHAR[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.97973/2017-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedC.A. No.-3355/2015III

C.I.T.,MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S INSTANT HOLDINGS LTD{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

Page 70: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No.-7167/2013III

CIT MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ESSAR TELEHOLDING LTD E. C. AGRAWALA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8376/2013III

THE COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX 10 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGODREJ INDUSTRIES LTD RAJIV TYAGI{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-7172/2013III

C.I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHINDUSTAN CONS. CO. LTD BINA GUPTA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-7170/2013III

C.I.T.-III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BOMBAY RAYON FASHIONS LTD{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-9183/2013III

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S KOHINOOR PROJECTS PVT.LTD.THROUGH ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8341/2013III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 10 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO.LTD BINA GUPTA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-7168/2013III

C.I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S JAYNEER CAPITAL PVT LTD{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8256/2013III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GOODLASS NEROLAC PAINTS LTD(KANSAI NEROLAC PAINTS LTD) BINA GUPTA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-7171/2013III

C.I.T.-10,MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S CITICORP FINANCE (I) LTD RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-7974/2013III

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S JAYNEER CAPITAL PVT LTD{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8342/2013III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MAZAGAON DOCK LTD BIMAL ROY JAD{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

Page 71: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No.-7173/2013III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusIL AND FS TRANSPORTATIONNETWORKS LTD VIJAY KUMAR

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-8343/2013III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BAKLIWAL FINANCIAL SERVICES (I)PVT LTD{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8933/2013III

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXMUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S IL FS TRANSPORTATION NETWORKLTD. VIJAY KUMAR

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-8909/2013III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MAHINDRA LIFESPACEDEVELOPERS LTD. S. GOWTHAMAN

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-9832/2013III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IIMUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S THE INDIAN HUME PIPE CO. LTDTHROUGH ITS DIRECTOR ASHOK MATHUR

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-9833/2013III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 7MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS ANDINFRASTRUCTURE LTD. THROUGH ITSDIRECTOR

E. C. AGRAWALA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-9184/2013III

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXMUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S RELIANCE INNOVENTURES PVT.LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR E. C. AGRAWALA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-3359/2015III

C.I.T.-VII,MAHARASHTRA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S HERTZ CHEMICALS LTD{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-10096/2013III

C.I.T-II MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHDFC BANK LTD.MUMBAI KHAITAN & CO.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-130/2015XIV

M/S ESTER INDUSTRIES LTD BRAJESH KUMAR

VersusCIT ANIL KATIYAR{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

Page 72: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No.-8596/2014III

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHDFC BANK LTD. KHAITAN & CO.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-36388/2014IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL IV ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S DEEPAK FERTILIZERS ANDPETROCHEMICALS CORP. LTD SHALLY BHASIN[R-1]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-3781/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5BOMBAY ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ESSAR INVESTMENTS LTD E. C. AGRAWALA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-1423/2015IV

M/S AVON CYCLES LTD RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } service is complete.ConnectedC.A. No.-3358/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NATIONAL COMMODITY ANDDERIVATIVES EXCHANGE LIMITED K ASHAR & CO.

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedSLP(C) No.-18398/2015IX

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S KALIMATI INVESTMENT CO. LTD. RAJAN NARAIN{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } MAIN MATTER- CIVIL APPEAL NO 2165/2012.

ConnectedC.A. No.-6294/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6,MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. CHURU TRADING CO. PVT. LTD.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-19303/2015IX

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ESSAR INVESTMENTS LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-20478/2015IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S KALIMATI INVESTMENT CO. LTD. RAJAN NARAIN{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-7892/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusL AND T WELFARE COMPANY LTD.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-9251/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-10,MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. GODREJ AGROVET LTD. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

Page 73: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No.-9252/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BENNETT COLEMAN AND CO. LTD. BIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-14525/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 10 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTIONS CO. LTD BINA GUPTA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8178/2016III

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II THANE ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S JAWAHARLAL NEHRU PORT TRUST AJAY SHARMA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8177/2016III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S FIRESTONE INTERNATIONAL PVT.LTD. CHANDRA PRAKASH

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-3279/2016III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6,MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S KOHINOOR PROJECTS PVT LTD{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-23624/2016IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. KANSAI NEROLAC PAINTS LTD. BINA GUPTA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-16185/2016IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S CENTURY TEXTILES ANDINDUSTRIES LTD SYED SHAHID HUSSAIN RIZVI

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5044/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5417/2016III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-10,MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SBI GLOBAL FACTORS LTD.(PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS M/S. GLOBALTRADE FINANCE LTD. )

PRAVEEN SWARUP

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedSLP(C) No.-31417/2016XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 8 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusSUNRAYS PROPERTIES ANDINVESTMENT CO. PVT. LTD. RAJIV TYAGI[R-1]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-6019/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-V ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

Page 74: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-26278/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMANSROVER INVESTMENTS LTD.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-27054/2016III

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX-1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusD B CORP LTD. KAVITA JHA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-4243/2017IX

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S URBAN INFRASTRUCTUREHOLDING PVT. LTD. THROUGHMANAGING DIRECTOR{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-8918/2017IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. CROMPTON GREAVES LTD. POOJA DHAR[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.97964/2017-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedC.A. No.-4539/2017III

PR. COMMISSONER OF INCOME TAX 3,CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BALLARPUR INDUSTRIES LTD KHAITAN & CO.[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-19098-/2017XIV

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 7COMMISSIONER ANIL KATIYAR

VersusPTC INDIA LTD PRAVEEN SWARUP[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } IA No.45647/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.45648/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17499-/2017XIV

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 7 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusPTC INDIA LTD. PRAVEEN SWARUP[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION AND I.R.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-25337-/2017XIV

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S HT MEDIA LTD{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ONIA 49025/2017

ConnectedDiary No. 19735-2017XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMALANA POWER CO. LTD{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } IA No.88764/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.88771/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.88768/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

Page 75: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedSLP(C) No.-20475-/2017IV-B

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX PATIALA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSTATE BANK OF PATIALA ALJO K. JOSEPH[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-23123-/2017IV-B

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

STATE BANK OF PATIALA ALJO K. JOSEPH[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } IA No.74705/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.74707/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.74706/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

51 C.A. No.-1399/2013XVII

U O I . AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusMAJOR RABINDRA SINGH RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALFOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2013

ConnectedC.A. No.-2806/2013XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

VersusBIRENDRA SINGH TOMAR (RETD. . ANDORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[Caveat]

ConnectedC.A. No.-10657/2013XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

VersusMAJ SHIV KUMAR AND ORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALFOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2013

52 C.A. No.-356/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.VersusC.I.T. AND ANR. ANIL KATIYARAT TOP

ConnectedC.A. No.-387/2015III

C.I.T 8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. JAY SAVLA

ConnectedC.A. No.-388/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. THROUGHITS DIRECTOR JAY SAVLA

ConnectedC.A. No.-380/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX V ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. THROUGHITS MANAGER JAY SAVLA

ConnectedC.A. No.-381/2015III

COMM. OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. THROUGHITS MANAGER JAY SAVLA

ConnectedC.A. No.-384/2015III

COMM. OF INCOME TAX-VIII, MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. JAY SAVLA

ConnectedC.A. No.-386/2015III

COMM. OF INCOME TAX VIII ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMONOSANTO INDIA LTD. JAY SAVLA

Page 76: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6

ConnectedC.A. No.-383/2015III

COMM. OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMONSANTO INDIA LTD. THROUGH ITSMANAGER JAY SAVLA

ConnectedC.A. No.-382/2015III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. THROUGHM.D. JAY SAVLA

ConnectedC.A. No.-385/2015III

C.I.T-V MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. JAY SAVLA

ConnectedC.A. No.-361-363/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusC.I.T. AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-357/2015IV-A

M/S. INDO AMERICAL EXPORTS SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusC.I.T. AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No.-366-367/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusC.I.T. AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No.-358-360/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusC.I.T. AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No.-374-376/2015IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT.LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No.-368-373/2015IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusC.I.T AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-377/2015III

C.I.T VIII ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. JAY SAVLA

ConnectedC.A. No.-378/2015III

C.I.T VIII ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. JAY SAVLA

ConnectedC.A. No.-379/2015III

C.I.T-VIII MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MONSANTO INDIA LTD. JAY SAVLA

ConnectedC.A. No.-389/2015IV-A

M/S INDO AMERICAN EXPORTS SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

Page 77: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-4584/2015IV-A

M/S ADVANTA INDIA LIMITED (NOWKNOWN AS ADVANTA LIMITED)THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR MR. VIKRAMR. SHROFF

PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101654/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No.-4579/2015IV-A

M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE 11(4) AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101667/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No.-4578/2015IV-A

M/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101664/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No.-4583/2015IV-A

M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM, [P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX . ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101644/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLEConnectedSLP(C) No.-4577/2015IV-A

M/S. UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

List alongwith C.A. No. 356 of 2015 and other connected mattersConnectedSLP(C) No.-4582/2015IV-A

M/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

and IA No.101655/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-4585/2015IV-A

M/S ADVANTA INDIA LIMITED (NOWKNOWN AS M/S. ADVANTA LIMITED) PRAVEENA GAUTAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

and IA No.101658/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-7567/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ADVANTA LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101669/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-6463/2015IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ADVANTA LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101683/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedC.A. No.-1954/2015IV-A

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT TO BE LISTED

Page 78: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedSLP(C) No.-7566/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT. LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.List alongwith C.A. No. 356 of 2017

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-6464/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ADVANTA LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.106019/2017-XTRA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-8509/2015IV-A

THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, RANGE-2 KARNATAKA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-8510/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -(OSD) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-9948/2015IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I,BANGALORE AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ADVANTA LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101668/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-7558/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ADVANTA LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101679/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-7557/2015IV-A

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, BANGALORE ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-19939/2015IV-A

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-9950/2015IV-A

THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX (OSD), RANGE-2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-9949/2015IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - IBANGALORE . AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101686/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-11727/2015IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S UPL LTD. PRAVEENA GAUTAMand IA No.101675/2017-AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CCNo.-3547/2016IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS PVT. LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX A. N. ARORA, ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][Gr], [R-2][Gr]

Page 79: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CCNo.-3505/2016IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][Gr]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CCNo.-3624/2016IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][Gr]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CCNo.-3789/2016IV-A

M/S. NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][Gr]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CCNo.-3804/2016IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(OSD) ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][Gr]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CCNo.-3705/2016IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(OSD) ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][Gr]

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CCNo.-3703/2016IV-A

M/S NAMDHARI SEEDS KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[R-1][Gr]

53 Crl.A. No.-121/2013II-C

SHAUKAT AHMED KHAN VIVEK GUPTAVersusTHE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAFOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 1036/2013

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-156/2013II-C

NAZIR AHMED SHEIKH VIVEK GUPTA

VersusSTATE OF J AND K MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAFOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 1443/2013

54 Crl.A. No.-2005/2013II

NANDKISHORE GURJAR @ TAMMI ANDANR. S.K. SINHA

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN HOMEDEPARTMENT RUCHI KOHLI

55 Crl.A. No.-2013/2014II-B

BALWINDER SINGH AJAY PAL[P-1], [P-2]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB UTTARA BABBAR[R-1]

56 T.C.(C) No.-115/2013XVI -A

RAJA MOHAMMAD AMIR MOHAMMADKHAN NIRAJ GUPTA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS.PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH, PAWANSHREEAGRAWAL, JITENDRA KUMAR, B. KRISHNAPRASAD, ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD

IA No.89229/2017-STAY APPLICATION

Page 80: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedW.P.(C) No.-28/2016X

RAJA MOHAMMAD AMIR MOHAMMADKHAN NIRAJ GUPTA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. SUSHMA SURI, ARDHENDUMAULI KUMARPRASAD[R-3], PAWANSHREE AGRAWAL[R-4]

ConnectedT.C.(C) No.-269-/2017XVI -A

KHAZA ZAHURUDDIN AND ORS S. K. VERMA

VersusTHE UNION SECRETARY TOGOVERNMENT OF INDIA S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-3], [R-4]

FOR ADMISSION

57 Crl.A.No.-2314-2319/2014II-A

SHIV SHANKAR SAHI CHANDRA PRAKASH

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. GOPAL SINGH, SUBHRO SANYAL[R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

58 C.A.No.-8231-8232/2017IV-A

M/S MYSORE FRUIT PRODUCTS ANDANR. RADHA SHYAM JENA

VersusCOMMISSIONER, BANGALOREDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS.

A. N. ARORA, RAJESH MAHALE, ARVINDKUMAR, ANKUR S. KULKARNI, NULI & NULI

59 C.A. No.-7662/2014XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLI AND FUNG INDIA PVT LTD THR. ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR KAVITA JHA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-6940/2015XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. LI AND FUNG (INDIA) PVT. LTD. KAVITA JHA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA1/2015 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING ON IA 2/2015

ConnectedC.A. No.-6941/2015XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IINEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. LI AND FUNG (INDIA) PVT. LTD. KAVITA JHA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-10222/2016XIV

PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-06 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MITSUI AND CO. INDIA PVT. LTD. KISHORE KUNAL{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-3069/2017XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. MITSUI AND CO. INDIA PVT. LTD. KISHORE KUNAL{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-11159/2017XIV

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUBENI ITOCHU STEEL P LTD SYED JAFAR ALAM{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA1/2017

ConnectedC.A. No.-4451/2017XIV

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI 5 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLI AND FUNG (INDIA ) PVT LTD{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

Page 81: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6

ConnectedC.A. No.-9525/2017XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MITSUI AND INDIA PVT. LTD{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.56022/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-20228-/2017XIV

ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

M/S BESTSELLER UNITED INDIA PVTLTD SYED JAFAR ALAM[R-1]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } only slp(C) No. 20228/2017 before Ld. Registrar'sCourt

ConnectedDiary No. 24245-2017XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA(P) LTD{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } IA No.88037/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.88038/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.88039/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OFDATES

ConnectedC.A. No.-11165/2017XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S MITSUI AND INDIA PVT LTD{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.76311/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.76312/2017-EXEMPTION FROMFILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

60 Crl.A. No.-334/2015II-A

SATISH PURUSHOTTAM AUSHAL ANDANR. ANAGHA S. DESAI, [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKARFOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 18856/2016

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.-1306/2015II-A

VILAS PURUSHOTTAM AUSHAL ANAGHA S. DESAI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

61 Crl.A. No.-1499/2015II-C

SHAMEEM BEGUM AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVAVersusSTATE OF M P(NOW CHATTISGARH) DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA

62 Crl.A. No.-1830/2014II-B

DARSHAN LAL VISHNU SHARMAVersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIAFOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA8186/2014

63 Crl.A. No.-828/2015II-A

SANJAY VITHHAL PACHAGHARE B. K. PALVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKARFOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 1321/2017

64 Crl.A. No.-934/2015II-B

RISHI PAL DIVYA ROYVersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-111/2016II-B

NARENDER SUDARSHAN SINGH RAWAT

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

Page 82: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1165/2015II-B

JASBIR @ JASSA S. USHA REDDY

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

65 Crl.A. No.-579/2016II-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA, [P-2], [P-3], [P-4],[P-5]

VersusCDR. RAVINDRA V. DESAI PANKAJ KUMAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-574/2016II-A

CDR. RAVINDRA V DESAI PANKAJ KUMAR

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5]

66 Crl.A.No.-1410-1412/2015II-A

RAJKUMAR SHASHIBHUSHAN P. ADGAONKAR

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1], AMOL B.KARANDE[R-2]

ConnectedSLP(Crl.)...CRLMPNo.-4705-4706/2016II-A

LAXMAN S/O DADARAO KARANDE AMOL B. KARANDE

Versus

RAJKUMAR AND ANR.

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1823/2017II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

VersusRAJKUMARIA No.99919/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.99922/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.99923/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

67 Crl.A. No.-1134/2016II-A

GAURI MAHTO @ GAURI KUMAR GAGAN GUPTAVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHA R. SHARMAORIGINAL RECORDS NOT RECEIVED YET

68 C.A. No.-5751/2017XVII

BRIG. NALIN KUMAR BHATIA SARVESH SINGHVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS . AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

ConnectedC.A. No.-5629/2017XVII

BRIG V. N. CHATURVEDI SARVESH SINGH

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

69 C.A. No.-2288/2017XI -A

NIRMALA AND ANR. P. V. DINESH[P-1]Versus

MEENAKSHIKUTTY AND ORS. LIZ MATHEW[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],RAJESH P.[R-6], [R-7]

70 Crl.A. No.-1070/2017II-A

SANJAY RAJAK MANSOOR ALIVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHA R. SHARMA

71 C.A. No.-559-560/2008XII

THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADUAND ANR. ETC. ETC. AND ORS. B. BALAJI

VersusARULMIGHU KALLALAGAR THIRUKOILALAGAR KOIL ETC. ETC. AND ORS.

V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, V. BALACHANDRAN,M. YOGESH KANNA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }72 C.A. No.-8743/2017

XIVTHE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX-1 ANIL KATIYARVersus

Page 83: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6M/S NORTEL NETWORKS INDIAINTERNATIONAL INCFOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2017

73 C.A. No.-294/2007XIV

ANAND KUMAR SHARMA SANJAY KUMAR TYAGIVersusBAR COUNCIL OF INDIA . THROUGHSECRETARY AND ANR. ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CCNo.-10531-10532/2013XV

ANAND KUMAR SHARMA SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI

Versus

BAR COUNCIL OF RAJASTHAN ANDANR.FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2013 FOR CONDONATION OFDELAY IN REFILING ON IA 3/2013 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA5/2015

74 C.A. No.-1632/2007IV-A

BYRASETTY (D) BY LRS. S. N. BHATVersusVENKATARAMANAPPA (D) BY LRS. S. SRINIVASANand IA No.95317/2017-I/A ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANTS TO COME ONRECORD AS THE LRS and IA No.95320/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

75 C.A. No.-611/2008IX

JAWED URDU PRIMARY SCHOOLTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANR. BALRAJ DEWAN[P-1]

Versus

COLLECTOR OF MUMBAI . AND ORS.SUCHITRA ATUL CHITALE[R-1], NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR[R-1], J SWAD AND CO[R-1]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.105142/2017-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IA No.105143/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.

76 C.A. No.-4938/2011XIV

UNION OF INDIA B. V. BALARAM DASVersusM/S SIKKIM SUBBA ASSOCIATES .{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

77 C.A. No.-414/2007XVII

GRID CORPORATION OF ORISSA LTD. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA[P-1]VersusWESTERN ELECT. SUP.CO.,ORISSALTD.. AND ORS.

RAJESH KUMAR[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-1], K.V. MOHAN[R-1], KIRTI RENU MISHRA[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No.-417/2007XVII

ORISSA POWER TRANSMISSION CORP.LTD. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA[P-1]

Versus

WESTERN ELECTRICITY COMPANY OFORISSA LTD. AND ORS.

RAJESH KUMAR[R-1], SOM RAJCHOUDHURY[R-1][Pr], RUTWIKPANDA[R-2][Pr], K. V. MOHAN[R-2], P. K.MANOHAR[R-12]

ConnectedC.A. No.-759/2007XVII

ORISSA ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION RUTWIK PANDA[P-1]

VersusNORTH EASTERN ELECTRICITY SUPPLYCO. OF ORISSA LTD.

RAJESH KUMAR[R-1], ABHISTH KUMAR[R-11],SURESH CHANDRA TRIPATHY[R-12]

ConnectedC.A. No.-572/2011XVII

GRIDCO LIMITED RAJ KUMAR MEHTA[P-1]

VersusWESTERN ELECT. SUP. CO. OF ORISSALD.

SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY, [R-1], RUTWIKPANDA[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No.-463/2011XVII

GRIDCO LIMITED RAJ KUMAR MEHTA

Versus

Page 84: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6NORTH-EASTERN ELEC.SUP.CO.OFORISSA LTD. (NESCO) AND ORS.

SHIV KUMAR SURI, SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY,RUTWIK PANDA

ConnectedC.A.No.-2942-2943/2011XVII

WESTERN ELECT.SUP.CO.OF ORISSALTD.ETC. SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY

VersusORISSA ELECT. REGULATORY COMMN.. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA, RUTWIK PANDA

ConnectedC.A.No.-2939-2941/2011XVII

WESTERN ELECT.SUPPLY CO.OFORISSA LTD. SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY[P-1]

Versus

ORISSA ELECT. REGULATORY COMMN.. RUTWIK PANDA[R-1], RAJ KUMARMEHTA[R-2], P. K. MANOHAR[R-8][Pr]

ConnectedC.A.No.-3595-3597/2011XVII

ORISSA ELECT. REGUL. COMMN. RUTWIK PANDA

Versus

WESTERN ELECT.SUP.CO.OF ORISSALTD. AND ORS. SHIV KUMAR SURI, SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY

ConnectedC.A. No.-2674/2013XVII

ODISHA ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION RUTWIK PANDA

VersusGRID CORPN.OF ORISSA LTD. . ANDORS. RAJ KUMAR MEHTA

ConnectedC.A.No.-10251-10263/2013XVII

ORISSA ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION RUTWIK PANDA

VersusSOUTHERN ELECTRICITY SUPPLYCOMPANY OF ORISSA LTD. (SOUTHCO)AND ORS.

SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY, SHIV KUMARSURI[Caveat], RAJ KUMAR MEHTA,KRISHNAYAN SEN, ANINDITA PUJARI

ConnectedC.A.No.-2625-2638/2014XVII

SOUTHERN ELECT. SUPPLY COMPANYOF ORISSA AND ORS. SHIV KUMAR SURI, [Caveat]

VersusORSSA ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ORS.

RUTWIK PANDA, RAJ KUMAR MEHTA,KRISHNAYAN SEN

ConnectedC.A.No.-3858-3860/2014XVII

ODISHA ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION RUTWIK PANDA

VersusWESTERN ELECTRICITY SUPPLYCOMPANY OF ORISSA LTD. AND ORS.

SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY, SHIV KUMAR SURI,ANINDITA PUJARI

78 Crl.A. No.-1622/2008II-A

ZAKIR ANSARI GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATIVersusSTATE OF BIHAR (NOW JHARKHAND) RATAN KUMAR CHOUDHURI

79 C.A. No.-137/2010XII

E.S.GANAPATHY NIKHIL NAYYARVersusN.M.ESSAKE RAJASEKAR . AND ORS. ANAGHA S. DESAI, AARTHI RAJAN[R-2][Pr]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.71861/2017-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

80 C.A.No.-7459-7460/2010XVII

KANCHAN DUA DEVESH KUMAR TRIPATHI

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

Page 85: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedSLP(C)No.-23260-23261/2012XIV

MANJU TIWARI GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1],ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD[R-1]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedSLP(C)No.-8588-8589/2014XIV

RADHIKA DEVI GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-26105/2015XIV

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

VersusRADHIKA DEVI W/O JC-538724 LATE NBSUB UMED SINGH{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

81 C.A. No.-724/2013XIV

ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INDUSTRIESLTD. PRESENTLY KNOWN AS ANSALPROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURELTD.

RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL 1 ANIL KATIYAR

FOR 01.11.2017 AT TOP

ConnectedC.A. No.-725/2013XIV

ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INDUSTRIESLTD. PRESENTLY KNOWN AS ANSALPROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURELTD.

RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL 1 ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-726/2013XIV

ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INDUSTRIESLTD. PRESENTLY KNOWN AS ANSALPROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURELTD.

RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL 1 ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-727/2013XIV

M/S ANSAL HOUSING ANDCONSTRUCTION LTD. (EARLIER KNOWNAS M/S. ANSAL HOUSING FINANCE ANDLEASING CO.

KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI-1 ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-2185/2013XIV

ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INDUSTRIESLTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusC.I.T. CENTRAL -1 ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-2184/2013XIV

ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INDUSTRIESLTD. PRESENTLY KNOWN AS ANSALPROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURELTD.

RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusC.I.T. CENTRAL -1 ANIL KATIYAR

Page 86: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No.-2183/2013XIV

ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INDUSTRIESLTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusC.I.T.,CENTRAL -1 ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-2186/2013XIV

ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INDUSTRIESLTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusC.I.T. CENTRAL-1 ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A.No.-2937-2943/2013XIV

M/S ANSAL HOUSING KAVITA JHA

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI 1 ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-2932/2013XIV

M/S ANSAL BUILDWELL LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL-I ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-2936/2013XIV

M/S ANSAL BUILDWELL LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.CENTRAL-I ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-2934/2013XIV

M/S ANSAL BUILDWELL LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL-I ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-2935/2013XIV

M/S ANSAL BUILDWELL LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL -I ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-2933/2013XIV

ANSAL BUILDWELL LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL -I ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-5328/2013XIV

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ANSAL HOUSING ANDCONSTRUCTION LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-5221/2013XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ANSAL HOUSING ANDCONSTRUCTION LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-5357/2013XIV

C.I.T. DELHI-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ANSAL HOUSING FINANCE ANDLEASING CO. LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-5356/2013XIV

C.I.T. DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 87: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6M/S ANSAL HOUSING CONSTRUCTIONLTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-5358/2013XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ANSAL PROPERTIES ANDINDUSTRIES LTD. SUJATA KURDUKAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-8590/2014XIV

C.I.T. DELHI-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ANSAL HOUSING KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-4411/2014XIV

C.I.T.,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ANSAL PROPERTIES ANDINDUSTRIES LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

ConnectedC.A. No.-5359/2013XIV

C.I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ANSAL HOUSING ANDCONSTRUCTION LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-9803/2014XIV

M/S ANSAL HOUSING ANDCONSTRUCTION LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-36836/2013XIV

DISCOVERY ESTATE PVT LTD RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusCIT IV NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-36837/2013XIV

DISCOVERY HOLDINGS PVT LTD RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusCIT IV NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-36838/2013XIV

DISCOVERY ESTATES PVT LTD RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusCIT IV NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-37717/2013XIV

ANSAL PROPERTIES SUJATA KURDUKAR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-5936/2014XIV

C.I.T.,DELHI CENTRAL-1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INDUST.LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

ConnectedC.A. No.-5567/2014XIV

ANSAL PROPERTIES& INDUSTRIES LTD RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusCIT ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-7314/2014III-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S U.P. STATE BRIDGE CORPORATIONLTD. BINA GUPTA

Page 88: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No.-9807/2014XIV

M/S. ANSAL HOUSING ANDCONSTRUCTION LTD KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-9402/2016XIV

M/S. ANSAL HOUSING ANDCONSTRUCTION LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEWDELHI-1 ANIL KATIYAR

82 Crl.A. No.-511/2015II-B

SAJAL SURESH KUMAR JAIN AMIT ANAND TIWARIVersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT HEMANTIKA WAHI{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } REMAIN ON BOARD

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-512/2015II-B

CHANDAN JAISWAL NIKHIL JAIN

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT HEMANTIKA WAHI{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-515/2015II-B

SUGAM @ MONTY JAISWAL HIMANSHU SHEKHAR

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT HEMANTIKA WAHI{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-513/2015II-B

ASHOK @ MANDAN JAISWAL NIKHIL JAIN

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT HEMANTIKA WAHI{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-514/2015II-B

DHARMENDRA MAHENDRABHAI JAIN AWANISH SINHA

VersusSTATE OF GUJARAT HEMANTIKA WAHI{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

83 Crl.A. No.-1810/2013II

NIRMAL SINGH ANKUR PRAKASHVersusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND D. BHARATHI REDDY{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1811/2013II

RAM GOPAL @ GOPAL ANIS AHMED KHAN

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND STATEOF UTTARAKHAND RAJIV NANDA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.-3216/2014II

HOME DEPARTMENT D. BHARATHI REDDY

VersusSOMVEER JAT @ BOBBY @ MOTA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

84 Crl.A. No.-421/2014II-B

SANJEEV KUMAR ALIAS TOTA MANJULA GUPTA[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

85 C.A.No.-4374-4375/2016XI -A

KIRAN KUMAR PARIDA SURESH CHANDRA TRIPATHY

VersusPRAVEENA SAMAL S. RAVI SHANKARWITH IA 3/2015

Page 89: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6

86 C.A.No.-8302-8303/2015XVII

SHREE MAHUVA BANDHARAKHETIWADI PARIYAVARAN BACHAVSAMITTEE

KAMINI JAISWAL[P-1]

VersusMINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT ANDFORESTS . THROUGH THE SECRETARYAND ORS.

HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-2], AJAY MARWAH[R-3],P. S. SUDHEER[R-4]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-939/2016XVII

SHREE MAHUVA BANDHARAKHETIWADI PARIYAVARAN BACHAVSAMITTEE

KAMINI JAISWAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFENVIRONMENT AND ORS. P. S. SUDHEER, , AJAY MARWAH

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }87 Crl.A. No.-44/2017

II-CMOHD. VAKIL AFTAB ALI KHANVersusSTATE(GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } Prayer for Interim Relief.

88 C.A. No.-792-793/2014III-A

NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIALDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusCHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX AND ORS.

ANIL KATIYAR, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], MEERAMATHUR, [R-6]

{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 } AT THE TOP

ConnectedC.A. No.-15613/2017XIV

M/S NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIALDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JASMEET SINGH

VersusCOMMISSIONER INCOME TAXAPPEALS(41) AND ORS.{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

ConnectedC.A. No.-15614/2017XIV

M/S. NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIALDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JASMEET SINGH

VersusINCOME TAX OFFICER AND ORS. ARTI SINGH[caveat]{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

ConnectedC.A. No.-9365/2017XIV

GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIALDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JASMEET SINGH

VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX (TDS) AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.53467/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedC.A. No.-12750/2017XIV

M/S NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIALDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JASMEET SINGH

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. DEBESH PANDA[caveat], RAVI PRAKASHMEHROTRA[R-1]

{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

ConnectedC.A. No.-9199/2017XIV

M/S NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIALDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THRO ITSACCOUNTANT

JASMEET SINGH

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS) AND ORS.{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

ConnectedC.A. No.-15615/2017XIV

M/S NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIALDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JASMEET SINGH

Versus

Page 90: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 6COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS) 41 AND ORS.{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

ConnectedC.A. No.-15130/2017XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS)II AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusRAJESH PROJECTS (INDIA) PVT LTD ANDANR.{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 } IA No.86453/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.86456/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

89 Crl.A. No.-1052/2016II-C

RAM SINGH SANJAY JAINVersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 } IA No.80770/2017-APPLICATION FOR BAIL

90 Crl.A. No.-63/2008II

STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMARVersusJAGDISH

91 Crl.A. No.-1031/2015II-A

VIJAY SINGH @ VIJAY KR. SHARMA AJAY KUMAR SINGHVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJI{Fixed Date for 09-11-2017 } Mr. Shantanu Sagar, Advocate has filed V/A On behalfof the Informant. His name may be shown in the Cause List.

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1036/2015II-A

TANIK SINGH @ AWADH BIHARIPRASAD SINGH AJAY KUMAR SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJI{Fixed Date for 09-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1579/2017II-A

KRISHNANDAN SINGH . AND ORS. AMIT SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]{Fixed Date for 09-11-2017 } and IA No.105917/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1578/2017II-A

BHAGWAN SINGH @ BHAGWAN PRASADSHARMA AMIT SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]{Fixed Date for 09-11-2017 } FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA5417/2017

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-765/2017II-A

SHYAMNANDAN SINGH FAUZIA SHAKIL

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]{Fixed Date for 09-11-2017 } [TO BE LISTED ALONGWITH ITEM NO. 10 I.ECRL.A.NO.1031/2015]

NEW DELHI03-11-2017 17:06:36

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 91: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 30 OF 2017 FROM : 07-11-2017 To 09-11-2017

COURT NO. : 7HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOREGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 C.A. No.-5792/2008

IV-ARAMESH TAI SEETA NAIK V. N. RAGHUPATHYVersusHULIYA YANKA NAIK . AND ORS. S. N. BHAT

2 C.A.No.-6150-6151/2009III-A

KRISHNA MOHAN . AND ORS. PRADEEP MISRA

VersusRAM CHANDRA . AND ORS. SHAKIL AHMED SYED

3 C.A. No.-5911/2012IV

PUNJAB STATE HUMAN RIGHTSCOMMISSION ABHIJAT P. MEDH

Versus

JAI SINGH AND ORS.HINGORANI & ASSOCIATES, KARANBHARIHOKE[R-2][Gr]SUSHMA SURI[I-3][IMPL][Gr]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } To be listed on 22.08.2017 as per Court's order dated09.08.2017.

ConnectedC.A. No.-5912/2012IV

PUNJAB STATE HUMAN RIGHTSCOMMISSION ABHIJAT P. MEDH

Versus

JATT RAM G. K. BANSAL, SUSHMA SURI, ANITHASHENOY

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-6236/2012IV

SURAIN SINGH SHALU SHARMA

VersusJATT RAM G. K. BANSAL{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6237/2012IV

NAVTEJ SINGH JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusGULSHANJIT KAUR KULDIP SINGH{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6232/2012IV

PUNJAB STATE HUMAN RIGHTSCOMMISSION ABHIJAT P. MEDH

VersusSUKHWINDER SINGH GILL{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6230/2012IV

PUNJAB STATE HUMAN RIGHTSCOMMISSION KARAN BHARIHOKE

VersusBALBIR SINGH @ MANGA KULDIP SINGH, DEBASIS MISRA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

Page 92: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No.-6233/2012IV

PUNJAB STATE HUMAN RIGHTSCOMMISSION KARAN BHARIHOKE

VersusRAJESH CHIBBER KULDIP SINGH{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6235/2012IV

PUNJAB STATE HUMAN RIGHTSCOMMISSION ABHIJAT P. MEDH[P-1]

Versus

AMRIK SINGH [R-1], KARAN BHARIHOKE[R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6234/2012IV

PUNJAB STATE HUMAN RIGHTSCOMMISSION ABHIJAT P. MEDH[P-1]

Versus

GULSHANJIT KAUR ARUN K. SINHA, KARAN BHARIHOKE, [R-3],[R-4], [R-5]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6231/2012IV

PUNJAB STATE HUMAN RIGHTSCOMMISSION ABHIJAT P. MEDH[P-1]

Versus

ASI BALDEV SINGHARUN K. SINHA, K. SARADA DEVI, ABHISHEKATREY[R-1], KARAN BHARIHOKE, [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-6]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C)No.-222/2005

SURAIN SINGH AND ORS. SHALU SHARMA

VersusA.K. DUBEY AND ORS.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6244/2012IV

PUNJAB STATE HUMAN RIGHTSCOMMISSION MOHAN PANDEY

VersusPUNJAB STATE CIVIL SUPPLIESCORPORATION LTD J S WAD AND CO, TARUN GUPTA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }4 C.A. No.-3876/2017

XVJAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYAVersus

JAMEA HIDAYAT TRUST AND ORS.R. D. UPADHYAY, PRATIBHA JAIN, PRAGATINEEKHRA, K. L. JANJANI, EQUITY LEXASSOCIATES, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No.-3874/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVT.AUTH. S. K. BHATTACHARYA

Versus

M/S S.M.S.INVESTMENT CORP.P.LTD.AND ORS.

COAC, R. D. UPADHYAY, PRATIBHA JAIN,PRAGATI NEEKHRA, K. L. JANJANI, EQUITYLEX ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No.-3872/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYA

Versus

M/S RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT. LTDAND ORS. AND ORS.

COAC, R. D. UPADHYAY, PRATIBHA JAIN,PRAGATI NEEKHRA, K. L. JANJANI, EQUITYLEX ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No.-3873/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYA

Versus

M/S S.M.S.INVESTMENT CORP.P.LTD.AND ORS.

COAC, R. D. UPADHYAY, PRATIBHA JAIN,PRAGATI NEEKHRA, K. L. JANJANI, EQUITYLEX ASSOCIATES

Page 93: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 7ConnectedC.A. No.-3875/2017XV

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S. K. BHATTACHARYA

Versus

M/S RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT. LTD.AND ORS. AND ORS.

COAC, R. D. UPADHYAY, PRATIBHA JAIN,PRAGATI NEEKHRA, K. L. JANJANI, EQUITYLEX ASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No.-3871/2017XV

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

Versus

M/S S.M.S.INVESTMENT CORP. . ANDORS.

COAC, S. K. BHATTACHARYA, RUCHI KOHLI,R. D. UPADHYAY, PRATIBHA JAIN, K. L.JANJANI

SUBJECT TO OVERNIGHT PART-HEARDConnectedC.A. No.-3882/2017XV

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusM/S RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH P.LTD..AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, SARVESH SINGHBAGHEL, R. D. UPADHYAY, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No.-3883/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

Versus

M/S SMS INVESTMENT CORPPORATION(P) LTD. AND ORS.

SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN, R. D. UPADHYAY,PRATIBHA JAIN, K. L. JANJANI, B. KRISHNAPRASAD, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No.-3877/2017XV

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusJAMEA HIDYAT TRUST . AND ORS. R. D. UPADHYAY, B. KRISHNA PRASAD, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No.-3881/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

VersusTHE JAMEA HIDAYAT TRUST AND ORSAND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD, R. D. UPADHYAY, K. L.JANJANI, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No.-3878/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

Versus

M/S. RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT. LTD.AND ORS. AND ORS.

SARVESH SINGH BAGHEL, R. D. UPADHYAY,PRATIBHA JAIN, K. L. JANJANI, B. KRISHNAPRASAD, COAC

ConnectedC.A. No.-3880/2017XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

Versus

M/S SMS INVESTMENT CORP.P.LTD.AND ORS.

SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN, R. D. UPADHYAY,PRATIBHA JAIN, K. L. JANJANI, B. KRISHNAPRASAD, COAC

ConnectedC.A.No.-15528-15531/2017XV

ABDUL RASHID MIR AND ANR. MUKUL KUMAR

Versus

M/S. RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH PVT.LTD.AND ORS AND ORS.IA No.88360/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.88364/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.88358/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP and IA No.88362/2017-PERMISSIONTO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

5 C.A. No.-6654/2015XII

KANNATHAL SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHYVersus

MANI THEVAR . AND ORS. G. BALAJI, ARDHENDUMAULI KUMARPRASAD[R-2], [R-4], PRADEEP MISRA[R-3]

IA No.70945/2017-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION and

Page 94: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 7

6 W.P.(C) No.-57/2011X

PRES.SINHAGAD TECH.EDU.STY.TR.PAHOLDER K. N. RAI

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. ASHA GOPALAN NAIR, SUSHMA SURI

7 W.P.(C) No.-89/2011X

JAIPURIA INST.OF MGT.. AND ORS. SAVITA SINGHVersusALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICALEDU.

NAVIN PRAKASH, MILIND KUMAR, GAURAVSHARMA, R. GOPALAKRISHNAN[R-4]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No.-258/2012X

MUDRA INST.OF COMMUNICATIONTHR. ITS EXECUTIVE REGISTRAR ANDANR.

NIKHIL GOEL

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. GOPAL SINGH, GAURAV SHARMA

ConnectedW.P.(C) No.-90/2011X

PRABIR PAL AND ANR. RENJITH. B

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. NAVIN PRAKASH, GAURAV SHARMAand IA No.106071/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION

ConnectedW.P.(C) No.-92/2011X

EDUCATION PROMOTION SOCIETY FORINDIA&OR LALITA KAUSHIK

Versus

UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. NAVIN PRAKASH, MILIND KUMAR, GAURAVSHARMA

and IA No.100807/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION

ConnectedT.P.(C) No.-514/2011XVI -A

ALL INDIA COUNCIL OF TECHNICALEDUCATION NAVIN PRAKASH

VersusFEDERATION OF ASSO.OF MGT OFUNAIDED AND ANR. ROMY CHACKO

ConnectedT.P.(C) No.-510/2011XVI -A

ALL INDIA COUNCIL OFTECH.EDUCATION GAURAV SHARMA

VersusANDHRA PRADESH PRIVATE ENGG.COLLEGES MANAGEMENTASSOCIATION

ROMY CHACKO

ConnectedT.P.(C) No.-511/2011XVI -A

ALL INDIA COUNCIL OF TECHNICALEDU GAURAV SHARMA

VersusFEDERATION OF ASSO.OF MGT OFUNAIDED ROMY CHACKO

ConnectedW.P.(C) No.-325/2011X

RAJAGIRI BUSINESS SCHOOL ROMY CHACKO

VersusALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECH EDU..AND ANR. NAVIN PRAKASH, GAURAV SHARMA

ConnectedW.P.(C) No.-451/2012X

INST.OF RURAL MGT.ANAND SOCIETYTHROUGH THE DIRECTOR NIKHIL GOEL

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HUMANRESOURCE DEVELOPMENT NOTICE TOBE SERVED THROUGH SECRETARY ANDANR.

GOPAL SINGH, GAURAV SHARMA

8 Crl.A.No.-437-438/2013II-C

VISHNU AND ORS. AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVA, KAILASH CHAND

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH(NOW STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Page 95: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 79 Crl.A. No.-2528/2014

II-CG.RAVIKUMAR REVATHY RAGHAVANVersusSUDHA AND ORS.Ms. V. Mohana, Sr. Adv. (A.C.) is representing for Respondent Nos. 2,4,5,6,7 and 8

10 Crl.A. No.-782/2013II-A

VIJENDRA SINGH RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHand IA No.80481/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. FOR SUSPENSION OFSENTENCE ON IA 51585/2017

11 Crl.A. No.-2353/2014II-B

RANJIT KAUR @ PRITI PRATIBHA JAINVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB

12 Crl.A. No.-188/2015II-A

RAM ISHWAR RAI PURUSHOTTAM SHARMA TRIPATHI[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR E. C. VIDYA SAGAR

13 Crl.A. No.-619/2016II

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND D. BHARATHI REDDYVersusTRILOK NATH AVADH BIHARI KAUSHIK

14 Crl.A. No.-1029/2017II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH VARINDER KUMAR SHARMAVersusSENJAM NONGDREN KHOMBA SINGH @SENJAM CHING THANG KHOMBASINGH @ SENJAM BASIL SINGH

NIDHI

FOR FINAL HEARING15 Crl.A. No.-391/2015

II-CTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH VARINDER KUMAR SHARMAVersusPANKAJ KUMAR KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH

16 Crl.A.No.-1419-1420/2015II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

VersusRAMESH JIJEBA LAHANE MANJU JETLEY

17 T.C.(C) No.-120/2015XVI -A

E. GOBINATHVersusTHE BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD

ConnectedT.C.(C) No.-121/2015XVI -A

DEVRAJ C.

VersusKARNATAKA STATE LAW UNIVERSITY ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD[R-3]

18 Crl.A. No.-667/2015II-C

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AJAY MARWAHVersusSHYAM SINGHMs. Jasleen Chahal, Advocate(Amicus Curiae)

19 Crl.A. No.-925/2016II

ANOOP SINGH ARUNA GUPTAVersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN RUCHI KOHLIFOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 8060/2017 FOR EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. ON IA 8061/2017

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1244/2016II

POONAM SINGH ARUNA GUPTA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN RUCHI KOHLI[R-1][Gr]and IA No.87886/2017-XTRA

20 Crl.A.No.-367-368/2017II-B

MOHAMMED TAHIR USMANGANISHEIKH SAMIR ALI KHAN

Versus

Page 96: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 7STATE OF GUJARAT HEMANTIKA WAHIWITH EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA200/2017 WITH EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 203/2017

21 Crl.A.No.-426-427/2016II-B

SURESHBHAI FAKABHAI MACHHI SOMESH CHANDRA JHA

VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT HEMANTIKA WAHIWITH IA No.69606/2017-EX-PARTE BAIL

22 C.A.No.-6919-6920/2009III-A

VINOD CHANDRA GUPTA (D) THR. LRS. GARIMA PRASHAD

Versus

U.P.STATE SUGAR CORPORATION LTD. PRADEEP MISRA, DHARMENDRA KUMARSINHA

23 C.A. No.-5905/2009XVI

CHHANA RANI SAHA AND ANR. DANISH ZUBAIR KHANVersusMANI PAL @ KALTU PAL SIDDHARTHA CHOWDHURY{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } As per Court's order dated 19.9.2016 passed inapplication for early hearing Court has directed hearing be expedited.

24 Crl.A. No.-2167/2014II-C

SRINIVASA @ VIJI KATIGAR RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYALVersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1028/2015II-C

RAMESH @ GANESH @ SANTHOSH RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA12943/2015 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 12945/2015

25 Crl.A. No.-621/2016II

MALKHAN AND ANR. PRAVEEN SWARUPVersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDANR. KAILASH CHAND[R-2]

{Mention Memo for 07-11-2017 } FOR SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE ON IA16844/2014 FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA 16845/2014

26 Crl.A. No.-1480/2008II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMARVersusPARAMJEET SINGH AND ORS. MADHU MOOLCHANDANI

27 C.A. No.-6271/2010IX

SHRI MARUTI DEVASTHAN PUBLICTRUST THROUGH TRUSTEE KASHINATHVAMANRAO PATIL AND ORS.

CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI

VersusDEOPRAM PANDURANG SATHBHAI .AND ORS. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

NEW DELHI03-11-2017 17:07:40

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 97: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 30 OF 2017 FROM : 07-11-2017 To 09-11-2017

COURT NO. : 8HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPREREGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 Crl.A. No.-1507/2009

IIDHARAMVEER P. D. SHARMAVersus

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.MILIND KUMAR[R-1][Gr], RISHIMALHOTRA[R-3][Pr], [R-4][Pr], [R-5][Pr],[R-6][Pr], [R-7][Pr], [R-8][Pr], [R-9][Pr],[R-10][Pr]

FOR ON IA 8446/2015ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1508/2009II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR

Versus

RAJ KUMAR . AND ORS. RISHI MALHOTRA[R-1][Pr], [R-2][Pr], [R-3][Pr],[R-4][Pr], [R-5][Pr], [R-6][Pr], [R-7][Pr], [R-8][Pr]

READY FOR ON IA 8443/2015

2 C.A. No.-1747/2008XI -A

M/S STANDARD ESSENTIAL OILINDUSTRIES AND ANR. A. RAGHUNATH[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE FOREST RANGE OFFICERKASARGOD AND ORS. G. PRAKASH, [R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

3 C.A. No.-2169/2007IV-A

MYSORE SALES INTERNATIONAL LTD.& ANR. AND ANR. NANDA KISHORE, RAJESH MAHALE

VersusTHE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF I.T. .AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-2168/2007IV-A

EXCISE COMMISSIONER KARNATAKAAND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusMYSORE SALES INTERNATIONAL LTD.&ORS. AND ORS.

RAJESH MAHALE, ANIL KATIYAR, NANDAKISHORE

4 C.A. No.-1491/2007IX

PLACIDO FRANCISCO PINTO(D) BY LRSAND ANR. BINU TAMTA

VersusJOSE FRANCICO PINTO AND ANR. MITTER & MITTER CO.and IA No.112122/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

5 C.A. No.-4584/2008IV-A

SHYAMSUNDAR AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALEVersusB.S. BRAMARAMBA AND ORS. NANDA KISHORE

6 C.A. No.-3585/2008IV

KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY SURYA KANTVersusPRITHVI SINGH KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

7 Crl.A. No.-1261/2008II-C

MAHADEVAPPA E. R. SUMATHYVersus

Page 98: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8STATE OF KARNATAKATR.PUB.PROSECUTOR. ANITHA SHENOY

8 Crl.A. No.-417/2010II-C

BASHEERA BEGAM VIJAY KUMAR[P-1]Versus

MOHAMMED IBRAHIM AND ORS.S. RAVI SHANKAR[R-1], [R-3], [R-5], [R-6], K. K.MANI[R-4], DHARMENDRA KUMARSINHA[R-7], YASH PAL DHINGRA[R-8]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-416/2010II-C

SHAHUL HAMEED GEETHA KOVILAN[P-1]

Versus

STATE REPRESENTED BY THEINSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ORS.

M. YOGESH KANNA, [R-1], [R-5], [R-8], K. K.MANI[R-4], S. RAVI SHANKAR[R-2], [R-3], [R-6],[R-7], DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA[R-9],YASH PAL DHINGRA[R-11]

ConnectedCrl.A.No.-408-414/2010II-C

STATE TR.INSP.OF POLICE,C.B.C.I.D. M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1]

Versus

MOHAMMED IBRAHIM 63/91 AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRA[R-1], [R-7], K. K.MANI[R-3]

9 C.A.No.-9118-9119/2010IV

SURAT SINGH (DEAD) KAILASH CHAND[P-1]

VersusSIRI BHAGWAN AND ORS. O. P. BHADANI[R-1]and IA No.101391/2017-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION and IANo.101394/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN.

10 C.A. No.-196/2010IV-A

JOINT DIRECTOR,SERICULTUR DEPT.AND ORS.VersusAPPAYYA ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA

11 Crl.A. No.-2155/2009II

SMT RAMA RANI RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]Versus

ARUN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR. RAVINDER KUMAR YADAV[R-1], JATINDERKUMAR BHATIA[R-2]

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 16247/2016 FOR EXEMPTIONFROM FILING O.T. ON IA 16248/2016

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-2156/2009II

SMT RAMA RANI RAJESH[P-1]

Versus

ARUN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR. RAVINDER KUMAR YADAV, [R-1], JATINDERKUMAR BHATIA[R-2]

12 Crl.A. No.-1224/2008II-A

MST. ANUSUYA @ SARASWATIBAI PRADEEP MISRA, [P-2]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH MISHRA SAURABH

13 Crl.A. No.-1703/2008II-C

BALKRISHAN MALIK PRAVEEN SWARUPVersusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1][Gr]

14 C.A. No.-242/2010XII

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,SALEM ANIL KATIYARVersusSALEM DIST.PRINTERS SER.IND.CO-OP.STY.LT KRISHNA KUMAR

AT TOPConnectedC.A. No.-7094/2010XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTHE SALEM DISTRICT PRINTERSSERVICE INDUSTRIAL COOPERATIVESOCIETY LTD.

KRISHNA KUMAR

Page 99: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-7093/2010XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusTHE SALEM DISTRICT PRINTERSSERVICE INDUSTRIAL COOPERATIVESOCIETY LTD.

KRISHNA KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-7096/2010XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusTHE SALEM DISTRICT PRINTERSSERVICE INDUSTRIAL CO OPERATIVESOCIETY LTD.

KRISHNA KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-7095/2010XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusTHE SALEM DISTRICT PRINTERSSERVICE INDUSTRIAL CO OPERATIVESOCIETY LTD.

KRISHNA KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-7098/2010XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusTHE SALEM DISTRICT PRINTERSSERVICE INDUSTRIAL CO OPERATIVESOCIETY LTD

KRISHNA KUMAR

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-12840/2007XII

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,SALEM ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S.SALEM DIST.PRINTERSSER.IND.CO-OP.LTD. THR. SECRETARY KRISHNA KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-7099/2010XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusTHE SALEM DISTRICT PRINTERSSERVICES INDUSTRIAL CO OPERATIVESOCIETY LTD.

KRISHNA KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-7097/2010XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusTHE SALEM DISTRICT SERVICEINDUSTRIAL CO OPERATIVE SOCIETYLTD.

15 C.A. No.-4639/2009XVI

CALCUTTA MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONAND ORS. AND ORS. L. C. AGRAWALA

VersusCALCUTTA SOFT DRINKS PVT. LTD. DIPAK KUMAR JENA

ConnectedC.A. No.-4640/2009XVI

CALCUTTA MUNICIPAL CORP. L. C. AGRAWALA

VersusPEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PVT. LTD.AND ANR. S. NARAIN & CO.

16 Crl.A. No.-1032/2007II

GORUSU NAGARAJU VIJAY KUMARVersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

17 C.A. No.-4783/2009IV

HARYANA STATE COOP.SUPPLY MANOJ SWARUP[P-1]VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS, B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

18 Crl.A. No.-1676/2009II-B

SUBHASH CHANDER BANSAL SHALU SHARMAVersus

Page 100: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8

GIAN CHAND AND MUSHTAQ AHMAD, , [R-2], [R-3], KAILASHCHAND[R-4], KULDIP SINGH, [R-6]

19 C.A. No.-10164/2010XII

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI B. V. BALARAM DASVersusM/S. S. AJIT KUMAR THR. ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR

ConnectedC.A. No.-10165/2010XII

C.I.T, COIMBATORE B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusP.K.GANESHWAR BINA GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No.-10917/2013XVI

C.I.T-I KOLKATA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBRAJ BINANI KUNAL CHEEMA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-4449/2015IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusYASHODA SHETTY K. V. MOHAN

ConnectedC.A. No.-5255/2015IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXMANGALORE AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusYASHODA SHETTY K. V. MOHAN[R-1]

20 C.A. No.-5932/2010XIV

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX-XVII,DELHI ANIL KATIYARVersusM/S DOORDARSHAN COMMERCIALSERVICES RAJEEV SHARMA

ConnectedSLP(C)No.-3320-3321/2011XI -A

THE DIR. PRASAR BHARATI RAJEEV SHARMA

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,THIRUVANANTH ANIL KATIYAR

21 C.A. No.-3370/2007IX

MAHARASHTRA STATEELECT.DISTRN.CO.LTD. A. S. BHASME

VersusAPPELLATE AUTHORITY . AND ANR. ANAGHA S. DESAI

ConnectedC.A.No.-3377-3381/2007IX

MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECT.BD. A. S. BHASME

Versus

CHIEF ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL) ANDANR. ARUN KUMAR BERIWAL, S. RAMAMANI

ConnectedC.A. No.-3376/2007IX

MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITYBD. AND ORS. A. S. BHASME

VersusM/S SHEEL ENTERPRISES AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A.No.-3371-3375/2007IX

MAHARASHTRA ST.ELEC.BD.DIST.CO.LTD. A. S. BHASME

Versus

M/S. NARMADA PLASTICS AND ANR. CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI, ANAGHA S.DESAI

22 C.A. No.-6262/2010IV-A

INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTUREDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION(GWALIOR) M.P. LTD.(FORMERLYKNOWN AS MADHYA PRADE

RANI CHHABRA

Versus

Page 101: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

23 C.A. No.-5397/2010XII

M/S NATESAN AGENCIES(PLANTATIONS) V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN[P-1]

VersusSTATE REP. BY THE SECRETARY TOGOVERNMENT ENVIRONMENT ANDFORESTS DEPARTMENT

M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

24 C.A.No.-6015-6018/2010XII

STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR. A. V. RANGAM

VersusV. ELAYAPERUMAL AND ANR. S. R. SETIA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

25 C.A.No.-5256-5257/2007III-A

KRISHI UTPADAN MANDI SAMITISAHARANPUR THROUGH ITSSECRETARY AND ANR.

E. C. AGRAWALA, [P-2], [P-3]

VersusITC LTD. THROUGH ITS CONSTITUTEDATTORNEY RAJAN NARAIN

ConnectedC.A. No.-5255/2007III-A

ITC LTD. RAJAN NARAIN[P-1]

Versus

MARKET PARISHAD, U.P. . AND ANR. UGRA SHANKAR PRASAD, PRADEEPMISRA[R-2]

26 Crl.A. No.-2161/2009II-A

KHALIL PASHA . AND ORS. AMOL NIRMALKUMAR SURYAWANSHIVersus

ABDUL GANI AND ANR. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV, NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-2]

27 C.A. No.-7004/2009XV

BASHIRU @ BASHIRAM AND ORS. (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[P-1]VersusMADAN NEELGAR . AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

28 C.A.No.-8649-8650/2011XIV

ASST DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES ANDANR. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

29 Crl.A.No.-1359-1361/2007II-B

THE STATE OF GUJARAT HEMANTIKA WAHI[P-1]

VersusANWAR OSMAN SUMBHANIYA ANDORS. NIDHI, [R-1], [R-2]

30 C.A.No.-3964-3971/2007IV-A

M/S. BANGALORE CLUB GAUTAM NARAYAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAXAND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

31 Crl.A. No.-2393/2009II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHVersusGANGABISHAN @ VISHNU NIRAJ SHARMAFOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 12915/2007 FOR ON IA 19229/2009FOR ON IA 28753/2009

32 Crl.A. No.-1309/2010II-B

UNITED BREWERIES LTD. KHAITAN & CO.VersusBANGUR FINANCE LTD. AND ORS. NARESH BAKSHI

33 C.A.No.-6088-6089/2009IV-A

NORTH WEST KARNATAKARD.TRANSPORT CORP. RAJEEV SINGH

Versus

Page 102: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8H.G.CHAKKALER AND ANR. K. K. MANI, NAVEEN R. NATH

34 C.A. No.-976/2010XIV

M/S VANGUARD SERVICES PVT.LTD.AND ORS. ARUN K. SINHA[P-1]

Versus

DELHI DEVT.AUTHORITY . AND ORS.SUDHIR NAAGAR[R-1][INT], SAHARYA &CO.[R-1], B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-2], RAKESHKUMAR-I[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No.-977/2010XIV

SUNNY UPPAL AND ORS. RUBY SINGH AHUJA[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SAHARYA & CO.[R-2], RAKESH KUMAR-I[R-3],ASHA GOPALAN NAIR[R-4], R. P. SHARMA[R-6]

and IA No.88700/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTSConnectedC.A. No.-979/2010XIV

VIJAY UPPAL RUBY SINGH AHUJA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAKESH KUMAR-I, R. P. SHARMA, ASHAGOPALAN NAIR, SAHARYA & CO.

and IA No./- and IA No./- and IA No.88688/2017-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IA No.88691/2017-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedC.A. No.-978/2010XIV

VINEY UPPAL RUBY SINGH AHUJA[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SAHARYA & CO.[R-2], RAKESH KUMAR-I[R-3],ASHA GOPALAN NAIR[R-4], R. P. SHARMA[R-6]

and IA No.91237/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS35 C.A. No.-5360/2010

IIICEMENT WORKERS MANDAL ANUSHREE PRASHIT KAPADIAVersusGLOBAL CEMENTS LTD(HMP CEMENTSLTD.) AND ORS. SAURABH TRIVEDI, GAUTAM AWASTHI

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

36 C.A. No.-3880/2009XII

VENKATARAMAYYA AND ANR. ANDANR. JOHN MATHEW

VersusSUNGAPPA AND ORS. AND ORS. K. K. MANI

37 C.A. No.-7684/2011XI -A

BHAGAVATHY MADOM TRUST . ANDANR. JOHN MATHEW

VersusHARIHAR IYER . AND ORS. R. GOPALAKRISHNAN[R-5]FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 11/2015 MAY BE READ ASAPPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION AND IMPLEADMENT AS ADDITIONALAPPELLANTS IN THE CIVIL APPEAL FOR INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION ON IA12/2015 : APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO PROSECUTE THE CIVIL APPEAL.FOR APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION ON IA 9/2015 MAY BE READ ASAPPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION AND IMPLEADMENT AS ADDITIONALPETITIONERS IN SLP.FOR INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION ON IA 10/2015 :APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO PROSECUTE THE SLP.

ConnectedC.A. No.-7686/2011XI -A

K.P.KARUNAKARAN (D) BY LRS. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

VersusBRAHMANA SAMOOHAM R. GOPALAKRISHNAN

ConnectedC.A. No.-7685/2011XI -A

M.VIJAYAN NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

VersusBRAHMANA SAMOOHAM R. GOPALAKRISHNAN

38 C.A. No.-3195/2008XII

THE UNION TERRITORY OFPUDUCHERRY AND ORS. V. G. PRAGASAM

Versus

Page 103: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8M. LATUCHUMANAN RAKESH K. SHARMA

39 Crl.A. No.-899/2010II-B

PARGAT SINGH KAILASH CHAND[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. JASPREET GOGIA[R-1]

40 C.A. No.-5057/2009XII

NARAYANA GRAMANI AND ORS. ANDORS. A. T. M. SAMPATH

VersusMARIAMMAL AND ORS. AND ORS.and IA No.66440/2017-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

41 C.A. No.-2799/2011III-A

ASHOK SINGH . AND ORS. SOM RAJ CHOUDHURY[P-1]Versus

STATE OF U.P . AND ORS.ASHOK K. SRIVASTAVA[R-1], RAVI PRAKASHMEHROTRA[R-1], PRADEEP MISRA[R-1], (MRS.) VIPIN GUPTA[R-1]

42 C.A. No.-8113/2009XVII

THE VICE CHANCELLOR RANCHIUNIVERSITY GOPAL PRASAD

VersusJHARKHAND STATE HOUSING BOARDTH CHAIRMAN

MANOJ SWARUP AND CO., [R-5][LR/S], PAVANKUMAR, HIMANSHU SHEKHAR

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }43 Crl.A. No.-601/2009

II-CC.B.I. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMAVersusPRATAP CHANDRA REDDY BINA GUPTA, P. N. PURI[R-2][Pr]and IA No.112852/2017-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS and IANo.112854/2017-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

44 C.A. No.-3031/2009XV

UMRAO SINGH MEHTA PRATIBHA JAINVersusRAM SWAROOP AND ANR. SANJEEV MALHOTRA

45 Crl.A. No.-1955/2009II-A

NAYAN PRASAD AND ORS. T. G. NARAYANAN NAIRVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. GOPAL SINGH, SHEKHAR KUMAR{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

46 Crl.A. No.-1243/2011II-C

SAMPATLAL BALRAJ DEWANVersusSTATE OF M.P.(NOW CHHATTISGARH)

47 Crl.A. No.-1122/2011II-C

THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR M. SHOEB ALAM[P-1]VersusSURAIN SINGH LANGEH UGRA SHANKAR PRASAD[R-1]FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 5826/2007

48 C.A. No.-5782/2008IV

INDUSTRIAL CABLES (I) LTD. MANJU JETLEYVersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYARand IA No.96571/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedC.A. No.-7688/2009IV

INDUSTRIAL CABLES (INDIA) LIMITED MANJU JETLEY

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYARand FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 96574/2017

ConnectedC.A. No.-5784/2008IV

INDUSTRIAL CABLES (I) LTD. MANJU JETLEY

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA(PUNJAB) B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

and FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 96568/2017

Page 104: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-5785/2008IV

INDUSTRIAL CABLES (INDIA) LTD. MANJU JETLEY

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA(PUNJAB) B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR

and FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 96579/2017

49 C.A. No.-1933/2009XII

MANGAMAL @ THULASI AND ANR. ANDANR. REVATHY RAGHAVAN[P-1]

VersusT.B.RAJU AND ORS. AND ORS. MOHIT PAUL[R-1], [R-2][Pr]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } PH

50 Crl.A. No.-1305/2008II-C

BILAL HAJAR @ ABDUL HAMEED K. K. MANIVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

51 C.A. No.-3548/2007XVI

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,WESTBENGAL ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSBI HOME FINANCER LIMITED{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } As directed by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated05.10.2017 list the matter on 2.11.2017. And also please show the name of Mr. S.K.Bagaria, Senior Advocate in the cause list on the next date of hearing.

52 C.A. No.-2404/2016XV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOEME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]VersusM/S BAJRANG TEXTILES P. V. YOGESWARAN{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

53 Crl.A. No.-2493/2009II-B

DILRAJ SINGH SHIVAJI M. JADHAVVersus

STATE OF HARYANA . AND ORS. UGRA SHANKAR PRASAD, KAMAL MOHANGUPTA

54 C.A. No.-8353/2014IV

VED PAL (D) TR.LRS.. AND ORS. MANOJ SWARUPVersusPREM DEVI (D) TR.LRS.. AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRA, ABHINAV MUKERJI{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } [ AT 2.00 P.M. ] and IA No.101545/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IA No.101548/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

55 C.A. No.-5870/2015XV

GHEWARCHAND AND ORS. AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAINVersusM/S. MAHENDRA SINGH AND ORS. ANDORS.and IA No.94110/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.94111/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.97674/2017-I/A UNDERORDER 6 RULE 17 CPC R/W SECTION 151 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE FORAMENDMENT OF PLAINT IN

56 C.A. No.-5105/2009XIV

NATIONAL CO-OP.DEVELOPMENTCORPORATION THROUGH ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR

PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-V,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-5106/2009XIV

NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE DEV. CORPN.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, DELHI ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-5107/2009XIV

NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE DEV. CORPN.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR PRADEEP KUMAR BAKSHI

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, DELHI

Page 105: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 857 C.A. No.-5199/2007

XII-AADAPA KRISHNA KUMARI SUDHA GUPTAVersusMEESALA SRINIVASARAO D. MAHESH BABU{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

58 Crl.A. No.-2218/2011II-B

THE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAINVersusRAJESH AGGARWAL AND ANR. SANJAY JAIN

59 C.A. No.-4247/2009XII-A

N.RAVINDRA MURTHY ANJANI AIYAGARIVersus

VEERBHADRA SWAMY TEMPLEV. N. RAGHUPATHY, [R-4][Pr], GUNTURPRABHAKAR, C. K. SUCHARITA[R-2][Pr],[R-3][Pr]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.89629/2017-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

60 C.A. No.-1756/2010XV

RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORTCORPORATION JAIPUR SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN

VersusPHOOL CHAND (D) THROUGH LRS. ANOOP KR. SRIVASTAVFOR ON IA 2/2010 FOR ON IA 65460/2010

61 C.A. No.-2342/2008IV-A

MUNI REDDY AND ANR. ANJANA CHANDRASHEKARVersusC.NAGARAJU AND ORS. PROMILA, S. THANANJAYAN

62 C.A. No.-10303/2010XII

THE CHIEFENGINEER(GENERAL),PUBLIC WORKSDEPTT. AND ORS.

B. BALAJI

VersusS.PATRAJAN G. INDIRA

63 Crl.A. No.-5/2010II

N.RAGHAVENDER VIKRAM SINGHVersusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP. BYCBI MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

FOR ON IA 18929/2009

64 Crl.A. No.-1550/2010II-A

DAHISAR SARASWATI COOP. HSG. SCY.LTD NITIN BHARDWAJ

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDORS.

SHEKHAR KUMAR, NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR

65 C.A.No.-3018-3019/2013XII

J. BOORARM @ J.B. CHOUDHARY ETC. REKHA PANDEY

VersusB. MOHAN AND ANR. AND ANR. K. K. MANI{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.91903/2017-EARLY HEARINGAPPLICATION

66 Crl.A. No.-361/2010II-A

ARIFVALI MUHAMMED SHAIKH HIMANSHU MUNSHIVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

67 C.A.No.-6511-6518/2010XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, N.DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTRAVELPORT INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALAAT THE TOP

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-21850/2012XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (IT-11) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBBC WORLDWIDE PVT. LTD. YOGINDER HANDOO

Page 106: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedSLP(C) No.-21849/2012XIV

DIR. OF I.T.(INTER. TAX.-1) DELHI, N.D. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBBC WORLDWIDE LTD. YOGINDER HANDOO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-24324/2012XIV

DIR.OF I.T(INTERNATIONAL) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusB.B.C WORLDWIDE LTD. YOGINDER HANDOO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-34800/2010XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL 1) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LIT (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-7520/2011XIV

C.I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-34801/2010XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE ( INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-4872/2014XIV

C.I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-34811/2010XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL 1) COMMISSIONER ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-34812/2010XIV

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL I) COMMISSIONER ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-34816/2010XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL 1) INCOME TAXDEPARTMENT COMMISSIONER

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-34802/2010XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL 1) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-34815/2010XIV

COMMISSIONER ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusJET LITE (INDIA ) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-2606/2011XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL 1) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-58/2011XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL 1) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-533/2011XIV

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL 1) ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 107: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8JET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-379/2011XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL 1) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-534/2011XIV

C.I.T, CENTRAL-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-3084/2011XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL 1) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-3088/2011XIV

C.I.T NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-3807/2011XIV

C.I.T NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE(INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-3087/2011XIV

C.I.T NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-5376/2011XIV

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL I) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SAHARA AIRLINES LTD. THR.DIRECTOR GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-3086/2011XIV

THE COMMISSIOENR OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL 1) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA)LTD. THROUGH ITSMANAGER GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-12614/2011XIV

C.I.T NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-9528/2011XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL 1) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusJET LITE (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

ConnectedC.A. No.-3221/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T(INTERNATIONALTAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-10931/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-12613/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

Page 108: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-4219/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-13938/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE GLBL INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-4319/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-16971/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC. THROUGH DIRECTOR RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17134/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T(INTERNAL.TAXN) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17419/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17353/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAMERICAN AIRLINES INC. THROUGHM.D. KHAITAN & CO.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17355/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17422/2011XIV

DIRERCTOR OF I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-18692/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T(IT) DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-19698/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17354/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17425/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17423/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 109: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8LIQUIDATOR M/S ABACUS DIS.SYSTEMP.LTD. KHAITAN & CO.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17421/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLIQUIDATOR OF M/S ABACUSDISTRIBUTION SYSTEM PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR

KHAITAN & CO.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-22279/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T(INTERNATIONALTAXN.) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLIQUIDATOR M/S ABACUSDISTRN.SYSTEM P.LT KHAITAN & CO.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-16972/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABRE INC RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-10494/2013XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSABER INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-8059/2011XIV

AMADEUS IT GROUP SA KAVITA JHA

VersusTHE DIRECTOR OF I.T.-I INTER. TAX.,N.D.

ConnectedC.A. No.-8055/2011XIV

AMADEUS IT GROUP SA KAVITA JHA

VersusDIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX-I INTR. TAX.N.D.

ConnectedC.A. No.-8056/2011XIV

AMADEUS IT GROUP SA (ENTITY INWHICH AMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRIBUTION SA HAS MERGED)

KAVITA JHA

VersusDIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX-IINTERNATIONAL TAXATION

ConnectedC.A. No.-8058/2011XIV

AMADEUS IT GROUP SA (ENTITY INWHICH AMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRIBUTION SA HAS MERGED)

KAVITA JHA

VersusTHE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX-I

ConnectedC.A. No.-8057/2011XIV

AMADEUS IT GROUP SA (ENTITY INWHICH AMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRIBUTION SA HAS MERGED)

KAVITA JHA

VersusTHE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX 1for pre final hearing

ConnectedC.A. No.-8060/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOMETAX,(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRIBUTION S.A. (ENTITY IN WHICHAMADEUS MARKETING S.A. HASMERGED)

KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-7779/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 110: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8AMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRIBUTION KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-8061/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVEL DISTRN.S.A KAVITA JHAfor pre final hearing

ConnectedC.A. No.-526/2012XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) . ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRIBUTION S.A. (ENTITY IN WHICHAMADEUS MARKETING S.A. HASMERGED)

KAVITA JHA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-32062/2011XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRICUTION KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-4571/2012XIV

DIRECTOR OF I.T NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S AMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRN.SA KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-2227/2012XIV

DIR.OF I.T.INTERNL.TAXN.NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S AMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRIBUTION SA C/O VAISHASSOCIATES

KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-783/2012XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. AMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRIBUTION SA KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-8963/2012XIV

ASSTT. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusROLLS ROYCE SINGAPORE PVT. LTD.C/O LUTHRA AND LUTHRA CAS

H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO, ANIL KUMARGAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No.-8961/2012XIV

ASSTT. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusROLLS ROYCE SINGAPORE PVT. LTD.C/O LUTHRA AND LUTHRA CAS

H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO, ANIL KUMARGAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No.-8962/2012XIV

ASSTT. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusROLLS ROYCE SINGAPORE PVT.LTD. C/OLUTHRA AND LUTHRA CAS

H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO, ANIL KUMARGAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No.-2241/2013XIV

DIRECTOR I.T.,INTERNATIONALTAXATION ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTRAVELPORT INC RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-7222/2013XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTRAVELPORT INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

Page 111: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-2956/2014XIV

THE DIR. OF I.T. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTRAVELPORT INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-2242/2013XIV

DIRECTOR OF INCOMETAX,INTL.TAXATION ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTRAVELPORT INC. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A.No.-1596-1598/2014XIV

AMADEUS IT GROUP SA KAVITA JHA

Versus

DIT -1 INTERNATIONAL TAXATION NEWDELHI

ConnectedC.A. No.-391/2015XIV

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GALILEO NEDERLAND BV RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-3779/2015XIV

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAXNEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GALILEO NEDERLAND BV (NOWTRAVELPORT GLOBAL DISTRIBUTIONSYSTEMS BV)

RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-1297/2015XIV

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR INCOME TAX,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GALILEO NADERLAND BV. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-3780/2015XIV

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S GALILEO NADERLAND BV RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A.No.-6079-6080/2016XIV

ASSTT. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE-1(2), NEW DELHI AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S TRAVELPORT GLOBALDISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BV (EARLIER,GALILEO NEDERLAND BV)

RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A.No.-6077-6078/2016XIV

ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. TRAVELPORT GLOBALDISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BV RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A.No.-6081-6082/2016XIV

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAXAND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. TRAVELPORT GLOBALDISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BV RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A.No.-7373-7374/2016XIV

ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX,C-1(2) (IT) . AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. TRAVELPORT GLOBALDISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BV RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

Page 112: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-4332/2017XIV

TRAVELPORT L.P., USA DEVESH KUMAR TRIPATHI

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX(INTERNATIONAL) TAXATION 3NEW DELHI

ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-4333/2017XIV

TRAVELPORT L.P., USA DEVESH KUMAR TRIPATHI

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION-3, NEWDELHI

ConnectedC.A. No.-4552/2017XIV

TRAVELPORT L.P., USA DEVESH KUMAR TRIPATHI

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION-3, NEWDELHI

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-16376-/2017XIV

TRAVELPORT L.P. USA DEVESH KUMAR TRIPATHI

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION 3 NEWDELHI

ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

FOR ADMISSIONConnectedSLP(C) No.-16416-/2017XIV

TRAVELPORT L.P. USA DEVESH KUMAR TRIPATHI

Versus

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION 3 NEWDELHI

ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

Diary No. 15633/2017 has been linked with Diary No. 15637/2017 as both arearising out of common order.

ConnectedC.A. No.-10023/2017XIV

AMADEUS IT GROUP SA (ERSTWHILEAMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRIBUTION)

KAVITA JHA

VersusDEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATIONFOR ADMISSION

ConnectedC.A. No.-10024/2017XIV

AMADEUS IT GROUP SA (ERSTWHIELAMADEUS GLOBAL TRAVELDISTRIBUTION)

KAVITA JHA

VersusTHE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOMETAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION NEWDELHIFOR ADMISSION

68 Crl.A. No.-38/2011II-B

ROHTAS AND ANR. RISHI MALHOTRAVersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA, MONIKA GUSAIN

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-775/2011II-B

BIJENDER RISHI MALHOTRA

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA

69 C.A. No.-7041/2011IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 11 ANIL KATIYARVersusM/S C.C.CHOKSHI AND CO. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

Page 113: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8

ConnectedC.A. No.-2916/2012IX

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX11 MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. C.C. CHOKSHI AND CO. THROUGHITS DIRECTOR RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-21852/2012IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S C.C. CHOKSHI AND CO. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-6173/2016III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,MADRAS ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. KANGA AND CO. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CCNo.-1764/2017IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

M/S. RSM AND CO. AMBIT HOUSE RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

70 Crl.A. No.-1768/2010II

SURENDRA SINGH AND ANR. C. N. SREE KUMARVersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND JATINDER KUMAR BHATIA

71 Crl.A. No.-720/2012II-C

JITENDER KUMAR GAURAV AGRAWALVersusTHE STATE OF DELHI B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

72 C.A.No.-10359-10361/2014XII

HINDUSTAN PETROLEUMCORPORATION LTD. AND ANR. SANJAY KAPUR

VersusV. SREEHARI AND ORS. AND ORS. MEENA C. R., SENTHIL JAGADEESANFOR [I/A FOR BRINGING ON RECORD THE LEGAL HEIRS] ON IA 45413/2017 FORCONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 45418/2017

73 C.A. No.-149/2013XIV

MUNICIPAL CORP OF DELHI PRAVEEN SWARUPVersusSRI AUROBINDO EUDCATION SOCIETY .AND ANR.AT TOP

ConnectedC.A. No.-697/2013XIV

M.C.D OF DELHI(S) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusGR GOENKA EDUCATION SOCIETY(REGD) RAKHI RAY

ConnectedC.A. No.-704/2013XIV

M.C.D OF DELHI (N) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusDAV COLLEGE TRUST AND ANR. RAKHI RAY

ConnectedC.A. No.-695/2013XIV

MCD PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusGR GOENKA EDUCATION SOCIETY(REGD) RAKHI RAY

ConnectedC.A. No.-152/2013XIV

M.C.D OF DELHI (N) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusDAV COLLEGE TRUST ANDMANAGEMENT SOCIETY (REGD.) ANDANR.

RAKHI RAY

Page 114: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-698/2013XIV

M.C.D.(N) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusDAV COLLEGE TRUST AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No.-1104/2013XIV

M.C.D OF DELHI (S) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusSRI AUROBINDO EDUCATION SOC(REGD) AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No.-699/2013XIV

M.C.D.(N) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusDAV COLLEGE TRUST ANDMANAGEMENT SOCIETY (REGD.) ANDANR.

RAKHI RAY

ConnectedC.A. No.-701/2013XIV

M.C.D.(N) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusDAV COLLEGE TRUST ANDMANAGEMENT SOCIETY (REGD.) ANDANR.

RAKHI RAY

ConnectedC.A. No.-702/2013XIV

M.C.D OF DELHI (N) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusDAV COLLEGE TRUST AND ANR. RAKHI RAY

ConnectedC.A. No.-151/2013XIV

M.C.D OF DELHI (S) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusSRI AUROBINDO EDUCATION SOC(REGD) AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No.-150/2013XIV

M.C.D OF DELHI (S) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusGR GOENKA EDUCATIONSOCIETY(REGD) RAKHI RAY

ConnectedC.A. No.-707/2013XIV

M.C.D OF DELHI (S) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusVASUDEVA EDUCATIONALFOUNDATION SOCIETY (REGD) ANDANR.

ConnectedC.A. No.-709/2013XIV

MUNICIPAL CORP OF DELHI(E) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusSANATAM DHARAM ADARSH SIKSHASANSTHAN (REGD)

ConnectedC.A. No.-706/2013XIV

MUNICIPAL CORP OF DELHI (S) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusGR GOENKA EDUCATION SOCIETYREGD . AND ANR. RAKHI RAY

ConnectedC.A. No.-696/2013XIV

MCD RAKESH KUMAR-I

VersusTAGORE EDUCATION SOCIETY LTD .AND ORS. N. ANNAPOORANI

ConnectedC.A. No.-1102/2013XIV

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI(S) PRAVEEN SWARUP

Versus

Page 115: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8SUMERMAL JAIN EDUCATIONAL ANDWELFARE SOCIETY(REGD) RAKHI RAY

ConnectedC.A. No.-1103/2013XIV

M.C.D. PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusMOUNT CARMEL SCHOOL SOC. . ANDORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17978/2014XIV

M.C.D (N) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusACTION COMMITTEE UNAIDED (REGD.). AND ANR.

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-39787/2013XIV

M.C.D. PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1]

VersusMAHARAJA AGARSEN TECH. EDUC.SOC.(R. AND ANR.

VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-2]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-39786/2013XIV

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHITHROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusD A V COLLEGE TRUST THROUGH ITSSECRETARY RAKHI RAY

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-24732/2015XIV

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHITHROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusD A V COLLEGE TRUST ANDMANAGEMENT SOCIETY THORUGH ITSSECRETARY

ConnectedC.A. No.-5935/2014XIV

M.C.D. PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusD A V COLLEGE TRUST ANDMANAGEMENT SOCIETY SHUBHANGI TULI

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-4926/2014XIV

M.C.D. (N) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusMAHAVIRA FOUNDATION (REGD)

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-5344/2014XIV

M.C.D. (N) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusD A V COLLEGE TRUST RAKHI RAY

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17980/2014XIV

M.C.D. (N) PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusD A V COLLEGE TRUST

ConnectedSLP(C)No.-24351-24359/2013XIV

PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN ETC. ETC. ABHAY KUMAR[P-1]

Versus

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI PRAVEEN SWARUP[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-10728/2013XIV

MOUNT CARMEL SCHOOL SOCIETY .AND ANR. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA A. N. ARORA, PRAVEEN SWARUP[R-1], B.KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], [R-2]

74 C.A. No.-10683/2017III

THE NEW INDIA COPERTIVE HOUSINGSOCIETY LTD. BHARGAVA V. DESAI

Versus

Page 116: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ANDANR. K. RAJEEV

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } IA No.100002/2017-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

75 Crl.A. No.-1279/2014II-A

MD. ISRAR KHAN @ ISRAR KHAN PURUSHOTTAM SHARMA TRIPATHI[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND KRISHNANAND PANDEYA[R-1], MD. SHAHIDANWAR[R-2], [R-3]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } ONLY CRIMINAL APPEAL TO BE LISTED

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.-5078/2016II-A

MD. ISRAR KHAN @ ISRAR KHAN ANDORS. PURUSHOTTAM SHARMA TRIPATHI

Versus

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND TAPESH KUMAR SINGH, RAJESH SINGHCHAUHAN, [R-2]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }76 C.A. No.-11128/2016

XIVC.I.T.,DELHI ANIL KATIYARVersusBHARTI HEXACOM LTD. KAVITA JHAAT THE TOP

ConnectedC.A. No.-11129/2016XIV

CIT ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11131/2016XIV

CIT, DELHI-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S.BHARTI HEXACOM LTD KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11148/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBHARTI TELENET LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11134/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBHARTI HEXACOM LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11130/2016XIV

C.I.T.,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBHARTI HEXACOM LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11132/2016XIV

C.I.T. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S.BHARTI CELLULAR LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11136/2016XIV

COMMISSIONR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S.BHARTI CELLULAR LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11133/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBHARTI CELLULAR LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11135/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BHARTI CELLULAR LTD KAVITA JHA

Page 117: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-11137/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBHARTI AIRTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11146/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BHARTI TELENET LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11138/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMICROWAVE COMMUNICATION LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No.-11140/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BHARTIINFOTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11141/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BHARTI INFOTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11139/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BHARTI INFOTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11142/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL)-III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONS LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No.-11143/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONS LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No.-11144/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL - III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. MICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONSLTD.

ConnectedC.A. No.-11145/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,(CENTRAL) - III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. MICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONSLTD.

ConnectedC.A. No.-11147/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-11149/2016III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. IDEA CELLULAR LTD. THROUG ITSDIRECTOR E. C. AGRAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-1564/2017XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - V ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. NEW DELHI TELEVISION LTD. B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[R-1]

Page 118: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedSLP(C) No.-10524/2017IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S IDEA CELLULAR LTD THROUGH ITSM.D. E. C. AGRAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-4839/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3/2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S IDEA CELLULAR LTD E. C. AGRAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-7164-/2017XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLEMON TREE HOTELS LTD. SUBODH S. PATIL[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-17501-/2017XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LTD B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[caveat]FOR ADMISSION AND I.R.

ConnectedC.A. No.-9488/2017XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLEMON TREE HOTELS PVT LTD SUBODH S. PATIL[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.53069/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No.-10529/2017XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNEW DELHI TELEVISION LIMITED B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[R-1]

77 C.A.No.-1082-1083/2017III-A

NEENA JAIN AND ORS. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

VersusSTATE OF U.P. DEPARTMENT OF URBANPLANNING SECRETARIAT THROUGHSECRETARY AND ANR.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-1085/2017III-A

MILAP CHANDRA JAIN PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusROOP KISHORE AND ORS. VIKRANT SINGH BAIS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-1086/2017III-A

SHREE CHAND JAIN PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusHOTCHAND ABHA JAIN{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-1089/2017III-A

MILAP CHANDRA JAIN PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusNANAK CHAND @ NANAK RAM PUJA SHARMA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-1088/2017III-A

SHREE CHAND JAIN PRATIBHA JAIN

VersusSRI LAXMAN PRASAD AGRAWAL (D)THR. LRS. ABHA JAIN

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

Page 119: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-1087/2017III-A

MILAP CHANDRA JAIN PRATIBHA JAIN

Versus

NEENA JAIN AND ORS. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }78 C.A. No.-4443/2017

III-ARADHEY SHYAM MISHRA PETITIONER-IN-PERSONVersusTHE ELECTION COMMISSIONER OFINDIA THROUGH ITS CHIEF ELECTIONCOMMISSIONER AND ORS.

MOHIT D. RAM, MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-3]

As per Court's order dated 13.09.2017, let this matter be listed on 31.10.2017before some other Bench.

79 C.A.No.-8595-8596/2016XII

VENUGOPALASWAMY TEMPLE REP. BYEXECUTIVE OFFICER, ETC. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

VersusK.T. VENUGOPALAN AND ORS. ETC.AND ORS. M. A. CHINNASAMY, K. KRISHNA KUMAR

ONLY IA 8-9/2016 and IA No.54675/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS and IA No.54677/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. FOR[DIRECTIONS] ON IA 8/2016

80 Crl.A. No.-497/2017II-C

YOGESH BAKHSHI JAY KISHOR SINGH[P-1]VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedCrl.A. No.-496/2017II-C

M/S. BALLARPUR INDUSTRIES LTD. ABHAY KUMAR

VersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONINSPECTOR OF POLICE

M. YOGESH KANNA, MUKESH KUMARMARORIA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

81 C.A. No.-3351/2007XII

HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPN. LTD.THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGER PARIJAT SINHA

VersusR. SARAVANAN AND ANR AND ANR. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.104549/2017-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IA No.104550/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.

82 C.A. No.-3834/2017XIV

ANIL GULATI BHARTI TYAGIVersusSMT. PROMILA GULATI WAJEEH SHAFIQ{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.98681/2017-PERMISSION TO ADDFURTHER ADDITIONAL PRAYERS IN THE APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION Courtvide order dated 3.3.2017 directed to list the matter in the second week of April2017

83 C.A. No.-2095/2007IX

VILAS DINKAR BHAT NARESH KUMARVersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

84 C.A. No.-4746/2017XVI

SARAF INFRA PROJECTS LTD. T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR[P-1]Versus

STATE OF WEST BENGAL . AND ORS.NANDINI SEN MUKHERJEE[R-1], [R-2], L. C.AGRAWALA[R-3], MUKESH KUMARMARORIA[R-4]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } C.A. NO.4746/2017 be de-tagged from the batch of6079/2017 and be listed after four weeks as per court's order dated 16.8.2017.

85 Crl.A. No.-440/2013II-A

SANJAY SINGH T. N. SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Page 120: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8and IA No.83878/2017-XTRA

86 C.A. No.-2913/2013XI -A

BINDU PHILIPS REP. BY P.O.A. KAMINI JAISWALVersusSUNIL JACOB SANAND RAMAKRISHNANlist in the first week of november 2017 IA No.56523/2017-APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONS FOR [Application for Direction] ON IA 8/2014 FOR [PER BYCM(IA FOR DIRECTIONS)] ON IA 33306/2017 FOR ON IA 11/2017

87 Crl.A. No.-184/2013II-A

SANJAY TIWARI RUKHSANA CHOUDHURYVersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH MISHRA SAURABHApplication for Bail (IA No.75808/2017) and Application for exemption from filingofficial translation (IA No.75811/2017)

88 C.A. No.-1364/2017III

BOMBAY GOODS TRANSPORTASSOCIATION AND ORS AND ORS. LIZ MATHEW

VersusMUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGIONDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. SRI KRISHNA PD. LATH, ABHIJAT P. MEDH

89 C.A. No.-132/2016XIV

CANON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ANIL KUMAR GAUTAMVersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR

AT THE TOP

ConnectedC.A. No.-134/2016XIV

DAIKIN AIRCONDITIONING INDIAPRIVATE LIMITED ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-133/2016XIV

DAIKIN AIRCONDITIONING INDIAPRIVATE LIMITED ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM[P-1]

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-135/2016XIV

SONY ERICSSON MOBILECOMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT.LTD.(NOW) MERGED WITH SONY INDIA PVTLTD) NEW DELHI

AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-138/2016XIV

SONY ERICSSON MOBILECOMMUNICATION INDIA PVT. LTD.(NOW MERGED WITH SONY INDIA PVTLTD)

AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-137/2016XIV

CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 3(1) NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-136/2016XIV

CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 3(1) ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-139/2016XIV

CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD. KISHORE KUNAL

Versus

Page 121: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-141/2016XIV

CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD. THR. MASAONAKA, MD KISHORE KUNAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-140/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHIVersusM/S. CANNON INDIA PVT. LTD. ANIL KATIYAR, , ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No.-2669/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S HAIER APPLIANCES INDIA PVT.LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No.-143/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHIVersusM/S DAIKIN AIR-CONDITIONING INDIAPVT. LTD. ANIL KATIYAR, , ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No.-2668/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. HAIER APPLICANCES INDIA PVT.LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No.-142/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VNEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S REEBOK INDIA COMPANY LTD. KAVITA JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-144/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SHARP BUSINESS SYSTEMS INDIALTD.

ConnectedC.A. No.-151/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. DAIKIN AIR - CONDITIONING INDIAPVT. LTD. ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No.-145/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. CASIO INDIA CO. PVT. LTD KISHORE KUNAL

ConnectedC.A. No.-147/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. CASIO INDIA CO. (P) LTD. KISHORE KUNAL

ConnectedC.A. No.-146/2016XIV

REEBOK INDIA COMPANY LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-148/2016XIV

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 3 (1) NEW DEHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

Page 122: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-3937/2017XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusDISCOVERY COMMUNICATION INDIA SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-150/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSTRYKER INDIA PVT. LTD. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No.-149/2016XIV

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-521/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1,NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. AMADEUS INDIA PVT. LTD. SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-527/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusTOSHIBA INDIA PVT. LTD. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

ConnectedC.A. No.-526/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI - 8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SHARPA BUSINESS SYSTEM(INDIA) PVT. LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No.-152/2016XIV

REEBOK INDIA COMPANY KAVITA JHA

VersusADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No.-1219/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEWDELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No.-2703/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE 3(1) ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. CANON INDIA PVT. LTD. ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

ConnectedC.A. No.-4808/2016XIV

HAIER APPLIANCES (INDIA ) P. LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX

ConnectedC.A. No.-5024/2016XIV

HAIER APPLIANCES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

ConnectedC.A. No.-4809/2016XIV

HAIER APPLIANCES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

ConnectedC.A. No.-4412/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -IVNEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusHAIER APPLIANCES INDIA PVT LTD

Page 123: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A.No.-5905-5906/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANDANR. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA)PVT. LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-5903/2016XIV

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA)PVT. LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-5904/2016XIV

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA)PVT. LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-6485/2016XIV

THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX RANGE 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE (INDIA )PVT LTD PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A.No.-11110-11111/2016XIV

ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-2572/2017XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. AVERY DENNISION (INDIA) PVTLTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]

and IA No.109421/2017-I/A FOR DE-TAGGING SLP BEING CA NO. 2572 OF 2017FROM CA NO. 132 OF 2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-2430/2017XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDELHI 2 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BAUSCH AND LOMB EYE CAREINDIA PVT LTD PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No.-3070/2017XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusAVERY DENNISON (INDIA) PVT LTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]and IA No.109423/2017-I/A FOR DE-TAGGING SLP BEING CA NO. 3070 OF 2017FROM CA NO. 132 OF 2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-5514/2017XIV

PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-09 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S TOSHIBA INDIA PVT LTD AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-11201/2017XIV

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE 4 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusLE PASSAGE TO INDIA TOURS ANDTRAVELS (P) LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1]

IA No.80934/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.80937/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No.-15498/2017XIV

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 124: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8LE PASSAGE TO INDIA TOURS ANDTRAVELS (P) LTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]

IA No.90874/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.90879/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No.-17811/2017XIV

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBAUSCH AND LOMB EYECARE INDIAPVT LTDIA No.103152/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.103155/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

90 C.A. No.-5529/2016III

UNA NAGAR PALIKA PREM PRAKASHVersusKALIBEN BALUBHAI MAKWANA . ANDANR. ANUSHREE PRASHIT KAPADIA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-5530/2016III

UNA NAGAR PALIKA PREM PRAKASH

VersusNANIBEN AND ORS. ANUSHREE PRASHIT KAPADIA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5531/2016III

UNA NAGAR PALIKA PREM PRAKASH

VersusMAHESH B. DESAI AND ORS. ANUSHREE PRASHIT KAPADIA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5532/2016III

UNA NAGAR PALIKA PREM PRAKASH

VersusCHANDRIKABEN AND ORS. ANUSHREE PRASHIT KAPADIA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6490/2016III

UNA NAGAR PALIKA THROUGH CHIEFOFFICER PREM PRAKASH

VersusDIVIBEN AND ORS. PROMILA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

91 C.A.No.-6949-6950/2004IX

THE COMMISSIONER ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LTD.THROUGH M.D. KHAITAN & CO.

{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 } ON 11.10.2017 AS FIRST CASE.

ConnectedC.A. No.-5320/2012IX

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BOMBAY CYCLE RAKESH K. SHARMA{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5319/2012IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5,MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BOMBAY CYCLE RAKESH K. SHARMA{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-20625/2012III

C.I.T AHMEDABAD ANIL KATIYAR

VersusCORE PARENTERALS LIMITED P. S. SUDHEER{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }

Page 125: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedC.A. No.-890/2012XIV

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXII INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT . B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusJINDAL EQUIPMENTS LEASINGANDCONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD. KAVITA JHA

{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-10169/2010IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. BOMBAY CYCLE AND MOTORAGENCY P.LTD RAKESH K. SHARMA

{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-10168/2010IX

C.I.T, MUMBAI B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusM/S. BOMBAY CYCLE &MOTOR AGENCYLTD.{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-3624/2012XI -A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE I KERALA ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S ACCELERATED FREEZE DRYINGCO.LTD. T. G. NARAYANAN NAIR[R-1]

{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-5751/2011XII

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusM/S ISKAEMECO REGENT LIMITED BHARTI TYAGI[R-1]{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 } and IA No.100994/2017-APPLICATION FOR BRINGON RECORD THE NEW INCORPORATED NAME OF RESPONDENT

ConnectedC.A. No.-1214/2012XIV

M/S. ROLLATAINERS LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISIONER OF INCOMETAX ANIL KATIYAR{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-780/2012XII

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusKOTHARI SUGARS CHEMICALS LIMITED PAREKH & CO.{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-2164/2012XIV

DCM SHRIRAM INDUSTRIES LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL III{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-20144/2012III

C.I.T-III ANIL KATIYAR

VersusCORE PARENTERALS LIMITED P. S. SUDHEER{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-7951/2012IX

C.I.T ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S BOMBAY CYCLE AND MOTORAGENCY LTD. RAKESH K. SHARMA

{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }

Page 126: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8ConnectedSLP(C) No.-4008/2014III

CIT ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGUJARAT STATE FERTILISERS ANDCHEMIALS LTD BHARGAVA V. DESAI[Caveat]

{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }ConnectedSLP(C) No.-5782/2014III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGUJARAT STATE FERTILIZER ANDCHEMICAL LTD BHARGAVA V. DESAI[Caveat]

{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-4345/2014XII

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S INNVOL MEDICAL INDIA LTD RABIN MAJUMDER{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-18964/2014IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXII ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S DHOLGIRI INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-24752/2014III

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IBARODA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGUJARAT STATE FERTILIZERS ANDCHEMICAL LIMITED BHARGAVA V. DESAI

{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }ConnectedSLP(C) No.-4977/2015IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S WEIZMANN LTD RASHMIKUMAR MANILAL VITHLANI{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6942/2015III

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX.-8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. SANTOGEN SILK MILLS LTD. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-6648/2016IX

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusPAL CREDIT AND CAPITAL LTDTHROUGH ITS DIRECTOR MANISH K. BISHNOI

{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 } Connected with D.No.26580/2003ConnectedSLP(C) No.-29776/2016XII

M/S. RAMANIYAM HOMES P. LTD. K J JOHN AND CO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 } List alongwith Civil Appeal No. 5751/2011.

ConnectedC.A. No.-6931-/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IBARODA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusALEMBIC LTD BARODA KHAITAN & CO.{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 } and IA No.94002/2017-APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONS

92 C.A. No.-5265/2012IX

JANARDHAN WAMAN SARODE ANAGHA S. DESAIVersusARUN RAU PAWAR ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

Page 127: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 8{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }

93 C.A. No.-1265/2007XVI

THE PEERLESS GEN.FIN K. RAJEEVVersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL KATIYAR{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 } As prayed list these matters on 8.11.2017 on the topof list

ConnectedC.A. No.-5907/2015XVI

THE PEERLESS GENERAL FINANCEAND INVESTMENT CO. LTD. MEERA MATHUR

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXKOLKATA-1{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5908/2015XVI

PEERLESS GENERAL FINANCE MEERA MATHUR

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXKOLKATA-1{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }

94 C.A. No.-3529/2008IX

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]VersusM/S PREMIER LIMITED (FORMERLYPREMIER AUTOMOBILES LTD.) ANDORS.

RAJAN NARAIN[R-1], MANISH K. BISHNOI[R-1]

{Fixed Date for 09-11-2017 }

NEW DELHI03-11-2017 17:08:18

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 128: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 30 OF 2017 FROM : 07-11-2017 To 09-11-2017

COURT NO. : 9HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate

1 Crl.A.No.-1616-1618/2008II

JAYASREE DESAI AND ANR. YOGINDER HANDOO[P-1]

Versus

SANJAY MUTHA AND ORS. SUDHA GUPTA[R-1], S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-1], [R-2]

AS PER R.P.DT.20.02.2017 ONLY CIVIL APPEAL NOS.4626/13 AND 6705/13 MAYBE LISTED BEFORE THE HON'BLE CHAMBER JUDGE ON 21.08.2017

2 C.A. No.-4454/2009IV-A

M.P.KANDASWAMY NIKHIL NAYYARVersusN.M.SHIVALINGAIAH AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE, VIJAY KUMAR

3 C.A. No.-6272/2010IX

VIJAY . AND ORS. CHANDAN RAMAMURTHIVersus

NANA . AND ORS. RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE, SUNILKUMAR VERMA, ASHA GOPALAN NAIR

ConnectedC.A. No.-1001/2013III

CHANDRAKANT(DEAD) THR. LRS. RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI[P-1]

Versus

SITALSINGH ASARAM NAIK . AND ORS. ATUL BABASAHEB DAKH[R-1], KAILASHCHAND[R-2]

4 C.A. No.-283/2010XII-A

STATE OF A.P. VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATESVersusB.VIJAYENDER REDDY (DEAD) SUMANTH NOOKALA[R-1]

5 Crl.A.No.-680-681/2009II-C

PATTU RAJAN AISHWARYA BHATI

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-896/2009II-C

JANARDHANAN AISHWARYA BHATI

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

ConnectedCrl.A.No.-820-821/2009II-C

P.RAJGOPAL AND ORS. AISHWARYA BHATI, [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7], [P-8]

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

ConnectedCrl.A.No.-799-800/2009II-C

DANIEL K. K. MANI

Versus

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

Page 129: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 9ConnectedCrl.A. No.-824/2009II-C

TAMIL @ TAMIL SELVAM AND ORS. AISHWARYA BHATI, [P-2], [P-3]

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

ConnectedCrl.A.No.-801-802/2009II-C

KARMEGAM AND ORS. K. K. MANI, [P-2], [P-3]

Versus

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

ConnectedCrl.A.No.-822-823/2009II-C

P.RAJAGOPAL AISHWARYA BHATI

Versus

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA

ConnectedSLP(Crl)No.-9261-9262/2015II-C

P. RAJAGOPAL AND ORS. AISHWARYA BHATI

Versus

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

6 C.A.No.-7184-7185/2013XVI -A

J S LUTHRA ACADEMY AND ANR. BIMAL ROY JAD[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIRAND ORS. M. SHOEB ALAM[R-2], [R-6]

7 C.A.No.-3846-3861/2015XIV

UNION OF INDIA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusNIRANJAN KUMAR AND ORS. SUMITA HAZARIKA[R-1], PRIYA PURI[R-1]

8 Crl.A. No.-535/2011II-B

THE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAINVersusDALBIR SINGH PARMANAND PANDEY

9 Crl.A. No.-1392/2014II

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH G. N. REDDYVersusM/S. SHALINI STEELS PRIVATE LIMITEDAND ORS. Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO

10 C.A. No.-10380/2014XIV

UNION OF INDIA THROUGHSECRETARY AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusTHE TZUWAR CLAN OF UNGMAVILLAGE SH. IMOLEMBA TATAR ANDORS.

PRAVIR CHOUDHARY

11 C.A. No.-4081/2014XVII

M/S OTIS ELEVATOR CO.(INDIA) LTD S. S. SHROFFVersusRASHMI HANDA AND ORS. AP & J CHAMBERS[Caveat]

12 Crl.A. No.-1301/2015II-A

LATESH @ DADU BABURAO KARLEKAR (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTAVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HOMEDEPARTMENT NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.112333/2017-I/A FOR BAILConnectedCrl.A. No.-165/2016II-A

ANIL ANKUSH GADEKAR RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-141/2016II-A

VISHNU MARUTI BULE RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE

Versus

Page 130: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 9THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-91/2016II-A

VIJAY @ VIJAY ISTRIWALA RAMDULARINIRMAL S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-94/2016II-A

SUNIL KASHINATH CHANDANSHIVA S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

13 Crl.A. No.-720/2016II

DEV KANYA TIWARI LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGHVersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH HOMEDEPARTMENT SECRETARY

ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD[R-1][P-RES]

14 C.A. No.-8461/2009XV

VINOD KUMAR GUPTA PRATIBHA JAINVersusKIRAN DEVI MILIND KUMAR

15 C.A.No.-4804-4805/2011X

SUDHIR KUMAR GOYAL ASHOK MATHUR

VersusSUNITA GOYAL SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA

16 C.A. No.-6460/2008XII-A

VIJENDRA KUMAR AND ORS. AND ORS. ABHIJIT SENGUPTA[P-1]Versus

THE COMMISSIONER VENKAT PALWAI LAW ASSOCIATES, [R-1][P-RES][Gr]

17 Crl.A. No.-315/2011II-A

MAUVIN GODINHO CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF GOA K J JOHN AND CO[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-312/2011II-A

KATREDDI VENKATA SAHAYEKRISHNAKUMAR BINU TAMTA[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF GOA AND ORS. A. SUBHASHINI[R-1], UMESH KUMARKHAITAN, [R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-311/2011II-A

M/S GLASS FIBRE DIVISION( A DIVISIONOF BINANI ZINC LTD.) PRESENTLYKNOWN AS M/S GOA GLASS FIBRE LTD

BINU TAMTA

Versus

THE STATE OF GOA AND ORS. A. SUBHASHINI, UMESH KUMAR KHAITAN,[R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-314/2011II-A

M/S MARMAGOA STEEL LTD. AND ORS. UMESH KUMAR KHAITAN

VersusTHE STATE OF GOA A. SUBHASHINI

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-313/2011II-A

T.NAGARAJAN ASHA GOPALAN NAIR

VersusTHE STATE OF GOA ANIL KATIYAR, A. SUBHASHINI

18 Crl.A.No.-359-360/2010II-C

SHEILA SEBASTIAN PRAMOD DAYAL

VersusR.JAWAHARAJ LEGION OF LAWYERS

19 Crl.A. No.-94-97/2013II-A

AMAR NATH JHA HIMANSHU MUNSHIVersusNAND KISHORE SINGH GOPAL SINGH[R-2]

Page 131: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 920 Crl.A.

No.-385-386/2008II-A

YASHWANT SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAThe name of deceased appellant no.1 (Bhaskar) has been deleted from the array ofparties in Criminal Appeal no.385/2008 vide Court's order dated 22-8-2016 passedin Cr.M.P. No.13146/2016.

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-299/2008II-A

SUDHAKAR S/O MAROTRAO THAKRE SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A.No.-387-388/2008II-A

JAHIRUDDIN SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ConnectedCrl.A.No.-182-187/2009II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[P-1]

Versus

BHASKAR SITARAM NARULE . AND ORS.SHIVAJI M. JADHAV[R-1], [R-2], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10],VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU[R-3]

21 Crl.A.No.-734-739/2011II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH MISHRA SAURABH

VersusSURESH KUMAR JADIA AND ORS. T. MAHIPAL, [R-2], [R-3], AFTAB ALI KHAN[R-4]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

22 Crl.A. No.-569/2011II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHVersusDEEPAK BHASKAR Y. KULKARNI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-570/2011II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

VersusNAR SINGH BHASKAR Y. KULKARNI{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

23 Crl.A. No.-624/2016II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ARJUN GARG[P-1]VersusNANDE @ NANDKISHORE SINGH

24 Crl.A. No.-637/2016II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH MISHRA SAURABHVersusRAJARAM @ RAJA

25 Crl.A. No.-1839/2011II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH ARJUN GARG[P-1]VersusMEWALAL ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD[R-1]

26 Crl.A.No.-741-742/2011II-A

UNION OF INDIA MANISH VASHISHTHA

VersusJAROOPARAM AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAINCriminal Appeal No.742 of 2011 is dismissed as abated. Vide Order dated11.4.2016 passed by Hon'ble Judge in Chamber inCrl.MP.No. 5197-98

27 Crl.A. No.-1600/2011II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH MISHRA SAURABH[P-1]Versus

HARI PRASAD AND ANR. MANJEET KIRPAL[R-1], AKSHATSHRIVASTAVA[R-2]

Page 132: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 928 Crl.A.

No.-1871-1873/2013II-A

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

VersusDINESH DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA

29 C.A. No.-2994/2010IX

SUVARNALATA MADHURIMA TATIAVersusMOHAN ANANDRAO DESHMUKH ANDANR. ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA

{Fixed Date for 08-11-2017 }30 Crl.A. No.-2030/2010

IICHHANGA RANBIR SINGH YADAV[P-1]Versus

AASU AND ORS. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], MILIND KUMAR[R-8]

READYConnectedCrl.A. No.-2031/2010II

SUFEDA AND ORS. EQUITY LEX ASSOCIATES, [P-2], [P-3]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-2032/2010II

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN MILIND KUMAR

VersusAASU AND ORS.READY

31 Crl.A. No.-408/2014II-A

BHASKARRAO AND ORS. ANAGHA S. DESAIVersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-520/2014II-A

DILIP UTTAMRAO MANKAR AND ANR. ANAGHA S. DESAI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1328/2014II-A

LAXMAN BHAURAO BHAGAT DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAand IA No.92181/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1228/2014II-A

BABARAO ANAGHA S. DESAI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAFOR 07.09.2017

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1223/2014II-A

PRABHAKAR ANAGHA S. DESAI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1229/2014II-A

MAROTI MAHADEORAO KOSARE ANAGHA S. DESAI

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1330/2014II-A

RAVINDRA AND ANR. DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ConnectedCrl.A. No.-1578/2014II-A

VISHNU BHARAO BHAGAT . AND ANR. DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

Page 133: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 932 Crl.A. No.-872/2015

II-CKHURSHID AHMED SYED MEHDI IMAM[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR M. SHOEB ALAM[R-1]and IA No.81824/2017-I/A FOR GRANT OF BAIL FOR GRANT OF BAIL ON IA7796/2016 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 7797/2016

NEW DELHI03-11-2017 16:59:40

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 134: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 30 OF 2017 FROM : 07-11-2017 To 09-11-2017

COURT NO. : 10HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDARREGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 C.A. No.-660/2003

XVINDER SINGH (D) THR. LRS. AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]Versus

KEHAR SINGH (D) THR. LRS. AND ORS. ABHAY KUMAR, [R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-1], L.C. AGRAWALA[R-1]

2 C.A. No.-8672/2010IV-A

STATE OF M.PVersusM.P. VIDYUT KARAMACHARI SANGHAND ORS. AND ORS. RAKESH K. SHARMA[R-3]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-8674/2010IV-A

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.

VersusPRISM CEMENT AVAM MINES SHRAMIKSANGH E. C. AGRAWALA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-8673/2010IV-A

STATE OF M.P. . AND ANR. AND ANR.

VersusHEAVY ELECTRICALS M. TRADE UNION. AND ANR AND ANR.

LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH, GAURAVAGRAWAL[R-2]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8676/2010IV-A

B.H.E.L. KARMACHARI TRADEUNION,BHOPAL B. K. SATIJA

VersusHEAVY ELECTRICALS MAZ.TRADEUNION . AND ORS. LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH, B. S. BANTHIA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-8684/2010IV-A

STATE OF M.P. . AND ANR.

VersusUJJAIN MILL MAZDOOR SANGH(INTUC){Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8682/2010IV-A

STATE OF M.P.

VersusNARAYAN SINGH{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8677/2010IV-A

STATE OF M.P.

VersusMOORAT SINGH{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

Page 135: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 10ConnectedC.A. No.-8680/2010IV-A

STATE OF M.P. AND ANR. AND ANR.

VersusM.P. LABOUR BAR ASSOCIATION{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8679/2010IV-A

STATE OF M.P. . AND ANR.

VersusTEXTILE EMPLOYEES UNION SHANKAR DIVATE{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8675/2010IV-A

STATE OF M.P. AND ANR. AND ANR.

VersusDEWAS MAZDOOR SANGH (INTUC){Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8681/2010IV-A

STATE OF M.P. AND ANR. AND ANR.

VersusTEXTILE LABOR UNION PURVA NIMANKHANDWA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8683/2010IV-A

STATE OF M.P. AND ANR.

VersusENGINEERING MAZDOOR SANGH{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8678/2010IV-A

STATE OF M.P. . AND ANR.

VersusINDORE MILL MAZDOOR SANGH{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8685/2010IV-A

HEAVY ELECTRICALS MAZDOOR TRADEUNIONVersusSTATE OF M.P.. AND ORS. B. S. BANTHIA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8688/2010IV-A

GRASIM MAZDOOR SANGH LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH

VersusSTATE OF M.P.. AND ANR.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-8687/2010IV-A

M.P.VIDYUT KARAMCHARI SANGHFEDERATIONVersusM.P.STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD . ANDORS. RAKESH K. SHARMA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-8686/2010IV-A

AUDYOGIK SHRAMIK SANGH SATISH VIG[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF M.P.. AND ANR. AND ANR. B. S. BANTHIA[R-1], [R-2]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

3 C.A. No.-6762/2009XV

STATE OF RAJASHTAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMARVersusRAMESHWAR LAL BOHRA (D) THR. LRS.AND ANR. SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA, ANUJ BHANDARI

4 C.A. No.-3157/2010IX

GOPINATH BHAGWAN CHAVAN UDAY B. DUBE[P-1]Versus

Page 136: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 10

UTTAM YESHWANT CHAVAN . AND ORS. CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI[R-1], ANILKUMAR[R-1]

5 C.A. No.-8787/2010X

CHANDRA SINGH(D) TR.LR.. AND ANR. R. SATHISHVersus

JAGAT SINGH (D) THR. LRS. . AND ORS. ANNAM D. N. RAO, SHREE PAL SINGH, K.SARADA DEVI

and IA No.68099/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.6 C.A. No.-6521/2010

IXRINOO SEHGAL UGRA SHANKAR PRASADVersusGOA COASTAL ZONE MANGT.AUTHORITY . AND ANR. A. SUBHASHINI

7 C.A. No.-3583/2008IV

SWARAJ ENGINES LTD. ATISHI DIPANKAR[P-1]VersusPUNJAB STATE INDUSTRIAL DEV.CORPN.LTD. ARUN K. SINHA[R-1]

8 C.A.No.-7207-7208/2008IV-A

PHAREZ JOHN ABRAHAM(DEAD) BYLRS. ANITHA SHENOY

VersusARUL JOTHI SIVASUBRAMANIAM K. .AND ORS. S. SRINIVASAN, SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

9 C.A.No.-7486-7487/2008XVI

SHYAM NARAYAN SINGH AND ANR. AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEY

VersusRAMA KANT SINGH . AND ORS. DEBA PRASAD MUKHERJEE

10 C.A. No.-1555/2008X

AANAND PRAKASH AND ORS. B. SUNITA RAOVersusPRITAM KUMAR VERMA . AND ORS. RAJIV NANDA, BHARAT SANGAL

11 C.A. No.-10028/2010XI -A

GOVT. OF KERALA AND ANR. C. K. SASIVersusTHOMMACHAN AND ORS. RANJITH K. C.

12 C.A. No.-784/2010IV-A

THULASIDHARA AND ANR. (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTAVersusNARAYANAPPA K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA

13 C.A. No.-1882/2010XV

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SECRETARYAND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusDURGESH SHANKAR AND ANR. AMIT KUMAR, COAC

14 C.A. No.-5676/2009IX

SEVA SADAN EDUCATION SOCIETYTHR. JT. SECY. VIKAS MEHTA

VersusPYARELAL RAMDEO SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA

ConnectedC.A. No.-5823/2009IX

PYARELAL RAMDEV SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA

VersusSEVA SADAN EDUCATION SOCIETY VIKAS MEHTA

15 C.A. No.-6049/2007IV-A

SIRDAR K.B.RAMACHANDRA RAJ URS(DEAD) THROUGH LRS. PARIJAT SINHA

VersusSARAH C URS VIKAS MEHTA

ConnectedC.A. No.-6050/2007IV-A

LEELA TRIPURA AND ORS. PARIJAT SINHA

VersusSARAH C URS . AND ORS. VIKAS MEHTA

16 C.A. No.-3890/2009IV-A

MUNEMMA (D) BY LRS. AND ANR. (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTAVersus

Page 137: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 10M.SADANANDAPPA(D) BY LRS.. ANDORS. K. K. MANI

17 C.A. No.-7374/2008XII

H. VASANTHI CHANDAN KUMAR[P-1]VersusA. SANTHA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. ANDORS. AND ORS. VIPIN NAIR[R-1][Pr]

18 C.A. No.-2165/2009IV-A

C.DODDANARAYANA REDDY(D) BY LRS.AND ORS. P. R. RAMASESH

VersusC.JAYARAMA REDDY (DEAD) BY LR. ANDORS.

(MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA, RAGHAVENDRA S.SRIVATSA, [R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9]

and IA No.108918/2017-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION and IANo.108921/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN.

19 C.A. No.-6746/2009IX

NATIONAL BUILDING CORPORATIONTHROUGH ITS PARTNER MR. DEVINDERDEVRAJ GHAI AND ANR.

K J JOHN AND CO

Versus

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS. S. RAJAPPA, RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE,NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

and IA No.90979/2017-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

20 C.A.No.-7254-7255/2009XI -A

R.N.SOUMIDA AND ORS. ZULFIKER ALI P. S[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANR. G. PRAKASH[R-1]

21 C.A. No.-2254/2009XII-A

KHAJA NASEERUNDDIN AND ORS. ANDANR. G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

DIST.COLLECTOR AND ORS . Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO, VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES

ConnectedC.A. No.-2255/2009XII-A

KHAJA NASEERUDDIN. AND ANR. G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

VersusCOMMISSIONER Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO

22 C.A.No.-8353-8354/2013XVI -A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA, [P-2], [P-3]

VersusPRADEEP SHARMA KULDIP SINGH

23 C.A. No.-9646/2013XVII

SUDHA GUPTA APPELLANT-IN-PERSONVersusDLF LTD AND ORS. RAJAN NARAIN{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE INPERSON ON IA 8/2016

24 C.A. No.-946/2016III

M/S. CHITRALEKHA BUILDERS & ANR.THROUGH ANIL G. SHAH POWER OFATTORNEY & HUSBAND OF THEPARTNER

PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusG.I.C. EMPLOYEES SONAL VIHAR CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. AND ANR. O. P. BHADANI[R-1], JAY SAVLA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.70788/2017-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

25 C.A. No.-1457/2007IV

IQBAL SINGH (D) BY LRS. . AND ORS. R. C. GUBRELE, PASHUPATHI NATH RAZDAN,KANHAIYA PRIYADARSHI[P-16]

Versus

LUDHIANA IMPROVEMENT TRUST ANDORS.

ABHAY KUMAR, GAGAN GUPTA, BIRENDRAKUMAR MISHRAANUPAM LAL DAS[I-1][IMPL], [I-2][IMPL]

and IA No.60192/2017-XTRA

Page 138: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 10ConnectedC.A. No.-6278/2009IV

GULRAJ SINGH GREWAL. AND ANR. NANITA SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

26 C.A. No.-11311/2011IV-A

L.I.C.OF INDIA INDRA SAWHNEYVersusK.LOKANATH RAJU . AND ORS.

27 C.A. No.-9791/2010XIV

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. NARESH BAKSHIVersusLATA DEVI AND ORS.

28 C.A. No.-7356/2009IX

MAHABAT KHAN(D) TR.LRS. SHIVAJI M. JADHAVVersusSAFFURA BEGUM RANJAN DWIVEDI

29 C.A.No.-8333-8334/2010IX

BACKWARD CLASS YOUTH RELIEFCOMMITTEE THROUGH ITS CHAIRMANSHRI BAHUSAHEB MULAK AND ORS.

ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

VersusNANDLAL KRISHNAJI BRAMHE ANDORS.

ANAGHA S. DESAI, NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR, GAURAV SHARMA

30 C.A. No.-464/2011IX

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLAPARISHAD AND ANR. KULDIP SINGH[P-1]

VersusBHAURAO RAMRAO DESHMUKH(DEAD)THROUGH LRS MADHUMALATIBBHURAO DESHMUKH AND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-1][Gr], R. R.DESHPANDE[R-1]

31 C.A. No.-7573/2012IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER HUBLI DHARWARURBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYAND ANR.

HETU ARORA SETHI

VersusYATEEN S. SHAH AND ORS. VIJAY KUMAR

32 C.A.No.-7054-7056/2009IV-A

M.P. JAISHANKAR V. N. RAGHUPATHY

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA . AND ORS. NAVEEN R. NATH, ANITHA SHENOY, AMBARQAMARUDDIN

33 C.A. No.-5995/2009IV-A

N. VEDAVATHI V. N. RAGHUPATHYVersusK. INDIRA DEVI RAJESH MAHALE

34 C.A. No.-6047/2010XII

KANDASWAMY (DEAD) THR LRS R. GOPALAKRISHNANVersusPARIASWAMY AND ORS AND ORS. ARUNESHWAR GUPTA

35 C.A. No.-10145/2010IV-A

GANGADHARAIAH AND ANR. RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSAVersusY. A. DESHIKENDRA SAMSTHANA . ANDORS. ANJANA CHANDRASHEKAR

36 C.A. No.-1606/2009XV

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUSTBIKANER ARUNESHWAR GUPTA[P-1]

VersusSWAMI SANWIT SOMGIRI MAHANT .AND ORS.

SURYA KANT, [R-1]MILIND KUMAR[IMPL]

NEW DELHI03-11-2017 17:00:17

Page 139: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 140: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 30 OF 2017 FROM : 07-11-2017 To 09-11-2017

COURT NO. : 12HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAULREGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate

1 C.A. No.-4834/2007XIV

P.E.C. LIMITED THROUGH ITS GENERALMANAGER RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA

VersusAUSTBULK SHIPPING SDN BHD R. K. KHANNA

2 C.A. No.-702/2008XIV

M/S. GUJARAT GUARDIAN LTD.THROUGH ITS NATIONAL HEAD (SALESAND MARKETING)

SANJEEV ANAND[P-1]

VersusATUL GLASS INDUSTRIES LTDTHROUGH ITS DIRECTOR K. K. MOHAN[R-1]

3 C.A. No.-4705/2007XVII

THERMAX LTD. . AND ANR. ASHOK MATHURVersusWINSOME BREWERIES LIMITED (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA

4 C.A. No.-2832/2007XVII

DAULAT SINGH RATHORE GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATIVersusRAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD B. D. SHARMA, K. L. JANJANI

5 C.A. No.-3695/2009III-A

NASIRUDDIN ANUPAM LAL DASVersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHSECRETARY

M. R. SHAMSHAD, VINAY GARG, KAMLENDRAMISHRA

ConnectedC.A. No.-3714/2009III-A

TAJ MOHAMMAD . AND ORS. ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

K. L. JANJANI, [R-3], RAVI PRAKASHMEHROTRA

ConnectedC.A. No.-3709/2009III-A

AKARAM PRAVEEN CHATURVEDI

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHPRINCIPAL SECRETARY ADARSH UPADHYAY, VINAY GARG

ConnectedC.A. No.-3705/2009III-A

RAM BABU SHARMA PRAVEEN CHATURVEDI

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHPRINCIPAL SECRETARY

ConnectedC.A. No.-3699/2009III-A

1KRAM PRAVEEN CHATURVEDI

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHPRINCIPAL SECRETARY VINAY GARG

Page 141: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 12ConnectedC.A. No.-3711/2009III-A

RAM BABU SHARMA PRAVEEN CHATURVEDI

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHPRINCIPAL SECRETARY M. R. SHAMSHAD, VINAY GARG

ConnectedC.A. No.-3702/2009III-A

RAM BABU SHARMA PRAVEEN CHATURVEDI

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHPRINCIPAL SECRETARY

6 C.A. No.-7089/2010IV-A

NANJEGOWDA @ GOWDA (D) BYLRS.ANR K. V. MOHAN

VersusRAMEGOWDA V. N. RAGHUPATHY

7 C.A.No.-9820-9821/2011IV

ARVIND JULKA AND ORS. ASHOK MATHUR, MANJU JETLEY

VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB. AND ORS. T. L. GARG, UTTARA BABBAR, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No.-9822/2011IV

NAVBHARAT ROLLER FLOUR MILLSAND ORS. ASHOK MATHUR[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. UTTARA BABBAR[R-1][Gr], PREMPRAKASH[R-1], P. N. PURI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.-9823/2011IV

M/S AMBA FOOD PROCEEDING PVT.LTD. ASHOK MATHUR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB UTTARA BABBAR[R-1][Gr]

ConnectedC.A. No.-9824/2011IV

B.R.FLOUR MILL GAGAN GUPTA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB UTTARA BABBAR[R-1][Gr]

ConnectedC.A. No.-9825/2011IV

SHIVA ROLLER FLOUR AND RICE MILLS ASHOK MATHUR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB UTTARA BABBAR[R-1][Gr]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No.-677/2007X

KUNAL AGRO MILLS THROUGH ITSPARTNER ASHOK MATHUR

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB THROUGHSECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OFPUNJAB AND ANR.

UTTARA BABBAR[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No.-9828/2011IV

SUMRISH VIJ AND ORS. ASHOK MATHUR

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No.-9826/2011IV

M/S CHANDIGARH FLOUR MILLS(P)LTD.AND ORS. ASHOK MATHUR

VersusCHANDIGARH ADMIN. SUDARSHAN SINGH RAWAT

8 C.A. No.-6069/2008IX

BALWANT VITHAL KADAM NARESH KUMARVersus

SUNIL BABURAOI KADAM VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU, ANAGHA S.DESAI

9 C.A. No.-5039/2009IV-A

REVANSIDDAYAYYA ANJANA CHANDRASHEKARVersusGANGAMMA @ SHASHIKALA . AND ANR. RAJESH MAHALE, ANKOLEKAR GURUDATTA

Page 142: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 1210 C.A. No.-8530/2009

IXUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S. SUSUKA PVT. LTD. . AND ORS. NARESH KUMAR

11 C.A. No.-8104/2011XI -A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ANR. C. K. SASI[P-1]VersusTHITHUTTY . AND ORS. E. M. S. ANAM[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

ConnectedC.A. No.-8483/2011XI -A

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. G. PRAKASH

VersusSAIDALAVI . AND ORS. E. M. S. ANAM, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

ConnectedC.A. No.-8214/2011XI -A

STATE OF KERALA AND ANR. C. K. SASI

VersusTHITHUTTY AND ORS. E. M. S. ANAM

12 C.A. No.-7019/2008XVII

G.M., AREA NO. X, BCCL . AND ANR. ANIP SACHTHEYVersusMAHENDRA PAL BHATIAS/O LATEL.M.BHATIA VINOD KUMAR TEWARI

13 C.A. No.-4487/2009IX

WESTERN COALFIELDS LTD. AND ANR ANIP SACHTHEY, [P-2]Versus

M/S. BALLAPUR COLLIERIES COMPANY. AND ORS

P. I. JOSE, [R-8], ANAGHA S. DESAI, [R-11],ARUN K. SINHA, [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6],[R-7], [R-12]

ConnectedC.A. No.-4488/2009IX

WESTERN COALFIELDS LTD. AND ANR ANIP SACHTHEY, [P-2]

VersusKRISHNA KUMAR DAGA AND ORS ANDORS.

ANAGHA S. DESAI, [R-17], AFTAB ALI KHAN,[R-17]

14 C.A. No.-8414/2009III-A

M/S INCAN CONSULTANCY SERVICESLTD. T. MAHIPAL

VersusOFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR RAVINDRA KUMAR, P. N. GUPTA

ConnectedC.A. No.-8416/2009III-A

M/S INCAN CONSTRUCTINS LTD. T. MAHIPAL

VersusOFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, U.P. P. N. GUPTA

15 C.A. No.-1455/2011IV-A

M/S SHEKAR ENTERPRISES NULI & NULIVersusJ.J.EXPORTERS LTD. AND ORS. P. R. RAMASESH, KHAITAN & CO.

ConnectedC.A. No.-1456/2011IV-A

M/S. KARNATAKA ENTERPRISES RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA

VersusJ.J.EXPORTERS LTD. . AND ORS. P. R. RAMASESH, KHAITAN & CO.

ConnectedC.A. No.-1457/2011IV-A

J.J. EXPORTERS LTD. KHAITAN & CO.

Versus

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR AND ORS. P. R. RAMASESH, RAGHAVENDRA S.SRIVATSA, ANJANA CHANDRASHEKAR

16 C.A. No.-3268/2009XII-A

M/S. KCP BIO-TECH LTD. SARLA CHANDRAVersusM/S. ANAND CONSTRUCTIONS

17 C.A. No.-670-671/2011IV-A

C.VENKATA SWAMY (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTAVersusH.N. SHIVANNA (D) BY LR. ETC. ANDORS. RAJESH MAHALE

Page 143: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 12

18 C.A. No.-4291/2009XIV

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFDEFENCE THROUGH THE SECRETARYAND ORS.

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNARESH KUMAR DEEPAK GOEL

19 C.A. No.-5337/2007IX

PISCES INDUSTRIAL LTD. THROUGHDIRECTOR SUDHIR KUMAR GUPTA

VersusSECURITIES EXCHANGE BOARD OFINDIA AND ANR AND ANR. ANIP SACHTHEY, RABIN MAJUMDER[R-2]

20 C.A. No.-4180/2008IV

PATIALA IMPROVEMENT TRUST ANDANR. T. N. SINGH

VersusM/S BALRAJ SINGH AND ANR.

21 C.A. No.-3060/2008XI -A

JOSE PULIKKEN P. I. JOSEVersusDAMIEN SUBSIDIES AND KURIES LTD. ROMY CHACKO

22 C.A. No.-5654/2007XVI

ESSAR SHIPPING LTD. CHIRA RANJAN ADDYVersusBRD.OF TRUSTEES FOR THE PORT OFCALCUTTA A. V. RANGAM

not taken up23 C.A. No.-8774/2010

XII-ASANTOSH VERMA (D) THR. LRS. LAWYER S KNIT & COVersusD.N.RAJU . AND ANR. SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHYand IA No.79902/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

ConnectedC.A. No.-8782/2010XII-A

M/S RAJYALAXMI CO-OP.HOUSINGSTY.LTD. MADHURIMA TATIA

Versus

D.N.RAJU . AND ORS. S. CHANDRA SHEKHAR, SHOBHARAMAMOORTHY, LAWYER S KNIT & CO

and IA No.80018/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS24 C.A. No.-6497/2009

XIVSHRI KEWAL KRISHAN KHURANA GAURAV AGRAWALVersusSITA RAM (D) TH.LEGAL HEIRS DALIP KUMAR MALHOTRA

ConnectedC.A. No.-6498/2009XIV

SITA RAM (D) TR.LEGAL HEIRS DALIP KUMAR MALHOTRA

VersusKEWAL KRISHAN KHURANA GAURAV AGRAWALTO BE TAKEN UP ALONG WITH ITEM NO. 128 I.E. C.A.NO. 6497/2009

25 C.A. No.-10596/2010IX

GOA STATE CO-OP.BANK LTD. THELIQUIDATORS SAURABH MISHRA

VersusKRISHNA NATH A.PRABHU DESAI . ANDORS. SHOBHA, A. SUBHASHINI

and IA No.86373/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS26 C.A. No.-8770/2010

XI -AABHMANYU SAHU . AND ANR. SHIV SAGAR TIWARI[P-1]Versus

J.KRISHNAVENI (D) TR.LRS.. AND ORS. SIBO SANKAR MISHRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN[R-6], [R-7], [R-8]

27 C.A. No.-697-698/2008XVII

FEDN.OF KARNATAKA CHAM.OFCOM.AND INDUS. ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA

VersusKARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSIONCORP. LTD. AND ORS.

K. V. MOHAN, V. N. RAGHUPATHY, SOMIRANSHARMA

Page 144: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 12ConnectedC.A. No.-4726/2008XVII

FED.OF KARNATAKA CHAM.OF C ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA

VersusKARNATAKA POWERTRANSM.CORP.LTD. . AND ORS. K. V. MOHAN, V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No.-5342/2008XVII

KARNATAKA ELECT.REGU.COMM.REP.BY SECR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusKARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSIONCORP.LTD. K. V. MOHAN

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2008ConnectedC.A.No.-1423-1427/2010XVII

FEDERATION OF KARNATAKACHAMBERS OF COMMERCE INDUSTRY ANANGA BHATTACHARYYA[P-1]

Versus

BANGALORE ELECTRICTY SUPPLY CO.LTD.

RAGHAVENDRA S. SRIVATSA[R-1][Pr], BALAJISRINIVASAN[R-2][Pr], K. V. MOHAN[R-3][Pr],[R-5][Pr], [R-6]

28 C.A. No.-7325/2008XII

OWN. NOW IN MADRAS PORTREPRESENTED BY THE AUTHORISEDSIGNATORY

K J JOHN AND CO

VersusM/S.EAST COAST STEEL LTD. REP. BYTHEIR GENERAL MANAGER E. C. AGRAWALA

29 C.A. No.-2176/2009IV

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S PRIME LEATHERS S. NARAIN & CO.as per Record of Proceeding dated 03.07.2017 in SLP No. 28215/2016, : matters tobe listed along with 2099/2009 and connected matters on the top of the list on aNMD.

ConnectedC.A. No.-2099/2009IV

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S GEE KAY INTERNATIONAL JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

ConnectedC.A. No.-4352/2009IV

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S RAGHU EXPORTS(I) P.LTD. RAJAN NARAIN

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-28299/2016XIV

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. IBIBO GROUP PVT. LTD. M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-28215/2016XIV

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. MAKE MY TRIP (INDIA) PVT. LTD. M. P. DEVANATHFOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 3/2016

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-28325/2016XIV

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. EBIZ.COM PVT. LTD. PRAVEEN SWARUP

30 C.A. No.-116/2013XII

RUKMANI COLLEGE OF EDUCATION R. AYYAM PERUMALVersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. M. YOGESH KANNA, S. R. SETIA

ConnectedC.A. No.-117/2013XII

ALL INDIA PVT.EDU.INST.ASSO.REP.BYPRES. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU . AND ORS. B. BALAJI

Page 145: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 12ConnectedC.A. No.-121/2013XII

SELF FIN. T.T. INST. AND B.ED. COL.ASSCN. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusSTATE OF T.NADU AND ORS B. BALAJI

ConnectedC.A. No.-124/2013XII

JAYASANTHI B.ED.COLLEGE SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS MONA K. RAJVANSHI, M. YOGESH KANNA

ConnectedC.A. No.-120/2013XII

TAMIL NADU SELF FINANCE B.ED ANDTEACHER TRAINING INSTITUTESSOCIETY

ARUN K. SINHA

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. B. BALAJI, M. YOGESH KANNA

ConnectedC.A. No.-118-119/2013XII

T.T.P.T.TEACHER TRAIN.INSTITUTE SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusDIRECTOR,D.T.E.R.T. AND ORS B. BALAJI

ConnectedC.A. No.-122/2013XII

ST.JOSEPHS TEACHER TRAINING INST. RAKESH K. SHARMA

VersusDIRECTOR OF TECH.EDUN. AND ORS.AND ORS. NAVIN PRAKASH

ConnectedC.A. No.-622/2013III

GUJARAT UNIVERSITY

VersusSARVODAYA CHARITABLE TRUST ANDANR. GOPAL SINGH

FOR ON IA 84034/2012ConnectedC.A. No.-123/2013XII

J.BALASUBRAMANIAN L. K. PANDEY

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.AND ORS. B. BALAJI, R. CHANDRACHUD, AMIT KUMAR

31 C.A.No.-4171-4172/2008XII

BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD

VersusSAVEETHA INSTITUTE OF MEDICALAND TECHNICAL SCIENCES AND ORS RAKESH K. SHARMA, M. YOGESH KANNA

32 C.A.No.-8183-8184/2012XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MINISTRYOF HOME AFFAIRS REP. BY THESECRETARY

B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1][Pr], [P-2][Pr],[P-3][Pr], [P-4][Pr], [P-5][Pr]

VersusHAREEM K.G.

33 C.A. No.-2500/2012XII

THE DIR.GEN.CENTRALINDUST.SECUR.FORCE AND ANR. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1], [P-2]

VersusP.K.MANDAL @ PRASANNA KUMARMANDAL KAILASH CHAND

34 C.A. No.-1106/2009XVII

B.B.PATEL . AND ORS. HEMANTIKA WAHIVersusDLF UNIVERSAL LTD. RAJAN NARAINFOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2009 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES]ON IA 4/2013

35 C.A. No.-867-870/2013IV

CHANDIGARH CONSTRUCTION CO.PVT.LTD. KUSUM CHAUDHARY

VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.

Page 146: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 12

36 C.A. No.-5677/2012IX

MONARCH ERECTORS PVT.LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SHRI JAIRAJKALYANI

RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusBHIWANI NIZAMPUR CITYMUNICIPAL.CORP. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV

and IA No.54310/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IANo.54311/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

37 C.A. No.-7608/2012IX

TCI INDUSTRIES LIMITED E. C. AGRAWALAVersusCOTTON CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.MANAGING DIRECTOR ABHA R. SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No.-7610/2012IX

THE COTTON CORPORATION OF INDIALTD. ABHA R. SHARMA

VersusTHE TRANSPORT CORPORATION OFINDIA LTD.

38 C.A. No.-4077/2013XVII

MR. RAJESH TOSHNIWAL PETITIONER-IN-PERSONVersusSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARDOF INDIA AND ORS. MOHIT PAUL, BHARGAVA V. DESAI

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } AS FIRST CASE ON BOARD39 C.A. No.-8130/2014

XVISHASHI SHEKHAR GUPTA AND ORS. SHEKHAR KUMARVersusBIBHUTI BHUSAN JHA AND ANR. GAURAV AGRAWALMediation Report received from the High Court Mediation Centre, Patna

40 C.A. No.-5417/2015XI -A

M. AHEMMEDKUTTY K. RAJEEV[P-1]VersusTHE DIVISIONAL MANAGER UNITEDINDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. BINAY KUMAR DAS[R-1]

41 C.A. No.-706/2014XVII

M/S PENNA ELECTRICITY LTD.(NOWM/S PIONEER POWER LTD.) A. V. RANGAM

VersusTAMILNADU ELECTRICITY BOARD SATYA MITRA GARG

ConnectedC.A. No.-5700/2014XVII

TAMIL NADU GENERATION SATYA MITRA GARG

VersusM/S PENNA ELECTRICITY LTD A. V. RANGAM[Caveat]FOR FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 3/2014 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 4/2015 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILEANNEXURES] ON IA 7/2016

42 C.A. No.-3659/2017IV-A

TAM TAM PEDDA GURUVA REDDY A. S. BHASMEVersusM/S MYSORE MINERALS LTD REP. BYM.D BALAJI SRINIVASAN

ConnectedC.A. No.-3660/2017IV-A

MYSORE MINERALS LTD. BALAJI SRINIVASAN

VersusTAM-TAM PEDDA GURUVA REDDY A. S. BHASME

43 C.A. No.-975-976/2014XVII

SANJEEV AGARWAL AND ANR. ALOK SHUKLA[P-1]VersusTHE ADJUDICATING OFFICER,SEBI SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]FOR ON IA 13480/2014 FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 3/2014

ConnectedC.A. No.-977/2014XVII

ASHESH AGARWAL ALOK SHUKLA[P-1]

VersusTHE ADJUDICATING OFFICER, SEBI SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]

Page 147: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 12FOR ON IA 13481/2014 FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2014

ConnectedC.A. No.-6817/2014XVII

M/S.RICH CAPITAL AND FINANCESERVICE LTD. AND ANR. ALOK SHUKLA[P-1]

VersusTHE ADJUDICATING OFFICER, SEBI SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2014

ConnectedC.A.No.-5636-5638/2014XVII

BANSAL SUPPLIERS PVT LTD ALOK SHUKLA[P-1]

Versus

THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER, SEBI SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 7/2014

ConnectedC.A.No.-5639-5641/2014XVII

ASHESH AGARWAL ALOK SHUKLA[P-1]

Versus

ADJUDICATING OFFICER, SEBI SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI[R-1]FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 7/2014

44 C.A. No.-5961/2014XVII

UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONSVersusM/S.DISHNET WIRELESS LTD.,CHENNAI SUNIL KUMAR JAIN[Caveat]FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2014 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OFDATES ON IA 2/2014 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 3/2014 FORMODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER ON IA 4/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-5783/2014XVII

U.O.I.,DOT

VersusM/S.AIRCEL LTD. SUNIL KUMAR JAIN[Caveat]FOR PERMISSION TO FILE SYNOPSIS AND LIST OF DATES ON IA 2/2014 FOR[PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 3/2015 FOR MODIFICATION OFCOURT ORDER ON IA 4/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-7212/2014XVII

M/S TATA TELESERVICES LTD. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-1], BINAGUPTA[R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No.-6339/2014XVII

M/S TATA TELESERVICES LTD. ANDANR. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[R-1], BINAGUPTA[R-3]

45 C.A. No.-10904/2014XVII

RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. K. R. SASIPRABHU[P-1]Versus

PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GASREGULATORY BOARD. AND ORS.

MUNAWWAR NASEEM[R-1], PUKHRAMBAMRAMESH KUMAR[R-2], KAVEETA WADIA[P-1],[R-6][Pr], [R-7][Pr], [R-8][Pr], [R-9][Pr],[R-10][Pr], [R-11][Pr], [R-12][Pr], [R-15][Pr],[R-16][Pr], [R-17][Pr], ANNAM D. N. RAO[R-13]

FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA2/2014

46 C.A.No.-7119-7120/2017III-A

M/S L.H. SUGAR FACTORIES ASHOK MATHUR[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF U.P. TAX AND REGISTRATIONTHROUGH THE SECRETARY

KARANJAWALA & CO.[R-1], [R-9], [R-13],ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD[R-1],[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8],PAREKH & CO.[R-10]

Page 148: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 12FOR ON IA 7/2015 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 9/2015 FOR[PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 13/2016 As per court's order dated9.5.2017, the instant civil appeals to be heard in six months.

ConnectedC.A.No.-7121-7122/2017III-A

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHDEPARTMENT OF TAX ANDREGTISTRATIN THROUGH THESECRETARY AND ORS.

ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD

VersusBAJAJ HINDUSTAN LTD. AND ANR. KARANJAWALA & CO.

47 C.A. No.-3338/2017IV

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIAVersusS.P. CONSTRUCTION NEERAJ SHEKHAR

48 C.A. No.-3005/2015XVII

M/S KKK HYDRO POWER LIMITED RAJ KUMAR MEHTAVersusHIMACHAL PRADESH STATEELECTRICITY BOARD LTD. . AND ORS. PRADEEP MISRA[IMPL], NIKUNJ DAYAL

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 3/2016 FORINTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 4/2016 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILEANNEXURES] ON IA 5/2017

49 C.A. No.-4463/2015XVII

TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OFANDHRA PRADESH LTD. AND ORS. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

VersusM/S LANCO KONDAPALLI POWER LTD.AND ANR. SAKYA SINGHA CHAUDHURI

FOR PERMISSION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF AMOUNT ON IA 2/2016ConnectedC.A. No.-8905/2015XVII

LANCO KONDAPALLI POWER LTD. SAKYA SINGHA CHAUDHURI

VersusTRANSMISSION CORPN. OF ANDHRAPRADESH LTD. AND ORS. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

50 C.A. No.-4036/2015XVII

63 MOONS TECHNOLOGIES LTD E. C. AGRAWALAVersusCENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ANR. NIKHIL NAYYAR, K. V. MOHAN

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 8/2016

51 C.A. No.-4879/2015XVII

DELHI ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION PRADEEP MISRA[P-1]

VersusTATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTIONCOMPANY LTD. Bharat Vinod Sharma[R-1]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015

ConnectedC.A. No.-6169/2015XVII

TATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTIONCOMPANY LTD.(FORMERLY KNOWN ASNORTH DELHI POWER LTD.)

Bharat Vinod Sharma[P-1]

VersusDELHI ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION PRADEEP MISRA[R-1]

FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA3/2015

52 C.A. No.-5731/2015XVII

RATTANINDIA NASHIK POWER LTD.([FORMERLY INDIABULLS REALTECHLTD. (NASHIK)]

E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1]

VersusWARDHA POWER COMPANY LTD. ANDORS.

PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1], M. V. KINI &ASSOCIATES[R-3], NISHTHA KUMAR[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No.-5478/2015XVII

RATTANINDIA NASHIK POWER LTD.[FORMERLY INDIA BULLS REALTECHLTD.(NASHIK)]

E. C. AGRAWALA

Versus

Page 149: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 12WARDHA POWER COMPANY LTD. ANDORS.

NISHTHA KUMAR[R-4], M. V. KINI &ASSOCIATES

53 C.A.No.-6013-6014/2015XVII

RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusBHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED. GAURAV SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No.-14293/2015XVII

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. GAURAV SHARMA

VersusRELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS LTD. ABHIJAT P. MEDHFOR PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES ON IA 2/2015 FOR ON IA3/2015

54 C.A.No.-2368-2370/2015XVII

M/S BHILANGANA HYDRO POWER LTD. DIVYA ROY

VersusPOWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATIONOF UTTARAKHAND LTD AND ORS. AMITA SINGH KALKAL, A. V. RANGAM

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 10/2015 FOR AMENDMENT OFAPPEAL / PETITION / I.A. ON IA 13/2015 FOR ON IA 16/2016

55 C.A.No.-2151-2152/2015XVII

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATIONLTD. PRAMOD DAYAL

VersusM/S MAWANA SUGARS LTD. AND ANR.ETC AND ORS.

SHREE PAL SINGH, KULDIP SINGH, DIVYAROY, ANURADHA MUTATKAR

ConnectedC.A.No.-3202-3205/2015XVII

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATIONLTD. TUSHAR BAKSHI[P-1]

VersusSTEEL FURNACE ASSOCIATION OFINDIA AND ORS.

ANURADHA MUTATKAR[R-2], DIVYA ROY[R-3],S. R. SETIA[R-4], ROHIT KUMAR SINGH[R-5]

FOR VACATING STAY ON IA 13/2016ConnectedC.A. No.-5062/2015XVII

THE STATE OF PUNJAB RANJEETA ROHATGI[P-1]

VersusM/S. BANSAL ALLOYS AND METALS (P)LTD AND ORS.

VIKASH SINGH[R-1], PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1],ANURADHA MUTATKAR[R-1]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2015 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 3/2015

56 C.A. No.-3253/2015XVII

BSE LTD. K J JOHN AND COVersus52 WEEKS ENTERTAINMENTLTD.(FORMERLY KNOWN ASSHANTANU SHEOREY AQUAKULT LTD.)AND ANR.

BHARGAVA V. DESAI, AKHILESH KUMARPANDEY

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 4/2015 FOR [PERMISSION TOFILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 6/2015

ConnectedC.A. No.-4204/2015XVII

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARDOF INDIA BHARGAVA V. DESAI

Versus52 WEEKS ENTERTAINMENTLTD.(FORMERLY KNOWN ASSHANTANU SHEOREY AQUAKULT LTD.)AND ANR.

AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEY[Caveat], K J JOHNAND CO

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2015 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ONIA 2/2015

57 C.A. No.-8275-/2017XVII

ICICI BANK LTD. PAREKH & CO.VersusSTARLOG ENTERPRISES LIMITED E. C. AGRAWALA, [Caveat]

Page 150: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 12FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 46492/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 46493/2017 FOR PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA 46636/2017

58 C.A.No.-8756-8757/2017XVI

YOGENDRA PRASAD AND ORS. SAURABH MISHRA

VersusANIL AGGARWAL AND ORS. NIRANJANA SINGH

59 C.A.No.-4452-4454/2005XIV

AIRCEL DIGILINK INDIA LTD. THROUGHPOWER OF ATTORNEY MR. SUNDEEPKATHURIA

BINA GUPTA

VersusDEPT. OF TELECOMMUNICATION .THROUGH SECRETARY AND ANR. V. K. VERMA, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-6645/2012XVII

UNION OF INDIA SECRETARY AND ANR. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusOIL INDIA LTD CORPORATE LAW GROUP{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } matters to be heard alonwith C.A. Nos. 565-568 of2008.

ConnectedC.A.No.-4499-4501/2005XIV

CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCN.OFINDIA THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEYMR. T.V. RAMACHANDRAN AND ORS.

BINA GUPTA

VersusDEPT. OF TELECOMMUNICATION .THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ANR. V. K. VERMA, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A.No.-4679-4680/2005XIV

ASSOCIATION OF U.T.S.P.INDIA (AUSPI)FORMERLY KNOWN AS ASSOCIAION OFBASIC TELECOM OPERATORS (ABTO)AND ORS.

KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusUNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS THROUGH ITSSECRETARY

V. K. VERMA, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A. No.-565-568/2008XVII

VIDESH SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. SUMITA HAZARIKA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } and IA No.102801/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION

ConnectedC.A. No.-311-318/2008XVII

DEPT.OF TELECOMMUNICATION ANDORS.Versus

DATA ACCESS INDIA LIMITED BINA GUPTA, SUMITA HAZARIKA, RAJANNARAIN, GAURAV KEJRIWAL

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-6575/2010XVII

DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATION ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

VersusESCOTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONSLIMITED PUNIT DUTT TYAGI[Caveat]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }ConnectedC.A.No.-6664-6669/2010XVII

DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATION ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

Versus

BPL MOBILE CELLULAR LTD . AND ANR. NAVEEN KUMAR, SUMITA HAZARIKA, E. C.AGRAWALA, BINA GUPTA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

Page 151: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 12

ConnectedC.A. No.-4896/2010XVII

DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICFATIONS ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

VersusARVIND MILLS LTD. RAJAN NARAIN{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-10675/2010XVII

DEPATMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

VersusBHARTI AIRTEL LTD. NAVEEN KUMAR[Caveat]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-10676/2010XVII

DEPT. OF TELECOMMUNICATION ANDANR. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

VersusVODAFONE ESSAR MOBILE SERVICELTD. (EARLIER HUTCHISON ESSARMOBILE SERVICE LTD.)

BINA GUPTA[Caveat]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-9827/2010XVII

DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

VersusM/S ESSEL SHYAM COMMUNICATIONLTD. JAYANT KUMAR MEHTA

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-4430/2011XVII

UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS THROUGH ITSSECRETARY AND ANR.

ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

VersusM/S TATA COMMUNICATION LTD. SUMITA HAZARIKA{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-258/2012XVII

DEPT.OF TELECOMMUNICATION DOT ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]

VersusM/S ESSEL SHYAM COMMUNCIATIONSLTD. A. N. ARORA[R-1]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5921/2012XVII

UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFCOMMUNICATION INFORMATIONTECHNOLOGY THROUGH ITSSECRETARY

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S.TATA COMMUNICATION PVT. LTD. DHARITRY PHOOKAN{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A.No.-5582-5583/2012XVII

UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS ITSSECRETARY

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. TATA COMMUNICATIONS LTD. DHARITRY PHOOKAN[Caveat]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5574/2012XVII

DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICAITONS AND ORS.DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONSDEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICAITON AND ORS.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S VODAFONE ESSAR SOUTH LTD PRAVEEN KUMAR{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5575/2012XVII

DEPARTMENT OFTELELCOMMUNICATION. AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

Page 152: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 12VODAFONE ESSAR DIGILINK LTD PRAVEEN KUMAR{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5576/2012XVII

DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS. AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusVODOFONE ESSAR CELLULAR LTD PRAVEEN KUMAR{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5572/2012XVII

DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS ANDORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S VODAFONE ESSAR GUJARAT LTD. PRAVEEN KUMAR{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A.No.-6328-6399/2015XVII

UNION OF INDIA

Versus

ASSOCIATION OF UNIFIED TELECOMSERVICE PROVIDERS OF INDIA ANDORS.

SWETANK SHANTANU, SUNIL KUMAR JAIN,KISHORE KUNAL, E. C. AGRAWALA, BINAGUPTA[Caveat], ABHIJAT P. MEDH

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1-72/2015 FOR STAYAPPLICATION ON IA 73-144/2015 FOR IMPLEADMENT ON IA 145-216/2016 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 217-227/2016

ConnectedC.A.No.-6183-6255/2015XVII

UNION OF INDIA

Versus

RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS LTD.ETC. ETC. AND ORS.

SUNIL KUMAR JAIN, PUKHRAMBAM RAMESHKUMAR, KISHORE KUNAL, HARSH KAUSHIK,GAURAV KEJRIWAL, FAISAL SHERWANI , E. C.AGRAWALA, ABHIJAT P. MEDH

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR ON IA 74/2015 FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA147/2015 FOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 220/2016 FOR ON IA221/2016 FOR EARLY HEARING APPLICATION ON IA 222/2016

ConnectedC.A.No.-5832-5852/2015XVII

M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. HARSH KAUSHIK

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. BINA GUPTA[Caveat]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

ConnectedC.A. No.-5909/2015XVII

VODAFONE INDIA LTD. KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA DEPT. OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2015

ConnectedC.A. No.-6009/2015XVII

M/S. VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICESLTD. (FORMERLY KNONW ASVODAFONE ESSAR MOBILE SERVICESLTD AND EARLIER AND ORS.

KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPTT. OFTELECOMMUNICATION AND ANR.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015

ConnectedC.A. No.-5996/2015XVII

M/S. VODAFONE SOUTH LIMITED,(CHENNAI) (FORMERLY KNOWN ASVODAFONE ESSAR SOUTH LTD ANDEARLIER KNOWN

KISHORE KUNAL

Versus

Page 153: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 12UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY , DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS AND ANR.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAmendment in Cause Title ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-5957/2015XVII

M/S. VODAFONE SOUTH LTD.KARNATAKA KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS AND ANR.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAmendment in Cause Title ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-5997/2015XVII

M/S. VODAFONE SOUTH LIMITED,PUNJAB KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS AND ANR.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAmendment in Cause Title ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-5998/2015XVII

M/S. VODAFONE WEST LTD. (GUJARAT)(FORMERLY KNOWN AS VODAFONEESSAR GUJARAT LTD. AND EARLIERKNOWN A

KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGHSECRETARY , DEPTT. OFTELECOMMUNICATION AND ANR.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-6011/2015XVII

M/S. VODAFONE SOUTH LTD., ANDHRAPRADESH (FORMERLY KNOWN ASVODAFONE ESSAR SOUTH LTD ANDEARLIER KNO

KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS AND ANR.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-6002/2015XVII

M/S. VODAFONE DIGILINK LTD.(RAJASTHAN) KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPTT. OFTELECOMMUNICATION AND ANR.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-6010/2015XVII

M/S VODAFONE DIGILINK LTD.,HARYANA (FORMERLY KNOWN ASVODAFONE ESSAR DIGILINK LIMITEDAND EARLIER K

KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA ITS SECRETARY ,DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS AND ANR.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

Page 154: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 12ConnectedC.A. No.-6012/2015XVII

M/S. VODAFONE DIGILINK LTD. (U.P.EAST SERVICE AREA) KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPTT. OFTELECOMMUNICATION AND ANR.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A.No.-8496-8505/2015XVII

TATA TELESERVICES LTD ABHIJAT P. MEDH

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 21/2015 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES]ON IA 31/2015

ConnectedC.A.No.-8493-8495/2015XVII

TATA TELESERVICES (MAHARASHTRA)LTD. ABHIJAT P. MEDH

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEALON IA 1/2015 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 7/2015

ConnectedC.A. No.-5929/2015XVII

M/S. VODAFONE EAST LTD. KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY , DEPTT OFTELECOMMUNICATION{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-5911/2015XVII

M/S VODAFONE CELLULAR LTD. KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-5882/2015XVII

M/S VODAFONE WEST LIMITED KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILEANNEXURES] ON IA 3/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-5931/2015XVII

M/S VODAFONE DIGILINK LIMITED KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPTT. OFTELECOMMUNICATION{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2015 FOR Amendmentin Cause Title ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-5934/2015XVII

M/S VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICESLIMITED KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPTT OFTELECOMMUNICATION{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015

Page 155: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 12ConnectedC.A. No.-5930/2015XVII

M/S VODAFONE SOUTH LIMITED KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2015 FOR Amendmentin Cause Title ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A.No.-6888-6895/2015XVII

IDEA CELLULAR LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA SECRETARYDEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS AND ANR.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 9/2015 FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 17/2015 FOR[PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 25/2015

ConnectedC.A. No.-6003/2015XVII

VODAFONE ESSAR SOUTH LTD. (NOWKNOWN AS M/S. VODAFONE SOUTHLTD.)

KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS AND ANR.

MOHIT PAUL

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-6004/2015XVII

VODAFONE ESSAR SOUTH LTD. ( NOWKNOWN AS M/S VODAFONE SOUTHLTD.

KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY AND ANR. MOHIT PAUL

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A.No.-8506-8530/2015XVII

RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

Versus

UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS AND ORS.

ABHIJAT P. MEDH

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 26/2015 FOR[PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 51/2015

ConnectedC.A.No.-8009-8017/2015XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

Versus

M/S. RELIANCE COMMUNICATION LTD.AND ORS.

KISHORE KUNAL[R-2], [R-3][Pr], [R-4][Pr],[R-5][Pr], [R-6][Pr], [R-7][Pr], RAMESHWARPRASAD GOYAL[R-8][Pr]

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FOR STAYAPPLICATION ON IA 10/2015 FOR AMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 19/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-344/2016XVII

M/S. VIDEOCON TELECOMMUNICATIONLIMITED GAUTAM NARAYAN

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 2/2016 FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 3/2016

Page 156: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 12ConnectedC.A. No.-498/2016XVII

M/S. VIDEOCONTELECOMMUNICATIONS LIMITED GAUTAM NARAYAN

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY MINISTRY OFCOMMUNICATIONS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2016 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 3/2016FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 4/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-497/2016XVII

M/S. VIDEOCONTELECOMMUNICATIONS LIMITED GAUTAM NARAYAN

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFCOMMUNICATIONS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 2/2016 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES]ON IA 3/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-493/2016XVII

M/S. VIDEOCONTELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD. GAUTAM NARAYAN

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY MINISTRY OFCOMMUNICATIONS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2016 FOREXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 3/2016FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 4/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-14624/2015XVII

M/S QUADRANT TELEVENTURE LTD.(EARLIER KNOWN AS M/S HFCLINFOCOMM LTD.)

RAHUL NARAYAN

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 2/2015 FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 3/2015

ConnectedC.A. No.-13550/2015XVII

VODAFONE SOUTH LIMITED (ANDHRAPRADESH SERVICE AREA) KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPTT. OFTELECOMMUNICATION{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A.No.-13705-13711/2015XVII

M/S. VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICESLTD. AND OTHERS KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPTT. OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 8/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-13590/2015XVII

M/S. VODAFONE DIGILINK LTD.(HARYANA SERVICE AREA) KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-13587/2015XVII

VODAFONE CELLULAR LTD. (KERALASERVICE AREA) KISHORE KUNAL

Versus

Page 157: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 12UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPTT. OFTELECOMMUNICATION{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-13586/2015XVII

M/S. VODAFONE DIGILINK LTD. (UPEAST) KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-13585/2015XVII

VODAFONE SOUTH LTD. (U.P WESTSERVICE AREA) KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-13591/2015XVII

VODAFONE CELLULAR LTD. (TAMILNADU SERVICE AREA) KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-13538/2015XVII

M/S. VODAFONE WEST LTD. (GUJARATSERVICE AREA) KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-13588/2015XVII

VODAFONE SOUTH LTD. (WEST BENGALSERVICE AREA) KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-13593/2015XVII

M/S. VODAFONE SPACETEL LTD. (BIHARSERVICE AREA) KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A.No.-13595-13596/2015XVII

M/S. VODAFONE EAST LTD. (KOLKATASERVICE AREA) KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS

Page 158: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 12{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 3/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-13584/2015XVII

M/S. VODAFONE SPACETEL LTD.(MADHYA PRADESH SERVICE AREA) KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR THROUGHITS SECRETARY AND ANR.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-13574/2015XVII

M/S. VODAFONE SPACETEL LTD.(JAMMU AND KASHMIR SERVICE AREA) KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-13681/2015XVII

VODAFONE CELLULAR LTD.(MAHARASHTRA SERVICE AREA) KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A.No.-13581-13582/2015XVII

M/S. VODAFONE INDIA LTD. (MUMBAISERVICE AREA) KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015

ConnectedC.A. No.-13592/2015XVII

VODAFONE SOUTH LTD., (KARNATAKASERVICE AREA) KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPTT. OFTELECOMMUNICATION{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-13699/2015XVII

VODAFONE SOUTH LTD., (CHENNAISERVICE AREA) KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-13697/2015XVII

M/S. VODAFONE SPACETEL LTD.(ASSAM KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-13698/2015XVII

M/S. VODAFONE SPACETEL LTD. HPSERVICE AREA, KISHORE KUNAL

Versus

Page 159: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 12UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-13680/2015XVII

VODAFONE SOUTH LTD. (PUNJABSERVICE AREA) KISHORE KUNAL

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATIONS{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 1/2015 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 2/2016

ConnectedC.A. No.-3099/2016XVII

M/S. IKF TECHNOLOGIES LTD. ANJANI AIYAGARI

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. THROUGHSECRETARY MINISTRY OFCOMMUNICATIONS AND IT AND ORS.

GURMEET SINGH MAKKER

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 2/2016 FOR ON IA4/2016 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 5/2016 FOR[PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA 6/2016

ConnectedC.A.No.-6022-6044/2016XVII

UNION OF INDIA (DEPT OFTELECOMMUNICATION ) THROUGHSECRETARYVersusM/S VODAFONE SOUTH LIMITED,(A.P.SERVICE AREA) ETC ETC AND ANR. KISHORE KUNAL, K. R. SASIPRABHU

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 47/2016 FORPERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES ON IA 70/2016 FORAMENDMENT IN CAUSE TITLE ON IA 93/2016

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-20219/2016III

M/S. INFINIUM (INDIA) LTD. MOHIT D. RAM

VersusDEPARTMENT OFTELECOMMUNICATION GOVT. OF INDIAAND ANR.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 }

60 C.A. No.-3018/2017XVI

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. HRISHIKESH BARUAHVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. ABHA R. SHARMA[R-1], [R-2]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } AT TOP I.A No. 53985 of 2017 i.e Application fordirections common in all the SLPs to be listed before the Hon'ble court on17.07.2017 (thr. Suppli).

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-15875-/2017XVI

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED HRISHIKESH BARUAH

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ABHA R. SHARMA[caveat]{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } Diary FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA53985/2017

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-15899-/2017XVI

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED HRISHIKESH BARUAH

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-15900-/2017XVI

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED HRISHIKESH BARUAH

Versus

Page 160: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 12THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-15893-/2017XVI

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED HRISHIKESH BARUAH

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-15926-/2017XVI

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED HRISHIKESH BARUAH

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-15896-/2017XVI

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED HRISHIKESH BARUAH

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-16192-/2017XVI

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMTED HRISHIKESH BARUAH

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR ADMISSION

61 C.A. No.-8747/2014XVII

TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OFANDHRA PRADESH LTD AND ORS. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

VersusM/S G M R VEMAGIRI POWERGENERATION LTD AND ANR. PUKHRAMBAM RAMESH KUMAR

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } [ TOP OF THE BOARD ]FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA1/2014

62 C.A. No.-1877/2015XVII

FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA)LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARDOF INDIA K J JOHN AND CO

{Fixed Date for 07-11-2017 } FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA49345/2017 FOR [ADDITIONAL FACTS AND DOCUMENTS ON RECORD] ON IA3/2015 FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS] ON IA 4/2015

63 C.A.No.-6513-6514/2012IX

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I,KOLHAPUR B. V. BALARAM DAS

VersusM/S CHAPHALKAR BROTHERS PUNE RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALAAT TOP [ 08.11.2017]

ConnectedC.A. No.-6511/2012IX

C.I.T.-I, KOLHAPUR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S CHAPHALKAR BROTHERS, PUNE. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-6512/2012IX

C.I.T-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S CHAPHALKAR BROTHERS PUNE RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-6228/2013III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMUNJAL AUTO INDUSTRIES LTD. ABHIJAT P. MEDH

Page 161: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 12ConnectedC.A. No.-6227/2013III

DTY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMUNJAL AUTO INDUSTRIES LTD. ABHIJAT P. MEDH

ConnectedC.A. No.-6226/2013III

DY.COMMNR.OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. MUNJAL AUTO INDUSTRIES LTD ABHIJAT P. MEDH

ConnectedC.A. No.-8119/2013III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,GUJRAT ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S INOX-LEISURE LTD., GUJARAT KHAITAN & CO.FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2013

ConnectedC.A. No.-10512/2013III

DCIT CIRCLE 1(2) BARODA THRU C.I.T. ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S INOX LEISURE LTD KHAITAN & CO.[Caveat]

ConnectedC.A. No.-8708/2013III

DY. C.I.T BARODA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMUNJAL AUTO IND. LTD

ConnectedSLP(C) No.-6010/2014IX

INCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S.CHAPHALKAR BROTHERS RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA(As per court order dated 24.02.2014 "tag with civil appeal nos. 6513-14 of 2012.)

ConnectedC.A. No.-3362/2015III

CIT, KOLHAPUR ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S CHAPHALKAR BROTHERS, PUNE RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-10513/2013III

DY.COMMR.OF I.T.,GUJARAT ANIL KATIYAR

VersusINOX LEISURE LTD. KHAITAN & CO.[Caveat]

ConnectedC.A. No.-10803/2013III

COMMR.OF I.T-8 MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S E.SQUARE LEISURE P.LTD. RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-3500/2016III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. CINEMAX INDIA PVT. LTD.

ConnectedC.A. No.-4650/2016III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 8 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. E-SQUARE LEISURE PVT. LTD.THROUGH DIRECTOR RUSTOM B. HATHIKHANAWALA

ConnectedC.A. No.-8886/2016III

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXVADODARA 1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGUJARAT STATE ELECTRICITYCORPORATION LTD. THROUGH ITSMANAGER

SANTOSH KRISHNAN

ConnectedC.A. No.-5506/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1,BARODA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusALEMBIC LTD KHAITAN & CO.

Page 162: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before

COURT NO. : 12ConnectedC.A. No.-5505/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1,BARODA ANIL KATIYAR

VersusALEMBIC LIMITED KHAITAN & CO.

ConnectedC.A. No.-5504/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ANIL KATIYAR

VersusALEMBIC LTD KHAITAN & CO.

ConnectedC.A. No.-9320/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 3MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVISTA ENTERTAINMENT P LTDDiary No. 15595/2017 arising out relied upon judgment is similar to present case

ConnectedC.A. No.-11203/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVISTA ENTERTAINMENT P LTD(NOWMERGED WITH M/S PVR LTD.)FOR FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 50626/2017

ConnectedC.A. No.-9827/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNIRMA LIMITED NIKHIL GOEL[R-1]IA No.56899/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

ConnectedC.A. No.-10450/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL III AHMEDABAD ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNIRMA LIMITED NIKHIL GOEL[R-1]IA No.62911/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.62918/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

ConnectedC.A. No.-11204/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. CINEMAX INDIA LTD.FOR FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 61559/2017

ConnectedC.A. No.-12442/2017III

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S FUN MULTIPLEX PVT LTDFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.78519/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

ConnectedC.A. No.-15565/2017III

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX16 MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S FUN MULTIPLEX PVT. LTD.IA No.88275/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.88282/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

NEW DELHI03-11-2017 17:04:15

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 163: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE … · supreme court of india [ it will be appreciated if the learned advocates on record do not seek adjournment in the matters listed before