Upload
gabriel-pope
View
220
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SUMMER INSTITUTE JULY 7-8, 2015 | TULSA, OK
Agenda• Updates on DN strategies and connections
to funding needs and opportunities
• What we’ve learned so far Lessons about working together to resource DN
• Panel Discussion
• Small group discussion/reflection
SUMMER INSTITUTE JULY 7-8, 2015 | TULSA, OK
City Year Long Term Impact
Strategy (WSWC and LTI
Blueprints)
TDS Strategic Plan(Build up, Dig in,
Push out)
CIS Strategic Plan (TQS and Growth
and Impact communities)
DN aligns with the individual org strategies
of the partners
SUMMER INSTITUTE JULY 7-8, 2015 | TULSA, OK
Key Post-I3 Strategies• Transition study (and other mature sites)
to long term partnerships• Support mature sites who want to use DN
to continue driving school improvement (the “Next Generation” concept)
• Complete feeder patterns wherever feasible to increase strategic impact
• Consider collective effort with district in highest needs circumstance
SUMMER INSTITUTE JULY 7-8, 2015 | TULSA, OK
DN partners work together on a spectrum
of intensity
“DN Practices”
DN EWI-Only
DN Whole School Reform
SUMMER INSTITUTE JULY 7-8, 2015 | TULSA, OK
Continued, intensive school reform with mature sites
New DN schools that have critical needs
Diplomas Now
The DN portfolio 2015-2018
SUMMER INSTITUTE JULY 7-8, 2015 | TULSA, OK
Sample city-level DN portfolio circa 2018
• 2 study schools in long-term partnerships (CY team, CIS site coordinator, school runs STF functions, part of TDS network)
• 1 study school still actively working with DN on school reform (Full DN team, active TDS TA, piloting new TDS labs)
• 1 new DN high school (Feeder for 2 of our study middle schools
• 1 new DN high school (SIG opportunity offered to DN by district)
• 1 new DN middle school (feeds study high school, TDS doing EWI only work, CY team and CIS site coordinator)
SUMMER INSTITUTE JULY 7-8, 2015 | TULSA, OK
Voices from the field: Execs and
funders talk about opportunities for
collaboration
SUMMER INSTITUTE JULY 7-8, 2015 | TULSA, OK
Lessons learned• Rather than going all or nothing on collaborative
fundraising, we need to use it strategically, and consider it one of many tools in the resource development toolkit.
• Projects that began as individually-funded projects are likely to continue that way absent a catalyst.
• New projects are more likely to be funded by collaborative fundraising.
• Partner support during individual resource development opportunities can be as or even more helpful than joint funding asks.
SUMMER INSTITUTE JULY 7-8, 2015 | TULSA, OK
Partners can support through the fundraising
cycle
• Partners share databases and notes around prospective funders• The “Me/You/We” Discussion
Identification
SUMMER INSTITUTE JULY 7-8, 2015 | TULSA, OK
Different funding strategies for different
projectsType of Project Associated Funding Strategies
Long-term, sustained partnership with mature site
• General budget (Case made based on evidence)• Title I• State/local funding for at-risk students• Supplemented with private funding
Continuing, “next generation” school reform work with a mature site
All sources above plus…• Innovation funding• Competitive grants (focused on new elements)
New Sites • Competitive Grants (particularly SIG)• Innovation Funding• ESEA Waiver Funding• School Improvement/Reform Funding• Private Funding focused on innovation/expansion
SUMMER INSTITUTE JULY 7-8, 2015 | TULSA, OK
Working with schools/districts to blend
funding streamsInstances where the district and/or school has sat down with each partner to make best us of available funding streams based on each partner’s role and purpose:• All Partners
o Title I fundso Innovation Funds (I3, RTTT, state innovation funds)o School Improvement Funds (SIG, State School Improvement Funds)
• Talent Developmento Title IIAo Other Professional Development Funds
• Communities in Schoolso Title VII-B of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Acto Community Services Block Grant (Dept. Of Health and Human
Services)o DOJ grants